JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


2003


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: New Computer Language

Ted Stern

Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:12:44 -0800

54 lines

New Computer Language

Yoshihiro Itoh

Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:41:04 +0900

27 lines

Re: problems with allocate

Peter Shenkin

Sun, 28 Dec 2003 21:55:15 -0500

34 lines

Travis D Nesmith/BOARD/FRS is out of the office.

<>

Sun, 28 Dec 2003 20:12:44 -0500

12 lines

Re: problems with allocate

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 28 Dec 2003 19:39:40 -0500

38 lines

problems with allocate

Ben Blackwell

Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:21:29 +0000

22 lines

Empty type

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:28:05 -0500

21 lines

Question about the function with pointer result

Richard Maine

Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:08:13 -0800

63 lines

Re: UK comment on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft

David Muxworthy

Mon, 22 Dec 2003 11:14:15 +0000

23 lines

Re: Question about the function with pointer result

Michael Metcalf

Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:39:31 +0100

23 lines

Question about the function with pointer result

vonkarman

Sat, 20 Dec 2003 13:29:12 +0800

69 lines

Re: NAGWare Fortran 95 Release 5.0 is now available

Siamak.Lina

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:35:47 -0500

92 lines

Re: NAGWare Fortran 95 Release 5.0 is now available

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:27:05 +0000

45 lines

Re: NAGWare Fortran 95 Release 5.0 is now available

J.L.Schonfelder

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:46:03 -0000

76 lines

NAGWare Fortran 95 Release 5.0 is now available

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:33:10 +0000

55 lines

Read/write locking Fortran files

Popa, Frank D.

Fri, 19 Dec 2003 07:23:47 -0500

28 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Wood Lotz

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:10:33 +0000

34 lines

Re: Array element as do variable

David LaFrance-Linden

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:06:13 -0500

18 lines

Re: Array element as do variable

Richard Maine

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:59:21 -0800

34 lines

Re: Array element as do variable

David LaFrance-Linden

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:33:56 -0500

44 lines

Re: Array element as do variable

<>

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:14:29 -0800

107 lines

Re: Array element as do variable

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:20:33 -0500

47 lines

Re: Array element as do variable

Dick Hendrickson

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:01:27 -0600

37 lines

Array element as do variable

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:25:37 -0500

18 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Jim Riley

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:45:16 -0600

196 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

G.F. Thomas

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:20:06 -0500

16 lines

big opject files

Richard Maine

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:32:03 -0800

60 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron -> f2003 implementation

Bill Long

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:42:08 -0600

43 lines

big opject files

Mike Bauer

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:39:48 -0500

38 lines

[Fwd: Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron]

Walt Brainerd

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:28:04 -0700

75 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Richard Maine

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:10:16 -0800

58 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:10:12 -0500

46 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:05:24 -0500

35 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Yoshihiro Itoh

Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:55:47 +0900

67 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Bill Long

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:48:40 -0600

194 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Richard Maine

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 08:59:32 -0800

61 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

David LaFrance-Linden

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:33:33 -0500

58 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

David LaFrance-Linden

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:18:41 -0500

41 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:41:05 -0500

44 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

G.F. Thomas

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 08:46:49 -0500

59 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on the G5

Drew McCormack

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:30:20 +0100

106 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Jim Riley

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 03:10:08 -0600

55 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Tim Prince

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:53:22 -0800

77 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:45:10 -0500

27 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Tim Prince

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:48:03 -0800

32 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Tim Prince

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:41:08 -0800

32 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

G.F. Thomas

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:41:37 -0500

44 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Toon Moene

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 01:30:50 +0100

37 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Bill Long

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:30:09 -0600

119 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

G.F. Thomas

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:27:44 -0500

34 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Len Makin

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:26:00 +1100

26 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Toon Moene

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 01:23:23 +0100

44 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

<>

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:21:31 -0800

61 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Richard Maine

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:02:44 -0800

36 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:51:34 -0500

36 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Greg Lindahl

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:49:39 -0800

21 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:38:24 -0500

48 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Toon Moene

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:30:00 +0100

27 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:14:28 -0500

24 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Toon Moene

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:54:11 +0100

31 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:31:07 -0500

24 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Greg Lindahl

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:07:41 -0800

43 lines

Re: absoft compiler

Blackwell, Bennie F

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:05:02 -0700

123 lines

absoft compiler

Dr. Moshe Vaxman

Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:41 +0200

77 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

keith bierman

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:57:56 -0800

23 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:29:09 -0500

19 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on the G5

Walt Brainerd

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:34:22 -0700

39 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on the G5

John A. Turner

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:34:00 -0700

83 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on the G5

Wei-Yin Loh

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:33:48 -0600

48 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:11:00 -0500

97 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Bill Long

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:07:59 -0600

57 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on the G5

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:33:40 -0500

82 lines

Fortran 95 on the G5

Richard Maine

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:03:33 -0800

55 lines

Re: Fortran 95 on Opteron

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:38:35 -0500

26 lines

Fortran 95 on the G5

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:33:53 -0500

40 lines

Intel Fortran Compilers 8.0 now available

Lionel, Steve

Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:50:17 -0500

80 lines

Suggestions for f03++

Dan Nagle

Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:37:45 -0500

30 lines

Re: Common block names

Dan Nagle

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:02:26 -0500

44 lines

Re: Common block names - (blanks in)

robin

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:40:56 +1000

23 lines

Re: Common block names

Dan Nagle

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:06:35 -0500

55 lines

Re: Common block names

W.J. Metzger

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:41:17 +0100

31 lines

Common block names

Drew McCormack

Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:19:14 +0100

18 lines

Re: [Fwd: [tree-ssa] RPM packages available for branch snapshots]

Toon Moene

Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:14:18 +0100

40 lines

Re: [Fwd: [tree-ssa] RPM packages available for branch snapshots]

Renchi Raju

Sat, 29 Nov 2003 09:28:41 -0600

25 lines

Re: [Fwd: [tree-ssa] RPM packages available for branch snapshots]

Toon Moene

Sat, 29 Nov 2003 16:16:59 +0100

26 lines

Re: [Fwd: [tree-ssa] RPM packages available for branch snapshots]

Al Greynolds

Sat, 29 Nov 2003 08:11:42 -0700

29 lines

[Fwd: [tree-ssa] RPM packages available for branch snapshots]

Toon Moene

Thu, 27 Nov 2003 21:40:02 +0100

112 lines

Fortran Resources (November)

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:48:14 +0100

717 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (December)

Z Zhou

Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:29:19 -0000

80 lines

Fortran Forum (December)

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:46:25 +0100

61 lines

Compiler diagnostics error

Laurent Debreu

Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:04:05 +0100

33 lines

DCABES2004 First Call for Papers

Choi-Hong Lai

Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:44:05 +0000

271 lines

Re: allocatable array of pointers within a structure?

Catherine Moroney

Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:37:20 -0800

145 lines

Re: allocatable array of pointers within a structure?

Alvaro Fernandez

Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:19:08 -0600

92 lines

Re: allocatable array of pointers within a structure?

Renchi Raju

Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:26:36 -0600

72 lines

allocatable array of pointers within a structure?

Richard Maine

Tue, 4 Nov 2003 12:25:54 -0800

65 lines

allocatable array of pointers within a structure?

Catherine Moroney

Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:46:05 -0800

57 lines

Official ANSI public comment period for Fortran 2003

<>

Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:05:24 -0700

42 lines

Re: Canadian comments on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft

Rob James

Fri, 24 Oct 2003 18:34:58 -0400

27 lines

Canadian comments on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft

Rob James

Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:42:05 -0400

28 lines

UK comment on Fortran 2003 Final Committee Draft

David Muxworthy

Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:29:19 +0100

68 lines

Re: Invitation to comment on Final Committee Draft for Fortran 2003

Ian Chivers

Sat, 18 Oct 2003 16:40:19 +0100

31 lines

Re: Invitation to comment on Final Committee Draft for Fortran 2003

Richard Maine

Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:22:04 -0700

37 lines

Re: Invitation to comment on Final Committee Draft for Fortran 2003

Ian Chivers

Fri, 17 Oct 2003 16:31:05 +0100

106 lines

Invitation to comment on Final Committee Draft for Fortran 2003

<>

Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:38:46 -0700

56 lines

New coco 1.26

Dan Nagle

Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:01:59 -0400

41 lines

New coco 1.25

Dan Nagle

Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:44:36 -0400

55 lines

New coco & Make_pm

Dan Nagle

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:14:58 -0400

65 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:06:19 -0400

46 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Paul J. Nikolai

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:36:04 -0400

31 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

J.L.Schonfelder

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:27:42 +0100

36 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Phillip Helbig

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 08:56:30 +0100

13 lines

Re: spam problem

José Rui Faustino de Sousa

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:20:37 +0100

63 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:17:05 -0400

58 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Richard Maine

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:12:08 -0700

40 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Phillip Helbig

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:01:32 +0100

42 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:59:39 -0400

45 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Phillip Helbig

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:53:09 +0100

39 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Phillip Helbig

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:44:02 +0100

20 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Phillip Helbig

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:38:40 +0100

32 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Richard Maine

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:16:58 -0700

28 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:52:53 -0700

41 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:45:30 -0400

29 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

John A. Turner

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:51:08 -0600

29 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Richard Maine

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:18:01 -0700

21 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:05:05 -0500

29 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Lionel, Steve

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:16:41 -0400

14 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Herbert Fruechtl

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:01:23 +0100

154 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Ian Chivers

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:44:02 +0100

87 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (September)/spam problem

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:16:21 +0200

37 lines

Fortran Resources (September)

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:40:51 +0200

713 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

David LaFrance-Linden

Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:24:08 -0400

55 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:17:25 -0400

29 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

David LaFrance-Linden

Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:07:22 -0400

84 lines

Re: DTNURBS

Jan van Oosterwijk

Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:51:15 +0300

62 lines

DTNURBS

GianLuigi Piacentini

Sat, 20 Sep 2003 13:39:48 +0000

25 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

Daniel Grimwood

Sat, 20 Sep 2003 08:43:01 +0800

43 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

David LaFrance-Linden

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:08:39 -0400

28 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:47:32 -0400

125 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

Daniel Grimwood

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:44:30 +0800

75 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

Paul J. Nikolai

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:57:22 -0400

71 lines

Re: file operations

Ian Bush

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:57:20 +0000

36 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

<>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:49:49 -0700

46 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

<>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:23:04 -0700

24 lines

file operations

Richard Maine

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:04:29 -0700

53 lines

Re: file operations

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:01:41 +0100

45 lines

Re: file operations

Catherine Moroney

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:00:30 -0700

57 lines

file operations

Xiaogang Wang

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:53:38 -0400

39 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:27:32 -0400

43 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

Richard Maine

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:17:16 -0700

75 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:10:50 +0100

55 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

Lionel, Steve

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:43:03 -0400

45 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:31:28 -0400

23 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

Dick Hendrickson

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:56:47 -0500

29 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

David LaFrance-Linden

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:20:58 -0400

38 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:06:48 -0400

24 lines

Re: Extends keyword in F2k

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:54:38 -0400

43 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

Popa, Frank D.

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 06:34:51 -0400

55 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

Volker Typke

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:30:59 +0200

73 lines

Extends keyword in F2k

Daniel Grimwood

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:17:51 +0800

55 lines

Re: Weird loss of precision

Tim Prince

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:50:16 -0700

34 lines

Weird loss of precision

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:26:25 -0400

46 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:26:39 +0100

39 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Craig Dedo

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:47:26 -0500

110 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

James Giles

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:44:08 -0600

34 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Richard Maine

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:13:45 -0700

42 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Xiaogang Wang

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:58:05 -0400

56 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Richard Maine

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:25:47 -0700

69 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Craig Dedo

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:23:16 -0500

79 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:08:09 +0100

38 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Clive Page

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:02:14 +0100

25 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:00:28 +0100

33 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Clive Page

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:55:41 +0100

25 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:20:40 +0100

57 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

David Hitchin

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:18:55 +0100

28 lines

Re: skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:14:00 +0200

36 lines

skip records reading SEQUENTIAL and UNFORMATTED file

Xiaogang Wang

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:04:02 -0400

60 lines

Re: long character strings and SGI MIPS compiler

Harry R Millwater

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:20:41 -0500

42 lines

Re: long character strings and SGI MIPS compiler

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 23:53:39 -0400

83 lines

Re: long character strings and SGI MIPS compiler

Tim Prince

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:12:38 -0700

36 lines

long character strings and SGI MIPS compiler

Catherine Moroney

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:23:01 -0700

32 lines

Re: MPI non-blocking messages in Fortran

Jing Guo

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:00:09 -0400

109 lines

Re: MPI non-blocking messages in Fortran

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:48:25 -0400

30 lines

Re: MPI non-blocking messages in Fortran

Stuart Midgley

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:34:47 +1000

94 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:32:01 +0200

15 lines

MPI non-blocking messages in Fortran

Bertrand Meltz

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:48:26 +0200

66 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Tim Prince

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:20:38 -0700

40 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Daniel Grimwood

Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:01:15 +0800

36 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Dan Nagle

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:24:09 -0400

39 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Pope, Beverly (BKPope)

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:53:14 -0500

74 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Richard Maine

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:27:58 -0700

19 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Dan Nagle

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:22:11 -0400

37 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Dan Nagle

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:19:19 -0400

42 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp

Harry R Millwater

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:12:47 -0500

64 lines

Re: fpp vs. cpp vs. CoCo

Craig Dedo

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:49:42 -0500

38 lines

Re: XML parser in Fortran (a little off-topic?)

Harry R Millwater

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:25:51 -0500

177 lines

fpp vs. cpp

Harry R Millwater

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:17:29 -0500

13 lines

Jennifer O'Connor is out of the office until Sept.8/03

Jennifer O'Connor

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 04:37:33 -0400

14 lines

Re: Buffering

Anthony Stone

Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:24:32 +0100

38 lines

Re: Buffering

James Giles

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:53:36 -0600

36 lines

Re: Buffering

Dan Nagle

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:30:19 -0400

41 lines

Re: Buffering

James Giles

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:44:27 -0600

43 lines

Re: Buffering

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:15:22 -0400

29 lines

Re: Buffering

<>

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:39:59 -0700

41 lines

Re: Buffering

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:35:21 -0400

25 lines

James Giles

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:28:25 -0600

37 lines

Unit zero is stderr?

Van Snyder

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 19:41:37 -0700

22 lines

Re: On Standards (was: FLUSH)

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 19:33:46 -0400

33 lines

Re: minloc function

Glenn Carver

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:55:35 +0100

26 lines

Re: minloc function

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:44:24 -0400

27 lines

minloc function

Glenn Carver

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:21:58 +0100

36 lines

On Standards (was: FLUSH)

James Giles

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:26:59 -0600

45 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

James Giles

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 12:42:28 -0600

34 lines

Re: Mail vs. News about Fortran

José Rui Faustino de Sousa

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:48:36 +0100

79 lines

Re: Mail vs. News about Fortran

Craig Dedo

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:09:55 -0500

57 lines

Re: Mail vs. News about Fortran

Richard Maine

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:56:22 -0700

39 lines

Mail vs. News about Fortran

Richard Maine

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:48:10 -0700

61 lines

Re: Mail vs. News about Fortran

Craig Dedo

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:46:00 -0500

82 lines

Re: Mail vs. News about Fortran

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:42:16 -0400

47 lines

Mail vs. News about Fortran

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:22:20 +0200

33 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Richard Maine

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:04:17 -0700

27 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Craig Dedo

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:47:38 -0500

97 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:44:01 -0400

64 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Lionel, Steve

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:59:52 -0400

24 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:25:07 -0400

29 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:23:48 -0400

25 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Joerg Stiller

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:28:52 +0000

56 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Daniel Grimwood

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:24:37 +0800

37 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Ted Stern

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:15:26 -0700

52 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Daniel Grimwood

Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:45:05 +0800

43 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Bill Long

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:22:38 -0500

31 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

James Giles

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:42:23 -0600

31 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:25:46 -0400

25 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Craig Dedo

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:24:52 -0500

72 lines

Re: Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

James Giles

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:17:04 -0600

39 lines

Standard Fortran FLUSH command?

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:04:02 -0400

32 lines

Re: variable length arrays

celevic

Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:40:58 +0100

43 lines

Re: variable length arrays

<>

Sun, 24 Aug 2003 12:01:07 -0600

77 lines

Re: variable length arrays

Alvaro Fernandez

Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:07:08 -0500

116 lines

Re: variable length arrays

Peter Shenkin

Sun, 24 Aug 2003 07:41:57 -0400

67 lines

Re: variable length arrays

Michael Metcalf

Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:20:19 +0200

39 lines

variable length arrays

celevic

Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:07:16 +0100

30 lines

Re: variable length arrays

Jan van Oosterwijk

Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:38:27 +0300

61 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Loren P Meissner

Sat, 23 Aug 2003 12:36:46 -0700

67 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Alberto Fasso'

Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:43:25 -0700

41 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

celevic

Fri, 22 Aug 2003 20:56:39 +0100

20 lines

Re: about global variables

robin

Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:10:40 +1000

30 lines

Schonfelder's Web site

J.L.Schonfelder

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:04:51 +0100

30 lines

Re: integral of complex functions

celevic

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 19:34:30 +0100

21 lines

Re: integral of complex functions

Ted Stern

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:08:45 -0700

39 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

SUBSCRIBE COMP-FORTRAN-90 celevic

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:50:58 +0100

13 lines

integral of complex functions

celevic

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:48:06 +0100

38 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Alois Steindl

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:03:29 +0200

35 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

celevic

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:49:11 +0100

71 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

SUBSCRIBE COMP-FORTRAN-90 celevic

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:35:26 +0100

79 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Van Snyder

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:27:30 -0700

78 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:50:53 -0400

104 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

SUBSCRIBE COMP-FORTRAN-90 celevic

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 01:47:15 +0100

54 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Ron Sverdlove

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:24:39 -0400

73 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

SUBSCRIBE COMP-FORTRAN-90 celevic

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:18:37 +0100

60 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:14:36 -0400

20 lines

Re: about global variables...I suppose

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:12:29 -0400

38 lines

about global variables...I suppose

SUBSCRIBE COMP-FORTRAN-90 celevic

Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:58:22 +0100

37 lines

Re: May I join this list?

Paddy O'Brien

Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:49:41 +1000

56 lines

May I join this list?

Alan Miller

Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:06:49 +1000

48 lines

Bond pricing functions in Fortran

Jean Vezina

Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:33:30 -0400

25 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Tim Prince

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 20:10:59 -0700

49 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Tim Prince

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 19:32:09 -0700

23 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Richard Maine

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:44:39 -0700

42 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

dsmith

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:32:39 -0700

46 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Richard Maine

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:10:29 -0700

57 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Richard Maine

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:55:26 -0700

98 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:54:44 -0400

25 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

dsmith

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:42:31 -0700

34 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:31:42 -0400

42 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Drew McCormack

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 19:13:19 +0200

47 lines

Re: Fw: New ISO_VARYING_STRING implementation (without memory leaks)

Richard Maine

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:09:34 -0700

52 lines

Re: Fw: New ISO_VARYING_STRING implementation (without memory leaks)

Jing Guo

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:47:22 -0400

96 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Richard Maine

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 08:00:41 -0700

75 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

James Giles

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:56:09 -0600

43 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Hargraves Gary

Thu, 14 Aug 2003 16:20:46 +1000

120 lines

Re: Empty derived types

Richard Maine

Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:43:26 -0700

49 lines

Re: Empty derived types

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:24:36 -0400

24 lines

Empty derived types

Richard Maine

Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:20:44 -0700

35 lines

Re: Empty derived types

Dick Hendrickson

Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:18:08 -0500

29 lines

Empty derived types

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:06:24 -0400

20 lines

Fw: New ISO_VARYING_STRING implementation (without memory leaks)

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:07:42 +0200

78 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier

Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:36:54 +0200

12 lines

Re: openmp question

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer

Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:45:21 +0100

40 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

Tim Prince

Sat, 9 Aug 2003 00:10:08 -0700

27 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

Tim Prince

Sat, 9 Aug 2003 00:05:59 -0700

41 lines

openmp question

Harry R Millwater

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:16:54 -0500

101 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

<>

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 12:01:25 -0400

27 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

Richard Maine

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 08:31:59 -0700

28 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

<>

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:23:39 -0400

18 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:52:10 -0400

43 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

<>

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:50:36 -0400

25 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

Tim Prince

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:06:22 -0700

31 lines

Re: Memory allocation

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:35:18 -0400

26 lines

Re: Memory allocation

Peter Steinle

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 07:31:33 +1000

56 lines

Memory allocation

Richard Maine

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:04:37 -0700

42 lines

Re: Memory allocation

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:47:53 -0400

26 lines

Memory allocation

Peter Steinle

Fri, 8 Aug 2003 06:34:32 +1000

21 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

<>

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:18:31 -0400

49 lines

Re: gdb support for F90

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:02:51 -0400

26 lines

gdb support for F90

David LaFrance-Linden

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:56:58 -0400

37 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:44:45 -0400

25 lines

obscure fortran features

Richard Maine

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 08:02:59 -0700

77 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Lionel, Steve

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:00:52 -0400

34 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Drew McCormack

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:52:47 +0200

43 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Volker Typke

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:43:08 +0200

84 lines

Re: obscure fortran features

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 10:12:01 -0400

55 lines

obscure fortran features

Drew McCormack

Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:00:40 +0200

56 lines

PUBLIC/PRIVATE Types

Richard Maine

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:47:32 -0700

70 lines

Re: PUBLIC/PRIVATE Types

Norman Clerman

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:43:13 -0400

59 lines

PUBLIC/PRIVATE Types

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:24:46 -0400

44 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

Dan Nagle

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:04:17 -0400

22 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

P Suckling

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:46:18 +0100

29 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

Richard Maine

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 08:33:36 -0700

36 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

Brian Hanson

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:19:57 -0400

42 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

<>

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:10:32 -0400

28 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

James Giles

Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:59:23 -0600

27 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

Hargraves Gary

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:05:54 +1000

90 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules (thread 2)

Colin Millar

Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:51:40 +0100

49 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules

Richard Maine

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:14:44 -0700

65 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:28:40 -0400

78 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules

Richard Maine

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:26:18 -0700

32 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:37:42 -0400

73 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:10:23 -0400

53 lines

Modules USEing modules

Richard Maine

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:27:56 -0700

35 lines

Re: Modules USEing modules

Craig Dedo

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:10:05 -0500

102 lines

Modules USEing modules

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:50:22 -0400

15 lines

Re: pointer argument problems with IFC

William Nicholson

Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:25:59 -0700

32 lines

Re: pointer argument problems with IFC

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:02:22 -0400

26 lines

pointer argument problems with IFC

William Nicholson

Thu, 10 Jul 2003 08:47:48 -0700

62 lines

Re: Intel 8.0 and LIBC 2.3

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:27:57 -0400

22 lines

Re: Intel 8.0 and LIBC 2.3

Kenneth Ayers

Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:09:47 -0400

54 lines

Intel 8.0 and LIBC 2.3

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:03:16 -0400

42 lines

Flipping and integer

Stenson Matthew

Mon, 7 Jul 2003 18:13:17 +1000

25 lines

Re: Flipping an integer

R. A. Vowels

Sat, 5 Jul 2003 10:06:48 +1000

21 lines

Re: Flipping an integer

R. A. Vowels

Sat, 5 Jul 2003 00:48:04 +1000

49 lines

Re: Flipping an integer

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer

Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:12:27 +0100

26 lines

Re: Flipping an integer

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:28:33 +0200

54 lines

Re: Flipping an integer

Alistair Mills

Fri, 4 Jul 2003 11:53:12 +0100

69 lines

Re: Flipping an integer

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 4 Jul 2003 11:39:04 +0200

56 lines

Flipping an integer

Stenson Matthew

Fri, 4 Jul 2003 12:07:29 +1000

30 lines

Re: Formatted read

Russell, Richard

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 09:52:09 -0400

63 lines

Re: Formatted read

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:55:10 +0100

46 lines

Re: Formatted read

Russell, Richard

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 08:36:13 -0400

37 lines

Re: Formatted read

Russell, Richard

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 08:00:35 -0400

92 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 03:47:46 +0200

11 lines

Formatted read

Stenson Matthew

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 09:36:43 +1000

42 lines

Re: Default initialization of local variables

Lionel, Steve

Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:50:34 -0700

30 lines

Default initialization of local variables

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 1 Jul 2003 16:31:43 -0400

39 lines

Re: Intel compiler for Academia

Lionel, Steve

Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:14:00 -0700

32 lines

Re: Intel compiler for Academia

Paul Stevenson

Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:11:13 +0100

24 lines

Intel compiler for Academia

Harry R Millwater

Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:00:40 -0500

14 lines

Fortran Forum (August)

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:50:50 +0200

66 lines

Re: Announcement: IBM XL Fortran new releases

Drew McCormack

Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:49:09 +0200

50 lines

Re: CONTAINS

Paddy O'Brien

Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:04:29 +1000

164 lines

Re: CONTAINS

Phillip Helbig

Sun, 29 Jun 2003 11:42:21 +0100

69 lines

CONTAINS

Paddy O'Brien

Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:32:00 +1000

75 lines

Re: Complex root

R. A. Vowels

Sat, 28 Jun 2003 00:05:29 +1000

20 lines

Announcement: IBM XL Fortran new releases

Yin Zhu

Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:58:53 -0400

34 lines

Re: Complex root

James Giles

Wed, 25 Jun 2003 22:43:31 -0600

22 lines

Re: Complex root

R. A. Vowels

Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:57:40 +1000

41 lines

Re: Complex root

Richard Maine

Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:12:33 -0700

69 lines

Re: Complex root

Giuseppe Panei

Mon, 23 Jun 2003 18:58:55 +0200

61 lines

Re: Complex root

R. A. Vowels

Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:49:02 +1000

41 lines

Re: Complex root

Giuseppe Panei

Mon, 23 Jun 2003 09:26:00 +0200

65 lines

Recursive external/internal IO

Richard Maine

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 14:02:10 -0700

31 lines

Recursive external/internal IO

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:51:44 -0400

22 lines

Re: Complex root

Craig Dedo

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:50:15 -0500

386 lines

Complex root

Richard Maine

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:45:12 -0700

44 lines

Complex root

Giuseppe Panei

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 17:21:03 +0200

263 lines

Re: Pointer as actual for INTENT(OUT)

Daniel Grimwood

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:57:02 +0800

33 lines

Re: Pointer as actual for INTENT(OUT)

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:12:16 -0400

25 lines

Re: Pointer as actual for INTENT(OUT)

Daniel Grimwood

Fri, 20 Jun 2003 06:55:10 +0800

26 lines

Pointer as actual for INTENT(OUT)

Richard Maine

Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:50:56 -0700

37 lines

Pointer as actual for INTENT(OUT)

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 19 Jun 2003 18:33:00 -0400

49 lines

Advice on naming an operation

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:26:21 -0400

33 lines

Re: File opened with ACTION='WRITE'

Craig Dedo

Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:25:31 -0500

99 lines

Re: Compiler error anomaly

Lionel, Steve

Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:20:25 -0700

25 lines

Compiler error anomaly

Colin Millar

Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:17:24 +0100

46 lines

File opened with ACTION='WRITE'

Al Greynolds

Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:50:09 -0700

13 lines

Re: virtual fortran

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:06:02 +0200

38 lines

Erich Kreiselmaier/CHBAD01/Power/ALSTOM is out of the office.

Erich Kreiselmaier

Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:33:14 +0200

11 lines

virtual fortran

Doug Moncur

Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:00:16 +0100

17 lines

Re: Print real with 'I' format

robin

Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:11:37 +1000

29 lines

Re: Justification in IO

Richard Maine

Fri, 13 Jun 2003 07:48:59 -0700

44 lines

Print real with 'I' format

Russell, Richard

Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:06:11 -0400

46 lines

Re: Justification in IO

Clive Page

Fri, 13 Jun 2003 09:19:58 +0100

32 lines

Re: Justification in IO

Craig Dedo

Thu, 12 Jun 2003 16:54:13 -0500

47 lines

Justification in IO

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 12 Jun 2003 15:50:16 -0400

18 lines

Re: Fortran interface to FreeGLUT

Norman Clerman

Thu, 12 Jun 2003 14:56:49 -0400

51 lines

Aliasing with USE

Richard Maine

Thu, 12 Jun 2003 09:38:50 -0700

39 lines

Aliasing with USE

P Suckling

Thu, 12 Jun 2003 17:29:08 +0100

19 lines

Re: denormalised number??

Daniel Kidger

Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:08:18 +0100

61 lines

Re: denormalised number??

robin

Thu, 12 Jun 2003 01:51:53 +1000

37 lines

Re: Dublicate specification

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:03:56 +0200

22 lines

Dublicate specification

Rasmus C. Østergaard

Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:02:22 +0100

19 lines

Re: denormalised number??

Phillip Helbig

Tue, 10 Jun 2003 22:40:40 +0100

18 lines

Re: denormalised number??

G.F. Thomas

Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:49:36 -0400

33 lines

Re: denormalised number??

Russell, Richard

Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:35:34 -0400

67 lines

denormalised number??

Harry R Millwater

Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:05:13 -0500

15 lines

Re: Intels Fortran Complier

Rasmus C. Østergaard

Tue, 10 Jun 2003 07:58:01 +0100

13 lines

Re: Intels Fortran Complie

Dimitri Antoniou

Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:39:13 -0400

23 lines

Re: Intels Fortran Complier

Renchi Raju

Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:10:24 -0500

36 lines

Intels Fortran Complier

Rasmus C. Østergaard

Mon, 9 Jun 2003 21:40:22 +0100

35 lines

Fortran interface to FreeGLUT

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 6 Jun 2003 16:35:42 -0400

38 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Richard Maine

Mon, 2 Jun 2003 08:01:22 -0700

61 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Jan van Oosterwijk

Sat, 31 May 2003 18:10:57 +0200

46 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Richard Maine

Fri, 30 May 2003 12:41:58 -0700

97 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Dick Hendrickson

Fri, 30 May 2003 14:38:42 -0500

128 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Renchi Raju

Fri, 30 May 2003 14:19:32 -0500

44 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Alvaro Fernandez

Fri, 30 May 2003 14:09:35 -0500

584 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Richard Maine

Fri, 30 May 2003 12:05:01 -0700

27 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Ted Stern

Fri, 30 May 2003 11:49:59 -0700

37 lines

automatic and optional

Richard Maine

Fri, 30 May 2003 11:40:15 -0700

31 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Richard Maine

Fri, 30 May 2003 11:38:09 -0700

24 lines

automatic and optional

Richard Maine

Fri, 30 May 2003 11:33:57 -0700

88 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Ted Stern

Fri, 30 May 2003 11:28:24 -0700

54 lines

Re: automatic and optional

Renchi Raju

Fri, 30 May 2003 13:14:15 -0500

35 lines

automatic and optional

Alvaro Fernandez

Fri, 30 May 2003 13:09:04 -0400

28 lines

ieee exceptions in F

Giuseppe Panei

Wed, 28 May 2003 17:54:34 +0200

245 lines

Write ghost!

Richard Maine

Tue, 27 May 2003 14:56:31 -0700

80 lines

Re: Write ghost!

Ñåðãåé Íåìíþãèí

Wed, 28 May 2003 01:51:42 +0400

46 lines

Write ghost!

Rasmus C. Østergaard

Tue, 27 May 2003 22:21:48 +0100

30 lines

Re: OpenGL animations of MD

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 27 May 2003 11:05:17 -0400

23 lines

Re: OpenGL animations of MD

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 26 May 2003 15:03:46 -0400

28 lines

OpenGL animations of MD

Aleksandar N. Donev

Sun, 25 May 2003 11:04:15 -0400

36 lines

Travis D Nesmith/BOARD/FRS is out of the office.

<>

Tue, 20 May 2003 08:02:59 -0400

12 lines

Fortran Resources (May)

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 20 May 2003 13:01:39 +0200

700 lines

Re: WHERE and MATMUL combination

P Suckling

Sun, 18 May 2003 07:46:30 +0100

39 lines

Re: WHERE and MATMUL combination

Walt Brainerd

Sat, 17 May 2003 22:20:30 -0700

158 lines

WHERE and MATMUL combination

P Suckling

Sun, 18 May 2003 01:10:44 +0100

130 lines

Re: Generic interface question

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 17 May 2003 12:42:04 -0400

37 lines

Re: Generic interface question

Daniel Grimwood

Sat, 17 May 2003 15:51:29 +0800

34 lines

Re: Generic interface question

John A. Turner

Fri, 16 May 2003 19:39:40 -0600

28 lines

Re: Incorrect CAUTION?

P Suckling

Sat, 17 May 2003 01:11:43 +0100

85 lines

Incorrect CAUTION?

P Suckling

Sat, 17 May 2003 00:57:33 +0100

73 lines

Re: Generic interface question

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 16 May 2003 19:19:03 -0400

51 lines

Re: Generic interface question

Van Snyder

Fri, 16 May 2003 15:54:33 -0700

48 lines

Re: Generic interface question

Renchi Raju

Fri, 16 May 2003 17:52:16 -0500

92 lines

Generic interface question

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 16 May 2003 18:43:59 -0400

36 lines

Inheritance versus embedding in F2x

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 16 May 2003 14:03:59 -0400

104 lines

Re: MPI

Choi-Hong Lai

Fri, 16 May 2003 08:40:08 +0100

71 lines

Re: pointers to array sections

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 16 May 2003 09:37:20 +0200

62 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Hargraves Gary

Fri, 16 May 2003 13:03:09 +1000

140 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Van Snyder

Thu, 15 May 2003 19:43:04 -0700

151 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Hargraves Gary

Fri, 16 May 2003 12:23:32 +1000

91 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Van Snyder

Thu, 15 May 2003 17:31:04 -0700

54 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Loren P Meissner

Thu, 15 May 2003 16:45:11 -0700

35 lines

pointers to array sections

Catherine Moroney

Thu, 15 May 2003 11:01:28 -0700

84 lines

Re: MPI

Joerg Stiller

Thu, 15 May 2003 17:33:45 +0000

74 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Michael Milgram

Thu, 15 May 2003 11:47:51 -0400

418 lines

Re: your views

Glenn Morris

Thu, 15 May 2003 14:40:05 +0100

24 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Daniel Kidger

Thu, 15 May 2003 14:19:26 +0100

392 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Alvaro Fernandez

Thu, 15 May 2003 08:04:17 -0500

431 lines

Re: MPI

Tim Prince

Thu, 15 May 2003 05:25:38 -0700

21 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Giuseppe Panei

Thu, 15 May 2003 10:42:31 +0200

210 lines

MPI

Choi-Hong Lai

Thu, 15 May 2003 08:11:57 +0100

36 lines

Re: Intel compiler on RH9

Tim Prince

Wed, 14 May 2003 23:28:54 -0700

28 lines

Intel compiler on RH9

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 14 May 2003 17:20:58 -0400

36 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 14 May 2003 09:57:53 -0500

167 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Alan Miller

Wed, 14 May 2003 09:19:29 +1000

163 lines

Re: Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Drew McCormack

Tue, 13 May 2003 22:00:59 +0200

119 lines

Slightly OT: Delaunay triangulation

Alvaro Fernandez

Tue, 13 May 2003 13:41:38 -0500

140 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei

Fri, 9 May 2003 18:59:57 +0200

364 lines

Re: your views

Ted Stern

Thu, 8 May 2003 08:26:09 -0700

64 lines

Re: your views

Paddy O'Brien

Thu, 8 May 2003 18:06:49 +1000

63 lines

Re: your views

Paddy O'Brien

Thu, 8 May 2003 17:53:35 +1000

51 lines

Re: Can you call a subroutine with arguments like this?

Richard Maine

Thu, 1 May 2003 12:24:51 -0700

40 lines

Re: Can you call a subroutine with arguments like this?

P Suckling

Thu, 1 May 2003 20:15:26 +0100

35 lines

Can you call a subroutine with arguments like this?

Richard Maine

Thu, 1 May 2003 11:39:23 -0700

119 lines

Can you call a subroutine with arguments like this?

P Suckling

Thu, 1 May 2003 18:59:20 +0100

64 lines

Re: your views

Ted Stern

Thu, 1 May 2003 08:18:03 -0700

50 lines

Re: your views

Tim Prince

Thu, 1 May 2003 06:15:13 -0700

30 lines

Re: your views

Jesper Harder

Thu, 1 May 2003 14:08:52 +0200

24 lines

your views

Ian Chivers

Thu, 1 May 2003 08:57:12 +0100

81 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:01:02 +0200

357 lines

Re: Non-advancing output

Nils Smeds

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:50:56 +0200

54 lines

Re: Non-advancing output

Walt Brainerd

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 08:41:37 -0700

58 lines

Non-advancing output

Richard Maine

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 08:05:15 -0700

75 lines

Non-advancing output

Anthony Stone

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:01:37 +0100

40 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Walt Brainerd

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:23:44 -0700

53 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:15:02 +0200

193 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

W. J. Metzger

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:48:00 +0200

41 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Walt Brainerd

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 19:29:09 -0700

169 lines

Re: Pure (was: Problem with optional in F)

Orville E. Wheeler

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:16:55 -0500

124 lines

Pure (was: Problem with optional in F)

Herbert Fruechtl

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 19:15:41 +0100

121 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:13:01 +0200

62 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

W. J. Metzger

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 19:28:55 +0200

37 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Richard Maine

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:14:03 -0700

28 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:56:14 +0200

86 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Richard Maine

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:33:38 -0700

37 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:31:27 +0200

152 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Renchi Raju

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:04:27 -0500

20 lines

Re: Problem with optional in F

Renchi Raju

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:57:31 -0500

28 lines

Problem with optional in F

Richard Maine

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 08:42:10 -0700

40 lines

Problem with optional in F

Giuseppe Panei

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:10:01 +0200

320 lines

Re: flexible format statements

James Giles

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 08:27:32 -0600

21 lines

Re: flexible format statements

Blackwell, Bennie F

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 07:36:48 -0600

89 lines

Re: flexible format statements

Dennis Dunn

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 13:50:28 +0100

68 lines

Re: USE HOST

Dan Nagle

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:52:37 -0400

103 lines

Re: USE HOST

James Giles

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:10:54 -0600

47 lines

USE HOST

P Suckling

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:30:24 +0100

48 lines

Re: Image processing

robin

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:08:32 +1000

27 lines

Re: Image processing

Michael Milgram

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 08:45:31 -0400

44 lines

Re: Image processing

Jacob =Jouk Jansen

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:59:33 +0200

35 lines

Image processing

Choi-Hong Lai

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 08:58:41 +0100

34 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (April)

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:12:50 +0200

1222 lines

Metcalf et al.

Aldo P. Solari

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 05:19:46 +0100

27 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (April)

Dan Nagle

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:53:02 -0400

50 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (April)

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:17:17 +0200

27 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (April)

Ian Chivers

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 16:48:43 +0100

54 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (April)

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:22:41 +0200

32 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (April)

Tim Prince

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 06:15:44 -0700

47 lines

Fortran Forum (April)

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:46:34 +0200

59 lines

ELEMENTALs (Was: Compiler differences)

Richard Maine

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 11:19:46 -0700

24 lines

ELEMENTALs (Was: Compiler differences)

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:12:26 -0400

413 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Richard Maine

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:39:23 -0700

59 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Alistair Mills

Sat, 5 Apr 2003 00:09:34 +0100

250 lines

Re: Compiler differences

P Suckling

Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:10:28 +0100

402 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:45:23 +0200

53 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 4 Apr 2003 09:17:50 +0200

32 lines

Re: autodependencies of fortran code on include, modules, etc.

Ted Stern

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:37:55 -0800

486 lines

autodependencies of fortran code on include, modules, etc.

Blackwell, Bennie F

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 09:32:13 -0700

159 lines

Re: Compiler differences

P Suckling

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 17:28:59 +0100

165 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 09:03:14 +0200

37 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Richard Maine

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:56:00 -0800

29 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 19:41:06 +0200

40 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:11:35 -0500

83 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:12:38 +0200

49 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:39:22 +0200

53 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Alistair Mills

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:14:38 +0100

92 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Jan van Oosterwijk

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:19:03 +0200

131 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 13:37:07 +0200

39 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Ian Bush

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:11:51 +0000

82 lines

Re: Compiler differences

P Suckling

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:06:11 +0100

19 lines

Re: Compiler differences

W. J. Metzger

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:57:48 +0200

507 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Alistair Mills

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:44:02 +0100

461 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Ian Chivers

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:43:53 +0100

406 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Alistair Mills

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:41:59 +0100

464 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Alistair Mills

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:14:41 +0100

543 lines

Re: Compiler differences

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 20:40:46 +0200

15 lines

Compiler differences

P Suckling

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:19:41 +0100

366 lines

Re: A related question: Derived types and ELEMENTAL procedures

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 17:35:53 +0200

25 lines

Re: A related question: Derived types and ELEMENTAL procedures

Alvaro Fernandez

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 08:57:07 -0600

32 lines

Re: A related question: Derived types and ELEMENTAL procedures

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:14:12 +0200

28 lines

A related question: Derived types and ELEMENTAL procedures

P Suckling

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 00:33:52 +0100

15 lines

Re: Derived types and pointers

P Suckling

Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:35:09 +0100

14 lines

Re: Derived types and pointers

Alistair Mills

Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:10:57 +0100

211 lines

Re: Derived types and pointers

James Giles

Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:30:11 -0700

42 lines

Re: Derived types and pointers

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:21:05 +0200

88 lines

Derived types and pointers

P Suckling

Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:14:50 +0100

89 lines

Re: flexible format statements

robin

Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:20:45 +1000

41 lines

Re: flexible format statements

Dick Hendrickson

Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:13:11 -0600

51 lines

Re: flexible format statements

Nils Smeds

Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:12:31 +0100

17 lines

Re: flexible format statements

Roderick W. Failing III

Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:04:29 -0500

73 lines

Re: flexible format statements

Herbert Fruechtl

Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:01:35 -0000

85 lines

flexible format statements

David Byrne

Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:54:17 +0000

27 lines

Re: Another F95 standard question

Malcolm Cohen

Sun, 23 Mar 2003 16:46:28 +0000

45 lines

Re: Another F95 standard question

Alvaro Fernandez

Sat, 22 Mar 2003 16:07:31 -0600

59 lines

Re: Another F95 standard question

Walt Brainerd

Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:33:16 -0700

176 lines

Another F95 standard question

Alvaro Fernandez

Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:17:11 -0600

363 lines

Re: Standard question about WHERE() - word from vendor

Alvaro Fernandez

Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:42:13 -0600

87 lines

Re: Standard question about WHERE()

Alvaro Fernandez

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:33:45 -0600

69 lines

Re: Standard question about WHERE()

Dick Hendrickson

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:18:55 -0600

55 lines

Re: Standard question about WHERE()

James Giles

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:08:37 -0700

20 lines

Re: Standard question about WHERE()

Craig Dedo

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:01:53 -0600

164 lines

Standard question about WHERE()

Richard Maine

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 11:51:18 -0800

24 lines

Standard question about WHERE()

Alvaro Fernandez

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:45:03 -0600

199 lines

Fortran Resources (March)

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:12:35 +0100

700 lines

cheap student compiler from intel

Ian Chivers

Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:52:11 +0000

30 lines

Re: Code or comiler error?

P Suckling

Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:30:21 +0000

17 lines

Re: Code or Compiler error

Richard Friedman

Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:37:18 -0800

18 lines

Code or Compiler error?

P Suckling

Tue, 11 Mar 2003 02:57:47 +0000

111 lines

Re: F90 parsing routines

Anthony Stone

Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:39:13 +0000

42 lines

Re: Preprocessing situation

Dan Nagle

Sun, 9 Mar 2003 11:08:39 -0500

153 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Jan van Oosterwijk

Sun, 9 Mar 2003 14:07:24 +0200

67 lines

Preprocessing situation

Alvaro Fernandez

Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:18:05 -0600

253 lines

Re: F90 parsing routines

Alistair Mills

Sat, 8 Mar 2003 13:41:54 -0000

97 lines

Re: F90 parsing routines

Anthony Stone

Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:43:55 +0000

63 lines

Re: F90 parsing routines

Alistair Mills

Sat, 8 Mar 2003 06:48:06 -0000

84 lines

Re: System calls within F90

José Rui Faustino de Sousa

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:54:34 -0000

62 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Kurt W Hirchert

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:27:32 -0600

64 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Richard Maine

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:48:16 -0800

46 lines

Re: F90 parsing routines

Anthony Stone

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:38:34 +0000

31 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Dick Hendrickson

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:25:49 -0600

74 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Roland Schilling

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:48:19 +0100

39 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:30:21 +0100

46 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Roland Schilling

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:03:06 +0100

50 lines

Re: System calls within F90

Richard Maine

Wed, 5 Mar 2003 08:22:17 -0800

69 lines

Re: Questions concerning FORALL

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:10:06 +0100

39 lines

Questions concerning FORALL

Roland Schilling

Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:34:03 +0100

44 lines

Re: MATMUL for very small matrices

Tim Prince

Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:29:55 -0800

33 lines

MATMUL for very small matrices

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:19:57 -0500

42 lines

Re: System calls within F90

José Rui Faustino de Sousa

Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:32:45 -0000

68 lines

Fortran capabilities

Ian Chivers

Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:05:06 +0000

68 lines

Re: Avoiding loss of precision in formatted IO

Tim Prince

Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:40:31 -0800

56 lines

Re: Avoiding loss of precision in formatted IO

James Giles

Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:03:00 -0700

38 lines

Avoiding loss of precision in formatted IO

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:49:30 -0500

41 lines

Re: ASSOCIATED bug

robin

Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:16:03 +1000

43 lines

ASSOCIATED bug

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 1 Mar 2003 14:32:02 -0500

52 lines

standard question

Richard Maine

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:31:14 -0800

92 lines

Re: standard question

Van Snyder

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:14:59 -0800

66 lines

standard question

James Abeles

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:02:57 -0500

43 lines

MPI over .NET

Yoshihiro Itoh

Sat, 1 Mar 2003 00:52:59 +0900

32 lines

Re: System calls within F90

Tim Prince

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:25:42 -0800

61 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Siamak Lina

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:51:10 -0500

39 lines

System calls within F90

Richard Maine

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:11:30 -0800

80 lines

System calls within F90

Alberto Águeda Maté

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:33:48 +0100

116 lines

Re: NAMELIST

W. J. Metzger

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:21:36 +0100

38 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Yoshihiro Itou

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 01:38:12 +0900

146 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Yoshihiro Itou

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 01:38:11 +0900

86 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Anthony Stone

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:58:29 +0000

78 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Richard Maine

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 07:48:52 -0800

23 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Harry R Millwater

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:50:19 -0600

75 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:35:26 -0500

50 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Anthony Stone

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:58:13 +0000

51 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Richard Maine

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:18:52 -0800

94 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:41:39 -0500

23 lines

Re: NAMELIST order

James Giles

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:38:31 -0700

38 lines

NAMELIST order

Richard Maine

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:23:19 -0800

60 lines

NAMELIST order

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:04:05 -0500

44 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Ian Chivers

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 17:16:30 +0000

130 lines

Re: FEM2DLib

Marco A. Garcia

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:58:27 +0400

81 lines

[ pointers to code /dyn. systems, etc. ] [24/02/2003 - 4:25 GMT]

Aldo P. Solari

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 04:37:34 +0000

26 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Tim Prince

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:08:37 -0800

69 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Jeffrey B. Layton

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 12:13:41 -0500

64 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

besus

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 02:03:25 +0900

45 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

besus

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 01:57:05 +0900

37 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Tim Prince

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 07:44:38 -0800

36 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Jeffrey B. Layton

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 07:41:09 -0500

31 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Tim Prince

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 22:27:38 -0800

69 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Nils Smeds

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:11:13 -0600

37 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Tim Prince

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:23:28 -0800

39 lines

Re: Subroutines as arguments

Van Snyder

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:31:45 -0800

53 lines

Re: Subroutines as arguments

Anthony Stone

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:05:57 +0000

30 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

besus

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 01:25:49 +0900

94 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Edward Osei

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:25:19 -0600

166 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

besus

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 00:57:26 +0900

138 lines

Re: mpi

besus

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 00:57:25 +0900

44 lines

Re: Subroutines as arguments

Richard Maine

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 07:39:56 -0800

47 lines

Re: Subroutines as arguments

Toby White

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:08:56 +0000

37 lines

Subroutines as arguments

Anthony Stone

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:51:09 +0000

48 lines

Re: Backspace and file position.

Hargraves Gary

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:12:14 +1000

99 lines

Re: mpi

Tim Zeisloft

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:00:19 -0800

30 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Edward Osei

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:41:22 -0600

107 lines

Re: mpi over .NET ?

Daniel Kidger

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:05:19 -0000

78 lines

Re: mpi

besus

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 00:42:56 +0900

55 lines

Re: Backspace and file position.

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:13:49 +0100

62 lines

Backspace and file position.

Colin Millar

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:13:53 -0000

44 lines

Re: Some people may be interested.

<>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:50:52 -0500

15 lines

Re: Some people may be interested.

Kurt W Hirchert

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:46:17 -0600

21 lines

Re: Some people may be interested.

P Suckling

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:43:55 +0000

32 lines

Re: Some people may be interested.

<>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:43:51 -0500

19 lines

Re: Some people may be interested.

Richard Maine

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:33:48 -0800

24 lines

Re: Some people may be interested.

Dan Nagle

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:11:48 -0500

56 lines

Some people may be interested.

Ian Chivers

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:07:31 +0000

50 lines

About parallel mesh generation and solving equations

Jacques Brancher

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 06:28:45 -0300

21 lines

Re: Quartic equations

Cezar Diaconu

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:31:29 +0900

407 lines

Re: mpi

Simon Clarke

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:54:50 +1100

28 lines

Re: mpi

Chun-Ho LIU

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 03:46:39 +0800

75 lines

Re: mpi

Harry R Millwater

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:04:16 -0600

43 lines

Re: mpi

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:51:44 +0000

45 lines

Molecular dynamics libraries

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:42:28 -0500

21 lines

thanks for comments on setting precision in F90!!

Blackwell, Bennie F

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:30:02 -0700

14 lines

Re: mpi

Tim Prince

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 07:22:43 -0800

32 lines

Re: Quartic equations

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:57:56 -0500

39 lines

Re: mpi

Feyzi Inanc

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:57:06 -0600

49 lines

Re: mpi

Herbert Fruechtl

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:56:40 -0000

66 lines

mpi

Ian Chivers

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:24:07 +0000

34 lines

Re: Quartic equations

Paddy O'Brien

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:54:40 +1100

79 lines

Re: Quartic equations

Alan Miller

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:11:29 +1100

36 lines

Re: Quick Poll Regarding Fortran Documentation

Samuel H. Dupree, Jr.

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:44:26 -0500

239 lines

Quick Poll Regarding Fortran Documentation

J.A. O'Connor

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:12:46 -0500

35 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Dan Nagle

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:11:43 -0500

98 lines

Re: Quartic equations

Michael Milgram

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:39:17 -0500

55 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

zhongfu zhou

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:24:28 +0000

64 lines

Re: Quartic equations

Daniel Kidger

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:14:10 -0000

49 lines

Quartic equations

Aleksandar N. Donev

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:14:40 -0500

20 lines

NAMELISTs for variable lengths

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:55:13 -0500

51 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Van Snyder

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:52:10 -0800

102 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Bill Long

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:46:34 -0600

269 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:54:52 -0600

623 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Dan Nagle

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:23:29 -0500

74 lines

preferred way of setting precision in F90

Richard Maine

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:57:07 -0800

50 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:16:11 +0100

168 lines

Re: AW: performance-test

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:12:43 -0500

27 lines

AW: performance-test

Martens Uwe PG I

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:09:14 +0100

38 lines

Re: preferred way of setting precision in F90

Herbert Fruechtl

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:58:32 -0000

112 lines

preferred way of setting precision in F90

Blackwell, Bennie F

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:33:00 -0700

141 lines

Re: performance-test

Lionel, Steve

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 05:40:46 -0800

33 lines

performance-test

Martens Uwe PG I

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:40:39 +0100

110 lines

Re: recursive write

Richard Maine

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:08:04 -0800

30 lines

Re: recursive write

Smith, David

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:58:56 -0800

24 lines

Re: recursive write

Alistair Mills

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:36:47 -0000

75 lines

recursive write

Richard Maine

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:29:44 -0800

29 lines

recursive write

Smith, David

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:58:34 -0800

37 lines

Re: character issue

robin

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:05:39 +1000

45 lines

Re: deallocate list

robin

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:05:39 +1000

30 lines

Re: character issue

Dick Hendrickson

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:44:00 -0600

60 lines

Re: character issue

Van Snyder

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:44:50 -0800

50 lines

character issue

Y.K. ZHOU

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:29:19 -0800

46 lines

Thanks for the wonderful reply for the deallocate list.

Junchao Xia

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:47:50 -0500

28 lines

Re: deallocate list

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:45:14 +0000

31 lines

Re: deallocate list

Anthony Stone

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:33:07 +0000

43 lines

Re: deallocate list

Alvaro Fernandez

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:28:32 -0600

91 lines

Re: deallocate list

Richard Maine

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:20:25 -0800

33 lines

Re: deallocate list

Craig Dedo

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:07:55 -0600

158 lines

Re: deallocate list

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:04:24 -0500

66 lines

Re: deallocate list

Catherine Moroney

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:02:46 -0800

80 lines

Re: deallocate list

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:01:19 -0500

24 lines

deallocate list

Junchao Xia

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:46:05 -0500

34 lines

Re: read a binary array by parts

robin

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 00:46:54 +1000

45 lines

Re: read a binary array by parts

Richard Maine

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:15:07 -0800

21 lines

Re: read a binary array by parts

Popa, Frank D.

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:59:46 -0500

33 lines

Re: read a binary array by parts

Kurt W Hirchert

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:36:37 -0600

46 lines

Re: read a binary array by parts

Craig Dedo

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:07:29 -0600

189 lines

read a binary array by parts

Richard Maine

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:45:38 -0800

81 lines

read a binary array by parts

Xiaogang Wang

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:18:24 -0500

58 lines

pthreads from Fortran 2000

Dan Nagle

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:20:10 -0500

48 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 10:54:26 -0500

41 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Van Snyder

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:15:27 -0800

42 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Van Snyder

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:57:17 -0800

76 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Michael Milgram

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:07:50 -0500

47 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Ted Stern

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:53:34 -0800

55 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Dick Hendrickson

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:46:58 -0600

110 lines

Re: Floating-point comparisons

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:10:41 -0500

34 lines

Floating-point comparisons

Richard Maine

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:45:28 -0800

52 lines

Floating-point comparisons

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:26:12 -0500

97 lines

Re: List-directed IO

Lionel, Steve

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 07:23:25 -0800

20 lines

Re: Greater then zero

robin

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 01:18:21 +1000

55 lines

Re: List-directed IO

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:51:54 -0500

52 lines

Re: List-directed IO

Lionel, Steve

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 05:44:55 -0800

37 lines

Re: Greater then zero

Daniel Grimwood

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:31:49 +0800

49 lines

Re: List-directed IO

Van Snyder

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:29:32 -0800

32 lines

Greater then zero

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:44:48 -0500

46 lines

List-directed IO

Richard Maine

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:32:42 -0800

43 lines

List-directed IO

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:15:47 -0500

30 lines

Re: "\" as an escape character

Richard Maine

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:10:33 -0800

47 lines

Re: "\" as an escape character

Lionel, Steve

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:52:24 -0800

18 lines

Re: "\" as an escape character

Roland Schilling

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 18:42:29 +0100

34 lines

Re: "\" as an escape character

Craig Dedo

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:38:47 -0600

155 lines

Re: "\" as an escape character

Herbert Fruechtl

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:24:42 -0000

53 lines

Re: "\" as an escape character

W. J. Metzger

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:15:34 +0100

56 lines

Re: "\" as an escape character

Daniel Kidger

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:12:03 -0000

46 lines

"\" as an escape character

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:02:37 -0500

48 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Van Snyder

Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:43:01 -0800

44 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Nils Smeds

Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:17:57 +0100

54 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Michael Milgram

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:48:35 -0500

126 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Alistair Mills

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 23:34:38 -0000

162 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Andy Leonard

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:52:21 -0600

107 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Alistair Mills

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:27:18 -0000

136 lines

Re: Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Alistair Mills

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:14:05 -0000

291 lines

Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Andy Leonard

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 09:39:04 -0600

97 lines

Performance penalties for allocatable arrays?

Andy Leonard

Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:04:03 +0000

86 lines

Book pre-announcement

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:22:07 +0100

30 lines

Re: Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

Ahmad Mr M

Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:12:03 -0000

63 lines

Re: Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

venkat sastry

Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:04:25 +0000

94 lines

Re: Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

Ahmad Mr M

Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:59:53 -0000

51 lines

Re: Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

Alois Steindl

Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:25:11 +0100

30 lines

Re: Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

Jacques Brancher

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 19:07:05 -0200

37 lines

Calling LAPACK routines on SGI 2000 machine

Ahmad Mr M

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 19:02:53 -0000

24 lines

Re: Compiler-Optimized source code on UltraSPARC-based systems

Richard Maine

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:55:51 -0800

21 lines

Re: Compiler-Optimized source code on UltraSPARC-based systems

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:49:43 -0800

24 lines

Re: Compiler-Optimized source code on UltraSPARC-based systems

Ahmad Mr M

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:44:50 -0000

63 lines

Re: Compiler-Optimized source code on UltraSPARC-based systems

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:39:06 -0800

44 lines

Compiler-Optimized source code on UltraSPARC-based systems

Ahmad Mr M

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:29:38 -0000

23 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (January)

Ian Chivers

Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:20:32 +0000

68 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (January)

George K. Chang

Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:05:12 -0600

36 lines

Fortran Resources (January)

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:37:44 +0100

698 lines

Re: Cascade recompilation with Intel

Anthony Stone

Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:34:04 +0000

41 lines

Re: Cascade recompilation with Intel

Daniel Grimwood

Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:13:37 +0800

40 lines

Re: Cascade recompilation with Intel

Daniel Grimwood

Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:36:54 +0800

67 lines

Cascade recompilation with Intel

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:24:06 -0500

28 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

Richard Maine

Wed, 8 Jan 2003 08:34:59 -0800

30 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

Richard Maine

Wed, 8 Jan 2003 08:27:34 -0800

63 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

John Reid

Wed, 8 Jan 2003 11:42:51 GMT

61 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

James Giles

Wed, 8 Jan 2003 01:19:42 -0700

47 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

David Vowles

Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:19:41 +1030

90 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

David Annetts

Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:05:40 +1100

21 lines

Re: Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

Van Snyder

Tue, 7 Jan 2003 21:52:18 -0800

63 lines

Fortran 95 conformance of two test programs

Jean Vezina

Tue, 7 Jan 2003 22:55:42 -0500

50 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2023
February 2023
November 2022
September 2022
February 2022
January 2022
June 2021
November 2020
September 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
December 2019
October 2019
September 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
April 2015
March 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager