JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


2004


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Chronologically

Size

NHS Flyers

Aston Information Security

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:22:08 -0000

72 lines

Re: DURANT DECISION NARROWS SCOPE OF DATA PROTECTION IN UK

Carl Johnson

Sat, 3 Jan 2004 15:19:32 +0000

320 lines

Re: DURANT DECISION NARROWS SCOPE OF DATA PROTECTION IN UK

Tim Trent

Sat, 3 Jan 2004 17:22:05 -0000

380 lines

Integrated efficient systems

Ian Welton

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:26:26 -0000

31 lines

Re: Integrated efficient systems

Otter, Thomas

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:48:40 +0100

66 lines

DPA to blame again

Pounder Chris

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:51:04 -0000

172 lines

Re: DPA to blame agai n

Talbot Richard

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:19:42 -0000

225 lines

The marvels of modern technology

Su Goulding

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:23:17 +0000

32 lines

Re: The marvels of modern technology

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:24:37 -0000

73 lines

Re: The marvels of modern technology

J F Hitches

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:27:21 +0000

41 lines

Re: DPA to blame agai n

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:30:45 -0000

285 lines

Re: The marvels of modern technology

DREW Nic

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 08:23:42 -0000

69 lines

Job vacancy

Wilton, Debbie (Cultural Services)

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 08:27:58 -0000

93 lines

New FoIA Model Action Plan

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 08:36:37 +0000

29 lines

Re: The marvels of modern technology

Ken Allen

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 08:56:47 +0000

29 lines

Gwent Police messages

J F Hitches

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:26:51 +0000

33 lines

Re: Gwent Police messages

Tim Trent

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:33:24 -0000

57 lines

Calling Contractors

Hugo Brown

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:16:06 -0000

93 lines

OIC and notifying online

Julie Bee

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:08:22 +0000

31 lines

FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Sue Hagon (PLC)

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:13:41 -0000

310 lines

Re: Gwent Police messages

Cashmore, Stuart

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:22:56 -0000

87 lines

Re: OIC and notifying online

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:25:21 +0000

29 lines

Re: DPA to blame agai n

Paula Owen

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:32:51 -0000

378 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Julian Curmi

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:34:28 +0100

173 lines

Re: OIC and notifying online

Tim Trent

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:39:14 -0000

63 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:50:09 -0000

398 lines

DPA to blaim again

Candy, Roy - Data Protection Officer

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:51:04 +0100

43 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Jane Corrin

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:03:00 -0000

359 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Charles Oppenheim

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:05:06 -0000

429 lines

Re: DPA to blaim again

Paula Owen

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:06:28 -0000

85 lines

Disclosure of Information from Registrar

Jackie Leesons

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:18:57 -0000

39 lines

FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

John Hughes

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:23:36 -0000

438 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Roland Perry

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:53:50 +0000

30 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:05:50 -0000

462 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:23:40 -0000

94 lines

Re: DPA to blame agai n

Tim Trent

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:35:19 -0000

129 lines

Re: DPA to blame agai n

Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:44:57 -0000

201 lines

Re: DPA to blame again

Tim Trent

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:51:51 -0000

50 lines

Re: DPA to blame agai n

Nwolie Ifeoma

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:52:40 -0000

255 lines

Re: DPA to blame agai n

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:18:50 -0000

281 lines

Re: DPA to blame agai n

Su Goulding

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:25:16 +0000

52 lines

Re: DPA to blame agai n

Nwolie Ifeoma

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:25:22 -0000

313 lines

Re: DPA to blame agai n

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:37:09 +0000

55 lines

Re: DPA to blame again

Tim Trent

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:04:11 -0000

336 lines

FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Hubert, Paul [STU]

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:27:47 -0000

29 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Michael Doherty

Tue, 6 Jan 2004 18:13:26 +0000

49 lines

FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

John Hughes

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:45:45 -0000

76 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:51:41 -0000

126 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Yuill, Allan

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:53:14 -0000

159 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Young, Janette (IRU)

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:54:23 -0000

116 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

DREW Nic

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:55:16 -0000

116 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Nwolie Ifeoma

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:57:44 -0000

219 lines

Order

Jo White

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:09:40 +0000

37 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Michael Doherty

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:14:19 +0000

28 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Ian Welton

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:11:06 -0000

45 lines

Re: Order

Jo White

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:19:58 +0000

29 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Tim Trent

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:31:39 -0000

32 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Malcolm Graham

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:38:43 +0000

109 lines

Misuse of DPA

Maurice Frankel

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:20:55 +0000

33 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:21:09 -0000

136 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 12:36:56 -0000

534 lines

Chris Pounder is innocent OK

Pounder Chris

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:32:49 -0000

112 lines

Re: Chris Pounder is innocent OK

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:19:33 +0000

62 lines

Unsolicited email regulations

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:27:47 +0000

38 lines

Re: Unsolicited email regulations

Tim Trent

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:32:51 -0000

59 lines

Re: Unsolicited email regulations

Jim Whitaker

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:33:33 +0000

37 lines

Re: Unsolicited email regulations

Alison Aiton

Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:07:28 +0000

42 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame agai n

Ian Welton

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:27:30 -0000

59 lines

Re: DPA to blame again

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:32:57 -0000

137 lines

Re: DPA to blame again

Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:44:46 -0000

82 lines

Re: DPA to blame again

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:54:57 -0000

122 lines

Data Sharing

Samantha Yalden

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:31:37 -0000

46 lines

Re: Data Sharing

Paula Owen

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:00:00 -0000

95 lines

Re: Data Sharing

Charles Christacopoulos

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:08:58 +0000

92 lines

Re: DPA to blame again

Ian Welton

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:19:12 -0000

189 lines

Re: DPA to blame again

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:23:32 +0000

31 lines

photos in exhibitions

Joanna Diamantopoulos

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:06:46 +0000

32 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Paul Brady

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:40:52 -0000

87 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Paul Ticher

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:43:09 -0000

92 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Charles Christacopoulos

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:47:55 +0000

103 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Hugo Brown

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:59:26 -0000

59 lines

Re: DPA to blame again

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:03:11 -0000

196 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Grantham Steve

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:33:07 -0000

37 lines

IC's Complaints process

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:34:35 -0000

63 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

<>

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 05:13:31 EST

63 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:22:51 -0000

123 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Cashmore, Stuart

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:24:24 -0000

157 lines

Departmental Plans Local Authorities

Jane Corrin

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:25:04 +0000

32 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Julian Curmi

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:28:55 +0100

162 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:34:13 -0000

231 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Cashmore, Stuart

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:46:02 -0000

277 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:05:28 -0000

111 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:15:41 -0000

160 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Clarke Suzanne - Data Quality Administrator

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:17:12 -0000

134 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Chris Bayliss

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:17:38 +0000

69 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Cashmore, Stuart

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:17:47 -0000

156 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:21:19 -0000

81 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:23:32 -0000

188 lines

More on photos

Mark Lenihan

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:37:56 -0000

69 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:39:16 -0000

134 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:40:32 -0000

117 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Sophie Houlton (7915 3722)

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:41:55 -0000

30 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:46:48 -0000

190 lines

Re: More on photos

Matthew Nunn

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:48:06 +0000

103 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:50:20 -0000

170 lines

Photographs in Public

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:51:19 -0000

36 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Cashmore, Stuart

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:00:53 -0000

69 lines

FW: [data-protection] photos in exhibitions

David Aspinall

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:01:30 -0000

225 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

<>

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 07:04:31 EST

61 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:04:42 -0000

95 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Tony Bowden

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:08:00 +0000

36 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:16:10 -0000

59 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Ian Welton

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:20:31 -0000

242 lines

DPO vs DDA

Okey, Andrew

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:23:54 -0000

61 lines

Re: DPO vs DDA

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:32:38 -0000

91 lines

Re: Photographs in Public

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:36:04 +0000

95 lines

Re: DPO vs DDA

Martin Tubbs

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:36:30 -0000

76 lines

Re: Photographs in Public

Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:51:08 -0000

144 lines

Re: DPO vs DDA

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:09:42 -0000

86 lines

Re: DPO vs DDA

Margarita Rainford

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:25:48 +0000

126 lines

Re: DPO vs DDA

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:31:17 -0000

132 lines

Re: DPO vs DDA

Steven Swinden

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:10:51 +0000

51 lines

Re: Photographs in Public

<>

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:19:34 EST

67 lines

Re: DPO vs DDA

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:20:11 -0000

101 lines

Re: Photographs in Public

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:29:37 +0000

59 lines

Re: DPO vs DDA

Hubert, Paul [STU]

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:29:55 -0000

87 lines

Re: DPO vs DDA

Steven Swinden

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:58:12 +0000

45 lines

Re: DPO vs DDA

Okey, Andrew

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:11:02 -0000

138 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Peter Sinfield

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:30:25 +0000

33 lines

Re: DPO vs DDA

Hubert, Paul [STU]

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:54:09 -0000

52 lines

Friday frolic : Thank you for calling Pizza Hut...America 2009

Charles Prescott

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:41:59 -0500

123 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] photos in exhibitions

davidwyatt

Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:52:54 -0000

228 lines

Re: Friday frolic : Thank you for calling Pizza Hut...America 2009

Tim Trent

Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:36:26 -0000

141 lines

Glasgow and Belfast Courses

Ibrahim Hasan

Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:02:31 +0000

25 lines

Re: photos in exhibitions

Pounder Chris

Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:51:17 -0000

595 lines

Re: More on photos

Charles Oppenheim

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:29:27 -0000

105 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:46:38 -0000

56 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Tim Trent

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:49:09 -0000

78 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Jane Corrin

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:53:01 -0000

102 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Chris Bayliss

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:07:52 +0000

131 lines

SPAM vs spam

<>

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 06:31:00 EST

45 lines

Re: IC's Complaints process

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:33:22 +0000

25 lines

Job Vacancy - Information Management Officer

Leoni, Rudi

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:28:40 -0000

83 lines

Re: SPAM vs spam

Ian Welton

Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:58:03 -0000

79 lines

Complaining to the IC and ASA - A Case Study

Tim Trent

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:25:45 -0000

80 lines

Re: Complaining to the IC and ASA - A Case Study

Tim Trent

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:54:42 -0000

127 lines

"Old" data records - Good Grief

Tim Trent

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:19:08 -0000

100 lines

Re: Complaining to the IC and ASA - A Case Study

Tim Trent

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:48:46 -0000

156 lines

Re: Complaining to the IC and ASA - A Case Study

Tim Trent

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:17:16 -0000

192 lines

Violent Warning Markers

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:24:49 -0000

41 lines

Post of Records & Information Manager

Paul Edward Roberts

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:15:29 +0000

74 lines

contact centres

Joanna Diamantopoulos

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:24:03 +0000

37 lines

FW: VWMs

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:36:31 -0000

40 lines

Councillors

Jane Corrin

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:14:17 +0000

33 lines

Re: Councillors

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:24:01 +0000

39 lines

Re: Councillors

Tim Trent

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:27:03 -0000

105 lines

Re: Councillors

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:29:02 +0000

28 lines

Shall we have a "Welcome back" party for Bill?

Tim Trent

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:39:51 -0000

40 lines

Re: Shall we have a "Welcome back" party for Bill?

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:48:32 +0000

28 lines

Re: Shall we have a "Welcome back" party for Bill?

Martin Tubbs

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:53:39 -0000

23 lines

Re: Councillors

<>

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 03:54:18 EST

73 lines

Re: Councillors

Jim Whitaker

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:29:53 +0000

44 lines

Re: Councillors

Gibson, Martin

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:37:12 -0000

93 lines

Reply:[data-protection] Violent Warning Markers

Gunn David

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:42:00 -0000

99 lines

Re: Councillors

<>

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:50:18 EST

56 lines

Re: Councillors

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:07:01 -0000

99 lines

Re: Reply:[data-protection] Violent Warning Markers

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:09:31 +0000

28 lines

Information Commissioner interview on Radio 4

Eluned Jones

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:09:57 +0000

42 lines

Re: Councillors

Ian Welton

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:52:21 -0000

49 lines

Channel Islands and Isle of Man

Paul Ticher

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:13:21 -0000

53 lines

Re: Information Commissioner interview on Radio 4

Malcolm Kendall

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:19:43 -0000

47 lines

Re: Information Commissioner interview on Radio 4

<>

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:21:16 -0000

113 lines

Re: Shall we have a "Welcome back" party for Bill?

Martin Gibson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:27:56 +0000

24 lines

Re: Information Commissioner interview on Radio 4

Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:28:48 -0000

162 lines

Thank You re Councillors

Jane Corrin

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:36:14 +0000

25 lines

SAR

Ben Cawley

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:21:06 -0000

47 lines

Re: Channel Islands and Isle of Man

Stephen John

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:27:15 +0000

21 lines

Re: Channel Islands and Isle of Man

Ian Welton

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:28:21 -0000

112 lines

Re: SAR

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:43:05 -0000

106 lines

FW: [data-protection] SAR

John Hughes

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:43:58 -0000

128 lines

Re: SAR

Kathryn Billings

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:49:35 -0000

161 lines

Re: SAR

Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:52:41 -0000

195 lines

Re: SAR

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:37:05 -0000

73 lines

Re: SAR

Tony Bowden

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:39:03 +0000

62 lines

Re: SAR

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:26:55 +0000

50 lines

Richard Thomas' Announcement

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:27:44 -0000

29 lines

Re: Richard Thomas' Announcement

Steve Wilson

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:01:38 +0000

28 lines

UNSUBSCRIBE data-protection

Liz Howard

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:02:47 -0000

29 lines

Re: Richard Thomas' Announcement

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:16:07 -0000

68 lines

FW: [data-protection] Channel Islands and Isle of Man

John Hughes

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:17:18 -0000

45 lines

Re: Richard Thomas' Announcement

Tim Trent

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:26:11 -0000

51 lines

Data Protection Authorities and regulation summarizations

Saundra Kae Rubel

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:56:34 -0800

125 lines

Employee Emails

Joanna Diamantopoulos

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:20:43 +0000

24 lines

Re: SAR

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:37:48 +0000

43 lines

Re: Employee Emails

davidwyatt

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:58:07 -0000

92 lines

Re: SAR

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:12:47 +0000

33 lines

Statutory Instrument 191 - DP and VAT

Gerry Dane

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:34:05 -0000

41 lines

Re: Statutory Instrument 191 - DP and VAT

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:51:15 +0000

26 lines

Re: Employee Emails

Charles Oppenheim

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:02:54 -0000

140 lines

Re: Statutory Instrument 191 - DP and VAT

J F Hitches

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:13:13 +0000

79 lines

Re: Employee Emails

Martin Tubbs

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:23:25 -0000

130 lines

Re: Employee Emails

J.S.M.Whitaker

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:56:00 -0000

32 lines

Re: Employee Emails

Ian Welton

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:17:45 -0000

135 lines

Re: Employee Emails

Hubert, Paul [STU]

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:29:16 -0000

41 lines

Re: Employee Emails

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:36:59 -0000

121 lines

Re: Employee Emails

<>

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:45:19 EST

59 lines

NINO use - PHP

Su Goulding

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:35:00 +0000

30 lines

OIC and Durant

Tony Bowden

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:44:21 +0000

81 lines

Re: DURANT DECISION NARROWS SCOPE OF DATA PROTECTION IN UK

Tony Bowden

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:49:20 +0000

32 lines

Re: Employee Emails

davidwyatt

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:44:44 -0000

193 lines

Re: Employee Emails

davidwyatt

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 23:26:42 -0000

89 lines

Re: Employee Emails

davidwyatt

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:07:28 -0000

181 lines

Re: NINO use - PHP

davidwyatt

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:20:35 -0000

64 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

davidwyatt

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:37:41 -0000

121 lines

Retention Periods

davidwyatt

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:56:45 -0000

49 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:17:41 +0000

54 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Andrew Kinglake

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:34:02 +0000

23 lines

SERIAL/PERSISTENT REQUESTORS

Steve Grantham

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:35:58 +0000

27 lines

Re: NINO use - PHP

Charles Oppenheim

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:37:23 -0000

100 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:56:21 -0000

88 lines

Re: SERIAL/PERSISTENT REQUESTORS

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:58:35 +0000

29 lines

Fw: Employee Emails

rosepattenden

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:35:16 -0000

221 lines

Privacy website

Jennifer Mayor

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:51:50 +0000

37 lines

National Insurance Number - General Identifiers

S.T.Allely

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:57:40 +0000

61 lines

Re: Employee Emails

Hubert, Paul [STU]

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:05:02 -0000

48 lines

Re: Employee Emails

Ian Welton

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:31:14 -0000

294 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Tony Bowden

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:55:05 +0000

61 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:08:12 +0000

29 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Paul Dodgson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:21:12 -0000

32 lines

Re: Employee Emails

Graham Smith

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:43:30 -0000

55 lines

FW: [data-protection] Fw: Employee Emails

David Aspinall

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:49:57 -0000

34 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Paul Dodgson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:51:12 +0000

24 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Paul Ticher

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:52:04 -0000

53 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Tony Bowden

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:16:46 +0000

31 lines

ICO's "make DP simpler" mailbox

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:47:40 -0000

23 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:57:08 -0000

54 lines

Re: ICO's "make DP simpler" mailbox

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:00:21 +0000

46 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Pounder Chris

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:20:43 -0000

56 lines

Stirring the pot

Ingrid Wilson

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:41:33 -0000

52 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Ian Welton

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:43:48 -0000

108 lines

Re: Stirring the pot

Tony Bowden

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:01:47 +0000

70 lines

(Fwd) Re: [data-protection] Stirring the pot

Ed Smith

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:10:46 -0000

129 lines

Re: (Fwd) Re: [data-protection] Stirring the pot

Charles Oppenheim

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:17:09 -0000

164 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Hubert, Paul [STU]

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:22:09 -0000

40 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Tony Bowden

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:00:57 +0000

37 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Ian Welton

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:20:15 -0000

74 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Tony Bowden

Sat, 17 Jan 2004 08:49:28 +0000

38 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Ian Welton

Sat, 17 Jan 2004 09:40:14 -0000

78 lines

DP in Spain

Otter, Thomas

Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:04:35 +0100

55 lines

Re: Employee Emails

Otter, Thomas

Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:06:30 +0100

318 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

<>

Sun, 18 Jan 2004 06:53:38 EST

74 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Tony Bowden

Sun, 18 Jan 2004 12:10:49 +0000

41 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

<>

Sun, 18 Jan 2004 07:43:18 EST

73 lines

Re: Employee Emails

Ian Welton

Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:52:09 -0000

460 lines

Re: Stirring the pot

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:05:32 +0000

34 lines

Re: Employee Emails

Julian Curmi

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:12:52 +0100

170 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Smith, Tony

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:26:27 -0000

126 lines

Re: Complaining to the IC and ASA - A Case Study

Tim Trent

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:05:03 -0000

224 lines

Retention of written warnings

Sarah Westwood

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:16:48 -0000

46 lines

Re: Retention of written warnings

Tim Trent

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:40:16 -0000

103 lines

Re: Retention of written warnings

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:41:42 -0000

86 lines

Re: Retention of written warnings

Sara Jane Newbon

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:42:30 -0000

93 lines

Re: Retention of written warnings

Tim Trent

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:00:06 -0000

120 lines

Beagle 2 (A Friday story on a Monday)

Adrian Tribe

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:04:18 -0000

37 lines

Re: Retention of written warnings

<>

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 06:04:48 EST

66 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Tony Bowden

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:47:22 +0000

32 lines

HR- IT compliance article

Otter, Thomas

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:20:24 +0100

31 lines

Re: Retention of written warnings

Sarah Westwood

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:59:51 -0000

164 lines

Re: OIC and Durant

Laurence Bebbington

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:12:06 +0000

73 lines

Re: Retention of written warnings

Tim Trent

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:20:12 -0000

194 lines

Re: Retention of written warnings

Sarah Westwood

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:39:38 -0000

226 lines

Re: Retention of written warnings

Hubert, Paul [STU]

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:08:20 -0000

64 lines

Funded Survey on Data Access Set to Help Information Officers

Ugonwa Ekweozor

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:06:35 +0000

59 lines

Re: DP in Spain

Charles Prescott

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:14:47 -0500

102 lines

Re: SAR

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 08:54:36 +0000

33 lines

Re: DP in Spain

Ian Welton

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:24:42 -0000

186 lines

Re: DP in Spain

Tim Trent

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:02:21 -0000

144 lines

Re: SAR

Tim Trent

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:07:23 -0000

66 lines

Re: SAR

Tony Bowden

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:49:56 +0000

34 lines

Re: DPA Enforcement (was SAR)

Tim Trent

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:57:49 -0000

94 lines

Re: DPA Enforcement (was SAR)

Kathryn Billings

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:01:26 -0000

134 lines

Re: DPA Enforcement (was SAR)

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:09:18 +0000

38 lines

Re: DPA Enforcement (was SAR)

Tony Bowden

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:20:30 +0000

38 lines

FoI Project Board Terms of Reference

Julie Bee

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:45:23 +0000

33 lines

CFP: e-society 2004

Natália Reis

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:44:37 +0000

163 lines

Re: FoI Project Board Terms of Reference

Stephen Williams

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:11:54 +0000

53 lines

Re: Funded Survey on Data Access Set to Help Information Officers

Maurice Frankel

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:53:48 +0000

77 lines

Re: Funded Survey on Data Access Set to Help Information Officers

Pounder Chris

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:06:11 -0000

157 lines

Re: Funded Survey on Data Access Set to Help Information Officers

Tony Bowden

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:11:34 +0000

31 lines

Re: Funded Survey on Data Access Set to Help Information Officers

Tim Trent

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:17:58 -0000

165 lines

Post to the Cynics Sub-Group

Stephen Williams

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:02:06 +0000

44 lines

Transfers

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:06:42 +0000

25 lines

Re: Transfers

Su Goulding

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:16:53 +0000

49 lines

Re: Post to the Cynics Sub-Group

Tim Trent

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:36:37 -0000

70 lines

Immigration - Schedule 2.5c

Miranda Whyte

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:06:14 -0000

39 lines

Re: Immigration - Schedule 2.5c

Smith, Tony

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:37:25 -0000

80 lines

Re: Immigration - Schedule 2.5c

Michael Doherty

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:55:45 +0000

47 lines

ADVERT - DPA Courses - Spring programme

<>

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 05:04:13 EST

46 lines

Re: List used for advertising

Tim Trent

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:24:29 -0000

77 lines

Re: List used for advertising

Alison Aiton

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:58:53 +0000

41 lines

Re: List used for advertising

David Aspinall

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:31:19 -0000

38 lines

Principle one compliance

Ian Welton

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:03:42 -0000

54 lines

Death List from Registrars office

Jane Corrin

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:33:25 +0000

31 lines

Re: Death List from Registrars office

J F Hitches

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:39:06 +0000

35 lines

HE Sector - Post Durant

Gerry Dane

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:39:45 -0000

77 lines

Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Stephen Williams

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:04:10 +0000

25 lines

Re: Death List from Registrars office

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:06:43 -0000

84 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

<>

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 05:21:38 EST

41 lines

Re: Death List from Registrars office

Ian Welton

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:26:45 -0000

92 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Jim Whitaker

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:27:15 +0000

31 lines

Housing Grants

Sara Jane Newbon

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:32:43 -0000

40 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Stephen Williams

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:14:15 +0000

25 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:19:36 -0000

50 lines

IC

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:39:33 -0000

47 lines

Re: IC

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:42:20 -0000

71 lines

Re: Housing Grants

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:55:28 +0000

34 lines

Re: Housing Grants

Susan Snell

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:19:42 -0000

86 lines

NINOS

Jane Corrin

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:00:27 +0000

25 lines

Re: Disclosing sensitive data to Housing associations

Arthur Howell

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:20:08 -0000

63 lines

Re: Disclosing sensitive data to Housing associations

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:26:07 -0000

29 lines

Re: Disclosing sensitive data to Housing associations

<>

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:08:06 EST

58 lines

Re: Death List from Registrars office

Watson, Patrick

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 16:20:52 -0000

118 lines

Funded Survey on Data Access Set to Help Information Officers

Ugonwa Ekweozor

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:42:43 +0000

45 lines

DPA/FOI Requests - Training Analysis

David Aspinall

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:50:11 -0000

70 lines

Records and Information Management approaches in Local Authorities

Ian Harrison

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:12:11 -0000

54 lines

Re: Death List from Registrars office

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:29:50 -0000

149 lines

Re: Death List from Registrars office

Yuill, Allan

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:50:27 -0000

180 lines

Sensitive data

Talbot Richard

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:51:58 -0000

40 lines

Re: Death List from Registrars office

Chris Spray

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:53:40 +0000

213 lines

Re: Death List from Registrars office

Watson, Patrick

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:54:47 -0000

190 lines

Re: Death List from Registrars office

Jane Corrin

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:57:11 -0000

203 lines

Re: Death List from Registrars office

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:59:40 -0000

211 lines

Re: Death List from Registrars office

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:00:29 -0000

212 lines

Education Department Retention Schedule

Paul Dodgson

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:39:08 +0000

22 lines

Subject Access Requests - disproportionate effort and relevant fili ngsystem

Emma Chilcott

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:16:05 +0000

86 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - disproportionate effort and relevan t fili ngsystem

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:38:17 -0000

151 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - disproportionate effort and relevant fili ngsystem

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:43:01 -0000

144 lines

Friday inspiration

Pounder Chris

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:55:13 -0000

115 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - disproportionate effort and relevant fili ngsystem

Tony Bowden

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:09:00 +0000

38 lines

Re: Friday inspiration

<>

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:20:01 EST

40 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - disproportionate effort and relevant fili ngsystem

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:23:45 -0000

66 lines

Data Protection Funny......Friday

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:55:12 -0000

50 lines

Re: Data Protection Funny......Friday

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:02:37 -0000

74 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Stephen Williams

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:15:01 +0000

26 lines

Forms! UKIC Forms!

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:52:36 -0000

67 lines

Spent Convictions & Adequate, relevant and not excessive

S.T.Allely

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:08:07 +0000

73 lines

Re: Spent Convictions & Adequate, relevant and not excessive

Hubert, Paul [STU]

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:30:20 -0000

30 lines

Re: Subject Access Requests - disproportionate effort and relevant fili ngsystem

DPCS Associates

Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:39:37 -0000

100 lines

Re: Sensitive data

Ian Welton

Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:39:15 -0000

88 lines

Re: Sensitive data

Ian Welton

Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:39:15 -0000

111 lines

Re: Unsolicited email regulations

Ibrahim Hasan

Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:33:55 +0000

32 lines

Re: Friday inspiration

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:45:35 +0000

26 lines

Re: Friday inspiration

Gibson, Martin

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:50:44 -0000

67 lines

Re: Friday inspiration

Martin Tubbs

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:59:12 -0000

72 lines

Re: Friday inspiration

Tim Trent

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:03:35 -0000

91 lines

another one....

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:05:47 +0000

19 lines

May the 1st is going to be interesting!

Tim Trent

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:15:49 -0000

72 lines

Re: Sensitive data

Redfern, Catherine

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:57:18 -0000

71 lines

Re: Sensitive data

Paul Brady

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:20:32 -0000

122 lines

question on UK's perception of outsourcing trends

Saundra Kae Rubel

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 10:49:03 -0800

54 lines

Re: question on UK's perception of outsourcing trends

davidwyatt

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:44:44 -0000

112 lines

Re: May the 1st is going to be interesting!

davidwyatt

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 23:55:39 -0000

106 lines

Re: May the 1st is going to be interesting!

Saundra Kae Rubel

Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:14:24 -0800

65 lines

Access to on-line personal data

Ian Welton

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:07:41 -0000

32 lines

Re: May the 1st is going to be interesting!

Tim Trent

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:11:25 -0000

174 lines

UKIC Is aware complaints handling is poor

Tim Trent

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:26:15 -0000

53 lines

CAFCASS requesting information from Social Services

Louise Kelly

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:48:23 +0000

33 lines

Complaints made to Local Authorities

Sara Jane Newbon

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:29:33 -0000

43 lines

Re: Complaints made to Local Authorities

<>

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:38:04 EST

52 lines

Re: Complaints made to Local Authorities

Redfern, Catherine

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:34:36 -0000

57 lines

Zeta Jones case

Ian Welton

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:00:12 -0000

27 lines

DPA & Isle of Man

Rob Dawson

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:59:48 +0000

54 lines

Viruses? Not that I usually worry

Tim Trent

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:56:34 -0000

56 lines

Welcome home Bill!

Tim Trent

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:02:46 -0000

36 lines

Re: Welcome home Bill!

<>

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:00:29 EST

39 lines

Evidence admissible in Court

Phillips, Tracy

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:51:06 -0000

68 lines

Re: Viruses? Not that I usually worry

DREW Nic

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:08:42 -0000

93 lines

Re: Evidence admissible in Court

Donald Henderson

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:17:35 -0000

101 lines

Monitoring Policy

Aston Information Security

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:27:15 -0000

29 lines

Re: Welcome home Bill!

DREW Nic

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:19:03 -0000

69 lines

FW: ICO DP Helpline

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:31:13 -0000

186 lines

UKIC's Complaints Process

Tim Trent

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:52:49 -0000

53 lines

Re: Viruses? Not that I usually worry

Charles Prescott

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:12:34 -0500

100 lines

Re: Evidence admissible in Court

davidwyatt

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 01:06:42 -0000

131 lines

Data Protection Training

Lisa Braund - Privacy & Data Protection

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 07:56:49 -0000

77 lines

Re: DPA & Isle of Man

Paul Ticher

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:52:16 -0000

85 lines

Re: DPA & Isle of Man

Tim Trent

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:18:42 -0000

109 lines

Re: CAFCASS requesting information from Social Services

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:30:22 +0000

33 lines

Re: Welcome home Bill!

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:36:53 +0000

28 lines

Recording disciplinary hearings

J.Barrett-Murrer

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:45:41 -0000

28 lines

Re: Recording disciplinary hearings

Ian Welton

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:23:40 -0000

56 lines

FW: [data-protection] Recording disciplinary hearings

John Hughes

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:55:14 -0000

80 lines

Re: Recording disciplinary hearings

Maurice Frankel

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:01:03 +0000

55 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Stephen Williams

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:06:33 +0000

20 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Tim Trent

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:08:05 -0000

60 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Tim Trent

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:20:55 -0000

87 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Stephen Williams

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:03:12 +0000

28 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Charles Christacopoulos

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:43:37 +0000

54 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Ian Welton

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:59:30 -0000

113 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Charles Oppenheim

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:16:45 -0000

141 lines

Freedom of Information Awareness Guidance

rosepattenden

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:45:02 -0000

34 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Tim Trent

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:45:49 -0000

173 lines

Re: Freedom of Information Awareness Guidance

Tim Trent

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:48:32 -0000

59 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Ian Welton

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:49:09 -0000

186 lines

Re: Freedom of Information Awareness Guidance

Gibson, Martin

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:50:10 -0000

84 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

<>

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 04:55:31 EST

42 lines

Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Candy, Roy - Data Protection Officer

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:00:23 +0100

41 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Tim Trent

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:01:35 -0000

64 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Michael Doherty

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:01:44 +0000

63 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Tim Trent

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:21:06 -0000

98 lines

IC Guidance over new case law

Talbot Richard

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:47:05 -0000

44 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Pounder Chris

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:30:22 -0000

208 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Stephen Williams

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:57:22 +0000

20 lines

VWMs again.......

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:03:46 -0000

63 lines

VWMs

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:05:13 -0000

34 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Tim Trent

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:11:38 -0000

47 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Ian Welton

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:21:19 -0000

198 lines

vwm

Sara Jane Newbon

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:51:43 -0000

52 lines

Radio programme

Wilton, Debbie (Cultural Services)

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:41:19 -0000

67 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Chris Spray

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:56:53 +0000

266 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Su Goulding

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:15:46 +0000

306 lines

Re: IC Guidance over new case law

Su Goulding

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:17:52 +0000

67 lines

Re: VWMs again.......

Su Goulding

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:21:33 +0000

91 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Chris Spray

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:23:28 +0000

410 lines

Attentive Commissioner

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:27:09 -0000

39 lines

Re: Attentive Commissioner

Steve Wilson

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:40:58 +0000

27 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Ian Welton

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:52:22 -0000

77 lines

Re: Attentive Commissioner

Jane Corrin

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:50:14 -0000

75 lines

Information Commissioner interview

Su Goulding

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:52:29 +0000

32 lines

Re: Radio programme

GRAHAM Susan

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:31:44 -0000

93 lines

Re: DPA & Isle of Man

David Aspinall

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:38:16 -0000

31 lines

After Hutton

Ibrahim Hasan (hotmail)

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:48:29 -0000

35 lines

Law inaction

<>

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:52:23 EST

36 lines

Info Commissioner site update now with password

Saundra Kae Rubel

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:00:53 -0800

47 lines

Re: Info Commissioner site update now with password

Ian Welton

Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:52:29 -0000

103 lines

Re: Law inaction

Ian Welton

Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:26:50 -0000

78 lines

Re: Law inaction

<>

Sat, 31 Jan 2004 06:55:43 EST

57 lines

Re: Law inaction

Ian Welton

Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:49:22 -0000

51 lines

Another DPA abuse?

Graham Smith

Sun, 1 Feb 2004 12:24:24 -0000

49 lines

Re: Another DPA abuse?

davidwyatt

Sun, 1 Feb 2004 20:50:40 -0000

75 lines

Re: Info Commissioner site update now with password

Tim Trent

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 08:20:59 -0000

77 lines

Re: Info Commissioner site update now with password

Les Kingstone

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 08:45:39 +0000

24 lines

Re: Info Commissioner site update now with password

Tim Trent

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:00:44 -0000

49 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Nick Clark

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:37:26 -0000

42 lines

Quote from the Computing Article

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:43:08 +0000

33 lines

Re: Quote from the Computing Article

Tim Trent

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:48:57 -0000

86 lines

Re: Quote from the Computing Article

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:52:19 +0000

26 lines

Re: Quote from the Computing Article

Gibson, Martin

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:02:33 -0000

66 lines

Re: Quote from the Computing Article

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:03:35 +0000

28 lines

putting the pieces together

Peter McGrath

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:05:18 -0000

67 lines

Re: putting the pieces together

Charles Oppenheim

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:16:44 -0000

96 lines

Redacted Information

Sara Jane Newbon

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:35:25 -0000

44 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Ian Welton

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:37:35 -0000

69 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:09:53 +0000

48 lines

Re: Redacted Information

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:48:47 -0000

80 lines

Re: Redacted Information

Rob Dawson

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:23:12 +0000

90 lines

Re: Redacted Information

Tony Bowden

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:28:22 +0000

32 lines

Re: Redacted Information

Sara Jane Newbon

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:03:10 -0000

92 lines

Re: Redacted Information

Tim Trent

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:25:50 -0000

119 lines

Re: Redacted Information

Atkinson, C.

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:26:27 -0000

135 lines

Re: Redacted Information

Donald Henderson

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:37:11 -0000

158 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Tim Trent

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:52:31 -0000

85 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert servi ce

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:03:20 -0000

109 lines

Re: Redacted Information

Gerry Dane

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:07:27 -0000

88 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert servi ce

Saundra Kae Rubel

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 07:16:35 -0800

30 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert servi ce

Tim Trent

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:31:42 -0000

62 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert servi ce

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:19:06 -0000

82 lines

Re: Redacted Information

davidwyatt

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 01:35:31 -0000

143 lines

Allegation

Gil Richardson

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 08:51:27 -0000

29 lines

Spam

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:43:08 +0000

21 lines

Re: Spam

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:51:40 -0000

62 lines

Re: Spam

Tim Trent

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:02:42 -0000

48 lines

Re: Spam

Chris Bayliss

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:41:51 +0000

83 lines

Re: Allegation

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:28:26 -0000

88 lines

Recorded phonecalls at work

Jim Ford

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:42:51 -0000

45 lines

Re: Allegation

Jackie Leesons

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:48:44 -0000

70 lines

Re: Spam

Chris Bayliss

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:51:06 +0000

29 lines

Re: Spam

Ian Welton

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:08:47 -0000

112 lines

ICO Website

Marlene Whyte

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:44:19 +0000

26 lines

Re: ICO Website

Jim Ford

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:50:58 -0000

48 lines

To "UCE" or not to "UCE", that is the question

Tim Trent

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:55:46 -0000

72 lines

Re: ICO Website

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:01:52 +0000

65 lines

Re: ICO Website

Ian Welton

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:18:23 -0000

58 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Andrew Cormack

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:04:38 -0000

76 lines

Re: To "UCE" or not to "UCE", that is the question

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:42:13 +0000

98 lines

Re: To "UCE" or not to "UCE", that is the question

Tim Trent

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:08:19 -0000

111 lines

Re: To "UCE" or not to "UCE", that is the question

Saundra Kae Rubel

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 07:14:33 -0800

61 lines

Re: Spam

David Aspinall

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:16:30 -0000

52 lines

FW: Re: [data-protection] Spam

David Aspinall

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:22:33 -0000

83 lines

[ ] [data-protection] Latest Edition

Talbot Richard

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:22:39 -0000

46 lines

Re: FW: Re: [data-protection] Spam

Tim Trent

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:33:17 -0000

105 lines

Re: Spam

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:02:57 +0000

66 lines

Re: Spam

Saundra Kae Rubel

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:58:22 -0800

54 lines

little black books, privacy concerns, new paper on

Saundra Kae Rubel

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:22:02 -0800

47 lines

Funded Survey on Subject Access Management Practices

Ugonwa Ekweozor

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 20:54:26 +0000

55 lines

ISP customers and Email

davidwyatt

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 22:57:04 -0000

38 lines

Re: ISP customers and Email

Peter Lane

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:58:11 -0000

79 lines

Re: Spam - esp money gathering spam

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 07:46:04 -0000

99 lines

Re: ISP customers and Email

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 07:49:20 -0000

75 lines

Re: Complaining to the IC and ASA - A Case Study

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:21:48 -0000

264 lines

Re: Spam

Chris Spray

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:57:34 +0000

125 lines

Re: Spam

Karen Blakeman

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:20:00 +0000

46 lines

Re: Spam

Ian Welton

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:11:54 -0000

62 lines

Re: Spam

Tim Salmon

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:26:25 -0000

83 lines

New Durant guidance

Tim Turner

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:34:46 -0000

49 lines

Decaf - Public sector Data Sharing

Jane Corrin

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:38:10 +0000

27 lines

Re: New Durant guidance

Stephen Williams

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:13:29 +0000

24 lines

HE Sector - Changes to supply of HESA student data

Gerry Dane

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:18:10 -0000

52 lines

Re: New Durant guidance

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:54:23 +0000

28 lines

FW: [data-protection] New Durant guidance

John Hughes

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:10:26 -0000

53 lines

Website relaunch and new E Journal

CCSR

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:37:40 +0000

42 lines

Re: Website relaunch and new E Journal

Ian Welton

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:46:08 -0000

85 lines

Re: Website relaunch and new E Journal

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:17:10 -0000

93 lines

Re: Website relaunch and new E Journal

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:33:56 +0000

85 lines

Off Topic - assistance please

Tim Trent

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:59:55 -0000

54 lines

Re: ISP customers and Email

davidwyatt

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 23:29:29 -0000

88 lines

Re: ISP customers and Email

davidwyatt

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 23:36:07 -0000

120 lines

Re: ISP customers and Email

davidwyatt

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 00:11:00 -0000

118 lines

Re: Off Topic - assistance please

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:54:20 +0000

26 lines

Telephone call recording

J F Hitches

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:22:19 +0000

51 lines

Re: Telephone call recording

Tim Turner

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:41:15 -0000

103 lines

Re: Telephone call recording

Paul Ticher

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:15:33 -0000

96 lines

Telephone call recording

Candy, Roy - Data Protection Officer

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 10:38:34 +0100

40 lines

Freedom Of Information Seminar: The Road to Compliance: 01 Jan 2005 and beyond

Betty Willder

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:49:38 -0000

40 lines

Re: Telephone call recording

J F Hitches

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:49:56 +0000

44 lines

Re: Telephone call recording

Chris Spray

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 10:15:09 +0000

127 lines

Re: Off Topic - assistance please

<>

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 05:29:46 EST

44 lines

Re: Telephone call recording

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:05:09 +0000

33 lines

Re: Telephone call recording

Paul Ticher

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:27:47 -0000

176 lines

Re: Telephone call recording

Ibrahim Hasan (hotmail)

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:39:27 -0000

137 lines

Re: Telephone call recording

Rob Dawson

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:41:57 +0000

89 lines

Re: Spam

Julian Curmi

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:04:01 +0100

267 lines

Re: Spam

Julian Curmi

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:07:03 +0100

152 lines

Re: Telephone call recording

Chris Spray

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:17:57 +0000

205 lines

Re: Telephone call recording

Ian Welton

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:50:34 -0000

458 lines

Re: Spam

Tim Trent

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:16:28 -0000

90 lines

New CCTV guidance from IC

Tim Turner

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:48:55 -0000

49 lines

Re: Telephone call recording

<>

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:52:35 EST

66 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:05:21 -0000

73 lines

Re: New Durant guidance

Paul Ticher

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:05:57 -0000

88 lines

Re: Telephone call recording

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:07:01 +0000

33 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:22:29 -0000

101 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:53:08 +0000

34 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Tim Turner

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:01:26 -0000

88 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Pounder Chris

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:50:50 -0000

160 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:54:01 +0000

30 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Alison Ross-Dow

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:08:11 +0000

48 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:19:43 -0000

147 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Gibson, Martin

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:30:32 -0000

54 lines

Durant & examination scripts

GRAHAM Susan

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:42:40 -0000

41 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

davidwyatt

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 22:38:06 -0000

81 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

davidwyatt

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 22:47:00 -0000

140 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

davidwyatt

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 23:33:15 -0000

126 lines

Web Beacons

Tim Trent

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 08:01:56 -0000

54 lines

[OT] M$ exasperates me!

Tim Trent

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 08:17:18 -0000

93 lines

Re: Durant & examination scripts

Gerry Dane

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 08:26:31 -0000

87 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

<>

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 03:54:56 EST

56 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Tim Trent

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 08:59:05 -0000

80 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Chris Bayliss

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:32:07 +0000

99 lines

Guardian article

Matthew Nunn

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:51:31 +0000

209 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Tim Trent

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:51:55 -0000

119 lines

Re: [OT] M$ exasperates me!

Cashmore, Stuart

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:11:44 -0000

134 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:29:40 -0000

169 lines

Re: Guardian article

Pounder Chris

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:30:02 -0000

284 lines

Re: Guardian article

Tim Turner

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:37:24 -0000

280 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Tim Trent

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:50:40 -0000

191 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Ian Welton

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 11:30:12 -0000

63 lines

Re: New CCTV guidance from IC

Ian Welton

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 11:30:12 -0000

88 lines

Re: [OT] M$ exasperates me!

Colin

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:07:28 -0000

34 lines

Schools admission form

Paul Gohl

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:13:40 +0000

29 lines

Re: Schools admission form

Tim Trent

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:30:35 -0000

57 lines

Re: Schools admission form

Chris Bayliss

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:14:09 +0000

75 lines

Re: Spam

Tim Wright

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:24:33 +0000

34 lines

Personal data query

Ian Welton

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:36:51 -0000

40 lines

Re: [OT] M$ exasperates me!

Tim Trent

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 14:22:23 -0000

160 lines

Re: Inattentive Commissioner e-mail alert service

Roland Perry

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 14:23:49 +0000

55 lines

seminar on Survey of Organisational Information Disclosure Practices

Babis Theodoulidis

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:10:56 -0000

60 lines

Re: [OT] M$ exasperates me!

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:11:00 +0000

53 lines

Seminar by the Information Commissioner

Babis Theodoulidis

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:14:04 -0000

44 lines

Re: Personal data query

Chris Spray

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:50:17 +0000

100 lines

Re: Personal data query

Ian Welton

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:46:15 -0000

140 lines

Re: Durant & examination scripts

Maurice Frankel

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 19:04:20 +0000

66 lines

Disposal of Computer tapes/discs hard drives etc.

Jane Corrin

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 08:52:55 +0000

33 lines

Re: Guardian article

Healy, Susan

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:01:37 -0000

234 lines

Re: Complaining to the IC and ASA - A Case Study

Tim Trent

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:02:12 -0000

300 lines

FW: CCTV Code of Practice

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:44:39 -0000

46 lines

Re: FW: CCTV Code of Practice

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 08:49:47 EST

56 lines

Re: Complaining to the IC and ASA - A Case Study

Ian Welton

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:50:57 -0000

365 lines

Re: FW: CCTV Code of Practice

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:11:59 -0000

96 lines

amending records

Alison Ross-Dow

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:47:33 +0000

37 lines

Re: amending records

<>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:28:42 EST

66 lines

Re: amending records

Roland Perry

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:59:37 +0000

29 lines

Re: amending records

Ian Welton

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 19:46:59 -0000

72 lines

Re: amending records / telephone logging data

davidwyatt

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 03:11:52 -0000

84 lines

Re: unsolicited emails

J.Barrett-Murrer

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:57:23 -0000

45 lines

Re: unsolicited emails

Tim Trent

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:11:48 -0000

110 lines

Re: unsolicited emails

Chris Bayliss

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:18:33 +0000

74 lines

Re: unsolicited emails

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:20:21 +0000

78 lines

DP & ERP

Steve Grantham

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:26:46 +0000

24 lines

Re: unsolicited emails

Ian Welton

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:56:18 -0000

91 lines

Paying for Council Members Notification

steve bramall

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:40:15 +0000

49 lines

Re: Paying for Council Members Notification

Donald Henderson

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:15:36 -0000

83 lines

ETHICOMP Journal update

CCSR

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:41:49 +0000

38 lines

Re: ETHICOMP Journal update

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:53:35 +0000

47 lines

Re: Paying for Council Members Notification

Graham Smith

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:58:38 -0000

87 lines

Re: amending records

<>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 03:29:01 EST

56 lines

Re: Paying for Council Members Notification

Lightowlers, Paul

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:16:42 -0000

51 lines

Re Supply of Named Student Data to HESA Statutory Customers

Anne Deverell

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:18:32 -0000

85 lines

data protection disclosure request

David Goddard

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:39:04 +0000

36 lines

Prior Consent from Data Subject Before Sending Electronic Direct Marketing eg Email

Julian Curmi

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:49:51 +0100

261 lines

Re: Prior Consent from Data Subject Before Sending Electronic Direct Marketing eg Email

Tim Trent

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:01:20 -0000

155 lines

Re: Paying for Council Members Notification

<>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 05:04:06 EST

97 lines

Re: amending records

Ian Welton

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:07:54 -0000

92 lines

Re: Paying for Council Members Notification

Heath, Mark

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:19:53 -0000

176 lines

Re: data protection disclosure request

Ian Welton

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:22:49 -0000

63 lines

Re: Prior Consent from Data Subject Before Sending Electronic Direct Marketing eg Email

Julian Curmi

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:25:29 +0100

508 lines

Re: data protection disclosure request

David Goddard

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:43:07 +0000

82 lines

Re: Paying for Council Members Notification

Graham Smith

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:27:19 -0000

38 lines

Re: Paying for Council Members Notification

Graham Smith

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:27:23 -0000

40 lines

Re: Paying for Council Members Notification

Lightowlers, Paul

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:21:26 -0000

63 lines

Re: data protection disclosure request

Ian Welton

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:35:02 -0000

101 lines

Re: Paying for Council Members Notification

<>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:58:18 EST

76 lines

Re: Paying for Council Members Notification - separate legal identity

Graham Smith

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:13:55 -0000

53 lines

OIC FOI generic PowerPoint presentation

S.T.Allely

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:06:48 +0000

46 lines

Re: Prior Consent from Data Subject Before Sending Electronic Direct Marketing eg Email

Roland Perry

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:44:58 +0000

84 lines

Re: data protection disclosure request

Stephen Williams

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:52:52 +0000

68 lines

Re: Prior Consent from Data Subject Before Sending Electronic Direct Marketing eg Email

davidwyatt

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 00:29:29 -0000

174 lines

Internet History

Ian Welton

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:01:05 -0000

28 lines

Caesar's Wife

Tim Trent

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:04:55 -0000

86 lines

Re: Internet History

Tim Trent

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:09:01 -0000

80 lines

Re: Internet History

Healy, Susan

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:27:26 -0000

112 lines

Re: Internet History

Tim Trent

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:40:33 -0000

168 lines

Is the IC a lert?

Stephen Williams

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:05:10 +0000

24 lines

Re: Is the IC a lert?

Tim Trent

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:10:12 -0000

51 lines

Re: Internet History

Ian Welton

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:17:39 -0000

116 lines

Re: Death List from Registrars office

Arthur Howell

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:05:16 -0000

88 lines

CCtv's non DP Act registered - Durant case - filming children

Arthur Howell

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:16:27 -0000

58 lines

Re: CCtv's non DP Act registered - Durant case - filming children

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:28:13 -0000

75 lines

Re: Internet History

Chris Spray

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:44:36 +0000

150 lines

Re: Internet History

Roland Perry

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:47:43 +0000

46 lines

Re: CCtv's non DP Act registered - Durant case - filming children

Ian Welton

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:07:11 -0000

101 lines

Re: CCtv's non DP Act registered - Durant case - filming children

Chris Spray

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:09:33 +0000

141 lines

Re: CCtv's non DP Act registered - Durant case - filming children

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:22:33 -0000

163 lines

Re: Internet History

Ian Welton

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:23:33 -0000

98 lines

Re: CCtv's non DP Act registered - Durant case - filming children

<>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:30:52 EST

75 lines

Re: Internet History

Tim Trent

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:34:15 -0000

120 lines

Re: Internet History

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:16:52 -0000

118 lines

Re: Internet History

Tim Trent

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:25:57 -0000

139 lines

Re: Internet History

Roland Perry

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:29:24 +0000

78 lines

Re: Internet History

Ian Welton

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:35:46 -0000

167 lines

Re: Internet History

Roland Perry

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:42:55 +0000

50 lines

Re: Internet History

Ian Welton

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:53:27 -0000

185 lines

Re: Internet History

Roland Perry

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:42:22 +0000

124 lines

GMC Job Vacancy

Andrew Ledgard (020 7915 3531)

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:57:29 -0000

130 lines

Destroyed files

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:18:25 +0000

27 lines

Re: Destroyed files

Paul Ticher

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:53:53 -0000

63 lines

Re: Internet History

Ian Welton

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:15:31 -0000

73 lines

Re: Internet History

Charles Oppenheim

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:52:57 -0000

96 lines

Re: Internet History

Andrew Charlesworth

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:14:27 +0000

78 lines

Re: Destroyed files

Ian Dean

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:53:40 +0000

112 lines

Re: Internet History

Roland Perry

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:04:24 +0000

77 lines

Re: Internet History

Ian Welton

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:36:53 -0000

38 lines

Re: Internet History

Roland Perry

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:45:32 +0000

35 lines

Re: Internet History

Ian Welton

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:13:36 -0000

92 lines

Email filters and our roles

Tim Trent

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:04:45 -0000

52 lines

monday morning

Otter, Thomas

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:45:23 +0100

26 lines

Incorrect Data

Tony Bowden

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:54:46 +0000

47 lines

No Longer Than Is Necessary?

Tony Bowden

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:16:34 +0000

43 lines

Re: No Longer Than Is Necessary?

Tim Turner

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:28:46 -0000

103 lines

Re: unsolicited emails

Su Goulding

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:58:59 +0000

67 lines

Re: CCtv's non DP Act registered - Durant case - filming children

Su Goulding

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:35:52 +0000

69 lines

Query - Signature as Personal data

davidwyatt

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:03:40 -0000

59 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

Donald Henderson

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:46:56 -0000

95 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

Tim Trent

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:11:24 -0000

125 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

J F Hitches

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:19:30 +0000

37 lines

Re: CCtv's non DP Act registered - Durant case - filming children

Arthur Howell

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:36:34 -0000

68 lines

Re: Caesar's Wife

Maurice Frankel

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:17:16 +0000

45 lines

Re: Caesar's Wife

Tim Trent

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:25:07 -0000

63 lines

The Email Stamp - a proposed toll on email

Tim Trent

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:37:49 -0000

74 lines

Re: The Email Stamp - a proposed toll on email

Cashmore, Stuart

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:43:37 -0000

103 lines

Re: The Email Stamp - a proposed toll on email

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:23:47 +0000

95 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

Ian Welton

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:15:09 -0000

106 lines

Re: The Email Stamp - a proposed toll on email

Su Goulding

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:52:12 +0000

50 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

<>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:34:58 EST

65 lines

Re: The Email Stamp - a proposed toll on email

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:20:14 -0000

66 lines

DPA mentioned in TV programme

Ross-Dow Alison

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:23:37 -0000

44 lines

Re: DPA mentioned in TV programme

Jane Corrin

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:27:44 -0000

90 lines

FW: [data-protection] DPA mentioned in TV programme

John Hughes

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:30:49 -0000

70 lines

Where next?

<>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 04:51:42 EST

66 lines

Re: DPA mentioned in TV programme

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:06:46 -0000

127 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

Ian Welton

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:07:34 -0000

56 lines

Re: Where next?

Ian Welton

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:29:21 -0000

68 lines

Re: Where next?

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:04:25 -0000

114 lines

Re: DPA mentioned in TV programme

Kathy Perkins

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:36:36 -0000

105 lines

Re: DPA mentioned in TV programme

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:42:48 -0000

114 lines

Re: DPA mentioned in TV programme

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:44:19 -0000

148 lines

Re: DPA mentioned in TV programme

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:44:41 -0000

122 lines

FW: [data-protection] DPA mentioned in TV programme

John Hughes

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:48:57 -0000

141 lines

Re: DPA mentioned in TV programme

Paul Dodgson

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:02:13 +0000

35 lines

Re: DPA mentioned in TV programme

Tim Turner

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:03:15 -0000

153 lines

Re: Where next?

Ian Welton

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:45:04 -0000

87 lines

Re: DPA mentioned in TV programme

<>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:48:03 EST

64 lines

Re: Where next?

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:50:26 -0000

122 lines

Proposed new Home Office guidelines

<>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:57:26 EST

54 lines

Re: Where next?

Ian Welton

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:41:28 -0000

35 lines

Re: Where next?

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:52:15 -0000

77 lines

Re: Where next?

Ian Welton

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:34:27 -0000

58 lines

Re: Where next?

Tim Trent

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:38:58 -0000

79 lines

Mailshots

Stewart Turner

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:12:30 -0000

39 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

davidwyatt

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 01:09:30 -0000

124 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

davidwyatt

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 02:30:33 -0000

73 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

davidwyatt

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 02:34:45 -0000

62 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

Ian Welton

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:46:11 -0000

58 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

Rob Dawson

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:58:57 +0000

97 lines

Using Live Data in Testing Environment

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:48:16 -0000

46 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

Ian Welton

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:40:28 -0000

137 lines

Spam - not quite Friday yet

Malcolm Kendall

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:57:02 -0000

50 lines

Live Data in Test again.......

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:05:38 -0000

49 lines

DP Contract Post

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:15:52 -0000

54 lines

Re: Live Data in Test again.......

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:37:15 -0000

77 lines

Re: Live Data in Test again.......

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:45:54 -0000

103 lines

Re: Live Data in Test again.......

Paul Ticher

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:28:27 -0000

83 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

Su Goulding

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:38:34 +0000

70 lines

Re: Mailshots

Paul Ticher

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:39:44 -0000

85 lines

Guidance on inclusion of e-mail as part of a DP Request

Paul Dodgson

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:09:21 +0000

30 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 04:01:55 EST

59 lines

Re: Using Live Data in Testing Environment

<>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 04:13:23 EST

76 lines

Insurer's correspondence

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:20:14 +0000

21 lines

Re: Insurer's correspondence

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:48:18 -0000

58 lines

Re: Insurer's correspondence

Donald Henderson

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:10:12 -0000

58 lines

Re: Query - Signature as Personal data

Ian Welton

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:05:47 -0000

38 lines

Re: Insurer's correspondence

Ian Welton

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:14:27 -0000

40 lines

Re: Insurer's correspondence

Stephen Williams

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:25:07 +0000

19 lines

Re: Using Live Data in Testing Environment

Ian Welton

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:26:31 -0000

138 lines

Records Management Vacancy - Stirling Council

Johanna King

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:55:09 +0000

71 lines

Re: Insurer's correspondence

Maurice Frankel

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:14:51 +0000

27 lines

Re: NHS Flyers

Gil Richardson

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:42:55 +0000

38 lines

Subject access, litigation, and Durant

Tim Turner

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:43:02 -0000

58 lines

Re: Subject access, litigation, and Durant

Mcconaghy, Andrew

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:54:54 -0000

48 lines

Re: Subject access, litigation, and Durant

<>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 05:59:09 EST

58 lines

Recent Cases

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:13:00 +0000

31 lines

Re: Subject access, litigation, and Durant

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:22:04 -0000

84 lines

Re: Subject access, litigation, and Durant

davidwyatt

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:51:57 -0000

100 lines

Re: Subject access, litigation, and Durant

Andrew McConaghy

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:56:43 +0000

34 lines

Re: Subject access, litigation, and Durant

<>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:52:43 EST

64 lines

Re: The Email Stamp - a proposed toll on email

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:11:58 +0000

41 lines

Use of data for questionnaires

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:13:22 +0000

39 lines

Re: Subject access, litigation, and Durant

Tim Turner

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:14:49 -0000

133 lines

Re: Use of data for questionnaires

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:26:39 -0000

96 lines

Re: Subject access, litigation, and Durant

Michael Doherty

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:47:16 +0000

50 lines

Re: Use of data for questionnaires

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:54:16 +0000

92 lines

Re: The Email Stamp - a proposed toll on email

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:54:52 +0000

53 lines

Racist incident Monitoring

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:57:37 +0000

30 lines

Re: Use of data for questionnaires

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:15:15 +0000

96 lines

Re: Subject access, litigation, and Durant

Robert (Bob) Waixel

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:27:09 +0000

100 lines

Re: Recent Cases

Michael Doherty

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:34:58 +0000

32 lines

Re: Subject access, litigation, and Durant

Peter Lane

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:55:08 -0000

94 lines

DP Job spec. for professionals in health sector

Karen Jane Mitchell

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 06:07:35 EST

31 lines

Is a CRM DP Compliant?

Julie Davenport

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:45:55 +0000

43 lines

Re: Is a CRM DP Compliant?

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:01:03 +0000

34 lines

Publication SCheme approvals

J F Hitches

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:52:06 +0000

33 lines

Taped Interviews

Andy Gray

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:46:04 +0000

30 lines

Re: Taped Interviews

Roland Perry

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:06:09 +0000

35 lines

PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR DISEASE AND ILLNESS CLAIMS

Gerry Dane

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:53:08 -0000

45 lines

Astonishing excuses for less than competent policing?

Tim Trent

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:25:08 -0000

155 lines

Re: Astonishing excuses for less than competent policing?

Gil Richardson

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:18:15 -0000

174 lines

Excessive data

Tim Trent

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:26:23 -0000

81 lines

Re: Excessive data

Tony Bowden

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:49:39 +0000

40 lines

Re: Astonishing excuses for less than competent policing?

Tim Turner

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:57:07 -0000

229 lines

Re: Astonishing excuses for less than competent policing?

<>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:01:46 EST

78 lines

Re: Astonishing excuses for less than competent policing?

J F Hitches

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:32:32 +0000

63 lines

Re: Astonishing excuses for less than competent policing?

Charles Prescott

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:01:27 -0500

97 lines

Re: Astonishing excuses for less than competent policing?

ianwelton

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:00:30 -0000

135 lines

Re: Recent Cases

Su Goulding

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:11:08 +0000

69 lines

Promotion of Volunteering Bill

Graham Smith

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 02:17:19 -0000

54 lines

Should the IC become involved?

Carl Johnson

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:25:05 +0000

73 lines

Re: Promotion of Volunteering Bill

Pounder Chris

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:32:27 -0000

150 lines

Anonymising Data for Testing Systems

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:20:32 -0000

33 lines

Re: Taped Interviews

Maurice Frankel

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:22:58 +0000

41 lines

Re: Promotion of Volunteering Bill

<>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 05:26:31 EST

63 lines

Re: Promotion of Volunteering Bill

ianwelton

Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:13:51 -0000

86 lines

Statistics

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:21:25 +0000

34 lines

Re: Promotion of Volunteering Bill

Paul Ticher

Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:28:34 -0000

140 lines

Re: Promotion of Volunteering Bill

Graham Smith

Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:54:18 -0000

42 lines

Re: Promotion of Volunteering Bill

Maurice Frankel

Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:33:13 +0000

35 lines

Re: Promotion of Volunteering Bill

Donald Henderson

Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:40:27 -0000

65 lines

FW: Data Protection Info

Fiona Musgrave

Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:05:03 -0000

60 lines

Re: FW: Data Protection Info

Clementine Amawo

Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:17:42 +0000

163 lines

Job Centre Plus

Jane Corrin

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:56:40 +0000

28 lines

Re: Job Centre Plus

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:48:10 +0000

52 lines

New Newsletter

Dan Towse

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:50:57 +0000

59 lines

Re: Job Centre Plus

Foster, Annelisa

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:00:17 -0000

95 lines

Re: New Newsletter

Paul Ticher

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:41:55 -0000

107 lines

Re: New Newsletter

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:36:10 +0000

42 lines

Re: New Newsletter

davidwyatt

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:52:55 -0000

145 lines

Re: New Newsletter

Chris Catton

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:29:00 +0000

36 lines

Bichard Inquiry Transcripts

Stephen Williams

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:30:55 +0000

52 lines

Re: data-protection Digest - 5 Mar 2004 to 8 Mar 2004 (#2004-55)

Dan Towse

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:30:55 +0000

109 lines

Re: Bichard Inquiry Transcripts

<>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:30:10 EST

65 lines

Re: Bichard Inquiry Transcripts

ianwelton

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:39:39 -0000

154 lines

Link to Bichard Enquiry Website

davidwyatt

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:35:19 -0000

27 lines

Promotion of Volunteering Bill update

Graham Smith

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:04:58 -0000

51 lines

Violent/Race/Hate Crimes

Jane Corrin

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:02:58 +0000

34 lines

MIAFTR2

<>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:08:48 -0000

88 lines

Special Purposes exemption

Tim Turner

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:04:54 -0000

57 lines

Re: Special Purposes exemption

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:37:16 +0000

114 lines

Re: Special Purposes exemption

Maurice Frankel

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:47:44 +0000

44 lines

Re: Special Purposes exemption

Paul Ticher

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:01:01 -0000

99 lines

Re: MIAFTR2

davidwyatt

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 02:05:56 -0000

194 lines

Re: Special Purposes exemption

Tim Turner

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:29:29 -0000

89 lines

JISC Legal Information Service FOI Event Stirling (and Bristol)

Betty Willder

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:30:40 -0000

48 lines

Re: Special Purposes exemption

Donald Henderson

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:50:22 -0000

132 lines

Re: Special Purposes exemption

Tim Turner

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:09:23 -0000

185 lines

Re: Special Purposes exemption

Charles Christacopoulos

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:31:53 +0000

77 lines

Recent Case Following Durant

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:32:56 +0000

47 lines

Re: Recent Case Following Durant

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:46:10 -0000

35 lines

Re: Recent Case Following Durant

Rob Dawson

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:15:26 +0000

88 lines

Re: Recent Case Following Durant

Laurence Bebbington

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:53:31 +0000

86 lines

Re: Special Purposes exemption

Maurice Frankel

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:16:55 +0000

39 lines

Re: Recent Case Following Durant

Pounder Chris

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 19:54:56 -0000

163 lines

Eurobarometer poll

Paul Pedley

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:14:44 +0000

26 lines

Data Protection lawyer recruitment advertisement

Louise Treacy

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:55:48 +0000

58 lines

Bad Guys, again!

Les Kingstone

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:53:59 +0000

44 lines

Re: Recent Case Following Durant

<>

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 03:30:42 EST

63 lines

European Identity Theft?

Saundra Kae Rubel

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:38:41 -0800

48 lines

Re: European Identity Theft?

Charles Prescott

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:49:54 -0500

87 lines

Fwd: Freedom of Information

datap

Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:51:31 +0000

79 lines

Re: Fwd: Freedom of Information

Edwina Withe

Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:36:11 +0000

108 lines

Confidentiality and Member of Parliament

Kathy Perkins

Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:07:08 +0000

26 lines

'payslip' marketing (again?)

Duncan Smith

Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:39:24 -0000

129 lines

Re: 'payslip' marketing (again?)

Nicola Mckilligan

Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:17:05 -0500

28 lines

Re: Recent Case Following Durant

Nicola Mckilligan

Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:22:47 -0500

27 lines

Re: 'payslip' marketing (again?)

<>

Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:16:39 EST

154 lines

Re: Confidentiality and Member of Parliament

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:48:57 -0000

69 lines

Re: Confidentiality and Member of Parliament

Clementine Amawo

Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:08:25 +0000

128 lines

Re: Recent Case Following Durant

Stephen Williams

Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:31:54 +0000

25 lines

Re: Should the IC become involved?

Steve Grantham

Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:33:24 +0000

23 lines

Re: Recent Case Following Durant

Simon Macauley

Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:56:38 +0000

31 lines

Re: Recent Case Following Durant

Smith, Tony

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:19:48 -0000

62 lines

[ ] RE: [data-protection] Recent Case Fol lowing Durant

Talbot Richard

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:46:50 -0000

96 lines

Re: [ ] RE: [data-protection] Recent Case Fol lowing Durant

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:58:15 -0000

124 lines

Re: [ ] RE: [data-protection] Recent Case Fol lowing Durant

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:12:33 -0000

159 lines

Re: [ ] RE: [data-protection] Recent Case Fol lowing Durant

Donald Henderson

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:52:36 -0000

216 lines

Re: [ ] RE: [data-protection] Recent Case Fol lowing Durant

Tony Bowden

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:58:57 +0000

49 lines

Re: [ ] RE: [data-protection] Recent Case Fol lowing Durant

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:17:23 +0000

34 lines

Implementation of EU law into domestic law; 'Durant investigation'

Warren, Adam

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:22:15 -0000

18 lines

CRM National Programe Legal Compliance Standards

Stephen Williams

Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:50:22 +0000

35 lines

Re: Implementation of EU law into domestic law; 'Durant investigation'

Laurence Bebbington

Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:21:29 +0000

72 lines

Re: European Identity Theft?

Tony Smith

Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:46:16 +0000

65 lines

Re: Implementation of EU law into domestic law; 'Durant investigation'

ianwelton

Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:27:40 -0000

67 lines

Re: Implementation of EU law into domestic law; 'Durant investigation'

Laurence Bebbington

Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:27:18 +0000

96 lines

EEA Expansion and 2002/58/EC

Tim Trent

Sat, 20 Mar 2004 16:34:04 -0000

60 lines

Re: Implementation of EU law into domestic law; 'Durant investigation'

ianwelton

Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:38:30 -0000

77 lines

Council Tax Data - Empty Homes Initiative

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:55:55 -0000

43 lines

Re: Implementation of EU law into domestic law; 'Durant investigation'

Laurence Bebbington

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:21:42 +0000

88 lines

Prospectus applications -Breach of DPA?

Alan Stead (Nottingham City Council)

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:12:20 -0000

62 lines

Re: Prospectus applications -Breach of DPA?

Stephen Williams

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:38:00 +0000

34 lines

Re: Prospectus applications -Breach of DPA?

Okey, Andrew

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:09:03 -0000

102 lines

anonymized data - still contravene DPA?

Victoria Hayes

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:19:32 -0000

73 lines

Empty Homes Again..........

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:48:26 -0000

43 lines

Re: anonymized data - still contravene DPA?

davidwyatt

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:04:04 -0000

109 lines

Housing

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:27:55 -0000

51 lines

Re: Implementation of EU law into domestic law; 'Durant investigation'

ianwelton

Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:36:16 -0000

44 lines

Re: Prospectus applications -Breach of DPA?

Sally Justice

Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:39:39 +0000

101 lines

Re: anonymized data - still contravene DPA?

Victoria Hayes

Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:44:19 -0000

130 lines

Re: anonymized data - still contravene DPA?

Jim Ford

Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:49:35 -0000

182 lines

Re: Prospectus applications -Breach of DPA?

J F Hitches

Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:54:29 +0000

44 lines

Re: Prospectus applications -Breach of DPA?

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:58:05 +0000

50 lines

Re: Empty Homes Again..........

Yuill, Allan

Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:31:04 -0000

98 lines

Re: Bad Guys, again!

Simon Macauley

Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:04:18 +0000

19 lines

Re: Bad Guys, again!

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:01:14 +0000

28 lines

Rquest for release of personal data by Police force

Sally Justice

Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:06:56 +0000

55 lines

Re: Rquest for release of personal data by Police force

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:43:18 +0000

34 lines

Sexual Health Data disclosure

Kitching, Susan

Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:31:32 -0000

64 lines

Re: Rquest for release of personal data by Police force

Roland Perry

Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:39:54 +0000

31 lines

JD for a Records Officer/Manager/Executive or GURU

Jane Corrin

Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:01:30 +0000

25 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

Roland Perry

Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:21:31 +0000

29 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:13:12 -0000

117 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

Maurice Frankel

Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:57:37 +0000

103 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

Peter Lane

Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:31:11 -0000

141 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

Roland Perry

Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:40:41 +0000

47 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

davidwyatt

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:18:56 -0000

152 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

davidwyatt

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:55:10 -0000

198 lines

Sexual Health Data Disclosure

DPCS Associates

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:40:40 -0000

38 lines

Agree

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:27:52 +0000

20 lines

Re: Agree / Disagree

Tim Turner

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:37:15 -0000

69 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:23:32 +0000

98 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

datap

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:23:48 +0000

125 lines

Re: Agree / Disagree

<>

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:25:22 EST

82 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data Disclosure

ianwelton

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:46:06 -0000

57 lines

Re: Agree

DPCS Associates

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:40:59 -0000

51 lines

Re: Agree

Stephen Williams

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:10:41 +0000

27 lines

Re: Agree

Tony Bowden

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:35:22 +0000

36 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

Maurice Frankel

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:00:07 +0000

115 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data Disclosure

Pounder Chris

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:08:36 -0000

81 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

Maurice Frankel

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:28:10 +0000

193 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data Disclosure

ianwelton

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:57:33 -0000

66 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data Disclosure

Pounder Chris

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:09:32 -0000

151 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

DREW Nic

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:37:05 -0000

143 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data Disclosure

ianwelton

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:26:59 -0000

39 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

Cashmore, Stuart

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:34:19 -0000

34 lines

Re: Agree

DPCS Associates

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:09:26 -0000

60 lines

Re: Agree

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:31:42 +0000

44 lines

Re: Agree

BILL.JACKSON

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:34:20 -0000

32 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

Marlene Whyte

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:39:10 +0000

22 lines

Re: Agree

Roland Perry

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:15:31 +0000

32 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

ianwelton

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:11:55 -0000

43 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:22:04 +0000

55 lines

Re: Sexual Health Data disclosure

Andrew Brown

Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:30:04 EST

31 lines

Re: Agree

DPCS Associates

Sat, 27 Mar 2004 09:26:28 -0000

69 lines

Changes to the justice system

Graham Smith

Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:44:45 -0000

50 lines

Re: Changes to the justice system

ianwelton

Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:30:04 +0100

83 lines

non domestic rating

Alan Stead

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:08:11 +0100

28 lines

Release of info to NHS

Arthur Longhurst

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:36:43 +0100

39 lines

Re: Changes to the justice system

DPCS Associates

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:57:55 +0100

97 lines

WWW/Internet 2004: Call for Papers

Natália Reis

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:44:51 +0100

23