JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FSL Archives


FSL Archives

FSL Archives


February 2008


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Manual BET" (2 messages)
"splitFEAT was run on the original design" - what does this mean? (2 messages)
'Manual BET' (7 messages)
.par .rec(v 4.1) conversion- bvecs and bvals (7 messages)
1 group ...unpaired t-test ?? (5 messages)
2 posts in functional neuroimaging (1 message)
2nd level fixed effects WILL run (on latest ubuntu gutsy: 4.0.3-2) (1 message)
2nd-level feat set-up (2 messages)
3x3 repeated measures anaova (4 messages)
<No subject> (3 messages)
about flirt (7 messages)
Analyze to nifti converting (2 messages)
applescript and fslview? (1 message)
AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Melodic output (2 messages)
AW: [FSL] McFLIRT basic use question (5 messages)
AW: [FSL] Melodic output (3 messages)
AW: [FSL] probtrackx problems (5 messages)
back issue of fsl (1 message)
Basics Featquery (3 messages)
bedpostx error (1 message)
bedpostx error - found answer (1 message)
BET (5 messages)
BET Error 'image file not valid' (5 messages)
BET output is 32 bits/pix (4 messages)
BET question (2 messages)
binary mask for FDT (3 messages)
Brain Atlas for rat brians (2 messages)
Can we have fslstats store the output to a text file? (4 messages)
Characterization & Propagation of uncertainty paper (2 messages)
Cluster Command (2 messages)
cluster tool on randomise output (6 messages)
command line for randomise -T (4 messages)
Command Line Scripts (4 messages)
Comparing 3 Groups with TBSS (2 messages)
compile BET2 under windows XP (1 message)
Conjunction Analysis (8 messages)
Conjunction Analysis..oops (1 message)
Corticospinal and optic tract mapping (6 messages)
Debian dependencies (5 messages)
Difference between SPM Display and FSL Nudge (1 message)
discrepancy with intensities using fslstats (1 message)
display zstats in standard space (1 message)
Does ROI correlation exclude seed ROI? (4 messages)
DTI group analysis with FSL (4 messages)
DTI-based White Matter Atlas (8 messages)
DTIFIT and bedpostx_datacheck question (3 messages)
eddy correct and b0 correction (2 messages)
error in feat log (2 messages)
Error when re-runnning stats & post-stats ERROR:: Empty mask image (3 messages)
Experience with SIEMENS Verio 3T versus TrioTim (2 messages)
F-values of the higher-level analyses? (4 messages)
FA skeleton range (1 message)
FAST changing orientation of BETed image (3 messages)
FAST output (1 message)
fast4 questions (1 message)
FEAT full model setup (7 messages)
Feat Multi-Session Multi-Subject Analysis (2 messages)
FEAT: WARNING: nifti_read_buffer (2 messages)
featquery on a second level analysis (2 messages)
Featquery Output (2 messages)
featquery variance of the % signal change (7 messages)
Featquery, contrast weights (2 messages)
FIRST (2 messages)
First analysis (2 messages)
flirt -displayinit (2 messages)
FLIRT input error? (5 messages)
flirt on 4D fMRI data (1 message)
FSL 4.0.3 debian gcc 4.1.2 patch (4 messages)
FSL vbm spatial oientation (1 message)
fsl2ascii accuracy question (3 messages)
fslchpixdim broken? (1 message)
fslmaths precision (4 messages)
fslmerge on Analyze images (2 messages)
fslorient problem - may be a bug ? (7 messages)
fslpspec (4 messages)
fslroi -- spherical ROIs? (11 messages)
fslview min max range and colormap types (2 messages)
FSLView timeseries, combined runs (2 messages)
fsl_sub vs runfsl (2 messages)
Fwd: Bug in slicer? or am I 3-Dimensionally challenged (2 messages)
Fwd: Re: [FSL] F-values of the higher-level analyses? (2 messages)
Fwd: [FSL] fslorient problem - may be a bug ? (1 message)
Fwd: [FSL] MELODIC errors (3 messages)
Fwd: [FSL] Tissue segmentation in macaques (1 message)
grand mean scaling (1 message)
group and fstat design file (1 message)
group ICA (8 messages)
Help with temporal derivatives (3 messages)
Hi and for VBM in white matter (2 messages)
Higher level Feat Q (3 messages)
higher level group mean (1 message)
Higher-level analysis with covariate of interest (2 messages)
Higher-level unbalanced analysis (3 messages)
Image overlay in FSLView (2 messages)
Importing external individual results to FEAT group analysis (4 messages)
Include temp derivative in model (3 messages)
incompatible object file (2 messages)
installation of a new brain atlas (for rats) into fsl (2 messages)
Intensity values of sigle voxels (4 messages)
interaction contrasts in ANOVA (2 messages)
Interpreting basis functions in FLOBS (2 messages)
Intervoxel Coherence, anyone? (5 messages)
libqt-mt.so library (2 messages)
masking procedure (3 messages)
Masks for TBSS randomise (5 messages)
MATLAB access to FSL 4.0 w/VMware (3 messages)
McFLIRT basic use question (1 message)
MEAN or Median - preprocessing of X repetitions (2 messages)
mean squared error (2 messages)
melodic filtering (4 messages)
MELODIC multi-session temporal concatenation (1 message)
Melodic output (5 messages)
mfast and FIRST (8 messages)
Modeling a motor response (2 messages)
Modes of Variation - FIRST (2 messages)
Modifying run_first_all (2 messages)
More DTI distortion after fugue B0 correction (8 messages)
more on easythresh (1 message)
more on easythresh -- amended (1 message)
Multiple b0s: different intensities (4 messages)
multiple volume simulation (9 messages)
Newbie question on FSL FLIRT (3 messages)
No post stat output for higher level analysis with FEAT (1 message)
Obscured decision of fslorient (4 messages)
ODP: [FSL] Siena and alignment (4 messages)
Older versions of FSL (3 messages)
patch - problem with config file (1 message)
Philips Scaling (15 messages)
PICA operation (2 messages)
podcasts of Advanced Neuroimaging Training Course available (1 message)
Postdoctoral Fellowship (1 message)
Postdoctoral Fellowships and RA Openings at Stanford University Neuroscience Lab (1 message)
Postdoctoral Research Associate (1 message)
Pre-threshold masking (7 messages)
prewhitening (2 messages)
Problem wiht spinal fiber tracking (2 messages)
Problem with 3D Image Viewer (2 messages)
Problem with TBSS and .msf file (2 messages)
probtrack tract length (4 messages)
probtrack vs. probtrackX (2 messages)
Probtrackx Bug + (8 messages)
probtrackx error (1 message)
probtrackx problems (4 messages)
probtrackx with anistropy to constrain tracking (2 messages)
publically available registered fMRI data? (3 messages)
questions about header info (2 messages)
questions about randomise usage (4 messages)
randomise and masking procedures (1 message)
randomise and the -v option (4 messages)
randomise does not complete for Trace data (1 message)
randomise of siena results (1 message)
RE : Re: [FSL] Comparing 3 Groups with TBSS (2 messages)
RE : Re: [FSL] RE : [FSL] registration problem from B0 to T1 with flirt (1 message)
RE : Re: [FSL] RE : [FSL] TBSS, correlation with RT (1 message)
RE : Re: [FSL] TBSS (1 message)
RE : [FSL] FA skeleton range (2 messages)
RE : [FSL] FSL vbm spatial oientation (1 message)
RE : [FSL] Hi and for VBM in white matter (1 message)
RE : [FSL] randomise and masking procedures (5 messages)
RE : [FSL] ROI FA analysis (2 messages)
RE : [FSL] tbss - spatial normalization (3 messages)
RE : [FSL] TBSS -- TFCE (1 message)
RE : [FSL] TBSS -D (2 messages)
RE : [FSL] TBSS L1 (1 message)
RE : [FSL] tbss mean_FA_skeleton alignment error (1 message)
RE : [FSL] TBSS randomise, -c t -- cluster p (3 messages)
RE : [FSL] TBSS, correlation with RT (3 messages)
RE : [FSL] tbss--subject number (7 messages)
RE : [FSL] TBSS-result & cluster p (2 messages)
Registration for Diffusion Data (4 messages)
regressor file with short activations (1 message)
reorientation (9 messages)
Reply if you use FSL's flirt to affine register your images (10 messages)
ROI analysis using atlases (2 messages)
ROI displacement (2 messages)
ROI FA analysis (1 message)
run_first_all (2 messages)
run_first_all fails to complete (1 message)
shortcut fslmerge (2 messages)
Siena and allignment (2 messages)
siena_flow2std error (1 message)
siena_flow2std error in FSL4 (4 messages)
Slicer error (1 message)
Slicer message (1 message)
small volume correction using randomise vs. feat (2 messages)
Software for tracing brain (2 messages)
Split-rotate and merge (3 messages)
strange Group ICA dimensional estimate (5 messages)
syntax error possumX (5 messages)
t-test for tractography (5 messages)
t2-lesions (4 messages)
TBSS (4 messages)
tbss - FA comparison between one patient and a control group (2 messages)
tbss - spatial normalization (1 message)
TBSS -- TFCE (1 message)
TBSS -D (1 message)
TBSS Analysis (3 messages)
TBSS and radomize for GM regions (5 messages)
tbss BUG ? (6 messages)
TBSS covariate (2 messages)
TBSS in stroke (1 message)
TBSS L1 (1 message)
tbss mean_FA_skeleton alignment error (1 message)
tbss randomise TFCE (3 messages)
TBSS randomise, -c t -- cluster p (1 message)
TBSS, correlation with RT (5 messages)
tbss--subject number (1 message)
TBSS-result & cluster p (1 message)
Tbss_2_reg -n (1 message)
tbss_2_reg -n will not pick up again after premature termination (2 messages)
tbss_3_postreg produces empty images: an insight (2 messages)
tbss_deproject (6 messages)
Tbss_non_FA error (2 messages)
Tensor-ICA GLM results (2 messages)
thresholding in FEAT (2 messages)
Tissue segmentation in macaques (2 messages)
two slightly different feat outputs from the same fsf design (2 messages)
UCLA Advanced Neuroimaging Summer School (1 message)
using BET in FEAT (2 messages)
volume calculation using FSL First (2 messages)
voxel values (8 messages)
voxelwise siena and dilation/smoothing (2 messages)
Which slice order does POSSUM use and can it be changed? (3 messages)
whole-brain % signal change maps (5 messages)
Why do my subjects have blue Corpus Callosums (after DTIfit)? (4 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FSL Home

FSL Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Manual BET"

"Manual BET"

Markus Kivikangas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:40:24 +0000

173 lines

Re: "Manual BET"

Lynne Gauthier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:47:35 -0600

87 lines

New Thread

"splitFEAT was run on the original design" - what does this mean?

"splitFEAT was run on the original design" - what does this mean?

Teena Moody <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:13:31 +0000

38 lines

Re: "splitFEAT was run on the original design" - what does this mean?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:25:19 +0000

59 lines

New Thread

'Manual BET'

Re: 'Manual BET'

Diana Tordesillas Gutiérrez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:11:01 +0100

28 lines

Re: 'Manual BET'

Kivikangas Markus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:14:38 +0200

44 lines

Re: 'Manual BET'

Carmela Tartaglia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:28:56 -0500

36 lines

Re: 'Manual BET'

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:29:18 -0500

62 lines

Re: 'Manual BET'

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:32:54 -0500

54 lines

Re: 'Manual BET'

Diana Tordesillas Gutiérrez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:10:56 +0100

55 lines

Re: 'Manual BET'

Vina Goghari <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:58:25 -0600

53 lines

New Thread

.par .rec(v 4.1) conversion- bvecs and bvals

.par .rec(v 4.1) conversion- bvecs and bvals

S. Groppa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:13:02 +0100

30 lines

Re: .par .rec(v 4.1) conversion- bvecs and bvals

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:22:52 +0000

46 lines

Re: .par .rec(v 4.1) conversion- bvecs and bvals

S. Groppa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:51:16 +0100

74 lines

Re: .par .rec(v 4.1) conversion- bvecs and bvals

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:26:16 +0000

95 lines

Re: .par .rec(v 4.1) conversion- bvecs and bvals

S. Groppa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:07:55 +0100

116 lines

Re: .par .rec(v 4.1) conversion- bvecs and bvals

Diana Tordesillas Gutiérrez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:31:47 +0100

136 lines

Re: .par .rec(v 4.1) conversion- bvecs and bvals

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:32:41 +0000

161 lines

New Thread

1 group ...unpaired t-test ??

1 group ...unpaired t-test ??

Versace, Amelia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:29:53 -0500

430 lines

Re: 1 group ...unpaired t-test ??

Jeanette Mumford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:31:10 -0800

293 lines

Re: 1 group ...unpaired t-test ??

Versace, Amelia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:39:12 -0500

847 lines

Re: 1 group ...unpaired t-test ??

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:08:35 +0000

165 lines

Re: 1 group ...unpaired t-test ??

Versace, Amelia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:33:00 -0500

409 lines

New Thread

2 posts in functional neuroimaging

2 posts in functional neuroimaging

Mareike Menz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:01:36 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

2nd level fixed effects WILL run (on latest ubuntu gutsy: 4.0.3-2)

Re: 2nd level fixed effects WILL run (on latest ubuntu gutsy: 4.0.3-2)

Nicholas P Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:20:09 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

2nd-level feat set-up

2nd-level feat set-up

Christopher Petty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:28:33 +0000

113 lines

Re: 2nd-level feat set-up

Christopher Petty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:47:45 +0000

15 lines

New Thread

3x3 repeated measures anaova

3x3 repeated measures anaova

bs Jeong <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:44:11 +0000

99 lines

Re: 3x3 repeated measures anaova

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:54:41 +0000

128 lines

Re: 3x3 repeated measures anaova

bs Jeong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:18:55 -0500

148 lines

Re: 3x3 repeated measures anaova

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:08:15 +0000

183 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Paul Geha <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:10:03 -0600

26 lines

<No subject>

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:23:14 +0000

54 lines

<no subject>

Braun, Allen (NIH/NIDCD) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:05:06 -0500

189 lines

New Thread

about flirt

Re: about flirt

Li Jiang <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:06:56 -0500

508 lines

Re: about flirt

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:18:47 +0000

333 lines

Re: about flirt

Li Jiang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:20:49 +0800

210 lines

Re: about flirt

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:05:04 +0000

376 lines

Re: about flirt

Li Jiang <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 22:03:11 +0800

243 lines

Re: about flirt

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:27:48 +0000

461 lines

Re: about flirt

Li Jiang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:57:29 -0500

277 lines

New Thread

Analyze to nifti converting

Analyze to nifti converting

Shireen, Kwiatkowska <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:43:45 +0100

21 lines

Re: Analyze to nifti converting

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:07:29 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

applescript and fslview?

applescript and fslview?

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:36:49 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Melodic output

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Melodic output

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:03:31 +0100

125 lines

AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] Melodic output

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:03:47 +0100

125 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] McFLIRT basic use question

AW: [FSL] McFLIRT basic use question

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:49:49 +0100

61 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] McFLIRT basic use question

Emily T Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:18:57 -0500

93 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] McFLIRT basic use question

Greg Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:02:16 +0000

117 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] McFLIRT basic use question

Emily Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:12:26 +0000

13 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] McFLIRT basic use question

FMRIB Brad MacIntosh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:54:02 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] Melodic output

AW: [FSL] Melodic output

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:55:22 +0100

97 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] Melodic output

Michelle Voss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:21:56 -0600

189 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] Melodic output

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:00:31 +0000

127 lines

New Thread

AW: [FSL] probtrackx problems

AW: [FSL] probtrackx problems

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:59:59 +0100

109 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] probtrackx problems

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:14:11 +1100

136 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] probtrackx problems

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:43:05 +0000

268 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] probtrackx problems

Ted Yanagihara <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:54:24 -0500

298 lines

Re: AW: [FSL] probtrackx problems

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:22:03 -0500

785 lines

New Thread

back issue of fsl

back issue of fsl

Stephen Paisey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:45:52 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

Basics Featquery

Basics Featquery

Yvonne Brehmer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:14:12 +0000

60 lines

Re: Basics Featquery

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:30:55 +0000

108 lines

Re: Basics Featquery

Yvonne Brehmer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:22:43 +0000

10 lines

New Thread

bedpostx error

bedpostx error

Swati Rane <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:19:37 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

bedpostx error - found answer

Re: bedpostx error - found answer

Swati Rane <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:07:38 +0000

12 lines

New Thread

BET

BET

Vina Goghari <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:53:58 -0600

17 lines

Re: BET

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:34:51 -0500

34 lines

Re: BET

Vina Goghari <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:49:02 -0600

43 lines

Re: BET

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:12:37 -0500

58 lines

Re: BET

Vina Goghari <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:31:50 -0600

66 lines

New Thread

BET Error 'image file not valid'

BET Error 'image file not valid'

Emily Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:22:54 +0000

77 lines

Re: BET Error 'image file not valid'

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:02:42 +0000

106 lines

Re: BET Error 'image file not valid'

Emily T Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:33:20 -0500

149 lines

Re: BET Error 'image file not valid'

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:44:05 +0100

158 lines

Re: BET Error 'image file not valid'

Emily Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:30:59 +0000

17 lines

New Thread

BET output is 32 bits/pix

BET output is 32 bits/pix

Jennifer Bramen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:10:37 +0000

36 lines

Re: BET output is 32 bits/pix

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:31:30 +0000

53 lines

Re: BET output is 32 bits/pix

Jennifer Bramen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:22:25 -0800

160 lines

Re: BET output is 32 bits/pix

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:45:15 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

BET question

BET question

Anastasia Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:00:37 +0000

20 lines

Re: BET question

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:21:07 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

binary mask for FDT

binary mask for FDT

Lucia Garrido <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:24:46 +0000

31 lines

Re: binary mask for FDT

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:20:45 +0000

49 lines

Re: binary mask for FDT

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:25:55 +0000

65 lines

New Thread

Brain Atlas for rat brians

Brain Atlas for rat brians

Stephen Paisey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:41:43 +0000

23 lines

Re: Brain Atlas for rat brians

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:35:57 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

Can we have fslstats store the output to a text file?

Can we have fslstats store the output to a text file?

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:54:59 -0500

52 lines

Re: Can we have fslstats store the output to a text file?

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:15:08 +0000

68 lines

Re: Can we have fslstats store the output to a text file?

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:25:38 -0500

333 lines

Re: Can we have fslstats store the output to a text file?

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:51:12 -0500

522 lines

New Thread

Characterization & Propagation of uncertainty paper

Characterization & Propagation of uncertainty paper

Anastasia Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:21:53 +0000

37 lines

Re: Characterization & Propagation of uncertainty paper

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:33:50 +0000

67 lines

New Thread

Cluster Command

Cluster Command

Jennifer Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:48:06 +0000

29 lines

Re: Cluster Command

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:08:53 +0000

78 lines

New Thread

cluster tool on randomise output

cluster tool on randomise output

Soohyun Cho <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:37:52 -0800

23 lines

Re: cluster tool on randomise output

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:28:03 +0000

46 lines

Re: cluster tool on randomise output

Soohyun Cho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 01:17:35 -0800

186 lines

Re: cluster tool on randomise output

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:09:03 +0000

96 lines

Re: cluster tool on randomise output

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:28:00 -0700

234 lines

Re: cluster tool on randomise output

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:50:46 +0000

158 lines

New Thread

command line for randomise -T

command line for randomise -T

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:38:09 +0000

24 lines

Re: command line for randomise -T

Himachandra Chebrolu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:39:10 -0800

55 lines

Re: command line for randomise -T

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:39:52 +0000

84 lines

Re: command line for randomise -T

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:42:56 +0000

103 lines

New Thread

Command Line Scripts

Command Line Scripts

Emily Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:43:59 +0000

19 lines

Re: Command Line Scripts

Daniel Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:48:23 -0800

33 lines

Re: Command Line Scripts

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:20:55 +0000

32 lines

Re: Command Line Scripts

Emily T Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:53:01 -0500

70 lines

New Thread

Comparing 3 Groups with TBSS

Re: Comparing 3 Groups with TBSS

David Kideckel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:23:00 -0500

132 lines

Re: Comparing 3 Groups with TBSS

David Kideckel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:05:19 -0500

137 lines

New Thread

compile BET2 under windows XP

compile BET2 under windows XP

kl chen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:26:12 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

Conjunction Analysis

Conjunction Analysis

Yvonne Brehmer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:24:10 +0000

24 lines

Conjunction Analysis

Yvonne Brehmer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:10:33 +0000

30 lines

Re: Conjunction Analysis

Joseph T. Devlin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:19:27 +0000

29 lines

Re: Conjunction Analysis

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:58:03 +0000

46 lines

Re: Conjunction Analysis

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:44:37 +0000

69 lines

Re: Conjunction Analysis

Yvonne Brehmer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:27:57 +0000

25 lines

Re: Conjunction Analysis

Joseph T. Devlin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:04:24 +0000

23 lines

Re: Conjunction Analysis

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:27:05 +0000

262 lines

New Thread

Conjunction Analysis..oops

Re: Conjunction Analysis..oops

Joseph T. Devlin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:23:52 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Corticospinal and optic tract mapping

Re: Corticospinal and optic tract mapping

Anastasia Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:04:08 +0000

34 lines

Re: Corticospinal and optic tract mapping

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:54:21 +0000

66 lines

Re: Corticospinal and optic tract mapping

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:35:37 +1100

102 lines

Re: Corticospinal and optic tract mapping

Anastasia Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:58:37 +0000

21 lines

Re: Corticospinal and optic tract mapping

Anastasia Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:11:24 +0000

25 lines

Re: Corticospinal and optic tract mapping

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:46:11 +0000

181 lines

New Thread

Debian dependencies

Debian dependencies

Jiří Keller, M.D. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:21:27 +0100

23 lines

Re: Debian dependencies

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:15:26 +0100

41 lines

Debian dependencies

Jiří Keller, M.D. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:28:11 +0100

34 lines

Re: Debian dependencies

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:09:16 +0100

65 lines

Re: Debian dependencies

Jiří Keller, M.D. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:43:15 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Difference between SPM Display and FSL Nudge

Difference between SPM Display and FSL Nudge

Buyean Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:39:59 -0500

81 lines

New Thread

discrepancy with intensities using fslstats

Re: discrepancy with intensities using fslstats

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:23:34 +0000

75 lines

New Thread

display zstats in standard space

Re: display zstats in standard space

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:19:11 +0000

97 lines

New Thread

Does ROI correlation exclude seed ROI?

Does ROI correlation exclude seed ROI?

Dost Ongur <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:44:19 +0000

20 lines

Re: Does ROI correlation exclude seed ROI?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:34:17 +0000

47 lines

Re: Does ROI correlation exclude seed ROI?

Dost Ongur <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:16:14 +0000

71 lines

Re: Does ROI correlation exclude seed ROI?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:21:16 +0000

96 lines

New Thread

DTI group analysis with FSL

DTI group analysis with FSL

H.D. Xiang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:53:41 +0100

54 lines

Re: DTI group analysis with FSL

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:04:04 -0500

142 lines

Re: DTI group analysis with FSL

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:24:28 +0000

64 lines

Re: DTI group analysis with FSL

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:15:46 -0500

259 lines

New Thread

DTI-based White Matter Atlas

DTI-based White Matter Atlas

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:18:14 -0500

17 lines

Re: DTI-based White Matter Atlas

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:45:17 +0000

43 lines

Re: DTI-based White Matter Atlas

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:34:16 -0500

64 lines

Re: DTI-based White Matter Atlas

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:12:20 +0000

95 lines

Re: DTI-based White Matter Atlas

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:11:15 -0500

144 lines

Re: DTI-based White Matter Atlas

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:41:08 +0000

185 lines

Re: DTI-based White Matter Atlas

Lindgren, Kristen, Ann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:25:58 -0500

216 lines

Re: DTI-based White Matter Atlas

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:48:01 +0000

231 lines

New Thread

DTIFIT and bedpostx_datacheck question

DTIFIT and bedpostx_datacheck question

Ashley Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:37:38 +0000

29 lines

Re: DTIFIT and bedpostx_datacheck question

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:07:26 -0500

45 lines

Re: DTIFIT and bedpostx_datacheck question

Cherif Sahyoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:01:41 -0500

89 lines

New Thread

eddy correct and b0 correction

eddy correct and b0 correction

Marenco, Stefano (NIH/NIMH) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:55:22 -0500

124 lines

Re: eddy correct and b0 correction

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:59:59 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

error in feat log

error in feat log

Aaron Trachtenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:08:01 -0600

77 lines

Re: error in feat log

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:49:41 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

Error when re-runnning stats & post-stats ERROR:: Empty mask image

Re: Error when re-runnning stats & post-stats ERROR:: Empty mask image

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:31:34 +0000

56 lines

Re: Error when re-runnning stats & post-stats ERROR:: Empty mask image

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:08:27 +0000

22 lines

Re: Error when re-runnning stats & post-stats ERROR:: Empty mask image

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:26:53 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Experience with SIEMENS Verio 3T versus TrioTim

Experience with SIEMENS Verio 3T versus TrioTim

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:54:35 +0100

35 lines

Re: Experience with SIEMENS Verio 3T versus TrioTim

Souheil Inati <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:56:13 -0500

78 lines

New Thread

F-values of the higher-level analyses?

F-values of the higher-level analyses?

Virve Vuontela <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:14:33 +0200

34 lines

Re: F-values of the higher-level analyses?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:32:59 +0000

59 lines

Re: F-values of the higher-level analyses?

Virve Vuontela <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:38:19 +0200

123 lines

Re: F-values of the higher-level analyses?

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:33:03 +0000

496 lines

New Thread

FA skeleton range

FA skeleton range

Naama Barnea-Goraly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:03:43 -0800

84 lines

New Thread

FAST changing orientation of BETed image

Re: FAST changing orientation of BETed image

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:24:53 +0000

54 lines

Re: FAST changing orientation of BETed image

WANG Bo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 08:16:15 +0800

89 lines

Re: FAST changing orientation of BETed image

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:43:51 +0000

100 lines

New Thread

FAST output

FAST output

Renee Ochs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:37:05 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

fast4 questions

Re: fast4 questions

Timm Wetzel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:53:45 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

FEAT full model setup

FEAT full model setup

carlos silva pereira <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:10:11 +0000

36 lines

Re: FEAT full model setup

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:16:14 +0000

33 lines

Re: FEAT full model setup

carlos silva pereira <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:23:53 +0000

69 lines

Re: FEAT full model setup

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:29:32 +0000

65 lines

Re: FEAT full model setup

carlos silva pereira <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:42:00 +0000

104 lines

Re: FEAT full model setup

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:58:35 +0000

138 lines

Re: FEAT full model setup

carlos silva pereira <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:42:09 +0000

186 lines

New Thread

Feat Multi-Session Multi-Subject Analysis

Feat Multi-Session Multi-Subject Analysis

Luetcke, Henry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:38:46 +0100

177 lines

Re: Feat Multi-Session Multi-Subject Analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:22:11 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

FEAT: WARNING: nifti_read_buffer

FEAT: WARNING: nifti_read_buffer

Emily Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:20:45 +0000

71 lines

Re: FEAT: WARNING: nifti_read_buffer

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:47:26 +0000

90 lines

New Thread

featquery on a second level analysis

Re: featquery on a second level analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:51:30 +0000

202 lines

Re: featquery on a second level analysis

Stephane Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:13:43 -0800

230 lines

New Thread

Featquery Output

Featquery Output

Aziz Asghar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:08:30 +0000

43 lines

Re: Featquery Output

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:18:50 +0000

90 lines

New Thread

featquery variance of the % signal change

featquery variance of the % signal change

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:14:43 +0000

18 lines

Re: featquery variance of the % signal change

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:31:41 +0000

37 lines

Featquery variance of the % signal change

Yvonne Brehmer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:08:09 +0000

25 lines

Re: Featquery variance of the % signal change

Greg Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:01:22 +0000

75 lines

Re: Featquery variance of the % signal change

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:33:35 +0000

118 lines

Re: Featquery variance of the % signal change

Yvonne Brehmer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:10:25 +0000

24 lines

Re: Featquery variance of the % signal change

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:42:12 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

Featquery, contrast weights

Featquery, contrast weights

Teemu Rinne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:56:31 +0200

142 lines

Re: Featquery, contrast weights

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:31:07 +0000

86 lines

New Thread

FIRST

FIRST

Allison C. Nugent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:53:26 +0000

34 lines

Re: FIRST

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:45:03 +0000

67 lines

New Thread

First analysis

First analysis

Adil Javed <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:42:36 -0800

33 lines

Re: First analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:40:23 +0000

59 lines

New Thread

flirt -displayinit

flirt -displayinit

Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:06:37 +0100

15 lines

Re: flirt -displayinit

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:20:32 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

FLIRT input error?

FLIRT input error?

Emily Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:08:32 +0000

54 lines

Re: FLIRT input error?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:19:56 +0000

72 lines

Re: FLIRT input error?

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:27:33 -0500

68 lines

Re: FLIRT input error?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:04:33 +0000

89 lines

Re: FLIRT input error?

Emily T Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:36:19 -0500

111 lines

New Thread

flirt on 4D fMRI data

flirt on 4D fMRI data

Kimberly Chiew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:34:30 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

FSL 4.0.3 debian gcc 4.1.2 patch

FSL 4.0.3 debian gcc 4.1.2 patch

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 17:44:06 +0000

18 lines

Re: FSL 4.0.3 debian gcc 4.1.2 patch

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 15:37:13 -0500

31 lines

Re: FSL 4.0.3 debian gcc 4.1.2 patch

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:44:40 +0100

30 lines

Re: FSL 4.0.3 debian gcc 4.1.2 patch

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:34:54 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

FSL vbm spatial oientation

FSL vbm spatial oientation

Paul Geha <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:41:55 -0600

34 lines

New Thread

fsl2ascii accuracy question

fsl2ascii accuracy question

Ben Mayer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:59:01 -0600

27 lines

Re: fsl2ascii accuracy question

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:24:47 +0000

48 lines

Re: fsl2ascii accuracy question

Ben Mayer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:07:33 -0600

54 lines

New Thread

fslchpixdim broken?

fslchpixdim broken?

Matthew Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:20:15 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

fslmaths precision

fslmaths precision

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:53:55 +1100

28 lines

Re: fslmaths precision

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:58:34 +0000

40 lines

Re: fslmaths precision

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:21:52 +1100

63 lines

Re: fslmaths precision

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:48:46 +0000

84 lines

New Thread

fslmerge on Analyze images

fslmerge on Analyze images

Aaron Trachtenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:25:41 -0600

62 lines

Re: fslmerge on Analyze images

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 07:52:11 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

fslorient problem - may be a bug ?

fslorient problem - may be a bug ?

Jiří Keller, M.D. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:29:23 +0100

25 lines

Re: fslorient problem - may be a bug ?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:02:45 +0000

56 lines

fslorient problem - may be a bug ?

Jiří Keller, M.D. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:26:56 +0100

47 lines

Re: fslorient problem - may be a bug ?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:50:11 +0000

74 lines

Re: fslorient problem - may be a bug ?

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:05:15 +0100

44 lines

fslorient problem - may be a bug ?

Jiří Keller, M.D. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:50:45 +0100

40 lines

Re: fslorient problem - may be a bug ?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:22:05 +0000

95 lines

New Thread

fslpspec

fslpspec

H.Steven Scholte <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 15:11:55 +0000

14 lines

Re: fslpspec

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 17:31:11 +0000

25 lines

Re: fslpspec

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:53:35 -0700

75 lines

Re: fslpspec

H.Steven Scholte <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:32:20 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

fslroi -- spherical ROIs?

fslroi -- spherical ROIs?

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:03:59 +0000

16 lines

Re: fslroi -- spherical ROIs?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:07:58 +0000

36 lines

Re: fslroi -- spherical ROIs?

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:54:38 +0000

43 lines

Re: fslroi -- spherical ROIs?

John Herrington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:45:00 -0500

59 lines

Re: fslroi -- spherical ROIs?

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:21:28 +0000

72 lines

Re: fslroi -- spherical ROIs?

John Herrington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:27:29 -0500

92 lines

Re: fslroi -- spherical ROIs?

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:30:31 -0500

74 lines

Re: fslroi -- spherical ROIs?

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:12:56 +0000

120 lines

Re: fslroi -- spherical ROIs?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:24:19 +0000

140 lines

Re: fslroi -- spherical ROIs?

John Herrington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:53:42 -0500

174 lines

Re: fslroi -- spherical ROIs?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:57:51 +0000

191 lines

New Thread

fslview min max range and colormap types

fslview min max range and colormap types

Soohyun Cho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:00:19 -0800

104 lines

Re: fslview min max range and colormap types

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:32:50 +0000

62 lines

New Thread

FSLView timeseries, combined runs

Re: FSLView timeseries, combined runs

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:40:19 +0000

55 lines

Re: FSLView timeseries, combined runs

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:15:06 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

fsl_sub vs runfsl

fsl_sub vs runfsl

Neil Killeen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:35:21 +1100

25 lines

Re: fsl_sub vs runfsl

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:44:31 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Bug in slicer? or am I 3-Dimensionally challenged

Fwd: Bug in slicer? or am I 3-Dimensionally challenged

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:18:23 -0500

563 lines

Re: Fwd: Bug in slicer? or am I 3-Dimensionally challenged

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:20:50 +0000

114 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: [FSL] F-values of the higher-level analyses?

Fwd: Re: [FSL] F-values of the higher-level analyses?

Virve Vuontela <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:20:22 +0200

76 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [FSL] F-values of the higher-level analyses?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:06:29 +0000

106 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [FSL] fslorient problem - may be a bug ?

Fwd: [FSL] fslorient problem - may be a bug ?

Jiří Keller, M.D. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:56:22 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [FSL] MELODIC errors

Fwd: [FSL] MELODIC errors

David V. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:46:51 -0500

312 lines

Re: Fwd: [FSL] MELODIC errors

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:44:48 +0000

194 lines

Re: Fwd: [FSL] MELODIC errors

David V. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:36:35 -0500

221 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [FSL] Tissue segmentation in macaques

Fwd: [FSL] Tissue segmentation in macaques

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:22 +0000

140 lines

New Thread

grand mean scaling

Re: grand mean scaling

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:29:23 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

group and fstat design file

Re: group and fstat design file

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:00:10 +0000

132 lines

New Thread

group ICA

group ICA

Weiming Zeng <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 20:54:59 +0000

23 lines

group ica

Weiming Zeng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:02:13 +0000

24 lines

Re: group ica

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:42:59 +0000

35 lines

Re: group ica

weiming zeng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:53:21 -0500

51 lines

group ica

weiming zeng <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:22:10 -0500

31 lines

Re: group ica

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:02:57 +0000

47 lines

Re: group ica

lingling pu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:39:52 -0800

237 lines

Re: group ica

weiming zeng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:22:43 -0500

64 lines

New Thread

Help with temporal derivatives

Help with temporal derivatives

Aaron Trachtenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:22:58 -0600

91 lines

Re: Help with temporal derivatives

Joseph T. Devlin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:49:31 +0000

54 lines

Re: Help with temporal derivatives

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:41:52 +0000

80 lines

New Thread

Hi and for VBM in white matter

Hi and for VBM in white matter

Zhang, Xiaochu (NIH/NIDA) [F] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 16:43:01 -0500

20 lines

Re: Hi and for VBM in white matter

Lynne Gauthier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:19:38 -0600

94 lines

New Thread

Higher level Feat Q

Higher level Feat Q

Joseph Devlin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 18:45:16 +0000

29 lines

Re: Higher level Feat Q

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:33:01 +0000

52 lines

Re: Higher level Feat Q

Joseph T. Devlin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:04:01 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

higher level group mean

higher level group mean

Anna Rieckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:09:20 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

Higher-level analysis with covariate of interest

Higher-level analysis with covariate of interest

Jessica Kirkland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:49:05 +0000

54 lines

Re: Higher-level analysis with covariate of interest

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:59:38 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

Higher-level unbalanced analysis

Higher-level unbalanced analysis

Jessica Kirkland <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:39:50 +0000

30 lines

Re: Higher-level unbalanced analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:36:37 +0000

55 lines

Re: Higher-level unbalanced analysis

Jessica Kirkland <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:57:52 -0600

86 lines

New Thread

Image overlay in FSLView

Image overlay in FSLView

Marc Dubin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:09:59 +0000

23 lines

Re: Image overlay in FSLView

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:58:34 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Importing external individual results to FEAT group analysis

Importing external individual results to FEAT group analysis

Xu Chen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 00:03:41 -0500

22 lines

Re: Importing external individual results to FEAT group analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:57:43 +0000

53 lines

Re: Importing external individual results to FEAT group analysis

Tom Johnstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:07:18 +0000

75 lines

Re: Importing external individual results to FEAT group analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:20:09 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

Include temp derivative in model

Include temp derivative in model

dartmouth fsl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:14:18 -0800

33 lines

Re: Include temp derivative in model

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:50:30 +0000

118 lines

Re: Include temp derivative in model

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:57:55 +0000

59 lines

New Thread

incompatible object file

incompatible object file

Bjorn Roelstraete <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:43:16 +0100

144 lines

Re: incompatible object file

Ivana Drobnjak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:14:54 +0000

155 lines

New Thread

installation of a new brain atlas (for rats) into fsl

installation of a new brain atlas (for rats) into fsl

Stephen Paisey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:52:23 +0000

21 lines

Re: installation of a new brain atlas (for rats) into fsl

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:08:41 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Intensity values of sigle voxels

Intensity values of sigle voxels

Shireen, Kwiatkowska <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:15:39 +0100

18 lines

Re: Intensity values of sigle voxels

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:26:08 +0000

37 lines

Re: Intensity values of sigle voxels

Shireen, Kwiatkowska <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:58:21 +0100

69 lines

Re: Intensity values of sigle voxels

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:19:59 -0500

82 lines

New Thread

interaction contrasts in ANOVA

interaction contrasts in ANOVA

Friedemann Szymanowski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:09:41 +0100

41 lines

Re: interaction contrasts in ANOVA

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:30:53 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Interpreting basis functions in FLOBS

Interpreting basis functions in FLOBS

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:21:31 +0000

27 lines

Re: Interpreting basis functions in FLOBS

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:26:09 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

Intervoxel Coherence, anyone?

Intervoxel Coherence, anyone?

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:38:18 -0700

92 lines

Re: Intervoxel Coherence, anyone?

Marenco, Stefano (NIH/NIMH) [E] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:17:51 -0500

368 lines

Re: Intervoxel Coherence, anyone?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:03:59 +0000

113 lines

Re: Intervoxel Coherence, anyone?

Carlo Pierpaoli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:56:13 -0500

181 lines

Re: Intervoxel Coherence, anyone?

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:30:24 -0700

257 lines

New Thread

libqt-mt.so library

libqt-mt.so library

Hyo Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:34:25 +0000

30 lines

Re: libqt-mt.so library

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:21:01 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

masking procedure

masking procedure

Carlos Silva Pereira <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:25:40 +0000

19 lines

Re: masking procedure

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:14:49 -0500

35 lines

Re: masking procedure

Chris Petty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:20:55 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Masks for TBSS randomise

Masks for TBSS randomise

S. Groppa <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:00:48 +0100

22 lines

Re: Masks for TBSS randomise

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:21:05 +0000

54 lines

Re: Masks for TBSS randomise

S. Groppa <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:52:59 +0100

81 lines

Re: Masks for TBSS randomise

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:59:23 +0000

109 lines

Re: Masks for TBSS randomise

S. Groppa <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:20:48 +0100

127 lines

New Thread

MATLAB access to FSL 4.0 w/VMware

MATLAB access to FSL 4.0 w/VMware

Russell Chu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 00:57:34 +0000

29 lines

Re: MATLAB access to FSL 4.0 w/VMware

vincent ferrera <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 21:44:01 -0500

34 lines

Re: MATLAB access to FSL 4.0 w/VMware

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 21:50:29 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

McFLIRT basic use question

McFLIRT basic use question

Emily Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:40:50 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

MEAN or Median - preprocessing of X repetitions

MEAN or Median - preprocessing of X repetitions

S. Groppa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:33:56 +0100

25 lines

Re: MEAN or Median - preprocessing of X repetitions

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:26:47 +0000

160 lines

New Thread

mean squared error

mean squared error

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:34:08 +0000

18 lines

Re: mean squared error

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:22:48 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

melodic filtering

melodic filtering

Shawn Yeh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:05:36 +0000

36 lines

Re: melodic filtering

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:43:51 +0000

60 lines

Re: melodic filtering

Shawn Yeh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:32:25 +0000

84 lines

Re: melodic filtering

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:32:15 +0000

117 lines

New Thread

MELODIC multi-session temporal concatenation

Re: MELODIC multi-session temporal concatenation

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 10:54:45 +0000

64 lines

New Thread

Melodic output

Melodic output

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:57:59 +0000

38 lines

Re: Melodic output

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:54:11 +0000

64 lines

Re: Melodic output

Michelle Voss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:39:31 -0600

104 lines

Re: Melodic output

Vishwadeep Ahluwalia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:05:11 +0000

32 lines

Re: Melodic output

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:16:46 +0000

62 lines

New Thread

mfast and FIRST

mfast and FIRST

Diana Tordesillas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:07:18 +0000

24 lines

Re: mfast and FIRST

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:01:34 +0000

43 lines

Re: mfast and FIRST

Diana Tordesillas Gutiérrez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:55:57 +0100

67 lines

Re: mfast and FIRST

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:09:33 +0000

86 lines

Re: mfast and FIRST

Diana Tordesillas Gutiérrez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:42:18 +0100

98 lines

Re: mfast and FIRST

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:37:41 +0000

115 lines

Re: mfast and FIRST

Diana Tordesillas Gutiérrez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:01:40 +0100

21 lines

Re: mfast and FIRST

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:24:47 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Modeling a motor response

Modeling a motor response

Jessica Kirkland <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 15:24:14 -0600

34 lines

Re: Modeling a motor response

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:24:02 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Modes of Variation - FIRST

Modes of Variation - FIRST

SUBSCRIBE FSL Carline <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:54:13 +0000

19 lines

Re: Modes of Variation - FIRST

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:28:35 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Modifying run_first_all

Modifying run_first_all

Melissa L. Henry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:26:14 +0000

191 lines

Re: Modifying run_first_all

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:45:14 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

More DTI distortion after fugue B0 correction

More DTI distortion after fugue B0 correction

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:48:57 +0000

24 lines

Re: More DTI distortion after fugue B0 correction

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:43:30 +0000

45 lines

Re: More DTI distortion after fugue B0 correction

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:14:24 +0000

20 lines

Re: More DTI distortion after fugue B0 correction

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:21:55 +0000

25 lines

Re: More DTI distortion after fugue B0 correction

Daniel Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:39:02 -0800

40 lines

Re: More DTI distortion after fugue B0 correction

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:30:51 +0000

14 lines

Re: More DTI distortion after fugue B0 correction

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:35:07 +0000

32 lines

Re: More DTI distortion after fugue B0 correction

Carlos Faraco <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:18:17 +0000

10 lines

New Thread

more on easythresh

more on easythresh

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:03:47 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

more on easythresh -- amended

Re: more on easythresh -- amended

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:34:01 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

Multiple b0s: different intensities

Multiple b0s: different intensities

Wen, Wei <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:54:27 +1100

29 lines

Re: Multiple b0s: different intensities

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 08:38:23 +0000

50 lines

Re: Multiple b0s: different intensities

Wen, Wei <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:27:48 +1100

65 lines

Re: Multiple b0s: different intensities

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:42:22 +0000

82 lines

New Thread

multiple volume simulation

multiple volume simulation

Bjorn Roelstraete <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:33:42 +0000

24 lines

Re: multiple volume simulation

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:38:50 +0000

33 lines

Re: multiple volume simulation

Bjorn Roelstraete <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:23:44 +0100

43 lines

Re: multiple volume simulation

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:34:06 +0000

54 lines

Re: multiple volume simulation

Bjorn Roelstraete <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:08:14 +0100

63 lines

Re: multiple volume simulation

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:20:44 -0500

77 lines

Re: multiple volume simulation

Bjorn Roelstraete <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:35:05 +0100

95 lines

Re: multiple volume simulation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 22:57:15 +0000

127 lines

Re: multiple volume simulation

Roland Marcus Rutschmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:32:41 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

Newbie question on FSL FLIRT

Newbie question on FSL FLIRT

Alessandro Daducci <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:17:16 +0000

45 lines

Re: Newbie question on FSL FLIRT

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:18:45 +0000

79 lines

Re: Newbie question on FSL FLIRT

Alessandro Daducci <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:50:29 +0100

100 lines

New Thread

No post stat output for higher level analysis with FEAT

No post stat output for higher level analysis with FEAT

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:15:19 +0000

103 lines

New Thread

Obscured decision of fslorient

Obscured decision of fslorient

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:26:12 +0100

100 lines

Re: Obscured decision of fslorient

Timm Wetzel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:07:43 +0100

42 lines

Re: Obscured decision of fslorient

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:38:56 +0000

115 lines

Re: Obscured decision of fslorient

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:46:29 +0100

122 lines

New Thread

ODP: [FSL] Siena and alignment

ODP: [FSL] Siena and alignment

Shireen, Kwiatkowska <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:27:41 +0100

81 lines

Re: ODP: [FSL] Siena and alignment

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:34:49 +0000

106 lines

ODP: [FSL] Siena and alignment

Shireen, Kwiatkowska <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:10:28 +0100

122 lines

Re: ODP: [FSL] Siena and alignment

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:58:04 +0000

160 lines

New Thread

Older versions of FSL

Older versions of FSL

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:06:32 -0800

13 lines

Re: Older versions of FSL

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:45:44 +0000

25 lines

Re: Older versions of FSL

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:59:24 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

patch - problem with config file

Re: patch - problem with config file

Neil Killeen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:39:47 +0000

59 lines

New Thread

Philips Scaling

Re: Philips Scaling

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:45:31 -0500

39 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Anastasia Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:16:42 +0000

666 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:11:04 -0500

39 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Anastasia Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:04:12 +0000

37 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:50:27 +0000

197 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Anastasia Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:49:27 +0000

35 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:02:23 +0000

200 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Anastasia Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:26:11 +0000

36 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:31:10 -0500

44 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Anastasia Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:38:16 +0000

22 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:42:45 -0500

38 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Anastasia Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:57:14 +0000

22 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:03:17 -0500

42 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Anastasia Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:11:26 +0000

27 lines

Re: Philips Scaling

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:38:23 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

PICA operation

Re: PICA operation

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:18:13 +0000

44 lines

Re: PICA operation

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 21:18:28 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

podcasts of Advanced Neuroimaging Training Course available

podcasts of Advanced Neuroimaging Training Course available

Russell Poldrack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:45:51 -0800

99 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Fellowship

Postdoctoral Fellowship

Allen Braun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:06:40 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Fellowships and RA Openings at Stanford University Neuroscience Lab

Postdoctoral Fellowships and RA Openings at Stanford University Neuroscience Lab

Sarah S. Wu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:40:25 -0800

165 lines

New Thread

Postdoctoral Research Associate

Postdoctoral Research Associate

Donna Lloyd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:56:29 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Pre-threshold masking

Pre-threshold masking

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:26:22 +0000

28 lines

Re: Pre-threshold masking

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:37:48 +0000

41 lines

Re: Pre-threshold masking

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:52:03 +0100

75 lines

Re: Pre-threshold masking

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:04:12 +0000

89 lines

Re: Pre-threshold masking

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:56:08 +0100

94 lines

Re: Pre-threshold masking

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:00:07 +0000

109 lines

Re: Pre-threshold masking

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:16:45 +0100

115 lines

New Thread

prewhitening

prewhitening

George He <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:01:59 -0500

129 lines

Re: prewhitening

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:54:54 +0000

229 lines

New Thread

Problem wiht spinal fiber tracking

Problem wiht spinal fiber tracking

Markus Gschwind <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:42:32 +0100

62 lines

Re: Problem wiht spinal fiber tracking

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:01:37 +0000

243 lines

New Thread

Problem with 3D Image Viewer

Problem with 3D Image Viewer

Umrao Sethi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:03:01 +0000

23 lines

Re: Problem with 3D Image Viewer

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:27:04 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Problem with TBSS and .msf file

Problem with TBSS and .msf file

Eytan Raz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:02:42 +0100

40 lines

Re: Problem with TBSS and .msf file

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:28:48 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

probtrack tract length

probtrack tract length

Ryan Muetzel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:21:24 -0600

17 lines

Re: probtrack tract length

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:31:24 +0000

140 lines

Re: probtrack tract length

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:40:26 -0500

102 lines

Re: probtrack tract length

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:03:04 +0000

229 lines

New Thread

probtrack vs. probtrackX

probtrack vs. probtrackX

Marko Müller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:57:36 +0000

113 lines

Re: probtrack vs. probtrackX

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:53:20 +0000

208 lines

New Thread

Probtrackx Bug +

Probtrackx Bug +

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:06:20 -0500

140 lines

Re: Probtrackx Bug +

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:55:37 +0000

171 lines

Re: Probtrackx Bug +

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:34:47 -0500

571 lines

Re: Probtrackx Bug +

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:49:34 +0000

446 lines

Re: Probtrackx Bug +

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:41:04 +0100

124 lines

Re: Probtrackx Bug +

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:44:18 -0500

1194 lines

Re: Probtrackx Bug +

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:48:02 -0500

1281 lines

Re: Probtrackx Bug +

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:49:09 -0500

1362 lines

New Thread

probtrackx error

Re: probtrackx error

dartmouth fsl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:35:33 -0800

144 lines

New Thread

probtrackx problems

probtrackx problems

SK <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:09:15 +1100

51 lines

Re: probtrackx problems

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:17:34 -0500

66 lines

Re: probtrackx problems

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:42:25 +1100

86 lines

Re: probtrackx problems

Scott Kolbe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:52:36 +1100

97 lines

New Thread

probtrackx with anistropy to constrain tracking

probtrackx with anistropy to constrain tracking

Finn Lennartsson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:21:56 +0100

44 lines

Re: probtrackx with anistropy to constrain tracking

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:28:55 +0000

93 lines

New Thread

publically available registered fMRI data?

publically available registered fMRI data?

Jeffrey Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:57:21 +0000

42 lines

Re: publically available registered fMRI data?

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 17:33:28 +0000

62 lines

Re: publically available registered fMRI data?

Daniel Fitzgerald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:27:33 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

questions about header info

questions about header info

Soohyun Cho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:17:09 -0800

77 lines

Re: questions about header info

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:29:41 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

questions about randomise usage

questions about randomise usage

Colm G.Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:07:42 +0000

1020 lines

Re: questions about randomise usage

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:33:38 +0000

118 lines

Re: questions about randomise usage

Colm G. Connolly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:03:24 +0000

80 lines

Re: questions about randomise usage

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:45:20 +0000

83 lines

New Thread

randomise and masking procedures

randomise and masking procedures

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:36:54 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

randomise and the -v option

randomise and the -v option

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:24:14 +0000

25 lines

Re: randomise and the -v option

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:44:34 +0000

129 lines

Re: randomise and the -v option

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:22:36 +0000

190 lines

Re: randomise and the -v option

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:32:32 +0000

180 lines

New Thread

randomise does not complete for Trace data

randomise does not complete for Trace data

Walker, Lindsay (NIH/NICHD) [G] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:14:28 -0500

168 lines

New Thread

randomise of siena results

randomise of siena results

Shireen, Kwiatkowska <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:18:55 +0100

138 lines

New Thread

RE : Re: [FSL] Comparing 3 Groups with TBSS

RE : Re: [FSL] Comparing 3 Groups with TBSS

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:08:34 +0100

161 lines

Re: RE : Re: [FSL] Comparing 3 Groups with TBSS

David Kideckel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:27:28 -0800

285 lines

New Thread

RE : Re: [FSL] RE : [FSL] registration problem from B0 to T1 with flirt

Re: RE : Re: [FSL] RE : [FSL] registration problem from B0 to T1 with flirt

Wang, Ling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:31:50 +0100

301 lines

New Thread

RE : Re: [FSL] RE : [FSL] TBSS, correlation with RT

RE : Re: [FSL] RE : [FSL] TBSS, correlation with RT

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:43:26 +0100

119 lines

New Thread

RE : Re: [FSL] TBSS

RE : Re: [FSL] TBSS

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:54:02 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] FA skeleton range

RE : [FSL] FA skeleton range

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:47:36 +0100

68 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] FA skeleton range

Naama Barnea-Goraly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:58:40 -0800

283 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] FSL vbm spatial oientation

RE : [FSL] FSL vbm spatial oientation

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:21:47 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] Hi and for VBM in white matter

RE : [FSL] Hi and for VBM in white matter

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:14:02 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] randomise and masking procedures

RE : [FSL] randomise and masking procedures

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:04:01 +0100

76 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] randomise and masking procedures

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:41:09 +0000

37 lines

RE : [FSL] randomise and masking procedures

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:26:04 +0000

30 lines

RE : [FSL] randomise and masking procedures

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:05:02 +0100

60 lines

RE : [FSL] randomise and masking procedures

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:13:02 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] ROI FA analysis

RE : [FSL] ROI FA analysis

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:55:35 +0100

56 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] ROI FA analysis

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:57:32 +0000

69 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] tbss - spatial normalization

RE : [FSL] tbss - spatial normalization

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:51:56 +0100

62 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] tbss - spatial normalization

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:30:43 -0500

92 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] tbss - spatial normalization

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:05:15 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] TBSS -- TFCE

RE : [FSL] TBSS -- TFCE

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:01:00 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] TBSS -D

RE : [FSL] TBSS -D

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:23:18 +0100

47 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] TBSS -D

David Kideckel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:01:14 -0500

112 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] TBSS L1

RE : [FSL] TBSS L1

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:00:51 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] tbss mean_FA_skeleton alignment error

RE : [FSL] tbss mean_FA_skeleton alignment error

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:02:22 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] TBSS randomise, -c t -- cluster p

RE : [FSL] TBSS randomise, -c t -- cluster p

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:45:17 +0100

44 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] TBSS randomise, -c t -- cluster p

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:56:56 -0500

71 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] TBSS randomise, -c t -- cluster p

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:22:08 +0000

92 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] TBSS, correlation with RT

RE : [FSL] TBSS, correlation with RT

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:20:17 +0100

65 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] TBSS, correlation with RT

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:35:46 -0500

90 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] TBSS, correlation with RT

vincent ferrera <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:49:34 -0500

200 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] tbss--subject number

RE : [FSL] tbss--subject number

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:32:32 +0100

59 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] tbss--subject number

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:13:56 -0500

688 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] tbss--subject number

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:14:27 -0500

687 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] tbss--subject number

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:15:24 -0500

996 lines

RE : [FSL] tbss--subject number

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:35:38 +0100

39 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] tbss--subject number

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:43:14 -0500

214 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] tbss--subject number

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:44:22 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

RE : [FSL] TBSS-result & cluster p

RE : [FSL] TBSS-result & cluster p

Gwenaëlle DOUAUD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:54:51 +0100

86 lines

Re: RE : [FSL] TBSS-result & cluster p

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:51:28 -0500

111 lines

New Thread

Registration for Diffusion Data

Registration for Diffusion Data

Roman Loonis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:08:43 +0000

23 lines

Re: Registration for Diffusion Data

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:24:36 +0000

49 lines

Re: Registration for Diffusion Data

Roman Loonis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:32:53 -0500

116 lines

Re: Registration for Diffusion Data

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:32:49 +0000

87 lines

New Thread

regressor file with short activations

regressor file with short activations

Jeffrey Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:10:54 +0000

638 lines

New Thread

reorientation

reorientation

Emily Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:46:45 +0000

18 lines

Re: reorientation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:31:36 +0000

41 lines

Re: reorientation

Emily T Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:08:21 -0500

78 lines

Re: reorientation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:14:09 +0000

82 lines

Re: reorientation

Emily T Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:19:50 -0500

116 lines

Re: reorientation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:26:22 +0000

125 lines

Re: reorientation

Emily T Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:26:48 -0500

158 lines

Re: reorientation

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:30:45 +0000

150 lines

Re: reorientation

Emily T Stoneham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:35:55 -0500

191 lines

New Thread

Reply if you use FSL's flirt to affine register your images

Reply if you use FSL's flirt to affine register your images

Donna Dierker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 08:42:55 -0600

14 lines

Re: Reply if you use FSL's flirt to affine register your images

Sheyna Gifford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:51:32 -0500

33 lines

Re: Reply if you use FSL's flirt to affine register your images

David Gutman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:00:50 -0500

52 lines

Re: Reply if you use FSL's flirt to affine register your images

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:13:06 +0000

54 lines

Re: Reply if you use FSL's flirt to affine register your images

Martin M Monti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:24:48 +0000

74 lines

Re: Reply if you use FSL's flirt to affine register your images

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:33:46 +0000

93 lines

Re: Reply if you use FSL's flirt to affine register your images

Donna Dierker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:48:45 -0600

100 lines

Re: Reply if you use FSL's flirt to affine register your images

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:02:47 +0000

151 lines

Re: Reply if you use FSL's flirt to affine register your images

Joseph T. Devlin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:05:35 +0000

14 lines

Re: Reply if you use FSL's flirt to affine register your images

Tom Johnstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:58:02 +0000

136 lines

New Thread

ROI analysis using atlases

ROI analysis using atlases

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:04:58 +0000

20 lines

Re: ROI analysis using atlases

Saad Jbabdi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:57:59 +0000

135 lines

New Thread

ROI displacement

ROI displacement

meiyun wang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:20:02 -0500

66 lines

Re: ROI displacement

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:37:56 +0000

92 lines

New Thread

ROI FA analysis

ROI FA analysis

Suzanna Laycock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:22:48 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

run_first_all

run_first_all

George He <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:17:31 -0500

28 lines

Re: run_first_all

Chris Petty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:50:52 -0500

79 lines

New Thread

run_first_all fails to complete

run_first_all fails to complete

Melissa L. Henry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:17:15 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

shortcut fslmerge

shortcut fslmerge

Bjorn Roelstraete <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:36:52 +0100

20 lines

Re: shortcut fslmerge

Jesper Andersson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:46:54 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

Siena and allignment

Siena and allignment

Shireen, Kwiatkowska <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:50:40 +0100

39 lines

Re: Siena and allignment

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:30:17 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

siena_flow2std error

siena_flow2std error

Antonios - Constantine Thanellas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:22:41 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

siena_flow2std error in FSL4

siena_flow2std error in FSL4

Matthew Kempton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:22:43 +0000

36 lines

Re: siena_flow2std error in FSL4

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:20:52 +0000

57 lines

Re: siena_flow2std error in FSL4

Matthew Kempton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:07:20 +0000

50 lines

Re: siena_flow2std error in FSL4

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:42:04 +0000

72 lines

New Thread

Slicer error

Slicer error

Marc Dubin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:41:57 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

Slicer message

Slicer message

Marc Dubin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:52:07 +0000

13 lines

New Thread

small volume correction using randomise vs. feat

small volume correction using randomise vs. feat

Soohyun Cho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:59:15 -0800

27 lines

Re: small volume correction using randomise vs. feat

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:00:24 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

Software for tracing brain

Software for tracing brain

Manish Dalwani <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 15:18:47 -0800

35 lines

Re: Software for tracing brain

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:25:05 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Split-rotate and merge

Split-rotate and merge

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:08:23 +0000

18 lines

Re: Split-rotate and merge

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:53:09 +0000

38 lines

Re: Split-rotate and merge

Hallvard Røe Evensmoen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:58:28 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

strange Group ICA dimensional estimate

strange Group ICA dimensional estimate

H.Steven Scholte <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:02:55 +0000

156 lines

Re: strange Group ICA dimensional estimate

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:38:44 +0000

48 lines

Re: strange Group ICA dimensional estimate

Steven Scholte <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:49:20 +0100

64 lines

Re: strange Group ICA dimensional estimate

Christian F. Beckmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:02:40 +0000

73 lines

Re: strange Group ICA dimensional estimate

H.Steven Scholte <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:57:25 +0000

12 lines

New Thread

syntax error possumX

syntax error possumX

Marijke Welvaert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:00:39 +0000

22 lines

Re: syntax error possumX

Ivana Drobnjak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:25:59 +0000

36 lines

Re: syntax error possumX

Marijke Welvaert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:45:01 +0100

49 lines

Re: syntax error possumX

Matthew Webster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:50:25 +0000

149 lines

Re: syntax error possumX

Bjorn Roelstraete <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:54:18 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

t-test for tractography

t-test for tractography

Paul Geha <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:06:01 -0600

29 lines

Re: t-test for tractography

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:23:41 +0000

67 lines

Re: t-test for tractography

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:38:49 -0500

82 lines

Re: t-test for tractography

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:47:54 +0000

109 lines

Re: t-test for tractography

Paul Geha <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:49:37 -0600

127 lines

New Thread

t2-lesions

Re: t2-lesions

Ruchika Wadhwa <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:15:32 +0000

21 lines

Re: t2-lesions

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:57:04 +0000

40 lines

Re: t2-lesions

Ruchika Wadhwa <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 06:37:42 +0000

50 lines

Re: t2-lesions

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:47:24 +0000

78 lines

New Thread

TBSS

TBSS

David Kideckel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:54:24 -0500

40 lines

Re: TBSS

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:41:41 +0000

54 lines

Re: TBSS

David Kideckel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:22:06 -0500

135 lines

Re: TBSS

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:33:45 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

tbss - FA comparison between one patient and a control group

Re: tbss - FA comparison between one patient and a control group

Joyce! <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:09:35 +0000

94 lines

Re: tbss - FA comparison between one patient and a control group

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:37:08 +0000

122 lines

New Thread

tbss - spatial normalization

tbss - spatial normalization

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:21:58 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

TBSS -- TFCE

TBSS -- TFCE

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:15:15 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

TBSS -D

TBSS -D

David Kideckel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:25:56 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

TBSS Analysis

TBSS Analysis

David Kideckel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:55:16 -0500

56 lines

Re: TBSS Analysis

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:40:31 +0000

81 lines

Re: TBSS Analysis

David Kideckel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:14:45 -0500

134 lines

New Thread

TBSS and radomize for GM regions

TBSS and radomize for GM regions

Adrian Koziak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:03:25 +0000

49 lines

Re: TBSS and radomize for GM regions

David Kideckel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:05 -0500

107 lines

Re: TBSS and radomize for GM regions

Adrian Koziak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:32:24 +0000

27 lines

Re: TBSS and radomize for GM regions

David Kideckel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:43:22 -0500

75 lines

Re: TBSS and radomize for GM regions

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:22:11 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

tbss BUG ?

tbss BUG ?

Filippo Panessa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:06:46 +0000

126 lines

Re: tbss BUG ?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:15:06 +0000

156 lines

Re: tbss BUG ?

Filippo Panessa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:10:15 +0100

38 lines

Re: tbss BUG ?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:14:21 +0000

48 lines

Re: tbss BUG ?

Michael Hanke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:24:13 +0100

37 lines

Re: tbss BUG ?

Filippo Panessa <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:59:05 +0100

60 lines

New Thread

TBSS covariate

TBSS covariate

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:16:34 -0500

80 lines

Re: TBSS covariate

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:03:04 +0000

112 lines

New Thread

TBSS in stroke

Re: TBSS in stroke

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:30:45 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

TBSS L1

TBSS L1

Paul Geha <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:22:31 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

tbss mean_FA_skeleton alignment error

tbss mean_FA_skeleton alignment error

James Andrews <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:06:26 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

tbss randomise TFCE

tbss randomise TFCE

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:03:27 -0500

36 lines

Re: tbss randomise TFCE

Thomas Nichols <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:31:31 +0000

96 lines

Re: tbss randomise TFCE

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:15:16 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

TBSS randomise, -c t -- cluster p

TBSS randomise, -c t -- cluster p

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:10:36 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

TBSS, correlation with RT

TBSS, correlation with RT

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:08:10 -0500

28 lines

Re: TBSS, correlation with RT

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:12:56 -0500

152 lines

Re: TBSS, correlation with RT

Cherif Sahyoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:20:45 -0500

296 lines

Re: TBSS, correlation with RT

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:00:25 -0500

393 lines

Re: TBSS, correlation with RT

Cherif Sahyoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:09:02 -0500

421 lines

New Thread

tbss--subject number

tbss--subject number

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:55:49 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

TBSS-result & cluster p

TBSS-result & cluster p

Jiansong Xu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:34:38 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Tbss_2_reg -n

Tbss_2_reg -n

Juergen Haenggi <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:57:08 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

tbss_2_reg -n will not pick up again after premature termination

tbss_2_reg -n will not pick up again after premature termination

Juergen Haenggi <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:10:29 +0100

51 lines

Re: tbss_2_reg -n will not pick up again after premature termination

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:58:07 +0000

76 lines

New Thread

tbss_3_postreg produces empty images: an insight

Re: tbss_3_postreg produces empty images: an insight

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:38:19 +0000

138 lines

Re: tbss_3_postreg produces empty images: an insight

Dianne Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:46:09 -0700

269 lines

New Thread

tbss_deproject

tbss_deproject

Merry Mani <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:18:46 -0500

192 lines

Re: tbss_deproject

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:55:36 +0000

134 lines

tbss_deproject

Chris Kell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:43:25 +0000

30 lines

Re: tbss_deproject

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:39:27 +0000

56 lines

Re: tbss_deproject

Thomas Sattler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:39:24 +0100

21 lines

Re: tbss_deproject

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:48:59 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Tbss_non_FA error

Tbss_non_FA error

Paul Geha <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:20:13 -0600

35 lines

Re: Tbss_non_FA error

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:48:10 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

Tensor-ICA GLM results

Tensor-ICA GLM results

Ingo Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:32:29 +0000

25 lines

Re: Tensor-ICA GLM results

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:09:43 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

thresholding in FEAT

thresholding in FEAT

Aaron Trachtenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:45:53 -0600

112 lines

Re: thresholding in FEAT

Mark Woolrich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:38:27 +0000

225 lines

New Thread

Tissue segmentation in macaques

Re: Tissue segmentation in macaques

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:57:34 -0500

59 lines

Re: Tissue segmentation in macaques

Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:35:04 +0000

102 lines

New Thread

two slightly different feat outputs from the same fsf design

two slightly different feat outputs from the same fsf design

Soohyun Cho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:30:12 -0800

60 lines

Re: two slightly different feat outputs from the same fsf design

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:31:01 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

UCLA Advanced Neuroimaging Summer School

UCLA Advanced Neuroimaging Summer School

Russell Poldrack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:00:34 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

using BET in FEAT

using BET in FEAT

Aaron Trachtenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:36:15 -0600

62 lines

Re: using BET in FEAT

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:26:33 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

volume calculation using FSL First

volume calculation using FSL First

Adil Javed <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:48:58 -0800

29 lines

Re: volume calculation using FSL First

Brian Patenaude <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:38:38 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

voxel values

voxel values

S. Groppa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:23:32 +0100

35 lines

Re: voxel values

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:52:56 +0000

57 lines

Re: voxel values

S. Groppa <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:21:53 +0100

71 lines

Re: voxel values

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:26:19 +0000

83 lines

Re: voxel values

S. Groppa <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:15:02 +0100

101 lines

Re: voxel values

S. Groppa <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:30:06 +0100

100 lines

Re: voxel values

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:57:32 +0000

122 lines

Re: voxel values

S. Groppa <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:59:42 +0100

136 lines

New Thread

voxelwise siena and dilation/smoothing

voxelwise siena and dilation/smoothing

Antonios - Constantine Thanellas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:15:38 +0000

20 lines

Re: voxelwise siena and dilation/smoothing

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:45:37 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

Which slice order does POSSUM use and can it be changed?

Re: Which slice order does POSSUM use and can it be changed?

Torben Ellegaard Lund <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:26:24 +0100

242 lines

Re: Which slice order does POSSUM use and can it be changed?

Ivana Drobnjak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:13:14 +0000

264 lines

Re: Which slice order does POSSUM use and can it be changed?

Torben Ellegaard Lund <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:29:51 +0100

284 lines

New Thread

whole-brain % signal change maps

whole-brain % signal change maps

Jennifer Townsend <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:23:04 -0800

82 lines

Re: whole-brain % signal change maps

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:54:51 +0000

47 lines

Re: whole-brain % signal change maps

Jennifer Townsend <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:45:25 -0800

208 lines

Re: whole-brain % signal change maps

Nanthia Suthana <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:54:19 -0800

221 lines

Re: whole-brain % signal change maps

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:02:49 +0000

90 lines

New Thread

Why do my subjects have blue Corpus Callosums (after DTIfit)?

Why do my subjects have blue Corpus Callosums (after DTIfit)?

James Sheehan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:58:07 +0000

30 lines

Re: Why do my subjects have blue Corpus Callosums (after DTIfit)?

Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:29:30 -0500

39 lines

Re: Why do my subjects have blue Corpus Callosums (after DTIfit)?

James Sheehan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:27:49 -0500

141 lines

Re: Why do my subjects have blue Corpus Callosums (after DTIfit)?

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:08:44 +0000

53 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager