JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


2006


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Survey Results Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:10:02 GMT

45 lines

Re: Roll on 2007

Nick Landau

Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:39:09 -0000

83 lines

Roll on 2007

David Wyatt

Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:06:22 -0000

129 lines

DoH sticks to 'opt out' (news item)

Nick Landau

Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:06:12 -0000

33 lines

Happy Christmas!

Lisa Souza - PDP

Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:20:15 -0000

349 lines

Re: Possible Housing benefit fraud

Simon Howarth

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:16:57 -0000

133 lines

Re: "Unauthorised" access to "public" website

Tim Trent

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:01:46 -0000

101 lines

"Unauthorised" access to "public" website

Nick Landau

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:17:46 -0000

55 lines

Merry Christmas (Kala Hristouyenna) From Crete

<>

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:13:25 -0500

95 lines

Statute Law Database = Consolidated legislative updates - was " Changes to DPA 98"

Ian Welton

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:11:20 -0000

152 lines

Re: Statute Law Database = Consolidated legisl ative updates - was " Changes to DPA 98"

DREW Nic

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:17:08 -0000

366 lines

Re: Statute Law Database = Consolidated legisl ative updates - was " Changes to DPA 98"

Bownes David (CEX)

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:08:18 -0000

256 lines

Re: Possible Housing benefit fraud

Nick Landau

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:42:02 -0000

96 lines

Possible Housing benefit fraud

Karen Town

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:38:20 -0000

185 lines

Possible Housing benefit fraud

Karen Town

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:27:56 -0000

184 lines

Statute Law Database = Consolidated legislative updates - was " Changes to DPA 98"

Robert (Bob) Waixel

Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:10:48 +0000

201 lines

Re: Changes to DPA 98

Nick Landau

Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:35:37 -0000

49 lines

NOMAIL

Toms Philip

Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:31:36 -0000

137 lines

FW: Data Destruction

Tim Trent

Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:03:03 -0000

409 lines

Re: Changes to DPA 98

Paul Ticher

Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:32:40 -0000

123 lines

A list of UK computer recyclers and refurbishers

Nick Landau

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:41:11 -0000

54 lines

Re: Orange Mobile/Broadband Services

Nick Landau

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:25:48 -0000

228 lines

Re: Orange Mobile/Broadband Services

Simon Howarth

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:10:12 -0000

599 lines

Re: Orange Mobile/Broadband Services

Simon Howarth

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:09:00 -0000

178 lines

Re: Orange Mobile/Broadband Services

J.S.M.Whitaker

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:04:25 -0000

265 lines

Re: Orange Mobile/Broadband Services

Nick Landau

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:52:19 -0000

97 lines

Re: Changes to DPA 98

Andrew Cormack

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:40:32 -0000

427 lines

Re: Changes to DPA 98

Robert (Bob) Waixel

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:38:25 +0000

275 lines

Orange Mobile/Broadband Services

RONAN DURNIN

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:18:25 -0000

63 lines

Re: Changes to DPA 98

Iain Harrison

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:50:42 +0000

111 lines

Changes to DPA 98

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:44:21 -0000

208 lines

Article in Telegraph about Private Investigator obtaining Personal Information

Nick Landau

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:43:53 -0000

51 lines

Christmas Holidays Plea

Tim Trent

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:53:28 -0000

190 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Wow. A prosecution!

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:23:16 -0000

791 lines

FW: [data-protection] Wow. A prosecution!

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:14:31 -0000

609 lines

Re: Wow. A prosecution!

Tim Trent

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:13:37 -0000

510 lines

Re: Wow. A prosecution!

Edwina Withe

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:27:05 +0000

292 lines

Re: Wow. A prosecution!

Paul Ticher

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:04:52 -0000

116 lines

Wow. A prosecution!

Tim Trent

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:22:49 -0000

207 lines

New Survey Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:22:50 GMT

47 lines

Re: Interview Questions

Tim Trent

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:33:07 -0000

829 lines

Re: Interview Questions

Tim Trent

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:27:50 -0000

659 lines

Survey Results Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:10:00 GMT

45 lines

Confidential Top-up Information Stored on Mobile Phone

Nick Landau

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:15:33 -0000

34 lines

DCA Consultation - FoI/DP Fees - Draft Regulations.

J.S.M.Whitaker

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:50:42 -0000

130 lines

Re: Sole traders and Limited Companies

Alan Stead

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:35:40 -0000

100 lines

Re: Interview Questions

PETER SELENIC

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:15:48 -0000

451 lines

Re: Sole traders and Limited Companies

David Aspinall

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:29:02 -0000

225 lines

Re: Sole traders and Limited Companies

Paul Ticher

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:28:48 -0000

82 lines

Re: Interview Questions

Chell, Robert

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:21:38 -0000

624 lines

Re: Sole traders and Limited Companies

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:14:46 -0000

129 lines

Re: Sole traders and Limited Companies

Lee Gardiner

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:06:06 -0000

93 lines

Sole traders and Limited Companies

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:57:07 +0000

29 lines

Re: Interview Questions

Tim Trent

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:22:50 -0000

29 lines

Re: Interview Questions

<>

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:23:06 +0000

740 lines

Re: Interview Questions

Nick Landau

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:45:42 -0000

175 lines

Re: Interview Questions

Simon Howarth

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:23:10 -0000

118 lines

Re: Interview Questions

Tim Trent

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:53:29 -0000

275 lines

Re: Interview Questions

Nick Landau

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:18:08 -0000

106 lines

MSc in Healthcare Information Governance at the University of Bath

Nick Landau

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:14:49 -0000

32 lines

Exciting Computer Ethics Conference in China

CCSR Web Master

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:45:39 +0000

104 lines

Re: Naming & Shaming, and the Data Protection A ct.

POUNDER Chris

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:04:46 -0000

198 lines

Re: Naming & Shaming, and the Data Protection A ct.

Alan Stead

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:46:07 -0000

151 lines

Re: Interview Questions

Iain Harrison

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:44:43 +0000

73 lines

Interview Questions

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:40:01 -0000

118 lines

Re: snippet on USA and "pretexting"

Chris Brogan

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:07:03 -0000

93 lines

Re: snippet on USA and "pretexting"

Tim Trent

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:04:13 -0000

44 lines

Re: snippet on USA and "pretexting"

Roland Perry

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:41:32 +0000

52 lines

snippet on USA and "pretexting"

Tim Trent

Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:25:09 -0000

207 lines

Re: The obligations about unstructured personal data

Paul Dodgson

Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:01:35 -0000

111 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Roland Perry

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:41:17 +0000

38 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Nick Landau

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:49:52 -0000

93 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Roland Perry

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:13:03 +0000

35 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Nick Landau

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:36:43 -0000

180 lines

Information Manager vacancy, Bristol

Chris Little

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:29:58 -0000

264 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Simon Howarth

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:58:47 -0000

135 lines

Re: Retention

Nick Landau

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:53:43 -0000

93 lines

Re: Naming & Shaming, and the Data Protection A ct.

Bownes David (CEX)

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:55:21 -0000

91 lines

Re: Naming & Shaming, and the Data Protection Act.

Blewitt, David

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:21:24 -0000

210 lines

Re: Use of Photos in Publicity Leaflet

Nick Landau

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:32:06 -0000

142 lines

Re: The obligations about unstructured personal data

Bownes David (CEX)

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:21:19 -0000

138 lines

Re: Data protection and CCTV - repeal the Act!

Nick Landau

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:21:05 -0000

97 lines

Re: Use of Photos in Publicity Leaflet

Simon Richardson

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:56:24 +0000

56 lines

Re: Use of Photos in Publicity Leaflet

Griffiths, Ian

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:47:06 -0000

54 lines

Re: Use of Photos in Publicity Leaflet

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:45:57 -0000

110 lines

Re: Use of Photos in Publicity Leaflet

C.Oppenheim

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:44:45 -0000

94 lines

The obligations about unstructured personal data

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:43:56 -0000

81 lines

Re: Use of Photos in Publicity Leaflet

Griffiths, Ian

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:38:12 -0000

48 lines

Re: Data protection and CCTV - repeal the Act!

Simon Richardson

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:33:12 +0000

53 lines

Re: Use of Photos in Publicity Leaflet

Nick Landau

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:29:06 -0000

170 lines

Re: Use of Photos in Publicity Leaflet

Paul Ticher

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:36:57 -0000

135 lines

Retention

Diane Tye

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:11:46 +0000

45 lines

Data protection and CCTV - repeal the Act!

Paul Hubert

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:03:42 +0000

90 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Nick Landau

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:32:44 -0000

95 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Simon Howarth

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:18:38 -0000

52 lines

Re: Metropolitan Police - phone tapping

Roland Perry

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:07:45 +0000

201 lines

Letter in newspaper regarding suggested access to medical records of Gordon Brown's baby son

Nick Landau

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:05:35 -0000

45 lines

Use of Photos in Publicity Leaflet

phil gregg

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:57:25 +0000

181 lines

Re: "Review recommends new ID measures" (news item)

Nick Landau

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:52:00 -0000

209 lines

Re: "Review recommends new ID measures" (news item)

Donald Henderson

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:30:38 -0000

170 lines

Re: Metropolitan Police - phone tapping

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:07:41 -0000

403 lines

Metropolitan Police - phone tapping

datap

Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:52:59 +0000

184 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Roland Perry

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:57:33 +0000

51 lines

Re: Data Destruction

RONAN DURNIN

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:51:49 -0000

79 lines

FW: [data-protection] Data Destruction

RONAN DURNIN

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:50:37 -0000

956 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Griffiths, Ian

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:48:54 -0000

50 lines

Re: Data Destruction

phil gregg

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:42:41 +0000

256 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Tim Trent

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:39:53 -0000

836 lines

Re: Data Destruction

RONAN DURNIN

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:17:28 -0000

771 lines

Re: Data Destruction

phil gregg

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:53:04 +0000

203 lines

Re: Data Destruction

Nick Landau

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:43:36 -0000

383 lines

Re: Data Destruction

phil gregg

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:24:50 +0000

218 lines

Data Destruction

Tim Trent

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:52:58 -0000

237 lines

Re: "Review recommends new ID measures" (news item)

Nick Landau

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:21:37 -0000

130 lines

Re: "Review recommends new ID measures" (news item)

Donald Henderson

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:42:18 -0000

96 lines

New Survey Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 08:30:26 GMT

47 lines

Survey Results Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Fri, 8 Dec 2006 00:10:01 GMT

45 lines

"Review recommends new ID measures" (news item)

Nick Landau

Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:28:13 -0000

38 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 6 Dec 2006 07:55:09 -0000

105 lines

Re: Trade union stewards

Nick Landau

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:28:39 -0000

80 lines

Re: Trade union stewards

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:18:26 -0000

110 lines

Re: Trade union stewards

Iain Harrison

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:17:35 +0000

71 lines

Trade union stewards

Hitches, John F

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:12:35 -0000

118 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Nick Landau

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:22:31 -0000

88 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Griffiths, Ian

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:50:15 -0000

55 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Carolyn Howard

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 10:19:33 +0000

48 lines

Re: Survey Results Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

Tim Trent

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 00:19:42 +0000

75 lines

Survey Results Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 00:10:00 GMT

45 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Smith, Tony

Mon, 4 Dec 2006 16:06:26 -0000

249 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Nick Landau

Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:59:00 -0000

301 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Tim Trent

Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:47:42 +0000

215 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Donald Henderson

Mon, 4 Dec 2006 13:50:54 -0000

187 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Paul Hubert

Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:45:31 +0000

118 lines

New Podcast

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:34:29 -0000

398 lines

"Computer fraudbusters go online" (news item HSJ Online)

Nick Landau

Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:27:45 -0000

41 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Blewitt, David

Mon, 4 Dec 2006 09:06:33 -0000

198 lines

Re: Even we "experts" get caught out

Tim Trent

Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:27:47 -0000

91 lines

Re: Even we "experts" get caught out

Roland Perry

Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:07:43 +0000

137 lines

Re: Even we "experts" get caught out

Tim Trent

Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:04:53 -0000

106 lines

Re: Even we "experts" get caught out

Roland Perry

Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:26:32 +0000

64 lines

Even we "experts" get caught out

Tim Trent

Sun, 3 Dec 2006 09:32:25 -0000

310 lines

Re: File uploaded re photographs

Chris Spray

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:04:37 -0000

387 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Nick Landau

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:35:18 -0000

80 lines

Survey Progress

Tim Trent

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:17:50 -0000

202 lines

File uploaded re photographs

Tim Trent

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:14:08 -0000

200 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Roland Perry

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:37:34 +0000

37 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Chris Brogan

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:04:48 -0000

218 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:32:38 -0000

163 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Tim Trent

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:26:42 -0000

132 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Roland Perry

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:26:15 +0000

44 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Tim Trent

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:17:37 -0000

238 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Smith, Tony

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:13:00 -0000

169 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Paul Ticher

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:12:18 -0000

206 lines

Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:50:14 -0000

73 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Tim Trent

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:31:42 -0000

205 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:28:25 +0000

170 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:19:25 +0000

226 lines

Re: Survey Results Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

Phil Ogden

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:12:29 +0000

154 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Tim Trent

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:11:16 -0000

138 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Roland Perry

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:11:14 +0000

50 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Paul Ticher

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:07:16 -0000

108 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Tim Trent

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:44:12 -0000

573 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:31:33 -0000

340 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Roland Perry

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:19:32 +0000

41 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Nigel Roberts

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:13:57 +0000

93 lines

Re: Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:07:27 -0000

122 lines

Photographs and DPA/Human Rights

Peter Burgess

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:52:02 -0000

193 lines

Re: Survey Results Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

Tim Trent

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:05:41 -0000

87 lines

New Survey Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:58:45 GMT

47 lines

Survey Results Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:57:50 GMT

45 lines

Survey Progress

Tim Trent

Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:32:18 -0000

246 lines

FW: training

Tim Trent

Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:50:25 -0000

216 lines

Re: training

Joe Sutton

Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:00:39 -0000

91 lines

Re: Pump and Dump - the SEC's preferred "solution"

Nick Landau

Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:57:17 -0000

141 lines

Re: training

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:43:44 -0000

138 lines

Re: training

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:14:53 -0000

121 lines

Re: training

Tim Trent

Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:51:01 -0000

63 lines

Re: Pump and Dump - the SEC's preferred "solution"

Mary Liddell

Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:47:04 -0000

361 lines

training

Diane Tye

Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:32:00 +0000

46 lines

Survey progress

Tim Trent

Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:04:59 -0000

227 lines

Pump and Dump - the SEC's preferred "solution"

Tim Trent

Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:13:33 -0000

294 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

HOWLETT Sue L

Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:55:39 -0000

613 lines

Training DVD

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:56:55 -0000

51 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:02:47 -0000

543 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:55:23 -0000

472 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:48:44 -0000

296 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:43:30 +0000

487 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:39:07 +0000

309 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:29:46 -0000

308 lines

Re: DP Days - was Xmas Holidays

Lee Gardiner

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:15:40 -0000

560 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

Phil Ogden

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:07:09 +0000

475 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:57:38 -0000

161 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

Phil Ogden

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:40:21 +0000

184 lines

Re: XMas Holidays

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:47:29 -0000

81 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:28:22 +0000

176 lines

Re: Us, here, and revealing our email details + Survey

Tim Trent

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:25:51 -0000

443 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:16:07 +0000

170 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

Rowland, Zoe

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:06:14 -0000

744 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:01:52 -0000

568 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

Simon Howarth

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:57:59 -0000

438 lines

Re: DP Days - was Xmas Holidays

Tim Trent

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:57:18 -0000

489 lines

Re: DP Days - was Xmas Holidays

Watts, Clare (C.)

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:53:45 -0000

370 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

Alan Redhead

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:52:25 +0000

174 lines

Re: That NHS IT thing

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:48:23 +0000

180 lines

Re: Xmas Holidays

Tim Trent

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:41:02 -0000

236 lines

Re: DP/FOI

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:37:46 +0000

183 lines

Xmas Holidays

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:17:24 -0000

118 lines

Re: DP/FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:03:03 -0000

520 lines

Re: DP/FOI

Bownes David (CEX)

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:46:46 -0000

292 lines

Re: DP/FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:41:13 -0000

177 lines

Re: DP/FOI

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:40:54 -0000

123 lines

That NHS IT thing

Tim Trent

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:30:45 -0000

194 lines

DP/FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:26:16 -0000

151 lines

Re: chaps, please look at what you are doing

Tim Trent

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:41:22 -0000

351 lines

Re: chaps, please look at what you are doing

Hitches, John F

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:35:50 -0000

419 lines

SET * CONCEAL

Smith, Trevor

Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:47:40 -0000

98 lines

Re: chaps, please look at what you are doing

Tim Trent

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:56:27 -0000

367 lines

chaps, please look at what you are doing

Tim Trent

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:36:55 -0000

240 lines

Re: SET CONCEAL

Paul Hubert

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:16:19 +0000

353 lines

SET * CONCEAL

Karen Waite

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:05:53 +0000

134 lines

SET CONCEAL

RONAN DURNIN

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:28:39 -0000

317 lines

Us, here, and revealing our email details

Tim Trent

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:20:23 -0000

304 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Roland Perry

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:34:15 +0000

53 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Roland Perry

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:54:57 +0000

62 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Andrew Cormack

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:40:02 -0000

95 lines

Re: Information Sharing Index

Kirsty Gray

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:17:59 +0000

41 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Kirsty Gray

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:34:49 +0000

65 lines

Survey Progress

Tim Trent

Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:47:55 -0000

324 lines

Re: Tape Recording

Iain Harrison

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:05:06 +0000

139 lines

Re: Tape Recording

datap

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:57:39 +0000

448 lines

Re: Surveys in general[Scanned]

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:35:19 -0000

313 lines

Re: Surveys in general

Tim Trent

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:28:14 -0000

193 lines

Re: Surveys in general[Scanned]

Smith, Tony

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:27:24 -0000

388 lines

FW: [data-protection] Surveys in general[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:24:52 -0000

889 lines

Re: Tape Recording

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:24:01 -0000

568 lines

Re: Tape Recording

Malcolm Kendall

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:18:56 -0000

439 lines

New Survey Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:01:49 GMT

47 lines

Re: Surveys in general

Tim Trent

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:00:35 -0000

730 lines

Re: Surveys in general[Scanned]

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:00:33 -0000

339 lines

Re: Surveys in general

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:58:20 +0000

384 lines

Re: Surveys in general[Scanned]

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:56:50 -0000

433 lines

Re: Tape Recording

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:50:53 -0000

224 lines

Tape Recording

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:48:40 -0000

129 lines

Re: Surveys in general

Kevin Berwick

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:43:48 +0000

490 lines

Re: Surveys in general[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:38:06 -0000

288 lines

Surveys in general

Tim Trent

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:33:27 -0000

165 lines

Re: I thought no-one would ask about the survey!

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:28:16 -0000

125 lines

Since my head is over the parapet already....

Tim Trent

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:26:20 -0000

243 lines

Re: I thought no-one would ask about the survey!

Tim Trent

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:42:01 -0000

124 lines

Re: I thought no-one would ask about the survey!

Simon Howarth

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:33:51 -0000

98 lines

Re: I thought no-one would ask about the survey!

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:57:05 +0000

164 lines

Re: That NHS Database.....

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:51:40 +0000

438 lines

I thought no-one would ask about the survey!

Tim Trent

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:18:40 -0000

68 lines

Re: List Netiquette

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:09:11 -0000

390 lines

Re: List Netiquette

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:04:37 -0000

308 lines

Re: List Netiquette

Tinsley, Chris

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:53:30 -0000

777 lines

Re: List Netiquette

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:48:15 +0000

97 lines

Re: List Netiquette

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:36:27 -0000

428 lines

List Netiquette

Tim Trent

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:48:14 -0000

275 lines

Re: That NHS Database.....

DREW Nic

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:07:12 -0000

659 lines

That NHS Database.....

Tim Trent

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:41:13 -0000

259 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Tim Trent

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:37:41 -0000

103 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:34:38 -0000

78 lines

Re: reading e-mail in HTML

Tim Trent

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:24:49 -0000

86 lines

Re: reading e-mail in HTML (was: List management things)

Tinsley, Chris

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:09:11 -0000

200 lines

Re: reading e-mail in HTML (was: List management things)

Andrew Cormack

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:04:43 -0000

152 lines

Re: Telegraph article

Tim Trent

Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:26:51 -0000

188 lines

Re: Telegraph article

Christopher Spray

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:33:30 -0000

306 lines

EU panel: SWIFT broke data privacy laws

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:16:03 -0000

211 lines

Re: List management things

Nick Landau

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:59:09 -0000

218 lines

Re: List management things

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:51:11 -0000

192 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Nick Landau

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:48:26 -0000

39 lines

Re: List management things

Nick Landau

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:46:07 -0000

137 lines

Re: List management things

Nick Landau

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:41:46 -0000

154 lines

Re: List management things

Nick Landau

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:40:18 -0000

174 lines

Re: Telegraph article

Nick Landau

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:36:49 -0000

221 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Roland Perry

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:21:30 +0000

50 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Chris Brogan

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:07:46 -0000

215 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Chris Brogan

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:52:04 -0000

77 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:46:59 -0000

378 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Roland Perry

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:44:35 +0000

45 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:17:54 -0000

281 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Paul Dodgson

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:54:17 -0000

227 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Roland Perry

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:49:40 +0000

34 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Kate McGinlay

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:46:27 +0000

149 lines

Re: Telegraph article

Chris Brogan

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:43:04 -0000

615 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Chris Brogan

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:36:56 -0000

99 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Gerry Dane

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:33:16 -0000

90 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:06:11 -0000

180 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Lee Gardiner

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:05:29 -0000

108 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Kate McGinlay

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:02:30 +0000

123 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Roland Perry

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:54:50 +0000

45 lines

Re: Data Protection Act - Section 29

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:54:09 -0000

101 lines

Re: List management things

Roland Perry

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:49:34 +0000

35 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Telegraph article[Scanned]

Roland Perry

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:44:35 +0000

40 lines

Re: List management things

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:31:10 -0000

105 lines

Re: List management things

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:30:08 +0000

175 lines

Re: List management things[Scanned]

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:29:43 -0000

145 lines

Re: Telegraph article

Smith, Tony

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:27:50 -0000

456 lines

Data Protection Act - Section 29

Legal Compliance at KCL

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:26:48 +0000

42 lines

Re: List management things

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:24:48 +0000

48 lines

Re: List management things[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:20:37 -0000

118 lines

Re: List management things

Nigel Roberts

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:18:37 +0000

33 lines

Re: List management things

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:18:26 -0000

367 lines

Re: List management things

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:16:13 -0000

141 lines

Re: List management things

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:13:36 +0000

267 lines

Re: List management things

Nigel Roberts

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:12:49 +0000

112 lines

Re: List management things

Nigel Roberts

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:11:38 +0000

105 lines

List management things

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:59:05 -0000

251 lines

FW: [data-protection] Telegraph article[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:54:35 -0000

822 lines

Re: Telegraph article

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:43:00 -0000

563 lines

Re: Telegraph article

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:33:11 +0000

310 lines

Re: Telegraph article

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:14:55 -0000

212 lines

Telegraph article

Hitches, John F

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:34:11 -0000

104 lines

The UK Child Database is under fire

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:28:27 -0000

225 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:11:45 -0000

225 lines

Re: FW: Call to all Senior Local Authority DP, FOI, Audit and Securi ty Policy Professionals

Tim Trent

Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:00:33 -0000

160 lines

FW: Call to all Senior Local Authority DP, FOI, Audit and Securi ty Policy Professionals

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:53:46 -0000

144 lines

HTML emails

Tim Trent

Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:51:30 -0000

205 lines

List management stuff

Tim Trent

Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:14:07 -0000

217 lines

Re: Some active list management

Tim Trent

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:20:25 -0000

167 lines

Re: Survey

Tim Trent

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:14:41 -0000

51 lines

Re: Some active list management

Karen Waite

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:57:08 +0000

163 lines

Survey

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:39:52 +0000

28 lines

Some active list management

Tim Trent

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:56:24 -0000

78 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Nick Landau

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:48:55 -0000

150 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Nick Landau

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:43:33 -0000

193 lines

Re: Top or Bottom posting

Griffiths, Ian

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:39:54 -0000

41 lines

Re: Top or Bottom posting

Oakman Phil

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:19:22 +0000

119 lines

Re: Top or Bottom posting

Roland Perry

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:29:34 +0000

72 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Roland Perry

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:28:28 +0000

49 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Justice, Sally

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:07:32 -0000

221 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Tim Trent

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:00:23 -0000

186 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Julie Gibbs

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:55:33 -0000

164 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:55:31 -0000

171 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Roger Fairman

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:47:50 -0000

151 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

McKay, Pat

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:46:36 -0000

120 lines

Re: Top or Bottom posting

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:32:24 +0000

147 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Tim Trent

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:44:23 -0000

70 lines

Top or Bottom posting

Tim Trent

Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:31:37 -0000

109 lines

Re: patient records

Nick Landau

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:52:05 -0000

115 lines

patient records

Casillas, Mojgan

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:12:37 -0000

47 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:25:59 +0000

77 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Roland Perry

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:12:31 +0000

59 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Tim Trent

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:17:23 -0000

70 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Roland Perry

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:55:55 +0000

40 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Tim Trent

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:24:36 -0000

116 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Tim Trent

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:02:18 -0000

65 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Roland Perry

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:55:25 +0000

35 lines

Re: The survey - Progress report

Tim Trent

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:24:33 -0000

145 lines

Re: Online Identity Protection

Nick Landau

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:54:48 -0000

142 lines

Online Identity Protection

Tim Trent

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:00:08 -0000

81 lines

This lights are on...

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:56:00 +0000

29 lines

Re: Sex Offenders

Robert Dawson

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:24:59 +0000

122 lines

The survey

Tim Trent

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:51:03 -0000

77 lines

New Survey Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:19:00 GMT

45 lines

Re: Security and High Street Banks (again)

Nick Landau

Sat, 18 Nov 2006 18:27:57 -0000

82 lines

Re: Sex Offenders

Nick Landau

Sat, 18 Nov 2006 18:21:37 -0000

191 lines

Re: Order from the ICO

Nick Landau

Sat, 18 Nov 2006 18:11:09 -0000

133 lines

Re: Sex Offenders

Tim Trent

Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:26:40 -0000

119 lines

Re: Sex Offenders

Ibrahim Hasan

Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:32:00 -0000

84 lines

Re: Security and High Street Banks (again)

C.Oppenheim

Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:30:27 -0000

81 lines

Sex Offenders

Ibrahim Hasan

Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:16:00 -0000

45 lines

Security and High Street Banks (again)

Ibrahim Hasan

Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:10:42 -0000

43 lines

Re: Order from the ICO

<>

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:30:53 +0000

298 lines

Re: Order from the ICO

Tim Trent

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:03:18 -0000

258 lines

Re: Order from the ICO

Edwina Withe

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:23 +0000

223 lines

Re: Survey Experiment on Monday

Tim Trent

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:37:12 -0000

249 lines

Re: Fw: [data-protection] Posts out of Sync...

Roland Perry

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:36:37 +0000

31 lines

Re: Survey Experiment on Monday

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:28:37 -0000

193 lines

Re: Survey Experiment on Monday

Paul Ticher

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:19:25 -0000

131 lines

Re: Order from the ICO

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:16:13 -0000

149 lines

Re: Order from the ICO

Priestley Sarah

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:48:58 -0000

110 lines

Survey Experiment on Monday

Tim Trent

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:08:27 -0000

86 lines

Order from the ICO

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:05:44 -0000

69 lines

Re: Order from the ICO

Tim Trent

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:55:08 -0000

69 lines

New Passports and Security

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:31:20 -0000

52 lines

Order from the ICO

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:58:12 +0000

43 lines

Re: Who has legal ownership of the posts on webbased forums?

Nick Landau

Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:50:20 -0000

178 lines

Re: Who has legal ownership of the posts on webbased forums?

Nick Landau

Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:39:11 -0000

112 lines

SMS, SPAM, PECR, EEA, ETC

Tim Trent

Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:31:53 -0000

65 lines

Re: Who has legal ownership of the posts on webbased forums?

C.Oppenheim

Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:08:54 -0000

103 lines

Re: Who has legal ownership of the posts on webbased forums?

Tim Trent

Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:08:09 -0000

82 lines

Who has legal ownership of the posts on webbased forums?

Nick Landau

Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:56:08 -0000

53 lines

Re: Fw: [data-protection] Posts out of Sync...

Nick Landau

Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:58:19 -0000

96 lines

Re: Incorrect use of the DPA 29(3)

Nick Landau

Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:53:25 -0000

297 lines

Re: Incorrect use of the DPA 29(3)

Paul Ticher

Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:40:17 -0000

247 lines

Re: Fw: [data-protection] Posts out of Sync...

Roland Perry

Thu, 16 Nov 2006 09:22:29 +0000

69 lines

Re: Fair Processing Notices and the ICO

Christopher Spray

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:06:39 -0000

150 lines

Re: "Switch in to Data Protection" - did we miss this?

Christopher Spray

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:56:31 -0000

119 lines

Re: Fw: [data-protection] Posts out of Sync...

Nick Landau

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:43:55 -0000

73 lines

Re: Police request for details

Paul Dodgson

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:00:35 -0000

172 lines

Re: Fw: [data-protection] Posts out of Sync...

Roland Perry

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:16:33 +0000

42 lines

Fw: [data-protection] Posts out of Sync...

Nick Landau

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:52:46 -0000

69 lines

Posts out of Sync...

Simon Howarth

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:41:58 -0000

35 lines

Re: Police request for details

Alan Stead

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:05:30 -0000

117 lines

Re: Fair Processing Notices and the ICO

Tim Trent

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:51:01 -0000

184 lines

Re: Fair Processing Notices and the ICO

Richardson Simon (Gateshead PCT)

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:48:06 +0000

147 lines

Re: Fair Processing Notices and the ICO

Joanne Shaw

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:37:01 +0000

179 lines

Re: Fair Processing Notices and the ICO

Lee Gardiner

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:19:08 -0000

113 lines

Fair Processing Notices and the ICO

Tim Trent

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:13:16 -0000

57 lines

Re: Photos of a property

Nick Landau

Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:20:53 -0000

220 lines

Re: Photos of a property

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:37:37 -0000

96 lines

University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study: Win £300

Ugonwa Ekweozor

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:36:35 +0000

65 lines

Re: Photos of a property

Phil Ogden

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:10:25 +0000

313 lines

Re: Photos of a property

Tinsley, Chris

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:02:32 -0000

318 lines

Re: Photos of a property

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:51:44 -0000

221 lines

Re: Photos of a property

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:49:31 +0000

194 lines

Re: Data Controller - meaning

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:47:10 -0000

165 lines

Re: Childrens files

Kirsty Gray

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:45:53 +0000

38 lines

Re: Photos of a property

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:32:53 -0000

148 lines

Re: Data Controller - meaning

Tim Trent

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:30:52 -0000

108 lines

Re: Data Controller - meaning

Healy, Susan

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:19:25 -0000

84 lines

Re: Photos of a property

Nick Landau

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:14:16 -0000

90 lines

Photos of a property

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:02:48 +0000

39 lines

"Switch in to Data Protection" - did we miss this?

Tim Trent

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:59:42 -0000

85 lines

Photos of a property

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:44:24 +0000

29 lines

Re: Incorrect use of the DPA 29(3)

Andrew Charlesworth

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:42:02 +0000

199 lines

Re: Incorrect use of the DPA 29(3)

<>

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:08:50 +0000

173 lines

Data Controller - meaning

Nick Landau

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:42:26 -0000

41 lines

Re: Incorrect use of the DPA 29(3)

Nick Landau

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:13:32 -0000

206 lines

Re: Incorrect use of the DPA 29(3)

Simon Howarth

Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:57:14 -0000

158 lines

Re: Incorrect use of the DPA 29(3)

Nick Landau

Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:23:27 -0000

124 lines

Incorrect use of the DPA 29(3)

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:01:57 -0000

98 lines

Police request for details

Samantha Hill

Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:20:39 +0000

55 lines

Re: Data fears don't stop survey (news story Health Service Journal 9.11.06)

Tim Trent

Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:32:47 -0000

143 lines

Telemarketing

Tim Trent

Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:31:56 -0000

60 lines

Re: Childrens files

Toby Davison

Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:13:41 -0000

88 lines

Re: Childrens files

Neil Chadwick

Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:52:36 +0000

43 lines

Data fears don't stop survey (news story Health Service Journal 9.11.06)

Nick Landau

Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:54:44 -0000

88 lines

Childrens files

Paul Dodgson

Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:41:25 -0000

66 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Ian Welton

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:49:00 -0000

91 lines

Re: Information Sharing Index

Ian Welton

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:48:42 -0000

97 lines

Re: Retention Guidelines

Ian Welton

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:48:39 -0000

59 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Nick Landau

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:33:56 -0000

101 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Roland Perry

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:51:57 +0000

45 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Smith, Tony

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:45:31 -0000

141 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Nick Landau

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:43:17 -0000

165 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:30:06 -0000

141 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Roland Perry

Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:02:05 +0000

52 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Nick Landau

Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:07:56 -0000

71 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Nick Landau

Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:54:22 -0000

130 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Roland Perry

Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:19:16 +0000

39 lines

Re: Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Tim Trent

Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:17:32 -0000

85 lines

Barnet Council requiring Utility Bill to Register to Vote

Nick Landau

Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:04:48 -0000

61 lines

Re: Interest

Nick Landau

Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:28:35 -0000

69 lines

Interest

Smith, Tony

Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:39:51 -0000

31 lines

Re: Medical records/reports

Paul Ticher

Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:45:03 -0000

357 lines

Re: Medical records/reports

Nick Landau

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:57:31 -0000

293 lines

Re: When is Market Research not Marketing???

Tim Trent

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:35:40 -0000

92 lines

Re: When is Market Research not Marketing???

Nick Landau

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:53:00 -0000

92 lines

Re: When is Market Research not Marketing???

Nick Landau

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:45:38 -0000

81 lines

Re: When is Market Research not Marketing???

Nick Landau

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:34:38 -0000

121 lines

Re: Medical records/reports

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:33:21 -0000

167 lines

Re: When is Market Research not Marketing???

Roland Perry

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:23:09 +0000

37 lines

Re: Medical records/reports

Nick Landau

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:19:50 -0000

124 lines

Re: When is Market Research not Marketing???

Griffiths, Ian

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:19:41 -0000

46 lines

Re: When is Market Research not Marketing???

Simon Howarth

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:13:05 -0000

95 lines

Re: Medical records/reports

Paul Ticher

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:06:11 -0000

198 lines

Re: When is Market Research not Marketing???

Kevin Berwick

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:05:15 +0000

127 lines

When is Market Research not Marketing???

Edwina Withe

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:55:54 +0000

45 lines

Re: Retention Guidelines

<>

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:54:56 +0000

129 lines

Re: Retention Guidelines

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:52:37 -0000

106 lines

Medical records/reports

Smith, Tony

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:51:44 -0000

76 lines

Re: Information Sharing Index

J.S.M.Whitaker

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:46:32 -0000

150 lines

Re: Retention Guidelines

Tim Trent

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:34:17 -0000

93 lines

Re: Information Sharing Index (= Children's ID Database)

Priestley Sarah

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:25:44 -0000

232 lines

Retention Guidelines

Sara-Jane Newbon

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:25:05 -0000

61 lines

Re: Information Sharing Index (= Children's ID Database)

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:49:00 -0000

189 lines

Re: Information Sharing Index (= Children's ID Database)

Robert (Bob) Waixel

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:24:51 +0000

133 lines

Re: Information Sharing Index

Nick Landau

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:44:23 -0000

60 lines

Information Sharing Index

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:36:12 -0000

61 lines

Newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan

Sat, 4 Nov 2006 07:49:36 -0000

42 lines

Re: Dot Gov email addresses

<>

Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:54:31 +0000

115 lines

Re: ICO Report

Ian Welton

Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:43:47 -0000

109 lines

Re: Dot Gov email addresses

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:16:41 -0000

91 lines

Dot Gov email addresses

Dave Parker

Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:00:43 +0000

36 lines

ICO Report

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:25:42 -0000

65 lines

Re: Requirement by Council of a Utility Bill (Original) to Register as an Elector

Nick Landau

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:19:16 -0000

90 lines

Re: Requirement by Council of a Utility Bill (Original) to Register as an Elector

Roland Perry

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:53:09 +0000

46 lines

Re: Requirement by Council of a Utility Bill (Original) to Register as an Elector

Nick Landau

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:43:36 -0000

67 lines

Re: Requirement by Council of a Utility Bill (Original) to Register as an Elector

Nick Landau

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:25:20 -0000

110 lines

Re: Requirement by Council of a Utility Bill (Original) to Register as an Elector

Smith, Tony

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:05:41 -0000

78 lines

Requirement by Council of a Utility Bill (Original) to Register as an Elector

Nick Landau

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:54:13 -0000

39 lines

Can DPA apply to public register? (arising from question on FoI list)

Nick Landau

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:40:42 -0000

32 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Roland Perry

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:06:35 +0000

46 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Nick Landau

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:36:59 -0000

184 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:43:00 -0000

154 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Nick Landau

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:37:38 -0000

170 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Smith, Tony

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:31:38 -0000

107 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Nick Landau

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:13:39 -0000

75 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Roland Perry

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:49:17 +0000

46 lines

Re: itsmypost.com continued

Nick Landau

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:00:58 -0000

85 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Nick Landau

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:55:23 -0000

113 lines

Re: itsmypost.com

Paul Ticher

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:37:08 -0000

267 lines

Re: itsmypost.com

Paul Ticher

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:37:08 -0000

231 lines

itsmypost.com continued

Diane Tye

Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:20:22 +0000

64 lines

Latest Podcast

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:44:54 -0000

57 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Roland Perry

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:38:19 +0000

51 lines

Re: itsmypost.com

Simon Howarth

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:15:22 -0000

184 lines

Re: itsmypost.com

Tim Trent

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:01:00 -0000

146 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Nigel Roberts

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:58:33 +0000

77 lines

Re: itsmypost.com

Nick Landau

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:55:19 -0000

43 lines

Fw: [data-protection] itsmypost.com

Nick Landau

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:54:12 -0000

96 lines

Re: itsmypost.com

Nick Landau

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:52:17 -0000

121 lines

Re: itsmypost.com

Tim Trent

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:47:08 -0000

85 lines

itsmypost.com

Diane Tye

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:07:24 +0000

55 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Nick Landau

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:46:05 -0000

87 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Nick Landau

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:35:36 -0000

289 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Roland Perry

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:18:31 +0000

47 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:08:21 -0000

317 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Nick Landau

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:58:44 -0000

114 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:49:04 +0000

85 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Nick Landau

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:35:58 -0000

48 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

Nick Landau

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:51:30 -0000

180 lines

Re: Letters of objection

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:34:50 -0000

88 lines

Insurance Enquiry

Sara-Jane Newbon

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:22:44 -0000

72 lines

Re: Letters of objection[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:14:47 -0000

133 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Tony Bowden

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:01:12 +0000

48 lines

Re: Letters of objection

Nick Landau

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:55:34 -0000

91 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Nigel Roberts

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:34:52 +0000

47 lines

Re: Letters of objection

Nigel Roberts

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:15:44 +0000

52 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Roland Perry

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:13:20 +0000

38 lines

Letters of objection

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:27:02 +0000

32 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:22:31 -0000

194 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subjec t access

Lee Gardiner

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:12:54 -0000

161 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Nigel Roberts

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:23:04 +0000

98 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Tony Bowden

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:04:48 +0000

38 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Nigel Roberts

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:00:08 +0000

133 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Simon Howarth

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:49:26 -0000

102 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Tim Trent

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:28:57 -0000

213 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Smith, Tony

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:11:39 -0000

178 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

<>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:56:18 +0000

135 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

datap

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:49:32 +0000

204 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:39:30 -0000

121 lines

Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Healy, Susan

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:26:09 -0000

58 lines

Re: Verification of requestor identity - subject access

Nigel Roberts

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:45:51 +0000

62 lines

Verification of requestor identity - subject access

RONAN DURNIN

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:35:15 -0000

302 lines

Re: Australians get tough on Spam

Roland Perry

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:57:48 +0000

34 lines

Re: Australians get tough on Spam

Nigel Roberts

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:50:12 +0000

39 lines

Re: Australians get tough on Spam

Griffiths, Ian

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:35:29 -0000

35 lines

Re: Australians get tough on Spam

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:32:39 -0000

189 lines

Re: Australians get tough on Spam

Tim Trent

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:22:27 -0000

145 lines

Re: Australians get tough on Spam

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:17:57 -0000

122 lines

Australians get tough on Spam

Tim Trent

Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:46:47 -0000

64 lines

Re: Please help a brain failed man!

Tim Trent

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:16:21 +0100

199 lines

FW: [data-protection] Please help a brain failed man!

Christopher Spray

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:15:50 +0100

181 lines

Re: Please help a brain failed man!

Christopher Spray

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:45:30 +0100

165 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:29:05 +0100

169 lines

Re: Top or bottom posting was Re: Email quarantine systems

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:15:10 +0100

302 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Ian Welton

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:02:34 +0100

169 lines

Re: Please help a brain failed man!

Richardson Simon (Gateshead PCT)

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:43:06 +0100

207 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Tinsley, Chris

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:16:57 +0100

144 lines

FW: [data-protection] FOI Advice Please.

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:06:14 +0100

174 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Ian Welton

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:03:58 +0100

76 lines

Re: USA is pushing EEA to change Data Transfer Rules

Ian Welton

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:03:14 +0100

61 lines

Re: Top or bottom posting was Re: Email quarantine systems

Charles Christacopoulos

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:58:02 +0100

314 lines

Re: Please help a brain failed man!

Richardson Simon (Gateshead PCT)

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:52:05 +0100

168 lines

Re: FOI Advice Please.

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:29:49 +0100

110 lines

Re: Please help a brain failed man!

Tim Trent

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:08:36 +0100

134 lines

Re: Please help a brain failed man!

Richardson Simon (Gateshead PCT)

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:04:01 +0100

100 lines

Please help a brain failed man!

Tim Trent

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:10:00 +0100

57 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Tim Trent

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:04:23 +0100

60 lines

FOI Advice Please.

Rachel Markham

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:46:54 +0100

49 lines

Re: Top or bottom posting was Re: Email quarantine systems

HOWLETT Sue L

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:41:57 +0100

303 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Roland Perry

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:40:11 +0100

35 lines

Re: Top or bottom posting was Re: Email quarantine systems

Tubbs Martin

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:59:41 +0100

265 lines

Top or bottom posting was Re: Email quarantine systems

Charles Christacopoulos

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:10:43 +0100

220 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Nick Landau

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:19:44 +0100

117 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:13:22 +0100

57 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Tim Trent

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:36:02 +0100

213 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Nick Landau

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:28:49 +0100

134 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:18:22 +0100

90 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Nick Landau

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:12:47 +0100

116 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Nick Landau

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:00:59 +0100

206 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Christopher Spray

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:04:07 +0100

49 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:28:54 +0100

208 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:28:22 +0100

276 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Tim Trent

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:24:31 +0100

154 lines

Re: Email quarantine systems

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:19:45 +0100

136 lines

Email quarantine systems

Tim Trent

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:15:54 +0100

73 lines

TPS Q & A

Tim Trent

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:12:59 +0100

71 lines

NPF

Sue Howlett

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:59:44 +0100

26 lines

USA is pushing EEA to change Data Transfer Rules

Tim Trent

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:53:53 +0100

59 lines

NPF

Sue Howlett

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:05:21 +0100

85 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:38:29 +0100

42 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Simon Howarth

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:25:05 +0100

86 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:37:47 +0100

50 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:18:13 +0100

82 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:56:45 +0100

40 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:44:02 +0100

47 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Roland Perry

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:06:01 +0100

51 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Roland Perry

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:57:07 +0100

47 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Tim Turner

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:41:48 +0100

269 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Nick Landau

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:19:23 +0100

238 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:04:29 +0100

208 lines

Re: Public authorities in Northern Ireland have been told the Data Protection Act is not a barrier to monitoring for equal opportunities (news item)

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:57:35 +0100

165 lines

Re: Email addresses

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:55:50 +0100

54 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Tim Trent

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:52:51 +0100

176 lines

Re: Email addresses

Tim Trent

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:49:46 +0100

115 lines

Re: Public authorities in Northern Ireland have been told the Data Protection Act is not a barrier to monitoring for equal opportunities (news item)

Nick Landau

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:46:21 +0100

133 lines

Re: Email addresses

Nigel Roberts

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:43:14 +0100

80 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:41:26 +0100

123 lines

Re: Public authorities in Northern Ireland have been told the Data Protection Act is not a barrier to monitoring for equal opportunities (news item)

Healy, Susan

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:27:56 +0100

97 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Roland Perry

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:52:30 +0100

65 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Roland Perry

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:43:31 +0100

41 lines

Re: Email addresses

Nick Landau

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:42:42 +0100

71 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Nick Landau

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:35:38 +0100

49 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Simon Howarth

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:41:01 +0100

33 lines

Re: Email addresses

Simon Howarth

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:34:33 +0100

44 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Roland Perry

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:53:54 +0100

34 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:44:32 +0100

63 lines

Public authorities in Northern Ireland have been told the Data Protection Act is not a barrier to monitoring for equal opportunities (news item)

Nick Landau

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:42:13 +0100

33 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Nick Landau

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:29:11 +0100

76 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Roland Perry

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:17:14 +0100

38 lines

Re: Email addresses

Roland Perry

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:42:29 +0100

40 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Nick Landau

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:34:05 +0100

63 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:57:39 +0100

34 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:52:05 +0100

66 lines

Hotel keeping card details...

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:18:40 +0100

30 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Lee Gardiner

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:44:39 +0100

88 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Richardson Simon (Gateshead PCT)

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:53:45 +0100

165 lines

Hotel keeping card details...

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:44:03 +0100

38 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Jim Whitaker

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:33:07 +0100

134 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:19:46 +0100

187 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Paul Ticher

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:11:22 +0100

129 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Paul Ticher

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:03:01 +0100

114 lines

Re: Email addresses

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:02:59 +0100

32 lines

Chasing a Sundry Debtor

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:55:33 +0100

26 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Nigel Roberts

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:39:12 +0100

105 lines

Re: Hotel keeping card details...

Nick Landau

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:32:16 +0100

73 lines

Re: Personal email addresses are personal data.

Tim Trent

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:28:19 +0100

227 lines

Hotel keeping card details...

Duncan Langford

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:20:17 +0100

36 lines

Re: Personal email addresses are personal data.

Jim Whitaker

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:17:10 +0100

206 lines

Chasing a Sundry Debtor

Cotterill Steve

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:16:41 +0100

69 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:12:41 +0100

68 lines

Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jim Whitaker

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:05:07 +0100

90 lines

Re: National Identity Fraud Week

Nick Landau

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:02:22 +0100

131 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Nick Landau

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:29:25 +0100

221 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:29:10 +0100

235 lines

Re: National Identity Fraud Week

Tim Trent

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:27:27 +0100

106 lines

Re: National Identity Fraud Week

Nick Landau

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:23:56 +0100

80 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:17:53 +0100

190 lines

Re: National Identity Fraud Week

Tim Trent

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:17:34 +0100

55 lines

National Identity Fraud Week

Nick Landau

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:11:56 +0100

31 lines

Re: Personal email addresses are personal data.

Tim Trent

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:07:21 +0100

155 lines

Re: Personal email addresses are personal data.

Paul Ticher

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:58:12 +0100

114 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:32:35 +0100

156 lines

FOI request to a copy of the Infraction proceedings re UK

POUNDER Chris

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:08:55 +0100

63 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:52:19 +0100

119 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:20:57 +0100

94 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Nick Landau

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:36:35 +0100

91 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:22:58 +0100

64 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:13:23 +0100

55 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:09:36 +0100

31 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:12:39 +0100

36 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:10:41 +0100

39 lines

various "Apologies for cross postings"

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:37:31 +0100

73 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:22:30 +0100

62 lines

Re: Durant and e-mail addresses (was Councils using cc lists for a mailing)

Paul Ticher

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:52:39 +0100

165 lines

Personal email addresses are personal data.

Jim Whitaker

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:48:42 +0100

84 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:46:09 +0100

48 lines

Records Manager - Job Vacancy at JISC infoNet

Janette Hillicks

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:42:17 +0100

83 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:38:14 +0100

249 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:30:10 +0100

58 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jim Whitaker

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:30:03 +0100

84 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:12:10 +0100

37 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:10:31 +0100

51 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:09:41 +0100

45 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:02:48 +0100

208 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:55:31 +0100

147 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tinsley, Chris

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:53:07 +0100

262 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:50:18 +0100

126 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Paul Ticher

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:44:45 +0100

95 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:22:58 +0100

110 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

datap

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:17:27 +0100

193 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:08:06 +0100

42 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:05:11 +0100

34 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tinsley, Chris

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:01:08 +0100

205 lines

FW: [data-protection] Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Justice, Sally

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:55:59 +0100

83 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:55:24 +0100

262 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:52:14 +0100

184 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tinsley, Chris

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:33:41 +0100

156 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:27:40 +0100

109 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Jethro R Binks

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:26:22 +0100

117 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Tinsley, Chris

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:16:32 +0100

87 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:13:41 +0100

107 lines

Re: Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Simon Howarth

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:09:37 +0100

76 lines

Councils using cc lists for a mailing

Roland Perry

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:56:54 +0100

38 lines

Job opportunity in the north east of England

Julie Bee

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:37:46 +0100

103 lines

Re: University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study

Ugonwa Ekweozor

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:39:22 +0100

267 lines

Re: ID Cards

Nick Landau

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:48:00 +0100

125 lines

ID Cards

Tim Trent

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:37:39 +0100

63 lines

Re: RFID getting closer!

Nick Landau

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:27:36 +0100

115 lines

RFID getting closer!

DREW Nic

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:55:37 +0100

75 lines

Re: Toucan Telecom

Tim Trent

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:48:58 +0100

175 lines

Re: Toucan Telecom

datap

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:40:52 +0100

152 lines

Re: Commercial use of this List

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:17:13 +0100

192 lines

Toucan Telecom

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:20:24 +0100

70 lines

Re: University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:13:49 +0100

235 lines

Commercial use of this List

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:11:54 +0100

95 lines

Re: 3rd Annual FOI Conference

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:58:04 +0100

91 lines

Re: University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study

Ugonwa Ekweozor

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:50:18 +0100

191 lines

Re: 3rd Annual FOI Conference

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:42:28 +0100

42 lines

Re: 3rd Annual FOI Conference

Paul Ticher

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:30:20 +0100

96 lines

Re: "Unauthorised" access by repairer to computer datasets

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:03:12 +0100

95 lines

"Unauthorised" access by repairer to computer datasets

Nick Landau

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:37:22 +0100

59 lines

BBC Radio 4 You and Yours Item on Identity Fraud

Nick Landau

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:47:58 +0100

36 lines

Re: University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:32:06 +0100

147 lines

Re: University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study

Simon Howarth

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:26:51 +0100

133 lines

3rd Annual FOI Conference

Ayaz Patel

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:06:33 +0100

54 lines

Re: University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:10:09 +0100

77 lines

Re: University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:56:08 +0100

99 lines

Re: MySpace and DPA

Paul Ticher

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:53:03 +0100

84 lines

Re: University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:18:08 +0100

79 lines

University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study

Ugonwa Ekweozor

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:03:43 +0100

50 lines

University of Manchester Knowledge Management Study

Ugonwa Ekweozor

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:49:01 +0100

57 lines

Conducting an Information Audit

Ayaz Patel

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:55:12 +0100

45 lines

MySpace and DPA

Gerry Dane

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:54:56 +0100

45 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

Nick Landau

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:44:02 +0100

50 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

Peter Burgess

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:11:23 +0100

114 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

Nick Landau

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:30:53 +0100

74 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

Nick Landau

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:45:03 +0100

131 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:39:16 +0100

108 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

POUNDER Chris

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:31:14 +0100

89 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes

Tim Trent

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:30:27 +0100

68 lines

Re: Data Protection Jokes[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:26:38 +0100

130 lines

Data Protection Jokes

Sophie Pilkington

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:22:31 +0100

51 lines

Re: UKIC and requiring timely compliance with PECR

Nick Landau

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:20:56 +0100

55 lines

Re: UKIC and requiring timely compliance with PECR

Tim Trent

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:50:28 +0100

206 lines

Re: UKIC and requiring timely compliance with PECR

Griffiths, Ian

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:46:25 +0100

177 lines

Re: UKIC and requiring timely compliance with PECR

Tim Trent

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:34:14 +0100

137 lines

Re: UKIC and requiring timely compliance with PECR

Griffiths, Ian

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:23:42 +0100

100 lines

UKIC and requiring timely compliance with PECR

Tim Trent

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:46:33 +0100

94 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Roland Perry

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:16:18 +0100

32 lines

Re: Bank security by phone

Tim Trent

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:17:05 +0100

193 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Cotterill Steve

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:15:50 +0100

224 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Nick Landau

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:10:18 +0100

175 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Smith, Tony

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:05:14 +0100

157 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Tim Trent

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:34:14 +0100

115 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Nick Landau

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:24:39 +0100

117 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:56:04 +0100

82 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Roland Perry

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:50:52 +0100

39 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:25:47 +0100

377 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Paul Dodgson

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:48:38 +0100

266 lines

Re: Every day I meet something I had never thought of before

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:06:11 +0100

196 lines

Re: Every day I meet something I had never thought of before

Simon Howarth

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:15:21 +0100

103 lines

Every day I meet something I had never thought of before

Tim Trent

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:38:42 +0100

66 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Nigel Roberts

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:31:05 +0100

218 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Hitches, John F

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:08:43 +0100

38 lines

Re: OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

Nigel Roberts

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 15:34:58 +0100

34 lines

Re: CH4 Dispatches

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 14:05:23 +0100

106 lines

OIC investigates CH4 Dispatche allegations

POUNDER Chris

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:23:43 +0100

175 lines

Re: CH4 Dispatches

Ian Welton

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:03:03 +0100

82 lines

Swift and data Privacy

Tim Trent

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:49:19 +0100

70 lines

CH4 Dispatches

Nigel Roberts

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:59:38 +0100

39 lines

Re: 3RD ANNUAL FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CONFERENCE : Two Years On

Tony Bowden

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:03:08 +0100

44 lines

Re: 3RD ANNUAL FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CONFERENCE : Two Years On

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:36:17 +0100

82 lines

3RD ANNUAL FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CONFERENCE : Two Years On

Ayaz Patel

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:11:48 +0100

42 lines

Re: Data sales for tax cuts (news item)

Nick Landau

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:51:13 +0100

120 lines

Re: Data sales for tax cuts (news item)

Nick Landau

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:42:15 +0100

84 lines

Re: Data sales for tax cuts (news item)

Tim Trent

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:09:16 +0100

57 lines

Data sales for tax cuts (news item)

Nick Landau

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:18:48 +0100

32 lines

Re: Posting a message by Proxy

Andrew Charlesworth

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:31:29 +0100

222 lines

Re: Posting a message by Proxy

Nigel Roberts

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:07:36 +0100

46 lines

Re: Posting a message by Proxy

Nick Landau

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:05:38 +0100

185 lines

Re: Posting a message by Proxy

Nigel Roberts

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:03:28 +0100

162 lines

Re: Posting a message by Proxy

Nick Landau

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:02:44 +0100

197 lines

Re: Posting a message by Proxy

Nick Landau

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:51:18 +0100

185 lines

Re: Posting a message by Proxy

Iain Harrison

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:41:44 +0100

175 lines

Re: Posting a message by Proxy

<>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:40:44 +0100

171 lines

Re: Posting a message by Proxy

Nigel Roberts

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:33:25 +0100

128 lines

Re: Posting a message by Proxy

Tim Trent

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:22:23 +0100

133 lines

Posting a message by Proxy

Tim Trent

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:14:59 +0100

94 lines

Re: Who pays for elected member notification?

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:13:37 +0100

226 lines

Re: Who pays for elected member notification?

Alan Stead

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:03:01 +0100

179 lines

Act Now Training - 3rd Annual FOI Conference

Ayaz Patel

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:49:51 +0100

39 lines

Act Now Training - 3rd Annual FOI Conference

Ayaz Patel

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:39:48 +0100

39 lines

Re: Inadvertent disclosure

Simon Howarth

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:11:09 +0100

74 lines

Re: Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality

Simon Howarth

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:10:49 +0100

254 lines

Re: Who pays for elected member notification?

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:38:45 +0100

154 lines

Re: Who pays for elected member notification?

Tim Turner

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:22:19 +0100

49 lines

Re: Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality

Tim Trent

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:20:52 +0100

224 lines

Re: Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality

Karen Waite

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:45:29 +0100

203 lines

Re: Inadvertent disclosure

Nigel Roberts

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:42:30 +0100

89 lines

Re: Inadvertent disclosure

Nick Landau

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 00:00:33 +0100

48 lines

Re: Inadvertent disclosure

Nick Landau

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:29:19 +0100

248 lines

Re: List Shrinkage

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:37:49 +0100

311 lines

Re: Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality

Roland Perry

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:51:21 +0100

49 lines

Re: Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality

Roland Perry

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:47:02 +0100

37 lines

Re: Inadvertent disclosure

RONAN DURNIN

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:31:45 +0100

214 lines

Re: List Monitoring

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:59:39 +0100

181 lines

Re: List Monitoring

Nick Landau

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:33:21 +0100

115 lines

Re: List Monitoring

Samantha Hill

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:32:32 +0100

89 lines

Re: List Monitoring

Nick Landau

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:27:54 +0100

85 lines

Re: Who pays for elected member notification?

Julie Gibbs

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:26:41 +0100

124 lines

Re: List Monitoring[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:05:00 +0100

130 lines

List Monitoring

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:00:43 +0100

53 lines

Re: Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality[Scanned]

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:40:58 +0100

212 lines

Re: Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality[Scanned]

Nick Landau

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:36:42 +0100

155 lines

Re: Who pays for elected member notification?

Nicola Storey

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:30:18 GMT

80 lines

Re: List Shrinkage[Scanned]

Nick Landau

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:27:49 +0100

424 lines

Re: Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:24:48 +0100

174 lines

Re: Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality

Anne Gadsden

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:16:36 +0100

119 lines

Re: Who pays for elected member notification?

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:15:02 +0100

186 lines

Re: Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:10:08 +0100

126 lines

Re: List Shrinkage[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:04:57 +0100

383 lines

Re: List Shrinkage

Karen Waite

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:04:05 +0100

300 lines

Re: List Shrinkage

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:02:58 +0100

273 lines

Re: Who pays for elected member notification?

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:01:37 +0100

113 lines

Who pays for elected member notification?

Tim Turner

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:57:40 +0100

51 lines

Hospital Privacy/Confidentiality

Nick Landau

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:34:42 +0100

36 lines

Re: List Shrinkage

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:20:56 +0100

209 lines

Re: List Shrinkage

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:14:29 +0100

198 lines

Re: List Shrinkage

Jane Bartlett

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:57:09 +0100

185 lines

Re: List Shrinkage

Nick Landau

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:55:44 +0100

170 lines

Re: Inadvertent disclosure

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:55:17 +0100

105 lines

Inadvertent disclosure

RONAN DURNIN

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:48:29 +0100

78 lines

Re: List Shrinkage

<>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:33:48 +0100

126 lines

List Shrinkage

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:18:49 +0100

57 lines

As we move inexorably towards Friday....

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:09:04 +0100

65 lines

Podcast

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:35:55 +0100

49 lines

Re: BT Text Message Delivery Service

Tim Trent

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:07:10 +0100

77 lines

Re: BT Text Message Delivery Service

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:00:27 +0100

104 lines

Re: BT Text Message Delivery Service

Roland Perry

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:59:35 +0100

51 lines

BT Text Message Delivery Service

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:27:24 +0100

53 lines

test

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:25:56 +0100

43 lines

Peter Dinsdale is out of the office

Peter Dinsdale

Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:01:24 +0100

33 lines

Re: DP Question on an external forum

Tim Trent

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:06:05 +0100

52 lines

Re: DP Question on an external forum

Tim Trent

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:05:59 +0100

80 lines

Re: DP Question on an external forum relating to HR record in previous job

Nick Landau

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:33:42 +0100

40 lines

Re: DP Question on an external forum relating to HR record in previous job

Smith, Tony

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:17:14 +0100

169 lines

Re: DP Question on an external forum relating to HR record in previous job

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:50:17 +0100

223 lines

Re: DP Question on an external forum relating to HR record in previous job

Nick Landau

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:53:53 +0100

114 lines

Re: DP Question on an external forum

Simon Howarth

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:19:26 +0100

59 lines

DP Question on an external forum

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:40:50 +0100

30 lines

Re: DP Question on an external forum regarding Retention of Employment records

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:35:11 +0100

223 lines

Re: DP Question on an external forum

Nick Landau

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:22:49 +0100

147 lines

Re: DP Question on an external forum regarding Retention of Employment records

Nick Landau

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:07:19 +0100

150 lines

Re: DP Question on an external forum

Smith, Tony

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:49:22 +0100

93 lines

DP Question on an external forum

Tim Trent

Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:30:49 +0100

62 lines

Re: Information Request

Richardson Simon (Gateshead PCT)

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:46:48 +0100

120 lines

Re: Information Request

Nick Landau

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:21:51 +0100

103 lines

Re: Information Request

Paul Ticher

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:21:01 +0100

112 lines

Information Request

Cotterill Steve

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:33:12 +0100

67 lines

Re: Public Holidays

Tim Trent

Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:51:23 +0100

142 lines

Re: Public Holidays

Tim Turner

Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:15:12 +0100

118 lines

Re: Public Holidays

Nigel Roberts

Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:45:14 +0100

108 lines

Re: Public Holidays

Nick Landau

Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:40:43 +0100

162 lines

Re: Public Holidays

Donald Henderson

Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:33:37 +0100

136 lines

Public Holidays

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:26:46 +0100

74 lines

Re: S35(1) and 'Court'

Robert Dawson

Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:43:04 +0100

76 lines

Re: S35(1) and 'Court'

Nick Landau

Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:51:54 +0100

72 lines

S35(1) and 'Court'

Gerry Dane

Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:40:19 +0100

33 lines

192.com

Nigel Roberts

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:17:09 +0100

73 lines

Re: [UCE] Re: [data-protection] Use of Business Rates Information[Scanned]

Nigel Roberts

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:32:58 +0100

73 lines

Re: [UCE] Re: [data-protection] Use of Business Rates Information[Scanned]

Nick Landau

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:22:32 +0100

77 lines

Re: [UCE] Re: [data-protection] Use of Business Rates Information[Scanned]

Nigel Roberts

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:12:37 +0100

45 lines

Re: [UCE] Re: [data-protection] Use of Business Rates Information[Scanned]

Peter Dinsdale

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:02:24 +0100

250 lines

Re: Use of Business Rates Information

Julie Gibbs

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:39:08 +0100

86 lines

Re: [UCE] Re: [data-protection] Use of Business Rates Information[Scanned]

Donald Henderson

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:30:20 +0100

222 lines

Re: Use of Business Rates Information[Scanned]

Nigel Roberts

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:42:32 +0100

146 lines

Re: Use of Business Rates Information

Tim Trent

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:37:49 +0100

107 lines

Use of Business Rates Information

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:32:49 +0100

32 lines

Re: Use of Business Rates Information

Simon Howarth

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:26:20 +0100

80 lines

Re: Use of Business Rates Information[Scanned]

RONAN DURNIN

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:50:08 +0100

126 lines

Re: Use of Business Rates Information

Tim Trent

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:42:37 +0100

71 lines

Use of Business Rates Information

Julie Gibbs

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:38:08 +0100

45 lines

Re: Question on a reference

Simon Howarth

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:12:17 +0100

133 lines

Re: Question on a reference

Tim Trent

Mon, 18 Sep 2006 08:01:41 +0100

103 lines

Re: Question on a reference

Office (Ayaz)

Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:19:34 +0100

72 lines

UC RE: [data-protection] 10 fee for SA R

Talbot Richard

Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:15:38 +0100

104 lines

Re: £10 fee for SAR

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:33:52 +0100

96 lines

Re: Section (29)

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:01:24 +0100

144 lines

Re: Section (29)

Tinsley, Chris

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:27:01 +0100

89 lines

Re: Section (29)

Lee Gardiner

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:16:55 +0100

89 lines

Re: Section (29)

Samantha Hill

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:04:25 +0100

44 lines

Re: £10 fee for SAR

Samantha Hill

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:12:48 +0100

39 lines

Section (29)

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:57:10 +0100

40 lines

Re: £10 fee for SAR

Lee Gardiner

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:26:44 +0100

99 lines

Re: £10 fee for SAR

Tim Trent

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:16:54 +0100

130 lines

Re: £10 fee for SAR

Gerry Dane

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:11:25 +0100

83 lines

Re: £10 fee for SAR

Mary Liddell

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:40:24 +0100

90 lines

Have your say

David Wyatt

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:42:42 +0100

38 lines

£10 fee for SAR

Kirsty Gray

Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:24:36 +0100

46 lines

World E-Gov Forum 18-20 October 2006 Paris

Nick Landau

Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:21:27 +0100

30 lines

Re: Recording passengers on planes

Tinsley, Chris

Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:01:38 +0100

188 lines

Re: Recording passengers on planes

Paul Dodgson

Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:00:06 +0100

158 lines

Re: Recording passengers on planes

Tim Trent

Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:49:24 +0100

127 lines

Re: Recording passengers on planes

Nigel Roberts

Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:38:28 +0100

96 lines

Re: Recording passengers on planes

Tinsley, Chris

Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:28:55 +0100

137 lines

Re: Recording passengers on planes

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:27:18 +0100

132 lines

Recording passengers on planes

datap

Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:47:06 +0100

69 lines

Recall: Set * nomail

Clarke-Round, Lesley

Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:18:50 +0100

24 lines

Re: Question on a reference[Scanned]

David Wyatt

Wed, 6 Sep 2006 22:16:05 +0100

371 lines

Re: Question on a reference[Scanned]

David Wyatt

Wed, 6 Sep 2006 21:49:57 +0100

217 lines

Re: Question on a reference[Scanned]

Andrew Charlesworth

Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:25:30 -0400

322 lines

Re: Question on a reference[Scanned]

Keith G Fraser

Wed, 6 Sep 2006 21:16:27 +0100

219 lines