JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BIOGRAPHIC-NARRATIVE-BNIM Archives


BIOGRAPHIC-NARRATIVE-BNIM Archives

BIOGRAPHIC-NARRATIVE-BNIM Archives


April 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIOGRAPHIC-NARRATIVE-BNIM Home

BIOGRAPHIC-NARRATIVE-BNIM Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Chronologically

Size

Criticisms of BNIM

Tom Wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:25:37 +0100

296 lines

Call: Special Issue of FQS on Performative Social Science

Kip Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:46:46 +0100

66 lines

BNIM question about a\ two-person interview that became a 3-person one

Tom Wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:07:31 +0100

410 lines

BNIM question about a two-person interview that became a 3-person one - postscript

Tom Wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:22:07 +0100

388 lines

London UK: 5-day intensive training in Biographic-narrative interviewing and interpretation (BNIM)

Tom Wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:20:19 +0100

1144 lines

Phd Bursary: Biographic Performative Method

Kip Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:05:45 +0100

69 lines

FW: invitation to talk re biographical methods in the Department of Nursing and Midwifery

Tom Wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:21:11 +0100

704 lines

Re: Does "anything go" in qualitative methods

Tom Wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:44:15 +0100

364 lines

BNIM and the positive or negative 'fetishism of method' with its attendant 'underestimation of the researcher's mind'

Tom Wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:09:42 +0100

506 lines

FW: BNIM and the positive or negative 'fetishism of method' with its attendant 'underestimation of the r

Tom Wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:16:52 +0100

1274 lines

Re: BNIM and the 'fetishism of method' - contribution from Jane Robertson

Tom Wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:23:00 +0100

1098 lines

Fwd: Re: BNIM and the positive or negative 'fetishism of method' with its attendant 'underestimation of the researcher's mind'

Kip Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:33:18 +0100

308 lines

BNIM: Can you use collective panels when writing an individual PhD? Any experiences, lessons, arguments or guidelines?

tom wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:12:46 +0100

611 lines

Re: BNIM: Can you use collective panels when writing an individual PhD? Any experiences, lessons, arguments or guidelines?

Kip Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:25:14 +0100

141 lines

Re: BNIM: Can you use collective panels when writing an individual PhD? Any experiences, lessons, arguments or guidelines?

Carina Meares <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:28:18 +1200

109 lines

Re: BNIM: Can you use collective panels when writing an individual PhD? Any experiences, lessons, ar

Annette King <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:19:48 +0100

343 lines

Re: BNIM: Can you use collective panels when writing an individual PhD? Any experiences, lessons, arguments or guidelines?

Margaret Volante <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:37:02 +0100

331 lines

Re: BNIM: Can you use collective panels when writing an individual PhD? Any experiences, lessons, arguments or guidelines?

June Hare <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:33:45 GMT

325 lines

Re: BNIM: Can you use collective panels when writing an individual PhD? Any experiences, lessons, arguments or guidelines?

Lynn Froggett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:32:11 +0100

404 lines

BNIM and working through translation out of a language you don't know - request for experience and reflections

tom wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:00:32 +0100

167 lines

Re: BNIM and working through translation out of a language you don't know - request for experience and reflections

Jennifer Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:28:20 +0100

207 lines

Individual PhD -- (not vs, but) using -- Collective Panels - summation

tom wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:47:29 +0100

731 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
November 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
December 2003
July 2003


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager