JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Tim Trent

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:06:40 -0000

152 lines

Re: Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Roland Perry

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:29:00 +0000

178 lines

Re: Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Tim Trent

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:59:59 -0000

184 lines

Re: Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Roland Perry

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:06:59 +0000

123 lines

Re: Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Tim Trent

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:20:44 -0000

128 lines

Re: Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Roland Perry

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:51:16 +0000

53 lines

Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Tim Trent

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:30:30 -0000

67 lines

Direct Marketing - Article Series

Lisa Souza

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:40:05 -0000

68 lines

Re: When does processing become Unfair?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:42:58 -0000

136 lines

Article 29 WP processing of location data

Ian Welton

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:46:08 -0000

39 lines

Re: When does processing become Unfair?

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:10:00 -0000

138 lines

Re: When does processing become Unfair?

Peter Dinsdale

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:00:40 +0000

118 lines

When does processing become Unfair?

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:44:22 -0000

84 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Ian Welton

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:08:55 -0000

208 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:24:17 +0000

137 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:17:39 -0000

49 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Ian Welton

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:21:21 -0000

82 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:31:59 -0000

87 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:13:32 +0000

54 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:00:24 +0000

154 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:51:23 +0000

53 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:43:28 -0000

119 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:32:10 +0000

69 lines

Did we cover the Sony incident?

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:23:26 -0000

63 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:59:24 -0000

123 lines

And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:40:24 -0000

68 lines

Seasonal Greetings

David Wyatt

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:52:11 -0000

27 lines

Re: Employee Numbers

David Wyatt

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:48:15 -0000

103 lines

Re: Employee Numbers

Tim Trent

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:38:41 -0000

81 lines

Employee Numbers

Sophie Pilkington

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:04:00 +0000

48 lines

Festive Greetings

Justice, Sally

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:11:39 -0000

45 lines

Re: Computer Misuse Act fine

David Wyatt

Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:55:30 -0000

87 lines

NZ Herald Content Link sent by Tim Trent

Tim Trent

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:12:21 +1300

35 lines

First UK BCR

Tim Trent

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:21:10 -0000

66 lines

Anyone know what actually happened?

Tim Trent

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:00:56 -0000

57 lines

Computer Misuse Act fine

Simon Howarth

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:29:01 -0000

33 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:57:29 -0000

90 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Wilson, Stephen

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:56:51 -0000

118 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Roland Perry

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:52:00 +0000

36 lines

Re: Request for a file location...

Simon Howarth

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:31:46 -0000

140 lines

Re: Request for a file location...

David Powell

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:27:53 +0000

283 lines

Re: Request for a file location...

datap

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:24:50 +0000

109 lines

Re: Request for a file location...

Clementine Amawo

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:17:51 -0000

90 lines

Request for a file location...

Simon Howarth

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:59:57 -0000

35 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Tim Trent

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:52:04 -0000

264 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Carl Johnson

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:59:55 +0000

221 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Julian Curmi

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:32:04 +0100

621 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Tim Trent

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:17:51 -0000

192 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Julian Curmi

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:07:59 +0100

414 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Tim Trent

Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:04:12 -0000

89 lines

Call Centre Staff

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:33:25 -0000

55 lines

Re: Passenger data-new purpose

Tim Trent

Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:28:25 -0000

127 lines

Passenger data-new purpose

DREW Nic

Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:53:01 -0000

92 lines

Call centre query

Ian Welton

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:06:02 -0000

59 lines

Re: Housing Act

Paul Ferguson

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:44:18 +0000

83 lines

Re: Housing Act

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:15:12 -0000

89 lines

Housing Act

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:35:34 +0000

32 lines

Re: Personal data on invoices

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:15:58 -0000

107 lines

Personal data on invoices

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:28:02 +0000

30 lines

Re: Buy buy

Paul Ticher

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:26:32 -0000

254 lines

Re: Buy buy

Justice, Sally

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:34:40 -0000

217 lines

Re: Business cards - Friday question

Tim Trent

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:36:39 -0000

140 lines

Buy buy

<>

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 03:34:48 EST

162 lines

Re: Bye bye

David Wyatt

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:06:55 -0000

116 lines

Re: Business cards - Friday question

Paul Ticher

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:08:25 -0000

84 lines

Re: Bye bye, buy buy

<>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:04:31 EST

47 lines

Re: Business cards - Friday question

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 17:09:15 -0000

81 lines

Business cards - Friday question

Mags McGinley

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:12:34 +0000

41 lines

Re: Bye bye

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:40:49 -0000

166 lines

Secondary Legislation (Education)

Jackie Leesons

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:24:32 +0000

34 lines

Bye Bye

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:38:52 +0000

28 lines

Re: Bye bye

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:29:10 -0000

132 lines

Re: Bye bye

Chris Brogan

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:21:47 -0000

122 lines

Re: Bye bye

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:07:34 -0000

125 lines

Re: Bye bye

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:55:59 -0000

98 lines

Re: Bye bye

Paul Dodgson

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:38:35 -0000

140 lines

Re: Bye bye

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:43:32 +0000

77 lines

Bye bye

<>

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:43:17 EST

70 lines

Re: Request from Government office for NI numbers

J.S.M.Whitaker

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:54:24 -0000

76 lines

Re: Fair Processing Notices

Paul Dodgson

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:14:30 -0000

129 lines

Re: NEW ICO Guidance Note

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:48:11 -0000

64 lines

NEW ICO Guidance Note

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:27:18 -0000

41 lines

Re: Request from Government office for NI numbers

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:19:32 -0000

79 lines

Re: Request from Government office for NI numbers

DREW Nic

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:17:40 -0000

126 lines

Request from Government office for NI numbers

Teresa Gudge

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:13:36 +0000

46 lines

Re: Fair Processing Notices

Tim Trent

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:48:38 -0000

91 lines

Re: Fair Processing Notices

Simon Howarth

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:38:23 -0000

75 lines

Fair Processing Notices

Gillian Whichelo

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:25:59 -0000

32 lines

Re: Access to children's records

Paul Ticher

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 08:51:24 -0000

76 lines

Information Governance Manager Role - Teesside.

Simon Howarth

Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:26:24 -0000

87 lines

Re: Access to children's records

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:43:17 -0000

52 lines

Access to children's records

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:10:36 +0000

24 lines

Disclosures

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:15:16 -0000

54 lines

FW: [data-protection] Is it a data processor?

Duncan Smith

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:51:38 -0000

184 lines

Re: Names in online archival finding aids

Iain Harrison

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:52:48 +0000

92 lines

Re: Names in online archival finding aids

Tim Trent

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:47:05 -0000

101 lines

Names in online archival finding aids

Vicky West

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:05:30 +0000

39 lines

Re: House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Ian Welton

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:02:46 -0000

150 lines

Re: House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Ian Welton

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:02:46 -0000

130 lines

Re: Is it a data processor?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 09:53:51 -0000

130 lines

Software companies

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 08:58:06 +0000

27 lines

Re: Is it a data processor?

<>

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:45:46 EST

85 lines

Re: Partnerships against crime

Chris Brogan

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 17:06:05 -0000

44 lines

Re: Is it a data processor?

Tim Trent

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:40:25 -0000

96 lines

Is it a data processor?

Hilary Lawrenson

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:34:09 +0000

59 lines

Re: Post-script - House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Tim Trent

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:10:52 -0000

184 lines

Post-script - House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Pounder Chris

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:04:03 -0000

155 lines

Re: House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

<>

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 05:22:51 EST

64 lines

Re: House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Tim Trent

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:32:36 -0000

97 lines

Re: House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

<>

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 03:20:35 EST

70 lines

Re: House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Tim Trent

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:02:50 -0000

86 lines

House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Pounder Chris

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:58:34 -0000

60 lines

Suspending mail from JISCmail lists over Xmas

Justice, Sally

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:34:54 -0000

52 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:12:40 -0000

195 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Hitches, John F

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:19:59 -0000

68 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Wilson, Stephen

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:33:22 -0000

185 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Julie Gibbs

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:31:48 -0000

122 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

<>

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 07:19:55 EST

75 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

<>

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 07:15:10 EST

65 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Roland Perry

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:57:02 +0000

34 lines

Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Gillian Whichelo

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:54:49 -0000

44 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:03:38 -0000

126 lines

Issue of birth certificates

GRAHAM Susan

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:44:24 -0000

41 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

J.S.M.Whitaker

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:29:53 -0000

103 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Christopher Spray

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:19:15 -0000

76 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:52:06 +0000

47 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

<>

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:50:58 EST

64 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Chris Bayliss

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:47:14 +0000

46 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:21:19 -0000

96 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:50:36 -0000

221 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Roland Perry

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:42:29 +0000

36 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:36:17 -0000

216 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:49:05 -0000

60 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Roland Perry

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:43:24 +0000

35 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

J.S.M.Whitaker

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:33:52 -0000

159 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Hilary Lawrenson

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:32:18 +0000

164 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Roland Perry

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:10:11 +0000

41 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:03:08 -0000

144 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:48:44 -0000

122 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Su Goulding

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:43:01 -0000

64 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:54:31 -0000

72 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:53:30 -0000

93 lines

Re: UKIC Gets Tough.... Allegedly

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:43:57 -0000

96 lines

UKIC Gets Tough.... Allegedly

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:25:55 -0000

68 lines

Issue of birth certifications

Kathryn Billings

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:24:53 +0000

39 lines

Re: Does being dad trump the DPA?

Roland Perry

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:40:38 +0000

39 lines

Re: Does being dad trump the DPA?

Kirsty Gray

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:34:55 +0000

51 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Anne Gadsden

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:00:40 +0000

134 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Mary Liddell

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:04:27 -0000

64 lines

Re: Does being dad trump the DPA?

Roland Perry

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:26:53 +0000

80 lines

Re: Does being dad trump the DPA?

Kirsty Gray

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:21:35 +0000

53 lines

FW: [data-protection] Request for sight of personnel records

John Hughes

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:37:33 -0000

307 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:18:29 -0000

256 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Paul Ticher

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:07:27 -0000

230 lines

Re: Retired Heads' Contact Details

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:47:02 -0000

91 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

<>

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 05:34:33 EST

62 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:03:59 -0000

198 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Paul Ticher

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:34:58 -0000

128 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

<>

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 04:24:02 EST

76 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:18:53 -0000

88 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Paul Ticher

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:58:36 -0000

71 lines

Retired Heads' Contact Details

Jackie Leesons

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:19:55 +0000

29 lines

Request for sight of personnel records

Lucy Fincham

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:35:47 +0000

27 lines

[log in to unmask]

Ian Welton

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:31:02 -0000

150 lines

Is Google Likely to break EEA laws over this?

Tim Trent

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:24:27 -0000

88 lines

Does being dad trump the DPA?

Roland Perry

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:42:13 +0000

64 lines

Freedom of Information (FOI) Act 2000: the first six months:

Justice, Sally

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:35:23 -0000

91 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:45:00 -0000

224 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:42:06 -0000

198 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Ian Welton

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:27:22 -0000

123 lines

Reopening the "Backups" discussion

<>

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:07:06 EST

81 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Doug Colyer

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:01:37 -0000

208 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:47:53 -0000

181 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Duncan Smith

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:39:21 -0000

154 lines

Durant in the House of Lords after all

Pounder Chris

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:46:00 -0000

80 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:16:46 -0000

85 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Ian Welton

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:50:48 -0000

58 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

<>

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:44:16 EST

59 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:38:40 -0000

183 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

<>

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:37:12 EST

87 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:25:29 -0000

161 lines

UKIC's Speech. Sony's Disaster

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:24:12 -0000

102 lines

Correction: British Library , Records Manager

Richard Burillo

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:27:18 +0000

27 lines

Was that a recruitment agent?

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:02:35 -0000

66 lines

Recent posting of Records Manager job opportunity with British Library

Richard Burillo

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:52:43 +0000

31 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Duncan Smith

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:49:14 -0000

151 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Simon Howarth

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:06:15 -0000

126 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Tinsley, Chris

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:02:49 -0000

138 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Tim Trent

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:26:42 -0000

91 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Duncan Smith

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:17:05 -0000

90 lines

Durant in the House of Lords after all

Pounder Chris

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:59:21 -0000

60 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Ken Allen

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:18:51 +0000

35 lines

Re: Details of next years DP courses and dates

Adrian Chase

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:39:20 +0000

154 lines

Details of next years DP courses and dates

Pounder Chris

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:01:12 -0000

54 lines

Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Tim Trent

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:07:24 -0000

62 lines

Third pillar data protection regime????

Jo Archer

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:16:37 -0000

69 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:37:07 -0000

63 lines

Re: References

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:24:08 +0000

35 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:11:32 -0000

79 lines

Re: References

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:03:00 +0000

43 lines

Re: Ride share companion question

Ian Welton

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:57:22 -0000

103 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:21:09 -0000

83 lines

Re: References

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:12:41 +0000

38 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:06:00 -0000

65 lines

Re: References

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:02:12 +0000

38 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:50:57 -0000

80 lines

Re: References

C.Oppenheim

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:48:30 -0000

99 lines

Re: References

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:36:52 +0000

54 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:25:51 -0000

62 lines

Re: References

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:21:37 +0000

38 lines

Re: Ride share companion question

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:59:06 -0000

100 lines

Ride share companion question

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:51:16 +0000

63 lines

Re: References

<>

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:20:52 EST

71 lines

Re: References

Ian Welton

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:36:30 -0000

87 lines

Re: References

Hitches, John F

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:55:47 -0000

36 lines

Re: References

<>

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:21:30 EST

74 lines

Re: Business Cards

Ekin Caglar

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:44:07 -0000

134 lines

Re: References

Gerry Dane

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:14:14 -0000

74 lines

Re: References

Hitches, John F

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:41:51 -0000

42 lines

Re: References

Edwina Withe

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:41:44 +0000

180 lines

Re: References

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:35:25 -0000

132 lines

Re: References

<>

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 06:11:07 EST

101 lines

Re: References

Ian Welton

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:04:17 -0000

88 lines

Re: Business Cards

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:47:00 -0000

110 lines

Re: Business Cards

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:15:56 -0000

92 lines

Re: References

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:54:55 +0000

31 lines

BSI Data Protection Workshop

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:23:17 -0000

68 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:16:05 -0000

365 lines

Re: References

Ian Welton

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:12:49 -0000

317 lines

Business Cards

Richard Frost

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:00:50 +0000

28 lines

Re: References

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:51:22 -0000

293 lines

Re: Friday question on telephone numbers

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:10:26 -0000

81 lines

Friday question on telephone numbers

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:01:53 +0000

58 lines

Re: References

DREW Nic

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:40:10 -0000

255 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:21:26 -0000

165 lines

Re: References

Hilary Lawrenson

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:12:55 +0000

141 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:57:41 -0000

69 lines

References

Casillas, Mojgan

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:55:58 -0000

43 lines

Intranet disclaimers

datap

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:14:20 +0000

67 lines

B&NES Council - Records Manager Position

Amanda Osborne

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:28:10 -0000

84 lines

British Library - Record Manager/Archivist Position

Karen Beck

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:49:48 +0000

62 lines

2nd Annual FOI Conference & Workshop Series

Lisa Souza

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:15:19 -0000

60 lines

Re: E-mail disclaimers

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:24:03 +0000

27 lines

E-mail disclaimers

Ian Welton

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:09:45 -0000

79 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:02:16 +0000

27 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

<>

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 06:42:24 EST

98 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:56:36 +0000

45 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

<>

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 04:25:18 EST

62 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:41:52 +0000

35 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Roland Perry

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:14:19 +0000

43 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:09:45 -0000

75 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:05:28 +0000

45 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:51:36 -0000

68 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:39:17 -0000

73 lines

FW: [data-protection] Council Tax secondary use - any progress?

Alan Stead

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:06:40 -0000

97 lines

Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:28:40 +0000

40 lines

Re: Council Tax secondary use - any progress?

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:38:16 +0000

53 lines

Re: Council Tax secondary use - any progress?

Lightowlers, Paul

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:47:57 -0000

44 lines

Council Tax secondary use - any progress?

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:10:56 +0000

29 lines

Assistant Records Manager (Part-Time) Vacancy at the University of Edinburgh

GRAHAM Susan

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:17:12 -0000

58 lines

Re: NI Numbers for CTAX change of Circs.

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:43:13 -0000

109 lines

Re: Release of info about a student

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:10:50 +0000

75 lines

Release of info about a student

Justice, Sally

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:21:30 -0000

36 lines

NI Numbers for CTAX change of Circs.

Fiona Musgrave

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:54:41 +0000

47 lines

Personal Information/Not

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:52:21 -0000

60 lines

Evidence of ethical approval.

Pat Gannon-Leary

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:24:41 +0000

36 lines

Re: Academic Research - Police Held Information

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:48:14 +0000

94 lines

Academic Research - Police Held Information

Michael Doherty

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:22:45 +0000

51 lines

Using the mail list for DP matters

Justice, Sally

Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:34:11 +0100

52 lines

Re: Spoof domains (was: If you are willing I need a little help)

Ekin Caglar

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:45:11 +0100

70 lines

Re: ICO Email Alerts

Tim Trent

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:36:52 +0100

215 lines

Re: ICO Email Alerts

Martin Hoskins

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:14:52 +0100

182 lines

Re: ICO Email Alerts

Simon Howarth

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:03:31 +0100

102 lines

Spoof domains (was: If you are willing I need a little help)

<>

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:09:20 EDT

37 lines

Re: Planning File

Roland Perry

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:54:46 +0100

36 lines

Re: Planning File

Tinsley, Chris

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:41:24 +0100

252 lines

Surveillance Law Bulletin Board

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:24:23 +0100

46 lines

Re: Planning File

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:05:05 +0100

305 lines

Re: Planning File

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:00:38 +0100

256 lines

Re: Planning File

Edwina Withe

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:52:02 +0100

129 lines

ICO Email Alerts

DREW Nic

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:45:23 +0100

78 lines

Re: Planning File

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:23:23 +0100

250 lines

Re: Planning File

Tim Trent

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:21:23 +0100

221 lines

Re: Planning File

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:15:47 +0100

194 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Roland Perry

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:08:03 +0100

37 lines

Re: Planning File

Tim Trent

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:00:33 +0100

138 lines

Planning File

Sara-Jane Newbon

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:48:51 +0100

83 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Tinsley, Chris

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:36:16 +0100

371 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:37:53 +0100

418 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:30:03 +0100

358 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:28:16 +0100

323 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Simon Howarth

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:24:52 +0100

308 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Simon Howarth

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:21:02 +0100

274 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:19:24 +0100

260 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Caroline Dominey

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:15:05 +0100

238 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:06:09 +0100

341 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:50:28 +0100

329 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:45:25 +0100

310 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:36:00 +0100

306 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:21:29 +0100

282 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Simon Howarth

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:12:35 +0100

308 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Simon Howarth

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:41:15 +0100

197 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:40:19 +0100

284 lines

malicious email, DP or FOI

PETER SELENIC

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:34:51 +0100

258 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Paul Ticher

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:25:03 +0100

216 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:15:35 +0100

179 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

PETER SELENIC

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:11:52 +0100

154 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:10:05 +0100

167 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:05:08 +0100

110 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:47:21 +0100

128 lines

malicious email, DP or FOI

PETER SELENIC

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:31:53 +0100

67 lines

Re: Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First

Alan Stead

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:00:10 +0100

176 lines

Re: Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First

Alan Stead

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:56:40 +0100

104 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Tim Trent

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:30:03 +0100

139 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Ian Welton

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:25:00 +0100

112 lines

If you are willing I need a little help

Tim Trent

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:45:06 +0100

74 lines

Re: web application access control: follow-up

Paul Ticher

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:12:33 +0100

142 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Ian Welton

Sat, 22 Oct 2005 12:31:05 +0100

353 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Tim Trent

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:35:51 +0100

259 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:26:08 +0100

191 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Tim Trent

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:17:33 +0100

183 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:15:34 +0100

19 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Lynzie Gadd

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:00:32 +0100

147 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Tim Trent

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:07:43 +0100

115 lines

Self abuse reporting

Fiona Musgrave

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:47:42 +0100

64 lines

web application access control: follow-up

S McCain

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:46:30 +0100

73 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Julian Curmi

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:32:52 +0200

530 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:15:49 +0100

61 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Tim Trent

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:04:22 +0100

140 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Roland Perry

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:27:21 +0100

49 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Roland Perry

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:27:16 +0100

53 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Fiona Musgrave

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:41:23 +0100

179 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Simon Howarth

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:15:29 +0100

147 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Donald Henderson

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:06:12 +0100

119 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:57:40 +0100

114 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Lisa Braund

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:50:35 +0100

115 lines

Bad Bank DP

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:36:02 +0100

59 lines

Records Manager post - University of Portsmouth

Samantha Hill

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:15:25 +0100

42 lines

National Association of DP & FOI Officers Annual Conference

Edwina Withe

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:55:06 +0100

54 lines

Information & Records Manager - vacancy

Lynn Evans

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:17:19 +0100

74 lines

Re: Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First

Julie Gibbs

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:11:58 +0100

127 lines

Re: Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First

Lightowlers, Paul

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:10:23 +0100

71 lines

Job Opportunity in Essex

Sarah Streetley

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:06:06 +0100

48 lines

Re: Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First

Donald Henderson

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:30:53 +0100

104 lines

Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:25:23 +0100

52 lines

Act Now newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:05:10 +0100

40 lines

Re: Durant ends his data protection battle

Tim Turner

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:43:37 +0100

142 lines

Consent forms

Pat Gannon-Leary

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:37:47 +0100

27 lines

Re: CCTV

<>

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:15:43 EDT

62 lines

CCTV

Sara-Jane Newbon

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:47:59 +0100

60 lines

Re: Durant ends his data protection battle

Tim Trent

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:05:12 +0100

86 lines

Re: data protection code of practice for records managers and archivists - revised draft issued for comment

Tim Trent

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:38:53 +0100

158 lines

data protection code of practice for records managers and archivists - revised draft issued for comment

Alan Stead

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:01:28 +0100

132 lines

Re: Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors

Tim Trent

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:39:33 +0100

29 lines

Leaving the list

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:06:34 +0100

24 lines

Re: DPA 1984

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:37:52 +0100

96 lines

Re: DPA 1984

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:34:18 +0100

72 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Kirsty Gray

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:26:33 +0100

46 lines

DPA 1984

Edwina Withe

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:20:58 +0100

36 lines

Address books in collections

Graeme Hawley

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:46:38 +0100

59 lines

Re: Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors

S McCain

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:18:45 +0100

116 lines

Re: Connexions consent

<>

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 04:53:19 EDT

55 lines

Re: Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solic itors

Bownes David (CEX)

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:10:23 +0100

117 lines

Re: Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:34:15 +0100

61 lines

Re: Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:15:54 +0100

78 lines

Re: Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:08:11 +0100

38 lines

Re: Durant ends his data protection battle

Ian Welton

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:45:08 +0100

196 lines

Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:13:42 +0100

76 lines

Re: Durant ends his data protection battle

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:23:51 +0100

165 lines

Re: Durant ends his data protection battle

Pounder Chris

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:16:04 +0100

144 lines

Re: Durant ends his data protection battle

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:43:07 +0100

114 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:32:48 +0100

194 lines

Durant ends his data protection battle

Pounder Chris

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:48:31 +0100

58 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Ian Welton

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:02:10 +0100

105 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Edwina Withe

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:38:36 +0100

92 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Turner

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:55:02 +0100

116 lines

Re: Connexions consent

<>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:53:47 EDT

71 lines

Re: Notice to staff

<>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:45:04 EDT

61 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:44:37 +0100

149 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:39:46 +0100

43 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:39:01 +0100

140 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:37:04 +0100

124 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:36:00 +0100

40 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Duncan James

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:35:30 +0100

158 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:33:39 +0100

37 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:31:37 +0100

63 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

<>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:31:29 EDT

85 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Lightowlers, Paul

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:30:03 +0100

101 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:25:54 +0100

84 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Turner

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:25:00 +0100

171 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:24:13 +0100

52 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:23:13 +0100

78 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Ian Welton

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:20:42 +0100

142 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:17:02 +0100

36 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:15:30 +0100

44 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Gibson, Martin

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:11:39 +0100

127 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:08:49 +0100

78 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Chris Bayliss

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:04:15 +0100

35 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Turner

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:04:13 +0100

75 lines

Re: Notice to staff

George Ross

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:57:32 +0100

35 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:57:12 +0100

131 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Duncan James

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:50:42 +0100

107 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:41:50 +0100

74 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:40:15 +0100

40 lines

Connexions consent

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:35:39 +0100

38 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Duncan James

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:33:23 +0100

174 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Ian Welton

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:26:13 +0100

165 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:21:01 +0100

107 lines

Notice to staff

Duncan James

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:58:13 +0100

53 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Lynzie Gadd, Examinations

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:23:27 +0100

106 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:13:54 +0100

187 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:08:08 +0100

135 lines

Accurate data?

<>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:54:39 EDT

36 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

<>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:51:51 EDT

72 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:39:56 +0100

203 lines

Re: DP Breach

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:39:38 +0100

242 lines

Re: DP Breach

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:39:15 +0100

242 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:37:57 +0100

157 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:36:23 +0100

155 lines

Re: DP Breach

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:35:33 +0100

214 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Lynzie Gadd, Examinations

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:30:11 +0100

112 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:29:15 +0100

186 lines

Re: DP Breach

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:28:44 +0100

176 lines

Re: DP Breach

Tim Turner

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:24:20 +0100

103 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:23:18 +0100

157 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:20:35 +0100

164 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:11:18 +0100

111 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

<>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:43:17 EDT

98 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:06:00 +0100

77 lines

DP Breach

Casillas, Mojgan

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:56:47 +0100

61 lines

Re: The new "Command Confirmations"

Hilary Lawrenson

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:23:29 +0100

139 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Hitches, John F

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:15:03 +0100

53 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:54:34 +0100

139 lines

Recovering Debt

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:49:02 +0100

64 lines

Re: Consent

<>

Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:11:59 EDT

70 lines

The new "Command Confirmations"

Tim Trent

Mon, 10 Oct 2005 07:47:25 +0100

64 lines

Re: Consent

Christopher Spray

Sat, 8 Oct 2005 21:14:16 +0100

117 lines

whistleblowing

Su Goulding

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 17:13:21 +0100

71 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Repeat request

Tim Trent

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:39:47 +0100

156 lines

FW: [data-protection] Repeat request

Justice, Sally

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:32:46 +0100

133 lines

Re: Repeat request

Justice, Sally

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 15:58:20 +0100

79 lines

Re: "Public Blog" on Data Protection

Tim Trent

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:13:36 +0100

97 lines

Re: "Public Blog" on Data Protection

Ian Welton

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 13:43:00 +0100

47 lines

Re: Who holds the info

Andrew Charlesworth

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 23:24:57 +0100

134 lines

"Public Blog" on Data Protection

Tim Trent

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:48:04 +0100

71 lines

Re: Who holds the info

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 14:43:42 +0100

115 lines

Re: Consent

<>

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 04:45:37 EDT

74 lines

Re: Consent

Tim Turner

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:18:50 +0100

126 lines

Re: Consent

DREW Nic

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:08:57 +0100

116 lines

Re: Consent

Simon Howarth

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:05:24 +0100

85 lines

Consent

Casillas, Mojgan

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:01:02 +0100

51 lines

Who holds the info

Mandi Barron

Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:32:22 +0100

61 lines

Data Controller/Data Processor

Chris Brogan

Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:40:39 +0100

98 lines

Student use of personal data

Pat Gannon-Leary

Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:37:22 +0100

34 lines

Re: Republic of Ireland's Data Protection Act

Les Kingstone

Tue, 4 Oct 2005 09:10:37 +0100

54 lines

data protection code of practice for records managers and archivists - revised draft issued for comment

Healy, Susan

Tue, 4 Oct 2005 09:07:09 +0100

81 lines

NAIM

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:20:25 +0100

29 lines

Plagiarism detection software

Mandi Barron

Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:46:54 +0100

76 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Roland Perry

Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:27:35 +0100

91 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Simon Howarth

Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:13:23 +0100

108 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Paul Ticher

Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:02:26 +0100

102 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Roland Perry

Sat, 1 Oct 2005 13:47:42 +0100

37 lines

Re: Republic of Ireland's Data Protection Act

David Wyatt

Sat, 1 Oct 2005 00:45:16 +0100

70 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Charles Prescott

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:52:58 -0400

92 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:33:02 +0100

55 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Roland Perry

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 21:33:44 +0100

52 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Paul Ticher

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:26:58 +0100

109 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Ian Welton

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:48:31 +0100

110 lines

Re: Republic of Ireland's Data Protection Act

Iain Harrison

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:52:26 +0100

68 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Roland Perry

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:50:48 +0100

59 lines

Republic of Ireland's Data Protection Act

Sophie Pilkington

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:33:36 +0100

31 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Andrea Simmons

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:09:56 +0100

78 lines

Re: Consensus, please. Happy Friday.

Tim Trent

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:07:47 +0100

123 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:16:24 +0100

79 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Ian Welton

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:37:59 +0100

155 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Ian Welton

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:37:59 +0100

135 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Chris Bayliss

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:29:46 +0100

69 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

<>

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:22:00 EDT

41 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Chris Catton

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:58:52 +0100

103 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Simon Howarth

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:40:06 +0100

53 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Charles Prescott

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:23:07 -0400

108 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Simon Howarth

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:50:23 +0100

106 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Simon Howarth

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:46:14 +0100

125 lines

Marketing to be opt-in?

Paul Ticher

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:25:52 +0100

53 lines

Re: Data Protection Fair processing Notices

Ken Allen

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:30:24 +0100

32 lines

Re: Mini Experts

<>

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:34:51 EDT

26 lines

Re: Mini Experts

Simon Howarth

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:31:23 +0100

50 lines

Re: Mini Experts

Ekin Caglar

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:27:10 +0100

93 lines

Re: Mini Experts

Tim Trent

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:24:02 +0100

62 lines

Re: Mini Experts

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:21:14 +0100

47 lines

Mini Experts

Tim Trent

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:14:22 +0100

68 lines

Re: Data Protection Fair processing Notices

Julie Gibbs

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:12:29 +0100

142 lines

Re: DPA implications of telephone conversation recording

Martin Hoskins

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:58:13 +0100

121 lines

DPA implications of telephone conversation recording

Joshua McKim

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:51:58 +0100

66 lines

CLINCAL RECORDS LEAD - New Post

Simon Howarth

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:45:54 +0100

56 lines

Data Protection Fair processing Notices

Tim Salmon

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:37:36 +0100

45 lines

Re: R4 FOI programme this evening...

Su Goulding

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:23:00 +0100

121 lines

R4 FOI programme this evening...

Su Goulding

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:11:29 +0100

65 lines

Re: Representation of the People Regulations 2001 (reg 35)

<>

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:38:49 EDT

91 lines

Re: Representation of the People Regulations 2001 (reg 35)

Edwina Withe

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:12:32 +0100

141 lines

Representation of the People Regulations 2001 (reg 35)

Steel, Rachael

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:52:03 +0100

91 lines

ADV - Data Protection and Employee Data seminar

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:22:59 +0100

49 lines

Re: Advise

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:22:21 +0100

93 lines

Re: Advise

Mary Liddell

Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:27:17 +0100

90 lines

Advise

Helen Bartram

Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:24:31 +0100

61 lines

web application access control - HE Sector

S McCain

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:26:49 +0100

66 lines

Consensus, please. Happy Friday.

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:39:11 +0100

80 lines

A bit of DP, a bit of FOI

datap

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 12:59:10 +0100

66 lines

Re: The Montreux Declaration

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:46:34 +0100

95 lines

The Montreux Declaration

Lisa Braund

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:51:37 +0100

65 lines

Re: Data and Information Governance

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:54:35 +0100

41 lines

Data and Information Governance

Hetty Sun

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:41:36 +0100

67 lines

Re: Retention of recorded phone conversations

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:12:17 +0100

117 lines

Re: Jamster! - update

datap

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:19:36 +0100

132 lines

Retention of recorded phone conversations

Joshua McKim

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:17:28 +0100

55 lines

Re: Jamster! - update

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:07:06 +0100

103 lines

Jamster! - update

Su Goulding

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:19:16 +0100

76 lines

EU Proposals for retention of communications data - press release 21/09

Su Goulding

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:59:58 +0100

77 lines

Re: Charging for confirmation of exam results

Simon Howarth

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:03:56 +0100

101 lines

CRM and customers not giving permission

Julie Gibbs

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:58:36 +0100

35 lines

Re: Charging for confirmation of exam results

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:41:43 +0100

65 lines

Charging for confirmation of exam results

Pat Gannon-Leary

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:15:19 +0100

37 lines

Email Archiving

Jackie Leesons

Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:38:18 +0100

35 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

Simon Howarth

Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:07:18 +0100

68 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

Roland Perry

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:20:59 +0100

36 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

PETER SELENIC

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:55:48 +0100

150 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

<>

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:50:38 EDT

62 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

Hitches, John F

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:21:29 +0100

54 lines

High volume of FOI requests for personal data and other information

Pounder Chris

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:36:29 +0100

84 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:33:06 +0100

90 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

George Ross

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:28:11 +0100

38 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

Lisa Braund

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:27:44 +0100

118 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

Tim Turner

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:24:09 +0100

77 lines

Recording Telephone Calls

Edwina Withe

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:19:23 +0100

37 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

David Wyatt

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:25:38 +0100

343 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

iamAID Limited

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:01:32 +0100

83 lines

Re: Data Audit

Simon Howarth

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:00:58 +0100

54 lines

Data Audit

Casillas, Mojgan

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:14:14 +0100

43 lines

Re: Data Audit

Tim Trent

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:10:20 +0100

67 lines

Re: Section 32

Ian Welton

Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:25:49 +0100

36 lines

Section 32

GRAHAM Susan

Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:13:27 +0100

40 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:52:20 +0100

35 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Roland Perry

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:23:27 +0100

48 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Martin Hoskins

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:07:44 +0100

287 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Martin Hoskins

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:02:29 +0100

89 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Mandi Barron

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:01:53 +0100

204 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Roland Perry

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:28 +0100

37 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:22 +0100

37 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Roland Perry

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:06:39 +0100

55 lines

Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Martin Hoskins

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:28:37 +0100

117 lines

Re: FW: Employee record

<>

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:22:39 EDT

58 lines

Re: FW: Employee record

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:10:28 +0100

117 lines

Re: FW: Employee record

<>

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:08:05 EDT

60 lines

4th Annual Data Protection Conference

Lisa Braund

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:46:05 +0100

62 lines

Vacancy - EDRMS Project Manager

Nigel Wratten

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:29:44 +0100

80 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:17:38 +0100

35 lines

FW: Employee record

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:33:54 +0100

273 lines

Re: Employee record

Tim Trent

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:23:26 +0100

105 lines

Re: Employee record

Jim Whitaker

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:04:29 +0100

73 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:02:27 +0100

141 lines

Re: Employee record

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:00:00 +0100

196 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:50:54 +0100

108 lines

Re: Employee record

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:46:19 +0100

34 lines

Re: Employee record

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:42:56 +0100

86 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:36:02 +0100

74 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:26:19 +0100

38 lines

Employee record

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:24:04 +0100

27 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:57:57 +0100

341 lines

Section 32

Ian Welton

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:53:27 +0100

34 lines

T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Devenish, Tom

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:22:19 +0100

298 lines

Dept of Work and Pensions

Jane Corrin

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:08:13 +0100

36 lines

Re: Desperation an excuse for Data Protection? was T-Mobile

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:47:30 +0100

46 lines

Re: Desperation an excuse for Data Protection? was T-Mobile

Ekin Caglar

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:46:09 +0100

39 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Roland Perry

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:44:02 +0100

35 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Chris Bayliss

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:16:42 +0100

42 lines

Re: Lapsed SARs?

Talbot Richard

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:33:57 +0100

115 lines

Re: Lapsed SARs?

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:19:59 +0100

70 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:07:46 +0100

141 lines

Re: Lapsed SARs?

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 12:00:03 +0100

118 lines

Lapsed SARs?

Gerry Dane

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:41:17 +0100

43 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:34:00 +0100

253 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Edwina Withe

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:31:34 +0100

233 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 10:15:26 +0100

145 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Martin Hoskins

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 09:00:53 +0100

107 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

<>

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 01:47:41 EDT

45 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Carl Johnson

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 00:13:02 +0100

296 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Ian Welton

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:00:42 +0100

80 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:51:31 +0100

117 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:31:51 +0100

202 lines

T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Chris Bayliss

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:25:26 +0100

43 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:53:17 +0100

293 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Martin Hoskins

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:19:34 +0100

255 lines

(reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Alan Stead

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:00:09 +0100

395 lines

Seminar - Access to Information - 29 September at Buckfast Abbey

Carol Clarke

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 12:42:23 +0100

160 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 12:10:14 +0100

353 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Ian Welton

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 12:05:46 +0100

306 lines

Seniority and privacy

Mark Brookes

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:19:49 +0100

63 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Simon Howarth

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:08:29 +0100

349 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Turner

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:05:38 +0100

292 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Ekin Caglar

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:58:17 +0100

250 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Simon Howarth

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:56:45 +0100

310 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:45:32 +0100

226 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Simon Howarth

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:00:46 +0100

169 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 08:05:42 +0100

27 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 08:02:03 +0100

34 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Carl Johnson

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 20:51:26 +0100

111 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Roland Perry

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 20:20:44 +0100

37 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Clementine Amawo

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:54:55 +0100

117 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:54:26 +0100

159 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:51:48 +0100

132 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:47:14 +0100

152 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:47:01 +0100

96 lines

Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Helen Bartram

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:20:37 +0100

64 lines

Re: [SPAM] - Re: [data-protection] (reply) Mobile phone scam warning - Email found in subject

Cotterill Steve

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:12:58 +0100

161 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:10:45 +0100

100 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:01:56 +0100

99 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:59:52 +0100

102 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Devenish, Tom

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:43:46 +0100

72 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:34:44 +0100

47 lines

Re: Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Turner

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:20:35 +0100

104 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

<>

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:16:39 EDT

68 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:56:38 +0100

29 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:45:11 +0100

99 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:16:29 +0100

43 lines

Re: Fulfilling FoIA can break DPA

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:55:48 +0100

166 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:49:39 +0100

167 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:22:34 +0100

88 lines

Obtaining Birth Certificates

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:10:26 +0100

68 lines

Re: Mobile phone scam warning

Iain Harrison

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:26:22 +0100

139 lines

Re: Mobile phone scam warning

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:10:56 +0100

51 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 08:19:57 +0100

30 lines

Re: Mobile phone scam warning

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 08:15:35 +0100

30 lines

Re: Mobile phone scam warning

Wilson, Stephen

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 07:59:29 +0100

126 lines

Mobile phone scam warning

Tom Devenish

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 23:10:50 +0100

49 lines

Re: reservations & data protection

Ian Welton

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:20:42 +0100

176 lines

Re: reservations & data protection

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:52:11 +0100

80 lines

Re: reservations & data protection

Iain Harrison

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:50:51 +0100

98 lines

Re: reservations & data protection

Tim Trent

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:27:40 +0100

109 lines

reservations & data protection

Maureen Berry

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:07:07 +0100

44 lines

Re: Fulfilling FoIA can break DPA

Tim Turner

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:59:06 +0100

162 lines

Re: Fulfilling FoIA can break DPA

Tim Trent

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:57:46 +0100

150 lines

Re: Fulfilling FoIA can break DPA

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:48:45 +0100

112 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Ian Welton

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:33:06 +0100

112 lines

Fulfilling FoIA can break DPA

Tim Trent

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:06:21 +0100

86 lines

Fishing Trips

DREW Nic

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:27:28 +0100

99 lines

Re: Draft guidance on sharing information about young people - Consul tation

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:01:35 +0100

35 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:54:36 +0100

36 lines

Re: Child Data Sharing

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:52:55 +0100

233 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Ian Welton

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:14:10 +0100

114 lines

Re: Employer request

<>

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:19:29 EDT

66 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:59:32 +0100

38 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Ian Welton

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:42:55 +0100

101 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:07:41 +0100

48 lines

Re: Employer request

Rob Dawson

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:33:03 +0100

117 lines

Re: Employer request

Lewis, Chris G.

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:13:24 +0100

24 lines

Re: Employer request

Charles Oppenhiem

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:07:26 +0100

557 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:07:00 +0100

555 lines

Re: Employer request

Rob Dawson

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:01:47 +0100

519 lines

Re: Employer request

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:43:48 +0100

123 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:43:11 +0100

415 lines

Re: Employer request

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:35:44 +0100

374 lines

Re: Employer request

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:24:44 +0100

91 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:18:29 +0100

321 lines

Re: Employer request

Charles Oppenhiem

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:18:20 +0100

311 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] Employer request

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:14:48 +0100

83 lines

Re: Employer request

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:10:14 +0100

296 lines

Re: Employer request

Gerry Dane

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:09:40 +0100

307 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:08:21 +0100

281 lines

Re: Employer request

Charles Oppenhiem

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:07:43 +0100

248 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Turner

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:57:11 +0100

248 lines

Re: Employer request

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:52:53 +0100

266 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:48:47 +0100

204 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Ian Welton

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:21:35 +0100

88 lines

Re: Employer request

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:09:39 +0100

180 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:05:31 +0100

122 lines

Re: Employer request

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:47:14 +0100

100 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:37:10 +0100

102 lines

Employer request

Casillas, Mojgan

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:01:52 +0100

49 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 08:21:42 +0100

46 lines

Re: Global TPS?

Charles Prescott

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:38:10 -0400

87 lines

Test data - retention of test results

Su Goulding

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:30:28 +0100

85 lines

Records Management Conference

Hetty Sun

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:09:58 +0100

53 lines

Re: Global TPS?

Roland Perry

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 14:46:25 +0100

39 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Roland Perry

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 14:40:35 +0100

51 lines

Re: Global TPS?

Charles Prescott

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 09:19:13 -0400

122 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Roland Perry

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:46:35 +0100

38 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:15:59 +0100

99 lines

Re: Global TPS?

Tim Turner

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:50:18 +0100

79 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Ian Welton

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:49:48 +0100

171 lines

Global TPS?

Duncan Smith

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:35:08 +0100

52 lines

Re: Draft guidance on sharing information about young people - Consul tation

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 08:03:32 +0100

31 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

<>

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 02:44:59 EDT

67 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

<>

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 02:31:18 EDT

110 lines

Re: Child Data Sharing

Pounder Chris

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:48:18 +0100

183 lines

Re: Child Data Sharing

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:20:04 +0100

106 lines

Child Data Sharing

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:14:48 +0100

50 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:10:41 +0100

21 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:01:59 +0100

117 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Paul Ticher

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:57:00 +0100

87 lines

Draft guidance on sharing information about young people - Consul tation

Tim Turner

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:49:32 +0100

31 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Roland Perry

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:45:38 +0100

45 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:34:40 +0100

66 lines

"Do not re-employ" Lists

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:27:35 +0100

45 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Roland Perry

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:11:42 +0100

65 lines

Re: Government consultation

Kirsty Gray

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:50:25 +0100

33 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Ian Welton

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:36:32 +0100

170 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:32:42 +0100

42 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Tim Turner

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:07:37 +0100

87 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Roland Perry

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:34:42 +0100

43 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Oakman Phil

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:15:30 +0100

124 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Tim Turner

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:00:56 +0100

157 lines

Government consultation

Smith, Tony

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 10:14:25 +0100

29 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

<>

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 02:52:15 EDT

86 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Paul Ticher

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:41:38 +0100

283 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:55:49 +0100

236 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Gibson, Martin

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:55:29 +0100

232 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Julie Gibbs

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:45:39 +0100

178 lines

Potentially Violent List

Steel, Rachael

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:27:59 +0100

80 lines

DATA PROTECTION UPDATE SESSIONS IN LONDON, GLASGOW AND MANCHESTER

Pounder Chris

Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:11:49 +0100

86 lines

Re: Info Sharing Protocol

Stuart Lynch

Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:52:54 +0100

82 lines

Re: DP Qualifications

Stuart Lynch

Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:14:52 +0100

80 lines

Re: Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Ian Welton

Sat, 27 Aug 2005 11:14:52 +0100

126 lines

Re: Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Roland Perry

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:57:10 +0100

35 lines

Re: Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Tinsley, Chris

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:15:31 +0100

77 lines

Re: Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Ekin Caglar

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:02:30 +0100

88 lines

Re: Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Roland Perry

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:56:16 +0100

71 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:44:00 +0100

98 lines

Re: Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Jason Campbell

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:38:51 +0100

89 lines

Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:29:00 +0100

37 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Ian Welton

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:19:45 +0100

91 lines

Re: ICO e-mail alerts service

Roland Perry

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:07:06 +0100

33 lines

ICO e-mail alerts service

Ian Welton

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:59:58 +0100

33 lines

FW: DP Qualifications

Jane Bartlett

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:19:30 +0100

88 lines

Re: DP Qualifications

Healy, Susan

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:13:22 +0100

111 lines

DP Qualifications

Casillas, Mojgan

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:07:54 +0100

42 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Roland Perry

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 07:55:44 +0100

39 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Ian Welton

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:44:56 +0100

99 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Roland Perry

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:16:34 +0100

39 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Ian Welton

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:40:14 +0100

265 lines

Vacancy - FOI/DPA Officer

Nigel Wratten

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:12:49 +0100

63 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Smith, Tony

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:10:33 +0100

218 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Tim Turner

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:56:14 +0100

173 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:49:39 +0100

32 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Smith, Tony

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:34:37 +0100

137 lines

Thank you Re: [data-protection] traveller site information request

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:13:37 +0100

47 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Tim Turner

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:49:54 +0100

100 lines

salary grade for DP/FOI manager.

Casillas, Mojgan

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:46:09 +0100

42 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:42:20 +0100

43 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:42:05 +0100

35 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:41:58 +0100

56 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:41:17 +0100

32 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:41:11 +0100

57 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:10:27 +0100

235 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Duncan Smith

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:45:10 +0100

188 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Lewis, Chris G.

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:17:14 +0100

94 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:12:51 +0100

130 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Peter Dinsdale

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:09:56 +0100

86 lines

Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Duncan Smith

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:06:14 +0100

57 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Jason Campbell

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:05:48 +0100

413 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Duncan Smith

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:01:19 +0100

102 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Ian Welton

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:13:57 +0100

32 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Jeremy Kuper

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:31:11 +0100

38 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Andrew Cormack

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:20:03 +0100

366 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:49:40 +0100

274 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Smith, Tony

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:15:27 +0100

223 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

David Wyatt

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:05:30 +0100

120 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:52:08 +0100

208 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:47:03 +0100

183 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:34:44 +0100

151 lines

Re: traveller site information request

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:29:35 +0100

128 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Smith, Tony

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:44:46 +0100

127 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Lewis, Chris G.

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:42:46 +0100

15 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Duncan Smith

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:38:16 +0100

101 lines

Re: traveller site information request

Edwina Withe

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:16:38 +0100

96 lines

traveller site information request

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:42:14 +0100

58 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:36:50 +0100

40 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:55:28 +0100

53 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:35:54 +0100

137 lines

Access to Chat Rooms

Duncan Smith

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:12:38 +0100

70 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Nick Clark

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:08:54 +0100

132 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Christopher Spray

Sat, 20 Aug 2005 08:56:47 +0100

301 lines

NO MAIL

Mags McGinley

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:36:41 +0100

38 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Michael Jason Lord

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:53:22 +0100

275 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules righ t?

Tinsley, Chris

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:52:24 +0100

303 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Peter Dinsdale

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:30:51 +0100

265 lines

Re: [SPAM] - Re: [data-protection] Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right? - Email found in subject

Cotterill Steve

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:30:07 +0100

299 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Smith, Tony

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:19:03 +0100

237 lines

Re: Fairly Obtaining

Ian Welton

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:57:01 +0100

138 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Peter Dinsdale

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:47:49 +0100

182 lines

Re: [SPAM] - Re: [data-protection] Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right? - Email found in subject

Cotterill Steve

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:42:50 +0100

219 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Christopher Spray

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:38:03 +0100

102 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Smith, Tony

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:36:50 +0100

160 lines

Re:

Graham Lewis

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:28:05 +0100

252 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:10:22 +0100

172 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Andrew Cormack

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:01:41 +0100

156 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:22:04 +0100

98 lines

FW: [data-protection] Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules righ t?

John Hughes

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:16:09 +0100

106 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Nick Clark

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:51:12 +0100

53 lines

Re: Fairly Obtaining

Duncan Smith

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:37:51 +0100

75 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:18:46 +0100

118 lines

Re: Fairly Obtaining

Ian Welton

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:01:38 +0100

183 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:18:34 +0100

28 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:04:48 +0100

79 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:02:15 +0100

111 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:36:32 +0100

45 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Smith, Tony

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:19:08 +0100

95 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:15:46 +0100

82 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:09:53 +0100

53 lines

Re: What breaches arise in this scenario - if any?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:09:53 +0100

41 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:04:27 +0100

42 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:41:11 +0100

179 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:17:38 +0100

38 lines

Re: What breaches arise in this scenario - if any?

Roland Perry

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 06:38:41 +0100

37 lines

Re: What breaches arise in this scenario - if any?

Christopher Spray

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:33:31 +0100

95 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Roland Perry

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:26:04 +0100

55 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Carl Johnson

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:42:45 +0100

105 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Chris Bayliss

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:37:47 +0100

45 lines

Re: What breaches arise in this scenario - if any?

Roland Perry

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:27:34 +0100

63 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Roland Perry

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:19:04 +0100

47 lines

What breaches arise in this scenario - if any?

Chris Spray

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:27:01 +0100

34 lines

Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:10:00 +0100

61 lines

Re: Fairly Obtaining

Duncan Smith

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:54:08 +0100

131 lines

Information Notice - New Employees

<>

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:10:03 +0100

54 lines

Re: lost documents

Rob Dawson

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:04:34 +0100

87 lines

Re: lost documents

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:19:37 +0100

107 lines

lost documents

Casillas, Mojgan

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:55:59 +0100

41 lines

Re: lost documents

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:52:23 +0100

82 lines

Re: Personnel records - SAR

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:43:09 +0100

30 lines

Free Leaflets from DCA

Alan Stead

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:01:15 +0100

53 lines

Re: Redaction software

Shipway, Andy (Strategic Services, Corp Performance Policy & Info - Solihull MBC)

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:47:11 +0100

116 lines

Redaction software

David Powell

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:39:01 +0100

66 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Roland Perry

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:02:04 +0100

93 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:54:21 +0100

301 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Jo Archer

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:17:45 +0100

256 lines

Re: Fairly Obtaining

Ian Welton

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:17:42 +0100

142 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:45:09 +0100

203 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Hodgetts, Jonathan

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:31:34 +0100

132 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:13:14 +0100

134 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Hodgetts, Jonathan

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:56:38 +0100

79 lines

A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:44:17 +0100

58 lines

Re: Fairly Obtaining

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:29:58 +0100

85 lines

Fairly Obtaining

Ian Welton

Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:04:14 +0100

32 lines

Re: Personnel records - SAR

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:59:38 +0100

71 lines

Personnel records - SAR

Jansen, Hope

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:25:37 +0100

42 lines

The fascination of auto-replies

Tim Trent

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:45:09 +0100

78 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

Michael Doherty

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:39:00 +0100

33 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:38:18 +0100

64 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] SAR - Durant - Litigation

Tim Trent

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:35:20 +0100

227 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

Michael Doherty

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:28:47 +0100

35 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] SAR - Durant - Litigation

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:20:59 +0100

200 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

Roland Perry

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:18:58 +0100

34 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:52:47 +0100

174 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:44:51 +0100

145 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:32:48 +0100

115 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:50:12 +0100

88 lines

SAR - Durant - Litigation

Rob Dawson

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:18:08 +0100

54 lines

Re: Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation survey

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:30:31 +0100

48 lines

Info Sharing Protocol

Clementine Amawo

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:46:18 +0100

43 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Nick Clark

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:37:28 +0100

48 lines

Re: UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Holt, Mark

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:53:11 +0100

166 lines

Re: UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mandi Barron

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:04:00 +0100

133 lines

Re: UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Roland Perry

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:53:00 +0100

70 lines

Re: UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mandi Barron

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:24:55 +0100

234 lines

Re: UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Roland Perry

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:37:25 +0100

34 lines

Re: Tenants addresses

Shipway, Andy (Strategic Services, Corp Performance Policy & Info - Solihull MBC)

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:15:50 +0100

197 lines

Re: Tenants addresses

Healy, Susan

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:55:44 +0100

180 lines

Re: Tenants addresses

Lisa Braund

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:52:42 +0100

180 lines

Re: Tenants addresses

Alan Stead

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:42:21 +0100

119 lines

Tenants addresses

Sara-Jane Newbon

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:34:43 +0100

63 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Roland Perry

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:05:05 +0100

35 lines

UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Owen Parry

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:26:17 +0100

176 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mary Liddell

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 06:49:15 +0100

178 lines

Re: Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation sur vey

Wiper, Carl

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:09:48 +0100

128 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Andrew Charlesworth

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:06:13 -0400

130 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Roland Perry

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:08:51 +0100

38 lines

Re: BT - Breach of DPA?

Carl Johnson

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:01:24 +0100

109 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mandi Barron

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:57:05 +0100

206 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Andrew Charlesworth

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:32:24 -0400

143 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Andrew Charlesworth

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:09:32 -0400

135 lines

Re: [SPAM] - Re: [data-protection] data protection and dates of birth in the US. - Email found in subject

Cotterill Steve

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:19:44 +0100

142 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mary Liddell

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:17:27 +0100

85 lines

data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Jarvis Rachel

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:46:41 +0100

46 lines

Establishing authority to deal with a third party

Emma Bothamley

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:15:53 +0100

57 lines

Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation survey

Helen Bartram

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:41:06 +0100

60 lines

Concessionary Travel Card Application Form

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:36:49 +0100

58 lines

Re: BT - Breach of DPA?

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:27:45 +0100

78 lines

Re: Retention of security breach information

Roland Perry

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:22:27 +0100

41 lines

Retention of security breach information

datap

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:43:47 +0100

79 lines

Re: BT - Breach of DPA?

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:16:32 +0100

31 lines

BT - Breach of DPA?

Carl Johnson

Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:51:26 +0100

43 lines

CCTV

Sara-Jane Newbon

Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:56:30 +0100

59 lines

Re: Multiple Language Statements

Paul Ticher

Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:22:29 +0100

72 lines

Re: Multiple Language Statements

Paul Baker

Fri, 5 Aug 2005 09:49:44 +0100

76 lines

Re: Multiple Language Statements

DREW Nic

Fri, 5 Aug 2005 08:38:42 +0100

102 lines

Multiple Language Statements

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:56:38 +0100

35 lines

dissertations, copyright and PSI

Healy, Susan

Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:39:34 +0100

78 lines

Re: Subject Access Fee

Bownes David (CEX)

Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:04:53 +0100

88 lines

Subject Access Fee

Rob Dawson

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 17:09:12 +0100

45 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Mandi Barron

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:57:18 +0100

167 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Laurence Bebbington

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:44:20 +0100

123 lines

Re: An amazing story about an email gone wrong

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:42:57 +0100

96 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:33:46 +0100

80 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:31:42 +0100

490 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Graham Lewis

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:30:30 +0100

146 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Laurence Bebbington

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:14:37 +0100

54 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Mandi Barron

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:08:57 +0100

468 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Laurence Bebbington

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:55:26 +0100

397 lines

Re: An amazing story about an email gone wrong

Carl Johnson

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:07:53 +0100

104 lines

An amazing story about an email gone wrong

Robert Melville

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 14:42:28 +0100

73 lines

Re: The perils of e-mail

Robert Melville

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:09:12 +0100

71 lines

Re: The perils of e-mail

Robert Melville

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:05:07 +0100

48 lines

The perils of e-mail

Robert Melville

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 12:22:08 +0100

38 lines