JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Disproportionate Effort" (6 messages)
"Do not re-employ" Lists (11 messages)
"Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal? (8 messages)
"Payslip Marketing" (5 messages)
"Protective Markings" for documents (1 message)
"Public Blog" on Data Protection (3 messages)
'pure' research (9 messages)
'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)' (7 messages)
(reply) Mobile phone scam warning (17 messages)
2nd Annual FOI Conference & Workshop Series (1 message)
2nd CFP ext.:IADIS Security and Privacy in Computing Systems 2005 Conference (1 message)
4th Annual Data Protection Conference (1 message)
A bit of DP, a bit of FOI (1 message)
A FRiday question (4 messages)
A little bit DP, a little bit FOI (for music lovers) or the XYZ affair(forthe diplo historians) (1 message)
A little entertainment (1 message)
A Monday morning question (10 messages)
A Principle 8 question (2 messages)
A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining" (8 messages)
Academic Research - Police Held Information (2 messages)
Access to Chat Rooms (25 messages)
Access to children's records (3 messages)
Access to education records in Scotland (1 message)
Access to Personal Statements (3 messages)
Accident Books (4 messages)
Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away' (19 messages)
Accurate data? (1 message)
Act Now newsletter (1 message)
Act now. Now that is spam! (6 messages)
Address books in collections (1 message)
ADV - Data Protection and Employee Data seminar (1 message)
Adv - Disclosure of Personal Data (1 message)
ADV - DPA/RIPA/HRA awareness for CCTV operators/managers (1 message)
Adv- Access to Communications Data (1 message)
Adv- Surveillance Law and RIPA course (1 message)
Adv. Re-use of Public Sector data briefing. (1 message)
Advertising on the Forum (6 messages)
Advice needed - customers in conflict (4 messages)
Advise (3 messages)
Amendments to the Data Protection Act 1998 (1 message)
An amazing story about an email gone wrong (3 messages)
And what is the UKIC's stance here?? (12 messages)
Anonymised research data - Was - RE: 'pure' research (1 message)
Anyone know what actually happened? (1 message)
Apologies for the Shotgun (2 messages)
Apologies for the spilt link. (1 message)
Apology (1 message)
APRIL:DP DAY UPDATE SESSION IN LONDON, MANCHESTER AND GLASGOW (1 message)
Article 29 DP WP - Data protection: New guidelines on payment card fraud prevention databases (1 message)
Article 29 WP processing of location data (1 message)
Articles of possible interest (1 message)
Assistant Records Manager (Part-Time) Vacancy at the University of Edinburgh (1 message)
Audit Commission Report - ICT Fraud and Abuse. (1 message)
B&NES Council - Records Manager Position (1 message)
Back-up (14 messages)
Bad Bank DP (11 messages)
Bad Law? (was Interview notes) (8 messages)
Behavioural Problems - recording or details and reports (1 message)
Belgium Registrations (1 message)
Best Practice regarding handing complaints or queries on fees (4 messages)
Big Brother Awards 2005 (1 message)
British Library - Record Manager/Archivist Position (1 message)
BSI Data Protection Workshop (1 message)
BT - Breach of DPA? (4 messages)
Burglars beware (7 messages)
Bus passes (6 messages)
Business Cards (4 messages)
Business cards - Friday question (4 messages)
business contact details (4 messages)
Buy buy (3 messages)
Bye bye (10 messages)
Bye bye, buy buy (1 message)
Call centre query (1 message)
Call Centre Staff (10 messages)
Carelessness and lack of attention to detail (1 message)
CCTV (3 messages)
CCTV etc. (5 messages)
CCTV from third parties (2 messages)
CCTV in Hotel (7 messages)
CFP: IADIS Security and Privacy in Computing Systems 2005 Conference (1 message)
Charging for confirmation of exam results (3 messages)
Child Data Sharing (4 messages)
Child Support Agency (7 messages)
Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM (22 messages)
CLINCAL RECORDS LEAD - New Post (1 message)
Closing Down Sale (last advert from Keep IT Legal Ltd) (1 message)
Collecting criminal record information on Learning Agreements (2 messages)
Commissioner's Annual Report - News Release (2 messages)
Computer Misuse Act fine (2 messages)
Concessionary Travel Card Application Form (1 message)
Conferment lists (1 message)
Connexions consent (18 messages)
Consensus, please. Happy Friday. (2 messages)
Consent (7 messages)
Consent for medical students to examine patients for teaching (4 messages)
consent form (1 message)
Consent forms (1 message)
Consent to process clause (1 message)
Constitution Unit, DCA and ICO to host FOI Live 2005 on 16 June (1 message)
Contract Statements (2 messages)
Conundrum (1 message)
Correction: British Library , Records Manager (1 message)
Council Benefit Investigation Teams (5 messages)
Council Tax data sharing scheme (2 messages)
Council Tax secondary use - any progress? (3 messages)
Covert monitoring - 'other information' (6 messages)
Covert Monitoring of Staff (10 messages)
Credit card details (4 messages)
Credit records (2 messages)
Credit Records - update (1 message)
Criminal Record Checks (3 messages)
CRM and CTAX again!! (5 messages)
CRM and CTAX again!! (ER data) (1 message)
CRM and customers not giving permission (1 message)
Current url or set of forms (1 message)
Customer Satisfaction Letters (1 message)
Data and Information Governance (2 messages)
Data Audit (3 messages)
Data controller or not?? (11 messages)
Data Controller V Data Processor (1 message)
Data Controller/Data Processor (1 message)
Data Export - Was India and the 8th principle (1 message)
Data matching - UKPS (7 messages)
Data Protection & FOI Officer Vacancy (1 message)
Data Protection & Timetables (3 messages)
Data Protection Act (7 messages)
Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation sur vey (1 message)
Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation survey (2 messages)
data protection and dates of birth in the US. (10 messages)
Data Protection and FOI Fees (14 messages)
Data protection and freedom of information consultancy (1 message)
data protection code of practice for records managers and archivists - revised draft issued for comment (3 messages)
Data Protection Fair processing Notices (3 messages)
Data protection in the movies (7 messages)
Data Protection in the UAE (1 message)
Data Protection Job Advert (1 message)
Data Protection Job Advert - Amended (1 message)
Data Protection Manuals (1 message)
Data Protection Staff Newsletter (7 messages)
DATA PROTECTION UPDATE SESSIONS IN LONDON, GLASGOW AND MANCHESTER (1 message)
Data Sharing Protocols (4 messages)
Data subject rights - deleting data (19 messages)
Data Transfers - Contractual Clauses (3 messages)
Data Transfers - New Contractual Clauses (1 message)
[log in to unmask] (1 message)
DATs - registration (4 messages)
Debt Collection Agencies (1 message)
Deceased Clients (2 messages)
Defense cousel right to victim's personal data (4 messages)
Dept of Work and Pensions (1 message)
Desperation an excuse for Data Protection? was T-Mobile (2 messages)
Details of next years DP courses and dates (2 messages)
Did he really hack the DEC website? (5 messages)
Did we cover the Sony incident? (1 message)
Direct Marketing - Article Series (1 message)
Disclosing school reports (11 messages)
Disclosing to IR or CSA (1 message)
Disclosure of contact details to a credit card company (3 messages)
Disclosure of Information (2 messages)
Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses (6 messages)
Disclosure or not? (29 messages)
Disclosure to father (19 messages)
Disclosure to Utilities (1 message)
Disclosures (1 message)
Discussion lists for students and educational purposes (4 messages)
Disproportionate Effort (7 messages)
dissertations and copyright (11 messages)
dissertations, copyright and PSI (1 message)
Does being dad trump the DPA? (5 messages)
DP Breach (6 messages)
DP Qualifications (3 messages)
DP Teaching Aids - Videos (4 messages)
DP/FOI (3 messages)
DPA 1984 (3 messages)
DPA and Confidentiality (11 messages)
DPA and the DLHE (1 message)
DPA implications of telephone conversation recording (2 messages)
DPA/FOI query - schools information (3 messages)
Draft guidance on sharing information about young people - Consul tation (3 messages)
Durant ends his data protection battle (7 messages)
Durant in the House of Lords after all (10 messages)
Durant update if interested (1 message)
duty of care and telephone recording (2 messages)
e-learning (3 messages)
E-mail disclaimers (2 messages)
E-payslips / self service HR systems (1 message)
Education and Skills -Electoral Reform Services Grammar Schools (1 message)
Educational Records (4 messages)
Elected Members access to Departmental Computer Systems (2 messages)
Electronic Electoral Register (3 messages)
Email Archiving (1 message)
Email best practice guidance from DMA (1 message)
Email Disclosure (2 messages)
email requesting Subject Access Request (20 messages)
Email Retention (1 message)
Employee Investigation (2 messages)
Employee Numbers (3 messages)
Employee record (6 messages)
Employer request (24 messages)
Employment Practices DP Training Day - Exeter (1 message)
Establishing authority to deal with a third party (1 message)
Ethical dilemmas? (1 message)
EU 7th DP report for years 2002-2003 (1 message)
EU Proposals for retention of communications data - press release 21/09 (1 message)
Evidence of ethical approval. (1 message)
Examination marks (1 message)
Expressions of opinion (1 message)
Extracting Information From Databases (7 messages)
Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam (7 messages)
Fair Processing Notices (4 messages)
Fairly Obtaining (7 messages)
Festive Greetings (1 message)
Filming Council Meetings (1 message)
First UK BCR (1 message)
Fishing Trips (1 message)
Flights over US (2 messages)
Flow chart for DPA and FOI (1 message)
FOI (1 message)
FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists ? (1 message)
FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists? (14 messages)
FOI - Disclosure of Council Tax Information (4 messages)
FOI and DP Fee Policy (1 message)
FOI and DPA Fees (6 messages)
FOI applications (2 messages)
FoI Disclosures (was disclosure or not?) (2 messages)
FOI problem with jiscmail? (1 message)
FoI Query (5 messages)
FOI/DP/RM job vacancy at University of Edinburgh (1 message)
For those with an interest in RFID technology (1 message)
franchise business (7 messages)
Free Leaflets from DCA (1 message)
Freedom of Information (FOI) Act 2000: the first six months: (1 message)
Friday artwork - Was - RE: Ownership of letters (2 messages)
Friday puzzler (for HE folks) (2 messages)
Friday question on telephone numbers (2 messages)
From PM's office (2 messages)
From the euobserver site (1 message)
Fulfilling FoIA can break DPA (5 messages)
Function creep (2 messages)
Functions under any enactment - Children Leaving Care Act (4 messages)
FW: Data Protection presentation (1 message)
FW: DP Qualifications (1 message)
FW: Employee record (4 messages)
FW: EU 7th DP report for years 2002-2003 corrected link appended (1 message)
FW: Reporting students to Home Office (4 messages)
FW: Resources about FOI Act - FYI (1 message)
FW: Section 29 and Private Investigators (1 message)
FW: Student data and local councils (2 messages)
FW: Student use of personal data (1 message)
FW: VERY IMPORTANT POLICE MESSAGE - www.communitysafe.org (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] A FRiday question (3 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Back-up (8 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Child Support Agency (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Council Tax secondary use - any progress? (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Data protection in the movies (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not? (14 messages)
FW: [data-protection] DP Teaching Aids - Videos (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Educational Records (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] How far away is this...? (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Is it a data processor? (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Notification & unstructured personal data (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Pending Trays (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Repeat request (2 messages)
FW: [data-protection] Request for sight of personnel records (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules righ t? (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Sole Traders (1 message)
FW: [data-protection] Surveillance (2 messages)
Generic DPA Statement (1 message)
Glasgow/Manchester/Leeds/London - DP FOI & DP Courses (ISEB) (1 message)
Global TPS? (5 messages)
Going on holiday and suspend your mail from Mailign Lists (1 message)
Government consultation (2 messages)
Graham Hadfield/IT/RCBC is out of the office. (3 messages)
Guidance notes for the release of information (1 message)
Handling a SAR outside the Act (9 messages)
HE records management positions (1 message)
Health records (2 messages)
Help with FOI software (1 message)
HESA Destinations of Leavers from HE (DLHE) longitudinal survey (1 message)
High volume of FOI requests for personal data and other information (1 message)
House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga (7 messages)
Housing Act (3 messages)
How far away is this...? (4 messages)
I am in receipt of a letter from a Law Centre (2 messages)
I win too many holidays (1 message)
I win too many holidays! (13 messages)
IADIS Conference - more Qs than As (1 message)
ICO e-mail alerts service (2 messages)
ICO Email Alerts (4 messages)
ICO good practice guide (5 messages)
ICO- SARs and Legal Proceedings (1 message)
Identity of a data subject ... (1 message)
Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information (14 messages)
Identity of a data subject or requirement for further ... (1 message)
Identity of a data subject or requirement for further information to loca... (2 messages)
Identity of a data subject or requirement for further information to locate reques (2 messages)
Identity of a data subject or requirement for further information to locate requested information (2 messages)
Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario (21 messages)
If you are willing I need a little help (11 messages)
Implications Principle 1 lawfulness? (1 message)
IMPORTANT INFO REGARDING LONDON UNDERGROUND - STATEMENT BEING ISSUED FROM MET (1 message)
Importing data (2 messages)
India and the 8th principle (6 messages)
Info Sharing Protocol (2 messages)
Information & Records Manager - vacancy (1 message)
Information Governance Manager Role - Teesside. (1 message)
Information Manager Vacancy (1 message)
Information Notice - New Employees (1 message)
Information request (4 messages)
Information Sharing and Assessment (4 messages)
Interesting DP response (5 messages)
Interesting query regarding CVs (17 messages)
Internal Audit Access (3 messages)
Internal Disciplinary Hearings (1 message)
Internal staff SAR (13 messages)
International Data Transfers Summit 2005 (1 message)
Interview notes (31 messages)
Intranet disclaimers (1 message)
Invitation: Data Protection & the Retail Industry 2005: Morning Briefing (1 message)
Is Google Likely to break EEA laws over this? (1 message)
Is it a data processor? (4 messages)
ISEB Qualifications (1 message)
Issue of birth certificates (1 message)
Issue of birth certifications (23 messages)
Jamster! - update (3 messages)
Japan - new data protection law (1 message)
Job descriptions for Information security role (1 message)
Job Opportunity in Essex (1 message)
Land Register Online (10 messages)
Lapsed SARs? (4 messages)
Last CFP: IADIS Cognitive Performance Support 2005 Conference (14th March) (8 messages)
Leave (1 message)
Leaving the list (1 message)
Legal Aspects of Online Learning Environments - Conference/Workshop - 1-2 June 2005, University of Warwick (1 message)
Legal Privilege (3 messages)
Legal Rights (was Monitoring of call, sms and email data) (2 messages)
Legal Rights (was Monitoring of call, sms and emaildata) (3 messages)
Lists held "remotely" - Who is the Data Controller (3 messages)
Lost alumni (6 messages)
lost documents (4 messages)
Maintaining e-mail distribution lists (7 messages)
malicious email, DP or FOI (17 messages)
Marketing - DPA law vs. best practise (2 messages)
Marketing and Credit Card transactions (3 messages)
Marketing to be opt-in? (22 messages)
Marriage and data protection issues (5 messages)
Medical Records form (16 messages)
Mini Experts (6 messages)
Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !! (11 messages)
Mobile phone scam warning (6 messages)
Monitoring of call, sms and email data (6 messages)
Multiple Language Statements (4 messages)
NAIM (1 message)
Names in online archival finding aids (3 messages)
National Association of DP & FOI Officers Annual Conference (1 message)
National ID Card Article (1 message)
New company info on DP (3 messages)
New DP Guidance from ICO (1 message)
New DP Guidance from ICO - this time with links (1 message)
NEW ICO Guidance Note (2 messages)
New Teachers Information (2 messages)
New to DP (1 message)
Next of Kin (5 messages)
NHS Database (2 messages)
NHS Fraud (4 messages)
NI Numbers for CTAX change of Circs. (2 messages)
NO MAIL (1 message)
No US DP Laws (9 messages)
Non living individuals (10 messages)
Notice to staff (17 messages)
Notification (3 messages)
Notification & unstructured personal data (1 message)
notify (9 messages)
notify - another referemce (4 messages)
NROSH National Register of Social Housing (4 messages)
NZ Herald Content Link sent by Tim Trent (1 message)
Obtaining Birth Certificates (12 messages)
Obtaining forwarding addresses (12 messages)
Office of Public Sector Information (4 messages)
Online Application - Sensitive Personal Data (1 message)
Oops! (1 message)
Opinions sought - Planning Applications (42 messages)
Ownership of letters (2 messages)
Ownership of letters - author or recipient? (1 message)
Parental permission (10 messages)
Partnerships against crime (1 message)
Passenger data-new purpose (2 messages)
Passing data to another company (8 messages)
Passing on official details (7 messages)
Pending Trays (11 messages)
Pending Trays / FOI (4 messages)
People finding services (3 messages)
Personal data on invoices (2 messages)
Personal FOI experience (1 message)
Personal Information/Not (1 message)
Personnel Files (5 messages)
Personnel records - SAR (3 messages)
Petitions (1 message)
PhD pre viva reports (1 message)
Phone Fraud - 100% HOAX (1 message)
Phone Fraud - Warning from the Police (2 messages)
Phone Fraud - Warning from the Police - Beware of urban myths (5 messages)
Photographs (1 message)
Photographs and retention (4 messages)
Plagiarism Detection and DPA (15 messages)
Plagiarism detection software (1 message)
Planning Applications (2 messages)
Planning File (10 messages)
Political Candates Marketing Joe Public (3 messages)
Population of a CRM System (1 message)
Post-script - House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga (2 messages)
Potentially Violent List (14 messages)
Preparing a File for release (1 message)
Principle enquiry (1 message)
Privacy caselaw (1 message)
Privacy filters (1 message)
Privacy, Technology and the Law - Briefing Day (1 message)
Privacy,Technology and the Law - JISC Legal Briefing Day (1 message)
Private investigator (7 messages)
Proposed Adoption (1 message)
Quick Guide to DPA and FOI Access requests (1 message)
R4 FOI programme this evening... (2 messages)
Reassuring! There IS a need for privacy officers! (6 messages)
Receiving emails (6 messages)
Recent posting of Records Manager job opportunity with British Library (1 message)
Recording disciplinary hearings (4 messages)
Recording ethnicity (12 messages)
Recording of Care visits (11 messages)
Recording Telephone Calls (10 messages)
Records Management Conference (1 message)
Records Manager post - University of Portsmouth (1 message)
Recovering Debt (21 messages)
Redaction software (2 messages)
References (32 messages)
Rehabilitation of Offenders (1 message)
Release of info about a student (2 messages)
release of personal details to insurance companies (10 messages)
Relevant filing system (2 messages)
Relevant Filing System and SAR (3 messages)
Reminder for those of you going away over the Easter Holidays (1 message)
Remote/Home working Policies (2 messages)
Reopening the "Backups" discussion (12 messages)
Repeat request (1 message)
Reponse from OIC (1 message)
Reporting Figures (1 message)
Representation of the People Regulations 2001 (reg 35) (3 messages)
Republic of Ireland's Data Protection Act (4 messages)
Request for a file location... (5 messages)
Request for Assistance (2 messages)
request for conference speaker/session presenter (1 message)
Request for data (8 messages)
Request for Details of Fireworks Traders (2 messages)
Request for Informaiton flow chart (1 message)
Request for sight of personnel records (11 messages)
Request from Government office for NI numbers (4 messages)
Request from THES for details of business expenses (1 message)
reservations & data protection (5 messages)
Results in the public domain (1 message)
Retention of College Records (1 message)
Retention of recorded phone conversations (2 messages)
Retention of security breach information (2 messages)
Retired Heads' Contact Details (2 messages)
Ride share companion question (3 messages)
salary grade for DP/FOI manager. (1 message)
SAR - Durant - Litigation (9 messages)
SAR - is it personal data or not? (1 message)
SAR and Legal Proceedings (1 message)
SAR Occupational Health (1 message)
SAR within Social Services (1 message)
SARS - Access to assessment information (4 messages)
Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solic itors (1 message)
Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors (6 messages)
Scope of UK DPA (1 message)
Seasonal Greetings (1 message)
Secondary Legislation (Education) (1 message)
Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First (6 messages)
Section 29 (4 messages)
Section 29 and Private Investigators (2 messages)
Section 32 (3 messages)
Section29 and private investigators (13 messages)
Self abuse reporting (8 messages)
Seminar - Access to Information - 29 September at Buckfast Abbey (1 message)
Seniority and privacy (1 message)
Sensitive Data (2 messages)
Sensitive Data? Exemption? (2 messages)
Severity Scales for ICT Breaches (2 messages)
Sharing Consent Form (3 messages)
Sharing data across a Group (2 messages)
SI 2005 No 1515 (8 messages)
Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk' (13 messages)
Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules righ t? (1 message)
Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right? (29 messages)
Software companies (1 message)
Sole Traders (8 messages)
Something just struck me (1 message)
spam and email lists (and adverts) (3 messages)
spam and email lists (was "That conference. You are wrong to complain!") (1 message)
Special Education Needs - processing sensitive data as part of the Statementing process (2 messages)
Special Issue of ICES: Call for papers (1 message)
Spoof domains (was: If you are willing I need a little help) (2 messages)
Staff grievance request (1 message)
Student data and local councils (1 message)
Student records from liquidated company (2 messages)
Student status - Pension Provider (2 messages)
Student use of personal data (8 messages)
Subject Access Fee (2 messages)
Subject Access Request (3 messages)
Subjective comments on a students record (8 messages)
Suggestions for Data Protection Audit (1 message)
Surveillance Law Bulletin Board (1 message)
Surveillance Law in Hollywood (9 messages)
Suspending mail from JISCmail lists over Xmas (1 message)
T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning (17 messages)
Tenants addresses (5 messages)
Test data - retention of test results (10 messages)
Thank you Re: [data-protection] traveller site information request (1 message)
That Citibank error (4 messages)
That conference. You are wrong to complain! (4 messages)
The fascination of auto-replies (1 message)
The glass consumer (1 message)
The Montreux Declaration (2 messages)
The new "Command Confirmations" (2 messages)
The perils of e-mail (3 messages)
Third party permission to disclose (4 messages)
Third pillar data protection regime???? (1 message)
To SAR or not to SAR (5 messages)
Torbay Council: Information & Security Manager Vacancy (1 message)
Training (7 messages)
traveller site information request (3 messages)
UKIC Gets Tough.... Allegedly (2 messages)
UKIC's Speech. Sony's Disaster (1 message)
Unborn child - DPA living individual (15 messages)
Unencrypted Data and Safe Harbor (3 messages)
Unregistered Keepers (4 messages)
Unsolicited mailing from political party (12 messages)
Unsubscribe advice please (1 message)
UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US. (6 messages)
Up-to-date Data Protection Act (3 messages)
UPDATE Session additions - new interpretation of lawful processing (1 message)
Use of National Insurance number (4 messages)
Useful Website (1 message)
Using the mail list for DP matters (1 message)
Vacancy - EDRMS Project Manager (1 message)
Vacancy - FOI/DPA Officer (1 message)
Vacancy in Records Management (1 message)
Videoing on private property (8 messages)
Was that a recruitment agent? (1 message)
web application access control - HE Sector (1 message)
web application access control: follow-up (2 messages)
Welfare report (5 messages)
What breaches arise in this scenario - if any? (5 messages)
When does processing become Unfair? (4 messages)
whistleblowing (1 message)
Who holds the info (3 messages)
Wonderful TICO quality control (6 messages)
WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call for Papers (7 messages)
WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call forPapers (6 messages)
WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call): Call for Papers (1 message)
WWW/Internet 2005: Call for Papers (1 message)
You have got to be kidding! (6 messages)
[Fwd: Home Office Monitoring of Students] (1 message)
[Fwd: Scottish Information Commissioner produces new guidance online] (1 message)
[Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not? (2 messages)
[Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] SAR - Durant - Litigation (2 messages)
[Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right? (1 message)
[Maybe Spam] [data-protection] Employer request (1 message)
[Maybe Spam] [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not? (1 message)
[Maybe Spam] [data-protection] Internal staff SAR (1 message)
[Maybe Spam] [data-protection] notify (3 messages)
[Maybe Spam] [data-protection] Photographs and retention (3 messages)
[SPAM] - Re: [data-protection] (reply) Mobile phone scam warning - Email found in subject (1 message)
[SPAM] - Re: [data-protection] data protection and dates of birth in the US. - Email found in subject (1 message)
[SPAM] - Re: [data-protection] Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right? - Email found in subject (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re:

Graham Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:28:05 +0100

252 lines

New Thread

"Disproportionate Effort"

"Disproportionate Effort"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:24:34 -0000

54 lines

Re: "Disproportionate Effort"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:44:31 -0000

118 lines

Re: "Disproportionate Effort"

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:09:49 +0000

92 lines

Re: "Disproportionate Effort"

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:49:03 EST

78 lines

Re: "Disproportionate Effort"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:33:33 -0000

144 lines

Re: "Disproportionate Effort"

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:12:53 -0000

94 lines

New Thread

"Do not re-employ" Lists

"Do not re-employ" Lists

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:27:35 +0100

45 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:34:40 +0100

66 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:45:38 +0100

45 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:57:00 +0100

87 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:01:59 +0100

117 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:10:41 +0100

21 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 02:44:59 EDT

67 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:49:48 +0100

171 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:15:59 +0100

99 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:46:35 +0100

38 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 14:40:35 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

"Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

"Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Su Goulding <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:22:46 +0100

36 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:36:14 +0100

74 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Paul Ferguson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:49:06 +0100

77 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Michael Doherty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:55:58 +0100

29 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:31:37 +0100

122 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:32:40 +0100

152 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:27:45 +0100

170 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:38:33 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

"Payslip Marketing"

"Payslip Marketing"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 11:55:41 +0100

55 lines

Re: "Payslip Marketing"

Sally Justice <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 12:00:52 +0100

141 lines

Re: "Payslip Marketing"

Christopher Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 12:52:41 +0100

80 lines

Re: "Payslip Marketing"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 13:09:46 +0100

103 lines

Re: "Payslip Marketing"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 13:10:11 +0100

164 lines

New Thread

"Protective Markings" for documents

"Protective Markings" for documents

Anne Gadsden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:56:40 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

"Public Blog" on Data Protection

"Public Blog" on Data Protection

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:48:04 +0100

71 lines

Re: "Public Blog" on Data Protection

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 13:43:00 +0100

47 lines

Re: "Public Blog" on Data Protection

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:13:36 +0100

97 lines

New Thread

'pure' research

'pure' research

Okey, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:21:12 -0000

58 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:24:33 -0000

81 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Ian Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:54:02 -0000

196 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:14:52 -0000

121 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:22:57 -0000

162 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:04:05 -0000

204 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:11:17 -0000

210 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:32:58 -0000

277 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:53:38 -0000

317 lines

New Thread

'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:30:37 +0100

24 lines

'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:51:50 +0100

27 lines

Re: 'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Julie Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:14:42 +0100

112 lines

Re: 'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:21:22 +0100

41 lines

Re: 'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Julie Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:14:17 +0100

90 lines

Re: 'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:54:00 +0100

148 lines

Re: 'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:23:46 +0100

203 lines

New Thread

(reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Devenish, Tom <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:43:46 +0100

72 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:01:56 +0100

99 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

ALASDAIR WARWOOD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:10:45 +0100

100 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 20:51:26 +0100

111 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 08:05:42 +0100

27 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:00:46 +0100

169 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:45:32 +0100

226 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:56:45 +0100

310 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:58:17 +0100

250 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:05:38 +0100

292 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:08:29 +0100

349 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 12:05:46 +0100

306 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Carter, Antoinette (KIS) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 12:10:14 +0100

353 lines

(reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:00:09 +0100

395 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Martin Hoskins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:19:34 +0100

255 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Carter, Antoinette (KIS) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:53:17 +0100

293 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 00:13:02 +0100

296 lines

New Thread

2nd Annual FOI Conference & Workshop Series

2nd Annual FOI Conference & Workshop Series

Lisa Souza <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:15:19 -0000

60 lines

New Thread

2nd CFP ext.:IADIS Security and Privacy in Computing Systems 2005 Conference

2nd CFP ext.:IADIS Security and Privacy in Computing Systems 2005 Conference

Natália Reis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:52:26 +0000

143 lines

New Thread

4th Annual Data Protection Conference

4th Annual Data Protection Conference

Lisa Braund <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:46:05 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

A bit of DP, a bit of FOI

A bit of DP, a bit of FOI

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 12:59:10 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

A FRiday question

A FRiday question

Hitches, John F <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:50:29 +0100

53 lines

Re: A FRiday question

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:39:04 +0100

45 lines

Re: A FRiday question

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:40:10 +0100

72 lines

Re: A FRiday question

Andrea Simmons <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:28:58 +0100

146 lines

New Thread

A little bit DP, a little bit FOI (for music lovers) or the XYZ affair(forthe diplo historians)

A little bit DP, a little bit FOI (for music lovers) or the XYZ affair(forthe diplo historians)

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:34:58 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

A little entertainment

A little entertainment

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:16:53 +0100

159 lines

New Thread

A Monday morning question

A Monday morning question

Gwenan Owen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 10:35:52 +0100

60 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 11:02:44 +0100

131 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 9 May 2005 06:05:32 EDT

78 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 11:17:15 +0100

96 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Jason Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 11:17:28 +0100

137 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 11:30:09 +0100

199 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Jim Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 12:51:51 +0100

120 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

ianwelton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 13:55:03 +0100

70 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 14:41:13 +0100

105 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 May 2005 21:34:43 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

A Principle 8 question

A Principle 8 question

Les Kingstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:37:09 +0100

47 lines

Re: A Principle 8 question

Charles Prescott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:21:23 -0400

98 lines

New Thread

A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:44:17 +0100

58 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Hodgetts, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:56:38 +0100

79 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:13:14 +0100

134 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Hodgetts, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:31:34 +0100

132 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:45:09 +0100

203 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Jo Archer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:17:45 +0100

256 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:54:21 +0100

301 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:02:04 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

Academic Research - Police Held Information

Academic Research - Police Held Information

Michael Doherty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:22:45 +0000

51 lines

Re: Academic Research - Police Held Information

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:48:14 +0000

94 lines

New Thread

Access to Chat Rooms

Access to Chat Rooms

Duncan Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:12:38 +0100

70 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:36:50 +0100

40 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Duncan Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:38:16 +0100

101 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:42:46 +0100

15 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:44:46 +0100

127 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:34:44 +0100

151 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carter, Antoinette (KIS) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:47:03 +0100

183 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:52:08 +0100

208 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

David Wyatt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:05:30 +0100

120 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:15:27 +0100

223 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:49:40 +0100

274 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:20:03 +0100

366 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Jeremy Kuper <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:31:11 +0100

38 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:13:57 +0100

32 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Duncan Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:01:19 +0100

102 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Jason Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:05:48 +0100

413 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:12:51 +0100

130 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:17:14 +0100

94 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Duncan Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:45:10 +0100

188 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:10:27 +0100

235 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:41:17 +0100

32 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:41:11 +0100

57 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:42:05 +0100

35 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:42:20 +0100

43 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:41:58 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Access to children's records

Access to children's records

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:10:36 +0000

24 lines

Re: Access to children's records

Carter, Antoinette (KIS) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:43:17 -0000

52 lines

Re: Access to children's records

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 08:51:24 -0000

76 lines

New Thread

Access to education records in Scotland

Access to education records in Scotland

David Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:48:07 +0000

58 lines

New Thread

Access to Personal Statements

Access to Personal Statements

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 14:51:17 +0100

70 lines

Re: Access to Personal Statements

Peter Dinsdale <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:19:36 +0100

108 lines

Re: Access to Personal Statements

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:36:15 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Accident Books

Accident Books

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jul 2005 09:56:07 +0100

52 lines

Re: Accident Books

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:08:36 +0100

106 lines

Re: Accident Books

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:26:25 +0100

29 lines

Re: Accident Books

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:27:51 +0100

86 lines

New Thread

Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Emma Bothamley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 13:51:05 +0100

73 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 13:54:23 +0100

122 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 14:40:06 +0100

36 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:05:32 +0100

66 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:09:39 +0100

95 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:14:42 +0100

104 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 13 May 2005 10:24:21 EDT

69 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:41:59 +0100

114 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:52:07 +0100

157 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 16:24:21 +0100

40 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 17:52:57 +0100

184 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:15:49 EDT

59 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 May 2005 15:35:58 +0100

290 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2005 08:56:09 +0100

309 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2005 10:40:48 +0100

401 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2005 10:53:53 +0100

418 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2005 13:00:01 +0100

374 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2005 13:12:13 +0100

405 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2005 15:48:14 +0100

459 lines

New Thread

Accurate data?

Accurate data?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:54:39 EDT

36 lines

New Thread

Act Now newsletter

Act Now newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:05:10 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Act now. Now that is spam!

Act now. Now that is spam!

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:10:03 +0100

57 lines

Re: Act now. Now that is spam!

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:33:46 +0100

149 lines

Re: Act now. Now that is spam!

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:42:41 +0100

134 lines

Re: Act now. Now that is spam!

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:49:57 +0100

74 lines

Re: Act now. Now that is spam!

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:49:52 +0100

83 lines

Re: Act now. Now that is spam!

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 11:50:31 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Address books in collections

Address books in collections

Graeme Hawley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:46:38 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

ADV - Data Protection and Employee Data seminar

ADV - Data Protection and Employee Data seminar

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:22:59 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Adv - Disclosure of Personal Data

Adv - Disclosure of Personal Data

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:19:22 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

ADV - DPA/RIPA/HRA awareness for CCTV operators/managers

ADV - DPA/RIPA/HRA awareness for CCTV operators/managers

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 25 May 2005 05:08:25 EDT

61 lines

New Thread

Adv- Access to Communications Data

Adv- Access to Communications Data

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:08:29 -0000

67 lines

New Thread

Adv- Surveillance Law and RIPA course

Adv- Surveillance Law and RIPA course

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2005 10:00:56 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Adv. Re-use of Public Sector data briefing.

Adv. Re-use of Public Sector data briefing.

Paul Simpkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 May 2005 10:59:40 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

Advertising on the Forum

Advertising on the Forum

Simon Howarth (WSL) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 10:50:11 +0100

40 lines

Re: Advertising on the Forum

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 10:56:54 +0100

47 lines

Re: Advertising on the Forum

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 11:42:57 +0100

21 lines

Re: Advertising on the Forum

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 16:01:10 +0100

55 lines

Re: Advertising on the Forum

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 16:09:11 +0100

84 lines

Re: Advertising on the Forum

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 May 2005 19:05:40 +0100

112 lines

New Thread

Advice needed - customers in conflict

Advice needed - customers in conflict

Graeme Hawley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:45:44 +0100

35 lines

Re: Advice needed - customers in conflict

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:07:07 +0100

67 lines

Re: Advice needed - customers in conflict

Ken Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:43:41 +0100

29 lines

Re: Advice needed - customers in conflict

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:26:14 +0100

102 lines

New Thread

Advise

Advise

Helen Bartram <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:24:31 +0100

61 lines

Re: Advise

Mary Liddell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:27:17 +0100

90 lines

Re: Advise

Simon Howarth (WSL) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:22:21 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

Amendments to the Data Protection Act 1998

Amendments to the Data Protection Act 1998

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:45:59 -0000

71 lines

New Thread

An amazing story about an email gone wrong

An amazing story about an email gone wrong

Robert Melville <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 14:42:28 +0100

73 lines

Re: An amazing story about an email gone wrong

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:07:53 +0100

104 lines

Re: An amazing story about an email gone wrong

Simon Howarth (WSL) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:42:57 +0100

96 lines

New Thread

And what is the UKIC's stance here??

And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:40:24 -0000

68 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:59:24 -0000

123 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:32:10 +0000

69 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:43:28 -0000

119 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:51:23 +0000

53 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:00:24 +0000

154 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:13:32 +0000

54 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:31:59 -0000

87 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:21:21 -0000

82 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:17:39 -0000

49 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:24:17 +0000

137 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:08:55 -0000

208 lines

New Thread

Anonymised research data - Was - RE: 'pure' research

Anonymised research data - Was - RE: 'pure' research

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:54:11 -0000

293 lines

New Thread

Anyone know what actually happened?

Anyone know what actually happened?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:00:56 -0000

57 lines

New Thread

Apologies for the Shotgun

Apologies for the Shotgun

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:46:06 -0000

55 lines

Re: Apologies for the Shotgun

Jim Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:32:03 -0000

109 lines

New Thread

Apologies for the spilt link.

Apologies for the spilt link.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:10:25 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Apology

Apology

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:51:31 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

APRIL:DP DAY UPDATE SESSION IN LONDON, MANCHESTER AND GLASGOW

APRIL:DP DAY UPDATE SESSION IN LONDON, MANCHESTER AND GLASGOW

Pounder Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:01:33 -0000

54 lines

New Thread

Article 29 DP WP - Data protection: New guidelines on payment card fraud prevention databases

Article 29 DP WP - Data protection: New guidelines on payment card fraud prevention databases

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:35:47 -0000

43 lines

New Thread

Article 29 WP processing of location data

Article 29 WP processing of location data

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:46:08 -0000

39 lines

New Thread

Articles of possible interest

Articles of possible interest

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:40:11 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Assistant Records Manager (Part-Time) Vacancy at the University of Edinburgh

Assistant Records Manager (Part-Time) Vacancy at the University of Edinburgh

GRAHAM Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:17:12 -0000

58 lines

New Thread

Audit Commission Report - ICT Fraud and Abuse.

Audit Commission Report - ICT Fraud and Abuse.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:33:33 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

B&NES Council - Records Manager Position

B&NES Council - Records Manager Position

Amanda Osborne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:28:10 -0000

84 lines

New Thread

Back-up

Back-up

chd201 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:14:06 +0000

44 lines

Re: Back-up

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:30:15 -0000

88 lines

Re: Back-up

Carter, Antoinette (CCM) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:12:56 -0000

88 lines

Re: Back-up

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:24:09 +0000

45 lines

Re: Back-up

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:32:21 -0000

151 lines

Re: Back-up

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:54:25 -0000

197 lines

Re: Back-up

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:17:33 -0000

243 lines

Re: Back-up

Leesons Jackie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:13:39 -0000

47 lines

Re: Back-up

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:29:51 -0000

84 lines

Re: Back-up

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:44:26 -0000

99 lines

Re: Back-up

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:45:54 +0000

62 lines

Re: Back-up

Carter, Antoinette (CCM) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:30:36 -0000

126 lines

Re: Back-up

Jim Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:47:33 -0000

166 lines

Re: Back-up

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:56:55 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

Bad Bank DP

Bad Bank DP

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:36:02 +0100

59 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Lisa Braund <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:50:35 +0100

115 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:57:40 +0100

114 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:06:12 +0100

119 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:15:29 +0100

147 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Fiona Musgrave <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:41:23 +0100

179 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:27:16 +0100

53 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:27:21 +0100

49 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:04:22 +0100

140 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:15:49 +0100

61 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Julian Curmi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:32:52 +0200

530 lines

New Thread

Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:21:55 EST

64 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:49:01 -0000

114 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:40:14 -0000

106 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:06:48 -0000

189 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:31:01 -0000

51 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Graham Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:52:11 -0000

99 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:20:01 -0000

132 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:53:06 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

Behavioural Problems - recording or details and reports

Behavioural Problems - recording or details and reports

Helen Bartram <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2005 08:53:48 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

Belgium Registrations

Belgium Registrations

Saundra Kae Rubel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:34:44 -0600

64 lines

New Thread

Best Practice regarding handing complaints or queries on fees

Best Practice regarding handing complaints or queries on fees

Helen Bartram <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:18:25 +0100

76 lines

Re: Best Practice regarding handing complaints or queries on fees

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:30:42 +0100

104 lines

Re: Best Practice regarding handing complaints or queries on fees

Mandi Barron <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:07:17 +0100

269 lines

Re: Best Practice regarding handing complaints or queries on fees

Trevor Louth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:55:02 +0100

321 lines

New Thread

Big Brother Awards 2005

Big Brother Awards 2005

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:00:44 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

British Library - Record Manager/Archivist Position

British Library - Record Manager/Archivist Position

Karen Beck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:49:48 +0000

62 lines

New Thread

BSI Data Protection Workshop

BSI Data Protection Workshop

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:23:17 -0000

68 lines

New Thread

BT - Breach of DPA?

BT - Breach of DPA?

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:51:26 +0100

43 lines

Re: BT - Breach of DPA?

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:16:32 +0100

31 lines

Re: BT - Breach of DPA?

ALASDAIR WARWOOD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:27:45 +0100

78 lines

Re: BT - Breach of DPA?

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:01:24 +0100

109 lines

New Thread

Burglars beware

Burglars beware

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:00:37 +0000

30 lines

Re: Burglars beware

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:38:59 +0000

37 lines

Re: Burglars beware

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:49:15 +0000

54 lines

Re: Burglars beware

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:32:30 +0000

34 lines

Re: Burglars beware

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:27:31 +0000

37 lines

Re: Burglars beware

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:41:44 +0000

45 lines

Re: Burglars beware

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:45:17 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

Bus passes

Bus passes

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:11:07 +0000

27 lines

Re: Bus passes

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:17:53 -0000

107 lines

Re: Bus passes

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:31:34 -0000

73 lines

Re: Bus passes

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:34:22 -0000

162 lines

Re: Bus passes

Jim Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:34:50 -0000

68 lines

Re: Bus passes

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 03:35:28 EST

77 lines

New Thread

Business Cards

Business Cards

Richard Frost <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:00:50 +0000

28 lines

Re: Business Cards

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:15:56 -0000

92 lines

Re: Business Cards

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:47:00 -0000

110 lines

Re: Business Cards

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:44:07 -0000

134 lines

New Thread

Business cards - Friday question

Business cards - Friday question

Mags McGinley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:12:34 +0000

41 lines

Re: Business cards - Friday question

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 17:09:15 -0000

81 lines

Re: Business cards - Friday question

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:08:25 -0000

84 lines

Re: Business cards - Friday question

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:36:39 -0000

140 lines

New Thread

business contact details

business contact details

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:39:30 -0000

74 lines

Re: business contact details

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:46:18 -0000

123 lines

Re: business contact details

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:04:26 -0000

142 lines

Re: business contact details

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:27:08 -0000

196 lines

New Thread

Buy buy

Buy buy

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 03:34:48 EST

162 lines

Re: Buy buy

Justice, Sally <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:34:40 -0000

217 lines

Re: Buy buy

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:26:32 -0000

254 lines

New Thread

Bye bye

Bye bye

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:43:17 EST

70 lines

Re: Bye bye

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:43:32 +0000

77 lines

Re: Bye bye

Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:38:35 -0000

140 lines

Re: Bye bye

Simon Howarth (WSL) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:55:59 -0000

98 lines

Re: Bye bye

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:07:34 -0000

125 lines

Re: Bye bye

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:21:47 -0000

122 lines

Re: Bye bye

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:29:10 -0000

132 lines

Bye Bye

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:38:52 +0000

28 lines

Re: Bye bye

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:40:49 -0000

166 lines

Re: Bye bye

David Wyatt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:06:55 -0000

116 lines

New Thread

Bye bye, buy buy

Re: Bye bye, buy buy

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:04:31 EST

47 lines

New Thread

Call centre query

Call centre query

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:06:02 -0000

59 lines

New Thread

Call Centre Staff

Call Centre Staff

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:33:25 -0000

55 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:04:12 -0000

89 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Julian Curmi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:07:59 +0100

414 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:17:51 -0000

192 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Julian Curmi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:32:04 +0100

621 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:59:55 +0000

221 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:52:04 -0000

264 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:52:00 +0000

36 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Wilson, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:56:51 -0000

118 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:57:29 -0000

90 lines

New Thread

Carelessness and lack of attention to detail

Carelessness and lack of attention to detail

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:08:03 -0000

64 lines

New Thread

CCTV

CCTV

Sara-Jane Newbon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:56:30 +0100

59 lines

CCTV

Sara-Jane Newbon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:47:59 +0100

60 lines

Re: CCTV

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:15:43 EDT

62 lines

New Thread

CCTV etc.

CCTV etc.

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:38:49 -0000

27 lines

Re: CCTV etc.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:15:31 -0000

100 lines

Re: CCTV etc.

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:31:29 +0000

38 lines

Re: CCTV etc.

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:12:25 -0000

127 lines

Re: CCTV etc.

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:24:01 -0000

109 lines

New Thread

CCTV from third parties

CCTV from third parties

Sara-Jane Newbon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:45:09 -0000

58 lines

Re: CCTV from third parties

Michael Doherty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:11:15 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

CCTV in Hotel

CCTV in Hotel

Stephen John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:08:30 +0000

34 lines

Re: CCTV in Hotel

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:29:40 -0000

64 lines

Re: CCTV in Hotel

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:30:29 -0000

82 lines

Re: CCTV in Hotel

George Ross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:37:31 +0000

36 lines

Re: CCTV in Hotel

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:52:50 +0000

91 lines

CCTV in Hotel

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:49:47 -0000

84 lines

Re: CCTV in Hotel

Simon Howarth (WSL) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:18:16 -0000

116 lines

New Thread

CFP: IADIS Security and Privacy in Computing Systems 2005 Conference

CFP: IADIS Security and Privacy in Computing Systems 2005 Conference

Natália Reis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:40:34 +0000

142 lines

New Thread

Charging for confirmation of exam results

Charging for confirmation of exam results

Pat Gannon-Leary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:15:19 +0100

37 lines

Re: Charging for confirmation of exam results

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:41:43 +0100

65 lines

Re: Charging for confirmation of exam results

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:03:56 +0100

101 lines

New Thread

Child Data Sharing

Child Data Sharing

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:14:48 +0100

50 lines

Re: Child Data Sharing

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:20:04 +0100

106 lines

Re: Child Data Sharing

Pounder Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:48:18 +0100

183 lines

Re: Child Data Sharing

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:52:55 +0100

233 lines

New Thread

Child Support Agency

Child Support Agency

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:23:48 -0000

55 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

Leesons Jackie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:53:37 -0000

90 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

Doug Colyer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:09:26 -0000

118 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:42:51 -0000

118 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:32:49 -0000

161 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

Leesons Jackie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:47:10 -0000

208 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

Doug Colyer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:16:14 -0000

245 lines

New Thread

Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Pounder Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:35:15 +0100

248 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:38:52 +0100

326 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:58:23 +0100

65 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:16:08 +0100

132 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Simon Howarth (WSL) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 23:01:01 +0100

158 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Chris Bayliss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:24:57 +0100

41 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:56:27 +0100

39 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Lewis Bourne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:22:41 +0100

93 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Oakman Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 13:44:26 +0100

119 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:04:39 +0100

47 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

datap <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:10:50 +0100

128 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:14:52 +0100

152 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:17:45 +0100

152 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:19:26 +0100

177 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Julia Hudson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:09:18 +0100

46 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Julia Hudson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:20:16 +0100

80 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:24:24 +0100

207 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Su Beesley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:34:29 +0100

117 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:23:42 +0100

214 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Simon Howarth (WSL) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:50:26 +0100

32 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Jul 2005 17:14:42 +0100

37 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Nick Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:29:26 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

CLINCAL RECORDS LEAD - New Post

CLINCAL RECORDS LEAD - New Post

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:45:54 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Closing Down Sale (last advert from Keep IT Legal Ltd)

Closing Down Sale (last advert from Keep IT Legal Ltd)

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:39:38 EDT

69 lines

New Thread

Collecting criminal record information on Learning Agreements

Collecting criminal record information on Learning Agreements

Helen Bartram <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2005 19:01:07 +0100

56 lines

Re: Collecting criminal record information on Learning Agreements

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 May 2005 14:13:37 +0100

129 lines

New Thread

Commissioner's Annual Report - News Release

Commissioner's Annual Report - News Release

Lisa Braund <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:23:02 +0100

159 lines

Re: Commissioner's Annual Report - News Release

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:35:44 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Computer Misuse Act fine

Computer Misuse Act fine

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:29:01 -0000

33 lines

Re: Computer Misuse Act fine

David Wyatt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:55:30 -0000

87 lines

New Thread

Concessionary Travel Card Application Form

Concessionary Travel Card Application Form

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:36:49 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Conferment lists

Conferment lists

Hitches, John F <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:11:16 -0000

53 lines

New Thread

Connexions consent

Connexions consent

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:35:39 +0100

38 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:41:50 +0100

74 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:04:13 +0100

75 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:08:49 +0100

78 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Gibson, Martin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:11:39 +0100

127 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:15:30 +0100

44 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:23:13 +0100

78 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:25:00 +0100

171 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:24:13 +0100

52 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:31:37 +0100

63 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:33:39 +0100

37 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:39:46 +0100

43 lines

Re: Connexions consent

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:53:47 EDT

71 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:55:02 +0100

116 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Edwina Withe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:38:36 +0100

92 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:32:48 +0100

194 lines

Re: Connexions consent

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 04:53:19 EDT

55 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:26:33 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Consensus, please. Happy Friday.

Consensus, please. Happy Friday.

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:39:11 +0100

80 lines

Re: Consensus, please. Happy Friday.

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:07:47 +0100

123 lines

New Thread

Consent

Consent

Casillas, Mojgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:01:02 +0100

51 lines

Re: Consent

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:05:24 +0100

85 lines

Re: Consent

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:08:57 +0100

116 lines

Re: Consent

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:18:50 +0100

126 lines

Re: Consent

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 04:45:37 EDT

74 lines

Re: Consent

Christopher Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Oct 2005 21:14:16 +0100

117 lines

Re: Consent

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:11:59 EDT

70 lines

New Thread

Consent for medical students to examine patients for teaching

Consent for medical students to examine patients for teaching

Anne Gadsden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:08:44 +0100

52 lines

Re: Consent for medical students to examine patients for teaching

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:34:16 +0100

51 lines

Re: Consent for medical students to examine patients for teaching

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:49:40 +0100

109 lines

Re: Consent for medical students to examine patients for teaching

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:03:54 +0100

157 lines

New Thread

consent form

consent form

Helen Bartram <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:16:25 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

Consent forms

Consent forms

Pat Gannon-Leary <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:37:47 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Consent to process clause

Consent to process clause

Susan Ferguson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:59:08 +0100

89 lines

New Thread

Constitution Unit, DCA and ICO to host FOI Live 2005 on 16 June

Constitution Unit, DCA and ICO to host FOI Live 2005 on 16 June

Sarah Holsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:13:59 +0000

73 lines

New Thread

Contract Statements

Contract Statements

Steel, Rachael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:50:03 +0100

62 lines

Re: Contract Statements

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:15:59 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Conundrum

Conundrum

Sara-Jane Newbon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:21:26 +0100

69 lines

New Thread

Correction: British Library , Records Manager

Correction: British Library , Records Manager

Richard Burillo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:27:18 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Council Benefit Investigation Teams

Council Benefit Investigation Teams

Hitches, John F <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:36:58 +0100

80 lines

Re: Council Benefit Investigation Teams

Julie Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:43:38 +0100

139 lines

Re: Council Benefit Investigation Teams

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:47:56 +0100

110 lines

Re: Council Benefit Investigation Teams

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:51:18 +0100

35 lines

Re: Council Benefit Investigation Teams

Christopher Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:29:35 +0100

142 lines

New Thread

Council Tax data sharing scheme

Council Tax data sharing scheme

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 08:22:13 +0100

42 lines

Re: Council Tax data sharing scheme

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 03:37:17 EDT

85 lines

New Thread

Council Tax secondary use - any progress?

Council Tax secondary use - any progress?

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:10:56 +0000

29 lines

Re: Council Tax secondary use - any progress?

Lightowlers, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:47:57 -0000

44 lines

Re: Council Tax secondary use - any progress?

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:38:16 +0000

53 lines

New Thread

Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Emma Bothamley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:28:55 +0100

69 lines

Re: Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:45:43 +0100

149 lines

Re: Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:07:09 +0100

129 lines

Re: Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:16:41 +0100

157 lines

Re: Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Andrew Cormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:48:01 +0100

158 lines

Re: Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:40:49 +0100

218 lines

New Thread

Covert Monitoring of Staff

Covert Monitoring of Staff

Sara-Jane Newbon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:50:56 +0100

56 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:53:47 +0100

96 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:56:56 +0100

98 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:00:56 +0100

171 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:04:39 +0100

221 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:07:27 +0100

265 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:10:16 +0100

312 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:15:26 +0100

360 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:18:13 EST

66 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Paul Ferguson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:00:29 +0100

406 lines

New Thread

Credit card details

Credit card details

Fiona Musgrave <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:18:46 +0100

46 lines

Re: Credit card details

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:22:13 +0100

113 lines

Re: Credit card details

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:45:49 +0100

54 lines

Re: Credit card details

davidwyatt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:57:27 +0100

107 lines

New Thread

Credit records

Credit records

Mandi Barron <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:24:19 +0100

77 lines

Re: Credit records

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:12:32 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Credit Records - update

Credit Records - update

Mandi Barron <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:40:34 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Criminal Record Checks

Criminal Record Checks

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2005 14:32:38 +0100

57 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 May 2005 14:57:47 +0100

46 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2005 14:45:49 +0100

120 lines

New Thread

CRM and CTAX again!!

CRM and CTAX again!!

Jane Corrin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:40:44 +0000

36 lines

Re: CRM and CTAX again!!

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:44:40 -0000

77 lines

Re: CRM and CTAX again!!

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:52:54 -0000

100 lines

Re: CRM and CTAX again!!

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:15:56 EST

88 lines

Re: CRM and CTAX again!!

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:45:58 -0000

151 lines

New Thread

CRM and CTAX again!! (ER data)

Re: CRM and CTAX again!! (ER data)

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:21:37 EST

62 lines

New Thread

CRM and customers not giving permission

CRM and customers not giving permission

Julie Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:58:36 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Current url or set of forms

Current url or set of forms

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:42:08 -0000

55 lines

New Thread

Customer Satisfaction Letters

Customer Satisfaction Letters

Jon Leonard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 May 2005 18:17:53 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

Data and Information Governance

Data and Information Governance

Hetty Sun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:41:36 +0100

67 lines

Re: Data and Information Governance

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:54:35 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Data Audit

Data Audit

Casillas, Mojgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:14:14 +0100

43 lines

Re: Data Audit

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:10:20 +0100

67 lines

Re: Data Audit

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:00:58 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Data controller or not??

Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:28:40 +0000

40 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Simon Howarth (WSL) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:39:17 -0000

73 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:05:28 +0000

45 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:51:36 -0000

68 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:09:45 -0000

75 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:14:19 +0000

43 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:41:52 +0000

35 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 04:25:18 EST

62 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:56:36 +0000

45 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 06:42:24 EST

98 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:02:16 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Data Controller V Data Processor

Data Controller V Data Processor

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:26:05 -0000

64 lines

New Thread

Data Controller/Data Processor

Data Controller/Data Processor

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:40:39 +0100

98 lines

New Thread

Data Export - Was India and the 8th principle

Re: Data Export - Was India and the 8th principle

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:54:49 +0100

144 lines

New Thread

Data matching - UKPS

Data matching - UKPS

DREW Nic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:53:50 +0100

80 lines

Re: Data matching - UKPS

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:05:05 +0100

116 lines

Re: Data matching - UKPS

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:23:42 +0100

31 lines

Re: Data matching - UKPS

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:28:01 +0100

60 lines

Re: Data matching - UKPS

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:17:22 +0100

100 lines

Re: Data matching - UKPS

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:47:13 +0100

33 lines

Re: Data matching - UKPS

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:41:23 +0100

126 lines

New Thread

Data Protection & FOI Officer Vacancy

Data Protection & FOI Officer Vacancy

Fatima Zohra <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 May 2005 11:57:52 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

Data Protection & Timetables

Data Protection & Timetables

Caroline Dominey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:02:09 +0000

49 lines

Re: Data Protection & Timetables

Robert (Bob) Waixel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:58:25 +0000

134 lines

Re: Data Protection & Timetables

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:12:40 -0000

208 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Act

Data Protection Act

Caroline Dominey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:16:47 +0100

47 lines

Re: Data Protection Act

Simon Howarth (WSL) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:23:35 +0100

82 lines

Re: Data Protection Act

Jim Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:57:22 +0100

142 lines

Re: Data Protection Act

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:37:40 +0100

195 lines

Re: Data Protection Act

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:22:07 +0100

121 lines

Re: Data Protection Act

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 12:13:41 +0100

167 lines

Re: Data Protection Act

Maurice Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:08:37 +0100

238 lines

New Thread

Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation sur vey

Re: Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation sur vey

Wiper, Carl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:09:48 +0100

128 lines

New Thread

Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation survey

Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation survey

Helen Bartram <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:41:06 +0100

60 lines

Re: Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation survey

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:30:31 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

data protection and dates of birth in the US.

data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Jarvis Rachel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:46:41 +0100

46 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mary Liddell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:17:27 +0100

85 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Andrew Charlesworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:09:32 -0400

135 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Andrew Charlesworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:32:24 -0400

143 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mandi Barron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:57:05 +0100

206 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:08:51 +0100

38 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Andrew Charlesworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:06:13 -0400

130 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mary Liddell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 06:49:15 +0100

178 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:05:05 +0100

35 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Nick Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:37:28 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

Data Protection and FOI Fees

Data Protection and FOI Fees

Helen Bartram <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:45:05 +0000

59 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Leoni, Rudi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:42:26 -0000

110 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:11:49 -0000

85 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:35:44 -0000

111 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Gerry Dane <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:58:20 -0000

156 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Edwina Withe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:04:01 +0000

201 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:05:17 -0000

187 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Mandi Barron <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:06:31 -0000

246 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:41:14 -0000

109 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Carter, Antoinette (KIS) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:20:53 -0000

218 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:44:39 -0000

232 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Andrew Charlesworth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:40:31 +0000

257 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:58:44 +0100

90 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:27:48 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Data protection and freedom of information consultancy

Data protection and freedom of information consultancy

David Gunn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:32:19 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

data protection code of practice for records managers and archivists - revised draft issued for comment

data protection code of practice for records managers and archivists - revised draft issued for comment

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Oct 2005 09:07:09 +0100

81 lines

data protection code of practice for records managers and archivists - revised draft issued for comment

Alan Stead <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:01:28 +0100

132 lines

Re: data protection code of practice for records managers and archivists - revised draft issued for comment

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:38:53 +0100

158 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Fair processing Notices

Data Protection Fair processing Notices

Tim Salmon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:37:36 +0100

45 lines

Re: Data Protection Fair processing Notices

Julie Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:12:29 +0100

142 lines

Re: Data Protection Fair processing Notices

Ken Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:30:24 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Data protection in the movies

Data protection in the movies

Susan Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:12:52 +0100

29 lines

Re: Data protection in the movies

Julian Curmi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:23:52 +0200

248 lines

Re: Data protection in the movies

Oakman Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:21:34 +0100

55 lines

Re: Data protection in the movies

Peter Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:39:28 +0100

57 lines

Re: Data protection in the movies

Robert Melville <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:27:00 +0100

55 lines

Re: Data protection in the movies

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:47:59 +0100

32 lines

Re: Data protection in the movies

Maurice Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:37:31 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Data Protection in the UAE

Data Protection in the UAE

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:31:57 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Job Advert

Data Protection Job Advert

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:34:20 EDT

30 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Job Advert - Amended

Data Protection Job Advert - Amended

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:07:55 EDT

29 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Manuals

Data Protection Manuals

Tom Devenish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:05:59 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Helen Bartram <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:20:37 +0100

64 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:47:01 +0100

96 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:51:48 +0100

132 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:54:26 +0100

159 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Clementine Amawo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:54:55 +0100

117 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Graham Hadfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 08:02:03 +0100

34 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Carter, Antoinette (KIS) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:31:51 +0100

202 lines

New Thread

DATA PROTECTION UPDATE SESSIONS IN LONDON, GLASGOW AND MANCHESTER

DATA PROTECTION UPDATE SESSIONS IN LONDON, GLASGOW AND MANCHESTER

Pounder Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:11:49 +0100

86 lines

New Thread

Data Sharing Protocols

Data Sharing Protocols

Tom Devenish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:29:04 +0000

38 lines

Re: Data Sharing Protocols

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:14:40 EST

69 lines

Re: Data Sharing Protocols

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:59:10 -0000

129 lines

Re: Data Sharing Protocols

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:33:22 -0000

244 lines

New Thread

Data subject rights - deleting data

Data subject rights - deleting data

Sally Gibson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 14:58:23 +0100

33 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 15:12:24 +0100

86 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Peter Dinsdale <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 15:23:31 +0100

132 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 15:30:43 +0100

170 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Graham Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 15:30:32 +0100

281 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 15:52:59 +0100

312 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 16:15:47 +0100

219 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 16:22:16 +0100

349 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2005 16:50:49 +0100

263 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 May 2005 07:05:45 +0100

43 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2005 16:16:24 +0100

333 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:32:04 +0100

70 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:39:24 +0100

129 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:28:24 +0100

36 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:37:56 +0100

63 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:23:28 +0100

35 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:53:01 +0100

66 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 19:35:42 +0100

32 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:33:16 +0100

164 lines

New Thread

Data Transfers - Contractual Clauses

Data Transfers - Contractual Clauses

Gerry Dane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:54:43 -0000

36 lines

Re: Data Transfers - Contractual Clauses

Lillina Taranto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:39:43 -0800

90 lines

Re: Data Transfers - Contractual Clauses

Naana Agyei-Ampadu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:13:48 +0000

114 lines

New Thread

Data Transfers - New Contractual Clauses

Data Transfers - New Contractual Clauses

Gerry Dane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:14:34 -0000

53 lines

New Thread

[log in to unmask]

[log in to unmask]

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:31:02 -0000

150 lines

New Thread

DATs - registration

DATs - registration

Adam Warren <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 13:27:32 +0100

32 lines

Re: DATs - registration

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 13:29:58 +0100

58 lines

Re: DATs - registration

Adam Warren <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2005 09:10:22 +0100

30 lines

Re: DATs - registration

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 May 2005 10:39:36 +0100

117 lines

New Thread

Debt Collection Agencies

Debt Collection Agencies

Mary Liddell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:51:59 -0000

31 lines

New Thread

Deceased Clients

Deceased Clients

Tom Devenish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:31:18 +0000

34 lines

Re: Deceased Clients

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:40:08 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

Defense cousel right to victim's personal data

Defense cousel right to victim's personal data

Clementine Amawo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:45:56 +0100

57 lines

Re: Defense cousel right to victim's personal data

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:43:13 +0100

57 lines

Re: Defense cousel right to victim's personal data

Alan Stead (Nottingham City Council) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:20:30 +0100

127 lines

Re: Defense cousel right to victim's personal data

Michael Doherty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:57:17 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Dept of Work and Pensions

Dept of Work and Pensions

Jane Corrin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:08:13 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Desperation an excuse for Data Protection? was T-Mobile

Re: Desperation an excuse for Data Protection? was T-Mobile

Ekin Caglar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:46:09 +0100

39 lines

Re: Desperation an excuse for Data Protection? was T-Mobile

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:47:30 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Details of next years DP courses and dates

Details of next years DP courses and dates

Pounder Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:01:12 -0000

54 lines

Re: Details of next years DP courses and dates

Adrian Chase <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:39:20 +0000

154 lines

New Thread

Did he really hack the DEC website?

Did he really hack the DEC website?

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:20:20 -0000

109 lines

Re: Did he really hack the DEC website?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 07:17:24 +0000

128 lines

Re: Did he really hack the DEC website?

Carl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:55:32 -0000

225 lines

Re: Did he really hack the DEC website?

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:01:28 -0000

173 lines

Re: Did he really hack the DEC website?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:15:51 +0000

97 lines

New Thread

Did we cover the Sony incident?

Did we cover the Sony incident?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:23:26 -0000

63 lines

New Thread

Direct Marketing - Article Series

Direct Marketing - Article Series

Lisa Souza <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:40:05 -0000

68 lines

New Thread

Disclosing school reports

Disclosing school reports

Carey Clifford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:29:47 +0000

45 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:45:32 -0000

79 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Donald Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:07:17 -0000

91 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:33:32 -0000

139 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Arthur Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:49:31 -0000

259 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:29:25 -0000

230 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:14:11 -0000

232 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Dan Hallam <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:44:27 -0000

284 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Trevor Louth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:13:50 +0000

342 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

carey clifford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:13:58 -0000

272 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:54:19 -0000

285 lines

New Thread

Disclosing to IR or CSA

Disclosing to IR or CSA

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:09:24 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Disclosure of contact details to a credit card company

Disclosure of contact details to a credit card company

John Hughes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:11:03 -0000

52 lines

Re: Disclosure of contact details to a credit card company

Chris Brogan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:01:19 -0000

105 lines

Re: Disclosure of contact details to a credit card company

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:49:15 -0000

132 lines

New Thread

Disclosure of Information

Disclosure of Information

Bridget Brook <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 08:34:24 +0100

34 lines

Re: Disclosure of Information

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:34:34 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Gillian Whichelo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:54:49 -0000

44 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 07:19:55 EST

75 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Julie Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:31:48 -0000

122 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Wilson, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:33:22 -0000

185 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Hitches, John F <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:19:59 -0000

68 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:12:40 -0000

195 lines

New Thread

Disclosure or not?

Disclosure or not?

John Hughes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:08:47 +0100

45 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:14:50 +0100

81 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:18:28 +0100

84 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:20:38 +0100

78 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:25:51 +0100

148 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Margarita Rainford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:42:07 +0100

174 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Jethro R Binks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:35:05 +0100

183 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:38:30 +0100

206 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Hawley, Graeme <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:40:16 +0100

334 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:41:38 +0100

262 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:51:31 +0100

332 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:56:03 EDT

64 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Hawley, Graeme <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:00:37 +0100

462 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Margarita Rainford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:09:30 +0100

429 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:21:22 +0100

306 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Redfern Catherine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:19:31 +0100

567 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:32:57 +0100

557 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:47:44 +0100

468 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Michael DOHERTY PSE 53852 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:47:45 +0100

669 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:58:44 +0100

755 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Lewis, Chris G. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:05:36 +0100

584 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:29:53 +0100

844 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:39:03 +0100

43 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Lynne Skipsey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:37:38 +0100

723 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:47:44 EDT

63 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Carter, Antoinette (KIS) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:42:56 +0100

119 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:54:32 +0100

190 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:41:08 EDT

110 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:45:44 +0100

247 lines

New Thread

Disclosure to father

Disclosure to father

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:38:19 +0000

25 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Trevor Louth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:22:29 +0000

65 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:28:28 -0000

91 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Smith, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:32:46 -0000

119 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Sarah Westwood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:35:25 +0000

160 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:42:46 -0000

64 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:39:55 -0000

175 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:50:10 -0000

219 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:54:17 -0000

228 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Scourfield, Brenda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:58:36 -0000

268 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:12:26 -0000

318 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:24:37 -0000

407 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:31:35 -0000

417 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:11:51 EST

65 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:19:11 -0000

284 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Simon Howarth (WSL) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:50:54 -0000

321 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:57:03 -0000

401 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:54:56 -0000

371 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Christopher Spray <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:20:35 -0000

403 lines

New Thread

Disclosure to Utilities

Disclosure to Utilities

Brenda Scourfield <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:36:38 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Disclosures

Disclosures

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:15:16 -0000

54 lines

New Thread

Discussion lists for students and educational purposes

Discussion lists for students and educational purposes

Pat Gannon-Leary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2005 09:58:44 +0100

36 lines

Re: Discussion lists for students and educational purposes

Charles Christacopoulos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2005 11:13:06 +0100

79 lines

Re: Discussion lists for students and educational purposes

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2005 11:30:06 +0100

139 lines

Re: Discussion lists for students and educational purposes

davidwyatt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 May 2005 20:45:12 +0100

117 lines

New Thread

Disproportionate Effort

Disproportionate Effort

Turner8 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 08:37:24 +0100

34 lines

Re: Disproportionate Effort

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 09:43:58 +0100

96 lines

Re: Disproportionate Effort

Turner8 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 May 2005 09:50:19 +0100

126 lines

Re: Disproportionate Effort

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 13:32:11 +0100

187 lines

Re: Disproportionate Effort

ianwelton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:06:31 +0100

235 lines

Re: Disproportionate Effort

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:12:24 +0100

279 lines

Re: Disproportionate Effort

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:47:11 +0100

357 lines

New Thread

dissertations and copyright

dissertations and copyright

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:28:22 +0100

93 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Mandi Barron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:31:29 +0100

131 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:45:13 +0100

168 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Laurence Bebbington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:55:26 +0100

397 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Mandi Barron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:08:57 +0100

468 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Laurence Bebbington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:14:37 +0100

54 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:31:42 +0100

490 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Antoinette Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:33:46 +0100

80 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Graham Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:30:30 +0100

146 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Laurence Bebbington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:44:20 +0100

123 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Mandi Barron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:57:18 +0100

167 lines

New Thread

dissertations, copyright and PSI

dissertations, copyright and PSI

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:39:34 +0100

78 lines

New Thread

Does being dad trump the DPA?

Does being dad trump the DPA?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:42:13 +0000

64 lines

Re: Does being dad trump the DPA?

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:21:35 +0000

53 lines

Re: Does being dad trump the DPA?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:26:53 +0000

80 lines

Re: Does being dad trump the DPA?

Kirsty Gray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:34:55 +0000

51 lines

Re: Does being dad trump the DPA?

Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:40:38 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

DP Breach

DP Breach

Casillas, Mojgan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:56:47 +0100

61 lines

Re: DP Breach

Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:24:20 +0100

103 lines

Re: DP Breach

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:28:44 +0100

176 lines

Re: DP Breach

Simon Howarth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:35:33 +0100

214 lines

Re: DP Breach

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:39:15 +0100

242 lines

Re: DP Breach

Tim Trent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:39:38 +0100

242 lines

New Thread

DP Qualifications

DP Qualifications

Casillas, Mojgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:07:54 +0100

42 lines

Re: DP Qualifications

Healy, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:13:22 +0100

111 lines

Re: DP Qualifications

Stuart Lynch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:14:52 +0100

80 lines

New Thread

DP Teaching Aids - Videos

DP Teaching Aids - Videos

Clementine Amawo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:09:23 +0000

29 lines

Re: DP Teaching Aids - Videos

Tinsley, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:02:15 -0000

76 lines

Re: DP Teaching Aids - Videos

ALASDAIR WARWOOD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:54:47 -0000

93 lines

Re: DP Teaching Aids - Videos

DPCS Associates <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:23:06 -0000

107 lines

New Thread

DP/FOI

DP/FOI

Broom, Doreen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:40:08 +0100

49 lines

Re: DP/FOI

Casillas, Mojgan <[log in to unmask]>