JISCMail - SIDNEY-SPENSER Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

SIDNEY-SPENSER Archives

February 2004

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		SIDNEY-SPENSER Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Spenser MLA sessions deadline extended: March 15	Craig A. Berry	Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:33:32 -0600	34 lines
Re: Spenser Stanza Competition: Reminder	<>	Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:55:43 -0500	39 lines
Spenser Stanza Competition: Reminder	zurch	Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:36:10 +0000	33 lines
Forgettable Spenser [forwarded from Jim Nohrnberg]	zurch	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:45:44 +0000	75 lines
forgettable Spenser	zurch	Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:03:33 +0000	53 lines
Re: Sp's forgettable language?	Hardin, Richard F	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:01:44 -0600	82 lines
Re: Nohrnberg: Re: Forgettable Spenser (fwd)	Andrew Zurcher	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:25:04 +0000	46 lines
Nohrnberg: Re: Forgettable Spenser (fwd)	Brad D. Tuggle	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:49:27 -0500	177 lines
Re: Tolkien	Peter C. Herman	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 05:35:07 -0800	13 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	Laurie Johnson	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:00:14 +0000	9 lines
Re: Sp's forgettable language?	Mike Shipley	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:54:29 EST	46 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	Dorothy Stephens	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:27:49 -0600	44 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	dmiller	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:02:54 -0500	159 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	Hardin, Richard F	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:31:02 -0600	35 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	Andrew Zurcher	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:29:14 +0000	28 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	Dorothy Stephens	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:43:23 -0600	72 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	Charles Butler	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:41:32 -0000	22 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	Andrew Zurcher	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:06:07 +0000	58 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	Marianne F Micros	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:43:47 -0500	71 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	Craig A. Berry	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 01:14:08 -0600	58 lines
Re: Sp's forgettable language?	Genevieve Guenther	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:17:46 -0800	38 lines
From Jim Nohrnberg	Brad D. Tuggle	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:21:34 -0500	321 lines
Re: Sp's forgettable language?	Hardin, Richard F	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:17:42 -0600	169 lines
Sp's forgettable language?	Kathryn Evans	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:33:58 -0800	102 lines
Re: Tolkien (fwd)	Kenneth Gross	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:02:17 -0500	47 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	Andrew Zurcher	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:27:17 +0000	19 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	dmiller	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:18:20 -0500	31 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	Andrew Zurcher	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:09:58 +0000	79 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)	<>	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:52:51 +0000	17 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing and R.A.Johnson	David Wilson-Okamura	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:06:26 -0500	57 lines
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing and R.A.Johnson	<>	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:23:49 EST	42 lines
good myths and bad or indifferent writing (mostly on Tolkien)	David Wilson-Okamura	Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:40:01 -0500	104 lines
Re: Medusa and terrible beauty	Marianne F Micros	Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:40:52 -0500	34 lines
Re: Medusa and terrible beauty (Correction)	Steven J. Willett	Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:50:04 +0900	32 lines
Re: Medusa and terrible beauty	Steven J. Willett	Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:11:00 +0900	116 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Mike Shipley	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:45:49 EST	38 lines
Re: Medusa and terrible beauty	Douglas Eskew	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:31:36 -0600	27 lines
Re: Medusa and terrible beauty	Dorothy Stephens	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:03:54 -0600	26 lines
Re: Medusa and terrible beauty	Douglas Eskew	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:10:36 -0600	67 lines
Medusa and terrible beauty	Katherine Eggert	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:30:21 -0700	144 lines
Re: lxxv	dmiller	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:06:08 -0500	73 lines
lxxv	<>	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:54:42 -0800	46 lines
Medusa (was xxv was LXXV)	<>	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:51:10 -0800	24 lines
Re: xxv	Christopher Warley	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:52:26 -0500	40 lines
posting from Jim Nohrnberg	Kenneth Gross	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:17:37 -0500	155 lines
Re: xxv	Roger Kuin	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:25:38 +0100	45 lines
Re: xxv	Kenneth Gross	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:01:14 -0500	17 lines
Re: xxv	William Oram	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:46:17 -0500	82 lines
Re: xxv	Dorothy Stephens	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 19:17:12 -0600	49 lines
Re: xxv	<>	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:55:15 -0500	52 lines
Re: xxv	Peter C. Herman	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:52:03 -0800	42 lines
Re: xxv	Roger Kuin	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:48:25 +0100	33 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Charles Butler	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:44:24 -0000	37 lines
Re: xxv	Andrew Zurcher	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:44:08 +0000	25 lines
Re: xxv	dmiller	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:05:43 -0500	33 lines
xxv	<>	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:35:46 -0800	43 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	William Oram	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:55:54 -0500	128 lines
Re: LXXV's last 3 words	William Oram	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:27:10 -0500	120 lines
Re: LXXV's last 3 words	Marshall Grossman	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:02:49 -0500	80 lines
LXXV's last 3 words	W.L. Godshalk	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:31:28 -0500	24 lines
Re: LXXV's last 3 words	<>	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:26:47 -0800	30 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	<>	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:31:56 -0500	94 lines
Re: LXXV's last 3 words	Christopher Warley	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:13:30 -0500	64 lines
Re: LXXV's last 3 words	William Oram	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:03:31 -0500	43 lines
Re: LXXV's last 3 words	<>	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:16:51 +0000	19 lines
Re: LXXV's last 3 words	Andrew Zurcher	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:40:45 +0000	57 lines
Re: LXXV's last 3 words	Charles Butler	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:27:19 -0000	28 lines
LXXV's last 3 words	Martin Leigh Harrison	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:18:28 -0500	49 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Steven J. Willett	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:33:05 +0900	81 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Susanne Woods	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:31:44 -0500	66 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Michael Saenger	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:29:37 -0600	61 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	<>	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 01:20:52 +0000	34 lines
Re: Trees and Tolkien	Thomas P Roche	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:50:04 -0500	118 lines
Trees and Tolkien	Reid Robert L.	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:27:23 -0500	106 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Beth Quitslund	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:13:28 -0500	32 lines
Trees and Tolkien	David Wilson-Okamura	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:04:19 -0500	59 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Bowman, Mary	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:52:03 -0600	59 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Margaret Christian	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:09:15 -0500	119 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	John Leonard	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:45:16 -0500	36 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	David Wilson-Okamura	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:03:09 -0500	155 lines
Re: Bombing Tolkien	Greg George	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:30:20 -0500	63 lines
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Andrew Zurcher	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:55:22 +0000	18 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Colin Burrow	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:11:03 -0000	131 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Gavin Alexander	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:36:45 +0000	109 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Steven J. Willett	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:21:16 +0900	99 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Charles Butler	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:19:50 -0000	20 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Colin Burrow	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:00:17 -0000	103 lines
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Mike Shipley	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:33:30 EST	85 lines
Bombing Tolkien	Mike Shipley	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:04:03 EST	98 lines
Apology	Roger Kuin	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:46:34 +0100	11 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Marshall Grossman	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:16:11 -0500	57 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Charles Butler	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:09:43 -0000	45 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Dorothy Stephens	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:54:17 -0600	77 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Beth Quitslund	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:36:17 -0500	98 lines
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Dan Knauss	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:48:52 -0600	115 lines
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Christine Cornell	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:18:40 -0400	59 lines
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Marianne F Micros	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:09:48 -0500	108 lines
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Marianne F Micros	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:05:58 -0500	147 lines
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Jacob Johnson	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:04:16 -0800	96 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Roger Kuin	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:54:21 +0100	68 lines
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Jacob Johnson	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:31:10 -0800	280 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Dan Knauss	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:24:46 -0600	190 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	<>	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:07:19 -0500	58 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP etc.	Ted Steinberg	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:05:11 -0500	22 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Charles Butler	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:49:56 -0000	44 lines
standards	dmiller	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:42:02 -0500	76 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	William Oram	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:24:08 -0500	70 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Dorothy Stephens	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:12:06 -0600	16 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Dorothy Stephens	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:43:51 -0600	74 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Steven J. Willett	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:01:01 +0900	80 lines
Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings	Susanne Woods	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:23:51 -0500	40 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Craig A. Berry	Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:51:02 -0600	39 lines
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Home	Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:43:45 -0500	213 lines
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Kathryn Evans	Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:15:34 -0800	470 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Marianne F Micros	Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:21:18 -0500	140 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Beth Quitslund	Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:03:57 -0500	122 lines
Sixteenth Century Studies Conference panel?	Margaret Christian	Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:27:56 +0000	16 lines
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	<>	Sun, 15 Feb 2004 23:44:24 +0000	50 lines
Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)	Peter C. Herman	Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:28:58 -0800	46 lines
Re: what was English good for?	John Geraghty	Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:01:20 -0800	1000 lines
Re: what were different scripts good for?	Germaine Warkentin	Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:05:51 -0500	74 lines
Re: what were different scripts good for?	Martin Leigh Harrison	Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:35:02 -0500	57 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Maura Michelle Tarnoff	Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:07:39 -0500	41 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Leon Conrad	Sat, 14 Feb 2004 15:16:14 -0000	27 lines
CFP -- RSA 2005: Prince Henry Reviv'd	Michael Ullyot	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:28:28 -0500	56 lines
Re: the list	Harry Berger, Jr.	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:35:49 -0800	79 lines
the list	dmiller	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:09:30 -0500	78 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Germaine Warkentin	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:40:41 -0500	21 lines
Re: what was English good for?	John Leonard	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:30:32 -0500	29 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Dorothy Stephens	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:38:14 -0600	15 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Meredith Skura	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:32:37 -0600	31 lines
Re: Fwd: candidate not hired by english dept, con't	Meredith Skura	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:22:02 -0600	20 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Peter C. Herman	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:50:31 -0800	41 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Hardin, Richard F	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:27:25 -0600	35 lines
candidate not hired by english dept, con't	Meredith Skura	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:08:52 -0600	27 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Hannibal Hamlin	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:32:34 -0500	42 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Jameela Lares	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:16:01 -0600	28 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Hannay, Margaret	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:12:22 -0500	61 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Hannay, Margaret	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:02:33 -0500	46 lines
Re: How many mothers had Medina and her sisters?	Richard Ramsey	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:36:08 +0000	49 lines
Re: what was English good for?	<>	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:31:23 +0000	77 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Andrew Zurcher	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:46:09 +0000	23 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Germaine Warkentin	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:31:57 -0500	23 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Katherine Eggert	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:23:29 -0700	52 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Jameela Lares	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:17:46 -0600	25 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Jameela Lares	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:56:36 -0600	39 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Kenneth Gross	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:54:20 -0500	20 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Charles Butler	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:18:43 -0000	28 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Harry Berger, Jr.	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:34:58 -0800	105 lines
Re: what was English good for?	<>	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:07:40 +0000	55 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Michael Saenger	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:54:50 -0600	80 lines
Re: what was English good for?	Boyd M Berry	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:51:31 -0500	62 lines
what was English good for?	David Wilson-Okamura	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:52:46 -0500	47 lines
Milton's corpse on tour of London	Jameela Lares	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:39:45 -0600	27 lines
Re: Renaissance London	Hardin, Richard F	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:17:58 -0600	46 lines
Re: Poeta Regius	Lee Piepho	Sun, 8 Feb 2004 10:43:01 -0500	55 lines
Re: Poeta Regius	Bryan John Lowrance	Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:59:05 -0500	36 lines
Re: How many mothers had Medina and her sisters?	Andrew Zurcher	Sat, 7 Feb 2004 20:32:58 +0000	36 lines
Poeta Regius	Lee Piepho	Sat, 7 Feb 2004 15:22:53 -0500	15 lines
Re: How many mothers had Medina and her sisters?	Charles Butler	Sat, 7 Feb 2004 20:31:59 +0100	239 lines
Re: How many mothers had Medina and her sisters?	Martin Leigh Harrison	Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:20:16 -0500	101 lines
Re: Renaissance London	Michael Saenger	Sat, 7 Feb 2004 13:17:10 -0600	60 lines
Re: Renaissance London (fwd)	Dorothy Stephens	Sat, 7 Feb 2004 13:02:22 -0600	21 lines
How many mothers had Medina and her sisters?	David Wilson-Okamura	Sat, 7 Feb 2004 13:10:19 -0500	42 lines
Re: Renaissance London	Dan Knauss	Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:32:13 -0600	50 lines
Re: Renaissance London	Marshall Grossman	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 21:30:58 -0500	36 lines
Re: Renaissance London (fwd)	Germaine Warkentin	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 19:55:41 -0500	101 lines
Re: Renaissance London (fwd)	John Webster	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:23:52 -0800	75 lines
Renaissance London (fwd)	Jameela Lares	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:43:07 -0600	49 lines
Re: Renaissance London	Charles Butler	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 21:02:28 -0000	14 lines
Re: Renaissance London	Jameela Lares	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:21:24 -0600	24 lines
Re: Renaissance London	Germaine Warkentin	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 14:10:06 -0500	92 lines
Renaissance London	Michael Saenger	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:55:11 -0600	18 lines
[Fwd: Please forward to Sp List (CFP)]	<>	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 08:11:21 -0500	80 lines

SIDNEY-SPENSER Archives

February 2004

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives