JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


February 2008


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

A quick Advert (2 messages)
Abstention? (27 messages)
Acute medical admissions (12 messages)
bak-up: a little further advice from those in the know pls. (1 message)
Branded or Generic (7 messages)
check this page please (and forward a copy if you would) (11 messages)
Childrens interest in Paris (5 messages)
Co-dydramol and underactive thyroid gland (1 message)
credit cards for kids (3 messages)
Cyberterminology (1 message)
Darzi Questions please (5 messages)
dear alan (3 messages)
Disk image/ backup software (6 messages)
display of lab results (2 messages)
E-mail from the BMA today (long post) (1 message)
Earthquake (10 messages)
Elena Kalceff is out of the office. (2 messages)
Extended hours poll, a hypothetical question... (10 messages)
Extended Hours unofficial poll (10 messages)
extended hours: shift work not allowed? (56 messages)
extended hours: shift work not allowed? vote no and the doh will negotiate. (1 message)
extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP! (13 messages)
flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused. (13 messages)
FLOTT (2 messages)
France (5 messages)
FW: Pulse magazine article (18 messages)
Go Peverley! (1 message)
Going away... (16 messages)
going back to work after hernia repair (9 messages)
GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we? (10 messages)
GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we? YES (6 messages)
His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman (19 messages)
HIV (7 messages)
Insurance Report for a company. (4 messages)
Lobbying MPs (1 message)
Locums (3 messages)
Management of borderline/moderately elevated LFTs - anyone have one? (4 messages)
Medical Podcasts and Webinars?? (1 message)
nGMS Contract Negotiations (13 messages)
Nurse prescribers and prescribing budgets (1 message)
OOH Pregnancy Testing (5 messages)
Options (39 messages)
Options - Additional Issue (3 messages)
Options - Additional Issue-smard card (8 messages)
Options-lure of gold (2 messages)
Petition (5 messages)
Prozac et al (3 messages)
Pulse magazine article (21 messages)
Pulse magazine article. ? arbitration (1 message)
Race Equality Foundation Healthy Option conference- 10 March. London (1 message)
Returning to UK from Australia - was Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs (2 messages)
saveoursurgeries (1 message)
Shadow Minister for Health Letter (6 messages)
sick (sic) (1 message)
sick, depraved and pure evil (1 message)
Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs (10 messages)
Sony Vaio VGN-FE11H running Windows Media Server - Anyone have one? (8 messages)
sore toe (2 messages)
Special Conference of LMCs (was turning the tanker) (7 messages)
Straw in the wind (3 messages)
Struck off GP UK. (2 messages)
Techy - Pensions (3 messages)
techy kwestions x2 (4 messages)
the future [Was: Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?] (1 message)
The Vote (1 message)
unbelievable post from GPC member (11 messages)
United we stand ... (18 messages)
Videos of inspirational lectures (1 message)
What hours is a practice expected to provide and by whom?? (10 messages)
What's going on? (17 messages)
What's going on?-me depressed thats what. (22 messages)
Your new practice (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

A quick Advert

A quick Advert

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:13:34 +0000

14 lines

Re: A quick Advert

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:20:08 -0000

38 lines

New Thread

Abstention?

Abstention?

North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:29:33 -0000

75 lines

Re: Abstention?

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:44:50 +0000

77 lines

Re: Abstention?

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:58:58 +0000

108 lines

Re: Abstention?

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:59:37 +0000

133 lines

Re: Abstention?

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:05:07 +0000

122 lines

Re: Abstention?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:58:33 +0000

11 lines

Re: Abstention?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:24:36 +0000

36 lines

Re: Abstention?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:41:13 +0000

64 lines

Re: Abstention?

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:10:06 +0000

24 lines

Re: Abstention?

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:25:48 -0000

118 lines

Re: Abstention?

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:55:52 -0000

75 lines

Re: Abstention?

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:19:38 -0000

128 lines

Re: Abstention?

North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:23:16 -0000

25 lines

Re: Abstention?

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:31:45 -0000

161 lines

Re: Abstention?

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:37:49 -0000

39 lines

Re: Abstention?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:16:54 +0000

73 lines

Re: Abstention?

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:21:58 +0000

128 lines

Re: Abstention?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:02:44 +0000

62 lines

Re: Abstention?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:03:54 +0000

52 lines

Re: Abstention?

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:44:05 +0000

31 lines

Re: Abstention?

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:14:32 +0000

74 lines

Re: Abstention?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:55:45 +0000

64 lines

Re: Abstention?

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:37:32 -0500

144 lines

Re: Abstention?

Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:59:49 -0000

63 lines

Re: Abstention?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:34:34 +0000

34 lines

Re: Abstention?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:26:38 +0000

72 lines

Re: Abstention?

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:58:15 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Acute medical admissions

Acute medical admissions

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:53:59 +0000

31 lines

Re: Acute medical admissions

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:10:29 +0000

77 lines

Re: Acute medical admissions

Alun Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:07:49 -0000

227 lines

Re: Acute medical admissions

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:48:24 +0000

37 lines

Re: Acute medical admissions

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:43:18 +0000

26 lines

Re: Acute medical admissions

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:27:01 +0000

39 lines

Re: Acute medical admissions

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:30:18 +0000

101 lines

Re: Acute medical admissions

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:35:49 +0000

143 lines

Re: Acute medical admissions

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:50:40 +0000

130 lines

Re: Acute medical admissions

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:08:15 +0000

218 lines

Re: Acute medical admissions

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:18:50 +0000

192 lines

Re: Acute medical admissions

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:22:48 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

bak-up: a little further advice from those in the know pls.

bak-up: a little further advice from those in the know pls.

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:36:29 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

Branded or Generic

Branded or Generic

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:50:12 +0000

20 lines

Re: Branded or Generic

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 19:15:21 +0000

33 lines

Re: Branded or Generic

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 20:04:16 +0000

36 lines

Re: Branded or Generic

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 20:18:16 +0000

19 lines

Re: Branded or Generic

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 00:06:29 +0000

33 lines

Re: Branded or Generic

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 01:42:52 +0000

32 lines

Re: Branded or Generic

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:56:02 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

check this page please (and forward a copy if you would)

check this page please (and forward a copy if you would)

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:48:45 +0000

32 lines

Re: check this page please (and forward a copy if you would)

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:51:50 +0000

49 lines

Re: check this page please (and forward a copy if you would)

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:02:23 -0000

12 lines

Re: check this page please (and forward a copy if you would)

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:02:40 +0000

36 lines

Re: check this page please (and forward a copy if you would)

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:04:07 +0000

21 lines

Re: check this page please (and forward a copy if you would)

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:05:29 -0000

117 lines

Re: check this page please (and forward a copy if you would)

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:10:30 +0000

21 lines

Re: check this page please (and forward a copy if you would)

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:16:14 -0000

14 lines

Re: check this page please (and forward a copy if you would)

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:07:31 +0000

20 lines

Re: check this page please (and forward a copy if you would)

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:01:43 +0000

32 lines

Re: check this page please (and forward a copy if you would)

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:53:31 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

Childrens interest in Paris

Childrens interest in Paris

Tim <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:42:06 +0000

11 lines

Re: Childrens interest in Paris

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:11:41 +0000

34 lines

Re: Childrens interest in Paris

Tim <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:19:15 +0000

48 lines

Re: Childrens interest in Paris

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:26:20 +0000

14 lines

Re: Childrens interest in Paris

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:16:48 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

Co-dydramol and underactive thyroid gland

Re: Co-dydramol and underactive thyroid gland

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 00:26:48 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

credit cards for kids

credit cards for kids

jenny sudell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:39:07 +0000

51 lines

Re: credit cards for kids

Alun Price <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:32:49 -0000

318 lines

Re: credit cards for kids

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:48:06 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

Cyberterminology

Cyberterminology

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:05:15 +1000

55 lines

New Thread

Darzi Questions please

Darzi Questions please

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:11:48 -0500

56 lines

Re: Darzi Questions please

Dr Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:13:50 -0000

91 lines

Re: Darzi Questions please

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:47:22 -0000

103 lines

Re: Darzi Questions please

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:06:28 -0000

104 lines

Re: Darzi Questions please

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:59:14 -0500

168 lines

New Thread

dear alan

dear alan

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:49:04 +0000

51 lines

Re: dear alan

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:56:12 +0000

21 lines

Re: dear alan

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:57:39 -0000

23 lines

New Thread

Disk image/ backup software

Disk image/ backup software

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:12:19 -0000

557 lines

Re: Disk image/ backup software

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:21:05 +0000

244 lines

Re: Disk image/ backup software

Paul Attwood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:58:44 +0000

241 lines

Re: Disk image/ backup software

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:21:11 -0800

33 lines

Re: Disk image/ backup software

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:49:10 +0000

260 lines

Re: Disk image/ backup software

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:18:48 +0000

398 lines

New Thread

display of lab results

display of lab results

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:59:43 +0000

11 lines

Re: display of lab results

Tim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:18:50 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

E-mail from the BMA today (long post)

E-mail from the BMA today (long post)

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:05:13 -0000

217 lines

New Thread

Earthquake

Earthquake

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:07:10 +0000

15 lines

Re: Earthquake

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:38:40 +0000

25 lines

Re: Earthquake

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:13:01 +0000

30 lines

Re: Earthquake

Michael Wells <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:54:06 +0000

33 lines

Re: Earthquake

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:22:09 +0000

23 lines

Re: Earthquake

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:04:19 +0000

23 lines

Re: Earthquake

Paul Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:47:38 -0000

121 lines

Re: Earthquake

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:02:10 +0000

13 lines

Re: Earthquake

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:26:09 +0000

38 lines

Re: Earthquake

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:20:41 +0000

17 lines

New Thread

Elena Kalceff is out of the office.

Re: Elena Kalceff is out of the office.

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:23:29 +1000

31 lines

Re: Elena Kalceff is out of the office.

quail <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:35:00 -0700

71 lines

New Thread

Extended hours poll, a hypothetical question...

Extended hours poll, a hypothetical question...

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:53:04 -0000

27 lines

Re: Extended hours poll, a hypothetical question...

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:38:37 -0000

40 lines

Re: Extended hours poll, a hypothetical question...

Tim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:47:30 +0000

51 lines

Re: Extended hours poll, a hypothetical question...

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:09:50 -0000

37 lines

Re: Extended hours poll, a hypothetical question...

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:14:44 +0000

68 lines

Re: Extended hours poll, a hypothetical question...

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:42:13 +0000

40 lines

Re: Extended hours poll, a hypothetical question...

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:59:09 +0000

42 lines

Re: Extended hours poll, a hypothetical question...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:06:49 +0000

23 lines

Re: Extended hours poll, a hypothetical question...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:07:38 +0000

17 lines

Re: Extended hours poll, a hypothetical question...

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:18:13 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

Extended Hours unofficial poll

Extended Hours unofficial poll

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:03:51 +0000

24 lines

Re: Extended Hours unofficial poll

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:20:42 +0000

31 lines

Re: Extended Hours unofficial poll

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:32:52 +0000

34 lines

Re: Extended Hours unofficial poll

Tim <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:40:55 +0000

43 lines

Re: Extended Hours unofficial poll

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:57:42 -0000

50 lines

Re: Extended Hours unofficial poll

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 01:08:43 +0000

21 lines

Re: Extended Hours unofficial poll

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:08:45 +0000

40 lines

Re: Extended Hours unofficial poll

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:20:11 +0000

19 lines

Re: Extended Hours unofficial poll

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:00:29 +0000

36 lines

Re: Extended Hours unofficial poll

Dinesh Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:06:44 -0000

56 lines

New Thread

extended hours: shift work not allowed?

extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:34:59 +0000

91 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:42:56 +0000

57 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:00:10 +0000

84 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:07:39 +0000

41 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:34:24 +0000

78 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:05:03 +0000

160 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:07:48 +0000

136 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:34:09 -0500

259 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:46:04 +0000

134 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:56:54 +0000

47 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:04:36 +0000

38 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Piers Longhorn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:19:42 -0000

28 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:54:46 +0000

14 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:56:55 +0000

27 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Attwood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:59:40 +0000

50 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:19:03 +0000

36 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:43:26 +0000

41 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:19:19 +0000

33 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:31:16 +0000

93 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:41:58 +0000

86 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:45:03 +0000

86 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:47:38 +0000

39 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:49:27 +0000

60 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:19:02 +0000

25 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:36:30 +0000

45 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:52:40 +1000

31 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:32:22 -0000

29 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:39:52 +0000

43 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:21:53 +0000

29 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:11:07 +0000

38 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:57:43 +0000

94 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:01:15 +0000

34 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:55:17 +0000

52 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:43:34 +0000

17 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:53:37 +0000

81 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:17:05 +0000

23 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:26:43 -0000

157 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:49:06 +0000

20 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:25:56 +1000

30 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:48:48 +0000

19 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:46:38 -0000

169 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:30:10 -0000

103 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:42:12 +0000

24 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:09:12 +0000

78 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:09:19 -0000

37 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Mark Howcutt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:14:14 -0000

54 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:32:47 -0000

62 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:22:25 +0000

34 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:28:00 +0000

47 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:13:56 +0000

30 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:56:29 -0000

44 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:19:22 +0000

41 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:38:06 +0000

67 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:48:57 +0000

14 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:22:16 +1000

28 lines

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:50:00 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

extended hours: shift work not allowed? vote no and the doh will negotiate.

Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed? vote no and the doh will negotiate.

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:50:02 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:52:20 +0000

87 lines

Re: extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:01:12 +0000

93 lines

Re: extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:32:28 +0000

51 lines

Re: extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:33:46 -0500

121 lines

Re: extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

David Royal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:48:46 +0000

99 lines

Re: extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:09:48 +0000

66 lines

Re: extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:19:05 +0000

22 lines

Re: extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:07:17 +0000

27 lines

Re: extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:12:35 +0000

55 lines

Re: extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:59:48 +0000

21 lines

Re: extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:13:49 +0000

34 lines

Re: extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:47:47 -0000

52 lines

Re: extended hrs circular from DOH-u need to read this ASAP!

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 23:20:14 -0000

68 lines

New Thread

flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:31:55 +0000

144 lines

Re: flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:35:52 -0000

313 lines

Re: flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:43:31 -0500

478 lines

Re: flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:47:04 +0000

104 lines

Re: flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:59:19 +0000

24 lines

Re: flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:19:02 +0000

61 lines

Re: flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

Dr Gillian Braunold <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:25:41 -0000

145 lines

Re: flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:24:41 +0000

28 lines

Re: flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:05:38 -0500

134 lines

Re: flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

Simon Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:55:38 -0000

318 lines

Re: flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:15:52 +0000

24 lines

Re: flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

John Canning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:53:33 -0000

61 lines

Re: flexible working and extended hours: wots the truth please?! from confused.

Paul Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:25:46 -0000

83 lines

New Thread

FLOTT

FLOTT

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:10:41 +1000

16 lines

Re: FLOTT

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:21:26 -0000

29 lines

New Thread

France

France

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:48:39 -0800

29 lines

Re: France

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:14:25 +1000

37 lines

Re: France

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:25:33 -0000

57 lines

Re: France

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:37:08 -0800

72 lines

Re: France

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:22:43 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

FW: Pulse magazine article

FW: Pulse magazine article

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 01:11:24 -0000

40 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:40:18 +0000

81 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:39:52 -0000

249 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:37:48 -0000

219 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:39:05 -0000

302 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:54:41 +0000

43 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:02:36 -0000

54 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 20:56:33 +0000

29 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:31:21 -0000

49 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:03:35 +0000

26 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:36:48 +0000

80 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 20:14:33 +0000

33 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 22:51:05 +0000

74 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 01:22:40 +0000

30 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:30:01 +0000

22 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:53:03 +0000

50 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:41:23 +0000

76 lines

Re: FW: Pulse magazine article

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:17:18 +1000

28 lines

New Thread

Go Peverley!

Go Peverley!

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:10:37 +0000

211 lines

New Thread

Going away...

Going away...

jenny sudell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:53:36 +0000

29 lines

Re: Going away...

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:11:25 +0000

34 lines

Re: Going away...

Stephen Crawshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:17:56 +0700

22 lines

Re: Going away...

jenny sudell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:39:23 +0000

32 lines

Re: Going away...

Stephen Crawshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:44:26 +0700

23 lines

Re: Going away...

jenny sudell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:49:12 +0000

49 lines

Re: Going away...

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:03:23 +1000

34 lines

Re: Going away...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:20:07 +0000

22 lines

Re: Going away...

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:22:50 +0000

20 lines

Re: Going away...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:04:14 +0000

21 lines

Re: Going away...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:11:00 +0000

17 lines

Re: Going away...

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:59:14 +0000

28 lines

Re: Going away...

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:07:24 +0000

26 lines

Re: Going away...

jenny sudell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:25:31 +0000

82 lines

Re: Going away...

Adrian Elliot-Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:10:45 +1030

60 lines

Re: Going away...

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 03:46:53 -0500

114 lines

New Thread

going back to work after hernia repair

going back to work after hernia repair

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:08:16 +0000

47 lines

Re: going back to work after hernia repair

North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:38:54 -0000

193 lines

Re: going back to work after hernia repair

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:30:55 -0000

205 lines

Re: going back to work after hernia repair

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:27:43 +0000

28 lines

Re: going back to work after hernia repair

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:21:21 -0000

114 lines

Re: going back to work after hernia repair

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:28:25 +0000

130 lines

Re: going back to work after hernia repair

Pork <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:53:07 +0000

32 lines

Re: going back to work after hernia repair

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:23:03 +0000

28 lines

Re: going back to work after hernia repair

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:24:05 +0000

77 lines

New Thread

GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we?

GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:18:24 +0000

50 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we?

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:26:09 -0000

64 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:45:33 +0000

20 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:29:29 +0000

27 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:29:45 +0000

44 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:36:04 +0000

66 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we?

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:55:15 +1000

29 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we?

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:30:14 +0000

63 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we?

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:36:17 +0000

19 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:12:46 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we? YES

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we? YES

John Canning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:49:45 -0000

116 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we? YES

Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:22:58 -0000

174 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we? YES

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:30:18 -0000

144 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we? YES

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:08:19 +0100

146 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we? YES

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:49:41 +0000

115 lines

Re: GPC - Turning the Tanker Can we? YES

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:48:45 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:07:56 +0000

14 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:00:09 +0000

30 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:35:56 +0000

17 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:38:36 +0000

14 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

James McGlew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:23:27 +0000

81 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:32:37 +0000

59 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:54:57 +0000

24 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:36:52 +0000

24 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:53:45 +0000

24 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:59:46 +0000

32 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:20:00 +0000

29 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:22:10 +0000

22 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Ian McNicoll <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:55:21 +0000

102 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:42:36 +0000

38 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Lesley Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:03:41 -0000

39 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:05:23 +0000

37 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Pork <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:09:53 +0000

22 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Lesley Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:40:01 -0000

53 lines

Re: His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:22:45 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

HIV

HIV

Chris Betty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:14:19 +0000

18 lines

Re: HIV

David & Stella Tyers <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:17:50 +0000

26 lines

Re: HIV

Pork <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:22:04 +0000

49 lines

Re: HIV

Chris Betty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:29:59 +0000

25 lines

Re: HIV

Paul Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:56:31 -0000

101 lines

Re: HIV

jenny sudell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 09:46:50 +0000

48 lines

Re: HIV

Chris Betty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:12:05 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Insurance Report for a company.

Insurance Report for a company.

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:17:25 +0000

26 lines

Re: Insurance Report for a company.

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:38:12 +0000

33 lines

Re: Insurance Report for a company.

Dr Paul Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:03:28 +0000

23 lines

Re: Insurance Report for a company.

Dr Paul Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:07:29 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

Lobbying MPs

Lobbying MPs

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:26:59 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

Locums

Locums

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:58:41 +1000

22 lines

Re: Locums

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:30:52 +0000

24 lines

Re: Locums

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:28:59 +0000

20 lines

New Thread

Management of borderline/moderately elevated LFTs - anyone have one?

Management of borderline/moderately elevated LFTs - anyone have one?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:24:33 +0000

28 lines

Re: Management of borderline/moderately elevated LFTs - anyone have one?

Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:33:44 -0000

74 lines

Re: Management of borderline/moderately elevated LFTs - anyone have one?

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:19:09 +0000

18 lines

Re: Management of borderline/moderately elevated LFTs - anyone have one?

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:37:21 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

Medical Podcasts and Webinars??

Medical Podcasts and Webinars??

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:42:48 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

nGMS Contract Negotiations

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:21:49 +0000

61 lines

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Mark Howcutt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:47:24 -0000

71 lines

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:03:00 +0000

32 lines

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:15:42 +0000

52 lines

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:17:49 +0000

24 lines

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:28:19 +0000

56 lines

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:52:26 +0000

55 lines

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:03:10 +0000

22 lines

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:17:06 +0000

71 lines

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:27:55 +0000

74 lines

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:29:01 +0000

111 lines

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:35:02 +0000

34 lines

Re: nGMS Contract Negotiations

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:39:02 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

Nurse prescribers and prescribing budgets

Re: Nurse prescribers and prescribing budgets

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:36:30 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

OOH Pregnancy Testing

OOH Pregnancy Testing

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:31:14 +0000

18 lines

Re: OOH Pregnancy Testing

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:45:56 +0000

37 lines

Re: OOH Pregnancy Testing

James McGlew <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:54:27 +0000

52 lines

Re: OOH Pregnancy Testing

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:18:52 +0000

23 lines

Re: OOH Pregnancy Testing

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:34:26 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

Options

Options

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:29:36 +0000

25 lines

Re: Options

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:28:00 +0000

28 lines

Re: Options

Emile de Sousa <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:25:40 -0000

32 lines

Re: Options

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:52:30 +0000

52 lines

Re: Options

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:28:22 +0000

30 lines

Re: Options

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:44:26 +0000

39 lines

Re: Options

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:34:49 -0000

36 lines

Re: Options

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:26:06 -0000

88 lines

Re: Options

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:06:11 +0000

72 lines

Re: Options

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:01:02 +0000

200 lines

Re: Options

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:21:09 -0000

216 lines

Re: Options

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:32:53 +0000

21 lines

Re: Options

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:51:15 +0000

18 lines

Re: Options

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:57:51 +0000

21 lines

Re: Options

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:51:08 +0000

85 lines

Re: Options

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:15:02 +0000

103 lines

Re: Options

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:32:10 +0000

24 lines

Re: Options

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:34:10 +0000

25 lines

Re: Options

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:11:36 +0000

51 lines

Re: Options

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:40:25 +0000

17 lines

Re: Options

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:25:51 +0000

68 lines

Re: Options

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:59:09 +0000

58 lines

Re: Options

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:16:07 +0000

46 lines

Re: Options

Dr Skinner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:24:31 -0000

62 lines

Re: Options

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:57:51 -0500

167 lines

Re: Options

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:38:16 -0000

283 lines

Re: Options

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:36:18 -0000

33 lines

Re: Options

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:05:47 -0500

269 lines

Re: Options

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:01:38 +0000

52 lines

Re: Options

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:28:30 +0000

21 lines

Re: Options

Colin Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:43:53 -0000

94 lines

Re: Options

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:36:20 -0000

140 lines

Re: Options

Dinesh Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:23:10 -0000

363 lines

Re: Options

Dinesh Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:24:23 -0000

378 lines

Re: Options

Dinesh Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:32:44 -0000

364 lines

Re: Options

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:51:23 -0500

373 lines

Re: Options

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:57:46 +0000

128 lines

Re: Options

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:47:10 +0000

26 lines

Re: Options

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:01:38 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Options - Additional Issue

Re: Options - Additional Issue

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:49:28 +0000

32 lines

Re: Options - Additional Issue

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:28:36 -0500

150 lines

Re: Options - Additional Issue

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:22:35 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Options - Additional Issue-smard card

Re: Options - Additional Issue-smard card

Alun Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:39:43 -0000

45 lines

Re: Options - Additional Issue-smard card

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:59:47 +0000

27 lines

Re: Options - Additional Issue-smard card

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:12:17 +0000

40 lines

Re: Options - Additional Issue-smard card

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:43:52 +0000

46 lines

Re: Options - Additional Issue-smard card

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:42:41 +0000

65 lines

Re: Options - Additional Issue-smard card

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:02:19 +0000

43 lines

Re: Options - Additional Issue-smard card

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:59:21 +0000

42 lines

Re: Options - Additional Issue-smard card

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:38:53 +1000

22 lines

New Thread

Options-lure of gold

Re: Options-lure of gold

Alun Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:00:39 -0000

76 lines

Re: Options-lure of gold

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:49:02 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Petition

Petition

Dr Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:45:48 -0000

52 lines

Re: Petition

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:27:49 +0000

26 lines

Re: Petition

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:25:33 +0000

27 lines

Re: Petition

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:08:27 +0000

17 lines

Re: Petition

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:19:06 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

Prozac et al

Prozac et al

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:50:59 -0500

158 lines

Re: Prozac et al

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:30:02 +0000

149 lines

Re: Prozac et al

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:30:15 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Pulse magazine article

Re: Pulse magazine article

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 04:36:33 -0500

164 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 04:46:18 -0500

221 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:30:24 +0000

120 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:45:44 +0000

168 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:54:13 +0000

162 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:13:28 -0000

47 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:43:34 +0000

46 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:24:33 -0000

38 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:21:20 -0500

147 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:38:12 +0000

82 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:51:18 -0000

169 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:45:39 +0000

78 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:22:17 +0000

71 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:18:15 -0500

148 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:31:36 -0000

529 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:26:04 +0000

188 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:31:26 +0000

343 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:11:42 +0000

45 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:07:40 +0000

142 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:09:25 +0000

121 lines

Re: Pulse magazine article

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:32:47 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

Pulse magazine article. ? arbitration

Re: Pulse magazine article. ? arbitration

Dr Paul Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:14:30 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

Race Equality Foundation Healthy Option conference- 10 March. London

Race Equality Foundation Healthy Option conference- 10 March. London

ronny <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:04:26 -0000

402 lines

New Thread

Returning to UK from Australia - was Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

Returning to UK from Australia - was Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

Adrian Elliot-Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:03:02 +1030

169 lines

Re: Returning to UK from Australia - was Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:54:26 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

saveoursurgeries

saveoursurgeries

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:00:40 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Shadow Minister for Health Letter

Shadow Minister for Health Letter

Dr Dave Barrett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:36:18 +0000

244 lines

Re: Shadow Minister for Health Letter

Chris Hoyte <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:09:30 +0000

40 lines

Re: Shadow Minister for Health Letter

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:14:28 +0000

30 lines

Re: Shadow Minister for Health Letter

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:02:49 +0000

169 lines

Re: Shadow Minister for Health Letter

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:36:33 -0000

168 lines

Re: Shadow Minister for Health Letter

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:59:27 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

sick (sic)

sick (sic)

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:47:30 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

sick, depraved and pure evil

sick, depraved and pure evil

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:42:29 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:02:14 +0000

22 lines

Re: Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:13:17 +0000

38 lines

Re: Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

Emile de Sousa <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:22:07 -0000

51 lines

Re: Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:49:27 -0500

141 lines

Re: Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:02:34 +0000

20 lines

Re: Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:37:15 +0000

84 lines

Re: Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

Adrian Elliot-Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:40:44 +1030

42 lines

Re: Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:48:19 +0000

36 lines

Re: Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:03:10 +0000

44 lines

Re: Simple Guide to the NHS Pension Scheme for GPs

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:52:33 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

Sony Vaio VGN-FE11H running Windows Media Server - Anyone have one?

Sony Vaio VGN-FE11H running Windows Media Server - Anyone have one?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:12:25 +0000

26 lines

Re: Sony Vaio VGN-FE11H running Windows Media Server - Anyone have one?

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:57:40 +0000

29 lines

Re: Sony Vaio VGN-FE11H running Windows Media Server - Anyone have one?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:10:34 +0000

49 lines

Re: Sony Vaio VGN-FE11H running Windows Media Server - Anyone have one?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:57:21 +0000

23 lines

Re: Sony Vaio VGN-FE11H running Windows Media Server - Anyone have one?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:36:07 +0000

59 lines

Re: Sony Vaio VGN-FE11H running Windows Media Server - Anyone have one?

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:39:23 +0000

27 lines

Re: Sony Vaio VGN-FE11H running Windows Media Server - Anyone have one?

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:35:56 +0000

27 lines

Re: Sony Vaio VGN-FE11H running Windows Media Server - Anyone have one?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:16:02 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

sore toe

sore toe

jenny sudell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:49:18 +0000

31 lines

Re: sore toe

Michael Wells <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:15:21 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Special Conference of LMCs (was turning the tanker)

Special Conference of LMCs (was turning the tanker)

Simon Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:09:17 -0000

80 lines

Re: Special Conference of LMCs (was turning the tanker)

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:57:01 -0000

90 lines

Re: Special Conference of LMCs (was turning the tanker)

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:56:57 +0000

17 lines

Re: Special Conference of LMCs (was turning the tanker)

Simon Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:12:23 -0000

71 lines

Re: Special Conference of LMCs (was turning the tanker)

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:47:36 +0000

94 lines

Re: Special Conference of LMCs (was turning the tanker)

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:40:35 +0000

151 lines

Re: Special Conference of LMCs (was turning the tanker)

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:05:42 +0000

132 lines

New Thread

Straw in the wind

Straw in the wind

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:15:14 +0000

53 lines

Re: Straw in the wind

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:19:13 +0000

21 lines

Re: Straw in the wind

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:26:21 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Struck off GP UK.

Re: Struck off GP UK.

roger weeks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:58:29 -0000

19 lines

Re: Struck off GP UK.

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:08:23 +1000

24 lines

New Thread

Techy - Pensions

Techy - Pensions

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:19:52 +0000

47 lines

Re: Techy - Pensions

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:29:32 -0500

178 lines

Re: Techy - Pensions

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:40:25 -0500

139 lines

New Thread

techy kwestions x2

techy kwestions x2

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:27:39 +0000

55 lines

Re: techy kwestions x2

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:45:08 +0000

57 lines

Re: techy kwestions x2

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:54:20 +0000

52 lines

Re: techy kwestions x2

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:01:43 +0000

20 lines

New Thread

the future [Was: Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?]

the future [Was: Re: extended hours: shift work not allowed?]

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:07:45 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

The Vote

The Vote

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:18:07 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

unbelievable post from GPC member

unbelievable post from GPC member

James McGlew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:17:22 +0000

130 lines

Re: unbelievable post from GPC member

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:55:00 -0000

233 lines

Re: unbelievable post from GPC member

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:57:59 +0000

80 lines

Re: unbelievable post from GPC member

James McGlew <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:20:59 +0000

196 lines

Re: unbelievable post from GPC member

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:46:27 -0000

108 lines

Re: unbelievable post from GPC member

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:02:46 +0000

31 lines

Re: unbelievable post from GPC member

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:09:29 +0000

16 lines

Re: unbelievable post from GPC member

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:55:38 +0000

21 lines

Re: unbelievable post from GPC member

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:01:37 +1000

31 lines

Re: unbelievable post from GPC member

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:33:36 +0000

128 lines

Re: unbelievable post from GPC member

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:42:20 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

United we stand ...

United we stand ...

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:41:55 -0000

210 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:10:41 +0000

23 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:23:35 +0000

81 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:06:33 +0000

28 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:50:05 +0000

32 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:53:36 -0000

26 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:00:55 +0000

249 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:02:24 +0000

96 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:04:29 -0000

53 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:49:27 +0000

24 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:52:28 +0000

23 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:31:07 +0000

67 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:40:19 -0000

39 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:59:00 +0000

53 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:11:55 -0000

65 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:15:53 +0000

16 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:55:53 +0000

33 lines

Re: United we stand ...

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:55:11 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Videos of inspirational lectures

Re: Videos of inspirational lectures

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 00:28:54 +0000

17 lines

New Thread

What hours is a practice expected to provide and by whom??

What hours is a practice expected to provide and by whom??

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:36:07 +0000

33 lines

Re: What hours is a practice expected to provide and by whom??

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:05:59 +0000

62 lines

Re: What hours is a practice expected to provide and by whom??

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:00:06 +0000

99 lines

Re: What hours is a practice expected to provide and by whom??

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:52:47 +0000

119 lines

Re: What hours is a practice expected to provide and by whom??

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:48:02 -0000

148 lines

Re: What hours is a practice expected to provide and by whom??

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:49:09 +0000

135 lines

Re: What hours is a practice expected to provide and by whom??

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:10:57 +0000

147 lines

Re: What hours is a practice expected to provide and by whom??

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:19:13 -0500

391 lines

Re: What hours is a practice expected to provide and by whom??

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:32:01 -0000

170 lines

Re: What hours is a practice expected to provide and by whom??

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:52:02 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

What's going on?

What's going on?

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 17:47:21 +0000

20 lines

Re: What's going on?

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:06:01 +0000

26 lines

Re: What's going on?

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:08:15 -0000

32 lines

Re: What's going on?

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 22:43:46 +0000

24 lines

Re: What's going on?

Chris Hoyte <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:22:24 +0000

19 lines

Re: What's going on?

Laurie Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:57:25 -0000

41 lines

Re: What's going on?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:53:54 +0000

58 lines

Re: What's going on?

Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:35:07 -0000

91 lines

Re: What's going on?

Alun Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:22:57 -0000

131 lines

Re: What's going on?

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:45:05 +0000

47 lines

Re: What's going on?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:58:16 +0000

58 lines

Re: What's going on?

Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:18:45 -0000

297 lines

Re: What's going on?

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:12:59 +0000

29 lines

Re: What's going on?

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:15:09 +0000

22 lines

Re: What's going on?

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:01:39 +1000

37 lines

Re: What's going on?

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:10:00 +0000

25 lines

Re: What's going on?

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:13:51 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:01:51 +0000

90 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:23:02 +0000

34 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 01:14:25 +0000

83 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 03:59:50 -0500

339 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Alun Price <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 09:02:43 -0000

452 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 09:19:03 +0000

123 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:46:06 +0000

197 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 05:47:16 -0500

124 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:58:04 +0000

19 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Geoff Schrecker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:12:37 +0000

20 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:11:43 +0000

185 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:13:43 +0000

129 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:27:43 +0000

19 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:40:27 +0000

62 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:35:34 +0000

20 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:21:57 -0500

115 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:03:59 +0000

165 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:22:37 +0000

22 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:43:20 -0500

601 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:14:29 +0000

21 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:17:55 +0000

226 lines

Re: What's going on?-me depressed thats what.

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:43:35 -0500

812 lines

New Thread

Your new practice

Your new practice

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:18:49 +0000

15 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager