JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for JISC-REPOSITORIES Archives


JISC-REPOSITORIES Archives

JISC-REPOSITORIES Archives


March 2008


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Call for papers: Special issue on metadata and institutional repositories: CCQ (4 messages)
Cato v's Cicero? (3 messages)
Central versus institutional self-archiving (52 messages)
Central versus institutional self-archiving (fwd) (1 message)
Central versus institutional self-archiving: 6 Mantras (5 messages)
Challenging assertions (12 messages)
Deposit Mandates as part of Publisher Services (1 message)
DORSDL2 Workshop at ECDL 2008 - Call for Abstracts (1 message)
DSpace 1.5 (1 message)
EurOpenScholar conference April 4 Southampton (1 message)
FW: DORSDL2 Workshop at ECDL 2008 - Call for Abstracts (1 message)
Geospatial Application Profile (1 message)
Growth in number of records in UK IRs (1 message)
Integrating University and Funder Open Access Mandates (1 message)
IPR and theses (1 message)
JISC preferred classification scheme (18 messages)
JULIET has been upgraded -- now includes Funders' Data and Open Access Journal Policies (1 message)
Last opportunities to join NCSC2008 (1 message)
LDAP/AD integration, Data Protection and duplicaiton of email addresses (2 messages)
Listing Institutional repositories, based on IP (1 message)
March issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter (1 message)
Need for a richer description, was: RE: Required and Desirable metadata ... (3 messages)
New Australian classification (1 message)
New data in IESR (1 message)
NIH Public Access Policy Comments/Public Meeting (fwd) (1 message)
OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections (17 messages)
OAI6 tutorial (1 message)
OR 2008 - DC Scholarly Communications Community lunchtime session on repository metadata (1 message)
Planning the future with Planets: a preservation planning tutorial (1 message)
Profile of the Open University's IR (2 messages)
Program Schedule Posted for "Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way!" (2 messages)
Publisher Proxy Deposit Is A Potential Trojan Horse (2 messages)
Registration cutoff for OR2008: 16th March (1 message)
Repositories Services Day (2 messages)
Repository Services Day - Booking Form (1 message)
Required and Desirable metadata in a repository (5 messages)
Surf Foundation Publisher Policy Survey (2 messages)
University of Zurich: 5th Institution with Self-Archiving Mandate (1 message)
Vacancy for Open Repository Service Manager (Ref: BMC/ORM) - BioMed Central (1 message)
Version 71, Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography (1 message)
Workshop: Which one's which? Understanding versioning in repositories, London, 22nd April (1 message)
[Fwd: [OAI-implementers] OAI-ORE add-on service for Fedora] (1 message)
[Fwd: [OAI-implementers] [ANN] OAI4J released as Open Source] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

JISC-REPOSITORIES Home

JISC-REPOSITORIES Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Call for papers: Special issue on metadata and institutional repositories: CCQ

Call for papers: Special issue on metadata and institutional repositories: CCQ

Michael Babinec <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Mar 2008 08:47:51 -0600

98 lines

Re: Call for papers: Special issue on metadata and institutional repositories: CCQ

Antony Corfield [awc] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:08:17 -0000

157 lines

Re: Call for papers: Special issue on metadata and institutional repositories: CCQ

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Mar 2008 17:08:38 +0000

174 lines

Re: Call for papers: Special issue on metadata and institutional repositories: CCQ

Antony Corfield [awc] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:28:21 -0000

189 lines

New Thread

Cato v's Cicero?

Cato v's Cicero?

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:41:58 +0000

29 lines

Re: Cato v's Cicero?

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:15:45 +0000

19 lines

Re: Cato v's Cicero?

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:03:19 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

Central versus institutional self-archiving

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:06:47 +0000

151 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:08:40 +0000

83 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:41:04 -0000

182 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Mar 2008 21:14:55 +0000

73 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Mar 2008 04:22:44 +0000

97 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Mar 2008 07:55:48 -0000

134 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 05:55:30 -0400

286 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:28:24 -0000

47 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:30:10 +0000

43 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Howard Noble <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:39:33 +0000

47 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Tom Franklin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:51:28 -0000

387 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:27:51 +0000

48 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:48:39 +0000

169 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:16:16 -0000

110 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

John Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:33:17 +0000

188 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Talat Chaudhri [tac] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:33:28 -0000

196 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Stephen Downes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:22:46 -0300

37 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Antony Corfield [awc] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:31:55 -0000

153 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:35:30 -0400

195 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Steve Hitchcock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:07:51 +0000

141 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:31:51 +0000

22 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:20:53 +0000

192 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:04:49 -0000

56 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:29:54 +0000

27 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Stephen Downes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:59:33 -0300

35 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:51:15 +0000

33 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Talat Chaudhri [tac] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:36:24 -0000

234 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Antony Corfield [awc] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:49:53 -0000

1097 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Talat Chaudhri [tac] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:54:34 -0000

170 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:25:17 +0000

479 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Ann Apps <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:06:38 +0000

97 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:10:14 -0000

246 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:24:31 +0000

74 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Stephen Downes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:50:28 -0300

156 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Antony Corfield [awc] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:49:50 -0000

309 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Talat Chaudhri [tac] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:54:06 -0000

297 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:30:45 +0000

42 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:39:26 -0400

41 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Ann Apps <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:30:26 +0000

141 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:30:43 +0000

43 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:08:20 +0000

40 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Talat Chaudhri [tac] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:52:43 -0000

87 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

John Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:41:55 +0000

75 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:13:32 +0000

74 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

John Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:36:03 +0000

111 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:45:03 +0000

1227 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:56:56 +0000

107 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:10:17 +0000

53 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Rosemary Russell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:06:31 +0000

139 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:32:36 +0000

27 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Julie Allinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:31:03 +0000

34 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:11:16 +0000

345 lines

New Thread

Central versus institutional self-archiving (fwd)

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving (fwd)

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Mar 2008 22:58:56 +0000

219 lines

New Thread

Central versus institutional self-archiving: 6 Mantras

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving: 6 Mantras

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:08:59 +0000

163 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving: 6 Mantras

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:31:19 +0000

153 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving: 6 Mantras

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:11:57 -0000

239 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving: 6 Mantras

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:53:10 +0000

52 lines

Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving: 6 Mantras

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:29:46 -0000

75 lines

New Thread

Challenging assertions

Challenging assertions

Derek Law <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:00:23 -0000

28 lines

Re: Challenging assertions

Rebecca Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:12:19 +1100

84 lines

Re: Challenging assertions

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:24:10 +0000

35 lines

Re: Challenging assertions

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:16:40 +0000

56 lines

Re: Challenging assertions

Peter Crowther <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:41:44 +0000

23 lines

Re: Challenging assertions

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:07:50 +0000

42 lines

Re: Challenging assertions

John Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:17:59 +0000

102 lines

Re: Challenging assertions

John Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:36:51 +0000

81 lines

Re: Challenging assertions

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:01:50 +0000

34 lines

Re: Challenging assertions

John Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:34:54 +0000

59 lines

Re: Challenging assertions

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:21:35 +0000

46 lines

Re: Challenging assertions

Aida Slavic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:46:28 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

Deposit Mandates as part of Publisher Services

Re: Deposit Mandates as part of Publisher Services

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:50:08 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

DORSDL2 Workshop at ECDL 2008 - Call for Abstracts

DORSDL2 Workshop at ECDL 2008 - Call for Abstracts

Chris Awre <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:10:27 +0100

140 lines

New Thread

DSpace 1.5

DSpace 1.5

Scott Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:12:20 -0500

128 lines

New Thread

EurOpenScholar conference April 4 Southampton

EurOpenScholar conference April 4 Southampton

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:03:30 +0000

66 lines

New Thread

FW: DORSDL2 Workshop at ECDL 2008 - Call for Abstracts

FW: DORSDL2 Workshop at ECDL 2008 - Call for Abstracts

Gareth Knight <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:47:15 -0000

155 lines

New Thread

Geospatial Application Profile

Geospatial Application Profile

James S Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:44:27 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

Growth in number of records in UK IRs

Growth in number of records in UK IRs

Chris Keene <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:00:42 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Integrating University and Funder Open Access Mandates

Integrating University and Funder Open Access Mandates

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:41:44 -0500

1044 lines

New Thread

IPR and theses

IPR and theses

Delasalle, Jenny <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:17:04 -0000

109 lines

New Thread

JISC preferred classification scheme

JISC preferred classification scheme

John Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:56:50 +0000

36 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Ann Apps <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:37:28 +0000

72 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Piegza, Amanda M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:29:38 -0500

62 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

John Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:53:07 +0000

92 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Rachel BRUCE <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:10:45 -0000

153 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Dennis Nicholson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:06:03 +0000

169 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Arthur Sale <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:07:21 +1100

82 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:10:51 +0000

26 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Rachel BRUCE <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:47:14 -0000

32 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Ann Apps <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:12:22 +0000

202 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Rachel BRUCE <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:43:22 -0000

158 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Parker, Roderic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:39:45 -0000

141 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Dennis Nicholson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:18:40 -0000

275 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Tom Franklin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:56:45 -0000

331 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Dennis Nicholson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:32:06 -0000

372 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Dennis Nicholson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:52:42 -0000

240 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Aida Slavic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:24:43 +0000

67 lines

Re: JISC preferred classification scheme

Lorna M. Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:00:37 +0000

257 lines

New Thread

JULIET has been upgraded -- now includes Funders' Data and Open Access Journal Policies

JULIET has been upgraded -- now includes Funders' Data and Open Access Journal Policies

Smith Jane <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Mar 2008 08:58:00 -0000

1347 lines

New Thread

Last opportunities to join NCSC2008

Last opportunities to join NCSC2008

Håkan Carlsson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:25:32 +0100

326 lines

New Thread

LDAP/AD integration, Data Protection and duplicaiton of email addresses

LDAP/AD integration, Data Protection and duplicaiton of email addresses

Joss Winn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:02:20 -0000

50 lines

Re: LDAP/AD integration, Data Protection and duplicaiton of email addresses

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:21:36 +0000

62 lines

New Thread

Listing Institutional repositories, based on IP

Re: Listing Institutional repositories, based on IP

Houston D (LCSS) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:09:32 -0000

59 lines

New Thread

March issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter

Re: March issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:00:43 +0000

72 lines

New Thread

Need for a richer description, was: RE: Required and Desirable metadata ...

Need for a richer description, was: RE: Required and Desirable metadata ...

John Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Mar 2008 15:41:59 +0000

225 lines

Re: Need for a richer description, was: RE: Required and Desirable metadata ...

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:18:10 +0000

38 lines

Re: Need for a richer description, was: RE: Required and Desirable metadata ...

Frances Shipsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:18:41 -0000

128 lines

New Thread

New Australian classification

New Australian classification

Arthur Sale <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Apr 2008 08:55:18 +1100

162 lines

New Thread

New data in IESR

New data in IESR

Ann Apps <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:21:19 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

NIH Public Access Policy Comments/Public Meeting (fwd)

NIH Public Access Policy Comments/Public Meeting (fwd)

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:04:38 +0000

20 lines

New Thread

OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Mar 2008 21:16:23 +0000

320 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

John Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:03:16 +0000

487 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:54:35 +0000

262 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2008 08:35:59 +0000

161 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:10:12 +0000

38 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Talat Chaudhri [tac] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0000

55 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

John Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2008 18:59:27 +0000

73 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Mar 2008 01:00:56 +0000

62 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Antony Corfield [awc] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Mar 2008 10:12:00 -0000

126 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:00:03 +0000

52 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Rosemary Russell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:58:35 +0000

68 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:02:42 +0000

33 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Neil Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:05:31 +0000

82 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Jenny Brace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:24:32 +0000

64 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Talat Chaudhri [tac] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:53:17 -0000

75 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:15:34 +0000

37 lines

Re: OA IRs Are Research Access Providers, Not Publishers or Library Collections

Anna Clements <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:27:33 +0000

113 lines

New Thread

OAI6 tutorial

OAI6 tutorial

Neil Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:10:21 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

OR 2008 - DC Scholarly Communications Community lunchtime session on repository metadata

OR 2008 - DC Scholarly Communications Community lunchtime session on repository metadata

Rosemary Russell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:17:41 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Planning the future with Planets: a preservation planning tutorial

Planning the future with Planets: a preservation planning tutorial

Lynne Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:38:54 +0000

116 lines

New Thread

Profile of the Open University's IR

Profile of the Open University's IR

Richard Poynder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:07:58 -0000

14 lines

Re: Profile of the Open University's IR

Ian Stuart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:58:44 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

Program Schedule Posted for "Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way!"

Program Schedule Posted for "Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way!"

Chris Awre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:30:15 +0000

64 lines

Program Schedule Posted for "Higher Education Solutions: The Community Source Way!"

Chris Awre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:30:15 +0000

80 lines

New Thread

Publisher Proxy Deposit Is A Potential Trojan Horse

Publisher Proxy Deposit Is A Potential Trojan Horse

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:51:47 +0000

136 lines

Re: Publisher Proxy Deposit Is A Potential Trojan Horse

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:07:25 +0000

99 lines

New Thread

Registration cutoff for OR2008: 16th March

Registration cutoff for OR2008: 16th March

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:52:09 +0000

15 lines

New Thread

Repositories Services Day

Repositories Services Day

Stephanie Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:53:32 +0000

99 lines

Re: Repositories Services Day

Riley Fred <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:17:15 -0000

32 lines

New Thread

Repository Services Day - Booking Form

Repository Services Day - Booking Form

Stephanie Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:39:52 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Required and Desirable metadata in a repository

Re: Required and Desirable metadata in a repository

Leslie Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Mar 2008 15:33:17 +0000

114 lines

Re: Required and Desirable metadata in a repository

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Mar 2008 16:18:46 +0000

157 lines

Re: Required and Desirable metadata in a repository

Frances Shipsey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Mar 2008 16:21:21 -0000

165 lines

Re: Required and Desirable metadata in a repository

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Mar 2008 17:48:58 +0000

298 lines

Re: Required and Desirable metadata in a repository

Steve Hitchcock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:21:56 +0000

58 lines

New Thread

Surf Foundation Publisher Policy Survey

Surf Foundation Publisher Policy Survey

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:37:20 +0000

75 lines

Re: Surf Foundation Publisher Policy Survey

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:32:29 +0000

118 lines

New Thread

University of Zurich: 5th Institution with Self-Archiving Mandate

Re: University of Zurich: 5th Institution with Self-Archiving Mandate

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:40:16 +0000

116 lines

New Thread

Vacancy for Open Repository Service Manager (Ref: BMC/ORM) - BioMed Central

Vacancy for Open Repository Service Manager (Ref: BMC/ORM) - BioMed Central

Mark Merifield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:56:15 -0000

248 lines

New Thread

Version 71, Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography

Version 71, Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography

Charles W. Bailey, Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:20:12 -0600

137 lines

New Thread

Workshop: Which one's which? Understanding versioning in repositories, London, 22nd April

Workshop: Which one's which? Understanding versioning in repositories, London, 22nd April

Dave Puplett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:17:42 -0000

435 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: [OAI-implementers] OAI-ORE add-on service for Fedora]

[Fwd: [OAI-implementers] OAI-ORE add-on service for Fedora]

R. John Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:10:18 +0000

66 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: [OAI-implementers] [ANN] OAI4J released as Open Source]

[Fwd: [OAI-implementers] [ANN] OAI4J released as Open Source]

R. John Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:37:24 +0000

54 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager