|
|
|
Size
|
Re: what's .mod for?
|
Michael Metcalf |
Wed, 19 Dec 2001 16:37:50 +0100 |
34 lines |
what's .mod for?
|
Zhou Yong Cheng |
Wed, 19 Dec 2001 19:07:49 +0800 |
21 lines |
Workshop on OpenMP in Japan (WOMPEI'02) - extended deadline
|
Matthijs van Waveren |
Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:47:29 +0000 |
119 lines |
An expression evaluator
|
Van Snyder |
Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:21:36 -0800 |
121 lines |
Re: which is faster ?
|
robin |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:47:54 +1000 |
60 lines |
which is faster
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:29:09 -0800 |
37 lines |
which is faster
|
Nofal, Mostafa |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 14:21:26 -0500 |
44 lines |
IBM XL Fortran for AIX V7.1.1
|
Yin Zhu |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:35:21 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: List addressing
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:37:43 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: List addressing
|
Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:00:57 +0000 |
25 lines |
List addressing
|
John Reid |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:59:20 GMT |
36 lines |
Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:19:18 -0600 |
24 lines |
Re: List addressing (was: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays)
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:52:13 +0000 |
77 lines |
Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again
|
Ted Stern |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:02:56 -0800 |
643 lines |
Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:46:35 -0600 |
87 lines |
Re: test 4
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:07:22 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: test 4
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:49:30 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: test 4
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:48:47 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: test 4
|
Terry Koontz |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 08:47:19 -0700 |
27 lines |
test 4
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:44:30 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: test 3
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:42:32 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: test 3
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:42:18 +0000 |
45 lines |
test 3
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:37:31 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: test 2
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:33:41 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: test 2
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:33:27 +0000 |
44 lines |
test 2
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:32:47 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: list reconfiguration - please be patient
|
Peter Shenkin |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:31:38 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: test1 - both,ignore
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:29:18 +0000 |
72 lines |
Re: test1 - both,ignore
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:29:04 +0000 |
72 lines |
test1 - both,ignore
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:28:09 +0000 |
53 lines |
list reconfiguration - please be patient
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:27:00 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:06:10 +0000 |
98 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Ian Chivers |
Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:38:45 -0800 |
47 lines |
Reply-To
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:23:50 -0600 |
20 lines |
List addressing (was: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays)
|
James Giles |
Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:12:43 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Dan Nagle |
Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:11:15 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
John Reid |
Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:58:22 GMT |
20 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
John Reid |
Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:19:43 GMT |
41 lines |
Re: Changing character to integer or real
|
robin |
Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:48:34 +1000 |
23 lines |
Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again
|
robin |
Sat, 8 Dec 2001 10:47:22 +1000 |
24 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:23:58 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Alvaro Fernandez |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:32:41 -0600 |
139 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Alois Steindl |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 17:15:01 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Tim Prince |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 07:46:49 -0800 |
45 lines |
Re: Changing character to integer or real
|
Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:17:10 +0000 |
13 lines |
Re: Changing character to integer or real
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:12:49 +0000 |
34 lines |
Changing character to integer or real
|
Nofal, Mostafa |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 08:56:42 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Back copies of Fortran Forum
|
Clive Page |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:52:17 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Peter Shenkin |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 08:17:23 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Peter Shenkin |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 07:13:29 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: Back copies of Fortran Forum
|
Michael Metcalf |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 05:52:25 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Alois Steindl |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:27:03 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Klaus Ramstöck |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:53:44 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: Back copies of Fortran Forum
|
Clive Page |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:47:57 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Peter Shenkin |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 23:53:39 -0500 |
99 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Anuchit Aromsawa |
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 03:24:42 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Tim Prince |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:02:28 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Klaus Ramstöck |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 21:49:48 +0100 |
72 lines |
Back copies of Fortran Forum
|
Michael Metcalf |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:08:19 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Anuchit Aromsawa |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 19:03:54 +0000 |
60 lines |
Pointing to a non-pointer element of a pointer structure
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 07:53:21 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Alois Steindl |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:50:47 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Tim Prince |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 07:41:52 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Alois Steindl |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:27:42 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Anuchit Aromsawa |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:16:10 +0000 |
81 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:54:57 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Size of automatic arrays
|
Alois Steindl |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:54:49 +0100 |
32 lines |
Size of automatic arrays
|
Anuchit Aromsawa |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:35:06 +0000 |
19 lines |
Pointing to a non-pointer element of a pointer structure
|
Michael Metcalf |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 04:32:00 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Pointing to a non-pointer element of a pointer structure
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:27:21 +0000 |
75 lines |
Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again
|
Michael Metcalf |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 03:51:06 -0500 |
19 lines |
Pointing to a non-pointer element of a pointer structure
|
John Bray |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 08:26:27 +0000 |
90 lines |
Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again
|
Ted Stern |
Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:34:04 -0800 |
498 lines |
Re: Internal procedure as actual argument
|
Roland Schilling |
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:28:29 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: Internal procedure as actual argument
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:10:37 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: Internal procedure as actual argument
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:00:51 +0000 |
93 lines |
Re: Internal procedure as actual argument
|
Neil Carlson |
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 11:29:03 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: Internal procedure as actual argument
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 12:08:14 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: Internal procedure as actual argument
|
Lionel, Steve |
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 09:55:29 -0800 |
24 lines |
Re: Internal procedure as actual argument
|
John Reid |
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 17:16:10 GMT |
51 lines |
Internal procedure as actual argument
|
Roland Schilling |
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 17:59:15 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: newline vs. linefeed
|
Gary Scott |
Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:03:03 -0600 |
103 lines |
Re: Efficiency of allocatable and pointer arrays
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Sun, 2 Dec 2001 18:11:34 +0200 |
142 lines |
Re: Efficiency of allocatable and pointer arrays
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sun, 2 Dec 2001 10:42:46 -0500 |
60 lines |
Efficiency of allocatable and pointer arrays
|
Jun Xiong |
Sun, 2 Dec 2001 04:16:11 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Yet More on newline
|
Jing Guo |
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:26:08 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: newline vs. linefeed
|
James Giles |
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:42:15 -0700 |
83 lines |
Re: Yet More on ACAHR( 10)
|
Lawrie Schonfelder |
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:26:56 +0000 |
23 lines |
newline vs. linefeed
|
Peter Shenkin |
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:35:16 -0500 |
133 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Dan Nagle |
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:57:40 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:36:51 +0000 |
55 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Clive Page |
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:26:44 +0000 |
44 lines |
|
Gary Scott |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:20:04 -0600 |
92 lines |
Re: Yet More on ACAHR( 10)
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:06:11 -0500 |
55 lines |
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:14:42 -0800 |
52 lines |
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:48:10 -0800 |
62 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
James Giles |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:56:14 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:46:26 -0800 |
72 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:38:19 -0800 |
38 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:20:53 -0800 |
67 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 16:03:30 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:55:40 -0800 |
54 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:23:30 -0800 |
47 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:10:46 -0800 |
57 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:35:36 -0500 |
74 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Clive Page |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:29:54 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 11:51:18 +0000 |
72 lines |
Re: Is D1MACH(4) == EPSILON(1.D0)?
|
simon harding (IACR-RES) |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:07:59 -0000 |
22 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Clive Page |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:00:04 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:55:47 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug
|
Jing Guo |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:27:45 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug ??
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:57:04 -0600 |
45 lines |
Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug
|
Jing Guo |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:49:30 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Is D1MACH(4) == EPSILON(1.D0)?
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:52:36 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug ??
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:25:07 +0100 |
24 lines |
Is D1MACH(4) == EPSILON(1.D0)?
|
Eric Petersen [Aero] |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:53:27 -0600 |
27 lines |
Cray pointers and compiler bug
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:47:54 -0600 |
204 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:44:24 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Catherine Moroney |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:16:07 -0800 |
34 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:07:46 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: Cheating in INTERFACE
|
Jing Guo |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:58:53 -0500 |
88 lines |
Re: Cheating in INTERFACE
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:23:48 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Nils Smeds |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:03:44 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:50:32 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Nils Smeds |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:45:13 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:17:57 +0000 |
71 lines |
Re: Cheating in INTERFACE
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:21:39 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Cheating in INTERFACE
|
Jing Guo |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:52:46 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Cheating in INTERFACE
|
Jing Guo |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:28:22 -0500 |
99 lines |
Re: Please ignore "Compiler analysis question"
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:06:48 -0600 |
132 lines |
Cheating in INTERFACE
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:36:15 -0600 |
73 lines |
Compiler analysis question
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:06:28 -0600 |
124 lines |
Cheating in INTERFACE
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:03:12 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:32:44 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:27:00 -0600 |
64 lines |
Re: mpi recommendations
|
Tim Prince |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 05:21:04 -0800 |
37 lines |
Re: mpi recommendations
|
Daniel Kidger |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:38:10 -0000 |
36 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Daniel Kidger |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:23:55 -0000 |
55 lines |
unsubscribe
|
Daniel Domert |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:23:40 +0100 |
33 lines |
unsubscribe
|
Hugues Libotte |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:16:23 +0100 |
135 lines |
Re: embedding new-lines in character string
|
Erik Schnetter |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:11:10 +0100 |
43 lines |
mpi recommendations
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:10:48 +0000 |
36 lines |
embedding new-lines in character string
|
Catherine Moroney |
Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:31:59 -0800 |
35 lines |
Re: Aliasing and allocatable components
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:22:18 -0600 |
65 lines |
Re: Aliasing and allocatable components
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:03:31 +0000 |
76 lines |
Aliasing and allocatable components
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:42:54 -0600 |
244 lines |
Re: Standards, a simple user's point of view
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Fri, 23 Nov 2001 08:52:49 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Standards, a simple user's point of view
|
robin |
Fri, 23 Nov 2001 09:32:44 +1000 |
49 lines |
Re: Statically link a module with library routines??
|
Roland Schilling |
Thu, 22 Nov 2001 18:24:33 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: including variables in edit descriptors
|
robin |
Fri, 23 Nov 2001 00:30:25 +1000 |
47 lines |
Re: pgf77 options - THANK YOU
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:04:45 -0200 |
14 lines |
Re: pgf77 options
|
Daniel Kidger |
Thu, 22 Nov 2001 13:55:41 -0000 |
41 lines |
Re: pgf77 options
|
Erik Schnetter |
Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:47:08 +0100 |
32 lines |
pgf77 options
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Thu, 22 Nov 2001 11:35:05 -0200 |
19 lines |
Re: including variables in edit descriptors
|
Hargraves Gary |
Thu, 22 Nov 2001 08:22:03 +1000 |
61 lines |
Re: including variables in edit descriptors
|
W. J. Metzger |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:11:54 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: Statically link a module with library routines??
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:08:38 -0600 |
42 lines |
Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk
|
Daniel Kidger |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:51:14 -0000 |
34 lines |
Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk
|
Ian Chivers |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:46:10 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk
|
Ian Chivers |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:45:33 +0000 |
72 lines |
Re: including variables in edit descriptors
|
Daniel Kidger |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:41:43 -0000 |
29 lines |
Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk
|
Shaun Forth AMORG |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:18:32 +0000 |
61 lines |
Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:13:02 +0100 |
49 lines |
fortran course near lancaster university in the uk
|
Ian Chivers |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:56:38 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: including variables in edit descriptors
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:56:35 -0800 |
51 lines |
Statically link a module with library routines??
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:45:23 -0800 |
37 lines |
Parsing XML
|
Popa, Frank D. |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:43:59 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: including variables in edit descriptors
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:10:41 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: including variables in edit descriptors
|
Daniel Kidger |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:33:43 -0000 |
49 lines |
Re: Statically link a module with library routines??
|
Daniel Kidger |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:07:32 -0000 |
39 lines |
ACM Fortran Forum (December issue)
|
Michael Metcalf |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 05:43:05 -0500 |
63 lines |
Statically link a module with library routines??
|
Roland Schilling |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:48:08 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: including variables in edit descriptors
|
Craig Dedo |
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 22:18:11 -0600 |
162 lines |
including variables in edit descriptors
|
Catherine Moroney |
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 17:34:01 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: Standards, a simple user's point of view
|
Dan Nagle |
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 11:04:18 -0500 |
88 lines |
Standards, a simple user's point of view
|
Bertrand Meltz |
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:06:38 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: Fortran Resources (November)
|
Jean Vezina |
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 23:22:05 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Standards
|
Richard Maine |
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:19:05 -0800 |
34 lines |
Re: Standards
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:46:48 -0600 |
119 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Lawrie Schonfelder |
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:25:03 +0000 |
81 lines |
Fortran Resources (November)
|
Michael Metcalf |
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 03:56:43 -0500 |
925 lines |
Re: Standards
|
robin |
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:51:14 +1000 |
81 lines |
Re: Standards
|
robin |
Sat, 17 Nov 2001 11:53:25 +1000 |
42 lines |
Re: Standards
|
Van Snyder |
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:42:42 -0800 |
65 lines |
Re: C interop (was Re: Standards ( was: Stream I/O ( was....
|
Dan Nagle |
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:02:56 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Rewrites ( was The truth about Fortran)
|
Clive Page |
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:47:27 +0000 |
35 lines |
C interop (was Re: Standards ( was: Stream I/O ( was....
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:36:44 -0800 |
54 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Len Makin |
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:24:34 +1100 |
36 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:12:16 -0800 |
33 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortrandisinformation article))
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:08:59 -0600 |
54 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Peter Shenkin |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:50:37 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:17:46 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Len Makin |
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 08:59:03 +1100 |
26 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
James Giles |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:53:48 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Standards
|
James Giles |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:37:13 -0700 |
63 lines |
Re: Standards
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:18:04 -0600 |
19 lines |
Re: Standards
|
Peter Shenkin |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:05:43 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:59:09 -0800 |
78 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
<> |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 20:00:02 +0010 |
40 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:29:02 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Peter Shenkin |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:38:44 -0500 |
135 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:27:29 -0800 |
61 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: AnotherFortrandisinformation article))
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:13:04 -0600 |
91 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:55:29 -0800 |
52 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:49:34 +0000 |
72 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:37:26 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Peter Shenkin |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:24:52 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 07:51:04 -0800 |
50 lines |
Re: Numerical Recipes (was: Another Fortran disinformation article)
|
Tom Clune |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:40:33 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Rewrites ( was The truth about Fortran)
|
<> |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:38:28 +0010 |
25 lines |
Re: The truth about Fortran, was: The departure of NASA's chief...
|
<> |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:30:49 +0010 |
21 lines |
Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortrandisinformation article))
|
Craig Dedo |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 06:48:36 -0600 |
168 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Popa, Frank D. |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 06:19:45 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
robin |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:19:37 +1000 |
32 lines |
Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Michael Metcalf |
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 04:03:49 -0500 |
92 lines |
Re: Numerical Recipes (was: Another Fortran disinformation article)
|
James Giles |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 23:33:53 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article)
|
Peter Shenkin |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 23:59:24 -0500 |
53 lines |
Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article)
|
Craig Dedo |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 21:49:30 -0600 |
139 lines |
Numerical Recipes (was: Another Fortran disinformation article)
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:44:55 -0800 |
68 lines |
Numerical Recipes (was: Another Fortran disinformation article)
|
James Giles |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:28:18 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
James Giles |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:16:06 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:15:41 -0800 |
26 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:03:02 -0800 |
28 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Klaus Ramstöck |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:52:22 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Klaus Ramstöck |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:45:11 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:28:56 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Stu Anderson 425-865-3595 |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:08:22 -0800 |
23 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
James Giles |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:54:19 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Craig Shirley |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:40:30 -0800 |
22 lines |
Re: SV: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
James Giles |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:40:29 -0700 |
22 lines |
Rewrites ( was The truth about Fortran)
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:30:07 -0800 |
87 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Klaus Ramstöck |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 20:26:12 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: The truth about Fortran, was: The departure of NASA's chief...
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:04:44 +0010 |
62 lines |
Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:45:24 -0800 |
42 lines |
SV: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Ring, Avi |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:41:20 +0100 |
91 lines |
perf de CGEMV on SGI
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:05:08 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
N. Shamsundar |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:13:13 -0600 |
32 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 08:36:19 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Daniel Kidger |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:46:37 -0000 |
23 lines |
Re: Passing pointer argument
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:35:08 -0600 |
79 lines |
Re: The truth about Fortran, was: The departure of NASA's chief...
|
Clive Page |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:18:00 +0000 |
23 lines |
Passing pointer argument
|
MELLION Gatien |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:44:35 +0100 |
149 lines |
Re: The truth about Fortran, was: The departure of NASA's chief...
|
Hargraves Gary |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:31:35 +1000 |
128 lines |
Re: The truth about Fortran, was: The departure of NASA's chief...
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 23:58:45 -0500 |
53 lines |
The departure of NASA's chief...
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:48:03 -0800 |
52 lines |
Another Fortran disinformation article
|
Jean Vezina |
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:24:00 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Interval arithmetic and F200x
|
Peter Shenkin |
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:31:53 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Interval arithmetic and F200x
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:51:38 -0600 |
49 lines |
Re: Interval arithmetic and F200x
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:42:53 -0800 |
62 lines |
Interval arithmetic and F200x
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:48:41 -0600 |
36 lines |
Re: Interval arithmetic and F200x
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:42:34 -0600 |
108 lines |
Interval arithmetic
|
Jerzy Rojek |
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:33:09 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI, SUN, IBM...
|
Daniel Kidger |
Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:35:33 -0000 |
26 lines |
Re: OpenMP question
|
Drew McCormack |
Fri, 9 Nov 2001 09:20:28 +0100 |
37 lines |
OpenMP question
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:08:24 -0800 |
59 lines |
Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI
|
<> |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 19:14:53 +0010 |
44 lines |
Intel compiler with C pointer functions
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:52:28 -0600 |
60 lines |
Re: Intel compiler with C pointer functions
|
Erik Schnetter |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 18:29:37 +0100 |
72 lines |
Re: Intel compiler with C pointer functions
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:11:54 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: What is the wrong with my program?
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 16:29:38 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: What is the wrong with my program?
|
Tim Prince |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 06:12:09 -0800 |
49 lines |
Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI
|
Tim Prince |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 06:06:54 -0800 |
73 lines |
Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI, SUN, IBM...
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:17:29 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI, SUN, IBM...
|
Alexei Matveev |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 12:18:08 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI, SUN, IBM...
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:55:47 +0100 |
40 lines |
What is the wrong with my program?
|
Michael Metcalf |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 03:04:30 -0500 |
31 lines |
What is the wrong with my program?
|
frank_ouyang |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:51:55 +0800 |
39 lines |
Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI
|
Tim Prince |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:29:48 -0800 |
30 lines |
Re: Fortran Memory
|
Hargraves Gary |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:19:43 +1000 |
81 lines |
Re: Fortran Memory
|
Len Makin |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:47:37 +1100 |
41 lines |
Re: Fortran Memory
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 14:57:32 -0800 |
68 lines |
Re: Fortran Memory
|
Len Makin |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:20:11 +1100 |
42 lines |
Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance
|
David Annetts |
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 08:16:58 +1100 |
40 lines |
Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI, SUN, IBM...
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:07:52 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: ELF90 3.00a under Windows NT/2000
|
tzeis |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:24:42 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance
|
Simon J. Rees |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:14:57 -0600 |
44 lines |
Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI
|
Ian Bush |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:57:40 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Fortran Memory
|
Lionel, Steve |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:33:11 -0800 |
35 lines |
Re: Fortran Memory
|
Daniel Kidger |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:28:49 -0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Fortran Memory
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:22:29 -0800 |
74 lines |
perf de CGEMV on SGI
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 17:22:04 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance
|
Thorsten Ohl |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:30:20 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Fortran Memory
|
Lionel, Steve |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 06:25:39 -0800 |
22 lines |
ELF90 3.00a under Windows NT/2000
|
Winfried Auzinger |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:06:44 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: Fortran Memory
|
Douglas Sondak |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:59:01 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Fortran Memory
|
Lionel, Steve |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 05:09:25 -0800 |
35 lines |
Q: Fortran Memory
|
Douglas Sondak |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 06:08:53 -0500 |
14 lines |
Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance
|
Tim Prince |
Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:41:19 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance
|
Peter Shenkin |
Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:01:32 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance
|
Thorsten Ohl |
Tue, 6 Nov 2001 18:48:10 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance
|
Peter Shenkin |
Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:28:26 -0500 |
59 lines |
Linux f90 Compiler performance
|
Simon J. Rees |
Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:55:52 -0600 |
19 lines |
Re: Legal in a pure function?
|
Neil Carlson |
Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:06:56 -0700 |
25 lines |
Legal in a pure function?
|
Michael Metcalf |
Tue, 6 Nov 2001 03:08:22 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Legal in a pure function?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 5 Nov 2001 17:36:10 -0600 |
56 lines |
Legal in a pure function?
|
Richard Maine |
Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:40:30 -0800 |
54 lines |
Legal in a pure function?
|
Neil Carlson |
Mon, 5 Nov 2001 14:11:15 -0700 |
42 lines |
Call for Papers for the 2002 Workshop on OpenMP (WOMPEI) in Japan
|
Matthijs van Waveren |
Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:11:13 +0000 |
113 lines |
Re: Intel Fortran Compiler for Linux - Scratch files
|
Jens Bischoff |
Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:51:50 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Q: Pointer Allocation
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:42:30 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: Q: Pointer Allocation
|
Douglas Sondak |
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:24:27 -0500 |
26 lines |
Q: Pointer Allocation
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:11:39 -0800 |
78 lines |
Re: Pointer Allocation
|
Roderick W. Failing III |
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:04:26 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: Q: Pointer Allocation
|
Drew McCormack |
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 14:50:16 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: graphic with fortran?
|
Lionel, Steve |
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 05:36:35 -0800 |
24 lines |
Q: Pointer Allocation
|
Douglas Sondak |
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:30:59 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Fortran
|
Venkat V S S Sastry |
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:58:01 +0000 |
123 lines |
Fortran
|
EXT-Hanly, John M |
Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:54:21 -0800 |
22 lines |
Re: graphic with fortran?
|
Clive Page |
Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:55:17 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Standard module-routine referencing in debuggers?
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:34:05 -0800 |
18 lines |
Standard module-routine referencing in debuggers?
|
Ted Stern |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:14:24 -0800 |
63 lines |
Re: PETSc library --- C dynamic arrays and Fortran
|
Tim Prince |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:40:16 -0800 |
51 lines |
PETSc library --- C dynamic arrays and Fortran
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:11:37 -0600 |
59 lines |
Re: graphic with fortran?
|
Marco A. Garcia |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 20:05:37 +0330 |
83 lines |
Re: graphic with Fortran?
|
Daniel Kidger |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:08:12 -0000 |
32 lines |
Re: graphic with fortran?
|
Zhou Yong Cheng |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 22:01:59 +0800 |
52 lines |
Re: graphic with fortran?
|
Clive Page |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:23:33 +0000 |
37 lines |
graphic with fortran?
|
Zhou Yong Cheng |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:04:17 +0800 |
21 lines |
Re: Associating COMMON variables
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:14:22 -0800 |
62 lines |
Associating COMMON variables
|
Jing Guo |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 19:43:00 -0500 |
53 lines |
Please cancel me from the list
|
Goeran Klose |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:37:09 +0100 |
11 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer |
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:25:27 +0000 |
20 lines |
Re: Intel Fortran Compiler for Linux - Scratch files
|
Daniel Kidger |
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 09:26:23 -0000 |
38 lines |
Intel Fortran Compiler for Linux - Scratch files
|
Jens Bischoff |
Sat, 27 Oct 2001 21:55:48 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: Name mangling problem
|
NAKADA Kazuhiko |
Sat, 27 Oct 2001 17:05:46 +0900 |
118 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
James Giles |
Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:25:48 -0600 |
40 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:22:05 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
James Giles |
Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:33:45 -0600 |
56 lines |
Re: Name mangling problem - with Intel IFC compiler
|
Daniel Kidger |
Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:37:02 +0100 |
49 lines |
Name mangling problem
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:32:31 -0200 |
41 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Fri, 26 Oct 2001 08:51:22 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 22:36:10 -0400 |
31 lines |
OpenMP + MATMUL?
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:11:58 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
James Giles |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:42:58 -0600 |
55 lines |
Pointers
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:25:00 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
James Giles |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:56:16 -0600 |
32 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
<> |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:31:42 +0010 |
38 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:57:42 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Lionel, Steve |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:38:00 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
James Giles |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:30:43 -0600 |
35 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 07:54:40 -0700 |
53 lines |
Unresolved external and conversion types
|
Pavel Houdek |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:43:29 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: OpenMP question
|
Herbert Fruchtl |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:47:10 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: OpenMP question
|
Ronald Fowler |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:29:11 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:51:53 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: OpenMP question
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 23:47:02 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 23:31:44 -0400 |
18 lines |
OpenMP question
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:25:22 -0700 |
83 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Abhishek Seth |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 06:08:42 +0530 |
21 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:58:07 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:29:15 -0700 |
71 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
<> |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 20:04:56 +0010 |
60 lines |
Re: % vs SCCS
|
richard friedman |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:59:32 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Lawrie Schonfelder |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:42:43 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Lawrie Schonfelder |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:33:57 +0100 |
72 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 12:24:28 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Peter Shenkin |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 12:33:35 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Intel for academics
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:24:05 -0200 |
89 lines |
Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:23:00 +0100 |
33 lines |
Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:56:31 -0500 |
138 lines |
Re: Intel for academics
|
Ian Chivers |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:01:10 +0100 |
57 lines |
Intel for academics
|
Drew McCormack |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:56:59 +0200 |
29 lines |
I apology much for increasing so annoying debate between ¡°B.a¡± & ¡°B%a
|
frank_ouyang |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 20:11:41 +0800 |
61 lines |
leaving the list
|
Ian Chivers |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:50:45 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:20:31 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: Emulating MATLAB's save
|
Clive Page |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:04:58 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:03:13 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Clive Page |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:57:52 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: What is wrong with my programe?
|
frank_ouyang |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:39:05 +0800 |
59 lines |
Re: What is wrong with my programe?
|
Abhishek Seth |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 06:02:28 +0530 |
57 lines |
Re: What is wrong with my programe?
|
R. A. Vowels |
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:02:30 +1000 |
42 lines |
Capturing keys problem
|
Pavel Houdek |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 23:50:11 +0200 |
23 lines |
Re: Emulating MATLAB's save
|
Bob Cohen |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:12:30 -0400 |
80 lines |
Emulating MATLAB's save
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:11:12 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:53:15 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Joerg Behrens |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 19:45:49 +0200 |
27 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Bob Cohen |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:39:31 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:32:09 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Jing Guo |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:21:02 -0400 |
68 lines |
% vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:13:23 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Bob Cohen |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:33:14 -0400 |
51 lines |
% vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:54:35 +0200 |
39 lines |
Thanks to every one.
|
frank_ouyang |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 22:32:36 +0800 |
86 lines |
Re: Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" in the program
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:14:45 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" i n the program
|
Lionel, Steve |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 05:27:32 -0700 |
30 lines |
Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" in the program
|
frank_ouyang |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 20:00:10 +0800 |
53 lines |
Re: What is wrong with my programe?
|
Drew McCormack |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 08:45:42 +0200 |
73 lines |
What is wrong with my programe?
|
frank_ouyang |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:10:04 +0800 |
36 lines |
Re: cfortran.h for Intel Linux ifc/icc?
|
Van Snyder |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:47:14 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: String length (was What *I* miss in Fortran)
|
Van Snyder |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:41:11 -0700 |
48 lines |
cfortran.h for Intel Linux ifc/icc?
|
Carlie Coats |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:34:29 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: String length (was What *I* miss in Fortran)
|
James Giles |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:24:53 -0600 |
46 lines |
Re: String length (was What *I* miss in Fortran)
|
Van Snyder |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:19:51 -0700 |
74 lines |
Re: String length (was What *I* miss in Fortran)
|
Peter Shenkin |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:05:44 -0400 |
51 lines |
String length (was What *I* miss in Fortran)
|
Van Snyder |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:05:28 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Question:
|
Lionel, Steve |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:19:33 -0700 |
22 lines |
Re: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile?
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:12:11 +0200 |
78 lines |
Question:
|
frank_ouyang |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:52:45 +0800 |
20 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
James Giles |
Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:38:40 -0600 |
31 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
robin |
Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:00:00 +1000 |
53 lines |
Re: String length
|
robin |
Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:00:00 +1000 |
27 lines |
Re: String length
|
Craig Dedo |
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 23:30:29 -0500 |
115 lines |
String length
|
Van Snyder |
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:06:41 -0700 |
22 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
James Giles |
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:30:03 -0600 |
36 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
robin |
Sat, 20 Oct 2001 09:28:05 +1000 |
49 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?
|
<> |
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 20:25:27 +0010 |
45 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:54:26 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is
|
Tim Prince |
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 07:54:26 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Peter Shenkin |
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:45:22 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is
|
robin |
Sat, 20 Oct 2001 00:39:59 +1000 |
32 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
<> |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:29:03 EDT |
38 lines |
Re: Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers Course
|
robin |
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:06:55 +1000 |
28 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?
|
robin |
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:06:55 +1000 |
33 lines |
leaving the list
|
Ian Chivers |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:15:29 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile? -
|
Volker Typke |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:10:38 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 07:43:56 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is
|
Ian Hounam |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 10:58:09 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
<> |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:56:55 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
Clive Page |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:53:58 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
Len Makin |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:34:26 +1000 |
46 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
Len Makin |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:04:46 +1000 |
40 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?
|
Hargraves Gary |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:44:02 +1000 |
71 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
robin |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:42:40 +1000 |
42 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:07:18 -0700 |
70 lines |
How to unsubscribe
|
LEE THORESEN |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:34:45 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
Bob Cohen |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:28:29 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:01:32 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
Bob Cohen |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:22:26 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: unsigned integers
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:52:51 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: unsigned integers
|
Jing Guo |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:41:35 -0400 |
91 lines |
Re: unsigned integers
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 07:59:19 -0700 |
67 lines |
Re: spelling of Fortran
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 07:35:52 -0700 |
20 lines |
Re: Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers Course
|
John Reid |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:36:40 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?
|
David Hitchin |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:24:09 +0100 |
33 lines |
Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers Course
|
Shaun Forth AMORG |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:58:59 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
Tim Prince |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 05:51:52 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
Alberto Fasso' |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:38:17 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
Clive Page |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:29:16 +0100 |
39 lines |
128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -
|
Popa, Frank D. |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 07:10:58 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile?
|
Len Makin |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:01:59 +1000 |
36 lines |
Re: spelling of Fortran
|
Lee Thoresen |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 20:37:25 -0400 |
10 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
robin |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:35:13 +1000 |
46 lines |
Re: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile?
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 17:26:58 -0700 |
51 lines |
Re: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile?
|
Len Makin |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:10:42 +1000 |
39 lines |
Re: unsigned integers
|
robin |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 08:14:04 +1000 |
26 lines |
Re: spelling of Fortran
|
Walt Brainerd |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:15:25 -0700 |
92 lines |
Re: spelling of Fortran
|
richard friedman |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:56:52 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 19:30:07 +0100 |
83 lines |
Re: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile?
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:54:50 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: spelling of Fortran
|
Walt Brainerd |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:47:02 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Peter Shenkin |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:36:36 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Herbert Fruchtl |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 16:04:21 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
simon harding (IACR-RES) |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 16:00:05 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Anthony Stone |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:54:23 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:15:06 +0100 |
120 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Bob Cohen |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:51:29 -0400 |
32 lines |
Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile?
|
Clive Page |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:48:47 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:17:45 +0200 |
89 lines |
Re: spelling of Fortran
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:11:36 +0200 |
58 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Bob Cohen |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:09:36 -0400 |
90 lines |
Re: spelling of Fortran
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:07:25 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Ian Chivers |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:46:03 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Bob Cohen |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:24:00 -0400 |
61 lines |
spelling of Fortran
|
Steven Lynch |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:11:24 +0200 |
29 lines |
Re: More questions about design issues for the submodules TR
|
Lawrie Schonfelder |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:10:25 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: More questions about design issues for the submodules TR
|
Lawrie Schonfelder |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:58:01 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Peter Shenkin |
Mon, 15 Oct 2001 23:44:55 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
robin |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:52:31 +1000 |
30 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
robin |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:03:23 +1000 |
45 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Peter Shenkin |
Sat, 13 Oct 2001 14:48:18 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
robin |
Sat, 13 Oct 2001 11:12:33 +1000 |
50 lines |
Re: File size
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:00:54 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: File size
|
Bob Cohen |
Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:38:00 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: File size
|
simon harding (IACR-RES) |
Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:49:41 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: File size
|
Fabienne Goffinont |
Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:46:09 +0200 |
29 lines |
File size
|
Drew McCormack |
Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:34:02 +0200 |
32 lines |
Re: More questions about design issues for the submodules TR
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 10:28:36 -0700 |
68 lines |
Re: More questions about design issues for the submodules TR
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:21:52 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Peter Shenkin |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:41:54 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: colors mismatch
|
Panagiotis Vossos |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:17:53 +0300 |
34 lines |
Re: colors mismatch
|
Pavel Houdek |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:09:39 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Drew McCormack |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:37:00 +0200 |
79 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
robin |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:05:45 +1000 |
36 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Tim Prince |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:40:27 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Peter Shenkin |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 19:56:00 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Hargraves Gary |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:50:48 +1000 |
51 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
James Giles |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:56:30 -0600 |
29 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
James Giles |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:51:37 -0600 |
28 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
James Giles |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:40:01 -0600 |
99 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Dan Nagle |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:58:41 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Peter Shenkin |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:05:22 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:51:23 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Bob Cohen |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 14:25:16 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:27:29 -0700 |
19 lines |
What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Peter Shenkin |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:22:36 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Thorsten Ohl |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:00:30 +0200 |
49 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:35:02 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: additional thoughts on submodules TR
|
Lawrie Schonfelder |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:06:51 +0100 |
325 lines |
Re: More questions about design issues for the submodules TR
|
Lawrie Schonfelder |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:05:06 +0100 |
851 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Bob Cohen |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:05:03 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Thorsten Ohl |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:37:07 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 14:21:34 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Drew McCormack |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:16:23 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Thorsten Ohl |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 14:56:25 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Bob Cohen |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 08:53:23 -0400 |
136 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Drew McCormack |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 14:33:11 +0200 |
132 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
James Giles |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 05:24:42 -0600 |
88 lines |
Re: OOP (was: Strings)
|
Drew McCormack |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:23:10 +0200 |
121 lines |
Re: De-blanking Strings (was: Strings)
|
Hargraves Gary |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:55:04 +1000 |
122 lines |
Re: Strings ... and other things
|
Gary Scott |
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 20:27:16 -0500 |
95 lines |
Re: Strings ... and other things
|
Hargraves Gary |
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:15:12 +1000 |
86 lines |
OOP (was: Strings)
|
James Giles |
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 14:50:36 -0600 |
60 lines |
Re: Strings
|
<> |
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 19:49:28 +0010 |
32 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 09:27:45 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: Where can I down load the released version 6.6 of Comapq Visu al Fortran?
|
Lionel, Steve |
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 08:16:53 -0700 |
24 lines |
Where can I down load the released version 6.6 of Comapq Visual Fortran?
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 08:09:29 -0700 |
23 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Clive Page |
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 12:26:08 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Drew McCormack |
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 11:59:13 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer |
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 09:25:51 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Ted Stern |
Mon, 8 Oct 2001 09:59:03 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Mandeep Singh |
Mon, 8 Oct 2001 08:47:52 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: Where can I down load the released version 6.6 of Comapq Visual Fortran?
|
Tim Prince |
Mon, 8 Oct 2001 05:51:21 -0700 |
25 lines |
Where can I down load the released version 6.6 of Comapq Visual Fortran?
|
frank_ouyang |
Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:40:07 +0800 |
20 lines |
Re: Strings
|
robin |
Mon, 8 Oct 2001 10:05:21 +1000 |
63 lines |
Re: De-blanking Strings (was: Strings)
|
robin |
Mon, 8 Oct 2001 10:05:21 +1000 |
23 lines |
Re: Strings
|
<> |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 19:55:02 +0010 |
71 lines |
Re: Strings
|
<> |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 19:24:57 +0010 |
55 lines |
Re: Strings
|
<> |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 19:15:33 +0010 |
40 lines |
Re: Strings
|
<> |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 19:07:01 +0010 |
69 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Bob Cohen |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 10:09:33 -0400 |
94 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Bob Cohen |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 09:55:18 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Bob Cohen |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 09:51:53 -0400 |
111 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Phillip Helbig |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 12:18:24 +0100 |
16 lines |
Re: Strings
|
robin |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 19:14:52 +1000 |
71 lines |
Re: Strings
|
R. A. Vowels |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 12:25:01 +1000 |
11 lines |
Re: Strings
|
R. A. Vowels |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 12:20:54 +1000 |
87 lines |
Re: compiler error ??
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Sat, 6 Oct 2001 17:31:21 +0000 |
67 lines |
Re: compiler error ??
|
Alan Miller |
Sat, 6 Oct 2001 23:44:54 +1000 |
1254 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Bob Cohen |
Sat, 6 Oct 2001 09:21:20 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: Strings
|
R. A. Vowels |
Sat, 6 Oct 2001 09:28:11 +1000 |
26 lines |
Re: program error (was compiler error)
|
robin |
Sat, 6 Oct 2001 09:24:19 +1000 |
27 lines |
Re: Strings
|
<> |
Fri, 5 Oct 2001 18:51:42 +0010 |
35 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Mandeep Singh |
Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:36:00 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Roland Schilling |
Fri, 5 Oct 2001 15:56:04 +0200 |
55 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Bob Cohen |
Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:55:51 -0400 |
270 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Mandeep Singh |
Fri, 5 Oct 2001 08:05:44 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: Strings
|
Alan Miller |
Fri, 5 Oct 2001 18:07:08 +1000 |
47 lines |
Strings
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:37:05 +0200 |
32 lines |
Reunion
|
Michael Metcalf |
Fri, 5 Oct 2001 03:34:01 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: compiler error
|
Alan Miller |
Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:50:52 +1000 |
2452 lines |
Re: Questions about design issues for the submodules TR
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:43:13 -0700 |
113 lines |
Re: F2x draft download
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 17:57:01 +0000 |
52 lines |
Intel Fortran free noncomercial compiler
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 12:48:53 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: compiler error
|
Tim Prince |
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:31:46 -0700 |
1146 lines |
Re: compiler error
|
Bob Cohen |
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 13:10:30 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: compiler error
|
Tim Prince |
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:07:36 -0700 |
1141 lines |
Re: Questions about design issues for the submodules TR
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:58:37 -0500 |
123 lines |
compiler error
|
shireen p |
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 08:43:57 -0400 |
1023 lines |
Re: Questions about design issues for the submodules TR
|
<> |
Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:28:23 EDT |
46 lines |
Re: F2x draft download
|
Dan Nagle |
Wed, 3 Oct 2001 17:19:43 -0400 |
42 lines |
More questions about design issues for the submodules TR
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 3 Oct 2001 10:51:59 -0700 |
66 lines |
Questions about design issues for the submodules TR
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 3 Oct 2001 10:50:34 -0700 |
84 lines |
F2x draft download
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 3 Oct 2001 11:44:52 -0500 |
36 lines |
Java Fortran interface via JNI
|
Erich Kreiselmaier |
Wed, 3 Oct 2001 10:38:37 +0200 |
29 lines |
colors mismatch
|
Pavel Houdek |
Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:05:07 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: Reunion
|
Walt Brainerd |
Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:34:33 -0700 |
39 lines |
Reunion
|
Walt Brainerd |
Mon, 1 Oct 2001 07:11:31 -0700 |
90 lines |
Fortran usage within HPC
|
Ian Chivers |
Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:10:58 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: J3-fortran.org
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:06:27 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: J3-fortran.org
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:52:29 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: J3-fortran.org
|
James Giles |
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:48:13 -0600 |
34 lines |
J3-fortran.org
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:27:43 +0200 |
40 lines |
Re: Intel F90 compiler and MPI
|
Tim Prince |
Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:43:21 -0700 |
40 lines |
Intel F90 compiler and MPI
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:05:02 -0300 |
25 lines |
Fortran Resource File (September)
|
Michael Metcalf |
Thu, 20 Sep 2001 03:06:20 -0400 |
915 lines |
Re: numeric inquiry in new coco
|
R. A. Vowels |
Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:41:01 +1000 |
48 lines |
Announcing Compaq Visual Fortran version 6.6
|
Lionel, Steve |
Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:02:15 -0700 |
79 lines |
Re: F90 compiler
|
Walt Brainerd |
Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:56:12 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: F90 compiler
|
Paul Stevenson |
Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:59:24 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Array sections as arguments
|
John Reid |
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:38:23 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: Array sections as arguments
|
Glenn Carver |
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:12:54 +0100 |
96 lines |
Re: F90 compiler
|
Srivastava, Niraj |
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:35:44 -0400 |
107 lines |
Re: Array sections as arguments
|
John Reid |
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:21:19 +0100 |
90 lines |
Re: F90 compiler
|
Walt Brainerd |
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:01:19 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Array sections as arguments
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:52:07 +0100 |
93 lines |
Re: Array sections as arguments
|
Glenn Carver |
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:37:37 +0100 |
14 lines |
Array sections as arguments
|
Glenn Carver |
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:21:03 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: F90 compiler - correction (kernel 2.2.*)
|
Tim Prince |
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 05:58:41 -0700 |
26 lines |
F90 compiler - correction (kernel 2.2.*)
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:45:31 -0300 |
16 lines |
F90 compiler
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:42:39 -0300 |
17 lines |
numeric inquiry in new coco
|
Dan Nagle |
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:03:19 -0400 |
53 lines |
F2x Draft revisions
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:32:34 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: F2x Draft revisions
|
Dan Nagle |
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:43:32 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: Simple question
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 18:27:49 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: Simple question
|
Feyzi Inanc |
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:24:13 -0500 |
32 lines |
Simple question
|
Rector, David |
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:07:35 -0700 |
12 lines |
Re: strange bug
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 18:02:02 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: strange bug
|
robin |
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 01:55:17 +1000 |
48 lines |
Re: implicit copy real-->complex ???
|
robin |
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 01:51:18 +1000 |
41 lines |
strange bug [Was: implicit copy...]
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 15:49:13 +0200 |
60 lines |
Oooops [Was: implicit copy real-->complex ???]
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:33:58 +0200 |
83 lines |
implicit copy real-->complex ???
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 10:50:21 +0200 |
64 lines |
Fortran-90 Windows programming
|
Michael Metcalf |
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 02:59:51 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: inverse matrix
|
Van Snyder |
Sat, 1 Sep 2001 19:10:18 -0700 |
21 lines |
Re: inverse matrix
|
<> |
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 19:45:37 +0010 |
72 lines |
Re: inverse matrix
|
Jaehoon Seol |
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:19:47 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: inverse matrix
|
Tim Prince |
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 05:35:03 -0700 |
77 lines |
Re: inverse matrix
|
simon harding (IACR-RES) |
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:03:20 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: array declaration
|
Alistair Mills |
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:41:13 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Free Sample Copies of JCMSE
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:11:25 +0200 |
58 lines |
inverse matrix
|
M.T Shakeri |
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:48:43 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: Linear Interpolation Routine
|
robin |
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 08:34:53 +1000 |
20 lines |
Free Sample Copies of JCMSE
|
Dr. T.E. Simos |
Sun, 26 Aug 2001 17:47:47 +0300 |
89 lines |
Re: Linear Interpolation Routine
|
Bob Leblanc |
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:03:11 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: Linear Interpolation Routine
|
Bob Cohen |
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:57:40 -0400 |
27 lines |
Linear Interpolation Routine
|
Robert Leblanc |
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 20:36:57 +0100 |
10 lines |
Re: (j3.2001-600) RE: 01-317 - What is an Input/Output error
|
Van Snyder |
Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:41:12 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
<> |
Fri, 17 Aug 2001 19:24:59 +0010 |
94 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Lars Mossberg |
Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:11:58 +0200 |
72 lines |
Efficiency of F77 vs. f90/95 another question
|
Cezar Diaconu |
Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:42:44 +0900 |
35 lines |
Re: variable formatting
|
robin |
Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:15:01 +1000 |
47 lines |
variable formatting
|
Jens Bredenbeck |
Wed, 15 Aug 2001 20:17:06 +0100 |
34 lines |
variable formatting
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:49:44 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: variable formatting
|
Bob Cohen |
Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:30:33 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:32:39 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:55:25 -0700 |
62 lines |
Array assignment and overloading (=)
|
Tom Clune |
Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:10:59 -0400 |
63 lines |
Array assignment and overloading (=)
|
Richard Maine |
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:13:15 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Executable file.
|
Walt Brainerd |
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 08:27:58 -0700 |
36 lines |
e-version of Metcalf & Reid
|
Michael Metcalf |
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:18:08 -0400 |
37 lines |
Array assignment and overloading (=)
|
Tom Clune |
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:22:43 -0400 |
94 lines |
Re: ISO Varying String Fortran 95
|
John Reid |
Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:51:41 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
<> |
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 19:28:24 +0010 |
69 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
<> |
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 19:14:08 +0010 |
64 lines |
Re: Simple I/O Question
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 10:44:26 -0700 |
25 lines |
Simple I/O Question
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 10:42:14 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Simple I/O Question
|
Terry Koontz |
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:36:58 -0600 |
69 lines |
Simple I/O Question
|
Bart Benthul |
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:29:34 -0600 |
61 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 07:48:09 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
robin |
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 23:24:14 +1000 |
36 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
robin |
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 23:24:14 +1000 |
24 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 07:50:25 -0500 |
86 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Lawrie Schonfelder |
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 13:49:27 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Ron Sverdlove x2517 |
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 02:51:00 -0400 |
110 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
<> |
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 19:49:30 +0010 |
54 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
<> |
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 15:04:56 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Douglas Sondak |
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:57:53 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Executable file.
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:49:43 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:23:09 -0500 |
90 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Douglas Sondak |
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:31:31 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Dan Nagle |
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 05:31:37 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Herbert Fruchtl |
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:47:36 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: Executable file.
|
Tim Prince |
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 19:58:15 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: Executable file.
|
Comer Duncan |
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 21:37:15 -0400 |
45 lines |
Executable file.
|
Gerd Bruno Rocha |
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 22:08:21 -0300 |
21 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Bill Long |
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 19:56:39 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
<> |
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 19:46:26 +0010 |
51 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 12:48:55 +0200 |
94 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Carlie Coats |
Sun, 5 Aug 2001 08:40:35 -0400 |
93 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 18:23:56 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Tim Prince |
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 15:03:45 -0700 |
126 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
<> |
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 19:28:18 +0010 |
57 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Carlie Coats |
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 13:06:14 -0400 |
78 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Walt Brainerd |
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 09:41:16 -0700 |
79 lines |
Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90
|
Lawrie Schonfelder |
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 16:26:12 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Toon Moene |
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 16:37:41 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Cezar Diaconu |
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 17:05:44 +0900 |
28 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Peter Shenkin |
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 01:27:49 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Charles Crawford |
Fri, 3 Aug 2001 21:44:31 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
richard friedman |
Fri, 3 Aug 2001 15:09:51 -0700 |
28 lines |
Efficiency of F77 vs.F90
|
Walt Brainerd |
Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:42:44 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90
|
Walt Brainerd |
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 15:18:08 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90
|
Walt Brainerd |
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 15:15:19 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90
|
Ian Hounam |
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:08:52 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90
|
Alberto Fasso' |
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:42:32 +0200 |
26 lines |
Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90
|
Ian Hounam |
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 10:10:50 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90
|
Karsten Chmielewski |
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:10:30 +0200 |
23 lines |
ISO Varying String Fortran90
|
Erich Kreiselmaier |
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 10:52:46 +0200 |
22 lines |
Re: disk fragmentation
|
Bob Cohen |
Wed, 1 Aug 2001 12:12:17 -0400 |
52 lines |
disk fragmentation
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 1 Aug 2001 09:09:18 -0700 |
68 lines |
disk fragmentation
|
Michael J. Steinkamp |
Wed, 1 Aug 2001 09:29:56 -0600 |
33 lines |
Version of fsplit that ignores C pre-processor directives
|
John Bray |
Wed, 1 Aug 2001 13:43:12 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: array declaration
|
Catherine Moroney |
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:39:24 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: array declaration
|
N. Shamsundar |
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:38:43 -0500 |
29 lines |
array declaration
|
Naomi Greenberg |
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 10:20:00 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: passing array bounds into subroutines
|
robin |
Sat, 28 Jul 2001 19:49:16 +1000 |
16 lines |
Re: passing array bounds into subroutines
|
robin |
Sat, 28 Jul 2001 19:35:20 +1000 |
28 lines |
passing array bounds into subroutines
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:15:50 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: passing array bounds into subroutines
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:13:12 -0400 |
32 lines |
passing array bounds into subroutines
|
Catherine Moroney |
Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:04:47 -0700 |
72 lines |
UNSUBSCRIBE
|
K.N. Pratima |
Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:04:41 +0530 |
82 lines |
Latin Hypercube routine
|
Craig Shirley |
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:08:16 +0100 |
11 lines |
Aliased DOT_PRODUCT
|
Richard Maine |
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 07:52:14 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: Comments in namelists
|
Dan Nagle |
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:37:14 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Comments in namelists
|
Roland Schilling |
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:25:23 +0200 |
27 lines |
Comments in namelists
|
John Bray |
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:04:27 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: Aliased DOT_PRODUCT
|
Tim Prince |
Sat, 21 Jul 2001 23:39:38 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: intrinsic SUM and roundoff errors
|
robin |
Sun, 22 Jul 2001 13:58:16 +1000 |
21 lines |
Aliased DOT_PRODUCT
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sat, 21 Jul 2001 15:54:08 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: intrinsic SUM and roundoff errors
|
<> |
Sat, 21 Jul 2001 19:55:09 +0010 |
41 lines |
intrinsic SUM and roundoff errors
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 20 Jul 2001 07:51:27 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: intrinsic SUM and roundoff errors
|
Tim Prince |
Fri, 20 Jul 2001 06:10:31 -0700 |
35 lines |
intrinsic SUM and roundoff errors
|
Manfred Mudelsee |
Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:58:58 +0100 |
16 lines |
Multiple namelists in files
|
John Bray |
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:05:00 +0100 |
156 lines |
Re: How to read data in such a file
|
Panagiotis Vossos |
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:49:46 +0300 |
52 lines |
Re: Printing to two units revisited
|
Len Makin |
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:21:44 +1000 |
36 lines |
Re: Printing to two units revisited
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:14:09 -0400 |
18 lines |
How to read data in such a file
|
Changrong SU |
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:04:29 +0800 |
37 lines |
Re: Printing to two units revisited
|
Comer Duncan |
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 19:31:12 -0400 |
49 lines |
Printing to two units revisited
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 18:57:58 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Memory allocation
|
lello |
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:44:21 +0200 |
34 lines |
Memory allocation
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:02:46 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: How is ELEMENTAL translated?
|
John Reid |
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:18:08 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: How is ELEMENTAL translated?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:25:49 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: How is ELEMENTAL translated?
|
Nils Smeds |
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:37:56 +0200 |
26 lines |
How is ELEMENTAL translated?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sun, 15 Jul 2001 23:49:40 -0400 |
40 lines |
Fortran Resource File (July)
|
Michael Metcalf |
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:30:09 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: Fortran version of getopt_long?
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 12 Jul 2001 20:52:13 -0400 |
50 lines |
Fortran version of getopt_long?
|
Martin Dix |
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:13:49 +1000 |
20 lines |
|
Gary Scott |
Wed, 11 Jul 2001 21:32:11 -0500 |
76 lines |
Incomplete factorization libraries
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:08:18 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: your mail
|
Bob Cohen |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:53:54 -0400 |
136 lines |
Re: your mail
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:14:19 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: your mail
|
Jing Guo |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:07:24 -0400 |
101 lines |
Re: your mail
|
Jing Guo |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:00:34 -0400 |
86 lines |
Re: your mail
|
Ted Stern |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:44:37 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: array and file size on read
|
Ferhun C. Caner |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:24:37 +0300 |
30 lines |
Re: array and file size on a read
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:28:16 -0500 |
57 lines |
ANNOUNCE: Perl code for sorting CONTAINed routines
|
Barry W. Brown |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:15:11 -0500 |
27 lines |
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 07:46:12 -0700 |
29 lines |
|
David Vowles |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:52:51 +0930 |
78 lines |
|
Zhou Yong Cheng |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:04:54 +0800 |
26 lines |
creating directory
|
Andrey E. Buzjurkin |
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 21:47:31 +0600 |
28 lines |
Re: fortran on Linux
|
Peter Shenkin |
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:38:11 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: fortran on Linux
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:23:06 -0500 |
42 lines |
creating directory
|
Richard Maine |
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:21:46 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: fortran on Linux
|
Richard Maine |
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 07:46:56 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: fortran on Linux
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:21:18 -0300 |
43 lines |
Re: fortran on Linux
|
Joerg Strutwolf |
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:12:14 +0100 |
27 lines |
fortran on Linux
|
Fabienne Goffinont |
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:04:47 +0200 |
30 lines |
New make_processor_model
|
Dan Nagle |
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 07:03:51 -0400 |
64 lines |
Multiprocessor Linux PC and Fortran
|
Van Snyder |
Fri, 6 Jul 2001 11:35:15 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Linux Workstation
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Fri, 6 Jul 2001 17:43:23 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: Linux Workstation
|
Carlie Coats |
Fri, 6 Jul 2001 07:05:08 -0400 |
50 lines |
Linux Workstation
|
<> |
Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:24:42 +1000 |
46 lines |
Fortran 90 compiles used by Fortran 77
|
Stu Anderson 425-865-3595 |
Thu, 5 Jul 2001 15:44:14 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: How transform C into F90 on Data Struct.
|
Giampaolo Bottoni |
Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:26:18 +0200 |
74 lines |
How transform C into F90 on Data Struct.
|
frank_ouyang |
Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:37:13 +0800 |
37 lines |
Re: Slash etiquette ...
|
Walt Brainerd |
Sat, 30 Jun 2001 12:57:19 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: namelist and characters
|
Bob Cohen |
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:37:21 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Error on J3 website
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:06:20 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: Error on J3 website
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:37:52 +0200 |
78 lines |
Re: Error on J3 website
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:12:03 +0100 |
37 lines |
Error on J3 website
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:04:13 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: Slash etiquette ...
|
Ron Sverdlove x2517 |
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 04:53:32 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: namelist and characters
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:54:30 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: namelist and characters
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:47:44 +0200 |
69 lines |
Re: namelist and characters
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:40:45 +0200 |
91 lines |
Re: namelist and characters
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:24:15 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: namelist and characters
|
James Giles |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:03:43 -0600 |
24 lines |
Re: namelist and characters
|
Ted Stern |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:04:38 -0700 |
19 lines |
Re: namelist and characters
|
Ted Stern |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:59:55 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: namelist and characters
|
James Giles |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:53:52 -0600 |
29 lines |
namelist and characters
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 19:20:57 +0200 |
65 lines |
Re: Slash etiquette ...
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 08:55:47 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: Slash etiquette ...
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:10:48 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Slash etiquette ...
|
<> |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:15:50 MET_DST |
66 lines |
Re: Slash etiquette ...
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:12:53 +0200 |
63 lines |
Re: Slash etiquette ...
|
John Macallister |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:14:28 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Slash etiquette ...
|
David Vowles |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:24:16 +0930 |
101 lines |
Re: Slash etiquette ...
|
<> |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:43:05 +1000 |
57 lines |
Re: Slash etiquette ...
|
Michael Metcalf |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:32:58 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Slash etiquette ...
|
Len Makin |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:41:27 +1000 |
26 lines |
Slash etiquette ...
|
Annetts, David (DEM, North Ryde) |
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:17:24 +1000 |
44 lines |
Off-topic :: Refprop - NIST
|
José Eduardo Santos Oliveira |
Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:39:32 -0300 |
21 lines |
Sun Fortran 90/95 compiler behaviour !
|
S. Janakiraman |
Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:48:19 +0530 |
24 lines |
Viterbi algorithm
|
Ravi C. Venkatesan |
Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:53:38 +0530 |
15 lines |
Sorry!
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:44:07 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Fortran Forum (August)
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:42:14 -0400 |
28 lines |
Fortran Forum (August)
|
Michael Metcalf |
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 04:40:51 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: Large parameter arrays
|
John Venier |
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:07:38 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Large parameter arrays
|
David Adams |
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:29:04 +0100 |
91 lines |
Re: Rebuttal to Treurich, et al.
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:23:08 +0200 |
45 lines |
Re: Rebuttal to Treurich, et al.
|
Lars Mossberg |
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:20:25 +0200 |
32 lines |
Re: Large parameter arrays
|
Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer |
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:07:14 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: real to complex to real
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:47:24 +0200 |
81 lines |
Re: Large parameter arrays
|
John Venier |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:40:16 -0500 |
75 lines |
Large parameter arrays
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:59:24 -0700 |
35 lines |
Large parameter arrays
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:45:53 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: Array re-allocation question
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:37:09 -0500 |
80 lines |
real to complex to real
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:35:14 -0700 |
32 lines |
Large parameter arrays
|
John Venier |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:58:02 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: real to complex to real
|
<> |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:53:33 -0600 |
64 lines |
real to complex to real
|
<> |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:53:03 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: real to complex to real
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:27:15 +0200 |
56 lines |
Array re-allocation question
|
José Luis Gómez Dans |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 20:54:48 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: sequence attribute for derived types
|
<> |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:31:38 +0010 |
34 lines |
real to complex to real
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:15:51 -0700 |
44 lines |
real to complex to real
|
<> |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:18:44 -0600 |
77 lines |
Re: sequence attribute for derived types
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:44:20 -0700 |
37 lines |
real to complex to real
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:47:25 +0200 |
216 lines |
Re: sequence attribute for derived types
|
Guylaine Prat |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:44:51 +0200 |
23 lines |
Re: sequence attribute for derived types
|
Guylaine Prat |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:37:52 +0200 |
25 lines |
Rebuttal to Treurich, et al.
|
Michael Metcalf |
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:17:38 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: sequence attribute for derived types
|
<> |
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 01:00:12 EDT |
34 lines |
Re: Compaq Visual Fortran Education Donation Program
|
Kipp Graham |
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:17:29 +1000 |
96 lines |
Rebuttal to Treurich, et al.
|
Dan Nagle |
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:46:26 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: sequence attribute for derived types
|
<> |
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:21:57 MET_DST |
71 lines |
Compaq Visual Fortran Education Donation Program
|
Lionel, Steven |
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:39:52 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Non-advancing READ
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Sat, 16 Jun 2001 10:58:51 -0500 |
70 lines |
Non-advancing READ
|
Roland Schilling |
Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:04:13 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: Comments on: "Pioneers of the 'Fortran' Programming Language"
|
Lawrie Schonfelder |
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:12:18 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: NYT article
|
Lawrie Schonfelder |
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:10:18 +0100 |
61 lines |
Entity accessibility through indirect USE association
|
Michael Metcalf |
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 04:55:35 -0400 |
27 lines |
Entity accessibility through indirect USE association
|
David Vowles |
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:28:38 +0930 |
111 lines |
Re: NYT article
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:15:45 -0700 |
46 lines |
Comments on: "Pioneers of the 'Fortran' Programming Language"
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 20:27:47 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: NYT article
|
<> |
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:06:24 +1000 |
67 lines |
NYT article
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:25:54 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: I need the help on "include"
|
Lionel, Steven |
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 04:42:51 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: sequence attribute for derived types
|
Guylaine Prat |
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:23:15 +0200 |
27 lines |
Re: sequence attribute for derived types
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 05:00:45 -0400 |
59 lines |
I need the help on "include"
|
frank_ouyang |
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:49:16 +0800 |
51 lines |
sequence attribute for derived types
|
Guylaine Prat |
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:05:37 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: Geometry optimizer.
|
Cezar Diaconu |
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:35:33 +0900 |
43 lines |
Re: Geometry optimizer.
|
Alan Miller |
Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:05:02 +1000 |
42 lines |
Re: Geometry optimizer.
|
Alberto Fasso' |
Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:52:19 +0200 |
39 lines |
Geometry optimizer.
|
Gerd Bruno Rocha |
Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:39:50 -0300 |
23 lines |
Re: Reading unknown file array
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:46:23 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: LBOUND on assumed-shape arguments
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Sun, 10 Jun 2001 11:00:16 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: speed of floating point arithmetic
|
Tim Prince |
Wed, 6 Jun 2001 06:14:11 -0700 |
58 lines |
speed of floating point arithmetic
|
Ian Chivers |
Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:34:10 +0100 |
36 lines |
Reccomendations for code migration tools
|
John Bray |
Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:20:48 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: LBOUND on assumed-shape arguments
|
John Reid |
Mon, 4 Jun 2001 17:51:10 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: How about the include in Fortran90
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:14:00 +0200 |
85 lines |
How about the include in Fortran90
|
frank_ouyang |
Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:46:30 +0800 |
24 lines |
LBOUND on assumed-shape arguments
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sun, 3 Jun 2001 13:35:57 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: TARGET arguments clarification
|
Kurt Hirchert |
Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:54:05 -0500 |
10 lines |
Re: TARGET arguments clarification
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 1 Jun 2001 18:53:36 -0400 |
24 lines |
What does a zero length string equate to?
|
<> |
Thu, 31 May 2001 20:12:28 +0010 |
61 lines |
Re: What does a zero length string equate to?
|
Ron Sverdlove x2517 |
Thu, 31 May 2001 12:00:52 -0400 |
78 lines |
Re: What does a zero length string equate to?
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 31 May 2001 07:33:45 -0700 |
23 lines |
Re: What does a zero length string equate to?
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Thu, 31 May 2001 13:07:27 +0200 |
82 lines |
Re: What does a zero length string equate to?
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 31 May 2001 11:18:04 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Array outer product
|
Anthony Stone |
Thu, 31 May 2001 09:23:41 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Thu, 31 May 2001 09:40:53 +0200 |
110 lines |
Re: TARGET arguments clarification
|
James Giles |
Wed, 30 May 2001 13:09:04 -0600 |
26 lines |
TARGET arguments clarification
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 30 May 2001 14:37:14 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: Array outer product
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Wed, 30 May 2001 13:05:47 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: Array outer product
|
James Giles |
Wed, 30 May 2001 11:32:31 -0600 |
27 lines |
Array outer product
|
Anthony Stone |
Wed, 30 May 2001 18:09:12 +0100 |
27 lines |
Dos application
|
Michael Metcalf |
Wed, 30 May 2001 03:30:12 -0400 |
116 lines |
Re: unsubscribe
|
Ian Chivers |
Mon, 28 May 2001 18:13:42 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
robin |
Mon, 28 May 2001 10:19:51 +1000 |
35 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
Abhishek Seth |
Sat, 26 May 2001 14:20:05 +0530 |
23 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
Loren P Meissner |
Fri, 25 May 2001 18:57:24 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
robin |
Sat, 26 May 2001 10:34:42 +1000 |
34 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
robin |
Sat, 26 May 2001 10:34:42 +1000 |
46 lines |
Fixing the size for assumed-shape arrays
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 24 May 2001 22:23:25 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
robin |
Fri, 25 May 2001 09:20:13 +1000 |
26 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
<> |
Thu, 24 May 2001 20:34:10 +0010 |
41 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
<> |
Thu, 24 May 2001 19:40:28 +0010 |
52 lines |
unsubscribe
|
Teresa Adams |
Thu, 24 May 2001 08:53:15 -0700 |
19 lines |
unsubscrible
|
frank_ouyang |
Thu, 24 May 2001 22:42:03 +0800 |
107 lines |
Re: Help reqd.
|
N. Shamsundar |
Thu, 24 May 2001 08:47:30 -0500 |
45 lines |
unsubscribe
|
Hilmy Awad |
Thu, 24 May 2001 14:34:05 +0200 |
70 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
Abhishek Seth |
Thu, 24 May 2001 16:00:22 +0530 |
21 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
John Reid |
Thu, 24 May 2001 11:15:45 +0100 |
20 lines |
unsubscribe
|
Fumie Costen |
Thu, 24 May 2001 10:03:04 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
John Reid |
Thu, 24 May 2001 09:52:52 +0100 |
51 lines |
Help reqd.
|
Amit Mathur |
Thu, 24 May 2001 10:15:26 +0530 |
30 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 23 May 2001 15:06:55 -0700 |
70 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
Abhishek Seth |
Thu, 24 May 2001 03:09:58 +0530 |
31 lines |
P.S. to Temporaries for easier typing
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 23 May 2001 12:47:06 -0400 |
29 lines |
Temporaries for easier typing
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 23 May 2001 12:41:33 -0400 |
97 lines |
Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 23 May 2001 09:30:44 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
Michael Metcalf |
Wed, 23 May 2001 12:04:58 -0400 |
16 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Wed, 23 May 2001 10:12:38 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Wed, 23 May 2001 15:03:24 +0200 |
120 lines |
Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine
|
Abhishek Seth |
Wed, 23 May 2001 17:47:13 +0530 |
51 lines |
Re: Compiling Large Prgrams
|
<> |
Tue, 22 May 2001 20:11:05 +0010 |
64 lines |
Re: Dependancies in declarations
|
robin |
Tue, 22 May 2001 09:14:59 -1000 |
35 lines |
Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95
|
<> |
Tue, 22 May 2001 17:16:00 MET_DST |
77 lines |
Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95
|
Ron Sverdlove x2517 |
Tue, 22 May 2001 11:55:01 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 22 May 2001 08:48:03 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95
|
Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer |
Tue, 22 May 2001 16:05:02 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 22 May 2001 07:55:20 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: Compiling Large Prgrams
|
Lionel, Steven |
Tue, 22 May 2001 08:29:10 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: F2x syntax---interface conformance with extended types
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 22 May 2001 08:43:47 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: F2x syntax---interface conformance with extended types
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Tue, 22 May 2001 10:31:54 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95
|
Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer |
Tue, 22 May 2001 09:17:47 +0100 |
15 lines |
Re: Compiling Large Prgrams
|
Bob Leblanc |
Mon, 21 May 2001 14:14:12 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Compiling Large Prgrams
|
Lionel, Steven |
Mon, 21 May 2001 13:12:43 -0500 |
56 lines |
Compiling Large Prgrams
|
Robert Leblanc |
Mon, 21 May 2001 18:54:29 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95
|
Ron Sverdlove x2517 |
Mon, 21 May 2001 12:33:45 -0400 |
81 lines |
Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95
|
S. Janakiraman |
Mon, 21 May 2001 14:39:53 +0530 |
72 lines |
Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95
|
Ron Sverdlove x2517 |
Mon, 21 May 2001 03:35:34 -0400 |
52 lines |
F2x syntax---interface conformance with extended types
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sat, 19 May 2001 13:20:58 -0400 |
66 lines |
Fortran Resource File (May)
|
Michael Metcalf |
Fri, 18 May 2001 07:44:09 -0400 |
915 lines |
Re: Dependancies in declarations
|
John Reid |
Thu, 17 May 2001 10:03:54 +0100 |
29 lines |
Dependancies in declarations
|
John Bray |
Thu, 17 May 2001 09:00:21 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Nested WHERE constructs. (Interpretation/implementation)
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Wed, 16 May 2001 09:33:01 -0500 |
58 lines |
Nested WHERE constructs. (Interpretation/implementation)
|
Helmers, Jens Bloch |
Wed, 16 May 2001 08:21:11 +0200 |
26 lines |
Re: passing structure components into subroutines
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 15 May 2001 09:23:46 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: passing structure components into subroutines
|
Catherine Moroney |
Tue, 15 May 2001 09:09:42 -0700 |
63 lines |
passing structure components into subroutines
|
Michael Metcalf |
Tue, 15 May 2001 03:29:03 -0400 |
56 lines |
passing structure components into subroutines
|
Catherine Moroney |
Mon, 14 May 2001 20:59:20 -0700 |
66 lines |
unsuscribe
|
Bandfield Thomas D Contr 96 CG/SCWDE |
Fri, 11 May 2001 07:17:15 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: derived types question
|
Paul Stevenson |
Fri, 11 May 2001 10:44:32 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: GDDM graphics ?
|
Gary Scott |
Thu, 10 May 2001 18:25:33 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: derived types question
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Thu, 10 May 2001 14:58:34 -0500 |
70 lines |
derived types question
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 10 May 2001 11:15:14 -0700 |
49 lines |
GDDM graphics ?
|
Terry Koontz |
Thu, 10 May 2001 12:13:09 -0600 |
70 lines |
derived types question
|
Panagiotis Vossos |
Thu, 10 May 2001 21:05:21 +0300 |
38 lines |
Re: RECURSIVE procedures
|
robin |
Wed, 9 May 2001 12:01:39 -1000 |
64 lines |
list home page
|
Ian Chivers |
Wed, 9 May 2001 10:16:54 +0100 |
31 lines |
unsubscribe
|
Jim Roberts |
Tue, 8 May 2001 17:00:13 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: BOZ syntax; [was: mixed output text/binary]
|
Dan Nagle |
Tue, 8 May 2001 13:51:14 -0400 |
94 lines |
Re: BOZ syntax; [was: mixed output text/binary]
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Tue, 8 May 2001 12:28:56 -0500 |
64 lines |
Array memory allocation
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Tue, 8 May 2001 13:38:53 -0300 |
31 lines |
Re: unsubcribe
|
omar dominguez sanchez |
Tue, 8 May 2001 11:27:57 -0500 |
12 lines |
Re: Array memory allocation
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 8 May 2001 11:53:04 -0400 |
29 lines |
BOZ syntax; [was: mixed output text/binary]
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Tue, 8 May 2001 17:26:25 +0200 |
56 lines |
Re: Tables of Gauss-Turan-type Quadrature
|
Ahmad Mr M |
Tue, 8 May 2001 09:34:14 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: RECURSIVE procedures
|
<> |
Tue, 8 May 2001 00:02:17 EDT |
57 lines |
Re: Addendum: RECURSIVE routines
|
Van Snyder |
Mon, 7 May 2001 15:18:40 -0700 |
29 lines |
Addendum: RECURSIVE routines
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 7 May 2001 17:03:27 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: RECURSIVE procedures
|
Jing Guo |
Mon, 7 May 2001 16:13:30 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: RECURSIVE procedures
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 7 May 2001 15:31:32 -0400 |
65 lines |
RECURSIVE procedures
|
Richard Maine |
Mon, 7 May 2001 12:30:23 -0700 |
36 lines |
RECURSIVE procedures
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Mon, 7 May 2001 16:21:16 -0300 |
19 lines |
Re: RECURSIVE procedures
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 7 May 2001 14:17:32 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: unsubcribe
|
Hilmy Awad |
Mon, 7 May 2001 11:20:51 +0200 |
54 lines |
unsubcribe
|
Jim Roberts |
Fri, 4 May 2001 21:41:25 -0500 |
34 lines |
Fw: gauss turan quadrature
|
James Giles |
Fri, 4 May 2001 15:34:42 -0600 |
25 lines |
Re: F2K syntax question
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Fri, 4 May 2001 12:50:08 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: F2K syntax question
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 4 May 2001 12:37:50 -0400 |
58 lines |
F2K syntax question
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 4 May 2001 11:50:59 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature (THANK YOU )
|
Ahmad Mr M |
Fri, 4 May 2001 10:14:37 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature
|
Ahmad Mr M |
Fri, 4 May 2001 10:10:20 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Recursive or not?
|
robin |
Thu, 3 May 2001 11:12:17 -1000 |
28 lines |
Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 3 May 2001 10:47:09 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature
|
Don Shirer |
Thu, 3 May 2001 12:41:07 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature
|
Joerg Strutwolf |
Thu, 3 May 2001 16:50:20 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature
|
<> |
Thu, 3 May 2001 11:07:30 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Allocation for linked lists and skip lists
|
<> |
Thu, 3 May 2001 14:36:57 MET_DST |
60 lines |
Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature
|
Ahmad Mr M |
Thu, 3 May 2001 15:34:10 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: Allocation for linked lists and skip lists
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 3 May 2001 10:27:42 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature
|
<> |
Thu, 3 May 2001 08:52:18 CDT |
48 lines |
Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature
|
Jacques Duilio Brancher |
Thu, 3 May 2001 10:25:18 -0300 |
34 lines |
Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature
|
Ahmad Mr M |
Thu, 3 May 2001 12:30:10 +0100 |
26 lines |
Allocation for linked lists and skip lists
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 2 May 2001 22:57:53 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Internal procedures as actuals
|
James Giles |
Wed, 2 May 2001 10:35:43 -0600 |
29 lines |
Re: Internal procedures as actuals
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 2 May 2001 17:35:20 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Internal procedures as actuals
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 2 May 2001 10:53:21 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals
|
<> |
Wed, 2 May 2001 06:48:38 -0400 |
71 lines |
Re: C & Fortran90
|
Clive Page |
Wed, 2 May 2001 09:15:09 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: Recursive or not?
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 2 May 2001 08:23:21 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals
|
James Giles |
Wed, 2 May 2001 00:52:12 -0600 |
33 lines |
Re: For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals
|
Phillip Helbig |
Wed, 2 May 2001 06:53:40 +0100 |
24 lines |
Recursive or not?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 2 May 2001 00:05:45 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 1 May 2001 23:55:56 -0400 |
38 lines |
For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 1 May 2001 22:37:11 -0400 |
31 lines |
Assumed-size hack
|
Richard Maine |
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:47:38 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: Assumed-size hack
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:52:17 -0400 |
52 lines |
Assumed-size hack
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:52:41 -0400 |
79 lines |
Re: Accessibility of type components
|
John Reid |
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 18:22:21 +0100 |
32 lines |
Accessibility of type components
|
Richard Maine |
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:40:52 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: C & Fortran90
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:24:54 +0100 |
33 lines |
Accessibility of type components
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:08:16 -0400 |
46 lines |
C & Fortran90
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:21:23 +0200 |
86 lines |
A challenge for an ingenious interface
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sun, 29 Apr 2001 11:31:42 -0400 |
102 lines |
Re: Aliasing and optimization
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sun, 29 Apr 2001 10:47:43 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Help!
|
robin |
Sat, 28 Apr 2001 10:59:00 -1000 |
34 lines |
Re: Hints to the optimizer, Blocking and SFCs
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sat, 28 Apr 2001 16:22:51 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Assumed-size arrays WAS: Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sat, 28 Apr 2001 14:51:17 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Skip Lists in F95
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sat, 28 Apr 2001 13:19:47 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: mixed output text/binary
|
Gary Scott |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 19:44:26 -0500 |
69 lines |
CoArray Fortran progress?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 13:57:40 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: mixed output text/binary
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:30:04 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: mixed output text/binary
|
Alberto Fasso' |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:47:13 +0200 |
55 lines |
Re: mixed output text/binary
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 07:46:46 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: Pointers and structure
|
<> |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:29:07 MET_DST |
74 lines |
Re: Help!
|
Ferhun C. Caner |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:44:49 +0300 |
56 lines |
Help!
|
frank_ouyang |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 18:24:28 +0800 |
21 lines |
Re: mixed output text/binary
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:09:02 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: mixed output text/binary
|
Alberto Fasso' |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:53:37 +0200 |
28 lines |
Re: mixed output text/binary
|
Michael Metcalf |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 04:33:17 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: mixed output text/binary
|
Alberto Fasso' |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:09:09 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: mixed output text/binary
|
Michael Metcalf |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 03:46:04 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: mixed output text/binary
|
Alberto Fasso' |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:18:01 +0200 |
24 lines |
Re: parsing input file (summary)
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:07:23 -0700 |
73 lines |
parsing input file (summary)
|
Pascal Richard |
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:32:31 +0200 |
46 lines |
mixed output text/binary
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:25:34 -0700 |
77 lines |
mixed output text/binary
|
José Luis Gómez Dans |
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 21:00:57 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Skip Lists in F95 --- wasted space revisited
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:32:54 -0700 |
67 lines |
Re: Skip Lists in F95 --- wasted space revisited
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:39:44 -0400 |
94 lines |
Re: Skip Lists in F95 --- wasted space revisited
|
Loren P Meissner |
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:14:00 -0700 |
1279 lines |
Re: Skip Lists in F95 --- wasted space revisited
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:17:31 -0400 |
37 lines |
Skip Lists in F95 --- wasted space revisited
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:24:06 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures
|
James Giles |
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:34:17 -0600 |
33 lines |
Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures
|
James Giles |
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:15:22 -0600 |
22 lines |
Re: parsing input file
|
Alan Aspuru-Guzik |
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:07:32 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures
|
Ted Stern |
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:25:50 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:24:33 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: parsing input file
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:15:22 -0400 |
65 lines |
parsing input file
|
Pascal Richard |
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:28:15 +0200 |
32 lines |
Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:00:53 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: Empty TYPEs
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:08:21 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:05:41 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: Empty TYPEs
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:04:37 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: EXTENDS of and extended type
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:55:01 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: EXTENDS of and extended type
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:50:36 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:48:45 -0400 |
89 lines |
Re: EXTENDS of and extended type
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:16:52 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Empty TYPEs
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:12:41 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Empty TYPEs
|
Alvaro Agustin Fernandez |
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:52:03 -0500 |
41 lines |
Pointers and structure
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:17:59 +0200 |
47 lines |
Empty TYPEs
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:26:55 -0400 |
38 lines |
ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sat, 21 Apr 2001 23:25:08 -0400 |
140 lines |
EXTENDS of and extended type
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sat, 21 Apr 2001 12:10:41 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: BIT_SIZE
|
varadharajan |
Thu, 19 Apr 2001 01:32:53 +0530 |
39 lines |
Re: BIT_SIZE
|
Michael Metcalf |
Wed, 18 Apr 2001 07:57:53 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: size of data
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:01:14 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: size of data
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Tue, 17 Apr 2001 19:24:09 +0200 |
76 lines |
Software updated
|
Dan Nagle |
Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:12:57 -0400 |
44 lines |
size of data
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:01:34 -0700 |
55 lines |
size of data
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:30:07 +0200 |
112 lines |
Memory profiling tool--mpatrol
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:03:20 -0400 |
765 lines |
Re: ALLOCATED in F95
|
Alvaro Fernandez |
Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:52:14 -0500 |
51 lines |
ALLOCATED in F95
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:22:13 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Pointer program
|
<> |
Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:16:41 +1000 |
110 lines |
Re: Pointer program
|
Loren P Meissner |
Mon, 9 Apr 2001 07:24:22 -0700 |
76 lines |
Re: Pointer program
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:07:58 +0200 |
56 lines |
Pointer program
|
Subscribe Comp-Fortran-90 Anonymous |
Mon, 9 Apr 2001 05:57:57 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Two states?
|
Avi Ring |
Sun, 8 Apr 2001 22:10:37 +0200 |
174 lines |
Two states?
|
Loren P Meissner |
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 19:17:20 -0700 |
94 lines |
Re: BIT_SIZE
|
Gary Scott |
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 19:55:27 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: system call
|
Jacob =Jouk Jansen |
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:42:39 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: system call
|
N. Shamsundar |
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:35:38 -0500 |
29 lines |
system call
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:11:13 +0200 |
18 lines |
Re: writing out signed integers in In.n format
|
James Giles |
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 01:57:27 -0600 |
48 lines |
Re: writing out signed integers in In.n format
|
Roland Schilling |
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:34:30 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: BIT_SIZE
|
Len Makin |
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:25:57 +1000 |
30 lines |
Re: BIT_SIZE
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 17:51:36 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: writing out signed integers in In.n format
|
<> |
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:44:04 +1000 |
95 lines |
Re: BIT_SIZE
|
Len Makin |
Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:24:07 +1000 |
36 lines |
writing out signed integers in In.n format
|
Catherine Moroney |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 16:32:41 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: Memory place of reals [selected_real_kind()]
|
Michael Metcalf |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:36:15 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: BIT_SIZE (was: Memory place of reals)
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:26:18 -0400 |
34 lines |
BIT_SIZE (was: Memory place of reals)
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:09:36 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: uninitialized data in COPY-IN/COPY-OUT
|
Tom Clune |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:52:38 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Memory place of reals
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:33:54 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: Memory place of reals [selected_real_kind()]
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:18:30 +0200 |
51 lines |
Re: Memory place of reals
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 07:18:09 -0400 |
48 lines |
Memory place of reals
|
Michael Metcalf |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 04:28:05 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Memory place of reals
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:44:22 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: Memory place of reals
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:04:47 +0200 |
44 lines |
Memory place of reals
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:36:54 +0200 |
92 lines |
Re: uninitialized data in COPY-IN/COPY-OUT
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:21:39 -0500 |
19 lines |
uninitialized data in COPY-IN/COPY-OUT
|
Tom Clune |
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:49:10 -0400 |
70 lines |
Debugger for Linux Fortran 90
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:51:21 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: floating point comparison
|
<> |
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:18:53 MET_DST |
65 lines |
Re: IMPORT
|
Dan Nagle |
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 07:17:38 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: floating point comparison
|
Carlie Coats |
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 06:38:56 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Automatic deallocation
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 09:23:49 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: Error message: Derived-type initialization
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 09:21:05 +0100 |
46 lines |
Puzzling performance with allocatable components
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:37:39 -0400 |
175 lines |
Re: IMPORT
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 17:25:49 -0700 |
78 lines |
Re: IMPORT
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:19:25 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: IMPORT
|
Dan Nagle |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:16:16 -0400 |
75 lines |
IMPORT
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 18:22:16 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Automatic deallocation
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 17:25:12 -0400 |
69 lines |
Error message: Derived-type initialization
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:27:43 -0400 |
41 lines |
Automatic deallocation
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:02:56 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: New: Reverse-communication: Internal Procedures as Arguments
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:37:48 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
Bill Long |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:34:04 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: New: A reverse-communication interface CG code in F2K
|
John Reid |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:44:07 +0100 |
165 lines |
Allocatable components vendor implementations
|
Michael Metcalf |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 03:51:22 -0500 |
26 lines |
Learning parallel Pro
|
Nguyen Le Anh |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 12:34:59 +0700 |
92 lines |
Re: Output on screen
|
<> |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:51:01 +1000 |
91 lines |
Re: Allocatable components vendor implementations
|
Bill Long |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 17:04:13 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
robin |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:59:43 -1000 |
71 lines |
New: A reverse-communication interface CG code in F2K
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:11:06 -0400 |
221 lines |
Re: Interfacing--legal or not?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:58:22 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 18:43:15 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Interfacing--legal or not?
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 18:40:53 +0100 |
119 lines |
Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:20:35 -0400 |
96 lines |
Re: Interfacing--legal or not?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:47:59 -0400 |
147 lines |
Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:28:20 -0500 |
99 lines |
Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
Lionel, Steven |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:46:59 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Interfacing--legal or not?
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:39:21 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:22:56 -0400 |
83 lines |
Allocatable components vendor implementations
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:59:05 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:08:20 -0500 |
92 lines |
Re: Avoiding aliasing with array pointers
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:47:20 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 14:56:05 +0200 |
59 lines |
Re: Output on screen
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:13:06 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: Modules instead of COMMON
|
Mr. Raghu C. |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:56:44 +0530 |
37 lines |
Output on screen
|
<> |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:36:25 +1000 |
46 lines |
Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
Len Makin |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:42:12 +1000 |
45 lines |
Re: Modules instead of COMMON
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:06:39 +0200 |
30 lines |
modules
|
Mr. Raghu C. |
Sun, 1 Apr 2001 14:37:39 +0530 |
21 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
robin |
Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:17:39 -1000 |
44 lines |
Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sat, 31 Mar 2001 12:17:10 -0500 |
81 lines |
Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Sat, 31 Mar 2001 18:31:04 +0200 |
64 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
robin |
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 20:58:12 -1000 |
66 lines |
Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
Jing Guo |
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:32:50 -0500 |
74 lines |
Undefined intent(out) arguments
|
Ron Sverdlove x2517 |
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:52:04 -0500 |
47 lines |
Interfacing--legal or not?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 13:07:32 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer |
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:13:46 +0100 |
133 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:32:43 +0100 |
193 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Alois Steindl |
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:16:25 +0200 |
48 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Roland Schilling |
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:04:38 +0200 |
67 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Kipp Graham |
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:07:30 +1000 |
113 lines |
Re: Left aligning during a write
|
Mandeep Singh |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:58:24 -0600 |
54 lines |
Re: Left aligning during a write
|
Brian Hanson |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:43:08 -0500 |
41 lines |
Left aligning during a write
|
Mandeep Singh |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:31:04 -0600 |
29 lines |
Corrected: Reverse communication in F2K--a detailed CG example
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:58:10 -0500 |
276 lines |
Reverse communication in F2K--a detailed CG example
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:33:12 -0500 |
265 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:30:57 -0800 |
96 lines |
OOP F2K--implementation (and exception handling)
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:19:08 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Michael Metcalf |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:47:12 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:50:06 +0100 |
120 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:42:13 +0100 |
140 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Roland Schilling |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:29:58 +0200 |
42 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:05:00 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:37:04 +0100 |
142 lines |
Re: output on screen
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:30:26 +0200 |
48 lines |
output on screen
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:02:00 +0100 |
86 lines |
Re: CPU_TIME for intrinsic functions
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:03:42 +0200 |
120 lines |
Re: CPU_TIME for intrinsic functions
|
Tim Prince |
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:03:28 -0800 |
119 lines |
Re: Reverse Communication: WAS: Pointers: Is this safe and legal?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:13:32 -0500 |
106 lines |
CPU_TIME for intrinsic functions
|
Ahmad Mr M |
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:03:52 +0100 |
98 lines |
POSIX system calls
|
Pascal Richard |
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:24:46 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: Pointers: Is this safe and legal?
|
David Vowles |
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 18:13:16 +0930 |
251 lines |
Thanks for the Tip
|
Dan Nagle |
Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:49:23 -0500 |
16 lines |
Re: Avoiding aliasing with array pointers
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:43:05 -0600 |
34 lines |
Re: Avoiding aliasing with array pointers
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:59:29 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Avoiding aliasing with array pointers
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:03:20 -0600 |
56 lines |
Avoiding aliasing with array pointers
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:16:29 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Pointers: Is this safe and legal?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:29:47 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Pointers: Is this safe and legal?
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:57:45 -0600 |
76 lines |
Re: Pointers: Is this safe and legal?
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:53:40 -0600 |
39 lines |
Re: Pointers: Is this safe and legal?
|
John Reid |
Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:45:27 +0100 |
73 lines |
Pointers: Is this safe and legal?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 26 Mar 2001 21:01:41 -0500 |
68 lines |
A summary of "important" F2K changes
|
Michael Metcalf |
Mon, 26 Mar 2001 03:07:28 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: A summary of "important" F2K changes
|
James Giles |
Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:51:18 -0700 |
40 lines |
A summary of "important" F2K changes
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sun, 25 Mar 2001 13:45:12 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: debugging / development tools for F90
|
robin |
Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:46:53 -1000 |
28 lines |
Re: debugging/development tools for F90
|
William V. Nicholson |
Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:11:29 -0800 |
222 lines |
Re: debugging/development tools for F90
|
William F Mitchell |
Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:41:54 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: debugging/development tools for F90
|
Peter Shenkin |
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:15:14 -0500 |
48 lines |
debugging/development tools for F90
|
Catherine Moroney |
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:28:58 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: "Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?
|
Peter Shenkin |
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:47:33 -0500 |
52 lines |
EWOMP'2001 European Workshop on OpenMP
|
Matthijs van Waveren |
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:34:46 +0000 |
112 lines |
Re: "Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?
|
Feyzi Inanc |
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:47:23 -0600 |
60 lines |
Re: "Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?
|
Tim Prince |
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:11:42 -0800 |
61 lines |
"Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?
|
<> |
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:56:14 -0700 |
45 lines |
"Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?
|
Bertrand Meltz |
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:09:14 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: ACM Fortran Forum (April)
|
Tim Prince |
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 06:25:52 -0800 |
97 lines |
Re: ACM Fortran Forum (April)
|
Giampaolo Bottoni |
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:50:40 +0100 |
76 lines |
ACM Fortran Forum (April)
|
Michael Metcalf |
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:53:32 -0500 |
87 lines |
Re: Fortran Resources (March)
|
Michael Metcalf |
Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:33:21 -0500 |
14 lines |
Re: Fortran Resources (March)
|
Robert Cochran |
Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:24:35 -0800 |
46 lines |
Fortran Resources (March)
|
Michael Metcalf |
Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:38:04 -0500 |
941 lines |
Re: image size in f90
|
Jacques Duilio Brancher |
Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:36:44 -0300 |
37 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
robin |
Sat, 10 Mar 2001 09:09:07 -1000 |
40 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
robin |
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 15:13:42 -1000 |
38 lines |
Re: Puzzling profiling result
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 13:30:05 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Puzzling profiling result
|
William F Mitchell |
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 13:04:59 -0500 |
68 lines |
Puzzling profiling result
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 12:16:24 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: wrapper routines and copy-in/copy-out
|
Lionel, Steven |
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 09:32:23 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: wrapper routines and copy-in/copy-out
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:19:11 +0000 |
28 lines |
wrapper routines and copy-in/copy-out
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 13:29:07 +0100 |
74 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Orville E. Wheeler |
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 16:18:44 -0600 |
75 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:56:34 -0600 |
62 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 10:57:17 -0600 |
39 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 07:48:40 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 09:09:55 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: Data acquisition from a port
|
Gary Scott |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 19:03:35 -0600 |
36 lines |
Pointers
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:39:31 -0800 |
43 lines |
Data acquisition from a port
|
Everton Zanoelo |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:26:29 -0300 |
17 lines |
Pointers
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 18:50:36 +0100 |
104 lines |
Re: A challenge for an ingenious interface
|
Richard Friedman (rchrd) |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 09:17:29 -0800 |
17 lines |
Re: Allocatabla arrays or pointers
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:42:43 +0100 |
36 lines |
Allocatabla arrays or pointers
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:04:55 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 16:03:38 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:45:08 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:37:33 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 14:27:00 +0000 |
49 lines |
Pointers
|
Mandeep Singh |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:08:37 -0600 |
282 lines |
Re: Pointers
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:04:59 +0100 |
68 lines |
Pointers
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 14:45:44 +0100 |
115 lines |
Re: unsigned integers
|
robin |
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 10:38:09 -1000 |
66 lines |
Re: INTRINSIC statement question
|
John Venier |
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 09:08:33 -0600 |
24 lines |
Sharing arguments revisited--more library design issues
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sun, 4 Mar 2001 22:53:33 -0500 |
94 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
<> |
Sat, 3 Mar 2001 09:32:19 EST |
32 lines |
INTRINSIC statement question
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:51:43 -0800 |
54 lines |
Re: INTRINSIC statement question
|
Van Snyder |
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:39:51 -0800 |
28 lines |
INTRINSIC statement question
|
John Venier |
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:33:48 -0600 |
46 lines |
Re: [unsigned integers]
|
Shyan Lam |
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:02:44 CST |
58 lines |
Re: Interface Fortran90 and C
|
Van Snyder |
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 10:43:43 -0800 |
16 lines |
unsigned integers
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:31:27 -0500 |
30 lines |
Interface Fortran90 and C
|
Erich Kreiselmaier |
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:32:40 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: Aliasing and optimization
|
Nils Smeds |
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 22:40:42 GMT |
43 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
robin |
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:50:32 -1000 |
30 lines |
Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:04:44 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 13:45:10 +0100 |
125 lines |
Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:44:23 +0000 |
128 lines |
Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:58:48 +0100 |
83 lines |
Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 09:26:48 +0000 |
67 lines |
Re: Aliasing and optimization
|
Nils Smeds |
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 05:56:51 GMT |
49 lines |
Re: Hints to the optimizer, Blocking and SFCs
|
Dan Nagle |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 19:15:06 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Hints to the optimizer (was Huge Arrays and Default INTEGERs)
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:32:00 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: Hints to the optimizer (was Huge Arrays and Default INTEGERs)
|
William F Mitchell |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:17:09 -0500 |
35 lines |
Hints to the optimizer (was Huge Arrays and Default INTEGERs)
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:05:37 -0800 |
70 lines |
Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a
|
Carlie Coats |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:30:48 -0500 |
172 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:19:48 -0800 |
59 lines |
Re: Aliasing and optimization
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:59:21 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:52:53 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell
|
John Bray |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:38:55 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell
|
Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:17:45 +0000 |
34 lines |
illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell
|
William F Mitchell |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:44:03 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell
|
Clive Page |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:59:59 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Ian Chivers |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:45:16 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:47:55 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell
|
John Bray |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:11:51 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Michael Metcalf |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 03:26:28 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Aliasing and optimization
|
Nils Smeds |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 04:01:11 +0000 |
94 lines |
Aliasing and optimization
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:02:49 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Warner Bruns |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:35:35 +0100 |
11 lines |
Re: Fwd: Re: module and interface
|
Ravi C. Venkatesan |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:14:13 +0530 |
80 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Carlie Coats |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:14:18 -0500 |
81 lines |
Fwd: Re: module and interface
|
Ravi C. Venkatesan |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:28:24 +0530 |
36 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:38:53 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: module and interface
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:38:44 -0800 |
38 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:34:25 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
James Giles |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:33:01 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
varadharajan |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:55:41 +0530 |
71 lines |
modules and interfaces in a nutshell
|
Ravi C. Venkatesan |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:51:51 +0530 |
88 lines |
Re: module and interface
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:20:34 -0800 |
46 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:06:48 -0500 |
55 lines |
Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:03:40 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Lionel, Steven |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:50:14 -0500 |
50 lines |
Fwd: Re: module and interface
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:49:53 -0800 |
73 lines |
Re: module and interface
|
Panagiotis Vossos |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:41:41 +0200 |
28 lines |
Re: modules and interfaces
|
Ravi C. Venkatesan |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:02:43 +0530 |
57 lines |
Huge arrays and default INTEGERs
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:31:16 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: module and interface
|
<> |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:28:07 MET |
61 lines |
Fwd: Re: module and interface
|
Ravi C. Venkatesan |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:45:50 +0530 |
56 lines |
Re: module and interface
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:03:43 -0800 |
23 lines |
Re: module and interface
|
James Giles |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:55:28 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: module and interface
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:25:28 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: module and interface
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:21:19 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: module and interface
|
Ravi C. Venkatesan |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:36:04 +0530 |
56 lines |
module and interface
|
AUBINEAU Franck |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:11:48 +0000 |
21 lines |
Re: PRESENT propagation
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:25:46 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: PRESENT propagation
|
Richard Maine |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:00:44 -0800 |
30 lines |
Re: PRESENT propagation
|
Van Snyder |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:51:01 -0800 |
89 lines |
Re: PRESENT propagation
|
Richard Maine |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:46:07 -0800 |
72 lines |
Re: PRESENT propagation
|
Ted Stern |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:35:04 -0800 |
38 lines |
Re: PRESENT propagation
|
Ted Stern |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:33:33 -0800 |
28 lines |
PRESENT propagation
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:37:11 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: floating point comparison
|
James Giles |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:08:17 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Rotating indices of an array
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:55:57 -0600 |
47 lines |
Re: floating point comparison
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:11:46 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")
|
Michael Metcalf |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 03:47:27 -0500 |
19 lines |
Shared arguments between procedures?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sun, 25 Feb 2001 22:21:11 -0500 |
100 lines |
Rotating indices of an array
|
Ketan V. Kotecha (99423802) |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 08:04:59 +0530 |
22 lines |
Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE
|
robin |
Sun, 25 Feb 2001 12:12:10 -1000 |
49 lines |
Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:37:03 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:22:04 -0600 |
20 lines |
Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")
|
Van Snyder |
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:15:57 -0800 |
22 lines |
Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:05:24 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77
|
Ian Hounam |
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:42:10 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77
|
<> |
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:25:30 +0010 |
66 lines |
Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")
|
Michael Metcalf |
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 05:29:34 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")
|
John Reid |
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:32:10 GMT |
13 lines |
Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")
|
Michael Metcalf |
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 03:37:18 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: floating point comparison
|
James Giles |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:09:27 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: floating point comparison
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:56:51 -0600 |
34 lines |
Re: floating point comparison
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:29:05 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: floating point comparison
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:02:49 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77
|
Jing Guo |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:43:14 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:29:11 -0800 |
31 lines |
floating point comparison
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:09:04 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:59:48 +0000 |
44 lines |
Reverse-communication interfaces in F77
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:11:19 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:01:25 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: How to compile with MODULE
|
John Bray |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:34:42 +0000 |
21 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE and pointer aliasing
|
Peter Shenkin |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 01:49:59 -0500 |
92 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
James Giles |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:15:53 -0700 |
71 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:46:54 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
James Giles |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:58:04 -0700 |
70 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE and pointer aliasing
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:56:31 -0800 |
50 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE and pointer aliasing
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:33:07 -0800 |
37 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE and pointer aliasing
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:27:54 -0800 |
26 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE and pointer aliasing
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:21:00 -0800 |
68 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:37:44 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
James Giles |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:48:26 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:04:41 -0600 |
49 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:03:48 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
James Giles |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:58:13 -0700 |
67 lines |
Re: PACK with DIM
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:55:20 -0500 |
75 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:39:47 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: How to compile with MODULE
|
James Giles |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:39:00 -0700 |
29 lines |
Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:20:45 -0800 |
126 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:36:54 -0600 |
78 lines |
Re: PACK with DIM
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:15:23 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: PACK with DIM
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:09:53 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: How to compile with MODULE
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:04:30 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: How to compile with MODULE
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:51:40 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: PACK with DIM
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:49:10 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: How to compile with MODULE
|
James Giles |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:38:25 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: PACK with DIM
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:35:35 -0600 |
57 lines |
Re: How to compile with MODULE
|
varadharajan |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:26:04 +0530 |
88 lines |
Re: How to compile with MODULE
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:51:12 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: How to compile with MODULE - THANKS
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:38:34 -0300 |
10 lines |
Re: How to compile with MODULE
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:20:41 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: How to compile with MODULE
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:15:17 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: How to compile with MODULE
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:14:53 +0100 |
79 lines |
How to compile with MODULE
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:55:33 -0300 |
52 lines |
Re: How to compile .MOD
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:58:47 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: How to compile .MOD
|
Alois Steindl |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:55:49 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: How to compile .MOD
|
Herbert Fruchtl |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:54:53 +0000 |
18 lines |
Proposed announcement to comp-fortran-90
|
Ian Chivers |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:46:54 +0000 |
87 lines |
How to compile .MOD
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:44:39 -0300 |
24 lines |
Re: PACK with DIM
|
Jing Guo |
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:44:57 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: PACK with DIM
|
Jing Guo |
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:48:02 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: BVP solver
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:03:06 -0800 |
24 lines |
Re: PACK with DIM
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:54:18 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: BVP solver
|
Alois Steindl |
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:16:41 +0100 |
36 lines |
BVP solver
|
Ravi C. Venkatesan |
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 03:06:33 +0530 |
15 lines |
Re: PACK with DIM
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:56:24 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: PACK with DIM
|
John Venier |
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:02:17 -0600 |
27 lines |
Re: PACK with DIM
|
John Venier |
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:50:46 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: PACK with DIM
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:55:48 -0500 |
91 lines |
Re: cpu time
|
Tim Prince |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:32:06 -0800 |
32 lines |
Re: cpu time
|
Van Snyder |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:35:28 -0800 |
29 lines |
cpu time
|
gunaratnam gnanaranjan |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:10:27 -0800 |
21 lines |
Re: Does your compiler accept this?
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:29:20 -0800 |
46 lines |
PACK with DIM
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:54:00 -0800 |
55 lines |
Re: Does your compiler accept this?
|
James Giles |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:51:01 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: Does your compiler accept this?
|
Van Snyder |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:42:40 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: Does your compiler accept this?
|
James Giles |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:07:10 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: Does your compiler accept this?
|
Roland Schilling |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:16:19 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Does your compiler accept this?
|
Matthijs van Waveren |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:04:31 +0000 |
15 lines |
Re: Does your compiler accept this?
|
William F Mitchell |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:12:08 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: hpff: Commercial: Fortran95 for $45
|
Erik Schnetter |
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:15:50 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: Does your compiler accept this?
|
James Giles |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:44:00 -0700 |
72 lines |
Does your compiler accept this?
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:03:47 -0800 |
56 lines |
PACK with DIM
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:07:36 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
James Giles |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:48:57 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
William F Mitchell |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:25:43 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: REALLOCATE
|
varadharajan |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:44:24 +0530 |
45 lines |
Re: Direct Unformatted
|
Robert Hill |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:13:20 GMT |
40 lines |
Re: hpff: Commercial: Fortran95 for $45
|
Erik Schnetter |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:38:41 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: hpff: Commercial: Fortran95 for $45
|
Erik Schnetter |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:38:41 +0100 |
41 lines |
REALLOCATE
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 07:33:52 -0800 |
37 lines |
REALLOCATE
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:17:42 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Mathematical functions for REAL*16 Fortran types and long double C types ?
|
Erik Schnetter |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:22:38 +0100 |
63 lines |
Mathematical functions for REAL*16 Fortran types and long double C types ?
|
Jean Claude Berges |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:40:50 +0100 |
38 lines |
JNI for fortran/java ?
|
Ian Chivers |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:01:11 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: More on unformatted data interchange
|
Giampaolo Bottoni |
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:32:04 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: flushing a buffer
|
Rob Flammang |
Wed, 14 Feb 2001 19:35:49 -0500 |
23 lines |
More on unformatted data interchange
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:51:08 -0800 |
39 lines |
Unformatted data interchange
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:39:24 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: Unformatted data interchange
|
James Giles |
Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:21:08 -0700 |
38 lines |
Unformatted data interchange
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:57:59 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: Direct Unformatted
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:16:18 -0800 |
93 lines |
Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:44:24 +0100 |
100 lines |
Re: flushing a buffer
|
Herbert Fruchtl |
Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:26:21 +0000 |
35 lines |
flushing a buffer
|
Rob Flammang |
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:28:56 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Writing to two units simultaneously
|
Robert Hill |
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:53:44 GMT |
29 lines |
Re: REMOVE ME FROM THE LIST PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:59:29 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: Direct Unformatted
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:58:22 +0100 |
63 lines |
REMOVE ME FROM THE LIST PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
|
Ercan Sozen |
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:26:08 -0800 |
13 lines |
Re: [LF] Direct Unformatted
|
Carlie Coats |
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:36:00 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: [LF] Direct Unformatted
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:21:52 +0100 |
103 lines |
Re: passing a function to a subroutine
|
robin |
Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:01:21 -1000 |
54 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
robin |
Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:51:40 -1000 |
24 lines |
Re: passing a function to a subroutine
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:20:59 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: is empty continuation line ok?
|
James Giles |
Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:03:32 -0700 |
27 lines |
is empty continuation line ok?
|
Alexei Matveev |
Sat, 10 Feb 2001 14:32:41 +0100 |
40 lines |
passing a function to a subroutine
|
Jaehoon |
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:02:39 -0600 |
37 lines |
Re: Writing to two units simultaneously
|
William F Mitchell |
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:15:48 -0500 |
30 lines |
Writing to two units simultaneously
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 15:18:01 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code
|
Roland Schilling |
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 18:42:50 +0100 |
53 lines |
Announcement: Release 4.1 of the NAGWare f95 Compiler
|
Ian Hounam |
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:57:15 +0000 |
83 lines |
Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:09:55 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code
|
David Singleton |
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 22:55:25 +1100 |
16 lines |
Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code
|
Roland Schilling |
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:33:21 +0100 |
135 lines |
Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code
|
Pascal Richard |
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:57:52 +0100 |
99 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
robin |
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:18:04 -1000 |
31 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
robin |
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:18:03 -1000 |
46 lines |
New F90 Sorting Library
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:50:06 -0500 |
1395 lines |
Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:34:40 -0500 |
162 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:08:52 -0600 |
94 lines |
Twiddle bit jay and Twiddle bit nay...
|
Avi Ring |
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:17:17 +0100 |
193 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:57:59 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:22:47 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:54:35 -0800 |
88 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:15:14 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:08:06 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:34:00 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:45:27 -0800 |
30 lines |
Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:56:36 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?
|
Neil Carlson |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:31:07 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:01:05 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: Draft Standard 2002
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:55:18 -0800 |
37 lines |
Coding technique for truly generic procedures?
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:46:03 -0800 |
81 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:32:54 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?
|
Alvaro Agustin Fernandez |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:08:48 -0600 |
24 lines |
Draft Fortran 200?
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:06:59 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Draft Standard 2002
|
Herbert Fruchtl |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:04:28 +0000 |
27 lines |
Draft Standard 2002
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:56:32 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:44:48 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:05:04 +0000 |
74 lines |
Re: Premature Optimisation (sic)
|
Robert Hill |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:55:33 GMT |
24 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:51:43 +0100 |
38 lines |
Coding technique for truly generic procedures?
|
Neil Carlson |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 00:36:57 -0700 |
155 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 02:21:51 -0500 |
28 lines |
Premature Optimisation (sic)
|
<> |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:28:00 +1000 |
37 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
William F Mitchell |
Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:16:47 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:15:20 -0500 |
81 lines |
Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:29:50 +0000 |
78 lines |
Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:50:33 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: MODULE Generic_List
|
Michael Metcalf |
Mon, 5 Feb 2001 04:13:05 -0500 |
13 lines |
Re: MODULE Generic_List
|
Ian Chivers |
Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:25:15 -0800 |
45 lines |
MODULE Generic_List
|
Michael Metcalf |
Fri, 2 Feb 2001 08:16:40 -0500 |
16 lines |
Lahey into MSDev
|
Nederson da S. Koehler |
Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:02:36 -0200 |
24 lines |
Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x - woke up!
|
Orville E. Wheeler |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:57:04 -0600 |
67 lines |
Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x
|
Orville E. Wheeler |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:54:47 -0600 |
66 lines |
Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:32:46 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x
|
Tim Prince |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 06:02:32 -0800 |
43 lines |
Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:02:23 +0100 |
60 lines |
"Averaging" an array in F9x
|
Jos Luis Gmez Dans |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:17:32 +0000 |
41 lines |
Random numbers
|
Van Snyder |
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:58:38 -0800 |
26 lines |
Re: one biginner's question about array shape!
|
Erik Schnetter |
Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:39:04 +0100 |
34 lines |
one biginner's question about array shape!
|
Michael Metcalf |
Sat, 27 Jan 2001 04:56:42 -0500 |
32 lines |
one biginner's question about array shape!
|
Rick Zhang |
Sat, 27 Jan 2001 07:18:13 +0000 |
25 lines |
Ambit of modules
|
Michael Metcalf |
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:49:13 -0500 |
40 lines |
Ambit of modules
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:43:56 -0800 |
44 lines |
Re: Ambit of modules
|
Van Snyder |
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:38:12 -0800 |
40 lines |
Ambit of modules
|
Goeran Klose |
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 18:26:41 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: SAVE in modules
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 07:36:02 -0800 |
35 lines |
Re: SAVE in modules
|
Herbert Fruchtl |
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 12:10:18 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: SAVE in modules
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 11:58:03 +0000 |
50 lines |
SAVE in modules
|
Herbert Fruchtl |
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 11:39:30 +0000 |
47 lines |
GOTO into a DO loop is ILlegal, same for IF block
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:16:48 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:42:17 -0800 |
49 lines |
Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited
|
John Bray |
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 11:56:37 +0000 |
73 lines |
Attachment: Makefiles for f90 projects
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:26:30 -0500 |
94 lines |
Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:19:40 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
<> |
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:08:56 +1000 |
63 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Alberto Fasso' |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:04:10 -0800 |
90 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
John Venier |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:27:39 -0600 |
39 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:06:44 -0800 |
66 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:46:13 -0800 |
49 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Lionel, Steven |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:36:28 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Lionel, Steven |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:02:34 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:59:13 -0500 |
463 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Catherine Moroney |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:41:10 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
William F Mitchell |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:41:01 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:40:50 -0800 |
36 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Lionel, Steven |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:40:22 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:35:44 -0800 |
22 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:32:52 -0800 |
35 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:32:49 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
W. J. Metzger |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 19:25:18 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:22:45 -0500 |
443 lines |
Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Lionel, Steven |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:21:59 -0500 |
15 lines |
GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:53:48 -0800 |
74 lines |
GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:31:57 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited--a possible solution?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:08:13 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited
|
Karsten Chmielewski |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:24:38 +0100 |
82 lines |
Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited
|
Anthony Stone |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:03:13 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited
|
Anthony Stone |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:35:20 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited
|
Ian Chivers |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:16:17 +0000 |
49 lines |
Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:26:02 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: New coco
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 01:00:23 -0500 |
28 lines |
(Yet Another) New coco
|
Dan Nagle |
Sun, 21 Jan 2001 19:20:27 -0500 |
107 lines |
Re: Explicit-shape arrays
|
robin |
Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:51:22 -1000 |
33 lines |
Re: DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification
|
robin |
Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:51:22 -1000 |
34 lines |
Re: PRIVATE modules and Explicit-shape arrays
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:07:38 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: PRIVATE modules and Explicit-shape arrays
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 18:50:13 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification
|
Neil Carlson |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:21:03 -0700 |
42 lines |
DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:05:13 -0800 |
53 lines |
DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:50:00 -0500 |
25 lines |
PRIVATE modules
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:49:24 -0800 |
52 lines |
PRIVATE modules
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:29:22 -0500 |
18 lines |
Two annoyances in F95
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:47:48 -0800 |
77 lines |
Re: image size in f90
|
Lionel, Steven |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:06:30 -0500 |
26 lines |
image size in f90
|
Ketan V. Kotecha (99423802) |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:48:06 +0530 |
25 lines |
Re: Clarification of generic interfaces
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:50:15 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Two annoyances in F95
|
Tim Prince |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:55:24 -0800 |
37 lines |
please forward this to the list
|
Ian Chivers |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:17:54 -0800 |
86 lines |
Clarification of generic interfaces
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:13:28 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: Two annoyances in F95
|
James Giles |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:52:07 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Two annoyances in F95
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:45:36 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Two annoyances in F95
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:41:45 -0800 |
41 lines |
Two annoyances in F95
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:01:54 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Two annoyances in F95
|
Robert Ferencz |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:26:00 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: no extended precision in pgf90 ?
|
<> |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:15:14 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: Link Error
|
robin |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:11:40 -1000 |
33 lines |
Re: no extended precision in pgf90 ?
|
Alan Miller |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:30:10 +1100 |
49 lines |
bug reports etc (forwarded for Phillip)
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:47:36 -0800 |
70 lines |
please forward this to the list
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:34:40 -0800 |
42 lines |
Re: no extended precision in pgf90 ?
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:53:49 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: no extended precision in pgf90 ?
|
Alberto Fasso' |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:45:35 -0800 |
52 lines |
Re: no extended precision in pgf90 ?
|
Al Greynolds |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:21:52 -0700 |
51 lines |
no extended precision in pgf90 ?
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:33:05 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Array rank in fortran
|
Richard Maine |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 07:38:49 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: Array rank in fortran
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:13:54 -0600 |
28 lines |
Re: Passing arrays efficiently between module procedures
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:36:23 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Pointer deallocation status differences, f90 and f95
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:31:51 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Pointer deallocation status differences, f90 and f95
|
John Bray |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:00:18 +0000 |
35 lines |
Passing arrays efficiently between module procedures
|
Goeran Klose |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:34:37 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: Pointer deallocation status differences, f90 and f95
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:18:05 +0000 |
72 lines |
Pointer deallocation status differences, f90 and f95
|
Michael Metcalf |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 04:39:21 -0500 |
22 lines |
Pointer deallocation status differences, f90 and f95
|
John Bray |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:53:17 +0000 |
57 lines |
Re: Array rank in fortran
|
John Bray |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:44:18 +0000 |
56 lines |
Re: Array rank in fortran
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:34:57 +0100 |
40 lines |
Array rank in fortran
|
Ketan V. Kotecha (99423802) |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:25:19 +0530 |
22 lines |
|
Ketan V. Kotecha (99423802) |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:24:15 +0530 |
14 lines |
Re: Ask for a Book
|
John Venier |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:16:24 -0600 |
34 lines |
Re: Interpretation of DATE_AND_TIME(ZONE=)
|
Walt Brainerd |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 08:55:39 -0700 |
23 lines |
Re: Ask for a Book
|
Walt Brainerd |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 08:44:41 -0700 |
66 lines |
Re: Interpretation of DATE_AND_TIME(ZONE=)
|
Tim Prince |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 06:05:23 -0800 |
83 lines |
Re: Need a little help here guys....
|
Ian Chivers |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:50:15 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Ask for a Book
|
Ian Chivers |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:24:00 +0000 |
58 lines |
New preconvert, restore
|
Dan Nagle |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 05:46:54 -0500 |
45 lines |
Interpretation of DATE_AND_TIME(ZONE=)
|
Michael Metcalf |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 05:38:10 -0500 |
22 lines |
Interpretation of DATE_AND_TIME(ZONE=)
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:23:27 +0100 |
62 lines |
Fortran Information File (Jan)
|
Michael Metcalf |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 05:21:21 -0500 |
939 lines |
Re: Ask for a Book
|
Charles Crawford |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:30:29 -0500 |
13 lines |
Re: Ask for a Book
|
Loren P Meissner |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:11:25 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: Random-number generation--an F90 mini library
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:52:17 -0800 |
19 lines |
Random-number generation--an F90 mini library
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:31:38 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Ask for a Book
|
Jacques Duílio Brancher |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:32:56 -0200 |
30 lines |
Re: Ask for a Book
|
Juan Casero |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:21:41 -0500 |
154 lines |
Re: Ask for a Book
|
John Venier |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:13:13 -0600 |
54 lines |
Compaq Fortran for Linux Alpha - Beta test 1.1 and 1.0-2 update
|
Lionel, Steven |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:57:10 -0500 |
62 lines |
Ask for a Book
|
Alexandre Suman de Araujo |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:29:43 -0200 |
98 lines |
Re: image size in f90
|
Venkat V S S Sastry |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:24:03 +0000 |
36 lines |
Need a little help here guys....
|
Juan Casero |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:09:47 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: image size in f90
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:03:58 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: image size in f90
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:51:12 -0600 |
36 lines |
command line arguments in Fortran
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:41:51 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: image size in f90
|
Don Woods |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:40:46 -0800 |
34 lines |
image size in f90
|
Richard Maine |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:35:10 -0800 |
32 lines |
Re: image size in f90
|
Lionel, Steven |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:35:02 -0500 |
41 lines |
command line arguments in Fortran
|
Catherine Moroney |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:26:57 -0800 |
15 lines |
image size in f90
|
Ketan V. Kotecha (99423802) |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:42:47 +0530 |
23 lines |
|
Van Snyder |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:44:37 -0800 |
670 lines |
Re: align
|
Dan Nagle |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 07:16:37 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:11:03 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: align
|
Michael Metcalf |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 03:09:42 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: align
|
W. J. Metzger |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:08:43 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: align
|
robin |
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:03:10 -1000 |
98 lines |
Re: align
|
Kipp Graham |
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:22:40 +1100 |
84 lines |
Re: align
|
John Venier |
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:37:20 -0600 |
32 lines |
Re: align
|
W. J. Metzger |
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:29:31 +0100 |
104 lines |
Re: To paraphrase Richard Maine...
|
<> |
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:06:43 +1000 |
61 lines |
Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments
|
robin |
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:53:04 -1000 |
50 lines |
Re: Image-formats
|
Jacob =Jouk Jansen |
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:10:00 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: precision in scattering benchmark example program
|
Tim Prince |
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:03:04 -0800 |
106 lines |
Re: precision in scattering benchmark example program
|
Michael Milgram |
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:04:29 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: align
|
Ralph Carmichael |
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 07:54:58 -0800 |
51 lines |
Fw: scatteri benchmark from polyhedron site
|
Tim Prince |
Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:14:07 -0800 |
3576 lines |
scatteri benchmark from polyhedron site
|
Tim Prince |
Sat, 13 Jan 2001 22:28:28 -0800 |
3615 lines |
align
|
mbai |
Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:52:01 -0500 |
88 lines |
New coco
|
Dan Nagle |
Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:06:21 -0500 |
74 lines |
Re: Image-formats
|
GianLuigi Piacentini |
Sat, 13 Jan 2001 21:38:42 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: Image-formats
|
Gary Scott |
Sat, 13 Jan 2001 10:55:02 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: Image-formats
|
STOCLET Patrick |
Sat, 13 Jan 2001 14:09:25 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Image-formats
|
Jan van Oosterwijk |
Sat, 13 Jan 2001 13:29:47 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:30:33 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:24:53 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:18:49 -0600 |
89 lines |
Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:40:16 -0600 |
82 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
robin |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:32:22 -1000 |
32 lines |
Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments
|
William F Mitchell |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:03:08 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:45:50 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments
|
William F Mitchell |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:11:51 -0500 |
84 lines |
Generic interface with assumed-size arguments
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:10:29 -0800 |
26 lines |
Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments
|
Walt Brainerd |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:31:30 -0700 |
64 lines |
Re: 1977 (was C99 floats)
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 19:03:00 +0100 |
58 lines |
Generic interface with assumed-size arguments
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 12:58:49 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Walt Brainerd |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:33:49 -0700 |
77 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Richard Maine |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 07:37:23 -0800 |
25 lines |
Re: 1977 (was C99 floats)
|
Phillip Helbig |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:19:53 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: 1977 (was C99 floats)
|
Clive Page |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:08:56 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Ian Chivers |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:46:15 +0000 |
60 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
William F Mitchell |
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 08:40:54 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: Bit shifting in Fortran and C--is it the same?
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 18:11:27 +0000 |
30 lines |
Bit shifting in Fortran and C--is it the same?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:56:02 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Walt Brainerd |
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:39:06 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:15:41 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 14:08:22 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:44:37 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:16:39 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Popa, Frank D. |
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:07:48 -0500 |
69 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:19:23 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:09:14 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:33:51 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: To paraphrase Richard Maine...
|
Peter Shenkin |
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:24:06 -0500 |
20 lines |
To paraphrase Richard Maine...
|
Van Snyder |
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:56:38 -0800 |
17 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Richard Maine |
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:55:43 -0800 |
61 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
John Venier |
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:10:58 -0600 |
78 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Dan Nagle |
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 13:03:03 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Walt Brainerd |
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:49:39 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:29:47 +0000 |
71 lines |
Re: C99 floats
|
John Venier |
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:47:06 -0600 |
59 lines |
C99 floats
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:16:24 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:09:31 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 11:29:33 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 14:42:58 +0000 |
85 lines |
Re: It would help if I would finish the message before sending it...
|
Malcolm Cohen |
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 14:32:52 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Vertical format control
|
Len Makin |
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 09:26:05 +1100 |
37 lines |
How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 17:06:56 -0500 |
137 lines |
It would help if I would finish the message before sending it...
|
Van Snyder |
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:58:46 -0800 |
137 lines |
Vertical format control
|
Van Snyder |
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:56:16 -0800 |
55 lines |
Re: new page
|
Van Snyder |
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 12:40:39 -0800 |
38 lines |
Re: Finite element multigrid
|
Robert Ferrell |
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 11:25:34 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: new page
|
Tim Prince |
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 07:04:31 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: new page
|
simon harding (IACR-RES) |
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 12:08:56 -0000 |
14 lines |
Re: new page
|
Dan Nagle |
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 06:53:37 -0500 |
54 lines |
new page
|
Moshe Vaxman |
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 11:33:30 +0200 |
27 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
Len Makin |
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 09:28:45 +1100 |
58 lines |
Re: free compiler
|
robin |
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:27:31 -1000 |
24 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
robin |
Sat, 6 Jan 2001 13:13:35 -1000 |
46 lines |
Re: CPU time.
|
J. van Oosterwijk |
Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:07:18 +0100 |
39 lines |
CPU time.
|
Zhou Yong Cheng |
Sat, 6 Jan 2001 16:59:57 +0800 |
23 lines |
My NAMELIST blue (Re: Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon )
|
Jing Guo |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 20:09:32 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
Van Snyder |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 11:15:12 -0800 |
1993 lines |
NAMELIST
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 14:12:52 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon
|
Van Snyder |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:47:05 -0800 |
26 lines |
Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon
|
Ian Chivers |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:41:35 -0800 |
140 lines |
Re: Preprocessing of parameter files
|
Bob Wells Tel: +44/0 1865 272915 |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 17:13:16 GMT |
9 lines |
Re: Preprocessing of parameter files
|
Anthony Stone |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 17:09:42 +0000 |
88 lines |
Re: Preprocessing of parameter files
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 11:34:06 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 11:24:05 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: XML for preprocessing
|
<> |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:17:06 CST |
134 lines |
Re: array variant
|
Joerg Strutwolf |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:15:23 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: array variant
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:14:03 -0600 |
39 lines |
Re: array variant
|
Herbert Fruchtl |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:12:56 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: free compiler
|
Dick Hendrickson |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:07:06 -0600 |
39 lines |
Re: Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon
|
Tim Prince |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 06:51:38 -0800 |
24 lines |
Re: XML for preprocessing
|
Anthony Stone |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 14:46:40 +0000 |
115 lines |
array variant
|
Mingwu Bai |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 23:39:38 +0900 |
19 lines |
Re: Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon
|
<> |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 08:28:08 CST |
156 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
Kurt W Hirchert |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 08:25:42 -0600 |
49 lines |
free compiler
|
Eduardo Melione Abreu |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:04:14 -0200 |
18 lines |
Re: Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon
|
Craig McNeile |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 13:40:51 +0000 |
115 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
Popa, Frank D. |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 07:21:49 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Calling C from Fortran90
|
Clive Page |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:51:06 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
Alan Miller |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:17:45 +1100 |
60 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
Dan Nagle |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 20:05:39 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 15:46:51 -0800 |
23 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
Alan Miller |
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:36:54 +1100 |
57 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
Van Snyder |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 15:23:35 -0800 |
54 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
Stu Anderson 425-865-3595 |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 14:20:51 -0800 |
36 lines |
Re: Random number seed generation
|
Lionel, Steven |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 17:01:09 -0500 |
28 lines |
Random number seed generation
|
Aleksandar Donev |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 16:53:01 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Calling C from Fortran90
|
Tim Prince |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 06:21:07 -0800 |
45 lines |
Re: Finite element multigrid
|
Alan Miller |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 23:59:20 +1100 |
26 lines |
Re: Finite element multigrid
|
William F Mitchell |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 07:57:57 -0500 |
34 lines |
Finite element multigrid
|
Paul Bolton |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:04:15 -0000 |
22 lines |
Re: Calling C from Fortran90
|
Pascal Richard |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:32:46 +0100 |
90 lines |
Re: Calling C from Fortran90
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:24:30 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Calling C from Fortran90
|
Pierre Hugonnet |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:12:03 +0100 |
34 lines |
Calling C from Fortran90
|
Franck AUBINEAU |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 09:51:34 +0100 |
76 lines |
Spotting CALLed routines that aren't external
|
John Bray |
Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:44:25 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Sparse matrices!
|
William F Mitchell |
Tue, 2 Jan 2001 11:20:58 -0500 |
78 lines |