JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


2002


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

!MS$ATTRIBUTES with Intel Fortran (3 messages)
"/" in string input (6 messages)
"no mapping at the fault address" (1 message)
"Volatility" of TARGETs (7 messages)
(SC22WG5.2639) (j3.2002-752) Re: Public comment on Fortran: ISO/IEC CD 1539-1 (2 messages)
/dev/null and scope of UNITs (9 messages)
A trio of philosophical issues (8 messages)
Accessing derived type components (1 message)
Adult content in Fortran list ??? (1 message)
Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments (23 messages)
allocatable and declaration (4 messages)
Allocatable scalars (4 messages)
Allocatable string lengths? (9 messages)
Allocatable strings (2 messages)
Allocated arrays with pointers as arguments (3 messages)
allocating an allocatable in a subroutine (6 messages)
Allocating Derived-Type Data Arrays (6 messages)
Amusing quotation.... (6 messages)
An invitation to vendors on the topic of slow compilation!(with Reply to Alvaro Fernandez and ) (1 message)
Announcement: IBM XL Fortran for AIX V8.1 (1 message)
Announcement: NAGWare f95 Release 4.2 (1 message)
Anyone have a suggestion for optimization software? (5 messages)
April issue of ACM Fortran Forum (2 messages)
Array descriptors (dope vectors) in various compilers? (1 message)
Array Dimension Limits (19 messages)
Array Dimension Limits--CONTAINED optimizations (1 message)
Array I/O question (3 messages)
Array IO question (9 messages)
Array operations on small arrays and efficiency (2 messages)
Array pointer reshaping (2 messages)
Array Sections (2 messages)
Ask for help on a no-replace sampling! (1 message)
Ask for help on ISML Lib. (3 messages)
Ask for help on the global variable of F77/F90 (4 messages)
ask help for effective algorithm for one dimension optimization (1 message)
Automatic deallocation in Fortran 95 (6 messages)
Basic array input question (4 messages)
basic questions (2 messages)
Beating a dead horse (WAS: String syntax in F2x) (8 messages)
behavior of recursive routines (6 messages)
binary file organisation (2 messages)
blas for intel pentium III (3 messages)
blas/lapack perf+reliability (7 messages)
C equivalent of ETIME (7 messages)
C99 standard (9 messages)
Callbacks in FORTRAN (5 messages)
calling a executable program within another program (4 messages)
Can an array element contain another array? (5 messages)
Code documentation software (3 messages)
Commenting on the draft Fortran 2000 standard (1 message)
compiler error (2 messages)
Complex (was double precision constants) (8 messages)
Component of PRIVATE type of a PUBLIC type (2 messages)
computer chip! (2 messages)
Confusion with Where ... (5 messages)
Counting 1-bits -- Why? (1 message)
Counting the number of 1 bits (4 messages)
Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines (11 messages)
Data structure question (2 messages)
deadlock (4 messages)
DEALLOCATING A POINTER (3 messages)
Deallocation problems (5 messages)
Dependencies due to modules (1 message)
Dependencies due to modules (Matveev) (4 messages)
Dependencies due to modules (tricky) (11 messages)
Derived type functions in interfaces (6 messages)
Double precision constants (7 messages)
Dynamic array (1 message)
Dynamic Array Problem with intel compiler (4 messages)
Efficiency of strided arrays (1 message)
eigenvalue problem (3 messages)
Emulation of ISO_C_BINDING in Fortran 95 (1 message)
Encapsulation and access--TRANSFER (1 message)
Encapsulation and access. (17 messages)
Error handling mechanisms (7 messages)
F02GBF subroutine in NAG library (2 messages)
f95 question (4 messages)
FEM2DLib (4 messages)
Find indices of nonzero elements (5 messages)
Find indices of nonzero elements [syntax err] (1 message)
Finding indices (4 messages)
For your amusement: Cray pointers (3 messages)
forall body question (7 messages)
FORTRAN / MATLAB (4 messages)
Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot (11 messages)
Fortran 200X Forum, London, 30/10/02 <fwd> (4 messages)
Fortran Forum (December) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (January) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (July) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (March) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (May) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (November) (2 messages)
Fortran Resources (Sep) (1 message)
Fortran source on a web page (4 messages)
Fortran-aware debuggers? (1 message)
Fortran: an almost obsolete language (2 messages)
free linux non-intel f90 compiler (4 messages)
Function result not assigned (5 messages)
FW: Amusing quotation.... (1 message)
FW: Error handling mechanisms (1 message)
Fw: Migration path of Plot10 and GKS Library to Solaris (2 messages)
Fw: Runtime test programs (10 messages)
Fw: Simple eigenvalue software (1 message)
Fw: Square Brackets in Standard Fortran --> Intervalers are concerned (1 message)
Fw: What is Fortran used for these days? (1 message)
Generic interface with EXTERNAL argument (4 messages)
Generic type constructors (3 messages)
Help needed with array sectioning (6 messages)
Help needed with array sectioning (Also: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components) (1 message)
Help needed with array sectioning: Clarification (1 message)
History (1 message)
how about random generator. (2 messages)
how can I deal with dynamic array? (6 messages)
How can keep the setting of link Lib.? (2 messages)
How many "unit" to connect to an external file? (3 messages)
how to define and value a two-element matrix? (2 messages)
how to link a .a lib (5 messages)
how to realize self-reference? (3 messages)
How to unsubscribe from this list? (2 messages)
IBM 1401 (4 messages)
IDE's for F90 (3 messages)
Implicit TARGET attribute--A bug or not? (5 messages)
Indenting tool? (8 messages)
Input variables at runtime (4 messages)
installing ifc on AMD Athlon (3 messages)
Intel's ifc and cascade compilation (4 messages)
Intent and derived type dummy arguments with pointer components (4 messages)
Intent and derived type dummy arguments with pointercomponents (1 message)
Intent and pointer components: need ref in standard (9 messages)
Interp 125 (Was: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments) (3 messages)
Interp 125, again... (4 messages)
Interp 81 (Was: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments) (1 message)
Interpreting the DATE_AND_TIME Intrinsic Subroutine (3 messages)
Intrinsics and minus zero, part one (1 message)
Intrinsics and minus zero, part three (1 message)
Intrinsics and minus zero, part two (3 messages)
Is this example standard conforming ? (10 messages)
Is this program standard conforming ? (4 messages)
J3 Fortran Standards Committee Approves Floating-Point Functions in Initialization Expressions (2 messages)
Kind values (was: Allocating Derived-Type Data Arrays (1 message)
LAPACK subroutine entry absent in profile - gprof (2 messages)
latest xeon from intel (3 messages)
leaving the list (1 message)
LEX/YACC for FORTRAN (2 messages)
Lf95 formatting problem (2 messages)
linux & f90/f95 (9 messages)
linux & f90/f95 (for Windoze too ?) (6 messages)
Linux largefile support (2 messages)
make with f90 source containing modules (5 messages)
Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again (1 message)
Max rank 7 (3 messages)
Meeting in Vegas (2 messages)
memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subro (2 messages)
memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subroutin (2 messages)
memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subroutines (3 messages)
Memory profiling (4 messages)
mips-tfile error (2 messages)
misaligned variable (2 messages)
mixed TYPES and OVERLOADING (5 messages)
Mixing C and (DEC/Compaq)-Fortran ... (3 messages)
Modules, procedures, and stack storage space. (7 messages)
More on allocatable vs. automatic vs. pointer (1 message)
More on allocatable vs. automatic vs. pointer arrays (3 messages)
More on automatic vs. allocatable vs. pointer (3 messages)
More on dummy arguments with target attribute (4 messages)
More on slow compilation! (5 messages)
moving code from IBM to Intel systems (2 messages)
Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components (17 messages)
Multiplying by powers of two (2 messages)
Munkres (6 messages)
NAG runtime setup: quick question (1 message)
Nested Modules [was:Re: Runtime error in Forte compiled program] (1 message)
Non-determinism in the FORALL Construct (4 messages)
novice allocatable array question (5 messages)
Off topic: Linux.. (was Re: linux & f90/f95) (1 message)
Optimizing the code in Fortran 90 (4 messages)
Order of declarations for EXTENSIBLE types (2 messages)
OT: Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components (1 message)
Parametrized data-types as dummies (7 messages)
Parent component in extended types (1 message)
Passing array between subroutines (6 messages)
Passing one-dimensional array sections to subroutines (1 message)
passing strings between C and Fortran (7 messages)
Passive one-dimensional array sections to subroutines (10 messages)
Passive RMA, F90 and MPI_ALLOC_MEM (4 messages)
pb with parameter initialised in module (8 messages)
PC Fortran Compilers (3 messages)
PDF version of Fortran 2000 draft (8 messages)
performance (again): assumed vs explicit shape (7 messages)
Please ignore message (1 message)
pointers and function calls (19 messages)
poor Performance of F90-code (12 messages)
Portability Project Update (1 message)
Problem with ALLOCATABLE components (3 messages)
Problem with ALLOCATABLE components (corrected) (1 message)
Problem with ALLOCATABLE components (further corrected) (2 messages)
problem with Dec-Alpha Fortran 90 v5.1 (2 messages)
Problem/question with types & operators (3 messages)
Procedure dummy argement? (7 messages)
Question about "allocate" vs. automatic arrays (9 messages)
quick conformance question (5 messages)
read fortran binary files from a different unix (4 messages)
Reading Indexed (ISAM) Files (Was: binary file organisation) (4 messages)
REAL initialization expressions (13 messages)
Reason for dbx to abnormally terminate (1 message)
reshape in declaration: ANSI compliant ? (2 messages)
Run Time error - FORTE DEV 6U2 (2 messages)
Run time error in SUN FORTEDEV_V6.2 compiler f90 (10 messages)
Runtime error in Forte compiled program (10 messages)
Runtime error in Forte compiled program - Contd (3 messages)
Runtime test programs (2 messages)
scale factor (9 messages)
scale factor (resend) (1 message)
Scanning two B-Trees at the same time (2 messages)
Secret array descriptor (4 messages)
Select case ... (2 messages)
SEQUENCE types and C struct interop (1 message)
Should Fortran have been made more low-level? (10 messages)
Should Fortran have been made more low-level? (long, and morose) (14 messages)
Should Fortran have been made more low-level? (long,and morose) (2 messages)
significance (9 messages)
Simple eigenvalue software (4 messages)
simulated annealing. (3 messages)
Slow compilation! (6 messages)
Slow compilation! (reply to Peter Shenkin) (7 messages)
Solver software query (5 messages)
Something for textbook writers to worry about (3 messages)
SOURCE= in ALLOCATE (1 message)
sparse matrices -- library in fortran? (4 messages)
standard conformance of a TRANSFER (5 messages)
Still Cannot Allocate Derived Type Data Component (3 messages)
String syntax in F2x (6 messages)
Strings versus array characters (MakeCharacterPointer) (3 messages)
Strings versus array characters for internal files (13 messages)
Subscriptions to ACM Fortran Forum (2 messages)
Summary: Error handling (1 message)
Test (1 message)
Testing (1 message)
The modules that are to be DLL's (1 message)
The New Features of Fortran 2000 (Fortran Forum) (2 messages)
The next standard (3 messages)
Thread-safety in profiling (1 message)
Travis D Nesmith/RS-MA/FRBOG/US is out of the office. (2 messages)
Unit number inquiry (2 messages)
Unit numbers (1 message)
Unrolling (1 message)
Use "end" to signify last element (3 messages)
use of where to replace code (4 messages)
What's up with G95? (4 messages)
WHERE in FORALL (7 messages)
which compile command should I use? (7 messages)
Which compiler for winXX and future? (2 messages)
Why octal (6 messages)
Working with DLL's (1 message)
write formats (5 messages)
WRITE(*, *) derived data type (1 message)
write(*,*) derived data type (1 message)
writing long strings to standard out (7 messages)
XML parser in Fortran (9 messages)
XML parser in Fortran (a little off-topic?) (3 messages)
XML Parsing (1 message)
Yin Zhu/Toronto/IBM is out of the office. (1 message)
zero length array (2 messages)
[Announcement] Compilation Cascade (2 messages)
[Fwd: More on automatic vs. allocatable vs. pointer] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

!MS$ATTRIBUTES with Intel Fortran

!MS$ATTRIBUTES with Intel Fortran

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:35:55 -0500

65 lines

Re: !MS$ATTRIBUTES with Intel Fortran

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:02:42 -0700

26 lines

Re: !MS$ATTRIBUTES with Intel Fortran

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:58:18 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

"/" in string input

"/" in string input

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jul 2002 12:58:31 -0500

21 lines

Re: "/" in string input

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:21:50 +0100

30 lines

Re: "/" in string input

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:30:27 -0700

29 lines

Re: "/" in string input

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jul 2002 13:25:03 -0500

19 lines

Re: "/" in string input

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:51:54 -0700

30 lines

Re: "/" in string input

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:48:17 +1000

57 lines

New Thread

"no mapping at the fault address"

"no mapping at the fault address"

Suresh Seetharam <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:15:25 GMT0BST

77 lines

New Thread

"Volatility" of TARGETs

"Volatility" of TARGETs

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:22:37 -0500

55 lines

"Volatility" of TARGETs

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:50:42 -0700

52 lines

Re: "Volatility" of TARGETs

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:57:05 -0500

32 lines

Re: "Volatility" of TARGETs

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jul 2002 13:28:55 -0700

40 lines

Re: "Volatility" of TARGETs

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:44:06 -0500

61 lines

Re: "Volatility" of TARGETs

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jul 2002 13:45:30 -0700

31 lines

Re: "Volatility" of TARGETs

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:06:06 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

(SC22WG5.2639) (j3.2002-752) Re: Public comment on Fortran: ISO/IEC CD 1539-1

Re: (SC22WG5.2639) (j3.2002-752) Re: Public comment on Fortran: ISO/IEC CD 1539-1

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:41:49 -0800

45 lines

Re: (SC22WG5.2639) (j3.2002-752) Re: Public comment on Fortran: ISO/IEC CD 1539-1

J.L.Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:05:25 -0000

102 lines

New Thread

/dev/null and scope of UNITs

/dev/null and scope of UNITs

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:42:38 -0600

45 lines

Re: /dev/null and scope of UNITs

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:05:59 -0800

35 lines

Re: /dev/null and scope of UNITs

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 20:58:07 -0000

99 lines

/dev/null and scope of UNITs

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:24:23 -0800

62 lines

Re: /dev/null and scope of UNITs

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2002 19:50:17 -0500

52 lines

Re: /dev/null and scope of UNITs

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:20:35 +1030

176 lines

Re: /dev/null and scope of UNITs

Alf Bakken <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:25:07 +0100

73 lines

Re: /dev/null and scope of UNITs

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:22:32 -0800

155 lines

Re: /dev/null and scope of UNITs

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:34:16 -0600

56 lines

New Thread

A trio of philosophical issues

A trio of philosophical issues

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:15:03 -0600

45 lines

Re: A trio of philosophical issues

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:46:11 -0700

39 lines

Re: A trio of philosophical issues

Alan Aspuru-Guzik <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:04:41 -0700

60 lines

Re: A trio of philosophical issues

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:51:08 -0500

35 lines

Re: A trio of philosophical issues

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:57:04 -0600

18 lines

Re: A trio of philosophical issues

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:23:24 +1000

76 lines

Re: A trio of philosophical issues

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:45:29 +0100

78 lines

Re: A trio of philosophical issues

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:14:29 -0600

32 lines

New Thread

Accessing derived type components

Accessing derived type components

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:00:10 +0100

139 lines

New Thread

Adult content in Fortran list ???

Adult content in Fortran list ???

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 19:50:19 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:35:13 -0400

57 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:04:19 +0200

33 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:22:19 -0600

39 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:28:56 -0500

34 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 18:03:47 +0100

57 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 13:09:02 -0500

43 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:42:54 -0600

28 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:25:01 +0100

70 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 10:36:08 -0500

40 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 08:06:58 -0700

41 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:12:53 -0500

33 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 17:08:25 +0100

34 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:56:23 -0500

33 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:41:19 -0700

36 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:40:11 -0600

32 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:31:43 +0100

40 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:48:58 -0500

44 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:20:57 +0200

64 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 10:32:11 -0500

65 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:15:47 +0100

46 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 11:19:18 -0500

28 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:58:40 +0200

25 lines

Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 10:33:19 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

allocatable and declaration

allocatable and declaration

Guylaine Prat <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:04:34 +0100

28 lines

Re: allocatable and declaration

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 19:13:03 +1030

71 lines

Re: allocatable and declaration

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:22:51 -0000

49 lines

Re: allocatable and declaration

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 07:48:58 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

Allocatable scalars

Allocatable scalars

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:34:55 -0500

42 lines

Re: Allocatable scalars

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:02:08 -0500

51 lines

Re: Allocatable scalars

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jul 2002 15:08:25 -0700

37 lines

Re: Allocatable scalars

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jul 2002 15:34:54 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

Allocatable string lengths?

Allocatable string lengths?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:07:38 -0700

18 lines

Re: Allocatable string lengths?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:23:19 -0800

42 lines

Re: Allocatable string lengths?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:17:29 -0600

35 lines

Re: Allocatable string lengths?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:51:32 -0700

37 lines

Allocatable string lengths?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:28:10 -0800

58 lines

Re: Allocatable string lengths?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:33:35 -0800

20 lines

Re: Allocatable string lengths?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:01:43 -0800

57 lines

Re: Allocatable string lengths?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:55:59 -0800

34 lines

Re: Allocatable string lengths?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:42:57 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

Allocatable strings

Allocatable strings

Aleksandar N. Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:37:31 -0500

21 lines

Re: Allocatable strings

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:58:19 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

Allocated arrays with pointers as arguments

Allocated arrays with pointers as arguments

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jun 2002 12:42:16 +0100

48 lines

Allocated arrays with pointers as arguments

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jun 2002 07:41:19 -0700

37 lines

Re: Allocated arrays with pointers as arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:35:53 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

allocating an allocatable in a subroutine

allocating an allocatable in a subroutine

Bertrand Meltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:41:22 +0200

58 lines

Re: allocating an allocatable in a subroutine

Xiaogang Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:34:15 -0400

99 lines

Re: allocating an allocatable in a subroutine

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:06:57 +0100

39 lines

Re: allocating an allocatable in a subroutine

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:19:46 -0700

84 lines

Re: allocating an allocatable in a subroutine

Feyzi Inanc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:10:50 -0500

76 lines

Re: allocating an allocatable in a subroutine

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:35:06 -0500

178 lines

New Thread

Allocating Derived-Type Data Arrays

Allocating Derived-Type Data Arrays

Bob Leblanc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 18:32:29 +0000

15 lines

Re: Allocating Derived-Type Data Arrays

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:42:37 -0800

51 lines

Re: Allocating Derived-Type Data Arrays

Bob Leblanc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:16:12 -0600

66 lines

Re: Allocating Derived-Type Data Arrays

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:43:02 +0100

34 lines

Re: Allocating Derived-Type Data Arrays

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:46:54 -0800

106 lines

Re: Allocating Derived-Type Data Arrays

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:20:45 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

Amusing quotation....

Amusing quotation....

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:10:58 -0500

30 lines

Re: Amusing quotation....

N. Shamsundar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:13:02 -0500

41 lines

Re: Amusing quotation....

Volker Typke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:28:14 +0200

67 lines

Re: Amusing quotation....

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:13:18 +1000

51 lines

Re: Amusing quotation....

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Aug 2002 23:31:02 -0600

62 lines

Re: Amusing quotation....

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Sep 2002 15:02:25 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

An invitation to vendors on the topic of slow compilation!(with Reply to Alvaro Fernandez and )

An invitation to vendors on the topic of slow compilation!(with Reply to Alvaro Fernandez and )

Magne Rudshaug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 07:59:49 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

Announcement: IBM XL Fortran for AIX V8.1

Announcement: IBM XL Fortran for AIX V8.1

Yin Zhu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:23:47 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Announcement: NAGWare f95 Release 4.2

Announcement: NAGWare f95 Release 4.2

Ian Hounam <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:45:34 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

Anyone have a suggestion for optimization software?

Anyone have a suggestion for optimization software?

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:01:26 -0500

81 lines

Re: Anyone have a suggestion for optimization software?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Apr 2002 13:39:16 -0500

46 lines

Re: Anyone have a suggestion for optimization software?

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Apr 2002 13:40:02 -0500

46 lines

Re: Anyone have a suggestion for optimization software?

Cezar Diaconu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:50:24 +0900

44 lines

Re: Anyone have a suggestion for optimization software?

Andrew McLean <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 May 2002 00:25:17 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

April issue of ACM Fortran Forum

April issue of ACM Fortran Forum

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:49:28 +0100

53 lines

Re: April issue of ACM Fortran Forum

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Mar 2002 19:06:18 -0800

60 lines

New Thread

Array descriptors (dope vectors) in various compilers?

Array descriptors (dope vectors) in various compilers?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:10:20 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

Array Dimension Limits

Array Dimension Limits

David Byrne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 May 2002 16:09:46 +0100

34 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Brian Hanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:15:52 -0400

71 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Roderick W. Failing III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:19:24 -0400

75 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:18:12 -0500

45 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:48:02 +0200

66 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

David Byrne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 May 2002 03:21:24 +0100

28 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 May 2002 23:27:59 -0400

28 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Michael Milgram <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 May 2002 23:49:39 -0400

61 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 May 2002 09:28:25 -0700

42 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

David Byrne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 May 2002 18:35:50 +0100

54 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:46:34 -0400

78 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:38:20 -0500

29 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 May 2002 11:00:41 -0700

55 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 May 2002 10:48:30 -0700

43 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 May 2002 22:25:56 +0200

30 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 May 2002 22:00:52 +0200

27 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Michael Milgram <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 May 2002 22:44:51 -0400

47 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:21:27 +0200

39 lines

Re: Array Dimension Limits

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 May 2002 07:59:58 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

Array Dimension Limits--CONTAINED optimizations

Re: Array Dimension Limits--CONTAINED optimizations

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 May 2002 23:30:45 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

Array I/O question

Re: Array I/O question

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Jul 2002 01:30:41 +1000

59 lines

Re: Array I/O question

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Jul 2002 01:30:41 +1000

38 lines

Re: Array I/O question

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jul 2002 21:50:08 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Array IO question

Array IO question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:03:25 -0500

22 lines

Re: Array IO question

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jul 2002 13:18:31 -0600

20 lines

Re: Array IO question

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jul 2002 13:31:14 -0600

28 lines

Re: Array IO question

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jul 2002 22:06:21 +0000

58 lines

Re: Array IO question

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:27:01 -0600

45 lines

Re: Array IO question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:11:35 -0500

25 lines

Re: Array IO question

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:12:02 +0930

185 lines

Re: Array IO question

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:53:59 +0100

25 lines

Re: Array IO question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jul 2002 07:50:35 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

Array operations on small arrays and efficiency

Array operations on small arrays and efficiency

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:15:56 -0500

86 lines

Re: Array operations on small arrays and efficiency

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:26:33 -0600

67 lines

New Thread

Array pointer reshaping

Array pointer reshaping

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:19:05 -0600

43 lines

Re: Array pointer reshaping

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2002 13:29:55 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

Array Sections

Array Sections

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:29:33 +1030

83 lines

Re: Array Sections

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 22:51:42 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

Ask for help on a no-replace sampling!

Ask for help on a no-replace sampling!

Frank OuYang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:27:32 +0800

27 lines

New Thread

Ask for help on ISML Lib.

Ask for help on ISML Lib.

frank_ouyang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:51:07 +0800

89 lines

Re: Ask for help on ISML Lib.

Eric Petersen [Aero] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 08:02:33 -0600

110 lines

Re: Ask for help on ISML Lib.

frank_ouyang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 09:23:43 +0800

112 lines

New Thread

Ask for help on the global variable of F77/F90

Ask for help on the global variable of F77/F90

Frank OuYang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:45:56 +0800

34 lines

Re: Ask for help on the global variable of F77/F90

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:03:46 +0200

32 lines

Re: Ask for help on the global variable of F77/F90

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 10 Apr 2002 21:55:58 +1000

44 lines

Re: Ask for help on the global variable of F77/F90

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Apr 2002 23:25:15 +1000

46 lines

New Thread

ask help for effective algorithm for one dimension optimization

ask help for effective algorithm for one dimension optimization

Frank OuYang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Apr 2002 02:51:40 +0800

41 lines

New Thread

Automatic deallocation in Fortran 95

Automatic deallocation in Fortran 95

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jun 2002 17:43:49 -0500

50 lines

Automatic deallocation in Fortran 95

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jun 2002 15:57:47 -0700

25 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation in Fortran 95

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jun 2002 23:10:11 -0400

24 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation in Fortran 95

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Jun 2002 09:47:33 -0700

58 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation in Fortran 95

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:10:47 -0400

34 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation in Fortran 95

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 07:45:07 -0700

46 lines

New Thread

Basic array input question

Basic array input question

Colin Millar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:44:56 +0100

55 lines

Basic array input question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:03:55 -0700

65 lines

Re: Basic array input question

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:51:16 -0700

82 lines

Re: Basic array input question

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:43:01 +1000

80 lines

New Thread

basic questions

basic questions

Jose Eduardo S. Oliveira <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:30:02 -0300

35 lines

Re: basic questions

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:14:25 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

Beating a dead horse (WAS: String syntax in F2x)

Beating a dead horse (WAS: String syntax in F2x)

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Nov 2002 00:01:37 -0800

41 lines

Re: Beating a dead horse (WAS: String syntax in F2x)

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Nov 2002 03:05:17 -0700

62 lines

Re: Beating a dead horse (WAS: String syntax in F2x)

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Nov 2002 07:41:37 -0800

127 lines

Re: Beating a dead horse (WAS: String syntax in F2x)

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Nov 2002 12:40:28 -0700

42 lines

Re: Beating a dead horse (WAS: String syntax in F2x)

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Nov 2002 09:59:45 -0800

41 lines

Re: Beating a dead horse (WAS: String syntax in F2x)

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Nov 2002 12:25:58 -0700

47 lines

Re: Beating a dead horse (WAS: String syntax in F2x)

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Nov 2002 12:29:52 -0800

30 lines

Re: Beating a dead horse (WAS: String syntax in F2x)

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Nov 2002 12:54:15 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

behavior of recursive routines

behavior of recursive routines

Tom Clune <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:09:46 -0400

344 lines

Re: behavior of recursive routines

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:16:50 +1000

350 lines

Re: behavior of recursive routines

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:57:08 +0300

124 lines

Re: behavior of recursive routines

Tom Clune <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:57:57 -0400

115 lines

Re: behavior of recursive routines

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:37:09 -0500

52 lines

Re: behavior of recursive routines

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:54:33 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

binary file organisation

binary file organisation

Colin Millar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:05:46 -0000

24 lines

Re: binary file organisation

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 22:18:10 +1000

39 lines

New Thread

blas for intel pentium III

blas for intel pentium III

Xiaogang Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:30:52 -0400

34 lines

Re: blas for intel pentium III

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:04:48 -0500

26 lines

Re: blas for intel pentium III

Erik Schnetter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:34:21 +0200

41 lines

New Thread

blas/lapack perf+reliability

blas/lapack perf+reliability

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:33:04 +0200

44 lines

Re: blas/lapack perf+reliability

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:42:04 +0100

81 lines

Re: blas/lapack perf+reliability

Erik Schnetter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:51:54 +0200

27 lines

Re: blas/lapack perf+reliability

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Sep 2002 05:57:59 -0700

37 lines

Re: blas/lapack perf+reliability

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Sep 2002 06:13:59 -0700

22 lines

Re: blas/lapack perf+reliability

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:12:50 +0200

40 lines

Re: blas/lapack perf+reliability

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:11:15 +0930

66 lines

New Thread

C equivalent of ETIME

C equivalent of ETIME

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:56:10 -0500

43 lines

Re: C equivalent of ETIME

Alan Aspuru-Guzik <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:16:07 -0700

114 lines

Re: C equivalent of ETIME

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:50:43 -0700

176 lines

Re: C equivalent of ETIME

Alan Aspuru-Guzik <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:28:17 -0700

62 lines

Re: C equivalent of ETIME

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jul 2002 17:58:53 -0500

30 lines

Re: C equivalent of ETIME

Erik Schnetter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:45:30 +0200

50 lines

Re: C equivalent of ETIME

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jul 2002 20:39:32 -0700

43 lines

New Thread

C99 standard

C99 standard

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:58:37 -0500

43 lines

Re: C99 standard

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:39:13 -0400

63 lines

Re: C99 standard

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:36:47 -0600

25 lines

Re: C99 standard

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:47:40 -0400

45 lines

Re: C99 standard

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:56:29 -0500

37 lines

Re: C99 standard

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:53:33 -0600

20 lines

Re: C99 standard

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:00:59 -0700

35 lines

Re: C99 standard

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:21:29 -0400

27 lines

Re: C99 standard

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:48:07 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

Callbacks in FORTRAN

Callbacks in FORTRAN

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 May 2002 17:48:36 +0200

94 lines

Re: Callbacks in FORTRAN

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:21:40 -0700

115 lines

Re: Callbacks in FORTRAN

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 May 2002 13:44:23 -0600

76 lines

Re: Callbacks in FORTRAN

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 May 2002 13:44:21 -0600

169 lines

Re: Callbacks in FORTRAN

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 May 2002 15:55:28 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

calling a executable program within another program

calling a executable program within another program

Ricardo Corrêa Simões <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:21:21 +0000

17 lines

Re: calling a executable program within another program

David Annetts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2002 07:38:25 +1100

31 lines

Re: calling a executable program within another program

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:35:59 -0800

48 lines

Re: calling a executable program within another program

Edward Osei <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:58:54 -0600

59 lines

New Thread

Can an array element contain another array?

Can an array element contain another array?

Edward Osei <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:03:07 -0600

28 lines

Re: Can an array element contain another array?

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 01:42:34 +0800

25 lines

Re: Can an array element contain another array?

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:43:02 -0600

90 lines

Re: Can an array element contain another array?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 12:35:11 -0600

95 lines

Re: Can an array element contain another array?

Edward Osei <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:56:23 -0600

104 lines

New Thread

Code documentation software

Code documentation software

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 05:16:53 -0700

43 lines

Re: Code documentation software

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 09:30:08 -0500

49 lines

Re: Code documentation software

John A. Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 08:41:25 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

Commenting on the draft Fortran 2000 standard

Commenting on the draft Fortran 2000 standard

D Muxworthy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:36:49 BST

27 lines

New Thread

compiler error

compiler error

Gerd Bruno Rocha <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:56:18 -0200

73 lines

Re: compiler error

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:01:15 -0000

129 lines

New Thread

Complex (was double precision constants)

Re: Complex (was double precision constants)

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:55:30 +1000

49 lines

Re: Complex (was double precision constants)

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:39:54 -0700

50 lines

Re: Complex (was double precision constants)

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Nov 2002 01:12:49 +1000

76 lines

Re: Complex (was double precision constants)

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:27:22 -0700

37 lines

Re: Complex (was double precision constants)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:56:26 -0800

23 lines

Re: Complex (was double precision constants)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:04:15 -0800

25 lines

Re: Complex (was double precision constants)

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 13:35:32 -0700

33 lines

Re: Complex (was double precision constants)

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Nov 2002 20:24:05 +1000

58 lines

New Thread

Component of PRIVATE type of a PUBLIC type

Component of PRIVATE type of a PUBLIC type

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jul 2002 09:46:20 -0500

75 lines

Re: Component of PRIVATE type of a PUBLIC type

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:51:02 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

computer chip!

computer chip!

Aniruddha Chakraborty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:03:01 +0530

22 lines

Re: computer chip!

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:30:31 +0200

23 lines

New Thread

Confusion with Where ...

Confusion with Where ...

David Annetts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:24:38 +1100

51 lines

Re: Confusion with Where ...

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:28:39 -0800

59 lines

Re: Confusion with Where ...

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:33:00 -0700

23 lines

Confusion with Where ...

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:40:19 -0800

51 lines

Re: Confusion with Where ...

David Annetts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:53:15 +1100

41 lines

New Thread

Counting 1-bits -- Why?

Counting 1-bits -- Why?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Aug 2002 19:03:36 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Counting the number of 1 bits

Counting the number of 1 bits

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:21:47 -0500

40 lines

Re: Counting the number of 1 bits

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Aug 2002 19:38:54 -0400

44 lines

Re: Counting the number of 1 bits

Jim Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Aug 2002 00:41:51 -0500

34 lines

Re: Counting the number of 1 bits

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Aug 2002 08:29:37 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines

Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:35:14 -0800

65 lines

Re: Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:10:02 -0600

157 lines

Re: Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:21:59 -0800

34 lines

Re: Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:15:38 -0600

55 lines

Re: Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Mar 2002 22:25:31 -0600

38 lines

Re: Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Mar 2002 10:58:54 -0600

64 lines

Re: Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:27:12 +1000

42 lines

Re: Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines

Shaun Forth AMORG <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:34:49 +0000

126 lines

Re: Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Mar 2002 07:30:35 -0800

27 lines

Re: Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:14:12 -0800

50 lines

Re: Creating a generic interface for CONTAINed routines

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:41:17 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Data structure question

Data structure question

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:09:30 +1030

67 lines

Re: Data structure question

Werner Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:02:53 -0000

71 lines

New Thread

deadlock

deadlock

Naomi Greenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:17:53 -0400

53 lines

Re: deadlock

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:29:42 -0500

57 lines

Re: deadlock

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:00:23 -0700

61 lines

deadlock

Naomi Greenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:17:15 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

DEALLOCATING A POINTER

DEALLOCATING A POINTER

Michael Milgram <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Dec 2002 13:13:13 -0500

104 lines

DEALLOCATING A POINTER

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:37:51 -0800

69 lines

Re: DEALLOCATING A POINTER

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Dec 2002 20:37:17 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Deallocation problems

Deallocation problems

Coby Needle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:31:12 +0100

42 lines

Deallocation problems

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Apr 2002 08:06:58 -0700

34 lines

Re: Deallocation problems

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:18:22 -0500

61 lines

Re: Deallocation problems

Michael Milgram <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:45:25 -0400

65 lines

Re: Deallocation problems

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 May 2002 00:38:59 +1000

39 lines

New Thread

Dependencies due to modules

Dependencies due to modules

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:40:01 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Dependencies due to modules (Matveev)

Re: Dependencies due to modules (Matveev)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:09:10 -0500

23 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (Matveev)

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:51:10 +0200

29 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (Matveev)

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jun 2002 07:13:57 +1000

58 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (Matveev)

Andrew McLean <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jun 2002 18:07:28 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Dependencies due to modules (tricky)

Re: Dependencies due to modules (tricky)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:35:01 -0500

49 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (tricky)

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jun 2002 11:06:19 +0200

40 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (tricky)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jun 2002 10:15:19 -0500

31 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (tricky)

John A. Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jun 2002 10:57:22 -0600

24 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (tricky)

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:31:39 -0400

31 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (tricky)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jun 2002 11:59:35 -0700

60 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (tricky)

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:03:31 -0400

82 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (tricky)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jun 2002 12:25:15 -0700

61 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (tricky)

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:51:34 +0200

76 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (tricky)

Alexei Matveev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:37:25 +0200

38 lines

Re: Dependencies due to modules (tricky)

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jun 2002 16:03:59 +0800

103 lines

New Thread

Derived type functions in interfaces

Derived type functions in interfaces

Colin Millar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:48:44 +0100

102 lines

Derived type functions in interfaces

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Apr 2002 08:13:58 -0800

63 lines

Re: Derived type functions in interfaces

John Venier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:08:14 -0600

35 lines

Re: Derived type functions in interfaces

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Apr 2002 09:16:29 -0800

47 lines

Re: Derived type functions in interfaces

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:57:50 -0700

24 lines

Re: Derived type functions in interfaces

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Apr 2002 15:37:11 +1000

31 lines

New Thread

Double precision constants

Double precision constants

Paddy O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:58:51 +1100

70 lines

Re: Double precision constants

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:39:45 -0600

57 lines

Re: Double precision constants

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:20:38 -0700

23 lines

Double precision constants

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:44:13 -0800

114 lines

Re: Double precision constants

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:54:17 +1000

58 lines

Re: Double precision constants

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:44:20 -0700

37 lines

Re: Double precision constants

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:27:27 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

Dynamic array

Re: Dynamic array

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:25:32 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Dynamic Array Problem with intel compiler

Dynamic Array Problem with intel compiler

Jens Bredenbeck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:58:15 +0100

96 lines

Dynamic Array Problem with intel compiler

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:26:03 -0800

29 lines

Re: Dynamic Array Problem with intel compiler

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:24:44 -0800

67 lines

Re: Dynamic Array Problem with intel compiler

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 13:21:54 +1000

24 lines

New Thread

Efficiency of strided arrays

Efficiency of strided arrays

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:25:04 -0600

49 lines

New Thread

eigenvalue problem

eigenvalue problem

zhongfu zhou <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 14:05:48 +0100

21 lines

Re: eigenvalue problem

Ian Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 14:29:25 +0100

60 lines

Re: eigenvalue problem

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 Jul 2002 10:42:19 +0010

19 lines

New Thread

Emulation of ISO_C_BINDING in Fortran 95

Emulation of ISO_C_BINDING in Fortran 95

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:07:04 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

Encapsulation and access--TRANSFER

Re: Encapsulation and access--TRANSFER

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:24:10 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

Encapsulation and access.

Encapsulation and access.

Colin Millar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:28:11 +0100

23 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:40:54 -0400

50 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:44:59 +0100

26 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Colin Millar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:59:27 +0100

26 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:47:12 +0100

34 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Bart Benthul <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:36:13 -0600

55 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:46:28 +0100

19 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:17:32 -0400

39 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Jack N. Hatfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:18:00 -0800

82 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:11:21 -0700

45 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:50:16 -0400

54 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:38:40 -0500

120 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:12:52 -0700

94 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Jack N. Hatfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:20:28 -0800

66 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Jack N. Hatfield <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:26:59 -0800

104 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:55:23 -0500

49 lines

Re: Encapsulation and access.

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:49:18 +0200

13 lines

New Thread

Error handling mechanisms

Error handling mechanisms

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:09:45 -0600

41 lines

Error handling mechanisms

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2002 19:11:39 +0100

155 lines

Re: Error handling mechanisms

George K Chang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:15:12 -0600

44 lines

Re: Error handling mechanisms

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:40:06 -0600

38 lines

Re: Error handling mechanisms

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:40:57 -0500

446 lines

Re: Error handling mechanisms

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:59:43 +1030

180 lines

Re: Error handling mechanisms

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:58:35 MET

62 lines

New Thread

F02GBF subroutine in NAG library

F02GBF subroutine in NAG library

zhongfu zhou <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Sep 2002 13:31:31 +0100

24 lines

Re: F02GBF subroutine in NAG library

Ian Hounam <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Sep 2002 13:47:04 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

f95 question

f95 question

James Abeles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:36:26 -0400

40 lines

Re: f95 question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:51:28 -0500

36 lines

f95 question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:17:20 -0700

47 lines

Re: f95 question

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:32:36 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

FEM2DLib

FEM2DLib

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:08:33 -0600

37 lines

Re: FEM2DLib

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:00:41 +0000

57 lines

Re: FEM2DLib

Marco A. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:59:33 +0400

81 lines

Re: FEM2DLib

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Dec 2002 07:50:19 -0600

104 lines

New Thread

Find indices of nonzero elements

Find indices of nonzero elements

Choru 'n Moru <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:24:05 +0000

31 lines

Re: Find indices of nonzero elements

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 08:57:49 -0600

45 lines

Re: Find indices of nonzero elements

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:01:41 +0000

78 lines

Re: Find indices of nonzero elements

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:28:01 -0600

159 lines

Re: Find indices of nonzero elements

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:18:07 -0600

141 lines

New Thread

Find indices of nonzero elements [syntax err]

Re: Find indices of nonzero elements [syntax err]

J. van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 09:58:05 +0100

148 lines

New Thread

Finding indices

Re: Finding indices

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:49:17 -0600

65 lines

Re: Finding indices

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:20:03 -0600

142 lines

Re: Finding indices

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:11:22 -0600

155 lines

Re: Finding indices

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:31:59 -0600

158 lines

New Thread

For your amusement: Cray pointers

For your amusement: Cray pointers

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:55:04 -0600

86 lines

For your amusement: Cray pointers

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 14:23:00 -0800

34 lines

Re: For your amusement: Cray pointers

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:39:11 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

forall body question

forall body question

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 May 2002 12:47:49 -0600

32 lines

forall body question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 May 2002 12:24:12 -0700

63 lines

Re: forall body question

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 May 2002 14:16:01 -0600

25 lines

Re: forall body question

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 May 2002 14:38:53 -0600

33 lines

Re: forall body question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 May 2002 14:30:43 -0700

28 lines

Re: forall body question

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 May 2002 09:42:18 -0500

68 lines

Re: forall body question

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 May 2002 15:54:26 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

FORTRAN / MATLAB

FORTRAN / MATLAB

Nirmal Govindaraju <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:53:22 -0500

27 lines

Re: FORTRAN / MATLAB

Cezar Diaconu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:33:21 +0900

72 lines

Re: FORTRAN / MATLAB

Ian Hounam <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:56:56 +0000

41 lines

Re: FORTRAN / MATLAB

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 03:26:10 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot

Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:13:56 +0100

121 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:25:59 +0300

42 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 07:50:17 -0700

44 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:41:19 +0300

68 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 07:49:53 -0700

50 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:11:53 -0400

68 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:08:46 -0500

30 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:20:42 +0100

32 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:19:58 +0100

24 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:10:03 +0100

77 lines

Re: Fortran 2000 is out for CD ballot

Harry R Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:54:51 -0500

92 lines

New Thread

Fortran 200X Forum, London, 30/10/02 <fwd>

Fortran 200X Forum, London, 30/10/02 <fwd>

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:53:21 +0100

91 lines

Re: Fortran 200X Forum, London, 30/10/02 <fwd>

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:27:43 +0010

14 lines

Re: Fortran 200X Forum, London, 30/10/02 <fwd>

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:06:22 +0100

45 lines

Re: Fortran 200X Forum, London, 30/10/02 <fwd>

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:24:26 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Fortran Forum (December)

Fortran Forum (December)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Nov 2002 14:01:53 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (January)

Fortran Resources (January)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:45:14 +0100

1713 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (July)

Fortran Resources (July)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:27:21 +0200

664 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (March)

Fortran Resources (March)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:06:10 +0100

657 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (May)

Fortran Resources (May)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 May 2002 09:53:08 +0200

655 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (November)

Fortran Resources (November)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:28:37 +0100

701 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (November)

Robin Vowels <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:39:11 +1000

19 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (Sep)

Fortran Resources (Sep)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:10:57 +0200

686 lines

New Thread

Fortran source on a web page

Fortran source on a web page

Al Greynolds <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:41:18 -0700

18 lines

Re: Fortran source on a web page

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:06:23 -0400

40 lines

Re: Fortran source on a web page

Werner Schulz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:19:03 +0100

37 lines

Re: Fortran source on a web page

Al Greynolds <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 06:20:06 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

Fortran-aware debuggers?

Fortran-aware debuggers?

Selden E Ball Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:19:02 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Fortran: an almost obsolete language

Fortran: an almost obsolete language

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:19:22 +0200

35 lines

Re: Fortran: an almost obsolete language

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 23:22:24 +0200

55 lines

New Thread

free linux non-intel f90 compiler

free linux non-intel f90 compiler

Eduardo Melione Abreu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:03:08 -0200

19 lines

Re: free linux non-intel f90 compiler

Zsolt Szekeres <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:59:13 +0100

23 lines

Re: free linux non-intel f90 compiler

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 05:11:16 -0800

22 lines

Re: free linux non-intel f90 compiler

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2002 05:46:14 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

Function result not assigned

Function result not assigned

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:09:22 -0500

26 lines

Re: Function result not assigned

John A. Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:17:22 -0600

30 lines

Re: Function result not assigned

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 18:20:41 -0700

33 lines

Re: Function result not assigned

Erik Schnetter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Jun 2002 14:50:27 +0200

79 lines

Re: Function result not assigned

Marie-Odile Licour <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Jun 2002 16:30:35 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

FW: Amusing quotation....

FW: Amusing quotation....

Bourque, Gilles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:41:57 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

FW: Error handling mechanisms

FW: Error handling mechanisms

George K Chang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:58:28 -0600

999 lines

New Thread

Fw: Migration path of Plot10 and GKS Library to Solaris

Fw: Migration path of Plot10 and GKS Library to Solaris

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:17:16 +0200

98 lines

Re: Fw: Migration path of Plot10 and GKS Library to Solaris

Len Makin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:20:50 +1000

34 lines

New Thread

Fw: Runtime test programs

Fw: Runtime test programs

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 May 2002 10:12:17 +0200

21 lines

Re: Fw: Runtime test programs

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 May 2002 10:48:20 -0400

46 lines

Re: Fw: Runtime test programs

John A. Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 May 2002 09:01:51 -0600

32 lines

Re: Fw: Runtime test programs

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 May 2002 11:10:07 -0700

40 lines

Re: Fw: Runtime test programs

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 May 2002 08:36:31 -0700

29 lines

Re: Fw: Runtime test programs

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 May 2002 14:00:00 -0400

58 lines

Re: Fw: Runtime test programs

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 May 2002 11:10:02 -0700

88 lines

Re: Fw: Runtime test programs

Len Makin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 May 2002 09:53:43 +1000

70 lines

Re: Fw: Runtime test programs

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 May 2002 20:19:37 -0400

100 lines

Re: Fw: Runtime test programs

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 May 2002 10:00:33 +0200

42 lines

New Thread

Fw: Simple eigenvalue software

Fw: Simple eigenvalue software

Paul J. Nikolai <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:46:45 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

Fw: Square Brackets in Standard Fortran --> Intervalers are concerned

Fw: Square Brackets in Standard Fortran --> Intervalers are concerned

Siamak Lina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:53:38 -0500

79 lines

New Thread

Fw: What is Fortran used for these days?

Fw: What is Fortran used for these days?

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 20:34:57 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Generic interface with EXTERNAL argument

Generic interface with EXTERNAL argument

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:29:25 -0500

49 lines

Re: Generic interface with EXTERNAL argument

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:40:04 -0500

47 lines

Re: Generic interface with EXTERNAL argument

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:28:19 -0600

32 lines

Re: Generic interface with EXTERNAL argument

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:57:00 -0600

12 lines

New Thread

Generic type constructors

Generic type constructors

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:34:41 -0500

45 lines

Generic type constructors

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jun 2002 08:18:32 -0700

26 lines

Re: Generic type constructors

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:22:45 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

Help needed with array sectioning

Help needed with array sectioning

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jun 2002 21:58:05 -0500

116 lines

Re: Help needed with array sectioning

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 18:39:34 -0400

190 lines

Re: Help needed with array sectioning

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 18:19:25 -0500

224 lines

Re: Help needed with array sectioning

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Jun 2002 12:28:27 -0500

39 lines

Re: Help needed with array sectioning

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:51:38 -0400

41 lines

Re: Help needed with array sectioning

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:18:22 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

Help needed with array sectioning (Also: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components)

Re: Help needed with array sectioning (Also: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 17:47:51 -0500

163 lines

New Thread

Help needed with array sectioning: Clarification

Re: Help needed with array sectioning: Clarification

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jun 2002 10:10:41 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

History

History

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:26:34 +0100

132 lines

New Thread

how about random generator.

how about random generator.

Frank OuYang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jun 2002 19:22:02 +0800

28 lines

Re: how about random generator.

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:46:30 +0300

43 lines

New Thread

how can I deal with dynamic array?

how can I deal with dynamic array?

frank_ouyang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:13:05 +0800

40 lines

Re: how can I deal with dynamic array?

Eduardo Melione Abreu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:43:07 -0200

65 lines

Re: how can I deal with dynamic array?

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:25:48 -0600

78 lines

Re: how can I deal with dynamic array?

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:09:52 +1000

36 lines

Re: how can I deal with dynamic array?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:47:13 +0010

63 lines

Re: how can I deal with dynamic array?

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2002 01:24:58 +1000

58 lines

New Thread

How can keep the setting of link Lib.?

How can keep the setting of link Lib.?

frank_ouyang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:08:02 +0800

114 lines

Re: How can keep the setting of link Lib.?

Eric Petersen [Aero] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:25:07 -0600

34 lines

New Thread

How many "unit" to connect to an external file?

How many "unit" to connect to an external file?

Anuchit Aromsawa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2002 04:04:53 +0000

17 lines

Re: How many "unit" to connect to an external file?

J. van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:25:02 +0100

32 lines

Re: How many "unit" to connect to an external file?

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:08:57 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

how to define and value a two-element matrix?

how to define and value a two-element matrix?

Zhongfu Zhou <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:27:29 +0100

19 lines

Re: how to define and value a two-element matrix?

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jun 2002 13:42:42 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

how to link a .a lib

how to link a .a lib

Xiaogang Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:42:17 -0400

33 lines

Re: how to link a .a lib

Tony Keating <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:56:26 +1000

34 lines

Re: how to link a .a lib

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:56:59 +0100

33 lines

Re: how to link a .a lib

Tony Keating <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:38:06 +1000

40 lines

Re: how to link a .a lib

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 20 Sep 2002 10:16:51 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

how to realize self-reference?

how to realize self-reference?

Frank OuYang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Sep 2002 22:30:30 +0800

701 lines

Re: how to realize self-reference?

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:07:32 +0200

45 lines

Re: how to realize self-reference?

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:50:14 +0100

768 lines

New Thread

How to unsubscribe from this list?

How to unsubscribe from this list?

Zhe Fu <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:35:43 -0700

34 lines

Re: How to unsubscribe from this list?

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:59:26 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

IBM 1401

IBM 1401

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:44:49 -0800

16 lines

Re: IBM 1401

richard friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:08:40 -0800

18 lines

Re: IBM 1401

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:10:49 -0800

26 lines

Re: IBM 1401

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:15:11 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

IDE's for F90

IDE's for F90

Matt Challacombe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:24:25 -0600

27 lines

Re: IDE's for F90

Klaus Ramstöck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:35:26 +0200

37 lines

Re: IDE's for F90

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:23:20 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Implicit TARGET attribute--A bug or not?

Implicit TARGET attribute--A bug or not?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jul 2002 19:24:08 -0500

63 lines

Re: Implicit TARGET attribute--A bug or not?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jul 2002 09:29:37 +0100

53 lines

Re: Implicit TARGET attribute--A bug or not?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jul 2002 17:06:19 +0000

73 lines

Re: Implicit TARGET attribute--A bug or not?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jul 2002 17:14:24 +0100

66 lines

Implicit TARGET attribute--A bug or not?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jul 2002 07:51:08 -0700

55 lines

New Thread

Indenting tool?

Indenting tool?

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:04:35 +0100

15 lines

Re: Indenting tool?

Alois Steindl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:08:51 +0100

24 lines

Re: Indenting tool?

Guylaine Prat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:27:08 +0100

23 lines

Re: Indenting tool?

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 12:07:18 +0100

22 lines

Re: Indenting tool?

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:25:15 -0800

35 lines

Re: Indenting tool?

Harry R Millwater <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 08:21:25 -0600

26 lines

Re: Indenting tool?

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:56:13 +0000

17 lines

Re: Indenting tool?

Ian Hounam <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:09:08 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

Input variables at runtime

Input variables at runtime

EXT-Hanly, John M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2002 13:59:29 -0800

24 lines

Re: Input variables at runtime

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:04:03 -0800

38 lines

Re: Input variables at runtime

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:11:29 -0800

48 lines

Re: Input variables at runtime

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:52:46 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

installing ifc on AMD Athlon

installing ifc on AMD Athlon

Eduardo Melione Abreu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:04:40 -0200

25 lines

Re: installing ifc on AMD Athlon

Zsolt Szekeres <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:46:39 +0100

26 lines

Re: installing ifc on AMD Athlon

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Jan 2002 05:59:09 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

Intel's ifc and cascade compilation

Intel's ifc and cascade compilation

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jun 2002 13:35:50 -0500

46 lines

Re: Intel's ifc and cascade compilation

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jun 2002 14:29:28 -0500

49 lines

Re: Intel's ifc and cascade compilation

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:47:54 +0800

47 lines

Re: Intel's ifc and cascade compilation

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:12:59 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

Intent and derived type dummy arguments with pointer components

Intent and derived type dummy arguments with pointer components

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jun 2002 12:21:51 -0600

43 lines

Intent and derived type dummy arguments with pointer components

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:40:34 -0700

66 lines

Re: Intent and derived type dummy arguments with pointer components

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:11:18 -0600

36 lines

Re: Intent and derived type dummy arguments with pointer components

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jun 2002 12:28:58 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

Intent and derived type dummy arguments with pointercomponents

Re: Intent and derived type dummy arguments with pointercomponents

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:43:56 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

Intent and pointer components: need ref in standard

Intent and pointer components: need ref in standard

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jun 2002 07:23:13 -0600

50 lines

Re: Intent and pointer components: need ref in standard

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jun 2002 06:47:12 -0700

45 lines

Re: Intent and pointer components: need ref in standard

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jun 2002 08:06:40 -0600

27 lines

Re: Intent and pointer components: need ref in standard

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jun 2002 08:18:29 -0600

39 lines

Re: Intent and pointer components: need ref in standard

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jun 2002 07:35:32 -0700

35 lines

Re: Intent and pointer components: need ref in standard

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jun 2002 16:34:55 +0100

58 lines

Re: Intent and pointer components: need ref in standard

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jun 2002 10:09:30 -0700

31 lines

Re: Intent and pointer components: need ref in standard

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jun 2002 12:37:35 -0700

27 lines

Re: Intent and pointer components: need ref in standard

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Jun 2002 18:18:25 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

Interp 125 (Was: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments)

Interp 125 (Was: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 10:41:17 -0500

260 lines

Re: Interp 125 (Was: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 10:47:23 -0500

18 lines

Re: Interp 125 (Was: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments)

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:34:45 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Interp 125, again...

Interp 125, again...

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:00:33 -0700

55 lines

Re: Interp 125, again...

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:17:26 -0600

48 lines

Re: Interp 125, again...

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:28:57 -0700

34 lines

Re: Interp 125, again...

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:33:31 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Interp 81 (Was: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments)

Interp 81 (Was: Aliasing of TARGET dummy arguments)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 11:29:54 -0500

380 lines

New Thread

Interpreting the DATE_AND_TIME Intrinsic Subroutine

Interpreting the DATE_AND_TIME Intrinsic Subroutine

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Jun 2002 12:18:58 +0100

28 lines

Re: Interpreting the DATE_AND_TIME Intrinsic Subroutine

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 8 Jun 2002 22:25:46 +1000

47 lines

Re: Interpreting the DATE_AND_TIME Intrinsic Subroutine

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Jun 2002 15:52:39 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

Intrinsics and minus zero, part one

Intrinsics and minus zero, part one

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Dec 2002 13:50:33 -0700

50 lines

New Thread

Intrinsics and minus zero, part three

Intrinsics and minus zero, part three

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:59:25 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

Intrinsics and minus zero, part two

Intrinsics and minus zero, part two

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:59:41 -0700

76 lines

Re: Intrinsics and minus zero, part two

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:34:09 -0800

36 lines

Re: Intrinsics and minus zero, part two

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Dec 2002 23:37:44 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

Is this example standard conforming ?

Is this example standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:03:33 -0400

25 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:13:54 -0700

51 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:27:41 -0600

27 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:27:05 -0500

61 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:24:44 +0100

19 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:57:08 -0400

14 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:43:33 +0000

57 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:21:11 -0500

74 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:31:14 -0600

52 lines

Re: Is this example standard conforming ?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:56:39 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Is this program standard conforming ?

Is this program standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Dec 2002 00:32:56 -0500

45 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming ?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Dec 2002 16:03:59 -0100

67 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming ?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Dec 2002 11:53:01 -0700

59 lines

Re: Is this program standard conforming ?

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Dec 2002 12:54:34 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

J3 Fortran Standards Committee Approves Floating-Point Functions in Initialization Expressions

J3 Fortran Standards Committee Approves Floating-Point Functions in Initialization Expressions

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:27:10 -0500

70 lines

Re: J3 Fortran Standards Committee Approves Floating-Point Functions in Initialization Expressions

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:30:14 +0100

83 lines

New Thread

Kind values (was: Allocating Derived-Type Data Arrays

Kind values (was: Allocating Derived-Type Data Arrays

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:59:49 -0100

54 lines

New Thread

LAPACK subroutine entry absent in profile - gprof

LAPACK subroutine entry absent in profile - gprof

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:48:16 +0100

30 lines

Re: LAPACK subroutine entry absent in profile - gprof

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:14:31 +0800

39 lines

New Thread

latest xeon from intel

latest xeon from intel

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Aug 2002 15:36:10 +0100

33 lines

Re: latest xeon from intel

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Aug 2002 08:05:50 -0700

30 lines

Re: latest xeon from intel

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Aug 2002 17:11:09 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

leaving the list

leaving the list

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Dec 2002 18:06:57 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

LEX/YACC for FORTRAN

LEX/YACC for FORTRAN

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:31:06 +1030

44 lines

Re: LEX/YACC for FORTRAN

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2002 22:44:49 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Lf95 formatting problem

Lf95 formatting problem

Stenson Matthew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 May 2002 09:46:59 +1000

49 lines

Re: Lf95 formatting problem

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 May 2002 19:42:53 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

linux & f90/f95

linux & f90/f95

Anuchit Aromsawa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:03:09 +0000

13 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:13:24 -0000

36 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:55:49 +0100

58 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95

Norm <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:40:51 -0500

32 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 05:50:38 -0800

37 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:52:10 -0500

82 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95

Alan Aspuru-Guzik <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:16:16 -0800

32 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:21:57 -0600

20 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95

Feyzi Inanc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 14:54:29 -0600

46 lines

New Thread

linux & f90/f95 (for Windoze too ?)

Re: linux & f90/f95 (for Windoze too ?)

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:48:29 -0000

42 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95 (for Windoze too ?)

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:34:51 +0000

80 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95 (for Windoze too ?)

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:57:08 -0000

45 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95 (for Windoze too ?)

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 05:47:08 -0800

35 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95 (for Windoze too ?)

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:57:23 +0000

99 lines

Re: linux & f90/f95 (for Windoze too ?)

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 05:56:17 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Linux largefile support

Linux largefile support

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:19:12 +0000

20 lines

Re: Linux largefile support

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 22:12:02 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

make with f90 source containing modules

make with f90 source containing modules

Ben Blackwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Dec 2002 22:15:24 +0000

13 lines

Re: make with f90 source containing modules

Jeff Ryman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Dec 2002 22:15:06 -0800

19 lines

Re: make with f90 source containing modules

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:27:43 +0100

29 lines

Re: make with f90 source containing modules

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Dec 2002 03:49:53 -0600

33 lines

Re: make with f90 source containing modules

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:46:53 -0800

427 lines

New Thread

Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:39:21 +0800

58 lines

New Thread

Max rank 7

Re: Max rank 7

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 14:49:42 +0200

98 lines

Re: Max rank 7

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:55:03 -0500

42 lines

Re: Max rank 7

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 21:57:54 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

Meeting in Vegas

Meeting in Vegas

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:04:36 +0100

14 lines

Re: Meeting in Vegas

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jul 2002 10:45:13 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subro

Re: memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subro

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2002 10:16:56 +1000

36 lines

Re: memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subro

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2002 20:02:46 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subroutin

Re: memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subroutin

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Mar 2002 10:25:01 +1000

50 lines

Re: memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subroutin

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Mar 2002 20:24:00 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subroutines

memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subroutines

Sanjay Sharma <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2002 07:49:33 -0800

118 lines

Re: memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subroutines

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2002 16:14:35 +0000

31 lines

Re: memory allocation: space taken by dummy arrays in subroutines

Len Makin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Mar 2002 11:20:59 +1100

42 lines

New Thread

Memory profiling

Memory profiling

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jul 2002 23:58:42 -0400

79 lines

Re: Memory profiling

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:01:53 -0400

105 lines

Re: Memory profiling

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jul 2002 10:08:41 -0700

62 lines

Re: Memory profiling

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:11:24 -0400

80 lines

New Thread

mips-tfile error

mips-tfile error

shireen p <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2002 14:04:42 -0500

17 lines

Re: mips-tfile error

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:53:41 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

misaligned variable

misaligned variable

Steven Lynch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jul 2002 15:02:29 +0200

25 lines

Re: misaligned variable

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jul 2002 06:22:39 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

mixed TYPES and OVERLOADING

mixed TYPES and OVERLOADING

Michael Milgram <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:00:52 -0500

126 lines

Re: mixed TYPES and OVERLOADING

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:45:11 -0600

227 lines

Re: mixed TYPES and OVERLOADING

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:29:04 +0100

137 lines

Re: mixed TYPES and OVERLOADING

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:17:03 +0100

43 lines

Re: mixed TYPES and OVERLOADING

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:00:13 -0600

49 lines

New Thread

Mixing C and (DEC/Compaq)-Fortran ...

Mixing C and (DEC/Compaq)-Fortran ...

Klaus Ramstöck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:31:48 +0100

20 lines

Re: Mixing C and (DEC/Compaq)-Fortran ...

Jaehoon Seol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2002 07:49:06 -0600

33 lines

Re: Mixing C and (DEC/Compaq)-Fortran ...

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont LycraR R&D <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Mar 2002 19:55:06 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Modules, procedures, and stack storage space.

Modules, procedures, and stack storage space.

P Suckling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:24:27 +0100

68 lines

Re: Modules, procedures, and stack storage space.

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:39:44 -0500

27 lines

Re: Modules, procedures, and stack storage space.

Herbert Fruechtl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:50:07 +0100

140 lines

Re: Modules, procedures, and stack storage space.

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:47:04 -0700

47 lines

Re: Modules, procedures, and stack storage space.

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:57:40 -0500

261 lines

Re: Modules, procedures, and stack storage space.

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:15:38 -0600

34 lines

Re: Modules, procedures, and stack storage space.

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:54:54 +1000

87 lines

New Thread

More on allocatable vs. automatic vs. pointer

More on allocatable vs. automatic vs. pointer

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 17:47:54 -0800

51 lines

New Thread

More on allocatable vs. automatic vs. pointer arrays

More on allocatable vs. automatic vs. pointer arrays

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 17:31:09 -0800

30 lines

Re: More on allocatable vs. automatic vs. pointer arrays

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Nov 2002 15:30:40 -0500

54 lines

Re: More on allocatable vs. automatic vs. pointer arrays

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:57:14 -0800

85 lines

New Thread

More on automatic vs. allocatable vs. pointer

More on automatic vs. allocatable vs. pointer

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:21:14 -0800

81 lines

Re: More on automatic vs. allocatable vs. pointer

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 18:36:49 +0200

62 lines

Re: More on automatic vs. allocatable vs. pointer

John A. Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:15:00 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

More on dummy arguments with target attribute

More on dummy arguments with target attribute

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:26:16 -0600

45 lines

Re: More on dummy arguments with target attribute

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:55:15 -0600

34 lines

Re: More on dummy arguments with target attribute

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:34:17 -0500

28 lines

Re: More on dummy arguments with target attribute

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:43:02 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

More on slow compilation!

More on slow compilation!

Magne Rudshaug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 08:31:57 +0100

38 lines

Re: More on slow compilation!

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 08:09:00 -0500

30 lines

Re: More on slow compilation!

Keith Lindsay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 07:04:58 -0700

26 lines

Re: More on slow compilation!

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Nov 2002 08:32:09 -0600

48 lines

Re: More on slow compilation!

José Rui Faustino de Sousa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:51:21 -0000

73 lines

New Thread

moving code from IBM to Intel systems

moving code from IBM to Intel systems

David Byrne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:33:23 +0100

24 lines

Re: moving code from IBM to Intel systems

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:01:37 -0400

71 lines

New Thread

Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:13:19 -0500

60 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:33:46 -0400

60 lines

Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:44:42 -0700

49 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:58:04 -0500

68 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jun 2002 20:48:37 -0400

87 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jun 2002 07:45:46 -0700

42 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:15:04 +0100

42 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:15:39 +0100

37 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:30:16 -0600

20 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jun 2002 17:21:15 -0700

108 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jun 2002 18:01:20 -0700

63 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:52:52 -0500

121 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Jun 2002 13:14:39 -0500

70 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 07:55:17 -0700

29 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:28:18 -0700

56 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:11:29 -0700

99 lines

Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 10:53:26 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Multiplying by powers of two

Multiplying by powers of two

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:19:38 -0700

18 lines

Re: Multiplying by powers of two

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:38:29 +0100

60 lines

New Thread

Munkres

Munkres

EXT-Hanly, John M <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Mar 2002 09:14:18 -0800

22 lines

Re: Munkres

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 6 Mar 2002 07:43:07 +1100

34 lines

Re: Munkres

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:06:35 +1100

108 lines

Re: Munkres

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:06:36 +1100

41 lines

Re: Munkres

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Mar 2002 13:50:23 +0100

35 lines

Re: Munkres

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 7 Mar 2002 00:01:03 +1100

40 lines

New Thread

NAG runtime setup: quick question

NAG runtime setup: quick question

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:42:03 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

Nested Modules [was:Re: Runtime error in Forte compiled program]

Nested Modules [was:Re: Runtime error in Forte compiled program]

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:34:50 +0300

98 lines

New Thread

Non-determinism in the FORALL Construct

Non-determinism in the FORALL Construct

Niki Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:41:29 +0100

50 lines

Non-determinism in the FORALL Construct

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jun 2002 08:42:55 -0700

37 lines

Re: Non-determinism in the FORALL Construct

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jun 2002 10:50:59 -0500

70 lines

Re: Non-determinism in the FORALL Construct

Niki Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:39:07 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

novice allocatable array question

novice allocatable array question

David Byrne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Apr 2002 17:59:51 +0100

49 lines

novice allocatable array question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:39:54 -0700

75 lines

Re: novice allocatable array question

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:11:17 +0200

36 lines

Re: novice allocatable array question

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Apr 2002 18:16:39 +0930

83 lines

Re: novice allocatable array question

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Apr 2002 22:09:18 +1000

76 lines

New Thread

Off topic: Linux.. (was Re: linux & f90/f95)

Off topic: Linux.. (was Re: linux & f90/f95)

Klaus Ramstöck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 10:53:30 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Optimizing the code in Fortran 90

Optimizing the code in Fortran 90

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:35:37 +0100

27 lines

Re: Optimizing the code in Fortran 90

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jul 2002 13:36:13 -0400

55 lines

Re: Optimizing the code in Fortran 90

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jul 2002 12:31:36 +0100

70 lines

Re: Optimizing the code in Fortran 90

Daniel Grimwood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jul 2002 20:10:35 +0800

32 lines

New Thread

Order of declarations for EXTENSIBLE types

Order of declarations for EXTENSIBLE types

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Jul 2002 12:22:25 -0500

36 lines

Re: Order of declarations for EXTENSIBLE types

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:28:23 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

OT: Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

OT: Re: Multiple nonzero rank references in structure components

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:45:58 -0500

99 lines

New Thread

Parametrized data-types as dummies

Parametrized data-types as dummies

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:23:02 -0500

52 lines

Parametrized data-types as dummies

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jun 2002 08:13:59 -0700

43 lines

Re: Parametrized data-types as dummies

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:41:03 -0500

84 lines

Re: Parametrized data-types as dummies

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jun 2002 13:28:17 -0700

84 lines

Re: Parametrized data-types as dummies

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jun 2002 12:10:01 -0700

37 lines

Re: Parametrized data-types as dummies

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jun 2002 16:53:27 -0500

58 lines

Re: Parametrized data-types as dummies

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:52:59 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

Parent component in extended types

Parent component in extended types

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jul 2002 22:35:15 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Passing array between subroutines

Passing array between subroutines

Zhou Yong Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:26:10 +0800

33 lines

Re: Passing array between subroutines

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:42:19 -0500

77 lines

Re: Passing array between subroutines

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:44:38 +0200

43 lines

Re: Passing array between subroutines

Zhou Yong Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:56:09 +0800

88 lines

Re: Passing array between subroutines

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:29:45 +0200

28 lines

Re: Passing array between subroutines

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:29:12 -0700

71 lines

New Thread

Passing one-dimensional array sections to subroutines