JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


2004


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Fortran 95/2003 Explained" (Errata) (1 message)
(j3.2004-508) Re: Fortran 20xx Request #Pub-121 (1 message)
(j3.2004-509) Re: Fortran 20xx Request #Pub-121 (1 message)
(random) Signal handling question (1 message)
(un)formatted IO (9 messages)
5 Day Course - Scientific Programming with Fortran 95 (1 message)
<No subject> (6 messages)
A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization... (11 messages)
a quick question (3 messages)
ABORT with traceback (5 messages)
add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC? (4 messages)
Allow OPTIONAL and named arguments in derived type constructors? (2 messages)
ANDTHEN, ORELSE as functions? (1 message)
Announcement: IBM XL Fortran Enterprise Edition V9.1 for AIX is now available (1 message)
anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems (12 messages)
Ariane (was: Stir it up again?) (2 messages)
Array help requested (2 messages)
Article by John Reid in Scientific Programming (2 messages)
ASSOCIATED (5 messages)
AW: Fortran Tutorials (1 message)
bug in g95 ? (7 messages)
bug in G95 with Reshape (1 message)
bugs everywhere (10 messages)
COMMON & SAVE (17 messages)
Compile Fortran 77 codes with long sentences (3 messages)
configurable default real (89 messages)
Confusing timing results (1 message)
Correction to message about Intel Visual Fortran Professional Edition (1 message)
creating i++ operator in F90? (15 messages)
Creation of a variable in a Module (4 messages)
Current Usage of OpenVMS (Was: vms uasge) (1 message)
data fingerprinting (2 messages)
Data structures question (6 messages)
Data type "UNDEFINED" (25 messages)
Deallocating array pointers (24 messages)
Default initialize a local variable (3 messages)
derived-type arrays (2 messages)
Direct data access in F from Excel (2 messages)
Does anybody have a copy of ANSI x3.21? (1 message)
Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x? (4 messages)
dummy adjustable array size.. (8 messages)
Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office. (4 messages)
error of rand with intel fortran compiler (10 messages)
Execution monitoring system (1 message)
explicit interfaces and array passing (17 messages)
F2003 has been published (5 messages)
F2003 has been published [OT] (1 message)
F90 interface to FFTW (1 message)
f90 paranoia benchmark (2 messages)
F90 problem (4 messages)
F90-95/F77 floating-point trapping mode on SUN workstation (2 messages)
files at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1601-N1650/ (3 messages)
FlexLM on Itanium? (1 message)
Forpedo: A Preprocessor for Fortran Generics (1 message)
Fortran 2003 standard publication date (3 messages)
Fortran 90 refactoring tools (3 messages)
Fortran 95/2003 Explained (announcement) (1 message)
Fortran 9X and SQL (2 messages)
Fortran Forum (1 message)
Fortran Open Directory (1 message)
Fortran Resources (January) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (June) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (Last Issue) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (March, 2004) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (May, 2004) (1 message)
Fortran Tutorials (1 message)
Fortran/C Speed (37 messages)
ftn95 and modules (11 messages)
Fw: Fortran Tutorials (1 message)
FW: [Fwd: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.3158) DTR vote result] (1 message)
g77 compiler? (7 messages)
g95 runs on Windows (16 messages)
g95 runs on Windows XP (1 message)
Generating correlated samples for a uniform distribution (2 messages)
Generic interfaces for function arguments (6 messages)
Generic resolution with CHARACTER (7 messages)
Generics (was: configurable...) (5 messages)
ibits question (5 messages)
IBM XL Fortran V8.1 for Linux supports Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 NOW (1 message)
Ieee 754 query (1 message)
Integer formating (5 messages)
intel compilers for academic use (3 messages)
Intel Visual Fortran Professional Edition - Pricing and Upgrades (1 message)
IO buffer overflow (17 messages)
IOSTAT and INTENT(OUT) (2 messages)
Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ? (11 messages)
Is this construct standard conforming ? (5 messages)
Is this example standard conforming (Fortran 95 + TR 15581)? (3 messages)
Is this example standard conforming ? (10 messages)
Is this other example standard conforming ? (5 messages)
Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ? (10 messages)
Is this recursive? (3 messages)
Isn't this standard conforming? (2 messages)
lahey fortran 2003 support (4 messages)
language lawyer needed re illegal array indices (2 messages)
legal code? (2 messages)
Long names on IA32/64 (9 messages)
Long names with Absoft (3 messages)
Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004 (4 messages)
memory allocation in conjuction with modules (7 messages)
modules & intrinsic functions (4 messages)
MPI under Opteron (fwd) (4 messages)
multiple association (2 messages)
My math problem (was: Somewhat OT) (7 messages)
My two cents RE: "ANDTHEN", "ORELSE" (1 message)
NAMELIST formatting question (4 messages)
New Kinds of Kinds (1 message)
Passing array pointer to implicit interface function (12 messages)
passing F90 data structures into subroutines (3 messages)
pb with intrinsic function and parameter (12 messages)
Please disregard Array Help Requested (1 message)
practical issues with array-valued functions (3 messages)
Precision in F90 (13 messages)
problem with function as argument of procedure (8 messages)
Question (1 message)
question about allocatable array components (TR 15581) (2 messages)
Quick allocate question (6 messages)
Quick g77 question (6 messages)
quickwin font set (1 message)
qwin-console cursor jump (1 message)
Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty (9 messages)
Reading a line of bytes one by one (4 messages)
referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays (6 messages)
Requirements for revision of Fortran (1 message)
Retire FORTRAN?! (21 messages)
review "Fortran 95/2003 Explained" on Slashdot? (2 messages)
Rewind and end of file (9 messages)
script language (10 messages)
Second call for papers (1 message)
Somewhat OT... (5 messages)
SSE2 instructions experiences (2 messages)
Stir it up again? (9 messages)
Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!) (32 messages)
STOP guarantees (9 messages)
Style question (13 messages)
suggestion (4 messages)
Summary: (un)formatted IO (1 message)
Symbols (40 messages)
target attribute (2 messages)
test (1 message)
TEST---IGNORE (1 message)
test: ignore (1 message)
tools for converting from f77 to f95 (26 messages)
Truly non-advancing print statement? (12 messages)
UK comment on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft (2 messages)
use of module elements - is this legal? (7 messages)
vms uasge (3 messages)
When a WRITE statement matters (10 messages)
Which compiler on IA64? (10 messages)
Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion (6 messages)
Writing to string buffer (9 messages)
Yet another thought: (RE: Retire FORTRAN?!) (2 messages)
[ANN] F90 for f77 programmers course material available (1 message)
[Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN] (12 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Fortran 95/2003 Explained" (Errata)

"Fortran 95/2003 Explained" (Errata)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:23:08 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

(j3.2004-508) Re: Fortran 20xx Request #Pub-121

(j3.2004-508) Re: Fortran 20xx Request #Pub-121

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:25:03 -0800

33 lines

New Thread

(j3.2004-509) Re: Fortran 20xx Request #Pub-121

(j3.2004-509) Re: Fortran 20xx Request #Pub-121

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:25:41 -0800

191 lines

New Thread

(random) Signal handling question

(random) Signal handling question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:31:36 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

(un)formatted IO

(un)formatted IO

Joerg Stiller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:45:53 +0100

21 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:22:26 +0100

20 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

Joerg Stiller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:26:35 +0100

34 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

W.J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:15:21 +0100

80 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:29:18 -0800

86 lines

(un)formatted IO

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:56:48 -0800

39 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

Yasuki Arasaki <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:37:26 +0900

21 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:45:06 -0600

31 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:24:33 -0600

292 lines

New Thread

5 Day Course - Scientific Programming with Fortran 95

5 Day Course - Scientific Programming with Fortran 95

Shaun Forth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:59:28 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

John Vaul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:32:21 +0100

45 lines

<No subject>

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:32:21 -0700

62 lines

<No subject>

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:06:58 +0100

21 lines

<No subject>

John Vaul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:32:21 +0100

29 lines

<No subject>

Jouni Lerssi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:43:08 +0200

60 lines

<No subject>

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:17:51 -0800

74 lines

New Thread

A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:27:31 -0500

51 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Martin Dix <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:14:18 +1100

36 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:24:05 -0500

46 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:06:31 -0800

53 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:21:24 -0500

44 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:54:55 -0800

29 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:35:40 -0800

25 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:18:54 -0500

35 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Stenson Matthew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:28:31 +1000

70 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:15:58 -0800

32 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Stenson Matthew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:30:51 +1000

30 lines

New Thread

a quick question

a quick question

Yongcheng Zhou <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:14:53 -0500

22 lines

Re: a quick question

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:18:46 +1000

61 lines

Re: a quick question

Keith Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:09:43 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

ABORT with traceback

ABORT with traceback

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 20:25:47 -0500

20 lines

Re: ABORT with traceback

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 07:07:51 -0500

52 lines

Re: ABORT with traceback

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:11:10 -0500

44 lines

Re: ABORT with traceback

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:46:12 +0000

40 lines

Re: ABORT with traceback

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:39:55 -0600

111 lines

New Thread

add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?

add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?

Vivek Rao <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:33:36 -0800

31 lines

Re: add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Dec 2004 21:06:52 -0500

27 lines

Re: add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:38:25 -0600

34 lines

Re: add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:12:43 +1000

23 lines

New Thread

Allow OPTIONAL and named arguments in derived type constructors?

Allow OPTIONAL and named arguments in derived type constructors?

Vivek Rao <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:48:08 -0800

74 lines

Re: Allow OPTIONAL and named arguments in derived type constructors?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 19:53:11 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

ANDTHEN, ORELSE as functions?

ANDTHEN, ORELSE as functions?

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:21:46 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

Announcement: IBM XL Fortran Enterprise Edition V9.1 for AIX is now available

Announcement: IBM XL Fortran Enterprise Edition V9.1 for AIX is now available

Yin Zhu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:56:40 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:58:12 +0100

226 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Keith Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:28:13 -0700

197 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:38:39 -0400

51 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:42:29 -0400

28 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:51:05 -0500

163 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:49:45 +0200

29 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:26:14 -0700

18 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:41:16 -0700

34 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Keith Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:45:51 -0700

119 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:07:24 -0400

47 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:08:27 -0700

49 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

J.L.Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:53:58 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

Ariane (was: Stir it up again?)

Re: Ariane (was: Stir it up again?)

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:11:53 +1000

75 lines

Re: Ariane (was: Stir it up again?)

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:26:25 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Array help requested

Array help requested

Craig Shirley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:02:14 -0800

65 lines

Re: Array help requested

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:33:33 -0800

86 lines

New Thread

Article by John Reid in Scientific Programming

Article by John Reid in Scientific Programming

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:00:44 +0000

15 lines

Re: Article by John Reid in Scientific Programming

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:21:57 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

ASSOCIATED

ASSOCIATED

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:33:16 -0400

51 lines

Re: ASSOCIATED

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:51:14 -0700

52 lines

Re: ASSOCIATED

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:23:33 -0600

29 lines

Re: ASSOCIATED

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:30:15 -0400

31 lines

Re: ASSOCIATED

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:32:19 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

AW: Fortran Tutorials

AW: Fortran Tutorials

Sadnik Dominik <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:11:31 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

bug in g95 ?

bug in g95 ?

Jean-Baptiste FAURE <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:23:55 +0100

35 lines

Re: bug in g95 ?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:59:00 +0100

53 lines

Re: bug in g95 ?

Paul Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:14:59 +0100

21 lines

Re: bug in g95 ?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:59:35 +0100

65 lines

Re: bug in g95 ?

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:14:20 -0800

28 lines

Re: bug in g95 ?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:34:04 +0100

44 lines

Re: bug in g95 ?

Harry Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:41:38 -0600

51 lines

New Thread

bug in G95 with Reshape

bug in G95 with Reshape

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:38:35 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

bugs everywhere

bugs everywhere

Stuart Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:57:06 +1100

61 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:49:36 -0800

71 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 00:10:37 -0800

23 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Stuart Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:52:54 +1100

49 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 05:25:37 -0800

45 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:20:45 +0200

26 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:45:01 -0800

27 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:12:20 +0200

37 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:57:26 -0500

34 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:20:36 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

COMMON & SAVE

COMMON & SAVE

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:22:38 -0500

48 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:04:48 -0500

36 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:58:24 -0500

65 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Keith Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:09:04 -0800

45 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:23:53 -0500

70 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:49:56 -0800

48 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:35:14 -0800

40 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Paddy O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:31:50 +1100

66 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Paddy O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:38:48 +1100

52 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:30:26 -0800

46 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:08:49 -0800

53 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:30:48 -0500

69 lines

COMMON & SAVE

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:29:31 -0800

31 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:43:05 -0500

60 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:17:00 -0500

33 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:54:20 -0800

55 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:06:18 -0800

54 lines

New Thread

Compile Fortran 77 codes with long sentences

Compile Fortran 77 codes with long sentences

Z Zhou <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:43:58 +0100

19 lines

Re: Compile Fortran 77 codes with long sentences

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jun 2004 05:43:03 -0500

24 lines

Re: Compile Fortran 77 codes with long sentences

Herbert Fruechtl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:55:49 +0100

81 lines

New Thread

configurable default real

configurable default real

Yasuki Arasaki <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:05:45 +0900

221 lines

Re: configurable default real

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2004 22:27:46 -0500

41 lines

Re: configurable default real

Yasuki Arasaki <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 16:06:58 +0900

82 lines

Re: configurable default real

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 09:34:14 -0500

51 lines

Re: configurable default real

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:02:31 -0500

74 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:24:27 +1000

238 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 16:06:17 -0700

37 lines

Re: configurable default real

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 18:31:52 -0500

32 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 16:46:51 -0700

28 lines

Re: configurable default real

Yasuki Arasaki <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Mar 2004 08:55:09 +0900

66 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 7 Mar 2004 00:13:51 +0000

46 lines

Re: configurable default real

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 21:42:46 -0500

42 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:48:07 -0700

30 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 7 Mar 2004 17:27:58 +0000

42 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Mar 2004 13:11:33 -0700

25 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 07:48:23 -0600

87 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:36:57 +1000

33 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:36:58 +1000

108 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:36:58 +1000

56 lines

Re: configurable default real

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:26:25 -0500

29 lines

configurable default real

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:51:04 -0800

72 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:19:11 -0700

19 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:41:12 -0800

40 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:44:28 -0600

63 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:09:52 -0800

73 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:28:52 -0700

75 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:58:36 -0800

27 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:08:50 -0600

48 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:16:51 -0700

38 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:18:03 -0800

39 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:41:43 -0600

58 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:39:06 -0800

76 lines

Re: configurable default real

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:51:30 -0600

54 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:55:30 -0800

80 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:06:49 -0600

100 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:08:17 -0800

36 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:16:33 -0700

34 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:13:30 -0800

48 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:30:56 -0700

51 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:36:25 -0800

65 lines

Re: configurable default real

Yasuki Arasaki <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:17:07 +0900

47 lines

Re: configurable default real

Yasuki Arasaki <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:53:05 +0900

84 lines

Re: configurable default real

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:18:47 -0700

26 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:29:35 -0800

53 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:55:31 -0800

47 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:38:17 -0700

20 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:54:54 -0600

28 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:34:45 -0800

90 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:14:36 -0800

68 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:35:51 -0700

43 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:05:35 -0800

27 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:01:37 -0700

20 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:32:46 -0800

32 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:09:46 -0700

43 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:19:51 -0800

27 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:45:34 -0700

26 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:58:50 +1000

70 lines

Re: configurable default real

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:43:28 -0600

105 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:34:02 +1000

31 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:34:02 +1000

25 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:35:58 -0800

52 lines

Re: configurable default real

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:35:28 -0600

94 lines

Re: configurable default real

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:48:03 -0600

26 lines

Re: configurable default real

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:02:49 -0000

27 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:08:01 -0800

51 lines

Re: configurable default real

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:33:06 -0600

42 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:07:43 -0800

43 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:20:55 -0800

45 lines

Re: configurable default real

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:25:48 -0500

25 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:37:34 -0800

20 lines

Re: configurable default real

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:54:00 -0600

43 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Mar 2004 23:22:25 +1000

61 lines

Re: configurable default real

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 02:04:11 -0800

20 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:12:06 -0800

42 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:49:47 -0600

62 lines

Re: configurable default real

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:05:50 -0800

22 lines

Re: configurable default real

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:09:31 -0500

30 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:16:52 -0800

27 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:47:42 -0600

63 lines

Re: configurable default real

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:53:16 -0600

48 lines

Re: configurable default real

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:12:08 -0800

26 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:36:38 -0600

62 lines

Re: configurable default real

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:52:15 -0500

31 lines

Re: configurable default real

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:58:55 EST

43 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 08:29:56 +1000

57 lines

Re: configurable default real

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:38:43 -0700

29 lines

Re: configurable default real

timothyprince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:30:56 -0800

46 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Apr 2004 01:21:32 +1000

42 lines

Re: configurable default real

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:00:27 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

Confusing timing results

Confusing timing results

Roderick W. Failing III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:14:29 -0500

224 lines

New Thread

Correction to message about Intel Visual Fortran Professional Edition

Correction to message about Intel Visual Fortran Professional Edition

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:15:40 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

creating i++ operator in F90?

creating i++ operator in F90?

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:31:16 -0700

52 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:53:38 -0700

34 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:00:42 -0700

48 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:15:14 -0400

22 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:25:28 -0700

39 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:29:49 -0700

39 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:08:30 -0600

92 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:39:59 -0700

136 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Erik Schnetter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:04:04 +0200

57 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:11:14 -0700

31 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:24:40 -0600

46 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:07:16 +0300

46 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:09:40 +0300

70 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:55:08 -0700

47 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:21:30 -0600

89 lines

New Thread

Creation of a variable in a Module

Creation of a variable in a Module

celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:18:13 +0000

26 lines

Re: Creation of a variable in a Module

Herbert Fruechtl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:42:02 -0000

75 lines

Re: Creation of a variable in a Module

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:11:51 -0500

27 lines

Re: Creation of a variable in a Module

J.L.Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:23:22 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Current Usage of OpenVMS (Was: vms uasge)

Current Usage of OpenVMS (Was: vms uasge)

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:40:42 -0500

344 lines

New Thread

data fingerprinting

data fingerprinting

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:52:23 -0700

25 lines

Re: data fingerprinting

Keith Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:10:29 -0800

51 lines

New Thread

Data structures question

Data structures question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:03:28 -0400

52 lines

Re: Data structures question

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:36:22 -0700

36 lines

Re: Data structures question

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:30:03 -0600

44 lines

Re: Data structures question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:57:20 -0400

73 lines

Re: Data structures question

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:14:31 -0600

138 lines

Re: Data structures question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:47:50 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Data type "UNDEFINED"

Data type "UNDEFINED"

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:56:19 -0500

74 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:10:03 -0800

33 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:08 -0700

35 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:22:49 -0600

95 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:22:59 -0500

57 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:58:30 -0600

85 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:01:54 -0800

73 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:47:51 -0700

107 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:13:49 -0800

43 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:20:23 -0800

31 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:24:10 -0800

28 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:15:49 -0800

25 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:52:17 +0100

44 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:46:24 -0800

34 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:07:36 +1000

69 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:13:18 -0500

71 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:13:06 -0800

80 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:19:57 +1000

20 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:19:57 +1000

25 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:19:57 +1000

40 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:08:41 -0500

88 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:39:38 -0600

94 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:32:30 +1030

109 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:41:07 -0600

63 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:15:57 -0000

29 lines

New Thread

Deallocating array pointers

Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:31:12 -0400

35 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:15:05 -0400

54 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:36:44 -0400

53 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:20:43 -0700

78 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:32:03 -0400

40 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:46:02 -0400

26 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:50:47 -0700

71 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:15:09 -0500

50 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

J.L.Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:11:51 +0100

34 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:59:39 -0700

35 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:16:11 -0400

31 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:29:17 -0700

42 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:52:47 -0600

50 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:05:16 -0400

55 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:05:48 -0700

47 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:22:57 -0600

44 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:54:34 -0700

39 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

J.L.Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:44:06 +0100

37 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:47:42 -0400

22 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

J.L.Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:25:17 +0100

55 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:45:37 -0400

29 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:54:04 -0400

38 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:52:30 -0500

33 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:18:55 -0800

68 lines

New Thread

Default initialize a local variable

Default initialize a local variable

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:40:25 -0500

25 lines

Re: Default initialize a local variable

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:09:30 +0000

44 lines

Re: Default initialize a local variable

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:07:52 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

derived-type arrays

derived-type arrays

David Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:28:28 -0700

30 lines

Re: derived-type arrays

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:46:56 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

Direct data access in F from Excel

Direct data access in F from Excel

Blair, Ernest R. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:33:19 -0700

23 lines

Re: Direct data access in F from Excel

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:04:06 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

Does anybody have a copy of ANSI x3.21?

Does anybody have a copy of ANSI x3.21?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:31:00 -0700

16 lines

New Thread

Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?

Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:59:35 -0400

33 lines

Re: Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?

Erik Schnetter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:03:12 +0200

42 lines

Re: Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:21:49 -0700

33 lines

Re: Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:27:49 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

dummy adjustable array size..

dummy adjustable array size..

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:19:02 -0600

41 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:31:27 +0000

47 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:38:01 -0800

60 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:54:41 -0600

37 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:24:51 -0800

58 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:02:31 -0600

53 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:49:16 -0500

22 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:07:58 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:51:23 +0100

12 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:34:38 +0100

12 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:32:30 +0100

12 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:32:38 +0200

15 lines

New Thread

error of rand with intel fortran compiler

error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Xiaogang Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 10:16:08 -0500

60 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 15:36:20 -0000

23 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 15:58:52 -0000

100 lines

Re: error of rand with Intel FORTRAN compiler

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:47:08 -0800

53 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Xiaogang Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 00:12:32 -0500

52 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:51:49 -0500

30 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 12:20:07 -0800

37 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:16:41 -0800

52 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:47:44 -0800

39 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:07:49 -0700

49 lines

New Thread

Execution monitoring system

Execution monitoring system

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:43:43 -0400

322 lines

New Thread

explicit interfaces and array passing

explicit interfaces and array passing

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 18:35:58 +0200

33 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 10:21:14 -0700

52 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 12:32:09 -0500

42 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 12:33:56 -0500

44 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 21:45:57 +0200

62 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 15:51:47 -0400

40 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 16:01:45 -0400

44 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 22:08:46 +0200

40 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 22:15:23 +0200

57 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 16:15:52 -0400

32 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 16:22:58 -0400

21 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 16:26:23 -0400

30 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 17:54:20 -0500

41 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 21:10:57 -0700

47 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 09:35:46 +0200

76 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 09:25:36 -0400

52 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 12:37:57 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

F2003 has been published

F2003 has been published

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:21:41 +0000

28 lines

Re: F2003 has been published

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:33:37 -0800

40 lines

Re: F2003 has been published

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:19:02 +1000

80 lines

Re: F2003 has been published

Blair, Ernest R. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:32:22 -0800

100 lines

Re: F2003 has been published

J.L.Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:25:42 +0000

103 lines

New Thread

F2003 has been published [OT]

Re: F2003 has been published [OT]

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 12:14:33 +0200

45 lines

New Thread

F90 interface to FFTW

F90 interface to FFTW

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:03:10 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

f90 paranoia benchmark

f90 paranoia benchmark

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:45:00 -0700

37 lines

Re: f90 paranoia benchmark

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:07:21 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

F90 problem

F90 problem

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:03:56 -0400

61 lines

Re: F90 problem

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:33:10 -0700

40 lines

Re: F90 problem

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:50:56 +0300

46 lines

Re: F90 problem

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:48:49 -0600

42 lines

New Thread

F90-95/F77 floating-point trapping mode on SUN workstation

F90-95/F77 floating-point trapping mode on SUN workstation

Jean-Claude Berges <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 17:16:32 +0200

39 lines

Re: F90-95/F77 floating-point trapping mode on SUN workstation

Keith Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:10:33 -0800

53 lines

New Thread

files at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1601-N1650/

files at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1601-N1650/

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:04:53 -0000

116 lines

Re: files at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1601-N1650/

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:27:37 +0000

44 lines

Re: files at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1601-N1650/

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 07:43:51 -0800

46 lines

New Thread

FlexLM on Itanium?

FlexLM on Itanium?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:04:50 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Forpedo: A Preprocessor for Fortran Generics

Forpedo: A Preprocessor for Fortran Generics

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:10:40 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Fortran 2003 standard publication date

Fortran 2003 standard publication date

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:59:47 +0100

19 lines

Re: Fortran 2003 standard publication date

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:04:16 -0700

31 lines

Re: Fortran 2003 standard publication date

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:16:41 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Fortran 90 refactoring tools

Fortran 90 refactoring tools

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:27:33 +0200

38 lines

Re: Fortran 90 refactoring tools

John Appleyard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:25:47 +0100

27 lines

Re: Fortran 90 refactoring tools

Richard Pascal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:38:24 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Fortran 95/2003 Explained (announcement)

Fortran 95/2003 Explained (announcement)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:15:25 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

Fortran 9X and SQL

Fortran 9X and SQL

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:05:55 -0600

115 lines

Re: Fortran 9X and SQL

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:25:31 -0600

135 lines

New Thread

Fortran Forum

Fortran Forum

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:39:31 -0400

81 lines

New Thread

Fortran Open Directory

Fortran Open Directory

Vivek Rao <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:12:55 -0800

42 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (January)

Fortran Resources (January)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:38:15 +0100

729 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (June)

Fortran Resources (June)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jun 2004 04:57:28 -0400

820 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (Last Issue)

Fortran Resources (Last Issue)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:23:55 +0100

818 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (March, 2004)

Fortran Resources (March, 2004)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:20:28 -0000

743 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (May, 2004)

Fortran Resources (May, 2004)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 09:46:16 +0100

746 lines

New Thread

Fortran Tutorials

Re: Fortran Tutorials

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:10:30 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Fortran/C Speed

Fortran/C Speed

Naomi Greenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:21:48 -0400

55 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:24:57 -0700

33 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:45:00 -0500

133 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:53:58 -0400

66 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Naomi Greenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:22:11 -0400

45 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:23:49 -0500

56 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:00:17 -0600

26 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Naomi Greenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:41:21 -0400

17 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Keith Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:42:26 -0700

138 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Keith Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:02:10 -0700

72 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:07:02 -0400

45 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:22:24 -0600

33 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:31:44 -0700

45 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:19:15 -0700

62 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:15:52 +0200

221 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Erik Schnetter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:07:04 +0200

61 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 06:06:00 -0700

23 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:28:42 -0400

37 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:33:51 -0400

41 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:09:53 -0600

29 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 21:41:09 +0200

77 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Vivek Rao <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:34:34 -0700

47 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Keith Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:41:46 -0700

101 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Paddy O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:15:52 +1000

111 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:10:10 -0600

47 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:05:56 -0700

34 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:35:05 +0200

114 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:51:52 +0200

83 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Paddy O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:48:51 +1000

95 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

David Muxworthy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:36:37 +0100

26 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:57:17 -0500

46 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:49:59 -0700

47 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:59:07 -0700

46 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Gerry Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 02:27:22 -0400

66 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Paddy O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:02:22 +1000

42 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:06:09 -0400

33 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:25:40 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

ftn95 and modules

ftn95 and modules

John Blair-Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 17:37:45 +0100

97 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 13:07:25 -0400

19 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 10:04:29 -0700

39 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 12:09:17 -0500

20 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 10:12:02 -0700

35 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 11:38:16 -0600

23 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 13:02:13 -0500

63 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 08:26:28 +0100

27 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Jacob =Jouk Jansen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 12:03:15 +0200

50 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 May 2004 13:11:33 +0200

35 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2004 17:15:05 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Fw: Fortran Tutorials

Fw: Fortran Tutorials

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:29:00 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

FW: [Fwd: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.3158) DTR vote result]

FW: [Fwd: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.3158) DTR vote result]

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:04:02 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

g77 compiler?

g77 compiler?

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:33:17 -0700

26 lines

Re: g77 compiler?

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:54:48 -0400

27 lines

Re: g77 compiler?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:58:56 -0400

25 lines

Re: g77 compiler?

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:02:25 -0700

32 lines

Re: g77 compiler?

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:21:57 +0200

32 lines

Re: g77 compiler?

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:01:51 +0100

86 lines

Re: g77 compiler?

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:59:42 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

g95 runs on Windows

g95 runs on Windows

Vivek Rao <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:43:00 -0800

57 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:56:00 +0100

32 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:59:27 -0700

156 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:03:42 -0700

196 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:11:38 -0000

28 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:00:55 -0800

52 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:08:50 +0200

19 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:22:51 -0500

27 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:59:42 +0100

32 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:16:27 +0100

39 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Keith Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:20:23 -0800

38 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:04:05 -0800

42 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:41:38 +0100

33 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:55:29 -0800

21 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 01:00:36 +0100

38 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Keith Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:37:04 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

g95 runs on Windows XP

Re: g95 runs on Windows XP

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:25:01 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Generating correlated samples for a uniform distribution

Generating correlated samples for a uniform distribution

Harry Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:13:03 -0600

20 lines

Re: Generating correlated samples for a uniform distribution

W.J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:46:40 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Generic interfaces for function arguments

Generic interfaces for function arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:00:28 -0400

39 lines

Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:27:02 -0500

41 lines

Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:28:05 -0700

73 lines

Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:04:24 -0400

65 lines

Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:17:17 -0700

87 lines

Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 05:12:05 -0400

105 lines

New Thread

Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:07:03 -0400

28 lines

Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:13:17 -0400

46 lines

Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:24:19 -0700

64 lines

Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:40:09 -0400

56 lines

Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:02:29 -0700

43 lines

Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:19:40 -0400

21 lines

Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:46:27 -0700

46 lines

New Thread

Generics (was: configurable...)

Generics (was: configurable...)

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:58:39 -0700

28 lines

Re: Generics (was: configurable...)

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:11:25 -0800

52 lines

Re: Generics (was: configurable...)

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:33:23 -0700

62 lines

Re: Generics (was: configurable...)

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:50:22 -0800

48 lines

Re: Generics (was: configurable...)

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:28:09 -0700

77 lines

New Thread

ibits question

ibits question

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:38:48 -0600

23 lines

Re: ibits question

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 01:52:35 +0100

33 lines

Re: ibits question

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:02:51 -0600

25 lines

Re: ibits question

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:12:07 -0700

37 lines

Re: ibits question

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:33:02 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

IBM XL Fortran V8.1 for Linux supports Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 NOW

IBM XL Fortran V8.1 for Linux supports Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 NOW

Yin Zhu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:40:48 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Ieee 754 query

Ieee 754 query

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:22:46 -0000

20 lines

New Thread

Integer formating

Integer formating

Paul Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:13:20 +0000

53 lines

Re: Integer formating

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:40:16 -0500

38 lines

Re: Integer formating

Robert E. Leblanc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:51:59 -0800

26 lines

Re: Integer formating

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:00:32 -0500

21 lines

Re: Integer formating

Paul Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:14:07 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

intel compilers for academic use

intel compilers for academic use

Paul Hatton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:07:11 +0100

31 lines

Re: intel compilers for academic use

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 05:42:41 -0800

25 lines

Re: intel compilers for academic use

PS HATTON <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 16:31:48 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

Intel Visual Fortran Professional Edition - Pricing and Upgrades

Intel Visual Fortran Professional Edition - Pricing and Upgrades

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:27:26 -0500

102 lines

New Thread

IO buffer overflow

IO buffer overflow

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:22:08 -0500

22 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 07:49:18 -0800

57 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:56:14 -0500

27 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:12:16 -0800

46 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:20:59 -0500

37 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:48:29 -0600

91 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:56:29 -0600

100 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:22:26 -0800

66 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:06:38 -0800

49 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:17:36 -0800

33 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:03:28 -0800

67 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:25:21 -0800

57 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:44:13 -0500

27 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Keith Bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:54:50 -0800

111 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:22:52 -0600

71 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:27:56 -0800

49 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:47:32 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

IOSTAT and INTENT(OUT)

IOSTAT and INTENT(OUT)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:17:50 -0400

40 lines

Re: IOSTAT and INTENT(OUT)

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:20:37 +0200

69 lines

New Thread

Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:58:36 -0500

29 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:39:48 +1000

34 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:27:15 +0100

39 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:40:42 +0200

66 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:07:46 +0100

52 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:00:35 +0200

81 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:17:37 -0600

113 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:09:03 +1000

34 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:37:29 -0500

33 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Apr 2004 02:13:58 +1000

43 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:47:29 -0800

43 lines

New Thread

Is this construct standard conforming ?

Is this construct standard conforming ?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:55:11 +0200

45 lines

Re: Is this construct standard conforming ?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:26:08 -0800

48 lines

Re: Is this construct standard conforming ?

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:44:56 -0600

60 lines

Re: Is this construct standard conforming ?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:47:07 +0000

62 lines

Re: Is this construct standard conforming ?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:55:59 +0200

71 lines

New Thread

Is this example standard conforming (Fortran 95 + TR 15581)?

Is this example standard conforming (Fortran 95 + TR 15581)?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Apr 2004 12:04:04 -0400

28 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming (Fortran 95 + TR 15581)?

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Apr 2004 12:42:06 -0500

37 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming (Fortran 95 + TR 15581)?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:57:08 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Is this example standard conforming ?

Is this example standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:35:05 -0500

28 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:11:43 +0000

41 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:23:33 +0000

65 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:19:37 +0000

44 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:48:23 -0500

25 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:49:35 -0600

35 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:56:50 -0800

23 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:38:42 +0100

66 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:09:37 +0000

39 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:53:29 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Is this other example standard conforming ?

Is this other example standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:13:36 -0500

33 lines

Re: Is this other example standard conforming ?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:24:19 +0000

40 lines

Re: Is this other example standard conforming ?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:22:11 -0500

21 lines

Re: Is this other example standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:29:15 -0500

17 lines

Re: Is this other example standard conforming ?

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:44:09 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:31:01 -0400

29 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:46:47 -0400

36 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:49:52 -0600

49 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 12:53:52 -0700

42 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:58:32 -0600

39 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:09:52 -0600

50 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:30:01 -0700

66 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:42:36 -0500

159 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:41:08 -0600

37 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 21:13:15 -0400

16 lines

New Thread

Is this recursive?

Is this recursive?

Bertrand Meltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:40:37 +0000

35 lines

Re: Is this recursive?

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:25:35 +0100

58 lines

Re: Is this recursive?

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:55:36 -0800

83 lines

New Thread

Isn't this standard conforming?

Isn't this standard conforming?

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:48:18 -0700

27 lines

Re: Isn't this standard conforming?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:56:59 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

lahey fortran 2003 support

lahey fortran 2003 support

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:48:41 +0000

15 lines

Re: lahey fortran 2003 support

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:52:26 -0500

21 lines

Re: lahey fortran 2003 support

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:00:07 +0000

48 lines

Re: lahey fortran 2003 support

Tim Zeisloft <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:15:22 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

language lawyer needed re illegal array indices

language lawyer needed re illegal array indices

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:42:09 -0700

25 lines

Re: language lawyer needed re illegal array indices

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:25:42 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

legal code?

legal code?

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:53:11 -0700

67 lines

Re: legal code?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:18:56 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

Long names on IA32/64

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:59:17 -0400

23 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:31:03 +0200

59 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:34:40 -0400

37 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:13:38 -0700

21 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:05:04 -0700

24 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:19:12 -0400

18 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:23:17 -0700

17 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:21:02 +0200

38 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:23:15 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

Long names with Absoft

Long names with Absoft

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:27:07 -0400

23 lines

Re: Long names with Absoft

Samuel H. Dupree, Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:39:47 -0400

151 lines

Re: Long names with Absoft

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:40:30 +0300

59 lines

New Thread

Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004

Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:48:03 -0400

28 lines

Re: Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:00:50 -0700

46 lines

Re: Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:10:01 -0700

61 lines

Re: Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:50:30 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

memory allocation in conjuction with modules

memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Ben Blackwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:28:29 -0700

47 lines

Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:27:18 +0100

47 lines

Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Ben Blackwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 06:47:00 -0700

67 lines

Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:49:29 -0600

92 lines

Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:50:52 -0600

24 lines

Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Ben Blackwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:19:02 -0700

40 lines

Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:41:34 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

modules & intrinsic functions

modules & intrinsic functions

celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 15:08:28 +0100

23 lines

Re: modules & intrinsic functions

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 07:46:56 -0700

53 lines

Re: modules & intrinsic functions

Herbert Fruechtl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 15:45:17 +0100

103 lines

Re: modules & intrinsic functions

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 09:56:09 +1000

88 lines

New Thread

MPI under Opteron (fwd)

Re: MPI under Opteron (fwd)

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:24:30 -0500

44 lines

Re: MPI under Opteron (fwd)

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:13:02 -0800

58 lines

Re: MPI under Opteron (fwd)

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:38:20 -0500

44 lines

Re: MPI under Opteron (fwd)

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:40:28 -0800

29 lines

New Thread

multiple association

multiple association

Bertrand Meltz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:38:16 +0100

23 lines

Re: multiple association

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:50:18 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:13:56 -0600

47 lines

Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Paul Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:57:39 +0100

95 lines

Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Ben Blackwell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:06:04 -0700

92 lines

Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:53:13 -0600

149 lines

Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Harry R Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:01:57 -0600

62 lines

Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Paul Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:25:44 +0100

52 lines

Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:37:25 -0600

89 lines

New Thread

My two cents RE: "ANDTHEN", "ORELSE"

My two cents RE: "ANDTHEN", "ORELSE"

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:48:09 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

NAMELIST formatting question

NAMELIST formatting question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 23:30:00 -0500

43 lines

Re: NAMELIST formatting question

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:24:11 -0800

33 lines

Re: NAMELIST formatting question

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:37:41 -0800

57 lines

Re: NAMELIST formatting question

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:29:41 -0600

173 lines

New Thread

New Kinds of Kinds

Re: New Kinds of Kinds

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:12:26 -0700

71 lines

New Thread

Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:01:35 +0200

49 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:24:38 -0400

18 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:11:39 -0700

58 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:27:00 +0200

104 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:22:30 +0200

24 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:12:57 -0400

25 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:28:44 +0200

53 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:34:05 -0400

21 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:42:15 -0700

33 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:16:03 -0400

20 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 12:37:20 -0700

53 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:19:54 +0200

34 lines

New Thread

passing F90 data structures into subroutines

Re: passing F90 data structures into subroutines

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:32:48 -0700

104 lines

Re: passing F90 data structures into subroutines

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:21:23 -0700

33 lines

Re: passing F90 data structures into subroutines

John Vaul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:52:22 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

pb with intrinsic function and parameter

pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Guylaine prat <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:55:56 +0200

33 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:00:08 -0400

22 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:45:41 -0700

49 lines

Re: PB WITH INTRINSIC FUNCTION AND PARAMETER

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:33:29 +1000

39 lines

Re: PB WITH INTRINSIC FUNCTION AND PARAMETER

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:42:33 -0700

26 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Guylaine prat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:52:25 +0200

54 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:03:36 +0200

53 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Guylaine prat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:12:22 +0200

27 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:09:41 +0200

43 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:18:09 -0400

37 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 07:43:25 -0700

34 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Guylaine prat <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:42:03 +0200

28 lines

New Thread

Please disregard Array Help Requested

Please disregard Array Help Requested

Craig Shirley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:38:13 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

practical issues with array-valued functions

practical issues with array-valued functions

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:11:51 -0700

34 lines

Re: practical issues with array-valued functions

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:21:16 -0500

26 lines

Re: practical issues with array-valued functions

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:45:45 -0600

46 lines

New Thread

Precision in F90

Precision in F90

celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:54:23 +0100

14 lines

Re: Precision in F90

David Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:34:58 -0700

28 lines

Re: Precision in F90

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:58:09 +0000

40 lines

Re: Precision in F90

Alan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:47:18 -0700

32 lines

Re: Precision in F90

celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:00:07 +0100

19 lines

Re: Precision in F90

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:00:54 -0700

44 lines

Re: Precision in F90

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:05:16 -0700

29 lines

Re: Precision in F90

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:13:44 +1000

51 lines

Re: Precision in F90

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:55:25 -0600

46 lines

Re: Precision in F90

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:35:45 -0700

36 lines

Re: Precision in F90

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:43:55 +0000

41 lines

Re: Precision in F90

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:15:34 +1000

54 lines

Re: Precision in F90

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:57:29 +1000

57 lines

New Thread

problem with function as argument of procedure

problem with function as argument of procedure

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:22:42 +0200

62 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:35:45 +0200

58 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:57:14 +0200

23 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:47:51 -0500

22 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Yasuki Arasaki <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:22:54 +0900

96 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 06:36:29 +0200

77 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 07:58:28 -0800

73 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:57:25 +0200

16 lines

New Thread

Question

Question

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:55:03 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

question about allocatable array components (TR 15581)

question about allocatable array components (TR 15581)

Norman Clerman (Opcon) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:18:48 -0400

58 lines

Re: question about allocatable array components (TR 15581)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:30:02 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

Quick allocate question

Quick allocate question

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:40:32 +0200

29 lines

Re: Quick allocate question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:04:59 -0400

33 lines

Re: Quick allocate question

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:30:37 +0200

56 lines

Re: Quick allocate question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:39:52 -0400

27 lines

Re: Quick allocate question

Orville E. Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:22:13 -0500

45 lines

Re: Quick allocate question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:00:15 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

Quick g77 question

Quick g77 question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:39:00 -0400

24 lines

Re: Quick g77 question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:49:37 -0700

52 lines

Re: Quick g77 question

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:48:09 +0300

50 lines

Re: Quick g77 question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:59:20 -0400

27 lines

Re: Quick g77 question

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:35:51 +0100

33 lines

Re: Quick g77 question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2004 07:51:09 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

quickwin font set

quickwin font set

Pavel Houdek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:02:29 +0200

63 lines

New Thread

qwin-console cursor jump

qwin-console cursor jump

Pavel Houdek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:14:00 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 02:45:11 +0000

36 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Jouni Lerssi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:00:41 +0200

74 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Richard E Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:57:45 -0800

62 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:03:31 +0000

105 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:19:48 -0500

25 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:23:37 -0500

44 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:30:58 -0500

25 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:36:36 -0500

42 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:56:58 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Reading a line of bytes one by one

Reading a line of bytes one by one

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:56:04 -0400

40 lines

Re: Reading a line of bytes one by one

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:05:00 -0400

40 lines

Re: Reading a line of bytes one by one

R A Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:27:04 +1000

56 lines

Re: Reading a line of bytes one by one

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:58:53 +0800

32 lines

New Thread

referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

Colin Millar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:20:49 +0100

41 lines

Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:23:46 -0500

23 lines

Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:33:48 -0400

47 lines

Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:51:54 +0000

51 lines

Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:17:39 +1000

55 lines

Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:37:21 +1000

37 lines

New Thread

Requirements for revision of Fortran

Requirements for revision of Fortran

David Muxworthy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:02:35 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Retire FORTRAN?!

Retire FORTRAN?!

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:41:30 -0500

29 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:17:02 -0800

47 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:01:45 -0800

24 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:45:33 -0600

76 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:09:43 -0600

88 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:08:11 -0800

38 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Bertrand Meltz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:53:24 +0100

82 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:53:48 -0800

41 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

venkat sastry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:58:04 +0000

121 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:52:58 -0500

88 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:12:55 -0800

37 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:15:32 -0700

37 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:51:24 -0800

70 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:30:56 -0800

43 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:47:35 -0500

18 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:56:39 -0800

27 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

David Muxworthy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:55:11 +0000

14 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 20:46:19 +0100

29 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:35:58 -0800

15 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:00:10 -0800

19 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:18:12 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

review "Fortran 95/2003 Explained" on Slashdot?

review "Fortran 95/2003 Explained" on Slashdot?

Vivek Rao <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:35:01 -0700

54 lines

Re: review "Fortran 95/2003 Explained" on Slashdot?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:55:24 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

Rewind and end of file

Rewind and end of file

Paul Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:21:05 +0100

87 lines

Re: Rewind and end of file

Paul Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:25:17 +0100

72 lines

Re: Rewind and end of file

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:27:03 -0500

29 lines

Re: Rewind and end of file

Paul Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:39:46 +0100

60 lines

Re: Rewind and end of file

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:52:40 -0500

35 lines