|
|
|
Size
|
Re: encoding schemes and rich representations
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:11:39 -0000 |
142 lines |
Re: Defining application profiles
|
Andy Powell |
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:27:11 -0000 |
190 lines |
AW: Indirection
|
Thomas Fischer |
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:13:02 +0100 |
84 lines |
Defining application profiles
|
Miles, AJ (Alistair) |
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:41:50 -0000 |
45 lines |
Defining application profiles
|
Miles, AJ (Alistair) |
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:28:05 -0000 |
155 lines |
encoding schemes and rich representations
|
Thomas Fischer |
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:11:58 +0100 |
99 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Ivan Herman |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:27:46 +0100 |
160 lines |
Re: URIs as Identifiers (was [DCAM Public Comment] URIs (was: AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group))
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:40:01 -0000 |
41 lines |
URIs as Identifiers (was [DCAM Public Comment] URIs (was: AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group))
|
Thomas Fischer |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:07:03 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:53:49 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:45:24 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group
|
Cecil Somerton |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 07:41:20 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Ivan Herman |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:26:06 +0100 |
125 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] URIs (was: AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group)
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:20:42 +0100 |
107 lines |
AW: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group
|
Thomas Fischer |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:06:39 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: Indirection (was [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model))
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:21:51 +0100 |
111 lines |
Indirection (was [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model))
|
Thomas Fischer |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:49:10 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group
|
Dan Brickley |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:58:33 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group
|
Cecil Somerton |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:40:27 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] abstract syntax needed
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:36:54 +0100 |
198 lines |
Re: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:48:03 +0100 |
86 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:45:15 +0100 |
112 lines |
Re: W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group
|
Cecil Somerton |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:31:50 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Pete Johnston |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:13:25 -0000 |
49 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Joseph Tennis |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:20:53 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Joseph Tennis |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:19:59 -0800 |
75 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] abstract syntax needed
|
Miles, AJ (Alistair) |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:01:26 -0000 |
91 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:53:34 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: [DCAM Piblic Comment] DCAM vs RDF and ranges
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:42:38 +0100 |
129 lines |
Re: [DCAM Piblic Comment] DCAM vs RDF and ranges
|
Ivan Herman |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:11:03 +0100 |
158 lines |
W3C Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER) Working Group
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:07:16 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:43:52 +0100 |
91 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Ivan Herman |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:25:52 +0100 |
85 lines |
Re: Comment on DCAM
|
Ivan Herman |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:21:37 +0100 |
137 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:43:01 +0100 |
178 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?
|
Liddy Nevile |
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:20:47 +1100 |
139 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:42:21 -0000 |
33 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:20:31 -0000 |
25 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:18:11 -0000 |
40 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:51:18 +0100 |
98 lines |
[DCMI Public Comment] Definition of metadata (was: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:24:58 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:17:46 +0100 |
33 lines |
Call for Participation: Open Forum on Metadata Registries 2007
|
Daniel C Redmon |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:14:23 -0500 |
179 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] "Reference model" (was: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:13:09 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Joseph Tennis |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:08:46 -0800 |
124 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Abstractness (was: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:00:24 +0100 |
38 lines |
[DCAM Piblic Comment] DCAM vs RDF and ranges (was:Comment on DCAM)
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:47:23 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:20:11 +0100 |
99 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Joseph Tennis |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:04:35 -0800 |
67 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Andy Powell |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:40:18 -0000 |
30 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Joseph Tennis |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:48:33 -0800 |
171 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Terminology (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:45:14 +0100 |
59 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] DCAM Semantics and RDF (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:26:30 +0100 |
60 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Vocabulary encoding schemes (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:17:06 +0100 |
47 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Value strings etc are resources? (was: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:05:54 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:08:40 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Diane I. Hillmann |
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:27:43 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: [Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:05:24 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:53:39 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: [Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:58:59 -0000 |
127 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:16:50 -0000 |
49 lines |
Re: Comment on DCAM
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:07:48 -0000 |
86 lines |
DC Representation on W3C Content Labels Incubator WG
|
Cecil Somerton |
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:01:41 -0500 |
35 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Rich Representations and Value Strings
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:09:39 -0000 |
96 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Multiple URIs per resource
|
Pete Johnston |
Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:12:25 -0000 |
56 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Described resources (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:25:16 -0000 |
183 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Values (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:08:12 -0000 |
25 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Values (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)
|
Makx Dekkers |
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:53:06 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Values (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:36:43 -0000 |
67 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?
|
Cecil Somerton |
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:15:33 -0500 |
112 lines |
Re: Commain on the domain range draft
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:43:47 -0500 |
25 lines |
Comment on DCAM
|
Ivan Herman |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:47:22 +0000 |
50 lines |
Commain on the domain range draft
|
Ivan Herman |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:20:36 +0000 |
29 lines |
Comment on DCAM
|
Ivan Herman |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:17:55 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?
|
Douglas Campbell |
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:29:32 +1300 |
171 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?
|
John Roberts |
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:48:50 +1300 |
134 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?
|
Dan Brickley |
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:12:54 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?
|
Liddy Nevile |
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:04:32 +1100 |
83 lines |
Re: [DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?
|
Makx Dekkers |
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:59:13 +0100 |
64 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Monotonicity?
|
Pete Johnston |
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:15:57 -0000 |
36 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Description set (WasRe: Public comment for revision of DCMI
|
Douglas Campbell |
Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:13:44 +1300 |
52 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Document Structure (Was Re: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:55:00 +0000 |
51 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Resource URI (Was Re: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:43:41 +0000 |
39 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Description set (WasRe: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model)
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:38:38 +0000 |
41 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Values (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:00:04 -0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model
|
Douglas Campbell |
Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:31:23 +1300 |
118 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Statements/descriptions (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:23:18 -0000 |
92 lines |
[DCAM Public Comment] Description model, description set and description (Was RE: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions)
|
Pete Johnston |
Wed, 7 Feb 2007 16:43:50 -0000 |
78 lines |
Re: [Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Wed, 7 Feb 2007 07:57:49 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model (OOO 2/7 - 2/9)
|
Darin Stewart |
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 20:32:27 -0800 |
12 lines |
Re: Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions
|
Pete Johnston |
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 08:52:08 -0000 |
100 lines |
Feedback on proposed DCAM revisions
|
Jon Mason |
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:17:47 +1030 |
88 lines |
Re: [Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:13:36 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: [Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 21:41:37 +0100 |
35 lines |
[Domains and Ranges Public Comment] date, title, and description should be literals?
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 13:54:15 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Public Comment on a DCMI vocabulary of domain and range classes
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 13:50:34 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Public Comment on a DCMI vocabulary of domain and range classes
|
Thomas Baker |
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:44:02 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: Public Comment on a DCMI vocabulary of domain and range classes
|
Bruce D'Arcus |
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:34:31 -0500 |
18 lines |
Public Comment on a DCMI vocabulary of domain and range classes
|
Thomas Baker |
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:32:53 +0100 |
48 lines |
Public comment for revision of DCMI Abstract Model
|
Thomas Baker |
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:32:28 +0100 |
110 lines |
Digital Data Repository Architect
|
Andy Powell |
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:17:48 -0000 |
65 lines |