JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BRITARCH Archives


BRITARCH Archives

BRITARCH Archives


October 2004


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BRITARCH Home

BRITARCH Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: Protecting archaeological sites from thieves

Jeff Hatt

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 23:13:47 +0000

7 lines

Re: Protecting SAM

John Hooker

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:43:15 -0600

34 lines

Protecting SAM

kevin wooldridge

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:25:41 +0000

50 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, Countryside Stewardship, etc but really metal detecting, metal detecting again, and again, and again...

Robert Burns

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:06:33 -0000

65 lines

Re: Protecting archaeological sites from thieves

Helen Holderness

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:04:00 +0000

26 lines

Protecting archaeological sites from thieves

clive hallam

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:26:31 -0000

12 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, Countryside Stewardship, etc but really metal detecting, metal detecting again, and again, and again...

John Wood

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:15:01 -0000

38 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

John Hooker

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:13:53 -0600

99 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Dave Tooke

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:32:22 -0000

52 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Tony Bardsley

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 16:14:21 +0000

14 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

Darren Toohie

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 15:47:21 +0000

103 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

Dave S

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:29:06 -0000

60 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

John Wood

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:38:29 -0000

75 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

John Wood

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:36:50 -0000

46 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

John Wood

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:21:20 -0000

66 lines

explorator 7.27

david meadows

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 07:52:08 -0500

553 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

Dave S

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:01:55 -0000

25 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Paul Barford

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 09:11:01 +0100

26 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Tony Bardsley

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 07:57:58 +0000

16 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Paul Barford

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 08:14:13 +0100

41 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Paul Barford

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 07:39:44 +0100

34 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Paul Barford

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 07:35:53 +0100

56 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

Tony Bardsley

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 23:08:20 +0100

15 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds - question for Paul Barford and other interested parties

Robert Burns

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 23:00:36 +0100

249 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Robert Burns

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 22:46:43 +0100

145 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 22:46:02 +0100

29 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

Paul Barford

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 21:38:57 +0200

35 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

Chris Walker

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:46:35 EDT

32 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

Tony Bardsley

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:28:01 +0100

11 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

Dave S

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:58:02 +0100

30 lines

Re: Rome - Total War

Mike Weatherley

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:51:17 +0100

21 lines

Portable Antiquities Scheme, et al

Pam Braddock

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:43:31 +0100

22 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds - question for Paul Barford and other interested parties

Pam Braddock

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:38:03 +0100

65 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds - question for Paul Barford and other interested parties

Paul Barford

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:29:07 +0200

39 lines

Geneology

morgan smith

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 08:36:29 -0600

26 lines

Re: Genealogy, 'unbroken lines'

Clark, John

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:31:07 +0100

17 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds - question for Paul Barford and other interested parties

clive hallam

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:43:57 +0100

253 lines

Archaeology Discovery Day !.

Rodney Gunner

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 11:36:10 +0100

24 lines

Re: Time Line

Win Scutt

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:40:13 +0100

53 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Diana Briscoe

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 09:58:10 +0100

39 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds - question for Paul Barford and other interested parties

Paul Barford

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:25:09 +0200

180 lines

Re: Rome - Total War

John Wood

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 06:54:32 +0100

141 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Paul Barford

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:47:33 +0200

30 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Paul Barford

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:28:32 +0200

51 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Paul Barford

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:02:32 +0200

85 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

clive hallam

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 04:24:26 +0100

115 lines

Pseudo-Count Transformation

A. Alzola Romero

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 02:27:47 +0100

57 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Robert Burns

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 01:26:40 +0100

75 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

clive hallam

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 01:16:06 +0100

50 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:41:25 +0100

54 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Robert Burns

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:24:14 +0100

114 lines

Re: Genealogy, 'unbroken lines'

kevin wooldridge

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:33:37 +0100

27 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey

Briga

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:09:50 +0100

22 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Paul Barford

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:49:37 +0200

15 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Paul Barford

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:31:40 +0200

73 lines

Re: Pseudo-Count Transformation

Richard Wright

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:09:46 +1000

39 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Edward Thompson

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:08:21 EDT

14 lines

Portable Antiquities Scheme

Les Skeates

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 21:25:27 +0100

19 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

clive hallam

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 21:15:52 +0100

47 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Edward Thompson

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:14:04 EDT

30 lines

Re: Rome - Total War

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:05:05 +0100

22 lines

Re: Rome - Total War

Colleen Cummings

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:03:13 +0100

41 lines

Re: Rome - Total War

John Wood

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:09:11 +0100

80 lines

Re Building construction query

Matthew Champion

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:39:54 +0100

19 lines

Re: Rome - Total War

Andy Burnham

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:39:33 +0100

32 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

clive hallam

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:35:24 +0100

35 lines

Re: Rome - Total War

Jan Blyth

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:16:42 +0000

86 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Edward Thompson

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:13:00 EDT

14 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Edward Thompson

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:07:28 EDT

26 lines

Re: Rome - Total War

John Wood

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:28:59 +0100

66 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds - question for Paul Barford and other interested parties

Dave Tooke

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:11:08 +0100

103 lines

Re: Rome - Total War

John Wood

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:48:18 +0100

53 lines

Rome - Total War

John Wood

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:44:32 +0100

42 lines

Going Over: The Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in north-west Europe

Jonathan Bateman

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:43:52 +0100

49 lines

Review of the Portable Antiquities Scheme

Jonathan Bateman

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:43:04 +0100

78 lines

Opened Landscape (19 November 2004 - 15 January 2005)

Jonathan Bateman

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:42:31 +0100

116 lines

Re: British Isles

Briga

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:37:54 +0100

13 lines

Re: Museum of London Ceramics and Glass website

John Wood

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:25:29 +0100

77 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

David R. Williams

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:13:04 +0200

19 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

David R. Williams

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:04:48 +0200

61 lines

FW: Museum of London Ceramics and Glass website

Clark, John

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:56:36 +0100

62 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling finds

Clark, John

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:38:14 +0100

26 lines

Re: Hopefully a productive re-emphasis on: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

steve

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:18:35 +0100

142 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

clive hallam

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:17:12 +0100

57 lines

Hopefully a productive re-emphasis on: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Michael Kershaw (1308929)

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:12:59 +0100

141 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey

John Briggs

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:43:24 +0100

21 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

steve

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:30:25 +0100

62 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Dave Tooke

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:07:21 +0100

133 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

clive hallam

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:01:25 +0100

172 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

clive hallam

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:44:06 +0100

139 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey

Kevin Flude

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:02:55 +0100

97 lines

Re: British Isles - A Natural History

Cerridwen Connelly

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:50:49 +0100

23 lines

Genealogy, 'unbroken lines' - was 'Ranting at Starkey'

John Wood

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:35:34 +0100

1934 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey

Kevin Flude

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:13:28 +0100

73 lines

Re: British Isles - A Natural History

John Wood

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:03:03 +0100

80 lines

Re: British Isles - A Natural History

Gwilym Hughes

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:59:24 +0100

39 lines

Re: British Isles

John Wood

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:59:16 +0100

46 lines

Re: Pseudo-Count Transformation

Wheeler Squares

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:56:18 +0200

20 lines

Re: English Delftware

Paul Courtney

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:54:20 +0100

27 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Robinson, Peter

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:40:58 +0100

40 lines

Re: British Isles

Paul.A Bennett

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:56:22 +0100

22 lines

Re: British Isles - A Natural History

Robert Burns

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:37:51 +0100

53 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Paul Barford

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:33:45 +0200

53 lines

Re: Pseudo-Count Transformation

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 02:01:45 +0100

16 lines

British Isles - A Natural History

John Wood

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:35:05 +0100

36 lines

Re: English Delftware

John Wood

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:03:24 +0100

53 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:56:36 +0100

23 lines

Pseudo-Count Transformation

A. Alzola Romero

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:27:50 +0100

28 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:20:52 +0100

20 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:16:30 +0100

33 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Mike Weatherley

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:49:53 +0100

32 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

John Briggs

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:45:48 +0100

18 lines

Archaeologica Acronomiron

A. Alzola Romero

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:41:19 +0100

16 lines

Re: Britains Real Monarch (Ranting at Starkey)

John Briggs

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:53:53 +0100

22 lines

Re: Britains Real Monarch (Ranting at Starkey)

Paul N Brown

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:41:54 +0100

30 lines

TR: IMPORTANT SHA CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT

Moss, William

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:35:23 -0400

86 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling finds

John Hooker

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:25:36 -0600

50 lines

Re: English Delftware

Daniel Büchner

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:21:59 +0200

44 lines

Re: English Delftware

Clark, John

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:53:15 +0100

38 lines

English Delftware

John Wood

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:49:23 +0100

11 lines

Re: Roman Road to Colchester

John Wood

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:40:16 +0100

72 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling finds

John Hooker

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:38:41 -0600

41 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Dave Tooke

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:37:40 +0100

27 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling finds

Clark, John

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:37:28 +0100

48 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Edward Thompson

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:08:29 EDT

12 lines

The Future of Parish Churches

Peter Wardle

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:54:23 +0100

57 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling detecting finds

Paul Barford

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:36:58 +0200

24 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling finds

John Briggs

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:29:31 +0100

30 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling finds

John Hooker

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:11:43 -0600

42 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling finds

John Hooker

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:44:17 -0600

114 lines

Re: Britains Real Monarch (Ranting at Starkey)

John Briggs

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:34:13 +0100

22 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling finds

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:18:34 +0100

33 lines

Britains Real Monarch (Ranting at Starkey)

Paul N Brown

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:09:09 +0100

14 lines

Fw: Bamburgh excavations: Saturday 30 October

Laura Sole

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:19:01 +0100

34 lines

Re: Archaeological tourism

Paul Barford

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:55:53 +0200

88 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme and selling finds

Paul Barford

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:40:36 +0200

48 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

McCrone, Peter

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:38:50 +0100

91 lines

Re: Roman Road to Colchester

Jeff Hatt

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:30:31 +0100

10 lines

Re: re Building Construction Query

Robert Burns

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:55:05 +0100

120 lines

Re: Scheduling - A query; and a bit on artefacts

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:34:03 +0100

34 lines

Re: Roman Road to Colchester

Gareth Talbot

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:22:44 +0100

48 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey

Briga

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:11:41 +0100

36 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

clive hallam

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:02:40 +0100

45 lines

Re: re Building Construction Query

RUSSELL, Nick

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:52:34 +0100

90 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey

Dave Tooke

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:46:01 +0100

68 lines

Re: re Building Construction Query

Robert Burns

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:27:36 +0100

76 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

McCrone, Peter

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:50:24 +0100

38 lines

Re: re Building Construction Query

RUSSELL, Nick

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:46:24 +0100

57 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

McCrone, Peter

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:45:17 +0100

44 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey

morgan smith

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:10:23 -0600

31 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey

morgan smith

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:06:18 -0600

43 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey

morgan smith

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:01:40 -0600

36 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

John Palmer

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:13:34 +0100

21 lines

Re: re Building Construction Query

Robert Burns

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:58:58 +0100

44 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Andrew Whincup

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:07:18 +0000

21 lines

re Building Construction Query

Matthew Champion

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:45:26 +0100

21 lines

Re: Burial Markers

Tony Williamson

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:24:34 EDT

15 lines

Call for Papers

Dr. Patricia A. Baker

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:57:02 +0100

97 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

clive hallam

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:56:36 +0100

12 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Gareth Talbot

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:17:10 +0100

13 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Paul Barford

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:10:21 +0200

19 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Nicholson, Andrew

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:05:03 +0100

23 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Alex Hunt

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:52:33 +0100

102 lines

Archaeologica Acronomiron

A. Alzola Romero

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:48:43 +0100

17 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Gareth Talbot

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:40:24 +0100

7 lines

Re: Archaeological tourism

Gaye Nayton

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:45:42 +0800

64 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Simon D Askew

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:31:30 +0100

17 lines

Roman Road to Colchester

Gareth Talbot

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:25:42 +0100

26 lines

Re: Roman Military Cemeteries / Burials

Brennand, J. Mark

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:59:25 +0100

103 lines

CBA South West Autumn Symposium

Jonathan Bateman

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:48:22 +0100

97 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Simon D Askew

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:23:05 +0100

13 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

CRIPPS, Paul

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:09:00 +0100

19 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Malcolm Watkins

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:03:34 +0100

104 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Robinson, Peter

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:21:30 +0100

160 lines

Re: Burial Markers

McCrone, Peter

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:17:41 +0100

146 lines

Re: Scheduling - A query; and a bit on artefacts

Anne Brundle

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:01:17 +0100

19 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Gail Boyle

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:50:21 +0100

37 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Robinson, Peter

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:24:02 +0100

178 lines

LPS Conference 2005: cfp: ageing

Jonathan Bateman

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:17:12 +0100

33 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey

galderman

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:14:47 +0100

39 lines

Re: Burial Markers

Robinson, Peter

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:56:25 +0100

119 lines

FW: Closure of Museums at Wigan Pier

Don Henson

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:54:39 +0100

116 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Robert Burns

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:50:07 +0100

32 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Alan S>

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:39:31 +0100

26 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Malcolm Watkins

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:37:32 +0100

117 lines

Re: Burial Markers

David Stokes

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:30:08 +0100

76 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Rathmell

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:00:23 +0100

25 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Robinson, Peter

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:55:15 +0100

277 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Gareth Talbot

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:54:28 +0100

7 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

McCrone, Peter

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:50:44 +0100

137 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Rob McNaught

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:49:25 +0100

26 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

RUSSELL, Nick

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:43:13 +0100

154 lines

Burial Markers

Robinson, Peter

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:39:34 +0100

38 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Bronwen Russell

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:37:31 +0100

34 lines

Re: Roman Military Cemeteries / Burials

Gareth Talbot

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:18:08 +0100

13 lines

Roman Military Cemeteries / Burials

Colleen Cummings

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:01:18 +0100

21 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Andrew Smith

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:53:42 +0100

135 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Nick Boldrini

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:53:25 +0100

71 lines

Time Line

Martin Snow

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:34:37 +0100

25 lines

Re: Archaeological Acronymania

Brennand, J. Mark

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:18:10 +0100

31 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey

John Wood

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:15:41 +0100

28 lines

Re: BRITARCH Digest - 25 Oct 2004 to 26 Oct 2004 (#2004-297)

Pat Reynolds

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:20:12 +0100

36 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Rathmell

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:05:39 +0100

40 lines

Odp: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Paul Barford

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:49:47 +0200

16 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Paul Barford

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:41:27 +0200

47 lines

Re: Building construction query

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:35:03 +0100

58 lines

Re: Building construction query

Robert Burns

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:02:45 +0100

35 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Matthew Champion

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:00:38 +0100

134 lines

Building construction query

Matthew Champion

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:00:34 +0100

16 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Robert Burns

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:51:28 +0100

74 lines

1997 design of resistivity meter

Richard Wright

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:49:38 +1000

20 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Joe Flatman

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:17:12 +0930

61 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Robert Burns

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:16:57 +0100

45 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Elaine Swann

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:10:33 +0000

31 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Robert Burns

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:06:37 +0100

133 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Edward Thompson

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:56:44 EDT

10 lines

Re: The Question of Approved Contractors

Mike Weatherley

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:54:22 +0100

17 lines

Re: Archaeologica Acronomiron

Patsy Jones

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:42:27 EDT

124 lines

Archaeologica Acronomiron

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:35:26 +0100

120 lines

Re: Archaeological tourism

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:38:12 +0100

42 lines

Re: Archaeological tourism

RANSLEY, Jesse

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:24:52 +0100

55 lines

Re: Archaeological tourism

Paul Barford

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:11:08 +0200

34 lines

Re: Archaeological tourism

RANSLEY, Jesse

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:44:39 +0100

27 lines

Re: Archaeological tourism

Becky Wallower

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:31:25 +0100

46 lines

Re: Archaeological tourism

Yellow Mike

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:07:28 +0100

44 lines

Re: Scheduling - A query; and a bit on artefacts

John Hooker

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:27:20 -0600

27 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

John Hooker

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:18:19 -0600

49 lines

Archaeological tourism

RANSLEY, Jesse

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:21:20 +0100

23 lines

FW: Re: The Question of Approved Contractors

MOORE, Ben

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:25:02 +0100

59 lines

Re: Scheduling - A query

WHITAKER, Katy

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:01:32 +0100

50 lines

Re: Scheduling - A query

RUSSELL, Nick

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:00:23 +0100

70 lines

MOORE, Ben

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:53:24 +0100

49 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Gail Boyle

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:47:16 +0100

37 lines

Re: The Question of Approved Contractors

tom wilson

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:22:07 +0100

59 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

White, Bill

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:19:00 +0100

42 lines

Re: Scheduling - A query; and a bit on artefacts

John Wood

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:03:10 +0100

48 lines

Re: The Question of Approved Contractors

John Wood

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:36:50 +0100

47 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

McCrone, Peter

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:55:25 +0100

86 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Andrew Smith

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:12:22 +0100

37 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:04:08 +0200

21 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

morgan smith

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:25:49 -0600

59 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Robert Burns

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:22:30 +0100

20 lines

Re: (Bathing) Scheduling

Mike Weatherley

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:59:56 +0100

38 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:39:29 +0100

68 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

Paul Barford

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:08:05 +0200

21 lines

Re: The Question of Approved Contractors

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:30:02 +0100

24 lines

Re: Portable Antiquities Scheme

John Hooker

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:46:45 -0600

46 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

John Hooker

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:23:02 -0600

92 lines

scheduling a question - Thanks

Robert Burns

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:23:08 +0100

13 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

John Hooker

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:19:25 -0600

26 lines

Re: The Question of Approved Contractors

MOORE, Ben

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:09:12 +0100

67 lines

Pantographs in Archaeology

Paul Barford

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:05:09 +0200

20 lines

Re: The Question of Approved Contractors

john armour

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:51:56 +0100

89 lines

Re: Seeking Shropshire Metal Detector Club Contact

clive hallam

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:08:13 +0100

14 lines

Seeking Shropshire Metal Detector Club Contact

Paul N Brown

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:58:22 +0100

21 lines

Re: Scheduling - A query

M. E. Hutchinson

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:55:27 +0100

28 lines

Portable Antiquities Scheme

Malcolm Watkins

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:54:56 +0100

55 lines

re scheduling of graves

Matthew Champion

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:07:40 +0100

14 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme (conduction)

clive hallam

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:32:44 +0100

57 lines

Re: Scheduling - A query

McCrone, Peter

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:05:54 +0100

120 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:53:19 +0200

16 lines

Re: Scheduling - A query

David Petts

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:28:59 +0100

85 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme (conduction)

Robert Burns

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:11:07 +0100

32 lines

Re: fences and ditches

White, Bill

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:08:57 +0100

38 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme (conduction)

White, Bill

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:02:32 +0100

44 lines

Re: Scheduling - A query

John Wood

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:07:10 +0100

57 lines

Re: Scheduling - A query

rob

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:44:10 +0100

21 lines

Re: Scheduling - A query

kevin wooldridge

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:33:45 +0100

30 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:14:36 +0100

38 lines

Bryan Sykes

Andrew Whincup

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:12:28 +0000

19 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Mike Weatherley

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:31:09 +0100

37 lines

Re: Ranting at Schama...!

Mike Weatherley

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:31:06 +0100

34 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Geoff Bagley

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:52:24 +0100

20 lines

Scheduling - A query

Robert Burns

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:29:53 +0100

21 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

J Blain

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:18:16 +0100

28 lines

trenches was Re: fences and ditches

Briga

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:55:01 +0100

20 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Keith J Matthews

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:24:23 +0100

29 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:23:58 +0200

101 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Kevin Flude

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:51:18 +0100

14 lines

Re: Approved contractors

Paul Courtney

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:18:19 +0100

49 lines

Re: Approved contractors

Andrew Whincup

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:34:11 +0000

49 lines

explorator 7.26

david meadows

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:13:12 -0400

568 lines

Re: Approved contractors

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:06:43 +0100

44 lines

Re: The Question of Approved Contractors

Paul Courtney

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:20:36 +0100

82 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

clive hallam

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:27:03 +0100

77 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:05:27 +0100

74 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Mike Weatherley

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 11:55:12 +0100

46 lines

CBA: welcome back online!

Diego Meozzi

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:43:37 +0200

15 lines

Odp: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:24:50 +0200

24 lines

Re: The Question of Approved Contractors

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:29:05 +0100

59 lines

Re: The Question of Approved Contractors

Paul Courtney

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:06:42 +0100

23 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:00:37 +0100

38 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Darren Toohie

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 23:02:50 +0100

14 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Geoff Bagley

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 22:42:19 +0100

32 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

John Briggs

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 22:31:12 +0100

35 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Mike Weatherley

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 22:14:19 +0100

51 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Geoff Bagley

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:59:52 +0100

21 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

clive hallam

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:43:08 +0100

22 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Darren Toohie

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:41:44 +0100

12 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Darren Toohie

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:26:14 +0100

21 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:37:42 +0200

24 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:16:44 +0200

31 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:14:29 +0100

35 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Bryan Saunders

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:59:29 +0100

48 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:53:23 +0100

43 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme (not)

Paul Barford

Sat, 23 Oct 2004 01:17:12 +0200

16 lines

Re: fences and ditches

John Fulcher

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 23:25:13 +0100

43 lines

Re: fences and ditches

John Fulcher

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 23:16:21 +0100

123 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Robert Burns

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:35:12 +0100

37 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

clive hallam

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:26:04 +0100

41 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme (not)

Paul Barford

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 23:00:53 +0200

71 lines

Re: fences and ditches

John Hooker

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:00:24 -0600

37 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Edward Thompson

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:51:29 EDT

27 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme (not)

John Hooker

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:58:26 -0600

322 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

clive hallam

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:17:51 +0100

40 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Peter Wardle

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:58:52 +0100

23 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Edward Thompson

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:11:51 EDT

37 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Clark, John

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:08:52 +0100

43 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Catherine Stallybrass

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:28:39 EDT

25 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

clive hallam

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:12:29 +0100

219 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:37:18 +0200

53 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

John Briggs

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:18:40 +0100

28 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Robinson, Peter

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:06:11 +0100

47 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Robinson, Peter

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:03:04 +0100

59 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Edward Thompson

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:49:00 EDT

17 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:46:03 +0100

235 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Robinson, Peter

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:25:16 +0100

163 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:47:33 +0100

96 lines

Licences - a different approach?

Paul N Brown

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:39:18 +0100

32 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Geoff Bagley

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:08:51 +0100

20 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

clive hallam

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:58:34 +0100

96 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:44:13 +0200

50 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme (not)

Catherine Stallybrass

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:31:26 EDT

64 lines

Re: Plea from a Britarch Digest subscriber

Paul Barford

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:10:36 +0200

32 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme (not)

clive hallam

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:08:27 +0100

209 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:55:01 +0200

30 lines

Re: Plea from a Britarch Digest subscriber

Gail Boyle

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:46:17 +0100

20 lines

Plea from a Britarch Digest subscriber

Rachel Edwards

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:33:25 +0100

25 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:31:44 +0100

88 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:17:15 +0100

188 lines

ORADS radiocarbon dating programme

Jonathan Bateman

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:33:38 +0100

75 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Andy Norfolk

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:31:33 +0100

43 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:29:32 +0100

67 lines

licences

paul blinkhorn

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:27:13 +0100

175 lines

Re: fences and ditches

Gordon Le Pard

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:19:25 +0100

22 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:09:58 +0200

38 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme (not)

Paul Barford

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:50:46 +0200

109 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Nick Boldrini

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:50:11 +0100

52 lines

Re: fences and ditches

Brennand, J. Mark

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:08:38 +0100

36 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme (not)

clive hallam

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:06:20 +0100

244 lines

Irish Licenced Archaeologists

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:25:27 +0100

19 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:23:52 +0100

171 lines

OT - Help us drowned rats!

George Chaplin

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 01:36:29 +0100

67 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

List post

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 23:16:09 +0100

137 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:57:15 +0100

102 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme (not)

List post

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:51:03 +0100

177 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme (not really)

Brennand, J. Mark

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:55:08 +0100

70 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

clive hallam

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:22:54 +0100

125 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:14:36 +0100

70 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:42:08 +0100

66 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:36:27 +0100

43 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Robert Burns

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:08:29 +0100

92 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Barry Bishop

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:53:42 +0200

212 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

clive hallam

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:46:32 +0100

66 lines

Archaeology, Art and Text in Byzantium

Jonathan Bateman

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:39:47 +0100

58 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

RUSSELL, Nick

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:35:31 +0100

106 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Dave Tooke

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:32:50 +0100

133 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:26:58 +0100

53 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

clive hallam

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:23:55 +0100

160 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:22:28 +0100

90 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Nicholson, Andrew

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:18:19 +0100

42 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:02:09 +0100

84 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Nick Boldrini

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:43:43 +0100

47 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:41:56 +0100

25 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:37:29 +0100

43 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

clive hallam

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:26:48 +0100

106 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

List post

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:25:07 +0100

31 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:22:17 +0100

40 lines

Re: fences and ditches

Brennand, J. Mark

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:20:53 +0100

82 lines

Re: fences and ditches

List post

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:19:00 +0100

85 lines

Re: Ancient footsteps retraced by hen

Briga

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:01:34 +0100

15 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:55:18 +0100

65 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:37:03 +0100

57 lines

Re: fences and ditches

Dave Tooke

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:19:23 +0100

73 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:10:37 +0200

59 lines

Re: fences and ditches

Dave Tooke

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:09:19 +0100

67 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Alan Radley

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:08:33 +0100

23 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:07:58 +0100

35 lines

Re: fences and ditches

Robert Burns

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:06:45 +0100

54 lines

Re: Bersu & the Isle of Man

Barry Bishop

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:05:45 +0200

31 lines

fences and ditches

tom wilson

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:02:06 +0100

25 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Robert Burns

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:00:32 +0100

41 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Barry Bishop

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:58:38 +0200

122 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

RUSSELL, Nick

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:55:10 +0100

183 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:39:02 +0100

166 lines

Re: The Question of Approved Contractors

Andrew Whincup

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:36:17 +0000

51 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

RUSSELL, Nick

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:34:28 +0100

138 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:13:25 +0100

127 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

RUSSELL, Nick

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:12:29 +0100

105 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:10:05 +0100

111 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Robert Burns

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:03:07 +0100

95 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:43:06 +0200

59 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:30:52 +0100

139 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:28:53 +0100

102 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme hijacked by Detecting Arguement

steve

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:11:30 +0100

178 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:57:09 +0100

70 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:18:37 +0100

79 lines

South Yorkshire Archaeology Day 2004 - programme and booking details

Jonathan Bateman

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:54:03 +0100

47 lines

Spades and Stages - one-day colloquium

Jonathan Bateman

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:21:38 +0100

64 lines

Re: Scandinavian Mesolithic Colonisation help?

Paul Barford

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:27:35 +0200

58 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:23:05 +0200

33 lines

Re: Ancient footsteps retraced by hen

Carol Primrose

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:57:35 +0100

11 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme hijacked by Detecting Arguement

paul blinkhorn

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:34:13 +0100

143 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme hijacked by Detecting Arguement

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:31:49 +0100

118 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme hijacked by Detecting Arguement

paul blinkhorn

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:32:49 +0100

55 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme hijacked by Detecting Arguement

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:02:02 +0100

79 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme hijacked by Detecting Arguement

paul blinkhorn

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:38:08 +0100

44 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:15:54 +0100

39 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme hijacked by Detecting Arguement

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:12:39 +0100

90 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

J Blain

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:50:12 +0100

47 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Dave Musgrove

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:10:08 +0100

28 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

WHITAKER, Katy

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:03:03 +0100

33 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Gordon Le Pard

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:46:18 +0100

12 lines

Scandinavian Mesolithic Colonisation help?

Lindsay Johnson

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:45:49 +0000

25 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme hijacked by Detecting Arguement

paul blinkhorn

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:25:29 +0100

32 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Geoff Evans

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:12:12 +0100

29 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme hijacked by Detecting Arguement

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:01:12 +0100

37 lines

Re: CBA website

Paul Barford

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:29:41 +0200

23 lines

Odp: CBA website

Paul Barford

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:13:09 +0200

27 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Sam Hardy

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:45:52 +0100

18 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Robinson, Peter

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:36:45 +0100

129 lines

Re: CBA website

steve

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:22:15 +0100

63 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:17:44 +0200

21 lines

Re: CBA website

corinne mills

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:12:11 +0100

50 lines

Re: CBA website

Paul Barford

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:03:56 +0200

32 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

McCrone, Peter

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:46:19 +0100

56 lines

2005 AFOB Listings - Deadline Reminder

listservs

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:31:43 -0400

56 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:24:24 +0100

60 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:16:38 +0100

29 lines

[Fwd: Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme]

corinne mills

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:48:02 +0100

14 lines

Bersu & the Isle of Man

Iestyn Jones

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:45:43 +0100

16 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Nick Boldrini

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:43:21 +0100

116 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Janet Davis

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:38:47 +0100

23 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Robert Burns

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:38:03 +0100

73 lines

Re: Piers

Brennand, J. Mark

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:24:29 +0100

48 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:21:42 +0100

71 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

corinne mills

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:18:36 +0100

52 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Tony Bardsley

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:17:38 +0100

16 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:04:01 +0100

30 lines

VAST-conference in Brussels 7-9 december, 2004: program available

Jonathan Bateman

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:02:00 +0100

61 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Catherine Stallybrass

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:53:40 EDT

30 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:51:56 +0100

50 lines

Re: Piers

steve

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:41:24 +0100

55 lines

Re: Piers

WADE, Petra

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:40:54 +0100

83 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:39:48 +0100

70 lines

Piers

David Jones

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:30:41 +0100

40 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:38:11 +0100

23 lines

Re: Ancient footsteps retraced by henge protestors

McCrone, Peter

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:31:25 +0100

69 lines

Re: The Question of Approved Contractors (Yawn)

John Wood

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:23:36 +0100

55 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:21:42 +0100

60 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:19:50 +0100

33 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

clive hallam

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:14:52 +0100

105 lines

Assistant SMR post at West Yorkshire Archaeology Service

Paul Wheelhouse

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:14:26 +0100

65 lines

Re: Ancient footsteps retraced by henge protestors

Thompson, Paul

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:50:21 +0100

44 lines

Re: BRITARCH Digest

John Wood

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:42:24 +0100

62 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

steve

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:36:51 +0100

126 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Nicholson, Andrew

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:15:18 +0100

64 lines

Re: CBA website

Andy Burnham

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:11:07 +0100

30 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Nick Boldrini

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:07:34 +0100

172 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Robinson, Peter

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:59:51 +0100

78 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

paul blinkhorn

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:46:46 +0100

35 lines

Re: Ancient footsteps retraced by henge protestors

Briga

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:38:12 +0100

17 lines

Roman Bathhouse discovered

Jonathan Bateman

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:28:43 +0100

69 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

clive hallam

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:03:21 +0100

92 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Andy Norfolk

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:54:47 +0100

21 lines

New online aerial archaeology resource announced

Jonathan Bateman

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:45:17 +0100

77 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Tony Bardsley

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:10:11 +0100

17 lines

Re: CBA website

corinne mills

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:47:06 +0100

33 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Elaine Swann

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:42:37 +0000

33 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:28:35 +0200

40 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheme

Paul Barford

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:00:08 +0200

57 lines

Re: CBA website

Paul Barford

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:15:09 +0200

50 lines

Experimental Archaeology

James Brothers

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:52:04 -0400

26 lines

Re: Ancient footsteps retraced by henge protestors

Carol Primrose

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:45:16 +0100

13 lines

Re: Origin of the British 'foot' measurement

morgan smith

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:39:01 -0600

30 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

morgan smith

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:32:29 -0600

23 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

<>

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:52:14 EDT

24 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:52:01 +0100

90 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

J Blain

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:40:31 +0100

54 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheming!

Pam White

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:53:12 +0100

80 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheming!

Edward Thompson

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:26:04 EDT

23 lines

Re: Countryside Stewardship scheming!

Robert Burns

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:06:28 +0100

50 lines

Countryside Stewardship scheming!

Edward Thompson

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:34:14 EDT

27 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Dave S

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:24:50 +0100

19 lines

Alderley site update....roman

peter abbadine

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:19:21 +0100

13 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Andy Sweet - Megalithic sites of Perthshire

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:18:12 +0100

25 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Barry Horne

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:11:53 +0100

37 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:03:29 +0100

44 lines

Re: The question of Approved Contractors (yawn)

Paul Courtney

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:06:01 +0100

20 lines

Re: Ancient footsteps retraced by henge protestors

George Chaplin

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:20:06 +0100

16 lines

Ancient footsteps retraced by henge protestors

George Chaplin

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:43:45 +0100

44 lines

Re: Ancient footsteps retraced by henge protestors

Robert Burns

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:39:12 +0100

66 lines

Re: Dr David Starkey - live and in person

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:05:16 +0100

67 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

John Briggs

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:02:14 +0100

25 lines

Re: cba website

p m graves-brown

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:25:19 +0100

22 lines

Re: cba website

Jonathan Bateman

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:10:25 +0100

34 lines

Re: cba website

Rob McNaught

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:03:43 +0100

25 lines

Dr David Starkey - live and in person

Robinson Ben

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:03:16 +0100

35 lines

Re: cba website

Brennand, J. Mark

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:59:47 +0100

28 lines

guide

Rodney Gunner

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:53:55 +0100

20 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Andy Sweet - Megalithic sites of Perthshire

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:35:36 +0100

21 lines

Re: cba website

p m graves-brown

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:31:36 +0100

15 lines

Re: cba website

Nicola Cooke

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:11:59 +0100

46 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Clark, John

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:08:59 +0100

23 lines

Re: cba website

Gareth Dean

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:58:27 +0000

31 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Andy Norfolk

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:55:38 +0100

20 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Andy Norfolk

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:53:18 +0100

26 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Geoff Bagley

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:52:52 +0100

18 lines

cba website

Nicola Cooke

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:28:09 +0100

15 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Lex Lamb

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:54:03 +0100

73 lines

IFA Wales/Cymru dayschool

Jenny Hall

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:41:01 +0100

39 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:30:03 +0100

53 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Ian Barefoot

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:58:51 +0100

23 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

White, Bill

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:47:28 +0100

45 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Anne Brundle

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:35:37 +0100

29 lines

Beads from Anglo-Saxon Graves

WG Kilbride

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 07:50:44 +0100

44 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Janet Davis

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 07:37:52 +0100

29 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Mike Gilbert

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 06:54:59 +0100

45 lines

Re: Origin of the British 'foot' measurement

Doug Weller

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 06:50:01 +0100

35 lines

Re: Origin of the British 'foot' measurement

John Briggs

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:58:47 +0100

27 lines

Job opening: Lecturer in Prehistoric Archaeology, University of Wales Bangor

Raimund Karl

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:30:30 +0100

61 lines

Re: Origin of the British 'foot' measurement

Andy Burnham

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:24:26 +0100

49 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

J Blain

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:23:43 +0100

41 lines

Re: The question of Approved Contractors (yawn)

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:47:30 +0100

156 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Andy Sweet - Megalithic sites of Perthshire

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:35:00 +0100

28 lines

Re: The question of Approved Contractors

Jan Blyth

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:22:38 +0000

126 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:18:05 +0100

29 lines

Re: Origin of the British 'foot' measurement

John Hooker

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:48:27 -0600

147 lines

Re: The question of Approved Contractors (yawn)

helen evans

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:50:29 +0000

56 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

David Robert Williams

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:22:22 +0100

42 lines

Re: The question of Approved Contractors

John Briggs

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:54:22 +0100

29 lines

Re: The question of Approved Contractors

Dalwood, Hal (CS, Archaeology)

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:45:08 +0100

102 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

Andy Sweet - Megalithic sites of Perthshire

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:23:19 +0100

31 lines

Re: The question of Approved Contractors

Christopher Cumberpatch

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:22:30 +0100

30 lines

Re: The question of Approved Contractors

John Wood

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:01:03 +0100

73 lines

Ranting at Starkey...!

John Wood

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:07:23 +0100

29 lines

Re: Origin of the British 'foot' measurement

Stephen Aleck

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:40:14 +0100

47 lines

Re: Archaeological Bibliographies

anne.ree

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:38:37 +0100

18 lines

Re: Archaeological Bibliographies

Geoff Evans

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:18:28 +0100

7 lines

Archaeological Bibliographies

David Petts

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:29:01 +0100

24 lines

mask

david freeman

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:56:45 +0100

16 lines

Re: Ranting at Starkey...!

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:48:56 +0100

41 lines

Ranting at Starkey...!

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:47:27 +0100

26 lines

Re: mask

david meadows

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:42:56 -0400

37 lines

Re: The question of Appoved Contractors

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:36:23 +0100

130 lines

Re: mask

Rosellen Cashman-Pugsley

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:01:08 +0100

20 lines

International Journal of Nautical Archaeology

Paula Martin

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:27:34 +0100

64 lines

Re: mask

John Briggs

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:51:36 +0100

21 lines

Re: Origin of the British 'foot' measurement

Bea Hopkinson

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:47:29 -0700

64 lines

Re: mask

Mike Gilbert

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:24:41 +0100

27 lines

IFA Registered Archaeologiical Organisations (was The question of Appoved Contractors)

kevin wooldridge

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 19:33:04 +0100

233 lines

Re: mask

david meadows

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:01:07 -0400

24 lines

mask

david freeman

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 17:18:17 +0100

15 lines

Re: The question of Appoved Contractors

Jan Blyth

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:19:56 +0000

133 lines

Re: The question of Appoved Contractors

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:25:31 +0100

109 lines

explorator 7.25

david meadows

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:06:59 -0400

487 lines

Origin of the British 'foot' measurement

Jean Kelly

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 10:21:40 +0100

39 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR - no answers

Jan Blyth

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 06:56:52 +0000

36 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

George Chaplin

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 01:52:22 +0100

226 lines

Re: Origin of the British 'foot' measurement

Doug Weller

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 23:10:19 +0100

30 lines

Re: Origin of the British 'foot' measurement

kevin wooldridge

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:35:35 +0100

26 lines

Re: BRITARCH Digest - 14 Oct 2004 to 15 Oct 2004 (#2004-286)

John Wood

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:07:58 +0100

21 lines

Re: Origin of the British 'foot' measurement

John Hooker

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:30:56 -0600

40 lines

Re: Bush Barrow Lozenge

John Hooker

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:03:57 -0600

45 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

Robert Burns

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 15:02:19 +0100

236 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

Peter Wardle

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:47:47 +0100

221 lines

Re: Domesday Measurements

Dave Durkin

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 08:29:28 EDT

26 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

Peter Wardle

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:09:50 +0100

172 lines

Origin of the British 'foot' measurement

Doug Weller

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:23:40 +0100

25 lines

Re: Water Buffalo

Doug Weller

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:22:19 +0100

39 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR - no answers

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 08:43:29 +0100

93 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR - no answers

Paul Barford

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 07:50:21 +0200

63 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

Paul Barford

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 07:30:18 +0200

24 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR - no answers

George Chaplin

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:52:59 +0100

183 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR - no answers

George Chaplin

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:41:35 +0100

168 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR - no answers

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:04:41 +0100

140 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

John Briggs

Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:27:12 +0100

59 lines

Re: ASF recorder

david meadows

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:12:47 -0400

98 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR - no answers

Paul Barford

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:08:51 +0200

70 lines

Re: British Archaeological Awards - results and citations

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:38:16 +0100

52 lines

Re: IFA 'Digger Group' meeting - urgent request

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:31:41 +0100

51 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR - no answers

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:25:08 +0100

57 lines

Re: British Archaeological Awards - results and citations

Andy Burnham

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:22:37 +0100

26 lines

IFA 'Digger Group' meeting - urgent request

kevin wooldridge

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:42:11 +0100

23 lines

Re: Pantographs in archaeology

kevin wooldridge

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:38:45 +0100

64 lines

Re: British Archaeological Awards - results and citations

Sarah MacLean

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:30:06 +0100

540 lines

British Archaeological Awards - results and citations

Jonathan Bateman

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:16:26 +0100

455 lines

Re: Open GIS Forum?

Nick Boldrini

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:46:43 +0100

58 lines

Re: Open GIS Forum?

Steve White

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:23:00 +0100

37 lines

Re: Open GIS Forum?

Andie

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:21:16 +0100

20 lines

Open GIS Forum?

List post

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:13:44 +0100

25 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

RUSSELL, Nick

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:27:20 +0100

173 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR now: IFA

paul blinkhorn

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:05:13 +0100

22 lines

Re: ASF recorder

david freeman

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:52:13 +0100

80 lines

British Archaeological Awards

David Petts

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:51:20 +0100

19 lines

Was: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR now: IFA

John Wood

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:45:29 +0100

87 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

George Chaplin

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:41:49 +0100

20 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

George Chaplin

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:35:34 +0100

90 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

Clark, John

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:30:20 +0100

46 lines

Re: ASF recorder

david meadows

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 06:05:56 -0400

31 lines

ASF recorder

david freeman

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:14:04 +0100

23 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

tom wilson

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:05:02 +0100

107 lines

Re: video capture

david meadows

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:58:44 -0400

21 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

RUSSELL, Nick

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:41:05 +0100

76 lines

Re: Pantographs in archaeology

Fraser Sturt

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:38:00 +0100

35 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

Paul Barford

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:32:14 +0200

27 lines

Re: Domesday Measurements

Catherine Petts

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:13:23 +0100

34 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

Nick

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:07:27 +0100

28 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

Jan Blyth

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 07:28:17 +0000

70 lines

Pantographs in archaeology

Paul Barford

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:07:10 +0200

23 lines

Re: Pantographs in archaeology

Elizabeth Davis

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 08:00:41 +0100

35 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

Paul Barford

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 08:53:14 +0200

55 lines

video capture

david freeman

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 07:53:12 +0100

13 lines

Re: Domesday Measurements

Bea Hopkinson

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:46:48 -0700

98 lines

Re: Domesday Measurements

Jan Blyth

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 03:08:01 +0000

80 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

Jan Blyth

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 02:32:03 +0000

32 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

Peter Wardle

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:24:56 +0100

96 lines

Re: Domesday Measurements

John Colby

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:05:10 +0100

66 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

George Chaplin

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:48:29 +0100

41 lines

Re: Domesday Measurements

Trevor Dunkerley

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:15:31 +0100

18 lines

Re: Contact details

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:10:25 +0100

48 lines

Re: TV Archaeology and a comparison with the genealogical fraternity

Andy Burnham

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:09:00 +0100

38 lines

Re: Danebury film webcast

Christian Allen

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:43:04 +0100

63 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

Peter Wardle

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:36:53 +0100

214 lines

Re: Danebury film webcast

Andy Burnham

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:57:18 +0100

78 lines

Re: CTRL and GCSE archaeology....

Charlie Stokes

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:34:28 +0100

20 lines

Day conference - Recent work in archaeological geophysics

Jonathan Bateman

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:12:25 +0100

148 lines

Re: Danebury film webcast

Sean Caveille

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:09:30 +0100

23 lines

Re: Danebury film webcast

Robert Burns

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:45:25 +0100

36 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavat ion ?

Brennand, J. Mark

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:24:07 +0100

101 lines

New TAC Video on Iron Age Britain

Jonathan Bateman

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:17:28 +0100

44 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavat ion ?

McCrone, Peter

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:14:22 +0100

87 lines

Re: Water Buffalo

Phillippa Wray

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:12:17 EDT

14 lines

Re: Water Buffalo

John Briggs

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:10:02 +0100

36 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

Alex Hunt

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:05:45 +0100

63 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

John Briggs

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:00:32 +0100

23 lines

Water Buffalo

McCrone, Peter

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:57:25 +0100

34 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

Robert Burns

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:47:55 +0100

66 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

John Briggs

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:46:19 +0100

24 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

John Briggs

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:42:44 +0100

54 lines

TV Archaeology and a comparison with the genealogical fraternity

Robert Burns

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:42:02 +0100

23 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

McCrone, Peter

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:16:11 +0100

74 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

Paul Barford

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:43:55 +0200

36 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

Clark, John

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:17:43 +0100

19 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

paul blinkhorn

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:58:26 +0100

36 lines

Re: What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

John Briggs

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:54:43 +0100

57 lines

What is British archaeology's definition of "illicit" excavation ?

Paul Barford

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:46:31 +0200

47 lines

Danebury film webcast

Sean Caveille

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:43:51 +0100

16 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

Nicholson, Andrew

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:39:07 +0100

39 lines

Re: Contact details

Nicholson, Andrew

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:33:07 +0100

50 lines

Re: Contact details

Brennand, J. Mark

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:33:04 +0100

40 lines

Contact details

David Petts

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:26:16 +0100

20 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

McCrone, Peter

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:04:52 +0100

164 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:35:06 +0100

137 lines

Bush Barrow Lozenge

Doug Weller

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:57:02 +0100

27 lines

Re: on sale

John Briggs

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:22:24 +0100

48 lines

Re: on sale

Paul Barford

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:55:47 +0200

24 lines

Re: on sale

John Briggs

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:37:36 +0100

25 lines

Re: on sale

Stephen Aleck

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:03:41 +0100

23 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

CRIPPS, Paul

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:50:31 +0100

114 lines

Images of Roman Mosaics

David Petts

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:46:57 +0100

14 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology

McCrone, Peter

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:50:00 +0100

91 lines

Re: Vacancy - Assistant editor at British Archaeology

Bronwen Russell

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:30:24 +0100

53 lines

CBA job advert - Conservation Coordinator

Mike Heyworth

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:24:41 +0100

195 lines

Re: BIAB / CBA website

Jonathan Bateman

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:21:45 +0100

44 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology/Valetta

Christopher Cumberpatch

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:12:17 +0100

27 lines

Vacancy - Assistant editor at British Archaeology

Jonathan Bateman

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:10:12 +0100

26 lines

Flinders University Graduate Programs in Maritime Archaeology

Joe Flatman

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:05:34 +0930

161 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology

Trevor Dunkerley

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:08:31 +0100

33 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology/Valetta

Edward Thompson

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:01:07 EDT

10 lines

Re: fences and ditches

John Fulcher

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:34:51 +0100

34 lines

BIAB / CBA website

David Petts

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:18:16 +0100

15 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology

John Hooker

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:33:23 -0600

22 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology/Valetta

Paul Barford

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:23:22 +0200

24 lines

Out of OfficeRe: Labour's policy on archaeology/Valetta

Dave Musgrove

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:19:05 +0100

112 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology/Valetta

McCrone, Peter

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:14:23 +0100

81 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology/Valetta

tom wilson

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:39:24 +0100

31 lines

Re: Coney

Mike Stokes

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:41:21 +0100

17 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology

Christopher Cumberpatch

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:33:12 +0100

26 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology

McCrone, Peter

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:20:43 +0100

52 lines

PPS October Meeting

Jonathan Bateman

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:13:20 +0100

42 lines

Re: Coney

Trevor Dunkerley

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:06:46 +0100

19 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology

Trevor Dunkerley

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:01:55 +0100

24 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology

McCrone, Peter

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:31:25 +0100

35 lines

Re: Labour's policy on archaeology

George Chaplin

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:27:46 +0100

14 lines

Re: Stonhenge revisited

McCrone, Peter

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:07:41 +0100

149 lines

Re: Stonhenge revisited

Dave Tooke

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:57:41 +0100

133 lines

Re: Visit Danebury

anne.ree

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:49:57 +0100

43 lines

Re: Stonhenge revisited

rob

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:26:51 +0100

67 lines

Re: Stonhenge revisited

Rodney Gunner

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:53:03 +0100

109 lines

Re: Stonhenge revisited

McCrone, Peter

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:17:42 +0100

77 lines

Re: Stonhenge revisited

Cerridwen Connelly

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:08:26 +0100

43 lines

Re: Request from BAJR

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:48:13 +0100

37 lines

Re: Request from BAJR

George Chaplin

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:47:53 +0100

23 lines

Jim Pickering

Mike Heyworth

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:47:04 +0100

62 lines

Labour's policy on archaeology

Mike Heyworth

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:38:22 +0100

56 lines

on sale

david freeman

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:28:23 +0100

13 lines

IFA Training and Standards Coordinator post

Mike Heyworth

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:16:00 +0100

34 lines

IFA admin posts

Mike Heyworth

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:14:28 +0100

40 lines

Re: Request from BAJR

Paul Barford

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:44:22 +0200

20 lines

Re: Thornbourgh & Request from BAJR

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 02:36:51 +0100

107 lines

Re: Request from BAJR

George Chaplin

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:19:18 +0100

58 lines

Fw: Request from BAJR

madbadrob

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:24:18 +0100

92 lines

Re: Stonhenge revisited

madbadrob

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:23:20 +0100

166 lines

Re: Stonhenge revisited

Paul Barford

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:24:38 +0200

21 lines

Stonhenge revisited

galderman

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:30:24 +0100

110 lines

Vacancies at Archaeological Services WYAS

Paul Wheelhouse

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:11:22 +0100

64 lines

BAJR - DAvid Connely

madbadrob

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:53:03 +0100

19 lines

Re: Ritual horse burial at Thornborough

Elaine Swann

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:46:36 +0000

28 lines

ape

david freeman

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:58:42 +0100

10 lines

Re: Ritual horse burial at Thornborough

George Chaplin

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:42:49 +0100

18 lines

New HEIRNET Data Sharing Tool

WG Kilbride

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:40:43 +0100

32 lines

Re: New Ape Discovered

paul blinkhorn

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:04:06 +0100

29 lines

Re: Ritual horse burial at Thornborough

Briga

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:47:58 +0100

38 lines

Re: Ferrybridge, West Yorks

Paul Wheelhouse

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:28:23 +0100

57 lines

New Ape Discovered

p m graves-brown

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:23:25 +0100

17 lines

BAJR Maps of Organisations

BAJRWebsite.ORG

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:12:20 +0100

18 lines

Re: Ritual horse burial at Thornborough

Elaine Swann

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 07:20:58 +0000

29 lines

Re: Ritual horse burial at Thornborough

Karl Wittwer

Sun, 10 Oct 2004 20:20:47 -0700

17 lines

Re: Ritual horse burial at Thornborough

madbadrob

Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:42:05 +0100

243 lines

Re: Ritual horse burial at Thornborough

George Chaplin

Sun, 10 Oct 2004 21:15:13 +0100

216 lines

Re: Ritual horse burial at Thornborough

kevin wooldridge

Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:53:07 +0100

37 lines

Ritual horse burial at Thornborough

George Chaplin

Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:13:18 +0100

40 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Martin Harrison

Sun, 10 Oct 2004 15:37:04 +0100

58 lines

Re: BRITARCH Digest - 8 Oct 2004 to 9 Oct 2004 (#2004-280)

Melanie Maelo

Sun, 10 Oct 2004 15:15:21 +0100

372 lines

explorator 7.24

david meadows

Sun, 10 Oct 2004 09:29:57 -0400

727 lines

Farm diversification

Dave Parkes

Sun, 10 Oct 2004 11:05:24 +0100

37 lines

Re: Churches Banks and Ditches

Angie Mitchell

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 22:38:33 +0100

14 lines

Ferrybridge, West Yorks

Briga

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 20:30:28 +0100

14 lines

Re: Churches Banks and Ditches

John Colby

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 18:57:16 +0100

21 lines

Re: Churches Banks and Ditches

Dave Tooke

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 18:46:50 +0100

68 lines

Re: Churches Banks and Ditches

Andie

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 18:43:02 +0100

57 lines

Re: Churches Banks and Ditches

David Robert Williams

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 17:31:44 +0100

36 lines

Churches Banks and Ditches

Rodney Gunner

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 16:19:51 +0100

18 lines

Re: Population of Britain during the palaeolithic

p m graves-brown

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 14:25:19 +0100

30 lines

Re: Population of Britain during the palaeolithic

kevin wooldridge

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 12:15:45 +0100

32 lines

Re: Population of Britain during the palaeolithic

p m graves-brown

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 10:41:44 +0100

36 lines

Re: RE Population of Britain

Carol De Priest

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:22:01 -0700

23 lines

Re: Population of Britain during the palaeolithic

p m graves-brown

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 20:57:48 +0100

61 lines

Re: Stonehenge - a landscape reunited

madbadrob

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:30:31 +0100

149 lines

Re: Stonehenge - a landscape reunited

galderman

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:56:00 +0100

111 lines

Re: Population of Britain during the palaeolithic

John Briggs

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:45:46 +0100

46 lines

Re: Population of Britain during the palaeolithic

Robinson, Peter

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:30:07 +0100

59 lines

Re: Population of Britain during the palaeolithic

p m graves-brown

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:29:49 +0100

41 lines

RE Population of Britain

Mike Stokes

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:29:11 +0100

10 lines

Re: Population of Britain during the palaeolithic

John Briggs

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:01:47 +0100

26 lines

Population of Britain during the palaeolithic

Robinson, Peter

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:52:36 +0100

35 lines

Visit Danebury

Rodney Gunner

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:37:31 +0100

17 lines

Expert systems, was Re: Database formats and matrices

John Hooker

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:05:05 -0600

336 lines

Re: Young Rescue

Paul Barford

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 23:58:07 +0200

15 lines

Re: sources of seconhand books

sally white

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 19:28:12 +0100

14 lines

Re: Young Rescue

Mike Heyworth

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:03:28 +0100

22 lines

Young Rescue

Paul Barford

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:33:09 +0200

13 lines

Re: Stonehenge - a landscape reunited

madbadrob

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:21:07 +0100

98 lines

Re: CTRL and GCSE archaeology....

John Briggs

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:03:12 +0100

22 lines

Re: CTRL and GCSE archaeology....

Christopher Cumberpatch

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:45:07 +0100

46 lines

Re: Stonehenge - a landscape reunited

Chris Woodford

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:28:45 +0100

51 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

No Name

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:21:50 +0100

49 lines

CTRL and GCSE archaeology....

Charlie Stokes

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 15:35:06 +0100

37 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Nick Boldrini

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:58:38 +0100

185 lines

Tees Archaeology Dayschool

David Petts

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:46:09 +0100

54 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

List post

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:43:07 +0100

139 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Nick Boldrini

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:07:27 +0100

121 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Edwin Deady

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:23:38 -0400

19 lines

XML Was Re: Database formats and matrices

LEE, Edmund

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:26:18 +0100

93 lines

CBA website etc

WHITAKER, Katy

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:54:30 +0100

48 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

List post

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:38:48 +0100

71 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

AAPiccini

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:24:40 +0100

114 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Briga

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:50:27 +0100

16 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Nick Boldrini

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:47:53 +0100

53 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Christian Allen

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 02:19:43 +0100

84 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Christian Allen

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 01:30:20 +0100

80 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

No Name

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 00:06:57 +0100

177 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Andrew Larcombe

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 21:45:54 +0100

72 lines

Re: Britarch website

Taff Simon

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:44:02 -0700

26 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Christopher Cumberpatch

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 17:28:37 +0100

96 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

No Name

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:55:53 +0100

32 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Mark Bell

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:33:21 +0100

89 lines

Re: Sources of second hand books

Diana Briscoe

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:28:58 +0100

89 lines

Re: Sources of second hand books

Heather Franklin

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:17:22 +0100

84 lines

Re: Sources of second hand books

Stuart Cakebread

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 14:38:30 +0100

36 lines

Re: Sources of second hand books

Peter Green

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 14:10:35 +0100

56 lines

Re: Sources of second hand books

GRAVES-BROWN C.A.

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 14:06:15 +0100

36 lines

Re: Sources of second hand books

Laura Sole

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:56:25 +0100

38 lines

Sources of second hand books

Britannia

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:47:15 +0100

21 lines

Re: Sources of second hand books

Barry Bishop

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 14:28:59 +0200

38 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

GRAVES-BROWN C.A.

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:54:32 +0100

33 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Nick Boldrini

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:53:47 +0100

125 lines

Re: Ceremonial trackays

madbadrob

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:18:25 +0100

51 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Christopher Cumberpatch

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:18:04 +0100

48 lines

Ships and Shipwrecks as National Icons (Vasa Museum Stockholm, 10-16.10.2005)

Diana Briscoe

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:41:59 +0100

138 lines

SPMA Conference 2005, Nevis

Andrew Townsend

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:45:23 +0100

126 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Mark Bell

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:44:55 +0100

36 lines

Re: Iron Age Meal

Kelvin Wilson

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:24:24 -0700

46 lines

How do I go to digest?

sally white

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 18:21:14 +0100

18 lines

Re: Cumwhitton, PAS and the Antiquaries

Nigel Page

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:19:04 +0100

20 lines

Cumwhitton, PAS and the Antiquaries

Paul Barford

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:07:13 +0200

65 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

List post

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:47:05 +0100

36 lines

Re: Iron Age Meal

McCrone, Peter

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:42:38 +0100

46 lines

Re: Iron Age Meal

David Robert Williams

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:38:13 +0100

54 lines

Re: Ceremonial trackays

Brennand, J. Mark

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:29:04 +0100

41 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Geoff Bagley

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:17:16 +0100

20 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

madbadrob

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:13:00 +0100

40 lines

Ceremonial trackays

madbadrob

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:09:23 +0100

17 lines

Re: Iron Age Meal

Christopher Cumberpatch

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:08:33 +0100

25 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

John Briggs

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:57:09 +0100

25 lines

Re: Iron Age Meal

Mike Stokes

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:26:36 +0100

9 lines

Re: Iron Age Meal

McCrone, Peter

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:00:57 +0100

31 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

Andrew Larcombe

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:59:42 +0100

40 lines

Re: Iron Age Meal

Edwin Deady

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 07:54:22 -0400

12 lines

Re: Iron Age Meal

McCrone, Peter

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:33:47 +0100

68 lines

Re: Iron Age Meal

Nick.Thorpe

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:20:19 +0100

59 lines

Iron Age Meal

David Jones

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:15:05 +0100

44 lines

Re: Database formats and matrices

McINTOSH, Caroline

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:10:52 +0100

66 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Nick Boldrini

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:06:01 +0100

90 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

madbadrob

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:26:46 +0100

35 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Andrew Whincup

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:44:34 +0000

37 lines

Database formats and matrices

tom wilson

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:31:17 +0100

22 lines

Re: Mystery Cowboy & Grey Literature

Mike Stokes

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:14:25 +0100

11 lines

Re: Mystery Cowboy (Grey Literature)

McCrone, Peter

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:03:32 +0100

32 lines

Antiquarian slide collection

WG Kilbride

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:40:56 +0100

52 lines

Museum Appeal Update....

David Connolly - BAJR

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:30:08 +0100

30 lines

Re: Mystery Cowboy (Grey Literature)

Mike Stokes

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:25:18 +0100

11 lines

Re: Big Find etc

Mike Stokes

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:21:10 +0100

10 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Nick Boldrini

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:40:29 +0100

53 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Nick Boldrini

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:37:59 +0100

144 lines

Re: BIG find: new sky disc and old gold bars

Paul Barford

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 07:17:47 +0200

42 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Paul Barford

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 22:09:46 +0200

36 lines

re Gold Spoof

Matthew Champion

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 19:34:27 +0100

15 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

madbadrob

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 18:26:30 +0100

74 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Paul

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 17:13:15 +0100

54 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Iain Hedley

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:48:27 +0100

48 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

George Chaplin

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:34:28 +0100

19 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

McCrone, Peter

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:33:50 +0100

49 lines

Re: mystery cowboy

Christopher Cumberpatch

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:27:59 +0100

53 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

p m graves-brown

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:15:21 +0100

22 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Iain Hedley

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:14:44 +0100

77 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Iain Hedley

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:53:34 +0100

33 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

madbadrob

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:52:32 +0100

35 lines

Re: mystery cowboy

p m graves-brown

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:38:49 +0100

47 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Martin Harrison

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:34:25 +0100

96 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Nigel Page

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:22:34 +0100

20 lines

Re: Coney?

McCrone, Peter

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:06:07 +0100

59 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

John Briggs

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 14:57:14 +0100

30 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

p m graves-brown

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 14:54:12 +0100

22 lines

Re: mystery cowboy [No Viruses detected]

Iain Hedley

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 14:45:16 +0100

53 lines

Re: mystery cowboy

madbadrob

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 14:42:08 +0100

32 lines

Glossop-Alderley-barford

mike stokes

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:41:51 GMT

48 lines

summer tv

Angela Piccini

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 14:11:55 +0100

26 lines

Re: mystery cowboy

p m graves-brown

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:08:58 +0100

14 lines

Re: mystery cowboy

p m graves-brown

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:03:53 +0100

21 lines

Re: mystery cowboy

Nigel Page

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:09:40 +0100

31 lines

Re: mystery cowboy

Cerridwen Connelly

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:01:57 +0100

24 lines

Re: mystery cowboy

Christopher Cumberpatch

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 11:30:24 +0100

18 lines

Odp: BIG find, Glossop Spoof

Paul Barford

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:15:25 +0200

17 lines

mystery cowboy

p m graves-brown

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 11:09:42 +0100

14 lines

Re: OFFLIST: Roman soldiers pay - Thank you

Robinson, Peter

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 10:52:05 +0100

94 lines

Re: BIG find, Glossop Spoof

Paul Barford

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 11:32:54 +0200

28 lines

Re: Coney

Mike Stokes

Mon, 4 Oct 2004 09:27:01 +0100

9 lines

Re: Early references for Roman material

Karl Wittwer

Sun, 3 Oct 2004 18:21:43 +0100

33 lines

Early references for Roman material

n/a

Sun, 3 Oct 2004 08:49:10 -0700

21 lines

explorator 7.23

david meadows

Sun, 3 Oct 2004 08:56:26 -0400

724 lines

Re: Amazing New Discovery rewrites history!

Helen Holderness

Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:07:54 +0000

39 lines

Re: BIG find, Glossop Spoof

madbadrob

Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:02:01 +0100

69 lines

Amazing New Discovery rewrites history!

Matthew Champion

Sat, 2 Oct 2004 09:54:33 +0100

25 lines

Re: BIG find, Glossop Spoof

Paul Barford

Sat, 2 Oct 2004 09:28:12 +0200

57 lines

Lots of Rabbits

Pat Reynolds

Sat, 2 Oct 2004 07:21:23 +0100

35 lines

Re: BIG find Cohort disk Glossop Manchester

Sally Winchester

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:34:46 -0400

24 lines

OFFLIST: Roman soldiers pay - Thank you

Bea Hopkinson

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:55:35 -0700

52 lines

Re: BIG find Cohort disk Glossop Manchester

paul blinkhorn

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:45:45 +0100

29 lines

message spoofing

Mike Heyworth

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:17:19 +0100

16 lines

BIG find Cohort disk Glossop Manchester

mike stokes

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:45:52 GMT

11 lines

britarch web server

Mike Heyworth

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:32:51 +0100

25 lines

Odp: Britarch website

Paul Barford

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:49:36 +0200

27 lines

Re: Britarch website

Chris Walker

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:48:44 EDT

23 lines

Britarch website

Nick Corcos

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:16:04 +0100

13 lines

Rabbits rabbits rabbits

Matthew Champion

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:47:37 +0100

14 lines

Re: Coney

Clark, John

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:18:26 +0100

27 lines

Re: Coney

Mike Stokes

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:09:55 +0100

10 lines

Re: Conservation Areas

Geoff Evans

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:54:38 +0100

8 lines

Re: Coney?

Lex Lamb

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:51:34 +0100

59 lines

Re: Coney?

RUSSELL, Nick

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:19:55 +0100

41 lines

Re: Coney?

Anne Brundle

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:05:48 +0100

29 lines

Re: Coney?

Tim Dennis

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:04:59 +0100

17 lines

Re: Coney?

Jeremy Greenwood

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:02:40 EDT

26 lines

Re: Coney?

RUSSELL, Nick

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:59:50 +0100

22 lines

Re: Coney?

Anne Brundle

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:52:23 +0100

12 lines

Re: Coney?

RUSSELL, Nick

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:34:56 +0100

33 lines

Re: Coney?

Edwin Deady

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 06:26:19 -0400

18 lines

Re: Coney?

Leigh Driver

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 06:09:48 EDT

55 lines

Re: Coney?

RUSSELL, Nick

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:08:16 +0100

33 lines

Re: Coney?

Anne Brundle

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:01:51 +0100

22 lines

Re: Coney?

Christopher Cumberpatch

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:10:20 +0100

18 lines

Latest Digger now online at BAJR

David Connolly - BAJR

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:58:00 +0100

16 lines

Approved contractors

phil abramson

Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:25:24 +0100

18 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
Octo