JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


2004


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: Email server rejections

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:45:42 -0000

264 lines

Re: Email server rejections

Mary Liddell

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:40:51 -0000

246 lines

Re: Email server rejections

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:40:36 -0000

215 lines

Re: Email server rejections

Ian Welton

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:31:30 -0000

205 lines

Re: Advice on claim for damages -breach of principle 4

Paul Ticher

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:40:36 -0000

129 lines

Re: Advice on claim for damages -breach of principle 4

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:56:41 -0000

86 lines

More Yultide Greetings

Jo Archer

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:51:58 -0000

24 lines

Advice on claim for damages -breach of principle 4

Janice Vale

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:24:15 +0000

51 lines

Re: Email server rejections

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:50:16 -0000

111 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Ian Welton

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:38:47 -0000

552 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Ian Welton

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:08:13 -0000

505 lines

Yultide Greetings

davidwyatt

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 01:30:06 -0000

57 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

davidwyatt

Thu, 23 Dec 2004 01:08:44 -0000

366 lines

Re: Email server rejections

Ian Welton

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:29:17 -0000

116 lines

Re: Email server rejections

Jethro R Binks

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:05:17 +0000

73 lines

Re: Email server rejections

Jethro R Binks

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:05:17 +0000

60 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Ian Welton

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:09:48 -0000

313 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Ian Welton

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:30:24 -0000

243 lines

Email server rejections

Ian Welton

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:29:17 -0000

39 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Chris Brogan

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:21:56 -0000

210 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Talbot Richard

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:17:07 -0000

492 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Ian Welton

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:12:09 -0000

531 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:02:32 -0000

458 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Smith, Tony

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:59:46 -0000

423 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Ian Welton

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:57:16 -0000

180 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Ian Welton

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:54:05 -0000

390 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Chris Brogan

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:26:52 -0000

135 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Talbot Richard

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:13:18 -0000

289 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Ian Welton

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:02:52 -0000

140 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

<>

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:42:32 EST

82 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Ian Welton

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:42:44 -0000

174 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:21:29 -0000

288 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Roland Perry

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:19:44 +0000

35 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Roland Perry

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:16:14 +0000

44 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Mary Liddell

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:15:11 -0000

276 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:07:50 -0000

221 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Paul Ticher

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:46:19 -0000

186 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Donald Henderson

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:41:34 -0000

186 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Turner8

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:52:55 -0000

74 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Roland Perry

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:09:03 +0000

37 lines

Re: FW: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] SAR - Employee Recs

Donald Henderson

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:07:44 -0000

224 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:58:46 -0000

128 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Turner8

Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:42:22 -0000

76 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] SAR - Employee Recs

Ian Welton

Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:06:10 -0000

246 lines

Re: SAR - Employee Recs

Ian Welton

Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:47:00 -0000

93 lines

FW: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] SAR - Employee Recs

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:27:05 -0000

168 lines

FOI implementation - was part of - Employee Recs

Ian Welton

Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:50:34 -0000

96 lines

SAR - Employee Recs

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 21 Dec 2004 14:56:49 -0000

49 lines

FW: foi administrator jd

Ian Welton

Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:13:37 -0000

35 lines

Re: foi administrator jd

Ian Welton

Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:05:47 -0000

52 lines

Skynews on ID Cards

Pounder Chris

Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:07:39 -0000

58 lines

Re: DPA ambiguity on credit agreement

Roland Perry

Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:10:44 +0000

42 lines

Re: DPA ambiguity on credit agreement

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:47:39 -0000

69 lines

Re: LEGAL BRIEFING & QUESTIONS ON PRIVACY AND ID CARDS

Ian Welton

Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:34:08 -0000

506 lines

Movement and Thank you

datap

Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:27:02 +0000

81 lines

Re: LEGAL BRIEFING & QUESTIONS ON PRIVACY AND ID CARDS

Pounder Chris

Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:13:10 -0000

396 lines

Re: DPA ambiguity on credit agreement

Roland Perry

Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:07:09 +0000

39 lines

Re: DPA ambiguity on credit agreement

Tim Turner

Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:30:57 -0000

98 lines

DPA ambiguity on credit agreement

Roland Perry

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:37:02 +0000

47 lines

Re: Chip and PIN and CCTV

Ian Welton

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:39:53 -0000

93 lines

Re: Chip and PIN and CCTV

Roland Perry

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:48:14 +0000

41 lines

Re: Chip and PIN and CCTV

Ian Welton

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:22:50 -0000

106 lines

Chip and PIN and CCTV

<>

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:09:23 EST

55 lines

Re: CCTV again

Ian Welton

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:58:04 -0000

146 lines

Re: CCTV again

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:49:37 +0000

35 lines

Re: CCTV again

Donald Henderson

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:40:09 -0000

77 lines

Re: CCTV again

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:53:55 +0000

32 lines

Re: CCTV again

Ian Welton

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:59:46 -0000

70 lines

CCTV again

Dr Jonathan Davies

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:32:37 -0000

38 lines

FW: FAP

Chris Brogan

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:08:24 -0000

74 lines

Harrassment documentation

Turner8

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:01:31 -0000

40 lines

Re: Criminal Records Bureau terminology

Paul Ticher

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:25:06 -0000

152 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Ian Welton

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:12:19 -0000

438 lines

Re: Criminal Records Bureau terminology

Ian Welton

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:12:19 -0000

99 lines

Re: Criminal Records Bureau terminology

Rob Dawson

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:54:01 +0000

100 lines

Criminal Records Bureau terminology

Paul Ticher

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:41:17 -0000

50 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:58:42 -0000

367 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Healy, Susan

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:06:50 -0000

383 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:54:22 -0000

333 lines

Sick Certs

Clementine Amawo

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:28:18 +0000

35 lines

Email and DPA

Sara Jane Newbon

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:39:27 -0000

41 lines

Re: Reasons for SAR (was Unstructured personal data)

<>

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 04:15:15 EST

59 lines

Re: Reasons for SAR (was Unstructured personal data)

Turner8

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:36:00 -0000

100 lines

COP Part 4

DREW Nic

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:13:43 -0000

38 lines

Re: Reasons for SAR (was Unstructured personal data)

Ian Welton

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:40:50 -0000

119 lines

Employment code Part 4

Paul Ticher

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:42:25 -0000

35 lines

Reasons for SAR (was Unstructured personal data)

<>

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:21:04 EST

67 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Ian Welton

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:01:58 -0000

293 lines

Re: Quick question

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:37:03 -0000

78 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

DREW Nic

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:23:09 -0000

267 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:02:22 -0000

269 lines

Quick question

Carl Johnson

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:43:48 -0000

43 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Paul Ticher

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:40:19 -0000

233 lines

Re: Internet monitoring in FE College[Scanned]

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:26:32 +0000

81 lines

Before you go on holiday.............!

Sally Justice

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:07:58 +0000

51 lines

Internet monitoring in FE College[Scanned]

Colin Hammond

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:00:20 -0000

80 lines

CJS XHIBIT Portal Roll-out DP Policy

Paul Dodgson

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:30:29 +0000

33 lines

ETHICOMP 2005

CCSR

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:53:44 +0000

59 lines

Special Call: IADIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE APPLIED COMPUTING 2005

Natália Reis

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:44:53 +0000

129 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

<>

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:26:49 EST

66 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Gerry Dane

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:29:11 -0000

218 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

<>

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:22:35 EST

76 lines

Re: TV licence information - a Friday question?

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:07:09 +0000

74 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:31:27 +0000

32 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Catherine Sclater

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:28:06 -0000

195 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Paul Ticher

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:23:45 -0000

74 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:22:31 +0000

34 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Lynne Skipsey

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:21:38 -0000

122 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:09:33 +0000

37 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Paul Ticher

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:03:32 -0000

122 lines

Re: Unstructured personal data

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:34:22 +0000

32 lines

Unstructured personal data

Kirsty Gray

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:19:25 +0000

54 lines

Re: TV licence information - questions that needs to be asked?

Cliff Hoy

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:24:12 -0000

65 lines

Re: TV licence information - a Friday question?

Jim Whitaker

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:15:37 -0000

64 lines

Re: TV licence information - a Friday question?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:14:29 -0000

146 lines

Re: TV licence information - a Friday question? (answered on Monday)

<>

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 04:38:49 EST

72 lines

Re: TV licence information - a Friday question?

Smith, Tony

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:33:04 -0000

123 lines

Re: Parking Black list

<>

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 04:14:25 EST

56 lines

Re: TV licence information - a Friday question?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:48:35 -0000

85 lines

TV licence information - a Friday question?

Samantha Hill

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:59:10 -0000

43 lines

Parking Black list

Hitches, John F

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:22:15 -0000

37 lines

Re: Contact Centres

Geoff Scott

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:24:46 -0000

88 lines

Contact Centres

Julie Bentley

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:47:00 +0000

32 lines

Re: Parking Black List

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:17:48 -0000

57 lines

Re: Parking Black List

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:14:50 -0000

86 lines

Re: Parking Black List

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:59:41 +0000

29 lines

Parking Black List

Rachel Woodcock

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:50:35 -0000

60 lines

Re: Test

Sally Justice

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:23:23 +0000

94 lines

Test

Steel, Rachael

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:04:24 -0000

40 lines

A Friday ish question

Talbot Richard

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:21:13 -0000

44 lines

Re: Visitors' signing in books

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:45:32 -0000

68 lines

ETHICOMP 2005 Call for Papers

CCSR

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:10:28 +0000

170 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

Roland Perry

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 07:59:24 +0000

35 lines

Re: Visitors' signing in books

Roland Perry

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 07:52:55 +0000

42 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

Tim Trent

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:43:47 -0000

134 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

Chris Spray

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:36:30 +0000

104 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

Hitches, John F

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:23:16 -0000

57 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

Edwina Withe

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:13:43 +0000

126 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

Ian Welton

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:01:51 -0000

85 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

Smith, Tony

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:00:09 -0000

82 lines

DP Forum Presentation

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:51:55 -0000

33 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:43:51 +0000

30 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:43:38 -0000

62 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

Martin Hoskins

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:37:21 -0000

83 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

Chris Bayliss

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:36:08 +0000

56 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

DREW Nic

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:29:15 -0000

54 lines

Re: banning use of camera phones

Tim Trent

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:27:58 -0000

56 lines

banning use of camera phones

Simon Wadmore

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:24:29 EST

33 lines

Re: Visitors' signing in books

Mark Brookes

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:45:46 +0000

120 lines

Re: Visitors' signing in books

Jim Whitaker

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:08:14 -0000

95 lines

Re: Visitors' signing in books

Paul Ticher

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 10:21:19 -0000

91 lines

Visitors' signing in books

C.Oppenheim

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:44:28 -0000

42 lines

Re: Occupational Health Records

DREW Nic

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:23:21 -0000

59 lines

Re: Occupational Health Records

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 9 Dec 2004 07:53:03 +0000

31 lines

Occupational Health Records

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:21:07 +0000

35 lines

Re: Referendums and Robertson

Ian Welton

Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:02:13 -0000

125 lines

Referendums and Robertson

Les Kingstone

Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:21:12 +0000

44 lines

Re: Does the scope of the DPA 1998 includes Manual Data?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:51:43 -0000

104 lines

Re: Photographs of children

Ian Welton

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:02:16 -0000

84 lines

Re: Data Protection Consultant

Tim Trent

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 12:58:04 -0000

345 lines

Re: Data Protection Consultant

Hugo Brown

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 12:53:38 -0000

299 lines

Data Protection Consultant

Hugo Brown

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:45:38 -0000

287 lines

Re: Does the scope of the DPA 1998 includes Manual Data?

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:51:07 -0000

103 lines

Does the scope of the DPA 1998 includes Manual Data?

Robert (Bob) Waixel

Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:47:53 +0000

77 lines

Re: Photographs of children

Ian Welton

Fri, 3 Dec 2004 22:03:31 -0000

164 lines

Disclosures

G.M.Waters

Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:38:15 -0000

34 lines

Re: Photographs of children

Joan Field

Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:15:58 +0000

104 lines

Photographs of children

Ian Welton

Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:21:17 -0000

31 lines

Re: Research

Tim Trent

Fri, 3 Dec 2004 07:06:10 -0000

227 lines

Re: Research

davidwyatt

Fri, 3 Dec 2004 02:01:56 -0000

210 lines

Re: FOI & Holidays

Iain Harrison

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:49:02 +0000

139 lines

Re: FOI & Holidays

Heath, Mark

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:36:28 -0000

113 lines

Re: Research

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:34:10 -0000

259 lines

Re: Research

Paul Ticher

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:25:15 -0000

247 lines

Re: Research

DREW Nic

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:18:10 -0000

237 lines

Re: FOI & Holidays

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:12:14 -0000

137 lines

Re: Research

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:11:44 -0000

216 lines

Re: Data Protection & Camera Phones

DREW Nic

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:09:04 -0000

419 lines

FW: [data-protection] Research

John Hughes

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:07:10 -0000

245 lines

Re: FOI & Holidays

Yuill, Allan

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:01:40 -0000

94 lines

Re: FOI & Holidays

Tinsley, Chris

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:55:07 -0000

105 lines

Re: Data Protection & Camera Phones

Ian Welton

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:54:25 -0000

394 lines

Re: FOI & Holidays

Peter Dinsdale

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:54:03 +0000

85 lines

Re: FOI & Holidays

Cotterill Steve

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:43:00 -0000

111 lines

Re: Research

Ian Welton

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:42:57 -0000

176 lines

Re: Data Protection & Camera Phones

Paul Ticher

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:31:17 -0000

288 lines

Re: Research

Tim Trent

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:26:39 -0000

173 lines

FOI & Holidays

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:23:22 -0000

51 lines

Re: Research

Tim Turner

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:22:41 -0000

141 lines

Re: Research

<>

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:18:13 EST

82 lines

Re: Data Protection & Camera Phones

Ian Welton

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:53:13 -0000

298 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Research

Tim Turner

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:46:11 -0000

144 lines

FW: [data-protection] Research

John Hughes

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:53:54 -0000

80 lines

Re: Research

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:46:53 -0000

182 lines

Re: Research

Martin Hoskins

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:33:59 -0000

141 lines

Re: Research

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 11:43:55 -0000

96 lines

Re: Research

Tim Trent

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:54:35 -0000

66 lines

Research

DREW Nic

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 08:19:49 -0000

38 lines

German DPA News item

davidwyatt

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 02:04:06 -0000

26 lines

Re: Greek Data Protection Law

davidwyatt

Thu, 2 Dec 2004 01:23:40 -0000

163 lines

Re: Internal transfer of Sensitive Personal Data

Smith, Tony

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 15:35:39 -0000

137 lines

Re: Internal transfer of Sensitive Personal Data

Hitches, John F

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 15:02:05 -0000

51 lines

Re: Greek Data Protection Law

Duncan Smith

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 14:42:34 -0000

153 lines

Re: Internal transfer of Sensitive Personal Data

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 14:11:38 +0000

99 lines

Re: Internal transfer of Sensitive Personal Data

Smith, Tony

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 14:02:38 -0000

72 lines

Re: Internal transfer of Sensitive Personal Data

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:38:32 +0000

34 lines

Internal transfer of Sensitive Personal Data

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:21:22 +0000

37 lines

Re: Greek Data Protection Law

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:08:09 +0000

75 lines

Re: Greek Data Protection Law

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:07:05 -0000

110 lines

Greek Data Protection Law

Trevor Chew

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:53:19 -0000

89 lines

Re: Poland DPA

Duncan Smith

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:09:36 -0000

124 lines

Re: Poland DPA

Jim Whitaker

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:08:43 -0000

99 lines

Re: Poland DPA

Ian Welton

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 09:59:15 -0000

120 lines

Re: Poland DPA

Ian Barker

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 09:44:25 -0000

167 lines

Re: Poland DPA

Jo Archer

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 09:34:43 -0000

68 lines

Re: COPPA jurisdiction

Roland Perry

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 09:01:39 +0000

49 lines

Re: COPPA jurisdiction

Roland Perry

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:57:37 +0000

30 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens access rights

Roland Perry

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:53:30 +0000

35 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

Roland Perry

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:44:36 +0000

42 lines

Senior Degree Referees

Owen Parry

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:14:48 -0000

77 lines

Poland DPA

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:41:24 -0000

40 lines

FOI overseas rights

Wood, Steve

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:09:50 -0000

39 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens access rights

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:37:23 -0000

185 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens access rights

Ian Welton

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:44:40 -0000

218 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

<>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:16:12 EST

87 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens access rights

Chris Spray

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:08:50 +0000

143 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

Atkinson, C.

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:11:11 -0000

119 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens access rights

Wood, Steve

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:56:03 -0000

99 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

<>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:10:14 EST

64 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens access rights

Ian Welton

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:45:13 -0000

102 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

Atkinson, C.

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:38:00 -0000

127 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

davidwyatt

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:06:14 -0000

195 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens access rights

davidwyatt

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:03:54 -0000

65 lines

Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

<>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 03:58:36 EST

75 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens access rights

davidwyatt

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:52:33 -0000

119 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens access rights

davidwyatt

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:48:01 -0000

58 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

davidwyatt

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:36:48 -0000

133 lines

Re: COPPA jurisdiction

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:14:42 -0000

43 lines

Re: COPPA jurisdiction

Tim Trent

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:52:26 -0000

131 lines

Re: COPPA jurisdiction

Charles Prescott

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:58:19 -0500

98 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:14:17 -0000

87 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Tim Trent

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:59:16 -0000

377 lines

COPPA jurisdiction

Duncan Smith

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:58:23 -0000

56 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Tim Trent

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:57:46 -0000

363 lines

FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Hitches, John F

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:50:48 -0000

39 lines

Re: COPPA jurisdiction

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:49:14 -0000

83 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:45:19 -0000

104 lines

FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Hitches, John F

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:40:20 -0000

61 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Duncan Smith

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:37:52 -0000

353 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:31:47 -0000

272 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Tim Trent

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:31:29 -0000

283 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:25:13 -0000

307 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:22:18 -0000

240 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Tim Trent

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:20:42 -0000

285 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:17:27 +0000

113 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Tim Trent

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:14:32 -0000

229 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:10:01 -0000

353 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:06:43 -0000

63 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Duncan Smith

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:05:13 -0000

171 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Tim Trent

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:02:27 -0000

166 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Duncan Smith

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:57:38 -0000

122 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:56:04 -0000

278 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:55:28 -0000

130 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens access rights

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:54:40 +0000

27 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:51:22 -0000

28 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:48:40 -0000

253 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens access rights

Hitches, John F

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:48:24 -0000

40 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:44:46 -0000

246 lines

FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

John Hughes

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:41:53 -0000

86 lines

IS Policy Compliance Job

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:36:36 -0000

30 lines

FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens access rights

John Hughes

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:32:34 -0000

54 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:30:36 -0000

190 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:28:04 -0000

232 lines

Re: Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:25:11 -0000

194 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens acces s rights

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:20:43 -0000

146 lines

Non Uk Citizens access rights

Wood, Steve

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:18:35 -0000

26 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Non Uk Citizens access rights

Jo Archer

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:12:44 -0000

85 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

David Aspinall

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:58:33 -0000

192 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

<>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 06:46:38 EST

81 lines

Re: DPA in the News

Tim Trent

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:28:36 -0000

57 lines

Re: DPA in the News

Tony Bowden

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:19:07 +0000

35 lines

Re: 40 Day period for SARs

Tony Bowden

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:14:54 +0000

33 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

DREW Nic

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:43:02 -0000

153 lines

DPA in the News

Tim Trent

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:39:48 -0000

60 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:37:25 -0000

105 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

Tim Trent

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:31:40 -0000

113 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:28:47 -0000

120 lines

Re: Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

Mary Liddell

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:27:56 -0000

113 lines

Salaries - Personal Information under FOI?

Cotterill Steve

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:21:27 -0000

82 lines

Repercussions of the new FOA for archives

Sarah George

Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:06:41 +0000

41 lines

Data Sharing Document

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:21:18 -0000

46 lines

Re: Notification Exemptions

Tim Trent

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:04:24 -0000

140 lines

Re: Notification Exemptions

<>

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 04:55:27 EST

106 lines

Re: Notification Exemptions

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:19:11 -0000

99 lines

Re: Notification Exemptions

Tim Trent

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:05:58 -0000

85 lines

Re US FTC GLB Act ruling

davidwyatt

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:37:52 -0000

76 lines

Notification Exemptions

davidwyatt

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:07:52 -0000

49 lines

English translation of new French Data Protection Law, anyone?

Saundra Kae Rubel

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:35:00 -0600

56 lines

Re: 40 Day period for SARs

Talbot Richard

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:30:02 -0000

64 lines

Re: Use of photographs

Ibrahim Hasan (hotmail)

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:42:16 -0000

111 lines

FTC Alleges Mortgage Companies Violated Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act

Julian Curmi

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:33:41 +0100

176 lines

Re: Benefits Query

davidwyatt

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:59:41 -0000

113 lines

Re: A Heavyweight contest: Blunkett vs Thomas

Ian Welton

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:38:12 -0000

162 lines

Re: Of where am I a data subject?

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:24:33 +0000

65 lines

Re: 40 Day period for SARs

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:22:34 -0000

33 lines

FW: [data-protection] 40 Day period for SARs

John Hughes

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:49:59 -0000

141 lines

Re: A Heavyweight contest: Blunkett vs Thomas

Tim Turner

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:44:03 -0000

108 lines

Re: A Heavyweight contest: Blunkett vs Thomas

<>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:39:31 EST

54 lines

A Heavyweight contest: Blunkett vs Thomas

Tim Trent

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:31:18 -0000

58 lines

Re: 40 Day period for SARs

Tim Turner

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:28:42 -0000

150 lines

Re: 40 Day period for SARs

Tim Trent

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:24:41 -0000

129 lines

Re: 40 Day period for SARs

Turner8

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:17:48 -0000

106 lines

Re: Benefits Query

<>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:16:28 EST

78 lines

Re: 40 Day period for SARs

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:06:57 +0000

33 lines

Re: 40 Day period for SARs

Donald Henderson

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:06:18 -0000

82 lines

FW: 40 Day period for SARs

Hitches, John F

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:56:42 -0000

62 lines

Re: Benefits Query

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:56:34 -0000

74 lines

Re: Benefits Query

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:55:16 +0000

30 lines

40 Day period for SARs

Hitches, John F

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:53:52 -0000

54 lines

Re: Of where am I a data subject?

Tim Trent

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:42:47 -0000

130 lines

Of where am I a data subject?

Chris Spray

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:19:29 +0000

92 lines

Re: email append, lawful?

Ian Welton

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:15:53 -0000

160 lines

Benefits query

Kate Richardson

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:06:18 +0000

40 lines

Re: Benefits Query

Roland Perry

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:03:56 +0000

33 lines

Re: Benefits Query

<>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 05:25:04 EST

83 lines

Benefits Query

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:03:57 -0000

56 lines

Of where am I a data subject?

Tim Trent

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:55:27 -0000

63 lines

TICO and UCE and Enforcement (or not!)

Tim Trent

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:44:08 -0000

102 lines

Re: Use of photographs

Tim Trent

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:11:26 -0000

184 lines

Re: email append, lawful?

Tim Trent

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:03:18 -0000

106 lines

Re: Use of photographs

davidwyatt

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:02:20 -0000

74 lines

Re: Use of photographs

Paul Ticher

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:08:54 -0000

125 lines

NHS request

Sian Newton

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:44:19 +0000

27 lines

Re: Use of photographs

<>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:10:41 EST

68 lines

Re: Use of photographs

Paul Ticher

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:44:01 -0000

92 lines

Re: Use of photographs

Smith, Tony

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:41:16 -0000

127 lines

Re: Use of photographs

Gerry Dane

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:31:12 -0000

85 lines

Re: Use of photographs

<>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:24:25 EST

55 lines

Re: Use of photographs

Gerry Dane

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:39:12 -0000

144 lines

Re: Use of photographs

Jim Whitaker

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:01:43 -0000

60 lines

Re: Use of photographs

Cotterill Steve

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:30:20 -0000

100 lines

Use of photographs

Anne-Marie Sizer

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:14:28 +0000

27 lines

Re: email append, lawful?

Duncan Smith

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:02:23 -0000

57 lines

Re: email append, lawful?

Ian Welton

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:49:35 -0000

223 lines

Re: email append, lawful?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 22:35:25 -0000

54 lines

Re: email append, lawful?

Tim Trent

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 08:57:02 -0000

79 lines

Re: email append, lawful?

Duncan Smith

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:35:20 -0000

72 lines

Re: email append, lawful?

Roland Perry

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:10:00 +0000

46 lines

Re: email append, lawful?

Chris Bayliss

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:01:20 +0000

60 lines

Re: email append, lawful?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:01:04 -0000

132 lines

Re: email append, lawful?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:44:34 -0000

102 lines

email append, lawful?

Duncan Smith

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:34:10 -0000

68 lines

Re: Article 29 WP opinion 9/2004. Communications data.

Ian Welton

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:24:45 -0000

94 lines

Workshop exercise

Turner8

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:34:31 -0000

35 lines

Re: ID Cards Article

David Aspinall

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:00:02 -0000

92 lines

Re: ID Cards Article

Turner8

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:35:28 -0000

126 lines

Re: ID Cards Article

<>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:28:26 EST

42 lines

Re: Article 29 WP opinion 9/2004. Communications data.

Roland Perry

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:42:22 +0000

39 lines

Article 29 WP opinion 9/2004. Communications data.

Ian Welton

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:12:19 -0000

56 lines

Re: ID Cards Article

Jim Whitaker

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:35:12 -0000

53 lines

Re: ID Cards Article

Smith, Tony

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:24:41 -0000

111 lines

Re: ID Cards Article

<>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:48:50 EST

60 lines

Re: Phishing

Roland Perry

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:28:11 +0000

27 lines

Re: ID Cards Article

Tim Trent

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:06:32 -0000

82 lines

Re: Phishing

Julian Curmi

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:01:14 +0100

414 lines

ID Cards Article

Tim Trent

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:53:13 -0000

58 lines

Re: Phishing

Roland Perry

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:24:57 +0000

34 lines

Re: Phishing

Roland Perry

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:21:02 +0000

45 lines

Re: Phishing

DREW Nic

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:14:22 -0000

92 lines

Re: Phishing

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:05:18 -0000

69 lines

Phishing

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:36:09 -0000

42 lines

Re: FOI and access to Exam Scripts

Hitches, John F

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:25:21 -0000

65 lines

Examination Scripts

davidwyatt

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:43:06 -0000

30 lines

Re: Examination Scripts

Okey, Andrew

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:47:46 -0000

108 lines

PDF

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:59:46 -0000

44 lines

Letter from myself & reply from Phil Boyd re Data Matching

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:07:25 -0000

49 lines

Re: Advice please - Housing

<>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:57:02 EST

79 lines

Advice please - Housing

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:39:22 +0000

41 lines

Re: Inaccurate data

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:33:48 -0000

167 lines

Re: Inaccurate data

Ian Welton

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:23:52 -0000

124 lines

Re: Council Tax Debt Recovery

Joan Field

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:38:38 +0000

334 lines

Re: Council Tax Debt Recovery

Ian Welton

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:37:36 -0000

68 lines

Inaccurate data

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:35:08 +0000

50 lines

Re: Council Tax Debt Recovery

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:24:13 -0000

244 lines

Re: Nothing to fear? (Was "Providing names in a work context")

Ian Welton

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:07:32 -0000

76 lines

Re: Nothing to fear? (Was "Providing names in a work context")

Roland Perry

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:59:53 +0000

50 lines

Re: Council Tax Debt Recovery

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:45:47 -0000

28 lines

Re: Council Tax Debt Recovery

Roland Perry

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:14:07 +0000

31 lines

Re: Council Tax Debt Recovery

Roland Perry

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:13:10 +0000

36 lines

Re: Nothing to fear? (Was "Providing names in a work context")

<>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:08:34 EST

60 lines

Re: Council Tax Debt Recovery

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:06:07 -0000

168 lines

Re: Council Tax Debt Recovery

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:58:26 -0000

128 lines

Re: Nothing to fear? (Was "Providing names in a work context")

Roland Perry

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:53:54 +0000

32 lines

Re: Nothing to fear? (Was "Providing names in a work context")

<>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 06:46:19 EST

42 lines

Re: Nothing to fear? (Was "Providing names in a work context")

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:42:06 -0000

45 lines

Re: Nothing to fear? (Was "Providing names in a work context")

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:40:19 -0000

130 lines

Re: Nothing to fear? (Was "Providing names in a work context")

Tim Trent

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:37:14 -0000

92 lines

Nothing to fear? (Was "Providing names in a work context")

<>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 06:32:58 EST

64 lines

Re: Providing names in a work context

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:22:02 -0000

184 lines

Re: Cahoot and the BBC technology analyst

Chris Spray

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:02:17 +0000

167 lines

Re: Examination Scripts

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:38:29 +0000

70 lines

Re: Cahoot and the BBC technology analyst

Tim Trent

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:04:03 -0000

105 lines

Cahoot and the BBC technology analyst

datap

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:57:55 +0000

81 lines

International students and health tourists: any statutes?

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:21:38 +0000

27 lines

Those with Italian operations

Tim Trent

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:05:41 -0000

58 lines

Re: off topic. "press 9 to be transferred to an operator"

Tim Trent

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:49:15 -0000

121 lines

Examination Scripts

davidwyatt

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 02:48:56 -0000

37 lines

off topic. "press 9 to be transferred to an operator"

Tim Trent

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:48:50 -0000

62 lines

Re: M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Ian Welton

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:25:22 -0000

124 lines

Re: M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:11:49 -0000

65 lines

Re: M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Ian Welton

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:27:40 -0000

214 lines

Re: Council Tax Debt Recovery

<>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 05:30:33 EST

78 lines

Council Tax Debt Recovery

Joan Field

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:01:21 +0000

67 lines

Re: Pupil Referral units

<>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 04:48:00 EST

84 lines

Re: Providing names in a work context

<>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 04:36:24 EST

68 lines

Re: Providing names in a work context

Paul Ticher

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:05:47 -0000

138 lines

Re: Providing names in a work context

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:46:26 -0000

106 lines

Re: Pro-active Services

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:42:06 -0000

80 lines

Re: Providing names in a work context

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:15:42 +0000

67 lines

Providing names in a work context

Emma Bothamley

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:59:07 +0000

73 lines

Request for a DP trainer

Jason Campbell

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:03:08 -0000

52 lines

Staff Levels

Steel, Rachael

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:48:24 -0000

66 lines

Re: M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Turner8

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:11:06 -0000

126 lines

Re: M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Jim Whitaker

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:16:19 -0000

99 lines

Re: M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Roland Perry

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:11:49 +0000

39 lines

Pro-active Services

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:04:19 +0000

50 lines

Re: M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:38:15 +0000

38 lines

Re: M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:33:47 -0000

175 lines

Re: M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Ian Welton

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:28:11 -0000

156 lines

Pupil Referral units

Barron, Nikki

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:45:40 -0000

72 lines

Re: Sharing information with Local Council - what is personal dat a?

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:30:50 -0000

106 lines

Re: M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:06:22 +0000

86 lines

Re: Utilities Doorknockers and doorknocker databases.

Tim Trent

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:57:36 -0000

260 lines

Re: M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Tim Trent

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:00:36 -0000

70 lines

Re: M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Roland Perry

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:53:55 +0000

45 lines

M$oft Information Rights Management Service (run by them)

Tim Trent

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:47:06 -0000

59 lines

Re: Utilities Doorknockers and doorknocker databases.

Tim Trent

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:05:41 -0000

170 lines

Utilities Doorknockers and doorknocker databases.

Tim Trent

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:08:00 -0000

88 lines

Sharing information with Local Council - what is personal data?

<>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:14:34 EST

70 lines

Sharing information with Local Council - what is personal data?

Gerry Dane

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:30:35 -0000

253 lines

Re: Sharing information with Local Council - what is personal data?

Heath, Mark

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:16:19 -0000

223 lines

Re: Sharing information with Local Council - what is personal data?

Gerry Dane

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:04:10 -0000

165 lines

Re: Sharing information with Local Council - what is personal data?

Smith, Tony

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:41:21 -0000

132 lines

Re: Sharing information with Local Council - wh at is personal data?

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:37:57 -0000

117 lines

Re: Sharing information with Local Council - what is personal data?

Gerry Dane

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:36:00 -0000

105 lines

Re: Sharing information with Local Council - what is personal data?

Charles Christacopoulos

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:20:35 +0000

61 lines

Re: Sharing information with Local Council - what is personal data?

<>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:05:18 EST

68 lines

Sharing information with Local Council - what is personal data?

Gwenan Owen

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:44:06 +0000

59 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Roland Perry

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:32:28 +0000

34 lines

Re: Truancy Information

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:47:58 +0000

37 lines

HR Information Statement

Turner8

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:47:24 -0000

42 lines

Re: Excessive Data

Roland Perry

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:35:40 +0000

105 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Tim Trent

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:23:58 -0000

143 lines

Re: Truancy Information

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:21:29 -0000

111 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Turner8

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:17:57 -0000

112 lines

Re: Truancy Information

Tim Trent

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:08:06 -0000

67 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Roland Perry

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:45:40 +0000

32 lines

Truancy Information

Paul Dodgson

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:42:21 +0000

40 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Morris, Giles - Learning & Culture - Cultural Services

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:27:45 -0000

78 lines

Re: Credit Card security numbers

Chris Spray

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:00:18 +0000

119 lines

DP BAsic Training

Sara Jane Newbon

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:47:23 -0000

43 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Roland Perry

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:26:16 +0000

36 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Roland Perry

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:22:32 +0000

40 lines

Re: Cold Calling

David Aspinall

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:00:57 -0000

81 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:12:26 -0000

35 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:52:22 +0000

29 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:46:29 -0000

259 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Kinglake, Andrew

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:43:40 -0000

242 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Morris, Giles - Learning & Culture - Cultural Services

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:36:58 -0000

240 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:08:26 -0000

204 lines

Excessive Data

Jackie Leesons

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:28:13 +0000

28 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Tim Trent

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:10:19 -0000

153 lines

Excessive Data?

No Name

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:57:21 +0000

24 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:42:01 -0000

211 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Tim Turner

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:37:44 -0000

116 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Tim Trent

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:31:53 -0000

161 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Jim Whitaker

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:27:33 -0000

81 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:26:04 -0000

154 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Geoff Scott

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:12:54 -0000

119 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Tim Trent

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:08:20 -0000

70 lines

Re: Cold Calling

Jim Whitaker

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:00:30 -0000

82 lines

Cold Calling

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:53:39 -0000

44 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:27:14 -0000

76 lines

Re: Credit Card security numbers

davidwyatt

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:15:38 -0000

68 lines

Re: Yet another.............

davidwyatt

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:51:25 -0000

85 lines

Re: India and European Union sign 'strategic partnership' alliance.

davidwyatt

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:34:26 -0000

166 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

davidwyatt

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:11:50 -0000

99 lines

Re: Section 40 Exemption

Maurice Frankel

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 20:37:10 +0000

66 lines

ebay sellers and DPA registration

Roland Perry

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:24:48 +0000

38 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Roland Perry

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:11:11 +0000

38 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Roland Perry

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:11:04 +0000

37 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:18:14 -0000

320 lines

Re: banks

Ian Welton

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:07:17 -0000

133 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Chris Spray

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:01:31 +0000

93 lines

Re: banks

Chris Spray

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:53:24 +0000

104 lines

Re: banks

Margarita Rainford

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:52:40 +0000

88 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Ian Welton

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:45:56 -0000

91 lines

Re: banks

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:42:48 -0000

67 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:38:11 -0000

292 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:33:06 -0000

249 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:32:12 -0000

66 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:30:35 -0000

37 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:28:59 -0000

200 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:27:06 -0000

182 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Tim Trent

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:26:19 -0000

74 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:25:33 -0000

36 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:24:32 -0000

157 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:21:57 -0000

144 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Tim Trent

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:13:00 -0000

118 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:04:25 -0000

78 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Roland Perry

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:56:02 +0000

36 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:49:51 -0000

54 lines

banks

Kate Richardson

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:47:43 +0000

42 lines

Re: Credit Card security numbers

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:43:16 -0000

135 lines

Re: Recording telephone conversations

Duncan Smith

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:39:17 -0000

63 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Roland Perry

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:37:44 +0000

48 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Tim Trent

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:24:22 -0000

93 lines

Re: Yet another.............

Roland Perry

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:12:36 +0000

45 lines

Re: Credit Card security numbers

Chris Spray

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:09:19 +0000

84 lines

Credit Card security numbers

Alison

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 13:42:40 +0000

22 lines

Yet another.............

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:27:44 -0000

45 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

Arthur Howell

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:08:41 -0000

67 lines

URL's

Ian Welton

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:13:44 -0000

42 lines

Cahoot Update

Tim Trent

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:15:44 -0000

70 lines

Re: Customer Contact Centres

Tim Trent

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 14:52:57 -0000

84 lines

Recording telephone conversations

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 14:48:00 +0000

20 lines

Re: India and European Union sign 'strategic partnership' alliance.

Tim Trent

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:47:37 -0000

131 lines

India and European Union sign 'strategic partnership' alliance.

datap

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:31:44 +0000

82 lines

Customer Contact Centres

Fiona Musgrave

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:15:37 -0000

44 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 12:02:48 +0000

24 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Roland Perry

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 12:00:09 +0000

41 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

Ian Welton

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:49:32 -0000

127 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Ian Welton

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:29:33 -0000

99 lines

Violent Warning Markers

Louise Widd

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:17:42 +0000

29 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:40:36 +0000

29 lines

Re: Cahoot

Roland Perry

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:34:41 +0000

48 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Is Transport for London br eaching DPA?

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:24:43 -0000

92 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

<>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 04:23:38 EST

65 lines

Re: Cahoot

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:20:10 +0000

68 lines

Re: Cahoot

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:03:45 -0000

40 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:43:54 +0000

39 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:22:04 +0000

37 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Roland Perry

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 06:36:25 +0000

34 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

davidwyatt

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 00:05:36 -0000

65 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Roland Perry

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 18:48:45 +0000

40 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Graham Hadfield

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 18:20:40 +0000

40 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Roland Perry

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:17:26 +0000

47 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Graham Hadfield

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 13:23:42 +0000

37 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Tim Trent

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 12:46:54 -0000

92 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Charles Christacopoulos

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:24:15 +0000

61 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Graham Hadfield

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 16:42:00 +0000

37 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Roland Perry

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 13:41:08 +0000

40 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Graham Hadfield

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 11:56:41 +0000

33 lines

Re: Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Roland Perry

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 11:15:52 +0000

42 lines

Is Transport for London breaching DPA?

Graham Hadfield

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 10:57:40 +0000

30 lines

Re: Cahoot

Roland Perry

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 15:52:34 +0000

42 lines

Cahoot

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 15:37:43 -0000

36 lines

Canda's Privacy Commissioner

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:05:51 -0000

45 lines

benfits files

Sara Jane Newbon

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:43:49 -0000

39 lines

Re: Cahoot and Data Protection

Tim Trent

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:33:18 -0000

89 lines

Re: SAR Access to Emails

Dr Jonathan Davies

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:09:17 -0000

84 lines

Re: SAR Access to Emails

Turner8

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:52:57 -0000

54 lines

Re: Cahoot and Data Protection

Roland Perry

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:57:29 +0000

34 lines

Re: Cahoot and Data Protection

Tim Trent

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:38:16 -0000

144 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

Joan Field

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:20:57 +0000

127 lines

Re: e-mail storage systems case law

Roland Perry

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:18:17 +0000

42 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:10:12 -0000

160 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:35:01 -0000

114 lines

Re: Cahoot and Data Protection

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:32:37 -0000

113 lines

Re: Fax from Home Office doing random checks on students

Duncan Smith

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:28:57 -0000

46 lines

Re: Do you smoke? Part II

Duncan Smith

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:22:26 -0000

126 lines

Re: e-mail storage systems case law

Chris Spray

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:02:22 +0000

116 lines

Cahoot and Data Protection

Tim Trent

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:50:12 -0000

76 lines

Re: Do you smoke?

Smith, Tony

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:37:51 -0000

64 lines

Re: e-mail storage systems case law

Roland Perry

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 07:26:23 +0000

43 lines

Re: E-mail addresses personal data?

Roland Perry

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 07:22:40 +0000

53 lines

Re: Do you smoke?

davidwyatt

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 00:49:46 -0000

79 lines

Re: e-mail storage systems case law

davidwyatt

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 00:12:39 -0000

88 lines

Re: E-mail addresses personal data?

davidwyatt

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 23:46:19 -0000

81 lines

Re: E-mail addresses personal data?

davidwyatt

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 23:42:58 -0000

93 lines

Re: Do you smoke? Part II

Duncan Smith

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:17:47 -0000

74 lines

Re: Fax from Home Office doing random checks on students

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:48:59 +0000

60 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:01:11 -0000

150 lines

Re: Fax from Home Office doing random checks on students

Mary Liddell

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:31:31 -0000

63 lines

Re: Fax from Home Office doing random checks on students

Gerry Dane

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:29:52 -0000

95 lines

Re: Do you smoke? Part II

Tim Trent

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:29:29 -0000

104 lines

Re: Do you smoke? Part II

<>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:13:25 EST

78 lines

Fax from Home Office doing random checks on students

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:07:55 +0000

30 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

Chris Spray

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:57:59 +0000

109 lines

Re: Do you smoke? Part II

Tim Trent

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:35:12 -0000

82 lines

Re: Do you smoke?

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:01:57 -0000

121 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Tim Trent

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:01:00 -0000

46 lines

Do you smoke? Part II

Duncan Smith

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:59:34 -0000

63 lines

Re: Do you smoke?

Roland Perry

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:59:20 +0000

38 lines

Re: Do you smoke?

Roland Perry

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:56:02 +0000

31 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

Roland Perry

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:52:35 +0000

33 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Roland Perry

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:47:52 +0000

44 lines

Re: e-mail storage systems case law

Talbot Richard

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:48:36 -0000

127 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:47:49 -0000

92 lines

Re: Double Identity DSAR

Arthur Howell

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:44:13 -0000

141 lines

Re: Do you smoke?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:38:52 -0000

94 lines

Re: Do you smoke?

Jim Whitaker

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:07:28 -0000

88 lines

Recall: Double Identity DSAR

Arthur Howell

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:06:25 -0000

42 lines

Re: Double Identity DSAR

Arthur Howell

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:04:40 -0000

90 lines

Re: Do you smoke?

<>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 05:47:39 EST

66 lines

Re: Do you smoke?

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:40:38 -0000

116 lines

Re: Posted pay slips

<>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 05:39:20 EST

69 lines

Re: Do you smoke?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:33:29 -0000

90 lines

Re: Do you smoke?

<>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 05:31:46 EST

58 lines

Re: Do you smoke?

Tim Turner

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:29:54 -0000

108 lines

Do you smoke?

Duncan Smith

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:21:26 -0000

54 lines

Posted pay slips

Arthur Howell

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:11:20 -0000

55 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Tim Trent

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:10:38 -0000

233 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Clementine Amawo

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:57:35 +0000

226 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Tim Trent

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:48:53 -0000

115 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Clementine Amawo

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:40:45 +0000

134 lines

Spammer goes to Jail

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:39:47 -0000

46 lines

Re: e-mail storage systems case law

Chris Spray

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:34:49 +0000

123 lines

SAR Access to Emails

Turner8

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:02:06 -0000

29 lines

Re: e-mail storage systems case law

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 08:53:50 -0000

83 lines

Re: e-mail storage systems case law

Tim Trent

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 08:12:02 -0000

93 lines

Re: e-mail storage systems case law

Roland Perry

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 06:39:36 +0000

40 lines

Re: Viral Marketing [Attachment REMOVED for your own safety]

Roland Perry

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 06:34:48 +0000

33 lines

Re: E-mail addresses personal data?

Roland Perry

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 06:31:32 +0000

55 lines

Re: E-mail addresses personal data?

Charles Christacopoulos

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 02:58:14 +0000

49 lines

Re: E-mail addresses personal data?

davidwyatt

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 01:57:13 -0000

89 lines

e-mail storage systems case law

Talbot Richard

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 18:49:28 -0000

45 lines

Viral Marketing [Attachment REMOVED for your own safety]

Duncan Smith

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 18:35:05 -0000

85 lines

Re: Letter from marketing consultant

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 18:25:38 +0000

47 lines

Re: Letter from marketing consultant

Duncan Smith

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 18:09:25 -0000

51 lines

Re: internal passage of data: students under-18

Heath, Mark

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:34:38 -0000

108 lines

Re: internal passage of data: students under-18

Roland Perry

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:08:32 +0000

36 lines

internal passage of data: students under-18

Okey, Andrew

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:43:25 -0000

55 lines

Re: E-mail addresses personal data?

Roland Perry

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:44:46 +0000

51 lines

Lawful processing? Wrongful disclosure? but catching the crims.........

<>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:33:36 EST

69 lines

Re: E-mail addresses personal data?

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:32:05 -0000

131 lines

Re: E-mail addresses personal data?

Roland Perry

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:29:57 +0000

32 lines

Re: E-mail addresses personal data?

Tim Trent

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:22:16 -0000

102 lines

Re: Letter from marketing consultant

Ian Welton

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:15:46 -0000

99 lines

E-mail addresses personal data?

<>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:15:44 EST

73 lines

Re: Lawful processing??? Wrongful disclosure? but catching the crims.........

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:00:48 -0000

76 lines

Lawful processing??? Wrongful disclosure? but catching the crims.........

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:43:07 -0000

45 lines

Re: Letter from marketing consultant

Roland Perry

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:42:37 +0000

34 lines

Re: Subject access

Chris Spray

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:57:14 +0000

94 lines

Re: Letter from marketing consultant

<>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 06:29:08 EST

60 lines

Re: Letter from marketing consultant

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:05:51 +0000

60 lines

Re: Subject access

Cotterill Steve

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:58:37 -0000

97 lines

Re: Subject access

Tim Trent

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:54:56 -0000

82 lines

Re: Letter from marketing consultant

Tim Trent

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:50:17 -0000

103 lines

Subject access

G.M.Waters

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:46:29 -0000

33 lines

Letter from marketing consultant

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:39:53 +0000

62 lines

Re: DVLA Information

Michael DOHERTY PSE 53852

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:36:17 +0000

100 lines

Re: DVLA Information

Cotterill Steve

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:08:29 -0000

93 lines

Re: DVLA Information

Roland Perry

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:07:11 +0000

35 lines

Re: DVLA Information

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:05:46 -0000

33 lines

Re: DVLA Information

Cotterill Steve

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:01:21 -0000

158 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Ian Welton

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:51:27 -0000

125 lines

Re: DVLA Information

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:48:22 -0000

110 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Tricia Spence

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:30:43 -0600

79 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 18:01:57 +0000

61 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:26:00 -0000

48 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:00:56 -0000

162 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:39:52 +0000

105 lines

Re: PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Tim Trent

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:19:54 -0000

112 lines

DVLA Information

Cotterill Steve

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:18:28 -0000

69 lines

PR & Electronic (via email) Newsletters

Clementine Amawo

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:51:39 +0000

53 lines

Re: Breach of Act ?

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:56:00 -0000

110 lines

Re: Breach of Act ?

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:49:51 -0000

68 lines

Re: Breach of Act ?

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:43:59 -0000

99 lines

Re: Breach of Act ?

<>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:27:42 EST

55 lines

Re: fraudulent reference

Michael DOHERTY PSE 53852

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:20:20 +0000

154 lines

Re: fraudulent reference

Tim Trent

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:51:08 -0000

105 lines

fraudulent reference

Gwenan Owen

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:39:29 +0000

60 lines

Breach of Act ?

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:23:00 +0000

21 lines

Re: Americans in UK apparently have no DPA rights

Roland Perry

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:58:17 +0000

32 lines

Re: Americans in UK apparently have no DPA rights

Roland Perry

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:53:37 +0000

34 lines

Re: Americans in UK apparently have no DPA rights

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:16:01 -0000

49 lines

Re: Americans in UK apparently have no DPA rights

Andrew Charlesworth

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 10:41:31 +0000

54 lines

Americans in UK apparently have no DPA rights

Roland Perry

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 10:31:11 +0000

26 lines

Re: Joined up ICO?

Tim Trent

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 22:17:49 -0000

51 lines

Joined up ICO?

Ian Welton

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:18:49 -0000

28 lines

Re: Ill judged comments

<>

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 05:13:42 EDT

74 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Ill judged comments

davidwyatt

Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:19:02 +0100

127 lines

Re: Union challenge to Lloyds TSB use of India

Cindy Paul

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:24:04 +0100

182 lines

Re: Union challenge to Lloyds TSB use of India

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:33:50 +0100

112 lines

Union challenge to Lloyds TSB use of India

Cindy Paul

Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:04:37 +0100

53 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Chris Spray

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:31:04 +0100

66 lines

Re: Secret services to be given access to ID card database

Pounder Chris

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:25:09 +0100

186 lines

Re: Secret services to be given access to ID card database

Charles Christacopoulos

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:47:05 +0100

42 lines

Re: Secret services to be given access to ID card database

Tim Trent

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:32:23 +0100

82 lines

Re: Secret services to be given access to ID card database

Tim Trent

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:15:02 +0100

61 lines

Re: Secret services to be given access to ID card database

<>

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 06:02:58 EDT

58 lines

"Keepahead.com"

Tim Trent

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:01:20 +0100

56 lines

Re: Fees for photocopying

Neil Chadwick

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:44:40 +0100

29 lines

Secret services to be given access to ID card database

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:28:32 +0100

27 lines

Re: Fees for photocopying

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:22:47 +0100

104 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Ian Welton

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:33:18 +0100

139 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Roland Perry

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:49:12 +0100

48 lines

Re: Fees for photocopying

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:47:25 +0100

37 lines

Re: Fees for photocopying

Tim Trent

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:41:24 +0100

46 lines

Re: Fees for photocopying

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:39:10 +0100

64 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Chris Spray

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:23:34 +0100

122 lines

Anyone recall that SMS message that "won you a £2000" award?

Tim Trent

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:10:55 +0100

73 lines

Re: Ill judged comments

Duncan Smith

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:07:57 +0100

168 lines

Fees for photocopying

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:52:04 +0100

23 lines

Standard paragraphs for DPA compliance

Sally Justice

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:50:03 +0100

38 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Roland Perry

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:22:36 +0100

56 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Ian Welton

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:14:19 +0100

231 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Chris Spray

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:30:37 +0100

107 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Gerry Dane

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:19:29 +0100

87 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:55:39 +0100

76 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Roland Perry

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:46:24 +0100

43 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Simon Macauley

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:20:15 +0100

177 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Ian Welton

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:03:47 +0100

129 lines

Re: Searching for e-mails

Simon Macaulay

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:13:32 +0100

71 lines

Searching for e-mails

Dr Jonathan Davies

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:35:00 +0100

44 lines

FW: [data-protection] Ill judged comments

Gerry Dane

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:06:12 +0100

85 lines

Re: Ill judged comments

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:03:02 +0100

252 lines

Re: Ill judged comments

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:53:59 +0100

188 lines

Re: Ill judged comments

Tim Trent

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:13:44 +0100

136 lines

Re: Ill judged comments

Tim Trent

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:12:19 +0100

116 lines

Re: Ill judged comments

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:03:04 +0100

44 lines

Re: Ill judged comments

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:55:48 +0100

94 lines

Ill judged comments

Gerry Dane

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:48:41 +0100

52 lines

HEI SECTOR - Electoral Register

Gerry Dane

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:00:13 +0100

42 lines

Re: Request for advice

Tim Trent

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:14:28 +0100

92 lines

Re: Fw: UK Email List

Tim Trent

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:10:43 +0100

117 lines

Re: Fw: UK Email List

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:35:12 +0100

87 lines

Request for advice

S.E.Woollett

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:33:02 +0100

32 lines

Fw: UK Email List

Sara Jane Newbon

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:14:37 +0100

60 lines

sample clauses for collaboration abroad not in EEA

Sally Justice

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:00:07 +0100

39 lines

Re: Consent

Roland Perry

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:36:05 +0100

39 lines

Re: Binding Corporate Rules

Roland Perry

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:51:50 +0100

34 lines

Re: Consent

Gwenan Owen

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:30:54 +0100

180 lines

Re: Consent

Ian Welton

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:18:25 +0100

117 lines

Re: Consent

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:01:49 +0100

101 lines

Re: CSA request for bank details

Arthur Howell

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:36:37 +0100

111 lines

Re: Consent

Tinsley, Chris

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:29:16 +0100

102 lines

Re: Binding Corporate Rules

Tim Trent

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:20:59 +0100

61 lines

Re: Consent

Duncan Smith

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:13:23 +0100

88 lines

Re: Binding Corporate Rules

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:08:01 +0100

38 lines

Binding Corporate Rules

Tim Trent

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:56:17 +0100

61 lines

Re: CSA request for bank details

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:42:09 +0100

41 lines

Re: Consent

Tinsley, Chris

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:24:08 +0100

170 lines

Re: CSA request for bank details

<>

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:14:45 EDT

66 lines

Re: CSA request for bank details

No Name

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:48:13 +0100

135 lines

Re: Consent

Duncan Smith

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:18:59 +0100

149 lines

CSA request for bank details

Arthur Howell

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:15:39 +0100

59 lines

How to subscribe to mail lists

Sally Justice

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:56:57 +0100

108 lines

Re: Rumblings of reform

Tim Trent

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:22:56 +0100

70 lines

Rumblings of reform

Roland Perry

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:54:23 +0100

91 lines

Re: DPA message on emails

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:48:00 +0100

55 lines

HEI SECTOR - Electoral Register

Gerry Dane

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:22:16 +0100

46 lines

Re: DPA message on emails

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:02:44 +0100

45 lines

Re: DPA message on emails

<>

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 05:21:55 EDT

59 lines

Re: Access to inforamtion and the ALMO

Marlene Whyte

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:49:19 +0100

21 lines

DPA message on emails

Turner8

Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:39:43 +0100

30 lines

Access to inforamtion and the ALMO

Marlene Whyte

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:53:14 +0100

25 lines

Re: Consent

Tim Trent

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:53:23 +0100

118 lines

Re: Consent

Tinsley, Chris

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:48:51 +0100

111 lines

Re: Consent

Michael Doherty

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:15:23 +0100

25 lines

Re: Consent

Roland Perry

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:07:20 +0100

35 lines

Re: Consent

Data Protection Officer

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:01:23 +0100

113 lines

Re: Consent

Emma Bothamley

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:59:11 +0100

175 lines

Re: Consent

Tim Trent

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:51:45 +0100

142 lines

Consent

Gwenan Owen

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:07:40 +0100

65 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Heath, Mark

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:35:25 +0100

122 lines

Re: FOi Wheres it Gone

Ian Welton

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:58:02 +0100

53 lines

Re: FOi Wheres it Gone

Ibrahim Hasan (hotmail)

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:52:41 +0100

58 lines

FOi Wheres it Gone

Ged D

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:30:12 +0100

19 lines

Re: Family Tax Credit Renewal Form

Kirsty E Gray

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:55:35 +0100

61 lines

Italy and the Data Security Document Deadline

Tim Trent

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:39:54 +0100

56 lines

Family Tax Credit Renewal Form

Kinglake, Andrew

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:45:06 +0100

39 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Kirsty E Gray

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:32:08 +0100

52 lines

Re: Unlawful obtaining of Personal Data

Roland Perry

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:19:26 +0100

36 lines

Surveillance Law and RIPA - ADV

Ibrahim Hasan (hotmail)

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:13:27 +0100

54 lines

Re: Unlawful obtaining of Personal Data

Chris Spray

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:31:04 +0100

97 lines

Unlawful obtaining of Personal Data

Roland Perry

Fri, 15 Oct 2004 08:09:48 +0100

33 lines

[ADV] Two Training Courses

Tim Trent

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:40:00 +0100

71 lines

Another mail list

Sally Justice

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:26:50 +0100

33 lines

Compliance with FOI

Sally Justice

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:33:36 +0100

65 lines

Re: Is this legal?

Chris Spray

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:51:12 +0100

103 lines

National Association of Data Protection Officers Conf 8th/9th November

Edwina Withe

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:09:58 +0100

55 lines

Re: References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

Ian Welton

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:44:13 +0100

205 lines

Re: References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

Roland Perry

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:09:50 +0100

37 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Roland Perry

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:08:45 +0100

40 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Mandi Barron

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:20:31 +0100

303 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

George Ross

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:17:02 +0100

38 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Tim Trent

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:59:38 +0100

231 lines

Re: References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

Smith, Tony

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:53:53 +0100

141 lines

Re: DSAR - Record Keeping

Tinsley, Chris

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:48:49 +0100

122 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Heath, Mark

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:26:55 +0100

202 lines

Re: DSAR - Record Keeping

Tim Trent

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:27:09 +0100

92 lines

DSAR - Record Keeping

<>

Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:21:22 +0100

72 lines

Re: References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

Ian Welton

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:24:11 +0100

108 lines

Is this legal?

Lillina Taranto

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:13:23 -0700

47 lines

Re: References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

Kirsty E Gray

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:32:55 +0100

55 lines

Re: References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

Kirsty E Gray

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:32:55 +0100

43 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:30:26 +0100

63 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Heath, Mark

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:30:09 +0100

145 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:58:09 +0100

86 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Mandi Barron

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:21:52 +0100

95 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Kirsty E Gray

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:56:12 +0100

48 lines

Re: References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

Ian Welton

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:24:33 +0100

356 lines

Job Advert - Data Protection Compliance Manager

<>

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 05:44:09 EDT

66 lines

Re: References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

Smith, Tony

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:12:51 +0100

316 lines

Re: References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

Ian Welton

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:02:12 +0100

292 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:31:53 +0100

133 lines

Re: References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

Smith, Tony

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:01:37 +0100

288 lines

Re: Disclosure of data in disciplinary cases

Samantha Hill

Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:01:26 +0100

135 lines

Re: Disclosure of data in disciplinary cases

Stephen John

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:01:47 +0100

22 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:30:48 +0100

63 lines

Re: Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Kirsty E Gray

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:53:07 +0100

48 lines

Re: Disclosure of data in disciplinary cases

Tim Trent

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:28:13 +0100

88 lines

Re: Disclosure of data in disciplinary cases

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:23:30 +0100

51 lines

Re: Disclosure of data in disciplinary cases

Samantha Hill

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:47:25 +0100

80 lines

Re: References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

DREW Nic

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:46:43 +0100

254 lines

Re: References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

Roland Perry

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:14:54 +0100

60 lines

Re: Disclosure of data in disciplinary cases

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:50:09 +0100

54 lines

Re: Disclosure of data in disciplinary cases

Margarita Rainford

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:24:33 +0100

99 lines

Re: Disclosure of data in disciplinary cases

Tim Trent

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:20:33 +0100

51 lines

Disclosure of data in disciplinary cases

G.M.Waters

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:07:28 +0100

28 lines

References: PQ's on National Insurance numbers etc

Pounder Chris

Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:49:06 +0100

115 lines

Re: Webcasts

Ian Welton

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 14:33:07 +0100

107 lines

Re: Webcasts

Roland Perry

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 11:55:45 +0100

36 lines

Re: Webcasts

Ian Welton

Sat, 9 Oct 2004 11:11:12 +0100

104 lines

NI, NHS and

Roland Perry

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 21:07:12 +0100

49 lines

Re: Live Testing

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:44:22 +0100

86 lines

Re: Live Testing

Iain Harrison

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:00:52 +0100

61 lines

Re: Live Testing

Michael Doherty

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:23:46 +0100

24 lines

Re: National Insurance numbers

Michael Doherty

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:04:10 +0100

26 lines

Fwd: Re: [data-protection] National Insurance numbers

Iain Harrison

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:24:37 +0100

80 lines

Re: Webcasts

Roland Perry

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:02:40 +0100

44 lines

Re: Webcasts

Ian Welton

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:20:17 +0100

77 lines

FOI information sheet for staff

Paul Stott

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 13:40:06 +0100

25 lines

Re: Secondary Uses of CT Data

Cotterill Steve

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:44:40 +0100

179 lines

Re: Secondary Uses of CT Data

Sara Jane Newbon

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:44:22 +0100

109 lines

National Insurance numbers

Sophie Houlton

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:36:17 +0100

44 lines

Re: Secondary Uses of CT Data

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:31:29 +0100

79 lines

Re: Webcasts

Roland Perry

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:22:41 +0100

40 lines

Secondary Uses of CT Data

Sara Jane Newbon

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:47:11 +0100

45 lines

Re: Webcasts

Ian Welton

Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:20:15 +0100

91 lines

Re: Webcasts

Roland Perry

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:32:56 +0100

38 lines

Re: Webcasts

Ian Welton

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:29:39 +0100

131 lines

Combined DP/FOI Role

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:15:20 +0100

44 lines

Re: Webcasts

<>

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 06:22:56 EDT

64 lines

Re: Webcasts

Donald Henderson

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:36:50 +0100

106 lines

Re: Webcasts

Smith, Tony

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:48:04 +0100

90 lines

Re: Webcasts

<>

Thu, 7 Oct 2004 02:59:56 EDT

59 lines

Re: Webcasts

Jo Archer

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:40:36 +0100

136 lines

Re: Webcasts

Ian Welton

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:25:39 +0100

201 lines

Re: Webcasts

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:01:05 +0100

134 lines

Re: Webcasts

Donald Henderson

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 14:45:25 +0100

109 lines

Re: Webcasts

<>

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:13:02 EDT

66 lines

Re: Webcasts

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:55:03 +0100

57 lines

Block registration of students on the electoral roll

Mandi Barron

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:36:18 +0100

52 lines

Re: Webcasts

Jo Archer

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:30:20 +0100

57 lines

Re: Webcasts

Roland Perry

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:13:17 +0100

34 lines

Re: Live Testing

Sally Justice

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:44:19 +0100

107 lines

Re: Live Testing

Donald Henderson

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:10:21 +0100

72 lines

Re: Live Testing

Michael Doherty

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:00:39 +0100

57 lines

Re: Live Testing

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:58:53 +0100

68 lines

Re: Live Testing

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:54:46 +0100

31 lines

Webcasts

Cotterill Steve

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:53:45 +0100

65 lines

Re: Live Testing

DREW Nic

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:43:20 +0100

66 lines

Re: Webcasts

Jo Archer

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:36:23 +0100

97 lines

Re: Missing Person

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:24:30 +0100

72 lines

Live Testing

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:22:11 +0100

39 lines

Re: Access Request .........a Friday one...........

<>

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 05:39:15 EDT

60 lines

Re: Missing Person

Roland Perry

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:22:50 +0100

45 lines

Missing Person

Andrew Kinglake

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:06:00 +0100

30 lines

Re: Quite an amusing one!

Roland Perry

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:37:28 +0100

37 lines

Re: Certainly Wilful!

Tim Trent

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:55:20 +0100

105 lines

Re: Certainly Wilful!

Turner8

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:49:23 +0100

78 lines

Re: Quite an amusing one!

C.Oppenheim

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:48:08 +0100

40 lines

Certainly Wilful!

Tim Trent

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:25:13 +0100

55 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Tim Trent

Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:00:36 +0100

339 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

davidwyatt

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:22:27 +0100

299 lines

Re: Quite an amusing one!

davidwyatt

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 22:56:18 +0100

102 lines

Students data - Was - RE: Quite an amusing one! [Contains reproduced SPAM]

Ian Welton

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:55:10 +0100

61 lines

Re: Quite an amusing one!

Ali Hartrey

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:18:18 +0100

67 lines

Re: Quite an amusing one!

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:15:48 +0100

58 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Tim Trent

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:49:58 +0100

389 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Atkinson, C.

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:42:44 +0100

409 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Tim Trent

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:35:07 +0100

337 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:33:12 +0100

137 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Atkinson, C.

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:28:01 +0100

317 lines

Re: Quite an amusing one!

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:18:34 +0100

110 lines

Re: Quite an amusing one!

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:10:25 +0100

35 lines

Re: Quite an amusing one!

C.Oppenheim

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:05:05 +0100

117 lines

Data Protection Half-Day Workshops - London - 13th October

James Black - Privacy & Data Protection

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:03:20 +0100

55 lines

Third Annual Data Protection Compliance Conference

James Black - Privacy & Data Protection

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:00:03 +0100

97 lines

Re: Quite an amusing one!

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:59:41 +0100

74 lines

Re: Quite an amusing one!

Roland Perry

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:54:16 +0100

38 lines

Re: Third party response consent. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Roland Perry

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:48:56 +0100

52 lines

Re: Quite an amusing one!

Ali Hartrey

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:59:45 +0100

107 lines

Re: Quite an amusing one!

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:57:18 +0100

75 lines

Quite an amusing one!

Paula Owen

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:15:36 +0100

42 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:13:24 +0100

246 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Tim Trent

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:55:59 +0100

251 lines

Re: Third party response consent

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:51:54 +0100

159 lines

Re: Third party response consent. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Ian Welton

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:49:37 +0100

90 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Atkinson, C.

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:38:14 +0100

204 lines

Re: Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Roland Perry

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:10:17 +0100

44 lines

EDRM/DM

Sara Jane Newbon

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:34:13 +0100

42 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:25:41 +0100

152 lines

Re: Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Tim Trent

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:22:22 +0100

66 lines

Re: Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Roland Perry

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:15:24 +0100

38 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Roland Perry

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:13:52 +0100

40 lines

Re: Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Tim Trent

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:39:13 +0100

161 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Third party response conse nt. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:28:46 +0100

91 lines

Re: Third party response consent. Was - RE: SAR and compliance calendar days

Roland Perry

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:17:31 +0100

40 lines

Increased Powers?

Les Kingstone

Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:11:11 +0100

27 lines