JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Latest Design Philosophy Papers

Anne-Marie Willis

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:25:18 +0000

34 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:51:40 -0500

147 lines

Design Thinking & Innovation Conference: March 29- 31st 2006, Singapore

Tan Chon Meng, Benny

Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:40:05 +0800

24 lines

Re: Capturing design information - coined a new word-Ranjan

M P Ranjan

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:07:21 +0530

324 lines

Happy Holidays!

Luis Inacio

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:03:47 -0800

151 lines

Re: Feliz Navidad! & Merry Christmas

Dr. Joseph Chiodo

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:24:52 -0500

105 lines

Feliz Navidad!

edgar koyis

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:37:43 -0600

63 lines

Doctroal fellowships available at the Oslo School of Architectureand Design

Simon Clatworthy

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:20:15 +0100

44 lines

Associate professor in design methods Stockholm

cheryl akner-koler

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:56:17 +0100

93 lines

Re: Help locating article: How to write a Doctoral Thesis by Dr Chad Perry, University of Southern Queensland

Terence Love

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:22:54 +0800

478 lines

Help locating article: How to write a Doctoral Thesis by Dr Chad Perry, University of Southern Queensland

Tom Crick

Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:03:12 -0000

95 lines

Late Application: Istanbul Workshop

ttnet

Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:13:50 +0200

20 lines

2nd CfP - Workshop CHI2006 - new user experience challenges in iT V: mobility & sociability

No Name

Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:02:02 -0000

89 lines

Position, Interior Architecture, Curtin University, Australia

Suzie Attiwill

Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:31:40 +1100

37 lines

Faculty Opening in Joint Program in Design, Stanford University

Charlie Ellinger

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:05:48 +0000

39 lines

Research Ethics in Art, Design and Media

Darren Newbury

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:02:01 -0000

178 lines

Re: Capturing design information - late response to Fil

Tiiu Poldma

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:59:10 -0500

60 lines

conferences-expectations, resources, takeaways

Lynn Kahle

Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:15:21 +0100

55 lines

Re: Capturing design information

Rob Bracewell

Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:49:40 +0000

113 lines

Re: Capturing design information

John Feland

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:29:09 -0800

106 lines

Re: Capturing design information

Rob Bracewell

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:46:06 +0000

83 lines

Re: I Wonder / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wonder

Stephen Scrivener

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:15:52 +0000

62 lines

Re: Capturing design information

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:46:44 -0500

60 lines

End of Regular application: Istanbul Workshop

ttnet

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:15:26 +0200

18 lines

Wonder etc: conferences and papers

Ranulph Glanville

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:28:36 +0000

54 lines

Re: I Wonder / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wonder

Fiona Jane Candy

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:23:09 +0000

40 lines

Re: I Wonder / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wonder

Eduardo Corte Real

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:06:26 -0000

53 lines

Re: I Wonder / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wonder

Stephen Scrivener

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:19:40 +0000

23 lines

faculty position in industrial design at the university of washington in seattle

Axel Roesler

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:07:03 +0000

58 lines

Re: Capturing design information

John Feland

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:59:16 -0800

49 lines

Capturing design information

Charles Burnette

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:56:43 -0500

25 lines

Re: I Wonder / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wonder

Jacques Giard

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:42:00 -0700

202 lines

Re: I Wonder / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wonder

Charles Burnette

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:31:20 -0500

144 lines

Working papers, full papers, exhibition projects -- all are welcome at Wonderground

Ken Friedman

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:42:26 +0100

101 lines

Re: Wonderground ..... We welcome Victor's proposal

Ken Friedman

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:37:02 +0100

74 lines

Re: I Wonder / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wonder

Fiona Jane Candy

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:34:00 +0000

75 lines

Re: I Wonder / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wonder

Thomas Schødt Rasmussen

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:56:59 +0100

259 lines

Re: I Wonder / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wonder

Jacques Giard

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:39:30 -0700

107 lines

I Wonder / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wo / Wonder

Thomas Schødt Rasmussen

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:58:15 +0100

179 lines

Re: Wonderground

Stephen Scrivener

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:24:50 +0000

35 lines

Re: Wonderground

Nicola Morelli

Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:50:34 +0100

345 lines

Cox Review

Hans Samuelson

Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:30:49 +0000

47 lines

Re: Wonderground

No Name

Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:57:12 +0600

122 lines

Re: Wonderground

Susan M. Hagan

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 19:05:14 -0500

63 lines

Wonderground

Ranulph Glanville

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:37:45 +0000

16 lines

Re: Wonderground

Victor Margolin

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 09:34:54 -0800

39 lines

Re: Wonderground

Christena Nippert-Eng

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:31:01 -0600

75 lines

Wonderground is coming to town !

Ken Friedman

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:21:38 +0100

276 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:51:36 -0500

48 lines

Faculty Positions at Carleton University Canada

Thomas Garvey

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 18:18:06 -0500

269 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Charles Burnette

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 16:18:09 -0500

52 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:12:20 -0500

135 lines

Re: Philosophy of design - new definition of theory (was Short Response to Klaus)

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:37:37 -0500

70 lines

Re: Philosophy of design - new definition of theory (was Short Response to Klaus)

Charles Burnette

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:27:41 -0500

34 lines

Cut Here: New Journal on Design and Media from India

M P Ranjan

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 20:42:50 +0530

100 lines

Re: Philosophy of design - new definition of theory (was Short Response to Klaus)

Charles Burnette

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:10:53 -0500

39 lines

Publications of practice based research

Stephen Scrivener

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:51:10 +0000

20 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design - theories, Klaus, and Chuck

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 05:59:34 -0500

74 lines

Re: Philosophy of design - new definition of theory (was Short Response to Klaus)

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:33:20 -0500

154 lines

Re: Philosophy of design - new definition of theory (was Short Response to Klaus)

Terence Love

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 03:40:00 +0000

128 lines

Re: Philosophy of design - new definition of theory (was Short Response to Klaus)

Charles Burnette

Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:42:53 -0500

46 lines

Re: Philosophy of design - new definition of theory (was Short Response to Klaus)

Terence Love

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:58:00 +0000

267 lines

Call for Artwork and Papers: IV 2006 and CGIV 2006

Elisa Giaccardi

Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:57:12 -0700

33 lines

Call for Artworks: ParticipART

Elisa Giaccardi

Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:22:58 -0700

113 lines

How to leave (or join) the PhD-Design list -- repeat message

Ken Friedman

Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:08:23 +0100

36 lines

Re: Philosophy of design - new definition of theory (was Short Response to Klaus)

Charles Burnette

Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:45:35 -0500

100 lines

Re: Philosophy of design - new definition of theory (was Short Response to Klaus)

Terence Love

Tue, 6 Dec 2005 08:42:00 +0000

127 lines

how to unsubsribe

Nina Sabnani

Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:21:23 +0530

10 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design - theories, Klaus, and Chuck

Prof. M P Ranjan

Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:58:37 +0530

16 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design - theories, Klaus, and Chuck

Charles Burnette

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:30:32 -0500

33 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Charles Burnette

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:38:18 -0500

103 lines

Re: Philosophy of design - new definition of theory (was Short Response to Klaus)

Charles Burnette

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:55:53 -0500

90 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design - theories, Klaus, and Chuck

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:29:13 -0500

262 lines

books on architecture & design

Heleen Gierveld

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:03:23 +0100

117 lines

design management and featuring of academic research

Florian Weiss

Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:28:02 +0100

43 lines

New book: Design Sketching

rob curedale

Sat, 3 Dec 2005 19:15:21 -0800

31 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design - theories, Klaus, and Chuck

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 22:49:26 -0500

205 lines

Philosophy of design - new definition of theory (was Short Response to Klaus)

Terence Love

Sat, 3 Dec 2005 00:19:00 +0000

118 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design - theories, Klaus, and Chuck

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:29:17 -0500

190 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Charles Burnette

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:32:35 -0500

42 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Charles Burnette

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:16:15 -0500

42 lines

Research Request: Philosophy of Design -- Full-text articles also welcome

Ken Friedman

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:50:59 +0100

59 lines

Re: 3 Quick Thoughts

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 01:11:52 -0500

146 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 00:11:47 -0500

52 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:21:43 -0500

55 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Terence Love

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 03:41:00 +0000

134 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Charles Burnette

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:50:11 -0500

34 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:11:23 -0500

127 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:41:20 -0500

95 lines

Re: 3 Quick Thoughts

Jerome Diethelm

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:56:20 -0800

69 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Tim Smithers

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:31:09 +0100

235 lines

3 Quick Thoughts

Ken Friedman

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:24:11 +0100

100 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:23:34 -0500

46 lines

Information of use to design research: Cereb. Cortex Table of Contents for January 2006; Vol. 16, No. 1

Terence Love

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:23:00 +0000

224 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Spotlight or Tool

Charles Burnette

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:09:42 -0500

27 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Charles Burnette

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:02:27 -0500

29 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Spotlight or Tool

M P Ranjan

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:06:47 +0530

105 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:44:22 -0500

67 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Erik Stolterman

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:42:39 -0500

120 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:36:27 -0500

85 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Charles Burnette

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:14:02 -0500

53 lines

Regular Registration: International Interaction Design Workshop

Oguzhan Ozcan

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:47:36 +0200

19 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:42:21 -0500

38 lines

Re: Designism, prescription, and description - was Design of Design. Philosophy of Design, Designism

David Sless

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:30:32 +1100

25 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Charles Burnette

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:51:46 -0500

35 lines

Designism, prescription, and description - was Design of Design. Philosophy of Design, Designism

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:26:15 -0500

80 lines

Philosophy of Design -- Zeno's Question to Diogenes

Eduardo Corte Real

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:28:39 -0000

40 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Zeno's Question to Diogenes

Ken Friedman

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:13:16 +0100

24 lines

Fw: Philosophy of Design -- Godel's Question to Frege

Eduardo Corte Real

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:03:27 -0000

88 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Godel's Question to Rosan

Ken Friedman

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:48:30 +0100

58 lines

Re: Design of Design. Philosophy of Design, Designism

Eduardo Corte Real

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:05:06 -0000

78 lines

Aw: Re: Philosophy of Design to Terry Kavanagh

Rosan Chow

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:58:45 +0100

50 lines

Design & Philosophy of Design - to Harold

Rosan Chow

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:50:11 +0100

61 lines

Design of Design. Philosophy of Design

Rosan Chow

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:47:02 +0100

38 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design

Terence Kavanagh

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:05:45 +0000

86 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:40:48 -0500

151 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way ... ] Response to Rosan

Eduardo Corte-Real

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:22:07 +0000

17 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way ... ] Response to Rosan

Terence Love

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:38:00 +0000

93 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way ... ] Response to Rosan

Charles Burnette

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:40:04 -0500

38 lines

Re: Research Request: Philosophy of Design

Jerome Diethelm

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:56:03 -0800

73 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Response to Rosan

Ken Friedman

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:51:10 +0100

76 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- the "meta" thing

Jerome Diethelm

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:22:52 -0800

136 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way ... ] Response to Rosan

Harold Nelson

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:20:46 -0800

44 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way ... ] Response to Rosan

Harold Nelson

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:11:38 -0800

58 lines

Re: Research Request: Philosophy of Design

Charles Burnette

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 12:14:24 -0500

110 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way ... ] Response to Rosan

Rosan Chow

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:00:07 +0100

39 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- the "meta" thing

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:22:39 -0500

79 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Ken Friedman

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:03:33 +0100

88 lines

How to leave (or join) the PhD-Design list

Ken Friedman

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:59:02 +0100

27 lines

Unsubscribe

Fay Bandoula

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:10:21 +0000

12 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way ... ] Response to Rosan

Terence Love

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:07:00 +0000

89 lines

Re: Research Request: Philosophy of Design

Terence Love

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:00:00 +0000

146 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way ... ] Response to Rosan

Rosan Chow

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 12:19:11 +0100

75 lines

Job: Professor of Industrial Design at Loughborough University, UK

A.R.Hodgson

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:38:00 -0000

321 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:51:10 -0500

155 lines

[Fwd: Re: [PHD-DESIGN] Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way ... ] Response to Rosan]

Ranjan M P

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:41:37 +0530

108 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:28 -0500

64 lines

Re: Research Request: Philosophy of Design

Charles Burnette

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:40:23 -0500

30 lines

Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Erik Stolterman

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:31:25 -0500

82 lines

Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Charles Burnette

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:12:57 -0500

41 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Jerome Diethelm

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:19:27 -0800

34 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- Short Response to Klaus

Ken Friedman

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:37:38 +0100

107 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Charles Burnette

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:42:48 -0500

63 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way ... ] Response to Rosan

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:32:30 -0500

227 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way ... ] Response to Rosan

Erik Stolterman

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:16:06 -0500

226 lines

Call for Papers: CHI Workshop on Reflective HCI

disalvo

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:01:55 -0500

59 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way ... ] Response to Rosan

Ken Friedman

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:55:57 +0100

192 lines

Re: Research Request: Philosophy of Design

Eduardo Corte Real

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:58:55 -0000

101 lines

CHI2006 Workshop About Face Interface

Pamela Jennings

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:15:01 -0500

131 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way]

Rosan Chow

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:42:31 +0100

64 lines

Re: Design Philosophy -- Response to Anne-Marie

Ken Friedman

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:49:49 +0100

153 lines

Design Philosophy

Anne-Marie Willis

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 06:39:09 +0000

31 lines

Re: Research Request: Philosophy of Design

Ken Friedman

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 07:17:37 +0100

96 lines

Re: Research Request: Philosophy of Design

Terence Love

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:23:00 +0000

195 lines

Re: Technicalities

Cameron Tonkinwise

Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:56:29 +1100

59 lines

Thrown forward cont...

Jerome Diethelm

Sun, 27 Nov 2005 13:38:10 -0800

88 lines

Re: Philosophy of Design

khchanjeffrey (sent by Nabble.com)

Sun, 27 Nov 2005 12:01:08 -0800

179 lines

Research Request: Philosophy of Design

Ken Friedman

Sun, 27 Nov 2005 19:48:34 +0100

101 lines

Philosophy of Design -- [Was: Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way]

Ken Friedman

Sun, 27 Nov 2005 19:36:15 +0100

384 lines

Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Erik Stolterman

Sun, 27 Nov 2005 11:15:57 -0500

112 lines

Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Rosan Chow

Sun, 27 Nov 2005 07:45:27 +0100

54 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Jerome Diethelm

Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:11:58 -0800

93 lines

PhD in Design in Mexico and Brazil

Fatina Saikaly

Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:48:25 +0000

55 lines

Re: Design Theories

Bosse Westerlund

Sat, 26 Nov 2005 17:19:27 +0100

37 lines

Recollections, diversity, and missing voices

Ken Friedman

Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:55:40 +0100

167 lines

Re: Technicalities

Rosan Chow

Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:36:21 +0100

42 lines

discourses in Design Research Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Rosan Chow

Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:27:24 +0100

31 lines

Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Erik Stolterman

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:46:31 -0500

70 lines

Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Erik Stolterman

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:00:36 -0500

43 lines

Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Terence Love

Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:57:00 +0000

145 lines

Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Terence Love

Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:48:00 +0000

152 lines

Technicalities

Eduardo Corte Real

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:26:35 +0000

25 lines

Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Erik Stolterman

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:57:21 -0500

99 lines

Re: Philosophy of technology -- useful resource

Rosan Chow

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:31:27 +0100

60 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:20:18 -0500

30 lines

Philosophy of technology -- useful resource

Ken Friedman

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:53:04 +0100

82 lines

Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Rosan Chow

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:21:52 +0100

61 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Terence Love

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:29:00 +0000

423 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Wolfgang Jonas

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:36:17 +0100

69 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Glenn E Snelbecker, PhD, Professor

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:35:59 -0500

257 lines

Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Eduardo Corte Real

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:02:42 -0000

84 lines

Job: Design Management/Design Research at York University

Wendy Siuyi Wong

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 03:56:57 -0800

119 lines

Aw: Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Rosan Chow

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:22:29 +0100

42 lines

Re: The Design Way or The Technology Way

Eduardo Corte Real

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:20:46 -0000

24 lines

Re: Design Scholarship and Clarity (3)

David Sless

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:13:22 +1100

39 lines

The Design Way or The Technology Way

Rosan Chow

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:14:25 +0100

63 lines

Re: Nelson and Stolterman -- 1/4 -- 993 of 4,043 words aaa

Eduardo Corte Real

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:04:59 -0000

67 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

David Sless

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:39:54 +1100

233 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Terence Love

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:31:00 +0000

199 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

David Sless

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:11:07 +1100

76 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Terence Love

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:31:00 +0000

154 lines

Flexner Book review -- 2/2 -- 1,169 of 2,525 words BbB

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:27:29 +0100

163 lines

Flexner Book review -- 1/2 -- 1,356 of 2,525 words aAa

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:26:41 +0100

171 lines

Nelson and Stolterman. -- 4/4 -- 745 of 4,043 words DdD

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:19:56 +0100

98 lines

Nelson and Stolterman. -- 3/4 -- 1,141 of 4,043 words cCc

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:19:06 +0100

144 lines

Nelson and Stolterman -- 2/4 -- 1,170 of 4,043 words bbb

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:46:50 +0100

135 lines

Nelson and Stolterman -- 1/4 -- 993 of 4,043 words aaa

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:46:04 +0100

166 lines

a SHORT apology

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:23:58 +0100

23 lines

Re: Distinguishing between design research and design activity

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:55:54 -0500

202 lines

Fields and sub-fields, taxa and traditions [ Addendum to long post -- references ]

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:21:26 +0100

103 lines

Art & Design: Subheading - Design

<>

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:17:40 -0500

94 lines

Fields and sub-fields, taxa and traditions [ 3/3 Long post -- 3,800 words total ] dd

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:16:24 +0100

114 lines

Fields and sub-fields, taxa and traditions [ 3/3 Long post -- 3,800 words total ] yyy

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:08:04 +0100

199 lines

Fields and sub-fields, taxa and traditions [ 2/3 Long post -- 3,800 words total ] xx

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:06:08 +0100

158 lines

Fields and sub-fields, taxa and traditions [ 2/3 Long post -- 3,800 words total ]

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:02:32 +0100

222 lines

Fields and sub-fields, taxa and traditions [ 1/3 Long post -- 3,800 words total ]

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:01:14 +0100

166 lines

Fields and sub-fields, taxa and traditions [Long post -- 3,500 words]

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:42:01 +0100

480 lines

Field -- etymology and selected definitions

Ken Friedman

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:57:35 +0100

149 lines

wonderground

Eduardo Corte Real

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:08:23 -0000

184 lines

Even more Clarity.

CD Evans

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:49:32 -0800

35 lines

Design Scholarship and Clarity (3)

CD Evans

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:41:35 -0800

39 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:49:42 -0500

142 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Charles Burnette

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:31:29 -0500

30 lines

Re: Distinguishing between design research and design activity

Terence Love

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:31:00 +0000

219 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Charles Burnette

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:09:57 -0500

40 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Charles Burnette

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:53:32 -0500

69 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Terence Love

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:52:00 +0000

78 lines

Conference on design promotion and support, Paris, January 9-10

Jean Schneider

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:54:08 +0100

694 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Jerome Diethelm

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:39:35 -0800

149 lines

Re: Distinguishing between design research and design activity

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:24:25 -0500

85 lines

Re: FW: DESIGN

Eduardo Corte Real

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:24:05 +0000

21 lines

PhD Research Request

Chris McKillop

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:18:38 +0000

52 lines

FW: DESIGN

Terence Love

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:52:00 +0000

191 lines

Re: Design Scholarship

Rosan Chow

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:45:12 +0100

25 lines

Re: Design Scholarship and Clarity

Rosan Chow

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:18:20 +0100

30 lines

nature of design 18 thanksgiving from rus

<>

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:45:31 -0600

16 lines

Fwd: [PHD-DESIGN] Design research circles

M P Ranjan

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:24:38 +0530

325 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Michael A R Biggs

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:53:03 +0000

124 lines

Fwd: [PHD-DESIGN] Black Hats, White Hats, Taxonomy

M P Ranjan

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:05:40 +0530

183 lines

Re: DESIGN

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 05:31:33 -0500

38 lines

Re: DESIGN

Eduardo Corte Real

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:18:33 -0000

125 lines

Re: Design Scholarship

Christopher Kueh

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:05:47 +0000

36 lines

Design Scholarship and Clarity

dr.popowsky

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:51:40 +0200

45 lines

Reminder of deadline: International Interaction Design Workshop

Oguzhan Ozcan

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:50:33 +0200

21 lines

Re: Design Scholarship and Clarity

David Sless

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:37:12 +1100

117 lines

Re: Design Scholarship

Rosan Chow

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:03:18 +0100

41 lines

Re: Black Hats, White Hats, Taxonomy

khchanjeffrey (sent by Nabble.com)

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:26:15 -0800

43 lines

Re: Distinguishing [design] from [art-and-design] and from [industrial-design]

Terence Love

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:18:00 +0000

22 lines

Re: Black Hats, White Hats, Taxonomy

Jerome Diethelm

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:37:41 -0800

103 lines

Re: "Ideas travel: places resonate."

Jerome Diethelm

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:37:08 -0800

141 lines

Re: Black Hats, White Hats, Taxonomy

Ken Friedman

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:08:31 +0100

91 lines

Re: Black Hats, White Hats, Taxonomy

Rosan Chow

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:52:33 +0100

38 lines

Black Hats, White Hats, Taxonomy

Ken Friedman

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:57:59 +0100

158 lines

Design Scholarship

Harold Nelson

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:15:32 -0800

76 lines

Re: DESIGN

disalvo

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:08:23 -0500

67 lines

Re: Distinguishing between design research and design activity

Håkan Edeholt

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:23:19 +0100

81 lines

Re: FW: Distinguishing [design] from [art-and-design] and from [industrial-design]

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:05:12 -0500

44 lines

Re: DESIGN

Rosan Chow

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:22:35 +0100

48 lines

Re: DESIGN

Rosan Chow

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:03:48 +0100

48 lines

Re: DESIGN

Terence Love

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:12:00 +0000

156 lines

Re: DESIGN

M P Ranjan

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:23:26 +0530

92 lines

Job Creation and PLM

<>

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:41:10 -0500

5562 lines

Re: DESIGN

Rodgers, Paul

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:06:34 -0000

62 lines

Re: DESIGN

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:03:43 -0500

55 lines

DESIGN

Rosan Chow

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:50:24 +0100

22 lines

"Ideas travel: places resonate."

dr.popowsky

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:04:48 +0200

91 lines

Distinguishing between design research and design activity

Terence Love

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:30:00 +0000

123 lines

design discourse

Rosan Chow

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:23:50 +0100

68 lines

Re: Discipline

PR Hodge

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:26:47 +0000

62 lines

Discipline

Ranulph Glanville

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:25:35 +0100

25 lines

Reminder of deadline: International Interaction Design Workshop

Oguzhan Ozcan

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:58:34 +0200

27 lines

List Clarity

CD Evans

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:47:08 -0800

28 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:06:10 -0500

140 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Terence Love

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:54:00 +0000

42 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Charles Burnette

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:34:49 -0500

85 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Charles Burnette

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:57:05 -0500

168 lines

Design tradition, field, etc. and the 2006 Wonderground

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:36:35 -0500

86 lines

FW: Distinguishing [design] from [art-and-design] and from [industrial-design]

Terence Love

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:25:00 +0000

103 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

khchanjeffrey (sent by Nabble.com)

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:26:58 -0800

153 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Jerome Diethelm

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:46:27 -0800

215 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Håkan Edeholt

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:28:51 +0100

110 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

khchanjeffrey (sent by Nabble.com)

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 12:29:38 -0800

43 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Glenn E Snelbecker, PhD, Professor

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:23:44 -0500

125 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Jerome Diethelm

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:57:04 -0800

173 lines

distinguishing design from art-and-design

dr.popowsky

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:38:28 +0200

83 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:00:58 -0500

240 lines

Re: Distinguishing [design] from [art-and-design] (Was: Design research circles)

M P Ranjan

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:30:59 +0530

132 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Erik Stolterman

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:10:32 -0500

70 lines

Re: Distinguishing [design] from [art-and-design] and from [industrial-design]

Terence Love

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:31:00 +0000

56 lines

Re: Distinguishing [design] from [art-and-design] (Was: Design research circles)

Clive Dilnot

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:55:26 -0500

227 lines

Distinguishing [design] from [art-and-design] and from [industrial-design]

Nicola Morelli

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:40:30 +0100

377 lines

Six Economies for Design Research

Ken Friedman

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:35:13 +0100

42 lines

Re: Distinguishing [design] from [art-and-design] (Was: Design research circles)

Ken Friedman

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:15:01 +0100

55 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Wolfgang Jonas

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:07:15 +0100

129 lines

Re: Distinguishing design from art-and-design

Terence Love

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:02:00 +0000

84 lines

Distinguishing design from art-and-design

dr.popowsky

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:27:06 +0200

96 lines

Re: it doesn't work that way Re: discuss 'The Design Way'

Pradeep G Yammiyavar

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:38:17 +0530

33 lines

Re: Distinguishing [design] from [art-and-design] (Was: Design research circles)

Erik Stolterman

Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:58:21 -0500

236 lines

Distinguishing [design] from [art-and-design] (Was: Design research circles)

Ken Friedman

Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:19:57 +0100

152 lines

Re: My own experience as a PhD student...

khchanjeffrey (sent by Nabble.com)

Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:32:42 -0800

67 lines

it doesn't work that way Re: discuss 'The Design Way'

Rosan Chow

Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:39:47 +0100

35 lines

Re: Design research circles

Rosan Chow

Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:57:15 +0100

180 lines

Re: discuss 'The Design Way' Re: context and design

Terence Love

Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:07:00 +0000

67 lines

Design research circles

Ken Friedman

Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:08:26 +0100

128 lines

Re: context and design

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:27:11 -0500

86 lines

Re: Pre-Design?

Eduardo Corte Real

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:01:33 -0000

186 lines

discuss 'The Design Way' Re: context and design

Rosan Chow

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:23:32 +0100

26 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:01:21 -0500

85 lines

Re: context and design

Ranjan M P

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:51:32 +0530

135 lines

Re: context and design

Terence Love

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 03:44:00 +0000

132 lines

Re: context and design

Jerome Diethelm

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:12:33 -0800

228 lines

Re: context and design

Charles Burnette

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:14:46 -0500

112 lines

Re: context and design

Jerome Diethelm

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:21:41 -0800

443 lines

Re: Pre-Design?

David Sless

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:14:34 +1100

31 lines

Re: context and design

Charles Burnette

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:14:28 -0500

245 lines

Re: context and design

Charles Burnette

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:39:52 -0500

64 lines

Re: context and design

Jerome Diethelm

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:37:32 -0800

189 lines

Re: context and design

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:04:44 -0500

57 lines

Fw: Pre-Design?

Eduardo Corte Real

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:01:38 -0000

132 lines

Re: Pre-Design?

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:35:03 -0500

102 lines

Re: BSc Change

Rosan Chow

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:50:46 +0100

57 lines

Re: Pre-Design?

Eduardo Corte Real

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:44:53 -0000

59 lines

Pre-Design?

David Pires

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:43:26 +0000

9 lines

Re: Design Theories

David Sless

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:02:13 +1100

408 lines

Re: context and design

Charles Burnette

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:53:03 -0500

42 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe

Ian Rooney

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:12:49 -0800

56 lines

Re: BSc Change

Ian Rooney

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:20:19 -0800

37 lines

Re: BSc Change

Ian Rooney

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:15:01 -0800

37 lines

Re: BSc Change

Kerry London

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:14:11 +1100

111 lines

Re: BSc Change

Ian Rooney

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:41:00 -0800

90 lines

Design Educators: 3 faculty jobs open

Christopher Vice

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:46:56 -0500

101 lines

Re: BSc Change

Jan Coker

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:06:08 +1030

336 lines

Re: Design Theories - Constructing Persons

Todd Warfel

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:18:01 -0500

200 lines

Re: Design Theories - Constructing Persons

Cameron Tonkinwise

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:15:21 +1100

65 lines

design theory

dr.popowsky

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:52:05 +0200

51 lines

Re: Research Request -- Ethnographic Research in Design -- Resource Compilation

khchanjeffrey (sent by Nabble.com)

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:12:46 -0800

78 lines

Re: Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:00:36 -0500

228 lines

Re: Design Theories

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:08:15 -0500

40 lines

Research Request -- Ethnographic Research in Design -- Resource Compilation

No Name

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:45:01 +0600

110 lines

Re: More personas [was: Re: Design Theories]

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 08:42:18 -0500

47 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 06:35:15 -0500

36 lines

Aw: Re: BSc Change

Rosan Chow

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:56:19 +0100

72 lines

Re: BSc Change

Ian Rooney

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 01:16:24 -0800

54 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Jan Coker

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:27:41 +1030

290 lines

Re: Design and entrepreneurship...

khchanjeffrey (sent by Nabble.com)

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:56:14 -0800

31 lines

CSD - Royalties

<>

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:37:06 -0500

67 lines

Assistant professor position at Aalborg University

Nicola Morelli

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:10:40 +0100

47 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe

Ian Rooney

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:22:47 -0800

34 lines

Design and entrepreneurship...

Ian Rooney

Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:26:06 -0800

20 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Rosan Chow

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 07:21:38 +0100

163 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Jan Coker

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:51:00 +1030

155 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:16:00 -0500

47 lines

Re: design theory

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:57:19 -0500

29 lines

Re: Design and entrepreneurship...

khchanjeffrey (sent by Nabble.com)

Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:54:08 -0800

59 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Ian Rooney

Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:00:59 -0800

241 lines

design theory

dr.popowsky

Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:02:45 +0200

43 lines

Re: Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:54:46 -0500

195 lines

Advice on Royalties agreements in European Furniture Industry

rob curedale

Sat, 12 Nov 2005 00:34:56 -0800

39 lines

Re: Design Theories

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:14:53 -0500

116 lines

Re: What design is - was: Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:53:12 -0500

52 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

khchanjeffrey (sent by Nabble.com)

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:08:20 -0800

45 lines

Re: Agency -- a clarification on agents, actors, and actants

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:43:23 -0500

145 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Rosan Chow

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:15:10 +0100

21 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Rodgers, Paul

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:04 -0000

178 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Ian Rooney

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 03:56:21 -0800

132 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Rodgers, Paul

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 09:42:00 -0000

96 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Rosan Chow

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:40:15 +0100

43 lines

AHRC Art, Design & Architecture Research Review

Rust, Chris

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 06:37:33 -0000

90 lines

Re: More personas [was: Re: Design Theories]

Todd Warfel

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:31:00 -0500

235 lines

Re: More personas [was: Re: Design Theories]

Gregory Fowler

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:43:03 -0500

236 lines

More personas [was: Re: Design Theories]

Todd Warfel

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:51:01 -0800

477 lines

Re: Design Theories

Gregory Fowler

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:38:01 -0500

201 lines

Design Research Forum, Nov 22, Swinburne University

Gloria Gomez

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:11:15 +0000

78 lines

Interrogating Fashion Research Event

ASHTON Philippa

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:19:45 -0000

106 lines

Re: What design is - was: Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest

Terence Love

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:29:00 +0000

95 lines

What design is - was: Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:00:31 -0500

51 lines

Educating Designers in a Global Context? - conf.sept06 -abstract deadline 2nd of dec 2005

Bernhard Rothbucher

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:20:23 +0100

48 lines

Re: Aw: Re: context and design

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:48:29 -0500

40 lines

Re: context and design

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:38:36 -0500

90 lines

Link to track designer's opinion

<>

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:25:28 -0500

36 lines

Mailing List Name Change?

<>

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:08:48 -0500

162 lines

Re: Agency -- a clarification on agents, actors, and actants

Terence Love

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:21:00 +0000

158 lines

Re: Agency -- a clarification on agents, actors, and actants

Kjetil Fallan

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:28:41 +0100

108 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Sophie Nichol Sauve

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:00:29 -0000

102 lines

Re: BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Rodgers, Paul

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:51:08 -0000

78 lines

BSc ChangeRe: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

Rosan Chow

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:44:37 +0100

42 lines

Agency -- a clarification on agents, actors, and actants

Ken Friedman

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:46:16 +0100

135 lines

Interior Design Lecturer Position - RMIT

Suzie Attiwill

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:13:23 +1100

51 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 7 Nov 2005 to 8 Nov 2005 (#2005-249)

<>

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:44:52 -0500

21 lines

University education for professional design practice -- repeat and resources

Ken Friedman

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:53:24 +0100

86 lines

Re: context and design

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:25:18 -0500

81 lines

Re: context and design

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:42:03 -0500

43 lines

Re: context and design

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:01:13 -0500

125 lines

Re: context and design

Dermott Mc Meel

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:12:05 +0000

80 lines

Aw: Re: context and design

Rosan Chow

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:59:25 +0100

69 lines

Re: context and design

Kjetil Fallan

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:55:17 +0100

56 lines

Re: context and design

David Sless

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:05:24 +1100

59 lines

Re: context and design

disalvo

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:04:24 -0500

60 lines

Re: context and design

Terence Love

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 04:00:00 +0000

247 lines

Re: context and design

Sabine Junginger

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:08:55 -0500

166 lines

Re: Design Theories

David Sless

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:55:40 +1100

111 lines

Re: context and design

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:55:55 -0500

106 lines

Re: context and design

disalvo

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:19:58 -0500

63 lines

Interaction of men with products

MEDEIROS Wellington G

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:49:39 -0000

49 lines

Re: context and design

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:46:17 -0500

83 lines

University education for professional design practice

Ken Friedman

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:14:29 +0100

43 lines

Re: How theories inform (summary)

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:03:27 -0500

55 lines

question

dr.popowsky

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:18:25 +0200

36 lines

etnography?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:51:56 -0500

34 lines

Re: Artifact - a new journal from Routledge

Hoffmann, Oliver - HOFOY001

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:22:00 +1030

270 lines

Artifact - a new journal from Routledge

Ken Friedman

Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:13:27 +0100

252 lines

Re: How ethnography informs design

Rosan Chow

Sat, 5 Nov 2005 18:37:34 +0100

40 lines

A research request will answer this question

Ken Friedman

Sat, 5 Nov 2005 12:30:48 +0100

93 lines

Re: How ethnography informs design

Terence Love

Sat, 5 Nov 2005 08:22:00 +0000

64 lines

Re: Aw: Re: Design Theories

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 15:15:20 -0500

75 lines

Re: Design Theories & personas

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:51:04 -0500

74 lines

Re: How theories inform (summary)

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:28:22 -0500

77 lines

Re: How ethnography informs design

Rosan Chow

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:14:24 +0100

107 lines

How ethnography informs design

Jacob Buur

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:36:12 +0100

174 lines

Jan Verwijnen

Sid Newton

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 23:44:03 +1100

26 lines

Re: Ethnographic reseach in design resources

Rosan Chow

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 04:25:03 +0100

45 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Rosan Chow

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 13:16:57 +0100

40 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Christopher Kueh

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 09:46:33 +0000

37 lines

Re: Aw: Re: research traditions in PHD Design Re: research on user study

Rosan Chow

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:28:53 +0100

98 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Rosan Chow

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:18:42 +0100

96 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Christopher Kueh

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:24:38 +0000

29 lines

Re: Aw: Re: research traditions in PHD Design Re: research on user study

Terence Love

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 01:18:00 +0000

74 lines

Ethnographic reseach in design resources

No Name

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 01:15:49 +0600

85 lines

Aw: Celebrate our differences [ design / research ]

Rosan Chow

Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:36:40 +0100

85 lines

Aw: Re: research traditions in PHD Design Re: research on user study

Rosan Chow

Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:42:15 +0100

23 lines

Design theories and design research

Terence Love

Wed, 2 Nov 2005 07:32:00 +0000

115 lines

Celebrate our differences [ design / research ]

Christopher Brisbin

Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:15:13 +1000

256 lines

Re: research traditions in PHD Design Re: research on user study

Terence Love

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:46:00 +0000

48 lines

Re: Design Theories Again

Michael A R Biggs

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:26:24 +0000

44 lines

Jan Verwijnen

Jean Schneider

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:12:14 +0100

20 lines

Re: Design Theories

Mel Fearman

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:29:03 -0800

121 lines

Re: research traditions in PHD Design Re: research on user study

Satoshi Kose

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:53:29 +0900

51 lines

design research and design education

Anke Coumans

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:51:02 +0100

103 lines

Re: How theories inform (summary)

Filippo Salustri

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 05:35:56 -0500

146 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Filippo Salustri

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 05:18:17 -0500

57 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Filippo Salustri

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 05:03:36 -0500

80 lines

Aw: Re: research traditions in PHD Design Re: research on user study

Rosan Chow

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:41:38 +0100

74 lines

Re: research traditions in PHD Design Re: research on user study

Satoshi Kose

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:17:05 +0900

48 lines

Re: research traditions in PHD Design Re: research on user study

Jonas Löwgren

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 08:19:21 +0100

98 lines

research traditions in PHD Design Re: research on user study

Rosan Chow

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 08:04:05 +0100

50 lines

Re: Design Theories

nicnak

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:28:41 +1030

34 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Rosan Chow

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 07:40:27 +0100

54 lines

Re: Design Theories Again

Erik Stolterman

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:23:36 -0500

37 lines

Re: Personas: was Design Theories

Cameron Tonkinwise

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:18:49 +1100

53 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:17:45 -0500

183 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:14:23 -0500

174 lines

Re: Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:13:24 -0500

207 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

David Sless

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:56:02 +1100

84 lines

Re: Design Theories

David Sless

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:55:15 +1100

37 lines

Re: Design Theories Again

David Sless

Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:34:53 +1100

112 lines

Re: Personas: was Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:16:33 -0500

222 lines

Re: Personas: was Design Theories

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:55:45 -0500

64 lines

Re: Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:50:57 -0500

223 lines

Re: Personas: was Design Theories

Mattias Arvola

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:17:46 +0000

37 lines

Re: Design Theories

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:05:17 -0500

316 lines

Re: Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:53:30 -0500

193 lines

Re: Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:53:11 -0500

379 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:51:22 -0500

191 lines

Re: Design Theories Again

Todd Warfel

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:47:49 -0500

238 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:09:36 -0500

45 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Christopher Kueh

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:19:47 +0000

42 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Mattias Arvola

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:54:52 +0000

27 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Mattias Arvola

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:50:28 +0000

47 lines

Re: Design Theories Again

Michael A R Biggs

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:56:05 +0000

81 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Christopher Kueh

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:38:47 +0000

34 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Christopher Kueh

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:31:15 +0000

90 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Rosan Chow

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:52:47 +0100

52 lines

Re: Design Theories Again

Erik Stolterman

Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:25:19 -0600

66 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Glenn E Snelbecker, PhD, Professor

Sun, 30 Oct 2005 14:10:07 -0500

58 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Mattias Arvola

Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:31:04 +0000

19 lines

Cognitive ethno: was research on user study

Mattias Arvola

Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:07:48 +0100

134 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Rosan Chow

Sun, 30 Oct 2005 11:36:36 +0100

58 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Akar, Evren

Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:42:47 +0100

172 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Mattias Arvola

Sun, 30 Oct 2005 08:29:14 +0000

44 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Rosan Chow

Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:35:07 +0200

39 lines

Re: Jan Verwijnen

Clive Dilnot

Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:55:27 -0400

43 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

David Sless

Sat, 29 Oct 2005 16:32:41 -0200

170 lines

Ethnographic research methods in design

Ken Friedman

Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:21:05 +0200

71 lines

Re: research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Mattias Arvola

Sat, 29 Oct 2005 15:13:18 +0100

44 lines

research on user studyRe: Design Theories

Rosan Chow

Sat, 29 Oct 2005 07:56:22 +0200

98 lines

Re: Design Theories Again

David Sless

Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:58:48 -0200

41 lines

Re: Design Theories Again

David Sless

Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:50:04 -0200

218 lines

Re: Design Theories Again

David Sless

Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:50:17 -0200

51 lines

Re: Design Theories

David Sless

Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:36:25 -0200

59 lines

Jan Verwijnen

Ken Friedman

Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:44:13 +0200

33 lines

Re: Design Theories

David Sless

Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:31:32 -0200

38 lines

Jan Verwijnen - In Memoriam

Artemis Yagou

Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:45:57 +0300

17 lines

Job Posting: Professor, Industrial/Interaction Design

Jon Kolko [SCAD]

Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:45:43 -0400

60 lines

Re: Design Theories Again

Wolfgang Jonas

Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:13:03 +0200

164 lines

Re: Design Theories

Mattias Arvola

Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:06:29 +0100

80 lines

Re: Design Theories Again

disalvo

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:13:29 -0400

50 lines

Design Theories Again

Erik Stolterman

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:47:33 -0500

110 lines

Re: Design Theories

David Sless

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:32:06 -0200

317 lines

Re: context and design

Jerome Diethelm

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:35:27 -0700

112 lines

Re: Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:59:40 -0400

481 lines

Re: context and design

Todd Warfel

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:32:40 -0400

191 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:23:06 -0400

77 lines

Re: How theories inform (summary)

David Sless

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:10:18 -0200

28 lines

Re: Design Theories

David Sless

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:52:24 -0200

220 lines

context and design

Rosan Chow

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:37:31 +0200

29 lines

Re: How theories inform (summary)

Terence Love

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:37:00 +0000

55 lines

Senior Research Position, University of Cambridge

Terry Dickerson

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:55:55 +0100

58 lines

Re: Aw: Re: Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:54:31 -0400

204 lines

Aw: Re: Design Theories

Rosan Chow

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:24:05 +0200

99 lines

Re: Design Theories

Todd Warfel

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:40:41 -0400

203 lines

Re: Design Theories

David Sless

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 02:03:15 -0200

66 lines

Re: Design Theories

Cameron Tonkinwise

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:58:07 +1000

57 lines

Fw: Design Theories

Reza Kazemian

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 01:06:01 +0200

184 lines

industrial design faculty position

Lois Frankel

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:18:21 +0100

61 lines

Re: Design Theories

David Sless

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:43:17 -0200

32 lines

Design Theories

Harold Nelson

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:58:12 -0700

107 lines

Re: How theories inform (summary)

Rosan Chow

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:15:00 +0200

37 lines

Re: How theories inform (summary)

David Sless

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:53:21 -0200

116 lines

How theories inform (summary)

Jacob Buur

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:11:09 +0200

87 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:00:50 -0400

78 lines

Wayshowing

Ken Friedman

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:09:30 +0200

59 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Pradeep G Yammiyavar

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:25:57 +0530

47 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Christopher Kueh

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:13:01 +0000

38 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 23 Oct 2005 23:51:34 -0400

84 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Hoffmann, Oliver - HOFOY001

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:35:26 +0930

58 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Hans Samuelson

Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:20:02 +0100

71 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Dag H

Sun, 23 Oct 2005 14:10:29 +0200

257 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Bosse Westerlund

Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:44:24 +0200

69 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

David Sless

Sun, 23 Oct 2005 02:43:14 +1000

63 lines

Position open: University Professor for Industrial Design

Ken Friedman

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:45:45 +0200

69 lines

Call for participation Workshop Understanding public spaces exploring methods

Parag Deshpande

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:52:28 +0100

117 lines

ERASMUS CD: Joint European MA in Interface Design and Disabling Environment.

Oguzhan Ozcan

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:17:27 +0300

52 lines

Re: Hong Kong

Gregprithcard

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:42:47 +0800

86 lines

Seeking IDSS 2007 ERASMUS PARTNERS

ttnet

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:07:47 +0300

27 lines

Seeking ERASMUS partner for IDSS 2007

ttnet

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:04:37 +0300

25 lines

Hong Kong

rob curedale

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:29:17 -0700

17 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Mattias Arvola

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:47:48 +0100

75 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Hans Vanhauwaert Bjelland

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:11:50 +0100

35 lines

Re: How theories inform (interaction) design

Jonas Löwgren

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:39:10 +0200

66 lines

Re: On Thatched Roofs

Lily Diaz

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:40:25 +0300

188 lines

How theories inform (interaction) design

Jacob Buur

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 06:38:40 +0200

48 lines

Re: PhD in Design in Mexico?

Omar Sosa Tzec

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:41:44 -0700

35 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 11 Oct 2005 to 16 Oct 2005 (#2005-226)

Christena Nippert-Eng

Sun, 16 Oct 2005 20:22:00 -0500

68 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 11 Oct 2005 to 16 Oct 2005 (#2005-226)

<>

Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:02:37 -0400

24 lines

Re: Graduate Research Study

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 16 Oct 2005 20:34:41 -0400

199 lines

Re: PhD in Design in Mexico?

edgar koyis

Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:05:06 -0500

87 lines

Re: Graduate Research Study

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:42:35 -0400

35 lines

Graduate Research Study

Linda Kohlman

Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:31:33 +0100

164 lines

Postdoctoral research

Heloisa Moura

Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:27:37 -0500

30 lines

Cross-Gender Sexual Attraction

SUBSCRIBE PHD-DESIGN parnian

Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:54:02 +0100

72 lines

PhD in Design in Mexico?

Fatina Saikaly

Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:11:57 +0100

11 lines

On Thatched Roofs

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:09:06 -0400

29 lines

Call for chapters - virtual teams and creativity

Steven MacGregor

Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:27:22 +0100

115 lines

ACAG2006: Call for Papers

Wendy Siuyi Wong

Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:46:07 -0700

133 lines

ISTANBUL Workshop for MFA/PhD STUDENTS

ttnet

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 18:20:57 +0300

96 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking ?

David Sless

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 05:52:54 +1000

223 lines

Museums and Galleries: Resources for Teaching and Research

Ken Friedman

Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:44:07 +0200

32 lines

ICHSL.5: call for participation (22-25 November - Marrakesh-Morocco)

Khaldoun Zreik

Sat, 1 Oct 2005 10:06:03 +0200

697 lines

DOCAM 05, Oct. 7-9 is about to come, Register now !

Niels Windfeld Lund

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:23:38 +0200

32 lines

International top-level researchers to Finland

Ken Friedman

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:31:56 +0200

41 lines

Recent Books and Articles on Museums and Galleries -- Long Post -- 4/4

Ken Friedman

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:35:28 +0200

588 lines

Recent Books and Articles on Museums and Galleries -- Long Post -- 3/4

Ken Friedman

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:35:24 +0200

755 lines

Recent Books and Articles on Museums and Galleries -- Long Post -- 2/4

Ken Friedman

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:35:20 +0200

890 lines

Recent Books and Articles on Museums and Galleries -- Long Post -- 1/4

Ken Friedman

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:35:15 +0200

787 lines

Conference Announcement

disalvo

Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:40:39 -0400

34 lines

Visual Perception informing Product Differentiation

Daniela Büchler

Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:34:20 +0100

139 lines

Research into Practice conference 2006, second call

Michael A R Biggs

Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:39:21 +0100

105 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking ?

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:19:59 -0400

53 lines

CFP: Failure: Ethics and Aesthetics

Ken Friedman

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:05:57 +0200

95 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence -From Chuck

Terence Love

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:08:00 +0000

109 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence -From Chuck

Ben Matthews

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:14:30 +0200

68 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence -From Chuck

Ranjan M P

Sun, 18 Sep 2005 08:24:36 +0530

138 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence -From Chuck

Charles Burnette

Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:17:28 -0400

48 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence -From Chuck

Terence Love

Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:26:00 +0000

161 lines

Re: Information Request -- Recent Books and Articles on Museums and Galleries

M P Ranjan

Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:29:13 +0530

558 lines

Re: Information Request -- Recent Books and Articles on Museums and Galleries

David Sless

Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:59:22 +1000

118 lines

Information Request -- Recent Books and Articles on Museums and Galleries

Ken Friedman

Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:48:07 +0200

81 lines

Design Knowledge Manager -- Position Open Until Filled

Ken Friedman

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:01:09 +0200

75 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence -From Chuck

Ben Matthews

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:34:18 +0200

83 lines

Design Knowledge Manager

Ken Friedman

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:00:45 +0200

55 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence -From Chuck

Christopher Kueh

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:04:11 +0000

23 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence -From Chuck

Martin Salisbury

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:20:15 +0100

70 lines

Fifth Danish Human Computer Interaction Research Symposium

Ken Friedman

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:10:52 +0200

131 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking ?

Christopher Kueh

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 04:29:08 +0000

18 lines

Language or pictures in design thinking ?

Ken Friedman

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 06:01:43 +0200

69 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence -From Chuck

Christopher Kueh

Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:28:50 +0000

46 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 13 Sep 2005 to 14 Sep 2005 (#2005-211)

Joana Ferreira Martins

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:00:19 +0100

14 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence

Christopher Kueh

Wed, 14 Sep 2005 01:14:36 +0000

78 lines

Ready for DOCAM 05

Niels Windfeld Lund

Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:43:00 +0200

51 lines

IAS-STS Fellowship Programme 2006-2007

Ken Friedman

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:30:52 +0200

117 lines

Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:24:22 -0400

35 lines

Humaniora -- special issue on design

Ken Friedman

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:27:50 +0200

53 lines

PhD Scholarships in Design Research at UTS

Cameron Tonkinwise

Sat, 10 Sep 2005 08:28:28 +1000

62 lines

Re: Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence

Christopher Kueh

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:37:18 +0000

65 lines

Design Philosophy Papers 3/2005

Anne-Marie Willis

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:39:25 +0100

29 lines

Language or pictures in design thinking? Physical evidence

Terence Love

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 04:25:00 +0000

49 lines

design analysis - most common resourses?

Charlotte Branth Clausen

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 16:40:55 +0200

24 lines

Doctoral Research Fellowship at University of Oslo

Ken Friedman

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:08:47 +0100

39 lines

Doctoral Research Fellowship at University of Oslo

Ken Friedman

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:39:49 +0200

31 lines

CFP: ENCYCLOPEDIA OF MOBILE COMPUTING & COMMERCE

Ken Friedman

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:52:34 +0200

124 lines

All set for Joining Forces

Lotta Palmi

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:35:21 +0300

135 lines

CFP: Vienna, QSE & Usability Symposium, 8th Nov 2005

Baumann Konrad

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:11:57 +0200

61 lines

IDForum Alias Software Competition

rob curedale

Sun, 28 Aug 2005 13:47:52 -0700

38 lines

Two (Chicago) Sustainable Design Challenges

Ken Friedman

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:02:02 +0200

53 lines

new publications and course

David Sless

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:02:56 +1000

42 lines

Valuable research resource for researchers in developing countries

Ken Friedman

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:40:10 +0200

79 lines

VIIth International Congress of Aesthetics -- Aesthetics Bridging Cultures

Ken Friedman

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:05:43 +0200

130 lines

4th Brazilian workshop on digital inclusion

Ken Friedman

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:39:04 +0200

243 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Charles Burnette

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:20:31 -0400

40 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:06:03 -0400

44 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

David Sless

Sun, 21 Aug 2005 12:30:37 +1000

416 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Pradeep G Yammiyavar

Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:59:30 +0530

25 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:31:35 -0400

64 lines

Re: Comparative studies design and other disciplines

Charles Burnette

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 21:45:01 -0400

108 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Jason Foster

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:14:15 -0400

139 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Jason Foster

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:35:54 -0400

40 lines

Re: Problem, solution, opportunity and design

Jerome Diethelm

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:50:08 -0700

196 lines

Comparative studies design and other disciplines

Alan Murdock

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:00:18 +0000

70 lines

Re: Problem, solution, opportunity and design

M P Ranjan

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:59:31 +0530

117 lines

Re: Problem, solution, opportunity and design

Charles Burnette

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:23:50 -0400

29 lines

Re: Problem, solution, opportunity and design

Charles Burnette

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:08:35 -0400

34 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:29:48 -0400

69 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Rosan Chow

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 06:13:19 +0200

57 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:09:05 -0400

82 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:56:31 -0400

99 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Terence Love

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:40:00 +0000

60 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Terence Love

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:40:00 +0000

35 lines

Re: Problem, solution, opportunity and design

Jerome Diethelm

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:30:43 -0700

225 lines

Replies and formats [repost] and a note on the thread

Ken Friedman

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:17:00 +0100

69 lines

Problem, solution, opportunity and design

M P Ranjan

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:20:52 +0530

189 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Gregory Fowler

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:27:30 -0400

352 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:56:56 -0400

348 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:56:55 -0400

74 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:36:52 -0400

322 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Jerome Diethelm

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:17:30 -0700

285 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:56:47 -0400

313 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Lubomir S. Popov

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:45:52 -0400

69 lines

Re: Problem, purpose, teleology

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:26:42 -0400

435 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Rosan Chow

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:04:56 +0200

37 lines

Re: Problem, purpose, teleology (ELIOT quote)

Artemis Yagou

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:02:54 +0300

17 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Gregory Fowler

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:02:27 -0400

280 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Alan Murdock

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:56:04 +0000

54 lines

Re: Problem, purpose, teleology

Wolfgang Jonas

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:41:59 +0200

174 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Terence Love

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:06:00 +0000

70 lines

Professsor of Design - University of Technology, Sydney

Cameron Tonkinwise

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:26:42 +1000

94 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 03:22:03 -0400

218 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 02:21:23 -0400

133 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Filippo A.

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 01:37:29 -0400

88 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology -- reply to David Sless

Ken Friedman

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:21:22 +0200

156 lines

Re: Problem, purpose, teleology

Filippo A.

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:47:06 -0400

57 lines

Re: Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology

David Sless

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:18:47 +1000

74 lines

Four issues -- [was] Re: Problem, purpose, teleology

Ken Friedman

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 23:44:56 +0200

556 lines

Re: Design : Intention v/s specifications

Jerome Diethelm

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:35:01 -0700

448 lines

Re: I|d like a copy -- Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Jerome Diethelm

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:53:57 -0700

209 lines

Article on learning available -- Re: Learning and improvements to practice

Ken Friedman

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:27:19 +0100

43 lines

designing as subject and paradigm of inquriy Aw: Re: Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

Rosan Chow

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:50:15 +0200

35 lines

Learning and improvements to practice

Ken Friedman

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:03:28 +0200

417 lines

Re: Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

Terence Love

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 04:41:00 +0000

154 lines

Re: Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

edgar koyis

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:11:02 +0900

202 lines

Re: Problem, purpose, teleology

Jan Coker

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:55:20 +0930

93 lines

Re: Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

Jan Coker

Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:49:19 +0930

173 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Jerome Diethelm

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:22:34 -0700

387 lines

Re: Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

Jason Foster

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:11:01 -0400

43 lines

Re: Problem, purpose, teleology

Jason Foster

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:02:19 -0400

33 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Filippo A.

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:41:22 -0400

47 lines

Re: Problem, purpose, teleology

Filippo A.

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:29:07 -0400

78 lines

Aw: Re: Problem, purpose, teleology

Rosan Chow

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:32:05 +0200

118 lines

Re: Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

edgar koyis

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:30:50 +0900

380 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

M P Ranjan

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:06:11 +0530

92 lines

Re: Problem, purpose, teleology

Wolfgang Jonas

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:57:51 +0200

198 lines

Re: Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

Sneha

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:13:00 +0530

174 lines

Problem, purpose, teleology

Ken Friedman

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:08:36 +0200

67 lines

Design, purpose, intention

Ken Friedman

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:25:17 +0200

96 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Charles Burnette

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:48:59 -0400

85 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Jerome Diethelm

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:01:51 -0700

151 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:28:01 -0400

110 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Charles Burnette

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:00:32 -0400

73 lines

to Klaus&Chuck Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Rosan Chow

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:39:33 +0200

50 lines

to jonas Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Rosan Chow

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:15:59 +0200

35 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:19:00 -0400

71 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Charles Burnette

Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:29:13 -0400

48 lines

Re: the Diving Analogy

Jerome Diethelm

Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:49:29 -0700

245 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:32:53 -0400

142 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Terence Love

Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:22:00 +0000

65 lines

Re: a specific proposal that fits?

Wolfgang Jonas

Sun, 14 Aug 2005 15:54:08 +0200

91 lines

a specific proposal that fits?

Rosan Chow

Sun, 14 Aug 2005 14:15:29 +0200

52 lines

Re: the Diving Analogy

Charles Burnette

Sat, 13 Aug 2005 21:54:05 -0400

128 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 12 Aug 2005 to 13 Aug 2005 (#2005-191)

Joana Ferreira Martins

Sun, 14 Aug 2005 00:00:26 +0100

14 lines

Re: Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

Klaus Krippendorff

Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:22:58 -0400

407 lines

Academic Commons -- valuable web resource

Ken Friedman

Sat, 13 Aug 2005 20:44:23 +0200

125 lines

Re: Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

edgar koyis

Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:59:45 +0900

239 lines

Fwd: Problem with Long URLs

M P Ranjan

Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:41:25 +0530

134 lines

Re: Dropping intention (was Re: design)

David Sless

Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:10:08 +1000

325 lines

Re: Design : Intention v/s specifications

Charles Burnette

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:05:04 -0400

276 lines

Re: Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

Christopher Brisbin

Sat, 13 Aug 2005 09:41:24 +1000

265 lines

Re: Design : Intention v/s specifications

Jerome Diethelm

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:44:59 -0700

584 lines

Re: Design : Intention v/s specifications

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:27:23 -0400

44 lines

Re: Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

Gregory Fowler

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:34:36 -0400

90 lines

Re: Design : Intention v/s specifications

M P Ranjan

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:56:12 +0530

307 lines

Re: Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:37:51 -0400

144 lines

Re: Design : Intention v/s specifications

Charles Burnette

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:39:56 -0400

40 lines

Re: Design : Intention v/s specifications

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:30:58 -0400

87 lines

Intention argument and the Diving Analogy

<>

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:19:27 -0400

81 lines

Re: Design intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:57:10 -0400

68 lines

Design Intention

Harold Nelson

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:36:38 -0700

21 lines

Dropping Intention

Harold Nelson

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:13:24 -0700

29 lines

Re: Dropping intention (was Re: design)

Charles Burnette

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:51:32 -0400

61 lines

Fwd: Design : Intention v/s specifications

Prof. Bernhard E. Buerdek

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:50:09 +0200

40 lines

Re: Design intention

Terence Love

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:24:00 +0000

45 lines

Re: Dropping intention (was Re: design)

David Sless

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:00:33 +1000

330 lines

Fwd: [PHD-DESIGN] Design ... design process + design sensibility

M P Ranjan

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:36:26 +0530

302 lines

Re: Dropping intention (was Re: design)

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:48:27 -0400

252 lines

Re: Design intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:48:26 -0400

112 lines

Dropping intention (was Re: design)

Terence Love

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 03:33:00 +0000

247 lines

Re: Design intention

Harold Nelson

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:28:32 -0700

56 lines

Re: Design

Jan Coker

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:01:34 +0930

597 lines

Re: Design

Jan Coker

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:49:21 +0930

365 lines

Re: Design intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:17:45 -0400

56 lines

Re: Design : Intention v/s specifications

Charles Burnette

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:11:09 -0400

97 lines

Re: Design : Intention v/s specifications

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:49:43 -0400

63 lines

Design intention

Harold Nelson

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:46:34 -0700

28 lines

Re: Design ... design process + design sensibility

Tracee Wolf

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:02:52 -0400

2647 lines

Re: Design

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:40:20 -0400

538 lines

Re: Design

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:00:09 -0400

49 lines

Re: Design

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:47:01 -0400

70 lines

Re: Design

edgar koyis

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:26:57 +0900

294 lines

Design : Intention v/s specifications

Pradeep G Yammiyavar

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:20:43 +0530

21 lines

Re: Design

Jan Coker

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:36:35 +0930

469 lines

Re: Design

Terence Love

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:36:00 +0000

189 lines

Re: Design

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:30:08 -0400

387 lines

Re: Design

Tiiu Poldma

Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:31:57 -0400

197 lines

Re: Design

Tiiu Poldma

Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:27:21 -0400

174 lines

Re: Design

Jan Coker

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:33:02 +0930

315 lines

Re: Design

Jan Coker

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:12:12 +0930

302 lines

Re: Design

Jan Coker

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:11:57 +0930

153 lines

Re: Design

Terence Love

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:02:00 +0000

107 lines

Re: Design

Tiiu Poldma

Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:11:25 -0400

105 lines

Re: Design

Terence Love

Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:49:00 +0000

135 lines

Cross-Gender Attraction in Design

SUBSCRIBE PHD-DESIGN parnian

Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:21:13 +0100

10 lines

Re: Design

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 9 Aug 2005 09:19:22 -0400

80 lines

Re: Gas prices: The bigger questions

Gunnar Swanson

Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:57:31 -0700

39 lines

Gas prices: The bigger questions

rob curedale

Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:32:25 -0700

34 lines

FW: Emerald Literati Newsline - 2006 Doctoral Research Awards

Terence Love

Fri, 5 Aug 2005 00:54:00 +0000

90 lines

Re: More about the word "design" and the activity of design

Terence Love

Thu, 4 Aug 2005 15:57:00 +0000

137 lines

More about the word "design" and the activity of design

Lily Diaz

Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:29:54 +0300

269 lines

Kyoto alternative & major technological developments

Dr. Joseph D. Chiodo

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 23:18:18 -0400

96 lines

Re: Design

Jan Coker

Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:35:44 +0930

215 lines

Gas Prices

rob curedale

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 18:38:37 -0700

53 lines

choosing testing methods

David Sless

Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:58:31 +1000

33 lines

Re: Types of design.

David Sless

Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:44:30 +1000

37 lines

Re: A research question about the rising price of oil

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:55:58 -0400

87 lines

A research question about the rising price of oil

rob curedale

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 08:49:16 -0700

50 lines

Re: types of design ; slicing through the disciplines

Tiiu Poldma

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:37:12 -0400

135 lines

Re: defining designing

Erik Stolterman

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 12:47:15 +0200

72 lines

Re: Design and the paper by Louridas

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 06:20:06 -0400

90 lines

Re: Design

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 06:07:22 -0400

71 lines

Re: Design

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 05:45:24 -0400

56 lines

Re: Types of design.

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 05:33:41 -0400

62 lines

defining designing

Peter J. Walters(ACES)

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 09:57:25 +0100

43 lines

Design Education for Future

Rosan Chow

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:15:42 +0200

25 lines

Re: Design

Jan Coker

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:06:34 +0930

188 lines

Re: Types of design.

Alan Murdock

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 21:20:38 -0700

66 lines

Re: Design

Jason Foster

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 00:20:07 -0400

66 lines

Re: Design

Cameron Tonkinwise

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:51:17 +1000

33 lines

Re: Design

Jason Foster

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 23:32:07 -0400

94 lines

Re: Design

Jan Coker

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:35:38 +0930

103 lines

Re: Significance

Charles Burnette

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 21:39:54 -0400

116 lines

Re: Types of design.

David Sless

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:05:33 +1000

33 lines

Design

rob curedale

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:31:30 -0700

114 lines

Disciplines that cut across all fields and academic disciplines

Ken Friedman

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:20:47 +0200

48 lines

Successful Projects are presented in Istanbul Workshop

ttnet

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:52:49 +0300

27 lines

Re: Significance

Jason Foster

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:38:30 -0400

79 lines

rob curedale

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:14:53 -0700

37 lines

Re: Types of design.

Filippo Salustri

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:07:21 -0400

76 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 31 Jul 2005 to 1 Aug 2005 (#2005-181)

Jason Foster

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:18:35 -0400

54 lines

Re: Types of design.

M P Ranjan

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:50:56 +0530

71 lines

Re: Types of design.

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:11:04 -0400

25 lines

Re: Types of design.

Gunnar Swanson

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 08:36:54 -0700

46 lines

Re: The word "design"

Eduardo Corte Real

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:49:34 +0100

251 lines

Re: education v. practice

Cameron Tonkinwise

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:46:53 +1000

72 lines

The word "design"

Ken Friedman

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 07:23:22 +0200

178 lines

Funky Touch

<>

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 23:37:47 -0400

20 lines

Long live design, art + design and design research

<>

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:33:59 -0400

65 lines

Re: Types of design.

Terence Love

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 01:53:00 +0000

46 lines

Re: Types of design.

Filippo Salustri

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 20:18:30 -0400

100 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 31 Jul 2005 to 1 Aug 2005 (#2005-181)

rob curedale

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:07:55 -0700

36 lines

Re: Types of design.

Mike McAuley

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:10:13 +1200

30 lines

Re: Types of design.

Charles Burnette

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:41:12 -0400

43 lines

Re: Types of design.

Alex Velasco

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:54:19 +0300

149 lines

Re: Design education

David Sless

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:37:44 +1000

52 lines

Re: Types of design.

Erik Stolterman

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:56:32 +0200

64 lines

Epsrc Case Studentship

Fisher, Tom

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:38:31 +0100

38 lines

Types of design.

Tony Fairlie-Clarke

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:18:17 +0100

38 lines

Re: Phd Design Subscribers

Ranulph Glanville

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 07:53:20 +0100

35 lines

Re: Design education

Alun Price

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:39:09 +0800

92 lines

2 types of design

rob curedale

Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:22:00 -0700

107 lines

Design Research News

Ken Friedman

Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:02:09 +0200

44 lines

2 types of design

<>

Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:33:53 -0400

36 lines

Re: education v. practice

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:44:35 -0400

34 lines

Epsrc Case studentship

Fisher, Tom

Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:11:57 +0100

36 lines

Position available: Design History, Theory and Criticism

Ken Friedman

Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:33:09 +0200

113 lines

Re: education v. practice - was: Phd Design Subscribers

Christopher Brisbin

Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:50:23 +1000

240 lines

Re: SV: Design education

Charles Burnette

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:48:51 -0400

129 lines

SV: Design education

Thomas Rasmussen

Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:21:14 +0200

419 lines

Re: Design education

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:32:37 -0400

27 lines

Re: Design education [was: Re: Phd Design Subscribers] -- shifting the perspective?

Tiiu Poldma

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:35:42 -0400

198 lines

Re: Design education

Américo Mateus

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:01:30 +0100

31 lines

Re: Infallibility

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:44:06 -0400

48 lines

education v. practice - was: Phd Design Subscribers

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:36:43 -0400

89 lines

Re: Design education

Erik Stolterman

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:28:10 +0200

51 lines

FW: Special Theme Issue on "Movement-Based Interaction"

Jared Donovan

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:37:09 +1000

98 lines

Design education [was: Re: Phd Design Subscribers] -- response from Jacques Giard

Ken Friedman

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:19:56 +0200

128 lines

Response to Rob

<>

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:47:16 -0400

40 lines

Infallibility

teena clerke

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:43:52 +1000

52 lines

Infallibility

rob curedale

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:23:06 -0700

71 lines

Phd Design Subscribers

teena clerke

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:31:17 +1000

53 lines

Re: Calling popes a draw [was: PhD-Design Subscriber Statistics]

Ken Friedman

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:48:32 +0100

22 lines

Calling popes a draw [was: PhD-Design Subscriber Statistics]

Ken Friedman

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:41:07 +0100

81 lines

Re: Phd Design Subscribers

Alan Murdock

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:36:59 +0000

214 lines

Re: Phd Design Subscribers

Alan Murdock

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:36:57 +0000

214 lines

Re: PhD-Design Subscriber Statistics

Eduardo Corte Real

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:02:41 +0100

68 lines

Re: PhD-Design Subscriber Statistics

Gunnar Swanson

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:42:02 -0700

38 lines

Re: PhD-Design Subscriber Statistics

David Durling

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:14:12 +0100

204 lines

Re: Phd Design Subscribers

Dr. Joseph D. Chiodo

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:48:17 -0400

81 lines

Re: Phd Design Subscribers

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:33:33 -0400

54 lines

Re: PhD-Design Subscriber Statistics

M P Ranjan

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:00:19 +0530

82 lines

Re: Phd Design Subscribers

rob curedale

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:23:50 -0700

147 lines

Re: Phd Design Subscribers OFF LIST

Alec Robertson

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:02:33 +0100

80 lines

Re: Phd Design Subscribers

Kirk Forder

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:17:45 +1030

82 lines

Re: Phd Design Subscribers

Deana McDonagh

Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:06:43 -0500

28 lines

Phd Design Subscribers

rob curedale

Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:51:11 -0700

46 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 22 Jul 2005 to 25 Jul 2005 (#2005-174)

<>

Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:52:04 -0400

23 lines

Re: country ranking for PhD-Design and IDFORUM

David Durling

Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:37:51 +0100

123 lines

DESIGN AND SEMANTICS OF FORM AND MOVEMENT (DeSForM) Conference

Robert Young DE

Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:21:11 +0100

581 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 22 Jul 2005 to 25 Jul 2005 (#2005-174)

<>

Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:14:28 -0400

101 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 22 Jul 2005 to 25 Jul 2005 (#2005-174)

Satoshi Kose

Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:22:41 +0900

30 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 22 Jul 2005 to 25 Jul 2005 (#2005-174)

<>

Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:48:49 -0400

93 lines

Bias in figures becasue all .com adfresses allocated to US

Terence Love

Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:45:00 +0000

80 lines

PhD-Design Subscriber Statistics

rob curedale

Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:10:49 -0700

83 lines

PhD-Design Subscriber Statistics

Ken Friedman

Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:37:48 +0200

54 lines

CFP: International Journal of Cases on Electronic Commerce (IJCEC)

Ken Friedman

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:11:18 +0200

109 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 18 Jul 2005 to 21 Jul 2005 (#2005-172)

Joana Ferreira Martins

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:41 +0100

14 lines

Re: Knitted visualization of geometric form

Johann Van Der Merwe

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 01:14:56 -0400

93 lines

"Embracing Complexity in Design" satellite workshop in European Conference on Complex Systems

Katerina Alexiou

Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:46:08 +0100

43 lines

Kohler

Amit Singh

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:58:43 -0400

54 lines

Consumption: Special issue of Journal of Industrial Ecology

Cheryl W. Myrup

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:52:33 -0400

65 lines

Re: Knitted visualization of geometric form

Terence Love

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:05:00 +0000

88 lines

Knitted visualization of geometric form

Ken Friedman

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:25:17 +0200

56 lines

Augmented heritage -EuropIA.10: Program & Registration

Khaldoun ZREIK

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:49:37 +0200

419 lines

Participatory Design Conference - PDC 2006, Trento,31 July-5 August

<>

Tue, 5 Jul 2005 20:18:19 +0200

95 lines

Accepted participants

ttnet

Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:53:20 +0300

68 lines

Accepted participants

ttnet

Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:00:49 +0300

67 lines

interesting design in Prague?

Martin Ludvigsen

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:11:44 +0200

213 lines

Video Available

Alec Robertson

Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:24:16 +0100

46 lines

How to join or leave the PhD-Design list

Ken Friedman

Tue, 28 Jun 2005 05:07:33 +0200

30 lines

Re: Article in New York Times: Bill Gates as Anthropologist

WONG Hang Fah (NSSE)

Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:31:14 +0800

59 lines

Design and the "Gross National Happiness Index" (GNHI)

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:25:16 -0400

50 lines

conference: the eclectic idea

yves schoonjans

Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:43:16 +0200

83 lines

Article in New York Times: Bill Gates as Anthropologist

Ken Friedman

Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:26:15 +0200

40 lines

3rd cltad conference: call for papers

Felix Lam

Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:32:47 +0000

199 lines

Understanding & context - Was: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:26:12 -0400

83 lines

reissued case history

David Sless

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:34:38 +1000

33 lines

reissued case history

David Sless

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:31:14 +1000

30 lines

Joining Forces - preliminary program available now!

Lotta Palmi

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:38:37 +0300

170 lines

Reminder, just 2 days to submitt your papers

Khaldoun ZREIK

Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:56:42 +0200

149 lines

Voice of the doctoral student

David Durling

Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:38:38 +0100

215 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

Rosan Chow

Wed, 22 Jun 2005 06:02:23 +0200

45 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

Sabine Junginger

Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:01:05 -0400

95 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:30:30 -0400

27 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

Ranulph Glanville

Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:09:15 +0100

37 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

GK VanPatter

Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:45:16 -0400

69 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

Rosan Chow

Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:54:09 +0200

58 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

GK VanPatter

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:56:33 -0400

115 lines

Re: cognitivism

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:02:39 -0400

58 lines

Re: cognitivism

Charles Burnette

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:18:08 -0400

43 lines

CFP: "Aarhus 2005" Workshop on Approaches to Movement-Based Interaction

Alastair Weakley

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:10:41 +1000

347 lines

Re: cognitivism

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 19 Jun 2005 01:24:49 -0400

16 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

Rosan Chow

Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:50:42 +0200

39 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

Keith Russell

Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:01:10 +1000

43 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

GK VanPatter

Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:41:56 -0400

281 lines

Re: NOT imitating science

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:07:22 -0400

63 lines

FW: PhD Studentships at Swansea

Riley, Howard

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:34:55 +0100

36 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:26:36 -0400

87 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:39:19 -0400

104 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:34:45 -0400

48 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:21:10 -0400

48 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

Jeoung-Ah Kim

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:47:23 +0100

86 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

David Sless

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:53:21 +1000

51 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

Keith Russell

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:40:23 +1000

97 lines

Re: OF and FOR / tribal-centric

GK VanPatter

Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:18:13 -0400

498 lines

NextD Journal / Latest Issue

GK VanPatter

Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:34:12 -0400

179 lines

Re: NOT imitating science

Charles Burnette

Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:30:08 -0400

97 lines

Re: NOT imitating science

Terence Love

Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:26:00 +0000

70 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:48:39 -0400

68 lines

Re: NOT imitating science

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:33:14 -0400

72 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:38:42 -0400

46 lines

Symp on Teaching & Research - Alberta Canada, Aug 3-5

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:55:19 -0400

54 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:06:42 -0400

125 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:44:54 -0400

85 lines

Heritage Virtual Library

Khaldoun ZREIK

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:36:39 +0200

184 lines

Re: Beyond Eurocentrism

Rosan Chow

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 06:20:04 +0200

44 lines

Fwd: Re: OF and FOR

Glenn E Snelbecker, PhD, Professor

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:56:42 -0400

209 lines

Fwd: Re: OF and FOR

Glenn E Snelbecker, PhD, Professor

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:55:40 -0400

150 lines

Re: Beyond Eurocentrism

Ken Friedman

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:55:27 +0100

52 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:22:27 -0400

29 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:12:24 -0400

85 lines

Re: to stay in a cave for long hours to grind stone into finest sand

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:02:20 -0400

37 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:41:31 -0400

72 lines

Re: Beyond Eurocentrism

Rosan Chow

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:59:44 +0200

28 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:54:48 -0400

59 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:15:53 -0400

59 lines

to stay in a cave for long hours to grind stone into finest sand

Rosan Chow

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:14:42 +0200

59 lines

DRS symposium 15 July 05: Research Quality

David Durling

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:02:21 +0100

267 lines

Re: OF and FOR

Charles Burnette

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:15:49 -0400

35 lines

Re: OF and FOR

Keith Russell

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:57:40 +1000

53 lines

Re: NOT imitating science

Harold Nelson

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:24:27 -0700

85 lines

Beyond Eurocentrism

Ken Friedman

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:44:09 +0100

70 lines

Re: euro-centric

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:34:42 -0400

82 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:04:28 -0400

188 lines

Re: NOT imitating science

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:41:48 -0400

58 lines

Re: How we save doctoral studies in Art&Design and live to tell

Eduardo Corte Real

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:29:57 +0100

141 lines

Re: Knowledge of and knowledge for

Ranulph Glanville

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:01:58 +0100

67 lines

Re: Knowledge of and knowledge for

Terence Love

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:46:00 +0000

45 lines

Re: Knowledge of and knowledge for

Charles Burnette

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:45:53 -0400

35 lines

NextD Workshops / Registration Open

GK VanPatter

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:40:46 -0400

311 lines

Re: Knowledge of and knowledge for

Ranulph Glanville

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:08:15 +0100

94 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:39:54 -0400

162 lines

Workshop on Human Behaviour in Design at ICED05 Conference

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:28:44 -0400

42 lines

Re: Knowledge of and knowledge for

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:12:41 -0400

73 lines

Re: NOT imitating science

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 08:55:55 -0400

43 lines

[Fwd: Workshop on Human Behaviour in Design at ICED05 Conference]

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 08:30:22 -0400

122 lines

euro-centric

Rosan Chow

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:16:22 +0200

34 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Tiiu Poldma

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 08:00:08 -0400

101 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 06:33:42 -0400

32 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

David Sless

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:41:42 +1000

55 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

David Sless

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:00:43 +1000

37 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

David Sless

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:53:24 +1000

52 lines

Re: imitating sciences

edgar koyis

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:40:50 +0900

76 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:34:12 -0400

110 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:13:57 -0400

41 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

David Sless

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:19:30 +1000

89 lines

Re: How we save doctoral studies in Art & Design and live to tell

Ken Friedman

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:20:14 +0100

46 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:18:04 -0400

144 lines

Re: How we save doctoral studies in Art&Design and live to tell

Karel van der Waarde

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:18:52 +0200

85 lines

Re: OF and FOR

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 16:09:39 -0400

67 lines

Re: NOT imitating science

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:58:37 -0400

49 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:41:32 -0400

71 lines

Re: Dictionaries describe usage -- correction

richard buchanan

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 11:29:29 -0400

50 lines

How we save doctoral studies in Art&Design and live to tell

eduardo Corte Real

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 16:13:59 +0100

88 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:54:07 -0400

87 lines

NextD Journal / Latest Issue

GK VanPatter

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:53:53 -0400

184 lines

DPP-Latest Issue

Anne-Marie Willis

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:22:55 +0100

47 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:38:56 -0400

84 lines

human or not human

Rosan Chow

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:03:24 +0200

39 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:12:33 -0400

62 lines

Re: OF and FOR

Jenny Ure

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:16:57 +0100

162 lines

Assistant Professor and PhD student positions at Aalborg University Copenhagen

Ken Friedman

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:22:08 +0200

73 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 00:59:16 -0400

95 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Keith Russell

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:42:23 +1000

61 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 22:09:34 -0400

40 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 21:28:59 -0400

99 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 21:18:53 -0400

70 lines

Re: NOT imitating science: knowledge of and knowledge for

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 20:13:59 -0400

105 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

John Broadbent

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:03:03 +1000

70 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 19:28:26 -0400

43 lines

Re: Dictionaries describe usage -- correction

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 17:29:36 -0400

113 lines

Yoda talk

Rosan Chow

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 23:28:57 +0200

40 lines

Re: Dictionaries describe usage -- correction

Ken Friedman

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 21:55:44 +0200

31 lines

Re: Dictionaries describe usage

Ken Friedman

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 19:51:50 +0200

215 lines

FW: OF and FOR

Terence Love

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 11:10:00 +0000

163 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Terence Love

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 11:08:00 +0000

228 lines

NOT imitating science

Wolfgang Jonas

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 11:39:14 +0200

15 lines

Re: dictionaries

Ranulph Glanville

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 17:12:51 +1000

95 lines

Re: NOT imitating science: knowledge of and knowledge for

Rosan Chow

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:41:09 +0200

49 lines

Re: Dictionaries describe usage

Keith Russell

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 15:53:52 +1000

23 lines

Re: dictionaries

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 01:45:14 -0400

54 lines

Re: Dictionaries describe usage

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 01:32:58 -0400

115 lines

dictionaries

Ranulph Glanville

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 15:18:11 +1000

36 lines

Dictionaries describe usage

Ken Friedman

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 05:21:02 +0100

54 lines

Re: NOT imitating science: knowledge of and knowledge for

Charles Burnette

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 21:37:18 -0400

53 lines

NOT imitating science: knowledge of and knowledge for

Ranulph Glanville

Sun, 5 Jun 2005 10:19:33 +1000

73 lines

Re: OF and FOR

Klaus Krippendorff

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 18:51:48 -0400

93 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 18:31:45 -0400

214 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 18:21:42 -0400

94 lines

Re: OF and FOR

Charles Burnette

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 15:58:24 -0400

111 lines

Re: OF and FOR

Keith Russell

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 21:21:49 +1000

63 lines

Re: OF and FOR

Glenn E Snelbecker, PhD, Professor

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:42:13 -0400

67 lines

OF and FOR

Keith Russell

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 14:33:08 +1000

25 lines

Re: NOT imitating science

Rosan Chow

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:20:05 +0200

53 lines

Posting error

Charles Burnette

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:19:59 -0400

13 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 2 Jun 2005 to 3 Jun 2005 (#2005-141)

Joana Ferreira Martins

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:00:34 +0100

15 lines

Re: Knowledge of and knowledge for -- notes for Chuck

Ken Friedman

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:48:06 +0200

329 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Ranulph Glanville

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:38:55 +1000

225 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:10:07 -0400

97 lines

Re: imitating sciences - criteria for scenarios

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:49:23 -0400

205 lines

Re: imitating sciences - criteria for scenarios

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:46:12 -0400

116 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:38:57 -0400

71 lines

Re: Knowledge of and knowledge for

Charles Burnette

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:08:24 -0400

58 lines

Re: Aw: Re: imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:21:54 -0400

68 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:08:16 -0400

139 lines

Resource Recovery Forum conference and environmental report on nappies (diapers)

Ken Friedman

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:39:53 +0200

179 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:14:25 -0400

135 lines

Knowledge of and knowledge for

Ken Friedman

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:35:42 +0100

77 lines

Re: Consensus - theory of mind

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:07:29 -0400

107 lines

Re: NOT imitating science

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:21:41 -0400

38 lines

Re: NOT imitating science - knowledge

Charles Burnette

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:18:53 -0400

56 lines

Re: NOT imitating science

Erik Stolterman

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:21:19 +0200

39 lines

Re: Consensus - theory of mind

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:08:02 -0400

225 lines

NOT imitating science

Ranulph Glanville

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:20:52 +1000

70 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:50:19 -0400

109 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:38:25 -0400

128 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:43:45 -0400

67 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:19:02 -0400

113 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:35:18 -0400

75 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:02:55 -0400

67 lines

Re: PhD -- and other doctorates -- in design

S K Khanna

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:12:04 +0530

32 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:30:18 -0400

36 lines

Human System Learning, Who is in Control?

Khaldoun ZREIK

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:11:34 +0200

140 lines

Re: PhD -- and other doctorates -- in design

Rosan Chow

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:19:31 +0200

613 lines

Re: NOT imitating sciences

Terence Love

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 06:08:00 +0000

64 lines

Re: Emotions & Design: topics for workshops

Terence Love

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 05:24:00 +0000

64 lines

Replies and formats

Keith Russell

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:14:53 +1000

30 lines

PhD -- and other doctorates -- in design

Ken Friedman

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 23:46:25 +0200

82 lines

Re: imitating sciences - criteria for scenarios

Rosan Chow

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:35:43 +0200

150 lines

Re: imitating sciences - criteria for scenarios

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:27:35 -0400

95 lines

Re: imitating sciences - criteria for scenarios

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:05:18 -0400

82 lines

Re: imitating sciences - criteria for scenarios

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:27:20 -0400

54 lines

Re: imitating sciences - criteria for scenarios

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 12:49:34 -0400

35 lines

Re: imitating sciences - criteria for scenarios

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:46:52 -0400

133 lines

Re: imitating sciences - criteria for scenarios

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:05:35 -0400

94 lines

Assessment exerperiences

Chris McKillop

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:53:25 +0100

72 lines

Re: Call for Papers: "Design Studies and Design Culture"

Miodrag Mitrasinovic

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:12:58 +0300

132 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 31 May 2005 12:30:34 -0400

99 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 31 May 2005 10:25:04 -0400

59 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 31 May 2005 10:12:30 -0400

65 lines

Re: Emotions & Design: topics for workshops

Miguel Tito

Tue, 31 May 2005 12:46:05 +0200

87 lines

Aw: Re: imitating sciences

Rosan Chow

Tue, 31 May 2005 10:13:01 +0200

45 lines

Re: 5 not-so-easy pieces - was Five Reasonably Easy Pieces

Filippo Salustri

Mon, 30 May 2005 23:13:42 -0400

203 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Mon, 30 May 2005 16:47:14 -0400

79 lines

Re: Consensus - theory of mind

Charles Burnette

Mon, 30 May 2005 16:30:21 -0400

32 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 30 May 2005 16:25:43 -0400

365 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 30 May 2005 16:16:58 -0400

222 lines

Re: Consensus - theory of mind

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 30 May 2005 15:46:02 -0400

105 lines

Re: Consensus - theory of mind

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 30 May 2005 14:35:57 -0400

161 lines

Re: imitating sciences-systems

Charles Burnette

Mon, 30 May 2005 11:25:51 -0400

367 lines

Re: Theory as a car - categoricals

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 30 May 2005 09:45:13 -0400

99 lines

Important notice for Istanbul Workshop

ttnet

Mon, 30 May 2005 16:43:43 +0300

34 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 30 May 2005 08:28:58 -0400

153 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 30 May 2005 08:14:53 -0400

148 lines

Re: imitating sciences - patterns

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 30 May 2005 07:59:17 -0400

94 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Wolfgang Jonas

Mon, 30 May 2005 10:17:03 +0200

250 lines

Re: imitating sciences

John Broadbent

Mon, 30 May 2005 17:18:32 +1000

226 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Cameron Tonkinwise

Mon, 30 May 2005 16:54:22 +1000

34 lines

Re: imitating sciences

John Broadbent

Mon, 30 May 2005 15:49:33 +1000

325 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 29 May 2005 23:25:24 -0400

260 lines

Re: imitating sciences

John Broadbent

Mon, 30 May 2005 11:58:05 +1000

260 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 29 May 2005 20:53:27 -0400

60 lines

Re: imitating sciences

John Broadbent

Mon, 30 May 2005 10:00:58 +1000

234 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Sun, 29 May 2005 18:39:26 -0400

78 lines

Re: imitating sciences

John Broadbent

Mon, 30 May 2005 08:02:27 +1000

167 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Rosan Chow

Sun, 29 May 2005 15:39:25 +0200

83 lines

Conference: Information Design / IIID Vision Plus 11 Conference / Summer Academy (Im)Material Exchange

Baumann Konrad

Sun, 29 May 2005 10:19:44 +0200

496 lines

CfP: INTERACT 2005: Workshop on the Role and Models of Design Research in HCI

Baumann Konrad

Sun, 29 May 2005 09:55:25 +0200

88 lines

CfP: Workshop 'How Designers Teach' by IFIP WG 13.1 on HCI Education

Baumann Konrad

Sun, 29 May 2005 09:45:31 +0200

1017 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Sat, 28 May 2005 07:01:55 -0400

32 lines

Vandana Shiva Commentary

Ricardo Sosa

Sat, 28 May 2005 10:58:43 +1000

268 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 27 May 2005 16:20:48 -0400

173 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Rosan Chow

Fri, 27 May 2005 21:10:56 +0200

53 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 27 May 2005 14:49:25 -0400

40 lines

Re: NextD Research / Biggest opportunity for designers?

Rosan Chow

Fri, 27 May 2005 20:43:30 +0200

35 lines

Re: Car & theory

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 27 May 2005 14:12:05 -0400

78 lines

Re: Consensus - theory of mind

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 27 May 2005 13:22:17 -0400

58 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Fri, 27 May 2005 12:47:56 -0400

26 lines

NextD Research / Biggest opportunity for designers?

GK VanPatter

Fri, 27 May 2005 10:22:15 -0400

118 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Rosan Chow

Fri, 27 May 2005 09:42:47 +0200

71 lines

Re: Consensus - theory of mind

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 26 May 2005 14:57:34 -0400

124 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Charles Burnette

Thu, 26 May 2005 14:19:17 -0400

50 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Rosan Chow

Thu, 26 May 2005 15:26:21 +0200

52 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Charles Burnette

Thu, 26 May 2005 08:51:04 -0400

46 lines

Re: 5 not-so-easy pieces - was Five Reasonably Easy Pieces

Tim Smithers

Thu, 26 May 2005 11:52:52 +0200

287 lines

PhD Peer Review in London

Joyce Yee

Thu, 26 May 2005 09:14:51 +0100

65 lines

Re: Theory as a car

Johann Van Der Merwe

Thu, 26 May 2005 03:29:24 -0400

53 lines

NOT imitating sciences

Ranulph Glanville

Thu, 26 May 2005 16:31:11 +1000

23 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 25 May 2005 22:56:08 -0400

88 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 25 May 2005 18:31:57 -0400

115 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 25 May 2005 18:31:56 -0400

86 lines

Re: Theory as a car

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 25 May 2005 17:56:00 -0400

180 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 25 May 2005 17:01:58 -0400

85 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 25 May 2005 16:39:54 -0400

66 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 25 May 2005 16:25:08 -0400

69 lines

5 not-so-easy pieces - was Five Reasonably Easy Pieces

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 25 May 2005 15:20:03 -0400

180 lines

Re: imitating sciences

edgar koyis

Wed, 25 May 2005 15:53:15 +0200

268 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Rosan Chow

Wed, 25 May 2005 14:45:37 +0200

75 lines

Re: Car & theory

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 25 May 2005 02:00:11 -0400

143 lines

Car & theory

Norm Sheehan

Wed, 25 May 2005 15:33:41 +1000

53 lines

Re: Consensus - theory of mind

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 25 May 2005 01:31:13 -0400

396 lines

Re: Consensus - theory of mind

Keith Russell

Wed, 25 May 2005 14:54:13 +1000

368 lines

Re: Consensus - theory of mind

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 25 May 2005 00:42:46 -0400

280 lines

Re: Consensus - theory of mind

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 25 May 2005 00:22:43 -0400

310 lines

Good, bad and ugly design!

Soren Petersen

Tue, 24 May 2005 20:06:15 -0700

22 lines

CFP: INTERACT 2005: Workshop on the Role and Models of Design Research in HCI

disalvo

Tue, 24 May 2005 20:55:49 -0400

84 lines

Consensus - theory of mind

Keith Russell

Wed, 25 May 2005 09:59:23 +1000

255 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 24 May 2005 13:57:46 -0400

203 lines

Thomas Friedman followup

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 24 May 2005 12:33:33 -0400

36 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 24 May 2005 11:16:24 -0400

39 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Rosan Chow

Tue, 24 May 2005 16:19:21 +0200

142 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 24 May 2005 08:10:43 -0400

168 lines

Theory as a car

Johann Van Der Merwe

Tue, 24 May 2005 03:49:23 -0400

143 lines

Re: imitating sciences

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 23 May 2005 13:03:53 -0400

112 lines

imitating sciences

Rosan Chow

Mon, 23 May 2005 15:47:54 +0200

56 lines

theory as a car

Wolfgang Jonas

Mon, 23 May 2005 09:58:13 +0200

218 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

David Sless

Mon, 23 May 2005 08:19:16 +1000

50 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 22 May 2005 16:42:34 -0400

758 lines

Bruce Archer

Alec Robertson

Sun, 22 May 2005 21:22:33 +0100

28 lines

Re: Five Reasonably Easy Pieces

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 22 May 2005 02:55:29 -0400

311 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Ranjan M P

Sat, 21 May 2005 22:04:51 +0530

514 lines

Five Reasonably Easy Pieces

Ken Friedman

Sat, 21 May 2005 18:23:02 +0200

188 lines

Last Call for Workshop Application

ttnet

Sat, 21 May 2005 17:26:16 +0300

33 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Wolfgang Jonas

Sat, 21 May 2005 14:41:05 +0200

274 lines

Re: theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 20 May 2005 12:58:42 -0400

118 lines

Re: Emotions & Design: topics for workshops

Rosan Chow

Fri, 20 May 2005 18:51:46 +0200

75 lines

Insight to miguel tito

Américo Mateus

Fri, 20 May 2005 17:04:47 +0100

35 lines

Re: Emotions & Design: topics for workshops

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Fri, 20 May 2005 11:43:37 -0400

33 lines

theory as a car: theory and theorist and their contexts

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 20 May 2005 10:21:09 -0400

90 lines

Re: Emotions & Design: topics for workshops

Charles Burnette

Fri, 20 May 2005 10:14:24 -0400

142 lines

Emotions & Design: topics for workshops

Miguel Tito

Fri, 20 May 2005 12:20:58 +0200

82 lines

Re: Theory as affordance

Keith Russell

Fri, 20 May 2005 11:47:27 +1000

149 lines

Re: Theory as affordance

Charles Burnette

Thu, 19 May 2005 21:05:43 -0400

91 lines

Re: Theory as affordance

Keith Russell

Fri, 20 May 2005 09:41:44 +1000

65 lines

Theory as affordance

Charles Burnette

Thu, 19 May 2005 14:24:18 -0400

59 lines

affording a car

Keith Russell

Thu, 19 May 2005 11:34:07 +1000

168 lines

Re: theory as a car -- distinguishing between theory and theorist

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 18 May 2005 21:04:43 -0400

126 lines

Re: theory as a car -- distinguishing between theory and theorist

Charles Burnette

Wed, 18 May 2005 17:26:53 -0400

98 lines

Re: theory as a car -- distinguishing between theory and theorist

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 18 May 2005 02:50:13 -0400

177 lines

Re: theory as a car -- distinguishing between theory and theorist

Charles Burnette

Tue, 17 May 2005 23:17:35 -0400

77 lines

Re: theory as a car -- distinguishing between theory and theorist

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 17 May 2005 21:15:29 -0400

387 lines

Re: theory as car- seeking a framework

Charles Burnette

Tue, 17 May 2005 13:00:26 -0400

183 lines

sustainable assessment fostering long-term learning in design

teena clerke

Tue, 17 May 2005 23:58:09 +1000

39 lines

Re: theory as a car -- distinguishing among theory and theory construction, authorship and process

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 17 May 2005 01:19:53 -0400

290 lines

Re: theory as a car -- Fish enough

Ken Friedman

Mon, 16 May 2005 16:36:10 +0200

44 lines

Re: theory as a car -- distinguishing among theory and theory construction, authorship and process

Keith Russell

Mon, 16 May 2005 20:22:26 +1000

28 lines

Re: theory as a car -- distinguishing among theory and theory construction, authorship and process

Ken Friedman

Mon, 16 May 2005 08:08:58 +0200

184 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Keith Russell

Mon, 16 May 2005 09:45:58 +1000

89 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 15 May 2005 18:34:09 -0400

52 lines

Re: theory as a car -- query (or comment?) for Klaus

Ken Friedman

Sun, 15 May 2005 21:38:17 +0200

566 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Charles Burnette

Sun, 15 May 2005 14:23:56 -0400

87 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Charles Burnette

Sun, 15 May 2005 14:23:34 -0400

29 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 15 May 2005 14:03:36 -0400

119 lines

Re: theory as a car -- note for Michael (or why Tycho's solar system did not work)

Ken Friedman

Sun, 15 May 2005 17:04:38 +0200

125 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Sun, 15 May 2005 10:13:03 -0400

61 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Charles Burnette

Sun, 15 May 2005 10:00:36 -0400

39 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Michael A R Biggs

Sun, 15 May 2005 10:49:30 +0100

66 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Klaus Krippendorff

Sat, 14 May 2005 12:21:25 -0400

91 lines

Fwd: Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Michael A R Biggs

Sat, 14 May 2005 07:32:36 +0100

42 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 13 May 2005 09:40:22 -0400

63 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Keith Russell

Fri, 13 May 2005 09:41:55 +1000

65 lines

Re: theory as a car -- response to Klaus

Ken Friedman

Thu, 12 May 2005 20:52:53 +0200

60 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 12 May 2005 14:30:09 -0400

37 lines

Re: Design-focused research -- notes for Terry Love

Ken Friedman

Thu, 12 May 2005 20:28:04 +0200

78 lines

Re: theory as a car

Charles Burnette

Thu, 12 May 2005 13:32:38 -0400

52 lines

Re: theory as a car

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 12 May 2005 11:12:49 -0400

52 lines

Re: theory as a car

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 12 May 2005 10:04:18 -0400

177 lines

Re: theory as fish

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 12 May 2005 09:44:16 -0400

174 lines

IADE/Cumulus Conference

Eduardo Corte Real

Thu, 12 May 2005 12:01:21 +0100

35 lines

Design-focused research was Re: theory as a car

Terence Love

Thu, 12 May 2005 11:52:45 +0100

17 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Keith Russell

Thu, 12 May 2005 18:06:16 +1000

99 lines

theory as fish

Wolfgang Jonas

Thu, 12 May 2005 10:02:27 +0200

106 lines

Re: theory as a car -- thoughts for Keith

Ken Friedman

Thu, 12 May 2005 07:03:07 +0100

64 lines

Re: theory as a car

Keith Russell

Thu, 12 May 2005 15:17:39 +1000

25 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise

Ricardo Sosa

Thu, 12 May 2005 14:59:40 +1000

41 lines

Re: theory as a car

Ken Friedman

Thu, 12 May 2005 05:35:33 +0100

124 lines

Re: theory as a car

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 11 May 2005 21:51:07 -0400

239 lines

Re: theory as a car

Charles Burnette

Wed, 11 May 2005 20:02:41 -0400

132 lines

theory as a car

Keith Russell

Thu, 12 May 2005 08:45:28 +1000

182 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise -- question and comments

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 11 May 2005 15:43:43 -0400

67 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise -- question and comments

Charles Burnette

Wed, 11 May 2005 15:00:17 -0400

148 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise -- question and comments

Terence Love

Wed, 11 May 2005 17:46:28 +0100

41 lines

Design out of Complexity workshop - reminder

Katerina Alexiou

Wed, 11 May 2005 15:35:49 +0100

50 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise -- question and comments

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 11 May 2005 10:31:41 -0400

77 lines

DRS Symposium on Research Quality

David Durling

Wed, 11 May 2005 15:06:53 +0100

70 lines

Re: Modularity In Automotive Industry

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 11 May 2005 09:23:14 -0400

62 lines

Re: Modularity In Automotive Industry

Terence Love

Wed, 11 May 2005 10:54:20 +0100

23 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 10 May 2005 14:00:40 -0400

69 lines

Modularity In Automotive Industry

kuRT

Tue, 10 May 2005 10:19:39 -0700

156 lines

Vacant position in design theory

Thomas Schødt Rasmussen

Tue, 10 May 2005 15:24:11 +0200

229 lines

Research Training in Practice Based PhD programms in MUSIC

Henk Borgdorff

Tue, 10 May 2005 11:27:53 +0200

542 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise

Tim Smithers

Tue, 10 May 2005 09:15:53 +0200

126 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise -- question and comments

Charles Burnette

Mon, 9 May 2005 10:11:36 -0400

100 lines

New Mail Address / Ny mailadresse

Per Galle

Sat, 7 May 2005 23:44:56 +0100

45 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise -- response to GK

Ken Friedman

Sat, 7 May 2005 08:39:02 +0100

183 lines

Re: Printed Project Issue 4

Ranjan M P

Sat, 7 May 2005 11:34:53 +0530

73 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise -- question and comments

Ranjan M P

Sat, 7 May 2005 11:29:19 +0530

91 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise -- question and comments

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Sat, 7 May 2005 08:13:17 +0300

44 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise -- question and comments

GK VanPatter

Fri, 6 May 2005 22:34:53 -0400

520 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise -- question and comments

Lubomir S. Popov

Fri, 6 May 2005 21:31:44 -0400

56 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise -- question and comments

Gunnar Swanson

Fri, 6 May 2005 18:06:43 -0700

38 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise -- question and comments

Ken Friedman

Fri, 6 May 2005 21:16:22 +0100

134 lines

Director: Goldstein Museum of Design

Barbara Martinson

Fri, 6 May 2005 20:15:19 +0100

175 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise

Rosan Chow

Fri, 6 May 2005 21:09:38 +0200

133 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise

Rosan Chow

Fri, 6 May 2005 11:15:42 +0200

1283 lines

Re: Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Fri, 6 May 2005 10:06:33 +0300

258 lines

Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise

GK VanPatter

Thu, 5 May 2005 16:29:15 -0400

1137 lines

Call for Papers; please share with colleagues.

Nancy Blossom

Thu, 5 May 2005 08:41:03 -0700

80 lines

cltad workshops: June 2005 & 2004 conference proceedings

Felix Lam

Thu, 5 May 2005 14:38:14 +0000

107 lines

Conference on Ergonomics

Pradeep G Yammiyavar

Thu, 5 May 2005 15:20:23 +0530

27 lines

JOB: Hong Kong Polytechnic University

GK VanPatter

Wed, 4 May 2005 13:06:19 -0400

33 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Wed, 4 May 2005 12:32:01 -0400

43 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Karen

Thu, 5 May 2005 00:15:44 +0800

113 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Eduardo Corte Real

Wed, 4 May 2005 12:31:15 +0100

323 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Karen

Wed, 4 May 2005 18:14:10 +0800

190 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Eduardo Corte Real

Wed, 4 May 2005 09:53:01 +0100

120 lines

Re: Printed Project Issue 4

David Durling

Wed, 4 May 2005 08:52:10 +0100

131 lines

Last Call: Istanbul Interactive Design Workshop

ttnet

Wed, 4 May 2005 10:51:15 +0300

33 lines

Re: Printed Project Issue 4

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 3 May 2005 13:32:06 -0400

217 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 3 May 2005 11:18:19 -0400

129 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Tiiu Poldma

Tue, 3 May 2005 11:13:19 -0400

105 lines

Re: Printed Project Issue 4

David Durling

Tue, 3 May 2005 14:17:04 +0100

122 lines

Printed Project Issue 4

TE Jones

Tue, 3 May 2005 13:33:36 +0100

118 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ... reply to Karen

Ken Friedman

Tue, 3 May 2005 12:20:30 +0100

68 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Karen

Tue, 3 May 2005 16:02:16 +0800

74 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

kairen88

Tue, 3 May 2005 15:28:35 +0800

75 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Susan M. Hagan

Mon, 2 May 2005 23:08:30 -0400

120 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

kristina niedderer

Mon, 2 May 2005 21:23:24 +0100

147 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Charles Burnette

Mon, 2 May 2005 16:19:24 -0400

51 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 2 May 2005 15:46:18 -0400

88 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

kristina niedderer

Mon, 2 May 2005 16:48:05 +0100

58 lines

Re: Rigour and supervision

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 1 May 2005 23:18:39 -0400

71 lines

Re: unfair analogy? Re: Aw: Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 1 May 2005 20:02:52 -0400

78 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 1 May 2005 19:51:40 -0400

115 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 1 May 2005 18:18:12 -0400

79 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 1 May 2005 17:59:55 -0400

95 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 1 May 2005 16:25:25 -0400

183 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Tim Smithers

Sat, 30 Apr 2005 11:37:06 +0200

449 lines

Re: Rigour and supervision

Pradeep G Yammiyavar

Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:43:50 +0530

35 lines

Rigour and supervision

Ranulph Glanville

Sat, 30 Apr 2005 05:13:14 +0100

82 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:12:06 -0400

30 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- reply to Michael Biggs

Ken Friedman

Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:08:59 +0100

49 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Michael A R Biggs

Fri, 29 Apr 2005 08:48:51 +0100

56 lines

Toward A Reconcilation Re: Rigor and supervision

Rosan Chow

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:45:23 +0200

259 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Rosan Chow

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:53:11 +0200

250 lines

Re: unfair analogy? Re: Aw: Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Rosan Chow

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:23:32 +0200

46 lines

Re: unfair analogy? Re: Aw: Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Gunnar Swanson

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:23:05 -0700

30 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Jenny Ure

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:18:30 +0100

123 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Christena Nippert-Eng

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:36:00 -0500

169 lines

Rigor and supervision

Ian Rooney

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:05:24 +0100

39 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

edgar koyis

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:58:03 +0200

150 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Susan M. Hagan

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:39:16 -0400

54 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Susan M. Hagan

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:31:15 -0400

67 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Lubomir S. Popov

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:50:12 -0400

226 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:40:30 -0400

81 lines

Re: Imagine doing a phd without supervisor

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:27:49 -0400

135 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:25:55 -0400

95 lines

Re: unfair analogy? Re: Aw: Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:23:42 -0400

211 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Eduardo Corte Real

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:52:41 +0100

71 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Rosan Chow

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:38:31 +0200

52 lines

Aw: Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Rosan Chow

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:13:06 +0200

317 lines

Re: Imagine doing a phd without supervisor

Rosan Chow

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 07:09:23 +0200

110 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Rosan Chow

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 06:33:51 +0200

73 lines

unfair analogy? Re: Aw: Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Rosan Chow

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 06:27:09 +0200

172 lines

Re: Imagine doing a phd without supervisor

Filippo Salustri

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:08:54 -0400

94 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:27:18 -0400

60 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Filippo Salustri

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:10:19 -0400

88 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Kerry London

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:52:01 +1000

124 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Tim Smithers

Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:22:41 +0200

280 lines

Re: Aw: Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:04:34 -0400

102 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Charles Burnette

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:24:44 -0400

283 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Rosan Chow

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:52:05 +0200

77 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Ben Matthews

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:25:58 +0200

135 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Susan M. Hagan

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:41:12 -0400

62 lines

PhD supervision

Tiiu Poldma

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:31:48 -0400

103 lines

Aw: Re: Imagine doing a phd without supervisor

Rosan Chow

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:02:05 +0200

86 lines

Re: Imagine doing a phd without supervisor

Terence Love

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:35:38 +0100

53 lines

Imagine doing a phd without supervisor

Rosan Chow

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:13:07 +0200

292 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Tim Smithers

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:54:23 +0200

199 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Kerry London

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:19:31 +1000

226 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Rosan Chow

Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:07:18 +0200

163 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

GK VanPatter

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:51:10 -0400

702 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Susan M. Hagan

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:46:19 -0400

145 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Rosan Chow

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:27:44 +0200

156 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

disalvo

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:52:10 -0400

56 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Christena Nippert-Eng

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:07:59 -0500

56 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few more thoughts

Ken Friedman

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:33:39 +0100

132 lines

Aw: Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Rosan Chow

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:33:11 +0200

59 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- a few thoughts

Ken Friedman

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:12:21 +0200

78 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision ...

Tim Smithers

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:10:46 +0200

92 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:11:19 -0400

229 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- thoughts for Keith and Rosan

Rosan Chow

Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:16:08 +0200

41 lines

Fwd: Re: Rigor and supervision -- thoughts for Keith and Rosan

Johann Van Der Merwe

Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:18:47 -0400

164 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- reflection on Rosan's comment

Ken Friedman

Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:17:49 +0200

75 lines

Re: Rigor and supervision -- thoughts for Keith and Rosan

Rosan Chow

Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:52:02 +0200

216 lines

Re: Research and supervision skills -- reply to Vikram Singh

Wendy Siuyi Wong

Sun, 24 Apr 2005 10:50:59 -0700

26 lines

FW: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Charles Burnette

Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:33:15 -0400

63 lines

Re: Research and supervision skills -- reply to Vikram Singh

Ken Friedman

Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:38:19 +0200

158 lines

Re: Research and supervision skills -- a bibliographic essay

Vikram's Mail

Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:27:39 +0530

64 lines

Re: Research and supervision skills -- a bibliographic essay

John Feland

Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:31:03 -0700

193 lines

Research and supervision skills -- a bibliographic essay

Ken Friedman

Sun, 24 Apr 2005 01:39:59 +0200

181 lines

Rigor and supervision -- thoughts for Keith and Rosan

Ken Friedman

Sun, 24 Apr 2005 01:34:19 +0200

179 lines

Re: EAD06 - photos now online

Gunnar Swanson

Sat, 23 Apr 2005 09:47:04 -0700

31 lines

EAD06 - photos now online

Wolfgang Jonas

Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:29:17 +0200

29 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

David Sless

Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:47:44 -0500

40 lines

International Symposium on Fashion Marketing and Management Research registration

Philippa Ashton

Sat, 23 Apr 2005 16:41:47 +0100

303 lines

CALL FOR PARTICIPATION:  Nordes conference IN THE MAKING, May 30'th - 31'th, 2005 in Copenhagen

Thomas Binder

Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:37:32 +0200

471 lines

Joining Forces: Early Bird deadline coming up!

Lotta Palmi

Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:50:03 +0300

192 lines

Re: Good PhD supervision

Rosan Chow

Fri, 22 Apr 2005 12:47:00 +0200

39 lines

Workshop GRANT :Early Application is going to be closed

ttnet

Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:44:59 +0300

92 lines

cltad workshop: learning about the learning of non-traditional

Felix Lam

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:57:18 +0000

84 lines

EAD06 - proceedings now available

Wolfgang Jonas

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:01:46 +0200

51 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Keith Russell

Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:46:14 +1000

69 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Jason W. Howell

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:15:32 -0500

117 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

GK VanPatter

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:50:05 -0400

157 lines

Defining Design Criticism

Elizabeth Guffey

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:55:51 +0100

29 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Ian Rooney

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:11:56 +0100

40 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Keith Russell

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:00:28 +1000

135 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Ian Rooney

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:51:13 +0100

92 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Keith Russell

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:46:19 +1000

64 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Pradeep G Yammiyavar

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:41:54 +0530

40 lines

Metropolis Design Education Survey 2005

GK VanPatter

Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:55:32 -0400

134 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Carma R Gorman

Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:38:02 -0500

55 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Gunnar Swanson

Sat, 16 Apr 2005 15:05:52 -0700

39 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Luis Inacio

Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:10:40 -0700

88 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

eduardo corte real

Sat, 16 Apr 2005 19:02:31 +0100

33 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Terence Love

Sat, 16 Apr 2005 00:32:00 +0000

87 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Carma R Gorman

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:05:14 -0500

56 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Gunnar Swanson

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 07:41:58 -0700

41 lines

Re: CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

GK VanPatter

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:26:19 -0400

90 lines

CFP: "Design(ing) Criticism"

Carma R Gorman

Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:27:22 -0500

60 lines

[Fwd: Design out of Complexity - call for papers]

Ricardo Sosa

Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:06:44 +1000

47 lines

Design out of complexity - call for papers

Katerina Alexiou

Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:50:04 +0100

39 lines

Incorrection

Vinicius Kaster Marini

Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:45:26 -0300

20 lines

Shifting topic to problem decomposition

Vinicius Kaster Marini

Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:22:56 -0300

63 lines

Re: Engaging China

Carole Caulier

Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:47:33 +0200

118 lines

INTERNATIONAL PHD SUPERVISION AND COMPLETION

Bruce Currey

Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:03:01 +0100

129 lines

Designing for the 21st Century

Ken Friedman

Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:59:02 +0200

63 lines

Re: Engaging China

Peter Retallick

Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:20:42 -0400

23 lines

Re: Engaging China

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Thu, 7 Apr 2005 07:54:37 -0400

39 lines

Re: Engaging China

Rosan Chow

Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:21:12 +0200

318 lines

Re: Engaging China

Christopher Kueh

Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:03:58 +0000

22 lines

Job Opening: Research Associate, InformeDesign

Kate Bukoski

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:50:57 +0100

144 lines

Re: Engaging China

Karen

Thu, 7 Apr 2005 02:53:03 +0800

213 lines

Re: Engaging China

Wendy Siuyi Wong

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:23:01 -0700

156 lines

Engaging China

rob curedale

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:47:15 -0700

274 lines

EAD6 Bremen: swift report

Eduardo Corte Real

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:04:40 +0100

363 lines

URL for Journal of Research Practice

Ken Friedman

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:56:41 +0200

144 lines

New Trans-disciplinary Journal Launched -- Journal of Research Practice

Ken Friedman

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:07:31 +0200

144 lines

Quiet Crisis / Slow to Rise

GK VanPatter

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:34:10 -0400

993 lines

Re: Engaging China/Cultural Differences in design process

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:05:26 -0400

57 lines

sorry for spam - Re: Engaging China/Cultural Differences in design process

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:48:05 +0300

14 lines

Re: Engaging China/Cultural Differences in design process

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:34:18 +0300

52 lines

New Book Review

Darren Newbury

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:24:02 +0100

92 lines

Re: Engaging China/Cultural Differences in design process

Jenny Ure

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:54:13 +0100

37 lines

Re: Engaging China/Cultural Differences in design process

rob curedale

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:14:02 -0700

172 lines

Re: Engaging China/Cultural Differences in design process

Jenny Ure

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:54:53 +0100

221 lines

Engaging China

rob curedale

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:03:10 -0700

39 lines

CSIRO research in multimedia design, animation and web systems design

Terence Love

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:02:00 +0000

204 lines

Good PhD supervision

Terence Love

Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:06:00 +0000

42 lines

2nd International Design and Cinema Conference

Ayhan Ensici

Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:08:03 +0300

49 lines

Re: Synthesis isn't everything

Charles Burnette

Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:27:05 -0500

52 lines

Re: Synthesis isn't everything

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:31:03 -0500

112 lines

Re: Interlude -- a common destiny, a human past

Norm Sheehan

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:59:54 +1000

427 lines

Re: Theory and practice in design

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:39:20 -0500

51 lines

Vacant professorships at Oslo National Academy of the Arts

Ken Friedman

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:36:29 +0200

50 lines

Re: Interlude -- a common destiny, a human past

SZETO, Sing Ying Elson

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:58:43 +0800

164 lines

Re: Interlude -- a common destiny, a human past

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:36:29 -0500

28 lines

Re: Relations between theory, practice, and research

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:36:41 -0500

129 lines

Re: Interlude -- a common destiny, a human past

Ken Friedman

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:35:23 +0200

148 lines

Re: Interlude

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:51:16 -0500

125 lines

Re: Interlude - Design as "Christian" and "Christopher"

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:59:44 -0500

60 lines

Re: Interlude

Eduardo Corte Real

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:53:52 +0100

113 lines

Re: Interlude

Terence Love

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 06:48:00 +0000

95 lines

Re: Latest Issue Design Philosophy Papers

Terence Love

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 01:58:00 +0000

77 lines

Latest Issue Design Philosophy Papers

Anne-Marie Willis

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:26:08 +0100

37 lines

Re: Interlude

Rosan Chow

Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:32:15 +0100

67 lines

Interlude

Ken Friedman

Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:45:34 +0100

56 lines

Never a Dull Moment

Thomas Rasmussen

Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:10:26 +0100

389 lines

Re: Relations between theory, practice, and research

Rosan Chow

Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:43:07 +0100

140 lines

Relations between theory, practice, and research

Ken Friedman

Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:02:52 +0100

135 lines

Re: Synthesis isn't everything

Charles Burnette

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:46:27 -0500

45 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory" -- reply to Rosan

Ken Friedman

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:53:57 +0100

75 lines

Re: Synthesis isn't everything

Terence Love

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:31:00 +0000

227 lines

Re: Synthesis isn't everything

Charles Burnette

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:06:50 -0500

59 lines

Re: Synthesis isn't everything

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:01:47 -0500

99 lines

Re: Synthesis isn't everything

Charles Burnette

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:12:16 -0500

51 lines

Re: Synthesis isn't everything

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:22:40 -0500

117 lines

Synthesis isn't everything

Terence Love

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 05:32:00 +0000

101 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Charles Burnette

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:16:33 -0500

43 lines

Re: Engineering Design--synthesis v creativity

John Horner

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:31:52 -0800

137 lines

cltad workshop: creative thinking processes

Felix Lam

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:50:45 +0000

81 lines

Re: Engineering Design--synthesis v creativity

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:35:36 -0500

68 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Terence Love

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:48:00 +0000

146 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Charles Burnette

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:43:19 -0500

97 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory"

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:13:02 -0500

93 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:59:43 -0500

49 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jenny Ure

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:52:46 -0000

80 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:24:56 -0500

59 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory"

Rosan Chow

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:06:26 +0100

46 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory" - offlist reply

Ken Friedman

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:25:49 +0100

132 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory" - offlist reply

Amanda Bill

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:49:31 +1200

152 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory"

Ken Friedman

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:06:10 +0100

113 lines

Re: concise definitions of design research

Ken Friedman

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:48:02 +0100

53 lines

WURMAN UNCUT / NextD Journal

GK VanPatter

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:02:29 -0500

157 lines

Re: concise definitions of design research

kristina niedderer

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:05:59 +0000

71 lines

Re: concise definitions of design research

Charles Burnette

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:46:05 -0500

99 lines

Re: concise definitions of design research

Ken Friedman

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:14:04 +0100

84 lines

Engaging China

rob curedale

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 07:59:40 -0800

31 lines

concise definitions of design research

Mike McAuley

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:30:03 +1300

23 lines

Re: concise definitions of design research

Charles Burnette

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:13:07 -0500

50 lines

To Join or Leave the List .....

Ken Friedman

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:10:07 +0100

27 lines

List

Carsten Loly

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:02:15 +0100

11 lines

FW: list

Brian Minards

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:36:13 -0000

137 lines

update

ead06

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:02:26 +0100

763 lines

7 full grant for Interactive Design Summer Workshop Istanbul

ttnet

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:40:21 +0200

74 lines

list

Margrethe Dobloug

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:58:17 +0100

190 lines

Re: New website

Charles Burnette

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:33:05 -0500

49 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

John Horner

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:17:07 -0800

200 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:55:33 -0500

67 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:50:15 -0500

103 lines

Form an Impression! (and help with my research...)

Alastair Weakley

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:55:18 +1100

36 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:40:25 -0500

71 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory"

Filippo A. Salustri

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:32:35 -0500

92 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:51:58 -0500

77 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:34:33 -0500

53 lines

job opportunity

pierre lonchampt

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:24:54 +0100

76 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:41:54 -0500

70 lines

Re: New website

M P Ranjan

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:52:14 +0530

99 lines

Re: Engineering Design -- four quick thoughts -- reply to Fil

Ken Friedman

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:03:43 +0100

253 lines

Re: Intelligent Design

Norm Sheehan

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:58:19 +1000

227 lines

Re: Intelligent Design

Lus Incio

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:05:15 -0800

344 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other -- four quick thoughts

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:19:46 -0500

111 lines

Re: Embodied mind

M P Ranjan

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:55:35 +0530

1064 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:21:42 -0500

129 lines

Re: Intelligent Design

Charles Burnette

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:03:07 -0500

79 lines

Re: Intelligent Design

Norm Sheehan

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:06:18 +1000

323 lines

Re: New website

Charles Burnette

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:42:00 -0500

67 lines

edgar moving to the netherlands

edgar koyis

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 21:40:28 +0100

36 lines

Re: Engineering Design--feedback loops, not semantics

Jenny Ure

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:50:14 -0000

535 lines

Shared customership?

Raija Halonen

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:16:47 +0200

27 lines

Design using smart materials

Terence Love

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:40:00 +0000

70 lines

Re: Spatial Interpretation through Phenomenology

Reza Kazemian

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:33:00 +0100

165 lines

Re: Engineering Design-- and software design

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 08:03:13 -0500

120 lines

analytical vs continental

Eduardo Corte Real

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:31:02 +0000

221 lines

Re: New website

Mike McAuley

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:05:21 +1300

73 lines

Re: New website

Dag H

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:58:10 +0100

89 lines

Re: New website

Bosse Westerlund

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:03:16 +0100

81 lines

Re: New website

Mattias Arvola

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:02:49 +0000

20 lines

Re: New website

Bosse Westerlund

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 13:05:53 +0100

65 lines

Re: Engineering Design-- and software design

Terence Love

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 00:56:00 +0000

122 lines

Re: Engineering Design-- and software design

Filippo Salustri

Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:17:20 -0500

123 lines

Re: New website

cheryl akner-koler

Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:12:53 +0100

64 lines

Re: New website

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 20:30:14 +0200

27 lines

New website

Charles Burnette

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:17:31 -0500

46 lines

Theory and practice in design (was: General definitions of the word "theory")

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:30:31 +0200

80 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory" -- reply to Klaus

Chanpory Rith

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:07:22 -0800

235 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jason Foster

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:11:02 -0500

45 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jason Foster

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:59:44 -0500

47 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jason Foster

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:49:50 -0500

47 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jason Foster

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:09:11 -0500

53 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jason Foster

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:05:15 -0500

83 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jason Foster

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:34:31 -0500

45 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:56:47 -0500

49 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jason Foster

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:39:01 -0500

29 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jason Foster

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:25:44 -0500

72 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory" -- reply to Klaus

Ken Friedman

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:53:04 +0100

191 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Terence Love

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:54:00 +0000

61 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

richard buchanan

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:23:27 -0500

436 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:57:39 -0500

143 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Rosan Chow

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:20:58 +0100

69 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory"

Rosan Chow

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:14:59 +0100

48 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Terence Love

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 05:26:00 +0000

430 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory"

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:13:06 -0500

561 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

richard buchanan

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:45:57 -0500

33 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

richard buchanan

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:33:06 -0500

82 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Terence Love

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:14:00 +0000

119 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory"

Terence Love

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:39:00 +0000

945 lines

Re: General definitions of the word "theory"

Keith Russell

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:51:36 +1100

533 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jason Foster

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:04:25 -0500

54 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Charles Burnette

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:36:15 -0500

119 lines

General definitions of the word "theory"

Ken Friedman

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:55:30 +0100

507 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:25:38 -0500

65 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:20:20 -0500

86 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Charles Burnette

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:06:27 -0500

40 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:01:33 -0500

102 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:19:45 -0500

104 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:11:30 -0500

80 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:02:17 -0500

91 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other -- four quick thoughts

Ken Friedman

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:56:57 +0100

128 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jared Donovan

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:04:22 +1000

50 lines

2nd Announcement and Call for papers: Joining Forces, Helsinki, September 22-24, 2005

Lotta Palmi

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:41:54 +0200

167 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

richard buchanan

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 05:40:00 -0500

152 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jared Donovan

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:18:57 +1000

142 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Norm Sheehan

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:42:29 +1000

337 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Pradeep G Yammiyavar

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:31:22 +0530

38 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

John Broadbent

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:01:07 +1100

72 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Keith Russell

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:00:22 +1100

86 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jason Foster

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 20:31:46 -0500

61 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Lus Incio

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:54:18 -0800

164 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Charles Burnette

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:51:33 -0500

41 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

richard buchanan

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:15:36 -0500

338 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:35:12 -0500

75 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Jason Foster

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:27:14 -0500

40 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Filippo A. Salustri

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:59:59 -0500

97 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Charles Burnette

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:43:03 -0500

86 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Terence Love

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:15:00 +0000

280 lines

Re: Mind and body,

Prof. E Corte Real

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:16:58 +0000

146 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

richard buchanan

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 03:11:42 -0500

56 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

richard buchanan

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:48:38 -0500

435 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Norm Sheehan

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:24:38 +1000

817 lines

Re: Mind and body,

Jared Donovan

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:52:48 +1000

54 lines

Re: What is on your desk? (do you have a desk?)

Jared Donovan

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:48:57 +1000

256 lines

What we have in common?

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:31:17 -0500

29 lines

Mind and body

teena clerke

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:29:46 +1100

17 lines

Re: Mind and body

Gunnar Swanson

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:18:16 -0800

34 lines

Faculty Position at CU-SID: Tenure Track

Thomas Garvey

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:01:56 -0500

177 lines

Faculty Position at CU-SID: 9-month term

Thomas Garvey

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:01:27 -0500

146 lines

Re: Engineering Design

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:56:10 -0500

67 lines

Mind and body

teena clerke

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 07:52:02 +1100

44 lines

Engineering Design

richard buchanan

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:15:24 -0500

42 lines

Re: Mind and body,

Fiona Jane Candy

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:49:40 +0000

97 lines

Metaphysic Design Theory?

Lus Incio

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:42:27 -0800

174 lines

Re: Mind and body,

Terence Love

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:21:00 +0000

155 lines

Re: Engineering Design--topic was something or other

Peter J. Walters(ACES)

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:39:59 +0000

39 lines

Re: Mind and body,

Fiona Jane Candy

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:28:14 +0000

115 lines

Re: Design System Evolution Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Rosan Chow

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:22:49 +0100

546 lines

Re: Emminded body

Mads Vedel Jensen

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:44:36 +0100

73 lines

Engineering Design--topic was something or other

richard buchanan

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:43:16 -0500

73 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

richard buchanan

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:06:47 -0500

299 lines

Re: ideas and action

Terence Love

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:56:00 +0000

29 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Norm Sheehan

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:14:04 +1000

412 lines

Conference of Interest?

Bob Este

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:37:49 +0000

18 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Charles Burnette

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:38:23 -0500

118 lines

Re: ideas and action

Terence Love

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:29:00 +0000

133 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Norm Sheehan

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:39:59 +1000

133 lines

Why students study Design

rob curedale

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:32:28 -0800

44 lines

Halldor Gislason

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:32:40 -0000

182 lines

Re: ideas and action

Gunnar Swanson

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:45:36 -0800

74 lines

Re: ideas and action

Terence Love

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:54:00 +0000

275 lines

Mind and body, ideas and action

teena clerke

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:33:39 +1100

27 lines

Re: Why students study Design

Karen

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:19:43 +0800

71 lines

Re: Mind and body, ideas and action

Paul Tosh, M.F.A.

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:53:47 EST

30 lines

Re: Why students study Design

Karen

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:43:18 +0800

53 lines

Re: Mind and body, ideas and action

Keith Russell

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:55:15 +1100

22 lines

Mind and body, ideas and action

teena clerke

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:03:12 +1100

32 lines

Re: ideas and action

Charles Burnette

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:14:48 -0500

45 lines

Re: Mind and body, ideas and action

Paul Tosh, M.F.A.

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:03:11 EST

34 lines

Apprenticeship and guild training

Ken Friedman

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 18:07:24 +0000

62 lines

Re: ideas and action (off-list)

Terence Love

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:14:00 +0000

117 lines

Re: ideas and action

cheryl akner-koler

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:42:24 +0100

117 lines

Re: Mind and body, ideas and action

Peter J. Walters(ACES)

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:34:28 +0000

35 lines

Re: ideas and action

Peter J. Walters(ACES)

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:15:36 +0000

43 lines

Mind and body, ideas and action

Ken Friedman

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:57:57 +0000

62 lines

Re: ideas and action

Terence Love

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:24:00 +0000

101 lines

ideas and action

Peter J. Walters(ACES)

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:26:12 +0000

41 lines

Embodied mind

Ken Friedman

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:01:19 +0000

97 lines

Re: Why students study Design

Terence Love

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 02:25:00 +0000

74 lines

CFP: Book Chapters on Human Computer Interaction Research in Web Design and Evaluation

Ken Friedman

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:59:10 +0100

134 lines

Re: Design System Evolution Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

richard buchanan

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:43:35 -0500

194 lines

Re: Why students study Design

Fiona Jane Candy

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:40:54 +0000

55 lines

Diversity in practice

Felix Lam

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:36:34 +0000

51 lines

Design System Evolution Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Rosan Chow

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:23:49 +0100

428 lines

Re: Why students study Design

Pradeep G Yammiyavar

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:33:35 +0530

37 lines

Re: Why students study Design

Mayank Shekhar

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:32:52 +0530

88 lines

position in interior architecture in oslo - please distribute to the interested parties

Halldór Gíslason

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:12:24 +0000

169 lines

position in visual communication in oslo - please distribute to the interested parties

Halldór Gíslason

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:09:22 +0000

171 lines

position in fashion in oslo - please distribute to the interested parties

Halldór Gíslason

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:06:02 +0000

175 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

richard buchanan

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:03:31 -0500

164 lines

Re: Why students study Design

prashantk

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:29:16 +0530

56 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

richard buchanan

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:29:42 -0500

62 lines

Re: Why students study Design

Karen

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:48:12 +0800

64 lines

Re: Why students study Design

Ricardo Sosa

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:21:41 +1100

47 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Lus Incio

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:10:30 -0800

289 lines

Intelligent? Design?

Ranulph Glanville

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:21:56 +0000

23 lines

Further Details of Drawing Symposium in Galway

Timothy Emlyn Jones

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:16:32 +0000

190 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:13:43 -0500

58 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Lubomir S. Popov

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:45:56 -0500

33 lines

Re: Black Boxes

Ranulph Glanville

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:54:39 +0000

470 lines

Re: Why students study Design

Peter J. Walters(ACES)

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:15:36 +0000

36 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Charles Burnette

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:59:32 -0500

69 lines

Re: Why students study Design

Lubomir S. Popov

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:42:14 -0500

67 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

krishnesh

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:39:11 +0530

425 lines

Intellegent design capacity

<>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:51:47 -0500

94 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Eduardo Corte Real

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:08:43 +0000

64 lines

Re: Why students study Design

Peter J. Walters(ACES)

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:52:02 +0000

44 lines

Why students study Design

Keith Russell

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:29:40 +1100

44 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Norm Sheehan

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:43:41 +1000

213 lines

Re: Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Gunnar Swanson

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:23:17 -0800

61 lines

Intelligent Design the Metaphysical Design

Lus Incio

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:44:13 -0800

176 lines

Apologies

Ken Friedman

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:37:51 +0000

16 lines

Read it .........

Ken Friedman

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:17:40 +0100

22 lines

Re: Understanding by Design RESEARCH

Norm Sheehan

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:59:18 +1000

61 lines

RE : localisation and design

Jean Schneider

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:46:28 +0100

77 lines

CFP -- Fifth Danish HCI Research Symposium

Ken Friedman

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:14:21 +0100

44 lines

InfoDesign: Understanding by Design -- valuable free newsletter

Ken Friedman

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:22:55 +0100

298 lines

Re: localisation and design

Jenny Ure

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:55:30 -0000

54 lines

localisation and design

Artemis Yagou

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:50:29 +0200

34 lines

Faculty position in design at Olin

Benjamin Linder

Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:57:21 -0500

104 lines

CFP -- Journal of Research Practice

Ken Friedman

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:53:52 +0100

123 lines

"The top 100 gadgets of all time"

Bob Este

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 03:41:18 +0000

29 lines

Postdoctoral and Predoctoral Research Positions Available in Nanotechnology and Society

Ken Friedman

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:03:24 +0100

72 lines

Black Boxes, Design Innovations, Design Knowledge

Ken Friedman

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:51:05 +0000

65 lines

Re: Black Boxes

Ben Matthews

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:07:32 +0100

320 lines

Announcement of Drawing Month

Timothy Emlyn Jones

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 04:21:19 +0000

50 lines

ACM Ubiquity

Ken Friedman

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:37:29 +0100

62 lines

Fwd: Dean position

David Durling

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:04:01 +0000

35 lines

Re: towards a pimp theory of design

John Horner

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:24:01 +0000

49 lines

Re: towards a pimp theory of design

Jan Coker

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:43:54 +1030

90 lines

Re: towards a pimp theory of design

edgar koyis

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:46:56 +0900

65 lines

PhD vacancy at School of Industrial Design Engineering, TU Delft

Peter Lloyd

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:59:18 +0100

84 lines

Re: towards a pimp theory of design

Ken Friedman

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:08:16 +0000

45 lines

Sept 10-17 Creative Loitering in the Lot: Awakening Vision Photography Workshop

Ken Friedman

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:08:57 +0100

95 lines

Re: towards a pimp theory of design

Jan Coker

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:35:41 +1030

42 lines

Re: towards a pimp theory of design

Keith Russell

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:02:19 +1100

22 lines

Re: towards a pimp theory of design

Jan Coker

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:23:24 +1030

60 lines

towards a pimp theory of design

Keith Russell

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:49:48 +1100

80 lines

black boxes

Wolfgang Jonas

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:21:14 +0100

161 lines

Re: Chronicle article: Reinventing Physics: the Search for the Real Frontier

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:24:14 -0500

82 lines

Chronicle article: Reinventing Physics: the Search for the Real Frontier

Harold Nelson

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:10:06 -0500

61 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Charles Burnette

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:21:39 -0500

54 lines

Re: 3D scans in e-learning

Kristin Mudd

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:09:48 -0600

94 lines

Vacant position: Design Anthropology, Denmark

Jacob Buur

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:44:35 +0100

41 lines

Re: 3D scans in e-learning

Jenny Ure

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:40:37 -0000

64 lines

Re: Black Boxes

Ranulph Glanville

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:54:18 +0000

235 lines

Re: Black Boxes

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:58:08 -0500

129 lines

Re: Black Boxes

Terence Love

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 05:35:00 +0000

81 lines

skiing accidents and design

Keith Russell

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:19:35 +1100

95 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Susan M. Hagan

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:42:10 -0500

47 lines

3D scans in e-learning

Kristin Mudd

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:25:41 +0000

38 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Terence Love

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:55:00 +0000

89 lines

Black Boxes

Ranulph Glanville

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:04:40 +0000

33 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Charles Burnette

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:10:22 -0500

62 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Terence Love

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:55:00 +0000

53 lines

international conference 'The unthinkable doctorate'

Katrien Vandendorpe

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:18:48 +0100

104 lines

cltad workshop: charting the creative process

Felix Lam

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:41:56 +0000

178 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Susan M. Hagan

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:07:30 -0500

75 lines

Design & Theory and accidents

Keith Russell

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:14:07 +1100

26 lines

Re: Design & theory

Harold Nelson

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:31:10 -0800

37 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Charles Burnette

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:51:29 -0500

19 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Charles Burnette

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:34:10 -0500

35 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:38:18 -0500

112 lines

What is on your desk? (do you have a desk?)

Jared Donovan

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:43:00 +1000

68 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 23:11:04 -0500

147 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 22:51:01 -0500

135 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Susan M. Hagan

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:13:57 -0500

91 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:20:13 -0500

77 lines

ICOGRADA and ICOGRADA eNews

Ken Friedman

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:45:52 +0100

30 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Susan M. Hagan

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:32:28 -0500

34 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Susan M. Hagan

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 07:56:08 -0500

177 lines

Design for Living

Ken Friedman

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:49:26 +0100

104 lines

Convivio Teachers Workshop: Learning Practices in Interaction Des ign

Marilyn.Lennon

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:48:58 -0000

474 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Amanda Bill

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:37:32 +1300

21 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 03:03:35 -0500

130 lines

CFP -- Management and the Arts

Ken Friedman

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 08:28:52 +0100

102 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Norm Sheehan

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:02:45 +1000

245 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Susan M. Hagan

Sun, 6 Feb 2005 16:03:40 -0500

100 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Susan M. Hagan

Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:32:39 -0500

105 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Terence Love

Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:04:00 +0000

101 lines

CFP -- Micro-biotechnologies for Urban agriculture

Ken Friedman

Sun, 6 Feb 2005 16:02:32 +0100

37 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Terence Love

Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:00:00 +0000

55 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Sun, 6 Feb 2005 08:16:32 -0500

57 lines

CFP -- the information design international conference 2005

Ken Friedman

Sat, 5 Feb 2005 07:43:02 +0100

106 lines

Conceptual work and interdisciplinarity

Ken Friedman

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:25:07 +0100

70 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:51:49 -0500

941 lines

Design & Theory: conceptual work

Bob Este

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 17:44:47 +0000

154 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Susan M. Hagan

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:09:36 -0500

45 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Susan M. Hagan

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:05:21 -0500

382 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Jenny Ure

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:33:46 -0000

320 lines

New Knowledge Community in the field of Emotional Design

Miguel Tito

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:16:44 +0000

58 lines

gender and words

Keith Russell

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:17:16 +1100

92 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Jan Coker

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:18:25 +1030

33 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Jan Coker

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:54:32 +1030

23 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Jan Coker

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:51:20 +1030

42 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Jan Coker

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:33:35 +1030

25 lines

FW: objects and emotions

Jan Coker

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:29:33 +1030

29 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Jan Coker

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:22:30 +1030

68 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:51:00 -0500

54 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Jan Coker

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:18:44 +1030

40 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Tiiu Poldma

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:27:53 -0500

34 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Susan M. Hagan

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:29:04 -0500

330 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:50:04 -0500

293 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Susan M. Hagan

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:37:35 -0500

261 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:58:34 -0500

139 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Ranulph Glanville

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:07:21 +0000

117 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:58:26 -0500

68 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:48:25 -0500

40 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Ranulph Glanville

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:39:41 +0000

132 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Raija Halonen

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:23:02 +0200

68 lines

Re: objects and emotions

eduardo corte-real

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:03:34 +0000

43 lines

Literary Design and Theses as design artefacts

mjnoble

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:40:05 +0800

37 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Jan Coker

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:54:52 +1030

76 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Keith Russell

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:04:34 +1100

42 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Ranulph Glanville

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:04:12 +0000

252 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Jan Coker

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:28:10 +1030

25 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 02:53:49 -0500

47 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 02:44:13 -0500

60 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 02:44:13 -0500

46 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Jan Coker

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:50:17 +1030

25 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Jan Coker

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:44:16 +1030

35 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Keith Russell

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:03:36 +1100

41 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Pradeep G Yammiyavar

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:55:34 +0530

23 lines

Re: objects and emotions

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:53:45 -0500

160 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:33:41 -0500

131 lines

objects and emotions

Keith Russell

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:24:29 +1100

130 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Terence Love

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:52:00 +0000

94 lines

Re: Design & Theory

John Broadbent

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:47:34 +1100

103 lines

CFP - The Arts and Social Responsibility

Ken Friedman

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:03:34 +0100

37 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:11:36 -0500

134 lines

New Strategy Conference Announced

GK VanPatter

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:35:14 -0500

120 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:29:50 -0500

43 lines

Call for presentations

Mark Palmer

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:05:51 +0000

45 lines

FWD: Job vacancy at Pratt Institute

David Durling

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:28:59 +0000

59 lines

Re: theory of design in portuguese

Nicola Morelli

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:20:24 +0100

221 lines

theory of design in portuguese

Luís Inácio

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:43:50 +0000

51 lines

Re: theses/papers specific to user information

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:04:47 -0500

30 lines

Re: theses/papers specific to user information

Daria Loi

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:40:01 +1100

74 lines

Re: theses/papers specific to user information

Elisa Giaccardi

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:56:50 -0700

89 lines

Re: theses/papers specific to user information

Bilge Mutlu

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:54:03 -0500

227 lines

Re: theses/papers specific to user information

Bilge Mutlu

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:22:45 -0500

104 lines

theses/papers specific to user information

Umesh Persad

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:40:54 +0000

33 lines

CFP -- New Views: Repositioning Graphic Design History

Ken Friedman

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:36:43 +0100

75 lines

Re: Design & Theory

Keith Russell

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:23:43 +1100

55 lines

Design & Theory

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:08:49 -0500

29 lines

CFP -- Practical Philosophy Prize Essay Competition

Ken Friedman

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:04:56 +0100

74 lines

cltad workshop: Supervising practice-based research

Felix Lam

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:57:11 +0000

205 lines

Doctoral Seminar on the Cultural Embeddedness of Research

Ken Friedman

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:36:52 +0100

170 lines

E&PDE 2005 Final Reminder

Rodgers, Paul

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:20:08 -0000

408 lines

Three postions at UWS Industrial Design, Sydney Australia

Erik

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:16:36 +1100

498 lines

Useful resource on 'ease of use'

Terence Love

Sat, 22 Jan 2005 14:48:00 +0000

16 lines

Re: Current directions in POST graduate design education

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:56:30 +0200

40 lines

Re: Current directions in POST graduate design education

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:47:57 +0200

80 lines

Current directions in POST graduate design education

GK VanPatter

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:19:23 -0500

138 lines

Re: Current directions in graduate design education

GK VanPatter

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:55:49 -0500

252 lines

Re: Current directions in graduate design education

John Broadbent

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:57:07 +1100

29 lines

CAD and talent

<>

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:08:09 -0500

17 lines

Artsy Talent - Stochastic

<>

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:19:27 -0500

19 lines

Re: Aw: Re: Design Knowledge

Harold Nelson

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:55:51 -0800

51 lines

FW: Inspiring Designers Book

Rodgers, Paul

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:55:23 -0000

74 lines

Re: "Not entirely random"? [has been: artsy talent]

Terence Love

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:49:00 +0000

194 lines

"Not entirely random"? [has been: artsy talent]

Ricardo

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:14:32 +1100

120 lines

Design Knowledge

SZETO, Sing Ying Elson

Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:03:16 +0800

103 lines

2nd Call Fashion Research Symposium

ASHTON Philippa

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:16:50 -0000

114 lines

Aw: Re: Design Knowledge

Rosan Chow

Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:16:47 +0100

86 lines

Re: talent by any other name would smell as sweet

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:28:56 -0500

73 lines

Re: Design Knowledge

Harold Nelson

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:45:23 -0800

124 lines

design and intention

Ranulph Glanville

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:35:07 +0000

14 lines

talent by any other name would smell as sweet

Gunnar Swanson

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:29:47 -0800

38 lines

Re: design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:14:02 -0500

101 lines

Re: design and intention

Rosan Chow

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:53:40 +0100

102 lines

design and intention

Ranulph Glanville

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:56:11 +0000

84 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 15 Jan 2005 to 16 Jan 2005 (#2005-17)

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 01:53:38 -0500

77 lines

Re: PHD-DESIGN Digest - 15 Jan 2005 to 16 Jan 2005 (#2005-17)

Rob Curedale

Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:44:38 -0500

54 lines

Fw: Design and intention, value judgements and creativity

Tiiu Poldma

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 20:23:32 -0500

140 lines

Re: Design and intention

Michael Hohl

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:59:28 +0000

91 lines

Re: Design Knowledge

Rosan Chow

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:58:34 +0100

68 lines

Design and intention

Ranulph Glanville

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:27:39 +0000

45 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

Bilge Mutlu

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:50:22 -0500

177 lines

Re: Design and intention

Michael Hohl

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 14:58:54 +0000

91 lines

Re: Design and intention

Ranulph Glanville

Sat, 15 Jan 2005 07:54:00 +0000

373 lines

Design Knowledge

Harold Nelson

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:01:21 -0800

22 lines

Design Knowledge aaddendumendum

Harold Nelson

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:35:40 -0800

34 lines

Re: Design knowledge

Hoffmann, Oliver - HOFOY001

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:09:48 +1030

66 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

Thea

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:13:12 +1000

124 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

kristina niedderer

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:38:41 +0000

143 lines

Design knowledge

Harold Nelson

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:10:41 -0800

49 lines

Re: Design and intention

Jenny Ure

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:52:33 -0000

342 lines

Design and intention

Ranulph Glanville

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:50:43 +0000

367 lines

Re: criteria for supporting creative user

Jenny Ure

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:55:56 -0000

87 lines

WORKSHOP DOCTORAL SUPERVISION ART - DESIGN - MEDIA

Carlos Duarte

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:49:01 +0000

71 lines

3rd Engineering & Product Design Education International Conference

Rodgers, Paul

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:44:18 -0000

1022 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

Sabine Junginger

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:25:52 -0500

47 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

Michael Hohl

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:25:45 +0000

134 lines

JOB: Design Research, Sun, Silicon Valley

GK VanPatter

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:19:52 -0500

44 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

Michael A R Biggs

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:38:24 +0000

62 lines

CFP -- ORGANIZATIONAL AND CORPORATE IDENTITY

Ken Friedman

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:23:39 +0100

91 lines

Awards - Validity

<>

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:43:59 -0500

55 lines

Re: Current Directions in Doctoral Research

Terence Love

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:25:00 +0000

214 lines

specification - a defining criterion/term?

Rosan Chow

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:03:02 +0100

53 lines

sympathetic evaluation (was Re: Current directions in doctoral research)

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:43:13 +0200

54 lines

Re: Who designs? / Who leads?

Rosan Chow

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:39:53 +0100

940 lines

Current Directions in Graduate Design Education

GK VanPatter

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:03:05 -0500

103 lines

Current directions in doctoral research

Boess, S.U.

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:00:17 +0100

111 lines

Re: Who designs? / Who leads?

GK VanPatter

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:46:18 -0500

849 lines

Current Directions in Doctoral Research

Restrepo-Giraldo.John Dairo

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:03:19 +0100

420 lines

Re: Design and Intention

Charles Burnette

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:45:56 -0500

49 lines

Re: Design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 03:26:19 -0500

708 lines

Re: Design and intention

Terence Love

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:23:00 +0000

492 lines

Re: specification Re: Design and intention

M P Ranjan

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:29:41 +0530

243 lines

Re: Design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:49:36 -0500

527 lines

Re: specification Re: Design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:29:35 -0500

48 lines

Re: specification Re: Design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:19:33 -0500

182 lines

Re: specification Re: Design and intention

Pradeep G Yammiyavar

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:16:16 +0530

25 lines

Re: specification Re: Design and intention

M P Ranjan

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:57:24 +0530

158 lines

Re: specification Re: Design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:49:27 -0500

47 lines

Re: Design and intention

Terence Love

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 03:01:00 +0000

260 lines

Re: design awards and meassuring design quality

Soren Petersen

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:31:26 -0800

90 lines

Re: design awards and meassuring design quality

Charles Burnette

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:40:49 -0500

76 lines

Re: Design and intention

Charles Burnette

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:06:12 -0500

38 lines

Re: design awards and meassuring design quality

John Feland

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:30:16 -0800

48 lines

Re: specification Re: Design and intention

Lubomir S. Popov

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:13:22 -0500

25 lines

Re: specification

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:22:36 +0200

87 lines

Re: design awards and meassuring design quality

Gunnar Swanson

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:21:32 -0800

38 lines

Re: specification Re: Design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:47:06 -0500

351 lines

Re: Design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:37:04 -0500

61 lines

design awards and meassuring design quality

Soren Petersen

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:29:44 -0800

71 lines

specification Re: Design and intention

Rosan Chow

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:05:04 +0100

207 lines

Re: Design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:06:53 -0500

89 lines

Re: Design and intention

Charles Burnette

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:04:41 -0500

30 lines

Re: Design and intention

Charles Burnette

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:46:08 -0500

54 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

Amanda Bill

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:24:10 +1300

110 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

Sufern Hoe

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:37:58 +1100

36 lines

Re: Design and intention

Michael A R Biggs

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:41:16 +0000

42 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

Kjetil Fallan

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:41:15 +0100

87 lines

Re: Design and intention

Michael A R Biggs

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:32:31 +0000

62 lines

Who designs? [Was design and intention]

Terence Love

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:16:00 +0000

483 lines

Re: Design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:17:19 -0500

78 lines

Re: Cause, effect, intention

Charles Burnette

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:55:08 -0500

36 lines

Re: Design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:54:33 -0500

449 lines

Re: Design and intention

Terence Love

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:00:00 +0000

214 lines

Re: Cause, effect, intention

Jan Coker

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:27:30 +1030

231 lines

Re: Design and intention

Charles Burnette

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:57:41 -0500

50 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

Susan M. Hagan

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:43:33 -0500

81 lines

Re: Design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:06:42 -0500

60 lines

Re: Design and intention

Charles Burnette

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:47:43 -0500

32 lines

Re: Design and intention

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:13:59 -0500

102 lines

Re: Design and intention

Rosan Chow

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 19:05:58 +0100

87 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

Susan M. Hagan

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:12:16 -0500

200 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

kristina niedderer

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:18:13 +0000

167 lines

Re: Design and intention

Michael A R Biggs

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:01:11 +0000

57 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

Raija Halonen

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:34:39 +0200

82 lines

Re: Design and intention

Rosan Chow

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 08:04:21 +0100

51 lines

Re: Current directions in doctoral research

disalvo

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:21:49 -0500

58 lines

Re: effects and outcomes

John Broadbent

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 10:27:59 +1100

44 lines

FW: [RRE]reading list - may be of interest

Terence Love

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:24:00 +0000

215 lines

Result of Interactive ideas

ttnet

Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:27:51 +0200

29 lines

Re: causality and pluralism

Klaus Krippendorff

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:10:19 -0500

210 lines

Design Challenges Revealed

GK VanPatter

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:36:27 -0500

43 lines

Re: causality and pluralism

Charles Burnette User

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:38:18 -0500

110 lines

Current directions in doctoral research

Ken Friedman

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:52:41 +0100

48 lines

Re: criteria for supporting creative user

Mattias Arvola

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:32:06 +0000

46 lines

Re: causality and pluralism

Wolfgang Jonas

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:46:19 +0100

246 lines

Re: Design and intention

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Sat, 8 Jan 2005 02:31:09 +0200

113 lines

Re: causality and pluralism

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:50:25 -0500

245 lines

Re: causality and pluralism

Rosan Chow

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:20:48 +0100

135 lines

Re: causality and pluralism

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:30:29 -0500

273 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Gunnar Swanson

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:46:37 -0800

52 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:56:53 -0500

79 lines

Design Challenges Revealed

GK VanPatter

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:23:59 -0500

30 lines

cltad workshop: February and March 2005

Felix Lam

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:14:31 +0000

118 lines

Creative Computer Studies

<>

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:53:26 -0500

27 lines

Augmented Heritage: CFP

Khaldoun ZREIK

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:51:20 +0100

315 lines

causality and pluralism

Wolfgang Jonas

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:29:53 +0100

117 lines

Thanks: Original meaning of designing: was Design and intention (was: Re: Nature and nurture in education)

Raija Halonen

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:50:24 +0200

109 lines

Design -- definitions and etymology

Ken Friedman

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:39:54 +0100

1002 lines

Original meaning of designing: was Design and intention (was: Re: Nature and nurture in education)

Terence Love

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:08:00 +0000

71 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Hoffmann, Oliver - HOFOY001

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:11:55 +1030

61 lines

redefining Re: Cause, effect, intention

Rosan Chow

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:43:20 +0100

78 lines

Re: Design and intention (was: Re: Nature and nurture in education)

Hoffmann, Oliver - HOFOY001

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:10:35 +1030

256 lines

Re: Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Klaus Krippendorff

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:19:42 -0500

92 lines

Re: Nurture/ Probability

<>

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:07:20 -0500

37 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Alan Murdock

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:56:51 -0800

34 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Gunnar Swanson

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:00:40 -0800

33 lines

Re: Design and intention (was: Re: Nature and nurture in education)

Terence Love

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:43:00 +0000

24 lines

criteria for supporting creative user

Hoffmann, Oliver - HOFOY001

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:22:53 +1030

166 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Hoffmann, Oliver - HOFOY001

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:14:38 +1030

94 lines

Re: Design and intention (was: Re: Nature and nurture in education)

Hoffmann, Oliver - HOFOY001

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:11:25 +1030

79 lines

Re: Directions of inquiry in doctoral research

Joy Sykes Leonard

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:32:44 -0500

50 lines

Re: Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Charles Burnette User

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:34:07 -0500

36 lines

Re: Discumknackerating prior concepts - was Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Klaus Krippendorff

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:41:48 -0500

637 lines

Cause, effect, intention

Ken Friedman

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:51:11 +0100

166 lines

Discumknackerating prior concepts - was Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Terence Love

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:01:00 +0000

360 lines

Re: Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Ricardo

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:16:49 +1100

148 lines

Re: Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:40:04 -0500

147 lines

Re: Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Charles Burnette User

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:20:15 -0500

79 lines

Re: Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Gunnar Swanson

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:46:56 -0800

67 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Alan Murdock

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:34:16 -0800

75 lines

Re: Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:09:38 -0500

152 lines

Re: Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Charles Burnette User

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:10:18 -0500

81 lines

Tsunami Pyramid

<>

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:03:32 -0500

12 lines

Re: Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Rosan Chow

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:40:14 +0100

34 lines

Result of Interactive Ideas

ttnet

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:37:07 +0200

26 lines

Design and intention (was: Re: Nature and nurture in education)

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:24:16 +0200

60 lines

Re: Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Klaus Krippendorff

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:32:10 -0500

114 lines

Nature and nurture in education [was Re: talent]

Ricardo

Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:18:26 +1100

73 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:09:07 -0500

219 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Charles Burnette User

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 18:12:02 -0500

40 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:35:29 -0500

58 lines

Re: Talent, hard work, Incredibles, etc.

Klaus Krippendorff

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:25:27 -0500

163 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Thomas Schødt Rasmussen

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:38:28 +0100

44 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Rosan Chow

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:12:39 +0100

46 lines

DESIGN / tsunami Reconstruction Appeal

GK VanPatter

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:48:21 -0500

188 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Gunnar Swanson

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:01:22 -0800

31 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Rosan Chow

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:54:37 +0100

36 lines

Re: Talent, hard work, Incredibles, etc.

noci

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:47:10 +0100

97 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Terence Love

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:17:00 +0000

57 lines

Re: cutting apple - cause or effect?

Charles Burnette User

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:48:33 -0500

31 lines

think differently Re: Talent, hard work, Incredibles, etc.

Rosan Chow

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:37:21 +0100

186 lines

Re: Talent, hard work, Incredibles, etc.

Hans Samuelson

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:10:00 +0000

74 lines

Re: street corners

Hans Samuelson

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:20:58 +0000

69 lines

Re: Talent, hard work, Incredibles, etc.

<>

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:11:29 -0500

152 lines

Falmouth College of Arts 3D Digital Research Symposium

Katie Bunnell

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:23:39 +0000

44 lines

street corners

Rosan Chow

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:17:35 +0100

19 lines

cutting apple - cause or effect?

Rosan Chow

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:11:23 +0100

23 lines

Re: Talent, hard work, Incredibles, etc.

Rosan Chow

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:47:34 +0100

130 lines

Re: complex systems

dr.popowsky

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:26:55 +0000

125 lines

Re: Directions of inquiry in doctoral research

richard buchanan

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:15:36 -0500

36 lines

Talent, hard work, Incredibles, etc.

<>

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:01:51 -0500

60 lines

complex systems

dr.popowsky

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:57:48 +0000

51 lines

Re: Karate Kid and Spiderman

Filippo A. Salustri

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:02:27 -0500

45 lines

Avoid polarization into dichotomy (was Re: Karate Kid and Spiderman)

Kari-Hans Kommonen

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 13:07:51 +0200

54 lines

Re: Karate Kid and Spiderman

Michael A R Biggs

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:50:55 +0000

66 lines

Complex Theories

dr.popowsky

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:33:26 +0000

80 lines

Re: Karate Kid and Spiderman

Terence Love

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 03:31:00 +0000

98 lines

Re: Karate Kid and Spiderman

Gunnar Swanson

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:22:26 -0800

118 lines

Re: Karate Kid and Spiderman

Lubomir S. Popov

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:50:31 -0500

158 lines

Re: Karate Kid and Spiderman

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:26:55 -0500

125 lines

Re: Karate Kid and Spiderman

Gunnar Swanson

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:52:36 -0800

88 lines

Re: Karate Kid and Spiderman

Klaus Krippendorff

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:23:48 -0500

146 lines

Re: Karate Kid and Spiderman

Gunnar Swanson

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:13:34 -0800

99 lines

Re: Karate Kid and Spiderman

Rosan Chow

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:27:38 +0100

59 lines

Re: Karate Kid and Spiderman

Gunnar Swanson

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:58:07 -0800

47 lines

Re: Complex sytems theory

Francois-Xavier Nsenga (fme)

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:02:26 -0500

28 lines

Karate Kid and Spiderman

Rosan Chow

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:01:06 +0100

119 lines

Re: mathematics and design (was: talent)

Ricardo

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:37:00 +1100

69 lines

Re: mathematics and design (was: talent)

Terence Love

Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:28:00 +0000

150 lines

Re: effects and outcomes

Hans Samuelson

Sat, 1 Jan 2005 21:40:42 +0000

49 lines

Fw: complex systems theory

dr.popowsky

Sat, 1 Jan 2005 19:35:29 +0000

79 lines

resources fwd fyi

Bob Este

Sat, 1 Jan 2005 18:30:08 +0000

28 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager