JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


May 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

6th Annual Data Protection Compliance Conference (1 message)
An Information Tribunal decision (4 messages)
Appropriate length of retention...? (6 messages)
BBC news story (2 messages)
CBI and IoD have different views (3 messages)
CCTV Footage Release (2 messages)
CCTV may fail to comply with the law article reference (1 message)
CFP: WWW/Internet 2007 - Portugal (1 message)
Data Protection Notification (1 message)
Don't lose your notes..... (1 message)
DP Officer Job Edinburgh (1 message)
FOI Podcast - Latest Episode (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario (12 messages)
Fw: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario - amendment (1 message)
Hiding behind Data Protection (9 messages)
Hospital Scenario (20 messages)
Humourous look at ID Cards (1 message)
I should know the answer to this (3 messages)
INFORMATION PRIVACY DAY (1 message)
Interesting way to use DPA (12 messages)
JISC Information Governance Gateway (JIGG) (1 message)
Letters to MPs re DPA (1 message)
Local authority email retentions. (7 messages)
Manual data and 24 October 2007 (5 messages)
Mrs L? (9 messages)
News item: "NHS upgrade creates false patient records" (Computer Weekly) (1 message)
On-Line Training Programmes (1 message)
Psychosocial Genograms ... (4 messages)
Reference Books (3 messages)
Rental agreement (8 messages)
Rental agreement[Scanned] (1 message)
Request for copies of "private" discussions by Moderators of a forum under the DPA (1 message)
Roche Pharmaceuticals releases Medical Data via the web (2 messages)
Roche releases Medical Data via the web (1 message)
See Information Commissioner audits HBOS (5 messages)
Selling of Facebook information? (4 messages)
Selling of Facebook information?[Scanned] (3 messages)
Spam Arrest (1 message)
The term "Bluespam" (1 message)
Third party access to school records (15 messages)
Transfer of personnel records (4 messages)
UK Elections and Secrecy (13 messages)
UKIC asks for real power (6 messages)
UKIC Evidence paper (1 message)
Vacancy for Senior Records Management and Information Compliance Specialist (1 message)
While we are on medical things (10 messages)
While we are on medical things[Scanned] (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

6th Annual Data Protection Compliance Conference

6th Annual Data Protection Compliance Conference

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 14:03:02 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

An Information Tribunal decision

An Information Tribunal decision

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 13:58:13 +0100

247 lines

Re: An Information Tribunal decision

POUNDER Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 14:04:41 +0100

399 lines

Re: An Information Tribunal decision

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 14:20:07 +0100

45 lines

Re: An Information Tribunal decision

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 17:48:50 +0100

98 lines

New Thread

Appropriate length of retention...?

Appropriate length of retention...?

Duncan Langford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 12:21:11 +0100

72 lines

Re: Appropriate length of retention...?

POUNDER Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 12:34:39 +0100

114 lines

Re: Appropriate length of retention...?

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 12:40:27 +0100

107 lines

Re: Appropriate length of retention...?

Andrew Charlesworth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 12:44:26 +0100

128 lines

Re: Appropriate length of retention...?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 13:01:07 +0100

126 lines

Re: Appropriate length of retention...?

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 14:13:21 +0100

150 lines

New Thread

BBC news story

BBC news story

Bremer, Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 13:17:36 +0100

178 lines

Re: BBC news story

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 15:08:46 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

CBI and IoD have different views

CBI and IoD have different views

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 16:23:09 +0100

249 lines

Re: CBI and IoD have different views

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:47:48 +0100

134 lines

Re: CBI and IoD have different views

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 09:30:18 +0100

105 lines

New Thread

CCTV Footage Release

CCTV Footage Release

Sue Howlett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 14:38:00 +0100

39 lines

Re: CCTV Footage Release

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 17:58:19 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

CCTV may fail to comply with the law article reference

CCTV may fail to comply with the law article reference

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 19:11:37 +0100

110 lines

New Thread

CFP: WWW/Internet 2007 - Portugal

CFP: WWW/Internet 2007 - Portugal

Natalia Teixeira <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 15:23:49 +0100

166 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Notification

Data Protection Notification

Tim Rodgers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 11:07:15 +0100

197 lines

New Thread

Don't lose your notes.....

Don't lose your notes.....

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 08:32:06 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

DP Officer Job Edinburgh

DP Officer Job Edinburgh

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 10:44:42 +0100

136 lines

New Thread

FOI Podcast - Latest Episode

FOI Podcast - Latest Episode

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2007 09:47:38 +0100

359 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 09:30:21 +0100

287 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 09:39:05 +0100

341 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 09:39:39 +0100

317 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 09:57:31 +0100

55 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

Carolyn Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 10:07:47 +0100

93 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 May 2007 10:26:15 +0100

191 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 10:53:42 +0100

39 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 11:44:01 +0100

43 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 11:55:09 +0100

74 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 15:53:29 +0100

56 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 18:28:30 +0100

92 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 20:43:06 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Fw: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario - amendment

Fw: [data-protection] Hospital Scenario - amendment

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 12:06:38 +0100

682 lines

New Thread

Hiding behind Data Protection

Hiding behind Data Protection

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 08:28:06 +0100

305 lines

Re: Hiding behind Data Protection

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 09:48:25 +0100

840 lines

Re: Hiding behind Data Protection

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 10:42:31 +0100

121 lines

Re: Hiding behind Data Protection

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 11:55:24 +0100

147 lines

Re: Hiding behind Data Protection

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 23:21:53 +0100

547 lines

Re: Hiding behind Data Protection

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:58:57 +0100

742 lines

Re: Hiding behind Data Protection

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 11:10:56 +0100

273 lines

Re: Hiding behind Data Protection

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 08:34:01 +0100

602 lines

Re: Hiding behind Data Protection

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 09:21:26 +0100

292 lines

New Thread

Hospital Scenario

Hospital Scenario

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 15:20:15 +0100

54 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 15:27:22 +0100

87 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 15:36:01 +0100

90 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:10:51 +0100

42 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:13:48 +0100

69 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:20:42 +0100

127 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 17:29:29 +0100

139 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 08:56:26 +0100

178 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Hitches, John F <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 09:14:42 +0100

33 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 09:24:28 +0100

222 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 09:18:42 +0100

43 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 09:38:26 +0100

264 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Jane Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 10:06:40 +0100

350 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 10:42:10 +0100

46 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 11:58:35 +0100

670 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:17:14 +0100

233 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:17:16 +0100

99 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:28:02 +0100

126 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 08:34:59 +0100

161 lines

Re: Hospital Scenario

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 09:39:43 +0100

196 lines

New Thread

Humourous look at ID Cards

Humourous look at ID Cards

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 16:54:35 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

I should know the answer to this

I should know the answer to this

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 09:40:40 +0100

231 lines

Re: I should know the answer to this

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 04:42:34 -0400

435 lines

Re: I should know the answer to this

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 09:44:11 +0100

557 lines

New Thread

INFORMATION PRIVACY DAY

INFORMATION PRIVACY DAY

POUNDER Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 11:26:58 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Interesting way to use DPA

Interesting way to use DPA

Kevin Berwick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:58:43 +0100

102 lines

Re: Interesting way to use DPA

Carolyn Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:04:29 +0100

79 lines

Re: Interesting way to use DPA

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:11:24 +0100

119 lines

Re: Interesting way to use DPA

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 07:19:49 -0400

176 lines

Re: Interesting way to use DPA

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:52 +0100

220 lines

Re: Interesting way to use DPA

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:26:12 +0100

255 lines

Re: Interesting way to use DPA

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 07:29:20 -0400

299 lines

Re: Interesting way to use DPA

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 13:00:32 +0100

258 lines

Re: Interesting way to use DPA

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 13:01:58 +0100

347 lines

Re: Interesting way to use DPA

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 09:30:16 +0100

57 lines

Re: Interesting way to use DPA

Charles Oppenheim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 09:36:01 +0100

104 lines

Re: Interesting way to use DPA

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 09:45:12 +0100

134 lines

New Thread

JISC Information Governance Gateway (JIGG)

JISC Information Governance Gateway (JIGG)

Jonathan Orford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 18:50:16 +0100

86 lines

New Thread

Letters to MPs re DPA

Letters to MPs re DPA

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 09:44:10 +0100

259 lines

New Thread

Local authority email retentions.

Local authority email retentions.

Tim Salmon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 11:28:50 +0100

82 lines

Re: Local authority email retentions.

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 11:32:45 +0100

114 lines

Re: Local authority email retentions.

Mark Brookes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 11:46:22 +0100

204 lines

Re: Local authority email retentions.

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 11:53:45 +0100

212 lines

Re: Local authority email retentions.

Mark Brookes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 12:01:48 +0100

293 lines

Re: Local authority email retentions.

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 14:18:44 +0100

180 lines

Re: Local authority email retentions.

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 15:50:39 +0100

178 lines

New Thread

Manual data and 24 October 2007

Manual data and 24 October 2007

Joshua McKim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 10:11:54 +0100

261 lines

Re: Manual data and 24 October 2007

POUNDER Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 10:18:55 +0100

316 lines

Re: Manual data and 24 October 2007

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 11:20:15 +0100

357 lines

Re: Manual data and 24 October 2007

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 11:25:39 +0100

396 lines

Re: Manual data and 24 October 2007

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 11:30:52 +0100

446 lines

New Thread

Mrs L?

Mrs L?

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 14:33:58 +0100

72 lines

Re: Mrs L?

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 14:49:55 +0100

119 lines

Re: Mrs L?

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 09:50:30 -0400

151 lines

Re: Mrs L?

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 15:02:43 +0100

44 lines

Re: Mrs L?

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 15:14:24 +0100

110 lines

Re: Mrs L?

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 15:17:37 +0100

58 lines

Re: Mrs L?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2007 07:55:05 +0100

36 lines

Re: Mrs L?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2007 11:53:41 +0100

83 lines

Re: Mrs L?

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2007 00:12:01 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

News item: "NHS upgrade creates false patient records" (Computer Weekly)

News item: "NHS upgrade creates false patient records" (Computer Weekly)

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 14:06:01 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

On-Line Training Programmes

On-Line Training Programmes

Tracey Walters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 16:37:09 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

Psychosocial Genograms ...

Psychosocial Genograms ...

Jackie Leesons <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 11:51:23 +0100

38 lines

Re: Psychosocial Genograms ...

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 12:39:56 +0100

82 lines

Re: Psychosocial Genograms ...

Leesons Jackie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 16:51:39 +0100

99 lines

Re: Psychosocial Genograms ...

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 17:01:21 +0100

171 lines

New Thread

Reference Books

Reference Books

Bremer, Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 09:30:33 +0100

182 lines

Re: Reference Books

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 09:44:23 +0100

732 lines

Re: Reference Books

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 15:29:58 +0100

69 lines

New Thread

Rental agreement

Rental agreement

Julie Bee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 13:46:49 +0100

168 lines

Re: Rental agreement

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 13:53:08 +0100

610 lines

Re: Rental agreement

Graham Donelan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 14:00:00 +0100

156 lines

Re: Rental agreement

Iain Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 14:13:34 +0100

191 lines

Re: Rental agreement

Graham Donelan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 14:15:37 +0100

214 lines

Re: Rental agreement

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 14:18:44 +0100

32 lines

Re: Rental agreement

Iain Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 14:18:28 +0100

242 lines

Re: Rental agreement

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 14:43:33 +0100

187 lines

New Thread

Rental agreement[Scanned]

Re: Rental agreement[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 14:31:21 +0100

241 lines

New Thread

Request for copies of "private" discussions by Moderators of a forum under the DPA

Request for copies of "private" discussions by Moderators of a forum under the DPA

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 10:02:01 +0100

77 lines

New Thread

Roche Pharmaceuticals releases Medical Data via the web

Roche Pharmaceuticals releases Medical Data via the web

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 09:50:13 +0100

242 lines

Re: Roche Pharmaceuticals releases Medical Data via the web

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 07:56:42 +0100

383 lines

New Thread

Roche releases Medical Data via the web

Re: Roche releases Medical Data via the web

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2007 07:45:59 +0100

665 lines

New Thread

See Information Commissioner audits HBOS

See Information Commissioner audits HBOS

POUNDER Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 09:59:17 +0100

285 lines

Re: See Information Commissioner audits HBOS

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 11:00:22 +0100

413 lines

Re: See Information Commissioner audits HBOS

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 11:09:35 +0100

506 lines

Re: See Information Commissioner audits HBOS

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 11:29:51 +0100

742 lines

Re: See Information Commissioner audits HBOS

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 12:05:56 +0100

557 lines

New Thread

Selling of Facebook information?

Selling of Facebook information?

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 11:28:39 +0100

43 lines

Re: Selling of Facebook information?

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 12:44:34 +0100

91 lines

Re: Selling of Facebook information?

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 12:53:04 +0100

114 lines

Re: Selling of Facebook information?

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 07:56:18 -0400

181 lines

New Thread

Selling of Facebook information?[Scanned]

Re: Selling of Facebook information?[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 12:55:47 +0100

192 lines

Re: Selling of Facebook information?[Scanned]

Bremer, Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 15:06:52 +0100

632 lines

Re: Selling of Facebook information?[Scanned]

Iain Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 15:21:54 +0100

315 lines

New Thread

Spam Arrest

Spam Arrest

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 15:17:14 +0100

219 lines

New Thread

The term "Bluespam"

The term "Bluespam"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 13:06:18 +0100

225 lines

New Thread

Third party access to school records

Third party access to school records

Gill Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:18:11 +0100

42 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:32:54 +0100

81 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:42:48 +0100

64 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Iain Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:45:09 +0100

123 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 13:16:06 +0100

106 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 13:16:54 +0100

158 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 13:41:09 +0100

84 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Peter Dinsdale <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 13:44:46 +0100

253 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 13:55:44 +0100

123 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Chell, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 15:19:09 +0100

392 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 09:50:12 +0100

707 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 09:57:42 +0100

211 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 10:06:16 +0100

274 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 10:24:16 +0100

371 lines

Re: Third party access to school records

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 14:59:10 +0100

348 lines

New Thread

Transfer of personnel records

Transfer of personnel records

Malcolm Kendall <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 16:03:07 +0100

45 lines

Re: Transfer of personnel records

Marchini, Renzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 11:20:20 -0400

115 lines

Re: Transfer of personnel records

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 17:37:11 +0100

48 lines

Re: Transfer of personnel records

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 May 2007 12:00:16 +0100

97 lines

New Thread

UK Elections and Secrecy

UK Elections and Secrecy

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:15:51 +0100

278 lines

Re: UK Elections and Secrecy

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:34:10 +0100

665 lines

Re: UK Elections and Secrecy

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:37:15 +0100

137 lines

Re: UK Elections and Secrecy

Hitches, John F <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:45:19 +0100

234 lines

Re: UK Elections and Secrecy

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:45:53 +0100

192 lines

Re: UK Elections and Secrecy

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:51:03 +0100

94 lines

Re: UK Elections and Secrecy

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:55:18 +0100

86 lines

Re: UK Elections and Secrecy

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:56:54 +0100

283 lines

Re: UK Elections and Secrecy

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 14:02:20 +0100

157 lines

Re: UK Elections and Secrecy

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 14:07:23 +0100

347 lines

Re: UK Elections and Secrecy

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 14:11:07 +0100

378 lines

Re: UK Elections and Secrecy

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 14:41:24 +0100

213 lines

Re: UK Elections and Secrecy

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 14:43:07 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

UKIC asks for real power

UKIC asks for real power

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 11:26:16 +0100

227 lines

Re: UKIC asks for real power

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 11:46:06 +0100

92 lines

Re: UKIC asks for real power

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 12:17:39 +0100

94 lines

Re: UKIC asks for real power

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 12:56:03 +0100

123 lines

Re: UKIC asks for real power

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 13:57:50 +0100

170 lines

Re: UKIC asks for real power

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 15:13:13 +0100

200 lines

New Thread

UKIC Evidence paper

UKIC Evidence paper

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:08:03 +0100

230 lines

New Thread

Vacancy for Senior Records Management and Information Compliance Specialist

Re: Vacancy for Senior Records Management and Information Compliance Specialist

David Fildes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 11:25:26 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

While we are on medical things

While we are on medical things

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:02:30 +0100

249 lines

Re: While we are on medical things

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:17:48 +0100

393 lines

Re: While we are on medical things

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:29:42 +0100

448 lines

Re: While we are on medical things

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:31:04 +0100

552 lines

Re: While we are on medical things

Mark Brookes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:25:45 +0100

209 lines

Re: While we are on medical things

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:43:15 +0100

269 lines

Re: While we are on medical things

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 17:15:46 +0100

132 lines

Re: While we are on medical things

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 17:17:35 +0100

300 lines

Re: While we are on medical things

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 23:25:13 +0100

166 lines

Re: While we are on medical things

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 09:41:49 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

While we are on medical things[Scanned]

Re: While we are on medical things[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:04:32 +0100

676 lines

Re: While we are on medical things[Scanned]

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:11:13 +0100

696 lines

Re: While we are on medical things[Scanned]

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 16:19:50 +0100

510 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager