JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CETIS-METADATA Archives


CETIS-METADATA Archives

CETIS-METADATA Archives


May 2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

a moratorium on metadata? (3 messages)
before it gets all serious again... (1 message)
CoLIS Workshop Announcement and Call for Contributions (1 message)
DCC Workshop on Persistent Identifiers - Registration now open (1 message)
DELOS Summer School 2005 (1 message)
Distributed Service Registry Workshop 14-15 July 2005 - Registration open (1 message)
Do they mean metadata?! (30 messages)
Do they mean metadata?! OT (2 messages)
Early bird deadline approaching - Metadata workshop. (1 message)
Extending/modifying LOM vocabularies (5 messages)
Fw: What do we mean by metadata? (2 messages)
google vs librarians (3 messages)
How do you refer to a different system's cataloguing record for an item? (3 messages)
Identifiers for QTI assessmentItems (1 message)
Invitation to attend DCC Site Visit - Glasgow (1 message)
legal metadata and resource discovery (9 messages)
Mac OS X system metadata (1 message)
New British Standard on interoperability between metadata systems (1 message)
Survey on UKEL (1 message)
What do we mean by metadata? (30 messages)
Which LOM.Classification Purpose (LOM 9.1) for syllabus, curriculum data? (1 message)
XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata (12 messages)
[Fwd: Re: [CETIS-METADATA] Which LOM.Classification Purpose (LOM 9.1) for syllabus, curriculum data?] (2 messages)
[Fwd: [LOM-XML:] FW: P1484.12.3 Approval Notification] (1 message)
[Fwd: [LTSC-LOM:] ProLearn LOMI Research Seminars] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CETIS-METADATA Home

CETIS-METADATA Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

a moratorium on metadata?

a moratorium on metadata?

Scott Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 09:25:35 +1000

106 lines

Re: a moratorium on metadata?

Simon Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 07:27:13 +0100

53 lines

Re: a moratorium on metadata?

Steve Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 12:50:02 +0100

100 lines

New Thread

before it gets all serious again...

before it gets all serious again...

Sarah Currier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2005 13:30:37 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

CoLIS Workshop Announcement and Call for Contributions

CoLIS Workshop Announcement and Call for Contributions

Robert John Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2005 19:17:59 +0100

118 lines

New Thread

DCC Workshop on Persistent Identifiers - Registration now open

DCC Workshop on Persistent Identifiers - Registration now open

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2005 16:07:44 +0100

154 lines

New Thread

DELOS Summer School 2005

DELOS Summer School 2005

Joy Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 May 2005 16:24:40 +0100

127 lines

New Thread

Distributed Service Registry Workshop 14-15 July 2005 - Registration open

Distributed Service Registry Workshop 14-15 July 2005 - Registration open

Natasha Bishop <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2005 16:17:50 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Do they mean metadata?!

Do they mean metadata?!

Lorna Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2005 14:48:32 +0100

88 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Rowin Young <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2005 14:53:23 +0100

68 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Sarah Currier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2005 15:03:43 +0100

230 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Steve Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2005 15:10:35 +0100

110 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

George Macgregor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2005 15:06:06 +0100

102 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Wilbert Kraan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2005 17:41:24 +0100

133 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Sarah Currier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2005 18:03:52 +0100

190 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Simon Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2005 19:03:31 +0100

55 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Steve Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2005 19:25:57 +0100

254 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

George Macgregor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2005 14:18:53 +0100

344 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Scott Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 May 2005 13:35:46 +1000

275 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

George Macgregor <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 11:35:53 +0100

336 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Sarah Currier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 11:49:26 +0100

887 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Vashti Zarach <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 12:46:23 +0100

561 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Steve Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 12:49:08 +0100

523 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Steve Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 13:21:29 +0100

697 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Vashti Zarach <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 13:53:40 +0100

791 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Sarah Currier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 14:00:06 +0100

2073 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Paul Hollands <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 14:11:06 +0100

60 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Sarah Currier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 14:21:59 +0100

48 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Paul Hollands <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 14:27:26 +0100

20 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Vashti Zarach <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 14:32:01 +0100

68 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Suzanne Hardy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 14:34:35 +0100

52 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

George Macgregor <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 14:52:25 +0100

603 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Steve Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 15:17:00 +0100

1122 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Paul Hollands <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 15:22:13 +0100

39 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

George Macgregor <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 16:03:55 +0100

1277 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Sarah Currier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 16:49:32 +0100

84 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Scott Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 May 2005 15:06:38 +1000

81 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?!

Steve Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 14:51:12 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Do they mean metadata?! OT

Re: Do they mean metadata?! OT

Suzanne Hardy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 14:07:16 +0100

950 lines

Re: Do they mean metadata?! OT

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 14:20:36 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Early bird deadline approaching - Metadata workshop.

Early bird deadline approaching - Metadata workshop.

Gillian Sinclair <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2005 16:26:27 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Extending/modifying LOM vocabularies

Extending/modifying LOM vocabularies

Flack, Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2005 10:37:57 +1000

48 lines

Re: Extending/modifying LOM vocabularies

Sarah Currier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2005 09:38:47 +0100

134 lines

Re: Extending/modifying LOM vocabularies

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2005 10:29:09 +0100

86 lines

Re: Extending/modifying LOM vocabularies

Lassi Nirhamo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2005 13:44:02 +0300

101 lines

Re: Extending/modifying LOM vocabularies

RILEY, Elizabeth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 14:14:02 +1000

71 lines

New Thread

Fw: What do we mean by metadata?

Fw: What do we mean by metadata?

Melanie Bates <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 08:18:52 +0100

53 lines

Re: Fw: What do we mean by metadata?

