JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: linux 64 bit computer

Stuart Midgley

Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:17:12 +0800

98 lines

Re: linux 64 bit computer

Stuart Midgley

Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:54:36 +0800

24 lines

Re: linux 64 bit computer

Stuart Midgley

Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:51:11 +0800

162 lines

Re: linux 64 bit computer

Greg Lindahl

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:00:52 -0800

23 lines

Re: linux 64 bit computer

Tim Prince

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:47:17 -0800

23 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Van Snyder

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:29:17 -0800

27 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Richard E Maine

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:27:36 -0800

38 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Russell, Richard

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:26:23 -0500

48 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Ben Blackwell

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:10:24 -0700

130 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Colin Watters

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:35:24 -0000

96 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Dan Nagle

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:26:19 -0500

93 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Ben Blackwell

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:24:23 -0700

89 lines

Re: linux 64 bit computer

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:10:37 -0500

23 lines

Re: linux 64 bit computer

Dan Nagle

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:39:44 -0500

63 lines

Re: linux 64 bit computer

Stuart Midgley

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:58:24 +0800

44 lines

linux 64 bit computer

Moshe Vaxman

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:55:27 +0300

111 lines

Re: linux 64 bit computer

Dan Nagle

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:37:44 -0500

40 lines

linux 64 bit computer

Moshe Vaxman

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:58:17 +0300

64 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Keith Bierman

Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:46:02 -0800

59 lines

Re: allocatable arrays inside a derived type

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:48:20 -0500

19 lines

allocatable arrays inside a derived type

Xiaogang Wang

Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:31:23 -0500

68 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Richard E Maine

Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:49:19 -0800

95 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Dan Nagle

Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:36:54 -0500

52 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Keith Bierman

Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:33:23 -0800

31 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Ben Blackwell

Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:12:39 -0700

37 lines

Re: spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:00:21 -0500

25 lines

spawing other jobs from within F90 code

Ben Blackwell

Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:25:20 -0700

163 lines

Re: Formatted Read

Richard E Maine

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:09:05 -0800

69 lines

Formatted Read

Rowles, Steve CIV G25

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:33:03 -0500

34 lines

Re: XML Parser

robin

Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:35:14 +1100

22 lines

Re: XML Parser

Dan Nagle

Sun, 18 Dec 2005 07:22:33 -0500

121 lines

Re: XML Parser

Edmund J Dunlop

Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:58:49 -0000

92 lines

Re: XML Parser

Dan Nagle

Sun, 18 Dec 2005 05:36:54 -0500

65 lines

Re: XML Parser

robin

Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:08:55 +1100

37 lines

Re: Storing procedure pointers

Drew McCormack

Sat, 17 Dec 2005 09:50:31 +0100

105 lines

Re: Storing procedure pointers

Bill Long

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:30:05 -0600

94 lines

Re: Storing procedure pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:11:43 -0500

66 lines

Re: Storing procedure pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:35:13 -0500

32 lines

Re: Storing procedure pointers

Dan Nagle

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:59:34 -0500

74 lines

Storing procedure pointers

Drew Mccormack

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:01:00 +0100

54 lines

Re: XML Parser

Dan Nagle

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:30:38 -0500

46 lines

Re: XML Parser

robin

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:13:12 +1100

25 lines

Re: XML Parser

robin

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:11:32 +1100

49 lines

Re: array assignment

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 00:32:19 +0100

38 lines

array assignment

Arie Beresteanu

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:14:59 +0000

33 lines

Re: [ANN] Programming paradigms course

Van Snyder

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:16:33 -0800

32 lines

[ANN] Programming paradigms course

Drew McCormack

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:59:02 +0100

27 lines

TCP sockets in Fortran 2003 (Was Re: XML Parser)

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:25:07 -0500

214 lines

Re: XML Parser

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:34:02 -0500

39 lines

Re: XML Parser

Dan Nagle

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:23:16 -0500

36 lines

Re: XML Parser

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:09:02 +0100

25 lines

Re: XML Parser

robin

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:51:31 +1100

64 lines

Re: XML Parser

Richard E Maine

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:01:42 -0800

45 lines

Re: XML Parser

Dan Nagle

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:43:41 -0500

34 lines

Re: XML Parser

Dr. Volker Typke

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 21:37:43 +0100

35 lines

Re: XML Parser

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:29:01 -0500

25 lines

Re: XML Parser

Bill Long

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:22:22 -0600

112 lines

Re: XML Parser

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:21:05 -0500

22 lines

Re: XML Parser

Charles W Howard

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:04:39 -0700

92 lines

Re: XML Parser

Harry Millwater

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:58:05 -0600

81 lines

XML Parser

Naomi Greenberg

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 12:31:30 -0500

34 lines

Re: An example: Calling OpenGL in Fortran 2003

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:33:12 -0800

19 lines

Re: An example: Calling OpenGL in Fortran 2003

Bill Long

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:15:46 -0600

34 lines

Re: An example: Calling OpenGL in Fortran 2003

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:44:02 -0500

67 lines

Re: An example: Calling OpenGL in Fortran 2003

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:59:58 -0800

57 lines

Re: Is this doable?

James Giles

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:32:16 -0700

48 lines

Re: An example: Calling OpenGL in Fortran 2003

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:31:59 -0500

112 lines

Re: An example: Calling OpenGL in Fortran 2003

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:25:26 -0800

28 lines

Re: An example: Calling OpenGL in Fortran 2003

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:43:51 -0500

63 lines

Re: An example: Calling OpenGL in Fortran 2003

Anthony Stone

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:59:50 +0000

31 lines

Re: Is this doable?

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:52:17 -0500

26 lines

Is this doable?

Nofal, Mostafa

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:35:28 -0500

170 lines

C Interop for DLLs: Was: Dynamic loading of shared object files in Fortran

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 22:15:55 -0500

240 lines

An example: Calling OpenGL in Fortran 2003

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:28:45 -0500

453 lines

Re: Overloading =>

Bill Long

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:31:32 -0600

64 lines

Re: Overloading =>

Greg Lindahl

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:10:15 -0800

19 lines

Fortran 95 & performance materials

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:50:26 -0500

34 lines

Re: Overloading =>

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:50:17 -0500

29 lines

Re: Overloading =>

Drew McCormack

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:36:15 +0100

25 lines

Re: Overloading =>

Bill Long

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 14:18:43 -0600

41 lines

Re: C functions returning strings

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:43:08 -0500

38 lines

C functions returning strings

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:10:46 -0500

46 lines

Re: Overloading =>

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 22:35:26 -0500

21 lines

Overloading =>

Drew McCormack

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 21:42:25 +0100

20 lines

Re: Question concerning the use of HUGE

Roland Schilling

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:48:10 +0100

36 lines

Re: Question concerning the use of HUGE

John Reid

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:24:46 +0000

56 lines

Re: Question concerning the use of HUGE

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:14:08 -0500

31 lines

Re: Question concerning the use of HUGE

robin

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 02:57:29 +1100

37 lines

Question concerning the use of HUGE

Roland Schilling

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:02:34 +0100

54 lines

Re: a PRIVATE question

Richard E Maine

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:15:52 -0800

41 lines

a PRIVATE question

W.J. Metzger

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:06:36 +0100

145 lines

Re: Copy in/out and MPI-2

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:53:07 -0500

19 lines

Copy in/out and MPI-2

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:51:21 -0500

50 lines

Re: Compilers that implement C interoperability?

Dan Nagle

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:32:13 -0500

39 lines

Re: Compilers that implement C interoperability?

Ian Bush

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:47:35 +0000

53 lines

Re: Dynamic loading of shared object files in Fortran (how?)

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:18:43 -0500

23 lines

Re: Dynamic loading of shared object files in Fortran (how?)

Van Snyder

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:48:21 -0800

36 lines

Re: Examples/tests for C interoperability

Bill Long

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:02:04 -0600

36 lines

Re: Compilers that implement C interoperability?

Ian Chivers

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:46:34 -0000

57 lines

Compilers that implement C interoperability?

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:43:10 -0500

42 lines

Re: Examples/tests for C interoperability

Ian Chivers

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:31:09 -0000

55 lines

Re: Examples/tests for C interoperability

Ian Bush

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:36:43 +0000

44 lines

Examples/tests for C interoperability

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:37:39 -0500

28 lines

Re: Dynamic loading of shared object files in Fortran (how?)

Neil Carlson

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:07:02 -0700

23 lines

Retrieving structured data from common storage utility

Popa, Frank D.

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 06:46:10 -0500

35 lines

Re: Dynamic loading of shared object files in Fortran (how?)

Richard E Maine

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:58:24 -0800

29 lines

Re: Dynamic loading of shared object files in Fortran (how?)

Russell, Richard

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:44:32 -0500

60 lines

Re: Dynamic loading of shared object files in Fortran (how?)

Richard E Maine

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:15:13 -0800

499 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

Yasuki Arasaki

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:17:39 +0900

80 lines

Dynamic loading of shared object files in Fortran (how?)

Neil Carlson

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:20:46 -0700

19 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

James Giles

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:33:49 -0700

56 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

Shareef Siddeek

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 06:56:08 -0900

185 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

Shareef Siddeek

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 06:42:54 -0900

85 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

Shareef Siddeek

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 06:41:08 -0900

146 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

J A A Van Oosterwijk

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:15:58 +0100

54 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

robin

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:49:05 +1100

32 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

robin

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:48:44 +1100

20 lines

Re: Array of pointers

Richard E Maine

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:25:37 -0800

42 lines

Re: Array of pointers

Catherine Moroney

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:17:45 -0800

54 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

Shareef Siddeek

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:08:40 -0900

100 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

Shareef Siddeek

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 06:58:51 -0900

93 lines

Re: Array of pointers

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:49:41 +0100

20 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

Dan Nagle

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:35:45 -0500

52 lines

Array of pointers

Jose Munoz

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:23:21 +0100

32 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:45:27 +0200

68 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

robin

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:51:51 +1100

44 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

Shareef Siddeek

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:22:27 -0900

126 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:43:23 +0900

26 lines

Re: free format maximum number of characters per line

Shareef Siddeek

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:18:56 -0900

15 lines

Call for reviewers

Ian Chivers

Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:28:51 -0000

80 lines

Re: end of input

Russell, Richard

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:27:20 -0400

31 lines

Re: end of input

<>

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:03:59 +0000

26 lines

Re: end of input

Richard E Maine

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 07:55:10 -0700

63 lines

Re: end of input

robin

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:39:11 +1000

63 lines

Re: end of input

robin

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:37:35 +1000

22 lines

Re: end of input

Greg Lindahl

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:05:02 -0700

20 lines

Re: end of input

Richard E Maine

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:47:48 -0700

84 lines

Re: end of input

Greg Lindahl

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:56:20 -0700

22 lines

Re: end of input

Van Snyder

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:08:53 -0700

29 lines

Re: Repeat factor

robin

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:19:12 +1000

28 lines

Re: end of input

Colin Millar

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:28:20 +0100

72 lines

Re: Repeat factor

Yasuki Arasaki

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:51:21 +0900

30 lines

Re: end of input

Russell, Richard

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:46:27 -0400

39 lines

Re: end of input

Dick Hendrickson

Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:35:53 -0500

36 lines

end of input

Ben Blackwell

Sat, 22 Oct 2005 13:43:52 +0000

14 lines

Re: Repeat factor

Van Snyder

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:12:33 -0700

27 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Van Snyder

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:09:41 -0700

31 lines

Re: Repeat factor

James Giles

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:55:57 -0600

43 lines

Re: Repeat factor

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:28:41 -0400

30 lines

Re: Repeat factor

Dan Nagle

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:07:37 -0400

44 lines

Re: Repeat factor

robin

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:30:37 +1000

63 lines

Re: Repeat factor

robin

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:30:11 +1000

23 lines

Help mastering LF95

Michael E. Burke

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:58:34 -0500

46 lines

Re: Repeat factor

Phillip Helbig

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:30:41 +0200

19 lines

Re: Repeat factor

Nils Smeds

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 23:11:21 +0200

49 lines

Re: Repeat factor

James Giles

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:24:40 -0600

25 lines

Re: Repeat factor

Richard E Maine

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:09:08 -0700

28 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Richard E Maine

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:04:29 -0700

39 lines

Re: Repeat factor

Richard E Maine

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:51:59 -0700

43 lines

Re: Repeat factor

Herbert Fruechtl

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:29:11 +0100

71 lines

Re: Repeat factor

Yasuki Arasaki

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:01:07 +0900

48 lines

Re: Repeat factor

O'Brien Paddy

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:56:15 +1000

55 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:53:17 -0400

28 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95 - IDE

Hargraves Gary

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:48:44 +1000

206 lines

Re: Repeat factor

robin

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:26:33 +1000

43 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Walt Brainerd

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:50:53 -0700

98 lines

Re: Repeat factor

Walt Brainerd

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:25:22 -0700

29 lines

Re: Repeat factor

Richard E Maine

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:57:36 -0700

51 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Dan Nagle

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:48:34 -0400

160 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Naomi Greenberg

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:01:38 -0400

132 lines

Re: Repeat factor

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:21:48 +0200

29 lines

Repeat factor

O'Brien Paddy

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:07:50 +1000

45 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Yasuki Arasaki

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:30:52 +0900

77 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

ian.chivers

Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:18:13 +0100

268 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Dan Nagle

Sat, 15 Oct 2005 06:38:30 -0400

29 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Ian Chivers

Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:51:23 +0100

125 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Richard E Maine

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:40:09 -0700

43 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Van Snyder

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:26:12 -0700

29 lines

Example of what's driving me nuts!

Van Snyder

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:11:51 -0700

50 lines

Re: Example of what's driving me nuts!

Michael E. Burke

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:34:56 -0500

75 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Michael E. Burke

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:05:18 -0500

77 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Ian Chivers

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:29:50 +0100

114 lines

Re: Example of what's driving me nuts!

Dick Hendrickson

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:07:48 -0500

59 lines

Re: Example of what's driving me nuts!

Henry Tillotson

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:52:24 +0100

67 lines

Re: Example of what's driving me nuts!

Roland Schilling

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:44:22 +0200

55 lines

Re: Example of what's driving me nuts!

Michael E. Burke

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:34:48 -0500

69 lines

Re: Example of what's driving me nuts!

Giorgio Pastore

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:16:46 +0200

15 lines

Re: Example of what's driving me nuts!

Pedro Alberto Enriquez

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:59:51 +0200

434 lines

Example of what's driving me nuts!

Michael E. Burke

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 06:49:07 -0500

320 lines

Re: Help mastering LF95

Dan Nagle

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 06:41:41 -0400

78 lines

Help mastering LF95

Michael E. Burke

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 03:31:57 -0500

243 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation of allocatable derived type components

Bill Long

Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:54:37 -0500

51 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation of allocatable derived type components

Richard E Maine

Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:31:46 -0700

71 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation of allocatable derived type components

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:39:54 -0400

24 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation of allocatable derived type components

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:33:43 +0200

38 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation of allocatable derived type components

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:08:50 -0400

34 lines

Automatic deallocation of allocatable derived type components

David Vowles

Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:36:16 +0930

55 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Phillip Helbig

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:35:25 +0200

21 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Ian Chivers

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:03:50 +0100

60 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Phillip Helbig

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:32:25 +0200

38 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Ian Chivers

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:36:28 +0100

94 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Dan Nagle

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:55:16 -0400

34 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Tim Prince

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 06:50:15 -0700

147 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Ian Chivers

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:06:53 +0100

323 lines

Web of interest to Fortran community

Van Snyder

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:33:11 -0700

18 lines

Re: How commonly do processors do these optimizations?

Tim Prince

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:38:08 -0700

54 lines

How commonly do processors do these optimizations?

Van Snyder

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:42:07 -0700

32 lines

Re: return value of max() when handed a NaN

Tim Prince

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 06:14:39 -0700

48 lines

Re: return value of max() when handed a NaN

J.L.Schonfelder

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:00:32 +0100

65 lines

Re: return value of max() when handed a NaN

Richard E Maine

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:51:13 -0700

42 lines

Re: return value of max() when handed a NaN

Harvey Richardson - Consultant Benchmark Engineer

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:47:21 +0100

18 lines

return value of max() when handed a NaN

Greg Lindahl

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:34:55 -0700

16 lines

Re: [1:n] as replacement for [(i,i=1,n)]

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:02:26 -0400

26 lines

Re: [1:n] as replacement for [(i,i=1,n)]

Van Snyder

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:47:22 -0700

61 lines

Re: [1:n] as replacement for [(i,i=1,n)]

Richard E Maine

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:19:38 -0700

38 lines

Re: [1:n] as replacement for [(i,i=1,n)]

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:52 -0400

51 lines

Re: [1:n] as replacement for [(i,i=1,n)]

Reid, JK (John)

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:30:56 +0100

34 lines

Re: [1:n] as replacement for [(i,i=1,n)]

Greg Lindahl

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:00:48 -0700

24 lines

Re: [1:n] as replacement for [(i,i=1,n)]

Richard E Maine

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:38:51 -0700

38 lines

Course - Scientific Programming in Fortran 95

Shaun Forth

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:39:36 +0100

16 lines

[1:n] as replacement for [(i,i=1,n)]

Vivek Rao

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 06:06:00 -0700

36 lines

Re: Q about MVBITS

Walt Brainerd

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 08:25:46 -0700

39 lines

Re: Q about MVBITS

Jan van Oosterwijk

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 17:39:54 +0300

64 lines

Re: Q about MVBITS

Emilio Perea

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 09:25:54 -0500

20 lines

Q about MVBITS

Jan van Oosterwijk

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:56:49 +0300

69 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

John Reid

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:58:52 +0100

22 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:34:38 +0900

19 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

robin

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:27:03 -0700

35 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Dan Nagle

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:48:13 -0400

41 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Erik Schnetter

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:35:55 +0200

64 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Ian Chivers

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:21:04 +0100

238 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Phillip Helbig

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:58:34 +0200

42 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:08:20 +0900

42 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Bill Long

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:01:50 -0500

49 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Erik Schnetter

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:39:42 +0200

57 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Ian Chivers

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:21:22 +0100

252 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Ian Chivers

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:15:45 +0100

68 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

LAI, Choi-Hong

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:16:27 +0100

49 lines

Re: Fortran aware editors

Richard E Maine

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:01:14 -0700

31 lines

Re: Fortran aware editors

Van Snyder

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:48:26 -0700

140 lines

Preserving Control Data software

Van Snyder

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:40:34 -0700

20 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Lionel, Steve

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:00:03 -0400

40 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Bill Long

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:57:36 -0500

28 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Bill Long

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:54:49 -0500

76 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Ian Chivers

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:50:52 +0100

197 lines

Re: Fortran aware editors

Jean-Baptiste FAURE

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:53:06 +0200

30 lines

Re: Fortran aware editors

Dr. Luis Samaniego

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:57:56 +0200

146 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:29:21 -0400

24 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Emilio Perea

Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:09:31 -0500

21 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Tim Prince

Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:43:26 -0700

28 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Tim Prince

Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:41:52 -0700

35 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Phillip Helbig

Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:00:02 +0200

13 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Ian Chivers

Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:47:06 +0100

53 lines

Re: Parallel programming update

Phillip Helbig

Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:15:12 +0200

22 lines

Parallel programming update

Ian Chivers

Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:07:59 +0100

113 lines

Re: Fortran aware editors

Henry Tillotson

Sat, 20 Aug 2005 09:04:02 +0100

39 lines

Re: Fortran aware editors

Ian Chivers

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:48:41 +0100

36 lines

Re: Fortran aware editors

Harry Millwater

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:22:50 -0500

23 lines

Re: Fortran aware editors

Werner Schulz

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:08:24 +0100

30 lines

Parallel programming

Ian Chivers

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:39:25 +0100

71 lines

Fortran aware editors

Ian Chivers

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:15:20 +0100

131 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

Jacob =Jouk Jansen

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:08:58 +0200

34 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

David Vowles

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:18:36 +0930

82 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

Keith Refson

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:24:25 +0100

43 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

Drew McCormack

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:22:19 +0200

133 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

Alberto Fasso'

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:36:08 -0700

59 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

Lionel, Steve

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:20:57 -0400

32 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

Harry Millwater

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:59:11 -0500

46 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

Ben Blackwell

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:55:59 -0600

55 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

Emilio Perea

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:49:45 -0500

22 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

Richard E Maine

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:48:41 -0700

34 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

Roland Schilling

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:34:11 +0200

25 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:22:44 +0200

70 lines

Re: Colour coded editors for Fortran

Herbert Fruechtl

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:21:22 +0100

58 lines

Re: TR15581 example code?

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:15:20 -0400

35 lines

Colour coded editors for Fortran

Ian Chivers

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:10:37 +0100

45 lines

TR15581 example code?

Keith Refson

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:39:22 +0100

33 lines

Re: Stream I/O questions

Richard E Maine

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:18:54 -0700

130 lines

Re: Problems with Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9 for Windows

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:36:22 +0900

74 lines

Problems with Intel Fortran Compiler Version 9 for Windows

Peter Herzenstiel

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:59:59 +0200

4198 lines

Errata file for "Fortran 95/2000 Explained"

michael metcalf

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:25:52 +0200

20 lines

Re: Stream I/O questions

Clive Page

Sat, 9 Jul 2005 09:57:08 +0100

18 lines

Re: KIND and architecture

Lionel, Steve

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 13:09:57 -0400

34 lines

Re: KIND and architecture

Phillip Helbig

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 18:58:55 +0200

15 lines

Re: KIND and architecture

Lionel, Steve

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 12:12:08 -0400

51 lines

Re: KIND and architecture

Phillip Helbig

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:45:51 +0200

28 lines

Re: KIND and architecture

Bill Long

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:42:14 -0500

157 lines

Re: KIND and architecture

Anthony Stone

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 16:00:28 +0100

33 lines

Re: KIND and architecture

Lionel, Steve

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:32:29 -0400

37 lines

Re: Stream I/O questions

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:27:00 -0400

24 lines

Re: KIND and architecture

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:23:05 -0400

27 lines

Re: KIND and architecture

Stuart Midgley

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 21:35:47 +0800

111 lines

KIND and architecture

simon harding (RRes-Roth)

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:18:17 +0100

27 lines

Re: Stream I/O questions

No Name

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:28:15 +0100

23 lines

Re: Stream I/O questions

Van Snyder

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 20:52:04 -0700

34 lines

Re: Stream I/O questions

Yasuki Arasaki

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:59:44 +0900

35 lines

Re: Stream I/O questions

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:53:21 +0900

125 lines

Re: Stream I/O questions

Clive Page

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 21:23:18 +0100

85 lines

Re: Stream I/O questions

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:45:38 +0900

150 lines

Stream I/O questions

Clive Page

Tue, 5 Jul 2005 20:37:40 +0100

50 lines

Re: IEEE exceptions and arithmetic: IEEE_FEATURES

F2k3

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:22:17 -0700

35 lines

Re: IEEE exceptions and arithmetic: IEEE_FEATURES

Richard E Maine

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:04:10 -0700

64 lines

IEEE exceptions and arithmetic: IEEE_FEATURES

F2k3

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 06:23:20 -0700

43 lines

Re: Flattening nested loops

Stuart Midgley

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:58:17 +0800

66 lines

Re: Flattening nested loops

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:55:39 -0400

33 lines

Re: Flattening nested loops

Stuart Midgley

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:44:06 +0800

135 lines

Re: Flattening nested loops

R. A. Vowels

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:07:26 +1000

23 lines

Re: Flattening nested loops

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:51:30 -0400

34 lines

Re: Flattening nested loops

Yasuki Arasaki

Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:22:13 +0900

51 lines

Re: Flattening nested loops

Stuart Midgley

Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:16:45 +0800

62 lines

Re: Flattening nested loops

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:56:58 -0400

23 lines

Flattening nested loops

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:41:46 -0400

30 lines

Fortran 2003 and 95 Programming Courses

Shaun Forth

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:45:35 +0100

53 lines

Re: include files and c-preprocessor directives

Richard E Maine

Wed, 4 May 2005 07:42:24 -0700

84 lines

Re: include files and c-preprocessor directives

Daniel Grimwood

Wed, 4 May 2005 17:21:01 +0800

47 lines

include files and c-preprocessor directives

Catherine Moroney

Tue, 3 May 2005 17:08:14 -0700

67 lines

Re: include files and c-preprocessor directives

Catherine Moroney

Tue, 3 May 2005 14:30:12 -0700

106 lines

Re: include files and c-preprocessor directives

<>

Tue, 3 May 2005 16:06:11 -0500

39 lines

Re: include files and c-preprocessor directives

Thomas Clune

Tue, 3 May 2005 08:29:32 -0400

82 lines

Re: include files and c-preprocessor directives

Giorgio Pastore

Tue, 3 May 2005 13:42:06 +0200

29 lines

Re: include files and c-preprocessor directives

Daniel and Nicola Grimwood

Tue, 3 May 2005 07:21:18 +0800

29 lines

include files and c-preprocessor directives

Catherine Moroney

Mon, 2 May 2005 14:54:31 -0700

55 lines

Re: matrix size compile error

Nils Smeds

Thu, 14 Apr 2005 21:00:16 +0200

14 lines

Re: matrix size compile error

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 8 Apr 2005 23:25:18 -0700

21 lines

matrix size compile error

SUBSCRIBE COMP-FORTRAN-90 Aggie Adam

Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:40:58 +0100

23 lines

LOGICAL redux

James Giles

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:20:12 -0700

85 lines

Re: LOGICALS

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:32:41 -0800

22 lines

Re: LOGICALS

Bill Long

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:02:57 -0600

46 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

robin

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 23:59:46 +1000

251 lines

Re: Type Extension, Procedure reference: F2003

John Reid

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:58:27 +0100

54 lines

Representing Logical values

Loren P Meissner

Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:13:17 -0800

73 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

robin

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:07:09 +1000

193 lines

Re: LOGICALS

robin

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:07:09 +1000

117 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

Simon Harding

Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:08:00 +0100

39 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

Phillip Helbig

Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:58:13 +0200

48 lines

Re: LOGICAL values

Yasuki Arasaki

Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:15:56 +0900

55 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

David LaFrance-Linden

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:16:04 -0500

122 lines

Re: LOGICALS

David LaFrance-Linden

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:46:43 -0500

55 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

robin

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:48:48 +1000

98 lines

Re: LOGICAL values

robin

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:48:48 +1000

55 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

James Giles

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:38:19 -0700

182 lines

Re: LOGICAL values

James Giles

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:10:40 -0700

37 lines

LOGICALS

robin

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:45:39 +1000

36 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

robin

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:45:39 +1000

283 lines

Re: LOGICAL values

robin

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:45:39 +1000

125 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

David LaFrance-Linden

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:13:59 -0500

58 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

robin

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:06:37 +1000

26 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

James Giles

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:26:14 -0700

145 lines

Re: LOGICAL values

James Giles

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:46:41 -0700

108 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

robin

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:24:05 +1000

130 lines

Re: LOGICAL values

robin

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:24:05 +1000

146 lines

Re: LOGICAL

James Giles

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:17:12 -0700

31 lines

Re: LOGICAL

Bill Long

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:06:25 -0600

63 lines

Re: LOGICAL

David LaFrance-Linden

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:58:02 -0500

51 lines

Re: LOGICAL

Walt Brainerd

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:25:39 -0700

45 lines

Re: LOGICAL

James Giles

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:21:10 -0700

68 lines

Re: LOGICAL

Richard E Maine

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:17:34 -0800

38 lines

Re: LOGICAL

Dan Nagle

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:02:12 -0500

28 lines

Re: LOGICAL

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:57:15 -0500

18 lines

Re: LOGICAL

Bill Long

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:49:49 -0600

36 lines

Re: LOGICAL

David LaFrance-Linden

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:09:40 -0500

33 lines

Re: LOGICAL

Phillip Helbig

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:48:53 +0200

11 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

David LaFrance-Linden

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:48:17 -0500

17 lines

Re: LOGICAL

Bill Long

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:00:55 -0600

141 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

Bill Long

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:07:21 -0600

35 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

David LaFrance-Linden

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:16:25 -0500

37 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

Daniel and Nicola Grimwood

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:28:48 +0800

36 lines

Type Extension, Procedure reference: F2003

F2k3

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:42:16 -0800

52 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

James Giles

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 17:09:56 -0700

61 lines

Re: LOGICAL values

James Giles

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:45:13 -0700

99 lines

Re: LOGICAL (was: maxloc of a logical array)

robin

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:11:18 +1000

71 lines

Re: LOGICAL values

robin

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:11:18 +1000

84 lines

Re: LOGICAL values (was: maxloc of a logical array)

James Giles

Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:26:16 -0700

48 lines

Re: LOGICAL values (was: maxloc of a logical array)

robin

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:53:00 +1000

33 lines

Re: Addendum: Transition x86 to x86_64

Nils Smeds

Sat, 26 Mar 2005 22:46:58 +0100

49 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

robin

Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:58:33 +1000

35 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

James Giles

Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:43:52 -0700

47 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

robin

Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:19:44 +1000

38 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

Dan Nagle

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:04:43 -0500

45 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

David LaFrance-Linden

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:10:55 -0500

41 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:57:23 -0500

24 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

Harvey Richardson - Consultant Benchmark Engineer

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:25:21 +0000

19 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

Phillip Helbig

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 06:34:34 +0200

27 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

James Giles

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:39:06 -0700

31 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

Daniel and Nicola Grimwood

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:15:34 +0800

26 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

<>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:57:51 -0800

23 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

Richard E Maine

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:18:29 -0800

34 lines

Re: maxloc of a logical array

James Giles

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:18:22 -0700

28 lines

maxloc of a logical array

Daniel and Nicola Grimwood

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 06:59:21 +0800

27 lines

Re: Tracing after SIGSEGV

David LaFrance-Linden

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:38:19 -0500

51 lines

Re: Tracing after SIGSEGV

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:19:46 -0500

71 lines

Re: Difference between -trace and -g

David LaFrance-Linden

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:54:13 -0500

82 lines

Difference between -trace and -g

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:03:24 -0500

22 lines

Re: Tracing after SIGSEGV

David LaFrance-Linden

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:22:36 -0500

32 lines

Tracing after SIGSEGV

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:04:04 -0500

25 lines

Re: SEQUENCE and padding

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:51:21 +0900

27 lines

Re: Addendum: Transition x86 to x86_64

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:02:09 -0500

23 lines

SEQUENCE and padding

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:35:40 -0500

35 lines

Re: forall+where

Alexei Matveev

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:07:52 +0100

99 lines

Re: forall+where

Alexei Matveev

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:00:48 +0100

64 lines

Re: forall+where

Richard E Maine

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 07:55:22 -0800

59 lines

Re: forall+where

Tim Prince

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 05:40:13 -0800

41 lines

Re: FFTW

Simon Clarke

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:03:18 +0000

51 lines

Re: forall+where

Alexei Matveev

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:42:15 +0100

19 lines

Re: forall+where

Alexei Matveev

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:36:43 +0100

59 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Greg Lindahl

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:49:09 -0800

18 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:05:25 -0500

30 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Tim Prince

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:25:54 -0800

52 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:19:50 -0500

61 lines

Re: forall+where

Richard E Maine

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:12:39 -0800

26 lines

Re: forall+where

Lionel, Steve

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:39:58 -0500

51 lines

Re: forall+where

Chuck Koelbel

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:47:06 -0600

75 lines

Re: forall+where

Richard E Maine

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:50:51 -0800

61 lines

Re: forall+where

Dick Hendrickson

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:41:59 -0600

62 lines

Future of sNans

Keith Bierman

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:22:02 -0800

72 lines

forall+where

Alexei Matveev

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:28:33 +0100

44 lines

Re: FFTW

Jacob =Jouk Jansen

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:26:43 +0100

41 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:28:59 -0500

28 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Tim Prince

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:29:10 -0800

48 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:27:49 -0800

28 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Tim Prince

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:21:52 -0800

35 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:16:01 -0500

55 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:04:27 -0500

21 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:54:26 -0500

31 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Tim Prince

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:32:28 -0800

36 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:03:18 -0500

24 lines

Re: Transition x86 to x86_64

Lionel, Steve

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:56:04 -0500

36 lines

Re: Addendum: Transition x86 to x86_64

Tim Prince

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:21:45 -0800

30 lines

Addendum: Transition x86 to x86_64

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:53:56 -0500

22 lines

Transition x86 to x86_64

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:49:28 -0500

45 lines

Re: Iterative solvers

<>

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:22:30 -0800

27 lines

Re: Iterative solvers

Vivek Rao

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:48:18 -0800

60 lines

Re: FFTW

Alan Miller

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:03:16 -0800

40 lines

Re: FFTW

Dr Sabino Chavez-Cerda

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:05:00 -0600

13 lines

Re: FFTW

Dr Sabino Chavez-Cerda

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:03:55 -0600

41 lines

Re: FFTW

Dr Sabino Chavez-Cerda

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:56:41 -0600

56 lines

Re: FFTW

Dr Sabino Chavez-Cerda

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:53:55 -0600

33 lines

Re: FFTW

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:49:26 -0500

29 lines

Re: FFTW

Thomas Clune

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 08:55:58 -0500

43 lines

Re: FFTW

Yasuki Arasaki

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:37:07 +0900

27 lines

FFTW

Dr Sabino Chavez-Cerda

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:16:20 -0600

24 lines

Re: Iterative solvers

Erik Schnetter

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:51:36 +0100

51 lines

Re: Iterative solvers

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:39:59 -0500

23 lines

Iterative solvers

Suresh Seetharam

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:32:16 +0000

19 lines

Re: Has Fortran 90 been superseded by Fortran 95?

Bill Long

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:05:57 -0600

138 lines

Re: Has Fortran 90 been superseded by Fortran 95?

Vivek Rao

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:29:45 -0800

54 lines

Re: Has Fortran 90 been superseded by Fortran 95?

Toon Moene

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 20:45:47 +0100

31 lines

Re: Has Fortran 90 been superseded by Fortran 95?

Bill Long

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:36:13 -0600

34 lines

Re: Intrinsic "size()" as auto array dimension

Keith Refson

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:40:52 +0000

74 lines

Re: Intrinsic "size()" as auto array dimension

Richard E Maine

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:15:42 -0800

70 lines

Re: 3d matrices

Ted Stern

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:48:26 -0800

50 lines

Re: 3d matrices

Bill Long

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:34:14 -0600

106 lines

Re: Has Fortran 90 been superseded by Fortran 95?

Orville E. Wheeler

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:22:08 -0600

133 lines

Re: 3d matrices

Richard E Maine

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:17:48 -0800

62 lines

3d matrices

Suresh Seetharam

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:47:13 +0000

64 lines

Re: Has Fortran 90 been superseded by Fortran 95?

Harvey Richardson

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:23:09 +0000

15 lines

Re: Has Fortran 90 been superseded by Fortran 95?

Richard E Maine

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:10:57 -0800

74 lines

Re: Has Fortran 90 been superseded by Fortran 95?

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:39:56 -0500

22 lines

Re: Has Fortran 90 been superseded by Fortran 95?

Orville E. Wheeler

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:39:58 -0600

38 lines

Re: Fw: FREE FORTRAN COMPILER

Lionel, Steve

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:19:10 -0500

34 lines

Intrinsic "size()" as auto array dimension

Keith Refson

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:14:33 +0000

37 lines

Re: Has Fortran 90 been superseded by Fortran 95?

Keith Refson

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:06:17 +0000

41 lines

Re: Has Fortran 90 been superseded by Fortran 95?

Phillip Helbig

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:44:58 +0200

13 lines

Has Fortran 90 been superseded by Fortran 95?

John Reid

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:14:28 +0000

20 lines

Re: Fw: FREE FORTRAN COMPILER

Vivek Rao

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:59:40 -0800

60 lines

Re: Fw: FREE FORTRAN COMPILER

Walt Brainerd

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:09:38 -0700

68 lines

Re: Fw: FREE FORTRAN COMPILER

Dan Nagle

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:37:02 -0500

69 lines

Fw: FREE FORTRAN COMPILER

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:18:47 +0100

114 lines

Re: 32- vs. 64-bit benchmarks on Nocona?

Greg Lindahl

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:17:45 -0800

28 lines

Re: 32- vs. 64-bit benchmarks on Nocona?

Keith Bierman

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:07:55 -0800

32 lines

32- vs. 64-bit benchmarks on Nocona?

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:02:39 -0500

39 lines

Meeting on UK Fortran requirements

David Muxworthy

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:47:32 +0000

29 lines

Re: How to make Standards

Ian Chivers

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:38:40 -0000

103 lines

Re: How to make Standards

Dan Nagle

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:20:27 -0500

46 lines

Re: How to make Standards

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:17:45 +0200

79 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:05:58 +0900

54 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

James Giles

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:33:37 -0700

54 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

<>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:05:43 -0800

97 lines

Fortran Journal

Richard E Maine

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:33:38 -0800

32 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

Richard E Maine

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:23:09 -0800

26 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

Ian Chivers

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:13:12 -0000

46 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

James Giles

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:45:46 -0700

33 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

<>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:42:46 -0800

40 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

James Giles

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:50:23 -0700

34 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:15:22 +0900

42 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

James Giles

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:53:25 -0700

41 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 01:19:31 -0500

27 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

James Giles

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:16:43 -0700

52 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

<>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:54:20 -0800

72 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

Keith Bierman

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:27:20 -0800

33 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

James Giles

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:16:47 -0700

30 lines

Re: Design based on Existing Practice

James Giles

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:14:11 -0700

49 lines

Re: How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

<>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:40:58 -0800

55 lines

Re: Design based on Existing Practice

<>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:14:10 -0800

95 lines

How to make Standards (was Re: Design based on Existing Practice)

Keith Bierman

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:33:04 -0800

57 lines

Re: Design based on Existing Practice

James Giles

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:02:05 -0700

27 lines

Re: Design based on Existing Practice

Richard E Maine

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:43:17 -0800

22 lines

Re: Design based on Existing Practice

James Giles

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:34:29 -0700

57 lines

Re: Design based on Existing Practice

Richard E Maine

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:06:43 -0800

69 lines

Re: Design based on Existing Practice

<>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:10:02 -0800

92 lines

Re: Design based on Existing Practice

James Giles

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:13:32 -0700

43 lines

Design based on Existing Practice

Loren P Meissner

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 06:21:31 -0800

25 lines

How to speedup program compiled by G95 ?

Jean-Baptiste FAURE

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 06:29:58 +0100

40 lines

Re: discussion of F200X in comp.lang.fortran

Werner Schulz

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:16:03 +0000

28 lines

discussion of F200X in comp.lang.fortran

Vivek Rao

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 15:38:33 -0800

29 lines

Re: Question about the F95 standard

<>

Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:17:12 +0000

60 lines

Question about the F95 standard

Roland Schilling

Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:59:42 +0100

51 lines

Re: Equivalence inside a derived type

Dan Nagle

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:21:00 -0500

30 lines

Re: Equivalence inside a derived type

James Giles

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:04:41 -0700

39 lines

Re: Equivalence inside a derived type

<>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:18:52 -0800

18 lines

Re: Equivalence inside a derived type

Jing Guo

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:43:10 -0500

54 lines

Re: Equivalence inside a derived type

Richard E Maine

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:06:39 -0800

46 lines

Re: Equivalence inside a derived type

Bertrand Meltz

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:24:57 +0100

86 lines

Re: Equivalence inside a derived type

Bertrand Meltz

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:19:15 +0100

72 lines

Re: Equivalence inside a derived type

Jacob =Jouk Jansen

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:31:38 +0100

101 lines

Re: Equivalence inside a derived type

James Giles

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:31:45 -0700

64 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 explained?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:37:34 +0100

43 lines

Re: Real literal constants

Richard E Maine

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:21:08 -0800

80 lines

Re: Real literal constants

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:56:50 -0500

24 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Richard E Maine

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:55:06 -0800

38 lines

Re: Equivalence inside a derived type

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:51:57 -0500

52 lines

Re: Real literal constants

Ian Chivers

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:51:36 -0000

95 lines

Real literal constants

Ian Chivers

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:44:12 -0000

81 lines

Equivalence inside a derived type

Bertrand Meltz

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:35:44 +0100

53 lines

Re: How Not to Write FORTRAN in Any Language

Bertrand Meltz

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:11:07 +0100

39 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 explained?

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:41:18 +0100

30 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Tim Prince

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:47:55 -0800

36 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Yasuki Arasaki

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:28:56 +0900

45 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

James Giles

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:46:25 -0700

62 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 explained?

Stuart Midgley

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:54:16 +1100

34 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 explained?

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:50:34 -0500

20 lines

Fortran 2000 explained?

Stuart Midgley

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:43:06 +1100

24 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Hargraves Gary

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:35:30 +1000

136 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Anthony Stone

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:35:23 +0000

68 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Werner Schulz

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:15:43 +0000

46 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

James Giles

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:54:04 -0700

64 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

James Giles

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:07:03 -0700

77 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Ted Stern

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:41:48 -0800

61 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:23:56 -0800

21 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

<>

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:52:52 -0800

33 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Ted Stern

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:49:12 -0800

48 lines

Re: deallocate error detection

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:37:42 -0800

22 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Van Snyder

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:27:24 -0800

33 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Phillip Helbig

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:47:11 +0200

13 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

David LaFrance-Linden

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:18:53 -0500

63 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Richard E Maine

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:10:00 -0800

89 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Anthony Stone

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:28:49 +0000

34 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Phillip Helbig

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:16:17 +0200

16 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Yasuki Arasaki

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:01:14 +0900

67 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

robin

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:56:51 +1000

64 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Anthony Stone

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:11:56 +0000

77 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Bertrand Meltz

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:34:20 +0100

102 lines

International e-Conference on Computer Science 2005 (IeCCS 2005)

Äñ. Èåüäùñïò Óßìïò - Dr. Theodore Simos

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:16:17 +0200

230 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Yasuki Arasaki

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:02:24 +0900

49 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Hargraves Gary

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:22:05 +1000

97 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Simon Harding

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:45:42 -0000

96 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:23:05 +0100

19 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Keith Refson

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:47:01 +0000

50 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Anthony Stone

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:37:38 +0000

49 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Wheeler, JF (Jonathan)

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:20:06 -0000

48 lines

Re: Computed GOTO

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:12:41 +0100

35 lines

Computed GOTO

Anthony Stone

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:31:56 +0000

50 lines

Re: How Not to Write FORTRAN in Any Language

Loren P Meissner

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:27:53 -0800

67 lines

Re: g95 and internal writes/reads

robin

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:14:20 +1000

34 lines

Re: How Not to Write FORTRAN in Any Language

<>

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:02:20 -0800

30 lines

Re: How Not to Write FORTRAN in Any Language

Dan Nagle

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:52:00 -0500

52 lines

Re: How Not to Write FORTRAN in Any Language

Russell, Richard

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:08:24 -0500

27 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

Yasuki Arasaki

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:55:51 +0900

35 lines

How Not to Write FORTRAN in Any Language

<>

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:29:46 -0800

71 lines

Re: g95 and internal writes/reads

Dan Nagle

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:29:37 -0500

45 lines

g95 and internal writes/reads

Catherine Moroney

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:10:57 -0800

36 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

Yongcheng Zhou

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:08:05 -0500

39 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

Bertrand Meltz

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:17:56 +0100

30 lines

Re: deallocate error detection

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:37:00 +0900

55 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

James Giles

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:01:19 -0700

40 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

<>

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:52:23 -0800

113 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

James Giles

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:10:01 -0700

91 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

<>

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:58:14 -0800

35 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

<>

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:48:27 -0800

117 lines

Re: deallocate error detection

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:49:25 -0500

87 lines

Re: deallocate error detection

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:29:27 +0100

27 lines

Re: deallocate error detection

Tim Prince

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 19:01:56 -0800

53 lines

deallocate error detection

Greg Lindahl

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:58:30 -0800

44 lines

Logical IF in F77

Loren P Meissner

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:14:30 -0800

55 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

Walt Brainerd

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:03:49 -0700

46 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

Walt Brainerd

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:31:46 -0700

35 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

Walt Brainerd

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:21:13 -0700

30 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

Ian Chivers

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:38:15 -0000

75 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

James Giles

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:00:27 -0700

88 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

<>

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:45:11 -0800

131 lines

Re: Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

<>

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:11:29 -0800

18 lines

Fortran bashing in ACM Queue magazine

Vivek Rao

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:01:59 -0800

54 lines

Re: F2003 has been published

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:18:45 +0100

23 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2023
February 2023
November 2022
September 2022
February 2022
January 2022
June 2021
November 2020
September 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
December 2019
October 2019
September 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
April 2015
March 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager