JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


2001


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Averaging" an array in F9x (5 messages)
"Averaging" an array in F9x - woke up! (1 message)
"Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium? (5 messages)
% vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.] (17 messages)
% vs SCCS (1 message)
 What is wrong with my programe? (1 message)
(j3.2001-600) RE: 01-317 - What is an Input/Output error (1 message)
(Yet Another) New coco (1 message)
128 bits of precision? (5 messages)
128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is (3 messages)
128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? - (13 messages)
128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile? - (1 message)
1977 (was C99 floats) (3 messages)
<No subject> (9 messages)
A challenge for an ingenious interface (2 messages)
A summary of "important" F2K changes (3 messages)
Accessibility of type components (3 messages)
ACM Fortran Forum (April) (3 messages)
ACM Fortran Forum (December issue) (1 message)
Addendum: RECURSIVE routines (2 messages)
additional thoughts on submodules TR (1 message)
Aliased DOT_PRODUCT (3 messages)
Aliasing and allocatable components (3 messages)
Aliasing and optimization (6 messages)
align (9 messages)
Allocatabla arrays or pointers (2 messages)
Allocatable components vendor implementations (3 messages)
ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures (8 messages)
ALLOCATED in F95 (2 messages)
Allocation for linked lists and skip lists (3 messages)
Ambit of modules (4 messages)
An expression evaluator (1 message)
ANNOUNCE: Perl code for sorting CONTAINed routines (1 message)
Announcement: Release 4.1 of the NAGWare f95 Compiler (1 message)
Announcing Compaq Visual Fortran version 6.6 (1 message)
Another Fortran disinformation article (17 messages)
array and file size on a read (1 message)
array and file size on read (1 message)
Array assignment and overloading (=) (3 messages)
array declaration (4 messages)
Array memory allocation (2 messages)
Array outer product (4 messages)
Array rank in fortran (5 messages)
Array re-allocation question (2 messages)
Array sections as arguments (6 messages)
array variant (4 messages)
Ask for a Book (9 messages)
Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" i n the program (1 message)
Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" in the program (2 messages)
Associating COMMON variables (2 messages)
Assumed-size arrays WAS: Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a (1 message)
Assumed-size hack (3 messages)
Attachment: Makefiles for f90 projects (1 message)
Automatic deallocation (3 messages)
Avoiding aliasing with array pointers (5 messages)
Back copies of Fortran Forum (4 messages)
Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency (19 messages)
Bit shifting in Fortran and C--is it the same? (2 messages)
BIT_SIZE (6 messages)
BIT_SIZE (was: Memory place of reals) (2 messages)
BOZ syntax; [was: mixed output text/binary] (3 messages)
bug reports etc (forwarded for Phillip) (1 message)
BVP solver (3 messages)
C & Fortran90 (3 messages)
C interop (was Re: Standards ( was: Stream I/O ( was.... (2 messages)
C99 floats (22 messages)
Call for Papers for the 2002 Workshop on OpenMP (WOMPEI) in Japan (1 message)
Calling C from Fortran90 (6 messages)
Capturing keys problem (1 message)
cfortran.h for Intel Linux ifc/icc? (2 messages)
Changing character to integer or real (4 messages)
Cheating in INTERFACE (7 messages)
Clarification of generic interfaces (2 messages)
CoArray Fortran progress? (1 message)
Coding technique for truly generic procedures? (7 messages)
colors mismatch (3 messages)
command line arguments in Fortran (2 messages)
Comments in namelists (3 messages)
Comments on: "Pioneers of the 'Fortran' Programming Language" (2 messages)
Compaq Fortran for Linux Alpha - Beta test 1.1 and 1.0-2 update (1 message)
Compaq Visual Fortran Education Donation Program (2 messages)
Compiler analysis question (1 message)
compiler error (5 messages)
compiler error ?? (2 messages)
Compiling Large Prgrams (5 messages)
Constructive use for INCLUDE (1 message)
Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE") (7 messages)
Corrected: Reverse communication in F2K--a detailed CG example (1 message)
cpu time (3 messages)
CPU time. (2 messages)
CPU_TIME for intrinsic functions (3 messages)
Cray pointers and compiler bug (4 messages)
Cray pointers and compiler bug ?? (2 messages)
creating directory (2 messages)
Data acquisition from a port (2 messages)
De-blanking Strings (was: Strings) (2 messages)
Debugger for Linux Fortran 90 (1 message)
debugging / development tools for F90 (1 message)
debugging/development tools for F90 (4 messages)
Dependancies in declarations (3 messages)
derived types question (4 messages)
DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification (4 messages)
Direct Unformatted (3 messages)
disk fragmentation (3 messages)
Does your compiler accept this? (9 messages)
Dos application (1 message)
Draft Fortran 200? (1 message)
Draft Standard 2002 (3 messages)
e-version of Metcalf & Reid (1 message)
Efficiency of allocatable and pointer arrays (3 messages)
Efficiency of F77 vs. f90/95 another question (1 message)
Efficiency of F77 vs.F90 (34 messages)
ELF90 3.00a under Windows NT/2000 (2 messages)
embedding new-lines in character string (27 messages)
Empty TYPEs (5 messages)
Emulating MATLAB's save (3 messages)
Entity accessibility through indirect USE association (2 messages)
Error message: Derived-type initialization (2 messages)
Error on J3 website (4 messages)
EWOMP'2001 European Workshop on OpenMP (1 message)
Executable file. (5 messages)
Explicit-shape arrays (1 message)
EXTENDS of and extended type (4 messages)
F2K syntax question (3 messages)
F2x draft download (3 messages)
F2x Draft revisions (2 messages)
F2x syntax---interface conformance with extended types (3 messages)
F90 compiler (5 messages)
F90 compiler - correction (kernel 2.2.*) (2 messages)
File size (5 messages)
Finite element multigrid (4 messages)
Fixing the size for assumed-shape arrays (1 message)
floating point comparison (9 messages)
flushing a buffer (3 messages)
For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals (5 messages)
Fortran (2 messages)
Fortran 90 compiles used by Fortran 77 (1 message)
Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers Course (3 messages)
fortran course near lancaster university in the uk (6 messages)
Fortran Forum (August) (2 messages)
Fortran Information File (Jan) (1 message)
Fortran Memory (10 messages)
fortran on Linux (6 messages)
Fortran Resource File (July) (1 message)
Fortran Resource File (May) (1 message)
Fortran Resource File (September) (1 message)
Fortran Resources (March) (3 messages)
Fortran Resources (November) (2 messages)
Fortran usage within HPC (1 message)
Fortran version of getopt_long? (2 messages)
Fortran-90 Windows programming (1 message)
free compiler (3 messages)
Free Sample Copies of JCMSE (2 messages)
Fw: gauss turan quadrature (1 message)
Fw: scatteri benchmark from polyhedron site (1 message)
Fwd: Re: module and interface (4 messages)
GDDM graphics ? (2 messages)
Generic interface with assumed-size arguments (11 messages)
Geometry optimizer. (4 messages)
GOTO into a DO loop is ILlegal, same for IF block (1 message)
GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not (21 messages)
graphic with fortran? (7 messages)
Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code (7 messages)
Help reqd. (2 messages)
Help! (3 messages)
Hints to the optimizer (was Huge Arrays and Default INTEGERs) (3 messages)
Hints to the optimizer, Blocking and SFCs (2 messages)
How about the include in Fortran90 (2 messages)
How is ELEMENTAL translated? (4 messages)
How to compile .MOD (4 messages)
How to compile with MODULE (11 messages)
How to compile with MODULE - THANKS (1 message)
How to read data in such a file (2 messages)
How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library? (4 messages)
How to unsubscribe (1 message)
How transform C into F90 on Data Struct. (2 messages)
hpff: Commercial: Fortran95 for $45 (3 messages)
Huge arrays and default INTEGERs (20 messages)
I apology much for increasing so annoying debate between B.a & B%a (1 message)
I need the help on "include" (2 messages)
IBM XL Fortran for AIX V7.1.1 (1 message)
illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a (6 messages)
illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell (3 messages)
image size in f90 (10 messages)
Image-formats (5 messages)
implicit copy real-->complex ??? (2 messages)
IMPORT (5 messages)
including variables in edit descriptors (9 messages)
Incomplete factorization libraries (1 message)
Intel compiler with C pointer functions (3 messages)
Intel F90 compiler and MPI (2 messages)
Intel for academics (3 messages)
Intel Fortran Compiler for Linux - Scratch files (3 messages)
Intel Fortran free noncomercial compiler (1 message)
Interface Fortran90 and C (2 messages)
Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays (17 messages)
Interfacing--legal or not? (5 messages)
Internal procedure as actual argument (8 messages)
Internal procedures as actuals (3 messages)
Interpretation of DATE_AND_TIME(ZONE=) (4 messages)
Interval arithmetic (1 message)
Interval arithmetic and F200x (5 messages)
INTRINSIC statement question (4 messages)
intrinsic SUM and roundoff errors (5 messages)
inverse matrix (6 messages)
Is D1MACH(4) == EPSILON(1.D0)? (3 messages)
is empty continuation line ok? (2 messages)
ISO Varying String Fortran 95 (1 message)
ISO Varying String Fortran90 (8 messages)
It would help if I would finish the message before sending it... (2 messages)
J3-fortran.org (4 messages)
Java Fortran interface via JNI (1 message)
JNI for fortran/java ? <fwd> (1 message)
Lahey into MSDev (1 message)
Large parameter arrays (7 messages)
Latin Hypercube routine (1 message)
LBOUND on assumed-shape arguments (3 messages)
Learning parallel Pro (1 message)
leaving the list (2 messages)
Left aligning during a write (3 messages)
Legal in a pure function? (5 messages)
Linear Interpolation Routine (4 messages)
Link Error (1 message)
Linux f90 Compiler performance (8 messages)
Linux Workstation (3 messages)
List addressing (3 messages)
List addressing (was: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays) (2 messages)
list home page (1 message)
list reconfiguration - please be patient (2 messages)
Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited (7 messages)
Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited--a possible solution? (1 message)
Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again (7 messages)
Mathematical functions for REAL*16 Fortran types and long double C types ? (2 messages)
Memory allocation (2 messages)
Memory place of reals (6 messages)
Memory place of reals [selected_real_kind()] (2 messages)
Memory profiling tool--mpatrol (1 message)
mixed output text/binary (12 messages)
module and interface (10 messages)
MODULE Generic_List (3 messages)
modules (1 message)
modules and interfaces (1 message)
modules and interfaces in a nutshell (4 messages)
Modules instead of COMMON (2 messages)
More on unformatted data interchange (2 messages)
More questions about design issues for the submodules TR (6 messages)
mpi recommendations (3 messages)
Multiple namelists in files (1 message)
Multiprocessor Linux PC and Fortran (1 message)
My NAMELIST blue (Re: Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon <fwd>) (1 message)
Name mangling problem (2 messages)
Name mangling problem - with Intel IFC compiler (1 message)
NAMELIST (1 message)
namelist and characters (10 messages)
Need a little help here guys.... (2 messages)
Nested WHERE constructs. (Interpretation/implementation) (2 messages)
New coco (2 messages)
New F90 Sorting Library (1 message)
New make_processor_model (1 message)
new page (5 messages)
New preconvert, restore (1 message)
New: A reverse-communication interface CG code in F2K (2 messages)
New: Reverse-communication: Internal Procedures as Arguments (1 message)
newline vs. linefeed (3 messages)
no extended precision in pgf90 ? (6 messages)
Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine (19 messages)
Non-advancing READ (2 messages)
numeric inquiry in new coco (2 messages)
Numerical Recipes (was: Another Fortran disinformation article) (4 messages)
NYT article (4 messages)
Off-topic :: Refprop - NIST (1 message)
one biginner's question about array shape! (3 messages)
Oooops [Was: implicit copy real-->complex ???] (1 message)
OOP (was: Strings) (18 messages)
OOP F2K--implementation (and exception handling) (1 message)
OpenMP + MATMUL? (1 message)
OpenMP question (6 messages)
output on screen (20 messages)
P.S. to Temporaries for easier typing (1 message)
PACK with DIM (14 messages)
parsing input file (3 messages)
parsing input file (summary) (2 messages)
Parsing XML (1 message)
passing a function to a subroutine (3 messages)
passing array bounds into subroutines (5 messages)
Passing arrays efficiently between module procedures (2 messages)
Passing pointer argument (2 messages)
passing structure components into subroutines (4 messages)
perf de CGEMV on SGI (7 messages)
perf de CGEMV on SGI, SUN, IBM... (5 messages)
PETSc library --- C dynamic arrays and Fortran (2 messages)
pgf77 options (3 messages)
pgf77 options - THANK YOU (1 message)
Please cancel me from the list (1 message)
please forward this to the list <fwd> (2 messages)
Please ignore "Compiler analysis question" (1 message)
Pointer Allocation (1 message)
Pointer deallocation status differences, f90 and f95 (5 messages)
Pointer program (4 messages)
Pointers (19 messages)
Pointers and structure (2 messages)
Pointers: Is this safe and legal? (6 messages)
Pointing to a non-pointer element of a pointer structure (4 messages)
Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile? (6 messages)
POSIX system calls (1 message)
precision in scattering benchmark example program (2 messages)
Premature Optimisation (sic) (2 messages)
Preprocessing of parameter files (3 messages)
PRESENT propagation (7 messages)
Printing to two units revisited (4 messages)
PRIVATE modules (2 messages)
PRIVATE modules and Explicit-shape arrays (2 messages)
program error (was compiler error) (1 message)
Proposed announcement to comp-fortran-90 <fwd> (1 message)
Puzzling performance with allocatable components (1 message)
Puzzling profiling result (3 messages)
Q: Fortran Memory (1 message)
Q: Pointer Allocation (5 messages)
Question: (2 messages)
Questions about design issues for the submodules TR (4 messages)
Random number seed generation (14 messages)
Random numbers (1 message)
Random-number generation--an F90 mini library (2 messages)
Reading unknown file array (1 message)
real to complex to real (8 messages)
REALLOCATE (16 messages)
REALLOCATE and pointer aliasing (5 messages)
Rebuttal to Treurich, et al. (4 messages)
Reccomendations for code migration tools (1 message)
Recursive or not? (3 messages)
RECURSIVE procedures (7 messages)
REMOVE ME FROM THE LIST PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEE (2 messages)
Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95 (9 messages)
Reply-To (1 message)
Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon <fwd> (5 messages)
Reunion (3 messages)
Reverse communication in F2K--a detailed CG example (1 message)
Reverse Communication: WAS: Pointers: Is this safe and legal? (1 message)
Reverse-communication interfaces in F77 (8 messages)
Rewrites ( was The truth about Fortran) (3 messages)
Rotating indices of an array (2 messages)
Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature (9 messages)
Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature (THANK YOU ) (1 message)
SAVE in modules (4 messages)
scatteri benchmark from polyhedron site (1 message)
sequence attribute for derived types (9 messages)
Shared arguments between procedures? (1 message)
Sharing arguments revisited--more library design issues (1 message)
Simple I/O Question (4 messages)
Simple question (3 messages)
Size of automatic arrays (20 messages)
size of data (4 messages)
Skip Lists in F95 (1 message)
Skip Lists in F95 --- wasted space revisited (5 messages)
Slash etiquette ... (12 messages)
Software updated (1 message)
Sorry! (1 message)
Sparse matrices! (1 message)
speed of floating point arithmetic (2 messages)
spelling of Fortran (8 messages)
Spotting CALLed routines that aren't external (1 message)
Standard module-routine referencing in debuggers? (2 messages)
Standards (8 messages)
Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article)) (17 messages)
Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortrandisinformation article)) (2 messages)
Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: AnotherFortrandisinformation article)) (1 message)
Standards, a simple user's point of view (4 messages)
Statically link a module with library routines?? (5 messages)
strange bug (2 messages)
strange bug [Was: implicit copy...] (1 message)
Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article) (2 messages)
String length (3 messages)
String length (was What *I* miss in Fortran) (5 messages)
Strings (28 messages)
Strings ... and other things (2 messages)
Sun Fortran 90/95 compiler behaviour ! (1 message)
SV: Another Fortran disinformation article (2 messages)
system call (3 messages)
Tables of Gauss-Turan-type Quadrature (1 message)
TARGET arguments clarification (4 messages)
Temporaries for easier typing (1 message)
test 2 (3 messages)
test 3 (3 messages)
test 4 (5 messages)
test1 - both,ignore (3 messages)
Thanks for the Tip (1 message)
Thanks to every one. (1 message)
The departure of NASA's chief... (1 message)
The truth about Fortran, was: The departure of NASA's chief... (5 messages)
To paraphrase Richard Maine... (3 messages)
Twiddle bit jay and Twiddle bit nay... (1 message)
Two annoyances in F95 (7 messages)
Two states? (2 messages)
Undefined intent(out) arguments (13 messages)
Unformatted data interchange (3 messages)
uninitialized data in COPY-IN/COPY-OUT (3 messages)
Unresolved external and conversion types (1 message)
unsigned integers (6 messages)
unsubcribe (3 messages)
unsubscribe (8 messages)
unsubscrible (1 message)
unsuscribe (1 message)
variable formatting (4 messages)
Version of fsplit that ignores C pre-processor directives (1 message)
Vertical format control (2 messages)
Viterbi algorithm (1 message)
What *I* miss in Fortran (27 messages)
What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings) (6 messages)
What does a zero length string equate to? (5 messages)
What is the wrong with my program? (4 messages)
What is wrong with my programe? (4 messages)
what's .mod for? (2 messages)
Where can I down load the released version 6.6 of Comapq Visu al Fortran? (1 message)
Where can I down load the released version 6.6 of Comapq Visual Fortran? (3 messages)
which is faster (2 messages)
which is faster ? (1 message)
Workshop on OpenMP in Japan (WOMPEI'02) - extended deadline (1 message)
wrapper routines and copy-in/copy-out (3 messages)
writing out signed integers in In.n format (4 messages)
Writing to two units simultaneously (3 messages)
XML for preprocessing (2 messages)
Yet More on ACAHR( 10) (2 messages)
Yet More on newline (1 message)
your mail (5 messages)
[LF] Direct Unformatted (2 messages)
[unsigned integers] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Averaging" an array in F9x

"Averaging" an array in F9x

Jos Luis Gmez Dans <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:17:32 +0000

41 lines

Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 06:02:32 -0800

43 lines

Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:02:23 +0100

60 lines

Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:32:46 +0100

66 lines

Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x

Orville E. Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:54:47 -0600

66 lines

New Thread

"Averaging" an array in F9x - woke up!

Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x - woke up!

Orville E. Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:57:04 -0600

67 lines

New Thread

"Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?

"Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?

Bertrand Meltz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:09:14 +0100

32 lines

"Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:56:14 -0700

45 lines

Re: "Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:11:42 -0800

61 lines

Re: "Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?

Feyzi Inanc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:47:23 -0600

60 lines

Re: "Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:47:33 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

% vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

% vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:54:35 +0200

39 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Bob Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:33:14 -0400

51 lines

% vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:13:23 -0700

41 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:21:02 -0400

68 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:32:09 -0700

36 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Bob Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:39:31 -0400

49 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:53:15 -0700

25 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Joerg Behrens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 19:45:49 +0200

27 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:57:52 +0100

33 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:03:13 +0200

46 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:20:31 +0100

46 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 20:04:56 +0010

60 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:33:57 +0100

72 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:42:43 +0100

58 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:51:53 +0200

44 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:31:42 +0010

38 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:38:00 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

% vs SCCS

Re: % vs SCCS

richard friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:59:32 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

&nbsp;What&nbsp;is&nbsp;wrong&nbsp;with&nbsp;my&nbsp;programe?

Re: &nbsp;What&nbsp;is&nbsp;wrong&nbsp;with&nbsp;my&nbsp;programe?

frank_ouyang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:39:05 +0800

59 lines

New Thread

(j3.2001-600) RE: 01-317 - What is an Input/Output error

Re: (j3.2001-600) RE: 01-317 - What is an Input/Output error

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:41:12 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

(Yet Another) New coco

(Yet Another) New coco

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Jan 2001 19:20:27 -0500

107 lines

New Thread

128 bits of precision?

Re: 128 bits of precision?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:24:09 +0100

33 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:44:02 +1000

71 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:06:55 +1000

33 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 20:25:27 +0010

45 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:54:26 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is

Ian Hounam <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 10:58:09 +0100

44 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Oct 2001 00:39:59 +1000

32 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 07:54:26 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Popa, Frank D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 07:10:58 -0400

61 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 05:51:52 -0700

38 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:29:16 +0100

39 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:38:17 +0200

36 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Bob Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:22:26 -0400

25 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:01:32 -0700

31 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Bob Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:28:29 -0400

50 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:07:18 -0700

70 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Len Makin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:04:46 +1000

40 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Len Makin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:34:26 +1000

46 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:53:58 +0100

54 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:56:55 +0200

44 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 07:43:56 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile? -

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile? -

Volker Typke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:10:38 +0200

46 lines

New Thread

1977 (was C99 floats)

Re: 1977 (was C99 floats)

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:08:56 +0000

51 lines

Re: 1977 (was C99 floats)

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:19:53 +0100

18 lines

Re: 1977 (was C99 floats)

J. van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 19:03:00 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:44:37 -0800

670 lines

<No subject>

Ketan V. Kotecha (99423802) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:24:15 +0530

14 lines

<No subject>

Zhou Yong Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:04:54 +0800

26 lines

<No subject>

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:52:51 +0930

78 lines

<No subject>

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 07:46:12 -0700

29 lines

<No subject>

Gary Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jul 2001 21:32:11 -0500

76 lines

<No subject>

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:48:10 -0800

62 lines

<No subject>

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:14:42 -0800

52 lines

<No subject>

Gary Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:20:04 -0600

92 lines

New Thread

A challenge for an ingenious interface

A challenge for an ingenious interface

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Apr 2001 11:31:42 -0400

102 lines

Re: A challenge for an ingenious interface

Richard Friedman (rchrd) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 09:17:29 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

A summary of "important" F2K changes

A summary of "important" F2K changes

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 13:45:12 -0500

37 lines

Re: A summary of "important" F2K changes

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:51:18 -0700

40 lines

A summary of "important" F2K changes

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 03:07:28 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Accessibility of type components

Accessibility of type components

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:08:16 -0400

46 lines

Accessibility of type components

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:40:52 -0700

48 lines

Re: Accessibility of type components

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 18:22:21 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

ACM Fortran Forum (April)

ACM Fortran Forum (April)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:53:32 -0500

87 lines

Re: ACM Fortran Forum (April)

Giampaolo Bottoni <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:50:40 +0100

76 lines

Re: ACM Fortran Forum (April)

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 06:25:52 -0800

97 lines

New Thread

ACM Fortran Forum (December issue)

ACM Fortran Forum (December issue)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 05:43:05 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

Addendum: RECURSIVE routines

Addendum: RECURSIVE routines

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2001 17:03:27 -0400

38 lines

Re: Addendum: RECURSIVE routines

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2001 15:18:40 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

additional thoughts on submodules TR

Re: additional thoughts on submodules TR

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:06:51 +0100

325 lines

New Thread

Aliased DOT_PRODUCT

Aliased DOT_PRODUCT

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jul 2001 15:54:08 -0400

17 lines

Re: Aliased DOT_PRODUCT

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jul 2001 23:39:38 -0700

28 lines

Aliased DOT_PRODUCT

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jul 2001 07:52:14 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

Aliasing and allocatable components

Aliasing and allocatable components

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:42:54 -0600

244 lines

Re: Aliasing and allocatable components

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:03:31 +0000

76 lines

Re: Aliasing and allocatable components

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:22:18 -0600

65 lines

New Thread

Aliasing and optimization

Aliasing and optimization

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:02:49 -0500

47 lines

Re: Aliasing and optimization

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 04:01:11 +0000

94 lines

Re: Aliasing and optimization

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:59:21 -0500

46 lines

Re: Aliasing and optimization

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 05:56:51 GMT

49 lines

Re: Aliasing and optimization

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Apr 2001 10:47:43 -0400

38 lines

Re: Aliasing and optimization

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 22:40:42 GMT

43 lines

New Thread

align

align

mbai <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:52:01 -0500

88 lines

Re: align

Ralph Carmichael <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Jan 2001 07:54:58 -0800

51 lines

Re: align

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:03:10 -1000

98 lines

Re: align

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:29:31 +0100

104 lines

Re: align

John Venier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:37:20 -0600

32 lines

Re: align

Kipp Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:22:40 +1100

84 lines

Re: align

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:08:43 +0100

101 lines

Re: align

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 03:09:42 -0500

28 lines

Re: align

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 07:16:37 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Allocatabla arrays or pointers

Allocatabla arrays or pointers

Franck AUBINEAU <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:04:55 +0100

84 lines

Re: Allocatabla arrays or pointers

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:42:43 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Allocatable components vendor implementations

Allocatable components vendor implementations

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:59:05 -0400

30 lines

Re: Allocatable components vendor implementations

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 17:04:13 -0500

44 lines

Allocatable components vendor implementations

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 03:51:22 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2001 23:25:08 -0400

140 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:05:41 +0100

67 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:48:45 -0400

89 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:00:53 +0100

63 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:24:33 -0400

54 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:25:50 -0700

28 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:15:22 -0600

22 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:34:17 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

ALLOCATED in F95

ALLOCATED in F95

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:22:13 -0400

34 lines

Re: ALLOCATED in F95

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:52:14 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

Allocation for linked lists and skip lists

Allocation for linked lists and skip lists

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 22:57:53 -0400

49 lines

Re: Allocation for linked lists and skip lists

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 May 2001 14:36:57 MET_DST

60 lines

Re: Allocation for linked lists and skip lists

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2001 10:27:42 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Ambit of modules

Ambit of modules

Goeran Klose <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2001 18:26:41 +0100

21 lines

Re: Ambit of modules

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:38:12 -0800

40 lines

Ambit of modules

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:43:56 -0800

44 lines

Ambit of modules

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:49:13 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

An expression evaluator

An expression evaluator

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:21:36 -0800

121 lines

New Thread

ANNOUNCE: Perl code for sorting CONTAINed routines

ANNOUNCE: Perl code for sorting CONTAINed routines

Barry W. Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:15:11 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Announcement: Release 4.1 of the NAGWare f95 Compiler

Announcement: Release 4.1 of the NAGWare f95 Compiler

Ian Hounam <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:57:15 +0000

83 lines

New Thread

Announcing Compaq Visual Fortran version 6.6

Announcing Compaq Visual Fortran version 6.6

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:02:15 -0700

79 lines

New Thread

Another Fortran disinformation article

Another Fortran disinformation article

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:24:00 -0500

34 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:46:37 -0000

23 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 08:36:19 -0800

31 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

N. Shamsundar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:13:13 -0600

32 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Klaus Ramstöck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 20:26:12 +0100

68 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Craig Shirley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:40:30 -0800

22 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:54:19 -0700

37 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Stu Anderson 425-865-3595 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:08:22 -0800

23 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:28:56 -0800

53 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Klaus Ramstöck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:45:11 +0100

47 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Klaus Ramstöck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:52:22 +0100

59 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:03:02 -0800

28 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:15:41 -0800

26 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:16:06 -0700

29 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:19:37 +1000

32 lines

Another Fortran disinformation article

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 04:03:49 -0500

92 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Popa, Frank D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 06:19:45 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

array and file size on a read

Re: array and file size on a read

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:28:16 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

array and file size on read

Re: array and file size on read

Ferhun C. Caner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:24:37 +0300

30 lines

New Thread

Array assignment and overloading (=)

Array assignment and overloading (=)

Tom Clune <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:22:43 -0400

94 lines

Array assignment and overloading (=)

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:13:15 -0700

43 lines

Array assignment and overloading (=)

Tom Clune <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:10:59 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

array declaration

array declaration

Naomi Greenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jul 2001 10:20:00 -0400

46 lines

Re: array declaration

N. Shamsundar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:38:43 -0500

29 lines

Re: array declaration

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:39:24 -0700

37 lines

Re: array declaration

Alistair Mills <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:41:13 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Array memory allocation

Array memory allocation

Eduardo Melione Abreu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 13:38:53 -0300

31 lines

Re: Array memory allocation

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 11:53:04 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Array outer product

Array outer product

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 18:09:12 +0100

27 lines

Re: Array outer product

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 11:32:31 -0600

27 lines

Re: Array outer product

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 13:05:47 -0500

37 lines

Re: Array outer product

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2001 09:23:41 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Array rank in fortran

Array rank in fortran

Ketan V. Kotecha (99423802) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:25:19 +0530

22 lines

Re: Array rank in fortran

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:44:18 +0000

56 lines

Re: Array rank in fortran

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:34:57 +0100

40 lines

Re: Array rank in fortran

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:13:54 -0600

28 lines

Re: Array rank in fortran

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 07:38:49 -0800

56 lines

New Thread

Array re-allocation question

Array re-allocation question

José Luis Gómez Dans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 20:54:48 +0100

54 lines

Re: Array re-allocation question

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:37:09 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

Array sections as arguments

Array sections as arguments

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:21:03 +0100

67 lines

Re: Array sections as arguments

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:37:37 +0100

14 lines

Re: Array sections as arguments

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:52:07 +0100

93 lines

Re: Array sections as arguments

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:21:19 +0100

90 lines

Re: Array sections as arguments

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:12:54 +0100

96 lines

Re: Array sections as arguments

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:38:23 +0100

84 lines

New Thread

array variant

array variant

Mingwu Bai <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 23:39:38 +0900

19 lines

Re: array variant

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:14:03 -0600

39 lines

Re: array variant

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:12:56 +0000

36 lines

Re: array variant

Joerg Strutwolf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:15:23 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

Ask for a Book

Ask for a Book

Alexandre Suman de Araujo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:29:43 -0200

98 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

John Venier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:13:13 -0600

54 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

Juan Casero <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:21:41 -0500

154 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

Jacques Duílio Brancher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:32:56 -0200

30 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:11:25 -0800

51 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

Charles Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:30:29 -0500

13 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:24:00 +0000

58 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 08:44:41 -0700

66 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

John Venier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:16:24 -0600

34 lines

New Thread

Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" i n the program

Re: Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" i n the program

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 05:27:32 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" in the program

Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" in the program

frank_ouyang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 20:00:10 +0800

53 lines

Re: Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" in the program

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:14:45 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

Associating COMMON variables

Associating COMMON variables

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Oct 2001 19:43:00 -0500

53 lines

Re: Associating COMMON variables

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:14:22 -0800

62 lines

New Thread

Assumed-size arrays WAS: Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a

Re: Assumed-size arrays WAS: Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Apr 2001 14:51:17 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Assumed-size hack

Assumed-size hack

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:52:41 -0400

79 lines

Assumed-size hack

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:47:38 -0700

58 lines

Re: Assumed-size hack

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:52:17 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

Attachment: Makefiles for f90 projects

Attachment: Makefiles for f90 projects

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:26:30 -0500

94 lines

New Thread

Automatic deallocation

Automatic deallocation

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:02:56 -0400

36 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 17:25:12 -0400

69 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 09:23:49 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Avoiding aliasing with array pointers

Avoiding aliasing with array pointers

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:16:29 -0500

53 lines

Re: Avoiding aliasing with array pointers

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:03:20 -0600

56 lines

Re: Avoiding aliasing with array pointers

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:59:29 -0500

34 lines

Re: Avoiding aliasing with array pointers

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:43:05 -0600

34 lines

Re: Avoiding aliasing with array pointers

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:47:20 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Back copies of Fortran Forum

Back copies of Fortran Forum

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:08:19 -0500

72 lines

Re: Back copies of Fortran Forum

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:47:57 +0000

27 lines

Re: Back copies of Fortran Forum

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 05:52:25 -0500

23 lines

Re: Back copies of Fortran Forum

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:52:17 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:50:33 -0500

49 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:29:50 +0000

78 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:15:20 -0500

81 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:16:47 -0500

20 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 02:21:51 -0500

28 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:51:43 +0100

38 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:44:48 -0600

41 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:32:54 -0500

45 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:45:27 -0800

30 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:34:00 -0500

39 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:08:06 -0800

56 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:15:14 -0500

19 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:54:35 -0800

88 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:22:47 -0800

39 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:18:04 -1000

31 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:18:03 -1000

46 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:57:59 -0500

60 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:08:52 -0600

94 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:51:40 -1000

24 lines

New Thread

Bit shifting in Fortran and C--is it the same?

Bit shifting in Fortran and C--is it the same?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:56:02 -0500

40 lines

Re: Bit shifting in Fortran and C--is it the same?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 18:11:27 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

BIT_SIZE

Re: BIT_SIZE

Len Makin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:24:07 +1000

36 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 17:51:36 -0700

46 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE

Len Makin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:25:57 +1000

30 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE

Gary Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 19:55:27 -0500

36 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 07:57:53 -0400

27 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE

varadharajan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2001 01:32:53 +0530

39 lines

New Thread

BIT_SIZE (was: Memory place of reals)

BIT_SIZE (was: Memory place of reals)

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:09:36 -0500

37 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE (was: Memory place of reals)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:26:18 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

BOZ syntax; [was: mixed output text/binary]

BOZ syntax; [was: mixed output text/binary]

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 17:26:25 +0200

56 lines

Re: BOZ syntax; [was: mixed output text/binary]

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 12:28:56 -0500

64 lines

Re: BOZ syntax; [was: mixed output text/binary]

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2001 13:51:14 -0400

94 lines

New Thread

bug reports etc (forwarded for Phillip)

bug reports etc (forwarded for Phillip)

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:47:36 -0800

70 lines

New Thread

BVP solver

BVP solver

Ravi C. Venkatesan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 03:06:33 +0530

15 lines

Re: BVP solver

Alois Steindl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:16:41 +0100

36 lines

Re: BVP solver

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:03:06 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

C & Fortran90

C & Fortran90

Franck AUBINEAU <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:21:23 +0200

86 lines

Re: C & Fortran90

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:24:54 +0100

33 lines

Re: C & Fortran90

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 09:15:09 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

C interop (was Re: Standards ( was: Stream I/O ( was....

C interop (was Re: Standards ( was: Stream I/O ( was....

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:36:44 -0800

54 lines

Re: C interop (was Re: Standards ( was: Stream I/O ( was....

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:02:56 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

C99 floats

C99 floats

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:16:24 +0100

31 lines

Re: C99 floats

John Venier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:47:06 -0600

59 lines

Re: C99 floats

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:29:47 +0000

71 lines

Re: C99 floats

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:49:39 -0700

30 lines

Re: C99 floats

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 13:03:03 -0500

42 lines

Re: C99 floats

John Venier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:10:58 -0600

78 lines

Re: C99 floats

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:55:43 -0800

61 lines

Re: C99 floats

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:33:51 +0100

63 lines

Re: C99 floats

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:09:14 +0000

40 lines

Re: C99 floats

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:19:23 +0100

47 lines

Re: C99 floats

Popa, Frank D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:07:48 -0500

69 lines

Re: C99 floats

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:16:39 +0100

39 lines

Re: C99 floats

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:44:37 +0000

51 lines

Re: C99 floats

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 14:08:22 +0100

55 lines

Re: C99 floats

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:15:41 -0500

43 lines

Re: C99 floats

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:39:06 -0700

47 lines

Re: C99 floats

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:32:22 -1000

32 lines

Re: C99 floats

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:46:15 +0000

60 lines

Re: C99 floats

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 08:40:54 -0500

49 lines

Re: C99 floats

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 07:37:23 -0800

25 lines

Re: C99 floats

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:33:49 -0700

77 lines

Re: C99 floats

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:11:03 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

Call for Papers for the 2002 Workshop on OpenMP (WOMPEI) in Japan

Call for Papers for the 2002 Workshop on OpenMP (WOMPEI) in Japan

Matthijs van Waveren <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:11:13 +0000

113 lines

New Thread

Calling C from Fortran90

Calling C from Fortran90

Franck AUBINEAU <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 09:51:34 +0100

76 lines

Re: Calling C from Fortran90

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:12:03 +0100

34 lines

Re: Calling C from Fortran90

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:24:30 +0100

45 lines

Re: Calling C from Fortran90

Pascal Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:32:46 +0100

90 lines

Re: Calling C from Fortran90

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 06:21:07 -0800

45 lines

Re: Calling C from Fortran90

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:51:06 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Capturing keys problem

Capturing keys problem

Pavel Houdek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 23:50:11 +0200

23 lines

New Thread

cfortran.h for Intel Linux ifc/icc?

cfortran.h for Intel Linux ifc/icc?

Carlie Coats <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:34:29 -0400

27 lines

Re: cfortran.h for Intel Linux ifc/icc?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:47:14 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

Changing character to integer or real

Changing character to integer or real

Nofal, Mostafa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 08:56:42 -0500

27 lines

Re: Changing character to integer or real

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:12:49 +0000

34 lines

Re: Changing character to integer or real

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:17:10 +0000

13 lines

Re: Changing character to integer or real

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:48:34 +1000

23 lines

New Thread

Cheating in INTERFACE

Cheating in INTERFACE

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:36:15 -0600

73 lines

Cheating in INTERFACE

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:03:12 -0800

39 lines

Re: Cheating in INTERFACE

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:28:22 -0500

99 lines

Re: Cheating in INTERFACE

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:52:46 -0500

45 lines

Re: Cheating in INTERFACE

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:21:39 -0500

56 lines

Re: Cheating in INTERFACE

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:23:48 -0800

29 lines

Re: Cheating in INTERFACE

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:58:53 -0500

88 lines

New Thread

Clarification of generic interfaces

Clarification of generic interfaces

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:13:28 -0500

18 lines

Re: Clarification of generic interfaces

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:50:15 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

CoArray Fortran progress?

CoArray Fortran progress?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 13:57:40 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 00:36:57 -0700

155 lines

Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:05:04 +0000

74 lines

Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Alvaro Agustin Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:08:48 -0600

24 lines

Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:46:03 -0800

81 lines

Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:01:05 -0800

31 lines

Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:31:07 -0700

36 lines

Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:56:36 -0800

51 lines

New Thread

colors mismatch

colors mismatch

Pavel Houdek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:05:07 +0200

52 lines

Re: colors mismatch

Pavel Houdek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:09:39 +0200

50 lines

Re: colors mismatch

Panagiotis Vossos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:17:53 +0300

34 lines

New Thread

command line arguments in Fortran

command line arguments in Fortran

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:26:57 -0800

15 lines

command line arguments in Fortran

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:41:51 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

Comments in namelists

Comments in namelists

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:04:27 +0100

18 lines

Re: Comments in namelists

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:25:23 +0200

27 lines

Re: Comments in namelists

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:37:14 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

Comments on: "Pioneers of the 'Fortran' Programming Language"

Comments on: "Pioneers of the 'Fortran' Programming Language"

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 20:27:47 -0400

45 lines

Re: Comments on: "Pioneers of the 'Fortran' Programming Language"

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:12:18 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Compaq Fortran for Linux Alpha - Beta test 1.1 and 1.0-2 update

Compaq Fortran for Linux Alpha - Beta test 1.1 and 1.0-2 update

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:57:10 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

Compaq Visual Fortran Education Donation Program

Compaq Visual Fortran Education Donation Program

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:39:52 -0500

50 lines

Re: Compaq Visual Fortran Education Donation Program

Kipp Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:17:29 +1000

96 lines

New Thread

Compiler analysis question

Compiler analysis question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:06:28 -0600

124 lines

New Thread

compiler error

compiler error

shireen p <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 08:43:57 -0400

1023 lines

Re: compiler error

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:07:36 -0700

1141 lines

Re: compiler error

Bob Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 13:10:30 -0400

29 lines

Re: compiler error

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:31:46 -0700

1146 lines

Re: compiler error

Alan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:50:52 +1000

2452 lines

New Thread

compiler error ??

Re: compiler error ??

Alan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Oct 2001 23:44:54 +1000

1254 lines

Re: compiler error ??

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Oct 2001 17:31:21 +0000

67 lines

New Thread

Compiling Large Prgrams

Compiling Large Prgrams

Robert Leblanc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 18:54:29 +0100

41 lines

Re: Compiling Large Prgrams

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 13:12:43 -0500

56 lines

Re: Compiling Large Prgrams

Bob Leblanc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2001 14:14:12 -0500

39 lines

Re: Compiling Large Prgrams

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 May 2001 20:11:05 +0010

64 lines

Re: Compiling Large Prgrams

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 08:29:10 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Constructive use for INCLUDE

Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2001 12:12:10 -1000

49 lines

New Thread

Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:20:45 -0800

126 lines

Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 03:37:18 -0500

17 lines

Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:32:10 GMT

13 lines

Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 05:29:34 -0500

21 lines

Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:15:57 -0800

22 lines

Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:37:03 -0500

35 lines

Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 03:47:27 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Corrected: Reverse communication in F2K--a detailed CG example

Corrected: Reverse communication in F2K--a detailed CG example

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:58:10 -0500

276 lines

New Thread

cpu time

cpu time

gunaratnam gnanaranjan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:10:27 -0800

21 lines

Re: cpu time

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:35:28 -0800

29 lines

Re: cpu time

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:32:06 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

CPU time.

CPU time.

Zhou Yong Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Jan 2001 16:59:57 +0800

23 lines

Re: CPU time.

J. van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:07:18 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

CPU_TIME for intrinsic functions

CPU_TIME for intrinsic functions

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:03:52 +0100

98 lines

Re: CPU_TIME for intrinsic functions

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:03:28 -0800

119 lines

Re: CPU_TIME for intrinsic functions

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:03:42 +0200

120 lines

New Thread

Cray pointers and compiler bug

Cray pointers and compiler bug

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:47:54 -0600

204 lines

Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:49:30 -0500

56 lines

Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug

Jing Guo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:27:45 -0500

66 lines

Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:55:47 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

Cray pointers and compiler bug ??

Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug ??

J. van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:25:07 +0100

24 lines

Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug ??

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:57:04 -0600

45 lines

New Thread

creating directory

creating directory

Andrey E. Buzjurkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 21:47:31 +0600

28 lines

creating directory

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:21:46 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

Data acquisition from a port

Data acquisition from a port

Everton Zanoelo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:26:29 -0300

17 lines

Re: Data acquisition from a port

Gary Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 19:03:35 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

De-blanking Strings (was: Strings)

Re: De-blanking Strings (was: Strings)

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Oct 2001 10:05:21 +1000

23 lines

Re: De-blanking Strings (was: Strings)

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:55:04 +1000

122 lines

New Thread

Debugger for Linux Fortran 90

Debugger for Linux Fortran 90

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:51:21 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

debugging / development tools for F90

Re: debugging / development tools for F90

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:46:53 -1000

28 lines

New Thread

debugging/development tools for F90

debugging/development tools for F90

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:28:58 -0800

31 lines

Re: debugging/development tools for F90

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:15:14 -0500

48 lines

Re: debugging/development tools for F90

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:41:54 -0500

54 lines

Re: debugging/development tools for F90

William V. Nicholson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:11:29 -0800

222 lines

New Thread

Dependancies in declarations

Dependancies in declarations

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 09:00:21 +0100

25 lines

Re: Dependancies in declarations

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2001 10:03:54 +0100

29 lines

Re: Dependancies in declarations

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 09:14:59 -1000

35 lines

New Thread

derived types question

derived types question

Panagiotis Vossos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 21:05:21 +0300

38 lines

derived types question

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 11:15:14 -0700

49 lines

Re: derived types question

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 14:58:34 -0500

70 lines

Re: derived types question

Paul Stevenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2001 10:44:32 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification

DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:50:00 -0500

25 lines

DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:05:13 -0800

53 lines

Re: DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:21:03 -0700

42 lines

Re: DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:51:22 -1000

34 lines

New Thread

Direct Unformatted

Re: Direct Unformatted

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:58:22 +0100

63 lines

Re: Direct Unformatted

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:16:18 -0800

93 lines

Re: Direct Unformatted

Robert Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:13:20 GMT

40 lines

New Thread

disk fragmentation

disk fragmentation

Michael J. Steinkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Aug 2001 09:29:56 -0600

33 lines

disk fragmentation

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Aug 2001 09:09:18 -0700

68 lines

Re: disk fragmentation

Bob Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Aug 2001 12:12:17 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

Does your compiler accept this?

Does your compiler accept this?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:03:47 -0800

56 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:44:00 -0700

72 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:12:08 -0500

52 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

Matthijs van Waveren <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:04:31 +0000

15 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:16:19 +0100

36 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:07:10 -0700

26 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:42:40 -0800

44 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:51:01 -0700

40 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:29:20 -0800

46 lines

New Thread

Dos application

Dos application

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2001 03:30:12 -0400

116 lines

New Thread

Draft Fortran 200?

Draft Fortran 200?

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:06:59 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Draft Standard 2002

Draft Standard 2002

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:56:32 +0100

43 lines

Re: Draft Standard 2002

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:04:28 +0000

27 lines

Re: Draft Standard 2002

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:55:18 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

e-version of Metcalf & Reid

e-version of Metcalf & Reid

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:18:08 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

Efficiency of allocatable and pointer arrays

Efficiency of allocatable and pointer arrays

Jun Xiong <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Dec 2001 04:16:11 +0000

58 lines

Re: Efficiency of allocatable and pointer arrays

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Dec 2001 10:42:46 -0500

60 lines

Re: Efficiency of allocatable and pointer arrays

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Dec 2001 18:11:34 +0200

142 lines

New Thread

Efficiency of F77 vs. f90/95 another question

Efficiency of F77 vs. f90/95 another question

Cezar Diaconu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:42:44 +0900

35 lines

New Thread

Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:42:44 -0700

25 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

richard friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2001 15:09:51 -0700

28 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Charles Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2001 21:44:31 -0400

41 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 01:27:49 -0400

44 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Cezar Diaconu <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 17:05:44 +0900

28 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 19:28:18 +0010

57 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 16:37:41 +0200

53 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 09:41:16 -0700

79 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Carlie Coats <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 13:06:14 -0400

78 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 15:03:45 -0700

126 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 18:23:56 -0400

37 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Carlie Coats <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Aug 2001 08:40:35 -0400

93 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 19:46:26 +0010

51 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

J. van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 12:48:55 +0200

94 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Bill Long <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 19:56:39 -0500

61 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:47:36 +0100

23 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 05:31:37 -0400

55 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 19:49:30 +0010

54 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Douglas Sondak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:31:31 -0400

40 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:23:09 -0500

90 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Douglas Sondak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:57:53 -0400

33 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 15:04:56 -0400

29 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Ron Sverdlove x2517 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 02:51:00 -0400

110 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 19:14:08 +0010

64 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 19:28:24 +0010

69 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 07:50:25 -0500

86 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 13:49:27 +0100

55 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 23:24:14 +1000

24 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 23:24:14 +1000

36 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 07:48:09 -0700

49 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:55:25 -0700

62 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:32:39 -0700

26 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Lars Mossberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:11:58 +0200

72 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 17 Aug 2001 19:24:59 +0010

94 lines

New Thread

ELF90 3.00a under Windows NT/2000

ELF90 3.00a under Windows NT/2000

Winfried Auzinger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:06:44 +0100

24 lines

Re: ELF90 3.00a under Windows NT/2000

tzeis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:24:42 -0800

53 lines

New Thread

embedding new-lines in character string

embedding new-lines in character string

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:31:59 -0800

35 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Erik Schnetter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:11:10 +0100

43 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:23:55 -0000

55 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:27:00 -0600

64 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:32:44 -0800

41 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:17:57 +0000

71 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:45:13 +0100

44 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:50:32 +0000

36 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:03:44 +0100

36 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:07:46 -0800

48 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:16:07 -0800

34 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:44:24 -0800

41 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:00:04 +0000

38 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 11:51:18 +0000

72 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:29:54 +0000

51 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:35:36 -0500

74 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:10:46 -0800

57 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:23:30 -0800

47 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:55:40 -0800

54 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 16:03:30 -0500

72 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:20:53 -0800

67 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:38:19 -0800

38 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:46:26 -0800

72 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:56:14 -0700

27 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:26:44 +0000

44 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:36:51 +0000

55 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:57:40 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Empty TYPEs

Empty TYPEs

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:26:55 -0400

38 lines

Re: Empty TYPEs

Alvaro Agustin Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:52:03 -0500

41 lines

Re: Empty TYPEs

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:04:37 -0500

42 lines

Re: Empty TYPEs

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:08:21 +0100

41 lines

Re: Empty TYPEs

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:12:41 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Emulating MATLAB's save

Emulating MATLAB's save

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:11:12 -0500

45 lines

Re: Emulating MATLAB's save

Bob Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:12:30 -0400

80 lines

Re: Emulating MATLAB's save

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:04:58 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Entity accessibility through indirect USE association

Entity accessibility through indirect USE association

David Vowles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:28:38 +0930

111 lines

Entity accessibility through indirect USE association

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 04:55:35 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Error message: Derived-type initialization

Error message: Derived-type initialization

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:27:43 -0400

41 lines

Re: Error message: Derived-type initialization

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 09:21:05 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Error on J3 website

Error on J3 website

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:04:13 +0200

41 lines

Re: Error on J3 website

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:12:03 +0100

37 lines

Re: Error on J3 website

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:37:52 +0200

78 lines

Re: Error on J3 website

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:06:20 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

EWOMP'2001 European Workshop on OpenMP

EWOMP'2001 European Workshop on OpenMP

Matthijs van Waveren <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:34:46 +0000

112 lines

New Thread

Executable file.

Executable file.

Gerd Bruno Rocha <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 22:08:21 -0300

21 lines

Re: Executable file.

Comer Duncan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 21:37:15 -0400

45 lines

Re: Executable file.

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 19:58:15 -0700

31 lines

Re: Executable file.

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:49:43 -0700

39 lines

Re: Executable file.

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Aug 2001 08:27:58 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

Explicit-shape arrays

Re: Explicit-shape arrays

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:51:22 -1000

33 lines

New Thread

EXTENDS of and extended type

EXTENDS of and extended type

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2001 12:10:41 -0400

27 lines

Re: EXTENDS of and extended type

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:50:36 +0100

33 lines

Re: EXTENDS of and extended type

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:55:01 -0500

19 lines

Re: EXTENDS of and extended type

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:16:52 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

F2K syntax question

F2K syntax question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 11:50:59 -0400

43 lines

Re: F2K syntax question

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 12:50:08 -0500

38 lines

Re: F2K syntax question

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 12:37:50 -0400

58 lines

New Thread

F2x draft download

F2x draft download

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Oct 2001 11:44:52 -0500

36 lines

Re: F2x draft download

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Oct 2001 17:19:43 -0400

42 lines

Re: F2x draft download

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 17:57:01 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

F2x Draft revisions

F2x Draft revisions

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:32:34 -0500

36 lines

Re: F2x Draft revisions

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:43:32 -0400

54 lines

New Thread

F2x syntax---interface conformance with extended types

F2x syntax---interface conformance with extended types

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2001 13:20:58 -0400

66 lines

Re: F2x syntax---interface conformance with extended types

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 10:31:54 +0100

33 lines

Re: F2x syntax---interface conformance with extended types

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2001 08:43:47 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

F90 compiler

F90 compiler

Eduardo Melione Abreu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:42:39 -0300

17 lines

Re: F90 compiler

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:01:19 -0700

29 lines

Re: F90 compiler

Srivastava, Niraj <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:35:44 -0400

107 lines

Re: F90 compiler

Paul Stevenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:59:24 +0100

29 lines

Re: F90 compiler

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:56:12 -0700

49 lines

New Thread

F90 compiler - correction (kernel 2.2.*)

F90 compiler - correction (kernel 2.2.*)

Eduardo Melione Abreu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:45:31 -0300

16 lines

Re: F90 compiler - correction (kernel 2.2.*)

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 05:58:41 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

File size

File size

Drew McCormack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:34:02 +0200

32 lines

Re: File size

Fabienne Goffinont <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:46:09 +0200

29 lines

Re: File size

simon harding (IACR-RES) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:49:41 +0100

55 lines

Re: File size

Bob Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:38:00 -0400

40 lines

Re: File size

J. van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:00:54 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

Finite element multigrid

Finite element multigrid

Paul Bolton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:04:15 -0000

22 lines

Re: Finite element multigrid

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 07:57:57 -0500

34 lines

Re: Finite element multigrid

Alan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 23:59:20 +1100

26 lines

Re: Finite element multigrid

Robert Ferrell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2001 11:25:34 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

Fixing the size for assumed-shape arrays

Fixing the size for assumed-shape arrays

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 22:23:25 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

floating point comparison

floating point comparison

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:09:04 +0100

42 lines

Re: floating point comparison

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:02:49 -0600

43 lines

Re: floating point comparison

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:29:05 +0100

44 lines

Re: floating point comparison

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:56:51 -0600

34 lines

Re: floating point comparison

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:09:27 -0700

41 lines

Re: floating point comparison

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:11:46 +0100

47 lines

Re: floating point comparison

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:08:17 -0700

43 lines

Re: floating point comparison

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:18:53 MET_DST

65 lines

Re: floating point comparison

Carlie Coats <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 06:38:56 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

flushing a buffer

flushing a buffer

Rob Flammang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:28:56 -0500

26 lines

Re: flushing a buffer

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:26:21 +0000

35 lines

Re: flushing a buffer

Rob Flammang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 19:35:49 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals

For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 22:37:11 -0400

31 lines

Re: For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 06:53:40 +0100

24 lines

Re: For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2001 23:55:56 -0400

38 lines

Re: For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2001 00:52:12 -0600

33 lines

Re: For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 May 2001 06:48:38 -0400

71 lines

New Thread

Fortran

Fortran

EXT-Hanly, John M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:54:21 -0800

22 lines

Re: Fortran

Venkat V S S Sastry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:58:01 +0000

123 lines

New Thread

Fortran 90 compiles used by Fortran 77

Fortran 90 compiles used by Fortran 77

Stu Anderson 425-865-3595 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jul 2001 15:44:14 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers Course

Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers Course

Shaun Forth AMORG <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:58:59 +0100

49 lines

Re: Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers Course

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:36:40 +0100

21 lines

Re: Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers Course

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:06:55 +1000

28 lines

New Thread

fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:56:38 +0000

30 lines

Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:13:02 +0100

49 lines

Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

Shaun Forth AMORG <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:18:32 +0000

61 lines

Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:51:14 -0000

34 lines

Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:46:10 +0000

82 lines

Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:45:33 +0000

72 lines

New Thread

Fortran Forum (August)

Fortran Forum (August)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jun 2001 04:40:51 -0400

68 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (August)

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:42:14 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

Fortran Information File (Jan)

Fortran Information File (Jan)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 05:21:21 -0500

939 lines

New Thread

Fortran Memory

Re: Fortran Memory

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 05:09:25 -0800

35 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Douglas Sondak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:59:01 -0500

23 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 06:25:39 -0800

22 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:22:29 -0800

74 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:28:49 -0000

30 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:33:11 -0800

35 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Len Makin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:20:11 +1100

42 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 14:57:32 -0800

68 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Len Makin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:47:37 +1100

41 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Hargraves Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:19:43 +1000

81 lines

New Thread

fortran on Linux

fortran on Linux

Fabienne Goffinont <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:04:47 +0200

30 lines

Re: fortran on Linux

Joerg Strutwolf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:12:14 +0100

27 lines

Re: fortran on Linux

Eduardo Melione Abreu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:21:18 -0300

43 lines

Re: fortran on Linux

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 07:46:56 -0700

36 lines

Re: fortran on Linux

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:23:06 -0500

42 lines

Re: fortran on Linux

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:38:11 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resource File (July)

Fortran Resource File (July)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:30:09 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resource File (May)

Fortran Resource File (May)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2001 07:44:09 -0400

915 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resource File (September)

Fortran Resource File (September)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Sep 2001 03:06:20 -0400

915 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (March)

Fortran Resources (March)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:38:04 -0500

941 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (March)

Robert Cochran <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:24:35 -0800

46 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (March)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:33:21 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

Fortran Resources (November)

Fortran Resources (November)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Nov 2001 03:56:43 -0500

925 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (November)

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Nov 2001 23:22:05 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Fortran usage within HPC

Fortran usage within HPC

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:10:58 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

Fortran version of getopt_long?

Fortran version of getopt_long?

Martin Dix <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:13:49 +1000

20 lines

Re: Fortran version of getopt_long?

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jul 2001 20:52:13 -0400

50 lines

New Thread

Fortran-90 Windows programming

Fortran-90 Windows programming

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Sep 2001 02:59:51 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

free compiler

free compiler

Eduardo Melione Abreu <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:04:14 -0200

18 lines

Re: free compiler

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:07:06 -0600

39 lines

Re: free compiler

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:27:31 -1000

24 lines

New Thread

Free Sample Copies of JCMSE

Free Sample Copies of JCMSE

Dr. T.E. Simos <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Aug 2001 17:47:47 +0300

89 lines

Re: Free Sample Copies of JCMSE

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:11:25 +0200

58 lines

New Thread

Fw: gauss turan quadrature

Fw: gauss turan quadrature

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2001 15:34:42 -0600

25 lines

New Thread

Fw: scatteri benchmark from polyhedron site

Fw: scatteri benchmark from polyhedron site

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:14:07 -0800

3576 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: module and interface

Fwd: Re: module and interface

Ravi C. Venkatesan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:45:50 +0530

56 lines

Fwd: Re: module and interface

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:49:53 -0800

73 lines

Fwd: Re: module and interface

Ravi C. Venkatesan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:28:24 +0530

36 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: module and interface

Ravi C. Venkatesan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:14:13 +0530

80 lines

New Thread

GDDM graphics ?

GDDM graphics ?

Terry Koontz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 12:13:09 -0600

70 lines

Re: GDDM graphics ?

Gary Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2001 18:25:33 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 12:58:49 -0500

53 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:31:30 -0700

64 lines

Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:10:29 -0800

26 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:11:51 -0500

84 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:45:50 -0500

46 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:03:08 -0500

50 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:40:16 -0600

82 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:18:49 -0600

89 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:24:53 -0500

44 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:30:33 -0500

36 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:53:04 -1000

50 lines

New Thread

Geometry optimizer.

Geometry optimizer.

Gerd Bruno Rocha <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:39:50 -0300

23 lines

Re: Geometry optimizer.

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:52:19 +0200

39 lines

Re: Geometry optimizer.

Alan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:05:02 +1000

42 lines

Re: Geometry optimizer.

Cezar Diaconu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:35:33 +0900

43 lines

New Thread

GOTO into a DO loop is ILlegal, same for IF block

GOTO into a DO loop is ILlegal, same for IF block

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:16:48 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:31:57 -0500

47 lines

GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:53:48 -0800

74 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:22:45 -0500

443 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:21:59 -0500

15 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 19:25:18 +0100

28 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:32:49 -0500

26 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:32:52 -0800

35 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:35:44 -0800

22 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:40:22 -0500

73 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:41:10 -0800

40 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:40:50 -0800

36 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:41:01 -0500

39 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:59:13 -0500

463 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:02:34 -0500

34 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:36:28 -0500

20 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:46:13 -0800

49 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:06:44 -0800

66 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

John Venier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:27:39 -0600

39 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:04:10 -0800

90 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:08:56 +1000

63 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:42:17 -0800

49 lines

New Thread

graphic with fortran?

graphic with fortran?

Zhou Yong Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:04:17 +0800

21 lines

Re: graphic with fortran?

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:23:33 +0000

37 lines

Re: graphic with fortran?

Zhou Yong Cheng <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 22:01:59 +0800

52 lines

Re: graphic with Fortran?

Daniel Kidger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:08:12 -0000

32 lines

Re: graphic with fortran?

Marco A. Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 20:05:37 +0330

83 lines

Re: graphic with fortran?

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:55:17 +0000

28 lines

Re: graphic with fortran?

Lionel, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Nov 2001 05:36:35 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:34:40 -0500

162 lines

Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Pascal Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:57:52 +0100

99 lines

Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:33:21 +0100

135 lines

Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

David Singleton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 22:55:25 +1100

16 lines

Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:09:55 -0500

30 lines

Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 18:42:50 +0100

53 lines

Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:44:24 +0100

100 lines

New Thread

Help reqd.

Help reqd.

Amit Mathur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 10:15:26 +0530

30 lines

Re: Help reqd.

N. Shamsundar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2001 08:47:30 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Help!

Help!

frank_ouyang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 18:24:28 +0800

21 lines

Re: Help!

Ferhun C. Caner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:44:49 +0300

56 lines

Re: Help!

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Apr 2001 10:59:00 -1000

34 lines

New Thread

Hints to the optimizer (was Huge Arrays and Default INTEGERs)

Hints to the optimizer (was Huge Arrays and Default INTEGERs)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:05:37 -0800

70 lines

Re: Hints to the optimizer (was Huge Arrays and Default INTEGERs)

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:17:09 -0500

35 lines

Re: Hints to the optimizer (was Huge Arrays and Default INTEGERs)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:32:00 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

Hints to the optimizer, Blocking and SFCs

Re: Hints to the optimizer, Blocking and SFCs

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Apr 2001 16:22:51 -0400

49 lines

Re: Hints to the optimizer, Blocking and SFCs

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 19:15:06 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

How about the include in Fortran90

How about the include in Fortran90

frank_ouyang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:46:30 +0800

24 lines

Re: How about the include in Fortran90

J. van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:14:00 +0200

85 lines

New Thread

How is ELEMENTAL translated?

How is ELEMENTAL translated?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jul 2001 23:49:40 -0400

40 lines

Re: How is ELEMENTAL translated?

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:37:56 +0200

26 lines

Re: How is ELEMENTAL translated?

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:18:08 +0100

41 lines

Re: How is ELEMENTAL translated?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:25:49 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

How to compile .MOD

How to compile .MOD

Eduardo Melione Abreu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:44:39 -0300

24 lines

Re: How to compile .MOD

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:54:53 +0000

18 lines

Re: How to compile .MOD

Alois Steindl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:55:49 +0100

35 lines

Re: How to compile .MOD

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:58:47 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

How to compile with MODULE

How to compile with MODULE

Eduardo Melione Abreu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:55:33 -0300

52 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:15:17 +0100

78 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:20:41 +0100

78 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:14:53 +0100

79 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

varadharajan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:26:04 +0530

88 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:51:12 +0100

39 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:38:25 -0700

36 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:51:40 -0800

29 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:04:30 +0100

48 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:39:00 -0700

29 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:34:42 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

How to compile with MODULE - THANKS

Re: How to compile with MODULE - THANKS

Eduardo Melione Abreu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:38:34 -0300

10 lines

New Thread

How to read data in such a file

How to read data in such a file

Changrong SU <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:04:29 +0800

37 lines

Re: How to read data in such a file

Panagiotis Vossos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:49:46 +0300

52 lines

New Thread

How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?

How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2001 17:06:56 -0500

137 lines

Re: How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2001 14:42:58 +0000

85 lines

Re: How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2001 11:29:33 -0500

56 lines

Re: How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:09:31 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

How to unsubscribe

How to unsubscribe

LEE THORESEN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:34:45 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

How transform C into F90 on Data Struct.

How transform C into F90 on Data Struct.

frank_ouyang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:37:13 +0800

37 lines

Re: How transform C into F90 on Data Struct.

Giampaolo Bottoni <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:26:18 +0200

74 lines

New Thread

hpff: Commercial: Fortran95 for $45

Re: hpff: Commercial: Fortran95 for $45

Erik Schnetter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:38:41 +0100

41 lines

Re: hpff: Commercial: Fortran95 for $45

Erik Schnetter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:15:50 +0100

59 lines

Re: hpff: Commercial: Fortran95 for $45

Erik Schnetter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:38:41 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:31:16 -0500

33 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:50:14 -0500

50 lines

Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:03:40 -0800

51 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

varadharajan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:55:41 +0530

71 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:06:48 -0500

55 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:33:01 -0700

37 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:38:53 -0800

40 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:34:25 -0500

35 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Carlie Coats <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:14:18 -0500

81 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Warner Bruns <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:35:35 +0100

11 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 03:26:28 -0500

21 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:45:16 +0000

47 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:52:53 -0500

57 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:19:48 -0800

59 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:50:32 -1000

30 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 3 Mar 2001 09:32:19 EST

32 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Kurt W Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:56:34 -0600

62 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Orville E. Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 16:18:44 -0600

75 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

robin <[log in to unmask]>