JISCMail - ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC Archives

June 2008

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: Crowley's relationship with disciples	Caroline Tully	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:01:16 -0700	51 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caroline Tully	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:26:48 -0700	23 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caroline Tully	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:21:51 -0700	56 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caroline Tully	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:19:09 -0700	18 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caroline Tully	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:17:21 -0700	74 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caroline Tully	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:09:52 -0700	42 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caroline Tully	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:01:09 -0700	20 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caroline Tully	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:58:49 -0700	24 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caroline Tully	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:55:16 -0700	27 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caroline Tully	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:52:11 -0700	44 lines
Re: Archives (Was OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright)	Grant Potts	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:58:21 -0500	64 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	mandrake	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:29:40 +0100	67 lines
Re: Crowley's relationship with disciples	Hagay Hacohen	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:18:40 -0700	151 lines
Archives (Was OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright)	Grant Potts	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:43:57 -0500	87 lines
Re: IQ and religious belief :)	Jez	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:44:01 +0100	70 lines
Re: Crowley's relationship with disciples	Caduceus Books	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:36:47 +0100	51 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caduceus Books	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:17:39 +0100	64 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caduceus Books	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:15:10 +0100	53 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	bob dogstar	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:53:45 +0000	166 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	D E	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:25:01 +0100	124 lines
Re: OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright	D E	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:19:53 +0100	56 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	D E	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:16:23 +0100	102 lines
Re: OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright	Christopher Kimberley	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:09:17 +0100	29 lines
Re: OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright	D E	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:01:22 +0100	44 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	clive harper	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:59:52 +0100	37 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	mandrake	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:50:41 +0100	53 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	D E	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:49:33 +0100	124 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	janet ifimust	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:46:35 +0100	42 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	D E	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:43:18 +0100	202 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caroline Tully	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:30:50 -0700	38 lines
Re: "Legal" Golden Dawn	Caroline Tully	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:21:49 -0700	26 lines
Re: "Legal" Golden Dawn	Caroline Tully	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:15:47 -0700	37 lines
Re: "Legal" Golden Dawn 2	Caroline Tully	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:08:04 -0700	29 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caroline Tully	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:56:06 -0700	80 lines
Re: "Legal" Golden Dawn	Caroline Tully	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:52:20 -0700	90 lines
Re: OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright	Grant Potts	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:21:01 -0500	74 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Keith Boyle	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:01:25 -0500	48 lines
"Legal" Golden Dawn	Caroline Tully	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:59:44 -0700	70 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	mandrake	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:13:58 +0100	65 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	mandrake	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:57:23 +0100	70 lines
Numbers of Thelemites?	Caroline Tully	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:50:45 -0700	73 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Caduceus Books	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:55:24 +0100	79 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Keith Boyle	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:20:22 -0500	63 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	mandrake	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:40:06 +0100	75 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Melissa Harrington	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:26:56 +0100	98 lines
Re: "Legal" Golden Dawn	mandrake	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:12:40 +0100	109 lines
Re: Numbers of Thelemites?	Keith Boyle	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:37:43 -0500	64 lines
Re: "Legal" Golden Dawn	mandrake	Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:03:29 +0100	53 lines
Re: OTO legal case	Caduceus Books	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:42:11 +0100	46 lines
Re: OTO legal case	D E	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:22:22 +0100	100 lines
Re: OTO legal case	mandrake	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:58:07 +0100	62 lines
Re: Nevill Drury	Helen Farley	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:48:08 +1000	1209 lines
Re: Nevill Drury	Peter Edwards	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:04:09 +0100	291 lines
Re: Nevill Drury	Helen Farley	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:03:22 +1000	304 lines
Re: OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright	grant b, sun reporter	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:16:05 -0700	81 lines
Re: OTO legal case	Grant Potts	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:46:13 -0500	17 lines
Re: OTO legal case	Grant Potts	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:35:15 -0500	37 lines
Re: OTO legal case	Arild	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:07:32 +0200	27 lines
Re: OTO legal case	Amy Hale	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:57:45 -0400	56 lines
Re: OTO legal case	Grant Potts	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:17:14 -0500	48 lines
Re: OTO legal case	Daniel Harms	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:01:32 -0400	62 lines
OTO legal case	D E	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:46:30 +0100	38 lines
Re: Archaeology of belief	D E	Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:43:19 +0100	20 lines
Weiser Antiquarian catalogue	Caroline Tully	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:26:16 -0700	380 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Jezreell	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:48:22 +0100	57 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Christopher Kimberley	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:46:33 +0100	34 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Jezreell	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:39:04 +0100	30 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Christopher Kimberley	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:22:51 +0100	125 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	janet ifimust	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:11:47 +0100	192 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Christopher Kimberley	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:06:45 +0100	71 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	janet ifimust	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:45:06 +0100	70 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Christopher Kimberley	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:40:19 +0100	97 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	janet ifimust	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:24:59 +0100	136 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Christopher Kimberley	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:23:24 +0100	58 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	janet ifimust	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:18:24 +0100	71 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Jezreell	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:52:00 +0100	87 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Shya/Sue	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:50:44 -0600	173 lines
Re: Archaeology of belief	Caroline Tully	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:32:44 -0700	172 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Caroline Tully	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:29:23 -0700	64 lines
Nevill Drury	Caroline Tully	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:23:06 -0700	89 lines
Re: Archaeology of belief	Christopher Kimberley	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:49:48 +0100	53 lines
Re: Archaeology of belief	Caduceus Books	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:27:56 +0100	52 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Christopher Kimberley	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:39:58 +0100	45 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Francis Cameron	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:07:30 +0100	50 lines
Re: Archaeology of belief	David and Jasmine	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:59:46 +1000	109 lines
Re: Archaeology of belief	mandrake	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:21:49 +0100	50 lines
What is "Witchcraft"?	Caroline Tully	Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:57:57 -0700	171 lines
Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	David and Jasmine	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:26:53 +1000	54 lines
Re: Archaeology of belief	David and Jasmine	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:14:15 +1000	98 lines
Wizards and Witches hunted down and burned	James John Bell	Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:41:19 -0700	62 lines
Re: What is "Witchcraft"?	Christopher Kimberley	Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:04:56 +0100	83 lines
Re: Archaeology of belief	Caelum Rainieri	Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:09:33 -0700	87 lines
more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft	Francis Cameron	Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:28:41 +0100	54 lines
Re: Archaeology of belief	mandrake	Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:09:28 +0100	60 lines
Re: Intuition	Caroline Tully	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:50:45 -0700	45 lines
Re: what is witchcraft?	Hagay Hacohen	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:36:19 -0700	190 lines
Re: Archaeology of belief	Christopher Kimberley	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:31:27 +0100	62 lines
what is witchcraft?	Francis Cameron	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:31:22 +0100	64 lines
Re: Second Life and conferences	Helen Farley	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:28:18 +1000	58 lines
Re: Second Life	mandrake	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:14:06 +0100	41 lines
Re: Intuition	Caroline Tully	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:02:42 -0700	16 lines
Re: Intuition	Caroline Tully	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:01:46 -0700	18 lines
Re: Intuition	Caroline Tully	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:00:24 -0700	48 lines
Re: Intuition	Caroline Tully	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:55:10 -0700	68 lines
Re: Intuition	Caroline Tully	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:46:31 -0700	36 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Caroline Tully	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:59:49 -0700	49 lines
Re: Preaching to the converted?	Caroline Tully	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:43:04 -0700	24 lines
Re: Intuition	Morgan Leigh	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:15:00 +1000	90 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Caroline Tully	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:10:29 -0700	42 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Caroline Tully	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:50:08 -0700	16 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Caroline Tully	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:49:02 -0700	43 lines
Re: Were churches built upon pagan sites?	bob dogstar	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:46:49 +0000	63 lines
Re: Wicca and Tantra	Chas S. Clifton	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:18:34 -0600	34 lines
Re: Intuition	Helen Farley	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:22:27 +1000	96 lines
Re: Wicca and Tantra	kaligrafr	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:22:25 -0700	58 lines
Re: Intuition	mandrake	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:11:29 +0100	53 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	mandrake	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:08:54 +0100	65 lines
Re: Intuition	Christopher Kimberley	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:57:00 +0100	37 lines
Re: Intuition	David and Jasmine	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:52:45 +1000	52 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	David and Jasmine	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:41:41 +1000	51 lines
Re: Wicca and Tantra	Christopher Kimberley	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:33:05 +0100	32 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	mandrake	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:16:35 +0100	73 lines
Re: Wicca and Tantra	David and Jasmine	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:06:41 +1000	111 lines
Re: Wicca and Tantra	mandrake	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:58:49 +0100	88 lines
Re: Wicca and Tantra	David and Jasmine	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:25:55 +1000	61 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	mandrake	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:25:00 +0100	66 lines
Wicca and Tantra	mandrake	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:08:13 +0100	39 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Christopher Kimberley	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:04:25 +0100	44 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	David and Jasmine	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:29:39 +1000	61 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	mandrake	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:29:16 +0100	65 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	David and Jasmine	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:40:44 +1000	79 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	heliade	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:14:06 +1000	66 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Caroline Tully	Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:27:54 -0700	314 lines
Re: "Academic Magic"	Caroline Tully	Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:23:40 -0700	70 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Caelum Rainieri	Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:27:11 -0700	75 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Francis Cameron	Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:08:16 +0100	37 lines
Re: "Academic Magic"	Francis Cameron	Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:54:20 +0100	102 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	kaligrafr	Sun, 15 Jun 2008 06:45:57 -0700	59 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	janet ifimust	Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:50:22 +0100	47 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Christopher Kimberley	Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:02:16 +0100	50 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	David and Jasmine	Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:31:19 +1000	58 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Christopher Kimberley	Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:09:28 +0100	54 lines
"Academic Magic"	Caroline Tully	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:56:17 -0700	94 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Caroline Tully	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:27:41 -0700	191 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	jason winslade	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:57:31 -0700	153 lines
Re: "Academic Magic"	mandrake	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:15:27 +0100	81 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Caroline Tully	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:01:46 -0700	102 lines
Re: "Academic Magic"	Francis Cameron	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:57:27 +0100	116 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	kaligrafr	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:39:10 -0700	64 lines
Re: discussion of magic: what is academic?	Caelum Rainieri	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:24:32 -0700	253 lines
Re: Pessoa-Crowley correspondence on auction?	mandrake	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:50:40 +0100	43 lines
Re: discussion of magic: what is academic?	David Green	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:13:24 +0100	496 lines
Pessoa-Crowley correspondence on auction?	Roberto Labanti	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:58:56 +0200	20 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	D E	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:48:48 +0100	130 lines
Re: discussion of magic: what is academic?	Hagay Hacohen	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:27:24 -0700	469 lines
Re: discussion of magic: what is academic?	Christopher I. Lehrich	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:06:58 -0400	195 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	jason winslade	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:29:47 -0700	246 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	David and Jasmine	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:16:04 +1000	49 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Sabina Magliocco	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:45:12 -0700	117 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	David and Jasmine	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:36:30 +1000	73 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	David and Jasmine	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:23:20 +1000	187 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Ty Falk	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:32:31 -0400	325 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Sabina Magliocco	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:23:57 -0700	164 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	mandrake	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:45:58 +0100	83 lines
Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	Ty Falk	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:20:56 -0400	131 lines
thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream	David and Jasmine	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:13:11 +1000	97 lines
Re: [magic practice/religion	Morgan Leigh	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:02:43 +1000	112 lines
Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic	Grant Potts	Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:10:45 -0500	46 lines
Re: [magic practice/religion	Khem Caigan	Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:45:57 -0400	103 lines
Re: [magic practice/religion	Morgan Leigh	Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:46:07 +1000	145 lines
Re: Mass	Caroline Tully	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:52:22 -0700	44 lines
Re: Mass	heliade	Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:21:22 +1000	18 lines
Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic	Sabina Magliocco	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:49:45 -0700	139 lines
Re: [magic practice/religion	Caelum Rainieri	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:07:34 -0700	106 lines
Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic	Ty Falk	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:02:54 -0400	126 lines
Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic	Sabina Magliocco	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:58:20 -0700	117 lines
Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic	Ty Falk	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:53:26 -0400	104 lines
Re: List	Amy Hale	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:21:23 -0400	74 lines
Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic	Sabina Magliocco	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:19:55 -0700	64 lines
Re: [magic practice/religion	Sabina Magliocco	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:00:03 -0700	80 lines
Religion or Gnostic Culture	Mark Shekoyan	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:56:48 -0700	176 lines
Re: List	D E	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:55:10 +0100	183 lines
Re: List	David Green	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:43:57 +0100	70 lines
Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic	Ty Falk	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:59:46 -0400	48 lines
Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic	Ty Falk	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:52:52 -0400	47 lines
Re: [magic practice/religion	mandrake	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:34:34 +0100	68 lines
Re: [discussion of magic: what is academic?	Grant Potts	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:17:05 -0500	75 lines
OTO/EGC Mass, how participants might look at these questions	Grant Potts	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:15:13 -0500	81 lines
Re: [discussion of magic: what is academic?	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:21:00 -0700	37 lines
Re: [magic practice/religion	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:01:32 -0700	34 lines
Re: magic	Ty Falk	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:10:32 -0400	95 lines
Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic	mandrake	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:27:51 +0100	62 lines
Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic	Shya Young	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:55:27 -0700	29 lines
Re: discussion of magic	D E	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:47:40 +0100	66 lines
discussion of magic	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:35:06 -0700	18 lines
magic	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:29:54 -0700	22 lines
Re: magic	Leigh Blackmore	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:18:13 +1000	170 lines
Re: LIST TITLE GIVES A CLUE, was magic	D E	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:17:29 +0100	153 lines
Re: magic	Mary Christine Erikson	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:02:00 EDT	100 lines
magic	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:48:54 -0700	31 lines
questions	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:47:59 -0700	25 lines
Re: discussion methods	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:46:48 -0700	30 lines
Re: Mass	David Green	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:28:37 +0100	27 lines
Re: Mass	heliade	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:51:46 +1000	34 lines
Re: Loaded?	heliade	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:49:42 +1000	56 lines
Re: Gnostic Mass (was "OTO" Mass)	Caroline Tully	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:44:01 -0700	63 lines
Re: oto mass	Caroline Tully	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:09:44 -0700	58 lines
loaded	Josephine Cavopol	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:35:54 -0700	18 lines
Re: Gnostic Mass (was "OTO" Mass)	mandrake	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:44:26 +0100	52 lines
Re: endocrine notes	mandrake	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:43:51 +0100	44 lines
Re: endocrine notes	Josephine Cavopol	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:34:02 -0700	27 lines
Re: Gnostic Mass (was "OTO" Mass)	Josephine Cavopol	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:29:37 -0700	26 lines
Re: endocrine notes	gerry	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:23:40 +0100	69 lines
Re: Gnostic Mass (was "OTO" Mass)	mandrake	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:34:13 +0100	86 lines
Gnostic Mass (was "OTO" Mass)	mandrake	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:26:26 +0100	54 lines
Fw: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] oto mass	Josephine Cavopol	Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:21:07 -0700	30 lines
Re: religious succeptibility	Caroline Tully	Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:45:07 -0700	242 lines
Re: oto mass	Caroline Tully	Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:44:05 -0700	123 lines
Test	Kenneth Rees	Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:09:53 +0000	28 lines
Re: oto mass	Josephine Cavopol	Sat, 7 Jun 2008 05:13:48 -0700	24 lines
Re: Religious succeptibility	Caroline Tully	Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:38:42 -0700	79 lines
Re: Lionel Ziprin [ was : Re: Religious succeptibility? ]	Hagay Hacohen	Fri, 6 Jun 2008 02:08:15 -0700	166 lines
Re: Religious succeptibility	Hagay Hacohen	Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:49:10 -0700	77 lines
Religious succeptibility?	Caroline Tully	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:54:11 -0700	198 lines
Lionel Ziprin [ was : Re: Religious succeptibility? ]	Khem Caigan	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:05:47 -0400	70 lines
Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.	Ty Falk	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:47:01 -0400	357 lines
Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.	James John Bell	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:37:26 -0700	448 lines
Re: Religious succeptibility?	Hagay Hacohen	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:38:50 -0700	124 lines
war time seers	Josephine Cavopol	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:00:54 -0700	24 lines
Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.	Khem Caigan	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:00:45 -0400	78 lines
Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.	Caduceus Books	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:54:17 +0100	59 lines
Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.	bob dogstar	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:46:35 +0000	296 lines
Re: magical trips	kaligrafr	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:54:20 -0700	39 lines
Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.	Ty Falk	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:35:08 -0400	582 lines
Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.	Daniel Harms	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:14:54 -0400	763 lines
Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.	Ty Falk	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:30:32 -0400	254 lines
Re: being good	David Green	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:17:55 +0100	133 lines
Re: magical trips	gerry	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:39:45 +0100	73 lines
Re: being good	Christopher Kimberley	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 07:38:05 +0100	48 lines
Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.	Peter Edge	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 07:32:55 +0100	74 lines
Re: being good	Caroline Tully	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:40:59 -0700	82 lines
SCIENCE, psychedelics and PSI	Khem Caigan	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:57:01 -0400	37 lines
Re: SCIENCE, psychedelics and the endocrine system.	grant b, sun reporter	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:26:20 -0700	98 lines
Re: SCIENCE, psychedelics and the endocrine system.	Khem Caigan	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:52:49 -0400	69 lines
Re: being good	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:00:40 -0700	21 lines
Re: being good	David Green	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:44:50 +0100	149 lines
Re: being good, NOT god	Harry Roth	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:13:26 -0400	29 lines
Re: being good, NOT god	LAITY, KATHRYN	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:51:23 -0400	502 lines
Re: jesus dude	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:49:38 -0700	16 lines
Re: being good, NOT god	James John Bell	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:45:08 -0700	148 lines
Re: SCIENCE, psychedelics and the endocrine system.	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:36:19 -0700	19 lines
Re: being good means more beer	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:34:42 -0700	22 lines
Re: SCIENCE, psychedelics and the endocrine system.	grant b, sun reporter	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:33:49 -0700	119 lines
Re: being good	Sabina Magliocco	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:33:15 -0700	166 lines
Re: being good... or bad	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:28:12 -0700	34 lines
Re: being good, NOT god	LAITY, KATHRYN	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:28:00 -0400	354 lines
Re: being good	James John Bell	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:22:17 -0700	55 lines
Re: poking with a stick	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:07:17 -0700	40 lines
Re: being good	Sabina Magliocco	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:59:54 -0700	472 lines
Re: cool	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:43:12 -0700	39 lines
Re: self	Ty Falk	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:35:01 -0400	216 lines
Re: being good	Ty Falk	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:29:20 -0400	88 lines
Re: self	Harry Roth	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:47:49 -0400	18 lines
Re: poking with a stick	Harry Roth	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:46:55 -0400	44 lines
Re: poking with a stick	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:15:02 -0700	88 lines
Re: self	Terri Frew	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:45:10 -0400	163 lines
Re: self	Shya/Sue	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 05:48:38 -0600	107 lines
Re: masturbation	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:15:48 -0700	24 lines
Re: being good	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:07:33 -0700	36 lines
Re: self	Josephine Cavopol	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 03:49:49 -0700	21 lines
Re: Dire Movie - Chemical Wedding	Christopher Kimberley	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 07:59:38 +0100	75 lines
Re: self	Caroline Tully	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:28:36 -0700	69 lines
[Fwd: [Religion EASA] An Interdisciplinary Conference on Fetishism (fwd)]	Christopher Kimberley	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 07:27:35 +0100	241 lines
Re: self	Ty Falk	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:53:12 -0400	205 lines
Re: self	heliade	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:50:33 +1000	69 lines
Re: self	heliade	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:45:30 +1000	41 lines
Re: self	Josephine Cavopol	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:24:44 -0700	29 lines
self and karma	Josephine Cavopol	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:18:16 -0700	30 lines
Re: R self	bob dogstar	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:43:11 +0000	255 lines
Re: Dire Movie - Chemical Wedding	mandrake	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:05:53 +0100	53 lines
Re: Dire Movie - Chemical Wedding	D E	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:50:48 +0100	37 lines
Re: self	mandrake	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:53:53 +0100	43 lines
R self	Josephine Cavopol	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 06:20:42 -0700	22 lines
Re: seeing	Josephine Cavopol	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 04:32:48 -0700	28 lines
Re: offence	Josephine Cavopol	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 04:28:44 -0700	20 lines
Re: Dire Movie - Chemical Wedding	mandrake	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:27:47 +0100	20 lines
Re: Dire Movie	Christopher Kimberley	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 07:08:42 +0100	83 lines
Re: SCIENCE	Khem Caigan	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:40:02 -0400	194 lines
Re: SCIENCE	Khem Caigan	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:35:28 -0400	70 lines
Re: SCIENCE	D E	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 23:59:19 +0100	67 lines
Re: SCIENCE	James John Bell	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:59:45 -0700	235 lines
Re: SCIENCE	Christopher Kimberley	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 19:33:49 +0100	188 lines
Re: SCIENCE	Ty Falk	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:44:40 -0400	156 lines
Re: SCIENCE	mandrake	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:16:13 +0100	118 lines
Re: SCIENCE	Ty Falk	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:50:50 -0400	93 lines
Re: SCIENCE	Harry Roth	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:48:04 -0400	20 lines
Re: SCIENCE	mandrake	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:33:52 +0100	61 lines
Re: SCIENCE	Kenneth Rees	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:34:24 +0000	210 lines
Re: SCIENCE	Ty Falk	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:04:44 -0400	89 lines
Re: SCIENCE	Daniel Harms	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:02:39 -0400	74 lines
Re: seeing	Caroline Tully	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 20:23:02 -0700	30 lines
Re: SCIENCE	Caroline Tully	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:26 -0700	33 lines
Re: SCIENCE	Caroline Tully	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:31:47 -0700	79 lines
Re: Seeing: Was Manson an auto-parasite?	Caroline Tully	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:25:46 -0700	69 lines
Re: seeing	Caroline Tully	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:18:34 -0700	15 lines
Re: seeing	Caroline Tully	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:15:19 -0700	51 lines
[Fwd: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] 'seeing' eye to eye]	Christopher Kimberley	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:42:20 +0100	156 lines
'seeing' eye to eye	bob dogstar	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:36:34 +0000	163 lines
Re: seeing	mandrake	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:37:43 +0100	84 lines
Re: clarify!!	Josephine Cavopol	Sat, 31 May 2008 22:14:20 -0700	20 lines
Re: sweet pea	Josephine Cavopol	Sat, 31 May 2008 22:06:44 -0700	26 lines
Re: SCIENCE	Josephine Cavopol	Sat, 31 May 2008 22:02:41 -0700	32 lines
Re: seeing	Mary Christine Erikson	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:47:46 EDT	89 lines
Re: seeing	Mary Christine Erikson	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:45:00 EDT	157 lines

ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC Archives

June 2008

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives