JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COOT Archives


COOT Archives

COOT Archives


October 2008


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Atoms (7 messages)
C-alpha disappear (2 messages)
Centos5 64-bit install notes (1 message)
Centos5 64-bit install notes (update) (1 message)
CNS coordinate in COOT (2 messages)
Coot molprobity problem in Version 0.5? (6 messages)
edit backbone torsions? (8 messages)
Edit chi angles does not work for monomers (1 message)
Edit chi angles lost indicator? (1 message)
Edit chi angles/refinement does not work for monomers (3 messages)
embarrassing question (1 message)
environmental distances (2 messages)
Fedora 8 binary core dumps - please help (9 messages)
Find waters has moved (2 messages)
Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5 (8 messages)
Keybindings extension bug (1 message)
Labels for NCS ghosts? (1 message)
libbluecurve.so problem (3 messages)
mac 10.4 coot 5 error? (2 messages)
misleading wincoot on google (2 messages)
more feedback... (1 message)
Moving hydrogen atoms (2 messages)
NCS Map averaging problems (1 message)
Nucleotide Builder (4 messages)
OS X 10.4.X G4 ppc libgmp.3.dylib (1 message)
Problem with Coot validation after Phenix twinned refinement (3 messages)
Problem with NCS on coot-0.5-final for intel 10.5 (1 message)
regarding installing coot via fink (3 messages)
scheme-to-python? (2 messages)
section 7 of manual is missing..... (2 messages)
SMILES all trans (2 messages)
SSM problem (3 messages)
strict NCS restraints automatic? (2 messages)
symmetry molecules in H32 (6 messages)
symmetry pick (2 messages)
where did add alt conf go? (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COOT Home

COOT Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Atoms

Atoms

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Oct 2008 16:45:08 +0100

14 lines

Re: Atoms

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Oct 2008 18:11:00 +0200

128 lines

Re: Atoms

Lynn F. Ten Eyck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:26:10 -0700

48 lines

Re: Atoms

Charlie Bond <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:27:25 +0800

64 lines

Re: Atoms

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Oct 2008 19:14:53 -0700

65 lines

Re: Atoms

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:33:14 +0200

63 lines

Re: Atoms

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:42:15 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

C-alpha disappear

C-alpha disappear

Jinghua Tang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Oct 2008 00:20:06 +0100

120 lines

Re: C-alpha disappear

Feng Yu <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:00:34 +0100

125 lines

New Thread

Centos5 64-bit install notes

Centos5 64-bit install notes

James M. Vergis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:21 -0400

95 lines

New Thread

Centos5 64-bit install notes (update)

Centos5 64-bit install notes (update)

James M. Vergis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:45:34 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

CNS coordinate in COOT

CNS coordinate in COOT

Masaki UNNO <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:59:22 +0900

196 lines

Re: CNS coordinate in COOT

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Oct 2008 19:26:43 -0700

61 lines

New Thread

Coot molprobity problem in Version 0.5?

Coot molprobity problem in Version 0.5?

James M. Vergis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:32:38 -0400

109 lines

Re: Coot molprobity problem in Version 0.5?

Mark Brooks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:47:00 +0200

277 lines

Re: Coot molprobity problem in Version 0.5?

Mark Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:07:47 -0400

23 lines

Re: Coot molprobity problem in Version 0.5?

James M. Vergis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:55:57 -0400

52 lines

Re: Coot molprobity problem in Version 0.5?

Bernhard Lohkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:08:23 +0200

142 lines

Re: Coot molprobity problem in Version 0.5?

James M. Vergis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:18:28 -0400

194 lines

New Thread

edit backbone torsions?

edit backbone torsions?

Michele Lunelli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:36:30 +0200

18 lines

Re: edit backbone torsions?

Kevin Cowtan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:46:40 +0100

26 lines

Re: edit backbone torsions?

Michele Lunelli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:11:31 +0200

20 lines

Re: edit backbone torsions?

Bernhard Lohkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:38:36 +0100

38 lines

Re: edit backbone torsions?

Bernhard Lohkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:16:54 +0100

51 lines

Re: edit backbone torsions?

Donnie Berkholz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:10:43 -0700

49 lines

Re: edit backbone torsions?

Mark Brooks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:25:41 +0200

109 lines

Re: edit backbone torsions?

Kevin Cowtan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:20:50 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Edit chi angles does not work for monomers

Edit chi angles does not work for monomers

Les Tari <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:10:32 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Edit chi angles lost indicator?

Re: Edit chi angles lost indicator?

Nobuo OKAZAKI <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:33:55 +0900

25 lines

New Thread

Edit chi angles/refinement does not work for monomers

Re: Edit chi angles/refinement does not work for monomers

Les Tari <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Oct 2008 03:34:06 +0100

23 lines

Re: Edit chi angles/refinement does not work for monomers

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:15:52 +0100

35 lines

Re: Edit chi angles/refinement does not work for monomers

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:18:44 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

embarrassing question

embarrassing question

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2008 09:42:32 -0700

16 lines

New Thread

environmental distances

environmental distances

S. Shanmuga Sundara Raj <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:06:27 -0700

29 lines

Re: environmental distances

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:36:09 +0100

82 lines

New Thread

Fedora 8 binary core dumps - please help

Fedora 8 binary core dumps - please help

Scott Classen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:08:50 +0100

210 lines

Re: Fedora 8 binary core dumps - please help

Scott Classen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:38:01 -0700

203 lines

Re: Fedora 8 binary core dumps - please help

Iain Kerr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:46:54 -0700

220 lines

Re: Fedora 8 binary core dumps - please help

Scott Classen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:55:17 -0700

250 lines

Re: Fedora 8 binary core dumps - please help

Tim Fenn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:37:47 -0700

56 lines

Re: Fedora 8 binary core dumps - please help

Scott Classen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:38:31 -0700

160 lines

Re: Fedora 8 binary core dumps - please help

Nathaniel Echols <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:42:24 -0700

340 lines

Re: Fedora 8 binary core dumps - please help

Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:02:13 -0400

404 lines

Re: Fedora 8 binary core dumps - please help

Scott Classen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:45:21 -0700

217 lines

New Thread

Find waters has moved

Find waters has moved

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:48:42 +0000

17 lines

Re: Find waters has moved

Bernhard Lohkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:56:27 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

Jonathan Winger <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Oct 2008 19:14:45 -0700

18 lines

Re: Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

Jonathan Winger <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Oct 2008 20:02:07 -0700

26 lines

Re: Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

Mark Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:36:48 -0400

33 lines

Re: Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:15:22 +0100

52 lines

Re: Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:35:55 +0100

37 lines

Re: Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

Mark Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:13:52 -0400

550 lines

Re: Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

Mark Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:27:06 -0400

488 lines

Re: Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

Mark Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:30:55 -0400

230 lines

New Thread

Keybindings extension bug

Keybindings extension bug

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:20:54 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

Labels for NCS ghosts?

Labels for NCS ghosts?

Francis E Reyes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:33:48 -0600

25 lines

New Thread

libbluecurve.so problem

libbluecurve.so problem

Robert Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:13:45 -0400

176 lines

Re: libbluecurve.so problem

Kay Diederichs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:29:57 +0200

221 lines

Re: libbluecurve.so problem

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:33:45 +0100

89 lines

New Thread

mac 10.4 coot 5 error?

mac 10.4 coot 5 error?

Mark Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:09:11 -0400

116 lines

Re: mac 10.4 coot 5 error?

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:52:36 -0700

60 lines

New Thread

misleading wincoot on google

misleading wincoot on google

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:27:36 +0100

18 lines

Re: misleading wincoot on google

Bernhard Lohkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:36:17 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

more feedback...

more feedback...

Giles Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:20:58 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Moving hydrogen atoms

Moving hydrogen atoms

Maria Håkansson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:10:06 +0100

144 lines

Re: Moving hydrogen atoms

Mark Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:55:52 -0500

86 lines

New Thread

NCS Map averaging problems

NCS Map averaging problems

Francis E Reyes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:45:51 -0600

53 lines

New Thread

Nucleotide Builder

Nucleotide Builder

Daniel Holloway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:48:36 +0100

16 lines

Re: Nucleotide Builder

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:13:57 -0700

22 lines

Re: Nucleotide Builder

Daniel Holloway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:36:03 +0100

30 lines

Re: Nucleotide Builder

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:37:08 -0700

42 lines

New Thread

OS X 10.4.X G4 ppc libgmp.3.dylib

OS X 10.4.X G4 ppc libgmp.3.dylib

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Oct 2008 10:35:44 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

Problem with Coot validation after Phenix twinned refinement

Problem with Coot validation after Phenix twinned refinement

Lieven Buts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:01:38 +0200

33 lines

Re: Problem with Coot validation after Phenix twinned refinement

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:41:31 +0100

41 lines

Re: Problem with Coot validation after Phenix twinned refinement

Peter Zwart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:33:23 +0200

71 lines

New Thread

Problem with NCS on coot-0.5-final for intel 10.5

Problem with NCS on coot-0.5-final for intel 10.5

Sheena McGowan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:27:11 +1100

134 lines

New Thread

regarding installing coot via fink

Re: regarding installing coot via fink

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:43:41 -0700

94 lines

Re: regarding installing coot via fink

William Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:37:19 -0700

119 lines

Re: regarding installing coot via fink

William G. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:18:15 -0700

188 lines

New Thread

scheme-to-python?

scheme-to-python?

Frank von Delft <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:30:02 +0100

28 lines

Re: scheme-to-python?

Bernhard Lohkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:28:52 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

section 7 of manual is missing.....

section 7 of manual is missing.....

Miller, Mitchell D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:10:26 -0700

31 lines

Re: section 7 of manual is missing.....

Miller, Mitchell D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:12:50 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

SMILES all trans

SMILES all trans

Giles Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:49:30 +0100

24 lines

Re: SMILES all trans

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:44:41 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

SSM problem

SSM problem

Engin Ozkan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:08:43 +0100

29 lines

Re: SSM problem

junfeng liu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:54:38 +0100

34 lines

Re: SSM problem

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:02:31 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

strict NCS restraints automatic?

strict NCS restraints automatic?

Daniel Schlieper <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:55:53 +0200

25 lines

Re: strict NCS restraints automatic?

Kevin Cowtan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:33:39 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

symmetry molecules in H32

symmetry molecules in H32

James Whittle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:22:19 -0400

20 lines

Re: symmetry molecules in H32

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:18:43 +0000

27 lines

Re: symmetry molecules in H32

Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:22:36 +0000

33 lines

Re: symmetry molecules in H32

Kevin Cowtan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:10:29 +0000

48 lines

Re: symmetry molecules in H32

Paul Emsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:46:43 +0000

47 lines

Re: symmetry molecules in H32

James Whittle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:28:56 -0400

64 lines

New Thread

symmetry pick

symmetry pick

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:52:17 +0100

28 lines

Re: symmetry pick

Phil Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:57:23 +0100

60 lines

New Thread

where did add alt conf go?

Re: where did add alt conf go?

Jianghai Zhu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:47:38 -0400

93 lines

Re: where did add alt conf go?

Bernhard Lohkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Oct 2008 21:27:16 +0200

148 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager