JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FSL Archives


FSL Archives

FSL Archives


January 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

(memory) problem with randomise? (4 messages)
2 postdoctoral research positions in Paris/Leipzig (1 message)
2009 fMRI courses? (4 messages)
3D problems in fslview (7 messages)
3D slicer experience? (1 message)
a quick TBSS question (1 message)
About orthogonalization (2 messages)
Adding Covariates (1 message)
Age X Sex Interaction (1 message)
ANOVA results (5 messages)
Any command can average a few subject volumes? (2 messages)
Applying non-linear transforms from tbss_2_reg to other images (1 message)
atlas tools (4 messages)
Baseline/rest contrast (4 messages)
bash does not recognize ". $..." (6 messages)
Basis functions (9 messages)
BET and registration across subjects (2 messages)
bet memory error (2 messages)
bet/betsurf questions (1 message)
bet/betsurf questions (and why not a real forum?) (5 messages)
Betsurf coordinate system (bug?) (2 messages)
both hemisferes coordinates same cluster (wernickes area) (1 message)
brain atlas (1 message)
calculation of dwell time (2 messages)
Can't use FSL FIRST with a Nifti file converted from DICOM with SPM5 (10 messages)
cluster z threshold and p-value (4 messages)
Comparing the results of the segmentation (6 messages)
converting 4dfp data (4 messages)
correct use of randomise_parallel on SGE? (7 messages)
correlation analysis TBSS (1 message)
could you check this result? RE: [FSL] fnirt: warpped field. (5 messages)
data types (2 messages)
Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch) (11 messages)
Demean (2 messages)
Despeckling (4 messages)
dtifit exception (3 messages)
dtifit V{1,2,3} data format (3 messages)
dummy scans (3 messages)
Error During subject level analysis (2 messages)
Error running multiple probtrackx windows (4 messages)
errors are not zero and where is fslroi command? (4 messages)
extracting one volume from a 4D file (7 messages)
F contrast cluster corrected (1 message)
FA and BOLD correlation (4 messages)
FA per cluster (2 messages)
fast: how to make the CSF area less? (1 message)
Fdt (DTIFIT) & NEWMAT error (2 messages)
FDT - extract voxel-wise vector, MD, FA data (2 messages)
FEAT - How do I script the creation of design.fsf? (8 messages)
FEAT results and ROI analysis (1 message)
first level behavioral covariate (4 messages)
FIRST training data (5 messages)
FIRST without flirt (4 messages)
FIRST, continued. (3 messages)
first_flirt without resize (6 messages)
Flirt\mcflirt constraints (3 messages)
FNIRT (3 messages)
FNIRT and invwarp (5 messages)
FNIRT error through FEAT gui (2 messages)
FNIRT failure for grid patients (1 message)
FNIRT failure for grid patients (with attachment) (1 message)
FNIRT parameters for monkeys (2 messages)
fnirt question (1 message)
fnirt: warpped field. (3 messages)
Format file of FSL's output (1 message)
From DICOm to Nifti (1 message)
fsl 4.0 VBM method description (2 messages)
fsl 4.1.2 on ubuntu 8.10: libnewimage.so (2 messages)
FSL bugs due to 'dash' as the default shell (1 message)
FSL bugs due to 'dash' as the default shell (was: run_first_all - kubuntu 8.10) (1 message)
FSL for arcuate fasciculus probability map / atlas (2 messages)
FSL intallation is OK (1 message)
FSL output formats (2 messages)
FSL4.1 installation problem (2 messages)
fslcpgeom (2 messages)
fslorient (2 messages)
fslpspec (5 messages)
fslview atlases (1 message)
fslview atlases-solved (1 message)
fslview in 64bits (3 messages)
Fugue -field map correction (6 messages)
Fwd: PhD position available: translational fMRI research in Aachen/Jülich (1 message)
Getting data from probtrackx (2 messages)
GLM GUI (3 messages)
GLM GUI for TBSS paste problem (2 messages)
Group Analysis - GLM setup (5 messages)
Group comparison using unpaired t-test, FEAT OLS vs randomise (6 messages)
group differences in functional connectivity (4 messages)
Hemispheric asymmetry study using TBSS (1 message)
Hi and for randomise question (4 messages)
high pass filter for block designs (3 messages)
Higher-level analysis without co-registration? (2 messages)
how long should invwarp take? (3 messages)
how to add more regions to an existing mask? (4 messages)
how to cite for FNIRT?? (4 messages)
how to count the number of non-zero voxel in a 3d image? (3 messages)
how to get field map from Philip 3T Archiva (1 message)
ICA clustering in FSL (2 messages)
image scaling (6 messages)
Incomplete 2x2x2-factorial design (3 messages)
input to FDT (2 messages)
INVWARP runtime (2 messages)
J'aimerais aller au UCLA Advanced Neuroimaging Summer Course, July 20-31, 2009 (1 message)
Longitudinal DTI (4 messages)
longitudinal TBSS (1 message)
mac osx 10.3.2 install problem (1 message)
mac osx install (1 message)
Melodic is stopping… sometimes! (memory overflow?) (1 message)
MGH Palette (2 messages)
MRICRO-FSLVIEW palette conversion... (1 message)
nifti_read_buffer in probtrackx (4 messages)
Nonlinear Registration "FEAT cannot find the whole-head image" (2 messages)
on correlation analysis (2 messages)
on MELODIC ICA (3 messages)
on the output of correlation analysis with Feat (3 messages)
Orientation (2 messages)
paste problem in GLM GUI for TBSS (3 messages)
Possible to use old FAST version in new FSL version? (7 messages)
Postdoc and PhD Positions available (1 message)
Postdoctoral research associate: statistical methodology, Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow (1 message)
pre-processing Bedpost (2 messages)
probabilistic tractography : why chose curvature threshold of 0.2? (1 message)
Problems using fast (6 messages)
Probtrackx - Two masks (6 messages)
probtrackx numbers (2 messages)
probtrackx question (1 message)
PROBTRACKX related question (3 messages)
Propagating atlases to subject space (2 messages)
Question about MNI152 brain and mask from its atlas (3 messages)
Question on VBM: How many subjects are enough to have statistical power? (1 message)
quick randomise qestions (2 messages)
Radomise_parallel with data generated outside FSL (2 messages)
RAM disk usefullness (4 messages)
Randomise mask (4 messages)
Randomise Option --T2 (4 messages)
randomise: higher level analysis (1 message)
Re : [FSL] a quick TBSS question (1 message)
Re : [FSL] brain atlas (4 messages)
Re : [FSL] FA per cluster (2 messages)
Re : [FSL] fsl 4.0 VBM method description (1 message)
Re : [FSL] Skeleton transparency (1 message)
Re : [FSL] tbss_2_reg failed (1 message)
read DICOM header to correct bvec for angulation (5 messages)
registration (3 messages)
Registration Higher Level analysis (1 message)
reproducibility of SIENAX & SIENA with MPRAGE (7 messages)
research assistant position in intracranial EEG (1 message)
run fnirt (2 messages)
run_first_all - kubuntu 8.10 (1 message)
SEED files still there after randomise_parallel? (5 messages)
setting up a linear contrast (2 messages)
Siemens spin echo field map sequence (1 message)
SIENA Error (3 messages)
SIENA Parallel Jobs (2 messages)
Sienax problem? (7 messages)
single and multiple masks (2 messages)
single powerful computer Vs. cluster (2 messages)
Skeleton transparency (1 message)
Specifying complex values in fsl_sub (2 messages)
T1 to b-zero registration for tractography (15 messages)
TBSS partial correlaion (1 message)
TBSS partial volume effects? (1 message)
TBSS question (2 messages)
TBSS: FA - BOLD correlation for a single group design (2 messages)
tbss_2_reg failed (1 message)
tbss_2_reg parallelizing/cloud computing (2 messages)
tbss_2_reg results (1 message)
tbss_3_postreg : failiure creating mask of mean and fa (1 message)
TBSS_3_postreg error (3 messages)
template for fnirt (14 messages)
template for fnirt. --- Brain label atlas (1 message)
TFCE optimized in TBSS (2 messages)
threshold (2 messages)
UCLA Advanced Neuroimaging Summer Course, July 20-31, 2009 (1 message)
using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT (11 messages)
voxel size and probtrack probability distributions (2 messages)
WARNING: number of gradient directions is limited (2 messages)
Waytotal patch (4 messages)
waytotal thresholding (2 messages)
where is T1_2_MNI152_2mm located in FSL toolkit (7 messages)
white matter lesion segmentation on FLAIR image (3 messages)
WM detected as GM in fslvbm (6 messages)
X11 error - any ideas? (2 messages)
[Fwd: [FSL] GLM GUI for TBSS paste problem] (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FSL Home

FSL Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

(memory) problem with randomise?

(memory) problem with randomise?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:58:07 +0100

221 lines

Re: (memory) problem with randomise?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:28:22 +0000

382 lines

Re: (memory) problem with randomise?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:51:49 +0100

265 lines

Re: (memory) problem with randomise?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 20:24:58 +0100

330 lines

New Thread

2 postdoctoral research positions in Paris/Leipzig

2 postdoctoral research positions in Paris/Leipzig

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:52:26 +0000

77 lines

New Thread

2009 fMRI courses?

2009 fMRI courses?

Laura Chaddock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:05:37 -0600

37 lines

Re: 2009 fMRI courses?

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:39:47 +0000

39 lines

Re: 2009 fMRI courses?

Xuelin Cui <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 04:18:13 +0800

57 lines

Re: 2009 fMRI courses?

Russ Poldrack <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:52:31 -0800

128 lines

New Thread

3D problems in fslview

3D problems in fslview

Tibor Auer MD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:47:31 +0100

40 lines

Re: 3D problems in fslview

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:15:20 +0000

53 lines

Re: 3D problems in fslview

Tibor Auer MD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:21:54 +0100

31 lines

Re: 3D problems in fslview

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:31:58 +0100

37 lines

Re: 3D problems in fslview

Rolf Heckemann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:51:54 +0000

66 lines

Re: 3D problems in fslview

Tibor Auer MD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:59:10 +0100

33 lines

Re: 3D problems in fslview

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:15:05 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

3D slicer experience?

3D slicer experience?

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:35:52 -0700

57 lines

New Thread

a quick TBSS question

a quick TBSS question

liang wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:07:16 -0800

58 lines

New Thread

About orthogonalization

About orthogonalization

Ning Liu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:45:19 +0000

31 lines

Re: About orthogonalization

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:38:08 +0000

61 lines

New Thread

Adding Covariates

Adding Covariates

Vina Goghari <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:19:43 -0600

42 lines

New Thread

Age X Sex Interaction

Age X Sex Interaction

Robert Terwilliger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:55:37 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

ANOVA results

ANOVA results

Hanne Lehn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:16:57 +0000

51 lines

Re: ANOVA results

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:28:02 +0000

77 lines

Re: ANOVA results

Hanne Lehn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:58:38 +0100

98 lines

Re: ANOVA results

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:00:38 +0000

116 lines

Re: ANOVA results

Hanne Lehn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:02:58 +0100

132 lines

New Thread

Any command can average a few subject volumes?

Any command can average a few subject volumes?

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 05:31:58 +0800

77 lines

Re: Any command can average a few subject volumes?

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:37:29 +0000

124 lines

New Thread

Applying non-linear transforms from tbss_2_reg to other images

Applying non-linear transforms from tbss_2_reg to other images

Thomas Doke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:57:03 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

atlas tools

atlas tools

Koene Van Dijk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:29:41 +0000

22 lines

Re: atlas tools

Koene Van Dijk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:44:33 +0000

35 lines

Re: atlas tools

Michael T Rubens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:42:49 -0800

75 lines

Re: atlas tools

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:49:54 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Baseline/rest contrast

Baseline/rest contrast

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:02:14 +0000

23 lines

Re: Baseline/rest contrast

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:23:34 +0000

47 lines

Re: Baseline/rest contrast

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:47:37 +0000

71 lines

Re: Baseline/rest contrast

Stephane Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:59:59 -0800

100 lines

New Thread

bash does not recognize ". $..."

bash does not recognize ". $..."

Zareal Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:44:50 +0000

25 lines

Re: bash does not recognize ". $..."

Dave Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:17:49 +0000

31 lines

Re: bash does not recognize ". $..."

王彦(罗非课题) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:05:47 +0800

130 lines

Re: bash does not recognize ". $..."

Feng Xue <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:32:50 +0800

66 lines

Re: bash does not recognize ". $..."

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:37:45 +0000

104 lines

Re: bash does not recognize ". $..."

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:12:08 +0000

146 lines

New Thread

Basis functions

Basis functions

Nils Richter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:33:34 +0100

25 lines

Re: Basis functions

Jason Steffener <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:43:57 -0500

507 lines

Re: Basis functions

Nils Richter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:56:36 +0100

106 lines

Re: Basis functions

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:57:04 +0000

155 lines

Re: Basis functions

Jason Steffener <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:42:01 -0500

381 lines

Re: Basis functions

Nils Richter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:28:31 +0100

102 lines

Re: Basis functions

Jason Steffener <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:19:19 -0500

265 lines

Re: Basis functions

Nils Richter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:51:24 +0100

157 lines

Re: Basis functions

Jason Steffener <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:57:46 -0500

363 lines

New Thread

BET and registration across subjects

BET and registration across subjects

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:43:42 +0000

25 lines

Re: BET and registration across subjects

Rolf Heckemann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:10:16 +0000

82 lines

New Thread

bet memory error

bet memory error

Alina Jurcoane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:29:09 +0100

35 lines

Re: bet memory error

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:45:26 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

bet/betsurf questions

Re: bet/betsurf questions

Marc Lalancette <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:40:26 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

bet/betsurf questions (and why not a real forum?)

bet/betsurf questions (and why not a real forum?)

Marc Lalancette <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:01:59 +0000

40 lines

Re: bet/betsurf questions (and why not a real forum?)

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:04:52 +0000

77 lines

Re: bet/betsurf questions (and why not a real forum?)

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:28:25 +0000

28 lines

Re: bet/betsurf questions (and why not a real forum?)

Marc Lalancette <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:11:55 +0000

30 lines

Re: bet/betsurf questions (and why not a real forum?)

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:44:27 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

Betsurf coordinate system (bug?)

Betsurf coordinate system (bug?)

Marc Lalancette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:33:34 +0000

44 lines

Re: Betsurf coordinate system (bug?)

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:36:56 +0000

61 lines

New Thread

both hemisferes coordinates same cluster (wernickes area)

both hemisferes coordinates same cluster (wernickes area)

Gonzalo Rojas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:41:08 -0300

33 lines

New Thread

brain atlas

brain atlas

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:43:39 +0800

56 lines

New Thread

calculation of dwell time

calculation of dwell time

sm ke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:28:41 +0000

29 lines

Re: calculation of dwell time

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:45:15 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

Can't use FSL FIRST with a Nifti file converted from DICOM with SPM5

Can't use FSL FIRST with a Nifti file converted from DICOM with SPM5

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:28:00 -0500

53 lines

Re: Can't use FSL FIRST with a Nifti file converted from DICOM with SPM5

Benny Liberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:16:25 +0100

93 lines

Re: Can't use FSL FIRST with a Nifti file converted from DICOM with SPM5

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:23:44 -0500

181 lines

Re: Can't use FSL FIRST with a Nifti file converted from DICOM with SPM5

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:27:31 +0000

78 lines

Re: Can't use FSL FIRST with a Nifti file converted from DICOM with SPM5

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:22:27 -0500

337 lines

Re: Can't use FSL FIRST with a Nifti file converted from DICOM with SPM5

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:47:44 +0000

117 lines

Re: Can't use FSL FIRST with a Nifti file converted from DICOM with SPM5

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:51:52 -0500

458 lines

Re: Can't use FSL FIRST with a Nifti file converted from DICOM with SPM5

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:03:23 +0000

151 lines

Re: Can't use FSL FIRST with a Nifti file converted from DICOM with SPM5

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:26:13 -0500

575 lines

Re: Can't use FSL FIRST with a Nifti file converted from DICOM with SPM5

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:15:26 -0500

584 lines

New Thread

cluster z threshold and p-value

cluster z threshold and p-value

shih-Wei Wu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 22:26:30 +0000

36 lines

Re: cluster z threshold and p-value

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:46:16 +0000

82 lines

Re: cluster z threshold and p-value

Shih-Wei Wu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:40:12 -0800

162 lines

Re: cluster z threshold and p-value

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:54:13 +0000

113 lines

New Thread

Comparing the results of the segmentation

Re: Comparing the results of the segmentation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:11:34 +0000

81 lines

Re: Comparing the results of the segmentation

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:17:14 +0000

46 lines

Re: Comparing the results of the segmentation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:55:05 +0000

68 lines

Re: Comparing the results of the segmentation

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:17:53 +0000

37 lines

Re: Comparing the results of the segmentation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:56:19 +0000

68 lines

Re: Comparing the results of the segmentation

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:35:54 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

converting 4dfp data

converting 4dfp data

Ben Levy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:52:45 +0000

20 lines

Re: converting 4dfp data

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:12:42 -0600

73 lines

Re: converting 4dfp data

Donna Dierker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:11:44 -0600

86 lines

Re: converting 4dfp data

Junqian Gordon Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:56:45 -0600

54 lines

New Thread

correct use of randomise_parallel on SGE?

correct use of randomise_parallel on SGE?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:38:49 +0100

63 lines

Re: correct use of randomise_parallel on SGE?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:09:57 +0000

103 lines

Re: correct use of randomise_parallel on SGE?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:39:43 +0100

113 lines

Re: correct use of randomise_parallel on SGE?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:13:39 +0000

166 lines

Re: correct use of randomise_parallel on SGE?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:20:05 +0100

178 lines

Re: correct use of randomise_parallel on SGE?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:51:10 +0000

272 lines

Re: correct use of randomise_parallel on SGE?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:45:46 +0100

104 lines

New Thread

correlation analysis TBSS

Re: correlation analysis TBSS

John Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:25:38 +0000

91 lines

New Thread

could you check this result? RE: [FSL] fnirt: warpped field.

could you check this result? RE: [FSL] fnirt: warpped field.

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:43:21 +0800

534 lines

Re: could you check this result? RE: [FSL] fnirt: warpped field.

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:05:28 +0000

212 lines

Re: could you check this result? RE: [FSL] fnirt: warpped field.

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:22:41 +0800

643 lines

Re: could you check this result? RE: [FSL] fnirt: warpped field.

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:42:08 +0800

282 lines

Re: could you check this result? RE: [FSL] fnirt: warpped field.

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:02:07 +0000

71 lines

New Thread

data types

data types

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:14:48 -0800

66 lines

Re: data types

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:58:06 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch)

Re: Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch)

Jen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:44:23 +0000

39 lines

Re: Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch)

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:58:51 +0100

62 lines

Re: Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch)

"Nicholas P Holmes" <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:35:24 +0000

15 lines

Re: Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch)

John Herrington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:25:44 -0500

31 lines

Re: Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch)

Perrin, Jennifer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:48:41 +0000

119 lines

Re: Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch)

Feng Xue <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:23:02 +0800

39 lines

Re: Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch)

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:06:47 +0100

32 lines

Re: Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch)

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:51:23 +0100

25 lines

Re: Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch)

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:45:35 +0100

49 lines

Re: Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch)

Riccardo Della Nave <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:48:19 +0100

21 lines

Re: Debian package update (Re: FSL 4.1.2 patch)

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:27:36 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

Demean

Demean

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:50:19 -0500

121 lines

Re: Demean

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:17:10 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

Despeckling

Despeckling

Jordan Poppenk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:55:00 +0000

272 lines

Re: Despeckling

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:40:23 -0600

62 lines

Re: Despeckling

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:06:11 -0800

165 lines

Re: Despeckling

Volkmar Glauche <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:59:50 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

dtifit exception

dtifit exception

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:34:25 -0800

87 lines

Re: dtifit exception

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:45:08 -0600

278 lines

Re: dtifit exception

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:00:22 -0800

199 lines

New Thread

dtifit V{1,2,3} data format

Re: dtifit V{1,2,3} data format

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:52:00 -0800

542 lines

Re: dtifit V{1,2,3} data format

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:06:10 +0000

178 lines

Re: dtifit V{1,2,3} data format

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:35:23 -0600

194 lines

New Thread

dummy scans

dummy scans

Yael Shani <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:24:47 +0200

57 lines

Re: dummy scans

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:30:55 +0000

45 lines

Re: dummy scans

Yael Shani <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:18:21 +0200

118 lines

New Thread

Error During subject level analysis

Error During subject level analysis

Vina Goghari <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:10:46 -0600

636 lines

Re: Error During subject level analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:19:32 +0000

743 lines

New Thread

Error running multiple probtrackx windows

Error running multiple probtrackx windows

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:09:04 -0500

32 lines

Re: Error running multiple probtrackx windows

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:32:16 -0600

54 lines

Re: Error running multiple probtrackx windows

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:00:47 -0500

80 lines

Re: Error running multiple probtrackx windows

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:32:08 -0600

96 lines

New Thread

errors are not zero and where is fslroi command?

errors are not zero and where is fslroi command?

Pom Sailasuta <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:14:29 -0800

107 lines

Re: errors are not zero and where is fslroi command?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:01:03 +0000

122 lines

Re: errors are not zero and where is fslroi command?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:54:42 +0100

265 lines

Re: errors are not zero and where is fslroi command?

Pom Sailasuta <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:28:13 -0800

132 lines

New Thread

extracting one volume from a 4D file

extracting one volume from a 4D file

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:52:21 -0800

410 lines

Re: extracting one volume from a 4D file

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:59:04 +0000

435 lines

Re: extracting one volume from a 4D file

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:06:38 -0500

687 lines

Re: extracting one volume from a 4D file

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:15:17 -0800

452 lines

Re: extracting one volume from a 4D file

Siddharth Srivastava <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:20:24 -0800

550 lines

Re: extracting one volume from a 4D file

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:28:57 -0500

850 lines

Re: extracting one volume from a 4D file

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:27:21 -0600

971 lines

New Thread

F contrast cluster corrected

F contrast cluster corrected

Silvia Juanes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:11:07 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

FA and BOLD correlation

FA and BOLD correlation

Cibu Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:40:26 -0500

53 lines

Re: FA and BOLD correlation

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:18:43 +0000

87 lines

Re: FA and BOLD correlation

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:54:26 -0500

100 lines

Re: FA and BOLD correlation

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:31:52 +0000

119 lines

New Thread

FA per cluster

FA per cluster

Cherif Sahyoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:13:49 +0000

35 lines

Re: FA per cluster

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 08:23:07 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

fast: how to make the CSF area less?

fast: how to make the CSF area less?

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:10:46 +0800

50 lines

New Thread

Fdt (DTIFIT) & NEWMAT error

Fdt (DTIFIT) & NEWMAT error

A.Crippa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:29:06 +0100

25 lines

Re: Fdt (DTIFIT) & NEWMAT error

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:56:50 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

FDT - extract voxel-wise vector, MD, FA data

FDT - extract voxel-wise vector, MD, FA data

Silviu Podariu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:31:54 +0000

31 lines

Re: FDT - extract voxel-wise vector, MD, FA data

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:55:57 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

FEAT - How do I script the creation of design.fsf?

FEAT - How do I script the creation of design.fsf?

Todd Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:02:16 -0500

42 lines

Re: FEAT - How do I script the creation of design.fsf?

Martin Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:34:56 +0000

115 lines

Re: FEAT - How do I script the creation of design.fsf?

Todd Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:51:51 -0500

65 lines

Re: FEAT - How do I script the creation of design.fsf?

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:12:50 +0000

152 lines

Re: FEAT - How do I script the creation of design.fsf?

Todd Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:38:59 -0500

131 lines

Re: FEAT - How do I script the creation of design.fsf?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:31:43 +0000

168 lines

Re: FEAT - How do I script the creation of design.fsf?

Daniel Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:42:40 -0500

285 lines

Re: FEAT - How do I script the creation of design.fsf?

Todd Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:37:09 -0500

164 lines

New Thread

FEAT results and ROI analysis

FEAT results and ROI analysis

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:04:44 +0000

81 lines

New Thread

first level behavioral covariate

first level behavioral covariate

Heather Urry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:37:26 +0000

99 lines

Re: first level behavioral covariate

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:13:23 +0000

262 lines

Re: first level behavioral covariate

Heather L. Urry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:52:42 -0500

73 lines

Re: first level behavioral covariate

Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:58:43 +0000

141 lines

New Thread

FIRST training data

FIRST training data

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:29:12 +0000

17 lines

Re: FIRST training data

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:57:39 +0000

32 lines

Re: FIRST training data

Hedok Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:22:53 -0500

47 lines

Re: FIRST training data

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:34:33 +0000

68 lines

Re: FIRST training data

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:14:33 +0000

14 lines

New Thread

FIRST without flirt

FIRST without flirt

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:42:28 +0000

24 lines

Re: FIRST without flirt

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:13:05 +0000

42 lines

Re: FIRST without flirt

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:47:35 +0000

23 lines

Re: FIRST without flirt

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:36:07 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

FIRST, continued.

FIRST, continued.

Laura Chaddock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:01:23 -0600

399 lines

Re: FIRST, continued.

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:39:39 +0000

24 lines

Re: FIRST, continued.

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:43:10 -0000

40 lines

New Thread

first_flirt without resize

first_flirt without resize

Mark Schira <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:44:44 +0000

31 lines

Re: first_flirt without resize

wolf zinke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:44:55 +0100

47 lines

Re: first_flirt without resize

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:52:34 +0000

74 lines

Re: first_flirt without resize

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:32:14 -0000

93 lines

Re: first_flirt without resize

Mark Schira <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:14:14 +0000

87 lines

Re: first_flirt without resize

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:25:29 +0000

113 lines

New Thread

Flirt\mcflirt constraints

Re: Flirt\mcflirt constraints

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:34:03 +0000

83 lines

Re: Flirt\mcflirt constraints

wolf zinke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:13:31 +0100

119 lines

Re: Flirt\mcflirt constraints

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:01:44 +0000

160 lines

New Thread

FNIRT

FNIRT

Vina Goghari <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:34:10 -0600

1851 lines

Re: FNIRT

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:40:24 +0100

1875 lines

Re: FNIRT

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:10:07 +0000

1885 lines

New Thread

FNIRT and invwarp

FNIRT and invwarp

Ryan Muetzel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:50:45 -0600

794 lines

Re: FNIRT and invwarp

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:38:10 +0000

86 lines

Re: FNIRT and invwarp

Ryan Muetzel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:40:19 -0600

145 lines

Re: FNIRT and invwarp

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:56:33 +0000

124 lines

Re: FNIRT and invwarp

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:15:46 +0000

161 lines

New Thread

FNIRT error through FEAT gui

FNIRT error through FEAT gui

Heather Urry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:25:14 +0000

30 lines

Re: FNIRT error through FEAT gui

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:54:13 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

FNIRT failure for grid patients

FNIRT failure for grid patients

Riki Matsumoto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:45:45 +0900

67 lines

New Thread

FNIRT failure for grid patients (with attachment)

FNIRT failure for grid patients (with attachment)

Riki Matsumoto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:47:16 +0900

618 lines

New Thread

FNIRT parameters for monkeys

FNIRT parameters for monkeys

Brittany Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +0000

14 lines

Re: FNIRT parameters for monkeys

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:53:50 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

fnirt question

fnirt question

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:46:51 +0800

116 lines

New Thread

fnirt: warpped field.

fnirt: warpped field.

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:08:55 +0800

63 lines

Re: fnirt: warpped field.

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:15:49 +0000

90 lines

Re: fnirt: warpped field.

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:23:52 +0800

104 lines

New Thread

Format file of FSL's output

Re: Format file of FSL's output

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:56:47 +0000

86 lines

New Thread

From DICOm to Nifti

From DICOm to Nifti

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:30:06 -0500

560 lines

New Thread

fsl 4.0 VBM method description

fsl 4.0 VBM method description

Colm Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:10:18 +0000

33 lines

Re: fsl 4.0 VBM method description

Erik O Hanlon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:25:57 +0000

129 lines

New Thread

fsl 4.1.2 on ubuntu 8.10: libnewimage.so

fsl 4.1.2 on ubuntu 8.10: libnewimage.so

Vincent Ferrera <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:14:18 +0000

18 lines

Re: fsl 4.1.2 on ubuntu 8.10: libnewimage.so

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:23:57 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

FSL bugs due to 'dash' as the default shell

Re: FSL bugs due to 'dash' as the default shell

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:56:20 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

FSL bugs due to 'dash' as the default shell (was: run_first_all - kubuntu 8.10)

FSL bugs due to 'dash' as the default shell (was: run_first_all - kubuntu 8.10)

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:44:13 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

FSL for arcuate fasciculus probability map / atlas

FSL for arcuate fasciculus probability map / atlas

liang wang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:53:46 -0800

55 lines

Re: FSL for arcuate fasciculus probability map / atlas

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:55:08 -0600

263 lines

New Thread

FSL intallation is OK

Re: FSL intallation is OK

Yan Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:43:39 +0800

79 lines

New Thread

FSL output formats

FSL output formats

Frederick Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:34:41 -0500

16 lines

Re: FSL output formats

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:53:47 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

FSL4.1 installation problem

FSL4.1 installation problem

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 04:12:37 +0800

83 lines

Re: FSL4.1 installation problem

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:13:49 +0100

90 lines

New Thread

fslcpgeom

fslcpgeom

Hanie Elfenbein <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:13:12 +0000

24 lines

Re: fslcpgeom

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:36:14 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

fslorient

fslorient

Michael Rohan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:21:21 +0000

53 lines

Re: fslorient

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:19:20 +0000

88 lines

New Thread

fslpspec

fslpspec

Christopher Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:23:21 +0000

35 lines

Re: fslpspec

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:30:30 +0000

74 lines

Re: fslpspec

Xinian Zuo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:47:08 +0000

92 lines

Re: fslpspec

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:32:32 +0000

115 lines

Re: fslpspec

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:06:08 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

fslview atlases

fslview atlases

carlos silva pereira <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:17:09 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

fslview atlases-solved

fslview atlases-solved

carlos silva pereira <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:55:36 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

fslview in 64bits

fslview in 64bits

Gael Varoquaux <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:23:50 +0100

25 lines

Re: fslview in 64bits

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:00:15 +0000

40 lines

Re: fslview in 64bits

Gael Varoquaux <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:50:07 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Fugue -field map correction

Re: Fugue -field map correction

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:13:11 +0000

408 lines

Re: Fugue -field map correction

Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:36:39 -0500

475 lines

Re: Fugue -field map correction

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:12:45 +0000

485 lines

Re: Fugue -field map correction

Rajagopalan, Venkateswaran <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:20:58 -0500

540 lines

Re: Fugue -field map correction

Jee Eun Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:44:06 -0600

613 lines

Re: Fugue -field map correction

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:13:18 +0000

524 lines

New Thread

Fwd: PhD position available: translational fMRI research in Aachen/Jülich

Fwd: PhD position available: translational fMRI research in Aachen/Jülich

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:27:26 +0000

124 lines

New Thread

Getting data from probtrackx

Getting data from probtrackx

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:28:18 -0500

42 lines

Re: Getting data from probtrackx

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:03:38 +0000

183 lines

New Thread

GLM GUI

GLM GUI

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:52:17 -0500

163 lines

Re: GLM GUI

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:04:58 +0000

113 lines

Re: GLM GUI

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:41:30 -0500

362 lines

New Thread

GLM GUI for TBSS paste problem

GLM GUI for TBSS paste problem

Thomas Doke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:50:43 +0000

23 lines

Re: GLM GUI for TBSS paste problem

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:59:55 +0100

85 lines

New Thread

Group Analysis - GLM setup

Group Analysis - GLM setup

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:57:59 +0000

50 lines

Group Analysis - GLM setup

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:20:08 +0000

52 lines

Re: Group Analysis - GLM setup

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:31:04 +0000

99 lines

Re: Group Analysis - GLM setup

Lin Nga <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:14:19 +0000

20 lines

Re: Group Analysis - GLM setup

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:35:16 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

Group comparison using unpaired t-test, FEAT OLS vs randomise

Group comparison using unpaired t-test, FEAT OLS vs randomise

Robert Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:37:03 +0000

66 lines

Re: Group comparison using unpaired t-test, FEAT OLS vs randomise

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:13:25 +0000

98 lines

Re: Group comparison using unpaired t-test, FEAT OLS vs randomise

Robert Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:16:27 -0500

119 lines

Re: Group comparison using unpaired t-test, FEAT OLS vs randomise

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:51:13 +0000

173 lines

Re: Group comparison using unpaired t-test, FEAT OLS vs randomise

Robert Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:45:18 -0500

307 lines

Re: Group comparison using unpaired t-test, FEAT OLS vs randomise

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:35:13 +0000

250 lines

New Thread

group differences in functional connectivity

Re: group differences in functional connectivity

Michelle W. Voss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:46:09 -0600

204 lines

Re: group differences in functional connectivity

MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:23:14 -0600

194 lines

Re: group differences in functional connectivity

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:36:11 +0000

157 lines

Re: group differences in functional connectivity

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:38:52 +0000

181 lines

New Thread

Hemispheric asymmetry study using TBSS

Hemispheric asymmetry study using TBSS

Siawoosh Mohammadi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:50:29 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Hi and for randomise question

Hi and for randomise question

Zhang, Xiaochu (NIH/NIDA) [F] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:38:33 -0500

364 lines

Re: Hi and for randomise question

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:31:33 +0000

128 lines

Re: Hi and for randomise question

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:08:52 +0000

310 lines

Re: Hi and for randomise question

Zhang, Xiaochu (NIH/NIDA) [F] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:11:54 -0500

518 lines

New Thread

high pass filter for block designs

Re: high pass filter for block designs

Stephane Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:02:16 +0000

61 lines

Re: high pass filter for block designs

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:29:22 +0000

305 lines

Re: high pass filter for block designs

Stephane Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:16:51 -0800

144 lines

New Thread

Higher-level analysis without co-registration?

Higher-level analysis without co-registration?

Dav Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:27:04 -0800

26 lines

Re: Higher-level analysis without co-registration?

wolf zinke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:45:45 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

how long should invwarp take?

how long should invwarp take?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:58:12 +0100

113 lines

Re: how long should invwarp take?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:42:41 +0000

113 lines

Re: how long should invwarp take?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:14:02 +0100

247 lines

New Thread

how to add more regions to an existing mask?

how to add more regions to an existing mask?

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:56:20 +0800

69 lines

Re: how to add more regions to an existing mask?

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:07:58 -0700

102 lines

Re: how to add more regions to an existing mask?

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:22:59 +0800

98 lines

Re: how to add more regions to an existing mask?

Brittany Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:15:34 -0500

75 lines

New Thread

how to cite for FNIRT??

how to cite for FNIRT??

Kim Chi Nguyen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:15:34 -0800

27 lines

Re: how to cite for FNIRT??

Feng Xue <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:36:42 +0800

27 lines

Re: how to cite for FNIRT??

Kim Chi Nguyen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:48:03 -0800

119 lines

Re: how to cite for FNIRT??

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:04:22 -0000

105 lines

New Thread

how to count the number of non-zero voxel in a 3d image?

how to count the number of non-zero voxel in a 3d image?

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:13:44 +0800

73 lines

Re: how to count the number of non-zero voxel in a 3d image?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:43:06 +0100

99 lines

Re: how to count the number of non-zero voxel in a 3d image?

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:55:21 +0800

140 lines

New Thread

how to get field map from Philip 3T Archiva

how to get field map from Philip 3T Archiva

kl chen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:12:23 +0000

17 lines

New Thread

ICA clustering in FSL

ICA clustering in FSL

Anonymous <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:57:42 +0000

14 lines

Re: ICA clustering in FSL

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:38:29 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

image scaling

image scaling

Veronique Weser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:32:43 -0800

32 lines

Re: image scaling

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:39:55 -0600

232 lines

Re: image scaling

Veronique Weser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:05:50 -0800

839 lines

Re: image scaling

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:24:26 +0000

93 lines

Re: image scaling

Veronique Weser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:41:30 -0800

402 lines

Re: image scaling

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:43:39 +0000

272 lines

New Thread

Incomplete 2x2x2-factorial design

Incomplete 2x2x2-factorial design

Jan Derrfuss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:43:54 +0000

52 lines

Re: Incomplete 2x2x2-factorial design

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:31:34 +0000

77 lines

Re: Incomplete 2x2x2-factorial design

Jan Derrfuss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:51:57 +0000

110 lines

New Thread

input to FDT

input to FDT

dfwang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:42:01 +0800

53 lines

Re: input to FDT

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:30:00 +0100

83 lines

New Thread

INVWARP runtime

INVWARP runtime

siamak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:09:33 +0000

22 lines

Re: INVWARP runtime

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:06:17 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

J'aimerais aller au UCLA Advanced Neuroimaging Summer Course, July 20-31, 2009

J'aimerais aller au UCLA Advanced Neuroimaging Summer Course, July 20-31, 2009

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:13:27 +0100

129 lines

New Thread

Longitudinal DTI

Longitudinal DTI

Walterfang, Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 00:02:26 +1100

48 lines

Re: Longitudinal DTI

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:22:15 -0600

74 lines

Re: Longitudinal DTI

Walterfang, Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:26:32 +1100

98 lines

Re: Longitudinal DTI

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:40:33 -0600

127 lines

New Thread

longitudinal TBSS

longitudinal TBSS

Eytan Raz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:54:22 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

mac osx 10.3.2 install problem

mac osx 10.3.2 install problem

Curren Katz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:10:56 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

mac osx install

mac osx install

Curren Katz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:42:37 -0500

212 lines

New Thread

Melodic is stopping… sometimes! (memory overflow?)

Re: Melodic is stopping… sometimes! (memory overflow?)

Jose Paulo Santos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:11:11 +0000

108 lines

New Thread

MGH Palette

MGH Palette

joel bruss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:00:36 -0600

27 lines

Re: MGH Palette

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:35:50 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

MRICRO-FSLVIEW palette conversion...

MRICRO-FSLVIEW palette conversion...

Gonzalo Rojas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:12:59 -0300

25 lines

New Thread

nifti_read_buffer in probtrackx

nifti_read_buffer in probtrackx

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:57:54 -0500

35 lines

Re: nifti_read_buffer in probtrackx

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:33:30 -0600

52 lines

Re: nifti_read_buffer in probtrackx

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:54:20 -0500

107 lines

Re: nifti_read_buffer in probtrackx

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:18:05 -0600

122 lines

New Thread

Nonlinear Registration "FEAT cannot find the whole-head image"

Re: Nonlinear Registration "FEAT cannot find the whole-head image"

Ariana Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:21:02 +0000

39 lines

Re: Nonlinear Registration "FEAT cannot find the whole-head image"

David V. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:40:31 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

on correlation analysis

on correlation analysis

杨宏宇 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:31:21 -0600

34 lines

Re: on correlation analysis

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:50:01 +0000

88 lines

New Thread

on MELODIC ICA

on MELODIC ICA

Hongyu Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:36:35 +0000

34 lines

Re: on MELODIC ICA

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:23:24 +0000

80 lines

Re: on MELODIC ICA

yanghy720 <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:40:13 +0800

212 lines

New Thread

on the output of correlation analysis with Feat

on the output of correlation analysis with Feat

Hongyu Yang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:09:44 +0000

36 lines

Re: on the output of correlation analysis with Feat

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:36:01 +0000

112 lines

Re: on the output of correlation analysis with Feat

John Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:28:30 +0000

78 lines

New Thread

Orientation

Orientation

Michael Lipton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:27:58 -0500

30 lines

Re: Orientation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:46:42 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

paste problem in GLM GUI for TBSS

paste problem in GLM GUI for TBSS

Thomas F Doke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:50:01 -0000

25 lines

Re: paste problem in GLM GUI for TBSS

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:53:43 +0000

46 lines

Re: paste problem in GLM GUI for TBSS

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:00:19 +0100

94 lines

New Thread

Possible to use old FAST version in new FSL version?

Possible to use old FAST version in new FSL version?

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:40:53 +0100

24 lines

Re: Possible to use old FAST version in new FSL version?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:58:55 +0000

58 lines

Re: Possible to use old FAST version in new FSL version?

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:13:48 +0100

83 lines

Re: Possible to use old FAST version in new FSL version?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:00:16 +0000

108 lines

Re: Possible to use old FAST version in new FSL version?

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:27:58 +0100

129 lines

Re: Possible to use old FAST version in new FSL version?

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:30:35 +0100

138 lines

Re: Possible to use old FAST version in new FSL version?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:39:01 +0000

141 lines

New Thread

Postdoc and PhD Positions available

Postdoc and PhD Positions available

Jens Sommer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:25:42 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral research associate: statistical methodology, Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow

Postdoctoral research associate: statistical methodology, Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:08:58 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

pre-processing Bedpost

pre-processing Bedpost

Oded Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:37:41 +0000

30 lines

Re: pre-processing Bedpost

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:19:02 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

probabilistic tractography : why chose curvature threshold of 0.2?

probabilistic tractography : why chose curvature threshold of 0.2?

Emma Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:04:03 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

Problems using fast

Problems using fast

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:40:51 +0100

31 lines

Re: Problems using fast

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:52:09 +0100

32 lines

Re: Problems using fast

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:04:04 +0100

48 lines

Re: Problems using fast

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:22:08 +0100

62 lines

Re: Problems using fast

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:16:33 +0100

80 lines

Re: Problems using fast

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:34:54 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

Probtrackx - Two masks

Probtrackx - Two masks

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:23:43 -0500

1587 lines

Re: Probtrackx - Two masks

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:49:03 +0000

151 lines

Re: Probtrackx - Two masks

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:53:46 -0500

541 lines

Re: Probtrackx - Two masks

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:41:24 -0500

109 lines

Re: Probtrackx - Two masks

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:21:29 -0000

128 lines

Re: Probtrackx - Two masks

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:25:17 -0500

145 lines

New Thread

probtrackx numbers

probtrackx numbers

Yu-Chin Chiu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:29:44 +0000

49 lines

Re: probtrackx numbers

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:30:10 -0000

79 lines

New Thread

probtrackx question

Re: probtrackx question

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:30:31 +0100

153 lines

New Thread

PROBTRACKX related question

PROBTRACKX related question

Oded Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:20:42 +0000

30 lines

Re: PROBTRACKX related question

Cherif Sahyoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:31:34 -0500

50 lines

Re: PROBTRACKX related question

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:09:58 -0600

70 lines

New Thread

Propagating atlases to subject space

Propagating atlases to subject space

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:58:12 -0000

20 lines

Re: Propagating atlases to subject space

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:21:14 -0000

39 lines

New Thread

Question about MNI152 brain and mask from its atlas

Re: Question about MNI152 brain and mask from its atlas

Anthony Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:12:11 +1100

57 lines

Re: Question about MNI152 brain and mask from its atlas

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:09:10 +0000

83 lines

Re: Question about MNI152 brain and mask from its atlas

Anthony Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:44:19 +1100

76 lines

New Thread

Question on VBM: How many subjects are enough to have statistical power?

