|
|
|
Size
|
[Fwd: Please forward to Sp List (CFP)]
|
<> |
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 08:11:21 -0500 |
80 lines |
Renaissance London
|
Michael Saenger |
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:55:11 -0600 |
18 lines |
Re: Renaissance London
|
Germaine Warkentin |
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 14:10:06 -0500 |
92 lines |
Re: Renaissance London
|
Jameela Lares |
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:21:24 -0600 |
24 lines |
Re: Renaissance London
|
Charles Butler |
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 21:02:28 -0000 |
14 lines |
Renaissance London (fwd)
|
Jameela Lares |
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:43:07 -0600 |
49 lines |
Re: Renaissance London (fwd)
|
John Webster |
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:23:52 -0800 |
75 lines |
Re: Renaissance London (fwd)
|
Germaine Warkentin |
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 19:55:41 -0500 |
101 lines |
Re: Renaissance London
|
Marshall Grossman |
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 21:30:58 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Renaissance London
|
Dan Knauss |
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:32:13 -0600 |
50 lines |
How many mothers had Medina and her sisters?
|
David Wilson-Okamura |
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 13:10:19 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Renaissance London (fwd)
|
Dorothy Stephens |
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 13:02:22 -0600 |
21 lines |
Re: Renaissance London
|
Michael Saenger |
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 13:17:10 -0600 |
60 lines |
Re: How many mothers had Medina and her sisters?
|
Martin Leigh Harrison |
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:20:16 -0500 |
101 lines |
Re: How many mothers had Medina and her sisters?
|
Charles Butler |
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 20:31:59 +0100 |
239 lines |
Poeta Regius
|
Lee Piepho |
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 15:22:53 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: How many mothers had Medina and her sisters?
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 20:32:58 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Poeta Regius
|
Bryan John Lowrance |
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 19:59:05 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Poeta Regius
|
Lee Piepho |
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 10:43:01 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: Renaissance London
|
Hardin, Richard F |
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:17:58 -0600 |
46 lines |
Milton's corpse on tour of London
|
Jameela Lares |
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:39:45 -0600 |
27 lines |
what was English good for?
|
David Wilson-Okamura |
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:52:46 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Boyd M Berry |
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:51:31 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Michael Saenger |
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:54:50 -0600 |
80 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
<> |
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:07:40 +0000 |
55 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Harry Berger, Jr. |
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:34:58 -0800 |
105 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Charles Butler |
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:18:43 -0000 |
28 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Kenneth Gross |
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:54:20 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Jameela Lares |
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:56:36 -0600 |
39 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Jameela Lares |
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:17:46 -0600 |
25 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Katherine Eggert |
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:23:29 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Germaine Warkentin |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:31:57 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:46:09 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
<> |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:31:23 +0000 |
77 lines |
Re: How many mothers had Medina and her sisters?
|
Richard Ramsey |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:36:08 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Hannay, Margaret |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:02:33 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Hannay, Margaret |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:12:22 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Jameela Lares |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:16:01 -0600 |
28 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Hannibal Hamlin |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:32:34 -0500 |
42 lines |
candidate not hired by english dept, con't
|
Meredith Skura |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:08:52 -0600 |
27 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Hardin, Richard F |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:27:25 -0600 |
35 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Peter C. Herman |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:50:31 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: Fwd: candidate not hired by english dept, con't
|
Meredith Skura |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:22:02 -0600 |
20 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Meredith Skura |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:32:37 -0600 |
31 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Dorothy Stephens |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:38:14 -0600 |
15 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
John Leonard |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:30:32 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Germaine Warkentin |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:40:41 -0500 |
21 lines |
the list
|
dmiller |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:09:30 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: the list
|
Harry Berger, Jr. |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:35:49 -0800 |
79 lines |
CFP -- RSA 2005: Prince Henry Reviv'd
|
Michael Ullyot |
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:28:28 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Leon Conrad |
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 15:16:14 -0000 |
27 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
Maura Michelle Tarnoff |
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:07:39 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: what were different scripts good for?
|
Martin Leigh Harrison |
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 18:35:02 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: what were different scripts good for?
|
Germaine Warkentin |
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:05:51 -0500 |
74 lines |
Re: what was English good for?
|
John Geraghty |
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:01:20 -0800 |
1000 lines |
Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Peter C. Herman |
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:28:58 -0800 |
46 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
<> |
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 23:44:24 +0000 |
50 lines |
Sixteenth Century Studies Conference panel?
|
Margaret Christian |
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:27:56 +0000 |
16 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Beth Quitslund |
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:03:57 -0500 |
122 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Marianne F Micros |
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:21:18 -0500 |
140 lines |
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Kathryn Evans |
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:15:34 -0800 |
470 lines |
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Home |
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:43:45 -0500 |
213 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Craig A. Berry |
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:51:02 -0600 |
39 lines |
Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Susanne Woods |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:23:51 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Steven J. Willett |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:01:01 +0900 |
80 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Dorothy Stephens |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:43:51 -0600 |
74 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Dorothy Stephens |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:12:06 -0600 |
16 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
William Oram |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:24:08 -0500 |
70 lines |
standards
|
dmiller |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:42:02 -0500 |
76 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Charles Butler |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:49:56 -0000 |
44 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP etc.
|
Ted Steinberg |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:05:11 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
<> |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:07:19 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Dan Knauss |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:24:46 -0600 |
190 lines |
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Jacob Johnson |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:31:10 -0800 |
280 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Roger Kuin |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:54:21 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Jacob Johnson |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:04:16 -0800 |
96 lines |
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Marianne F Micros |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:05:58 -0500 |
147 lines |
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Marianne F Micros |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:09:48 -0500 |
108 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Christine Cornell |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:18:40 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Dan Knauss |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:48:52 -0600 |
115 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Beth Quitslund |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:36:17 -0500 |
98 lines |
Re: Fwd: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Dorothy Stephens |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:54:17 -0600 |
77 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Charles Butler |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:09:43 -0000 |
45 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Marshall Grossman |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:16:11 -0500 |
57 lines |
Apology
|
Roger Kuin |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:46:34 +0100 |
11 lines |
Bombing Tolkien
|
Mike Shipley |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:04:03 EST |
98 lines |
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Mike Shipley |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:33:30 EST |
85 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Colin Burrow |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:00:17 -0000 |
103 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Charles Butler |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:19:50 -0000 |
20 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Steven J. Willett |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:21:16 +0900 |
99 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Gavin Alexander |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:36:45 +0000 |
109 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Colin Burrow |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:11:03 -0000 |
131 lines |
Re: CFP: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings (3/01/04; MLA '04)
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:55:22 +0000 |
18 lines |
Re: Bombing Tolkien
|
Greg George |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:30:20 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
David Wilson-Okamura |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:03:09 -0500 |
155 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
John Leonard |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:45:16 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Margaret Christian |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:09:15 -0500 |
119 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Bowman, Mary |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:52:03 -0600 |
59 lines |
Trees and Tolkien
|
David Wilson-Okamura |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:04:19 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Beth Quitslund |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:13:28 -0500 |
32 lines |
Trees and Tolkien
|
Reid Robert L. |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:27:23 -0500 |
106 lines |
Re: Trees and Tolkien
|
Thomas P Roche |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:50:04 -0500 |
118 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
<> |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 01:20:52 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Michael Saenger |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:29:37 -0600 |
61 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Susanne Woods |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:31:44 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Steven J. Willett |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:33:05 +0900 |
81 lines |
LXXV's last 3 words
|
Martin Leigh Harrison |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:18:28 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: LXXV's last 3 words
|
Charles Butler |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:27:19 -0000 |
28 lines |
Re: LXXV's last 3 words
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:40:45 +0000 |
57 lines |
Re: LXXV's last 3 words
|
<> |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:16:51 +0000 |
19 lines |
Re: LXXV's last 3 words
|
William Oram |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:03:31 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: LXXV's last 3 words
|
Christopher Warley |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:13:30 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
<> |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:31:56 -0500 |
94 lines |
Re: LXXV's last 3 words
|
<> |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:26:47 -0800 |
30 lines |
LXXV's last 3 words
|
W.L. Godshalk |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:31:28 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: LXXV's last 3 words
|
Marshall Grossman |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:02:49 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: LXXV's last 3 words
|
William Oram |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:27:10 -0500 |
120 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
William Oram |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:55:54 -0500 |
128 lines |
xxv
|
<> |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:35:46 -0800 |
43 lines |
Re: xxv
|
dmiller |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:05:43 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: xxv
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:44:08 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Charles Butler |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:44:24 -0000 |
37 lines |
Re: xxv
|
Roger Kuin |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:48:25 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: xxv
|
Peter C. Herman |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:52:03 -0800 |
42 lines |
Re: xxv
|
<> |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:55:15 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: xxv
|
Dorothy Stephens |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 19:17:12 -0600 |
49 lines |
Re: xxv
|
William Oram |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:46:17 -0500 |
82 lines |
Re: xxv
|
Kenneth Gross |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:01:14 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: xxv
|
Roger Kuin |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:25:38 +0100 |
45 lines |
posting from Jim Nohrnberg
|
Kenneth Gross |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:17:37 -0500 |
155 lines |
Re: xxv
|
Christopher Warley |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:52:26 -0500 |
40 lines |
Medusa (was xxv was LXXV)
|
<> |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:51:10 -0800 |
24 lines |
lxxv
|
<> |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:54:42 -0800 |
46 lines |
Re: lxxv
|
dmiller |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:06:08 -0500 |
73 lines |
Medusa and terrible beauty
|
Katherine Eggert |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:30:21 -0700 |
144 lines |
Re: Medusa and terrible beauty
|
Douglas Eskew |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:10:36 -0600 |
67 lines |
Re: Medusa and terrible beauty
|
Dorothy Stephens |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:03:54 -0600 |
26 lines |
Re: Medusa and terrible beauty
|
Douglas Eskew |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:31:36 -0600 |
27 lines |
Re: Theorizing J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
|
Mike Shipley |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:45:49 EST |
38 lines |
Re: Medusa and terrible beauty
|
Steven J. Willett |
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:11:00 +0900 |
116 lines |
Re: Medusa and terrible beauty (Correction)
|
Steven J. Willett |
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:50:04 +0900 |
32 lines |
Re: Medusa and terrible beauty
|
Marianne F Micros |
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:40:52 -0500 |
34 lines |
good myths and bad or indifferent writing (mostly on Tolkien)
|
David Wilson-Okamura |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:40:01 -0500 |
104 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing and R.A.Johnson
|
<> |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:23:49 EST |
42 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing and R.A.Johnson
|
David Wilson-Okamura |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:06:26 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
<> |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:52:51 +0000 |
17 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:09:58 +0000 |
79 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
dmiller |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:18:20 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:27:17 +0000 |
19 lines |
Re: Tolkien (fwd)
|
Kenneth Gross |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:02:17 -0500 |
47 lines |
Sp's forgettable language?
|
Kathryn Evans |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:33:58 -0800 |
102 lines |
Re: Sp's forgettable language?
|
Hardin, Richard F |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:17:42 -0600 |
169 lines |
From Jim Nohrnberg
|
Brad D. Tuggle |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:21:34 -0500 |
321 lines |
Re: Sp's forgettable language?
|
Genevieve Guenther |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:17:46 -0800 |
38 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
Craig A. Berry |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 01:14:08 -0600 |
58 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
Marianne F Micros |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:43:47 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:06:07 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
Charles Butler |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:41:32 -0000 |
22 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
Dorothy Stephens |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:43:23 -0600 |
72 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:29:14 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
Hardin, Richard F |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:31:02 -0600 |
35 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
dmiller |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:02:54 -0500 |
159 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
Dorothy Stephens |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:27:49 -0600 |
44 lines |
Re: Sp's forgettable language?
|
Mike Shipley |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:54:29 EST |
46 lines |
Re: good myths and bad or indifferent writing (on Spenser)
|
Laurie Johnson |
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:00:14 +0000 |
9 lines |
Re: Tolkien
|
Peter C. Herman |
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 05:35:07 -0800 |
13 lines |
Nohrnberg: Re: Forgettable Spenser (fwd)
|
Brad D. Tuggle |
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:49:27 -0500 |
177 lines |
Re: Nohrnberg: Re: Forgettable Spenser (fwd)
|
Andrew Zurcher |
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:25:04 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Sp's forgettable language?
|
Hardin, Richard F |
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:01:44 -0600 |
82 lines |
forgettable Spenser
|
zurch |
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:03:33 +0000 |
53 lines |
Forgettable Spenser [forwarded from Jim Nohrnberg]
|
zurch |
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:45:44 +0000 |
75 lines |
Spenser Stanza Competition: Reminder
|
zurch |
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:36:10 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: Spenser Stanza Competition: Reminder
|
<> |
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:55:43 -0500 |
39 lines |
Spenser MLA sessions deadline extended: March 15
|
Craig A. Berry |
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:33:32 -0600 |
34 lines |