Lassi Nirhamo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2005 12:17:58 +0300

99 lines

New Thread

google vs librarians

google vs librarians

Amber Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2005 12:31:16 +0100

145 lines

Re: google vs librarians

Jake Wallis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2005 13:23:38 +0100

395 lines

Re: google vs librarians

Jerome Di Pietro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2005 14:57:45 +0100

573 lines

New Thread

How do you refer to a different system's cataloguing record for an item?

How do you refer to a different system's cataloguing record for an item?

RILEY, Elizabeth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2005 11:19:55 +1000

30 lines

Re: How do you refer to a different system's cataloguing record for an item?

Daniel R. Rehak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2005 21:45:16 -0400

75 lines

Re: How do you refer to a different system's cataloguing record for an item?

Mike Collett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2005 11:06:20 +0100

113 lines

New Thread

Identifiers for QTI assessmentItems

Identifiers for QTI assessmentItems

Rowin Young <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 May 2005 15:16:59 +0100

215 lines

New Thread

Invitation to attend DCC Site Visit - Glasgow

Invitation to attend DCC Site Visit - Glasgow

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2005 11:27:39 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

legal metadata and resource discovery

legal metadata and resource discovery

Amber Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 15:26:02 +0100

153 lines

Re: legal metadata and resource discovery

John Casey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 15:47:43 +0100

215 lines

Re: legal metadata and resource discovery

Kenny Baird <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2005 15:25:29 +0100

98 lines

Re: legal metadata and resource discovery

Scott Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 16:25:20 +1000

501 lines

Re: legal metadata and resource discovery

Scott Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2005 12:03:19 +1000

365 lines

Re: legal metadata and resource discovery

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 08:31:38 +0100

196 lines

Re: legal metadata and resource discovery

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 09:56:24 +0100

43 lines

Re: legal metadata and resource discovery

moira massey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 10:12:15 +0100

351 lines

Re: legal metadata and resource discovery

Andy Heath <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 May 2005 12:59:21 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Mac OS X system metadata

Mac OS X system metadata

Scott Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2005 15:02:48 +1000

78 lines

New Thread

New British Standard on interoperability between metadata systems

New British Standard on interoperability between metadata systems

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 12:32:47 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

Survey on UKEL

Survey on UKEL

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2005 11:21:04 +0100

122 lines

New Thread

What do we mean by metadata?

What do we mean by metadata?

Simon Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2005 07:23:16 +0100

72 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Steve Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2005 10:00:19 +0100

100 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Steve Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2005 11:15:52 +0100

76 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Simon Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2005 12:36:36 +0100

74 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

George Macgregor <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2005 12:42:37 +0100

146 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Simon Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2005 16:05:29 +0100

63 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Fred Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 May 2005 16:39:48 +0100

48 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Scott Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 09:47:14 +1000

111 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Rob Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 07:21:52 +0100

16 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Simon Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 07:57:30 +0100

33 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Tom Franklin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 09:37:40 +0100

34 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Andy Heath <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 10:17:49 +0100

67 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Simon Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 13:08:30 +0100

107 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Andy Heath <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 13:18:15 +0100

26 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Steve Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 13:42:04 +0100

180 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Simon Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2005 15:04:40 +0100

55 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 09:14:41 +0200

157 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 08:37:32 +0100

31 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 10:09:05 +0200

82 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 10:10:50 +0100

49 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 11:41:01 +0200

126 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Matthew J. Dovey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 11:07:32 +0100

64 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 12:08:24 +0200

56 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Steve Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 11:12:37 +0100

51 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 13:05:50 +0200

101 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 13:18:50 +0200

92 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 12:38:34 +0100

43 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 13:59:53 +0200

73 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 13:05:14 +0100

49 lines

Re: What do we mean by metadata?

Steve Richardson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 13:36:35 +0100

149 lines

New Thread

Which LOM.Classification Purpose (LOM 9.1) for syllabus, curriculum data?

Which LOM.Classification Purpose (LOM 9.1) for syllabus, curriculum data?

Flack, Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2005 12:29:15 +1000

50 lines

New Thread

XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

Pierre Gorissen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 10:38:30 +0200

47 lines

Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 10:12:10 +0100

63 lines

Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 11:10:31 +0100

62 lines

Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

Lorna Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 17:12:12 +0100

110 lines

Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

Wilbert Kraan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 15:08:01 -0500

80 lines

Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

Pierre Gorissen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 22:43:36 +0200

80 lines

Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

Daniel R. Rehak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 20:49:41 -0400

111 lines

Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

Scott Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 14:25:53 +1000

149 lines

Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

Pierre Gorissen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 08:25:11 +0200

191 lines

Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

Lorna Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 12:34:15 +0100

175 lines

Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 13:05:39 +0100

56 lines

Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata

Scott Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 May 2005 12:47:45 +1000

123 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: Re: [CETIS-METADATA] Which LOM.Classification Purpose (LOM 9.1) for syllabus, curriculum data?]

[Fwd: Re: [CETIS-METADATA] Which LOM.Classification Purpose (LOM 9.1) for syllabus, curriculum data?]

Sarah Currier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 May 2005 12:37:59 +0100

275 lines

Re: [Fwd: Re: [CETIS-METADATA] Which LOM.Classification Purpose (LOM 9.1) for syllabus, curriculum data?]

Flack, Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 May 2005 12:16:55 +1000

465 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: [LOM-XML:] FW: P1484.12.3 Approval Notification]

[Fwd: [LOM-XML:] FW: P1484.12.3 Approval Notification]

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 10:15:20 +0100

121 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: [LTSC-LOM:] ProLearn LOMI Research Seminars]

[Fwd: [LTSC-LOM:] ProLearn LOMI Research Seminars]

Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 May 2005 09:36:27 +0100

66 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager