JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


2003


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"" as an escape character (8 messages)
<No subject> (1 message)
A related question: Derived types and ELEMENTAL procedures (4 messages)
about global variables (1 message)
about global variables...I suppose (15 messages)
About parallel mesh generation and solving equations (1 message)
absoft compiler (2 messages)
Advice on naming an operation (1 message)
Aliasing with USE (2 messages)
allocatable array of pointers within a structure? (5 messages)
Announcement: IBM XL Fortran new releases (2 messages)
Another F95 standard question (4 messages)
Array element as do variable (7 messages)
ASSOCIATED bug (2 messages)
autodependencies of fortran code on include, modules, etc. (2 messages)
automatic and optional (14 messages)
Avoiding loss of precision in formatted IO (3 messages)
AW: performance-test (2 messages)
Backspace and file position. (3 messages)
big opject files (2 messages)
Bond pricing functions in Fortran (1 message)
Book pre-announcement (1 message)
Buffering (7 messages)
Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine (6 messages)
Can you call a subroutine with arguments like this? (4 messages)
Canadian comments on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft (2 messages)
Cascade recompilation with Intel (4 messages)
character issue (4 messages)
cheap student compiler from intel (1 message)
Code or comiler error? (1 message)
Code or Compiler error (1 message)
Code or Compiler error? (1 message)
Common block names (4 messages)
Common block names - (blanks in) (1 message)
Compiler diagnostics error (1 message)
Compiler differences (24 messages)
Compiler error anomaly (2 messages)
Compiler-Optimized source code on UltraSPARC-based systems (5 messages)
Complex root (10 messages)
CONTAINS (3 messages)
DCABES2004 First Call for Papers (1 message)
deallocate list (10 messages)
Default initialization of local variables (2 messages)
denormalised number?? (6 messages)
Derived types and pointers (5 messages)
DTNURBS (2 messages)
Dublicate specification (2 messages)
ELEMENTALs (Was: Compiler differences) (2 messages)
Empty derived types (5 messages)
Empty type (1 message)
Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office. (4 messages)
Extends keyword in F2k (10 messages)
F90 parsing routines (5 messages)
FEM2DLib (1 message)
File opened with ACTION='WRITE' (2 messages)
file operations (5 messages)
flexible format statements (9 messages)
Flipping an integer (7 messages)
Flipping and integer (1 message)
Floating-point comparisons (9 messages)
Formatted read (5 messages)
Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs (8 messages)
Fortran 95 on Opteron (39 messages)
Fortran 95 on Opteron -> f2003 implementation (1 message)
Fortran 95 on the G5 (7 messages)
Fortran capabilities <fwd> (1 message)
Fortran Forum (April) (7 messages)
Fortran Forum (August) (1 message)
Fortran Forum (December) (2 messages)
Fortran interface to FreeGLUT (2 messages)
Fortran Resources (January) (3 messages)
Fortran Resources (March) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (May) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (November) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (September) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem (21 messages)
fpp vs. cpp (9 messages)
fpp vs. cpp vs. CoCo (1 message)
Fw: New ISO_VARYING_STRING implementation (without memory leaks) (3 messages)
gdb support for F90 (11 messages)
Generic interface question (7 messages)
Greater then zero (3 messages)
ieee exceptions in F (1 message)
Image processing (4 messages)
Incorrect CAUTION? (2 messages)
Inheritance versus embedding in F2x (1 message)
integral of complex functions (3 messages)
Intel 8.0 and LIBC 2.3 (3 messages)
Intel compiler for Academia (3 messages)
Intel compiler on RH9 (2 messages)
Intel Fortran Compilers 8.0 now available (1 message)
Intels Fortran Complie (1 message)
Intels Fortran Complier (3 messages)
Invitation to comment on Final Committee Draft for Fortran 2003 (4 messages)
Jennifer O'Connor is out of the office until Sept.8/03 (1 message)
Justification in IO (4 messages)
List-directed IO (6 messages)
long character strings and SGI MIPS compiler (4 messages)
Mail vs. News about Fortran (7 messages)
MATMUL for very small matrices (2 messages)
May I join this list? (2 messages)
Memory allocation (5 messages)
Metcalf et al. (1 message)
minloc function (3 messages)
Modules USEing modules (8 messages)
Modules USEing modules (thread 2) (8 messages)
Molecular dynamics libraries (1 message)
mpi (15 messages)
MPI non-blocking messages in Fortran (4 messages)
MPI over .NET (1 message)
mpi over .NET ? (17 messages)
NAGWare Fortran 95 Release 5.0 is now available (4 messages)
NAMELIST (1 message)
NAMELIST order (11 messages)
NAMELISTs for variable lengths (1 message)
New coco & Make_pm (1 message)
New coco 1.25 (1 message)
New coco 1.26 (1 message)
New Computer Language (2 messages)
Non-advancing output (4 messages)
obscure fortran features (20 messages)
Official ANSI public comment period for Fortran 2003 (1 message)
On Standards (was: FLUSH) (2 messages)
OpenGL animations of MD (3 messages)
openmp question (2 messages)
Performance penalties for allocatable arrays? (9 messages)
performance-test (2 messages)
pointer argument problems with IFC (3 messages)
Pointer as actual for INTENT(OUT) (5 messages)
pointers to array sections (2 messages)
preferred way of setting precision in F90 (10 messages)
Preprocessing situation (2 messages)
Print real with 'I' format (2 messages)
Problem with optional in F (16 messages)
problems with allocate (3 messages)
pthreads from Fortran 2000 (1 message)
PUBLIC/PRIVATE Types (3 messages)
Pure (was: Problem with optional in F) (2 messages)
Quartic equations (7 messages)
Question about the function with pointer result (3 messages)
Questions concerning FORALL (9 messages)
Quick Poll Regarding Fortran Documentation (2 messages)
read a binary array by parts (7 messages)
Read/write locking Fortran files (1 message)
Recursive external/internal IO (2 messages)
recursive write (5 messages)
Schonfelder's Web site (1 message)
skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file (15 messages)
Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation (13 messages)
Some people may be interested. (7 messages)
spam problem (1 message)
Standard Fortran FLUSH command? (17 messages)
standard question (3 messages)
Standard question about WHERE() (6 messages)
Standard question about WHERE() - word from vendor (1 message)
Subroutines as arguments (5 messages)
Suggestions for f03++ (1 message)
System calls within F90 (6 messages)
thanks for comments on setting precision in F90!! (1 message)
Thanks for the wonderful reply for the deallocate list. (1 message)
Travis D Nesmith/BOARD/FRS is out of the office. (2 messages)
UK comment on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft (2 messages)
Unit zero is stderr? (1 message)
USE HOST (3 messages)
variable length arrays (7 messages)
virtual fortran (2 messages)
Weird loss of precision (14 messages)
WHERE and MATMUL combination (3 messages)
Write ghost! (3 messages)
XML parser in Fortran (a little off-topic?) (1 message)
your views (8 messages)
[ pointers to code /dyn. systems, etc. ] [24/02/2003 - 4:25 GMT] (1 message)
[Fwd: Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron] (1 message)
[Fwd: [tree-ssa] RPM packages available for branch snapshots] (5 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"" as an escape character

"" as an escape character

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:02:37 -0500

48 lines

Re: "" as an escape character

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:12:03 -0000

46 lines

Re: "" as an escape character

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:15:34 +0100

56 lines

Re: "" as an escape character

Herbert Fruechtl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:24:42 -0000

53 lines

Re: "" as an escape character

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:38:47 -0600

155 lines

Re: "" as an escape character

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 18:42:29 +0100

34 lines

Re: "" as an escape character

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:52:24 -0800

18 lines

Re: "" as an escape character

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:10:33 -0800

47 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:28:25 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

A related question: Derived types and ELEMENTAL procedures

A related question: Derived types and ELEMENTAL procedures

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 00:33:52 +0100

15 lines

Re: A related question: Derived types and ELEMENTAL procedures

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:14:12 +0200

28 lines

Re: A related question: Derived types and ELEMENTAL procedures

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 08:57:07 -0600

32 lines

Re: A related question: Derived types and ELEMENTAL procedures

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 17:35:53 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

about global variables

Re: about global variables

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:10:40 +1000

30 lines

New Thread

about global variables...I suppose

about global variables...I suppose

SUBSCRIBE COMP-FORTRAN-90 celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:58:22 +0100

37 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:12:29 -0400

38 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:14:36 -0400

20 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

SUBSCRIBE COMP-FORTRAN-90 celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:18:37 +0100

60 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Ron Sverdlove <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:24:39 -0400

73 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

SUBSCRIBE COMP-FORTRAN-90 celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 01:47:15 +0100

54 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:50:53 -0400

104 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:27:30 -0700

78 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

SUBSCRIBE COMP-FORTRAN-90 celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:35:26 +0100

79 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:49:11 +0100

71 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Alois Steindl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:03:29 +0200

35 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

SUBSCRIBE COMP-FORTRAN-90 celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:50:58 +0100

13 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Aug 2003 20:56:39 +0100

20 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:43:25 -0700

41 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Aug 2003 12:36:46 -0700

67 lines

New Thread

About parallel mesh generation and solving equations

About parallel mesh generation and solving equations

Jacques Brancher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 06:28:45 -0300

21 lines

New Thread

absoft compiler

absoft compiler

Dr. Moshe Vaxman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:41 +0200

77 lines

Re: absoft compiler

Blackwell, Bennie F <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:05:02 -0700

123 lines

New Thread

Advice on naming an operation

Advice on naming an operation

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:26:21 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Aliasing with USE

Aliasing with USE

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jun 2003 17:29:08 +0100

19 lines

Aliasing with USE

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jun 2003 09:38:50 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

allocatable array of pointers within a structure?

allocatable array of pointers within a structure?

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:46:05 -0800

57 lines

allocatable array of pointers within a structure?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Nov 2003 12:25:54 -0800

65 lines

Re: allocatable array of pointers within a structure?

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:26:36 -0600

72 lines

Re: allocatable array of pointers within a structure?

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:19:08 -0600

92 lines

Re: allocatable array of pointers within a structure?

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:37:20 -0800

145 lines

New Thread

Announcement: IBM XL Fortran new releases

Announcement: IBM XL Fortran new releases

Yin Zhu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:58:53 -0400

34 lines

Re: Announcement: IBM XL Fortran new releases

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:49:09 +0200

50 lines

New Thread

Another F95 standard question

Another F95 standard question

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:17:11 -0600

363 lines

Re: Another F95 standard question

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:33:16 -0700

176 lines

Re: Another F95 standard question

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Mar 2003 16:07:31 -0600

59 lines

Re: Another F95 standard question

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Mar 2003 16:46:28 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

Array element as do variable

Array element as do variable

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:25:37 -0500

18 lines

Re: Array element as do variable

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:01:27 -0600

37 lines

Re: Array element as do variable

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:20:33 -0500

47 lines

Re: Array element as do variable

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:14:29 -0800

107 lines

Re: Array element as do variable

David LaFrance-Linden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:33:56 -0500

44 lines

Re: Array element as do variable

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:59:21 -0800

34 lines

Re: Array element as do variable

David LaFrance-Linden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:06:13 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

ASSOCIATED bug

ASSOCIATED bug

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Mar 2003 14:32:02 -0500

52 lines

Re: ASSOCIATED bug

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:16:03 +1000

43 lines

New Thread

autodependencies of fortran code on include, modules, etc.

autodependencies of fortran code on include, modules, etc.

Blackwell, Bennie F <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 09:32:13 -0700

159 lines

Re: autodependencies of fortran code on include, modules, etc.

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:37:55 -0800

486 lines

New Thread

automatic and optional

automatic and optional

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 13:09:04 -0400

28 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 13:14:15 -0500

35 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 11:28:24 -0700

54 lines

automatic and optional

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 11:33:57 -0700

88 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 11:38:09 -0700

24 lines

automatic and optional

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 11:40:15 -0700

31 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 11:49:59 -0700

37 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 12:05:01 -0700

27 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 14:09:35 -0500

584 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 14:19:32 -0500

44 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 14:38:42 -0500

128 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 May 2003 12:41:58 -0700

97 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 May 2003 18:10:57 +0200

46 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jun 2003 08:01:22 -0700

61 lines

New Thread

Avoiding loss of precision in formatted IO

Avoiding loss of precision in formatted IO

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:49:30 -0500

41 lines

Re: Avoiding loss of precision in formatted IO

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:03:00 -0700

38 lines

Re: Avoiding loss of precision in formatted IO

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:40:31 -0800

56 lines

New Thread

AW: performance-test

AW: performance-test

Martens Uwe PG I <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:09:14 +0100

38 lines

Re: AW: performance-test

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:12:43 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Backspace and file position.

Backspace and file position.

Colin Millar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:13:53 -0000

44 lines

Re: Backspace and file position.

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:13:49 +0100

62 lines

Re: Backspace and file position.

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:12:14 +1000

99 lines

New Thread

big opject files

big opject files

Mike Bauer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:39:48 -0500

38 lines

big opject files

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:32:03 -0800

60 lines

New Thread

Bond pricing functions in Fortran

Bond pricing functions in Fortran

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:33:30 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Book pre-announcement

Book pre-announcement

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:22:07 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Buffering

Re: Buffering

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:35:21 -0400

25 lines

Re: Buffering

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:39:59 -0700

41 lines

Re: Buffering

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:15:22 -0400

29 lines

Re: Buffering

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:44:27 -0600

43 lines

Re: Buffering

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:30:19 -0400

41 lines

Re: Buffering

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:53:36 -0600

36 lines

Re: Buffering

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:24:32 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 19:02:53 -0000

24 lines

Re: Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

Jacques Brancher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 19:07:05 -0200

37 lines

Re: Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

Alois Steindl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:25:11 +0100

30 lines

Re: Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:59:53 -0000

51 lines

Re: Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

venkat sastry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:04:25 +0000

94 lines

Re: Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:12:03 -0000

63 lines

New Thread

Can you call a subroutine with arguments like this?

Can you call a subroutine with arguments like this?

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 May 2003 18:59:20 +0100

64 lines

Can you call a subroutine with arguments like this?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 May 2003 11:39:23 -0700

119 lines

Re: Can you call a subroutine with arguments like this?

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 May 2003 20:15:26 +0100

35 lines

Re: Can you call a subroutine with arguments like this?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 May 2003 12:24:51 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

Canadian comments on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft

Canadian comments on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft

Rob James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:42:05 -0400

28 lines

Re: Canadian comments on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft

Rob James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Oct 2003 18:34:58 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Cascade recompilation with Intel

Cascade recompilation with Intel

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:24:06 -0500

28 lines

Re: Cascade recompilation with Intel

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:36:54 +0800

67 lines

Re: Cascade recompilation with Intel

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:13:37 +0800

40 lines

Re: Cascade recompilation with Intel

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:34:04 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

character issue

character issue

Y.K. ZHOU <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:29:19 -0800

46 lines

Re: character issue

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:44:50 -0800

50 lines

Re: character issue

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:44:00 -0600

60 lines

Re: character issue

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:05:39 +1000

45 lines

New Thread

cheap student compiler from intel

cheap student compiler from intel

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:52:11 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Code or comiler error?

Re: Code or comiler error?

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:30:21 +0000

17 lines

New Thread

Code or Compiler error

Re: Code or Compiler error

Richard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:37:18 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

Code or Compiler error?

Code or Compiler error?

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Mar 2003 02:57:47 +0000

111 lines

New Thread

Common block names

Common block names

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:19:14 +0100

18 lines

Re: Common block names

W.J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:41:17 +0100

31 lines

Re: Common block names

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:06:35 -0500

55 lines

Re: Common block names

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:02:26 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Common block names - (blanks in)

Re: Common block names - (blanks in)

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:40:56 +1000

23 lines

New Thread

Compiler diagnostics error

Compiler diagnostics error

Laurent Debreu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:04:05 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Compiler differences

Compiler differences

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:19:41 +0100

366 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 20:40:46 +0200

15 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:14:41 +0100

543 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:41:59 +0100

464 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:44:02 +0100

461 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:43:53 +0100

406 lines

Re: Compiler differences

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:57:48 +0200

507 lines

Re: Compiler differences

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:06:11 +0100

19 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Ian Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:11:51 +0000

82 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 13:37:07 +0200

39 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:14:38 +0100

92 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:19:03 +0200

131 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:39:22 +0200

53 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:12:38 +0200

49 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:11:35 -0500

83 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 19:41:06 +0200

40 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:56:00 -0800

29 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 09:03:14 +0200

37 lines

Re: Compiler differences

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 17:28:59 +0100

165 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Apr 2003 09:17:50 +0200

32 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:45:23 +0200

53 lines

Re: Compiler differences

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:10:28 +0100

402 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Apr 2003 00:09:34 +0100

250 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:39:23 -0700

59 lines

New Thread

Compiler error anomaly

Compiler error anomaly

Colin Millar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:17:24 +0100

46 lines

Re: Compiler error anomaly

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:20:25 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

Compiler-Optimized source code on UltraSPARC-based systems

Compiler-Optimized source code on UltraSPARC-based systems

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:29:38 -0000

23 lines

Re: Compiler-Optimized source code on UltraSPARC-based systems

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:39:06 -0800

44 lines

Re: Compiler-Optimized source code on UltraSPARC-based systems

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:44:50 -0000

63 lines

Re: Compiler-Optimized source code on UltraSPARC-based systems

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:49:43 -0800

24 lines

Re: Compiler-Optimized source code on UltraSPARC-based systems

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:55:51 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

Complex root

Complex root

Giuseppe Panei <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 17:21:03 +0200

263 lines

Complex root

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:45:12 -0700

44 lines

Re: Complex root

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:50:15 -0500

386 lines

Re: Complex root

Giuseppe Panei <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2003 09:26:00 +0200

65 lines

Re: Complex root

R. A. Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:49:02 +1000

41 lines

Re: Complex root

Giuseppe Panei <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2003 18:58:55 +0200

61 lines

Re: Complex root

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:12:33 -0700

69 lines

Re: Complex root

R. A. Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:57:40 +1000

41 lines

Re: Complex root

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jun 2003 22:43:31 -0600

22 lines

Re: Complex root

R. A. Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2003 00:05:29 +1000

20 lines

New Thread

CONTAINS

CONTAINS

Paddy O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:32:00 +1000

75 lines

Re: CONTAINS

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2003 11:42:21 +0100

69 lines

Re: CONTAINS

Paddy O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:04:29 +1000

164 lines

New Thread

DCABES2004 First Call for Papers

DCABES2004 First Call for Papers

Choi-Hong Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:44:05 +0000

271 lines

New Thread

deallocate list

deallocate list

Junchao Xia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:46:05 -0500

34 lines

Re: deallocate list

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:01:19 -0500

24 lines

Re: deallocate list

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:02:46 -0800

80 lines

Re: deallocate list

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:04:24 -0500

66 lines

Re: deallocate list

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:07:55 -0600

158 lines

Re: deallocate list

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:20:25 -0800

33 lines

Re: deallocate list

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:28:32 -0600

91 lines

Re: deallocate list

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:45:14 +0000

31 lines

Re: deallocate list

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:33:07 +0000

43 lines

Re: deallocate list

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:05:39 +1000

30 lines

New Thread

Default initialization of local variables

Default initialization of local variables

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jul 2003 16:31:43 -0400

39 lines

Re: Default initialization of local variables

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:50:34 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

denormalised number??

denormalised number??

Harry R Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:05:13 -0500

15 lines

Re: denormalised number??

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2003 22:40:40 +0100

18 lines

Re: denormalised number??

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:35:34 -0400

67 lines

Re: denormalised number??

G.F. Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:49:36 -0400

33 lines

Re: denormalised number??

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jun 2003 01:51:53 +1000

37 lines

Re: denormalised number??

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:08:18 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

Derived types and pointers

Derived types and pointers

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:14:50 +0100

89 lines

Re: Derived types and pointers

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:30:11 -0700

42 lines

Re: Derived types and pointers

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:21:05 +0200

88 lines

Re: Derived types and pointers

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:10:57 +0100

211 lines

Re: Derived types and pointers

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:35:09 +0100

14 lines

New Thread

DTNURBS

DTNURBS

GianLuigi Piacentini <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Sep 2003 13:39:48 +0000

25 lines

Re: DTNURBS

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:51:15 +0300

62 lines

New Thread

Dublicate specification

Dublicate specification

Rasmus C. Østergaard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:02:22 +0100

19 lines

Re: Dublicate specification

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:03:56 +0200

22 lines

New Thread

ELEMENTALs (Was: Compiler differences)

ELEMENTALs (Was: Compiler differences)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:12:26 -0400

413 lines

ELEMENTALs (Was: Compiler differences)

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 11:19:46 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

Empty derived types

Empty derived types

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:06:24 -0400

20 lines

Re: Empty derived types

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:18:08 -0500

29 lines

Empty derived types

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:20:44 -0700

35 lines

Re: Empty derived types

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:24:36 -0400

24 lines

Re: Empty derived types

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:43:26 -0700

49 lines

New Thread

Empty type

Empty type

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:28:05 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:33:14 +0200

11 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 03:47:46 +0200

11 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:36:54 +0200

12 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:32:01 +0200

15 lines

New Thread

Extends keyword in F2k

Extends keyword in F2k

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:17:51 +0800

55 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:54:38 -0400

43 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

David LaFrance-Linden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:20:58 -0400

38 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:44:30 +0800

75 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:47:32 -0400

125 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

David LaFrance-Linden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:08:39 -0400

28 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Sep 2003 08:43:01 +0800

43 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

David LaFrance-Linden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:07:22 -0400

84 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:17:25 -0400

29 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

David LaFrance-Linden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:24:08 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

F90 parsing routines

Re: F90 parsing routines

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:38:34 +0000

31 lines

Re: F90 parsing routines

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Mar 2003 06:48:06 -0000

84 lines

Re: F90 parsing routines

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:43:55 +0000

63 lines

Re: F90 parsing routines

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Mar 2003 13:41:54 -0000

97 lines

Re: F90 parsing routines

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:39:13 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

FEM2DLib

Re: FEM2DLib

Marco A. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:58:27 +0400

81 lines

New Thread

File opened with ACTION='WRITE'

File opened with ACTION='WRITE'

Al Greynolds <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:50:09 -0700

13 lines

Re: File opened with ACTION='WRITE'

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:25:31 -0500

99 lines

New Thread

file operations

file operations

Xiaogang Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:53:38 -0400

39 lines

Re: file operations

Ian Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:57:20 +0000

36 lines

Re: file operations

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:01:41 +0100

45 lines

file operations

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:04:29 -0700

53 lines

Re: file operations

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:00:30 -0700

57 lines

New Thread

flexible format statements

flexible format statements

David Byrne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:54:17 +0000

27 lines

Re: flexible format statements

Roderick W. Failing III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:04:29 -0500

73 lines

Re: flexible format statements

Herbert Fruechtl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:01:35 -0000

85 lines

Re: flexible format statements

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:12:31 +0100

17 lines

Re: flexible format statements

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:13:11 -0600

51 lines

Re: flexible format statements

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:20:45 +1000

41 lines

Re: flexible format statements

Dennis Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 13:50:28 +0100

68 lines

Re: flexible format statements

Blackwell, Bennie F <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 07:36:48 -0600

89 lines

Re: flexible format statements

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 08:27:32 -0600

21 lines

New Thread

Flipping an integer

Flipping an integer

Stenson Matthew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jul 2003 12:07:29 +1000

30 lines

Re: Flipping an integer

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jul 2003 11:39:04 +0200

56 lines

Re: Flipping an integer

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jul 2003 11:53:12 +0100

69 lines

Re: Flipping an integer

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:28:33 +0200

54 lines

Re: Flipping an integer

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:12:27 +0100

26 lines

Re: Flipping an integer

R. A. Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jul 2003 00:48:04 +1000

49 lines

Re: Flipping an integer

R. A. Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jul 2003 10:06:48 +1000

21 lines

New Thread

Flipping and integer

Flipping and integer

Stenson Matthew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jul 2003 18:13:17 +1000

25 lines

New Thread

Floating-point comparisons

Floating-point comparisons

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:26:12 -0500

97 lines

Floating-point comparisons

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:45:28 -0800

52 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:10:41 -0500

34 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:46:58 -0600

110 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:53:34 -0800

55 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Michael Milgram <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:07:50 -0500

47 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:57:17 -0800

76 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:15:27 -0800

42 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 10:54:26 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Formatted read

Formatted read

Stenson Matthew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 09:36:43 +1000

42 lines

Re: Formatted read

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 08:00:35 -0400

92 lines

Re: Formatted read

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 08:36:13 -0400

37 lines

Re: Formatted read

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:55:10 +0100

46 lines

Re: Formatted read

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 09:52:09 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jan 2003 22:55:42 -0500

50 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jan 2003 21:52:18 -0800

63 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

David Annetts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:05:40 +1100

21 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:19:41 +1030

90 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jan 2003 01:19:42 -0700

47 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jan 2003 11:42:51 GMT

61 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jan 2003 08:27:34 -0800

63 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jan 2003 08:34:59 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

Fortran 95 on Opteron

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:38:35 -0500

26 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:07:59 -0600

57 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:11:00 -0500

97 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:29:09 -0500

19 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

keith bierman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:57:56 -0800

23 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:07:41 -0800

43 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:31:07 -0500

24 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:54:11 +0100

31 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:14:28 -0500

24 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:30:00 +0100

27 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:38:24 -0500

48 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Greg Lindahl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:49:39 -0800

21 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:51:34 -0500

36 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:02:44 -0800

36 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 01:23:23 +0100

44 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:30:09 -0600

119 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Len Makin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:26:00 +1100

26 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 01:30:50 +0100

37 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

G.F. Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:27:44 -0500

34 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:21:31 -0800

61 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

G.F. Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:41:37 -0500

44 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:41:08 -0800

32 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:48:03 -0800

32 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:45:10 -0500

27 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:53:22 -0800

77 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Jim Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 03:10:08 -0600

55 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

G.F. Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 08:46:49 -0500

59 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:41:05 -0500

44 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

David LaFrance-Linden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:18:41 -0500

41 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

David LaFrance-Linden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:33:33 -0500

58 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 08:59:32 -0800

61 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:48:40 -0600

194 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Yoshihiro Itoh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:55:47 +0900

67 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:05:24 -0500

35 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:10:12 -0500

46 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:10:16 -0800

58 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

G.F. Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:20:06 -0500

16 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Jim Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:45:16 -0600

196 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Wood Lotz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:10:33 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

Fortran 95 on Opteron -> f2003 implementation

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron -> f2003 implementation

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:42:08 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

Fortran 95 on the G5

Fortran 95 on the G5

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:33:53 -0500

40 lines

Fortran 95 on the G5

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:03:33 -0800

55 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on the G5

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:33:40 -0500

82 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on the G5

John A. Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:34:00 -0700

83 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on the G5

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:34:22 -0700

39 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on the G5

Wei-Yin Loh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:33:48 -0600

48 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on the G5

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:30:20 +0100

106 lines

New Thread

Fortran capabilities <fwd>

Fortran capabilities <fwd>

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:05:06 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

Fortran Forum (April)

Fortran Forum (April)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:46:34 +0200

59 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (April)

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 06:15:44 -0700

47 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (April)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:22:41 +0200

32 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (April)

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 16:48:43 +0100

54 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (April)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:17:17 +0200

27 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (April)

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:53:02 -0400

50 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (April)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:12:50 +0200

1222 lines

New Thread

Fortran Forum (August)

Fortran Forum (August)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:50:50 +0200

66 lines

New Thread

Fortran Forum (December)

Fortran Forum (December)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:46:25 +0100

61 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (December)

Z Zhou <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:29:19 -0000

80 lines

New Thread

Fortran interface to FreeGLUT

Fortran interface to FreeGLUT

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jun 2003 16:35:42 -0400

38 lines

Re: Fortran interface to FreeGLUT

Norman Clerman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jun 2003 14:56:49 -0400

51 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (January)

Fortran Resources (January)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:37:44 +0100

698 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (January)

George K. Chang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:05:12 -0600

36 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (January)

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:20:32 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (March)

Fortran Resources (March)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:12:35 +0100

700 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (May)

Fortran Resources (May)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 May 2003 13:01:39 +0200

700 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (November)

Fortran Resources (November)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:48:14 +0100

717 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (September)

Fortran Resources (September)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:40:51 +0200

713 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:16:21 +0200

37 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:44:02 +0100

87 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Herbert Fruechtl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:01:23 +0100

154 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:16:41 -0400

14 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:05:05 -0500

29 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:18:01 -0700

21 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

John A. Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:51:08 -0600

29 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:38:40 +0100

32 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:44:02 +0100

20 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:45:30 -0400

29 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:52:53 -0700

41 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:53:09 +0100

39 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:01:32 +0100

42 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:16:58 -0700

28 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:59:39 -0400

45 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:12:08 -0700

40 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:17:05 -0400

58 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 08:56:30 +0100

13 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

J.L.Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:27:42 +0100

36 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Paul J. Nikolai <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:36:04 -0400

31 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:06:19 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

fpp vs. cpp

fpp vs. cpp

Harry R Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:17:29 -0500

13 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Harry R Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:12:47 -0500

64 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:19:19 -0400

42 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:22:11 -0400

37 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:27:58 -0700

19 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Pope, Beverly (BKPope) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:53:14 -0500

74 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:24:09 -0400

39 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:01:15 +0800

36 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:20:38 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

fpp vs. cpp vs. CoCo

Re: fpp vs. cpp vs. CoCo

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:49:42 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Fw: New ISO_VARYING_STRING implementation (without memory leaks)

Fw: New ISO_VARYING_STRING implementation (without memory leaks)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:07:42 +0200

78 lines

Re: Fw: New ISO_VARYING_STRING implementation (without memory leaks)

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:47:22 -0400

96 lines

Re: Fw: New ISO_VARYING_STRING implementation (without memory leaks)

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:09:34 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

gdb support for F90

gdb support for F90

David LaFrance-Linden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:56:58 -0400

37 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:02:51 -0400

26 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:18:31 -0400

49 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:06:22 -0700

31 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:50:36 -0400

25 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:52:10 -0400

43 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:23:39 -0400

18 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 08:31:59 -0700

28 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 12:01:25 -0400

27 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Aug 2003 00:05:59 -0700

41 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Aug 2003 00:10:08 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

Generic interface question

Generic interface question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 18:43:59 -0400

36 lines

Re: Generic interface question

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 15:54:33 -0700

48 lines

Re: Generic interface question

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 17:52:16 -0500

92 lines

Re: Generic interface question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 19:19:03 -0400

51 lines

Re: Generic interface question

John A. Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 19:39:40 -0600

28 lines

Re: Generic interface question

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 15:51:29 +0800

34 lines

Re: Generic interface question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 12:42:04 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

Greater then zero

Greater then zero

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:44:48 -0500

46 lines

Re: Greater then zero

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:31:49 +0800

49 lines

Re: Greater then zero

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 01:18:21 +1000

55 lines

New Thread

ieee exceptions in F

ieee exceptions in F

Giuseppe Panei <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 May 2003 17:54:34 +0200

245 lines

New Thread

Image processing

Image processing

Choi-Hong Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 08:58:41 +0100

34 lines

Re: Image processing

Jacob =Jouk Jansen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:59:33 +0200

35 lines

Re: Image processing

Michael Milgram <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 08:45:31 -0400

44 lines

Re: Image processing

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:08:32 +1000

27 lines

New Thread

Incorrect CAUTION?

Incorrect CAUTION?

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 00:57:33 +0100

73 lines

Re: Incorrect CAUTION?

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 May 2003 01:11:43 +0100

85 lines

New Thread

Inheritance versus embedding in F2x

Inheritance versus embedding in F2x

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 14:03:59 -0400

104 lines

New Thread

integral of complex functions

integral of complex functions

celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:48:06 +0100

38 lines

Re: integral of complex functions

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:08:45 -0700

39 lines

Re: integral of complex functions

celevic <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 19:34:30 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Intel 8.0 and LIBC 2.3

Intel 8.0 and LIBC 2.3

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:03:16 -0400

42 lines

Re: Intel 8.0 and LIBC 2.3

Kenneth Ayers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:09:47 -0400

54 lines

Re: Intel 8.0 and LIBC 2.3

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:27:57 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Intel compiler for Academia

Intel compiler for Academia

Harry R Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:00:40 -0500

14 lines

Re: Intel compiler for Academia

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:14:00 -0700

32 lines

Re: Intel compiler for Academia

Paul Stevenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:11:13 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Intel compiler on RH9

Intel compiler on RH9

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 17:20:58 -0400

36 lines

Re: Intel compiler on RH9

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 23:28:54 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

Intel Fortran Compilers 8.0 now available

Intel Fortran Compilers 8.0 now available

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:50:17 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

Intels Fortran Complie

Re: Intels Fortran Complie

Dimitri Antoniou <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:39:13 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Intels Fortran Complier

Intels Fortran Complier

Rasmus C. Østergaard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jun 2003 21:40:22 +0100

35 lines

Re: Intels Fortran Complier

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:10:24 -0500

36 lines

Re: Intels Fortran Complier

Rasmus C. Østergaard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jun 2003 07:58:01 +0100

13 lines

New Thread

Invitation to comment on Final Committee Draft for Fortran 2003

Invitation to comment on Final Committee Draft for Fortran 2003

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:38:46 -0700

56 lines

Re: Invitation to comment on Final Committee Draft for Fortran 2003

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2003 16:31:05 +0100

106 lines

Re: Invitation to comment on Final Committee Draft for Fortran 2003

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:22:04 -0700

37 lines

Re: Invitation to comment on Final Committee Draft for Fortran 2003

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Oct 2003 16:40:19 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Jennifer O'Connor is out of the office until Sept.8/03

Jennifer O'Connor is out of the office until Sept.8/03

Jennifer O'Connor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 04:37:33 -0400

14 lines

New Thread

Justification in IO

Justification in IO

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jun 2003 15:50:16 -0400

18 lines

Re: Justification in IO

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jun 2003 16:54:13 -0500

47 lines

Re: Justification in IO

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jun 2003 09:19:58 +0100

32 lines

Re: Justification in IO

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jun 2003 07:48:59 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

List-directed IO

List-directed IO

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:15:47 -0500

30 lines

List-directed IO

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:32:42 -0800

43 lines

Re: List-directed IO

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:29:32 -0800

32 lines

Re: List-directed IO

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 05:44:55 -0800

37 lines

Re: List-directed IO

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:51:54 -0500

52 lines

Re: List-directed IO

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 07:23:25 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

long character strings and SGI MIPS compiler

long character strings and SGI MIPS compiler

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:23:01 -0700

32 lines

Re: long character strings and SGI MIPS compiler

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:12:38 -0700

36 lines

Re: long character strings and SGI MIPS compiler

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 23:53:39 -0400

83 lines

Re: long character strings and SGI MIPS compiler

Harry R Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:20:41 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Mail vs. News about Fortran

Mail vs. News about Fortran

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:22:20 +0200

33 lines

Re: Mail vs. News about Fortran

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:42:16 -0400

47 lines

Re: Mail vs. News about Fortran

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:46:00 -0500

82 lines

Mail vs. News about Fortran

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:48:10 -0700

61 lines

Re: Mail vs. News about Fortran

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:56:22 -0700

39 lines

Re: Mail vs. News about Fortran

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:09:55 -0500

57 lines

Re: Mail vs. News about Fortran

José Rui Faustino de Sousa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:48:36 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

MATMUL for very small matrices

MATMUL for very small matrices

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:19:57 -0500

42 lines

Re: MATMUL for very small matrices

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:29:55 -0800

33 lines

New Thread

May I join this list?

May I join this list?

Alan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:06:49 +1000

48 lines

Re: May I join this list?

Paddy O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:49:41 +1000

56 lines

New Thread

Memory allocation

Memory allocation

Peter Steinle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 06:34:32 +1000

21 lines

Re: Memory allocation

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:47:53 -0400

26 lines

Memory allocation

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:04:37 -0700

42 lines

Re: Memory allocation

Peter Steinle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 07:31:33 +1000

56 lines

Re: Memory allocation

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:35:18 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

Metcalf et al.

Metcalf et al.

Aldo P. Solari <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 05:19:46 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

minloc function

minloc function

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:21:58 +0100

36 lines

Re: minloc function

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:44:24 -0400

27 lines

Re: minloc function

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:55:35 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Modules USEing modules

Modules USEing modules

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:50:22 -0400

15 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:10:05 -0500

102 lines

Modules USEing modules

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:27:56 -0700

35 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:10:23 -0400

53 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:26:18 -0700

32 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:37:42 -0400

73 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:14:44 -0700

65 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:28:40 -0400

78 lines

New Thread

Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

Colin Millar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:51:40 +0100

49 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:05:54 +1000

90 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:59:23 -0600

27 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:10:32 -0400

28 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

Brian Hanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:19:57 -0400

42 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 08:33:36 -0700

36 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:46:18 +0100

29 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:04:17 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Molecular dynamics libraries

Molecular dynamics libraries

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:42:28 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

mpi

mpi

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:24:07 +0000

34 lines

Re: mpi

Feyzi Inanc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:57:06 -0600

49 lines

Re: mpi

Herbert Fruechtl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:56:40 -0000

66 lines

Re: mpi

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 07:22:43 -0800

32 lines

Re: mpi

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:51:44 +0000

45 lines

Re: mpi

Harry R Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:04:16 -0600

43 lines

Re: mpi

Chun-Ho LIU <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 03:46:39 +0800

75 lines

Re: mpi

Simon Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:54:50 +1100

28 lines

Re: mpi

besus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 00:42:56 +0900

55 lines

Re: mpi

Tim Zeisloft <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:00:19 -0800

30 lines

Re: mpi

besus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 00:57:25 +0900

44 lines

MPI

Choi-Hong Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 08:11:57 +0100

36 lines

Re: MPI

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 05:25:38 -0700

21 lines

Re: MPI

Joerg Stiller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 17:33:45 +0000

74 lines

Re: MPI

Choi-Hong Lai <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 08:40:08 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

MPI non-blocking messages in Fortran

MPI non-blocking messages in Fortran

Bertrand Meltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:48:26 +0200

66 lines

Re: MPI non-blocking messages in Fortran

Stuart Midgley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:34:47 +1000

94 lines

Re: MPI non-blocking messages in Fortran

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:48:25 -0400

30 lines

Re: MPI non-blocking messages in Fortran

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:00:09 -0400

109 lines

New Thread

MPI over .NET

MPI over .NET

Yoshihiro Itoh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Mar 2003 00:52:59 +0900

32 lines

New Thread

mpi over .NET ?

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:05:19 -0000

78 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Edward Osei <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:41:22 -0600

107 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

besus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 00:57:26 +0900

138 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

besus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 01:25:49 +0900

94 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Edward Osei <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:25:19 -0600

166 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:23:28 -0800

39 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:11:13 -0600

37 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 22:27:38 -0800

69 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Jeffrey B. Layton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 07:41:09 -0500

31 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 07:44:38 -0800

36 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

besus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 01:57:05 +0900

37 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

besus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 02:03:25 +0900

45 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Jeffrey B. Layton <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 12:13:41 -0500

64 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:08:37 -0800

69 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 17:16:30 +0000

130 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Yoshihiro Itou <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 01:38:12 +0900

146 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Yoshihiro Itou <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 01:38:11 +0900

86 lines

New Thread

NAGWare Fortran 95 Release 5.0 is now available

NAGWare Fortran 95 Release 5.0 is now available

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:33:10 +0000

55 lines

Re: NAGWare Fortran 95 Release 5.0 is now available

J.L.Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:46:03 -0000

76 lines

Re: NAGWare Fortran 95 Release 5.0 is now available

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:27:05 +0000

45 lines

Re: NAGWare Fortran 95 Release 5.0 is now available

Siamak.Lina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:35:47 -0500

92 lines

New Thread

NAMELIST

Re: NAMELIST

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:21:36 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

NAMELIST order

NAMELIST order

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:04:05 -0500

44 lines

NAMELIST order

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:23:19 -0800

60 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:41:39 -0500

23 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:38:31 -0700

38 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:18:52 -0800

94 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:58:13 +0000

51 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:35:26 -0500

50 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Harry R Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:50:19 -0600

75 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 07:48:52 -0800

23 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:58:29 +0000

78 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Siamak Lina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:51:10 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

NAMELISTs for variable lengths

NAMELISTs for variable lengths

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:55:13 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

New coco & Make_pm

New coco & Make_pm

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:14:58 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

New coco 1.25

New coco 1.25

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:44:36 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

New coco 1.26

New coco 1.26

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:01:59 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

New Computer Language

New Computer Language

Yoshihiro Itoh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:41:04 +0900

27 lines

Re: New Computer Language

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:12:44 -0800

54 lines

New Thread

Non-advancing output

Non-advancing output

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:01:37 +0100

40 lines

Non-advancing output

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 08:05:15 -0700

75 lines

Re: Non-advancing output

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 08:41:37 -0700

58 lines

Re: Non-advancing output

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:50:56 +0200

54 lines

New Thread

obscure fortran features

obscure fortran features

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:00:40 +0200

56 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 10:12:01 -0400

55 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Volker Typke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:43:08 +0200

84 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:52:47 +0200

43 lines

obscure fortran features

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 08:02:59 -0700

77 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:00:52 -0400

34 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:44:45 -0400

25 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 16:20:46 +1000

120 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:56:09 -0600

43 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 08:00:41 -0700

75 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 19:13:19 +0200

47 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:31:42 -0400

42 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

dsmith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:42:31 -0700

34 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:54:44 -0400

25 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:55:26 -0700

98 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:10:29 -0700

57 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

dsmith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:32:39 -0700

46 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:44:39 -0700

42 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 19:32:09 -0700

23 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 20:10:59 -0700

49 lines

New Thread

Official ANSI public comment period for Fortran 2003

Official ANSI public comment period for Fortran 2003

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:05:24 -0700

42 lines

New Thread

On Standards (was: FLUSH)

On Standards (was: FLUSH)

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:26:59 -0600

45 lines

Re: On Standards (was: FLUSH)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 19:33:46 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

OpenGL animations of MD

OpenGL animations of MD

Aleksandar N. Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 May 2003 11:04:15 -0400

36 lines

Re: OpenGL animations of MD

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 May 2003 15:03:46 -0400

28 lines

Re: OpenGL animations of MD

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 May 2003 11:05:17 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

openmp question

openmp question

Harry R Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:16:54 -0500

101 lines

Re: openmp question

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:45:21 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Andy Leonard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:04:03 +0000

86 lines

Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Andy Leonard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 09:39:04 -0600

97 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:14:05 -0000

291 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:27:18 -0000

136 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Andy Leonard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:52:21 -0600

107 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 23:34:38 -0000

162 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Michael Milgram <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:48:35 -0500

126 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:17:57 +0100

54 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:43:01 -0800

44 lines

New Thread

performance-test

performance-test

Martens Uwe PG I <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:40:39 +0100

110 lines

Re: performance-test

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 05:40:46 -0800

33 lines

New Thread

pointer argument problems with IFC

pointer argument problems with IFC

William Nicholson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jul 2003 08:47:48 -0700

62 lines

Re: pointer argument problems with IFC

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:02:22 -0400

26 lines

Re: pointer argument problems with IFC

William Nicholson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:25:59 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

Pointer as actual for INTENT(OUT)

Pointer as actual for INTENT(OUT)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2003 18:33:00 -0400

49 lines

Pointer as actual for INTENT(OUT)

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:50:56 -0700

37 lines

Re: Pointer as actual for INTENT(OUT)

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 06:55:10 +0800

26 lines

Re: Pointer as actual for INTENT(OUT)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:12:16 -0400

25 lines

Re: Pointer as actual for INTENT(OUT)

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:57:02 +0800

33 lines

New Thread

pointers to array sections

pointers to array sections

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 11:01:28 -0700

84 lines

Re: pointers to array sections

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 09:37:20 +0200

62 lines

New Thread

preferred way of setting precision in F90

preferred way of setting precision in F90

Blackwell, Bennie F <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:33:00 -0700

141 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Herbert Fruechtl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:58:32 -0000

112 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:16:11 +0100

168 lines

preferred way of setting precision in F90

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:57:07 -0800

50 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:23:29 -0500

74 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:54:52 -0600

623 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:46:34 -0600

269 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:52:10 -0800

102 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

zhongfu zhou <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:24:28 +0000

64 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:11:43 -0500

98 lines

New Thread

Preprocessing situation

Preprocessing situation

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:18:05 -0600

253 lines

Re: Preprocessing situation

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Mar 2003 11:08:39 -0500

153 lines

New Thread

Print real with 'I' format

Print real with 'I' format

Russell, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:06:11 -0400

46 lines

Re: Print real with 'I' format

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:11:37 +1000

29 lines

New Thread

Problem with optional in F

Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:10:01 +0200

320 lines

Problem with optional in F

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 08:42:10 -0700

40 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:57:31 -0500

28 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Renchi Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:04:27 -0500

20 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:31:27 +0200

152 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:33:38 -0700

37 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:56:14 +0200

86 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:14:03 -0700

28 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 19:28:55 +0200

37 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:13:01 +0200

62 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 19:29:09 -0700

169 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:48:00 +0200

41 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:15:02 +0200

193 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:23:44 -0700

53 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:01:02 +0200

357 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 May 2003 18:59:57 +0200

364 lines

New Thread

problems with allocate

problems with allocate

Ben Blackwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:21:29 +0000

22 lines

Re: problems with allocate

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Dec 2003 19:39:40 -0500

38 lines

Re: problems with allocate

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Dec 2003 21:55:15 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

pthreads from Fortran 2000

pthreads from Fortran 2000

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:20:10 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

PUBLIC/PRIVATE Types

PUBLIC/PRIVATE Types

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:24:46 -0400

44 lines

Re: PUBLIC/PRIVATE Types

Norman Clerman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:43:13 -0400

59 lines

PUBLIC/PRIVATE Types

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:47:32 -0700

70 lines

New Thread

Pure (was: Problem with optional in F)

Pure (was: Problem with optional in F)

Herbert Fruechtl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 19:15:41 +0100

121 lines

Re: Pure (was: Problem with optional in F)

Orville E. Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:16:55 -0500

124 lines

New Thread

Quartic equations

Quartic equations

Aleksandar N. Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:14:40 -0500

20 lines

Re: Quartic equations

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:14:10 -0000

49 lines

Re: Quartic equations

Michael Milgram <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:39:17 -0500

55 lines

Re: Quartic equations

Alan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:11:29 +1100

36 lines

Re: Quartic equations

Paddy O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:54:40 +1100

79 lines

Re: Quartic equations

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:57:56 -0500

39 lines

Re: Quartic equations

Cezar Diaconu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:31:29 +0900

407 lines

New Thread

Question about the function with pointer result

Question about the function with pointer result

vonkarman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Dec 2003 13:29:12 +0800

69 lines

Re: Question about the function with pointer result

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:39:31 +0100

23 lines

Question about the function with pointer result

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:08:13 -0800

63 lines

New Thread

Questions concerning FORALL

Questions concerning FORALL

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:34:03 +0100

44 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:10:06 +0100

39 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:03:06 +0100

50 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:30:21 +0100

46 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:48:19 +0100

39 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:25:49 -0600

74 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:48:16 -0800

46 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:27:32 -0600

64 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Mar 2003 14:07:24 +0200

67 lines

New Thread

Quick Poll Regarding Fortran Documentation

Quick Poll Regarding Fortran Documentation

J.A. O'Connor <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:12:46 -0500

35 lines

Re: Quick Poll Regarding Fortran Documentation

Samuel H. Dupree, Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:44:26 -0500

239 lines

New Thread

read a binary array by parts

read a binary array by parts

Xiaogang Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:18:24 -0500

58 lines

read a binary array by parts

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:45:38 -0800

81 lines

Re: read a binary array by parts

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:07:29 -0600

189 lines

Re: read a binary array by parts

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:36:37 -0600

46 lines

Re: read a binary array by parts

Popa, Frank D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:59:46 -0500

33 lines

Re: read a binary array by parts

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:15:07 -0800

21 lines

Re: read a binary array by parts

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 00:46:54 +1000

45 lines

New Thread

Read/write locking Fortran files

Read/write locking Fortran files

Popa, Frank D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 07:23:47 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Recursive external/internal IO

Recursive external/internal IO

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:51:44 -0400

22 lines

Recursive external/internal IO

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 14:02:10 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

recursive write

recursive write

Smith, David <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:58:34 -0800

37 lines

recursive write

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:29:44 -0800

29 lines

Re: recursive write

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:36:47 -0000

75 lines

Re: recursive write

Smith, David <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:58:56 -0800

24 lines

Re: recursive write

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:08:04 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

Schonfelder's Web site

Schonfelder's Web site

J.L.Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:04:51 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Xiaogang Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:04:02 -0400

60 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:14:00 +0200

36 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:18:55 +0100

28 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:20:40 +0100

57 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:55:41 +0100

25 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:00:28 +0100

33 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:02:14 +0100

25 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:08:09 +0100

38 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:23:16 -0500

79 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:25:47 -0700

69 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Xiaogang Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:58:05 -0400

56 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:13:45 -0700

42 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:44:08 -0600

34 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:47:26 -0500

110 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:26:39 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 13:41:38 -0500

140 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 May 2003 22:00:59 +0200

119 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Alan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 09:19:29 +1000

163 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 May 2003 09:57:53 -0500

167 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Giuseppe Panei <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 10:42:31 +0200

210 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 08:04:17 -0500

431 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 14:19:26 +0100

392 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Michael Milgram <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 11:47:51 -0400

418 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 16:45:11 -0700

35 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 17:31:04 -0700

54 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 12:23:32 +1000

91 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 May 2003 19:43:04 -0700

151 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 May 2003 13:03:09 +1000

140 lines

New Thread

Some people may be interested.

Some people may be interested.

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:07:31 +0000

50 lines

Re: Some people may be interested.

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:11:48 -0500

56 lines

Re: Some people may be interested.

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:33:48 -0800

24 lines

Re: Some people may be interested.

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:43:55 +0000

32 lines

Re: Some people may be interested.

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:43:51 -0500

19 lines

Re: Some people may be interested.

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:46:17 -0600

21 lines

Re: Some people may be interested.

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:50:52 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

spam problem

Re: spam problem

José Rui Faustino de Sousa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:20:37 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:04:02 -0400

32 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:17:04 -0600

39 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:24:52 -0500

72 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:25:46 -0400

25 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:42:23 -0600

31 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:22:38 -0500

31 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:45:05 +0800

43 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:15:26 -0700

52 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:24:37 +0800

37 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Joerg Stiller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:28:52 +0000

56 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:23:48 -0400

25 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:25:07 -0400

29 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:59:52 -0400

24 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:44:01 -0400

64 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:47:38 -0500

97 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:04:17 -0700

27 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 12:42:28 -0600

34 lines

New Thread

standard question

standard question

James Abeles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:02:57 -0500

43 lines

Re: standard question

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:14:59 -0800

66 lines

standard question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:31:14 -0800

92 lines

New Thread

Standard question about WHERE()

Standard question about WHERE()

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:45:03 -0600

199 lines

Re: Standard question about WHERE()

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:01:53 -0600

164 lines

Standard question about WHERE()

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 11:51:18 -0800

24 lines

Re: Standard question about WHERE()

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:08:37 -0700

20 lines

Re: Standard question about WHERE()

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:18:55 -0600

55 lines

Re: Standard question about WHERE()

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:33:45 -0600

69 lines

New Thread

Standard question about WHERE() - word from vendor

Re: Standard question about WHERE() - word from vendor

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:42:13 -0600

87 lines

New Thread

Subroutines as arguments

Subroutines as arguments

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:51:09 +0000

48 lines

Re: Subroutines as arguments

Toby White <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:08:56 +0000

37 lines

Re: Subroutines as arguments

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 07:39:56 -0800

47 lines

Re: Subroutines as arguments

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:05:57 +0000

30 lines