Question on VBM: How many subjects are enough to have statistical power?

dfwang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:55:20 +0800

80 lines

New Thread

quick randomise qestions

quick randomise qestions

Colm G.Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:05:28 +0000

40 lines

Re: quick randomise qestions

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:16:42 +0000

142 lines

New Thread

Radomise_parallel with data generated outside FSL

Re: Radomise_parallel with data generated outside FSL

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:15:59 +0000

49 lines

Re: Radomise_parallel with data generated outside FSL

Eric Kan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:51:54 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

RAM disk usefullness

RAM disk usefullness

Kent Conover <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:24:33 +0000

24 lines

Re: RAM disk usefullness

Mohammad Bhuyan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:18:16 +1100

30 lines

Re: RAM disk usefullness

Kent Conover <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:17:24 +0000

27 lines

Re: RAM disk usefullness

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:48:40 -0600

46 lines

New Thread

Randomise mask

Randomise mask

Eric Kan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:58:57 +0000

48 lines

Re: Randomise mask

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:41:12 +0000

72 lines

Re: Randomise mask

Eric Kan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:10:52 -0800

100 lines

Re: Randomise mask

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:30:36 +0000

124 lines

New Thread

Randomise Option --T2

Randomise Option --T2

Cibu Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:55:25 -0500

27 lines

Re: Randomise Option --T2

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:19:12 +0000

96 lines

Re: Randomise Option --T2

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:10:45 +0000

38 lines

Re: Randomise Option --T2

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:45:11 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

randomise: higher level analysis

randomise: higher level analysis

Stephane Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:05:29 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] a quick TBSS question

Re : [FSL] a quick TBSS question

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:28:12 -0800

64 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] brain atlas

Re : [FSL] brain atlas

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:08:57 -0800

42 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] brain atlas

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:45:26 +0800

79 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] brain atlas

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:23:12 -0800

84 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] brain atlas

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:59:04 +0800

137 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] FA per cluster

Re : [FSL] FA per cluster

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:06:56 -0800

55 lines

Re: Re : [FSL] FA per cluster

Cherif Sahyoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:12:14 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] fsl 4.0 VBM method description

Re : [FSL] fsl 4.0 VBM method description

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:42:56 +0000

454 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] Skeleton transparency

Re : [FSL] Skeleton transparency

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:21:37 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

Re : [FSL] tbss_2_reg failed

Re : [FSL] tbss_2_reg failed

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:36:35 -0800

50 lines

New Thread

read DICOM header to correct bvec for angulation

read DICOM header to correct bvec for angulation

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:54:04 -0800

47 lines

Re: read DICOM header to correct bvec for angulation

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 22:11:27 -0600

86 lines

Re: read DICOM header to correct bvec for angulation

David Lythgoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:28:07 +0000

99 lines

Re: read DICOM header to correct bvec for angulation

Michael Scheel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:33:07 -0800

132 lines

Re: read DICOM header to correct bvec for angulation

David Lythgoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:01:50 +0000

153 lines

New Thread

registration

registration

Yael Shani <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:27:03 +0200

32 lines

Re: registration

Reza Salimi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:39:55 +0000

59 lines

Re: registration

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:00:59 +0100

99 lines

New Thread

Registration Higher Level analysis

Re: Registration Higher Level analysis

Eldreth, Dana A. <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:31:10 -0500

346 lines

New Thread

reproducibility of SIENAX & SIENA with MPRAGE

reproducibility of SIENAX & SIENA with MPRAGE

Daniel Reich <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:52:59 +0000

26 lines

Re: reproducibility of SIENAX & SIENA with MPRAGE

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:00:30 +1100

47 lines

Re: reproducibility of SIENAX & SIENA with MPRAGE

Daniel Reich <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:44:43 +0000

16 lines

Re: reproducibility of SIENAX & SIENA with MPRAGE

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:03:52 +1100

44 lines

Re: reproducibility of SIENAX & SIENA with MPRAGE

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:35:31 +0000

50 lines

Re: reproducibility of SIENAX & SIENA with MPRAGE

Daniel Reich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:44:59 -0500

132 lines

Re: reproducibility of SIENAX & SIENA with MPRAGE

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:40:37 +0000

89 lines

New Thread

research assistant position in intracranial EEG

research assistant position in intracranial EEG

Thomas Thesen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:55:52 -0800

519 lines

New Thread

run fnirt

run fnirt

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:21:13 +0800

70 lines

Re: run fnirt

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:33:36 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

run_first_all - kubuntu 8.10

run_first_all - kubuntu 8.10

Tibor Auer MD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:12:55 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

SEED files still there after randomise_parallel?

SEED files still there after randomise_parallel?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:35:15 +0100

51 lines

Re: SEED files still there after randomise_parallel?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:08:55 +0000

83 lines

Re: SEED files still there after randomise_parallel?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:35:37 +0100

122 lines

Re: SEED files still there after randomise_parallel?

Matthew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:51:11 +0000

98 lines

Re: SEED files still there after randomise_parallel?

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:00:51 +0100

234 lines

New Thread

setting up a linear contrast

setting up a linear contrast

Hilary watson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:42:46 +0000

120 lines

Re: setting up a linear contrast

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:52:25 +0000

131 lines

New Thread

Siemens spin echo field map sequence

Siemens spin echo field map sequence

Sm Ke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:35:51 +0000

15 lines

New Thread

SIENA Error

SIENA Error

Evangelou, Iordanis (NIH/NINDS) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:54:07 -0500

159 lines

Re: SIENA Error

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:40:25 +0000

182 lines

Re: SIENA Error

Evangelou, Iordanis (NIH/NINDS) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:02:24 -0500

219 lines

New Thread

SIENA Parallel Jobs

SIENA Parallel Jobs

Amith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:48:13 +0000

30 lines

Re: SIENA Parallel Jobs

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:39:25 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

Sienax problem?

Sienax problem?

Erick Canales Rodriguez (Benito Menni CASM) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:45:04 +0100

158 lines

Re: Sienax problem?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:48:54 +0000

71 lines

Re: Sienax problem?

Erick Canales Rodriguez (Benito Menni CASM) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:25:42 +0100

240 lines

Re: Sienax problem?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:39:59 +0000

70 lines

Re: Sienax problem?

Erick Canales Rodriguez (Benito Menni CASM) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:43:56 +0100

80 lines

Re: Sienax problem?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:05:35 +0000

225 lines

Re: Sienax problem?

Erick Canales Rodriguez (Benito Menni CASM) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:13:16 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

single and multiple masks

single and multiple masks

cathyliu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:11:53 +0800

75 lines

Re: single and multiple masks

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:10:09 +0000

187 lines

New Thread

single powerful computer Vs. cluster

single powerful computer Vs. cluster

Anonymous <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:54:06 +0000

30 lines

Re: single powerful computer Vs. cluster

Andrew Janke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:10:18 +1100

45 lines

New Thread

Skeleton transparency

Skeleton transparency

Frederick Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:15:23 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Specifying complex values in fsl_sub

Specifying complex values in fsl_sub

Jonathan Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:17:12 -0800

39 lines

Re: Specifying complex values in fsl_sub

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:41:56 -0000

44 lines

New Thread

T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Anastasia A Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:27:49 +0000

28 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:06:20 +0100

101 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:45:39 -0600

430 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:32:02 +0000

194 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Anastasia A Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:26:03 +0000

16 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Anastasia A Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:38:20 +0000

21 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:01:13 -0600

39 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Anastasia A Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:49:01 +0000

304 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Anastasia A Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:10:42 +0000

27 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:13:18 -0600

48 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:02:06 +0000

28 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Anastasia A Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:18:53 +0000

213 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:06:17 -0600

44 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Anastasia A Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:39:22 +0000

28 lines

Re: T1 to b-zero registration for tractography

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:39:43 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

TBSS partial correlaion

TBSS partial correlaion

Matthew Hoptman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:09:08 +0000

80 lines

New Thread

TBSS partial volume effects?

TBSS partial volume effects?

Naama Barnea-Goraly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:21:24 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

TBSS question

TBSS question

Frederick Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:03:26 -0500

25 lines

Re: TBSS question

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:46:06 +0100

86 lines

New Thread

TBSS: FA - BOLD correlation for a single group design

TBSS: FA - BOLD correlation for a single group design

Cibu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:17:34 -0500

256 lines

Re: TBSS: FA - BOLD correlation for a single group design

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:53:32 +0000

234 lines

New Thread

tbss_2_reg failed

tbss_2_reg failed

Priti Srinivasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:51:41 +0000

92 lines

New Thread

tbss_2_reg parallelizing/cloud computing

tbss_2_reg parallelizing/cloud computing

Olivia Liang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:48:47 -0800

29 lines

Re: tbss_2_reg parallelizing/cloud computing

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:53:36 +0100

82 lines

New Thread

tbss_2_reg results

tbss_2_reg results

liang wang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:27:56 -0800

51 lines

New Thread

tbss_3_postreg : failiure creating mask of mean and fa

Re: tbss_3_postreg : failiure creating mask of mean and fa

Thomas F Doke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:14:44 -0000

108 lines

New Thread

TBSS_3_postreg error

TBSS_3_postreg error

Lars Tjelta Westlye <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:00:01 +0100

92 lines

Re: TBSS_3_postreg error

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:47:07 +0000

129 lines

Re: TBSS_3_postreg error

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:18:47 +0000

140 lines

New Thread

template for fnirt

template for fnirt

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:31:36 +0800

74 lines

Re: template for fnirt

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:40:11 -0000

47 lines

Re: template for fnirt

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:11:35 +0800

111 lines

Re: template for fnirt

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:29:16 +0800

136 lines

Re: template for fnirt

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:40:40 -0000

33 lines

Re: template for fnirt

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:43:34 -0000

21 lines

Re: template for fnirt

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:07:47 +0800

110 lines

Re: template for fnirt

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:22:35 -0000

22 lines

Re: template for fnirt

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:39:54 +0800

77 lines

Re: template for fnirt

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:56:30 +0800

129 lines

Re: template for fnirt

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:03:46 +0800

132 lines

Re: template for fnirt

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:41:52 -0000

105 lines

Re: template for fnirt

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:07:43 +0800

188 lines

Re: template for fnirt

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:25:55 -0000

30 lines

New Thread

template for fnirt. --- Brain label atlas

Re: template for fnirt. --- Brain label atlas

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:03:48 +0800

109 lines

New Thread

TFCE optimized in TBSS

TFCE optimized in TBSS

SUBSCRIBE FSL Anonymous <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:28:47 +0000

39 lines

Re: TFCE optimized in TBSS

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:53:40 +0000

71 lines

New Thread

threshold

threshold

cathyliu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 01:06:54 +0800

107 lines

Re: threshold

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:00:50 -0600

312 lines

New Thread

UCLA Advanced Neuroimaging Summer Course, July 20-31, 2009

UCLA Advanced Neuroimaging Summer Course, July 20-31, 2009

Russ Poldrack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:21:15 -0800

76 lines

New Thread

using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT

using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT

Diederick Stoffers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:25:15 -0800

668 lines

Re: using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:09:02 +0000

251 lines

Re: using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT

Diederick Stoffers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:59:11 -0800

357 lines

Re: using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:14:21 +0000

457 lines

Re: using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT

Diederick Stoffers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:53:34 -0800

567 lines

Re: using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:44:09 +0000

652 lines

Re: using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT

Diederick Stoffers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:08:44 -0800

838 lines

Re: using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT

Diederick Stoffers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:25:00 -0800

643 lines

Re: using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:51:24 +0000

354 lines

Re: using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT

Diederick Stoffers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:15:11 -0800

381 lines

Re: using a voxel-dependent EV in FEAT

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:08:49 +0000

463 lines

New Thread

voxel size and probtrack probability distributions

voxel size and probtrack probability distributions

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:22:25 +1100

17 lines

Re: voxel size and probtrack probability distributions

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:15:27 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

WARNING: number of gradient directions is limited

WARNING: number of gradient directions is limited

A.Crippa <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:35:47 +0100

27 lines

Re: WARNING: number of gradient directions is limited

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:22:33 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Waytotal patch

Waytotal patch

Jeremy Young <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:31:11 -0500

18 lines

Re: Waytotal patch

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:34:42 -0600

32 lines

Re: Waytotal patch

Jeremy Young <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:22:41 -0500

45 lines

Re: Waytotal patch

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:11:25 +0100

126 lines

New Thread

waytotal thresholding

waytotal thresholding

John D. Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:17:05 +0000

34 lines

Re: waytotal thresholding

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:47:26 +1100

56 lines

New Thread

where is T1_2_MNI152_2mm located in FSL toolkit

where is T1_2_MNI152_2mm located in FSL toolkit

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:57:04 +0800

48 lines

Re: where is T1_2_MNI152_2mm located in FSL toolkit

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:14:14 +0000

34 lines

Re: where is T1_2_MNI152_2mm located in FSL toolkit

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:22:59 +0800

100 lines

Re: where is T1_2_MNI152_2mm located in FSL toolkit

Heather L. Urry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:24:12 -0500

25 lines

Re: where is T1_2_MNI152_2mm located in FSL toolkit

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:46:57 +0000

57 lines

Re: where is T1_2_MNI152_2mm located in FSL toolkit

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:51:09 +0800

147 lines

Re: where is T1_2_MNI152_2mm located in FSL toolkit

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:29:38 -0600

435 lines

New Thread

white matter lesion segmentation on FLAIR image

Re: white matter lesion segmentation on FLAIR image

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:53:41 +0800

733 lines

Re: white matter lesion segmentation on FLAIR image

Oliver Trebbe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:37:41 +0100

184 lines

Re: white matter lesion segmentation on FLAIR image

WangPing <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:59:30 +0800

249 lines

New Thread

WM detected as GM in fslvbm

WM detected as GM in fslvbm

Kosta Markov <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:10:20 +0000

169 lines

Re: WM detected as GM in fslvbm

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:16:30 +0000

65 lines

Re: WM detected as GM in fslvbm

Kamen Tsvetanov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:58:12 -0800

78 lines

Re: WM detected as GM in fslvbm

Kamen Tsvetanov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:42:12 -0800

75 lines

Re: WM detected as GM in fslvbm

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:56:29 -0800

128 lines

Re: WM detected as GM in fslvbm

Kamen Tsvetanov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:34:30 -0800

77 lines

New Thread

X11 error - any ideas?

X11 error - any ideas?

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:29:42 -0500

53 lines

Re: X11 error - any ideas?

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:35:06 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: [FSL] GLM GUI for TBSS paste problem]

[Fwd: [FSL] GLM GUI for TBSS paste problem]

Thomas F Doke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:51:41 -0000

21 lines

Re: [Fwd: [FSL] GLM GUI for TBSS paste problem]

David Flitney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:14:00 +0000

31 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager