JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DYSLEXIA Archives


DYSLEXIA Archives

DYSLEXIA Archives


January 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

BETT 2009 show at Olympia, London 14 to 17 January. (1 message)
Classifying dyslexia into 'lickel' boxes (3 messages)
disgruntled with learn direct and maths support (2 messages)
Don't know what happened (3 messages)
Early Day Motion request (1 message)
Famous dyslexic (1 message)
FW: Letter from your constituent Dr Katie Bristow (3 messages)
Graham Stringer MP (9 messages)
Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction' (28 messages)
Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'/ clarification needed (1 message)
I think we get so hung up on definitions (15 messages)
Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery (29 messages)
Just in case anyone, two, three well here it is anyway. (2 messages)
Lack of understanding by others (2 messages)
Learning disabilities and counselling (1 message)
NADP Publications (1 message)
NADP SPRING CONFERENCE (1 message)
Problems (4 messages)
Request for info (7 messages)
Request for info part 2 (1 message)
Request for info satisfied (1 message)
Support for Graham Stringer Manchester MP (2 messages)
Thoughts of the week. (1 message)
Visual learners periodic table (4 messages)
When will the BDA have web pages that are APD freindly (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DYSLEXIA Home

DYSLEXIA Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

BETT 2009 show at Olympia, London 14 to 17 January.

BETT 2009 show at Olympia, London 14 to 17 January.

Jean Hutchins 1 <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:13:18 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

Classifying dyslexia into 'lickel' boxes

Classifying dyslexia into 'lickel' boxes

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:10:14 +0000

223 lines

Re: Classifying dyslexia into 'lickel' boxes

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:29:44 +0000

318 lines

Re: Classifying dyslexia into 'lickel' boxes

Kerry J Pace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:21:17 -0000

170 lines

New Thread

disgruntled with learn direct and maths support

disgruntled with learn direct and maths support

JANIS SMITH <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:39:48 +0000

66 lines

Re: disgruntled with learn direct and maths support

Anne Sheddick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:41:44 -0000

477 lines

New Thread

Don't know what happened

Don't know what happened

Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:14:04 -0000

16 lines

Re: Don't know what happened

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:56:00 +0000

56 lines

Re: Don't know what happened

Mike J Horne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:47:41 -0000

46 lines

New Thread

Early Day Motion request

Early Day Motion request

Jean Hutchins 1 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:53:41 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

Famous dyslexic

Famous dyslexic

Christine Howlett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:25:21 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

FW: Letter from your constituent Dr Katie Bristow

FW: Letter from your constituent Dr Katie Bristow

Bristow, Katie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:28:35 +0000

78 lines

Re: FW: Letter from your constituent Dr Katie Bristow

Jane Smart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:44:03 -0000

96 lines

Re: FW: Letter from your constituent Dr Katie Bristow

Bristow, Katie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:37:33 +0000

109 lines

New Thread

Graham Stringer MP

Graham Stringer MP

Jane Smart <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:01:18 -0000

490 lines

Re: Graham Stringer MP

Judith Stansfield <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:20:48 -0000

173 lines

Re: Graham Stringer MP

Jane Smart <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:08:52 -0000

221 lines

Re: Graham Stringer MP

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:09:43 +0000

349 lines

Re: Graham Stringer MP

Shade Akinyemi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:22:30 -0000

542 lines

Re: Graham Stringer MP

Jane Smart <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:01:30 -0000

527 lines

Re: Graham Stringer MP

Jane Smart <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:41 -0000

623 lines

Re: Graham Stringer MP

Christine Howlett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:28:11 +0000

365 lines

Re: Graham Stringer MP

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:17:01 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:37:48 -0000

22 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Trisha Tunstall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:54:25 EST

59 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:53:59 -0000

144 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Subscribe Dyslexia L. Shankar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:11:03 +0000

30 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Jackie Drew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:13:16 +0000

37 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Bristow, Katie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:16:23 +0000

34 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

alan shoreman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:27:07 +0000

102 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Steven O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:56:01 -0500

243 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:06:13 +0000

34 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

alan shoreman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:02:48 +0000

198 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Bristow, Katie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:55:00 +0000

242 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:27:32 +0000

224 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:28:55 +0000

314 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Jane Smart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:15:02 -0000

299 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Bristow, Katie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:41:07 +0000

568 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:42:44 +0000

188 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Bristow, Katie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:02:26 +0000

191 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

alan shoreman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:18:25 +0000

282 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Steven O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:58:05 -0500

543 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:25:11 -0000

211 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:29:39 +0000

242 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Bristow, Katie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:41:55 +0000

243 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:16:13 +0000

67 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:42:15 +0000

13 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:51:29 +0000

25 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Jackie Drew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:07:29 +0000

47 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:24:20 +0000

119 lines

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'

Jane Smart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:24:15 -0000

255 lines

New Thread

Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'/ clarification needed

Re: Here we go again MP brands dyslexia a 'fiction'/ clarification needed

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:18:29 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

I think we get so hung up on definitions

I think we get so hung up on definitions

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:43:39 +0000

171 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:58:05 +0000

83 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Graham Ewing (Montague Diagnostics Ltd.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:15:36 +0000

160 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Ira Socol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:10:11 -0500

248 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:15:02 -0000

469 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Graham Ewing (Montague Diagnostics Ltd.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:26:38 +0000

155 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Ira Socol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:45:56 -0500

463 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:41:01 -0000

232 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:45:45 +0000

142 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:42:34 +0000

262 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:04:38 +0000

37 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:24:55 +0000

28 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:50:31 +0000

145 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:25:05 +0000

36 lines

Re: I think we get so hung up on definitions

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:25:53 +0000

199 lines

New Thread

Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:04:47 +0000

20 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:57:33 +0000

41 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:11:08 +0000

96 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:07:01 +0000

186 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Ira Socol <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:59:42 +0000

147 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:08:12 +0000

242 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Gordon Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:47:15 +0900

334 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graham Ewing (Montague Diagnostics Ltd.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:49:08 +0000

100 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:55:42 +0000

82 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:08:02 +0000

87 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:15:34 +0000

30 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:28:20 +0000

54 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:33:11 +0000

30 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:23:40 +0000

177 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:30:00 +0000

82 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:51:33 +0000

64 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:06:07 -0000

309 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:03:01 +0000

66 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:14:07 +0000

83 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graham Ewing (Montague Diagnostics Ltd.) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:31:12 +0000

92 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:34:55 +0000

205 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:13:26 +0000

26 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:33:40 +0000

27 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Bristow, Katie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:07:24 +0000

370 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Bristow, Katie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:09:30 +0000

538 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:54:29 +0000

130 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:43:19 +0000

143 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Kerry J Pace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:24:19 -0000

118 lines

Re: Introducing the IHR auditory processing test battery

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:28:48 +0000

72 lines

New Thread

Just in case anyone, two, three well here it is anyway.

Just in case anyone, two, three well here it is anyway.

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:29:58 +0000

73 lines

Re: Just in case anyone, two, three well here it is anyway.

Karen Wintle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:20:35 -0000

165 lines

New Thread

Lack of understanding by others

Lack of understanding by others

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:34:23 +0000

129 lines

Re: Lack of understanding by others

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:24:56 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

Learning disabilities and counselling

Learning disabilities and counselling

Piers Samson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:47:43 -0800

75 lines

New Thread

NADP Publications

NADP Publications

NADP <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:19:59 -0000

283 lines

New Thread

NADP SPRING CONFERENCE

NADP SPRING CONFERENCE

NADP <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:24:38 -0000

161 lines

New Thread

Problems

Problems

Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:18:23 -0000

11 lines

Re: Problems

michelle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:04:32 +0000

21 lines

Re: Problems

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:56:38 +0000

51 lines

Re: Problems

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:02:40 +0000

62 lines

New Thread

Request for info

Request for info

Kerry J Pace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:33:24 -0000

203 lines

Re: Request for info

Barbara Pavey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:01:22 +0000

347 lines

Re: Request for info

Jane Smart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:37:12 -0000

271 lines

Re: Request for info

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:18:55 +0000

34 lines

Re: Request for info

Trisha Tunstall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:21:33 EST

83 lines

Re: Request for info

Christine Howlett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:47:00 +0000

309 lines

Re: Request for info

Anne Sheddick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:30:36 -0000

177 lines

New Thread

Request for info part 2

Re: Request for info part 2

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:28:56 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

Request for info satisfied

Re: Request for info satisfied

Kerry J Pace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:36:08 -0000

223 lines

New Thread

Support for Graham Stringer Manchester MP

Support for Graham Stringer Manchester MP

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:09:33 +0000

80 lines

Re: Support for Graham Stringer Manchester MP

Graham Ewing (Montague Diagnostics Ltd.) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:24:36 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

Thoughts of the week.

Thoughts of the week.

Norman Butler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:29:32 +0000

83 lines

New Thread

Visual learners periodic table

Visual learners periodic table

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:35:50 +0000

162 lines

Re: Visual learners periodic table

Kerry J Pace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:54:32 -0000

255 lines

Re: Visual learners periodic table

Sheridan Sharp1 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:20:12 +0000

210 lines

Re: Visual learners periodic table

Kerry J Pace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:25:02 -0000

237 lines

New Thread

When will the BDA have web pages that are APD freindly

When will the BDA have web pages that are APD freindly

Graeme Wadlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:19:13 +0000

25 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager