JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CETIS-METADATA Archives


CETIS-METADATA Archives

CETIS-METADATA Archives


March 2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

AHDS Information Paper on XML Editors (1 message)
anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: S econd one] (1 message)
anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one] (8 messages)
anyone for pedagogy? (2 messages)
Classification (was: anyone for pedagogy...) (1 message)
CORDRA Workshop Report published (1 message)
DELOS Digital Preservation Summer School 2005 (1 message)
Guides to metadata (3 messages)
here's my joke about IPR in e-learning (3 messages)
Identifiers. Was: RE: Questions re 9. Classification: First one (1 message)
JISC ITTs - e-Assessment (1 message)
Linking to external metadata files (3 messages)
Oclc and ddc was: RE: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one (1 message)
Online Metadata and Semantics Research Conference (1 message)
Open meeting of the CETIS Learner Information Profiles SIG (1 message)
Open Source Learning Object Repositories (4 messages)
OpenSearch (3 messages)
Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing? (24 messages)
Questions re 9. Classification: First one (14 messages)
Questions re 9. Classification: Second one (8 messages)
Repository Ecology and ELF presentations (1 message)
Taxonomy registry was: RE: Questions re 9. Classification: First one (2 messages)
UK LOM Core (3 messages)
[Fwd: digital repositories call for proposals] (1 message)
[Fwd: FW: Launch of e-Learning Focus site] (1 message)
[Fwd: Fwd: [amega] need help disseminating the annoucmenet] (1 message)
[Fwd: [LTSC-LOM:] LOMnext] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CETIS-METADATA Home

CETIS-METADATA Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Most Recent First

From

Date

Size

New Thread

AHDS Information Paper on XML Editors

Fwd: AHDS Information Paper on XML Editors

John Casey

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:32:04 +0000

266 lines

New Thread

anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: S econd one]

Re: anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: S econd one]

Dr David Davies

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:28:08 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one]

Re: anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one]

Jane Read

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:42:29 -0000

147 lines

Re: anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one]

Bill Olivier

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:33:03 +0000

910 lines

Re: anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one]

Pete Johnston

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:10:09 +0000

29 lines

Re: anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one]

Scott Wilson

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:08:51 +1100

171 lines

Re: anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one]

Lorna Campbell

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:45:09 +0000

171 lines

Re: anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one]

Sarah Currier

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:11:56 +0000

80 lines

Re: anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one]

Lisa Corley

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:44:03 -0000

62 lines

anyone for pedagogy [was Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one]

Phil Barker

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:30:15 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

anyone for pedagogy?

Re: anyone for pedagogy?

David Davies

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:24:52 +0000

56 lines

Re: anyone for pedagogy?

Lisa Corley

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:58:52 -0000

194 lines

New Thread

Classification (was: anyone for pedagogy...)

Classification (was: anyone for pedagogy...)

Simon Grant

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:52:22 +0000

62 lines

New Thread

CORDRA Workshop Report published

CORDRA Workshop Report published

Lorna M. Campbell

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:07:52 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

DELOS Digital Preservation Summer School 2005

DELOS Digital Preservation Summer School 2005

Joy Davidson

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:59:04 -0000

560 lines

New Thread

Guides to metadata

Re: Guides to metadata

Lorna M. Campbell

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:54:01 +0000

58 lines

Re: Guides to metadata

Phil Barker

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:40:18 +0000

65 lines

Guides to metadata

Phil Barker

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:07:38 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

here's my joke about IPR in e-learning

Re: here's my joke about IPR in e-learning

Sarah Currier

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:49:12 +0000

265 lines

Re: here's my joke about IPR in e-learning

Lorna Campbell

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:45:29 +0000

222 lines

here's my joke about IPR in e-learning

Sarah Currier

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:59:11 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

Identifiers. Was: RE: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Identifiers. Was: RE: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Dempsey,Lorcan

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:04:25 -0500

95 lines

New Thread

JISC ITTs - e-Assessment

FW: JISC ITTs - e-Assessment

Rowin Young

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:45:42 -0000

451 lines

New Thread

Linking to external metadata files

Re: Linking to external metadata files

Lorna M. Campbell

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:26:00 +0000

97 lines

Re: Linking to external metadata files

Pierre Gorissen

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:39:46 +0100

81 lines

Linking to external metadata files

Owen ONeill

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:21:49 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Oclc and ddc was: RE: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one

Oclc and ddc was: RE: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one

Dempsey,Lorcan

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:44:55 -0500

169 lines

New Thread

Online Metadata and Semantics Research Conference

Online Metadata and Semantics Research Conference

Phil Barker

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:47:29 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Open meeting of the CETIS Learner Information Profiles SIG

Open meeting of the CETIS Learner Information Profiles SIG

Simon Grant

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:09:20 +0000

5981 lines

New Thread

Open Source Learning Object Repositories

Re: Open Source Learning Object Repositories

Jim Martino

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:40:45 -0500

72 lines

Re: Open Source Learning Object Repositories

Lorna M. Campbell

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:44:21 +0000

76 lines

Re: Open Source Learning Object Repositories

Boon Low

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:01:26 +0000

331 lines

Open Source Learning Object Repositories

Andrew Gold

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:53:27 -0000

313 lines

New Thread

OpenSearch

Re: OpenSearch

Andy Powell

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:07:56 +0000

35 lines

Re: OpenSearch

Chris Croome

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:49:18 +0000

27 lines

OpenSearch

Phil Barker

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:27:41 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Jane Read

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:29:36 -0000

99 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Lorna Campbell

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:03:57 +0000

170 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Phil Barker

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:30:09 +0000

62 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Jane Read

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:01:58 -0000

84 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Phil Barker

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:02:23 +0000

52 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Scott Wilson

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:24:52 +1100

177 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Sarah Currier

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:04:34 +0000

105 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Ben Ryan

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:49:33 -0000

92 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Bill Olivier

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:23:22 +0000

65 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Sarah Currier

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:36:28 +0000

827 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Jim Martino

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:23:22 -0500

360 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Ben Ryan

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:21:13 -0000

857 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Sarah Currier

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:13:21 +0000

678 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Ben Ryan

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:06:46 -0000

93 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Andy Powell

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:25:01 +0000

45 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Phil Barker

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:07:00 +0000

59 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Ben Ryan

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:45:00 -0000

666 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Sarah Currier

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:39:56 +0000

625 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Bill Olivier

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:36:16 +0000

171 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Sarah Currier

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:41:43 +0000

115 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Phil Barker

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:39:36 +0000

46 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Bill Olivier

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:31:21 +0000

66 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Sarah Currier

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:52:29 +0000

43 lines

Re: Question re Keywords in the LOM: what are folk doing?

Scott Wilson

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:58:15 +1100

272 lines

New Thread

Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Mike Collett

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:28:41 +0000

76 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Mike Collett

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:30:32 +0000

353 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Phil Barker

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:49:28 +0000

45 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Mike Collett

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:02:05 +0000

350 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Phil Barker

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:17:40 +0000

35 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Pete Johnston

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:20:02 -0000

29 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Jane Read

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:15:53 -0000

57 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Pete Johnston

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:07:04 +0000

46 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Andy Powell

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 23:17:47 +0000

111 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Lorna Campbell

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:15:44 +0000

138 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Pete Johnston

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:29:33 -0000

30 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Sarah Currier

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:01:23 +0000

93 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Charles Duncan

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:24:51 +0000

63 lines

Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Sarah Currier

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:40:09 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

Questions re 9. Classification: Second one

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one

Andy Powell

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:10:19 +0000

119 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one

Lorna Campbell

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:38:04 +0000

155 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one

Sarah Currier

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:23:49 +0000

84 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one

Phil Barker

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:17:34 +0000

53 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one

Sarah Currier

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:52:20 +0000

225 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one

Phil Barker

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:37:50 +0000

43 lines

Re: Questions re 9. Classification: Second one

Ben Ryan

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:48:51 -0000

79 lines

Questions re 9. Classification: Second one

Sarah Currier

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:43:11 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

Repository Ecology and ELF presentations

Repository Ecology and ELF presentations

Lorna Campbell

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:02:43 +0000

84 lines

New Thread

Taxonomy registry was: RE: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Re: Taxonomy registry was: RE: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Pete Johnston

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:48:42 +0000

57 lines

Taxonomy registry was: RE: Questions re 9. Classification: First one

Dempsey,Lorcan

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 23:09:25 -0500

156 lines

New Thread

UK LOM Core

Re: UK LOM Core

Lorna Campbell

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:07:24 +0000

98 lines

Re: UK LOM Core

Andy Powell

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:02:09 +0000

33 lines

Re: UK LOM Core

Lorna Campbell

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:24:11 +0000

301 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: digital repositories call for proposals]

[Fwd: digital repositories call for proposals]

Phil Barker

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:50:43 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: FW: Launch of e-Learning Focus site]

[Fwd: FW: Launch of e-Learning Focus site]

Phil Barker

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:46:12 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: Fwd: [amega] need help disseminating the annoucmenet]

[Fwd: Fwd: [amega] need help disseminating the annoucmenet]

Robert John Robertson

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:32:11 +0100

108 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: [LTSC-LOM:] LOMnext]

[Fwd: [LTSC-LOM:] LOMnext]

Phil Barker

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:35:45 +0100

57 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
October 2022
August 2022
July 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
January 2022
November 2021
September 2021
May 2021
April 2021
February 2021
November 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
February 2020
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
April 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
September 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager