JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


January 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

A New Year's gift idea..... (5 messages)
a problem with anecdote-based medicine (4 messages)
A Request (1 message)
Adastra and Anglia ICE (1 message)
Any Questions tonight - panel has Ben Bradshaw and Andrew Langley (1 message)
Apples and pears (2 messages)
ATOS origin IB/ESA113 forms and assertions (2 messages)
Can you compost paper, and if so how much? (6 messages)
Chaperones in secondary care. (12 messages)
Chaperones in secondary care. (And primary) (2 messages)
eGPR and medico-legal responsibility (4 messages)
Enquiry re NHS Mail system (21 messages)
FOIA - Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system (2 messages)
Further query with NHS email (3 messages)
FYI: Trusted Reviews | Panasonic ToughBook CF-H1 Mobile Clinical Assistant. (2 messages)
Ganfyd - a medical wiki (1 message)
Google and I (3 messages)
Heart Failure DES embargo? (1 message)
High risk bloods (6 messages)
HNY (3 messages)
I'm a GP, sue me (2 messages)
in Sheffield, David Whitham presides over (4 messages)
information information information (5 messages)
INR near patient testing (11 messages)
is education affordable in the manner the NHS intends? (1 message)
Jigsaw have solved a problem the NHS has failed at (1 message)
Journalism (9 messages)
Laptop carrying cases (3 messages)
Learning Credits (5 messages)
Luggage (3 messages)
MEREC (6 messages)
MIQUEST and QMAS (2 messages)
new demands from DH via PCT (7 messages)
new demands from DH via PCT: hang on, solved problem... (1 message)
New Government Powers to Enable Data Sharing without Consent (6 messages)
NHS Pension Scheme - Membership Statement - Checking it!! (3 messages)
NHSnet and Linux Re: NHSnet Migration (4 messages)
NHSnet Migration (8 messages)
Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others (40 messages)
Sativex prescribers (2 messages)
Something Fay said (4 messages)
sounds familiar... (7 messages)
Stating the bleeding obvious... (5 messages)
ubiquity of connection and recording (1 message)
Web-enabled joint working on documents (8 messages)
what the NHS thinks a GP wears (17 messages)
Windows macro-recorder (9 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

A New Year's gift idea.....

A New Year's gift idea.....

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:45:24 -0000

14 lines

Re: A New Year's gift idea.....

Mark Williams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:32:23 +0000

40 lines

Re: A New Year's gift idea.....

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:54:54 +0000

42 lines

Re: A New Year's gift idea.....

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:13:30 -0000

26 lines

Re: A New Year's gift idea.....

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:05:17 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

a problem with anecdote-based medicine

a problem with anecdote-based medicine

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:27:50 +0000

46 lines

Re: a problem with anecdote-based medicine

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:58:30 +0000

24 lines

Re: a problem with anecdote-based medicine

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:54:19 -0000

38 lines

Re: a problem with anecdote-based medicine

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:01:55 +0000

67 lines

New Thread

A Request

A Request

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:38:22 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

Adastra and Anglia ICE

Re: Adastra and Anglia ICE

Lynn Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:10:35 +0000

67 lines

New Thread

Any Questions tonight - panel has Ben Bradshaw and Andrew Langley

Any Questions tonight - panel has Ben Bradshaw and Andrew Langley

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:13:19 +0000

14 lines

New Thread

Apples and pears

Apples and pears

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:07:26 +0000

23 lines

Re: Apples and pears

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:28:09 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

ATOS origin IB/ESA113 forms and assertions

ATOS origin IB/ESA113 forms and assertions

Dr Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:26:09 +0000

63 lines

Re: ATOS origin IB/ESA113 forms and assertions

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:48:56 +0000

163 lines

New Thread

Can you compost paper, and if so how much?

Can you compost paper, and if so how much?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 08:59:00 +0000

22 lines

Re: Can you compost paper, and if so how much?

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:04:54 +0000

38 lines

Re: Can you compost paper, and if so how much?

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:25:16 +1000

46 lines

Re: Can you compost paper, and if so how much?

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:40:12 +0000

26 lines

Re: Can you compost paper, and if so how much?

m.wells <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:02:19 +0000

32 lines

Re: Can you compost paper, and if so how much?

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:00:49 +1000

19 lines

New Thread

Chaperones in secondary care.

Chaperones in secondary care.

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:21:33 +0000

102 lines

Re: Chaperones in secondary care.

James McGlew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:15:30 +0000

165 lines

Re: Chaperones in secondary care.

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:31:44 +0000

23 lines

Re: Chaperones in secondary care.

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:52:14 +0000

29 lines

Re: Chaperones in secondary care.

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:54:39 +0000

83 lines

Re: Chaperones in secondary care.

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:01:32 +0000

77 lines

Re: Chaperones in secondary care.

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:03:22 +0000

70 lines

Re: Chaperones in secondary care.

Lesley Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:12:54 -0000

291 lines

Re: Chaperones in secondary care.

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:05:58 +0000

113 lines

Re: Chaperones in secondary care.

quail <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:14:03 -0700

18 lines

Re: Chaperones in secondary care.

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:41:15 +0000

208 lines

Re: Chaperones in secondary care.

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:19:54 +0000

183 lines

New Thread

Chaperones in secondary care. (And primary)

Re: Chaperones in secondary care. (And primary)

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:24:18 -0000

35 lines

Re: Chaperones in secondary care. (And primary)

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:53:39 +0000

101 lines

New Thread

eGPR and medico-legal responsibility

eGPR and medico-legal responsibility

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:30:16 -0000

133 lines

Re: eGPR and medico-legal responsibility

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:16:34 +0000

101 lines

Re: eGPR and medico-legal responsibility

David Royal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:29:12 +0000

81 lines

Re: eGPR and medico-legal responsibility

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:30:49 -0000

289 lines

New Thread

Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:44:38 +0000

52 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:07:51 -0000

18 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:10:19 +0000

856 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:31:46 -0000

1455 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:37:22 -0000

1519 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:01:37 +0000

1259 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:33:00 +0000

26 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:35:23 +0000

62 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:55:21 +0000

420 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:13:46 +0000

1022 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:39:24 +0000

28 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:29:03 +0000

111 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:34:09 -0000

19 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:32:49 +0000

38 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:06:24 +0000

28 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Mike Prentice <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:57:41 +0000

50 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Dr Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:00:31 -0000

153 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:24:03 +0000

65 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:54:28 +0000

32 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:36:45 +0000

81 lines

Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Mike Prentice <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:52:11 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

FOIA - Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

FOIA - Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:15:11 +0000

88 lines

Re: FOIA - Re: Enquiry re NHS Mail system

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:19:38 +0000

117 lines

New Thread

Further query with NHS email

Further query with NHS email

Strange Martin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:32:05 -0000

58 lines

Re: Further query with NHS email

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:22:52 +0000

52 lines

Re: Further query with NHS email

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:38:32 +0000

166 lines

New Thread

FYI: Trusted Reviews | Panasonic ToughBook CF-H1 Mobile Clinical Assistant.

FYI: Trusted Reviews | Panasonic ToughBook CF-H1 Mobile Clinical Assistant.

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:33:19 +0000

26 lines

Re: FYI: Trusted Reviews | Panasonic ToughBook CF-H1 Mobile Clinical Assistant.

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:46:08 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Ganfyd - a medical wiki

Ganfyd - a medical wiki

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:54:22 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Google and I

Google and I

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:06:18 +0000

37 lines

Re: Google and I

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:00:50 +0000

46 lines

Re: Google and I

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:35:01 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

Heart Failure DES embargo?

Heart Failure DES embargo?

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:47:46 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

High risk bloods

High risk bloods

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:33:25 +0000

23 lines

Re: High risk bloods

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:44:05 +0000

63 lines

Re: High risk bloods

jenny sudell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:49:04 +0900

76 lines

Re: High risk bloods

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:25:59 -0000

39 lines

Re: High risk bloods

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:40:28 -0000

35 lines

Re: High risk bloods

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:47:33 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

HNY

Re: HNY

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 01:01:08 +0000

19 lines

Re: HNY

m.wells <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:22:31 +0000

26 lines

Re: HNY

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:08:02 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

I'm a GP, sue me

I'm a GP, sue me

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:52:51 +0000

51 lines

Re: I'm a GP, sue me

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:19:13 -0000

64 lines

New Thread

in Sheffield, David Whitham presides over

in Sheffield, David Whitham presides over

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:59:28 +0000

71 lines

Re: in Sheffield, David Whitham presides over

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:29:32 +0000

28 lines

Re: in Sheffield, David Whitham presides over

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:39:55 +0000

114 lines

Re: in Sheffield, David Whitham presides over

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:02:16 -0000

89 lines

New Thread

information information information

Re: information information information

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:56:50 +0000

14 lines

Re: information information information

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:54:03 +1000

27 lines

Re: information information information

Martin Goldman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:58:55 -0000

77 lines

Re: information information information

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:43:22 +0000

20 lines

Re: information information information

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:44:25 +0000

15 lines

New Thread

INR near patient testing

INR near patient testing

David Royal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:58:49 +0000

37 lines

Re: INR near patient testing

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:43:08 -0000

137 lines

Re: INR near patient testing

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:59:50 +0000

115 lines

Re: INR near patient testing

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 01:49:49 -0000

192 lines

Re: INR near patient testing

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 01:59:18 +0000

112 lines

Re: INR near patient testing

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:52:32 +0000

15 lines

Re: INR near patient testing

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:51:18 -0000

195 lines

Re: INR near patient testing

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:04:15 +0000

39 lines

Re: INR near patient testing

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:15:55 -0000

33 lines

Re: INR near patient testing

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:32:01 -0000

35 lines

Re: INR near patient testing

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:35:52 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

is education affordable in the manner the NHS intends?

is education affordable in the manner the NHS intends?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:41:45 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Jigsaw have solved a problem the NHS has failed at

Jigsaw have solved a problem the NHS has failed at

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:47:35 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Journalism

Journalism

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:47:52 +0000

33 lines

Re: Journalism

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:36:04 +0000

48 lines

Re: Journalism

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:36:44 +0000

43 lines

Re: Journalism

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:35:41 +0000

56 lines

Re: Journalism

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:58:07 -0000

33 lines

Re: Journalism

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:26:09 +0000

57 lines

Re: Journalism

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:11:30 +0000

49 lines

Re: Journalism

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:18:53 -0000

46 lines

Re: Journalism

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:29:29 +0000

112 lines

New Thread

Laptop carrying cases

Laptop carrying cases

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 18:04:17 -0000

14 lines

Re: Laptop carrying cases

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 18:23:57 +0000

18 lines

Re: Laptop carrying cases

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:31:39 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

Learning Credits

Learning Credits

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:36:36 +0000

40 lines

Re: Learning Credits

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:14:44 -0500

164 lines

Re: Learning Credits

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:57:34 +0000

25 lines

Re: Learning Credits

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:27:28 +0000

77 lines

Re: Learning Credits

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:52:22 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Luggage

Luggage

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 20:52:36 +1000

19 lines

Re: Luggage

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 09:18:43 -0800

59 lines

Re: Luggage

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:59:53 +1000

42 lines

New Thread

MEREC

MEREC

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:03:09 -0000

119 lines

Re: MEREC

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:43:33 +0000

20 lines

Re: MEREC

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:07:59 +0000

20 lines

Re: MEREC

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:19:04 +0000

30 lines

Re: MEREC

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:07:34 +0000

18 lines

Re: MEREC

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:09:22 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

MIQUEST and QMAS

MIQUEST and QMAS

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:49:59 +0000

24 lines

Re: MIQUEST and QMAS

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:57:10 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

new demands from DH via PCT

new demands from DH via PCT

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 20:54:12 +0000

44 lines

Re: new demands from DH via PCT

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 21:37:50 +0000

28 lines

Re: new demands from DH via PCT

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 23:16:45 +0000

45 lines

Re: new demands from DH via PCT

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 22:54:34 +0000

57 lines

Re: new demands from DH via PCT

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 10:24:35 +0000

30 lines

Re: new demands from DH via PCT

m.wells <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:16:30 +0000

33 lines

Re: new demands from DH via PCT

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:51:01 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

new demands from DH via PCT: hang on, solved problem...

Re: new demands from DH via PCT: hang on, solved problem...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 02:38:06 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

New Government Powers to Enable Data Sharing without Consent

New Government Powers to Enable Data Sharing without Consent

Ewan Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:28:45 -0000

43 lines

Re: New Government Powers to Enable Data Sharing without Consent

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:38:38 +0000

98 lines

Re: New Government Powers to Enable Data Sharing without Consent

Dr Martin Knightley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:34:28 -0000

121 lines

Re: New Government Powers to Enable Data Sharing without Consent

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:50:21 +0000

136 lines

Re: New Government Powers to Enable Data Sharing without Consent

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:59:28 +0000

55 lines

Re: New Government Powers to Enable Data Sharing without Consent

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:08:33 +0000

71 lines

New Thread

NHS Pension Scheme - Membership Statement - Checking it!!

NHS Pension Scheme - Membership Statement - Checking it!!

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:49:51 +0000

43 lines

Re: NHS Pension Scheme - Membership Statement - Checking it!!

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:22:45 +0000

67 lines

Re: NHS Pension Scheme - Membership Statement - Checking it!!

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:47:01 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

NHSnet and Linux Re: NHSnet Migration

NHSnet and Linux Re: NHSnet Migration

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:58:04 +0000

53 lines

Re: NHSnet and Linux Re: NHSnet Migration

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:00:21 +0000

115 lines

Re: NHSnet and Linux Re: NHSnet Migration

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:18:53 +0000

47 lines

Re: NHSnet and Linux Re: NHSnet Migration

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:31:47 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

NHSnet Migration

NHSnet Migration

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:33:51 +0000

47 lines

Re: NHSnet Migration

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:41:41 -0000

40 lines

Re: NHSnet Migration

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:15:18 +0000

47 lines

Re: NHSnet Migration

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:53:36 +0000

19 lines

Re: NHSnet Migration

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:56:17 +0000

16 lines

Re: NHSnet Migration

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:41:47 +0000

52 lines

Re: NHSnet Migration

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:52:52 +0000

30 lines

Re: NHSnet Migration

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:17:16 +0000

96 lines

New Thread

Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:50:13 +0000

19 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:10:50 +0000

47 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:26:07 -0000

269 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:07:41 +0000

82 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:24:38 -0000

66 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:49:58 +0000

29 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:47:29 +0000

42 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:48:35 +0000

98 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:56:55 +0000

22 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:06:49 +0000

87 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:53:08 +0000

183 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:04:08 +0000

52 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:11:47 +0000

163 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:28:16 +0000

186 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:31:53 +0000

170 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:44:01 +0000

218 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:25:07 +0000

37 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:45:19 +0000

33 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:53:28 +0000

72 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:59:28 +0000

25 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Dr Joegy K Shah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:56:07 -0000

108 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:06:10 +0000

67 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:20:11 +0000

98 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:23:46 +0000

32 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:43:06 +0000

30 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:12:35 +0000

208 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:14:41 +0000

39 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:33:58 +0000

214 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:54:02 +0000

23 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:34:21 +0000

30 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:39:02 +0000

22 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:42:46 +0000

66 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:49:08 +0000

19 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:52:07 +0000

55 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:02:33 +0000

22 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:29:20 +0000

149 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:30:18 +0000

45 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:15:04 -0000

80 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:46:09 -0000

20 lines

Re: Politically correct identification of ethnic minorities - and others

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:13:58 +0000

20 lines

New Thread

Sativex prescribers

Sativex prescribers

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:11:58 +0000

38 lines

Re: Sativex prescribers

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:26:44 -0000

50 lines

New Thread

Something Fay said

Something Fay said

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:48:38 +0000

61 lines

Re: Something Fay said

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:01:05 +0000

86 lines

Re: Something Fay said

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:46:51 +0000

37 lines

Re: Something Fay said

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:25:47 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

sounds familiar...

sounds familiar...

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:06:46 +0000

48 lines

Re: sounds familiar...

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:16:48 +0000

78 lines

Re: sounds familiar...

John Glasspool <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:30:58 +0000

55 lines

Re: sounds familiar...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:59:03 +0000

55 lines

Re: sounds familiar...

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:28:59 +0000

38 lines

Re: sounds familiar...

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:27:27 +0000

19 lines

Re: sounds familiar...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:11:09 +0000

62 lines

New Thread

Stating the bleeding obvious...

Stating the bleeding obvious...

David Royal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:27:35 +0000

33 lines

Re: Stating the bleeding obvious...

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:30:42 +0000

24 lines

Re: Stating the bleeding obvious...

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:08:43 +0000

19 lines

Re: Stating the bleeding obvious...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:04:19 +0000

49 lines

Re: Stating the bleeding obvious...

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:02:33 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

ubiquity of connection and recording

ubiquity of connection and recording

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:09:56 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Web-enabled joint working on documents

Web-enabled joint working on documents

Colin Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:30:49 -0000

271 lines

Re: Web-enabled joint working on documents

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:44:55 +0000

144 lines

Re: Web-enabled joint working on documents

Ewan Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:32:51 -0000

178 lines

Re: Web-enabled joint working on documents

Colin Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:52:02 -0000

204 lines

Re: Web-enabled joint working on documents

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:56:16 +0000

30 lines

Re: Web-enabled joint working on documents

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:50:14 +0000

27 lines

Re: Web-enabled joint working on documents

Ian McNicoll <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:38:54 +0000

94 lines

Re: Web-enabled joint working on documents

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:31:54 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

what the NHS thinks a GP wears

what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:47:47 +0000

35 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:52:39 -0000

28 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:33:54 +0000

20 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Lesley Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:44:57 -0000

50 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:27:50 +0000

37 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:40:41 -0500

139 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:44:48 -0000

20 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:51:46 -0000

229 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:55:29 +0000

28 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:16:05 -0000

18 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Lesley Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:56:47 -0000

41 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:20:39 +0000

29 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:25:13 +0000

45 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:34:07 +0000

58 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:30:06 +0000

20 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:45:21 +0000

19 lines

Re: what the NHS thinks a GP wears

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:50:08 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Windows macro-recorder

Windows macro-recorder

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:52:18 +0000

25 lines

Re: Windows macro-recorder

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:04:54 -0000

35 lines

Re: Windows macro-recorder

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:56:01 +0000

35 lines

Re: Windows macro-recorder

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:40:30 +1000

27 lines

Re: Windows macro-recorder

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:53:04 +0000

84 lines

Re: Windows macro-recorder

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:02:37 +0000

93 lines

Re: Windows macro-recorder

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:23:56 +0000

31 lines

Re: Windows macro-recorder

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:49:24 +0000

35 lines

Re: Windows macro-recorder

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 02:48:37 +0000

62 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager