JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC Archives


ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC Archives

ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC Archives


June 2008


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Academic Magic" (5 messages)
"Legal" Golden Dawn (6 messages)
"Legal" Golden Dawn 2 (1 message)
'seeing' eye to eye (1 message)
Archaeology of belief (10 messages)
Archives (Was OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright) (2 messages)
being good (10 messages)
being good means more beer (1 message)
being good, NOT god (4 messages)
being good... or bad (1 message)
clarify!! (1 message)
cool (1 message)
Crowley's relationship with disciples (3 messages)
Dire Movie (1 message)
Dire Movie - Chemical Wedding (4 messages)
discussion methods (1 message)
discussion of magic (2 messages)
discussion of magic: what is academic? (4 messages)
endocrine notes (3 messages)
Fw: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] oto mass (1 message)
Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic (10 messages)
Gnostic Mass (was "OTO" Mass) (5 messages)
Intuition (11 messages)
IQ and religious belief :) (1 message)
jesus dude (1 message)
Lionel Ziprin [ was : Re: Religious succeptibility? ] (2 messages)
List (3 messages)
LIST TITLE GIVES A CLUE, was magic (1 message)
loaded (1 message)
Loaded? (1 message)
magic (5 messages)
Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers. (9 messages)
magical trips (2 messages)
Mass (4 messages)
masturbation (1 message)
more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft (18 messages)
Nevill Drury (4 messages)
Numbers of Thelemites? (31 messages)
offence (1 message)
OTO legal case (10 messages)
OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright (5 messages)
oto mass (3 messages)
OTO/EGC Mass, how participants might look at these questions (1 message)
Pessoa-Crowley correspondence on auction? (2 messages)
poking with a stick (3 messages)
Preaching to the converted? (1 message)
questions (1 message)
R self (2 messages)
Religion or Gnostic Culture (1 message)
Religious succeptibility (3 messages)
Religious succeptibility? (2 messages)
SCIENCE (16 messages)
SCIENCE, psychedelics and PSI (1 message)
SCIENCE, psychedelics and the endocrine system. (4 messages)
Second Life (1 message)
Second Life and conferences (1 message)
seeing (7 messages)
Seeing: Was Manson an auto-parasite? (1 message)
self (11 messages)
self and karma (1 message)
sweet pea (1 message)
Test (1 message)
thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream (36 messages)
war time seers (1 message)
Weiser Antiquarian catalogue (1 message)
Were churches built upon pagan sites? (1 message)
What is "Witchcraft"? (2 messages)
what is witchcraft? (2 messages)
Wicca and Tantra (7 messages)
Wizards and Witches hunted down and burned (1 message)
[discussion of magic: what is academic? (2 messages)
[Fwd: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] 'seeing' eye to eye] (1 message)
[Fwd: [Religion EASA] An Interdisciplinary Conference on Fetishism (fwd)] (1 message)
[magic practice/religion (7 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC Home

ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Academic Magic"

"Academic Magic"

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:56:17 -0700

94 lines

Re: "Academic Magic"

Francis Cameron <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:57:27 +0100

116 lines

Re: "Academic Magic"

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:15:27 +0100

81 lines

Re: "Academic Magic"

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:23:40 -0700

70 lines

Re: "Academic Magic"

Francis Cameron <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:54:20 +0100

102 lines

New Thread

"Legal" Golden Dawn

"Legal" Golden Dawn

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:59:44 -0700

70 lines

Re: "Legal" Golden Dawn

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:03:29 +0100

53 lines

Re: "Legal" Golden Dawn

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:52:20 -0700

90 lines

Re: "Legal" Golden Dawn

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:12:40 +0100

109 lines

Re: "Legal" Golden Dawn

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:15:47 -0700

37 lines

Re: "Legal" Golden Dawn

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:21:49 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

"Legal" Golden Dawn 2

Re: "Legal" Golden Dawn 2

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:08:04 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

'seeing' eye to eye

'seeing' eye to eye

bob dogstar <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:36:34 +0000

163 lines

New Thread

Archaeology of belief

Re: Archaeology of belief

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:31:27 +0100

62 lines

Re: Archaeology of belief

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:09:28 +0100

60 lines

Re: Archaeology of belief

Caelum Rainieri <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:09:33 -0700

87 lines

Re: Archaeology of belief

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:32:44 -0700

172 lines

Re: Archaeology of belief

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:14:15 +1000

98 lines

Re: Archaeology of belief

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:21:49 +0100

50 lines

Re: Archaeology of belief

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:59:46 +1000

109 lines

Re: Archaeology of belief

Caduceus Books <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:27:56 +0100

52 lines

Re: Archaeology of belief

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:49:48 +0100

53 lines

Re: Archaeology of belief

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:43:19 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

Archives (Was OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright)

Archives (Was OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright)

Grant Potts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:43:57 -0500

87 lines

Re: Archives (Was OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright)

Grant Potts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:58:21 -0500

64 lines

New Thread

being good

Re: being good

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:40:59 -0700

82 lines

Re: being good

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:07:33 -0700

36 lines

Re: being good

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:29:20 -0400

88 lines

Re: being good

Sabina Magliocco <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:59:54 -0700

472 lines

Re: being good

James John Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:22:17 -0700

55 lines

Re: being good

Sabina Magliocco <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:33:15 -0700

166 lines

Re: being good

David Green <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:44:50 +0100

149 lines

Re: being good

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:00:40 -0700

21 lines

Re: being good

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 07:38:05 +0100

48 lines

Re: being good

David Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:17:55 +0100

133 lines

New Thread

being good means more beer

Re: being good means more beer

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:34:42 -0700

22 lines

New Thread

being good, NOT god

Re: being good, NOT god

LAITY, KATHRYN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:28:00 -0400

354 lines

Re: being good, NOT god

James John Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:45:08 -0700

148 lines

Re: being good, NOT god

LAITY, KATHRYN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:51:23 -0400

502 lines

Re: being good, NOT god

Harry Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:13:26 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

being good... or bad

Re: being good... or bad

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:28:12 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

clarify!!

Re: clarify!!

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 May 2008 22:14:20 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

cool

Re: cool

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:43:12 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

Crowley's relationship with disciples

Re: Crowley's relationship with disciples

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:01:16 -0700

51 lines

Re: Crowley's relationship with disciples

Caduceus Books <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:36:47 +0100

51 lines

Re: Crowley's relationship with disciples

Hagay Hacohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:18:40 -0700

151 lines

New Thread

Dire Movie

Re: Dire Movie

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 07:08:42 +0100

83 lines

New Thread

Dire Movie - Chemical Wedding

Re: Dire Movie - Chemical Wedding

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:27:47 +0100

20 lines

Re: Dire Movie - Chemical Wedding

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:50:48 +0100

37 lines

Re: Dire Movie - Chemical Wedding

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:05:53 +0100

53 lines

Re: Dire Movie - Chemical Wedding

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 07:59:38 +0100

75 lines

New Thread

discussion methods

Re: discussion methods

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:46:48 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

discussion of magic

discussion of magic

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:35:06 -0700

18 lines

Re: discussion of magic

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:47:40 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

discussion of magic: what is academic?

Re: discussion of magic: what is academic?

Christopher I. Lehrich <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:06:58 -0400

195 lines

Re: discussion of magic: what is academic?

Hagay Hacohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:27:24 -0700

469 lines

Re: discussion of magic: what is academic?

David Green <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:13:24 +0100

496 lines

Re: discussion of magic: what is academic?

Caelum Rainieri <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:24:32 -0700

253 lines

New Thread

endocrine notes

Re: endocrine notes

gerry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:23:40 +0100

69 lines

Re: endocrine notes

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:34:02 -0700

27 lines

Re: endocrine notes

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:43:51 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Fw: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] oto mass

Fw: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] oto mass

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:21:07 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic

Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic

Shya Young <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:55:27 -0700

29 lines

Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:27:51 +0100

62 lines

Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:52:52 -0400

47 lines

Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:59:46 -0400

48 lines

Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic

Sabina Magliocco <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:19:55 -0700

64 lines

Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:53:26 -0400

104 lines

Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic

Sabina Magliocco <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:58:20 -0700

117 lines

Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:02:54 -0400

126 lines

Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic

Sabina Magliocco <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:49:45 -0700

139 lines

Re: Fwd: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] magic

Grant Potts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:10:45 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Gnostic Mass (was "OTO" Mass)

Gnostic Mass (was "OTO" Mass)

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:26:26 +0100

54 lines

Re: Gnostic Mass (was "OTO" Mass)

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:44:01 -0700

63 lines

Re: Gnostic Mass (was "OTO" Mass)

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:34:13 +0100

86 lines

Re: Gnostic Mass (was "OTO" Mass)

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:29:37 -0700

26 lines

Re: Gnostic Mass (was "OTO" Mass)

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:44:26 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Intuition

Re: Intuition

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:46:31 -0700

36 lines

Re: Intuition

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:52:45 +1000

52 lines

Re: Intuition

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:57:00 +0100

37 lines

Re: Intuition

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:55:10 -0700

68 lines

Re: Intuition

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:00:24 -0700

48 lines

Re: Intuition

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:01:46 -0700

18 lines

Re: Intuition

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:02:42 -0700

16 lines

Re: Intuition

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:11:29 +0100

53 lines

Re: Intuition

Helen Farley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:22:27 +1000

96 lines

Re: Intuition

Morgan Leigh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:15:00 +1000

90 lines

Re: Intuition

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:50:45 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

IQ and religious belief :)

Re: IQ and religious belief :)

Jez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:44:01 +0100

70 lines

New Thread

jesus dude

Re: jesus dude

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:49:38 -0700

16 lines

New Thread

Lionel Ziprin [ was : Re: Religious succeptibility? ]

Lionel Ziprin [ was : Re: Religious succeptibility? ]

Khem Caigan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:05:47 -0400

70 lines

Re: Lionel Ziprin [ was : Re: Religious succeptibility? ]

Hagay Hacohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 02:08:15 -0700

166 lines

New Thread

List

Re: List

David Green <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:43:57 +0100

70 lines

Re: List

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:55:10 +0100

183 lines

Re: List

Amy Hale <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:21:23 -0400

74 lines

New Thread

LIST TITLE GIVES A CLUE, was magic

Re: LIST TITLE GIVES A CLUE, was magic

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:17:29 +0100

153 lines

New Thread

loaded

loaded

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:35:54 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

Loaded?

Re: Loaded?

heliade <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:49:42 +1000

56 lines

New Thread

magic

magic

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:48:54 -0700

31 lines

Re: magic

Mary Christine Erikson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:02:00 EDT

100 lines

Re: magic

Leigh Blackmore <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:18:13 +1000

170 lines

magic

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:29:54 -0700

22 lines

Re: magic

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:10:32 -0400

95 lines

New Thread

Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.

Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.

Peter Edge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 07:32:55 +0100

74 lines

Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:30:32 -0400

254 lines

Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.

Daniel Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:14:54 -0400

763 lines

Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:35:08 -0400

582 lines

Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.

bob dogstar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:46:35 +0000

296 lines

Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.

Caduceus Books <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:54:17 +0100

59 lines

Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.

Khem Caigan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:00:45 -0400

78 lines

Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.

James John Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:37:26 -0700

448 lines

Re: Magical practitioners as providers of services to consumers.

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:47:01 -0400

357 lines

New Thread

magical trips

Re: magical trips

gerry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:39:45 +0100

73 lines

Re: magical trips

kaligrafr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:54:20 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

Mass

Re: Mass

heliade <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:51:46 +1000

34 lines

Re: Mass

David Green <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:28:37 +0100

27 lines

Re: Mass

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:52:22 -0700

44 lines

Re: Mass

heliade <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:21:22 +1000

18 lines

New Thread

masturbation

Re: masturbation

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 04:15:48 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Francis Cameron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:28:41 +0100

54 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:29:23 -0700

64 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:26:53 +1000

54 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Francis Cameron <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:07:30 +0100

50 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:39:58 +0100

45 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Shya/Sue <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:50:44 -0600

173 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Jezreell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:52:00 +0100

87 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

janet ifimust <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:18:24 +0100

71 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:23:24 +0100

58 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

janet ifimust <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:24:59 +0100

136 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:40:19 +0100

97 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

janet ifimust <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:45:06 +0100

70 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:06:45 +0100

71 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

janet ifimust <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:11:47 +0100

192 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:22:51 +0100

125 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Jezreell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:39:04 +0100

30 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:46:33 +0100

34 lines

Re: more thoughts about the nature of witchcraft

Jezreell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:48:22 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

Nevill Drury

Nevill Drury

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:23:06 -0700

89 lines

Re: Nevill Drury

Helen Farley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:03:22 +1000

304 lines

Re: Nevill Drury

Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:04:09 +0100

291 lines

Re: Nevill Drury

Helen Farley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:48:08 +1000

1209 lines

New Thread

Numbers of Thelemites?

Numbers of Thelemites?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:50:45 -0700

73 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Keith Boyle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:37:43 -0500

64 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:56:06 -0700

80 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Melissa Harrington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:26:56 +0100

98 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:30:50 -0700

38 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:40:06 +0100

75 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Keith Boyle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:20:22 -0500

63 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caduceus Books <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:55:24 +0100

79 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:13:58 +0100

65 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:57:23 +0100

70 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Keith Boyle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:01:25 -0500

48 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:43:18 +0100

202 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

janet ifimust <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:46:35 +0100

42 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:49:33 +0100

124 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:50:41 +0100

53 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:52:11 -0700

44 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:55:16 -0700

27 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:58:49 -0700

24 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:01:09 -0700

20 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

clive harper <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:59:52 +0100

37 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:09:52 -0700

42 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:16:23 +0100

102 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:17:21 -0700

74 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:19:09 -0700

18 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:25:01 +0100

124 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:21:51 -0700

56 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:26:48 -0700

23 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

bob dogstar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:53:45 +0000

166 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caduceus Books <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:15:10 +0100

53 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

Caduceus Books <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:17:39 +0100

64 lines

Re: Numbers of Thelemites?

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:29:40 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

offence

Re: offence

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 04:28:44 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

OTO legal case

OTO legal case

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:46:30 +0100

38 lines

Re: OTO legal case

Daniel Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:01:32 -0400

62 lines

Re: OTO legal case

Grant Potts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:17:14 -0500

48 lines

Re: OTO legal case

Amy Hale <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:57:45 -0400

56 lines

Re: OTO legal case

Arild <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:07:32 +0200

27 lines

Re: OTO legal case

Grant Potts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:35:15 -0500

37 lines

Re: OTO legal case

Grant Potts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:46:13 -0500

17 lines

Re: OTO legal case

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:58:07 +0100

62 lines

Re: OTO legal case

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:22:22 +0100

100 lines

Re: OTO legal case

Caduceus Books <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:42:11 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright

Re: OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright

grant b, sun reporter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:16:05 -0700

81 lines

Re: OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright

Grant Potts <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:21:01 -0500

74 lines

Re: OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:01:22 +0100

44 lines

Re: OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:09:17 +0100

29 lines

Re: OTO legal case/ Scientology & Copyright

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:19:53 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

oto mass

Re: oto mass

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Jun 2008 05:13:48 -0700

24 lines

Re: oto mass

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:44:05 -0700

123 lines

Re: oto mass

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:09:44 -0700

58 lines

New Thread

OTO/EGC Mass, how participants might look at these questions

OTO/EGC Mass, how participants might look at these questions

Grant Potts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:15:13 -0500

81 lines

New Thread

Pessoa-Crowley correspondence on auction?

Pessoa-Crowley correspondence on auction?

Roberto Labanti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:58:56 +0200

20 lines

Re: Pessoa-Crowley correspondence on auction?

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:50:40 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

poking with a stick

Re: poking with a stick

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:15:02 -0700

88 lines

Re: poking with a stick

Harry Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:46:55 -0400

44 lines

Re: poking with a stick

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:07:17 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

Preaching to the converted?

Re: Preaching to the converted?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:43:04 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

questions

questions

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:47:59 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

R self

R self

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 06:20:42 -0700

22 lines

Re: R self

bob dogstar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:43:11 +0000

255 lines

New Thread

Religion or Gnostic Culture

Religion or Gnostic Culture

Mark Shekoyan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:56:48 -0700

176 lines

New Thread

Religious succeptibility

Re: Religious succeptibility

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:38:42 -0700

79 lines

Re: Religious succeptibility

Hagay Hacohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:49:10 -0700

77 lines

Re: religious succeptibility

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:45:07 -0700

242 lines

New Thread

Religious succeptibility?

Religious succeptibility?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:54:11 -0700

198 lines

Re: Religious succeptibility?

Hagay Hacohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:38:50 -0700

124 lines

New Thread

SCIENCE

Re: SCIENCE

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:31:47 -0700

79 lines

Re: SCIENCE

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:26 -0700

33 lines

Re: SCIENCE

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 May 2008 22:02:41 -0700

32 lines

Re: SCIENCE

Daniel Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:02:39 -0400

74 lines

Re: SCIENCE

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:04:44 -0400

89 lines

Re: SCIENCE

Kenneth Rees <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:34:24 +0000

210 lines

Re: SCIENCE

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:33:52 +0100

61 lines

Re: SCIENCE

Harry Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:48:04 -0400

20 lines

Re: SCIENCE

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:50:50 -0400

93 lines

Re: SCIENCE

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:16:13 +0100

118 lines

Re: SCIENCE

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:44:40 -0400

156 lines

Re: SCIENCE

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 19:33:49 +0100

188 lines

Re: SCIENCE

James John Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:59:45 -0700

235 lines

Re: SCIENCE

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 23:59:19 +0100

67 lines

Re: SCIENCE

Khem Caigan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:35:28 -0400

70 lines

Re: SCIENCE

Khem Caigan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:40:02 -0400

194 lines

New Thread

SCIENCE, psychedelics and PSI

SCIENCE, psychedelics and PSI

Khem Caigan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:57:01 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

SCIENCE, psychedelics and the endocrine system.

Re: SCIENCE, psychedelics and the endocrine system.

grant b, sun reporter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:33:49 -0700

119 lines

Re: SCIENCE, psychedelics and the endocrine system.

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:36:19 -0700

19 lines

Re: SCIENCE, psychedelics and the endocrine system.

Khem Caigan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:52:49 -0400

69 lines

Re: SCIENCE, psychedelics and the endocrine system.

grant b, sun reporter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:26:20 -0700

98 lines

New Thread

Second Life

Re: Second Life

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:14:06 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Second Life and conferences

Re: Second Life and conferences

Helen Farley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:28:18 +1000

58 lines

New Thread

seeing

Re: seeing

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:15:19 -0700

51 lines

Re: seeing

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:18:34 -0700

15 lines

Re: seeing

Mary Christine Erikson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:45:00 EDT

157 lines

Re: seeing

Mary Christine Erikson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:47:46 EDT

89 lines

Re: seeing

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:37:43 +0100

84 lines

Re: seeing

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jun 2008 20:23:02 -0700

30 lines

Re: seeing

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 04:32:48 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

Seeing: Was Manson an auto-parasite?

Re: Seeing: Was Manson an auto-parasite?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:25:46 -0700

69 lines

New Thread

self

Re: self

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:28:36 -0700

69 lines

Re: self

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:53:53 +0100

43 lines

Re: self

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:24:44 -0700

29 lines

Re: self

heliade <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:45:30 +1000

41 lines

Re: self

heliade <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:50:33 +1000

69 lines

Re: self

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:53:12 -0400

205 lines

Re: self

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 03:49:49 -0700

21 lines

Re: self

Shya/Sue <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 05:48:38 -0600

107 lines

Re: self

Terri Frew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:45:10 -0400

163 lines

Re: self

Harry Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:47:49 -0400

18 lines

Re: self

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:35:01 -0400

216 lines

New Thread

self and karma

self and karma

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:18:16 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

sweet pea

Re: sweet pea

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 May 2008 22:06:44 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Test

Test

Kenneth Rees <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:09:53 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:13:11 +1000

97 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:20:56 -0400

131 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:45:58 +0100

83 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Sabina Magliocco <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:23:57 -0700

164 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Ty Falk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:32:31 -0400

325 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:23:20 +1000

187 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:36:30 +1000

73 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Sabina Magliocco <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:45:12 -0700

117 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:16:04 +1000

49 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:01:46 -0700

102 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

jason winslade <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:29:47 -0700

246 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

D E <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:48:48 +0100

130 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:27:41 -0700

191 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

kaligrafr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:39:10 -0700

64 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

jason winslade <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:57:31 -0700

153 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:09:28 +0100

54 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:27:54 -0700

314 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:31:19 +1000

58 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:02:16 +0100

50 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

janet ifimust <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:50:22 +0100

47 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

kaligrafr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 06:45:57 -0700

59 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Francis Cameron <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:08:16 +0100

37 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Caelum Rainieri <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:27:11 -0700

75 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

heliade <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:14:06 +1000

66 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:40:44 +1000

79 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:49:02 -0700

43 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:50:08 -0700

16 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:10:29 -0700

42 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:29:16 +0100

65 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:29:39 +1000

61 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:04:25 +0100

44 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:25:00 +0100

66 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:59:49 -0700

49 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:16:35 +0100

73 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:41:41 +1000

51 lines

Re: thoughts on bias and public response to your work in the mainstream

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:08:54 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

war time seers

war time seers

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:00:54 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

Weiser Antiquarian catalogue

Weiser Antiquarian catalogue

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:26:16 -0700

380 lines

New Thread

Were churches built upon pagan sites?

Re: Were churches built upon pagan sites?

bob dogstar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:46:49 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

What is "Witchcraft"?

What is "Witchcraft"?

Caroline Tully <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:57:57 -0700

171 lines

Re: What is "Witchcraft"?

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:04:56 +0100

83 lines

New Thread

what is witchcraft?

what is witchcraft?

Francis Cameron <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:31:22 +0100

64 lines

Re: what is witchcraft?

Hagay Hacohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:36:19 -0700

190 lines

New Thread

Wicca and Tantra

Wicca and Tantra

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:08:13 +0100

39 lines

Re: Wicca and Tantra

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:25:55 +1000

61 lines

Re: Wicca and Tantra

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:58:49 +0100

88 lines

Re: Wicca and Tantra

David and Jasmine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:06:41 +1000

111 lines

Re: Wicca and Tantra

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:33:05 +0100

32 lines

Re: Wicca and Tantra

kaligrafr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:22:25 -0700

58 lines

Re: Wicca and Tantra

Chas S. Clifton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:18:34 -0600

34 lines

New Thread

Wizards and Witches hunted down and burned

Wizards and Witches hunted down and burned

James John Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:41:19 -0700

62 lines

New Thread

[discussion of magic: what is academic?

Re: [discussion of magic: what is academic?

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:21:00 -0700

37 lines

Re: [discussion of magic: what is academic?

Grant Potts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:17:05 -0500

75 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] 'seeing' eye to eye]

[Fwd: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] 'seeing' eye to eye]

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:42:20 +0100

156 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: [Religion EASA] An Interdisciplinary Conference on Fetishism (fwd)]

[Fwd: [Religion EASA] An Interdisciplinary Conference on Fetishism (fwd)]

Christopher Kimberley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jun 2008 07:27:35 +0100

241 lines

New Thread

[magic practice/religion

Re: [magic practice/religion

Josephine Cavopol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:01:32 -0700

34 lines

Re: [magic practice/religion

mandrake <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:34:34 +0100

68 lines

Re: [magic practice/religion

Sabina Magliocco <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:00:03 -0700

80 lines

Re: [magic practice/religion

Caelum Rainieri <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:07:34 -0700

106 lines

Re: [magic practice/religion

Morgan Leigh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:46:07 +1000

145 lines

Re: [magic practice/religion

Khem Caigan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:45:57 -0400

103 lines

Re: [magic practice/religion

Morgan Leigh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:02:43 +1000

112 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager