JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


August 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: pointless / batch number / axial hkl

Phil Evans

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:15:42 +0100

41 lines

pointless / batch number / axial hkl

Bryan W. Lepore

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:52:51 -0500

25 lines

water picking

Jianghai Zhu

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:07:32 -0400

108 lines

phaser + phased-TF

Bryan W. Lepore

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:06:27 -0500

13 lines

mrBUMP 0.4.1 questions

Ricardo Aparicio

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:46:53 -0300

63 lines

Re: How many twinned crystals?

George M. Sheldrick

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:14:34 +0200

77 lines

Buried lysines!

Ramaswamy Subramanian

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:32:22 -0500

22 lines

Re: How many twinned crystals?

Ian Tickle

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:46:34 +0100

68 lines

How many twinned crystals?

Jacob Keller

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:32:08 -0500

19 lines

Re: small molecule refinement GUI for Mac

Peter Zwart

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:19:58 -0700

83 lines

Re: small molecule refinement GUI for Mac

Bryan W. Lepore

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:15:01 -0500

17 lines

Re: small molecule refinement GUI for Mac

William Scott

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:14:22 -0700

72 lines

Re: Strange diffraction images

Green, Todd

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:31:30 -0500

1471 lines

Re: small molecule refinement GUI for Mac

Miller, Mitchell D.

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:20:32 -0700

60 lines

Re: Strange diffraction images

Eleanor Dodson

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:00:47 +0100

213 lines

Re: alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622

Eleanor Dodson

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:57:41 +0100

81 lines

small molecule refinement GUI for Mac

Kristof Van Hecke

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:16:09 +0200

110 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Jon Wright

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:24:42 +0200

44 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Eleanor Dodson

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:03:56 +0100

37 lines

Re: contact density

Eleanor Dodson

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:01:02 +0100

40 lines

Re: MSE

Charlie Bond

Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:43:19 +0800

31 lines

CDC position available

Stevens, James (CDC/CCID/NCIRD)

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:31:50 -0400

103 lines

Re: solving structure of which 70% is known

<>

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:19:59 -0500

42 lines

Re: MSE

P.Artymiuk

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:09:43 +0100

40 lines

Re: MSE

Kim Henrick

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:41:48 +0100

87 lines

Re: MSE

Joe Krahn

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:33:26 -0400

33 lines

Re: off-topic-Heat shock protein gets precipitated

Martin Hallberg

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:05:36 +0200

44 lines

Re: Rotation function calculation from 2 patterson maps

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:00:54 +0100

37 lines

off-topic-Heat shock protein gets precipitated

shivesh kumar

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:36:22 +0530

35 lines

Re: MSE

Marko Hyvonen

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:28:18 +0100

86 lines

Re: How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?

<>

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:27:48 +0100

140 lines

Re: MSE

Joe Krahn

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:20:38 -0400

49 lines

Re: How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?

Warren DeLano

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:17:03 -0700

50 lines

Re: How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?

Paul Emsley

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:15:48 +0100

46 lines

Re: How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?

Antony Oliver

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:09:13 +0100

138 lines

Re: MSE

Ian Tickle

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:07:01 +0100

75 lines

Re: solving structure of which 70% is known

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:05:36 +0100

23 lines

MSE

Phil Evans

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:44:38 +0100

26 lines

Re: How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?

Clemens Vonrhein

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:31:17 +0100

87 lines

Re: How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?

Hyunchul Kim

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:22:29 +0900

69 lines

How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?

Antony Oliver

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:16:33 +0100

78 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Ambrose Cole

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:00:51 +0100

486 lines

Pre - announcement for Study Weekend, 3 - 5 January 2008

Howard, ME (Maeri)

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:11:10 +0100

243 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

David Briggs

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:38:21 +0100

326 lines

Re: Mean phase difference calculation

Adam Ralph

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:19:54 +0100

59 lines

Postdoc protein crystallographer in Greece

Demetres D. Leonidas

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:48:15 +0300

58 lines

How to obtain specific chain protein structures without ligand?

Hyunchul Kim

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:43:35 +0900

24 lines

Postdoc protein crystallographer in Greece

Demetres D. Leonidas

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:38:53 +0300

60 lines

Re: Question about the percentages of occupancy for dual conformations.

George M. Sheldrick

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:36:54 +0200

48 lines

Question about the percentages of occupancy for dual conformations.

Jian Wu

Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:57:46 +0800

49 lines

solving structure of which 70% is known

Raja Dey

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:30:51 -0700

14 lines

exporting the "NCS found for Chain ... onto Chain ..." map

<>

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:15:03 +0100

40 lines

High solvent content crystals

Joe Krahn

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:10:35 -0400

72 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Raji Edayathumangalam

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:43:37 -0400

82 lines

Rotation function calculation from 2 patterson maps

Raja Dey

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:32:42 -0700

14 lines

Why wwPDB and members are doing a poor job.

Joe Krahn

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:08:22 -0400

77 lines

permanent crystalliser job - AZ Boston

Pauptit, Richard A

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:22:44 +0100

26 lines

Re: Mean phase difference calculation

Phil Evans

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:38:09 +0100

51 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

James Stroud

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:39:23 -0700

37 lines

Re: water soluble protein that needs detergent to be stable

Daniel Picot

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:10:58 +0200

62 lines

Re: Mean phase difference calculation

Winter, G (Graeme)

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:04:03 +0100

75 lines

Resid for occupancy

Vu Thai

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:04:12 -0700

22 lines

Re: water soluble protein that needs detergent to be stable

Artem Evdokimov

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:02:04 -0400

417 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

Nave, C (Colin)

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:54:10 +0100

237 lines

alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622 - feedback / quasi SUMMARY

<>

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:17:44 -0300

126 lines

water soluble protein that needs detergent to be stable

Daniel Jin

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:44:38 -0700

90 lines

Re: Mean phase difference calculation

Kevin Cowtan

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:22:47 +0100

49 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

James Holton

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:56:16 -0700

187 lines

Mean phase difference calculation

Winter, G (Graeme)

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:20:32 +0100

98 lines

Job offer: Postdoctoral Scientist in X-ray structural analysis of plant proteins

Prof. Dr. Arne Skerra

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:22:34 +0200

47 lines

Re: Applying NCS Edits in Coot

Paul Emsley

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:56:44 +0100

30 lines

PDRA post in Sheffield further details

Dr John Rafferty

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:42:51 +0100

25 lines

PDRA position

Dr John Rafferty

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:27:49 +0100

31 lines

Practical Course in Macromolecular Crystallography M2M-7

Victor Lamzin

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:03:37 +0200

46 lines

AW: [ccp4bb] Strange diffraction images

<>

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:49:58 +0200

512 lines

Re: Strange diffraction images

Boaz Shaanan

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:43:23 GMT

270 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Kevin Cowtan

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:14:41 +0100

30 lines

Re: alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622

Rizkallah, PJ (Pierre)

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:27:29 +0100

145 lines

Re: Strange diffraction images

Jacob Keller

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:44:07 -0500

194 lines

Re: Strange diffraction images

Bart Hazes

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:02:36 -0600

137 lines

Re: alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622

Bart Hazes

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:57:24 -0600

116 lines

Re: alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622

Dale Tronrud

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:47:03 -0700

79 lines

Re: Strange diffraction images

Peter Zwart

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:10:55 -0700

29 lines

Re: Strange diffraction images

Green, Todd

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:49:25 -0500

6263 lines

Applying NCS Edits in Coot

<>

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:34:04 +0200

20 lines

Re: Strange diffraction images

Jacob Keller

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:42:58 -0500

112 lines

Re: Strange diffraction images

Raji Edayathumangalam

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:36:08 -0400

91 lines

Re: Strange diffraction images - PS

George M. Sheldrick

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:35:02 +0200

36 lines

Re: Strange diffraction images

Jacob Keller

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:31:26 -0500

100 lines

Re: Strange diffraction images

George M. Sheldrick

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:19:15 +0200

76 lines

Strange diffraction images

Jacob Keller

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:44:23 -0500

118 lines

Re: alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622

<>

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:41:04 -0400

35 lines

alternating strong/weak intensities in reciprocal planes - P622

Jorge Iulek

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:47:54 -0300

63 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Mark J. van Raaij

Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:57:45 +0200

247 lines

mail archives that are actually usable?

William Scott

Sun, 26 Aug 2007 09:53:28 -0700

30 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

Andrzej Olczak

Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:22:02 +0200

48 lines

Re: Off Topic:crystallization in the presence of glycerol

Patrick Shaw Stewart

Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:42:28 +0100

55 lines

Re: Off Topic:crystallization in the presence of glycerol

bputcha

Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:06:22 -0400

51 lines

Re: Alternate indexing

J.P. Rose

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:23:04 -0400

15 lines

Re: Off Topic:crystallization in the presence of glycerol

Artem Evdokimov

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:46:30 -0400

43 lines

Re: Off Topic:crystallization in the presence of glycerol

James Whisstock

Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:18:55 +1000

51 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

Dale Tronrud

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:49:44 -0700

101 lines

Re: Off Topic:crystallization in the presence of glycerol

Edward Berry

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:38:13 -0700

36 lines

Off Topic:crystallization in the presence of glycerol

Rob Gruninger

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:08:55 -0600

28 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

Michel Fodje

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:07:10 -0600

71 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

James Stroud

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:36:29 -0700

64 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

James Stroud

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:00:16 -0700

86 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

Dale Tronrud

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:48:33 -0700

56 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

William Scott

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:42:27 -0700

36 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

Jacob Keller

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:15:36 -0500

60 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

Michel Fodje

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:08:19 -0600

41 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

Michel Fodje

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:55:20 -0600

26 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

Michel Fodje

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:40:13 -0600

37 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

Dale Tronrud

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:56:47 -0700

35 lines

Re: Questions about diffraction

Ethan Merritt

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:46:33 -0700

30 lines

PX Jobs Team Leader, Postdoc, Tech (SGC-Oxford).txt

Frank von Delft

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:44:30 +0100

46 lines

Questions about diffraction

Michel Fodje

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:22:19 -0600

45 lines

Re: centrosymm structure

Bart Hazes

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:02:49 -0600

79 lines

Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000

Gerard Bricogne

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:58:54 +0100

147 lines

Mosflm v 7.0.1 Mac Intel pre-built executable.

Harry Powell

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:32:26 +0100

35 lines

postdoctoral positions available

Van Den Berg, Bert

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:32:16 -0400

82 lines

Re: centrosymm structure

Soisson, Stephen Michael

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:09:55 -0400

114 lines

Re: centrosymm structure

Soisson, Stephen Michael

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:59:27 -0400

66 lines

centrosymm structure

Bernhard Rupp

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:56:56 -0700

34 lines

Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000

Harry Powell

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:39:31 +0100

112 lines

Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000

Gerard Bricogne

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:14:29 +0100

78 lines

Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000

Harry Powell

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:20:29 +0100

45 lines

Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000

Winter, G (Graeme)

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:55:15 +0100

195 lines

Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000

Winter, G (Graeme)

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:29:14 +0100

255 lines

Re: ccp4 pack_images program?

P.J.Briggs

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:54:26 +0100

62 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Axel T. Brunger

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:16:06 -0700

83 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Petr Leiman

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:01:54 -0400

42 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Dale Tronrud

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:17:23 -0700

77 lines

Re: alternate indexing / cubic space group

Zbyszek Otwinowski

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:16:07 -0500

31 lines

alternate indexing / cubic space group

Green, Todd

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:46:37 -0500

241 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Jenny Martin

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:46:14 +1000

36 lines

Re: ccp4 pack_images program?

Jim Pflugrath

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:00:50 -0500

18 lines

Re: crystal with precipitation

<>

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:52:46 -0400

77 lines

Re: crystal with precipitation

James Whisstock

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:34:31 +1000

46 lines

Re: ccp4 pack_images program?

William Scott

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:25:00 -0700

44 lines

Re: crystal with precipitation

shivesh kumar

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:37:07 +0530

46 lines

Re: ccp4 pack_images program?

Winter, G (Graeme)

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:12:26 +0100

33 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Zbyszek Otwinowski

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:54:09 -0500

29 lines

Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000

Tim Fenn

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:51:20 -0700

51 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

James Holton

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:52:56 -0700

65 lines

Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000

James Holton

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:46:51 -0700

153 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Anastassis Perrakis

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:26:39 +0200

56 lines

ccp4 pack_images program?

William Scott

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:33:52 -0700

32 lines

crystal with precipitation

Lisa A Nagy

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:21:25 -0500

153 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Zbyszek Otwinowski

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:17:58 -0500

41 lines

contact density

Mary Rorick

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:10:12 -0400

27 lines

Re: crystal with precipitation

Rob Gruninger

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:30:07 -0600

44 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Jordi Benach

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:24:17 +0200

99 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Edwin Pozharski

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:52:08 -0400

53 lines

Postdoctoral positions in crystallography in Stockholm, Sweden

Adnane Achour

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:12:44 +0200

80 lines

Re: SciVee - YouTube for scientist

Ronnie Berntsson

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:30:30 +0200

293 lines

Re: SciVee - YouTube for scientist

Ronnie Berntsson

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:58:26 +0200

244 lines

SciVee - YouTube for scientist

Clemens Vonrhein

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:57:49 +0100

45 lines

Re: Probelm in creating topology files for CNS refinement

<>

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:50:49 -0400

773 lines

Probelm in creating topology files for CNS refinement

Sampath Natarajan

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:52:47 -0700

1510 lines

[Fwd: Re: [ccp4bb]: self rotation function matrix & NCS matrix]

<>

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:15:18 -0400

65 lines

Re: mosflm and APS BM17

Jan Abendroth

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:14:20 -0700

73 lines

Re: crystal with precipitation

Lisa A Nagy

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:18:08 -0500

152 lines

crystal with precipitation

shivesh kumar

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 01:52:04 +0530

38 lines

area detector dark current/background correction

Klaas Decanniere

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:05:59 +0200

26 lines

Re: Wasp web server

Ian Tickle

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:00:30 +0100

252 lines

Re: [COOT] how to join the broken strand to the other whole molecular

Antony Oliver

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:57:21 +0100

87 lines

Re: mosflm and APS BM17

Harry Powell

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:28:13 +0100

56 lines

Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000

William Scott

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:40:05 -0700

28 lines

Post doc in structural character ization of the membrane-integrat ed plastid phosphate translocato rs, Tromsø, Norway

Arne Oskar Smalås

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:02:51 +0200

47 lines

Re: problem with Mr Bump?

Winn, MD (Martyn)

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:47:38 +0100

54 lines

Re: mosflm and APS BM17

Roger Rowlett

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:36:27 -0400

61 lines

mosflm and APS BM17

Jan Abendroth

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:20:19 -0700

35 lines

Re: Wasp web server

Ian Tickle

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:25:16 +0100

164 lines

Re: Wasp web server

Jacob Keller

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:54:31 -0500

68 lines

Re: Water is about 60% everywhere

Marko Hyvonen

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:48:00 +0100

67 lines

Re: Water is about 60% everywhere

William Scott

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:17:23 -0700

40 lines

Inadequate Summary: The importance of USING our validation tools

Eleanor Dodson

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:56:40 +0100

2564 lines

problem with Mr Bump?

Harry M. Greenblatt

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:59:05 +0300

176 lines

Re: [COOT] how to join the broken strand to the other whole molecular

Eleanor Dodson

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:36:02 +0100

60 lines

Water is about 60% everywhere

Tom Oldfield

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:01:01 +0100

29 lines

Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000

Herbert J. Bernstein

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:45:51 -0400

81 lines

ID-13 XDS.INP Update

Dr. Colin W. Levy

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:10:08 +0100

22 lines

Ph.D. Studentship in Structural Biology

Ellis, MJ (Mark)

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:37:23 +0100

115 lines

Seeking collaborators.Again.

cry

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:51:32 +0800

68 lines

Re: self-rotation interpretation, 5 minutes

Yanming Zhang

Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:13:58 -0400

23 lines

Re: water water everywhere

William Scott

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:57:38 -0700

44 lines

water water everywhere

<>

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:05:06 -0500

28 lines

Re: Release of Mosflm version 7.0.1 & iMosflm 0.5.3

Harry Powell

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:02:16 +0100

30 lines

Release of Mosflm version 7.0.1 & iMosflm 0.5.3

Harry Powell

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:26:25 +0100

57 lines

Re: self-rotation interpretation, 5 minutes

Alejandro Buschiazzo

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:13:04 -0300

120 lines

Scientist or Senior Scientist position available in Plexxikon Inc.

Jinyu Liu

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:07:43 -0700

260 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Axel T. Brunger

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:36:05 -0700

257 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Miller, Mitchell D.

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 08:53:26 -0700

187 lines

Re: Posting again: Is the H-bond length in CYS.cif library correct?

George M. Sheldrick

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:17:49 +0200

49 lines

AW: [ccp4bb] Posting again: Is the H-bond length in CYS.cif library correct?

<>

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:10:35 +0200

52 lines

Re: Posting again: Is the H-bond length in CYS.cif library correct?

Eleanor Dodson

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:46:11 +0100

37 lines

Posting again: Is the H-bond length in CYS.cif library correct?

Juergen J. Mueller

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:30:54 +0200

28 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Phil Evans

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:55:35 +0100

236 lines

Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000

Harry Powell

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:20:51 +0100

78 lines

Re: diffraction images images/jpeg2000

Winter, G (Graeme)

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 08:34:25 +0100

56 lines

Re: self-rotation interpretation, 5 minutes

Wim Burmeister

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:27:03 +0200

30 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

George M. Sheldrick

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:24:09 +0200

178 lines

Re: self-rotation interpretation, 5 minutes

Miguel Ortiz-Lombardía

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:23:15 +0200

143 lines

Re: self-rotation interpretation, 5 minutes

Wim Burmeister

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:08:24 +0200

54 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Alexander Aleshin

Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:24:46 -0800

150 lines

self-rotation interpretation, 5 minutes

Yanming Zhang

Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:50:23 -0400

5792 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Boaz Shaanan

Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:38:07 GMT

432 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

George M. Sheldrick

Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:49:17 +0200

109 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Lisa A Nagy

Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:45:45 -0500

92 lines

FW: [ccp4bb] The importance of USING our validation tools

Kantardjieff, Katherine

Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:12:10 -0700

98 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Artem Evdokimov

Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:44:11 -0400

272 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Thomas Stout

Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:34:18 -0700

316 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Juergen Bosch

Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:19:42 -0700

210 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Mischa Machius

Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:35:05 -0500

128 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Artem Evdokimov

Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:11:18 -0400

117 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

George M. Sheldrick

Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:26:50 +0200

90 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Mark J. van Raaij

Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:28:31 +0200

200 lines

Re: Depositing Raw Data

James Holton

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:26:39 -0700

840 lines

diffraction images images/jpeg2000

Maneesh Yadav

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:01:54 -0700

18 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Dale Tronrud

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:19:37 -0700

112 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Anastassis Perrakis

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 22:45:54 +0200

93 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Douglas Theobald

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:26:15 -0400

52 lines

Re: Richard Reid and the PDB

Bernhard Rupp

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:24:45 -0700

196 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Anthony Addlagatta

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:15:32 -0700

35 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

James Stroud

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:08:30 -0700

42 lines

Re: nature cb3 response

Arun Malhotra

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:41:13 -0400

144 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

<>

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:13:58 -0400

71 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

William Scott

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:51:06 -0700

102 lines

Re: nature cb3 response

Edward Snell

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:40:40 -0400

35 lines

Re: Depositing raw data

Das, Debanu

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:50:40 -0700

111 lines

Re: High Rfac/Rfree for a 1.6A reso structure

Juergen Bosch

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:18:33 -0700

51 lines

High Rfac/Rfree for a 1.6A reso structure

Santarsiero, Bernard D.

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:11:45 -0500

24 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Ronald E Stenkamp

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:50:06 -0700

38 lines

Re: Data mining using consensus sequences

Miller, Mitchell D.

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:41:48 -0700

60 lines

Re: Depositing Raw Data

Mischa Machius

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:29:43 -0500

301 lines

Depositing raw data

Diana Tomchick

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:15:01 -0500

43 lines

Data mining using consensus sequences

P Hubbard

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:13:57 -0700

47 lines

Re: High Rfac/Rfree for a 1.6A reso structure

Eleanor Dodson

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:56:57 +0100

48 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Manfred S. Weiss

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:53:05 +0200

36 lines

Re: nature cb3 response

Arun Malhotra

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:52:28 -0400

88 lines

Re: High Rfac/Rfree for a 1.6A reso structure

Peter Zwart

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:48:25 -0700

142 lines

Re: Depositing Raw Data

Winter, G (Graeme)

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:45:28 +0100

254 lines

Re: nature cb3 response

<>

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:42:20 -0500

176 lines

Re: nature cb3 response

Arun Malhotra

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:36:56 -0400

88 lines

High Rfac/Rfree for a 1.6A reso structure

Sabini, Elisabetta

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:36:30 -0500

732 lines

Diffraction data - a modest proposal

<>

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:10:34 -0400

29 lines

Re: Depositing Raw Data

Winter, G (Graeme)

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:50:04 +0100

215 lines

Re: Richard Reid and the PDB

Clemens Vonrhein

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:50:01 +0100

61 lines

Re: nature cb3 response - USING validation criteria

Eleanor Dodson

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:48:53 +0100

19 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

cdekker

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:46:22 +0100

89 lines

Re: nature cb3 response

Oganesyan, Vaheh

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:29:46 -0400

157 lines

Michele Cianci is out of the office.

Michele Cianci

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:09:50 +0200

12 lines

Depositing Raw Data

Mischa Machius

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:06:51 -0500

178 lines

Richard Reid and the PDB

Kim Henrick

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:04:27 +0100

144 lines

Re: public forums

Andreas Forster

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:43:44 +0200

137 lines

Re: public forums

Hurley, Thomas D.

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:36:09 -0400

147 lines

Application Specialist - X-Ray Crystallography for Life-Science

Adam, Martin

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:19:25 +0200

608 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Anastassis Perrakis

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:38:00 +0200

71 lines

LivePDB (related to: The importance of ... )

Gerard Bricogne

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:22:38 +0100

91 lines

The importance of USING our validation tools

<>

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:38:21 +0200

22 lines

Public forums

Hurley, Thomas D.

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:36:37 -0400

56 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Martin A. Walsh

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:29:35 +0200

88 lines

C3b, validation, deposition diffraction images

Luca Jovine

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:20:00 +0200

83 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Clemens Vonrhein

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:00:18 +0100

63 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Martin A. Walsh

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:09:28 +0200

153 lines

Re: possibility of other fabricated structures

Tim Fenn

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:41:27 -0400

40 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Winter, G (Graeme)

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:23:27 +0100

109 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Manuel Than

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:10:33 +0200

47 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Shekhar C. Mande

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:21:02 +0530

144 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

George M. Sheldrick

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:36:18 +0200

201 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

William Scott

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:55:53 -0700

30 lines

possibility of other fabricated structures

Petr Leiman

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:31:00 -0400

23 lines

Re: nature cb3 response

Marcos Vicente de Albuquerque Salles Navarro

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:17:25 -0300

154 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

William Scott

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:13:41 -0700

25 lines

Re: nature cb3 response

Bernhard Rupp

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:39:58 -0700

47 lines

Re: nature cb3 response

<>

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:10:17 -0500

127 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Dima Klenchin

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:01:51 -0500

20 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Mischa Machius

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:42:05 -0500

30 lines

nature cb3 response

Bernhard Rupp

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:33:30 -0700

109 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Dominika Borek

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:32:55 -0500

161 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Dunten, Pete W.

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:21:08 -0700

36 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

James Whisstock

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:43:21 +1000

172 lines

Re: nature cb3 comment pdf

Bernhard Rupp

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:03:02 -0700

48 lines

nature cb3 comment pdf

Bernhard Rupp

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:41:37 -0700

28 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

George M. Sheldrick

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:10:01 +0200

41 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Bernhard Rupp

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:39:27 -0700

37 lines

Best Practices in Virtual Screening

Barry Hardy

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:40:26 +0200

256 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Richard Baxter

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:33:46 -0500

132 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Mark J. van Raaij

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:00:02 +0200

468 lines

Correct H-bond length in CYS.cif ?

Juergen J. Mueller

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:57:36 +0200

23 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Jacob Keller

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:56:44 -0500

38 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Peter Keller

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:47:50 +0100

44 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Clemens Vonrhein

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:42:31 +0100

39 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Juergen Bosch

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:30:33 -0700

150 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:59:38 +0100

161 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Edward A Berry

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:30:04 -0700

157 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Andrew Raine

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:22:18 +0100

31 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Kay Diederichs

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:16:54 +0200

145 lines

Re: Problem with VDW restraints in Refmac

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:16:39 +0100

51 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Ashley Buckle

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:14:13 +1000

519 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Anastassis Perrakis

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:13:03 +0200

118 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Mark J. van Raaij

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:11:51 +0200

381 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Green, Todd

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:11:10 -0500

160 lines

The importance of USING our validation tools

Santarsiero, Bernard D.

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:04:25 -0500

125 lines

Problem with VDW restraints in Refmac

Alastair McEwen

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:55:27 +0200

40 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Clemens Vonrhein

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:47:10 +0100

102 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Mischa Machius

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:46:14 -0500

113 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Mischa Machius

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:30:17 -0500

95 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Ashley Buckle

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:21:06 +1000

291 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Phil Evans

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:13:29 +0100

65 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Ashley Buckle

Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:05:47 +1000

328 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:38:46 +0100

144 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

James Whisstock

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:33:17 +1000

144 lines

NSCM keyword in MolRep

Cynthia Czyrphony

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:28:03 +0200

30 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Randy J. Read

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:22:20 +0100

102 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Gina Clayton

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:09:48 -0400

128 lines

Re: Structure help

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:16:27 +0100

65 lines

Re: The importance of USING our validation tools

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:13:21 +0100

1174 lines

Re: "Dry" structures

Benini, Stefano

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:02:45 +0100

87 lines

Re: "Dry" structures

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:49:10 +0100

49 lines

Re: Structure help

George M. Sheldrick

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:59:33 +0200

66 lines

Re: Structure help

Das, Debanu

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:50:00 -0700

100 lines

Re: Structure help

Juergen Bosch

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:48:29 -0700

90 lines

Structure help

Yanming Zhang

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:24:56 -0400

49 lines

Re: follow up on model DNA-binding crystals?

Das, Debanu

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:38:29 -0700

79 lines

Re: model DNA-binding crystals?

Das, Debanu

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:31:17 -0700

58 lines

model DNA-binding crystals?

Frank von Delft

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:13:37 +0100

17 lines

Re: "Dry" structures

Kumar, Abhinav

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:54:08 -0700

409 lines

"Dry" structures

Sabini, Elisabetta

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:35:17 -0500

443 lines

Re: Oligomer which lacks conformational cooperativity

Jacob Keller

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:23:40 -0500

64 lines

Re: Oligomer which lacks conformational cooperativity

Daniel Schlieper

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:59:27 +0200

60 lines

Oligomer which lacks conformational cooperativity

Jacob Keller

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:39:14 -0500

44 lines

SGI Indigo II question

David Roberts

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:40:17 -0400

38 lines

Re: ID-13 XDS.INP

Kay Diederichs

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:26:44 +0200

119 lines

The importance of USING our validation tools

Eleanor Dodson

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:11:10 +0100

4557 lines

New CCP4 Molecular Graphics (1.1beta2)

CCP4 Molecular Graphics Team

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:51:37 +0100

29 lines

Re: coot in stereo

Oganesyan, Vaheh

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:28:34 -0400

66 lines

ID-13 XDS.INP

Dr. Colin W. Levy

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:03:06 +0100

20 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Charles Ballard

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:39:41 +0100

107 lines

Re: CCP4 rotation convention

Ian Tickle

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:28:08 +0100

332 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Kay Diederichs

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:24:24 +0200

160 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Kay Diederichs

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:24:24 +0200

143 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Eleanor Dodson

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:23:45 +0100

77 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Andy Purkiss-Trew

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:12:07 +0100

78 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Ian Tickle

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:03:23 +0100

70 lines

Re: CCP4 rotation convention

Ian Tickle

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:46:48 +0100

259 lines

about error in MGLtools1.4.5 and autodock4

Zhiyong Lou

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:14:58 +0800

218 lines

about error in MGLtools1.4.5 and autodock4

Zhiyong Lou

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:14:58 +0800

218 lines

Re: coot in stereo

Kay Diederichs

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:53:50 +0200

131 lines

Postdoctoral fellow / Research Associate position with the Structural Genomics Consortium, Toronto

alexey bochkarev

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:15:08 -0400

99 lines

Postdoctoral fellow / Research Associate position with the Structural Genomics Consortium, Toronto

alexey bochkarev

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:15:08 -0400

99 lines

Re: coot in stereo

<>

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:55:47 -0400

139 lines

Re: question

Wim Burmeister

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:16:28 +0200

51 lines

Computer/X-ray Crystallography Laboratory Manager at Scripps-Florida

Izard, Tina

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:59:50 -0500

99 lines

Computer/X-ray Crystallography Laboratory Manager at Scripps-Florida

Izard, Tina

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:59:50 -0500

99 lines

Re: CCP4 rotation convention

Ian Tickle

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:11:42 +0100

134 lines

Re: extra density on Cysteine

Stephen Graham

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:48:35 +0100

53 lines

Re: coot in stereo

Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS]

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:37:02 -0400

50 lines

coot in stereo

Paul D. Cook

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:22:25 +0100

26 lines

question

Mirek Cygler

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:04:13 -0400

20 lines

Re: extra density on Cysteine

mesters

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:46:38 +0200

73 lines

Re: CCP4 rotation convention

Ian Tickle

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:56:07 +0100

264 lines

Re: step 1 & step 2

Ian Tickle

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:29:17 +0100

178 lines

Seeking collaborators.

cry

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:08:10 +0800

63 lines

Re: CCP4 rotation convention

Edward Berry

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:03:51 -0700

46 lines

Re: extra density on Cysteine

Artem Evdokimov

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:51:16 -0400

248 lines

Re: extra density on Cysteine

Artem Evdokimov

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:51:16 -0400

248 lines

extra density on Cysteine

<>

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:58:30 +0800

26336 lines

extra density on Cysteine

<>

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:58:30 +0800

26334 lines

Re: CCP4 rotation convention

Edward A. Berry

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:29:49 -0700

49 lines

Re: domains missing

<>

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:13:14 -0500

122 lines

Re: domains missing

<>

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:13:14 -0500

122 lines

Re: My flower crystals

James Whisstock

Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:02:49 +1000

40 lines

Re: CCP4 rotation convention

Bernhard Rupp

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:06:50 -0700

65 lines

Re: CCP4 rotation convention

Philippe DUMAS

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:28:47 +0200

200 lines

My flower crystals

Jinzhi Tan

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:45:16 +0200

20 lines

domains missing

Wu, Mousheng

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:38:41 -0500

138 lines

domains missing

Wu, Mousheng

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:38:41 -0500

138 lines

Re: CCP4 rotation convention

Ian Tickle

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:10:46 +0100

146 lines

Re: CCP4 rotation convention

Ian Tickle

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:42:43 +0100

125 lines

Re: CCP4 rotation convention

Eleanor Dodson

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:11:00 +0100

80 lines

Re: CCP4 rotation convention - long comments

Sacha Urzhumtsev

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:10:33 +0200

130 lines

Re: libcheck question

Eleanor Dodson

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:35:39 +0100

46 lines

Posts available at EMBL-EBI

Kim Henrick

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:35:29 +0100

29 lines

selfrot plot

Bernhard Rupp

Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:06:09 -0700

32 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Edward A Berry

Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:51:17 -0700

36 lines

CCP4 rotation convention

Bernhard Rupp

Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:37:19 -0700

48 lines

Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data

Paul Adams

Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:25:22 -0700

133 lines

Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data

George M. Sheldrick

Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:05:17 +0200

99 lines

Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data

Paul Adams

Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:12:28 -0700

62 lines

Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data

Ethan A Merritt

Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:48:04 -0700

80 lines

Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data

Miller, Mitchell D.

Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:41:59 -0700

70 lines

kappa 180

Bernhard Rupp

Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:10:51 -0700

32 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Herbert J. Bernstein

Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:31:25 -0400

419 lines

Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement

Kay Diederichs

Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:39:28 +0200

112 lines

Re: a question about procheck

Kim Henrick

Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:33:50 +0100

99 lines

Re: a question about procheck

Kim Henrick

Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:27:45 +0100

105 lines

Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data

Sanishvili, Ruslan

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:46:53 -0500

60 lines

Re: a question about procheck

Jiamu Du

Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:10:06 +0800

150 lines

Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement

Mike S

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:25:36 -0400

58 lines

Covalent link

Scapin, Giovanna

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:03:36 -0400

88 lines

Real & reciprocal space refinements

Michael S. Chapman

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:02:20 -0700

217 lines

Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement

Dale Tronrud

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:40:40 -0700

122 lines

Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement

Pavel Afonine

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:19:38 -0700

79 lines

Re: Spam: Re: [ccp4bb] real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement

Anastassis Perrakis

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:03:05 +0200

59 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:38:16 -0700

52 lines

Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement

Pavel Afonine

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:12:23 -0700

35 lines

Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement

Anastassis Perrakis

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:57:35 +0200

93 lines

Re: real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement

Pavel Afonine

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:59:29 -0700

52 lines

real-space vs. reciprocal space refinement

Mike S

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:51:03 -0400

41 lines

Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data

Ethan Merritt

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:20:13 -0700

47 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Warren DeLano

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:13:59 -0700

357 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Ethan Merritt

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:06:09 -0700

282 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Herbert J. Bernstein

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:59:17 -0400

321 lines

libcheck question

Mark A Saper

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:53:58 -0400

94 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Herbert J. Bernstein

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:51:34 -0400

293 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Warren DeLano

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:29:21 -0700

263 lines

PDB format survey?

Santarsiero, Bernard D.

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:17:05 -0500

218 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Warren DeLano

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:10:49 -0700

204 lines

New buccaneer...

Kevin Cowtan

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:42:38 +0100

38 lines

Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data

Clemens Vonrhein

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:01:00 +0100

135 lines

technical position: protein expression for structural biology

Emsley Jonas

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:37:06 +0100

68 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Kevin Cowtan

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:19:59 +0100

20 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

George M. Sheldrick

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:12:52 +0200

98 lines

Re: a question about procheck

Paul Emsley

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:09:43 +0100

99 lines

Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data

Clemens Vonrhein

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:53:05 +0100

116 lines

Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data

Clemens Vonrhein

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:26:58 +0100

80 lines

Re: a question about procheck

Jiamu Du

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:19:44 +0800

112 lines

a question about procheck

Jiamu Du

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:56:06 +0800

54 lines

Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data

Eleanor Dodson

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:27:16 +0100

60 lines

Re: refmac problem in running arp/warp

Tommi Kajander

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:00:58 +0300

57 lines

Job offer: Protein Crystallographer (with Ph.D)

Blaesse, Michael

Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:46:29 +0200

451 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Warren DeLano

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:49:53 -0700

161 lines

Re: SAD: Refine against anomalous data

ping sun

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 20:37:06 -0400

35 lines

SAD: Refine against anomalous data

ping sun

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:55:09 -0400

49 lines

SAD: Refine against anomalous data

ping sun

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:48:11 -0400

47 lines

Re: refmac problem in running arp/warp

Roberto Steiner

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:08:49 +0100

113 lines

adjustable loops, other cryo mounting methods

Bryan W. Lepore

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:01:48 -0500

19 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Joe Krahn

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:12:44 -0400

82 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:11:13 -0700

155 lines

CCP4 web-newsletter 46 (Summer 2007)

Remacle, F (Francois)

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:32:56 +0100

108 lines

Re: mr query

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:43:56 +0100

129 lines

Re: refmac5 refinement with PEG400

Eleanor Dodson

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:41:05 +0100

26 lines

Re: refmac problem in running arp/warp

Anastassis Perrakis

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:19:57 +0200

70 lines

refmac problem in running arp/warp

Tommi Kajander

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:02:02 +0300

82 lines

PhD studentship at University of Groningen, the Netherlands

Andy-Mark Thunnissen

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:29:09 +0200

115 lines

Re: mr query

Kolstoe S.E.

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:33:47 +0100

116 lines

Re: More than 70 TLS groups

Martyn Winn

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 09:50:42 +0100

48 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Edward A. Berry

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 23:39:11 -0700

37 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Ethan A Merritt

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 23:21:42 -0700

47 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 20:47:23 -0700

81 lines

More than 70 TLS groups

Craig Morton

Thu, 9 Aug 2007 12:54:27 +1000

29 lines

SUMMARY: highly soluble proteins

Yvonne Leduc

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:19:50 -0600

381 lines

Re: refmac5 refinement with PEG400

Craig McElroy

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:50:14 -0400

220 lines

Re: refmac5 refinement with PEG400

Kumar, Abhinav

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:43:49 -0700

89 lines

Re: refmac5 refinement with PEG400

Manish C Pathak

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:37:02 -0700

61 lines

Re: refmac5 refinement with PEG400

Craig McElroy

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:26:38 -0400

58 lines

Re: refmac5 refinement with PEG400

Kumar, Abhinav

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:20:21 -0700

50 lines

refmac5 refinement with PEG400

Craig McElroy

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:10:33 -0400

642 lines

Re: mr query

Eleanor Dodson

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:27:35 +0100

46 lines

Re: highly soluble proteins

Das, Debanu

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:10:41 -0700

127 lines

Re: mr query

Ian Tickle

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:06:15 +0100

92 lines

mr query

Kolstoe S.E.

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:51:10 +0100

97 lines

Re: needles vs crystals

Jens-Christian Navarro Poulsen

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:47:29 +0200

386 lines

Re: AMORE_NSOL

Eleanor Dodson

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:27:26 +0100

30 lines

AMORE_NSOL

Xue-Yuan Pei

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:40:04 +0100

16 lines

Re: CCP4 mailing list

Michele Lunelli

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:35:24 +0200

20 lines

Re: Merging datasets

Eleanor Dodson

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:52:25 +0100

44 lines

Re: CCP4 mailing list

Eleanor Dodson

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:40:52 +0100

40 lines

Re: highly soluble proteins

Stephen Graham

Wed, 8 Aug 2007 07:42:03 +0100

81 lines

Position for PSI Knowledgebase development

Paul Adams

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:40:07 -0700

92 lines

Merging datasets

Kianoush Sadre-Bazzaz

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:04:56 -0700

32 lines

Beam time at X6A NSLS

Stojanoff, Vivian

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:36:47 -0400

36 lines

Re: highly soluble proteins

M T

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 23:10:23 +0200

44 lines

Re: needles vs crystals

James Pauff

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:37:29 -0700

50 lines

Re: highly soluble proteins

<>

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:30:48 -0400

57 lines

CCP4 mailing list

Thomas Stout

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:20:01 -0700

90 lines

Re: needles vs crystals

<>

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:17:40 -0400

131 lines

Postdoc position: Structural biology of intracellular signalling systems

Clemens Steegborn

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:51:55 +0200

56 lines

Re: highly soluble proteins

Jack Tanner

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:40:52 -0500

41 lines

highly soluble proteins

Yvonne Leduc

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:17:18 -0600

31 lines

Re: needles vs crystals

Roger Rowlett

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:10:56 -0400

43 lines

needles vs crystals

shivesh kumar

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:15:33 +0530

35 lines

Re: Surface complementarity

Rizkallah, PJ (Pierre)

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:16:57 +0100

71 lines

AstraZeneca US permanent PX position

Pauptit, Richard A

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:10:12 +0100

25 lines

Could anyone get me the HKL2MAP 0.2 sources?

Wim Cossement

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:50:29 +0200

35 lines

Surface complementarity

Rosemary Harrison

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:43:04 +1000

28 lines

Re: J. Struct. Biology EndNote style

Ngo Duc Tri

Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:04:00 +0700

21 lines

Postdoctoral Position at UCLA

Duilio Cascio

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 23:45:41 -0700

138 lines

Re: speeding crystallisation

Zhen Zhang

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:56:21 -0400

60 lines

Problem solved! Re: [ccp4bb] Asking help about refmac5?

zhongzhou chen

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:44:16 -0600

157 lines

Re: speeding crystallisation

Christian Biertumpfel

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:16:56 -0400

56 lines

endnote style file found

<>

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:16:45 -0400

16 lines

Re: speeding crystallisation

David J. Schuller

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:14:36 -0400

40 lines

Re: speeding crystallisation

<>

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:05:34 -0400

59 lines

slab command of Windows povscript

brenda obrien07

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:00:19 -0500

43 lines

Re: Dnase activity in E. coli expressed his tag proteins

Filip Van Petegem

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:54:06 -0700

84 lines

speeding crystallisation

Neeraj

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:50:30 -0400

30 lines

J. Struct. Biology EndNote style

<>

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:21:48 -0400

22 lines

Re: Dnase activity in E. coli expressed his tag proteins

<>

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:19:25 -0400

52 lines

Re: Calculating vertical offset of helices

Jie Liu

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:10:54 -0400

92 lines

Re: Calculating vertical offset of helices

Edward Berry

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:19:46 -0700

57 lines

Bruker Microstar-H with Helios optics and MarDTB

praveen kumar

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:29:38 -0700

32 lines

Dnase activity in E. coli expressed his tag proteins

Narayanan Ramasubbu

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:12:46 -0400

26 lines

Re: Calculating vertical offset of helices

Eleanor Dodson

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:41:06 +0100

44 lines

Hg rippled summary

Klemens Wild

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:26:25 +0200

35 lines

Re: Tweaking with SCBUlk and BBULk parameters in refmac

Eleanor Dodson

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:08:37 +0100

75 lines

Systems Biology Session: Diamond User Meeting 2007

Brandao-Neto, J (Jose)

Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:02:13 +0100

305 lines

Calculating vertical offset of helices

Jie Liu

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:10:24 -0400

21 lines

Job: RNA Center in Santa Cruz, CA, US

William Scott

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:21:38 -0700

54 lines

Tweaking with SCBUlk and BBULk parameters in refmac

Jose Antonio Cuesta-Seijo

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:49:26 -0400

55 lines

Re: Volume calculation of a crevice

Anthony Addlagatta

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 11:02:51 -0700

38 lines

Re: resolution vs ramachandran

Robert Immormino

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:36:13 -0400

49 lines

Re: resolution vs ramachandran

<>

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:00:46 -0500

61 lines

Re: Volume calculation of a crevice

Murray, James W

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:52:50 +0100

146 lines

Re: resolution vs ramachandran

Edward Berry

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:44:30 -0700

48 lines

resolution vs ramachandran

Xiaofei Jia

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:30:49 -0700

34 lines

Volume calculation of a crevice

Enrique Rudiño-Piñera

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 10:53:41 -0500

40 lines

some resources for working with new pdbv3 format

Robert Immormino

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:30:25 -0400

55 lines

Re: stacking interaction!

Kim Henrick

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:10:00 +0100

103 lines

Re: stacking interaction!

Eleanor Dodson

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:07:09 +0100

38 lines

Re: density histogram

Adam Ralph

Fri, 3 Aug 2007 10:05:40 +0100

30 lines

Re: density histogram

Peter Zwart

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:23:59 -0700

146 lines

density histogram

Bernhard Rupp

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 19:52:01 -0700

25 lines

Biophysicist (SAXS, crystallography) position at LBNL, SF Bay Area

Amy Pagsolingan

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:16:53 -0700

267 lines

Re: stacking interaction!

Anthony Addlagatta

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:49:38 -0700

73 lines

Re: stacking interaction!

Robert Immormino

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:23:27 -0400

995 lines

Molrep question

Cynthia Czyrphony

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 19:59:12 +0200

33 lines

Postdoctoral Position in USC Los Angeles

Lin Chen

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:34:33 -0700

27 lines

stacking interaction!

Sreeram Mahesh

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:18:35 +0530

38 lines

Postdoctoral Position for PHENIX development

Paul D. Adams

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:47:16 -0700

84 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

George M. Sheldrick

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 18:14:35 +0200

100 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Joe Krahn

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:10:44 -0400

72 lines

imgCIF workshops at BSR 2007

Herbert J. Bernstein

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:45:15 -0400

49 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Kevin Cowtan

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:20:35 +0100

44 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Bernhard Rupp

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:07:26 -0700

113 lines

Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms

Bret Church

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:57:23 +1000

95 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Joe Krahn

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:17:21 -0400

47 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Jon Wright

Thu, 2 Aug 2007 00:58:58 +0200

18 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Thomas Stout

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:31:03 -0700

277 lines

Re: PDB format survey?

Ethan Merritt

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:06:14 -0700

82 lines

Re: pdb-l: Stop the new PDB format!

Frances C. Bernstein

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:48:57 -0400

112 lines

pseudo-translation vectors in molrep vs other programs

Savvas Savvides

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:46:38 +0200

90 lines

PDB format survey?

Joe Krahn

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:10:45 -0400

28 lines

Re: how to bring back the missing density for half of the structure

Anastassis Perrakis

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:03:56 +0200

148 lines

Re: how to bring back the missing density for half of the structure

Eric Liu

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:55:38 -0700

99 lines

Re: pdb-l: Stop the new PDB format!

Joe Krahn

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:50:16 -0400

53 lines

Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms

James Holton

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:47:08 -0600

53 lines

Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms

Kevin Jude

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:29:13 -0700

36 lines

Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms

Bart Hazes

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:37:13 -0600

91 lines

Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms

Kay Diederichs

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:07:57 +0200

136 lines

Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms

George M. Sheldrick

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:06:47 +0200

122 lines

Re: how to bring back the missing density for half of the structure

Peter Adrian Meyer

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:34:42 -0400

35 lines

Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms

Bart Hazes

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:22:21 -0600

102 lines

Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms

Peter Adrian Meyer

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:18:40 -0400

39 lines

Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms

Kay Diederichs

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:18:29 +0200

120 lines

Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms

David J. Schuller

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:10:02 -0400

41 lines

Re: difference density ripples around Hg atoms

Eleanor Dodson

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:51:07 +0100

42 lines

Re: how to bring back the missing density for half of the structure

Eleanor Dodson

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:36:13 +0100

97 lines

difference density ripples around Hg atoms

Klemens Wild

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:35:57 +0200

25 lines

Re: how to bring back the missing density for half of the structure

Fan, Hai-fu

Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:07:40 +0800

87 lines

Re: how to bring back the missing density for half of the structure

Eric Liu

Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:44:02 -0700

88 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager