JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


April 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" pr ivate data, court told" (1 message)
"GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" private data, court told" (8 messages)
+AFs-data-protection+AF0- Personal Information conundrum (1 message)
A couple of other stories in the press (8 messages)
Access to old school records (7 messages)
access to school records (1 message)
Adv - Training Courses (1 message)
Automated CCTV surveillance to determine if you are a villain. DP issuesto consider (4 messages)
Automatic Replies (1 message)
Bluetooth for Drive By Marketing expands (10 messages)
Bluetooth malware (1 message)
Complaints enquiry (2 messages)
Data Controllers/Data processors (3 messages)
Data may be protected, but what of one's home? (7 messages)
Data Retention - migration of CRM system (2 messages)
Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative (13 messages)
European Court of Human Rights: Personal ca lls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected (6 messages)
European Court of Human Rights: Personal calls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected (10 messages)
Expectation of Privacy at work (3 messages)
Failure to respond within statutory timesca le to Subject Access Request (4 messages)
Failure to respond within statutory timescale to Subject Access Request (2 messages)
FOI decision (1 message)
Free to View Live Webcast - JISC Legal - Interception and Monitoring Law (1 message)
FW: Call for evidence - House of Lords Constitution Committee (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Personal Information conundrum (2 messages)
information governance assessment toolkit (2 messages)
Information Law Newsletter (1 message)
Information Rights Masters Degree (1 message)
Johnson v Medical Defence Union No.2 (2 messages)
Latest Podcast (1 message)
New Guidance by ICO (January) "The use of personal information held for collecting and administering Council Tax" (1 message)
Opt out lists (21 messages)
PECR Rules OK (3 messages)
Personal Information conundrum (9 messages)
Privacy Impact Assessments - training (1 message)
s.31 Agreements (1 message)
SAR implications? (2 messages)
SAR implications?[Scanned] (3 messages)
Surveillance law Update (1 message)
The term "Bluespam" (1 message)
UNSUCSCRIBE (1 message)
Web sites need checking for data leakage (3 messages)
When is spam not spam? (31 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" pr ivate data, court told"

Re: "GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" pr ivate data, court told"

Doherty Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:17:01 +0100

423 lines

New Thread

"GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" private data, court told"

"GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" private data, court told"

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:12:32 +0100

39 lines

Re: "GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" private data, court told"

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:07:07 +0100

44 lines

Re: "GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" private data, court told"

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:41:19 +0100

47 lines

Re: "GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" private data, court told"

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:06:03 +0100

39 lines

Re: "GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" private data, court told"

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:21:39 +0100

73 lines

Re: "GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" private data, court told"

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:20:51 +0100

125 lines

Re: "GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" private data, court told"

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:44:06 +0100

84 lines

Re: "GM subsidiary paid conman for "blagged" private data, court told"

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:31:53 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

+AFs-data-protection+AF0- Personal Information conundrum

Re: +AFs-data-protection+AF0- Personal Information conundrum

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:36:14 +0100

195 lines

New Thread

A couple of other stories in the press

A couple of other stories in the press

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:04:31 +0100

168 lines

Re: A couple of other stories in the press

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:17:03 +0100

291 lines

Re: A couple of other stories in the press

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:48:52 +0100

89 lines

Re: A couple of other stories in the press

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:19:58 +0100

165 lines

Re: A couple of other stories in the press

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:52:03 +0100

212 lines

Re: A couple of other stories in the press

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:51:57 +0100

198 lines

Re: A couple of other stories in the press

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:12:11 +0100

251 lines

Re: A couple of other stories in the press

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:20:36 +0100

289 lines

New Thread

Access to old school records

Access to old school records

Iain Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:55:19 +0100

55 lines

Re: Access to old school records

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:15:04 +0100

89 lines

Re: Access to old school records

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:18:47 +0100

120 lines

Re: Access to old school records

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:32:38 +0100

39 lines

Re: Access to old school records

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:34:20 +0100

136 lines

Re: Access to old school records

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:49:36 +0100

91 lines

Re: Access to old school records

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:55:58 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

access to school records

access to school records

Kevin Mulley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:55:34 +0100

91 lines

New Thread

Adv - Training Courses

Adv - Training Courses

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:33:29 +0100

445 lines

New Thread

Automated CCTV surveillance to determine if you are a villain. DP issuesto consider

Automated CCTV surveillance to determine if you are a villain. DP issuesto consider

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:50:36 +0100

141 lines

Re: Automated CCTV surveillance to determine if you are a villain. DP issuesto consider

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:05:44 +0100

275 lines

Re: Automated CCTV surveillance to determine if you are a villain. DP issuesto consider

POUNDER Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:16:11 +0100

496 lines

Re: Automated CCTV surveillance to determine if you are a villain. DP issuesto consider

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:27:08 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Automatic Replies

Automatic Replies

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2007 08:49:51 +0100

307 lines

New Thread

Bluetooth for Drive By Marketing expands

Bluetooth for Drive By Marketing expands

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:49:15 +0100

246 lines

Re: Bluetooth for Drive By Marketing expands

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:45:51 +0100

43 lines

Re: Bluetooth for Drive By Marketing expands

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:01:04 +0100

69 lines

Re: Bluetooth for Drive By Marketing expands

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:21:15 +0100

47 lines

Re: Bluetooth for Drive By Marketing expands

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:41:03 +0100

74 lines

Re: Bluetooth for Drive By Marketing expands

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:42:06 +0100

36 lines

Re: Bluetooth for Drive By Marketing expands

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:48:35 +0100

45 lines

Re: Bluetooth for Drive By Marketing expands

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:04:14 +0100

43 lines

Re: Bluetooth for Drive By Marketing expands

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:12:53 +0100

89 lines

Re: Bluetooth for Drive By Marketing expands

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:44:28 +0100

168 lines

New Thread

Bluetooth malware

Bluetooth malware

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:23:51 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Complaints enquiry

Complaints enquiry

Steel, Rachael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:49:10 +0100

250 lines

Re: Complaints enquiry

Steel, Rachael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:08:31 +0100

616 lines

New Thread

Data Controllers/Data processors

Data Controllers/Data processors

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:45:03 +0100

292 lines

Re: Data Controllers/Data processors

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:57:48 +0100

425 lines

Re: Data Controllers/Data processors

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:28:11 +0100

596 lines

New Thread

Data may be protected, but what of one's home?

Data may be protected, but what of one's home?

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:00:40 +0100

102 lines

Re: Data may be protected, but what of one's home?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:46:43 +0100

56 lines

Re: Data may be protected, but what of one's home?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:51:31 +0100

461 lines

Re: Data may be protected, but what of one's home?

Peter Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:09:01 +0100

480 lines

Re: Data may be protected, but what of one's home?

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:16:20 +0100

134 lines

Re: Data may be protected, but what of one's home?

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:25:56 +0100

640 lines

Re: Data may be protected, but what of one's home?

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:38:26 +0100

722 lines

New Thread

Data Retention - migration of CRM system

Data Retention - migration of CRM system

Ward, Ciaran <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:05:09 +0100

253 lines

Re: Data Retention - migration of CRM system

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:44:13 +0100

506 lines

New Thread

Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:56:13 +0100

48 lines

Re: Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Doherty Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:22:59 +0100

312 lines

Re: Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:15:14 +0100

514 lines

Re: Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Doherty Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:26:36 +0100

732 lines

Re: Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:25:52 +0100

272 lines

Re: Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Doherty Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:44:06 +0100

833 lines

Re: Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:28:56 +0100

50 lines

Re: Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:40:14 +0100

79 lines

Re: Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:01:23 +0100

69 lines

Re: Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:06:39 +0100

74 lines

Re: Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:55:02 +0100

39 lines

Re: Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:20:52 +0100

83 lines

Re: Employee Data goes missing when sent to the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:49:54 +0100

128 lines

New Thread

European Court of Human Rights: Personal ca lls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal ca lls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:20:39 +0100

92 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal ca lls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:31:20 +0100

150 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal ca lls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:40:45 +0100

410 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal ca lls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:48:21 +0100

235 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal ca lls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:54:19 +0100

43 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal ca lls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:08:17 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

European Court of Human Rights: Personal calls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

European Court of Human Rights: Personal calls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:14:45 +0100

35 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal calls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:18:44 +0100

49 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal calls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:34:37 +0100

34 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal calls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:35:48 +0100

77 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal calls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:46:14 +0100

46 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal calls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:05:03 +0100

44 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal calls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Saundra Kae Rubel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:29:25 -0700

81 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal calls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:01:58 +0100

106 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal calls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:06:10 +0100

67 lines

Re: European Court of Human Rights: Personal calls and Internet usage from work are (maybe) protected

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:16:14 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Expectation of Privacy at work

Expectation of Privacy at work

Clare <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:30:13 +0100

54 lines

Re: Expectation of Privacy at work

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:59:19 +0100

120 lines

Re: Expectation of Privacy at work

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:58:48 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Failure to respond within statutory timesca le to Subject Access Request

Re: Failure to respond within statutory timesca le to Subject Access Request

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:31:45 +0100

141 lines

Re: Failure to respond within statutory timesca le to Subject Access Request

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:00:16 +0100

217 lines

Re: Failure to respond within statutory timesca le to Subject Access Request

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:03:22 +0100

56 lines

Re: Failure to respond within statutory timesca le to Subject Access Request

Renzo Marchini <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:01:14 +0100

175 lines

New Thread

Failure to respond within statutory timescale to Subject Access Request

Failure to respond within statutory timescale to Subject Access Request

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:17:30 +0100

69 lines

Re: Failure to respond within statutory timescale to Subject Access Request

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:57:45 +0100

347 lines

New Thread

FOI decision

FOI decision

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:44:15 +0100

168 lines

New Thread

Free to View Live Webcast - JISC Legal - Interception and Monitoring Law

Free to View Live Webcast - JISC Legal - Interception and Monitoring Law

John X Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:22:22 +0100

75 lines

New Thread

FW: Call for evidence - House of Lords Constitution Committee

FW: Call for evidence - House of Lords Constitution Committee

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:02:59 +0100

81 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Personal Information conundrum

FW: [data-protection] Personal Information conundrum

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:05:48 +0100

200 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Personal Information conundrum

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:38:30 +0100

265 lines

New Thread

information governance assessment toolkit

information governance assessment toolkit

Danny Budzak <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:33:55 +0100

54 lines

Re: information governance assessment toolkit

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:36:28 +0100

84 lines

New Thread

Information Law Newsletter

Information Law Newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:38:56 +0100

369 lines

New Thread

Information Rights Masters Degree

Information Rights Masters Degree

Priestley Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:14:20 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Johnson v Medical Defence Union No.2

Johnson v Medical Defence Union No.2

Gardiner Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:29:50 +0100

71 lines

Re: Johnson v Medical Defence Union No.2

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:20:55 +0100

427 lines

New Thread

Latest Podcast

Latest Podcast

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:14:52 +0100

360 lines

New Thread

New Guidance by ICO (January) "The use of personal information held for collecting and administering Council Tax"

New Guidance by ICO (January) "The use of personal information held for collecting and administering Council Tax"

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:00:55 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

Opt out lists

Opt out lists

GRAHAM Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:50:53 +0100

46 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:10:57 +0100

79 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:57:43 +0100

46 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:31:06 +0100

105 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:17:52 +0100

131 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:14:18 +0100

199 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:22:51 +0100

242 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:59:09 +0100

425 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:34:19 +0100

490 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:00:45 +0100

517 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:15:26 +0100

53 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:01:41 +0100

119 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:43:51 +0100

150 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:54:35 +0100

203 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:59:47 +0100

39 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:27:54 +0100

145 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:29:29 +0100

194 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:40:06 +0100

107 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:50:32 +0100

157 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:49:47 +0100

44 lines

Re: Opt out lists

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:54:25 +0100

193 lines

New Thread

PECR Rules OK

PECR Rules OK

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:35:30 +0100

249 lines

Re: PECR Rules OK

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:20:19 +0100

45 lines

Re: PECR Rules OK

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:27:31 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Personal Information conundrum

Personal Information conundrum

Priestley Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:52:26 +0100

49 lines

Re: Personal Information conundrum

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:59:03 +0100

107 lines

Re: Personal Information conundrum

Samantha Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:59:52 +0100

83 lines

Re: Personal Information conundrum

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:06:51 +0100

120 lines

Re: Personal Information conundrum

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:15:24 +0100

121 lines

Re: Personal Information conundrum

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:19:28 +0100

57 lines

Re: Personal Information conundrum

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:19:36 +0100

157 lines

Re: Personal Information conundrum

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:32:52 +0100

99 lines

Re: Personal Information conundrum

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:36:48 +0100

135 lines

New Thread

Privacy Impact Assessments - training

Privacy Impact Assessments - training

Adam Warren <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:15:18 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

s.31 Agreements

s.31 Agreements

Priestley Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:35:20 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

SAR implications?

SAR implications?

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:26:36 +0100

34 lines

Re: SAR implications?

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:27:40 +0100

80 lines

New Thread

SAR implications?[Scanned]

Re: SAR implications?[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:17:06 +0100

112 lines

Re: SAR implications?[Scanned]

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:34:00 +0100

160 lines

Re: SAR implications?[Scanned]

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:55:48 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Surveillance law Update

Surveillance law Update

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:21:44 +0100

213 lines

New Thread

The term "Bluespam"

The term "Bluespam"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:48:38 +0100

289 lines

New Thread

UNSUCSCRIBE

UNSUCSCRIBE

Margret <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:42:20 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

Web sites need checking for data leakage

Web sites need checking for data leakage

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:37:23 +0100

270 lines

Re: Web sites need checking for data leakage

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:42:51 +0100

42 lines

Re: Web sites need checking for data leakage

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:49:07 +0100

75 lines

New Thread

When is spam not spam?

When is spam not spam?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:15:18 +0100

255 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:41:30 +0100

94 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 13:31:20 +0100

179 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:39:33 +0100

47 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:18:47 +0100

106 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:53:34 +0100

51 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:55:39 +0100

124 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:45:48 +0100

446 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:49:37 +0100

83 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:40:32 +0100

119 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:05:03 +0100

45 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:47:08 +0100

102 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:39:15 +0100

143 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:49:12 +0100

176 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:49:47 +0100

236 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:11:55 +0100

267 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:28:02 +0100

72 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:34:41 +0100

54 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:41:03 +0100

280 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:07:54 +0100

191 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:29:53 +0100

104 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:47:23 +0100

39 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:00:49 +0100

44 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:45:59 +0100

92 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

David Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:10:24 +0100

151 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:27:49 +0100

196 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:29:17 +0100

245 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:54:14 +0100

37 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:00:20 +0100

43 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:19:43 +0100

73 lines

Re: When is spam not spam?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:37:08 +0100

62 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager