JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


February 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: NINO

Nick Landau

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:01:09 -0000

113 lines

NINO

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:34:49 +0000

32 lines

Re: National Student Survey

Nick Landau

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:07:13 -0000

143 lines

Re: National Student Survey

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:30:10 +0000

95 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Roland Perry

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:45:58 +0000

37 lines

National Student Survey

Graham Donelan

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:13:18 +0000

46 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Griffiths, Ian

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:31:08 -0000

237 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Caroline Dominey

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:26:34 +0000

198 lines

DPA agreement for beneficiary case studies

Healy, Susan

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:22:54 -0000

200 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Roland Perry

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:18:32 +0000

48 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Person al Data?

Doherty Michael

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:48:58 -0000

229 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nick Landau

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:24:25 -0000

195 lines

FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:23:48 -0000

237 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Griffiths, Ian

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:14:17 -0000

196 lines

FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:51:23 -0000

162 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Doherty Michael

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:39:05 -0000

109 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Griffiths, Ian

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:50:41 -0000

114 lines

Re: E-petition - "We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Make sharing of personal data opt-in only"

Tim Trent

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:22:02 -0000

75 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nick Landau

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:16:01 -0000

60 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Simon Howarth

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:49:43 -0000

97 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Roland Perry

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:39:36 +0000

39 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: National Insurance No's

datap

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:05:40 +0000

529 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Caroline Dominey

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:04:23 +0000

183 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nick Landau

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:57:16 -0000

104 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nick Landau

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:43:51 -0000

57 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: National Insurance No's

datap

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:41:57 +0000

422 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:24:15 -0000

86 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nigel Roberts

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:19:35 +0000

71 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Roland Perry

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:16:31 +0000

34 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Roland Perry

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:15:02 +0000

54 lines

E-petition - "We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Make sharing of personal data opt-in only"

Nick Landau

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:38:17 -0000

47 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nick Landau

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:29:43 -0000

104 lines

FW: [data-protection] FW: National Insurance No's

Blewitt, David

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:22:17 -0000

507 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:07:02 -0000

139 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nick Landau

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:02:02 -0000

81 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Tim Trent

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:37:10 -0000

73 lines

Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Caroline Dominey

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:10:53 +0000

50 lines

Peter Dinsdale is out of the office

Peter Dinsdale

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 01:00:53 +0000

86 lines

Re: Naming and Shaming

Roland Perry

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:07:58 +0000

43 lines

Naming and Shaming

Chris Brogan

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:41:19 -0000

40 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Roland Perry

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:40:22 +0000

46 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Smith, Tony

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:33:27 -0000

90 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Roland Perry

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:18:22 +0000

52 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Nick Landau

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:17:44 -0000

74 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Roland Perry

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:30:44 +0000

55 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Roland Perry

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:37:03 +0000

108 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Nick Landau

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:06:39 -0000

96 lines

Data sharing in public sector

Roland Perry

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:52:15 +0000

43 lines

FW: [data-protection] Have we breached the DPA 1998?

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:24:50 -0000

363 lines

Re: Have we breached the DPA 1998?

Griffiths, Ian

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:05:43 -0000

50 lines

Re: Have we breached the DPA 1998?

Paul Ticher

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:23:13 -0000

112 lines

Re: Have we breached the DPA 1998?

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:56:52 -0000

143 lines

Have we breached the DPA 1998?

Cotterill Steve

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:51:10 -0000

205 lines

FW: National Insurance No's

DREW Nic

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:18:16 -0000

783 lines

Re: National Insurance No's

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:13:02 -0000

160 lines

Re: National Insurance No's

POUNDER Chris

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:05:32 -0000

413 lines

National Insurance No's

Kirkup,Stewart (Cultural & Community Services)

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:04:17 -0000

262 lines

Re: Personal details missing, someone elses in their place

Paul Ticher

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:02:35 -0000

111 lines

Re: Story of missing information

datap

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:50:34 +0000

381 lines

Re: Personal details missing, someone elses in their place

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:28:56 -0000

134 lines

Re: Personal details missing, someone elses in their place

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:14:43 -0000

110 lines

Re: The pseudonym of NORN

Nick Landau

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:51:45 -0000

81 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Ian Welton

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:47:39 -0000

85 lines

Re: The pseudonym of NORN

Nigel Roberts

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:28:07 +0000

61 lines

Re: Story of missing information

Nick Landau

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:25:49 -0000

127 lines

The pseudonym of NORN

Nick Landau

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:02:53 -0000

38 lines

Personal details missing, someone elses in their place

Griffiths, Ian

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:20:10 -0000

40 lines

Story of missing information

datap

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:07:45 +0000

160 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:37:44 -0000

148 lines

Re: last 3 emails

Roland Perry

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:22:17 +0000

43 lines

Re: Safe harbor and Google

Tinsley, Chris

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:55:23 -0000

120 lines

Re: Safe harbor and Google

Ekin Caglar

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:33:20 -0000

74 lines

EMails received

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:28:51 -0000

49 lines

Re: Using the Google Toolbar for SpellChecking

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:17:56 -0000

140 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Ian Welton

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:15:48 -0000

75 lines

last 3 emails

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:51:06 -0000

53 lines

Re: Using the Google Toolbar for SpellChecking

Nigel Roberts

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:47:42 +0000

76 lines

Confirm mail received

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:36:51 +0000

32 lines

Safe harbor and Google

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:13:48 +0000

48 lines

Using the Google Toolbar for SpellChecking

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:18:51 +0000

58 lines

Employee Surveillance

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:09:49 -0000

348 lines

Employee Surveillance

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:03:33 -0000

374 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Nick Landau

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:50:29 -0000

307 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:49:58 -0000

372 lines

Re: Attachments and file area

Tim Trent

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:32:49 -0000

475 lines

Attachments and file area

Paul Hubert

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:21:53 +0000

354 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Griffiths, Ian

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:59:51 -0000

45 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:57:58 -0000

239 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Griffiths, Ian

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:54:20 -0000

224 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Nick Landau

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:50:04 -0000

265 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:29:30 -0000

252 lines

Transfer of Personal Data out with the EEA

Keith G Fraser

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:21:35 -0000

150 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Nick Landau

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:55:43 -0000

129 lines

FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Ian Welton

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:54:37 -0000

64 lines

Re: Experian encourages Identity Theft?

Tim Trent

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:06:15 -0000

357 lines

Experian encourages Identity Theft?

Tim Trent

Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:48:57 -0000

237 lines

Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Ian Welton

Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:19:55 -0000

52 lines

Re: Update

Tim Trent

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:04:27 -0000

473 lines

The Co-ordinated Online Record of Electors (CORE) - The implementation of national access arrangements

Nick Landau

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:49:38 -0000

41 lines

Re: Update

Nick Landau

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:07:22 -0000

350 lines

Re: Update

Nigel Roberts

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:47:47 +0000

39 lines

Update

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:18:43 -0000

171 lines

Re: I was just wondering....

Tim Trent

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:25:48 -0000

502 lines

Re: I was just wondering....

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:59:44 -0000

187 lines

I was just wondering....

Paul Roman

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:56:14 -0000

344 lines

Re: I was just wondering....

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:53:41 -0000

393 lines

I was just wondering....

Tim Trent

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:49:11 -0000

211 lines

I have found an EXEMPT business

Tim Trent

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:05:39 -0000

275 lines

Potential for Durant issues to be heard by House of Lords

POUNDER Chris

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:59:58 -0000

64 lines

cofamating leter

arisemola ayo

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:17:25 +0000

64 lines

to know

arisemola ayo

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:09:44 +0000

71 lines

Security

Ibrahim Hasan

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:18:53 -0000

352 lines

Potential for Durant issues to be heard by House of Lords

POUNDER Chris

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:28:15 -0000

66 lines

Adv - Information Law Podcast

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:39:15 -0000

371 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesti ng . . )]

Roland Perry

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:21:42 +0000

42 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interestin g . . )]

Roland Perry

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:16:36 +0000

40 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

Roland Perry

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:12:56 +0000

51 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesti ng . . )]

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:08:36 -0000

381 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesti ng . . )]

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:07:07 -0000

413 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:03:42 -0000

354 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesting . . )]

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:01:56 -0000

320 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesting . . )]

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:07:43 -0000

269 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interestin g . . )]

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:07:25 -0000

345 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:57:48 -0000

297 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Roland Perry

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:54:34 +0000

100 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:54:03 +0000

41 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

Nick Landau

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:50:51 -0000

241 lines

Re: What is spam?

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:26:57 -0000

235 lines

What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

Tim Turner

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:54:01 -0000

171 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Nick Landau

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:52:30 -0000

93 lines

Model Data Protection Statement for Forms?

Phil Gregg

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:41:11 +0000

47 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:14:09 -0000

102 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Roland Perry

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:41:29 +0000

52 lines

Re: Customer Relationship Management (CRM) in FE and HE - assistance requested.

Blewitt, David

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:32:39 -0000

205 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:22:23 -0000

326 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Griffiths, Ian

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:16:47 -0000

257 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Roland Perry

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:07:14 +0000

49 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:32:24 -0000

123 lines

Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:55:57 +0000

242 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Roland Perry

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:45:19 +0000

84 lines

Re: Increased penalties for data thieves

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:28:59 -0000

170 lines

Re: Electoral register

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:28:49 -0000

285 lines

Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Electoral register

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:25:53 +0000

139 lines

Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:12:24 +0000

295 lines

Electoral register

Doug Colyer

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:08:38 -0000

107 lines

Re: Increased penalties for data thieves

Chris Brogan

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:51:52 -0000

531 lines

Re: Increased penalties for data thieves

Tim Turner

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:49:54 -0000

354 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

RONAN DURNIN

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:45:34 -0000

216 lines

Re: Increased penalties for data thieves

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:39:33 -0000

449 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Paul Ticher

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:36:45 -0000

157 lines

Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Nigel Roberts

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:20:36 +0000

97 lines

Increased penalties for data thieves

Tim Turner

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 08:58:38 -0000

167 lines

Re: ACPO(Police) Data protection Guidance

Roland Perry

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:48:25 +0000

91 lines

ACPO(Police) Data protection Guidance

Hitches, John F

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:47:28 -0000

155 lines

Data Sharing Briefing

Kavitha Kasilingam

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:18:30 +0000

115 lines

Re: ICO

Ian Welton

Sun, 4 Feb 2007 12:54:44 -0000

117 lines

Guernsey Police: Computer Misuse/Unauthorised disclosure

Nigel Roberts

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:32:15 +0000

28 lines

Re: ICO

Doherty Michael

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:15:29 -0000

107 lines

Re: ICO

Roland Perry

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:11:04 +0000

35 lines

Re: ICO

Nigel Roberts

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:38:20 +0000

98 lines

Re: ICO

Paul Ticher

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 15:18:51 -0000

77 lines

Re: ICO

Bownes David (CEX)

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:21:15 -0000

90 lines

Re: ICO

Nick Landau

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:19:16 -0000

76 lines

Re: ICO

Nigel Roberts

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:43:06 +0000

39 lines

Re: ICO

Nick Landau

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:35:11 -0000

139 lines

Re: DoH Caldicott Guardian Manual 2006

Nick Landau

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:33:14 -0000

141 lines

Re: DoH Caldicott Guardian Manual 2006

Nick Landau

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:31:51 -0000

102 lines

Exciting Computer Ethics Conference in China

CCSR Web Master

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:16:24 +0000

72 lines

Re: DoH Caldicott Guardian Manual 2006

Andrea

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 11:07:02 -0000

757 lines

Re: CCTV Policy

Ian Welton

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 11:00:38 -0000

82 lines

Re: ICO

Ian Welton

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:56:17 -0000

60 lines

Re: DoH Caldicott Guardian Manual 2006

Stuart Lynch

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:43:39 -0000

522 lines

Re: CCTV Policy

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:09:50 -0000

108 lines

DoH Caldicott Guardian Manual 2006

Edwina Withe

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 08:19:30 +0000

151 lines

Re: CCTV Policy

Robert Vesey

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:44:46 -0000

111 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Roland Perry

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:09:57 +0000

47 lines

Re: ICO

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:27:14 -0000

902 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Nick Landau

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:27:51 -0000

82 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Roland Perry

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:12:25 +0000

44 lines

Re: CCTV Policy

Nick Landau

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:55:35 -0000

112 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

PETER SELENIC

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:19:36 -0000

505 lines

CCTV Policy

Bridget Brook

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:50:44 +0000

65 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Nick Landau

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:40:50 -0000

292 lines

Re: ICO

Edwina Withe

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:26:49 +0000

347 lines

Re: ICO

Lee Gardiner

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:17:56 -0000

480 lines

Re: ICO

Bremer, Sarah

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:45:17 -0000

375 lines

Re: Electoral Commission

Nick Landau

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:44:48 -0000

177 lines

Re: Electoral Commission

Nick Landau

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:32:55 -0000

228 lines

Re: ICO

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:28:25 -0000

128 lines

ICO

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:12:03 -0000

147 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Roland Perry

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:47:20 +0000

38 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

PETER SELENIC

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:38:17 -0000

331 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Paul Hubert

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:13:10 +0000

139 lines

Re: Electoral Commission

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:07:27 -0000

161 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

David Hirst

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:05:25 +0000

655 lines

Re: Electoral Commission

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:56:58 +0000

145 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:44:45 +0000

246 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:40:02 +0000

248 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:35:03 +0000

79 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:18:24 -0000

362 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Roland Perry

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:09:11 +0000

310 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:00:34 -0000

127 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

Paul Ticher

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:58:49 -0000

73 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

Tim Trent

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:57:26 -0000

269 lines

FW: [data-protection] all families have a right to privacy

Peter Burgess

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:55:55 -0000

514 lines

Re: OIC comment on: Prison sentences for ringleaders of bogus data protection agencies

POUNDER Chris

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:54:13 -0000

854 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:50:35 -0000

187 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:43:54 -0000

278 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Tinsley, Chris

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:42:05 -0000

690 lines

Jail term for Data misuse

J.S.M.Whitaker

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:36:06 -0000

104 lines

Electoral Commission

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:21:35 -0000

194 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

<>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:12:22 +0000

366 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager