JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives


DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives

DC-ARCHITECTURE Archives


September 2003


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Abstract Model: related metadata (6 messages)
Abstract model: What is a "value"? (16 messages)
Betr.: Re: DCX proposal (9 messages)
Betr.: Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"? (1 message)
Borrowing elements between different models (4 messages)
DCX proposal (6 messages)
Dublin Core Abstract Model (22 messages)
Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"? (8 messages)
Expressing Qualified Dublin Core in HTML/XHTML meta elements (1 message)
FW: should the abstract model say anything about mixed namespaces ? (1 message)
record boundaries (15 messages)
should the abstract model say anything abou t mixed namespaces? (1 message)
should the abstract model say anything about mixed namespaces? (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DC-ARCHITECTURE Home

DC-ARCHITECTURE Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Abstract Model: related metadata

Abstract Model: related metadata

Ann Apps <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:37:38 +0000

66 lines

Re: Abstract Model: related metadata

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:02:34 +0100

116 lines

Re: Abstract Model: related metadata

Rachel Heery <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:50:11 +0100

135 lines

Re: Abstract Model: related metadata

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:41:12 +0100

219 lines

Re: Abstract Model: related metadata

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:28:35 +0200

35 lines

Re: Abstract Model: related metadata

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:44:56 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:26:30 +0200

74 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:58:18 +0200

53 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:21:53 +0200

49 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:37:12 +0100

32 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:20:39 +0200

27 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:40:44 +0100

41 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:40:16 +0200

28 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:08:32 +0100

22 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Sigfrid Lundberg - LUB NetLab <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:15:42 +0200

27 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:37:53 +0100

47 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Sigfrid Lundberg - LUB NetLab <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:42:50 +0200

22 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:52:01 +0100

41 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:58:47 +0100

39 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 21:22:43 +0200

38 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 23:04:51 +0200

37 lines

Re: Abstract model: What is a "value"?

Sigfrid Lundberg - LUB NetLab <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:59:54 +0200

23 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: DCX proposal

Betr.: Re: DCX proposal

Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:56:34 +0200

33 lines

Betr.: Re: DCX proposal

Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:08:37 +0200

149 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: DCX proposal

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:54:37 +0100

78 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: DCX proposal

Clayphan, Robina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:54:00 +0100

114 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: DCX proposal

Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:14:17 +0200

100 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: DCX proposal

Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:14:58 +0200

131 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: DCX proposal

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:21:31 +0200

47 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: DCX proposal

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:49:23 +0100

18 lines

Re: Betr.: Re: DCX proposal

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:28:22 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Betr.: Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"?

Betr.: Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"?

Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:49:21 +0200

68 lines

New Thread

Borrowing elements between different models

Borrowing elements between different models

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:57:46 +0200

75 lines

Re: Borrowing elements between different models

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:50:48 +0100

62 lines

Re: Borrowing elements between different models

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:19:13 +0200

74 lines

Re: Borrowing elements between different models

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:22:54 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

DCX proposal

DCX proposal

Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:53:21 +0200

1186 lines

Re: DCX proposal

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:29:20 +0200

19 lines

Re: DCX proposal

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:36:26 +0100

105 lines

Re: DCX proposal

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:54:21 +0200

93 lines

Re: DCX proposal

Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:24:02 +0200

169 lines

Re: DCX proposal

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:33:37 +0100

111 lines

New Thread

Dublin Core Abstract Model

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Sep 2003 15:34:40 +0100

25 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:42:15 +0100

22 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:59:56 +0200

54 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:16:18 +0100

71 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 19:42:47 +0200

86 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:17:10 +0100

95 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:01:19 +0100

54 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Thomas G. Habing <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:19:15 -0500

129 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:05:38 +0200

44 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Rachel Heery <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:06:19 +0100

73 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:46:24 +0100

113 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Rachel Heery <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:46:03 +0100

50 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:59:53 +0100

53 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:53:17 +0200

19 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:34:01 +0200

17 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:10:19 +0200

61 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Diane Hillmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:25:19 -0400

99 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 11:24:56 +0200

49 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:26:59 +0200

55 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:33:55 +0200

45 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:15:34 +0200

31 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:56:51 +0200

54 lines

New Thread

Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"?

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:22:45 +0200

56 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"?

Weibel,Stu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 08:49:19 -0400

21 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"?

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:52:39 +0100

58 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"?

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:49:33 +0100

75 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:01:47 +0200

115 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"?

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 23:45:40 +0200

150 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 05:00:54 +0200

143 lines

Re: Dublin Core Abstract Model -> What makes a record "DC"?

Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 05:09:43 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

Expressing Qualified Dublin Core in HTML/XHTML meta elements

Re: Expressing Qualified Dublin Core in HTML/XHTML meta elements

Phil Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Sep 2003 09:27:16 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

FW: should the abstract model say anything about mixed namespaces ?

FW: should the abstract model say anything about mixed namespaces ?

Weibel,Stu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:16:36 -0400

81 lines

New Thread

record boundaries

record boundaries

Weibel,Stu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:18:35 -0400

95 lines

Re: record boundaries

Sigfrid Lundberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:35:47 +0200

58 lines

Re: record boundaries

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:09:14 +0200

40 lines

Re: record boundaries

Naomi Dushay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:18:01 -0400

18 lines

Re: record boundaries

Sigfrid Lundberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:30:31 +0200

46 lines

Re: record boundaries

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:26:48 +0200

31 lines

Re: record boundaries

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:07:58 +0100

60 lines

Re: record boundaries

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:02:54 +0200

37 lines

Re: record boundaries

Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:53:09 +0100

93 lines

Re: record boundaries

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 21:28:31 +0100

38 lines

Re: record boundaries

Sigfrid Lundberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:03:41 +0200

105 lines

Re: record boundaries

Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:14:47 +0100

47 lines

Re: record boundaries

No Name <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:01:48 +0200

22 lines

Re: record boundaries

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:23:52 +0200

52 lines

Re: record boundaries

No Name <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:36:54 +0200

23 lines

New Thread

should the abstract model say anything abou t mixed namespaces?

Re: should the abstract model say anything abou t mixed namespaces?

Weibel,Stu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:10:04 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

should the abstract model say anything about mixed namespaces?

should the abstract model say anything about mixed namespaces?

Weibel,Stu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:36:06 -0400

23 lines

Re: should the abstract model say anything about mixed namespaces?

Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:40:32 +0200

49 lines

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager