|
|
|
Size
|
DORSDL2 Workshop at ECDL 2008 - Call for Abstracts
|
Chris Awre |
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:10:27 +0100 |
140 lines |
New Australian classification
|
Arthur Sale |
Tue, 1 Apr 2008 08:55:18 +1100 |
162 lines |
Growth in number of records in UK IRs
|
Chris Keene |
Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:00:42 +0100 |
26 lines |
FW: DORSDL2 Workshop at ECDL 2008 - Call for Abstracts
|
Gareth Knight |
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:47:15 -0000 |
155 lines |
[Fwd: [OAI-implementers] OAI-ORE add-on service for Fedora]
|
R. John Robertson |
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:10:18 +0000 |
66 lines |
New data in IESR
|
Ann Apps |
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:21:19 +0000 |
33 lines |
OR 2008 - DC Scholarly Communications Community lunchtime session on repository metadata
|
Rosemary Russell |
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:17:41 +0000 |
47 lines |
[Fwd: [OAI-implementers] [ANN] OAI4J released as Open Source]
|
R. John Robertson |
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:37:24 +0000 |
54 lines |
DSpace 1.5
|
Scott Phillips |
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:12:20 -0500 |
128 lines |
Re: Cato v's Cicero?
|
Ian Stuart |
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:03:19 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Cato v's Cicero?
|
Leslie Carr |
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:15:45 +0000 |
19 lines |
Cato v's Cicero?
|
Ian Stuart |
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:41:58 +0000 |
29 lines |
Planning the future with Planets: a preservation planning tutorial
|
Lynne Chivers |
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:38:54 +0000 |
116 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Lorna M. Campbell |
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:00:37 +0000 |
257 lines |
Re: Deposit Mandates as part of Publisher Services
|
Stevan Harnad |
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:50:08 +0000 |
53 lines |
Re: Publisher Proxy Deposit Is A Potential Trojan Horse
|
Stevan Harnad |
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:07:25 +0000 |
99 lines |
OAI6 tutorial
|
Neil Jacobs |
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:10:21 +0000 |
33 lines |
EurOpenScholar conference April 4 Southampton
|
Stevan Harnad |
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:03:30 +0000 |
66 lines |
Publisher Proxy Deposit Is A Potential Trojan Horse
|
Stevan Harnad |
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:51:47 +0000 |
136 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Aida Slavic |
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:24:43 +0000 |
67 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Dennis Nicholson |
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:52:42 -0000 |
240 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Dennis Nicholson |
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:32:06 -0000 |
372 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Tom Franklin |
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:56:45 -0000 |
331 lines |
Re: Challenging assertions
|
Aida Slavic |
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:46:28 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Dennis Nicholson |
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:18:40 -0000 |
275 lines |
Program Schedule Posted for "Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way!"
|
Chris Awre |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:30:15 +0000 |
80 lines |
Program Schedule Posted for "Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way!"
|
Chris Awre |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:30:15 +0000 |
64 lines |
Re: Challenging assertions
|
Leslie Carr |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:21:35 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Challenging assertions
|
John Smith |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:34:54 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Challenging assertions
|
Leslie Carr |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:01:50 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Challenging assertions
|
John Smith |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:36:51 +0000 |
81 lines |
Re: Challenging assertions
|
John Smith |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:17:59 +0000 |
102 lines |
Registration cutoff for OR2008: 16th March
|
Leslie Carr |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:52:09 +0000 |
15 lines |
Re: Challenging assertions
|
Stevan Harnad |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:07:50 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Challenging assertions
|
Peter Crowther |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:41:44 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: Challenging assertions
|
Stevan Harnad |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:16:40 +0000 |
56 lines |
Re: Challenging assertions
|
Ian Stuart |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:24:10 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: Challenging assertions
|
Rebecca Parker |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:12:19 +1100 |
84 lines |
Re: University of Zurich: 5th Institution with Self-Archiving Mandate
|
Stevan Harnad |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:40:16 +0000 |
116 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Leslie Carr |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:11:16 +0000 |
345 lines |
Geospatial Application Profile
|
James S Reid |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:44:27 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Julie Allinson |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:31:03 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Ian Stuart |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:32:36 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Rosemary Russell |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:06:31 +0000 |
139 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Ian |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:10:17 +0000 |
53 lines |
Challenging assertions
|
Derek Law |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:00:23 -0000 |
28 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Rachel BRUCE |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:43:22 -0000 |
158 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Parker, Roderic |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:39:45 -0000 |
141 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Anna Clements |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:27:33 +0000 |
113 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Ann Apps |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:12:22 +0000 |
202 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Leslie Carr |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:56:56 +0000 |
107 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Rachel BRUCE |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:47:14 -0000 |
32 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Leslie Carr |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:10:51 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Arthur Sale |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:07:21 +1100 |
82 lines |
Last opportunities to join NCSC2008
|
Håkan Carlsson |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:25:32 +0100 |
326 lines |
NIH Public Access Policy Comments/Public Meeting (fwd)
|
Stevan Harnad |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:04:38 +0000 |
20 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Dennis Nicholson |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:06:03 +0000 |
169 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Rachel BRUCE |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:10:45 -0000 |
153 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
John Smith |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:53:07 +0000 |
92 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
John Smith |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:36:03 +0000 |
111 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Piegza, Amanda M. |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:29:38 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: JISC preferred classification scheme
|
Ann Apps |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:37:28 +0000 |
72 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Ian Stuart |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:13:32 +0000 |
74 lines |
JISC preferred classification scheme
|
John Smith |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:56:50 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
John Smith |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:41:55 +0000 |
75 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Ian Stuart |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:08:20 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Talat Chaudhri [tac] |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:52:43 -0000 |
87 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Stevan Harnad |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:30:43 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Ann Apps |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:30:26 +0000 |
141 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Leslie Carr |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:45:03 +0000 |
1227 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:39:26 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Ian Stuart |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:30:45 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Talat Chaudhri [tac] |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:54:06 -0000 |
297 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Stephen Downes |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:50:28 -0300 |
156 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Antony Corfield [awc] |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:49:50 -0000 |
309 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Ian Stuart |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:24:31 +0000 |
74 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Andy Powell |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:10:14 -0000 |
246 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Ann Apps |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:06:38 +0000 |
97 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Leslie Carr |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:25:17 +0000 |
479 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Talat Chaudhri [tac] |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:54:34 -0000 |
170 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Antony Corfield [awc] |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:49:53 -0000 |
1097 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Talat Chaudhri [tac] |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:36:24 -0000 |
234 lines |
Re: Profile of the Open University's IR
|
Ian Stuart |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:58:44 +0000 |
57 lines |
Profile of the Open University's IR
|
Richard Poynder |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:07:58 -0000 |
14 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Ian Stuart |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:51:15 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Stephen Downes |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:59:33 -0300 |
35 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Ian Stuart |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:29:54 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Andy Powell |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:04:49 -0000 |
56 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Leslie Carr |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:20:53 +0000 |
192 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Stevan Harnad |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:31:51 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Ian Stuart |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:15:34 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Steve Hitchcock |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:07:51 +0000 |
141 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Stevan Harnad |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:35:30 -0400 |
195 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Antony Corfield [awc] |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:31:55 -0000 |
153 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Stephen Downes |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:22:46 -0300 |
37 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Talat Chaudhri [tac] |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:53:17 -0000 |
75 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Talat Chaudhri [tac] |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:33:28 -0000 |
196 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
John Smith |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:33:17 +0000 |
188 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Andy Powell |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:16:16 -0000 |
110 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Stevan Harnad |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:48:39 +0000 |
169 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Ian Stuart |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:27:51 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Tom Franklin |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:51:28 -0000 |
387 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Howard Noble |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:39:33 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Leslie Carr |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:30:10 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving: 6 Mantras
|
Andy Powell |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:29:46 -0000 |
75 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Andy Powell |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:28:24 -0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Stevan Harnad |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 05:55:30 -0400 |
286 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving: 6 Mantras
|
Leslie Carr |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:53:10 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving: 6 Mantras
|
Andy Powell |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:11:57 -0000 |
239 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving: 6 Mantras
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:31:19 +0000 |
153 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving: 6 Mantras
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:08:59 +0000 |
163 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Andy Powell |
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 07:55:48 -0000 |
134 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 04:22:44 +0000 |
97 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving (fwd)
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 22:58:56 +0000 |
219 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 21:14:55 +0000 |
73 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Andy Powell |
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:41:04 -0000 |
182 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:08:40 +0000 |
83 lines |
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:06:47 +0000 |
151 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Jenny Brace |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:24:32 +0000 |
64 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Neil Jacobs |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:05:31 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Ian Stuart |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:02:42 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Rosemary Russell |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:58:35 +0000 |
68 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Ian Stuart |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:00:03 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Antony Corfield [awc] |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 10:12:00 -0000 |
126 lines |
Re: LDAP/AD integration, Data Protection and duplicaiton of email addresses
|
Ian Stuart |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:21:36 +0000 |
62 lines |
LDAP/AD integration, Data Protection and duplicaiton of email addresses
|
Joss Winn |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:02:20 -0000 |
50 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Leslie Carr |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 01:00:56 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
John Smith |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 18:59:27 +0000 |
73 lines |
Repository Services Day - Booking Form
|
Stephanie Taylor |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:39:52 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Repositories Services Day
|
Riley Fred |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:17:15 -0000 |
32 lines |
Workshop: Which one's which? Understanding versioning in repositories, London, 22nd April
|
Dave Puplett |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:17:42 -0000 |
435 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Talat Chaudhri [tac] |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0000 |
55 lines |
Repositories Services Day
|
Stephanie Taylor |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:53:32 +0000 |
99 lines |
Re: Call for papers: Special issue on metadata and institutional repositories: CCQ
|
Antony Corfield [awc] |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:28:21 -0000 |
189 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Ian Stuart |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:10:12 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Leslie Carr |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 08:35:59 +0000 |
161 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Stevan Harnad |
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:54:35 +0000 |
262 lines |
Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
John Smith |
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:03:16 +0000 |
487 lines |
Re: Call for papers: Special issue on metadata and institutional repositories: CCQ
|
Leslie Carr |
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 17:08:38 +0000 |
174 lines |
Vacancy for Open Repository Service Manager (Ref: BMC/ORM) - BioMed Central
|
Mark Merifield |
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:56:15 -0000 |
248 lines |
IPR and theses
|
Delasalle, Jenny |
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:17:04 -0000 |
109 lines |
Re: Call for papers: Special issue on metadata and institutional repositories: CCQ
|
Antony Corfield [awc] |
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:08:17 -0000 |
157 lines |
Re: Surf Foundation Publisher Policy Survey
|
Stevan Harnad |
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:32:29 +0000 |
118 lines |
Re: Need for a richer description, was: RE: Required and Desirable metadata ...
|
Frances Shipsey |
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:18:41 -0000 |
128 lines |
Re: Need for a richer description, was: RE: Required and Desirable metadata ...
|
Leslie Carr |
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:18:10 +0000 |
38 lines |
Surf Foundation Publisher Policy Survey
|
Stevan Harnad |
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:37:20 +0000 |
75 lines |
OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections
|
Stevan Harnad |
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 21:16:23 +0000 |
320 lines |
Need for a richer description, was: RE: Required and Desirable metadata ...
|
John Smith |
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 15:41:59 +0000 |
225 lines |
Call for papers: Special issue on metadata and institutional repositories: CCQ
|
Michael Babinec |
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 08:47:51 -0600 |
98 lines |
Re: Required and Desirable metadata in a repository
|
Steve Hitchcock |
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:21:56 +0000 |
58 lines |
Version 71, Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography
|
Charles W. Bailey, Jr. |
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:20:12 -0600 |
137 lines |
Re: Listing Institutional repositories, based on IP
|
Houston D (LCSS) |
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:09:32 -0000 |
59 lines |
JULIET has been upgraded -- now includes Funders' Data and Open Access Journal Policies
|
Smith Jane |
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 08:58:00 -0000 |
1347 lines |
Integrating University and Funder Open Access Mandates
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:41:44 -0500 |
1044 lines |
Re: March issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:00:43 +0000 |
72 lines |
Re: Required and Desirable metadata in a repository
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 17:48:58 +0000 |
298 lines |
Re: Required and Desirable metadata in a repository
|
Frances Shipsey |
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 16:21:21 -0000 |
165 lines |
Re: Required and Desirable metadata in a repository
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 16:18:46 +0000 |
157 lines |
Re: Required and Desirable metadata in a repository
|
Leslie Carr |
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 15:33:17 +0000 |
114 lines |