|
|
|
Size
|
Re: Workflow mapping software
|
Andy Powell |
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:44:32 -0000 |
57 lines |
Re: Licences - once only or every time?
|
Jackie Proven |
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:27:57 +0000 |
139 lines |
Re: Workflow mapping software
|
Paula Callan, QUT eResearch Access Coordinator |
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:18:26 +1000 |
60 lines |
Re: Workflow mapping software
|
Scott Wilson |
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:11:22 +0000 |
69 lines |
JORUM USER SERVICE NOW AVAILABLE
|
Michael Dodds |
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:20:20 +0000 |
57 lines |
Workflow mapping software
|
Steve Loddington |
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:07:14 -0000 |
40 lines |
Reminder: Intrallect Packaging Fest, 14th February 2006
|
Ed Barker |
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:14:50 +0000 |
830 lines |
Re: From ROAR to DOAR
|
Stevan Harnad |
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:02:39 +0000 |
84 lines |
Re: From ROAR to DOAR
|
Bill Hubbard |
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:56:10 +0000 |
97 lines |
Job Opportunity
|
Mark Stiles |
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:33:29 +0000 |
85 lines |
Bronze release of RAE software for OA repositories
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:19:44 +0000 |
51 lines |
From ROAR to DOAR
|
Stevan Harnad |
Sat, 28 Jan 2006 13:02:20 +0000 |
97 lines |
JISC RIVER Project
|
Deborah Kahn |
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:18:26 -0000 |
982 lines |
OpenDOAR repository listing
|
Bill Hubbard |
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:57:36 +0000 |
91 lines |
Re: Licences - once only or every time?
|
Paula Callan, QUT eResearch Access Coordinator |
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:45:51 +1000 |
67 lines |
Re: Newly enhanced Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR)
|
Stevan Harnad |
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:59:31 +0000 |
78 lines |
FW: To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan) - and preservation
|
H.M. Gladney |
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:35:46 -0800 |
203 lines |
Re: To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan) - and preservation
|
Wheatley, Paul |
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:24:10 -0000 |
196 lines |
Re: Licences - once only or every time?
|
Arthur Sale |
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:51:11 +1100 |
86 lines |
Re: Licences - once only or every time?
|
Ryan Hargreaves |
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:55:34 +0000 |
121 lines |
Re: Licences - once only or every time?
|
Annette Day |
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:35:08 -0500 |
93 lines |
Re: Licences - once only or every time?
|
C.A.Pegler |
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:15:01 -0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Licences - once only or every time?
|
Leslie Carr |
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:48:41 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Licences - once only or every time?
|
Lorna Campbell |
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:09:12 +0000 |
115 lines |
Re: Licences - once only or every time?
|
Peter Crowther |
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:49:57 -0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Licences - once only or every time?
|
Pat Galloway |
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:41:07 -0600 |
25 lines |
Re: Licences - once only or every time?
|
Terry McAndrew |
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:39:19 -0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Licences - once only or every time?
|
Jonathan Bell [jpb] |
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:06:57 -0000 |
66 lines |
Licences - once only or every time?
|
Nockels, K.H. |
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:30:26 -0000 |
48 lines |
JORUM Research and Development - Activity & Reports
|
Stephen Rogers |
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:35:10 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: FW: Institutional repositories - who is using what?
|
Robert Talbot |
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:51:15 +0000 |
63 lines |
FW: Institutional repositories - who is using what?
|
Harris, Jane |
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:23:11 -0000 |
1353 lines |
Re: ERCIM News - special European theme - Open Access
|
Stevan Harnad |
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:15:45 +0000 |
45 lines |
FW: OECD Study on Open educational Resources
|
MacLeod, Roderick A |
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:31:25 -0000 |
134 lines |
Re: Learning from the successful OA IRs
|
Joanne Yeomans |
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:36:27 +0100 |
119 lines |
Re: Learning from the successful OA IRs
|
Robin Rice |
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:05:28 -0000 |
60 lines |
Institutional Repositories and Names and things
|
John Casey |
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:42:12 +0000 |
137 lines |
Publishing Reform, University Self-Publishing and Open Access
|
Stevan Harnad |
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:32:08 +0000 |
68 lines |
Indian Science Congress: Optimal National Open Access Policy Recommendation
|
Stevan Harnad |
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:24:17 +0000 |
42 lines |
Reiststance to sharing
|
C.A.Pegler |
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:06:56 -0000 |
64 lines |
Re: Learning from the successful OA IRs
|
Paula Callan, QUT Eprint Archive Co-ordinator |
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:31:56 +1000 |
209 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Arthur Sale |
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:26:23 +1100 |
63 lines |
Re: Learning from the successful OA IRs
|
Joanne Yeomans |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:01:48 +0100 |
142 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Peter Crowther |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:45:09 -0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Alistair Young |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:27:59 +0000 |
239 lines |
Learning from the successful OA IRs
|
Stevan Harnad |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:20:51 +0000 |
74 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
H.M. Gladney |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:16:40 -0800 |
202 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Alistair Young |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:37:30 +0000 |
148 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Howard Noble |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:29:47 -0000 |
108 lines |
Introduction: Peter Crowther
|
Peter Crowther |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:16:42 -0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
rrankin |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:53:27 -0000 |
97 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Phil Barker |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:38:56 +0000 |
76 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Howard Noble |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:54:48 -0000 |
138 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Jonathan Bell [jpb] |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:48:33 -0000 |
135 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Arthur Sale |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:04:34 +1100 |
89 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Robert John Robertson |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:48:26 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Rachel Heery |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:44:42 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Amber Thomas |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:16:44 -0000 |
264 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Sheila Anderson |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:53:50 -0000 |
222 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
James S reid |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:34:08 -0000 |
212 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Sarah Currier |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:11:10 +0000 |
143 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Amber Thomas |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:54:59 -0000 |
244 lines |
Re: The eScholarship Repository: an interview with Catherine Candee
|
Philip J Hunter |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:47:01 -0000 |
52 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: Stemming the needless flow
|
Stevan Harnad |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:36:20 +0000 |
79 lines |
Intrallect Package Fest: 14th February 2006
|
Ed Barker |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:00:25 +0000 |
820 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: The bottom line is money
|
Philip J Hunter |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:25:07 -0000 |
97 lines |
FW: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Philip J Hunter |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:40:40 -0000 |
72 lines |
The eScholarship Repository: an interview with Catherine Candee
|
Richard Poynder |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:36:34 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: The bottom line is money
|
Melanie Bates |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:21:30 +0000 |
69 lines |
Re: To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan) - and preservation
|
Bryan Lawrence |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:55:14 +0000 |
98 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Arthur Sale |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:07:32 +1100 |
1368 lines |
Re: To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan)
|
Doug Moncur |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:58:36 +1100 |
118 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
C.A.Pegler |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:23:16 -0000 |
82 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Leslie Carr |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:28:33 +0000 |
111 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Joanne Yeomans |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:28:12 +0100 |
380 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Leslie Carr |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:20:26 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Jane Stevenson |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:09:37 +0000 |
103 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Sarah Currier |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:06:54 +0000 |
114 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:53:51 -0000 |
103 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Robert John Robertson |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:50:47 +0000 |
104 lines |
Academic survey
|
Sue Manuel |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:47:50 -0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Leslie Carr |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:37:25 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Simon Grant |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:32:30 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Richard Green |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:18:42 -0000 |
86 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Sarah Currier |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:11:01 +0000 |
118 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Leslie Carr |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:59:50 +0000 |
130 lines |
Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:39:30 -0000 |
37 lines |
Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
|
Sarah Currier |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:07:14 +0000 |
99 lines |
Re: To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan)
|
Leslie Carr |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:03:24 +0000 |
110 lines |
Re: To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan)
|
Howard Noble |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:40:35 -0000 |
156 lines |
Re: To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan)
|
David White |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:55:34 -0000 |
704 lines |
Re: To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan)
|
Steve Hitchcock |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:36:15 +0000 |
112 lines |
Re: To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan) - and preservation
|
Wheatley, Paul |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:02:47 -0000 |
138 lines |
Re: To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan)
|
Pauline Simpson |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:48:49 +0000 |
103 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Joanne Yeomans |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:26:11 +0100 |
1164 lines |
Re: To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan)
|
Howard Noble |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:52:12 -0000 |
81 lines |
Re: To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan)
|
Bryan Lawrence |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:32:11 +0000 |
43 lines |
To do: Re: Repository content (17 Jan)
|
Maria Leonardi |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:35:07 +0100 |
1291 lines |
Repository content - a thank you
|
Sarah Kaufman |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:25:06 +0000 |
44 lines |
DSpace User Group Meeting, Bergen 2006
|
Julie Allinson |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:23:34 +0000 |
137 lines |
RepoMMan project deliverables
|
Richard Green |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:31:59 -0000 |
155 lines |
Re: Repository Content
|
Jennifer Niven |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:06:36 -0000 |
681 lines |
Call JCDL 2006
|
José Borbinha |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:14:57 -0000 |
217 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Arthur Sale |
Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:33:05 +1100 |
1048 lines |
Repository content
|
Arthur Sale |
Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:58:55 +1100 |
1010 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Lucy Burrow |
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:43:44 +0000 |
79 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Leslie Carr |
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:21:35 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Brown, Douglas |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:22:21 -0000 |
130 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Theo Andrew |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:09:32 -0000 |
108 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Mahendra Mahey |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:03:24 +0000 |
123 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Julie Allinson |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:41:19 +0000 |
109 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Theo Andrew |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:24:30 -0000 |
108 lines |
Re: Repository content
|
Jennifer Peters-Lise |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:12:59 -0500 |
223 lines |
Repository content
|
Sarah Kaufman |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:58:24 +0000 |
64 lines |
Re: Repository software
|
Steve Hitchcock |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:24:47 +0000 |
94 lines |
Re: Repository software
|
rrankin |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:39:48 -0000 |
118 lines |
Urgente
|
Okoli Henry |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:31:08 +0000 |
43 lines |
|
Ryan Hargreaves |
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:37:41 +0000 |
87 lines |
Re: Repository software
|
Chris Awre |
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:46:48 +0000 |
474 lines |
SUBSCRIBE Salvador Sánchez
|
Salvador Sánchez García de las Bayonas |
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:31:47 +0100 |
36 lines |
[Fwd: REMINDER: Comment period closing for RLG-NARA repository certification checklist]
|
Julie Allinson |
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:18:24 +0000 |
63 lines |
subscribe Manuela Queitsch
|
Manuela B. Queitsch |
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:12:56 +0100 |
24 lines |
SUBSCRIBE Jenny Sotnik
|
Jenny Sotnik |
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:54:14 -0800 |
54 lines |
|
reza ghane |
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:23:58 -0800 |
33 lines |
Re: Repository software
|
Leslie Carr |
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:16:55 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: Repository software
|
Steve Hitchcock |
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:15:31 +0000 |
52 lines |
Repository software
|
rrankin |
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:11:40 -0000 |
95 lines |
Subscribe
|
Eamon Fennessy |
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:56:32 +0000 |
30 lines |
|
Monica Rivers-Latham |
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:49:33 +0000 |
8 lines |
Re: apologies
|
Julie Allinson |
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:24:05 +0000 |
32 lines |
apologies
|
Gayle J Calverley |
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:04:38 -0000 |
14 lines |
[Fwd: FW: Key documents now available from the European Task Force for Permanent Access]
|
Neil Jacobs |
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:19:41 +0000 |
86 lines |
[Fwd: FW: New book just published]
|
Neil Jacobs |
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:29:37 +0000 |
37 lines |
Digital Rights online workshop
|
Neil Jacobs |
Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:48:32 +0000 |
98 lines |
Comments invited on two documents related to repositories
|
MacLeod, Roderick A |
Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:45:16 -0000 |
316 lines |