JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


2001


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: what's .mod for?

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 19 Dec 2001 16:37:50 +0100

34 lines

what's .mod for?

Zhou Yong Cheng

Wed, 19 Dec 2001 19:07:49 +0800

21 lines

Workshop on OpenMP in Japan (WOMPEI'02) - extended deadline

Matthijs van Waveren

Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:47:29 +0000

119 lines

An expression evaluator

Van Snyder

Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:21:36 -0800

121 lines

Re: which is faster ?

robin

Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:47:54 +1000

60 lines

which is faster

Richard Maine

Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:29:09 -0800

37 lines

which is faster

Nofal, Mostafa

Wed, 12 Dec 2001 14:21:26 -0500

44 lines

IBM XL Fortran for AIX V7.1.1

Yin Zhu

Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:35:21 -0500

31 lines

Re: List addressing

Jan van Oosterwijk

Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:37:43 +0100

58 lines

Re: List addressing

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer

Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:00:57 +0000

25 lines

List addressing

John Reid

Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:59:20 GMT

36 lines

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:19:18 -0600

24 lines

Re: List addressing (was: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays)

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:52:13 +0000

77 lines

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again

Ted Stern

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:02:56 -0800

643 lines

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:46:35 -0600

87 lines

Re: test 4

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:07:22 +0100

46 lines

Re: test 4

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:49:30 +0000

43 lines

Re: test 4

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:48:47 +0000

43 lines

Re: test 4

Terry Koontz

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 08:47:19 -0700

27 lines

test 4

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:44:30 +0000

24 lines

Re: test 3

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:42:32 +0000

45 lines

Re: test 3

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:42:18 +0000

45 lines

test 3

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:37:31 +0000

26 lines

Re: test 2

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:33:41 +0000

44 lines

Re: test 2

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:33:27 +0000

44 lines

test 2

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:32:47 +0000

25 lines

Re: list reconfiguration - please be patient

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:31:38 -0500

58 lines

Re: test1 - both,ignore

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:29:18 +0000

72 lines

Re: test1 - both,ignore

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:29:04 +0000

72 lines

test1 - both,ignore

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:28:09 +0000

53 lines

list reconfiguration - please be patient

Ian Chivers

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:27:00 +0000

47 lines

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:06:10 +0000

98 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Ian Chivers

Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:38:45 -0800

47 lines

Reply-To

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:23:50 -0600

20 lines

List addressing (was: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays)

James Giles

Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:12:43 -0700

32 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Dan Nagle

Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:11:15 -0500

56 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

John Reid

Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:58:22 GMT

20 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

John Reid

Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:19:43 GMT

41 lines

Re: Changing character to integer or real

robin

Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:48:34 +1000

23 lines

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again

robin

Sat, 8 Dec 2001 10:47:22 +1000

24 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Richard Maine

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:23:58 -0800

56 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Alvaro Fernandez

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:32:41 -0600

139 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Alois Steindl

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 17:15:01 +0100

29 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Tim Prince

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 07:46:49 -0800

45 lines

Re: Changing character to integer or real

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:17:10 +0000

13 lines

Re: Changing character to integer or real

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:12:49 +0000

34 lines

Changing character to integer or real

Nofal, Mostafa

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 08:56:42 -0500

27 lines

Re: Back copies of Fortran Forum

Clive Page

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:52:17 +0000

33 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 08:17:23 -0500

28 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 07:13:29 -0500

49 lines

Re: Back copies of Fortran Forum

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 05:52:25 -0500

23 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Alois Steindl

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:27:03 +0100

24 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Klaus Ramstöck

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:53:44 +0100

65 lines

Re: Back copies of Fortran Forum

Clive Page

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:47:57 +0000

27 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 23:53:39 -0500

99 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Anuchit Aromsawa

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 03:24:42 +0000

26 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Tim Prince

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:02:28 -0800

44 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Klaus Ramstöck

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 21:49:48 +0100

72 lines

Back copies of Fortran Forum

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:08:19 -0500

72 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Anuchit Aromsawa

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 19:03:54 +0000

60 lines

Pointing to a non-pointer element of a pointer structure

Richard Maine

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 07:53:21 -0800

44 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Alois Steindl

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:50:47 +0100

25 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Tim Prince

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 07:41:52 -0800

48 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Alois Steindl

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:27:42 +0100

21 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Anuchit Aromsawa

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:16:10 +0000

81 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:54:57 +0000

37 lines

Re: Size of automatic arrays

Alois Steindl

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:54:49 +0100

32 lines

Size of automatic arrays

Anuchit Aromsawa

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:35:06 +0000

19 lines

Pointing to a non-pointer element of a pointer structure

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 04:32:00 -0500

32 lines

Re: Pointing to a non-pointer element of a pointer structure

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:27:21 +0000

75 lines

Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 03:51:06 -0500

19 lines

Pointing to a non-pointer element of a pointer structure

John Bray

Thu, 6 Dec 2001 08:26:27 +0000

90 lines

Makefiles and cascade recompilation, yet again

Ted Stern

Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:34:04 -0800

498 lines

Re: Internal procedure as actual argument

Roland Schilling

Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:28:29 +0100

23 lines

Re: Internal procedure as actual argument

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:10:37 -0600

41 lines

Re: Internal procedure as actual argument

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:00:51 +0000

93 lines

Re: Internal procedure as actual argument

Neil Carlson

Mon, 3 Dec 2001 11:29:03 -0700

25 lines

Re: Internal procedure as actual argument

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 3 Dec 2001 12:08:14 -0600

43 lines

Re: Internal procedure as actual argument

Lionel, Steve

Mon, 3 Dec 2001 09:55:29 -0800

24 lines

Re: Internal procedure as actual argument

John Reid

Mon, 3 Dec 2001 17:16:10 GMT

51 lines

Internal procedure as actual argument

Roland Schilling

Mon, 3 Dec 2001 17:59:15 +0100

43 lines

Re: newline vs. linefeed

Gary Scott

Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:03:03 -0600

103 lines

Re: Efficiency of allocatable and pointer arrays

Jan van Oosterwijk

Sun, 2 Dec 2001 18:11:34 +0200

142 lines

Re: Efficiency of allocatable and pointer arrays

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 2 Dec 2001 10:42:46 -0500

60 lines

Efficiency of allocatable and pointer arrays

Jun Xiong

Sun, 2 Dec 2001 04:16:11 +0000

58 lines

Re: Yet More on newline

Jing Guo

Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:26:08 -0500

30 lines

Re: newline vs. linefeed

James Giles

Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:42:15 -0700

83 lines

Re: Yet More on ACAHR( 10)

Lawrie Schonfelder

Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:26:56 +0000

23 lines

newline vs. linefeed

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:35:16 -0500

133 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Dan Nagle

Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:57:40 -0500

44 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:36:51 +0000

55 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Clive Page

Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:26:44 +0000

44 lines

Gary Scott

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:20:04 -0600

92 lines

Re: Yet More on ACAHR( 10)

Dan Nagle

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:06:11 -0500

55 lines

Richard Maine

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:14:42 -0800

52 lines

Van Snyder

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:48:10 -0800

62 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

James Giles

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:56:14 -0700

27 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:46:26 -0800

72 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:38:19 -0800

38 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:20:53 -0800

67 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Dan Nagle

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 16:03:30 -0500

72 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Richard Maine

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:55:40 -0800

54 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:23:30 -0800

47 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Richard Maine

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:10:46 -0800

57 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Dan Nagle

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:35:36 -0500

74 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Clive Page

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:29:54 +0000

51 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 11:51:18 +0000

72 lines

Re: Is D1MACH(4) == EPSILON(1.D0)?

simon harding (IACR-RES)

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:07:59 -0000

22 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Clive Page

Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:00:04 +0000

38 lines

Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:55:47 -0500

60 lines

Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug

Jing Guo

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:27:45 -0500

66 lines

Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug ??

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:57:04 -0600

45 lines

Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug

Jing Guo

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:49:30 -0500

56 lines

Re: Is D1MACH(4) == EPSILON(1.D0)?

Van Snyder

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:52:36 -0800

40 lines

Re: Cray pointers and compiler bug ??

J. van Oosterwijk

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:25:07 +0100

24 lines

Is D1MACH(4) == EPSILON(1.D0)?

Eric Petersen [Aero]

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:53:27 -0600

27 lines

Cray pointers and compiler bug

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:47:54 -0600

204 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:44:24 -0800

41 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Catherine Moroney

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:16:07 -0800

34 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:07:46 -0800

48 lines

Re: Cheating in INTERFACE

Jing Guo

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:58:53 -0500

88 lines

Re: Cheating in INTERFACE

Richard Maine

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:23:48 -0800

29 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Nils Smeds

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:03:44 +0100

36 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:50:32 +0000

36 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Nils Smeds

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:45:13 +0100

44 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:17:57 +0000

71 lines

Re: Cheating in INTERFACE

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:21:39 -0500

56 lines

Re: Cheating in INTERFACE

Jing Guo

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:52:46 -0500

45 lines

Re: Cheating in INTERFACE

Jing Guo

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:28:22 -0500

99 lines

Re: Please ignore "Compiler analysis question"

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:06:48 -0600

132 lines

Cheating in INTERFACE

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:36:15 -0600

73 lines

Compiler analysis question

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:06:28 -0600

124 lines

Cheating in INTERFACE

Richard Maine

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:03:12 -0800

39 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Van Snyder

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:32:44 -0800

41 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Dick Hendrickson

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:27:00 -0600

64 lines

Re: mpi recommendations

Tim Prince

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 05:21:04 -0800

37 lines

Re: mpi recommendations

Daniel Kidger

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:38:10 -0000

36 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Daniel Kidger

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:23:55 -0000

55 lines

unsubscribe

Daniel Domert

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:23:40 +0100

33 lines

unsubscribe

Hugues Libotte

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:16:23 +0100

135 lines

Re: embedding new-lines in character string

Erik Schnetter

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:11:10 +0100

43 lines

mpi recommendations

Ian Chivers

Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:10:48 +0000

36 lines

embedding new-lines in character string

Catherine Moroney

Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:31:59 -0800

35 lines

Re: Aliasing and allocatable components

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:22:18 -0600

65 lines

Re: Aliasing and allocatable components

Malcolm Cohen

Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:03:31 +0000

76 lines

Aliasing and allocatable components

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:42:54 -0600

244 lines

Re: Standards, a simple user's point of view

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 23 Nov 2001 08:52:49 +0000

40 lines

Re: Standards, a simple user's point of view

robin

Fri, 23 Nov 2001 09:32:44 +1000

49 lines

Re: Statically link a module with library routines??

Roland Schilling

Thu, 22 Nov 2001 18:24:33 +0100

22 lines

Re: including variables in edit descriptors

robin

Fri, 23 Nov 2001 00:30:25 +1000

47 lines

Re: pgf77 options - THANK YOU

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:04:45 -0200

14 lines

Re: pgf77 options

Daniel Kidger

Thu, 22 Nov 2001 13:55:41 -0000

41 lines

Re: pgf77 options

Erik Schnetter

Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:47:08 +0100

32 lines

pgf77 options

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Thu, 22 Nov 2001 11:35:05 -0200

19 lines

Re: including variables in edit descriptors

Hargraves Gary

Thu, 22 Nov 2001 08:22:03 +1000

61 lines

Re: including variables in edit descriptors

W. J. Metzger

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:11:54 +0100

49 lines

Re: Statically link a module with library routines??

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:08:38 -0600

42 lines

Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

Daniel Kidger

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:51:14 -0000

34 lines

Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

Ian Chivers

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:46:10 +0000

82 lines

Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

Ian Chivers

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:45:33 +0000

72 lines

Re: including variables in edit descriptors

Daniel Kidger

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:41:43 -0000

29 lines

Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

Shaun Forth AMORG

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:18:32 +0000

61 lines

Re: fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

Jan van Oosterwijk

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:13:02 +0100

49 lines

fortran course near lancaster university in the uk

Ian Chivers

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:56:38 +0000

30 lines

Re: including variables in edit descriptors

Richard Maine

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:56:35 -0800

51 lines

Statically link a module with library routines??

Richard Maine

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:45:23 -0800

37 lines

Parsing XML

Popa, Frank D.

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:43:59 -0500

24 lines

Re: including variables in edit descriptors

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:10:41 +0000

39 lines

Re: including variables in edit descriptors

Daniel Kidger

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:33:43 -0000

49 lines

Re: Statically link a module with library routines??

Daniel Kidger

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:07:32 -0000

39 lines

ACM Fortran Forum (December issue)

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 05:43:05 -0500

63 lines

Statically link a module with library routines??

Roland Schilling

Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:48:08 +0100

34 lines

Re: including variables in edit descriptors

Craig Dedo

Tue, 20 Nov 2001 22:18:11 -0600

162 lines

including variables in edit descriptors

Catherine Moroney

Tue, 20 Nov 2001 17:34:01 -0800

56 lines

Re: Standards, a simple user's point of view

Dan Nagle

Tue, 20 Nov 2001 11:04:18 -0500

88 lines

Standards, a simple user's point of view

Bertrand Meltz

Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:06:38 +0100

49 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (November)

Jean Vezina

Mon, 19 Nov 2001 23:22:05 -0500

21 lines

Re: Standards

Richard Maine

Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:19:05 -0800

34 lines

Re: Standards

Kurt W Hirchert

Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:46:48 -0600

119 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Lawrie Schonfelder

Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:25:03 +0000

81 lines

Fortran Resources (November)

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 19 Nov 2001 03:56:43 -0500

925 lines

Re: Standards

robin

Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:51:14 +1000

81 lines

Re: Standards

robin

Sat, 17 Nov 2001 11:53:25 +1000

42 lines

Re: Standards

Van Snyder

Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:42:42 -0800

65 lines

Re: C interop (was Re: Standards ( was: Stream I/O ( was....

Dan Nagle

Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:02:56 -0500

48 lines

Re: Rewrites ( was The truth about Fortran)

Clive Page

Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:47:27 +0000

35 lines

C interop (was Re: Standards ( was: Stream I/O ( was....

Van Snyder

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:36:44 -0800

54 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Len Makin

Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:24:34 +1100

36 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Van Snyder

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:12:16 -0800

33 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortrandisinformation article))

Dick Hendrickson

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:08:59 -0600

54 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:50:37 -0500

45 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Dan Nagle

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:17:46 -0500

40 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Len Makin

Fri, 16 Nov 2001 08:59:03 +1100

26 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

James Giles

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:53:48 -0700

29 lines

Re: Standards

James Giles

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:37:13 -0700

63 lines

Re: Standards

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:18:04 -0600

19 lines

Re: Standards

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:05:43 -0500

41 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Van Snyder

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:59:09 -0800

78 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

<>

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 20:00:02 +0010

40 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Dan Nagle

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:29:02 -0500

39 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:38:44 -0500

135 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Richard Maine

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:27:29 -0800

61 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: AnotherFortrandisinformation article))

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:13:04 -0600

91 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Richard Maine

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:55:29 -0800

52 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:49:34 +0000

72 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Dan Nagle

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:37:26 -0500

67 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:24:52 -0500

38 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article))

Richard Maine

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 07:51:04 -0800

50 lines

Re: Numerical Recipes (was: Another Fortran disinformation article)

Tom Clune

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:40:33 -0500

53 lines

Re: Rewrites ( was The truth about Fortran)

<>

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:38:28 +0010

25 lines

Re: The truth about Fortran, was: The departure of NASA's chief...

<>

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:30:49 +0010

21 lines

Re: Standards (was: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortrandisinformation article))

Craig Dedo

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 06:48:36 -0600

168 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Popa, Frank D.

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 06:19:45 -0500

38 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

robin

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:19:37 +1000

32 lines

Another Fortran disinformation article

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 15 Nov 2001 04:03:49 -0500

92 lines

Re: Numerical Recipes (was: Another Fortran disinformation article)

James Giles

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 23:33:53 -0700

53 lines

Re: Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article)

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 23:59:24 -0500

53 lines

Stream I/O in Fortran (Was: Another Fortran disinformation article)

Craig Dedo

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 21:49:30 -0600

139 lines

Numerical Recipes (was: Another Fortran disinformation article)

Van Snyder

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:44:55 -0800

68 lines

Numerical Recipes (was: Another Fortran disinformation article)

James Giles

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:28:18 -0700

38 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

James Giles

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:16:06 -0700

29 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Richard Maine

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:15:41 -0800

26 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Van Snyder

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:03:02 -0800

28 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Klaus Ramstöck

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:52:22 +0100

59 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Klaus Ramstöck

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:45:11 +0100

47 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Richard Maine

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:28:56 -0800

53 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Stu Anderson 425-865-3595

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:08:22 -0800

23 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

James Giles

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:54:19 -0700

37 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Craig Shirley

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:40:30 -0800

22 lines

Re: SV: Another Fortran disinformation article

James Giles

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:40:29 -0700

22 lines

Rewrites ( was The truth about Fortran)

Van Snyder

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:30:07 -0800

87 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Klaus Ramstöck

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 20:26:12 +0100

68 lines

Re: The truth about Fortran, was: The departure of NASA's chief...

<>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:04:44 +0010

62 lines

Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI

Van Snyder

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:45:24 -0800

42 lines

SV: Another Fortran disinformation article

Ring, Avi

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:41:20 +0100

91 lines

perf de CGEMV on SGI

<>

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:05:08 -0500

53 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

N. Shamsundar

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:13:13 -0600

32 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Richard Maine

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 08:36:19 -0800

31 lines

Re: Another Fortran disinformation article

Daniel Kidger

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:46:37 -0000

23 lines

Re: Passing pointer argument

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:35:08 -0600

79 lines

Re: The truth about Fortran, was: The departure of NASA's chief...

Clive Page

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:18:00 +0000

23 lines

Passing pointer argument

MELLION Gatien

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:44:35 +0100

149 lines

Re: The truth about Fortran, was: The departure of NASA's chief...

Hargraves Gary

Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:31:35 +1000

128 lines

Re: The truth about Fortran, was: The departure of NASA's chief...

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 13 Nov 2001 23:58:45 -0500

53 lines

The departure of NASA's chief...

Van Snyder

Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:48:03 -0800

52 lines

Another Fortran disinformation article

Jean Vezina

Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:24:00 -0500

34 lines

Re: Interval arithmetic and F200x

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:31:53 -0500

34 lines

Re: Interval arithmetic and F200x

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:51:38 -0600

49 lines

Re: Interval arithmetic and F200x

Richard Maine

Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:42:53 -0800

62 lines

Interval arithmetic and F200x

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:48:41 -0600

36 lines

Re: Interval arithmetic and F200x

Dick Hendrickson

Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:42:34 -0600

108 lines

Interval arithmetic

Jerzy Rojek

Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:33:09 +0100

84 lines

Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI, SUN, IBM...

Daniel Kidger

Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:35:33 -0000

26 lines

Re: OpenMP question

Drew McCormack

Fri, 9 Nov 2001 09:20:28 +0100

37 lines

OpenMP question

Van Snyder

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:08:24 -0800

59 lines

Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI

<>

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 19:14:53 +0010

44 lines

Intel compiler with C pointer functions

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:52:28 -0600

60 lines

Re: Intel compiler with C pointer functions

Erik Schnetter

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 18:29:37 +0100

72 lines

Re: Intel compiler with C pointer functions

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:11:54 +0000

29 lines

Re: What is the wrong with my program?

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 16:29:38 +0000

44 lines

Re: What is the wrong with my program?

Tim Prince

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 06:12:09 -0800

49 lines

Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI

Tim Prince

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 06:06:54 -0800

73 lines

Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI, SUN, IBM...

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:17:29 +0100

39 lines

Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI, SUN, IBM...

Alexei Matveev

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 12:18:08 +0100

23 lines

Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI, SUN, IBM...

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:55:47 +0100

40 lines

What is the wrong with my program?

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 03:04:30 -0500

31 lines

What is the wrong with my program?

frank_ouyang

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:51:55 +0800

39 lines

Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI

Tim Prince

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:29:48 -0800

30 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Hargraves Gary

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:19:43 +1000

81 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Len Makin

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:47:37 +1100

41 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Richard Maine

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 14:57:32 -0800

68 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Len Makin

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:20:11 +1100

42 lines

Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance

David Annetts

Thu, 8 Nov 2001 08:16:58 +1100

40 lines

Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI, SUN, IBM...

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:07:52 +0100

44 lines

Re: ELF90 3.00a under Windows NT/2000

tzeis

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:24:42 -0800

53 lines

Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance

Simon J. Rees

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:14:57 -0600

44 lines

Re: perf de CGEMV on SGI

Ian Bush

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:57:40 +0000

40 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Lionel, Steve

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:33:11 -0800

35 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Daniel Kidger

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:28:49 -0000

30 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Richard Maine

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:22:29 -0800

74 lines

perf de CGEMV on SGI

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 17:22:04 +0100

33 lines

Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance

Thorsten Ohl

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:30:20 +0100

32 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Lionel, Steve

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 06:25:39 -0800

22 lines

ELF90 3.00a under Windows NT/2000

Winfried Auzinger

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:06:44 +0100

24 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Douglas Sondak

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:59:01 -0500

23 lines

Re: Fortran Memory

Lionel, Steve

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 05:09:25 -0800

35 lines

Q: Fortran Memory

Douglas Sondak

Wed, 7 Nov 2001 06:08:53 -0500

14 lines

Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance

Tim Prince

Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:41:19 -0800

29 lines

Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:01:32 -0500

69 lines

Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance

Thorsten Ohl

Tue, 6 Nov 2001 18:48:10 +0100

40 lines

Re: Linux f90 Compiler performance

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:28:26 -0500

59 lines

Linux f90 Compiler performance

Simon J. Rees

Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:55:52 -0600

19 lines

Re: Legal in a pure function?

Neil Carlson

Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:06:56 -0700

25 lines

Legal in a pure function?

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 6 Nov 2001 03:08:22 -0500

26 lines

Re: Legal in a pure function?

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 5 Nov 2001 17:36:10 -0600

56 lines

Legal in a pure function?

Richard Maine

Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:40:30 -0800

54 lines

Legal in a pure function?

Neil Carlson

Mon, 5 Nov 2001 14:11:15 -0700

42 lines

Call for Papers for the 2002 Workshop on OpenMP (WOMPEI) in Japan

Matthijs van Waveren

Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:11:13 +0000

113 lines

Re: Intel Fortran Compiler for Linux - Scratch files

Jens Bischoff

Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:51:50 +0100

45 lines

Re: Q: Pointer Allocation

Richard Maine

Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:42:30 -0800

56 lines

Re: Q: Pointer Allocation

Douglas Sondak

Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:24:27 -0500

26 lines

Q: Pointer Allocation

Richard Maine

Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:11:39 -0800

78 lines

Re: Pointer Allocation

Roderick W. Failing III

Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:04:26 -0500

80 lines

Re: Q: Pointer Allocation

Drew McCormack

Fri, 2 Nov 2001 14:50:16 +0100

41 lines

Re: graphic with fortran?

Lionel, Steve

Fri, 2 Nov 2001 05:36:35 -0800

24 lines

Q: Pointer Allocation

Douglas Sondak

Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:30:59 -0500

36 lines

Re: Fortran

Venkat V S S Sastry

Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:58:01 +0000

123 lines

Fortran

EXT-Hanly, John M

Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:54:21 -0800

22 lines

Re: graphic with fortran?

Clive Page

Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:55:17 +0000

28 lines

Re: Standard module-routine referencing in debuggers?

Van Snyder

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:34:05 -0800

18 lines

Standard module-routine referencing in debuggers?

Ted Stern

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:14:24 -0800

63 lines

Re: PETSc library --- C dynamic arrays and Fortran

Tim Prince

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:40:16 -0800

51 lines

PETSc library --- C dynamic arrays and Fortran

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:11:37 -0600

59 lines

Re: graphic with fortran?

Marco A. Garcia

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 20:05:37 +0330

83 lines

Re: graphic with Fortran?

Daniel Kidger

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:08:12 -0000

32 lines

Re: graphic with fortran?

Zhou Yong Cheng

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 22:01:59 +0800

52 lines

Re: graphic with fortran?

Clive Page

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:23:33 +0000

37 lines

graphic with fortran?

Zhou Yong Cheng

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:04:17 +0800

21 lines

Re: Associating COMMON variables

Van Snyder

Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:14:22 -0800

62 lines

Associating COMMON variables

Jing Guo

Tue, 30 Oct 2001 19:43:00 -0500

53 lines

Please cancel me from the list

Goeran Klose

Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:37:09 +0100

11 lines

Re: Pointers

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer

Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:25:27 +0000

20 lines

Re: Intel Fortran Compiler for Linux - Scratch files

Daniel Kidger

Mon, 29 Oct 2001 09:26:23 -0000

38 lines

Intel Fortran Compiler for Linux - Scratch files

Jens Bischoff

Sat, 27 Oct 2001 21:55:48 +0100

53 lines

Re: Name mangling problem

NAKADA Kazuhiko

Sat, 27 Oct 2001 17:05:46 +0900

118 lines

Re: Pointers

James Giles

Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:25:48 -0600

40 lines

Re: Pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:22:05 -0500

36 lines

Re: Pointers

James Giles

Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:33:45 -0600

56 lines

Re: Name mangling problem - with Intel IFC compiler

Daniel Kidger

Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:37:02 +0100

49 lines

Name mangling problem

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:32:31 -0200

41 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 26 Oct 2001 08:51:22 +0100

44 lines

Re: Pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 22:36:10 -0400

31 lines

OpenMP + MATMUL?

Van Snyder

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:11:58 -0700

34 lines

Re: Pointers

James Giles

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:42:58 -0600

55 lines

Pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:25:00 -0500

54 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

James Giles

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:56:16 -0600

32 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

<>

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:31:42 +0010

38 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Van Snyder

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:57:42 -0700

52 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Lionel, Steve

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:38:00 -0700

29 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

James Giles

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:30:43 -0600

35 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Richard Maine

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 07:54:40 -0700

53 lines

Unresolved external and conversion types

Pavel Houdek

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:43:29 +0200

47 lines

Re: OpenMP question

Herbert Fruchtl

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:47:10 +0100

26 lines

Re: OpenMP question

Ronald Fowler

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:29:11 +0100

58 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:51:53 +0200

44 lines

Re: OpenMP question

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 23:47:02 -0400

29 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 23:31:44 -0400

18 lines

OpenMP question

Van Snyder

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:25:22 -0700

83 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Abhishek Seth

Thu, 25 Oct 2001 06:08:42 +0530

21 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:58:07 -0500

56 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Richard Maine

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:29:15 -0700

71 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

<>

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 20:04:56 +0010

60 lines

Re: % vs SCCS

richard friedman

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:59:32 -0700

37 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Lawrie Schonfelder

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:42:43 +0100

58 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Lawrie Schonfelder

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:33:57 +0100

72 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 12:24:28 -0500

47 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 12:33:35 -0400

65 lines

Re: Intel for academics

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:24:05 -0200

89 lines

Re: Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:23:00 +0100

33 lines

Interfacing with C in F90/95 with arrays

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:56:31 -0500

138 lines

Re: Intel for academics

Ian Chivers

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:01:10 +0100

57 lines

Intel for academics

Drew McCormack

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:56:59 +0200

29 lines

I apology much for increasing so annoying debate between ¡°B.a¡± & ¡°B%a

frank_ouyang

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 20:11:41 +0800

61 lines

leaving the list

Ian Chivers

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:50:45 +0100

28 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:20:31 +0100

46 lines

Re: Emulating MATLAB's save

Clive Page

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:04:58 +0100

30 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:03:13 +0200

46 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Clive Page

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:57:52 +0100

33 lines

Re:  What is wrong with my programe?

frank_ouyang

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:39:05 +0800

59 lines

Re: What is wrong with my programe?

Abhishek Seth

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 06:02:28 +0530

57 lines

Re: What is wrong with my programe?

R. A. Vowels

Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:02:30 +1000

42 lines

Capturing keys problem

Pavel Houdek

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 23:50:11 +0200

23 lines

Re: Emulating MATLAB's save

Bob Cohen

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:12:30 -0400

80 lines

Emulating MATLAB's save

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:11:12 -0500

45 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Richard Maine

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:53:15 -0700

25 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Joerg Behrens

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 19:45:49 +0200

27 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Bob Cohen

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:39:31 -0400

49 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Richard Maine

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:32:09 -0700

36 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Jing Guo

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:21:02 -0400

68 lines

% vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Richard Maine

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:13:23 -0700

41 lines

Re: % vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Bob Cohen

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:33:14 -0400

51 lines

% vs . [Was: Re: Thanks to every one.]

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:54:35 +0200

39 lines

Thanks to every one.

frank_ouyang

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 22:32:36 +0800

86 lines

Re: Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" in the program

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:14:45 +0200

36 lines

Re: Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" i n the program

Lionel, Steve

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 05:27:32 -0700

30 lines

Ask the correct position of "module" and "parameter(...)" in the program

frank_ouyang

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 20:00:10 +0800

53 lines

Re: What is wrong with my programe?

Drew McCormack

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 08:45:42 +0200

73 lines

What is wrong with my programe?

frank_ouyang

Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:10:04 +0800

36 lines

Re: cfortran.h for Intel Linux ifc/icc?

Van Snyder

Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:47:14 -0700

35 lines

Re: String length (was What *I* miss in Fortran)

Van Snyder

Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:41:11 -0700

48 lines

cfortran.h for Intel Linux ifc/icc?

Carlie Coats

Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:34:29 -0400

27 lines

Re: String length (was What *I* miss in Fortran)

James Giles

Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:24:53 -0600

46 lines

Re: String length (was What *I* miss in Fortran)

Van Snyder

Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:19:51 -0700

74 lines

Re: String length (was What *I* miss in Fortran)

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:05:44 -0400

51 lines

String length (was What *I* miss in Fortran)

Van Snyder

Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:05:28 -0700

29 lines

Re: Question:

Lionel, Steve

Mon, 22 Oct 2001 07:19:33 -0700

22 lines

Re: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile?

Pierre Hugonnet

Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:12:11 +0200

78 lines

Question:

frank_ouyang

Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:52:45 +0800

20 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

James Giles

Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:38:40 -0600

31 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

robin

Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:00:00 +1000

53 lines

Re: String length

robin

Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:00:00 +1000

27 lines

Re: String length

Craig Dedo

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 23:30:29 -0500

115 lines

String length

Van Snyder

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:06:41 -0700

22 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

James Giles

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:30:03 -0600

36 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

robin

Sat, 20 Oct 2001 09:28:05 +1000

49 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?

<>

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 20:25:27 +0010

45 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:54:26 -0700

32 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is

Tim Prince

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 07:54:26 -0700

44 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Peter Shenkin

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:45:22 -0400

54 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is

robin

Sat, 20 Oct 2001 00:39:59 +1000

32 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

<>

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:29:03 EDT

38 lines

Re: Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers Course

robin

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:06:55 +1000

28 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?

robin

Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:06:55 +1000

33 lines

leaving the list

Ian Chivers

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:15:29 +0100

39 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile? -

Volker Typke

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:10:38 +0200

46 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Richard Maine

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 07:43:56 -0700

29 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is

Ian Hounam

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 10:58:09 +0100

44 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

<>

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:56:55 +0200

44 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Clive Page

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:53:58 +0100

54 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Len Makin

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:34:26 +1000

46 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Len Makin

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:04:46 +1000

40 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?

Hargraves Gary

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:44:02 +1000

71 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

robin

Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:42:40 +1000

42 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Richard Maine

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:07:18 -0700

70 lines

How to unsubscribe

LEE THORESEN

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:34:45 -0400

23 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Bob Cohen

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:28:29 -0400

50 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Richard Maine

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:01:32 -0700

31 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Bob Cohen

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:22:26 -0400

25 lines

Re: unsigned integers

Richard Maine

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:52:51 -0700

32 lines

Re: unsigned integers

Jing Guo

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:41:35 -0400

91 lines

Re: unsigned integers

Richard Maine

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 07:59:19 -0700

67 lines

Re: spelling of Fortran

Richard Maine

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 07:35:52 -0700

20 lines

Re: Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers Course

John Reid

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:36:40 +0100

21 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?

David Hitchin

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:24:09 +0100

33 lines

Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers Course

Shaun Forth AMORG

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:58:59 +0100

49 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Tim Prince

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 05:51:52 -0700

38 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Alberto Fasso'

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:38:17 +0200

36 lines

Re: 128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Clive Page

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:29:16 +0100

39 lines

128 bits of precision?: RE: Porting code: is selected_real_kind r eally worthwhile? -

Popa, Frank D.

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 07:10:58 -0400

61 lines

Re: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile?

Len Makin

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:01:59 +1000

36 lines

Re: spelling of Fortran

Lee Thoresen

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 20:37:25 -0400

10 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

robin

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:35:13 +1000

46 lines

Re: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile?

Van Snyder

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 17:26:58 -0700

51 lines

Re: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile?

Len Makin

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:10:42 +1000

39 lines

Re: unsigned integers

robin

Wed, 17 Oct 2001 08:14:04 +1000

26 lines

Re: spelling of Fortran

Walt Brainerd

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:15:25 -0700

92 lines

Re: spelling of Fortran

richard friedman

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:56:52 -0700

39 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Ian Chivers

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 19:30:07 +0100

83 lines

Re: Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile?

Van Snyder

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:54:50 -0700

49 lines

Re: spelling of Fortran

Walt Brainerd

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:47:02 -0700

46 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Peter Shenkin

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:36:36 -0400

43 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Herbert Fruchtl

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 16:04:21 +0100

31 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

simon harding (IACR-RES)

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 16:00:05 +0100

47 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Anthony Stone

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:54:23 +0100

30 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Ian Chivers

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:15:06 +0100

120 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Bob Cohen

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:51:29 -0400

32 lines

Porting code: is selected_real_kind really worthwhile?

Clive Page

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:48:47 +0100

50 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:17:45 +0200

89 lines

Re: spelling of Fortran

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:11:36 +0200

58 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Bob Cohen

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:09:36 -0400

90 lines

Re: spelling of Fortran

Kurt W Hirchert

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:07:25 -0500

33 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Ian Chivers

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:46:03 +0100

59 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Bob Cohen

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:24:00 -0400

61 lines

spelling of Fortran

Steven Lynch

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:11:24 +0200

29 lines

Re: More questions about design issues for the submodules TR

Lawrie Schonfelder

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:10:25 +0100

61 lines

Re: More questions about design issues for the submodules TR

Lawrie Schonfelder

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:58:01 +0100

84 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 15 Oct 2001 23:44:55 -0400

64 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

robin

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:52:31 +1000

30 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

robin

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:03:23 +1000

45 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Peter Shenkin

Sat, 13 Oct 2001 14:48:18 -0400

68 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

robin

Sat, 13 Oct 2001 11:12:33 +1000

50 lines

Re: File size

J. van Oosterwijk

Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:00:54 +0200

38 lines

Re: File size

Bob Cohen

Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:38:00 -0400

40 lines

Re: File size

simon harding (IACR-RES)

Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:49:41 +0100

55 lines

Re: File size

Fabienne Goffinont

Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:46:09 +0200

29 lines

File size

Drew McCormack

Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:34:02 +0200

32 lines

Re: More questions about design issues for the submodules TR

Richard Maine

Thu, 11 Oct 2001 10:28:36 -0700

68 lines

Re: More questions about design issues for the submodules TR

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:21:52 -0500

71 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:41:54 -0400

42 lines

Re: colors mismatch

Panagiotis Vossos

Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:17:53 +0300

34 lines

Re: colors mismatch

Pavel Houdek

Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:09:39 +0200

50 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Drew McCormack

Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:37:00 +0200

79 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

robin

Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:05:45 +1000

36 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Tim Prince

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:40:27 -0700

29 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 19:56:00 -0400

40 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Hargraves Gary

Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:50:48 +1000

51 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings)

James Giles

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:56:30 -0600

29 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

James Giles

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:51:37 -0600

28 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

James Giles

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:40:01 -0600

99 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Dan Nagle

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:58:41 -0400

56 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:05:22 -0400

35 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran

Van Snyder

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:51:23 -0700

36 lines

Re: What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Bob Cohen

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 14:25:16 -0400

56 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Van Snyder

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:27:29 -0700

19 lines

What *I* miss in Fortran; was, Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:22:36 -0400

54 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Thorsten Ohl

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:00:30 +0200

49 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:35:02 +0100

57 lines

Re: additional thoughts on submodules TR

Lawrie Schonfelder

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:06:51 +0100

325 lines

Re: More questions about design issues for the submodules TR

Lawrie Schonfelder

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:05:06 +0100

851 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Bob Cohen

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:05:03 -0400

56 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Thorsten Ohl

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:37:07 +0200

36 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 14:21:34 +0100

43 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Drew McCormack

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:16:23 +0200

30 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Thorsten Ohl

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 14:56:25 +0200

37 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Bob Cohen

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 08:53:23 -0400

136 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Drew McCormack

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 14:33:11 +0200

132 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

James Giles

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 05:24:42 -0600

88 lines

Re: OOP (was: Strings)

Drew McCormack

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:23:10 +0200

121 lines

Re: De-blanking Strings (was: Strings)

Hargraves Gary

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:55:04 +1000

122 lines

Re: Strings ... and other things

Gary Scott

Tue, 9 Oct 2001 20:27:16 -0500

95 lines

Re: Strings ... and other things

Hargraves Gary

Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:15:12 +1000

86 lines

OOP (was: Strings)

James Giles

Tue, 9 Oct 2001 14:50:36 -0600

60 lines

Re: Strings

<>

Tue, 9 Oct 2001 19:49:28 +0010

32 lines

Re: Strings

Richard Maine

Tue, 9 Oct 2001 09:27:45 -0700

31 lines

Re: Where can I down load the released version 6.6 of Comapq Visu al Fortran?

Lionel, Steve

Tue, 9 Oct 2001 08:16:53 -0700

24 lines

Where can I down load the released version 6.6 of Comapq Visual Fortran?

Richard Maine

Tue, 9 Oct 2001 08:09:29 -0700

23 lines

Re: Strings

Clive Page

Tue, 9 Oct 2001 12:26:08 +0100

34 lines

Re: Strings

Drew McCormack

Tue, 9 Oct 2001 11:59:13 +0200

47 lines

Re: Strings

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer

Tue, 9 Oct 2001 09:25:51 +0100

22 lines

Re: Strings

Ted Stern

Mon, 8 Oct 2001 09:59:03 -0700

27 lines

Re: Strings

Mandeep Singh

Mon, 8 Oct 2001 08:47:52 -0500

62 lines

Re: Where can I down load the released version 6.6 of Comapq Visual Fortran?

Tim Prince

Mon, 8 Oct 2001 05:51:21 -0700

25 lines

Where can I down load the released version 6.6 of Comapq Visual Fortran?

frank_ouyang

Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:40:07 +0800

20 lines

Re: Strings

robin

Mon, 8 Oct 2001 10:05:21 +1000

63 lines

Re: De-blanking Strings (was: Strings)

robin

Mon, 8 Oct 2001 10:05:21 +1000

23 lines

Re: Strings

<>

Sun, 7 Oct 2001 19:55:02 +0010

71 lines

Re: Strings

<>

Sun, 7 Oct 2001 19:24:57 +0010

55 lines

Re: Strings

<>

Sun, 7 Oct 2001 19:15:33 +0010

40 lines

Re: Strings

<>

Sun, 7 Oct 2001 19:07:01 +0010

69 lines

Re: Strings

Bob Cohen

Sun, 7 Oct 2001 10:09:33 -0400

94 lines

Re: Strings

Bob Cohen

Sun, 7 Oct 2001 09:55:18 -0400

20 lines

Re: Strings

Bob Cohen

Sun, 7 Oct 2001 09:51:53 -0400

111 lines

Re: Strings

Phillip Helbig

Sun, 7 Oct 2001 12:18:24 +0100

16 lines

Re: Strings

robin

Sun, 7 Oct 2001 19:14:52 +1000

71 lines

Re: Strings

R. A. Vowels

Sun, 7 Oct 2001 12:25:01 +1000

11 lines

Re: Strings

R. A. Vowels

Sun, 7 Oct 2001 12:20:54 +1000

87 lines

Re: compiler error ??

Jan van Oosterwijk

Sat, 6 Oct 2001 17:31:21 +0000

67 lines

Re: compiler error ??

Alan Miller

Sat, 6 Oct 2001 23:44:54 +1000

1254 lines

Re: Strings

Bob Cohen

Sat, 6 Oct 2001 09:21:20 -0400

63 lines

Re: Strings

R. A. Vowels

Sat, 6 Oct 2001 09:28:11 +1000

26 lines

Re: program error (was compiler error)

robin

Sat, 6 Oct 2001 09:24:19 +1000

27 lines

Re: Strings

<>

Fri, 5 Oct 2001 18:51:42 +0010

35 lines

Re: Strings

Mandeep Singh

Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:36:00 -0500

71 lines

Re: Strings

Roland Schilling

Fri, 5 Oct 2001 15:56:04 +0200

55 lines

Re: Strings

Bob Cohen

Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:55:51 -0400

270 lines

Re: Strings

Mandeep Singh

Fri, 5 Oct 2001 08:05:44 -0500

64 lines

Re: Strings

Alan Miller

Fri, 5 Oct 2001 18:07:08 +1000

47 lines

Strings

Franck AUBINEAU

Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:37:05 +0200

32 lines

Reunion

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 5 Oct 2001 03:34:01 -0400

17 lines

Re: compiler error

Alan Miller

Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:50:52 +1000

2452 lines

Re: Questions about design issues for the submodules TR

Van Snyder

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:43:13 -0700

113 lines

Re: F2x draft download

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 17:57:01 +0000

52 lines

Intel Fortran free noncomercial compiler

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 12:48:53 -0500

41 lines

Re: compiler error

Tim Prince

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:31:46 -0700

1146 lines

Re: compiler error

Bob Cohen

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 13:10:30 -0400

29 lines

Re: compiler error

Tim Prince

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:07:36 -0700

1141 lines

Re: Questions about design issues for the submodules TR

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:58:37 -0500

123 lines

compiler error

shireen p

Thu, 4 Oct 2001 08:43:57 -0400

1023 lines

Re: Questions about design issues for the submodules TR

<>

Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:28:23 EDT

46 lines

Re: F2x draft download

Dan Nagle

Wed, 3 Oct 2001 17:19:43 -0400

42 lines

More questions about design issues for the submodules TR

Van Snyder

Wed, 3 Oct 2001 10:51:59 -0700

66 lines

Questions about design issues for the submodules TR

Van Snyder

Wed, 3 Oct 2001 10:50:34 -0700

84 lines

F2x draft download

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 3 Oct 2001 11:44:52 -0500

36 lines

Java Fortran interface via JNI

Erich Kreiselmaier

Wed, 3 Oct 2001 10:38:37 +0200

29 lines

colors mismatch

Pavel Houdek

Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:05:07 +0200

52 lines

Re: Reunion

Walt Brainerd

Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:34:33 -0700

39 lines

Reunion

Walt Brainerd

Mon, 1 Oct 2001 07:11:31 -0700

90 lines

Fortran usage within HPC

Ian Chivers

Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:10:58 +0100

66 lines

Re: J3-fortran.org

Richard Maine

Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:06:27 -0700

42 lines

Re: J3-fortran.org

Richard Maine

Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:52:29 -0700

36 lines

Re: J3-fortran.org

James Giles

Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:48:13 -0600

34 lines

J3-fortran.org

J. van Oosterwijk

Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:27:43 +0200

40 lines

Re: Intel F90 compiler and MPI

Tim Prince

Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:43:21 -0700

40 lines

Intel F90 compiler and MPI

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:05:02 -0300

25 lines

Fortran Resource File (September)

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 20 Sep 2001 03:06:20 -0400

915 lines

Re: numeric inquiry in new coco

R. A. Vowels

Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:41:01 +1000

48 lines

Announcing Compaq Visual Fortran version 6.6

Lionel, Steve

Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:02:15 -0700

79 lines

Re: F90 compiler

Walt Brainerd

Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:56:12 -0700

49 lines

Re: F90 compiler

Paul Stevenson

Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:59:24 +0100

29 lines

Re: Array sections as arguments

John Reid

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:38:23 +0100

84 lines

Re: Array sections as arguments

Glenn Carver

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:12:54 +0100

96 lines

Re: F90 compiler

Srivastava, Niraj

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:35:44 -0400

107 lines

Re: Array sections as arguments

John Reid

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:21:19 +0100

90 lines

Re: F90 compiler

Walt Brainerd

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:01:19 -0700

29 lines

Re: Array sections as arguments

Malcolm Cohen

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:52:07 +0100

93 lines

Re: Array sections as arguments

Glenn Carver

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:37:37 +0100

14 lines

Array sections as arguments

Glenn Carver

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:21:03 +0100

67 lines

Re: F90 compiler - correction (kernel 2.2.*)

Tim Prince

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 05:58:41 -0700

26 lines

F90 compiler - correction (kernel 2.2.*)

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:45:31 -0300

16 lines

F90 compiler

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:42:39 -0300

17 lines

numeric inquiry in new coco

Dan Nagle

Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:03:19 -0400

53 lines

F2x Draft revisions

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:32:34 -0500

36 lines

Re: F2x Draft revisions

Dan Nagle

Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:43:32 -0400

54 lines

Re: Simple question

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 11 Sep 2001 18:27:49 +0200

44 lines

Re: Simple question

Feyzi Inanc

Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:24:13 -0500

32 lines

Simple question

Rector, David

Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:07:35 -0700

12 lines

Re: strange bug

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 11 Sep 2001 18:02:02 +0200

36 lines

Re: strange bug

robin

Wed, 12 Sep 2001 01:55:17 +1000

48 lines

Re: implicit copy real-->complex ???

robin

Wed, 12 Sep 2001 01:51:18 +1000

41 lines

strange bug [Was: implicit copy...]

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 11 Sep 2001 15:49:13 +0200

60 lines

Oooops [Was: implicit copy real-->complex ???]

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:33:58 +0200

83 lines

implicit copy real-->complex ???

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 11 Sep 2001 10:50:21 +0200

64 lines

Fortran-90 Windows programming

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 11 Sep 2001 02:59:51 -0400

34 lines

Re: inverse matrix

Van Snyder

Sat, 1 Sep 2001 19:10:18 -0700

21 lines

Re: inverse matrix

<>

Tue, 28 Aug 2001 19:45:37 +0010

72 lines

Re: inverse matrix

Jaehoon Seol

Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:19:47 -0500

17 lines

Re: inverse matrix

Tim Prince

Tue, 28 Aug 2001 05:35:03 -0700

77 lines

Re: inverse matrix

simon harding (IACR-RES)

Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:03:20 +0100

43 lines

Re: array declaration

Alistair Mills

Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:41:13 +0100

34 lines

Re: Free Sample Copies of JCMSE

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:11:25 +0200

58 lines

inverse matrix

M.T Shakeri

Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:48:43 +0100

23 lines

Re: Linear Interpolation Routine

robin

Tue, 28 Aug 2001 08:34:53 +1000

20 lines

Free Sample Copies of JCMSE

Dr. T.E. Simos

Sun, 26 Aug 2001 17:47:47 +0300

89 lines

Re: Linear Interpolation Routine

Bob Leblanc

Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:03:11 -0500

22 lines

Re: Linear Interpolation Routine

Bob Cohen

Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:57:40 -0400

27 lines

Linear Interpolation Routine

Robert Leblanc

Fri, 24 Aug 2001 20:36:57 +0100

10 lines

Re: (j3.2001-600) RE: 01-317 - What is an Input/Output error

Van Snyder

Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:41:12 -0700

27 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

<>

Fri, 17 Aug 2001 19:24:59 +0010

94 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Lars Mossberg

Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:11:58 +0200

72 lines

Efficiency of F77 vs. f90/95 another question

Cezar Diaconu

Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:42:44 +0900

35 lines

Re: variable formatting

robin

Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:15:01 +1000

47 lines

variable formatting

Jens Bredenbeck

Wed, 15 Aug 2001 20:17:06 +0100

34 lines

variable formatting

Richard Maine

Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:49:44 -0700

58 lines

Re: variable formatting

Bob Cohen

Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:30:33 -0400

43 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Van Snyder

Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:32:39 -0700

26 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Van Snyder

Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:55:25 -0700

62 lines

Array assignment and overloading (=)

Tom Clune

Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:10:59 -0400

63 lines

Array assignment and overloading (=)

Richard Maine

Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:13:15 -0700

43 lines

Re: Executable file.

Walt Brainerd

Mon, 13 Aug 2001 08:27:58 -0700

36 lines

e-version of Metcalf & Reid

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:18:08 -0400

37 lines

Array assignment and overloading (=)

Tom Clune

Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:22:43 -0400

94 lines

Re: ISO Varying String Fortran 95

John Reid

Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:51:41 +0100

27 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

<>

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 19:28:24 +0010

69 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

<>

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 19:14:08 +0010

64 lines

Re: Simple I/O Question

Richard Maine

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 10:44:26 -0700

25 lines

Simple I/O Question

Richard Maine

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 10:42:14 -0700

36 lines

Re: Simple I/O Question

Terry Koontz

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:36:58 -0600

69 lines

Simple I/O Question

Bart Benthul

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:29:34 -0600

61 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Richard Maine

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 07:48:09 -0700

49 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

robin

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 23:24:14 +1000

36 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

robin

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 23:24:14 +1000

24 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Dick Hendrickson

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 07:50:25 -0500

86 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Lawrie Schonfelder

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 13:49:27 +0100

55 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Ron Sverdlove x2517

Wed, 8 Aug 2001 02:51:00 -0400

110 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

<>

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 19:49:30 +0010

54 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

<>

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 15:04:56 -0400

29 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Douglas Sondak

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:57:53 -0400

33 lines

Re: Executable file.

Richard Maine

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:49:43 -0700

39 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Dick Hendrickson

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:23:09 -0500

90 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Douglas Sondak

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:31:31 -0400

40 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Dan Nagle

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 05:31:37 -0400

55 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Herbert Fruchtl

Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:47:36 +0100

23 lines

Re: Executable file.

Tim Prince

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 19:58:15 -0700

31 lines

Re: Executable file.

Comer Duncan

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 21:37:15 -0400

45 lines

Executable file.

Gerd Bruno Rocha

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 22:08:21 -0300

21 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Bill Long

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 19:56:39 -0500

61 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

<>

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 19:46:26 +0010

51 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

J. van Oosterwijk

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 12:48:55 +0200

94 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Carlie Coats

Sun, 5 Aug 2001 08:40:35 -0400

93 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 18:23:56 -0400

37 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Tim Prince

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 15:03:45 -0700

126 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

<>

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 19:28:18 +0010

57 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Carlie Coats

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 13:06:14 -0400

78 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Walt Brainerd

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 09:41:16 -0700

79 lines

Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90

Lawrie Schonfelder

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 16:26:12 +0100

58 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Toon Moene

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 16:37:41 +0200

53 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Cezar Diaconu

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 17:05:44 +0900

28 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Peter Shenkin

Sat, 4 Aug 2001 01:27:49 -0400

44 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Charles Crawford

Fri, 3 Aug 2001 21:44:31 -0400

41 lines

Re: Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

richard friedman

Fri, 3 Aug 2001 15:09:51 -0700

28 lines

Efficiency of F77 vs.F90

Walt Brainerd

Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:42:44 -0700

25 lines

Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90

Walt Brainerd

Thu, 2 Aug 2001 15:18:08 -0700

33 lines

Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90

Walt Brainerd

Thu, 2 Aug 2001 15:15:19 -0700

37 lines

Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90

Ian Hounam

Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:08:52 +0100

43 lines

Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90

Alberto Fasso'

Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:42:32 +0200

26 lines

Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90

Ian Hounam

Thu, 2 Aug 2001 10:10:50 +0100

35 lines

Re: ISO Varying String Fortran90

Karsten Chmielewski

Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:10:30 +0200

23 lines

ISO Varying String Fortran90

Erich Kreiselmaier

Thu, 2 Aug 2001 10:52:46 +0200

22 lines

Re: disk fragmentation

Bob Cohen

Wed, 1 Aug 2001 12:12:17 -0400

52 lines

disk fragmentation

Richard Maine

Wed, 1 Aug 2001 09:09:18 -0700

68 lines

disk fragmentation

Michael J. Steinkamp

Wed, 1 Aug 2001 09:29:56 -0600

33 lines

Version of fsplit that ignores C pre-processor directives

John Bray

Wed, 1 Aug 2001 13:43:12 +0100

20 lines

Re: array declaration

Catherine Moroney

Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:39:24 -0700

37 lines

Re: array declaration

N. Shamsundar

Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:38:43 -0500

29 lines

array declaration

Naomi Greenberg

Tue, 31 Jul 2001 10:20:00 -0400

46 lines

Re: passing array bounds into subroutines

robin

Sat, 28 Jul 2001 19:49:16 +1000

16 lines

Re: passing array bounds into subroutines

robin

Sat, 28 Jul 2001 19:35:20 +1000

28 lines

passing array bounds into subroutines

Richard Maine

Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:15:50 -0700

45 lines

Re: passing array bounds into subroutines

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:13:12 -0400

32 lines

passing array bounds into subroutines

Catherine Moroney

Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:04:47 -0700

72 lines

UNSUBSCRIBE

K.N. Pratima

Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:04:41 +0530

82 lines

Latin Hypercube routine

Craig Shirley

Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:08:16 +0100

11 lines

Aliased DOT_PRODUCT

Richard Maine

Mon, 23 Jul 2001 07:52:14 -0700

33 lines

Re: Comments in namelists

Dan Nagle

Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:37:14 -0400

47 lines

Re: Comments in namelists

Roland Schilling

Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:25:23 +0200

27 lines

Comments in namelists

John Bray

Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:04:27 +0100

18 lines

Re: Aliased DOT_PRODUCT

Tim Prince

Sat, 21 Jul 2001 23:39:38 -0700

28 lines

Re: intrinsic SUM and roundoff errors

robin

Sun, 22 Jul 2001 13:58:16 +1000

21 lines

Aliased DOT_PRODUCT

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 21 Jul 2001 15:54:08 -0400

17 lines

Re: intrinsic SUM and roundoff errors

<>

Sat, 21 Jul 2001 19:55:09 +0010

41 lines

intrinsic SUM and roundoff errors

Richard Maine

Fri, 20 Jul 2001 07:51:27 -0700

26 lines

Re: intrinsic SUM and roundoff errors

Tim Prince

Fri, 20 Jul 2001 06:10:31 -0700

35 lines

intrinsic SUM and roundoff errors

Manfred Mudelsee

Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:58:58 +0100

16 lines

Multiple namelists in files

John Bray

Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:05:00 +0100

156 lines

Re: How to read data in such a file

Panagiotis Vossos

Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:49:46 +0300

52 lines

Re: Printing to two units revisited

Len Makin

Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:21:44 +1000

36 lines

Re: Printing to two units revisited

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:14:09 -0400

18 lines

How to read data in such a file

Changrong SU

Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:04:29 +0800

37 lines

Re: Printing to two units revisited

Comer Duncan

Tue, 17 Jul 2001 19:31:12 -0400

49 lines

Printing to two units revisited

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 17 Jul 2001 18:57:58 -0400

28 lines

Re: Memory allocation

lello

Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:44:21 +0200

34 lines

Memory allocation

Franck AUBINEAU

Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:02:46 +0200

43 lines

Re: How is ELEMENTAL translated?

John Reid

Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:18:08 +0100

41 lines

Re: How is ELEMENTAL translated?

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:25:49 -0400

35 lines

Re: How is ELEMENTAL translated?

Nils Smeds

Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:37:56 +0200

26 lines

How is ELEMENTAL translated?

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 15 Jul 2001 23:49:40 -0400

40 lines

Fortran Resource File (July)

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:30:09 -0400

20 lines

Re: Fortran version of getopt_long?

Dan Nagle

Thu, 12 Jul 2001 20:52:13 -0400

50 lines

Fortran version of getopt_long?

Martin Dix

Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:13:49 +1000

20 lines

Gary Scott

Wed, 11 Jul 2001 21:32:11 -0500

76 lines

Incomplete factorization libraries

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:08:18 -0400

31 lines

Re: your mail

Bob Cohen

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:53:54 -0400

136 lines

Re: your mail

Richard Maine

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:14:19 -0700

33 lines

Re: your mail

Jing Guo

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:07:24 -0400

101 lines

Re: your mail

Jing Guo

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:00:34 -0400

86 lines

Re: your mail

Ted Stern

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:44:37 -0700

58 lines

Re: array and file size on read

Ferhun C. Caner

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:24:37 +0300

30 lines

Re: array and file size on a read

Dick Hendrickson

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:28:16 -0500

57 lines

ANNOUNCE: Perl code for sorting CONTAINed routines

Barry W. Brown

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:15:11 -0500

27 lines

Richard Maine

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 07:46:12 -0700

29 lines

David Vowles

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:52:51 +0930

78 lines

Zhou Yong Cheng

Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:04:54 +0800

26 lines

creating directory

Andrey E. Buzjurkin

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 21:47:31 +0600

28 lines

Re: fortran on Linux

Peter Shenkin

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:38:11 -0400

65 lines

Re: fortran on Linux

Kurt W Hirchert

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:23:06 -0500

42 lines

creating directory

Richard Maine

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:21:46 -0700

40 lines

Re: fortran on Linux

Richard Maine

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 07:46:56 -0700

36 lines

Re: fortran on Linux

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:21:18 -0300

43 lines

Re: fortran on Linux

Joerg Strutwolf

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:12:14 +0100

27 lines

fortran on Linux

Fabienne Goffinont

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:04:47 +0200

30 lines

New make_processor_model

Dan Nagle

Mon, 9 Jul 2001 07:03:51 -0400

64 lines

Multiprocessor Linux PC and Fortran

Van Snyder

Fri, 6 Jul 2001 11:35:15 -0700

38 lines

Re: Linux Workstation

J. van Oosterwijk

Fri, 6 Jul 2001 17:43:23 +0200

38 lines

Re: Linux Workstation

Carlie Coats

Fri, 6 Jul 2001 07:05:08 -0400

50 lines

Linux Workstation

<>

Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:24:42 +1000

46 lines

Fortran 90 compiles used by Fortran 77

Stu Anderson 425-865-3595

Thu, 5 Jul 2001 15:44:14 -0700

37 lines

Re: How transform C into F90 on Data Struct.

Giampaolo Bottoni

Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:26:18 +0200

74 lines

How transform C into F90 on Data Struct.

frank_ouyang

Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:37:13 +0800

37 lines

Re: Slash etiquette ...

Walt Brainerd

Sat, 30 Jun 2001 12:57:19 -0700

58 lines

Re: namelist and characters

Bob Cohen

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:37:21 -0400

37 lines

Re: Error on J3 website

Richard Maine

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:06:20 -0700

41 lines

Re: Error on J3 website

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:37:52 +0200

78 lines

Re: Error on J3 website

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:12:03 +0100

37 lines

Error on J3 website

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:04:13 +0200

41 lines

Re: Slash etiquette ...

Ron Sverdlove x2517

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 04:53:32 -0400

44 lines

Re: namelist and characters

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:54:30 +0200

46 lines

Re: namelist and characters

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:47:44 +0200

69 lines

Re: namelist and characters

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:40:45 +0200

91 lines

Re: namelist and characters

Richard Maine

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:24:15 -0700

30 lines

Re: namelist and characters

James Giles

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:03:43 -0600

24 lines

Re: namelist and characters

Ted Stern

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:04:38 -0700

19 lines

Re: namelist and characters

Ted Stern

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:59:55 -0700

43 lines

Re: namelist and characters

James Giles

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:53:52 -0600

29 lines

namelist and characters

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 19:20:57 +0200

65 lines

Re: Slash etiquette ...

Richard Maine

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 08:55:47 -0700

46 lines

Re: Slash etiquette ...

Kurt W Hirchert

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:10:48 -0500

43 lines

Re: Slash etiquette ...

<>

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:15:50 MET_DST

66 lines

Re: Slash etiquette ...

J. van Oosterwijk

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:12:53 +0200

63 lines

Re: Slash etiquette ...

John Macallister

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:14:28 +0100

29 lines

Re: Slash etiquette ...

David Vowles

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:24:16 +0930

101 lines

Re: Slash etiquette ...

<>

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:43:05 +1000

57 lines

Re: Slash etiquette ...

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:32:58 -0400

25 lines

Re: Slash etiquette ...

Len Makin

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:41:27 +1000

26 lines

Slash etiquette ...

Annetts, David (DEM, North Ryde)

Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:17:24 +1000

44 lines

Off-topic :: Refprop - NIST

José Eduardo Santos Oliveira

Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:39:32 -0300

21 lines

Sun Fortran 90/95 compiler behaviour !

S. Janakiraman

Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:48:19 +0530

24 lines

Viterbi algorithm

Ravi C. Venkatesan

Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:53:38 +0530

15 lines

Sorry!

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:44:07 -0400

28 lines

Re: Fortran Forum (August)

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:42:14 -0400

28 lines

Fortran Forum (August)

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 25 Jun 2001 04:40:51 -0400

68 lines

Re: Large parameter arrays

John Venier

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:07:38 -0500

38 lines

Re: Large parameter arrays

David Adams

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:29:04 +0100

91 lines

Re: Rebuttal to Treurich, et al.

J. van Oosterwijk

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:23:08 +0200

45 lines

Re: Rebuttal to Treurich, et al.

Lars Mossberg

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:20:25 +0200

32 lines

Re: Large parameter arrays

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:07:14 +0100

28 lines

Re: real to complex to real

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:47:24 +0200

81 lines

Re: Large parameter arrays

John Venier

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:40:16 -0500

75 lines

Large parameter arrays

Van Snyder

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:59:24 -0700

35 lines

Large parameter arrays

Richard Maine

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:45:53 -0700

39 lines

Re: Array re-allocation question

Dick Hendrickson

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:37:09 -0500

80 lines

real to complex to real

Richard Maine

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:35:14 -0700

32 lines

Large parameter arrays

John Venier

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:58:02 -0500

77 lines

Re: real to complex to real

<>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:53:33 -0600

64 lines

real to complex to real

<>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:53:03 -0600

41 lines

Re: real to complex to real

J. van Oosterwijk

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:27:15 +0200

56 lines

Array re-allocation question

José Luis Gómez Dans

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 20:54:48 +0100

54 lines

Re: sequence attribute for derived types

<>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:31:38 +0010

34 lines

real to complex to real

Richard Maine

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:15:51 -0700

44 lines

real to complex to real

<>

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:18:44 -0600

77 lines

Re: sequence attribute for derived types

Richard Maine

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:44:20 -0700

37 lines

real to complex to real

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:47:25 +0200

216 lines

Re: sequence attribute for derived types

Guylaine Prat

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:44:51 +0200

23 lines

Re: sequence attribute for derived types

Guylaine Prat

Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:37:52 +0200

25 lines

Rebuttal to Treurich, et al.

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:17:38 -0400

20 lines

Re: sequence attribute for derived types

<>

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 01:00:12 EDT

34 lines

Re: Compaq Visual Fortran Education Donation Program

Kipp Graham

Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:17:29 +1000

96 lines

Rebuttal to Treurich, et al.

Dan Nagle

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:46:26 -0400

25 lines

Re: sequence attribute for derived types

<>

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:21:57 MET_DST

71 lines

Compaq Visual Fortran Education Donation Program

Lionel, Steven

Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:39:52 -0500

50 lines

Re: Non-advancing READ

Dick Hendrickson

Sat, 16 Jun 2001 10:58:51 -0500

70 lines

Non-advancing READ

Roland Schilling

Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:04:13 +0200

46 lines

Re: Comments on: "Pioneers of the 'Fortran' Programming Language"

Lawrie Schonfelder

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:12:18 +0100

53 lines

Re: NYT article

Lawrie Schonfelder

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:10:18 +0100

61 lines

Entity accessibility through indirect USE association

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 04:55:35 -0400

27 lines

Entity accessibility through indirect USE association

David Vowles

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:28:38 +0930

111 lines

Re: NYT article

Van Snyder

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:15:45 -0700

46 lines

Comments on: "Pioneers of the 'Fortran' Programming Language"

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 20:27:47 -0400

45 lines

Re: NYT article

<>

Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:06:24 +1000

67 lines

NYT article

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:25:54 -0400

35 lines

Re: I need the help on "include"

Lionel, Steven

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 04:42:51 -0500

27 lines

Re: sequence attribute for derived types

Guylaine Prat

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:23:15 +0200

27 lines

Re: sequence attribute for derived types

Dan Nagle

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 05:00:45 -0400

59 lines

I need the help on "include"

frank_ouyang

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:49:16 +0800

51 lines

sequence attribute for derived types

Guylaine Prat

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:05:37 +0200

31 lines

Re: Geometry optimizer.

Cezar Diaconu

Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:35:33 +0900

43 lines

Re: Geometry optimizer.

Alan Miller

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:05:02 +1000

42 lines

Re: Geometry optimizer.

Alberto Fasso'

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:52:19 +0200

39 lines

Geometry optimizer.

Gerd Bruno Rocha

Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:39:50 -0300

23 lines

Re: Reading unknown file array

J. van Oosterwijk

Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:46:23 +0200

34 lines

Re: LBOUND on assumed-shape arguments

Dick Hendrickson

Sun, 10 Jun 2001 11:00:16 -0500

72 lines

Re: speed of floating point arithmetic

Tim Prince

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 06:14:11 -0700

58 lines

speed of floating point arithmetic

Ian Chivers

Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:34:10 +0100

36 lines

Reccomendations for code migration tools

John Bray

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:20:48 +0100

43 lines

Re: LBOUND on assumed-shape arguments

John Reid

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 17:51:10 +0100

44 lines

Re: How about the include in Fortran90

J. van Oosterwijk

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:14:00 +0200

85 lines

How about the include in Fortran90

frank_ouyang

Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:46:30 +0800

24 lines

LBOUND on assumed-shape arguments

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 3 Jun 2001 13:35:57 -0400

40 lines

Re: TARGET arguments clarification

Kurt Hirchert

Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:54:05 -0500

10 lines

Re: TARGET arguments clarification

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 1 Jun 2001 18:53:36 -0400

24 lines

What does a zero length string equate to?

<>

Thu, 31 May 2001 20:12:28 +0010

61 lines

Re: What does a zero length string equate to?

Ron Sverdlove x2517

Thu, 31 May 2001 12:00:52 -0400

78 lines

Re: What does a zero length string equate to?

Richard Maine

Thu, 31 May 2001 07:33:45 -0700

23 lines

Re: What does a zero length string equate to?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 31 May 2001 13:07:27 +0200

82 lines

Re: What does a zero length string equate to?

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 31 May 2001 11:18:04 +0100

25 lines

Re: Array outer product

Anthony Stone

Thu, 31 May 2001 09:23:41 +0100

43 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 31 May 2001 09:40:53 +0200

110 lines

Re: TARGET arguments clarification

James Giles

Wed, 30 May 2001 13:09:04 -0600

26 lines

TARGET arguments clarification

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 30 May 2001 14:37:14 -0400

58 lines

Re: Array outer product

Kurt W Hirchert

Wed, 30 May 2001 13:05:47 -0500

37 lines

Re: Array outer product

James Giles

Wed, 30 May 2001 11:32:31 -0600

27 lines

Array outer product

Anthony Stone

Wed, 30 May 2001 18:09:12 +0100

27 lines

Dos application

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 30 May 2001 03:30:12 -0400

116 lines

Re: unsubscribe

Ian Chivers

Mon, 28 May 2001 18:13:42 +0100

48 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

robin

Mon, 28 May 2001 10:19:51 +1000

35 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

Abhishek Seth

Sat, 26 May 2001 14:20:05 +0530

23 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

Loren P Meissner

Fri, 25 May 2001 18:57:24 -0700

27 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

robin

Sat, 26 May 2001 10:34:42 +1000

34 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

robin

Sat, 26 May 2001 10:34:42 +1000

46 lines

Fixing the size for assumed-shape arrays

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 24 May 2001 22:23:25 -0400

63 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

robin

Fri, 25 May 2001 09:20:13 +1000

26 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

<>

Thu, 24 May 2001 20:34:10 +0010

41 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

<>

Thu, 24 May 2001 19:40:28 +0010

52 lines

unsubscribe

Teresa Adams

Thu, 24 May 2001 08:53:15 -0700

19 lines

unsubscrible

frank_ouyang

Thu, 24 May 2001 22:42:03 +0800

107 lines

Re: Help reqd.

N. Shamsundar

Thu, 24 May 2001 08:47:30 -0500

45 lines

unsubscribe

Hilmy Awad

Thu, 24 May 2001 14:34:05 +0200

70 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

Abhishek Seth

Thu, 24 May 2001 16:00:22 +0530

21 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

John Reid

Thu, 24 May 2001 11:15:45 +0100

20 lines

unsubscribe

Fumie Costen

Thu, 24 May 2001 10:03:04 +0100

30 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

John Reid

Thu, 24 May 2001 09:52:52 +0100

51 lines

Help reqd.

Amit Mathur

Thu, 24 May 2001 10:15:26 +0530

30 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

Richard Maine

Wed, 23 May 2001 15:06:55 -0700

70 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

Abhishek Seth

Thu, 24 May 2001 03:09:58 +0530

31 lines

P.S. to Temporaries for easier typing

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 23 May 2001 12:47:06 -0400

29 lines

Temporaries for easier typing

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 23 May 2001 12:41:33 -0400

97 lines

Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

Richard Maine

Wed, 23 May 2001 09:30:44 -0700

38 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 23 May 2001 12:04:58 -0400

16 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

Dick Hendrickson

Wed, 23 May 2001 10:12:38 -0500

77 lines

Re: Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

Jan van Oosterwijk

Wed, 23 May 2001 15:03:24 +0200

120 lines

Non Conformal Array Strides in a Subroutine

Abhishek Seth

Wed, 23 May 2001 17:47:13 +0530

51 lines

Re: Compiling Large Prgrams

<>

Tue, 22 May 2001 20:11:05 +0010

64 lines

Re: Dependancies in declarations

robin

Tue, 22 May 2001 09:14:59 -1000

35 lines

Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95

<>

Tue, 22 May 2001 17:16:00 MET_DST

77 lines

Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95

Ron Sverdlove x2517

Tue, 22 May 2001 11:55:01 -0400

31 lines

Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95

Richard Maine

Tue, 22 May 2001 08:48:03 -0700

57 lines

Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer

Tue, 22 May 2001 16:05:02 +0100

26 lines

Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95

Richard Maine

Tue, 22 May 2001 07:55:20 -0700

27 lines

Re: Compiling Large Prgrams

Lionel, Steven

Tue, 22 May 2001 08:29:10 -0500

32 lines

Re: F2x syntax---interface conformance with extended types

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 22 May 2001 08:43:47 -0400

32 lines

Re: F2x syntax---interface conformance with extended types

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 22 May 2001 10:31:54 +0100

33 lines

Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer

Tue, 22 May 2001 09:17:47 +0100

15 lines

Re: Compiling Large Prgrams

Bob Leblanc

Mon, 21 May 2001 14:14:12 -0500

39 lines

Re: Compiling Large Prgrams

Lionel, Steven

Mon, 21 May 2001 13:12:43 -0500

56 lines

Compiling Large Prgrams

Robert Leblanc

Mon, 21 May 2001 18:54:29 +0100

41 lines

Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95

Ron Sverdlove x2517

Mon, 21 May 2001 12:33:45 -0400

81 lines

Re: Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95

S. Janakiraman

Mon, 21 May 2001 14:39:53 +0530

72 lines

Reopening the standard input in Sun f90/95

Ron Sverdlove x2517

Mon, 21 May 2001 03:35:34 -0400

52 lines

F2x syntax---interface conformance with extended types

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 19 May 2001 13:20:58 -0400

66 lines

Fortran Resource File (May)

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 18 May 2001 07:44:09 -0400

915 lines

Re: Dependancies in declarations

John Reid

Thu, 17 May 2001 10:03:54 +0100

29 lines

Dependancies in declarations

John Bray

Thu, 17 May 2001 09:00:21 +0100

25 lines

Re: Nested WHERE constructs. (Interpretation/implementation)

Dick Hendrickson

Wed, 16 May 2001 09:33:01 -0500

58 lines

Nested WHERE constructs. (Interpretation/implementation)

Helmers, Jens Bloch

Wed, 16 May 2001 08:21:11 +0200

26 lines

Re: passing structure components into subroutines

Richard Maine

Tue, 15 May 2001 09:23:46 -0700

33 lines

Re: passing structure components into subroutines

Catherine Moroney

Tue, 15 May 2001 09:09:42 -0700

63 lines

passing structure components into subroutines

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 15 May 2001 03:29:03 -0400

56 lines

passing structure components into subroutines

Catherine Moroney

Mon, 14 May 2001 20:59:20 -0700

66 lines

unsuscribe

Bandfield Thomas D Contr 96 CG/SCWDE

Fri, 11 May 2001 07:17:15 -0500

38 lines

Re: derived types question

Paul Stevenson

Fri, 11 May 2001 10:44:32 +0100

41 lines

Re: GDDM graphics ?

Gary Scott

Thu, 10 May 2001 18:25:33 -0500

28 lines

Re: derived types question

Dick Hendrickson

Thu, 10 May 2001 14:58:34 -0500

70 lines

derived types question

Richard Maine

Thu, 10 May 2001 11:15:14 -0700

49 lines

GDDM graphics ?

Terry Koontz

Thu, 10 May 2001 12:13:09 -0600

70 lines

derived types question

Panagiotis Vossos

Thu, 10 May 2001 21:05:21 +0300

38 lines

Re: RECURSIVE procedures

robin

Wed, 9 May 2001 12:01:39 -1000

64 lines

list home page

Ian Chivers

Wed, 9 May 2001 10:16:54 +0100

31 lines

unsubscribe

Jim Roberts

Tue, 8 May 2001 17:00:13 -0500

36 lines

Re: BOZ syntax; [was: mixed output text/binary]

Dan Nagle

Tue, 8 May 2001 13:51:14 -0400

94 lines

Re: BOZ syntax; [was: mixed output text/binary]

Kurt W Hirchert

Tue, 8 May 2001 12:28:56 -0500

64 lines

Array memory allocation

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Tue, 8 May 2001 13:38:53 -0300

31 lines

Re: unsubcribe

omar dominguez sanchez

Tue, 8 May 2001 11:27:57 -0500

12 lines

Re: Array memory allocation

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 8 May 2001 11:53:04 -0400

29 lines

BOZ syntax; [was: mixed output text/binary]

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 8 May 2001 17:26:25 +0200

56 lines

Re: Tables of Gauss-Turan-type Quadrature

Ahmad Mr M

Tue, 8 May 2001 09:34:14 +0100

54 lines

Re: RECURSIVE procedures

<>

Tue, 8 May 2001 00:02:17 EDT

57 lines

Re: Addendum: RECURSIVE routines

Van Snyder

Mon, 7 May 2001 15:18:40 -0700

29 lines

Addendum: RECURSIVE routines

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 7 May 2001 17:03:27 -0400

38 lines

Re: RECURSIVE procedures

Jing Guo

Mon, 7 May 2001 16:13:30 -0400

57 lines

Re: RECURSIVE procedures

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 7 May 2001 15:31:32 -0400

65 lines

RECURSIVE procedures

Richard Maine

Mon, 7 May 2001 12:30:23 -0700

36 lines

RECURSIVE procedures

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Mon, 7 May 2001 16:21:16 -0300

19 lines

Re: RECURSIVE procedures

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 7 May 2001 14:17:32 -0400

35 lines

Re: unsubcribe

Hilmy Awad

Mon, 7 May 2001 11:20:51 +0200

54 lines

unsubcribe

Jim Roberts

Fri, 4 May 2001 21:41:25 -0500

34 lines

Fw: gauss turan quadrature

James Giles

Fri, 4 May 2001 15:34:42 -0600

25 lines

Re: F2K syntax question

Kurt W Hirchert

Fri, 4 May 2001 12:50:08 -0500

38 lines

Re: F2K syntax question

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 4 May 2001 12:37:50 -0400

58 lines

F2K syntax question

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 4 May 2001 11:50:59 -0400

43 lines

Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature (THANK YOU )

Ahmad Mr M

Fri, 4 May 2001 10:14:37 +0100

60 lines

Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature

Ahmad Mr M

Fri, 4 May 2001 10:10:20 +0100

42 lines

Re: Recursive or not?

robin

Thu, 3 May 2001 11:12:17 -1000

28 lines

Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature

Van Snyder

Thu, 3 May 2001 10:47:09 -0700

35 lines

Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature

Don Shirer

Thu, 3 May 2001 12:41:07 -0400

21 lines

Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature

Joerg Strutwolf

Thu, 3 May 2001 16:50:20 +0100

24 lines

Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature

<>

Thu, 3 May 2001 11:07:30 -0400

49 lines

Re: Allocation for linked lists and skip lists

<>

Thu, 3 May 2001 14:36:57 MET_DST

60 lines

Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature

Ahmad Mr M

Thu, 3 May 2001 15:34:10 +0100

71 lines

Re: Allocation for linked lists and skip lists

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 3 May 2001 10:27:42 -0400

31 lines

Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature

<>

Thu, 3 May 2001 08:52:18 CDT

48 lines

Re: Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature

Jacques Duilio Brancher

Thu, 3 May 2001 10:25:18 -0300

34 lines

Routines or tables for Gauss-Turan-type quadrature

Ahmad Mr M

Thu, 3 May 2001 12:30:10 +0100

26 lines

Allocation for linked lists and skip lists

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 2 May 2001 22:57:53 -0400

49 lines

Re: Internal procedures as actuals

James Giles

Wed, 2 May 2001 10:35:43 -0600

29 lines

Re: Internal procedures as actuals

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 2 May 2001 17:35:20 +0100

55 lines

Re: Internal procedures as actuals

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 2 May 2001 10:53:21 -0400

46 lines

Re: For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals

<>

Wed, 2 May 2001 06:48:38 -0400

71 lines

Re: C & Fortran90

Clive Page

Wed, 2 May 2001 09:15:09 +0100

21 lines

Re: Recursive or not?

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 2 May 2001 08:23:21 +0100

32 lines

Re: For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals

James Giles

Wed, 2 May 2001 00:52:12 -0600

33 lines

Re: For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals

Phillip Helbig

Wed, 2 May 2001 06:53:40 +0100

24 lines

Recursive or not?

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 2 May 2001 00:05:45 -0400

27 lines

Re: For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 1 May 2001 23:55:56 -0400

38 lines

For the committee: Internal procedures as actuals

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 1 May 2001 22:37:11 -0400

31 lines

Assumed-size hack

Richard Maine

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:47:38 -0700

58 lines

Re: Assumed-size hack

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:52:17 -0400

52 lines

Assumed-size hack

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:52:41 -0400

79 lines

Re: Accessibility of type components

John Reid

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 18:22:21 +0100

32 lines

Accessibility of type components

Richard Maine

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:40:52 -0700

48 lines

Re: C & Fortran90

Malcolm Cohen

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:24:54 +0100

33 lines

Accessibility of type components

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:08:16 -0400

46 lines

C & Fortran90

Franck AUBINEAU

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:21:23 +0200

86 lines

A challenge for an ingenious interface

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 29 Apr 2001 11:31:42 -0400

102 lines

Re: Aliasing and optimization

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 29 Apr 2001 10:47:43 -0400

38 lines

Re: Help!

robin

Sat, 28 Apr 2001 10:59:00 -1000

34 lines

Re: Hints to the optimizer, Blocking and SFCs

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 28 Apr 2001 16:22:51 -0400

49 lines

Re: Assumed-size arrays WAS: Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 28 Apr 2001 14:51:17 -0400

42 lines

Re: Skip Lists in F95

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 28 Apr 2001 13:19:47 -0400

45 lines

Re: mixed output text/binary

Gary Scott

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 19:44:26 -0500

69 lines

CoArray Fortran progress?

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 13:57:40 -0400

34 lines

Re: mixed output text/binary

Richard Maine

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:30:04 -0700

45 lines

Re: mixed output text/binary

Alberto Fasso'

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:47:13 +0200

55 lines

Re: mixed output text/binary

Richard Maine

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 07:46:46 -0700

46 lines

Re: Pointers and structure

<>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:29:07 MET_DST

74 lines

Re: Help!

Ferhun C. Caner

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:44:49 +0300

56 lines

Help!

frank_ouyang

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 18:24:28 +0800

21 lines

Re: mixed output text/binary

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:09:02 +0100

47 lines

Re: mixed output text/binary

Alberto Fasso'

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:53:37 +0200

28 lines

Re: mixed output text/binary

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 04:33:17 -0400

18 lines

Re: mixed output text/binary

Alberto Fasso'

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:09:09 +0200

37 lines

Re: mixed output text/binary

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 03:46:04 -0400

19 lines

Re: mixed output text/binary

Alberto Fasso'

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:18:01 +0200

24 lines

Re: parsing input file (summary)

Van Snyder

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:07:23 -0700

73 lines

parsing input file (summary)

Pascal Richard

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:32:31 +0200

46 lines

mixed output text/binary

Richard Maine

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:25:34 -0700

77 lines

mixed output text/binary

José Luis Gómez Dans

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 21:00:57 +0100

29 lines

Re: Skip Lists in F95 --- wasted space revisited

Van Snyder

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:32:54 -0700

67 lines

Re: Skip Lists in F95 --- wasted space revisited

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:39:44 -0400

94 lines

Re: Skip Lists in F95 --- wasted space revisited

Loren P Meissner

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:14:00 -0700

1279 lines

Re: Skip Lists in F95 --- wasted space revisited

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:17:31 -0400

37 lines

Skip Lists in F95 --- wasted space revisited

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:24:06 -0400

67 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

James Giles

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:34:17 -0600

33 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

James Giles

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:15:22 -0600

22 lines

Re: parsing input file

Alan Aspuru-Guzik

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:07:32 -0700

42 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

Ted Stern

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:25:50 -0700

28 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:24:33 -0400

54 lines

Re: parsing input file

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:15:22 -0400

65 lines

parsing input file

Pascal Richard

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:28:15 +0200

32 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:00:53 +0100

63 lines

Re: Empty TYPEs

Malcolm Cohen

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:08:21 +0100

41 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

Malcolm Cohen

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:05:41 +0100

67 lines

Re: Empty TYPEs

Kurt W Hirchert

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:04:37 -0500

42 lines

Re: EXTENDS of and extended type

Kurt W Hirchert

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:55:01 -0500

19 lines

Re: EXTENDS of and extended type

Malcolm Cohen

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:50:36 +0100

33 lines

Re: ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:48:45 -0400

89 lines

Re: EXTENDS of and extended type

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:16:52 -0400

29 lines

Re: Empty TYPEs

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:12:41 -0400

32 lines

Re: Empty TYPEs

Alvaro Agustin Fernandez

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:52:03 -0500

41 lines

Pointers and structure

Franck AUBINEAU

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:17:59 +0200

47 lines

Empty TYPEs

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:26:55 -0400

38 lines

ALLOCATE and dynamic data-structures

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 21 Apr 2001 23:25:08 -0400

140 lines

EXTENDS of and extended type

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 21 Apr 2001 12:10:41 -0400

27 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE

varadharajan

Thu, 19 Apr 2001 01:32:53 +0530

39 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 07:57:53 -0400

27 lines

Re: size of data

Richard Maine

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:01:14 -0700

40 lines

Re: size of data

Franck AUBINEAU

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 19:24:09 +0200

76 lines

Software updated

Dan Nagle

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:12:57 -0400

44 lines

size of data

Richard Maine

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:01:34 -0700

55 lines

size of data

Franck AUBINEAU

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:30:07 +0200

112 lines

Memory profiling tool--mpatrol

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:03:20 -0400

765 lines

Re: ALLOCATED in F95

Alvaro Fernandez

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:52:14 -0500

51 lines

ALLOCATED in F95

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:22:13 -0400

34 lines

Re: Pointer program

<>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:16:41 +1000

110 lines

Re: Pointer program

Loren P Meissner

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 07:24:22 -0700

76 lines

Re: Pointer program

Jan van Oosterwijk

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:07:58 +0200

56 lines

Pointer program

Subscribe Comp-Fortran-90 Anonymous

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 05:57:57 +0100

55 lines

Re: Two states?

Avi Ring

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 22:10:37 +0200

174 lines

Two states?

Loren P Meissner

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 19:17:20 -0700

94 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE

Gary Scott

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 19:55:27 -0500

36 lines

Re: system call

Jacob =Jouk Jansen

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:42:39 +0200

39 lines

Re: system call

N. Shamsundar

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:35:38 -0500

29 lines

system call

Franck AUBINEAU

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:11:13 +0200

18 lines

Re: writing out signed integers in In.n format

James Giles

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 01:57:27 -0600

48 lines

Re: writing out signed integers in In.n format

Roland Schilling

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:34:30 +0200

37 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE

Len Makin

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:25:57 +1000

30 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE

Van Snyder

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 17:51:36 -0700

46 lines

Re: writing out signed integers in In.n format

<>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:44:04 +1000

95 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE

Len Makin

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:24:07 +1000

36 lines

writing out signed integers in In.n format

Catherine Moroney

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 16:32:41 -0700

53 lines

Re: Memory place of reals [selected_real_kind()]

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:36:15 -0500

21 lines

Re: BIT_SIZE (was: Memory place of reals)

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:26:18 -0400

34 lines

BIT_SIZE (was: Memory place of reals)

Kurt W Hirchert

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:09:36 -0500

37 lines

Re: uninitialized data in COPY-IN/COPY-OUT

Tom Clune

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:52:38 -0400

37 lines

Re: Memory place of reals

Dan Nagle

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:33:54 -0400

62 lines

Re: Memory place of reals [selected_real_kind()]

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:18:30 +0200

51 lines

Re: Memory place of reals

Dan Nagle

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 07:18:09 -0400

48 lines

Memory place of reals

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 04:28:05 -0500

25 lines

Re: Memory place of reals

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:44:22 +0200

39 lines

Re: Memory place of reals

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:04:47 +0200

44 lines

Memory place of reals

Franck AUBINEAU

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:36:54 +0200

92 lines

Re: uninitialized data in COPY-IN/COPY-OUT

Kurt W Hirchert

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:21:39 -0500

19 lines

uninitialized data in COPY-IN/COPY-OUT

Tom Clune

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:49:10 -0400

70 lines

Debugger for Linux Fortran 90

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:51:21 -0400

30 lines

Re: floating point comparison

<>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:18:53 MET_DST

65 lines

Re: IMPORT

Dan Nagle

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 07:17:38 -0400

47 lines

Re: floating point comparison

Carlie Coats

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 06:38:56 -0400

52 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 09:23:49 +0100

40 lines

Re: Error message: Derived-type initialization

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 09:21:05 +0100

46 lines

Puzzling performance with allocatable components

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:37:39 -0400

175 lines

Re: IMPORT

Van Snyder

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 17:25:49 -0700

78 lines

Re: IMPORT

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:19:25 -0400

27 lines

Re: IMPORT

Dan Nagle

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:16:16 -0400

75 lines

IMPORT

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 18:22:16 -0400

52 lines

Re: Automatic deallocation

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 17:25:12 -0400

69 lines

Error message: Derived-type initialization

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:27:43 -0400

41 lines

Automatic deallocation

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:02:56 -0400

36 lines

Re: New: Reverse-communication: Internal Procedures as Arguments

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:37:48 -0400

63 lines

Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments

Bill Long

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:34:04 -0500

60 lines

Re: New: A reverse-communication interface CG code in F2K

John Reid

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:44:07 +0100

165 lines

Allocatable components vendor implementations

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 03:51:22 -0500

26 lines

Learning parallel Pro

Nguyen Le Anh

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 12:34:59 +0700

92 lines

Re: Output on screen

<>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:51:01 +1000

91 lines

Re: Allocatable components vendor implementations

Bill Long

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 17:04:13 -0500

44 lines

Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments

robin

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:59:43 -1000

71 lines

New: A reverse-communication interface CG code in F2K

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:11:06 -0400

221 lines

Re: Interfacing--legal or not?

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:58:22 -0400

53 lines

Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments

Malcolm Cohen

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 18:43:15 +0100

32 lines

Re: Interfacing--legal or not?

Malcolm Cohen

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 18:40:53 +0100

119 lines

Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:20:35 -0400

96 lines

Re: Interfacing--legal or not?

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:47:59 -0400

147 lines

Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments

Kurt W Hirchert

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:28:20 -0500

99 lines

Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments

Lionel, Steven

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:46:59 -0400

49 lines

Re: Interfacing--legal or not?

Kurt W Hirchert

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:39:21 -0500

69 lines

Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:22:56 -0400

83 lines

Allocatable components vendor implementations

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:59:05 -0400

30 lines

Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments

Kurt W Hirchert

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:08:20 -0500

92 lines

Re: Avoiding aliasing with array pointers

Kurt W Hirchert

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:47:20 -0500

29 lines

Re: output on screen

Jan van Oosterwijk

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 14:56:05 +0200

59 lines

Re: Output on screen

Jan van Oosterwijk

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:13:06 +0200

52 lines

Re: Modules instead of COMMON

Mr. Raghu C.

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:56:44 +0530

37 lines

Output on screen

<>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:36:25 +1000

46 lines

Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments

Len Makin

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:42:12 +1000

45 lines

Re: Modules instead of COMMON

J. van Oosterwijk

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:06:39 +0200

30 lines

modules

Mr. Raghu C.

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 14:37:39 +0530

21 lines

Re: output on screen

robin

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:17:39 -1000

44 lines

Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments

Aleksandar Donev

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 12:17:10 -0500

81 lines

Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments

J. van Oosterwijk

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 18:31:04 +0200

64 lines

Re: output on screen

robin

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 20:58:12 -1000

66 lines

Re: Undefined intent(out) arguments

Jing Guo

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:32:50 -0500

74 lines

Undefined intent(out) arguments

Ron Sverdlove x2517

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:52:04 -0500

47 lines

Interfacing--legal or not?

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 13:07:32 -0500

57 lines

Re: output on screen

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:13:46 +0100

133 lines

Re: output on screen

Franck AUBINEAU

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:32:43 +0100

193 lines

Re: output on screen

Alois Steindl

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:16:25 +0200

48 lines

Re: output on screen

Roland Schilling

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:04:38 +0200

67 lines

Re: output on screen

Kipp Graham

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:07:30 +1000

113 lines

Re: Left aligning during a write

Mandeep Singh

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:58:24 -0600

54 lines

Re: Left aligning during a write

Brian Hanson

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:43:08 -0500

41 lines

Left aligning during a write

Mandeep Singh

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:31:04 -0600

29 lines

Corrected: Reverse communication in F2K--a detailed CG example

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:58:10 -0500

276 lines

Reverse communication in F2K--a detailed CG example

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:33:12 -0500

265 lines

Re: output on screen

Van Snyder

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:30:57 -0800

96 lines

OOP F2K--implementation (and exception handling)

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:19:08 -0500

54 lines

Re: output on screen

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:47:12 -0500

22 lines

Re: output on screen

Franck AUBINEAU

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:50:06 +0100

120 lines

Re: output on screen

Franck AUBINEAU

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:42:13 +0100

140 lines

Re: output on screen

Roland Schilling

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:29:58 +0200

42 lines

Re: output on screen

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:05:00 +0200

37 lines

Re: output on screen

Franck AUBINEAU

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:37:04 +0100

142 lines

Re: output on screen

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:30:26 +0200

48 lines

output on screen

Franck AUBINEAU

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:02:00 +0100

86 lines

Re: CPU_TIME for intrinsic functions

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:03:42 +0200

120 lines

Re: CPU_TIME for intrinsic functions

Tim Prince

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:03:28 -0800

119 lines

Re: Reverse Communication: WAS: Pointers: Is this safe and legal?

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:13:32 -0500

106 lines

CPU_TIME for intrinsic functions

Ahmad Mr M

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:03:52 +0100

98 lines

POSIX system calls

Pascal Richard

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:24:46 +0200

31 lines

Re: Pointers: Is this safe and legal?

David Vowles

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 18:13:16 +0930

251 lines

Thanks for the Tip

Dan Nagle

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:49:23 -0500

16 lines

Re: Avoiding aliasing with array pointers

Dick Hendrickson

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:43:05 -0600

34 lines

Re: Avoiding aliasing with array pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:59:29 -0500

34 lines

Re: Avoiding aliasing with array pointers

Kurt W Hirchert

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:03:20 -0600

56 lines

Avoiding aliasing with array pointers

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:16:29 -0500

53 lines

Re: Pointers: Is this safe and legal?

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:29:47 -0500

67 lines

Re: Pointers: Is this safe and legal?

Kurt W Hirchert

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:57:45 -0600

76 lines

Re: Pointers: Is this safe and legal?

Kurt W Hirchert

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:53:40 -0600

39 lines

Re: Pointers: Is this safe and legal?

John Reid

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:45:27 +0100

73 lines

Pointers: Is this safe and legal?

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 21:01:41 -0500

68 lines

A summary of "important" F2K changes

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 03:07:28 -0500

22 lines

Re: A summary of "important" F2K changes

James Giles

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:51:18 -0700

40 lines

A summary of "important" F2K changes

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 13:45:12 -0500

37 lines

Re: debugging / development tools for F90

robin

Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:46:53 -1000

28 lines

Re: debugging/development tools for F90

William V. Nicholson

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:11:29 -0800

222 lines

Re: debugging/development tools for F90

William F Mitchell

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:41:54 -0500

54 lines

Re: debugging/development tools for F90

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:15:14 -0500

48 lines

debugging/development tools for F90

Catherine Moroney

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:28:58 -0800

31 lines

Re: "Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:47:33 -0500

52 lines

EWOMP'2001 European Workshop on OpenMP

Matthijs van Waveren

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:34:46 +0000

112 lines

Re: "Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?

Feyzi Inanc

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:47:23 -0600

60 lines

Re: "Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?

Tim Prince

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:11:42 -0800

61 lines

"Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?

<>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:56:14 -0700

45 lines

"Good" compiler on Linux/Pentium?

Bertrand Meltz

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:09:14 +0100

32 lines

Re: ACM Fortran Forum (April)

Tim Prince

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 06:25:52 -0800

97 lines

Re: ACM Fortran Forum (April)

Giampaolo Bottoni

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:50:40 +0100

76 lines

ACM Fortran Forum (April)

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:53:32 -0500

87 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (March)

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:33:21 -0500

14 lines

Re: Fortran Resources (March)

Robert Cochran

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:24:35 -0800

46 lines

Fortran Resources (March)

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:38:04 -0500

941 lines

Re: image size in f90

Jacques Duilio Brancher

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:36:44 -0300

37 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

robin

Sat, 10 Mar 2001 09:09:07 -1000

40 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

robin

Fri, 9 Mar 2001 15:13:42 -1000

38 lines

Re: Puzzling profiling result

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 9 Mar 2001 13:30:05 -0500

39 lines

Re: Puzzling profiling result

William F Mitchell

Fri, 9 Mar 2001 13:04:59 -0500

68 lines

Puzzling profiling result

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 9 Mar 2001 12:16:24 -0500

45 lines

Re: wrapper routines and copy-in/copy-out

Lionel, Steven

Fri, 9 Mar 2001 09:32:23 -0500

19 lines

Re: wrapper routines and copy-in/copy-out

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:19:11 +0000

28 lines

wrapper routines and copy-in/copy-out

Pierre Hugonnet

Fri, 9 Mar 2001 13:29:07 +0100

74 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Orville E. Wheeler

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 16:18:44 -0600

75 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Kurt W Hirchert

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:56:34 -0600

62 lines

Re: Pointers

Kurt W Hirchert

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 10:57:17 -0600

39 lines

Re: Pointers

Richard Maine

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 07:48:40 -0800

41 lines

Re: Pointers

Franck AUBINEAU

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 09:09:55 +0100

60 lines

Re: Data acquisition from a port

Gary Scott

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 19:03:35 -0600

36 lines

Pointers

Richard Maine

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:39:31 -0800

43 lines

Data acquisition from a port

Everton Zanoelo

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:26:29 -0300

17 lines

Pointers

Franck AUBINEAU

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 18:50:36 +0100

104 lines

Re: A challenge for an ingenious interface

Richard Friedman (rchrd)

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 09:17:29 -0800

17 lines

Re: Allocatabla arrays or pointers

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:42:43 +0100

36 lines

Allocatabla arrays or pointers

Franck AUBINEAU

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:04:55 +0100

84 lines

Re: Pointers

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 16:03:38 +0100

53 lines

Re: Pointers

Franck AUBINEAU

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:45:08 +0100

101 lines

Re: Pointers

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:37:33 +0100

39 lines

Re: Pointers

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 14:27:00 +0000

49 lines

Pointers

Mandeep Singh

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:08:37 -0600

282 lines

Re: Pointers

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:04:59 +0100

68 lines

Pointers

Franck AUBINEAU

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 14:45:44 +0100

115 lines

Re: unsigned integers

robin

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 10:38:09 -1000

66 lines

Re: INTRINSIC statement question

John Venier

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 09:08:33 -0600

24 lines

Sharing arguments revisited--more library design issues

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 4 Mar 2001 22:53:33 -0500

94 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

<>

Sat, 3 Mar 2001 09:32:19 EST

32 lines

INTRINSIC statement question

Richard Maine

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:51:43 -0800

54 lines

Re: INTRINSIC statement question

Van Snyder

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:39:51 -0800

28 lines

INTRINSIC statement question

John Venier

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:33:48 -0600

46 lines

Re: [unsigned integers]

Shyan Lam

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:02:44 CST

58 lines

Re: Interface Fortran90 and C

Van Snyder

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 10:43:43 -0800

16 lines

unsigned integers

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:31:27 -0500

30 lines

Interface Fortran90 and C

Erich Kreiselmaier

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:32:40 +0100

21 lines

Re: Aliasing and optimization

Nils Smeds

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 22:40:42 GMT

43 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

robin

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:50:32 -1000

30 lines

Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:04:44 +0100

37 lines

Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 13:45:10 +0100

125 lines

Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:44:23 +0000

128 lines

Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:58:48 +0100

83 lines

Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 09:26:48 +0000

67 lines

Re: Aliasing and optimization

Nils Smeds

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 05:56:51 GMT

49 lines

Re: Hints to the optimizer, Blocking and SFCs

Dan Nagle

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 19:15:06 -0500

27 lines

Re: Hints to the optimizer (was Huge Arrays and Default INTEGERs)

Van Snyder

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:32:00 -0800

39 lines

Re: Hints to the optimizer (was Huge Arrays and Default INTEGERs)

William F Mitchell

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:17:09 -0500

35 lines

Hints to the optimizer (was Huge Arrays and Default INTEGERs)

Van Snyder

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:05:37 -0800

70 lines

Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a

Carlie Coats

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:30:48 -0500

172 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Richard Maine

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:19:48 -0800

59 lines

Re: Aliasing and optimization

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:59:21 -0500

46 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:52:53 -0500

57 lines

Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell

John Bray

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:38:55 +0000

28 lines

Re: illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:17:45 +0000

34 lines

illegal type overloading; was Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell

William F Mitchell

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:44:03 -0500

67 lines

Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell

Clive Page

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:59:59 +0000

38 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Ian Chivers

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:45:16 +0000

47 lines

Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:47:55 +0000

39 lines

Re: modules and interfaces in a nutshell

John Bray

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:11:51 +0000

37 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 03:26:28 -0500

21 lines

Re: Aliasing and optimization

Nils Smeds

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 04:01:11 +0000

94 lines

Aliasing and optimization

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:02:49 -0500

47 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Warner Bruns

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:35:35 +0100

11 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: module and interface

Ravi C. Venkatesan

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:14:13 +0530

80 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Carlie Coats

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:14:18 -0500

81 lines

Fwd: Re: module and interface

Ravi C. Venkatesan

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:28:24 +0530

36 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Richard Maine

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:38:53 -0800

40 lines

Re: module and interface

Van Snyder

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:38:44 -0800

38 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:34:25 -0500

35 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

James Giles

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:33:01 -0700

37 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

varadharajan

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:55:41 +0530

71 lines

modules and interfaces in a nutshell

Ravi C. Venkatesan

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:51:51 +0530

88 lines

Re: module and interface

Van Snyder

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:20:34 -0800

46 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:06:48 -0500

55 lines

Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Richard Maine

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:03:40 -0800

51 lines

Re: Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Lionel, Steven

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:50:14 -0500

50 lines

Fwd: Re: module and interface

Richard Maine

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:49:53 -0800

73 lines

Re: module and interface

Panagiotis Vossos

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:41:41 +0200

28 lines

Re: modules and interfaces

Ravi C. Venkatesan

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:02:43 +0530

57 lines

Huge arrays and default INTEGERs

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:31:16 -0500

33 lines

Re: module and interface

<>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:28:07 MET

61 lines

Fwd: Re: module and interface

Ravi C. Venkatesan

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:45:50 +0530

56 lines

Re: module and interface

Richard Maine

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:03:43 -0800

23 lines

Re: module and interface

James Giles

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:55:28 -0700

27 lines

Re: module and interface

Richard Maine

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:25:28 -0800

44 lines

Re: module and interface

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:21:19 +0100

64 lines

Re: module and interface

Ravi C. Venkatesan

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:36:04 +0530

56 lines

module and interface

AUBINEAU Franck

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:11:48 +0000

21 lines

Re: PRESENT propagation

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:25:46 -0500

41 lines

Re: PRESENT propagation

Richard Maine

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:00:44 -0800

30 lines

Re: PRESENT propagation

Van Snyder

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:51:01 -0800

89 lines

Re: PRESENT propagation

Richard Maine

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:46:07 -0800

72 lines

Re: PRESENT propagation

Ted Stern

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:35:04 -0800

38 lines

Re: PRESENT propagation

Ted Stern

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:33:33 -0800

28 lines

PRESENT propagation

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:37:11 -0500

39 lines

Re: floating point comparison

James Giles

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:08:17 -0700

43 lines

Re: Rotating indices of an array

Dick Hendrickson

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:55:57 -0600

47 lines

Re: floating point comparison

Pierre Hugonnet

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:11:46 +0100

47 lines

Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 03:47:27 -0500

19 lines

Shared arguments between procedures?

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 25 Feb 2001 22:21:11 -0500

100 lines

Rotating indices of an array

Ketan V. Kotecha (99423802)

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 08:04:59 +0530

22 lines

Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE

robin

Sun, 25 Feb 2001 12:12:10 -1000

49 lines

Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:37:03 -0500

35 lines

Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77

Kurt W Hirchert

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:22:04 -0600

20 lines

Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Van Snyder

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:15:57 -0800

22 lines

Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:05:24 -0500

41 lines

Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77

Ian Hounam

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:42:10 +0000

41 lines

Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77

<>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:25:30 +0010

66 lines

Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 05:29:34 -0500

21 lines

Re: Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

John Reid

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:32:10 GMT

13 lines

Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 03:37:18 -0500

17 lines

Re: floating point comparison

James Giles

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:09:27 -0700

41 lines

Re: floating point comparison

Kurt W Hirchert

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:56:51 -0600

34 lines

Re: floating point comparison

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:29:05 +0100

44 lines

Re: floating point comparison

Kurt W Hirchert

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:02:49 -0600

43 lines

Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77

Jing Guo

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:43:14 -0500

80 lines

Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77

Van Snyder

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:29:11 -0800

31 lines

floating point comparison

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:09:04 +0100

42 lines

Re: Reverse-communication interfaces in F77

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:59:48 +0000

44 lines

Reverse-communication interfaces in F77

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:11:19 -0500

41 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:01:25 -0500

44 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

John Bray

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:34:42 +0000

21 lines

Re: REALLOCATE and pointer aliasing

Peter Shenkin

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 01:49:59 -0500

92 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

James Giles

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:15:53 -0700

71 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:46:54 -0500

56 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

James Giles

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:58:04 -0700

70 lines

Re: REALLOCATE and pointer aliasing

Richard Maine

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:56:31 -0800

50 lines

Re: REALLOCATE and pointer aliasing

Van Snyder

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:33:07 -0800

37 lines

Re: REALLOCATE and pointer aliasing

Richard Maine

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:27:54 -0800

26 lines

Re: REALLOCATE and pointer aliasing

Van Snyder

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:21:00 -0800

68 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:37:44 -0500

43 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

James Giles

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:48:26 -0700

31 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

Kurt W Hirchert

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:04:41 -0600

49 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:03:48 -0500

19 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

James Giles

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:58:13 -0700

67 lines

Re: PACK with DIM

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:55:20 -0500

75 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:39:47 -0500

52 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

James Giles

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:39:00 -0700

29 lines

Constructive use for INCLUDE (was "How to compile with MODULE")

Van Snyder

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:20:45 -0800

126 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

Kurt W Hirchert

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:36:54 -0600

78 lines

Re: PACK with DIM

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:15:23 +0100

36 lines

Re: PACK with DIM

Kurt W Hirchert

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:09:53 -0600

41 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:04:30 +0100

48 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

Richard Maine

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:51:40 -0800

29 lines

Re: PACK with DIM

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:49:10 +0100

51 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

James Giles

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:38:25 -0700

36 lines

Re: PACK with DIM

Kurt W Hirchert

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:35:35 -0600

57 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

varadharajan

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:26:04 +0530

88 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:51:12 +0100

39 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE - THANKS

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:38:34 -0300

10 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

Jan van Oosterwijk

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:20:41 +0100

78 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

Jan van Oosterwijk

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:15:17 +0100

78 lines

Re: How to compile with MODULE

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:14:53 +0100

79 lines

How to compile with MODULE

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:55:33 -0300

52 lines

Re: How to compile .MOD

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:58:47 +0100

51 lines

Re: How to compile .MOD

Alois Steindl

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:55:49 +0100

35 lines

Re: How to compile .MOD

Herbert Fruchtl

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:54:53 +0000

18 lines

Proposed announcement to comp-fortran-90

Ian Chivers

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:46:54 +0000

87 lines

How to compile .MOD

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:44:39 -0300

24 lines

Re: PACK with DIM

Jing Guo

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:44:57 -0500

33 lines

Re: PACK with DIM

Jing Guo

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:48:02 -0500

37 lines

Re: BVP solver

Van Snyder

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:03:06 -0800

24 lines

Re: PACK with DIM

Richard Maine

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:54:18 -0800

51 lines

Re: BVP solver

Alois Steindl

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:16:41 +0100

36 lines

BVP solver

Ravi C. Venkatesan

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 03:06:33 +0530

15 lines

Re: PACK with DIM

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:56:24 -0500

39 lines

Re: PACK with DIM

John Venier

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:02:17 -0600

27 lines

Re: PACK with DIM

John Venier

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:50:46 -0600

41 lines

Re: PACK with DIM

Aleksandar Donev

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:55:48 -0500

91 lines

Re: cpu time

Tim Prince

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:32:06 -0800

32 lines

Re: cpu time

Van Snyder

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:35:28 -0800

29 lines

cpu time

gunaratnam gnanaranjan

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:10:27 -0800

21 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

Richard Maine

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:29:20 -0800

46 lines

PACK with DIM

Richard Maine

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:54:00 -0800

55 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

James Giles

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:51:01 -0700

40 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

Van Snyder

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:42:40 -0800

44 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

James Giles

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:07:10 -0700

26 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

Roland Schilling

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:16:19 +0100

36 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

Matthijs van Waveren

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:04:31 +0000

15 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

William F Mitchell

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:12:08 -0500

52 lines

Re: hpff: Commercial: Fortran95 for $45

Erik Schnetter

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:15:50 +0100

59 lines

Re: Does your compiler accept this?

James Giles

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:44:00 -0700

72 lines

Does your compiler accept this?

Van Snyder

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:03:47 -0800

56 lines

PACK with DIM

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:07:36 -0500

20 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

James Giles

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:48:57 -0700

39 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

William F Mitchell

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:25:43 -0500

37 lines

Re: REALLOCATE

varadharajan

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:44:24 +0530

45 lines

Re: Direct Unformatted

Robert Hill

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:13:20 GMT

40 lines

Re: hpff: Commercial: Fortran95 for $45

Erik Schnetter

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:38:41 +0100

52 lines

Re: hpff: Commercial: Fortran95 for $45

Erik Schnetter

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:38:41 +0100

41 lines

REALLOCATE

Richard Maine

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 07:33:52 -0800

37 lines

REALLOCATE

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:17:42 -0500

34 lines

Re: Mathematical functions for REAL*16 Fortran types and long double C types ?

Erik Schnetter

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:22:38 +0100

63 lines

Mathematical functions for REAL*16 Fortran types and long double C types ?

Jean Claude Berges

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:40:50 +0100

38 lines

JNI for fortran/java ?

Ian Chivers

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:01:11 +0000

47 lines

Re: More on unformatted data interchange

Giampaolo Bottoni

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:32:04 +0100

34 lines

Re: flushing a buffer

Rob Flammang

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 19:35:49 -0500

23 lines

More on unformatted data interchange

Van Snyder

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:51:08 -0800

39 lines

Unformatted data interchange

Van Snyder

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:39:24 -0800

29 lines

Re: Unformatted data interchange

James Giles

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:21:08 -0700

38 lines

Unformatted data interchange

Van Snyder

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:57:59 -0800

44 lines

Re: Direct Unformatted

Richard Maine

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:16:18 -0800

93 lines

Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Jan van Oosterwijk

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:44:24 +0100

100 lines

Re: flushing a buffer

Herbert Fruchtl

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:26:21 +0000

35 lines

flushing a buffer

Rob Flammang

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:28:56 -0500

26 lines

Re: Writing to two units simultaneously

Robert Hill

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:53:44 GMT

29 lines

Re: REMOVE ME FROM THE LIST PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:59:29 +0100

18 lines

Re: Direct Unformatted

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:58:22 +0100

63 lines

REMOVE ME FROM THE LIST PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Ercan Sozen

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:26:08 -0800

13 lines

Re: [LF] Direct Unformatted

Carlie Coats

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:36:00 -0500

63 lines

Re: [LF] Direct Unformatted

Jan van Oosterwijk

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:21:52 +0100

103 lines

Re: passing a function to a subroutine

robin

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:01:21 -1000

54 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

robin

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:51:40 -1000

24 lines

Re: passing a function to a subroutine

J. van Oosterwijk

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:20:59 +0100

68 lines

Re: is empty continuation line ok?

James Giles

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:03:32 -0700

27 lines

is empty continuation line ok?

Alexei Matveev

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 14:32:41 +0100

40 lines

passing a function to a subroutine

Jaehoon

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:02:39 -0600

37 lines

Re: Writing to two units simultaneously

William F Mitchell

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:15:48 -0500

30 lines

Writing to two units simultaneously

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 15:18:01 -0500

17 lines

Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Roland Schilling

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 18:42:50 +0100

53 lines

Announcement: Release 4.1 of the NAGWare f95 Compiler

Ian Hounam

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:57:15 +0000

83 lines

Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:09:55 -0500

30 lines

Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

David Singleton

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 22:55:25 +1100

16 lines

Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Roland Schilling

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:33:21 +0100

135 lines

Re: Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Pascal Richard

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:57:52 +0100

99 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

robin

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:18:04 -1000

31 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

robin

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:18:03 -1000

46 lines

New F90 Sorting Library

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:50:06 -0500

1395 lines

Hands on test--TRANSFER timing code

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:34:40 -0500

162 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Kurt W Hirchert

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:08:52 -0600

94 lines

Twiddle bit jay and Twiddle bit nay...

Avi Ring

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:17:17 +0100

193 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:57:59 -0500

60 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Van Snyder

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:22:47 -0800

39 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Richard Maine

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:54:35 -0800

88 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:15:14 -0500

19 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Richard Maine

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:08:06 -0800

56 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:34:00 -0500

39 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Van Snyder

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:45:27 -0800

30 lines

Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Richard Maine

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:56:36 -0800

51 lines

Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Neil Carlson

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:31:07 -0700

36 lines

Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Richard Maine

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:01:05 -0800

31 lines

Re: Draft Standard 2002

Richard Maine

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:55:18 -0800

37 lines

Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Richard Maine

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:46:03 -0800

81 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:32:54 -0500

45 lines

Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Alvaro Agustin Fernandez

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:08:48 -0600

24 lines

Draft Fortran 200?

Jan van Oosterwijk

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:06:59 +0100

31 lines

Re: Draft Standard 2002

Herbert Fruchtl

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:04:28 +0000

27 lines

Draft Standard 2002

Jan van Oosterwijk

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:56:32 +0100

43 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Kurt W Hirchert

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:44:48 -0600

41 lines

Re: Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:05:04 +0000

74 lines

Re: Premature Optimisation (sic)

Robert Hill

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:55:33 GMT

24 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:51:43 +0100

38 lines

Coding technique for truly generic procedures?

Neil Carlson

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 00:36:57 -0700

155 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 02:21:51 -0500

28 lines

Premature Optimisation (sic)

<>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:28:00 +1000

37 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

William F Mitchell

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:16:47 -0500

20 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:15:20 -0500

81 lines

Re: Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:29:50 +0000

78 lines

Bit manipulations in F90--efficiency

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:50:33 -0500

49 lines

Re: MODULE Generic_List

Michael Metcalf

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 04:13:05 -0500

13 lines

Re: MODULE Generic_List

Ian Chivers

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:25:15 -0800

45 lines

MODULE Generic_List

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 08:16:40 -0500

16 lines

Lahey into MSDev

Nederson da S. Koehler

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:02:36 -0200

24 lines

Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x - woke up!

Orville E. Wheeler

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:57:04 -0600

67 lines

Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x

Orville E. Wheeler

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:54:47 -0600

66 lines

Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:32:46 +0100

66 lines

Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x

Tim Prince

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 06:02:32 -0800

43 lines

Re: "Averaging" an array in F9x

Jan van Oosterwijk

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:02:23 +0100

60 lines

"Averaging" an array in F9x

Jos Luis Gmez Dans

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:17:32 +0000

41 lines

Random numbers

Van Snyder

Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:58:38 -0800

26 lines

Re: one biginner's question about array shape!

Erik Schnetter

Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:39:04 +0100

34 lines

one biginner's question about array shape!

Michael Metcalf

Sat, 27 Jan 2001 04:56:42 -0500

32 lines

one biginner's question about array shape!

Rick Zhang

Sat, 27 Jan 2001 07:18:13 +0000

25 lines

Ambit of modules

Michael Metcalf

Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:49:13 -0500

40 lines

Ambit of modules

Richard Maine

Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:43:56 -0800

44 lines

Re: Ambit of modules

Van Snyder

Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:38:12 -0800

40 lines

Ambit of modules

Goeran Klose

Fri, 26 Jan 2001 18:26:41 +0100

21 lines

Re: SAVE in modules

Richard Maine

Fri, 26 Jan 2001 07:36:02 -0800

35 lines

Re: SAVE in modules

Herbert Fruchtl

Fri, 26 Jan 2001 12:10:18 +0000

43 lines

Re: SAVE in modules

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 26 Jan 2001 11:58:03 +0000

50 lines

SAVE in modules

Herbert Fruchtl

Fri, 26 Jan 2001 11:39:30 +0000

47 lines

GOTO into a DO loop is ILlegal, same for IF block

Jan van Oosterwijk

Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:16:48 +0100

71 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine

Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:42:17 -0800

49 lines

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited

John Bray

Thu, 25 Jan 2001 11:56:37 +0000

73 lines

Attachment: Makefiles for f90 projects

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:26:30 -0500

94 lines

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:19:40 -0500

48 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

<>

Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:08:56 +1000

63 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Alberto Fasso'

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:04:10 -0800

90 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

John Venier

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:27:39 -0600

39 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:06:44 -0800

66 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:46:13 -0800

49 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Lionel, Steven

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:36:28 -0500

20 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Lionel, Steven

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:02:34 -0500

34 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:59:13 -0500

463 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Catherine Moroney

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:41:10 -0800

40 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

William F Mitchell

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:41:01 -0500

39 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:40:50 -0800

36 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Lionel, Steven

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:40:22 -0500

73 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:35:44 -0800

22 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:32:52 -0800

35 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:32:49 -0500

26 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

W. J. Metzger

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 19:25:18 +0100

28 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:22:45 -0500

443 lines

Re: GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Lionel, Steven

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:21:59 -0500

15 lines

GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Richard Maine

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:53:48 -0800

74 lines

GOTO into a DO loop--legal or not

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:31:57 -0500

47 lines

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited--a possible solution?

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:08:13 -0500

72 lines

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited

Karsten Chmielewski

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:24:38 +0100

82 lines

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited

Anthony Stone

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:03:13 +0000

31 lines

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited

Anthony Stone

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:35:20 +0000

41 lines

Re: Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited

Ian Chivers

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:16:17 +0000

49 lines

Makefiles and cascade recompilation revisited

Aleksandar Donev

Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:26:02 -0500

23 lines

Re: New coco

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 22 Jan 2001 01:00:23 -0500

28 lines

(Yet Another) New coco

Dan Nagle

Sun, 21 Jan 2001 19:20:27 -0500

107 lines

Re: Explicit-shape arrays

robin

Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:51:22 -1000

33 lines

Re: DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification

robin

Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:51:22 -1000

34 lines

Re: PRIVATE modules and Explicit-shape arrays

Richard Maine

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:07:38 -0800

48 lines

Re: PRIVATE modules and Explicit-shape arrays

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 18:50:13 -0500

51 lines

Re: DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification

Neil Carlson

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:21:03 -0700

42 lines

DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification

Richard Maine

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:05:13 -0800

53 lines

DIMENSION(SIZE(dummy)) specification

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:50:00 -0500

25 lines

PRIVATE modules

Richard Maine

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:49:24 -0800

52 lines

PRIVATE modules

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:29:22 -0500

18 lines

Two annoyances in F95

Richard Maine

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:47:48 -0800

77 lines

Re: image size in f90

Lionel, Steven

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:06:30 -0500

26 lines

image size in f90

Ketan V. Kotecha (99423802)

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:48:06 +0530

25 lines

Re: Clarification of generic interfaces

Malcolm Cohen

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:50:15 +0000

50 lines

Re: Two annoyances in F95

Tim Prince

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:55:24 -0800

37 lines

please forward this to the list

Ian Chivers

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:17:54 -0800

86 lines

Clarification of generic interfaces

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:13:28 -0500

18 lines

Re: Two annoyances in F95

James Giles

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:52:07 -0700

29 lines

Re: Two annoyances in F95

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:45:36 -0500

45 lines

Re: Two annoyances in F95

Van Snyder

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:41:45 -0800

41 lines

Two annoyances in F95

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:01:54 -0500

35 lines

Re: Two annoyances in F95

Robert Ferencz

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:26:00 -0700

28 lines

Re: no extended precision in pgf90 ?

<>

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:15:14 -0500

52 lines

Re: Link Error

robin

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:11:40 -1000

33 lines

Re: no extended precision in pgf90 ?

Alan Miller

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:30:10 +1100

49 lines

bug reports etc (forwarded for Phillip)

Richard Maine

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:47:36 -0800

70 lines

please forward this to the list

Richard Maine

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:34:40 -0800

42 lines

Re: no extended precision in pgf90 ?

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:53:49 +0100

37 lines

Re: no extended precision in pgf90 ?

Alberto Fasso'

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:45:35 -0800

52 lines

Re: no extended precision in pgf90 ?

Al Greynolds

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:21:52 -0700

51 lines

no extended precision in pgf90 ?

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:33:05 +0100

37 lines

Re: Array rank in fortran

Richard Maine

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 07:38:49 -0800

56 lines

Re: Array rank in fortran

Kurt W Hirchert

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:13:54 -0600

28 lines

Re: Passing arrays efficiently between module procedures

Dan Nagle

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:36:23 -0500

53 lines

Re: Pointer deallocation status differences, f90 and f95

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:31:51 +0000

34 lines

Re: Pointer deallocation status differences, f90 and f95

John Bray

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:00:18 +0000

35 lines

Passing arrays efficiently between module procedures

Goeran Klose

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:34:37 +0100

24 lines

Re: Pointer deallocation status differences, f90 and f95

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:18:05 +0000

72 lines

Pointer deallocation status differences, f90 and f95

Michael Metcalf

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 04:39:21 -0500

22 lines

Pointer deallocation status differences, f90 and f95

John Bray

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:53:17 +0000

57 lines

Re: Array rank in fortran

John Bray

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:44:18 +0000

56 lines

Re: Array rank in fortran

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:34:57 +0100

40 lines

Array rank in fortran

Ketan V. Kotecha (99423802)

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:25:19 +0530

22 lines

Ketan V. Kotecha (99423802)

Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:24:15 +0530

14 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

John Venier

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:16:24 -0600

34 lines

Re: Interpretation of DATE_AND_TIME(ZONE=)

Walt Brainerd

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 08:55:39 -0700

23 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

Walt Brainerd

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 08:44:41 -0700

66 lines

Re: Interpretation of DATE_AND_TIME(ZONE=)

Tim Prince

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 06:05:23 -0800

83 lines

Re: Need a little help here guys....

Ian Chivers

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:50:15 +0000

46 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

Ian Chivers

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:24:00 +0000

58 lines

New preconvert, restore

Dan Nagle

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 05:46:54 -0500

45 lines

Interpretation of DATE_AND_TIME(ZONE=)

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 05:38:10 -0500

22 lines

Interpretation of DATE_AND_TIME(ZONE=)

Jan van Oosterwijk

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:23:27 +0100

62 lines

Fortran Information File (Jan)

Michael Metcalf

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 05:21:21 -0500

939 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

Charles Crawford

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:30:29 -0500

13 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

Loren P Meissner

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:11:25 -0800

51 lines

Re: Random-number generation--an F90 mini library

Van Snyder

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:52:17 -0800

19 lines

Random-number generation--an F90 mini library

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:31:38 -0500

44 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

Jacques Duílio Brancher

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:32:56 -0200

30 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

Juan Casero

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:21:41 -0500

154 lines

Re: Ask for a Book

John Venier

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:13:13 -0600

54 lines

Compaq Fortran for Linux Alpha - Beta test 1.1 and 1.0-2 update

Lionel, Steven

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:57:10 -0500

62 lines

Ask for a Book

Alexandre Suman de Araujo

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:29:43 -0200

98 lines

Re: image size in f90

Venkat V S S Sastry

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:24:03 +0000

36 lines

Need a little help here guys....

Juan Casero

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:09:47 -0500

27 lines

Re: image size in f90

Richard Maine

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:03:58 -0800

27 lines

Re: image size in f90

Kurt W Hirchert

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:51:12 -0600

36 lines

command line arguments in Fortran

Richard Maine

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:41:51 -0800

40 lines

Re: image size in f90

Don Woods

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:40:46 -0800

34 lines

image size in f90

Richard Maine

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:35:10 -0800

32 lines

Re: image size in f90

Lionel, Steven

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:35:02 -0500

41 lines

command line arguments in Fortran

Catherine Moroney

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:26:57 -0800

15 lines

image size in f90

Ketan V. Kotecha (99423802)

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:42:47 +0530

23 lines

Van Snyder

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:44:37 -0800

670 lines

Re: align

Dan Nagle

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 07:16:37 -0500

52 lines

Re: C99 floats

Pierre Hugonnet

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:11:03 +0100

63 lines

Re: align

Michael Metcalf

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 03:09:42 -0500

28 lines

Re: align

W. J. Metzger

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:08:43 +0100

101 lines

Re: align

robin

Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:03:10 -1000

98 lines

Re: align

Kipp Graham

Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:22:40 +1100

84 lines

Re: align

John Venier

Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:37:20 -0600

32 lines

Re: align

W. J. Metzger

Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:29:31 +0100

104 lines

Re: To paraphrase Richard Maine...

<>

Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:06:43 +1000

61 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

robin

Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:53:04 -1000

50 lines

Re: Image-formats

Jacob =Jouk Jansen

Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:10:00 +0100

44 lines

Re: precision in scattering benchmark example program

Tim Prince

Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:03:04 -0800

106 lines

Re: precision in scattering benchmark example program

Michael Milgram

Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:04:29 -0500

67 lines

Re: align

Ralph Carmichael

Sun, 14 Jan 2001 07:54:58 -0800

51 lines

Fw: scatteri benchmark from polyhedron site

Tim Prince

Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:14:07 -0800

3576 lines

scatteri benchmark from polyhedron site

Tim Prince

Sat, 13 Jan 2001 22:28:28 -0800

3615 lines

align

mbai

Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:52:01 -0500

88 lines

New coco

Dan Nagle

Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:06:21 -0500

74 lines

Re: Image-formats

GianLuigi Piacentini

Sat, 13 Jan 2001 21:38:42 +0100

18 lines

Re: Image-formats

Gary Scott

Sat, 13 Jan 2001 10:55:02 -0600

43 lines

Re: Image-formats

STOCLET Patrick

Sat, 13 Jan 2001 14:09:25 +0100

27 lines

Re: Image-formats

Jan van Oosterwijk

Sat, 13 Jan 2001 13:29:47 +0200

47 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:30:33 -0500

36 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:24:53 -0500

44 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Kurt W Hirchert

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:18:49 -0600

89 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Dick Hendrickson

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:40:16 -0600

82 lines

Re: C99 floats

robin

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:32:22 -1000

32 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

William F Mitchell

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:03:08 -0500

50 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:45:50 -0500

46 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

William F Mitchell

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:11:51 -0500

84 lines

Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Richard Maine

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:10:29 -0800

26 lines

Re: Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Walt Brainerd

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:31:30 -0700

64 lines

Re: 1977 (was C99 floats)

J. van Oosterwijk

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 19:03:00 +0100

58 lines

Generic interface with assumed-size arguments

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 12:58:49 -0500

53 lines

Re: C99 floats

Walt Brainerd

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:33:49 -0700

77 lines

Re: C99 floats

Richard Maine

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 07:37:23 -0800

25 lines

Re: 1977 (was C99 floats)

Phillip Helbig

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:19:53 +0100

18 lines

Re: 1977 (was C99 floats)

Clive Page

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:08:56 +0000

51 lines

Re: C99 floats

Ian Chivers

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:46:15 +0000

60 lines

Re: C99 floats

William F Mitchell

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 08:40:54 -0500

49 lines

Re: Bit shifting in Fortran and C--is it the same?

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 18:11:27 +0000

30 lines

Bit shifting in Fortran and C--is it the same?

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:56:02 -0500

40 lines

Re: C99 floats

Walt Brainerd

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:39:06 -0700

47 lines

Re: C99 floats

Dan Nagle

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:15:41 -0500

43 lines

Re: C99 floats

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 14:08:22 +0100

55 lines

Re: C99 floats

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:44:37 +0000

51 lines

Re: C99 floats

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:16:39 +0100

39 lines

Re: C99 floats

Popa, Frank D.

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:07:48 -0500

69 lines

Re: C99 floats

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:19:23 +0100

47 lines

Re: C99 floats

Malcolm Cohen

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:09:14 +0000

40 lines

Re: C99 floats

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:33:51 +0100

63 lines

Re: To paraphrase Richard Maine...

Peter Shenkin

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:24:06 -0500

20 lines

To paraphrase Richard Maine...

Van Snyder

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:56:38 -0800

17 lines

Re: C99 floats

Richard Maine

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:55:43 -0800

61 lines

Re: C99 floats

John Venier

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:10:58 -0600

78 lines

Re: C99 floats

Dan Nagle

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 13:03:03 -0500

42 lines

Re: C99 floats

Walt Brainerd

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:49:39 -0700

30 lines

Re: C99 floats

Malcolm Cohen

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:29:47 +0000

71 lines

Re: C99 floats

John Venier

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:47:06 -0600

59 lines

C99 floats

Pierre Hugonnet

Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:16:24 +0100

31 lines

Re: How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:09:31 -0500

29 lines

Re: How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?

Aleksandar Donev

Tue, 9 Jan 2001 11:29:33 -0500

56 lines

Re: How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 9 Jan 2001 14:42:58 +0000

85 lines

Re: It would help if I would finish the message before sending it...

Malcolm Cohen

Tue, 9 Jan 2001 14:32:52 +0000

40 lines

Re: Vertical format control

Len Makin

Tue, 9 Jan 2001 09:26:05 +1100

37 lines

How to replace RANDOM_NUMBER with my own library?

Aleksandar Donev

Mon, 8 Jan 2001 17:06:56 -0500

137 lines

It would help if I would finish the message before sending it...

Van Snyder

Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:58:46 -0800

137 lines

Vertical format control

Van Snyder

Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:56:16 -0800

55 lines

Re: new page

Van Snyder

Mon, 8 Jan 2001 12:40:39 -0800

38 lines

Re: Finite element multigrid

Robert Ferrell

Mon, 8 Jan 2001 11:25:34 -0700

33 lines

Re: new page

Tim Prince

Mon, 8 Jan 2001 07:04:31 -0800

40 lines

Re: new page

simon harding (IACR-RES)

Mon, 8 Jan 2001 12:08:56 -0000

14 lines

Re: new page

Dan Nagle

Mon, 8 Jan 2001 06:53:37 -0500

54 lines

new page

Moshe Vaxman

Mon, 8 Jan 2001 11:33:30 +0200

27 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

Len Makin

Mon, 8 Jan 2001 09:28:45 +1100

58 lines

Re: free compiler

robin

Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:27:31 -1000

24 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

robin

Sat, 6 Jan 2001 13:13:35 -1000

46 lines

Re: CPU time.

J. van Oosterwijk

Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:07:18 +0100

39 lines

CPU time.

Zhou Yong Cheng

Sat, 6 Jan 2001 16:59:57 +0800

23 lines

My NAMELIST blue (Re: Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon )

Jing Guo

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 20:09:32 -0500

80 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

Van Snyder

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 11:15:12 -0800

1993 lines

NAMELIST

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 14:12:52 -0500

26 lines

Re: Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon

Van Snyder

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:47:05 -0800

26 lines

Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon

Ian Chivers

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:41:35 -0800

140 lines

Re: Preprocessing of parameter files

Bob Wells Tel: +44/0 1865 272915

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 17:13:16 GMT

9 lines

Re: Preprocessing of parameter files

Anthony Stone

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 17:09:42 +0000

88 lines

Re: Preprocessing of parameter files

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 11:34:06 -0500

50 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

Aleksandar Donev

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 11:24:05 -0500

71 lines

Re: XML for preprocessing

<>

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:17:06 CST

134 lines

Re: array variant

Joerg Strutwolf

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:15:23 +0000

37 lines

Re: array variant

Dick Hendrickson

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:14:03 -0600

39 lines

Re: array variant

Herbert Fruchtl

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:12:56 +0000

36 lines

Re: free compiler

Dick Hendrickson

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:07:06 -0600

39 lines

Re: Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon

Tim Prince

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 06:51:38 -0800

24 lines

Re: XML for preprocessing

Anthony Stone

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 14:46:40 +0000

115 lines

array variant

Mingwu Bai

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 23:39:38 +0900

19 lines

Re: Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon

<>

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 08:28:08 CST

156 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

Kurt W Hirchert

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 08:25:42 -0600

49 lines

free compiler

Eduardo Melione Abreu

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:04:14 -0200

18 lines

Re: Request Permission to Invite Members to XML DevCon

Craig McNeile

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 13:40:51 +0000

115 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

Popa, Frank D.

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 07:21:49 -0500

23 lines

Re: Calling C from Fortran90

Clive Page

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:51:06 +0000

27 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

Alan Miller

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:17:45 +1100

60 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

Dan Nagle

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 20:05:39 -0500

55 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

Van Snyder

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 15:46:51 -0800

23 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

Alan Miller

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:36:54 +1100

57 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

Van Snyder

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 15:23:35 -0800

54 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

Stu Anderson 425-865-3595

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 14:20:51 -0800

36 lines

Re: Random number seed generation

Lionel, Steven

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 17:01:09 -0500

28 lines

Random number seed generation

Aleksandar Donev

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 16:53:01 -0500

36 lines

Re: Calling C from Fortran90

Tim Prince

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 06:21:07 -0800

45 lines

Re: Finite element multigrid

Alan Miller

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 23:59:20 +1100

26 lines

Re: Finite element multigrid

William F Mitchell

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 07:57:57 -0500

34 lines

Finite element multigrid

Paul Bolton

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:04:15 -0000

22 lines

Re: Calling C from Fortran90

Pascal Richard

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:32:46 +0100

90 lines

Re: Calling C from Fortran90

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:24:30 +0100

45 lines

Re: Calling C from Fortran90

Pierre Hugonnet

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:12:03 +0100

34 lines

Calling C from Fortran90

Franck AUBINEAU

Thu, 4 Jan 2001 09:51:34 +0100

76 lines

Spotting CALLed routines that aren't external

John Bray

Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:44:25 +0000

42 lines

Re: Sparse matrices!

William F Mitchell

Tue, 2 Jan 2001 11:20:58 -0500

78 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2023
February 2023
November 2022
September 2022
February 2022
January 2022
June 2021
November 2020
September 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
December 2019
October 2019
September 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
April 2015
March 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager