JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


2006


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

£10 fee for SAR (7 messages)
"Child database 'invades privacy'" (1 message)
"Computer fraudbusters go online" (news item HSJ Online) (1 message)
"Data proposal prompts legal warning" (25.8.06) (Government Computing) (1 message)
"Hoax" Viruses (1 message)
"Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer ?" (1 message)
"Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?" (19 messages)
"Review recommends new ID measures" (news item) (5 messages)
"Switch in to Data Protection" - did we miss this? (2 messages)
"Unauthorised" access by repairer to computer datasets (2 messages)
"Unauthorised" access to "public" website (2 messages)
02 (6 messages)
192.com (1 message)
192.com - "The NEW 2006 Electoral Roll is n ow LIVE" (3 messages)
192.com - "The NEW 2006 Electoral Roll is now LIVE" (1 message)
2nd Annual Freedom of Information Conference & Workshop Series (1 message)
3rd Annual FOI Conference (4 messages)
3RD ANNUAL FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CONFERENCE : Two Years On (3 messages)
5th Annual Data Protection Compliance Conference - 27th & 28th September - LONDON (3 messages)
5th Annual Data Protection Conference (1 message)
A Friday Question? (3 messages)
A list of UK computer recyclers and refurbishers (1 message)
Absence records (1 message)
Access to CCTV Control Rooms (1 message)
Act Now Training - 3rd Annual FOI Conference (2 messages)
ADV - DP Courses (1 message)
Adv- Act Now February and March Courses (1 message)
advice needed (1 message)
Advice on location of FOI and DP activities within an organisation (1 message)
All-day update sessions in data protection (2 messages)
Amendment of Notification (3 messages)
Amendment to DPA discussed in House of Lords re:-paedophiles (3 messages)
Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation (75 messages)
Anonymity when making FOI requests of your ownorganisation (3 messages)
Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners (13 messages)
Another TV item. (1 message)
Are we bored with Durant yet? (1 message)
arrests under RIPA 2000 (1 message)
Article 29 Working Parties Eighth Annual Report (1 message)
Article 29 WP - Whistleblowing and SOX (1 message)
Article 29 WP work programme (1 message)
Article in Telegraph about Private Investigator obtaining Personal Information (1 message)
As we move inexorably towards Friday.... (1 message)
Assistant records manager vacancy at the University of Edinburgh (1 message)
Audit & Legal view of the DPA - London courses (1 message)
Australians get tough on Spam (7 messages)
Award Ceremonies and the Data Protection Act (1 message)
B4U search website (4 messages)
B4U's enforcement date (2 messages)
b4usearch, tracesmart and eroll (3 messages)
Bad Debt (3 messages)
Bank probed by ICO (1 message)
Bank security by phone (1 message)
Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote (12 messages)
BBC News (1 message)
BBC Radio 4 You and Yours Item on Identity Fraud (1 message)
Best practice handling of SARs (17 messages)
Better compliance anyone? (2 messages)
Bin Laden: Privacy, Guantanomo Bay and the Right to Know (1 message)
Blagger (1 message)
Blogs (3 messages)
Breaking down DPA Barriers to Information Sharing - Truth or Dare? (1 message)
BT billing update (4 messages)
BT DPA Notification (25 messages)
BT notification (3 messages)
BT SMS (1 message)
BT SMS Self Service (29 messages)
BT SMS Self Service Update (1 message)
BT SMS service (94 messages)
BT Suspends SMS Trial (19 messages)
BT Text Message Delivery Service (4 messages)
Business case required (2 messages)
Call for Evidence: Dilemmas of Privacy and Surveillance (1 message)
Can DPA apply to public register? (arising from question on FoI list) (1 message)
CCTV used on TV programme (1 message)
CH4 Dispatches (3 messages)
change of address (3 messages)
Change of Address - Council Tax (5 messages)
Changes to DPA 98 (6 messages)
chaps, please look at what you are doing (4 messages)
Charges for SARs (13 messages)
Charges under DPA (5 messages)
Chasing a Sundry Debtor (2 messages)
checking individual's identity (4 messages)
Child Support Agency (2 messages)
Children and Young People Access to Files (2 messages)
Childrens files (4 messages)
Christmas Holidays Plea (1 message)
comedy moments (1 message)
Commercial use of this List (2 messages)
Company names (9 messages)
Complaints, DP Statement (1 message)
Conducting an Information Audit (1 message)
Confidential Top-up Information Stored on Mobile Phone (1 message)
Copies of Teacher's Notes (11 messages)
Coroner's Courts (2 messages)
Cost of photocopying (17 messages)
Council Tax & Empty Homes (5 messages)
Council Tax - Empty Homes Initiative (3 messages)
Council Tax Data (2 messages)
Councils using cc lists for a mailing (54 messages)
Covert surveillance - CCTV (8 messages)
CRB Checks and ID Cards (5 messages)
CRB results and Retention (4 messages)
Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens? (2 messages)
Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Cr iminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens? (2 messages)
Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record (2 messages)
Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Ward (3 messages)
Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens? (7 messages)
CRM (6 messages)
CSA query (3 messages)
CV (2 messages)
Data Controller - meaning (4 messages)
Data Destruction (17 messages)
Data fears don't stop survey (news story Health Service Journal 9.11.06) (2 messages)
Data Loss and Liability (5 messages)
Data Protection (Processing of Sensitive Data) Order 2006 (5 messages)
Data Protection - Strategic Issues of Compliance (1 message)
Data Protection Act - Section 29 (18 messages)
Data Protection Act - Section 29 <fwd> (6 messages)
Data protection and CCTV - repeal the Act! (3 messages)
Data Protection and Employment Briefing (1 message)
Data Protection and Research (2 messages)
Data Protection Event Promotion (1 message)
Data protection guidance re publication on the Internet (2 messages)
Data Protection Jokes (8 messages)
Data Protection Jokes[Scanned] (1 message)
Data Protection legislation in China (6 messages)
Data sales for tax cuts (news item) (4 messages)
Data sharing course/protection of the vulnerable - in London and B'ham (1 message)
Data Sharing proposals (3 messages)
DCA Consultation - FoI/DP Fees - Draft Regulations. (1 message)
Debate over Patient Consent for Electronic Records (7 messages)
Destroying Personal Data (5 messages)
Directors telephone numbers (7 messages)
Disclosure (1 message)
Disclosure of CCTV footage (6 messages)
DNA database (4 messages)
DNA database - data retention (1 message)
DoH sticks to 'opt out' (news item) (1 message)
Dot Gov email addresses (3 messages)
DP - CCTV - Advise please (6 messages)
DP and b4usearch.com (4 messages)
DP Days - was Xmas Holidays (3 messages)
DP List (1 message)
DP procedures (2 messages)
DP Question on an external forum (7 messages)
DP Question on an external forum regarding Retention of Employment records (2 messages)
DP Question on an external forum relating to HR record in previous job (4 messages)
DP staff awareness training slideshow (3 messages)
DP/FOI (6 messages)
DPA .pdf (1 message)
DPA and Planning (6 messages)
DPA and Sex Discrimination Act (1 message)
DPA Compliance DTI (1 message)
DPA Guidance re publication onto the internet (2 messages)
DPA in Spain (3 messages)
DPA interface with FOISA (7 messages)
DPA Policies (1 message)
Draft statutory instrument (1 message)
Durant - Can I ignore it? (15 messages)
Durant and e-mail addresses (was Councils using cc lists for a mailing) (1 message)
Duty to disclose? (12 messages)
DVLA Data share (3 messages)
Easter and Holidays (1 message)
Electoral Register (2 messages)
Email addresses (7 messages)
Email disclaimer (10 messages)
Email privacy and footnotes (5 messages)
Email quarantine systems (19 messages)
Email retention periods (2 messages)
email screening & privacy (1 message)
Emergency Briefing: Data Retention Directive: **THIS THURSDAY** (1 message)
Employee Protection Register (5 messages)
Employee SAR (4 messages)
Employee sickness records (6 messages)
Employment code of practice (3 messages)
ETHICOMP 2007 Call for papers (1 message)
EU panel: SWIFT broke data privacy laws (1 message)
European Court of Justice bans data transfers re airline passengers to the USA (7 messages)
European Court of Justice bans data transfers reairline passengers to the USA (5 messages)
European Court of Justice decision re PNR transfers to the USA (1 message)
Even we "experts" get caught out (5 messages)
Every day I meet something I had never thought of before (3 messages)
Exciting Computer Ethics Conference in China (1 message)
Exemptions (1 message)
External companies data mining (1 message)
Fair Processing Notices (1 message)
Fair Processing Notices and the ICO (6 messages)
File uploaded re photographs (2 messages)
Filming Graduation Ceremonies (12 messages)
financial details retained longer then is n ecessary (3 messages)
financial details retained longer then is n necessary (1 message)
financial details retained longer then is necessary (2 messages)
First "Voice recognition call" (1 message)
FOI Advice Please. (2 messages)
FOI disclosure of "personal" e-mails (1 message)
FOI request to a copy of the Infraction proceedings re UK (1 message)
FOI/DP Request (6 messages)
Fourth Annual Information Rights Conference: FOI Live 2006 (1 message)
Free Conference (1 message)
Free roaming PABX extensions (1 message)
Friday NOMAIL Reminder (1 message)
Friday question - telephone nos (2 messages)
From Scunthorpe via Graham (1 message)
Further purpose flowchart (2 messages)
FW: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation (1 message)
FW: Call to all Senior Local Authority DP, FOI, Audit and Securi ty Policy Professionals (2 messages)
FW: Data Destruction (1 message)
FW: Data protection investigation (2 messages)
FW: IDPP - Creating Futures (1 message)
FW: Iron Mountain fire (4 messages)
FW: Message ("Your message dated Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:49:20...") (1 message)
FW: Security note: virus hoax doing the rou nds (1 message)
FW: Security note: virus hoax doing the rou nds - HOAX (1 message)
FW: Security note: virus hoax doing the rounds (6 messages)
FW: training (1 message)
FW: Withholding of Marks (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation (9 messages)
FW: [data-protection] BT notification (4 messages)
FW: [data-protection] checking individual's identity (3 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Councils using cc lists for a mailing (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Data Destruction (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Debate over Patient Consent for Electronic Records (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Filming Graduation Ceremonies (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] FOI Advice Please. (1 message)
Fw: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Question for LA's - t hankyou! (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Hotel Reception (10 messages)
Fw: [data-protection] itsmypost.com (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Misdirected DPA/FoIA requests (Out OfOffice) (3 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Monitoring for Swear words (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Notification renewals (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Please help a brain failed man! (1 message)
Fw: [data-protection] Posts out of Sync... (6 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Question for LA's - t hankyou! (6 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Question for LA's - thankyou! (9 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Surveys in general[Scanned] (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Telegraph article[Scanned] (2 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Thinkuknow.co.uk which "promotes safety for children online" - confusion of name with other "adult" (?) site (3 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Using & Re-using phot o's. (8 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Using & Re-using photo's. (6 messages)
Fw: [data-protection] Vehicle Tax search (Not quite BT SMS) (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Wow. A prosecution! (2 messages)
FW: [data-protection] You're not going to believe this (1 message)
Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Private Eye Data Protection cartoon (1 message)
Geolocation using your Batphone (10 messages)
Google and Privacy (2 messages)
GPs references (3 messages)
Handling Subject Access Requests (3 messages)
Happy Christmas! (1 message)
Have your say (1 message)
Help with examples of DP Good Practice for client-facing organisations (1 message)
HOAX - RE: [data-protection] FW: Security note: virus hoax doing the rounds (1 message)
Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality (8 messages)
Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality[Scanned] (3 messages)
Hotel keeping card details... (22 messages)
Hotel Reception (24 messages)
How do you search a large electronic data system without breaching confidentiality, human rights, etc? (2 messages)
HR Question (2 messages)
HSBC data secureity breach (4 messages)
HTML emails (1 message)
I thought no-one would ask about the survey! (5 messages)
I've forgotten someone! (1 message)
IADIS Security and Privacy in Computing Systems 2006 Conference (1 message)
ICO Data Protection Annual Report (7 messages)
ICO Guidance note on 3rd country data transfer (2 messages)
ICO November 2005 conference papers (1 message)
ICO Report (2 messages)
ID Card, Privacy, FoI etc (2 messages)
ID Cards (2 messages)
ID Theft and planning information (3 messages)
Identity Checks over the telephone (4 messages)
identity management and e-portfolios event (1 message)
Impact of DPA on research collections (3 messages)
Impersonating the tax man! (3 messages)
In Vehicle Monitoring (4 messages)
Inadvertent disclosure (7 messages)
Incorrect use of the DPA 29(3) (8 messages)
Information Commissioner criticised for FOIA implementation (1 message)
Information Disclosure to Assessors (ERO) (12 messages)
Information Governance Job profiles - thank you! (1 message)
Information Law Newsletter (2 messages)
Information leaflet for staff re: possible uses of their information (2 messages)
Information Management Strategy (1 message)
Information Manager vacancy, Bristol (1 message)
Information Request (4 messages)
Information Sharing Index (5 messages)
Information Sharing Index (= Children's ID Database) (3 messages)
Inheriting a problem (2 messages)
Insurance (2 messages)
Insurance Enquiry (1 message)
Interest (2 messages)
International Data Transfers Briefing (1 message)
Internet Monitoring. (3 messages)
Interview Questions (12 messages)
Iraq War - Commissioner issues Enforcement Notice against Attorney General (1 message)
It's still summer (1 message)
itsmypost.com (8 messages)
itsmypost.com continued (2 messages)
Job opportunity at Leicestershire County Council (1 message)
Job opportunity in the north east of England (1 message)
Job profiles - a personal enquiry (2 messages)
Job Vacancy - Information Management Officer (1 message)
Joint controllers (13 messages)
Joint Controllers - sorry!! (1 message)
Keeping kids safe or a site for vigilantes? (3 messages)
Lack of Privacy of Mail (5 messages)
Latest Podcast (1 message)
Letter in newspaper regarding suggested access to medical records of Gordon Brown's baby son (1 message)
Letter of complaint and DP (19 messages)
Letters of objection (4 messages)
Letters of objection[Scanned] (17 messages)
List 99 and teachers (5 messages)
List management stuff (1 message)
List management things (16 messages)
List management things[Scanned] (2 messages)
List Monitoring (5 messages)
List Monitoring[Scanned] (1 message)
List Netiquette (6 messages)
List Shrinkage (9 messages)
List Shrinkage[Scanned] (2 messages)
Local authority Access to Health Records of deceased (3 messages)
Log Books and CSCI Inspections (14 messages)
Looking for a new Mail List Administrator (6 messages)
Looking for blogs on Data Protection (1 message)
Medical Records - deletion (9 messages)
Medical records/reports (6 messages)
Merry Christmas (Kala Hristouyenna) From Crete (1 message)
Metropolitan Police - phone tapping (3 messages)
Mis-directed DPA/FoIA requests (was RE: "Pl ease may I speak to your Privacy Officer?") (3 messages)
Mis-directed DPA/FoIA requests (was RE: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?") (1 message)
Misdirected DPA/FoIA requests (7 messages)
Missing Payslips (20 messages)
Monitoring emails (1 message)
Monitoring for Swear words (27 messages)
more unauthorised use of personal data? - lookups on the 4busearch dweb site (6 messages)
MSc in Healthcare Information Governance at the University of Bath (1 message)
MySpace and DPA (2 messages)
Naming & Shaming, and the Data Protection A ct. (3 messages)
Naming & Shaming, and the Data Protection Act. (1 message)
National Fraud Initiative 2006/07 (3 messages)
National Identity Fraud Week (5 messages)
Network Rail Stolen Identities (3 messages)
New Employee Fair Processing Notice (1 message)
New ICO Durant guidance (1 message)
New Passports and Security (1 message)
New Podcast (1 message)
New Survey Notice [DATA-PROTECTION] (5 messages)
NEW: Autumn 2006 Information Law Training Courses (1 message)
Newsletter (1 message)
NFI Creditors Data matching (3 messages)
NHS Connecting for Health (1 message)
NHS Electronic Staff Record - Opting out? (9 messages)
NHS Trust sharing information with Social Services (thank you) (3 messages)
NHS Trust sharing information with Social Services - explicit consent? (12 messages)
NHS Trust sharing information with Social Services -explicit consent? (1 message)
NOMAIL (1 message)
Northumbria Information Rights Conference, 30th June 2006 (1 message)
Not Friday (3 messages)
Not Friday! (3 messages)
Notification (1 message)
Notification and subsidiaries (2 messages)
Notification renewals (7 messages)
NPF (2 messages)
Nursing students' absence records (15 messages)
Obtaining Birth Certificates of Employees' Children (11 messages)
Offence for destruction, etc of personal data in order to frustra te a subject access request (2 messages)
OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations (14 messages)
Online Identity Protection (2 messages)
Online selection of medics (1 message)
Opt out lists (5 messages)
Orange Mobile/Broadband Services (6 messages)
Order from the ICO (9 messages)
Our glorious leader (2 messages)
Panorama - Tonight. the NHS and forced sale of property (1 message)
Part-time Assistant Records Manager vacancy in Edinburgh (1 message)
patient records (2 messages)
Penalties for DP offences - Consultation (9 messages)
Permits for Recycling centres data protection issues. (1 message)
Personal data found in skips (4 messages)
Personal data held in US (5 messages)
Personal Data in FOIA? (3 messages)
Personal details on a Lottery Application (2 messages)
Personal email addresses are personal data. (5 messages)
Personal surveillance data (8 messages)
Peter Dinsdale is out of the office (1 message)
petitions (4 messages)
Phot Image consent (20 messages)
Phot Image consent - Congratualtions (1 message)
Photocopying fees (1 message)
Photographs and DPA/Human Rights (32 messages)
Photos as personal information (15 messages)
Photos of a property (10 messages)
Planning Fees (5 messages)
Planning Objections (5 messages)
Please help a brain failed man! (7 messages)
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS LIST (1 message)
Podcast (1 message)
Police National Index (3 messages)
Police request for details (3 messages)
Possible Housing benefit fraud (4 messages)
Postgraduate Qualification in Information Rights Law and Practice (2 messages)
Posting a message by Proxy (11 messages)
Posts out of Sync... (1 message)
Principle 7 justifications (1 message)
Prison Sentence for Data Crime (1 message)
Privacy and confidentiality v uncontrolled terrorism investigation (1 message)
Privacy law(s) in the Philippines (2 messages)
Privacy of Emails / Telephone calls etc (8 messages)
Privacy trader must be jailed - Information Commissioner (2 messages)
Privacy, Guantanomo Bay and the Right to Know (1 message)
Private Eye Data Protection cartoon (20 messages)
Prohibition of destruction with intent to c onceal (2 messages)
Prohibition of destruction with intent to conceal (5 messages)
Pseudonyms and FOI requests (5 messages)
Public authorities in Northern Ireland have been told the Data Protection Act is not a barrier to monitoring for equal opportunities (news item) (4 messages)
Public Holidays (6 messages)
Public Sector Fraud Investigations (2 messages)
Pump and Dump - the SEC's preferred "solution" (3 messages)
Question for HEIs re confirmation of Awards (23 messages)
Question for LA's (7 messages)
Question for LA's - thankyou! (1 message)
Question on a reference (4 messages)
Question on a reference[Scanned] (6 messages)
Quotes (2 messages)
re Duty to Disclose? (4 messages)
reading e-mail in HTML (1 message)
reading e-mail in HTML (was: List management things) (2 messages)
Recall: Set * nomail (1 message)
Recording passengers on planes (7 messages)
Records management trainee vacancy at University of Edinburgh (1 message)
Records Management Workshop (1 message)
Records Management/Compliance Job at Surrey (1 message)
Records Manager - Job Vacancy at JISC infoNet (1 message)
Records Manager Vacancy (1 message)
redaction complaint (2 messages)
Release of personal data by a judge (8 messages)
Relevant Filing Systems and unfair processing (1 message)
Request for advice - DPA vs Gender Recognit ion Act (3 messages)
Request for advice - DPA vs Gender Recognition Act (6 messages)
Request for help (2 messages)
Requirement by Council of a Utility Bill (Original) to Register as an Elector (6 messages)
Retention (2 messages)
Retention Dates (5 messages)
Retention Guidelines (5 messages)
Retention of Childrens Files (1 message)
Retention period for subject access requests (4 messages)
Retention periods (16 messages)
Revised Code of Practice (1 message)
RFID getting closer! (2 messages)
RIPA: Accessing Communications Data (1 message)
Roll on 2007 (2 messages)
S10 Notices and Rights (1 message)
S35(1) and 'Court' (3 messages)
Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill (1 message)
SAR - Email (3 messages)
SAR - Material kept at home (5 messages)
SAR advice (4 messages)
SAR from manager to member of staff (5 messages)
SAR ID Verification (11 messages)
SARs and children (7 messages)
School Exam Marks - Access by Schools Pupils/Parents (4 messages)
Scores from interview panels (12 messages)
Section (29) (5 messages)
Section 29(3) (14 messages)
Security and High Street Banks (again) (3 messages)
Sensitive Personal Data (18 messages)
SET * CONCEAL (2 messages)
SET CONCEAL (2 messages)
Sex Offenders (5 messages)
Sex offenders register row (2 messages)
Shared data and SARs (2 messages)
Sharing data (7 messages)
Shelagh Gaskill (2 messages)
Sign up instructions (1 message)
Simon re: Complimentary health patient records (1 message)
Simon re: Employee SAR (2 messages)
Since my head is over the parapet already.... (1 message)
SMS, SPAM, PECR, EEA, ETC (1 message)
SMS, Tom Baker, and 2002/58/EC (1 message)
snippet on USA and "pretexting" (4 messages)
Sole traders and Limited Companies (6 messages)
Some active list management (3 messages)
Sorry (1 message)
Status of volunteer staff (11 messages)
Statute Law Database = Consolidated legisl ative updates - was " Changes to DPA 98" (2 messages)
Statute Law Database = Consolidated legislative updates - was " Changes to DPA 98" (2 messages)
Statutory Declarations (4 messages)
storage and back up of data when working on mobile devises (1 message)
Student Data Information available to all Staff (3 messages)
Student support and counselling (2 messages)
Subject access inspection of records (6 messages)
Subject Access Request - Social Work Files (8 messages)
Summer and set * NOMAIL (1 message)
Summer is upon us - "Set * NOMAIL" (1 message)
Survey (2 messages)
Survey Experiment on Monday (4 messages)
Survey Progress (4 messages)
Survey Results Notice [DATA-PROTECTION] (8 messages)
Surveys in general (5 messages)
Surveys in general[Scanned] (5 messages)
Swift and data Privacy (1 message)
Tape Recording (6 messages)
Telegraph article (9 messages)
Telemarketing (1 message)
Telephone Conversations was Re: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Using & Re-using phot o's. (1 message)
test (1 message)
Thank you and fare thee well (1 message)
That B4U enforcement notice (9 messages)
That NHS Database..... (3 messages)
That NHS IT thing (2 messages)
That Spam Court case (1 message)
The CNIL now wears SOX (1 message)
The Cost of Non-Compliance (12 messages)
The Data Protection Intensive 2006: (1 message)
The Fake Sheikh and the Right to Anonymity (1 message)
The Legal Risks of Wi-Fi (1 message)
The Northumbria Information Rights Conference: Rising to the Chal lenge, 30th June 2006 (1 message)
The obligations about unstructured personal data (3 messages)
The other Blair (16 messages)
The survey (1 message)
The survey - Progress report (19 messages)
The UK Child Database is under fire (1 message)
Thinkuknow.co.uk which "promotes safety for children online" - confusion of name with other "adult" (?) site (5 messages)
This lights are on... (1 message)
Tim Rodgers/EXEC/LBTH is out of the office. (8 messages)
To Notify or Not to Notify, That is the que stion (2 messages)
To Notify or Not to Notify, That is the question (18 messages)
Top or Bottom posting (5 messages)
Top or bottom posting was Re: Email quarantine systems (5 messages)
Toucan Telecom (3 messages)
TPS Q & A (1 message)
Trade union stewards (4 messages)
training (5 messages)
Training DVD (1 message)
Training materials (6 messages)
Trawling for data (6 messages)
Trawling for data (or was it something else, who knows?) (1 message)
UC RE: [data-protection] 10 fee for SA R (1 message)
UCISA Information Security Toolkit (1 message)
UKIC and requiring timely compliance with PECR (6 messages)
UKIC's Website about to change (4 messages)
Union Information (9 messages)
University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study (10 messages)
University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study: Win £300 (1 message)
unsubscribe data-protection (1 message)
unsubsribe (1 message)
Update data protection sessions - London, Glasgow, Manchester (1 message)
US Government and Data Retention. (13 messages)
Us, here, and revealing our email details (1 message)
Us, here, and revealing our email details + Survey (1 message)
USA is pushing EEA to change Data Transfer Rules (2 messages)
Use of Business Rates Information (6 messages)
Use of Business Rates Information[Scanned] (2 messages)
Use of Council Tax Information (5 messages)
Use of Photos in Publicity Leaflet (9 messages)
User Commands and Control of Lists (1 message)
Using & Re-using photo's. (14 messages)
Using live data for test purposes (5 messages)
Using tinyurl to conceal websites (1 message)
various "Apologies for cross postings" (1 message)
Vehicle Tax search (Not quite BT SMS) (13 messages)
Verification of requestor identity - subjec t access (1 message)
Verification of requestor identity - subject access (18 messages)
Verifying Requests for Personal Data - What 's Reasonable. (3 messages)
Verifying Requests for Personal Data - What's Reasonable. (8 messages)
Vexatious and repetitious, but when and for how long? (1 message)
Violent warning markers (again) (2 messages)
Wanting our cake and eating it.... (17 messages)
Web monitoring and confidentiality (3 messages)
When is Market Research not Marketing??? (9 messages)
Who has legal ownership of the posts on webbased forums? (5 messages)
Who pays for elected member notification? (9 messages)
Withholding of Marks (24 messages)
Workshop event - Building a Business Case f or Information Compliance (10 messages)
Workshop event - Building a Business Case for Information Compliance (4 messages)
World E-Gov Forum 18-20 October 2006 Paris (1 message)
Wow. A prosecution! (4 messages)
Xmas Holidays (19 messages)
You're not going to believe this (26 messages)
[data protection] Interdepartmental use of personal information (1 message)
[SPAM] "Free Sex tests" (1 message)
[UCE] Re: [data-protection] Use of Business Rates Information[Scanned] (5 messages)
{SPAM] IADIS Security and Privacy in Computing Systems 2006 Conference (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

£10 fee for SAR

£10 fee for SAR

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:24:36 +0100

46 lines

Re: £10 fee for SAR

Mary Liddell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:40:24 +0100

90 lines

Re: £10 fee for SAR

Gerry Dane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:11:25 +0100

83 lines

Re: £10 fee for SAR

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:16:54 +0100

130 lines

Re: £10 fee for SAR

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:26:44 +0100

99 lines

Re: £10 fee for SAR

Samantha Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:12:48 +0100

39 lines

Re: £10 fee for SAR

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:33:52 +0100

96 lines

New Thread

"Child database 'invades privacy'"

"Child database 'invades privacy'"

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Jul 2006 16:14:06 +0100

73 lines

New Thread

"Computer fraudbusters go online" (news item HSJ Online)

"Computer fraudbusters go online" (news item HSJ Online)

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:27:45 -0000

41 lines

New Thread

"Data proposal prompts legal warning" (25.8.06) (Government Computing)

"Data proposal prompts legal warning" (25.8.06) (Government Computing)

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:20:34 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

"Hoax" Viruses

"Hoax" Viruses

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 10:55:09 -0000

74 lines

New Thread

"Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer ?"

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer ?"

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:00:20 -0000

414 lines

New Thread

"Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

"Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:55:57 -0000

112 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:58:46 -0000

180 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:10:57 -0000

258 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:12:42 -0000

280 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:23:07 -0000

352 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:35:00 -0000

388 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Yuill, Allan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:16:04 -0000

283 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Edwina Withe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:29:22 +0000

450 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:28:12 -0000

346 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:48:38 -0000

411 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:12:59 -0000

360 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:33:58 -0000

463 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:17:07 -0000

509 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

HOWLETT Sue L <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:44:20 -0000

462 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

David Wyatt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:14:37 -0000

382 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:39:06 -0000

462 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:07:04 -0000

742 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

David Wyatt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 01:10:11 -0000

136 lines

Re: "Please may I speak to your Privacy Officer?"

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:05:12 -0000

513 lines

New Thread

"Review recommends new ID measures" (news item)

"Review recommends new ID measures" (news item)

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:28:13 -0000

38 lines

Re: "Review recommends new ID measures" (news item)

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:42:18 -0000

96 lines

Re: "Review recommends new ID measures" (news item)

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:21:37 -0000

130 lines

Re: "Review recommends new ID measures" (news item)

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:30:38 -0000

170 lines

Re: "Review recommends new ID measures" (news item)

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:52:00 -0000

209 lines

New Thread

"Switch in to Data Protection" - did we miss this?

"Switch in to Data Protection" - did we miss this?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:59:42 -0000

85 lines

Re: "Switch in to Data Protection" - did we miss this?

Christopher Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:56:31 -0000

119 lines

New Thread

"Unauthorised" access by repairer to computer datasets

"Unauthorised" access by repairer to computer datasets

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:37:22 +0100

59 lines

Re: "Unauthorised" access by repairer to computer datasets

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:03:12 +0100

95 lines

New Thread

"Unauthorised" access to "public" website

"Unauthorised" access to "public" website

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:17:46 -0000

55 lines

Re: "Unauthorised" access to "public" website

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:01:46 -0000

101 lines

New Thread

02

02

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:49:02 +0000

69 lines

Re: 02

Simon Howarth (WSL) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:23:54 -0000

135 lines

Re: 02

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:16:54 +0000

289 lines

Re: 02

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:59:05 -0000

347 lines

Re: 02

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:24:32 +0000

404 lines

Re: 02

Duncan Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:18:11 -0000

498 lines

New Thread

192.com

192.com

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:17:09 +0100

73 lines

New Thread

192.com - "The NEW 2006 Electoral Roll is n ow LIVE"

Re: 192.com - "The NEW 2006 Electoral Roll is n ow LIVE"

Chell, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:51:05 -0000

186 lines

Re: 192.com - "The NEW 2006 Electoral Roll is n ow LIVE"

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:08:12 -0000

144 lines

Re: 192.com - "The NEW 2006 Electoral Roll is n ow LIVE"

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:54:20 -0000

294 lines

New Thread

192.com - "The NEW 2006 Electoral Roll is now LIVE"

192.com - "The NEW 2006 Electoral Roll is now LIVE"

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:27:28 -0000

106 lines

New Thread

2nd Annual Freedom of Information Conference & Workshop Series

2nd Annual Freedom of Information Conference & Workshop Series

Lisa Souza <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:01:53 -0000

60 lines

New Thread

3rd Annual FOI Conference

3rd Annual FOI Conference

Ayaz Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:06:33 +0100

54 lines

Re: 3rd Annual FOI Conference

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:30:20 +0100

96 lines

Re: 3rd Annual FOI Conference

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:42:28 +0100

42 lines

Re: 3rd Annual FOI Conference

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:58:04 +0100

91 lines

New Thread

3RD ANNUAL FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CONFERENCE : Two Years On

3RD ANNUAL FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CONFERENCE : Two Years On

Ayaz Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:11:48 +0100

42 lines

Re: 3RD ANNUAL FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CONFERENCE : Two Years On

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:36:17 +0100

82 lines

Re: 3RD ANNUAL FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CONFERENCE : Two Years On

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:03:08 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

5th Annual Data Protection Compliance Conference - 27th & 28th September - LONDON

5th Annual Data Protection Compliance Conference - 27th & 28th September - LONDON

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:24:43 +0100

195 lines

5th Annual Data Protection Compliance Conference - 27th & 28th September - LONDON

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:26:53 +0100

193 lines

5th Annual Data Protection Compliance Conference - 27th & 28th September - LONDON

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:54:20 +0100

197 lines

New Thread

5th Annual Data Protection Conference

5th Annual Data Protection Conference

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:09:40 +0100

153 lines

New Thread

A Friday Question?

A Friday Question?

Cathy Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:03:56 +0100

68 lines

Re: A Friday Question?

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:50:25 +0100

110 lines

Re: A Friday Question?

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:33:02 +0100

148 lines

New Thread

A list of UK computer recyclers and refurbishers

A list of UK computer recyclers and refurbishers

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:41:11 -0000

54 lines

New Thread

Absence records

Absence records

Tait, Jamie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:08:10 -0000

63 lines

New Thread

Access to CCTV Control Rooms

Access to CCTV Control Rooms

Julie Bentley (ICTS) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 12:16:55 +0100

131 lines

New Thread

Act Now Training - 3rd Annual FOI Conference

Act Now Training - 3rd Annual FOI Conference

Ayaz Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:39:48 +0100

39 lines

Act Now Training - 3rd Annual FOI Conference

Ayaz Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:49:51 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

ADV - DP Courses

ADV - DP Courses

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Apr 2006 15:46:54 +0100

85 lines

New Thread

Adv- Act Now February and March Courses

Adv- Act Now February and March Courses

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:30:53 -0000

55 lines

New Thread

advice needed

advice needed

Diane Tye <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 15:48:47 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Advice on location of FOI and DP activities within an organisation

Advice on location of FOI and DP activities within an organisation

Kathryn Billings <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:20:19 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

All-day update sessions in data protection

All-day update sessions in data protection

Pounder Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:04:16 -0000

77 lines

Re: All-day update sessions in data protection

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:07:20 -0000

101 lines

New Thread

Amendment of Notification

Amendment of Notification

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:54:08 +0100

48 lines

Re: Amendment of Notification

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:26:50 +0100

113 lines

Re: Amendment of Notification

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:48:26 +0100

102 lines

New Thread

Amendment to DPA discussed in House of Lords re:-paedophiles

Amendment to DPA discussed in House of Lords re:-paedophiles

Aston Information Security <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:17:13 +0100

278 lines

Re: Amendment to DPA discussed in House of Lords re:-paedophiles

Leesons Jackie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:23:10 +0100

324 lines

Re: Amendment to DPA discussed in House of Lords re:-paedophiles

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:04:24 +0100

313 lines

New Thread

Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Graeme Hawley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 10:56:07 +0100

60 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 11:03:14 +0100

142 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

George Ross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 11:20:04 +0100

42 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 11:24:26 +0100

106 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

David Fildes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 11:28:42 +0100

96 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 12:06:08 +0100

97 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 12:39:35 +0100

114 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 12:43:33 +0100

112 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 12:51:35 +0100

151 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 13:07:53 +0100

156 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 13:19:08 +0100

40 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 13:55:03 +0100

343 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 14:08:32 +0100

375 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 14:12:27 +0100

556 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

David Fildes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 14:13:04 +0100

99 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 14:16:10 +0100

190 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 14:32:41 +0100

42 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 14:46:02 +0100

87 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 14:52:57 +0100

71 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 15:00:34 +0100

455 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Hawley, Graeme <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 15:09:03 +0100

729 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 15:17:10 +0100

635 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 15:56:37 +0100

591 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 16:56:29 +0100

48 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Hawley, Graeme <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:14:01 +0100

466 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:27:35 +0100

354 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:25:41 +0100

313 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:59:53 +0100

365 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:49:28 +0100

341 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:25:39 +0100

519 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:43:44 +0100

393 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:37:54 +0100

401 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:39:26 +0100

433 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:43:50 +0100

503 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

David Fildes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:06:18 +0100

497 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:22:25 +0100

50 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:01:45 +0100

28 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:21:45 +0100

64 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:47:18 +0100

34 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:05:08 +0100

65 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:22:01 +0100

74 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:59:10 +0100

73 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:35:52 +0100

88 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:41:24 +0100

36 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:47:23 +0100

39 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:40:57 +0100

44 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:30:02 +0100

105 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Ken Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:56:01 +0100

53 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:42:27 +0100

104 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Wilson, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:59:24 +0100

225 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Hawley, Graeme <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:24:12 +0100

68 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:23:40 +0100

118 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:15:37 +0100

91 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:07:50 +0100

149 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:19:06 +0100

159 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:17:39 +0100

78 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:30:35 +0100

109 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:14:06 +0100

104 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:40:35 +0100

36 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:45:20 +0100

80 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:31:50 +0100

77 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:02:32 +0100

107 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Jul 2006 11:50:48 +0100

119 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Jul 2006 17:40:19 +0100

64 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Jul 2006 11:12:16 +0100

136 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Jul 2006 15:39:32 +0100

59 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Jul 2006 19:37:17 +0100

37 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Jul 2006 09:45:38 +0100

53 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Jul 2006 08:55:15 +0100

113 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:02:51 +0100

51 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:40:32 +0100

101 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:38:28 +0100

159 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:54:12 +0100

101 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:16:35 +0100

139 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your own organisation

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:11:33 +0100

84 lines

New Thread

Anonymity when making FOI requests of your ownorganisation

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your ownorganisation

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 11:40:40 +0100

175 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your ownorganisation

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 12:07:07 +0100

308 lines

Re: Anonymity when making FOI requests of your ownorganisation

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 12:23:34 +0100

282 lines

New Thread

Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

David Wyatt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:01:37 -0000

65 lines

Re: Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:10:22 -0000

127 lines

Re: Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:33:34 -0000

213 lines

Re: Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:36:38 -0000

278 lines

Re: Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:43:10 -0000

337 lines

Re: Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:12:01 +0000

83 lines

Re: Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:16:48 +0000

84 lines

Re: Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Duncan Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:43:25 -0000

70 lines

Re: Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:34:07 -0000

93 lines

Re: Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:36:16 -0000

98 lines

Re: Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:48:17 -0000

126 lines

Re: Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:32:03 +0000

90 lines

Re: Another article of interest to Human Rights / Privacy Practitioners

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:30:57 -0000

210 lines

New Thread

Another TV item.

Another TV item.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:18:04 -0000

87 lines

New Thread

Are we bored with Durant yet?

Are we bored with Durant yet?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:34:13 -0000

103 lines

New Thread

arrests under RIPA 2000

arrests under RIPA 2000

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 16:15:48 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

Article 29 Working Parties Eighth Annual Report

Article 29 Working Parties Eighth Annual Report

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:52:23 -0000

70 lines

New Thread

Article 29 WP - Whistleblowing and SOX

Article 29 WP - Whistleblowing and SOX

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:48:12 -0000

73 lines

New Thread

Article 29 WP work programme

Article 29 WP work programme

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:26:03 +0100

70 lines

New Thread

Article in Telegraph about Private Investigator obtaining Personal Information

Article in Telegraph about Private Investigator obtaining Personal Information

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:43:53 -0000

51 lines

New Thread

As we move inexorably towards Friday....

As we move inexorably towards Friday....

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:09:04 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

Assistant records manager vacancy at the University of Edinburgh

Assistant records manager vacancy at the University of Edinburgh

GRAHAM Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:15:39 -0000

50 lines

New Thread

Audit & Legal view of the DPA - London courses

Audit & Legal view of the DPA - London courses

Pounder Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 14:55:57 +0100

102 lines

New Thread

Australians get tough on Spam

Australians get tough on Spam

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:46:47 -0000

64 lines

Re: Australians get tough on Spam

Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:17:57 -0000

122 lines

Re: Australians get tough on Spam

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:22:27 -0000

145 lines

Re: Australians get tough on Spam

Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:32:39 -0000

189 lines

Re: Australians get tough on Spam

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:35:29 -0000

35 lines

Re: Australians get tough on Spam

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:50:12 +0000

39 lines

Re: Australians get tough on Spam

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:57:48 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

Award Ceremonies and the Data Protection Act

Award Ceremonies and the Data Protection Act

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:36:18 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

B4U search website

B4U search website

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:05:29 +0100

41 lines

Re: B4U search website

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:16:17 +0100

65 lines

Re: B4U search website

Michael DOHERTY PSE 53852 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:37:36 +0100

93 lines

Re: B4U search website

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jul 2006 17:06:12 +0100

135 lines

New Thread

B4U's enforcement date

B4U's enforcement date

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:11:00 +0100

57 lines

Re: B4U's enforcement date

Phil Ogden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:20:57 +0100

108 lines

New Thread

b4usearch, tracesmart and eroll

b4usearch, tracesmart and eroll

Alison Aiton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:58:28 +0100

126 lines

Re: b4usearch, tracesmart and eroll

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:28:20 +0100

191 lines

Re: b4usearch, tracesmart and eroll

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:33:37 +0100

161 lines

New Thread

Bad Debt

Bad Debt

Gerry Dane <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 14:16:40 -0000

76 lines

Re: Bad Debt

Edwina Withe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 14:30:58 +0000

144 lines

Re: Bad Debt

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:29:11 -0000

240 lines

New Thread

Bank probed by ICO

Bank probed by ICO

Aston Information Security <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:59:49 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Bank security by phone

Re: Bank security by phone

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:17:05 +0100

193 lines

New Thread

Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:04:48 -0000

61 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:17:32 -0000

85 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:19:16 +0000

39 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:07:56 -0000

71 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:54:22 -0000

130 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:02:05 +0000

52 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:30:06 -0000

141 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:43:17 -0000

165 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:45:31 -0000

141 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:51:57 +0000

45 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:33:56 -0000

101 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:49:00 -0000

91 lines

New Thread

BBC News

BBC News

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:46:43 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

BBC Radio 4 You and Yours Item on Identity Fraud

BBC Radio 4 You and Yours Item on Identity Fraud

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:47:58 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Best practice handling of SARs

Best practice handling of SARs

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:39:06 +0100

69 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Martin Hoskins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:57:04 +0100

120 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:12:55 +0100

193 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:26:36 +0100

165 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:37:51 +0100

47 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:41:05 +0100

309 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:47:01 +0100

109 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:58:03 +0100

128 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:27:51 +0100

36 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:31:07 +0100

60 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:19:49 +0100

111 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:38:07 +0100

65 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:24:45 +0100

126 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:22:41 +0100

132 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:15:04 +0100

105 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:38:22 +0100

184 lines

Re: Best practice handling of SARs

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:44:35 +0100

219 lines

New Thread

Better compliance anyone?

Better compliance anyone?

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:04:29 -0000

46 lines

Better compliance anyone?

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:05:07 -0000

46 lines

New Thread

Bin Laden: Privacy, Guantanomo Bay and the Right to Know

Bin Laden: Privacy, Guantanomo Bay and the Right to Know

Pounder Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:32:29 -0000

178 lines

New Thread

Blagger

Blagger

Casillas, Mojgan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:48:15 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Blogs

Blogs

Talbot Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2006 15:43:23 +0100

104 lines

Re: Blogs

Gibson, Martin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2006 15:46:47 +0100

189 lines

Re: Blogs

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 12:57:32 +0100

208 lines

New Thread

Breaking down DPA Barriers to Information Sharing - Truth or Dare?

Breaking down DPA Barriers to Information Sharing - Truth or Dare?

Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:45:36 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

BT billing update

BT billing update

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Apr 2006 15:39:07 +0100

62 lines

Re: BT billing update

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:37:22 +0100

135 lines

Re: BT billing update

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:39:44 +0100

70 lines

Re: BT billing update

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:43:24 +0100

131 lines

New Thread

BT DPA Notification

BT DPA Notification

Yuill, Allan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:07:39 -0000

85 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:13:03 -0000

172 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:13:58 -0000

147 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:16:58 -0000

208 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:18:24 +0000

69 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:19:38 -0000

129 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:27:50 -0000

79 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Yuill, Allan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:32:39 -0000

75 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Yuill, Allan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:32:39 -0000

77 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:35:52 +0000

77 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:36:47 +0000

69 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:38:22 +0000

67 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:41:54 -0000

140 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:47:29 -0000

140 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Yuill, Allan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:48:08 -0000

204 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:48:54 -0000

172 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:52:31 -0000

65 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:51:52 -0000

138 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:59:53 -0000

235 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Paula Owen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:03:23 -0000

327 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:07:56 -0000

293 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:10:38 -0000

354 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:22:31 -0000

143 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:28:56 +0000

73 lines

Re: BT DPA Notification

Kevin Berwick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:20:51 +0000

512 lines

New Thread

BT notification

BT notification

John Hughes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:44:38 -0000

80 lines

Re: BT notification

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:33:17 +0000

74 lines

Re: BT notification

Mary Liddell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:36:32 -0000

92 lines

New Thread

BT SMS

BT SMS

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:46:25 -0000

41 lines

New Thread

BT SMS Self Service

BT SMS Self Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:15:55 -0000

96 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:18:10 -0000

157 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:19:46 -0000

218 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:24:22 -0000

240 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Doug Colyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:32:49 -0000

322 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:33:06 -0000

365 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Doug Colyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:38:17 -0000

452 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:44:33 +0000

480 lines

BT SMS Self Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:01:06 -0000

98 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Andrea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:03:14 -0000

195 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:34:54 -0000

171 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:13:27 -0000

219 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:24:03 +0000

289 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0000

362 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:49:06 +0000

73 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:00:57 -0000

143 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:03:01 -0000

206 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:17:23 +0000

78 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:29:25 -0000

159 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:05:48 -0000

155 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Martin Hoskins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:16:28 -0000

252 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:13:53 -0000

234 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:24:20 -0000

307 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:38:58 -0000

260 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:19:28 -0000

276 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:34:21 -0000

343 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:55:38 -0000

324 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:13:36 -0000

311 lines

Re: BT SMS Self Service

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:21:29 -0000

417 lines

New Thread

BT SMS Self Service Update

BT SMS Self Service Update

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:28:54 +0100

114 lines

New Thread

BT SMS service

BT SMS service

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:53:22 +0000

42 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:00:33 -0000

66 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:04:09 -0000

73 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:08:10 -0000

98 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:13:27 +0000

44 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:12:15 -0000

96 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Doug Colyer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:29:41 -0000

108 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:31:24 -0000

91 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:15:16 -0000

59 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:45:41 -0000

145 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:53:23 -0000

141 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:05:07 -0000

135 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:34:07 -0000

172 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:51:31 +0000

53 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:53:51 -0000

86 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 21:23:55 +0000

42 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 21:52:34 -0000

65 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Martin Hoskins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 00:26:10 -0000

227 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 07:05:37 +0000

76 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 07:30:40 -0000

270 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:14:02 -0000

331 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:07:44 +0000

369 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:13:01 -0000

409 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:25:34 -0000

445 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:55:41 -0000

483 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:25:30 -0000

517 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:29:11 -0000

544 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Carter, Antoinette (KIS) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:52:32 -0000

903 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:58:27 -0000

631 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:15:53 -0000

652 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:59:14 -0000

540 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Michael DOHERTY PSE 53852 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:01:37 +0000

702 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:02:31 -0000

568 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:06:55 -0000

677 lines

Re: BT SMS service

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:41:31 +0000

798 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Yuill, Allan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:08:39 -0000

932 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:16:23 -0000

961 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:17:03 +0000

37 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:20:05 -0000

28 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:27:31 -0000

60 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:27:01 +0000

45 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:51:30 -0000

110 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:54:11 -0000

30 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:55:50 -0000

81 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:59:00 -0000

149 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:07:36 +0000

37 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:09:40 -0000

189 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:14:36 -0000

225 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Karen Waite <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:06:53 +0000

73 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:21:51 -0000

101 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:23:00 -0000

107 lines

Re: BT SMS service

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:25:44 +0000

135 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:28:29 -0000

129 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:32:59 -0000

127 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:36:08 -0000

152 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:52:43 -0000

190 lines

BT SMS Service

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:35:43 +0000

29 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:55:19 -0000

59 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:56:25 -0000

31 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:57:40 -0000

213 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Karen Waite <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:56:32 +0000

253 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:08:05 -0000

793 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:11:31 -0000

669 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:02:13 -0000

52 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:26:39 -0000

78 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:41:10 +0000

34 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:44:14 -0000

37 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:47:59 +0000

33 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:53:45 -0000

57 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:57:18 -0000

45 lines

Re: BT SMS service

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:21:40 -0000

963 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:04:38 +0000

68 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Paul Ferguson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:08:25 +0000

63 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:53:03 +0000

42 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:16:31 -0000

72 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:49:55 -0000

135 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:01:08 -0000

35 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Wilson, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:06:16 -0000

117 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:13:20 -0000

125 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:19:44 -0000

77 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:28:20 -0000

74 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:29:59 +0000

36 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Feb 2006 17:20:13 -0000

67 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:26:30 -0000

55 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:22:32 -0000

58 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:35:05 -0000

100 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:46:00 +0000

34 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:55:57 -0000

58 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:05:31 -0000

141 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:16:15 +0000

30 lines

Re: BT SMS service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:18:36 -0000

56 lines

BT SMS Service

John Hawley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:36:25 -0000

31 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:49:17 -0000

57 lines

Re: BT SMS Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:43:35 -0000

69 lines

New Thread

BT Suspends SMS Trial

BT Suspends SMS Trial

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:11:46 -0000

76 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:18:15 -0000

109 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:31:14 +0000

47 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:35:37 -0000

75 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:41:51 -0000

91 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:52:36 -0000

115 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:55:01 -0000

120 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:11:12 -0000

136 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:14:37 -0000

159 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:16:08 -0000

142 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:42:21 +0000

62 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:48:54 -0000

107 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:17:20 -0000

153 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:41:35 +0000

34 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:59:33 +0000

130 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 09:51:54 -0000

77 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 10:12:58 -0000

105 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 10:42:50 -0000

136 lines

Re: BT Suspends SMS Trial

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 16:53:01 -0000

137 lines

New Thread

BT Text Message Delivery Service

BT Text Message Delivery Service

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:27:24 +0100

53 lines

Re: BT Text Message Delivery Service

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:59:35 +0100

51 lines

Re: BT Text Message Delivery Service

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:00:27 +0100

104 lines

Re: BT Text Message Delivery Service

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:07:10 +0100

77 lines

New Thread

Business case required

Business case required

Iain Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:36:32 +0000

89 lines

Business Case required

Iain Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:30:45 +0000

73 lines

New Thread

Call for Evidence: Dilemmas of Privacy and Surveillance

Call for Evidence: Dilemmas of Privacy and Surveillance

Pounder Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2006 14:44:02 +0100

99 lines

New Thread

Can DPA apply to public register? (arising from question on FoI list)

Can DPA apply to public register? (arising from question on FoI list)

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:40:42 -0000

32 lines

New Thread

CCTV used on TV programme

CCTV used on TV programme

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:12:24 -0000

51 lines

New Thread

CH4 Dispatches

CH4 Dispatches

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:59:38 +0100

39 lines

Re: CH4 Dispatches

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:03:03 +0100

82 lines

Re: CH4 Dispatches

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 14:05:23 +0100

106 lines

New Thread

change of address

change of address

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:22:41 +0100

67 lines

Re: change of address

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:43:05 +0100

168 lines

Re: change of address

Chris Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:22:34 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

Change of Address - Council Tax

Change of Address - Council Tax

Doug Colyer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:00:06 +0100

69 lines

Re: Change of Address - Council Tax

Iain Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:26:47 +0100

99 lines

Re: Change of Address - Council Tax

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:41:08 +0100

159 lines

Re: Change of Address - Council Tax

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:18:56 +0100

121 lines

Re: Change of Address - Council Tax

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:33:15 +0100

170 lines

New Thread

Changes to DPA 98

Changes to DPA 98

Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:44:21 -0000

208 lines

Re: Changes to DPA 98

Iain Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:50:42 +0000

111 lines

Re: Changes to DPA 98

Robert (Bob) Waixel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:38:25 +0000

275 lines

Re: Changes to DPA 98

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:40:32 -0000

427 lines

Re: Changes to DPA 98

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:32:40 -0000

123 lines

Re: Changes to DPA 98

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:35:37 -0000

49 lines

New Thread

chaps, please look at what you are doing

chaps, please look at what you are doing

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:36:55 -0000

240 lines

Re: chaps, please look at what you are doing

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:56:27 -0000

367 lines

Re: chaps, please look at what you are doing

Hitches, John F <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:35:50 -0000

419 lines

Re: chaps, please look at what you are doing

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:41:22 -0000

351 lines

New Thread

Charges for SARs

Charges for SARs

Graham Donelan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 14:43:05 +0100

47 lines

Re: Charges for SARs

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 14:54:01 +0100

109 lines

Re: Charges for SARs

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 14:52:29 +0100

99 lines

Re: Charges for SARs

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 15:07:53 +0100

166 lines

Re: Charges for SARs

David Fildes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 15:13:06 +0100

83 lines

Re: Charges for SARs

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 14:58:54 +0100

147 lines

Re: Charges for SARs

HOWLETT Sue L <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 15:22:29 +0100

86 lines

Re: Charges for SARs

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 16:26:23 +0100

129 lines

Re: Charges for SARs

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:09:27 +0100

176 lines

Re: Charges for SARs

Hitches, John F <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:31:46 +0100

32 lines

Re: Charges for SARs

Mary Liddell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jul 2006 13:10:02 +0100

83 lines

Re: Charges for SARs

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:41:22 +0100

182 lines

Re: Charges for SARs

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:16:58 +0100

215 lines

New Thread

Charges under DPA

Charges under DPA

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:59:39 +0100

70 lines

Re: Charges under DPA

Julie Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:12:59 +0100

117 lines

Re: Charges under DPA

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:17:21 +0100

152 lines

Re: Charges under DPA

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:54:40 +0100

129 lines

Re: Charges under DPA

Bownes David (CEX) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:23:06 +0100

78 lines

New Thread

Chasing a Sundry Debtor

Chasing a Sundry Debtor

Cotterill Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:16:41 +0100

69 lines

Chasing a Sundry Debtor

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:55:33 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

checking individual's identity

checking individual's identity

Christopher Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:44:14 +0100

70 lines

Re: checking individual's identity

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:44:15 +0100

130 lines

Re: checking individual's identity

Andrew Charlesworth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:01:11 +0100

224 lines

Re: checking individual's identity

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:29:37 +0100

340 lines

New Thread

Child Support Agency

Child Support Agency

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:16:01 +0100

31 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:03:28 +0100

84 lines

New Thread

Children and Young People Access to Files

Children and Young People Access to Files

Toby Davison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:25:04 +0100

62 lines

Re: Children and Young People Access to Files

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:09:41 +0100

110 lines

New Thread

Childrens files

Childrens files

Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:41:25 -0000

66 lines

Re: Childrens files

Neil Chadwick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:52:36 +0000

43 lines

Re: Childrens files

Toby Davison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:13:41 -0000

88 lines

Re: Childrens files

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:45:53 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

Christmas Holidays Plea

Christmas Holidays Plea

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:53:28 -0000

190 lines

New Thread

comedy moments

comedy moments

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:45:47 +0100

101 lines

New Thread

Commercial use of this List

Commercial use of this List

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:11:54 +0100

95 lines

Re: Commercial use of this List

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:17:13 +0100

192 lines

New Thread

Company names

Company names

Robert Mendonca <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 09:44:06 +0100

61 lines

Re: Company names

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 10:04:27 +0100

118 lines

Re: Company names

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 10:06:26 +0100

74 lines

Re: Company names

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 10:05:03 +0100

128 lines

Re: Company names

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 11:26:42 +0100

138 lines

Re: Company names

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 11:33:21 +0100

185 lines

Re: Company names

Maurice Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 14:19:23 +0100

182 lines

Re: Company names

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 20:39:35 +0100

130 lines

Re: Company names

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 20:56:33 +0100

166 lines

New Thread

Complaints, DP Statement

Complaints, DP Statement

Toby Davison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:47:37 -0000

102 lines

New Thread

Conducting an Information Audit

Conducting an Information Audit

Ayaz Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:55:12 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

Confidential Top-up Information Stored on Mobile Phone

Confidential Top-up Information Stored on Mobile Phone

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:15:33 -0000

34 lines

New Thread

Copies of Teacher's Notes

Copies of Teacher's Notes

Jane Corrin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:16:18 +0000

64 lines

Re: Copies of Teacher's Notes

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 13:30:36 -0000

163 lines

Re: Copies of Teacher's Notes

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:04:24 -0000

248 lines

Re: Copies of Teacher's Notes

Claire Bessant <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:14:14 -0000

338 lines

Re: Copies of Teacher's Notes

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:14:31 -0000

420 lines

Re: Copies of Teacher's Notes

Claire Bessant <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:25:26 -0000

515 lines

Re: Copies of Teacher's Notes

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:51:50 -0000

597 lines

Re: Copies of Teacher's Notes

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:57:00 -0000

560 lines

Re: Copies of Teacher's Notes

Simon Howarth (RGC) Interim Information Governance Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:48:11 -0000

586 lines

Re: Copies of Teacher's Notes

Edwina Withe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 17:04:05 +0000

533 lines

Re: Copies of Teacher's Notes

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 08:50:17 -0000

693 lines

New Thread

Coroner's Courts

Coroner's Courts

Ken Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:01:16 +0000

26 lines

Re: Coroner's Courts

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:58:13 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

Cost of photocopying

Cost of photocopying

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:10:27 +0100

30 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Anne Gadsden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 10:34:33 +0100

131 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 10:50:33 +0100

57 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 10:55:14 +0100

80 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 11:05:16 +0100

96 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 11:22:12 +0100

116 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 11:22:49 +0100

148 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 11:06:33 +0100

123 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 11:48:05 +0100

197 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Humphrey, Barry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 11:32:43 +0100

28 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 11:50:03 +0100

211 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:02:09 +0100

234 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:13:03 +0100

45 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Tim Salmon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:04:13 +0100

201 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:10:11 +0100

264 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:32:28 +0100

345 lines

Re: Cost of photocopying

J.S.M.Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:39:08 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Council Tax & Empty Homes

Council Tax & Empty Homes

Edwina Withe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:54:27 +0000

37 lines

Re: Council Tax & Empty Homes

Gillian Whichelo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:07:37 -0000

78 lines

Re: Council Tax & Empty Homes

Leoni, Rudi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:04:27 -0000

116 lines

Re: Council Tax & Empty Homes

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:50:52 -0000

95 lines

Re: Council Tax & Empty Homes

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:53:44 -0000

133 lines

New Thread

Council Tax - Empty Homes Initiative

Council Tax - Empty Homes Initiative

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:03:51 +0100

53 lines

Re: Council Tax - Empty Homes Initiative

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:57:34 +0100

114 lines

Re: Council Tax - Empty Homes Initiative

Neil Chadwick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:47:19 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Council Tax Data

Council Tax Data

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 12:16:47 +0100

78 lines

Re: Council Tax Data

Lightowlers, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 09:46:24 +0100

144 lines

New Thread

Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:56:54 +0100

38 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:09:37 +0100

76 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:13:41 +0100

107 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:16:32 +0100

87 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:26:22 +0100

117 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:27:40 +0100

109 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:33:41 +0100

156 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:55:24 +0100

262 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:01:08 +0100

205 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:08:06 +0100

42 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:17:27 +0100

193 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:22:58 +0100

110 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:05:11 +0100

34 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:52:14 +0100

184 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:44:45 +0100

95 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:53:07 +0100

262 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

NICHOLAS LANDAU <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:55:31 +0100

147 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

NICHOLAS LANDAU <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:02:48 +0100

208 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:09:41 +0100

45 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:30:10 +0100

58 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:38:14 +0100

249 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jim Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:30:03 +0100

84 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:50:18 +0100

126 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:46:09 +0100

48 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:12:10 +0100

37 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

NICHOLAS LANDAU <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:10:31 +0100

51 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:22:30 +0100

62 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:10:41 +0100

39 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:12:39 +0100

36 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:09:36 +0100

31 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:13:23 +0100

55 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:22:58 +0100

64 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:36:35 +0100

91 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:20:57 +0100

94 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:52:19 +0100

119 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:32:35 +0100

156 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:17:53 +0100

190 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:29:10 +0100

235 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:29:25 +0100

221 lines

Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jim Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:05:07 +0100

90 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:11:22 +0100

129 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:19:46 +0100

187 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:12:41 +0100

68 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:52:05 +0100

66 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:57:39 +0100

34 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:29:11 +0100

76 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:44:32 +0100

63 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:41:01 +0100

33 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:44:02 +0100

47 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:56:45 +0100

40 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:18:13 +0100

82 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:37:47 +0100

50 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:25:05 +0100

86 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:38:29 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Covert surveillance - CCTV

Covert surveillance - CCTV

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:14:39 +0000

107 lines

Re: Covert surveillance - CCTV

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:29:09 -0000

213 lines

Re: Covert surveillance - CCTV

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:19:23 -0000

194 lines

Re: Covert surveillance - CCTV

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:49:31 -0000

282 lines

Re: Covert surveillance - CCTV

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:52:02 +0000

78 lines

Re: Covert surveillance - CCTV

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:38:50 -0000

284 lines

Re: Covert surveillance - CCTV

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:23:07 -0000

296 lines

Re: Covert surveillance - CCTV

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:08:28 -0000

161 lines

New Thread

CRB Checks and ID Cards

CRB Checks and ID Cards

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 15:09:02 +0100

60 lines

CRB Checks and ID Cards

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 17:00:09 +0100

62 lines

Re: CRB Checks and ID Cards

Pounder Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 13:56:12 +0100

176 lines

Re: CRB Checks and ID Cards

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 14:25:33 +0100

113 lines

Re: CRB Checks and ID Cards

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 15:59:14 +0100

142 lines

New Thread

CRB results and Retention

CRB results and Retention

Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 13:29:13 +0100

40 lines

Re: CRB results and Retention

Bownes David (CEX) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 15:35:55 +0100

86 lines

Re: CRB results and Retention

Cathy Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 15:40:14 +0100

107 lines

Re: CRB results and Retention

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 16:10:10 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Re: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2006 20:32:21 +0100

116 lines

Re: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 09:04:56 +0100

180 lines

New Thread

Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Cr iminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Re: Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Cr iminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 10:31:55 +0100

242 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Cr iminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 17:03:52 +0100

91 lines

New Thread

Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record

Re: Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 13:32:11 +0100

249 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record

Tony Bowden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 14:06:05 +0100

80 lines

New Thread

Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Ward

Re: Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Ward

Robert Dawson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 11:13:13 +0100

327 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Ward

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 11:23:25 +0100

376 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Ward

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 12:11:20 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 10:00:30 +0100

80 lines

Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 10:10:22 +0100

138 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Samantha Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 10:12:55 +0100

154 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Mandi Barron <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 10:41:19 +0100

244 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 10:48:13 +0100

231 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 11:29:14 +0100

187 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks DPO's - was - RE: Criminal Record Check of Traffic Wardens?

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 12:28:39 +0100

293 lines

New Thread

CRM

CRM

Helen Bartram <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:21:59 +0000

58 lines

Re: CRM

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:38:38 -0000

119 lines

Re: CRM

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:21:50 -0000

174 lines

Re: CRM

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:26:23 -0000

183 lines

CRM

Helen Bartram <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:44:43 +0000

91 lines

Re: CRM

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:23:39 -0000

197 lines

New Thread

CSA query

CSA query

Okey, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 11:59:48 +0100

59 lines

Re: CSA query

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 12:15:59 +0100

98 lines

Re: CSA query

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 12:49:54 +0100

157 lines

New Thread

CV

CV

GRAHAM Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:07:32 +0100

58 lines

Re: CV

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:56:59 +0100

94 lines

New Thread

Data Controller - meaning

Data Controller - meaning

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:42:26 -0000

41 lines

Re: Data Controller - meaning

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:19:25 -0000

84 lines

Re: Data Controller - meaning

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:30:52 -0000

108 lines

Re: Data Controller - meaning

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:47:10 -0000

165 lines

New Thread

Data Destruction

Data Destruction

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:52:58 -0000

237 lines

Re: Data Destruction

phil gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:24:50 +0000

218 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:43:36 -0000

383 lines

Re: Data Destruction

phil gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:53:04 +0000

203 lines

Re: Data Destruction

RONAN DURNIN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:17:28 -0000

771 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:39:53 -0000

836 lines

Re: Data Destruction

phil gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:42:41 +0000

256 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Griffiths, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:48:54 -0000

50 lines

Re: Data Destruction

RONAN DURNIN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:51:49 -0000

79 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:57:33 +0000

51 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:18:38 -0000

52 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:32:44 -0000

95 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:58:47 -0000

135 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:36:43 -0000

180 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:13:03 +0000

35 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:52 -0000

93 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:41:17 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

Data fears don't stop survey (news story Health Service Journal 9.11.06)

Data fears don't stop survey (news story Health Service Journal 9.11.06)

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:54:44 -0000

88 lines

Re: Data fears don't stop survey (news story Health Service Journal 9.11.06)

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:32:47 -0000

143 lines

New Thread

Data Loss and Liability

Data Loss and Liability

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:51:53 +0100

79 lines

Re: Data Loss and Liability

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:14:21 +0100

57 lines

Re: Data Loss and Liability

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:10:13 +0100

70 lines

Re: Data Loss and Liability

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:25:47 +0100

48 lines

Re: Data Loss and Liability

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:44:54 +0100

82 lines

New Thread

Data Protection (Processing of Sensitive Data) Order 2006

Data Protection (Processing of Sensitive Data) Order 2006

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:51:42 +0100

77 lines

Re: Data Protection (Processing of Sensitive Data) Order 2006

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:13:45 +0100

117 lines

Re: Data Protection (Processing of Sensitive Data) Order 2006

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:12:54 +0100

173 lines

Re: Data Protection (Processing of Sensitive Data) Order 2006

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:31:46 +0100

44 lines

Re: Data Protection (Processing of Sensitive Data) Order 2006

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:28:48 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Data Protection - Strategic Issues of Compliance

Data Protection - Strategic Issues of Compliance

Lisa Souza - PDP <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 14:11:55 -0000

101 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Act - Section 29

Data Protection Act - Section 29

Legal Compliance at KCL <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:26:48 +0000

42 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:54:09 -0000

101 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:54:50 +0000

45 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Kate McGinlay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:02:30 +0000

123 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:05:29 -0000

108 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:06:11 -0000

180 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Gerry Dane <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:33:16 -0000

90 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:36:56 -0000

99 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:49:40 +0000

34 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:52:04 -0000

77 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:21:30 +0000

50 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:48:26 -0000

39 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Lee Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:34:38 -0000

78 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:37:41 -0000

103 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:34:49 +0000

65 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:40:02 -0000

95 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:54:57 +0000

62 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:34:15 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Act - Section 29 <fwd>

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29 <fwd>

Kate McGinlay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:46:27 +0000

149 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29 <fwd>

Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:54:17 -0000

227 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29 <fwd>

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:17:54 -0000

281 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29 <fwd>

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:44:35 +0000

45 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29 <fwd>

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:46:59 -0000

378 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29 <fwd>

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:07:46 -0000

215 lines

New Thread

Data protection and CCTV - repeal the Act!

Data protection and CCTV - repeal the Act!

Paul Hubert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:03:42 +0000

90 lines

Re: Data protection and CCTV - repeal the Act!

Simon Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:33:12 +0000

53 lines

Re: Data protection and CCTV - repeal the Act!

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:21:05 -0000

97 lines

New Thread

Data Protection and Employment Briefing

Data Protection and Employment Briefing

Kavitha Kasilingam <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:50:55 +0100

152 lines

New Thread

Data Protection and Research

Data Protection and Research

Tom Devenish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 15:57:22 +0000

36 lines

Re: Data Protection and Research

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:44:33 -0000

93 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Event Promotion

Data Protection Event Promotion

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:11:37 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

Data protection guidance re publication on the Internet

Data protection guidance re publication on the Internet

GRAHAM Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:46:00 +0100

38 lines

Re: Data protection guidance re publication on the Internet

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:14:01 +0100

82 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Jokes

Data Protection Jokes

Sophie Pilkington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:22:31 +0100

51 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

POUNDER Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:31:14 +0100

89 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

Carter, Antoinette (MCS) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:39:16 +0100

108 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:30:27 +0100

68 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:45:03 +0100

131 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:30:53 +0100

74 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

Peter Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:11:23 +0100

114 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

Nick Landau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:44:02 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Jokes[Scanned]

Re: Data Protection Jokes[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:26:38 +0100

130 lines

New Thread

Data Protection legislation in China

Data Protection legislation in China

Sally Gibson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 15:33:20 +0100

71 lines

Re: Data Protection legislation in China

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 16:11:01 +0100

138 lines

Re: Data Protection legislation in China

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 16:10:34 +0100

150 lines

Re: Data Protection legislation in China

Kevin Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 19:46:58 +0100

87 lines

Re: Data Protection legislation in China

Donald Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 15:26:41 -0400

160 lines

Re: Data Protection legislation in China

Donald Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 11:35:39 -0400

255 lines

New Thread

Data sales for tax cuts (news item)