JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


February 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

ACPO(Police) Data protection Guidance (2 messages)
Adv - Information Law Podcast (1 message)
all families have a right to privacy (12 messages)
Are Post Codes Personal Data? (20 messages)
Attachments and file area (2 messages)
CCTV Policy (5 messages)
cofamating leter (1 message)
Confirm mail received (1 message)
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) in FE and HE - assistance requested. (1 message)
Data Sharing Briefing (1 message)
Data sharing in public sector (8 messages)
DoH Caldicott Guardian Manual 2006 (5 messages)
DPA agreement for beneficiary case studies (1 message)
E-petition - "We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Make sharing of personal data opt-in only" (2 messages)
Electoral Commission (5 messages)
Electoral register (2 messages)
EMails received (1 message)
Employee Surveillance (2 messages)
Exciting Computer Ethics Conference in China (1 message)
Experian encourages Identity Theft? (2 messages)
FW: National Insurance No's (1 message)
FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine (12 messages)
FW: [data-protection] all families have a right to privacy (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Person al Data? (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data? (4 messages)
FW: [data-protection] FW: National Insurance No's (3 messages)
FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data? (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Have we breached the DPA 1998? (1 message)
Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Electoral register (1 message)
Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . ) (6 messages)
Guernsey Police: Computer Misuse/Unauthorised disclosure (1 message)
Have we breached the DPA 1998? (4 messages)
I have found an EXEMPT business (1 message)
I was just wondering.... (5 messages)
ICO (16 messages)
Increased penalties for data thieves (5 messages)
Jail term for Data misuse (10 messages)
last 3 emails (2 messages)
Model Data Protection Statement for Forms? (1 message)
Naming and Shaming (2 messages)
National Insurance No's (3 messages)
National Student Survey (3 messages)
NINO (2 messages)
OIC comment on: Prison sentences for ringleaders of bogus data protection agencies (1 message)
Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine (1 message)
Personal details missing, someone elses in their place (4 messages)
Peter Dinsdale is out of the office (1 message)
Potential for Durant issues to be heard by House of Lords (2 messages)
Safe harbor and Google (3 messages)
Security (1 message)
Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . ) (8 messages)
Story of missing information (3 messages)
The Co-ordinated Online Record of Electors (CORE) - The implementation of national access arrangements (1 message)
The pseudonym of NORN (3 messages)
to know (1 message)
Transfer of Personal Data out with the EEA (1 message)
Update (4 messages)
Using the Google Toolbar for SpellChecking (3 messages)
What is spam? (1 message)
What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesti ng . . )] (3 messages)
What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesting . . )] (2 messages)
What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interestin g . . )] (2 messages)
What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )] (6 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

ACPO(Police) Data protection Guidance

ACPO(Police) Data protection Guidance

Hitches, John F <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:47:28 -0000

155 lines

Re: ACPO(Police) Data protection Guidance

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:48:25 +0000

91 lines

New Thread

Adv - Information Law Podcast

Adv - Information Law Podcast

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:39:15 -0000

371 lines

New Thread

all families have a right to privacy

Re: all families have a right to privacy

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:12:22 +0000

366 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:42:05 -0000

690 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:09:11 +0000

310 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

NICHOLAS LANDAU <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:40:02 +0000

248 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Paul Hubert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:13:10 +0000

139 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

PETER SELENIC <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:38:17 -0000

331 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:47:20 +0000

38 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:40:50 -0000

292 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

PETER SELENIC <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:19:36 -0000

505 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:12:25 +0000

44 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:27:51 -0000

82 lines

Re: all families have a right to privacy

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:09:57 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Caroline Dominey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:10:53 +0000

50 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:37:10 -0000

73 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:02:02 -0000

81 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:07:02 -0000

139 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:29:43 -0000

104 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:15:02 +0000

54 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:16:31 +0000

34 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:19:35 +0000

71 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:24:15 -0000

86 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:43:51 -0000

57 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:57:16 -0000

104 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Caroline Dominey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:04:23 +0000

183 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:39:36 +0000

39 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:49:43 -0000

97 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:16:01 -0000

60 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:50:41 -0000

114 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Doherty Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:39:05 -0000

109 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:18:32 +0000

48 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Caroline Dominey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:26:34 +0000

198 lines

Re: Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:31:08 -0000

237 lines

New Thread

Attachments and file area

Attachments and file area

Paul Hubert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:21:53 +0000

354 lines

Re: Attachments and file area

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:32:49 -0000

475 lines

New Thread

CCTV Policy

CCTV Policy

Bridget Brook <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:50:44 +0000

65 lines

Re: CCTV Policy

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:55:35 -0000

112 lines

Re: CCTV Policy

Robert Vesey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:44:46 -0000

111 lines

Re: CCTV Policy

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 11:00:38 -0000

82 lines

Re: CCTV Policy

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:09:50 -0000

108 lines

New Thread

cofamating leter

cofamating leter

arisemola ayo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:17:25 +0000

64 lines

New Thread

Confirm mail received

Confirm mail received

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:36:51 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Customer Relationship Management (CRM) in FE and HE - assistance requested.

Re: Customer Relationship Management (CRM) in FE and HE - assistance requested.

Blewitt, David <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:32:39 -0000

205 lines

New Thread

Data Sharing Briefing

Data Sharing Briefing

Kavitha Kasilingam <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:18:30 +0000

115 lines

New Thread

Data sharing in public sector

Data sharing in public sector

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:52:15 +0000

43 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:06:39 -0000

96 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:37:03 +0000

108 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:30:44 +0000

55 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:17:44 -0000

74 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:18:22 +0000

52 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:33:27 -0000

90 lines

Re: Data sharing in public sector

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:40:22 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

DoH Caldicott Guardian Manual 2006

DoH Caldicott Guardian Manual 2006

Edwina Withe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 08:19:30 +0000

151 lines

Re: DoH Caldicott Guardian Manual 2006

Stuart Lynch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:43:39 -0000

522 lines

Re: DoH Caldicott Guardian Manual 2006

Andrea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 11:07:02 -0000

757 lines

Re: DoH Caldicott Guardian Manual 2006

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:31:51 -0000

102 lines

Re: DoH Caldicott Guardian Manual 2006

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:33:14 -0000

141 lines

New Thread

DPA agreement for beneficiary case studies

DPA agreement for beneficiary case studies

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:22:54 -0000

200 lines

New Thread

E-petition - "We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Make sharing of personal data opt-in only"

E-petition - "We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Make sharing of personal data opt-in only"

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:38:17 -0000

47 lines

Re: E-petition - "We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Make sharing of personal data opt-in only"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:22:02 -0000

75 lines

New Thread

Electoral Commission

Electoral Commission

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:21:35 -0000

194 lines

Re: Electoral Commission

NICHOLAS LANDAU <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:56:58 +0000

145 lines

Re: Electoral Commission

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:07:27 -0000

161 lines

Re: Electoral Commission

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:32:55 -0000

228 lines

Re: Electoral Commission

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:44:48 -0000

177 lines

New Thread

Electoral register

Electoral register

Doug Colyer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:08:38 -0000

107 lines

Re: Electoral register

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:28:49 -0000

285 lines

New Thread

EMails received

EMails received

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:28:51 -0000

49 lines

New Thread

Employee Surveillance

Employee Surveillance

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:03:33 -0000

374 lines

Employee Surveillance

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:09:49 -0000

348 lines

New Thread

Exciting Computer Ethics Conference in China

Exciting Computer Ethics Conference in China

CCSR Web Master <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:16:24 +0000

72 lines

New Thread

Experian encourages Identity Theft?

Experian encourages Identity Theft?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:48:57 -0000

237 lines

Re: Experian encourages Identity Theft?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:06:15 -0000

357 lines

New Thread

FW: National Insurance No's

FW: National Insurance No's

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:18:16 -0000

783 lines

New Thread

FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:54:37 -0000

64 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:55:43 -0000

129 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:29:30 -0000

252 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:50:04 -0000

265 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:54:20 -0000

224 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:57:58 -0000

239 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:59:51 -0000

45 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:49:58 -0000

372 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:50:29 -0000

307 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:15:48 -0000

75 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:37:44 -0000

148 lines

Re: FW: Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:47:39 -0000

85 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] all families have a right to privacy

FW: [data-protection] all families have a right to privacy

Peter Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:55:55 -0000

514 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Person al Data?

Re: FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Person al Data?

Doherty Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:48:58 -0000

229 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data?

FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:51:23 -0000

162 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:14:17 -0000

196 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:24:25 -0000

195 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:45:58 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] FW: National Insurance No's

FW: [data-protection] FW: National Insurance No's

Blewitt, David <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:22:17 -0000

507 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: National Insurance No's

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:41:57 +0000

422 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: National Insurance No's

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:05:40 +0000

529 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data?

FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Are Post Codes Personal Data?

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:23:48 -0000

237 lines

New Thread

FW: [data-protection] Have we breached the DPA 1998?

FW: [data-protection] Have we breached the DPA 1998?

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:24:50 -0000

363 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Electoral register

Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Electoral register

NICHOLAS LANDAU <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:25:53 +0000

139 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

NICHOLAS LANDAU <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:12:24 +0000

295 lines

Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

NICHOLAS LANDAU <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:55:57 +0000

242 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:07:14 +0000

49 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:14:09 -0000

102 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:52:30 -0000

93 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:54:34 +0000

100 lines

New Thread

Guernsey Police: Computer Misuse/Unauthorised disclosure

Guernsey Police: Computer Misuse/Unauthorised disclosure

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:32:15 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

Have we breached the DPA 1998?

Have we breached the DPA 1998?

Cotterill Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:51:10 -0000

205 lines

Re: Have we breached the DPA 1998?

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:56:52 -0000

143 lines

Re: Have we breached the DPA 1998?

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:23:13 -0000

112 lines

Re: Have we breached the DPA 1998?

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:05:43 -0000

50 lines

New Thread

I have found an EXEMPT business

I have found an EXEMPT business

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:05:39 -0000

275 lines

New Thread

I was just wondering....

I was just wondering....

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:49:11 -0000

211 lines

Re: I was just wondering....

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:53:41 -0000

393 lines

Re: I was just wondering....

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:59:44 -0000

187 lines

I was just wondering....

Paul Roman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:56:14 -0000

344 lines

Re: I was just wondering....

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:25:48 -0000

502 lines

New Thread

ICO

ICO

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:12:03 -0000

147 lines

Re: ICO

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:28:25 -0000

128 lines

Re: ICO

Bremer, Sarah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:45:17 -0000

375 lines

Re: ICO

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:17:56 -0000

480 lines

Re: ICO

Edwina Withe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:26:49 +0000

347 lines

Re: ICO

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:27:14 -0000

902 lines

Re: ICO

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:56:17 -0000

60 lines

Re: ICO

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:35:11 -0000

139 lines

Re: ICO

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:43:06 +0000

39 lines

Re: ICO

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:19:16 -0000

76 lines

Re: ICO

Bownes David (CEX) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:21:15 -0000

90 lines

Re: ICO

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:38:20 +0000

98 lines

Re: ICO

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 15:18:51 -0000

77 lines

Re: ICO

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:11:04 +0000

35 lines

Re: ICO

Doherty Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:15:29 -0000

107 lines

Re: ICO

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 2007 12:54:44 -0000

117 lines

New Thread

Increased penalties for data thieves

Increased penalties for data thieves

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 08:58:38 -0000

167 lines

Re: Increased penalties for data thieves

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:39:33 -0000

449 lines

Re: Increased penalties for data thieves

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:49:54 -0000

354 lines

Re: Increased penalties for data thieves

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:51:52 -0000

531 lines

Re: Increased penalties for data thieves

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:28:59 -0000

170 lines

New Thread

Jail term for Data misuse

Jail term for Data misuse

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:36:06 -0000

104 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:43:54 -0000

278 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:50:35 -0000

187 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:57:26 -0000

269 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:58:49 -0000

73 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:00:34 -0000

127 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:18:24 -0000

362 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

NICHOLAS LANDAU <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:35:03 +0000

79 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

NICHOLAS LANDAU <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:44:45 +0000

246 lines

Re: Jail term for Data misuse

David Hirst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:05:25 +0000

655 lines

New Thread

last 3 emails

last 3 emails

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:51:06 -0000

53 lines

Re: last 3 emails

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:22:17 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Model Data Protection Statement for Forms?

Model Data Protection Statement for Forms?

Phil Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:41:11 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Naming and Shaming

Naming and Shaming

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:41:19 -0000

40 lines

Re: Naming and Shaming

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:07:58 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

National Insurance No's

National Insurance No's

Kirkup,Stewart (Cultural & Community Services) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:04:17 -0000

262 lines

Re: National Insurance No's

POUNDER Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:05:32 -0000

413 lines

Re: National Insurance No's

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:13:02 -0000

160 lines

New Thread

National Student Survey

National Student Survey

Graham Donelan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:13:18 +0000

46 lines

Re: National Student Survey

Caroline Dominey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:30:10 +0000

95 lines

Re: National Student Survey

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:07:13 -0000

143 lines

New Thread

NINO

NINO

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:34:49 +0000

32 lines

Re: NINO

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:01:09 -0000

113 lines

New Thread

OIC comment on: Prison sentences for ringleaders of bogus data protection agencies

Re: OIC comment on: Prison sentences for ringleaders of bogus data protection agencies

POUNDER Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:54:13 -0000

854 lines

New Thread

Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Personal data loss - One Million Pounds fine

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:19:55 -0000

52 lines

New Thread

Personal details missing, someone elses in their place

Personal details missing, someone elses in their place

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:20:10 -0000

40 lines

Re: Personal details missing, someone elses in their place

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:14:43 -0000

110 lines

Re: Personal details missing, someone elses in their place

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:28:56 -0000

134 lines

Re: Personal details missing, someone elses in their place

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:02:35 -0000

111 lines

New Thread

Peter Dinsdale is out of the office

Peter Dinsdale is out of the office

Peter Dinsdale <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 01:00:53 +0000

86 lines

New Thread

Potential for Durant issues to be heard by House of Lords

Potential for Durant issues to be heard by House of Lords

POUNDER Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:28:15 -0000

66 lines

Potential for Durant issues to be heard by House of Lords

POUNDER Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:59:58 -0000

64 lines

New Thread

Safe harbor and Google

Safe harbor and Google

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:13:48 +0000

48 lines

Re: Safe harbor and Google

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:33:20 -0000

74 lines

Re: Safe harbor and Google

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:55:23 -0000

120 lines

New Thread

Security

Security

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:18:53 -0000

352 lines

New Thread

Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:20:36 +0000

97 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:36:45 -0000

157 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

RONAN DURNIN <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:45:34 -0000

216 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:45:19 +0000

84 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:32:24 -0000

123 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:16:47 -0000

257 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:22:23 -0000

326 lines

Re: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:41:29 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

Story of missing information

Story of missing information

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:07:45 +0000

160 lines

Re: Story of missing information

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:25:49 -0000

127 lines

Re: Story of missing information

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:50:34 +0000

381 lines

New Thread

The Co-ordinated Online Record of Electors (CORE) - The implementation of national access arrangements

The Co-ordinated Online Record of Electors (CORE) - The implementation of national access arrangements

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:49:38 -0000

41 lines

New Thread

The pseudonym of NORN

The pseudonym of NORN

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:02:53 -0000

38 lines

Re: The pseudonym of NORN

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:28:07 +0000

61 lines

Re: The pseudonym of NORN

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:51:45 -0000

81 lines

New Thread

to know

to know

arisemola ayo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:09:44 +0000

71 lines

New Thread

Transfer of Personal Data out with the EEA

Transfer of Personal Data out with the EEA

Keith G Fraser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:21:35 -0000

150 lines

New Thread

Update

Update

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:18:43 -0000

171 lines

Re: Update

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:47:47 +0000

39 lines

Re: Update

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:07:22 -0000

350 lines

Re: Update

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:04:27 -0000

473 lines

New Thread

Using the Google Toolbar for SpellChecking

Using the Google Toolbar for SpellChecking

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:18:51 +0000

58 lines

Re: Using the Google Toolbar for SpellChecking

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:47:42 +0000

76 lines

Re: Using the Google Toolbar for SpellChecking

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:17:56 -0000

140 lines

New Thread

What is spam?

Re: What is spam?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:26:57 -0000

235 lines

New Thread

What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesti ng . . )]

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesti ng . . )]

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:08:36 -0000

381 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesti ng . . )]

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:07:07 -0000

413 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesti ng . . )]

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:21:42 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesting . . )]

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesting . . )]

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:07:43 -0000

269 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Lo ng, but interesting . . )]

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:01:56 -0000

320 lines

New Thread

What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interestin g . . )]

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interestin g . . )]

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:07:25 -0000

345 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interestin g . . )]

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:16:36 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:54:01 -0000

171 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:50:51 -0000

241 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:54:03 +0000

41 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:57:48 -0000

297 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:03:42 -0000

354 lines

Re: What is spam? [was: Spam and email bugs (Long, but interesting . . )]

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:12:56 +0000

51 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager