JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives


DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives

DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives


February 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

AW: Indirection (1 message)
AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group (1 message)
Call for Participation: Open Forum on Metadata Registries 2007 (1 message)
Commain on the domain range draft (14 messages)
Comment on DCAM (4 messages)
DC Representation on W3C Content Labels Incubator WG (1 message)
Defining application profiles (3 messages)
Digital Data Repository Architect (1 message)
encoding schemes and rich representations (2 messages)
Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions (3 messages)
Indirection (was [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)) (2 messages)
Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model (2 messages)
Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model (OOO 2/7 - 2/9) (1 message)
Public Comment on a DCMI vocabulary of domain and range classes (4 messages)
URIs as Identifiers (was [DCAM Public Comment] URIs (was: AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group)) (2 messages)
W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group (6 messages)
[DCAM Piblic Comment] DCAM vs RDF and ranges (2 messages)
[DCAM Piblic Comment] DCAM vs RDF and ranges (was:Comment on DCAM) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] "Reference model" (was: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] abstract syntax needed (2 messages)
[DCAM Public Comment] Abstractness (was: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] DCAM Semantics and RDF (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] Described resources (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] Description model, description set and description (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] Description set (WasRe: Public comment for revision of DCMI (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] Description set (WasRe: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] Document Structure (Was Re: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity? (10 messages)
[DCAM Public Comment] Multiple URIs per resource (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] Resource URI (Was Re: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] Rich Representations and Value Strings (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] Statements/descriptions (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] Terminology (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] URIs (was: AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] Value strings etc are resources? (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model) (1 message)
[DCAM Public Comment] Values (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions) (4 messages)
[DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model) (12 messages)
[DCMI Public Comment] Definition of metadata (was: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions) (1 message)
[Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals? (6 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DC-ARCHITECTURE Home

DC-ARCHITECTURE Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

AW: Indirection

AW: Indirection

Thomas Fischer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:13:02 +0100

84 lines

New Thread

AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group

AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group

Thomas Fischer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:06:39 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Call for Participation: Open Forum on Metadata Registries 2007

Call for Participation: Open Forum on Metadata Registries 2007

Daniel C Redmon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:14:23 -0500

179 lines

New Thread

Commain on the domain range draft

Commain on the domain range draft

Ivan Herman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:20:36 +0000

29 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:43:47 -0500

25 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:16:50 -0000

49 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:53:39 -0500

20 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Diane I. Hillmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:27:43 -0500

38 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:08:40 -0500

33 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Ivan Herman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:25:52 +0100

85 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:43:52 +0100

91 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:53:34 -0500

49 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:45:15 +0100

112 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Ivan Herman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:26:06 +0100

125 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:45:24 +0100

101 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:53:49 -0500

28 lines

Re: Commain on the domain range draft

Ivan Herman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:27:46 +0100

160 lines

New Thread

Comment on DCAM

Comment on DCAM

Ivan Herman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:17:55 +0000

33 lines

Comment on DCAM

Ivan Herman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:47:22 +0000

50 lines

Re: Comment on DCAM

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:07:48 -0000

86 lines

Re: Comment on DCAM

Ivan Herman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:21:37 +0100

137 lines

New Thread

DC Representation on W3C Content Labels Incubator WG

DC Representation on W3C Content Labels Incubator WG

Cecil Somerton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:01:41 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Defining application profiles

Defining application profiles

Miles, AJ (Alistair) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:28:05 -0000

155 lines

Defining application profiles

Miles, AJ (Alistair) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:41:50 -0000

45 lines

Re: Defining application profiles

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:27:11 -0000

190 lines

New Thread

Digital Data Repository Architect

Digital Data Repository Architect

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:17:48 -0000

65 lines

New Thread

encoding schemes and rich representations

encoding schemes and rich representations

Thomas Fischer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:11:58 +0100

99 lines

Re: encoding schemes and rich representations

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:11:39 -0000

142 lines

New Thread

Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions

Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions

Jon Mason <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:17:47 +1030

88 lines

Re: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 08:52:08 -0000

100 lines

Re: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:17:46 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Indirection (was [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model))

Indirection (was [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model))

Thomas Fischer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:49:10 +0100

88 lines

Re: Indirection (was [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model))

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:21:51 +0100

111 lines

New Thread

Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model

Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:32:28 +0100

110 lines

Re: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model

Douglas Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:31:23 +1300

118 lines

New Thread

Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model (OOO 2/7 - 2/9)

Re: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model (OOO 2/7 - 2/9)

Darin Stewart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2007 20:32:27 -0800

12 lines

New Thread

Public Comment on a DCMI vocabulary of domain and range classes

Public Comment on a DCMI vocabulary of domain and range classes

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:32:53 +0100

48 lines

Re: Public Comment on a DCMI vocabulary of domain and range classes

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:34:31 -0500

18 lines

Re: Public Comment on a DCMI vocabulary of domain and range classes

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:44:02 +0100

24 lines

Re: Public Comment on a DCMI vocabulary of domain and range classes

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 13:50:34 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

URIs as Identifiers (was [DCAM Public Comment] URIs (was: AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group))

URIs as Identifiers (was [DCAM Public Comment] URIs (was: AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group))

Thomas Fischer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:07:03 +0100

59 lines

Re: URIs as Identifiers (was [DCAM Public Comment] URIs (was: AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group))

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:40:01 -0000

41 lines

New Thread

W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group

W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:07:16 +0100

37 lines

Re: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group

Cecil Somerton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:31:50 -0500

70 lines

Re: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:48:03 +0100

86 lines

Re: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group

Cecil Somerton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:40:27 -0500

72 lines

Re: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group

Dan Brickley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:58:33 +0000

35 lines

Re: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group

Cecil Somerton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 07:41:20 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Piblic Comment] DCAM vs RDF and ranges

Re: [DCAM Piblic Comment] DCAM vs RDF and ranges

Ivan Herman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:11:03 +0100

158 lines

Re: [DCAM Piblic Comment] DCAM vs RDF and ranges

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:42:38 +0100

129 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Piblic Comment] DCAM vs RDF and ranges (was:Comment on DCAM)

[DCAM Piblic Comment] DCAM vs RDF and ranges (was:Comment on DCAM)

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:47:23 +0100

78 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] "Reference model" (was: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

[DCAM Public Comment] "Reference model" (was: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:13:09 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] abstract syntax needed

[DCAM Public Comment] abstract syntax needed

Miles, AJ (Alistair) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:01:26 -0000

91 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] abstract syntax needed

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:36:54 +0100

198 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Abstractness (was: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

[DCAM Public Comment] Abstractness (was: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:00:24 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] DCAM Semantics and RDF (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

[DCAM Public Comment] DCAM Semantics and RDF (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:26:30 +0100

60 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Described resources (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

[DCAM Public Comment] Described resources (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:25:16 -0000

183 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Description model, description set and description (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

[DCAM Public Comment] Description model, description set and description (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:43:50 -0000

78 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Description set (WasRe: Public comment for revision of DCMI

[DCAM Public Comment] Description set (WasRe: Public comment for revision of DCMI

Douglas Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:13:44 +1300

52 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Description set (WasRe: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

[DCAM Public Comment] Description set (WasRe: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:38:38 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Document Structure (Was Re: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

[DCAM Public Comment] Document Structure (Was Re: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:55:00 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?

[DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:15:57 -0000

36 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?

Makx Dekkers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:59:13 +0100

64 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?

Liddy Nevile <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:04:32 +1100

83 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?

John Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:48:50 +1300

134 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?

Douglas Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:29:32 +1300

171 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?

Dan Brickley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:12:54 +0100

44 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?

Cecil Somerton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:15:33 -0500

112 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:51:18 +0100

98 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?

Liddy Nevile <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:20:47 +1100

139 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:43:01 +0100

178 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Multiple URIs per resource

[DCAM Public Comment] Multiple URIs per resource

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:12:25 -0000

56 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Resource URI (Was Re: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

[DCAM Public Comment] Resource URI (Was Re: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:43:41 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Rich Representations and Value Strings

[DCAM Public Comment] Rich Representations and Value Strings

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:09:39 -0000

96 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Statements/descriptions (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

[DCAM Public Comment] Statements/descriptions (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:23:18 -0000

92 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Terminology (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

[DCAM Public Comment] Terminology (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:45:14 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] URIs (was: AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group)

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] URIs (was: AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group)

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:20:42 +0100

107 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Value strings etc are resources? (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

[DCAM Public Comment] Value strings etc are resources? (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:05:54 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Values (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

[DCAM Public Comment] Values (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:00:04 -0000

58 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Values (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:36:43 -0000

67 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Values (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

Makx Dekkers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:53:06 +0100

21 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Values (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:08:12 -0000

25 lines

New Thread

[DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

[DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:17:06 +0100

47 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Joseph Tennis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:48:33 -0800

171 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:40:18 -0000

30 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Joseph Tennis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:04:35 -0800

67 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:20:11 +0100

99 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Joseph Tennis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:08:46 -0800

124 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:18:11 -0000

40 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:20:31 -0000

25 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:42:21 -0000

33 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Joseph Tennis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:19:59 -0800

75 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Joseph Tennis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:20:53 -0800

40 lines

Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:13:25 -0000

49 lines

New Thread

[DCMI Public Comment] Definition of metadata (was: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

[DCMI Public Comment] Definition of metadata (was: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:24:58 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

[Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?

[Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 13:54:15 -0500

21 lines

Re: [Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 21:41:37 +0100

35 lines

Re: [Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:13:36 -0500

41 lines

Re: [Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2007 07:57:49 -0500

20 lines

Re: [Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:58:59 -0000

127 lines

Re: [Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?

Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:05:24 -0500

22 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager