"such perfection of all heuenly grace"

James Broaddus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:17:15 -0500

94 lines

Re: "such perfection of all heuenly grace"

Harry Berger Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:18:15 -0800

688 lines

Re: "such perfection of all heuenly grace"

Harry Berger Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:52:36 -0800

93 lines

Re: "such perfection of all heuenly grace"

David L. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:13:35 -0500

113 lines

Re: "such perfection of all heuenly grace"

Harry Berger Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:26:39 -0800

251 lines

Re: "such perfection of all heuenly grace"

James C. Nohrnberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:47:36 -0500

425 lines

"To such perfection" / "nobody's perfect"

James C. Nohrnberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:03:29 -0500

62 lines

Re: "To such perfection," continued

Stephen Merriam Foley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:09:53 -0500

145 lines

Re: "To such perfection," continued

andrew zurcher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:33:31 +0000

46 lines

Re: "To such perfection," continued

Steven J. Willett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:59:54 +0900

5395 lines

Re: "To such perfection," continued

Steven J. Willett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:43:23 +0900

122 lines

Re: "To such perfection," continued

Stephen Merriam Foley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:58:49 -0500

169 lines

<No subject>

James Broaddus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:54:53 -0500

23 lines

Re: A thought

Harry Berger Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 07:52:14 -0800

30 lines

Re: A thought

Joel Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:28:02 -0500

222 lines

Re: A thought

Michael Saenger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:33:07 -0600

41 lines

Re: A thought

Michael Saenger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:55 -0600

81 lines

Re: A thought

Roger Kuin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:00:53 -0500

75 lines

Re: A thought

Peter C. Herman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:14:21 -0800

90 lines

CFP for MLA 2008 in San Francisco

Margaret Hannay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 20:25:39 -0500

88 lines

correction of garbled query

James Broaddus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:34:15 -0500

62 lines

Re: Crit. Lit.

Steven J. Willett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:26:27 +0900

173 lines

Re: Early Modern Mixed Marriage Ceremonies

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:19:44 -0500

25 lines

FW: [IASIL] FW: 12 PhD scholarships at Trinity College Dublin

THOMAS HERRON <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:17:17 -0500

102 lines

Jean Brink's Veue authorship theory

Coughlan, Pat (English) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:13:26 -0000

89 lines

Re: Jean Brink's Veue authorship theory

Brad D. Tuggle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:53:35 -0500

149 lines

Re: Jean Brink's Veue authorship theory

THOMAS HERRON <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:28:09 -0500

211 lines

Re: Jean Brink's Veue authorship theory

Peter C. Herman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:40:08 -0800

185 lines

Re: Jean Brink's Veue authorship theory -- and computers

william godshalk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:58:31 -0500

26 lines

Re: Jean Brink's Veue authorship theory -- and computers

Anne Prescott <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:06:34 -0500

144 lines

Juan de Bustamante and the Defence?

Germaine Warkentin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:43:08 -0500

81 lines

re oops

Penny M <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:50:38 -0000

165 lines

The thread of blueish blood

James C. Nohrnberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:34:24 -0500

176 lines

Re: wrong sort of tutor

Hardin, Richard F <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:29:50 -0600

86 lines

Re: [Bulk] Re: "To such perfection," continued

Susanne Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:50:07 -0500

306 lines