JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


2004


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Chronologically

Size

IBM XL Fortran V8.1 for Linux supports Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 NOW

Yin Zhu

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:40:48 -0500

30 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier

Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:51:23 +0100

12 lines

Re: MPI under Opteron (fwd)

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:24:30 -0500

44 lines

Re: MPI under Opteron (fwd)

Tim Prince

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:13:02 -0800

58 lines

Re: MPI under Opteron (fwd)

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:38:20 -0500

44 lines

Re: MPI under Opteron (fwd)

Tim Prince

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:40:28 -0800

29 lines

Integer formating

Paul Suckling

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:13:20 +0000

53 lines

Re: Integer formating

Lionel, Steve

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:40:16 -0500

38 lines

Re: Integer formating

Lionel, Steve

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:00:32 -0500

21 lines

Re: Integer formating

Paul Suckling

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:14:07 +0000

28 lines

Re: Integer formating

Robert E. Leblanc

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:51:59 -0800

26 lines

Re: UK comment on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft

Malcolm Cohen

Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:33:07 +0000

44 lines

Re: UK comment on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft

John Reid

Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:37:32 +0000

40 lines

Fortran Resources (January)

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:38:15 +0100

729 lines

A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:27:31 -0500

51 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Martin Dix

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:14:18 +1100

36 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:24:05 -0500

46 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Tim Prince

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:06:31 -0800

53 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:21:24 -0500

44 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Greg Lindahl

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:54:55 -0800

29 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Tim Prince

Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:35:40 -0800

25 lines

Truly non-advancing print statement?

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:50:27 -0600

235 lines

Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?

<>

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:09:22 -0800

53 lines

Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?

Renchi Raju

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:11:28 -0600

27 lines

Truly non-advancing print statement?

Richard Maine

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:23:30 -0800

47 lines

Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?

Russell, Richard

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:26:05 -0500

293 lines

Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?

Richard Maine

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:26:48 -0800

25 lines

Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?

<>

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:30:29 -0800

47 lines

Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?

Renchi Raju

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:33:14 -0600

27 lines

Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?

Richard Maine

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:57:05 -0800

36 lines

Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?

Richard Maine

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:00:03 -0800

24 lines

Somewhat OT...

Alvaro Fernandez

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:53:39 -0600

25 lines

Re: Somewhat OT...

<>

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:59:47 -0800

24 lines

Re: Somewhat OT...

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:15:27 -0500

33 lines

Re: Somewhat OT...

Ted Stern

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:47:22 -0800

39 lines

Re: Somewhat OT...

Michael Milgram

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:14:36 -0500

35 lines

Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:05:25 +0200

85 lines

My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Alvaro Fernandez

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:13:56 -0600

47 lines

Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Paul Suckling

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:57:39 +0100

95 lines

Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Ben Blackwell

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:06:04 -0700

92 lines

Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Alvaro Fernandez

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:53:13 -0600

149 lines

Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Harry R Millwater

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:01:57 -0600

62 lines

Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Paul Suckling

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:25:44 +0100

52 lines

Second call for papers

Choi-Hong Lai

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:30:17 +0000

366 lines

Re: My math problem (was: Somewhat OT)

Alvaro Fernandez

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:37:25 -0600

89 lines

tools for converting from f77 to f95

Ian Chivers

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:14:10 +0000

33 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Alan Miller

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:35:08 +1100

53 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Dr. Volker Typke

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:48:48 +0100

71 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Phillip Helbig

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:34:47 +0000

11 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Dan Nagle

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:40:54 -0500

57 lines

practical issues with array-valued functions

Neil Carlson

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:11:51 -0700

34 lines

Re: practical issues with array-valued functions

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:21:16 -0500

26 lines

Re: practical issues with array-valued functions

Bill Long

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:45:45 -0600

46 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Clive Page

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:13:35 +0000

60 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Russell, Richard

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:29:38 -0500

43 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Alvaro Fernandez

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:27:45 -0600

73 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Richard Maine

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:05:21 -0800

81 lines

Re: Truly non-advancing print statement?

Dan Kidger

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 22:57:19 +0000

64 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

<>

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:03:46 -0800

36 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

James Giles

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:05:17 -0700

50 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

robin

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:43:34 +1000

52 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Clive Page

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:09:23 +0000

48 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Russell, Richard

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 07:49:12 -0500

48 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Yasuki Arasaki

Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:15:51 +0900

43 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

robin

Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:19:43 +1000

43 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

robin

Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:19:43 +1000

29 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

robin

Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:19:43 +1000

33 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

<>

Sun, 8 Feb 2004 02:24:06 -0800

39 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Hargraves Gary

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:37:56 +1000

51 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Clive Page

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:34:06 +0000

31 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Clive Page

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:40:08 +0000

35 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:34:38 +0100

12 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Yasuki Arasaki

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 21:44:09 +0900

36 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Ronald Fowler

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:49:15 +0000

39 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Herbert Fruechtl

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:34:09 -0000

64 lines

Re: tools for converting from f77 to f95

Tim Prince

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 05:58:56 -0800

42 lines

ABORT with traceback

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 20:25:47 -0500

20 lines

Re: ABORT with traceback

Russell, Richard

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 07:07:51 -0500

52 lines

Re: ABORT with traceback

Russell, Richard

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:11:10 -0500

44 lines

Re: ABORT with traceback

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:46:12 +0000

40 lines

script language

Stuart Midgley

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:55:25 +0800

54 lines

Re: script language

Alvaro Fernandez

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:10:53 -0600

68 lines

Re: script language

Stuart Midgley

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 23:20:01 +0800

28 lines

Re: ABORT with traceback

Craig Dedo

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:39:55 -0600

111 lines

Re: script language

W.J. Metzger

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:42:44 +0100

92 lines

Re: script language

Clive Page

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:11:00 +0000

24 lines

Re: script language

Stuart Midgley

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:41:34 +0800

29 lines

Re: script language

Hargraves Gary

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:54:05 +1000

51 lines

Re: script language

David Vowles

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:20:54 +1030

52 lines

Re: script language

Stuart Midgley

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:36:01 +0800

50 lines

memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Ben Blackwell

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:28:29 -0700

47 lines

Re: script language

Dan Nagle

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:22:13 -0500

58 lines

Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:27:18 +0100

47 lines

Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Ben Blackwell

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 06:47:00 -0700

67 lines

Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Alvaro Fernandez

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:49:29 -0600

92 lines

Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Renchi Raju

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:50:52 -0600

24 lines

Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Ben Blackwell

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:19:02 -0700

40 lines

Re: memory allocation in conjuction with modules

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:41:34 +0100

26 lines

test

James Giles

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:21:03 -0700

34 lines

Re: New Kinds of Kinds

James Giles

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:12:26 -0700

71 lines

target attribute

Drew McCormack

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:09:38 +0100

65 lines

Re: target attribute

James Giles

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:10:15 -0700

25 lines

suggestion

Norman Clerman

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:02:08 -0500

20 lines

Re: suggestion

Chuck Koelbel

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:19:43 -0600

50 lines

Re: suggestion

Norman Clerman

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:28:41 -0500

64 lines

Re: suggestion

Chuck Koelbel

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:59:10 -0600

74 lines

Retire FORTRAN?!

Jing Guo

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:41:30 -0500

29 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Loren P Meissner

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:17:02 -0800

47 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Tim Prince

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:01:45 -0800

24 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Craig Dedo

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:45:33 -0600

76 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Loren P Meissner

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:08:11 -0800

38 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Alvaro Fernandez

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:09:43 -0600

88 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Bertrand Meltz

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:53:24 +0100

82 lines

[Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]

Craig Dedo

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:12:02 -0600

265 lines

Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]

Samuel H. Dupree, Jr.

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:48:23 -0500

722 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Richard Maine

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:53:48 -0800

41 lines

Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:29:42 -0500

108 lines

Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:57:54 -0500

30 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

venkat sastry

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:58:04 +0000

121 lines

Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]

Bill Long

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:04:56 -0600

39 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Jing Guo

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:52:58 -0500

88 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Richard Maine

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:12:55 -0800

37 lines

Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]

Toon Moene

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:07:09 +0100

28 lines

Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:16:59 -0500

48 lines

Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]

Russell, Richard

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:31:41 -0500

59 lines

Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]

Toon Moene

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:35:18 +0100

30 lines

Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]

Alvaro Fernandez

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:48:59 -0600

65 lines

Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:59:34 -0500

59 lines

Re: [Fwd: (j3.2004-464) Comment on PETITION TO RETIRE FORTRAN]

Toon Moene

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 23:09:28 +0100

63 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Walt Brainerd

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:15:32 -0700

37 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Loren P Meissner

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:51:24 -0800

70 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Ted Stern

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:30:56 -0800

43 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:47:35 -0500

18 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Loren P Meissner

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:56:39 -0800

27 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

David Muxworthy

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:55:11 +0000

14 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Toon Moene

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 20:46:19 +0100

29 lines

Yet another thought: (RE: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Loren P Meissner

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:31:51 -0800

58 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

<>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:35:58 -0800

15 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

Greg Lindahl

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:00:10 -0800

19 lines

Re: Retire FORTRAN?!

James Giles

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:18:12 -0700

18 lines

(j3.2004-508) Re: Fortran 20xx Request #Pub-121

Loren P Meissner

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:25:03 -0800

33 lines

(j3.2004-509) Re: Fortran 20xx Request #Pub-121

Loren P Meissner

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:25:41 -0800

191 lines

Re: Yet another thought: (RE: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Richard Maine

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:34:38 -0800

26 lines

F90 interface to FFTW

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:03:10 -0500

16 lines

Question

<>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:55:03 -0500

30 lines

Array help requested

Craig Shirley

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:02:14 -0800

65 lines

Re: Array help requested

Loren P Meissner

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:33:33 -0800

86 lines

Please disregard Array Help Requested

Craig Shirley

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:38:13 -0800

27 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:18:54 -0500

35 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Stenson Matthew

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:28:31 +1000

70 lines

Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Jing Guo

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:52:40 -0500

80 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

<>

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:58:35 -0800

31 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Tim Prince

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:15:58 -0800

32 lines

Re: A few Q's about P4 and Opteron optimization...

Stenson Matthew

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:30:51 +1000

30 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Richard Maine

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:22:23 -0800

43 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

David LaFrance-Linden

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:20:50 -0500

155 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Hargraves Gary

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:24:19 +1000

181 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Richard Maine

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:46:48 -0800

25 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Hargraves Gary

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:47:48 +1000

48 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Drew McCormack

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:08:39 +0100

220 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Alistair Mills

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 08:14:17 -0000

240 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Tim Prince

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 05:26:51 -0800

40 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Drew McCormack

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:21:02 +0100

47 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Orville E. Wheeler

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:07:50 -0600

76 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:15:28 -0500

30 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Drew McCormack

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:10:44 +0100

65 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Dan Nagle

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:59:30 -0500

47 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:07:39 -0500

23 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Loren P Meissner

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:37:03 -0800

47 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Drew McCormack

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:55:22 +0100

31 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Richard Maine

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:55:31 -0800

32 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

<>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:43:31 -0800

38 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

<>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:43:29 -0800

133 lines

Re: Stir it up again?

keith bierman

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:35:31 -0800

108 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:32:02 -0500

34 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

<>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:47:14 -0800

38 lines

Re: Stir it up again?

Dick Hendrickson

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:50:17 -0600

64 lines

Re: Stir it up again?

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:20:27 -0500

23 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

<>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:47:33 -0800

29 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:12:05 -0500

23 lines

Re: Stir it up again?

Loren P Meissner

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:19:32 -0800

32 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Toon Moene

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:25:13 +0100

30 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Clive Page

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:03:51 +0000

26 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Peter Shenkin

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:19:40 -0500

31 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Clive Page

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:11:53 +0000

33 lines

Re: Stir it up again?

Robin

Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:11:52 +1000

42 lines

Re: Stir it up again?

Robin

Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:11:52 +1000

42 lines

Re: Ariane (was: Stir it up again?)

Robin

Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:11:53 +1000

75 lines

Re: Stir it up again?

Gerry Thomas

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 10:27:18 -0500

58 lines

Re: Ariane (was: Stir it up again?)

Clive Page

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:26:25 +0000

29 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

David LaFrance-Linden

Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:28:41 -0500

44 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

Alvaro Fernandez

Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:36:51 -0600

60 lines

Re: Stir it up again? (was: Retire FORTRAN?!)

David LaFrance-Linden

Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:19:29 -0500

31 lines

(un)formatted IO

Joerg Stiller

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:45:53 +0100

21 lines

multiple association

Bertrand Meltz

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:38:16 +0100

23 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:22:26 +0100

20 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

Joerg Stiller

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:26:35 +0100

34 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

W.J. Metzger

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:15:21 +0100

80 lines

Re: multiple association

John Reid

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:50:18 +0000

28 lines

Symbols

Drew McCormack

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:06:58 +0100

151 lines

Re: Symbols

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:12:30 -0500

18 lines

Re: Symbols

John Reid

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:32:28 +0000

25 lines

Re: Symbols

J.L.Schonfelder

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:37:51 -0000

48 lines

Re: Stir it up again?

Robin

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:01:40 +1000

41 lines

Re: Symbols

Roderick W. Failing III

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:05:40 -0500

94 lines

Re: Symbols

Pope, Beverly (BKPope)

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:07:07 -0600

69 lines

Re: Symbols

Alberto Águeda Maté

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:20:03 +0100

224 lines

Re: Symbols

Alvaro Fernandez

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:23:59 -0600

568 lines

Re: Symbols

Drew McCormack

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:32:07 +0100

111 lines

Re: Symbols

Russell, Richard

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:35:49 -0500

45 lines

Re: Symbols

Craig Dedo

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:43:04 -0600

248 lines

Re: Symbols

W.J. Metzger

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:44:20 +0100

25 lines

Re: Symbols

Joerg Stiller

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:24:27 +0100

25 lines

Re: Symbols

Loren P Meissner

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:47:58 -0800

25 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

Ted Stern

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:29:18 -0800

86 lines

Re: Symbols

J.L.Schonfelder

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:19:58 -0000

45 lines

Re: Symbols

James Giles

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:48:11 -0700

30 lines

Requirements for revision of Fortran

David Muxworthy

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:02:35 +0000

39 lines

COMMON & SAVE

Russell, Richard

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:22:38 -0500

48 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Russell, Richard

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:58:24 -0500

65 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:04:48 -0500

36 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Keith Bierman

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:09:04 -0800

45 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:23:53 -0500

70 lines

Re: Symbols

Jing Guo

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:40:23 -0500

61 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Richard Maine

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:49:56 -0800

48 lines

Re: Stir it up again?

<>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:56:35 -0800

27 lines

(un)formatted IO

Richard Maine

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:56:48 -0800

39 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

<>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:35:14 -0800

40 lines

Re: Symbols

<>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:29:21 -0800

97 lines

Re: Symbols

Drew McCormack

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:07:42 +0100

61 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Paddy O'Brien

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:31:50 +1100

66 lines

Re: Symbols

<>

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:33:51 -0800

38 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Paddy O'Brien

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:38:48 +1100

52 lines

Re: Symbols

Drew McCormack

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:00:20 +0100

52 lines

Re: Symbols

Paddy O'Brien

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:03:17 +1100

149 lines

Re: Symbols

Paddy O'Brien

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:29:52 +1100

99 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Richard Maine

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:30:26 -0800

46 lines

Re: Symbols

Richard Maine

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:47:28 -0800

48 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Richard Maine

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:08:49 -0800

53 lines

Re: Symbols

J.L.Schonfelder

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:02:24 -0000

55 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Russell, Richard

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:30:48 -0500

69 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

Yasuki Arasaki

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:37:26 +0900

21 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

Renchi Raju

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:45:06 -0600

31 lines

Re: Symbols

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:01:27 -0600

75 lines

Re: Symbols

Robin

Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:08:20 +1000

22 lines

Re: Symbols

Walt Brainerd

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:56:06 -0700

72 lines

Re: Symbols

David LaFrance-Linden

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:03:10 -0500

46 lines

Re: Symbols

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:03:12 -0500

74 lines

Re: Symbols

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:28:08 -0600

61 lines

Re: Symbols

Craig Dedo

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:47:53 -0600

277 lines

Re: Symbols

David LaFrance-Linden

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:06:35 -0500

68 lines

Re: Symbols

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:08:55 -0500

24 lines

Re: Symbols

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:55:59 -0600

36 lines

COMMON & SAVE

Alberto Fasso'

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:29:31 -0800

31 lines

Re: Symbols

Walt Brainerd

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:37:06 -0700

102 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Russell, Richard

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:43:05 -0500

60 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:17:00 -0500

33 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

<>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:54:20 -0800

55 lines

Re: COMMON & SAVE

<>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:06:18 -0800

54 lines

Re: Symbols

<>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:30:08 -0800

50 lines

Re: Symbols

<>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:44:41 -0800

34 lines

Re: Symbols

<>

Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:47:28 -0800

39 lines

Re: Symbols

Alvaro Fernandez

Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:07:10 -0600

48 lines

Summary: (un)formatted IO

Joerg Stiller

Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:13:24 +0100

22 lines

Re: (un)formatted IO

Bill Long

Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:24:33 -0600

292 lines

configurable default real

Yasuki Arasaki

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:05:45 +0900

221 lines

Re: configurable default real

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 5 Mar 2004 22:27:46 -0500

41 lines

Re: configurable default real

Yasuki Arasaki

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 16:06:58 +0900

82 lines

Re: configurable default real

Peter Shenkin

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 09:34:14 -0500

51 lines

Re: configurable default real

Dan Nagle

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:02:31 -0500

74 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 16:06:17 -0700

37 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin

Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:24:27 +1000

238 lines

Re: configurable default real

Peter Shenkin

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 18:31:52 -0500

32 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 16:46:51 -0700

28 lines

Re: configurable default real

Yasuki Arasaki

Sun, 7 Mar 2004 08:55:09 +0900

66 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Sun, 7 Mar 2004 00:13:51 +0000

46 lines

Re: configurable default real

Peter Shenkin

Sat, 6 Mar 2004 21:42:46 -0500

42 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:48:07 -0700

30 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Sun, 7 Mar 2004 17:27:58 +0000

42 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Sun, 7 Mar 2004 13:11:33 -0700

25 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 07:48:23 -0600

87 lines

Re: configurable default real

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:26:25 -0500

29 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:36:57 +1000

33 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:36:58 +1000

108 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:36:58 +1000

56 lines

configurable default real

Richard Maine

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 09:51:04 -0800

72 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:19:11 -0700

19 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:41:12 -0800

40 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:44:28 -0600

63 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:09:52 -0800

73 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:28:52 -0700

75 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:58:36 -0800

27 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:08:50 -0600

48 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:16:51 -0700

38 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:18:03 -0800

39 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:39:06 -0800

76 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:41:43 -0600

58 lines

Re: configurable default real

Renchi Raju

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:51:30 -0600

54 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:55:30 -0800

80 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:06:49 -0600

100 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:08:17 -0800

36 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:13:30 -0800

48 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:16:33 -0700

34 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:30:56 -0700

51 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:36:25 -0800

65 lines

Generics (was: configurable...)

James Giles

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:58:39 -0700

28 lines

Re: Generics (was: configurable...)

<>

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:11:25 -0800

52 lines

Re: Generics (was: configurable...)

James Giles

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:33:23 -0700

62 lines

Is this example standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina

Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:35:05 -0500

28 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

John Reid

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:11:43 +0000

41 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:23:33 +0000

65 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

John Reid

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:19:37 +0000

44 lines

Re: configurable default real

Yasuki Arasaki

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:17:07 +0900

47 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:48:23 -0500

25 lines

Re: configurable default real

Yasuki Arasaki

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:53:05 +0900

84 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Bill Long

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:49:35 -0600

35 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Richard Maine

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:56:50 -0800

23 lines

Re: configurable default real

Walt Brainerd

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:18:47 -0700

26 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:29:35 -0800

53 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:38:42 +0100

66 lines

Re: Generics (was: configurable...)

<>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:50:22 -0800

48 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:55:31 -0800

47 lines

Re: Generics (was: configurable...)

James Giles

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:28:09 -0700

77 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:38:17 -0700

20 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:54:54 -0600

28 lines

Data type "UNDEFINED"

Russell, Richard

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:56:19 -0500

74 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Richard Maine

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:10:03 -0800

33 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

James Giles

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:08 -0700

35 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Alvaro Fernandez

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:22:49 -0600

95 lines

Intel Visual Fortran Professional Edition - Pricing and Upgrades

Lionel, Steve

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:27:26 -0500

102 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:34:45 -0800

90 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:14:36 -0800

68 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:35:51 -0700

43 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:05:35 -0800

27 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:01:37 -0700

20 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:32:46 -0800

32 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:09:46 -0700

43 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:19:51 -0800

27 lines

Re: configurable default real

James Giles

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:45:34 -0700

26 lines

Isn't this standard conforming?

Neil Carlson

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:48:18 -0700

27 lines

Re: Isn't this standard conforming?

<>

Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:56:59 -0800

36 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:09:37 +0000

39 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Russell, Richard

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:22:59 -0500

57 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:53:29 -0500

35 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:58:50 +1000

70 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:58:30 -0600

85 lines

Correction to message about Intel Visual Fortran Professional Edition

Lionel, Steve

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:15:40 -0500

25 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Richard Maine

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:01:54 -0800

73 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Walt Brainerd

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:47:51 -0700

107 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Richard Maine

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:13:49 -0800

43 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Loren P Meissner

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:15:49 -0800

25 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Loren P Meissner

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:20:23 -0800

31 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Loren P Meissner

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:24:10 -0800

28 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

<>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:46:24 -0800

34 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

W. J. Metzger

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:52:17 +0100

44 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Hargraves Gary

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:07:36 +1000

69 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Russell, Richard

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:13:18 -0500

71 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

<>

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:13:06 -0800

80 lines

Re: configurable default real

Bill Long

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:43:28 -0600

105 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:34:02 +1000

31 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:34:02 +1000

25 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Robin

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:19:57 +1000

20 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Robin

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:19:57 +1000

25 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Robin

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:19:57 +1000

40 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Russell, Richard

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:08:41 -0500

88 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Alvaro Fernandez

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:39:38 -0600

94 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:35:58 -0800

52 lines

Re: configurable default real

Bill Long

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:35:28 -0600

94 lines

Re: configurable default real

Renchi Raju

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:48:03 -0600

26 lines

Re: configurable default real

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:02:49 -0000

27 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:08:01 -0800

51 lines

Re: configurable default real

Bill Long

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:33:06 -0600

42 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:07:43 -0800

43 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alberto Fasso'

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:20:55 -0800

45 lines

Re: configurable default real

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:25:48 -0500

25 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alberto Fasso'

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:37:34 -0800

20 lines

Re: configurable default real

Renchi Raju

Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:54:00 -0600

43 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

David Vowles

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:32:30 +1030

109 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Alvaro Fernandez

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:41:07 -0600

63 lines

Re: Data type "UNDEFINED"

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:15:57 -0000

29 lines

Fortran 9X and SQL

Alvaro Fernandez

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:05:55 -0600

115 lines

Re: Fortran 9X and SQL

Craig Dedo

Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:25:31 -0600

135 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin

Sat, 13 Mar 2004 23:22:25 +1000

61 lines

Re: configurable default real

Greg Lindahl

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 02:04:11 -0800

20 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:12:06 -0800

42 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:49:47 -0600

62 lines

Re: configurable default real

Greg Lindahl

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:05:50 -0800

22 lines

Re: configurable default real

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:09:31 -0500

30 lines

Re: configurable default real

Richard Maine

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:16:52 -0800

27 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:47:42 -0600

63 lines

Re: configurable default real

Bill Long

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:53:16 -0600

48 lines

Re: configurable default real

Greg Lindahl

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:12:08 -0800

26 lines

Re: configurable default real

Alvaro Fernandez

Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:36:38 -0600

62 lines

Re: configurable default real

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:52:15 -0500

31 lines

Fortran Resources (March, 2004)

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:20:28 -0000

743 lines

Is this other example standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:13:36 -0500

33 lines

Re: Is this other example standard conforming ?

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:22:11 -0500

21 lines

Re: Is this other example standard conforming ?

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:24:19 +0000

40 lines

Re: Is this other example standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:29:15 -0500

17 lines

Re: Is this other example standard conforming ?

Roland Schilling

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:44:09 +0100

22 lines

Is this construct standard conforming ?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:55:11 +0200

45 lines

Re: Is this construct standard conforming ?

Richard Maine

Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:26:08 -0800

48 lines

Re: Is this construct standard conforming ?

Dick Hendrickson

Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:44:56 -0600

60 lines

Re: Is this construct standard conforming ?

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:47:07 +0000

62 lines

Re: Is this construct standard conforming ?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:55:59 +0200

71 lines

lahey fortran 2003 support

Ian Chivers

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:48:41 +0000

15 lines

Re: lahey fortran 2003 support

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:52:26 -0500

21 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:32:30 +0100

12 lines

Re: lahey fortran 2003 support

Ian Chivers

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:00:07 +0000

48 lines

Re: lahey fortran 2003 support

Tim Zeisloft

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:15:22 -0800

36 lines

dummy adjustable array size..

Renchi Raju

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:19:02 -0600

41 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Malcolm Cohen

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:31:27 +0000

47 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Richard Maine

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:38:01 -0800

60 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Renchi Raju

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:54:41 -0600

37 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Richard Maine

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:24:51 -0800

58 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Renchi Raju

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:02:31 -0600

53 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:49:16 -0500

22 lines

Re: dummy adjustable array size..

Renchi Raju

Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:07:58 -0600

27 lines

Article by John Reid in Scientific Programming

Ian Chivers

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:00:44 +0000

15 lines

Re: Article by John Reid in Scientific Programming

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:21:57 -0800

30 lines

data fingerprinting

Neil Carlson

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:52:23 -0700

25 lines

Re: data fingerprinting

Keith Bierman

Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:10:29 -0800

51 lines

Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina

Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:58:36 -0500

29 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Robin

Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:39:48 +1000

34 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

John Reid

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:27:15 +0100

39 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:40:42 +0200

66 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

John Reid

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:07:46 +0100

52 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:00:35 +0200

81 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Dick Hendrickson

Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:17:37 -0600

113 lines

Re: configurable default real

<>

Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:58:55 EST

43 lines

Fortran Open Directory

Vivek Rao

Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:12:55 -0800

42 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 08:29:56 +1000

57 lines

Re: configurable default real

Neil Carlson

Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:38:43 -0700

29 lines

Re: configurable default real

timothyprince

Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:30:56 -0800

46 lines

intel compilers for academic use

Paul Hatton

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:07:11 +0100

31 lines

Re: intel compilers for academic use

Tim Prince

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 05:42:41 -0800

25 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Robin

Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:09:03 +1000

34 lines

F90-95/F77 floating-point trapping mode on SUN workstation

Jean-Claude Berges

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 17:16:32 +0200

39 lines

Re: configurable default real

Robin

Fri, 2 Apr 2004 01:21:32 +1000

42 lines

Re: intel compilers for academic use

PS HATTON

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 16:31:48 +0100

15 lines

Re: configurable default real

Neil Carlson

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:00:27 -0700

31 lines

Re: F90-95/F77 floating-point trapping mode on SUN workstation

Keith Bierman

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:10:33 -0800

53 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina

Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:37:29 -0500

33 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Robin

Sat, 3 Apr 2004 02:13:58 +1000

43 lines

Re: Is IMPLICIT CHARACTER(*) standard conforming ?

Richard Maine

Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:47:29 -0800

43 lines

Is this example standard conforming (Fortran 95 + TR 15581)?

Jean Vezina

Wed, 7 Apr 2004 12:04:04 -0400

28 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming (Fortran 95 + TR 15581)?

Dick Hendrickson

Wed, 7 Apr 2004 12:42:06 -0500

37 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming (Fortran 95 + TR 15581)?

Jean Vezina

Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:57:08 -0400

23 lines

Quick allocate question

Drew McCormack

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:40:32 +0200

29 lines

Re: Quick allocate question

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:04:59 -0400

33 lines

Re: Quick allocate question

Drew McCormack

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:30:37 +0200

56 lines

Re: Quick allocate question

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:39:52 -0400

27 lines

Re: Quick allocate question

Orville E. Wheeler

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:22:13 -0500

45 lines

Re: Quick allocate question

Richard Maine

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:00:15 -0700

44 lines

explicit interfaces and array passing

Drew McCormack

Mon, 3 May 2004 18:35:58 +0200

33 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Ted Stern

Mon, 3 May 2004 10:21:14 -0700

52 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Renchi Raju

Mon, 3 May 2004 12:32:09 -0500

42 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Renchi Raju

Mon, 3 May 2004 12:33:56 -0500

44 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Drew McCormack

Mon, 3 May 2004 21:45:57 +0200

62 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Lionel, Steve

Mon, 3 May 2004 15:51:47 -0400

40 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 3 May 2004 16:01:45 -0400

44 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Drew McCormack

Mon, 3 May 2004 22:08:46 +0200

40 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Drew McCormack

Mon, 3 May 2004 22:15:23 +0200

57 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 3 May 2004 16:15:52 -0400

32 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 3 May 2004 16:22:58 -0400

21 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 3 May 2004 16:26:23 -0400

30 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Renchi Raju

Mon, 3 May 2004 17:54:20 -0500

41 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Richard Maine

Mon, 3 May 2004 21:10:57 -0700

47 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Drew McCormack

Tue, 4 May 2004 09:35:46 +0200

76 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 4 May 2004 09:25:36 -0400

52 lines

Re: explicit interfaces and array passing

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 4 May 2004 12:37:57 -0400

35 lines

modules & intrinsic functions

celevic

Mon, 10 May 2004 15:08:28 +0100

23 lines

Re: modules & intrinsic functions

Herbert Fruechtl

Mon, 10 May 2004 15:45:17 +0100

103 lines

Re: modules & intrinsic functions

Richard Maine

Mon, 10 May 2004 07:46:56 -0700

53 lines

Re: modules & intrinsic functions

Hargraves Gary

Tue, 11 May 2004 09:56:09 +1000

88 lines

ftn95 and modules

John Blair-Fish

Wed, 12 May 2004 17:37:45 +0100

97 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Richard Maine

Wed, 12 May 2004 10:04:29 -0700

39 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 12 May 2004 13:07:25 -0400

19 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Renchi Raju

Wed, 12 May 2004 12:09:17 -0500

20 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Richard Maine

Wed, 12 May 2004 10:12:02 -0700

35 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

James Giles

Wed, 12 May 2004 11:38:16 -0600

23 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Bill Long

Wed, 12 May 2004 13:02:13 -0500

63 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Clive Page

Thu, 13 May 2004 08:26:28 +0100

27 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Jacob =Jouk Jansen

Fri, 14 May 2004 12:03:15 +0200

50 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

Toon Moene

Sun, 16 May 2004 13:11:33 +0200

35 lines

Re: ftn95 and modules

John Reid

Mon, 17 May 2004 17:15:05 +0100

24 lines

Fortran Resources (May, 2004)

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 20 May 2004 09:46:16 +0100

746 lines

use of module elements - is this legal?

Catherine Moroney

Wed, 26 May 2004 09:13:15 -0700

108 lines

Re: use of module elements - is this legal?

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 26 May 2004 17:32:12 +0100

43 lines

Re: use of module elements - is this legal?

Renchi Raju

Wed, 26 May 2004 11:32:54 -0500

21 lines

Re: use of module elements - is this legal?

Richard Maine

Wed, 26 May 2004 09:45:07 -0700

35 lines

Re: use of module elements - is this legal?

Edmund J Dunlop

Wed, 26 May 2004 17:48:47 +0100

66 lines

Re: use of module elements - is this legal?

Bill Long

Wed, 26 May 2004 12:00:44 -0500

263 lines

[ANN] F90 for f77 programmers course material available

Drew McCormack

Thu, 27 May 2004 12:02:42 +0200

50 lines

Re: use of module elements - is this legal?

Greg Lindahl

Thu, 27 May 2004 14:06:17 -0700

28 lines

Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Drew McCormack

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:01:35 +0200

49 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:24:38 -0400

18 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Richard Maine

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:11:39 -0700

58 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

<>

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:22:30 +0200

24 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Drew McCormack

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:27:00 +0200

104 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:12:57 -0400

25 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Drew McCormack

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:28:44 +0200

53 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:34:05 -0400

21 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Richard Maine

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:42:15 -0700

33 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:16:03 -0400

20 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Richard Maine

Mon, 7 Jun 2004 12:37:20 -0700

53 lines

Re: Passing array pointer to implicit interface function

Drew McCormack

Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:19:54 +0200

34 lines

STOP guarantees

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:49:12 -0400

24 lines

Re: STOP guarantees

Dick Hendrickson

Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:44:55 -0500

71 lines

Re: STOP guarantees

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:22:57 -0400

25 lines

Re: STOP guarantees

Ted Stern

Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:54:58 -0700

41 lines

Re: STOP guarantees

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:28:14 -0400

24 lines

Re: STOP guarantees

Keith Bierman

Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:31:42 -0700

82 lines

Re: STOP guarantees

James Giles

Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:08:32 -0600

25 lines

Re: STOP guarantees

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:48:11 -0400

45 lines

When a WRITE statement matters

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:26:24 -0400

21 lines

Re: When a WRITE statement matters

Keith Bierman

Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:29:34 -0700

96 lines

Re: When a WRITE statement matters

David Singleton

Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:46:58 +1000

39 lines

Re: When a WRITE statement matters

Keith Bierman

Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:52:29 -0700

79 lines

Re: When a WRITE statement matters

Greg Lindahl

Thu, 10 Jun 2004 22:45:54 -0700

46 lines

Re: STOP guarantees

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:13:26 +0100

44 lines

Re: When a WRITE statement matters

<>

Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:37:21 +0200

29 lines

Re: When a WRITE statement matters

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:01:49 -0400

22 lines

Re: When a WRITE statement matters

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:36:04 -0700

27 lines

Re: When a WRITE statement matters

Keith Bierman

Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:08:33 -0700

138 lines

Re: When a WRITE statement matters

Robin

Sun, 13 Jun 2004 01:29:51 +1000

30 lines

language lawyer needed re illegal array indices

Greg Lindahl

Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:42:09 -0700

25 lines

Re: language lawyer needed re illegal array indices

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:25:42 +0100

50 lines

Fortran 95/2003 Explained (announcement)

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:15:25 +0100

93 lines

ASSOCIATED

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:33:16 -0400

51 lines

Re: ASSOCIATED

Richard Maine

Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:51:14 -0700

52 lines

Re: ASSOCIATED

James Giles

Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:23:33 -0600

29 lines

Re: ASSOCIATED

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:30:15 -0400

31 lines

Re: ASSOCIATED

Richard Maine

Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:32:19 -0700

27 lines

Compile Fortran 77 codes with long sentences

Z Zhou

Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:43:58 +0100

19 lines

Fortran Resources (June)

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 23 Jun 2004 04:57:28 -0400

820 lines

Re: Compile Fortran 77 codes with long sentences

Renchi Raju

Wed, 23 Jun 2004 05:43:03 -0500

24 lines

Re: Compile Fortran 77 codes with long sentences

Herbert Fruechtl

Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:55:49 +0100

81 lines

review "Fortran 95/2003 Explained" on Slashdot?

Vivek Rao

Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:35:01 -0700

54 lines

Re: review "Fortran 95/2003 Explained" on Slashdot?

Richard Maine

Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:55:24 -0700

45 lines

Fortran/C Speed

Naomi Greenberg

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:21:48 -0400

55 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Tim Prince

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:24:57 -0700

33 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Craig Dedo

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:45:00 -0500

133 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Dan Nagle

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:53:58 -0400

66 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Naomi Greenberg

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:22:11 -0400

45 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Bill Long

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:23:49 -0500

56 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

James Giles

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:00:17 -0600

26 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Naomi Greenberg

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:41:21 -0400

17 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Keith Bierman

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:42:26 -0700

138 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Keith Bierman

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:02:10 -0700

72 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:07:02 -0400

45 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

James Giles

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:22:24 -0600

33 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Richard Maine

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:31:44 -0700

45 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Van Snyder

Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:19:15 -0700

62 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Drew McCormack

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:15:52 +0200

221 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Erik Schnetter

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:07:04 +0200

61 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Paddy O'Brien

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:15:52 +1000

111 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Loren P Meissner

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 06:06:00 -0700

23 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Dan Nagle

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:28:42 -0400

37 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:33:51 -0400

41 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

James Giles

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:09:53 -0600

29 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Drew McCormack

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 21:41:09 +0200

77 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Vivek Rao

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:34:34 -0700

47 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Keith Bierman

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:41:46 -0700

101 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

James Giles

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:10:10 -0600

47 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

<>

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:05:56 -0700

34 lines

My two cents RE: "ANDTHEN", "ORELSE"

Loren P Meissner

Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:48:09 -0700

33 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Drew McCormack

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:35:05 +0200

114 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Drew McCormack

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:51:52 +0200

83 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Paddy O'Brien

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:48:51 +1000

95 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

David Muxworthy

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:36:37 +0100

26 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Bill Long

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:57:17 -0500

46 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Tim Prince

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:49:59 -0700

47 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

<>

Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:59:07 -0700

46 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Gerry Thomas

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 02:27:22 -0400

66 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Paddy O'Brien

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:02:22 +1000

42 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Dan Nagle

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:06:09 -0400

33 lines

anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Ian Chivers

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:58:12 +0100

226 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Keith Bierman

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:28:13 -0700

197 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:38:39 -0400

51 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:42:29 -0400

28 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Craig Dedo

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:51:05 -0500

163 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Drew McCormack

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:49:45 +0200

29 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:26:14 -0700

18 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

<>

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:41:16 -0700

34 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Keith Bierman

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:45:51 -0700

119 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:07:24 -0400

47 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

Richard Maine

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:08:27 -0700

49 lines

ANDTHEN, ORELSE as functions?

Loren P Meissner

Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:21:46 -0700

20 lines

Re: anyone using 'terminals' to access remote systems

J.L.Schonfelder

Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:53:58 +0100

51 lines

vms uasge

Ian Chivers

Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:03:44 +0100

18 lines

Current Usage of OpenVMS (Was: vms uasge)

Craig Dedo

Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:40:42 -0500

344 lines

Re: vms uasge

Tim Prince

Sat, 17 Jul 2004 09:15:46 -0700

22 lines

Re: Fortran/C Speed

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:25:40 -0400

45 lines

Fortran Forum

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:39:31 -0400

81 lines

derived-type arrays

David Smith

Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:28:28 -0700

30 lines

Re: derived-type arrays

<>

Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:46:56 -0700

32 lines

Reading a line of bytes one by one

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:56:04 -0400

40 lines

Re: Reading a line of bytes one by one

Dan Nagle

Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:05:00 -0400

40 lines

Re: Reading a line of bytes one by one

R A Vowels

Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:27:04 +1000

56 lines

Re: Reading a line of bytes one by one

Daniel Grimwood

Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:58:53 +0800

32 lines

referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

Colin Millar

Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:20:49 +0100

41 lines

Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

Renchi Raju

Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:23:46 -0500

23 lines

Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:33:48 -0400

47 lines

Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

<>

Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:51:54 +0000

51 lines

Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

robin

Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:17:39 +1000

55 lines

Re: referencing of assumed shape dummy arrays

robin

Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:37:21 +1000

37 lines

Re: vms uasge

Jacob =Jouk Jansen

Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:42:50 +0200

39 lines

f90 paranoia benchmark

Ted Stern

Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:45:00 -0700

37 lines

Re: f90 paranoia benchmark

Dick Hendrickson

Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:07:21 -0500

63 lines

pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Guylaine prat

Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:55:56 +0200

33 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier

Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:32:38 +0200

15 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:00:08 -0400

22 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Richard Maine

Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:45:41 -0700

49 lines

Re: PB WITH INTRINSIC FUNCTION AND PARAMETER

robin

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:33:29 +1000

39 lines

Re: PB WITH INTRINSIC FUNCTION AND PARAMETER

Loren P Meissner

Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:42:33 -0700

26 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Guylaine prat

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:52:25 +0200

54 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Roland Schilling

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:03:36 +0200

53 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Guylaine prat

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:12:22 +0200

27 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Roland Schilling

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:09:41 +0200

43 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Lionel, Steve

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:18:09 -0400

37 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Richard Maine

Thu, 12 Aug 2004 07:43:25 -0700

34 lines

Re: pb with intrinsic function and parameter

Guylaine prat

Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:42:03 +0200

28 lines

F90 problem

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:03:56 -0400

61 lines

Re: F90 problem

Richard Maine

Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:33:10 -0700

40 lines

Re: F90 problem

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:50:56 +0300

46 lines

Re: F90 problem

James Giles

Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:48:49 -0600

42 lines

Quick g77 question

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:39:00 -0400

24 lines

Re: Quick g77 question

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:48:09 +0300

50 lines

Re: Quick g77 question

Richard Maine

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:49:37 -0700

52 lines

Announcement: IBM XL Fortran Enterprise Edition V9.1 for AIX is now available

Yin Zhu

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:56:40 -0400

52 lines

Re: Quick g77 question

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:59:20 -0400

27 lines

question about allocatable array components (TR 15581)

Norman Clerman (Opcon)

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:18:48 -0400

58 lines

Re: question about allocatable array components (TR 15581)

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:30:02 -0400

41 lines

Re: Quick g77 question

Clive Page

Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:35:51 +0100

33 lines

Re: Quick g77 question

Richard Maine

Wed, 1 Sep 2004 07:51:09 -0700

36 lines

Style question

Ian Chivers

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:50:08 +0100

34 lines

Re: Style question

Dan Nagle

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:04:42 -0400

53 lines

Re: Style question

John Appleyard

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:26:32 +0100

38 lines

Re: Style question

Russell, Richard

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:02:05 -0400

41 lines

Re: Style question

Roderick W. Failing III

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:39:02 -0400

127 lines

Re: Style question

Loren P Meissner

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:45:54 -0700

66 lines

Re: Style question

Tim Prince

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 06:23:20 -0700

31 lines

Re: Style question

Richard Maine

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:42:23 -0700

27 lines

Re: Style question

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:43:31 -0400

40 lines

Re: Style question

Daniel Grimwood

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:21:04 +0800

31 lines

Re: Style question

Paul J.Nikolai

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:51:38 -0400

55 lines

Re: Style question

Keith Bierman

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 11:24:49 -0700

123 lines

FW: [Fwd: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.3158) DTR vote result]

Ian Chivers

Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:04:02 +0100

54 lines

Re: Style question

robin

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:21:21 +1000

42 lines

Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Jean Vezina

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:31:01 -0400

29 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Russell, Richard

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:46:47 -0400

36 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

James Giles

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:49:52 -0600

49 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Richard Maine

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 12:53:52 -0700

42 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

James Giles

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:58:32 -0600

39 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

James Giles

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:09:52 -0600

50 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Richard Maine

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:30:01 -0700

66 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

James Giles

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:41:08 -0600

37 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Dick Hendrickson

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:42:36 -0500

159 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming (Fortran 95) ?

Jean Vezina

Fri, 3 Sep 2004 21:13:15 -0400

16 lines

Generic interfaces for function arguments

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:00:28 -0400

39 lines

Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments

Renchi Raju

Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:27:02 -0500

41 lines

Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments

Van Snyder

Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:28:05 -0700

73 lines

Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:04:24 -0400

65 lines

Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments

<>

Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:17:17 -0700

87 lines

Long names with Absoft

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:27:07 -0400

23 lines

Re: Long names with Absoft

Samuel H. Dupree, Jr.

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:39:47 -0400

151 lines

Re: Generic interfaces for function arguments

Dan Nagle

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 05:12:05 -0400

105 lines

Re: Long names with Absoft

Jan van Oosterwijk

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:40:30 +0300

59 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:59:17 -0400

23 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Jan van Oosterwijk

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:31:03 +0200

59 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:34:40 -0400

37 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:13:38 -0700

21 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Loren P Meissner

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:05:04 -0700

24 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Lionel, Steve

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:19:12 -0400

18 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:23:17 -0700

17 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Toon Moene

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:21:02 +0200

38 lines

Re: Long names on IA32/64

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:23:15 -0400

28 lines

Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:07:03 -0400

28 lines

Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:13:17 -0400

46 lines

Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Richard E Maine

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:24:19 -0700

64 lines

Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:40:09 -0400

56 lines

Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Richard E Maine

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:02:29 -0700

43 lines

IOSTAT and INTENT(OUT)

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:17:50 -0400

40 lines

Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:19:40 -0400

21 lines

Re: Generic resolution with CHARACTER

Richard E Maine

Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:46:27 -0700

46 lines

5 Day Course - Scientific Programming with Fortran 95

Shaun Forth

Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:59:28 +0100

57 lines

Re: IOSTAT and INTENT(OUT)

Jan van Oosterwijk

Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:20:37 +0200

69 lines

SSE2 instructions experiences

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:49:03 -0400

44 lines

Re: SSE2 instructions experiences

Tim Prince

Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:24:40 -0700

41 lines

Fortran Resources (Last Issue)

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:23:55 +0100

818 lines

Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:31:12 -0400

35 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Dan Nagle

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:15:05 -0400

54 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:36:44 -0400

53 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Richard E Maine

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:20:43 -0700

78 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Dan Nagle

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:32:03 -0400

40 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Greg Lindahl

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:54:34 -0700

39 lines

Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:59:35 -0400

33 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:46:02 -0400

26 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Richard E Maine

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:50:47 -0700

71 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Richard E Maine

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:59:39 -0700

35 lines

Data structures question

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:03:28 -0400

52 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

J.L.Schonfelder

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:11:51 +0100

34 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Dick Hendrickson

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:15:09 -0500

50 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:16:11 -0400

31 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Richard E Maine

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:29:17 -0700

42 lines

creating i++ operator in F90?

Catherine Moroney

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:31:16 -0700

52 lines

g77 compiler?

Catherine Moroney

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:33:17 -0700

26 lines

Re: Data structures question

Richard E Maine

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:36:22 -0700

36 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Richard E Maine

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:53:38 -0700

34 lines

Re: g77 compiler?

Lionel, Steve

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:54:48 -0400

27 lines

Re: g77 compiler?

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:58:56 -0400

25 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Catherine Moroney

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:00:42 -0700

48 lines

Re: g77 compiler?

Richard E Maine

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:02:25 -0700

32 lines

Re: Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?

Erik Schnetter

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:03:12 +0200

42 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:15:14 -0400

22 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Richard E Maine

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:25:28 -0700

39 lines

Re: Data structures question

James Giles

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:30:03 -0600

44 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

James Giles

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:52:47 -0600

50 lines

Re: Data structures question

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:57:20 -0400

73 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:05:16 -0400

55 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Richard E Maine

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:05:48 -0700

47 lines

Re: Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?

<>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:21:49 -0700

33 lines

Re: g77 compiler?

Toon Moene

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:21:57 +0200

32 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

<>

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:29:49 -0700

39 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

James Giles

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:08:30 -0600

92 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

James Giles

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:22:57 -0600

44 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Catherine Moroney

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:39:59 -0700

136 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Erik Schnetter

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:04:04 +0200

57 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Richard E Maine

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:11:14 -0700

31 lines

Re: Data structures question

James Giles

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:14:31 -0600

138 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

James Giles

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:24:40 -0600

46 lines

Re: Doxygen filter for Fortran 9x?

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:27:49 -0400

21 lines

Re: Data structures question

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:47:50 -0400

42 lines

Re: g77 compiler?

Clive Page

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:01:51 +0100

86 lines

Re: g77 compiler?

Tim Prince

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:59:42 -0700

39 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

J.L.Schonfelder

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:44:06 +0100

37 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:47:42 -0400

22 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

J.L.Schonfelder

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:25:17 +0100

55 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Lionel, Steve

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:45:37 -0400

29 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:54:04 -0400

38 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:07:16 +0300

46 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:09:40 +0300

70 lines

"Fortran 95/2003 Explained" (Errata)

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:23:08 +0100

19 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

Richard E Maine

Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:55:08 -0700

47 lines

Re: creating i++ operator in F90?

James Giles

Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:21:30 -0600

89 lines

Direct data access in F from Excel

Blair, Ernest R.

Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:33:19 -0700

23 lines

Re: Direct data access in F from Excel

Walt Brainerd

Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:04:06 -0700

39 lines

Writing to string buffer

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:18:37 -0400

19 lines

Re: Writing to string buffer

Herbert Fruechtl

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:23:07 +0100

32 lines

Re: Writing to string buffer

Dan Nagle

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:28:01 -0400

32 lines

Re: Writing to string buffer

Richard E Maine

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:38:49 -0700

51 lines

Re: Writing to string buffer

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:44:00 +0200

38 lines

Re: Writing to string buffer

Richard E Maine

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:48:54 -0700

32 lines

Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion

Blair, Ernest R.

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:10:50 -0700

76 lines

Re: Writing to string buffer

James Giles

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:27:07 -0600

32 lines

Re: Writing to string buffer

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:32:02 -0400

28 lines

Re: Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion

Russell, Richard

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:38:36 -0400

69 lines

Re: Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion

Richard E Maine

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:45:37 -0700

58 lines

Re: Writing to string buffer

Richard E Maine

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:53:01 -0700

31 lines

Re: Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion

Blair, Ernest R.

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:50:27 -0700

88 lines

Re: Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion

Richard E Maine

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:33:20 -0700

28 lines

Precision in F90

celevic

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:54:23 +0100

14 lines

Re: Precision in F90

David Smith

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:34:58 -0700

28 lines

Re: Precision in F90

<>

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:58:09 +0000

40 lines

Re: Precision in F90

celevic

Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:00:07 +0100

19 lines

Re: Windows file I/O in F : newbie querstion

Blair, Ernest R.

Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:12:42 -0700

46 lines

Re: Precision in F90

Walt Brainerd

Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:00:54 -0700

44 lines

Re: Precision in F90

<>

Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:05:16 -0700

29 lines

Re: Precision in F90

robin

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:13:44 +1000

51 lines

Re: Precision in F90

James Giles

Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:55:25 -0600

46 lines

Re: Precision in F90

Alan Miller

Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:47:18 -0700

32 lines

Re: Precision in F90

Richard E Maine

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:35:45 -0700

36 lines

Re: Precision in F90

<>

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:43:55 +0000

41 lines

John Vaul

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:32:21 +0100

45 lines

John Vaul

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:32:21 +0100

29 lines

Execution monitoring system

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:43:43 -0400

322 lines

Richard E Maine

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:32:21 -0700

62 lines

Re: passing F90 data structures into subroutines

Catherine Moroney

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:32:48 -0700

104 lines

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:06:58 +0100

21 lines

Re: passing F90 data structures into subroutines

Richard E Maine

Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:21:23 -0700

33 lines

Re: Precision in F90

robin

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:15:34 +1000

54 lines

Re: passing F90 data structures into subroutines

John Vaul

Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:52:22 +0100

17 lines

Re: Precision in F90

robin

Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:57:29 +1000

57 lines

Fw: Fortran Tutorials

Michael Metcalf

Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:29:00 +0100

25 lines

AW: Fortran Tutorials

Sadnik Dominik

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:11:31 +0200

40 lines

Re: Fortran Tutorials

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:10:30 +0100

21 lines

quickwin font set

Pavel Houdek

Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:02:29 +0200

63 lines

ibits question

Neil Carlson

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:38:48 -0600

23 lines

Re: ibits question

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 01:52:35 +0100

33 lines

Re: ibits question

Neil Carlson

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:02:51 -0600

25 lines

Re: ibits question

Greg Lindahl

Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:12:07 -0700

37 lines

Re: ibits question

<>

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:33:02 +0000

54 lines

Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004

Lionel, Steve

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:48:03 -0400

28 lines

Re: Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004

Walt Brainerd

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:00:50 -0700

46 lines

Re: Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004

Walt Brainerd

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:10:01 -0700

61 lines

Re: Meet Intel Engineers at Supercomputing 2004

Greg Lindahl

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:50:30 -0700

29 lines

Fortran 90 refactoring tools

Drew McCormack

Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:27:33 +0200

38 lines

Re: Fortran 90 refactoring tools

John Appleyard

Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:25:47 +0100

27 lines

Fortran 2003 standard publication date

Ian Chivers

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:59:47 +0100

19 lines

Re: Fortran 2003 standard publication date

Richard E Maine

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:04:16 -0700

31 lines

Does anybody have a copy of ANSI x3.21?

<>

Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:31:00 -0700

16 lines

Re: Fortran 2003 standard publication date

John Reid

Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:16:41 +0100

44 lines

legal code?

Neil Carlson

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:53:11 -0700

67 lines

Re: legal code?

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:18:56 -0500

48 lines

Re: Fortran 90 refactoring tools

Richard Pascal

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:38:24 +0100

50 lines

error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Xiaogang Wang

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 10:16:08 -0500

60 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Michael Metcalf

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 15:36:20 -0000

23 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Ian Chivers

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 15:58:52 -0000

100 lines

Re: error of rand with Intel FORTRAN compiler

Loren P Meissner

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:47:08 -0800

53 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Xiaogang Wang

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 00:12:32 -0500

52 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Peter Shenkin

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:51:49 -0500

30 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Tim Prince

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 12:20:07 -0800

37 lines

NAMELIST formatting question

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 7 Nov 2004 23:30:00 -0500

43 lines

files at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1601-N1650/

Ian Chivers

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:04:53 -0000

116 lines

Re: files at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1601-N1650/

John Reid

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:27:37 +0000

44 lines

Re: files at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1601-N1650/

Richard E Maine

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 07:43:51 -0800

46 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Richard E Maine

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:16:41 -0800

52 lines

Re: NAMELIST formatting question

Richard E Maine

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:24:11 -0800

33 lines

Re: NAMELIST formatting question

Ted Stern

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:37:41 -0800

57 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

Tim Prince

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:47:44 -0800

39 lines

Re: NAMELIST formatting question

Bill Long

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:29:41 -0600

173 lines

Ieee 754 query

Ian Chivers

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:22:46 -0000

20 lines

Re: error of rand with intel fortran compiler

James Giles

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:07:49 -0700

49 lines

test: ignore

Phillip Helbig

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:05:58 +0200

7 lines

problem with function as argument of procedure

Phillip Helbig

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:22:42 +0200

62 lines

TEST---IGNORE

Phillip Helbig

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:58:33 +0200

8 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Phillip Helbig

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:35:45 +0200

58 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Phillip Helbig

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:57:14 +0200

23 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:47:51 -0500

22 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Yasuki Arasaki

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:22:54 +0900

96 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Phillip Helbig

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 06:36:29 +0200

77 lines

Generating correlated samples for a uniform distribution

Harry Millwater

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:13:03 -0600

20 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Richard E Maine

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 07:58:28 -0800

73 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:52:30 -0500

33 lines

Re: Deallocating array pointers

Richard E Maine

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:18:55 -0800

68 lines

Re: Generating correlated samples for a uniform distribution

W.J. Metzger

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:46:40 +0100

41 lines

Re: problem with function as argument of procedure

Phillip Helbig

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:57:25 +0200

16 lines

qwin-console cursor jump

Pavel Houdek

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:14:00 +0100

15 lines

Confusing timing results

Roderick W. Failing III

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:14:29 -0500

224 lines

bugs everywhere

Stuart Midgley

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:57:06 +1100

61 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Tim Prince

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:49:36 -0800

71 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Greg Lindahl

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 00:10:37 -0800

23 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Phillip Helbig

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:20:45 +0200

26 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Stuart Midgley

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:52:54 +1100

49 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Tim Prince

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 05:25:37 -0800

45 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Greg Lindahl

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:45:01 -0800

27 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Jan van Oosterwijk

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:12:20 +0200

37 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Peter Shenkin

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:57:26 -0500

34 lines

Re: bugs everywhere

Peter Shenkin

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:20:36 -0500

32 lines

g95 runs on Windows

Vivek Rao

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:43:00 -0800

57 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Toon Moene

Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:56:00 +0100

32 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

<>

Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:59:27 -0700

156 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

<>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:03:42 -0700

196 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:11:38 -0000

28 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Phillip Helbig

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:08:50 +0200

19 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Richard E Maine

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:00:55 -0800

52 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:22:51 -0500

27 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Roland Schilling

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:59:42 +0100

32 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Jan van Oosterwijk

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:16:27 +0100

39 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows XP

Jan van Oosterwijk

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:25:01 +0100

40 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Keith Bierman

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:20:23 -0800

38 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Richard E Maine

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:04:05 -0800

42 lines

a quick question

Yongcheng Zhou

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:14:53 -0500

22 lines

Re: a quick question

Hargraves Gary

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:18:46 +1000

61 lines

Re: a quick question

Keith Bierman

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:09:43 -0800

41 lines

IO buffer overflow

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:22:08 -0500

22 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Richard E Maine

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 07:49:18 -0800

57 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:56:14 -0500

27 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Richard E Maine

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:12:16 -0800

46 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:20:59 -0500

37 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Craig Dedo

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:48:29 -0600

91 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Craig Dedo

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:56:29 -0600

100 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Richard E Maine

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:22:26 -0800

66 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Van Snyder

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:06:38 -0800

49 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

<>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:17:36 -0800

33 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Richard E Maine

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:03:28 -0800

67 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

<>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:25:21 -0800

57 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:44:13 -0500

27 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Keith Bierman

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:54:50 -0800

111 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Dick Hendrickson

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:22:52 -0600

71 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Richard E Maine

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:27:56 -0800

49 lines

Re: IO buffer overflow

Walt Brainerd

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:47:32 -0700

44 lines

Forpedo: A Preprocessor for Fortran Generics

Drew McCormack

Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:10:40 +0100

39 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Toon Moene

Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:41:38 +0100

33 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Greg Lindahl

Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:55:29 -0800

21 lines

Which compiler on IA64?

Bertrand Meltz

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:50:05 +0100

17 lines

Re: Which compiler on IA64?

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:45:04 -0500

35 lines

Re: Which compiler on IA64?

Greg Lindahl

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:02:15 -0800

22 lines

Re: Which compiler on IA64?

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:31:33 -0500

33 lines

Re: Which compiler on IA64?

Lionel, Steve

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:51:53 -0500

25 lines

Re: Which compiler on IA64?

Greg Lindahl

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:03:49 -0800

17 lines

FlexLM on Itanium?

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:04:50 -0500

39 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Toon Moene

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 01:00:36 +0100

38 lines

Re: g95 runs on Windows

Keith Bierman

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:37:04 -0800

38 lines

bug in g95 ?

Jean-Baptiste FAURE

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:23:55 +0100

35 lines

Is this recursive?

Bertrand Meltz

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:40:37 +0000

35 lines

Re: Is this recursive?

Roland Schilling

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:25:35 +0100

58 lines

F2003 has been published

John Reid

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:21:41 +0000

28 lines

Re: bug in g95 ?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:59:00 +0100

53 lines

Re: bug in g95 ?

Paul Suckling

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:14:59 +0100

21 lines

Re: Which compiler on IA64?

Bertrand Meltz

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:32:52 +0100

32 lines

Re: bug in g95 ?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:59:35 +0100

65 lines

Re: Which compiler on IA64?

Tim Prince

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:11:09 -0800

36 lines

Re: Which compiler on IA64?

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:12:53 -0500

20 lines

Re: bug in g95 ?

Richard E Maine

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:14:20 -0800

28 lines

Re: Which compiler on IA64?

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:16:57 -0500

20 lines

Re: F2003 has been published

Richard E Maine

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:33:37 -0800

40 lines

Re: bug in g95 ?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:34:04 +0100

44 lines

bug in G95 with Reshape

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:38:35 +0100

47 lines

Re: bug in g95 ?

Harry Millwater

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:41:38 -0600

51 lines

Re: Is this recursive?

Richard E Maine

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:55:36 -0800

83 lines

Re: F2003 has been published

Hargraves Gary

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:19:02 +1000

80 lines

Re: F2003 has been published

Blair, Ernest R.

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:32:22 -0800

100 lines

Re: F2003 has been published [OT]

Jan van Oosterwijk

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 12:14:33 +0200

45 lines

Re: F2003 has been published

J.L.Schonfelder

Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:25:42 +0000

103 lines

Creation of a variable in a Module

celevic

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:18:13 +0000

26 lines

Re: Creation of a variable in a Module

Herbert Fruechtl

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:42:02 -0000

75 lines

Re: Creation of a variable in a Module

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:11:51 -0500

27 lines

Re: Creation of a variable in a Module

J.L.Schonfelder

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:23:22 +0000

39 lines

Allow OPTIONAL and named arguments in derived type constructors?

Vivek Rao

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:48:08 -0800

74 lines

Re: Allow OPTIONAL and named arguments in derived type constructors?

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 7 Dec 2004 19:53:11 -0500

22 lines

(random) Signal handling question

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:31:36 -0500

25 lines

add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?

Vivek Rao

Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:33:36 -0800

31 lines

Re: add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?

Jean Vezina

Sun, 12 Dec 2004 21:06:52 -0500

27 lines

Re: add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?

Dick Hendrickson

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:38:25 -0600

34 lines

Default initialize a local variable

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:40:25 -0500

25 lines

Re: Default initialize a local variable

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:09:30 +0000

44 lines

Re: Default initialize a local variable

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:07:52 -0500

26 lines

Re: add a MATCH array function similar to MINLOC?

Robin

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:12:43 +1000

23 lines

Rewind and end of file

Paul Suckling

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:21:05 +0100

87 lines

Re: Rewind and end of file

Paul Suckling

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:25:17 +0100

72 lines

Re: Rewind and end of file

Lionel, Steve

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:27:03 -0500

29 lines

Re: Rewind and end of file

Paul Suckling

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:39:46 +0100

60 lines

Re: Rewind and end of file

Lionel, Steve

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:52:40 -0500

35 lines

Re: Rewind and end of file

Nils Smeds

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:17:24 +0100

32 lines

Re: Rewind and end of file

Richard E Maine

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:32:27 -0800

86 lines

Re: Rewind and end of file

Phillip Helbig

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:40:47 +0200

48 lines

Re: Rewind and end of file

Paul Suckling

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:43:52 +0100

90 lines

Jouni Lerssi

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:43:08 +0200

60 lines

Richard E Maine

Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:17:51 -0800

74 lines

Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 02:45:11 +0000

36 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Jouni Lerssi

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:00:41 +0200

74 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Richard E Maine

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:57:45 -0800

62 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

<>

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:03:31 +0000

105 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:19:48 -0500

25 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:23:37 -0500

44 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:30:58 -0500

25 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:36:36 -0500

42 lines

Re: Re EQUIVALENCE and -dusty

Van Snyder

Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:56:58 -0800

38 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2023
February 2023
November 2022
September 2022
February 2022
January 2022
June 2021
November 2020
September 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
December 2019
October 2019
September 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
April 2015
March 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager