JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


February 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Action against climate change (46 messages)
Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (2 messages)
Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?) (27 messages)
Assistance please (1 message)
Blond joke (clean) (3 messages)
Brave new world! (1 message)
Calendar software (4 messages)
Car tracking - from EMIS EUG (7 messages)
Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork (19 messages)
Changes to NHS CFH email forwarding (1 message)
Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls? (15 messages)
Citizenship (12 messages)
Cornwall LMC conference (2 messages)
Cyberounds: 25% and Counting (1 message)
Cyberounds: Interview With A Hero Doctor (1 message)
Cyberounds: Knocked out (1 message)
Daily Mail yesterday - Patricia Hewitt & OOH (1 message)
Data Protection Act question. (7 messages)
Debate - 'There is nothing worse than a doctor who has gone over to the other side' (1 message)
DoH deliberately sabotaging PCTs? Category M price changes (2 messages)
ECG electrodes (6 messages)
electronic insurance medical reports (15 messages)
Floppy drives no longer needed (2 messages)
Fun with Vista (4 messages)
Further Archaic Certification (5 messages)
FW: [Ozgp-uncensored] Signs in Chinese hospital (4 messages)
Health eCard - more info (19 messages)
How about that (4 messages)
How much should OOH GPs be paid (9 messages)
How should sickness certification work? (30 messages)
IM&T DES (31 messages)
Inatrition (4 messages)
Inatrition - inanation (1 message)
injections expiry dates (8 messages)
joke from a patient (1 message)
lesson of the week non clinical backups (9 messages)
Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner? (23 messages)
Musings on Controversial Postings (61 messages)
Myths about the developing world, data use and more (5 messages)
Off listRe: electronic insurance medical reports (3 messages)
PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000 (12 messages)
Practice Websites (7 messages)
Privacy of patient accessible records, ( was Health eCard - more info) (4 messages)
Re CBT courses etc (6 messages)
Regulation (4 messages)
Sharing patient information (6 messages)
Should CfH plan to allow sharing of patients' EPRs with 6 EU countries? (3 messages)
Spam: injections expiry dates (1 message)
TechieGizmos (13 messages)
The brighter side of life (4 messages)
There have been no C&B outages... (7 messages)
Times article - Fujitsu blasts NPfIT (2 messages)
Today's IT question (25 messages)
Very bad headache (3 messages)
Why aren't GPs doing even more? (4 messages)
wild card (5 messages)
Windows installer error (8 messages)
Withdrawal from pot (3 messages)
[BGSpam]Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?) (2 messages)
[BGSpam]How should sickness certification work? (1 message)
[BGSpam]Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?) (5 messages)
[BGSpam]Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork (2 messages)
[BGSpam]Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner? (4 messages)
[BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings (11 messages)
]Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000 (7 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Action against climate change

Re: Action against climate change

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:52:20 -0000

31 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:26:54 +0000

57 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:44:31 +0000

32 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:53:14 +0000

61 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:27:37 +0000

15 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:39:56 +0000

51 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:44:04 +0000

29 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:49:11 EST

92 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 23:57:14 +0000

80 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 00:30:29 +0000

47 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Jonathan Reggler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:15:41 -0800

44 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:40:07 +0000

75 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:02:53 +0000

95 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:06:36 +0000

180 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Paul Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:13:10 -0000

320 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:24:14 +0000

70 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:26:31 +0000

21 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:35:05 +0000

113 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:34:41 +0000

31 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:39:36 +0000

56 lines

Re: Action against climate change

North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:59:32 -0000

134 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:51:52 +0000

105 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:53:56 +0000

30 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:56:50 +0000

31 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:57:36 +0000

30 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:58:43 +0000

35 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:59:15 +0000

45 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:19:56 +0000

23 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:22:06 +0000

23 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:42:17 +0000

46 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:18:53 +0000

16 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:52:41 +0000

42 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:58:57 +0000

52 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:04:53 +0000

75 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:07:34 +0000

21 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:53:38 -0000

15 lines

Re: Action against climate change

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 19:08:22 +0000

44 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Bill Westwood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 20:09:47 +0000

147 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 20:34:49 +0000

61 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 21:01:41 +0000

21 lines

Re: Action against climate change

David Jobson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 21:47:39 -0000

39 lines

Re: Action against climate change

David Jobson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 22:27:31 -0000

43 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 10:20:39 -0000

16 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:39:38 +0000

35 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:49:06 +0000

25 lines

Re: Action against climate change

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 13:48:09 EST

105 lines

New Thread

Archaic Certification - Time for major reform?

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform?

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:35:17 -0000

99 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform?

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:08:46 -0000

20 lines

New Thread

Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 23:48:30 +0000

31 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:25:53 +0000

28 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 07:05:56 +0000

36 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:42:25 +0000

44 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:48:21 +0000

41 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:09:24 +0000

19 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:23:23 +0000

40 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:42:08 +0000

35 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:50:04 +0000

33 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:58:59 +0000

26 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:04:36 +0000

22 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:07:30 +0000

27 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:15:38 -0000

53 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:25:08 +0000

35 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:37:06 +0000

24 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:38:32 +0000

18 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:02:37 +0000

52 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:24:15 +0000

37 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:42:35 +0000

37 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:24:37 -0000

20 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

David J Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:20:07 +0000

66 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:06:39 -0000

27 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:27:43 +0000

34 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:27:49 +0000

18 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

David Jobson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:00:17 -0000

27 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:37:40 +0000

29 lines

Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:42:51 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Assistance please

Re: Assistance please

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 02:01:45 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

Blond joke (clean)

Blond joke (clean)

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:45:49 +0000

26 lines

Re: Blond joke (clean)

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:12:12 -0000

12 lines

Re: Blond joke (clean)

North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:46:11 -0000

24 lines

New Thread

Brave new world!

Brave new world!

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2007 10:53:17 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

Calendar software

Re: Calendar software

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 00:06:42 +0000

46 lines

Re: Calendar software

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 01:43:53 +0000

33 lines

Re: Calendar software

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 05:40:03 -0000

20 lines

Re: Calendar software

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:49:23 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

Car tracking - from EMIS EUG

Car tracking - from EMIS EUG

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:17:38 +0000

39 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:08:18 +0000

49 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG

Mark Williams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 08:53:29 +0000

39 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG

Pork <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:12:39 +0000

55 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:09:39 +0000

91 lines

Car tracking - from EMIS EUG

Paul Attwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:45:49 +0000

60 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:25:53 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:11:13 +0000

142 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:06:30 +0000

55 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 21:06:12 +0000

29 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 23:58:41 +0000

64 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:53:23 -0000

155 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:18:43 +0000

162 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:39:01 +0000

16 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:39:56 +0000

21 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:00:05 +0000

41 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:18:18 +0000

47 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:36:07 +0000

58 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Pork <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:24:31 +0000

68 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:50:33 +0000

24 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:08:48 -0000

34 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:18:06 -0000

18 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:51:03 +0000

27 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:59:57 +0000

72 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:18:08 +0000

34 lines

Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:51:47 -0000

37 lines

New Thread

Changes to NHS CFH email forwarding

Changes to NHS CFH email forwarding

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:33:01 -0000

22 lines

New Thread

Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:11:42 +0000

32 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:21:52 +0000

76 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:24:55 +0000

64 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:36:34 +0000

129 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

Dr Skinner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:20:08 -0000

351 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:55:31 -0000

562 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

Dr Skinner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:11:21 -0000

713 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

Michael Hendry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:06:16 -0000

35 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

Dr Skinner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:24:29 -0000

42 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

Michael Hendry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:41:26 -0000

37 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:45:48 +0000

69 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

Martin Goldman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:40:40 -0000

244 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:49:47 -0000

437 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

Dr Skinner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:05:09 -0000

625 lines

Re: Cheapest way to make mobile phone calls?

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:55:52 -0000

620 lines

New Thread

Citizenship

Citizenship

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:48:36 +0000

17 lines

Re: Citizenship

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:33:34 -0000

28 lines

Re: Citizenship

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:09:31 +0000

29 lines

Re: Citizenship

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:22:38 +0000

37 lines

Re: Citizenship

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:51:59 +0000

16 lines

Re: Citizenship

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:18:27 +0000

30 lines

Re: Citizenship

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:12:51 +0000

54 lines

Re: Citizenship

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:41:48 -0000

258 lines

Re: Citizenship

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:40:05 +0000

164 lines

Re: Citizenship

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:23:43 -0000

138 lines

Re: Citizenship

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:26:47 +0000

80 lines

Re: Citizenship

Tom Sargent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:57:40 -0000

151 lines

New Thread

Cornwall LMC conference

Cornwall LMC conference

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:01:40 +0000

11 lines

Re: Cornwall LMC conference

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:20:19 -0000

23 lines

New Thread

Cyberounds: 25% and Counting

Cyberounds: 25% and Counting

Harry Levy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:17:54 -0500

130 lines

New Thread

Cyberounds: Interview With A Hero Doctor

Cyberounds: Interview With A Hero Doctor

Harry Levy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:23:21 -0500

137 lines

New Thread

Cyberounds: Knocked out

Cyberounds: Knocked out

Harry Levy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:01:34 -0500

147 lines

New Thread

Daily Mail yesterday - Patricia Hewitt & OOH

Re: Daily Mail yesterday - Patricia Hewitt & OOH

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:32:07 +0000

189 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Act question.

Data Protection Act question.

James McGlew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:05:57 +0000

28 lines

Re: Data Protection Act question.

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:14:45 -0000

25 lines

Re: Data Protection Act question.

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:38:27 +0000

49 lines

Re: Data Protection Act question.

North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:11:22 -0000

37 lines

Re: Data Protection Act question.

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:43:11 -0000

47 lines

Re: Data Protection Act question.

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:29:48 +0000

42 lines

Re: Data Protection Act question.

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:49:34 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Debate - 'There is nothing worse than a doctor who has gone over to the other side'

Debate - 'There is nothing worse than a doctor who has gone over to the other side'

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:08:54 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

DoH deliberately sabotaging PCTs? Category M price changes

DoH deliberately sabotaging PCTs? Category M price changes

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 01:45:11 +0000

27 lines

Re: DoH deliberately sabotaging PCTs? Category M price changes

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:35:48 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

ECG electrodes

ECG electrodes

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:33:54 +0000

32 lines

Re: ECG electrodes

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:57:50 +0000

27 lines

Re: ECG electrodes

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:58:57 +0000

43 lines

Re: ECG electrodes

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:10:19 +0000

29 lines

Re: ECG electrodes

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:54:02 +0000

76 lines

Re: ECG electrodes

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 14:31:51 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

electronic insurance medical reports

electronic insurance medical reports

Dr Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:01:49 -0000

55 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Tim Walter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:04:42 +0000

33 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Michael Hendry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:52:25 -0000

76 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Dr Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:37:23 -0000

109 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Dr Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:39:46 -0000

236 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:55:11 +0000

54 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:16:07 +0000

45 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:09:55 +0000

31 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Chris Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:35:08 +0000

38 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:13:26 +0000

25 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Chris Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:06:40 +0000

33 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Paul Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:35:12 -0000

600 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Dr Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:00:45 -0000

551 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:17 -0000

14 lines

Re: electronic insurance medical reports

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:25:17 -0000

317 lines

New Thread

Floppy drives no longer needed

Floppy drives no longer needed

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:58:55 +0000

14 lines

Re: Floppy drives no longer needed

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:35:09 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Fun with Vista

Fun with Vista

Simon Child <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:41:34 -0000

23 lines

Re: Fun with Vista

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:51:24 -0000

19 lines

Re: Fun with Vista

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:06:05 -0000

12 lines

Re: Fun with Vista

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 15:13:18 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

Further Archaic Certification

Further Archaic Certification

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:00:32 +0000

39 lines

Re: Further Archaic Certification

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:14:21 +0000

50 lines

Re: Further Archaic Certification

David J Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:39:23 +0000

64 lines

Re: Further Archaic Certification

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:45:55 -0000

49 lines

Re: Further Archaic Certification

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:01:48 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

FW: [Ozgp-uncensored] Signs in Chinese hospital

FW: [Ozgp-uncensored] Signs in Chinese hospital

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:49:25 +1030

180 lines

Re: FW: [Ozgp-uncensored] Signs in Chinese hospital

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:58:33 +0000

22 lines

Re: FW: [Ozgp-uncensored] Signs in Chinese hospital

Stephen Crawshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:00:39 +1000

31 lines

Re: FW: [Ozgp-uncensored] Signs in Chinese hospital

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:07:07 -0000

20 lines

New Thread

Health eCard - more info

Health eCard - more info

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:15:41 -0000

74 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:20:57 -0000

20 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Dr Paul Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:04:17 +0000

19 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:04:26 +0000

19 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:49:36 -0000

33 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:54:57 +0000

22 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:02:16 -0800

19 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:17:47 +0000

38 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:01:47 -0000

49 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:00:44 -0000

61 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:29:43 -0000

58 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:08:07 -0000

74 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:06:53 +0000

22 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:47:00 -0000

28 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:37:29 -0800

38 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:34:13 +0000

25 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:46:56 +0000

98 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:00:11 -0000

15 lines

Re: Health eCard - more info

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:15:55 -0000

18 lines

New Thread

How about that

How about that

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:00:53 +0000

30 lines

Re: How about that

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:01:48 -0800

41 lines

Re: How about that

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:42:09 +0000

17 lines

Re: How about that

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:26:08 -0000

18 lines

New Thread

How much should OOH GPs be paid

How much should OOH GPs be paid

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:48:09 +0000

37 lines

Re: How much should OOH GPs be paid

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:21:12 +0000

23 lines

Re: How much should OOH GPs be paid

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:49:05 +0000

42 lines

Re: How much should OOH GPs be paid

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:34:18 +0000

49 lines

Re: How much should OOH GPs be paid

Bill Westwood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:27:33 +0000

74 lines

Re: How much should OOH GPs be paid

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 01:13:15 +0000

30 lines

Re: How much should OOH GPs be paid

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:43:40 +0000

123 lines

Re: How much should OOH GPs be paid

North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:59:40 -0000

29 lines

Re: How much should OOH GPs be paid

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:48:53 +0000

20 lines

New Thread

How should sickness certification work?

How should sickness certification work?

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:50:05 -0000

67 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:30:02 +0000

100 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:43:40 +0000

35 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:00:12 +0000

51 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:41:17 +0000

27 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:43:23 +0000

23 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Andy Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 21:26:12 +0000

23 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Mark O'Connor <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:21:53 +0000

82 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 20:37:37 +0000

71 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:10:34 +0000

30 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:40:34 +0000

41 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:25:15 +0000

35 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:34:45 +0000

23 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:36:15 +0000

34 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:23:55 +0000

40 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:57:46 -0000

61 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:26:33 +0000

80 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:07:32 -0000

113 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:06:10 +0000

59 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Sandra Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:26:44 -0000

91 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:42:30 +0000

149 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:13:01 +0000

28 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:15:39 +0000

70 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:20:17 +0000

22 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:08:43 -0000

24 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:16:07 -0000

22 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:49:00 +0000

35 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

David J Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:40:51 +0000

36 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:05:13 +0000

18 lines

Re: How should sickness certification work?

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:55:41 -0000

24 lines

New Thread

IM&T DES

IM&T DES

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:56:35 +0000

53 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:46:18 +0000

81 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Michael Hendry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:23:41 -0000

71 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:44:00 +0000

30 lines

Re: IM&T DES

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:53:37 +0000

64 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:22:04 -0000

132 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:11:58 +0000

52 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:54:10 -0000

227 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:31:52 +0000

58 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Dr Gillian Braunold <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:07:25 -0000

258 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:21:01 +0000

186 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:07:34 +0000

42 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:03:43 +0000

38 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:31:30 +0000

84 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:42:14 -0000

398 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Trefor Roscoe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:44:59 -0000

593 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:56:09 +0000

161 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Dr Gillian Braunold <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:37:24 -0000

505 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Dr Gillian Braunold <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:37:24 -0000

52 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 06:54:07 -0500

219 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:10:43 -0000

583 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Mark Williams <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:37:09 +0000

87 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:43:06 +0000

34 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Kathryn Law <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:13:36 +0000

85 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:33:40 -0000

142 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:27:24 +0000

122 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:47:32 +0000

22 lines

Re: IM&T DES

roger weeks <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:59:19 -0000

203 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:51:58 +0000

29 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:30:01 -0000

62 lines

Re: IM&T DES

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:08:46 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Inatrition

Inatrition

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:25:38 +0000

23 lines

Re: Inatrition

quail <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:32:47 -0700

23 lines

Re: Inatrition

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:33:06 +0000

42 lines

Re: Inatrition

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:38:23 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

Inatrition - inanation

Re: Inatrition - inanation

Alun Price <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:18:34 -0000

63 lines

New Thread

injections expiry dates

injections expiry dates

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:46:30 +0000

29 lines

Re: injections expiry dates

Robert Pettifer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:48:04 EST

20 lines

Re: injections expiry dates

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:15:03 +0000

61 lines

Re: injections expiry dates

Martin Goldman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:20:00 -0000

224 lines

Re: injections expiry dates

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:03:41 +0000

238 lines

Re: injections expiry dates

Robert Pettifer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:12:17 EST

34 lines

Re: injections expiry dates

Martin Goldman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:29:47 -0000

612 lines

Re: injections expiry dates

Martin Goldman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:39:00 -0000

54 lines

New Thread

joke from a patient

joke from a patient

Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:27:30 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

lesson of the week non clinical backups

lesson of the week non clinical backups

Evans Dai (M83071) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:09:17 -0000

24 lines

Re: lesson of the week non clinical backups

Ian McNicoll <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:15:04 -0000

51 lines

Re: lesson of the week non clinical backups

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:50:45 +0000

22 lines

Re: lesson of the week non clinical backups

Michael Hendry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:19:03 -0000

71 lines

Re: lesson of the week non clinical backups

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:36:41 +0000

34 lines

Re: lesson of the week non clinical backups

Michael Hendry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:54:40 -0000

40 lines

Re: lesson of the week non clinical backups

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:09:18 -0000

73 lines

Re: lesson of the week non clinical backups

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:55:27 +0000

19 lines

Re: lesson of the week non clinical backups

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:52:34 -0000

68 lines

New Thread

Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:58:26 -0000

114 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:01:15 +0000

89 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Dr Peter von Kaehne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:04:17 +0000

53 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:14:55 +0000

35 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:24:52 -0000

45 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:34:33 -0000

23 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:51:27 +0000

16 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:56:58 +0000

67 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:19:55 +0000

87 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

John Canning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:53:37 -0000

108 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

John Canning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:51:23 -0000

118 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:38:36 -0000

36 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:05:45 +0000

53 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:18:56 +0000

44 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:19:29 +0000

58 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 23:12:47 +0000

87 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 23:26:37 +0000

29 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Paul Bromley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 23:57:12 +0000

25 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:24:31 +0000

38 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:33:56 +0000

48 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:21:15 +0000

25 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:09:20 -0000

18 lines

Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 21:30:28 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

Musings on Controversial Postings

Musings on Controversial Postings

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 19:59:45 -0000

93 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Bill Westwood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 20:11:15 +0000

105 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 20:58:35 +0000

39 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 21:05:06 -0000

51 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Bill Westwood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 21:29:15 +0000

64 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2007 23:05:25 +0000

178 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 01:15:36 +0000

25 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 01:16:36 +0000

16 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 01:27:58 +0000

107 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 10:18:00 +0000

43 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 10:43:43 -0000

34 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:28:33 +0000

35 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 12:32:47 -0000

25 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 12:41:55 -0000

25 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 13:37:33 +0000

22 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 15:02:58 +0000

52 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 15:09:03 +0000

26 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 15:34:33 +0000

33 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:43:53 +0000

29 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Bill Westwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 20:08:18 +0000

40 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2007 22:30:26 +0000

52 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Paul Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 2007 09:53:28 -0000

55 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 2007 11:58:13 +0000

57 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:29:44 +0000

20 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:34:13 +0000

27 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 2007 16:16:37 +0000

33 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 2007 17:37:23 +0000

35 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 2007 23:48:51 +0000

39 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 00:21:21 +0000

47 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

David Jobson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 00:55:19 -0000

25 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:52:08 +0000

56 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Paul Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:07:54 -0000

40 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:41:35 +0000

15 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 15:24:29 +0000

45 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Jonathan Reggler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 07:49:06 -0800

84 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Paul Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 15:53:24 -0000

19 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:10:38 +0000

20 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:16:05 +0000

105 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:23:48 +0000

47 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Alun Price <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:13:25 -0000

58 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:50:19 +0000

96 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 23:03:19 +0000

23 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Lesley Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 23:07:00 +0000

173 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Stephen Crawshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:42:18 +1100

22 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 23:51:24 +0000

17 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 00:25:52 +0000

33 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:04:23 -0000

179 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:10:30 +0000

60 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:11:17 +0000

128 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:20:55 +0000

56 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:03:29 +0000

32 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:23:20 +0000

61 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:48:19 +0000

69 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:44:38 +0000

100 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:56:34 +0000

100 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

David Jobson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 20:51:16 -0000

143 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:21:57 +0000

71 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 23:06:26 +0000

35 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Paul Pickering <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:30:06 -0000

218 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:15:03 +0000

120 lines

Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:57:24 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Myths about the developing world, data use and more

Myths about the developing world, data use and more

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:10:29 +1030

17 lines

Re: Myths about the developing world, data use and more

Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:13:09 -0000

19 lines

Re: Myths about the developing world, data use and more

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:24:56 +0000

40 lines

Re: Myths about the developing world, data use and more

Graham Balin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:29:45 +1030

45 lines

Re: Myths about the developing world, data use and more

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 01:02:31 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

Off listRe: electronic insurance medical reports

Off listRe: electronic insurance medical reports

Dr Paul Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:09:46 +0000

19 lines

Re: Off listRe: electronic insurance medical reports

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:55:04 -0000

48 lines

Re: Off listRe: electronic insurance medical reports

Alison Young <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:44:13 -0000

79 lines

New Thread

PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:34:12 -0000

43 lines

Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Gavin Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:42:19 +0000

34 lines

Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Lesley Kay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:45:44 +0000

210 lines

Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:56:24 +0000

48 lines

Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:19:59 +0000

53 lines

Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:37:04 -0000

26 lines

Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:18:49 +0000

37 lines

Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:40:16 -0500

346 lines

Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:47:42 +0000

91 lines

Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:25:17 +0000

56 lines

Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Paul Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:55:56 -0000

86 lines

Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:00:15 -0000

106 lines

New Thread

Practice Websites

Practice Websites

Jon Turvill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:41:21 EST

50 lines

Re: Practice Websites

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:33:13 +0000

25 lines

Re: Practice Websites

Jon Turvill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:51:45 EST

47 lines

Re: Practice Websites

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:56:59 +0000

63 lines

Re: Practice Websites

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:04:40 +0000

31 lines

Re: Practice Websites

Alun Price <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:24:52 -0000

384 lines

Re: Practice Websites

Jon Turvill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:44:35 EST

43 lines

New Thread

Privacy of patient accessible records, ( was Health eCard - more info)

Privacy of patient accessible records, ( was Health eCard - more info)

Dr Paul Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:29:27 +0000

46 lines

Re: Privacy of patient accessible records, ( was Health eCard - more info)

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:57:03 +0000

111 lines

Re: Privacy of patient accessible records, ( was Health eCard - more info)

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:07:08 -0000

400 lines

Re: Privacy of patient accessible records, ( was Health eCard - more info)

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:24:39 +0000

144 lines

New Thread

Re CBT courses etc

Re CBT courses etc

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:16:52 +0000

25 lines

Re: Re CBT courses etc

James McGlew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:27:15 +0000

50 lines

Re: Re CBT courses etc

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:29:43 +0000

35 lines

Re CBT courses etc

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:36:23 +0000

18 lines

Re CBT courses etc

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:37:43 +0000

16 lines

Re: Re CBT courses etc

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:40:44 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Regulation

Regulation

Mark Williams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:29:26 +0000

34 lines

Re: Regulation

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:24:55 +0000

36 lines

Re: Regulation

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:34:47 +0000

34 lines

Re: Regulation

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:15:18 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Sharing patient information

Sharing patient information

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:28:23 +0000

22 lines

Re: Sharing patient information

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:40:50 +0000

46 lines

Re: Sharing patient information

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 01:34:39 +0000

16 lines

Re: Sharing patient information

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:09:05 +0000

25 lines

Re: Sharing patient information

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:36:03 +0000

34 lines

Re: Sharing patient information

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:54:55 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Should CfH plan to allow sharing of patients' EPRs with 6 EU countries?

Should CfH plan to allow sharing of patients' EPRs with 6 EU countries?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 07:03:44 +0000

28 lines

Re: Should CfH plan to allow sharing of patients' EPRs with 6 EU countries?

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:57:15 +0000

60 lines

Re: Should CfH plan to allow sharing of patients' EPRs with 6 EU countries?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:18:13 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

Spam: injections expiry dates

Re: Spam: injections expiry dates

Martin Goldman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:48:07 -0000

182 lines

New Thread

TechieGizmos

TechieGizmos

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:14:20 -0000

214 lines

Re: TechieGizmos

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:37:43 -0000

25 lines

Re: TechieGizmos

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:50:16 -0000

62 lines

Re: TechieGizmos

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:56:24 +0000

25 lines

Re: TechieGizmos

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 21:14:09 -0000

95 lines

Re: TechieGizmos

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 21:25:34 -0000

23 lines

Re: TechieGizmos

David Jobson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:25:41 -0000

330 lines

Re: TechieGizmos

Tom Sargent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 23:00:49 -0000

192 lines

Re: TechieGizmos

Stephen Crawshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:16:25 +1100

23 lines

Re: TechieGizmos

Tilbrook Tim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 08:10:00 -0000

404 lines

Re: TechieGizmos

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:06:32 -0000

542 lines

Re: TechieGizmos

Bill Westwood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:03:41 +0000

38 lines

Re: TechieGizmos

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:41:51 -0000

51 lines

New Thread

The brighter side of life

The brighter side of life

Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:39:36 -0800

27 lines

Re: The brighter side of life

David Jobson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:26:00 -0000

25 lines

Re: The brighter side of life

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:51:48 +0000

22 lines

Re: The brighter side of life

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:25:30 -0000

12 lines

New Thread

There have been no C&B outages...

There have been no C&B outages...

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:59:21 -0000

23 lines

Re: There have been no C&B outages...

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:55:01 -0000

35 lines

Re: There have been no C&B outages...

Adrian McLachlan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:32:24 +0000

43 lines

Re: There have been no C&B outages...

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:34:34 -0000

224 lines

Re: There have been no C&B outages...

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:08:57 +0000

51 lines

Re: There have been no C&B outages...

David Jobson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:36:48 -0000

18 lines

Re: There have been no C&B outages...

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:31:01 -0000

64 lines

New Thread

Times article - Fujitsu blasts NPfIT

Times article - Fujitsu blasts NPfIT

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:44:16 +0000

17 lines

Re: Times article - Fujitsu blasts NPfIT

Dr Paul Thornton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:22:28 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

Today's IT question

Today's IT question

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:03:07 +0000

23 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:39:38 +0000

20 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:40:01 -0000

36 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:02:53 +0000

33 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:16:41 +0000

27 lines

Re: Today's IT question

David Jobson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:49:08 -0000

20 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Piers Longhorn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:23:10 -0000

35 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Alun Price <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:54:02 -0000

36 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:02:34 -0000

62 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:42:56 +0000

18 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:48:24 +0000

77 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:49:04 +0000

52 lines

Re: Today's IT question

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:01:06 +0000

23 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:04:55 +0000

19 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:52:58 +0000

40 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:41:18 +0000

24 lines

Re: Today's IT question

North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:11:47 -0000

34 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Mark Williams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:01:51 +0000

45 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Alistair Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:11:19 -0000

33 lines

Re: Today's IT question

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:52:30 +0000

41 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:29:43 +0000

34 lines

Re: Today's IT question

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:46:43 +0000

43 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:28:24 +0000

45 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:36:42 +0000

23 lines

Re: Today's IT question

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:40:39 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Very bad headache

Very bad headache

North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:32:53 -0000

46 lines

Re: Very bad headache

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:56:03 +0000

49 lines

Re: Very bad headache

Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:01:09 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Why aren't GPs doing even more?

Why aren't GPs doing even more?

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:57:33 -0000

16 lines

Re: Why aren't GPs doing even more?

Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 21:07:05 +0000

65 lines

Re: Why aren't GPs doing even more?

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 21:52:05 +0000

29 lines

Re: Why aren't GPs doing even more?

Jeff Green <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 01:36:55 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

wild card

wild card

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2007 09:31:44 +0000

42 lines

Re: wild card

Ian McNicoll <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:10:54 -0000

223 lines

Re: wild card

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2007 22:22:53 +0000

39 lines

Re: wild card

David Jobson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:16:50 -0000

18 lines

Re: wild card

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:02:33 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

Windows installer error

Windows installer error

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:02:53 -0000

16 lines

Re: Windows installer error

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:13:51 +0000

20 lines

Re: Windows installer error

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:28:15 -0000

30 lines

Re: Windows installer error

Dr Laurie Miles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:05:24 -0000

59 lines

Re: Windows installer error

Robert Treharne Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:19:49 -0000

37 lines

Re: Windows installer error

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:16:32 +0000

42 lines

Re: Windows installer error

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:50:19 +0000

64 lines

Re: Windows installer error

Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:04:38 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

Withdrawal from pot

Withdrawal from pot

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:31:59 -0000

22 lines

Re: Withdrawal from pot

Piers Longhorn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:44:40 -0000

40 lines

Re: Withdrawal from pot

TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:03:37 -0000

30 lines

New Thread

[BGSpam]Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Re: [BGSpam]Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:30:08 +0000

38 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:09:44 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

[BGSpam]How should sickness certification work?

Re: [BGSpam]How should sickness certification work?

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:17:36 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

[BGSpam]Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:08:26 +0000

33 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 20:15:39 +0000

47 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:34:49 +0000

34 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Dr Adrian Midgley (In the office) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:10:22 +0000

20 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Archaic Certification - Time for major reform? (Was - Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?)

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:46:31 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

[BGSpam]Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:40:48 +0000

15 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Car tracking - from EMIS EUG --- response for Pork

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:45:32 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

[BGSpam]Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:53:09 +0000

20 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Cherry Cullen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:05:17 -0000

38 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:01:10 +0000

21 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Med certs when seeing Nurse Practitioner?

Fay Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:09:09 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

[BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 2007 19:08:52 +0000

16 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 2007 19:57:04 +0000

35 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 21:38:03 +0000

50 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:12:15 +0000

79 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 23:03:27 +0000

23 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 23:18:41 +0000

24 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:02:36 +0000

47 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:31:56 +0000

64 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:17:00 +0000

79 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Paul Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:21:18 +0000

131 lines

Re: [BGSpam]Re: Musings on Controversial Postings

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:52:52 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

]Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

]Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:04:40 +0000

15 lines

Re: ]Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:19:56 +0000

20 lines

Re: ]Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Declan Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:27:41 +0000

30 lines

Re: ]Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

John Clegg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:50:47 +0000

38 lines

Re: ]Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Adrian Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:15:18 +0000

21 lines

Re: ]Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:10:15 +0000

57 lines

Re: ]Re: PCT's and Freedom of Information Act 2000

Paul Batchelor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:45:00 +0000

35 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager