JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DRS Archives


DRS Archives

DRS Archives


May 2000


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

(pas d'objet) (1 message)
3 small points amounting to a plea (1 message)
<No subject> (1 message)
A clarification on my response to John Wood. (1 message)
A fish tale (2 messages)
a more ambitious justification of design? (13 messages)
A short response to John Wood's latest note ... (1 message)
Acrobat pdf for research documents (1 message)
Against Rigour (1 message)
Anthropology and Design (4 messages)
Beryl's Challenge, Part 2, section 1. [Long post. Detailed analysis and description] (1 message)
Bruce Archer's address (2 messages)
BUILDING A DESIGN RESEARCH COMMUNITY (long post - 16K) (2 messages)
cancellation (1 message)
Clarification for note on Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry (2 messages)
Clarification to Ken's points (3 messages)
Comments on an anti-disciplinary program based on design practice (2 messages)
Conference website (1 message)
D.Des. in Graphic Design? Here's where to find them! (1 message)
design inquiry (1 message)
Design inquiry versus Scientific iInquiry (1 message)
Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry (7 messages)
Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry ... (2 messages)
Design Inspiration Sources (1 message)
Design of Inquiry (3 messages)
DO NOT OPEN ANY ATTACHMENTS FROM AGUAS (1 message)
Doctor of Graphic Design? (1 message)
Dr. Love's design research program re-stated (2 messages)
DRS: HOW TO LEAVE THE LIST (although I can't imagine why anyone would want to!) (1 message)
Examples of research through practice (1 message)
Five theses on clarity, definition and the formal properties of debate (1 message)
Four questions to John Wood remain open (2 messages)
fully-funded PhD studentship (1 message)
FW: Personal Remarks (1 message)
Fwd: Re: a more ambitious justification of design? (1 message)
Fwd: Re: Would welcome Klaus Krippendorff's paper ... (1 message)
Fwd: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ... (1 message)
Grand Designs (5 messages)
Important Opportunity for Developing Doctoral Education in Design (1 message)
Ken's Points (2 messages)
Ken's Points ... (1 message)
Lecturer/Senior Lecturer position at Loughborough University, UK (1 message)
Misplaced Arguments (1 message)
My Challenge, clarified on a positive note (6 messages)
New Foundations for Design Research (4 messages)
Notes on Rob's and Klaus's Clarifications to Ken's Points (1 message)
Notes on the new design space (2 messages)
On the dodgy URLs... (1 message)
On the evidence of good practice-based PhDs (2 messages)
Other Disciplines and Design (2 messages)
Percieved attributes.. (1 message)
ph.d debate, design research, etc.... (1 message)
Philosophy for/of design (1 message)
Practice based Research (1 message)
Prelude to summary (1 message)
Prelude to summary+clarifications+12 principles (1 message)
RE Response to point twelve of Ken Friedman ... (1 message)
REPLY: Re: On the evidence of good practice-based PhDs (1 message)
REPLY: Response to points from Alec (1 message)
Research into Practice conference registration (1 message)
Response to Rob Curedale (1 message)
Response to Rob Curedale's Response. (1 message)
Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman (1 message)
Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ... (7 messages)
Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman/ (1 message)
Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman/Terrence Love (1 message)
Sketches (1 message)
Social Science Research and Industrial Design (1 message)
Summary of The Milano conference "Design Plus Research" (1 message)
Sympathy for us devils (1 message)
Thanks for three good posts (2 messages)
The Beryl Graham Challenge (1 message)
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. [Beryl's Challenge] (1 message)
The sanctity of philosophy and other issues ... [Response to John Wood] (1 message)
Thesis 19: The nature of the philosophical doctorate (1 message)
Vacancy for a Fulltime Professor of Design Methodology (1 message)
Would welcome Klaus Krippendorff's paper ... (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DRS Home

DRS Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

(pas d'objet)

(pas d'objet)

Bouchaib Bahli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:36:42 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

3 small points amounting to a plea

3 small points amounting to a plea

(Chris RUST(SCS)) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 17:22:43 +0100

73 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Birger Sevaldson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 03 May 2000 17:05:36 +0200

77 lines

New Thread

A clarification on my response to John Wood.

A clarification on my response to John Wood.

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 22:08:47 +0200

78 lines

New Thread

A fish tale

A fish tale

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 05:58:04 +0200

132 lines

Re: A fish tale

(Mike PRESS(SCS)) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 14:34:14 +0100

76 lines

New Thread

a more ambitious justification of design?

a more ambitious justification of design?

Jean Schneider <[log in to unmask]>

Jeu, 18 Mai 00 13:23:25 -0000

213 lines

Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

Adrian Bowyer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 13:52:45 +0100

46 lines

Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

Lubomir S. Popov <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:07:51 -0400

55 lines

Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:08:56 EDT

53 lines

Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

J Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 21:28:34 +0100

72 lines

Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

Jean Schneider <[log in to unmask]>

Ven, 19 Mai 00 09:19:20 -0000

32 lines

Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

Adrian Bowyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 09:28:56 +0100

48 lines

Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

Adrian Bowyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 09:30:10 +0100

33 lines

Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

Ozlem Er <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 14:25:36 +0300 (EEST)

57 lines

Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:16:08 EDT

43 lines

Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

Klaus Krippendorff <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 01:01:40 -0400

233 lines

Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

J Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 21:02:21 +0100

62 lines

Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

Paul Murty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 15:24:08 +1000

58 lines

New Thread

A short response to John Wood's latest note ...

A short response to John Wood's latest note ...

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 21:16:19 +0200

90 lines

New Thread

Acrobat pdf for research documents

Acrobat pdf for research documents

(Chris RUST(SCS)) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 10:03:41 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

Against Rigour

Against Rigour

John Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 14:23:23 +0000

64 lines

New Thread

Anthropology and Design

Anthropology and Design

Conall O Cathain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 09:25:20 +0100 ()

99 lines

Anthropology and Design

Miller, Hugh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 10:44:02 +0100

102 lines

Anthropology and Design

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 May 2000 06:28:49 EDT

159 lines

Re: Anthropology and Design

Susann Vihma <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 13:45:38 +0300 (EET DST)

29 lines

New Thread

Beryl's Challenge, Part 2, section 1. [Long post. Detailed analysis and description]

Beryl's Challenge, Part 2, section 1. [Long post. Detailed analysis and description]

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 23:42:54 +0200

976 lines

New Thread

Bruce Archer's address

Bruce Archer's address

Nigan Bayazit <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 13:53:13 +0300

29 lines

Re: Bruce Archer's address

Nigel Cross <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:08:11 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

BUILDING A DESIGN RESEARCH COMMUNITY (long post - 16K)

BUILDING A DESIGN RESEARCH COMMUNITY (long post - 16K)

Conall O Cathain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 19:50:44 +0100 ()

350 lines

Re: BUILDING A DESIGN RESEARCH COMMUNITY (long post - 16K)

Jesse L Voss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 01:20:24 -0500 (CDT)

37 lines

New Thread

cancellation

cancellation

Terry Goodison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 08 May 2000 14:12:21 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

Clarification for note on Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry

Clarification for note on Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:12:11 +0200

270 lines

Re: Clarification for note on Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry

Klaus Krippendorff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 05:57:28 -0400

285 lines

New Thread

Clarification to Ken's points

Clarification to Ken's points

John Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:44:28 +0000

228 lines

Re: Clarification to Ken's points

Lubomir S. Popov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 12:47:47 -0400

248 lines

RE: Clarification to Ken's points

Klaus Krippendorff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 12:56:55 -0400

372 lines

New Thread

Comments on an anti-disciplinary program based on design practice

Comments on an anti-disciplinary program based on design practice

aguas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 10:11:59 -0700

429 lines

Re: Comments on an anti-disciplinary program based on design practice

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:52:48 EDT

19 lines

New Thread

Conference website

Conference website

Cal Swann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 20:59:55 +0800

574 lines

New Thread

D.Des. in Graphic Design? Here's where to find them!

D.Des. in Graphic Design? Here's where to find them!

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 12:40:52 +0200

256 lines

New Thread

design inquiry

design inquiry

Anthony Dunne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 17:30:28 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

Design inquiry versus Scientific iInquiry

re: Design inquiry versus Scientific iInquiry

Sid Newton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:26:31 -0700

474 lines

New Thread

Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry

Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry

Sid Newton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 15:46:57 -0700

259 lines

Re: Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry

Dr. Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:35:00

91 lines

re: Design inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry

Sid Newton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:56:54 -0700

302 lines

Design inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry

Sid Newton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:16:12 -0700

203 lines

re: Design inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry

Dr. Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:39:00

162 lines

re: Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry

Sid Newton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:32:28 -0700

471 lines

Re: Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry

Dr Keith Russell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 15:17:25 +1000

93 lines

New Thread

Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry ...

Re: Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry ...

Tim Smithers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 01:52:40 +0200

108 lines

Re: Design Inquiry versus Scientific Inquiry ...

Simeon J. Simoff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 18:56:52 +1000

22 lines

New Thread

Design Inspiration Sources

Design Inspiration Sources

P.A. Rodgers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:37:56 +0100 (BST)

48 lines

New Thread

Design of Inquiry

Design of Inquiry

Harold Nelson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 06 May 2000 09:39:59 -0700

36 lines

Re: Design of Inquiry

Klaus Krippendorff <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 07 May 2000 08:56:49 -0400

49 lines

Re: Design of Inquiry

Harold Nelson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 07 May 2000 20:39:31 -0700

71 lines

New Thread

DO NOT OPEN ANY ATTACHMENTS FROM AGUAS

DO NOT OPEN ANY ATTACHMENTS FROM AGUAS

aguas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 21:37:01 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Doctor of Graphic Design?

Doctor of Graphic Design?

Karel van der Waarde <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 09:57:04 +0200 (MET DST)

33 lines

New Thread

Dr. Love's design research program re-stated

Dr. Love's design research program re-stated

aguas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 08:26:20 -0700

93 lines

Dr. Love's design research program re-stated

John Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:15:00 +0000

119 lines

New Thread

DRS: HOW TO LEAVE THE LIST (although I can't imagine why anyone would want to!)

DRS: HOW TO LEAVE THE LIST (although I can't imagine why anyone would want to!)

Conall O Cathain <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:32:13 +0100 ()

51 lines

New Thread

Examples of research through practice

Examples of research through practice

(Chris RUST(SCS)) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 16:23:11 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Five theses on clarity, definition and the formal properties of debate

Five theses on clarity, definition and the formal properties of debate

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 22:12:27 +0200

446 lines

New Thread

Four questions to John Wood remain open

Four questions to John Wood remain open

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2000 15:55:33 +0200

201 lines

RE: Four questions to John Wood remain open

Klaus Krippendorff <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 18:45:02 -0400

103 lines

New Thread

fully-funded PhD studentship

fully-funded PhD studentship

Michael Biggs <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 09 May 2000 13:39:27 +0100

73 lines

New Thread

FW: Personal Remarks

FW: Personal Remarks

Alec Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:24:10 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

Fwd: Re: a more ambitious justification of design?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 19 May 2000 16:23:26 EDT

70 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: Would welcome Klaus Krippendorff's paper ...

Fwd: Re: Would welcome Klaus Krippendorff's paper ...

(Tom FISHER(SCS)) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 11:32:38 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...

Fwd: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 25 May 2000 09:03:22 EDT

147 lines

New Thread

Grand Designs

Grand Designs

Lloyd.P <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:02:38 +0100

61 lines

Re: Grand Designs

Nigel Cross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:30:09 +0100

59 lines

Re: Grand Designs

Adrian Bowyer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 16:22:46 +0100

64 lines

Grand Designs

John Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 19:43:41 +0000

83 lines

Re: Grand Designs

Lubomir S. Popov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:51:59 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Important Opportunity for Developing Doctoral Education in Design

Important Opportunity for Developing Doctoral Education in Design

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 06:44:41 +0200

211 lines

New Thread

Ken's Points

Ken's Points

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:11:16 EDT

63 lines

RE: Ken's Points

Klaus Krippendorff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 13:14:21 -0400

122 lines

New Thread

Ken's Points ...

RE: Ken's Points ...

Tim Smithers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 16:04:18 +0200

62 lines

New Thread

Lecturer/Senior Lecturer position at Loughborough University, UK

Lecturer/Senior Lecturer position at Loughborough University, UK

Paul Wormald <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:24:36 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Misplaced Arguments

Misplaced Arguments

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 00:07:35 +0200

288 lines

New Thread

My Challenge, clarified on a positive note

My Challenge, clarified on a positive note

Beryl Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 13:21:13 +0800

77 lines

Re: My Challenge, clarified on a positive note

(Mike PRESS(SCS)) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:47:40 +0100

49 lines

Re: My Challenge, clarified on a positive note

Beryl Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 15:14:49 +0800

97 lines

RE: My Challenge, clarified on a positive note

Klaus Krippendorff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 16:22:21 -0400

111 lines

RE: My Challenge, clarified on a positive note

Susann Vihma <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:28:13 +0300 (EET DST)

126 lines

RE: My Challenge, clarified on a positive note

Susann Vihma <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:30:24 +0300 (EET DST)

132 lines

New Thread

New Foundations for Design Research

New Foundations for Design Research

Dr. Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 13:58:00

124 lines

Re: New Foundations for Design Research

(Chris RUST(SCS)) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 08:19:49 +0100

46 lines

Re: New Foundations for Design Research

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 31 May 2000 03:28:30 EDT

39 lines

RE: New Foundations for Design Research

Alec Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 13:25:07 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

Notes on Rob's and Klaus's Clarifications to Ken's Points

Notes on Rob's and Klaus's Clarifications to Ken's Points

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 16:54:33 +0200

522 lines

New Thread

Notes on the new design space

Notes on the new design space

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 04:47:16 +0200

457 lines

notes on the new design space

john chris jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 15:54:22 +0100

147 lines

New Thread

On the dodgy URLs...

On the dodgy URLs...

David Durling <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 15:53:57 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

On the evidence of good practice-based PhDs

On the evidence of good practice-based PhDs

David Durling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 08:47:20 +0100

314 lines

Re: On the evidence of good practice-based PhDs

(Mike PRESS(SCS)) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:03:43 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

Other Disciplines and Design

Other Disciplines and Design

Dr. Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 9:47:00

85 lines

Re: Other Disciplines and Design

(Chris RUST(SCS)) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:56:25 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Percieved attributes..

Percieved attributes..

Tina K. Andersen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:02:17 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

ph.d debate, design research, etc....

ph.d debate, design research, etc....

aguas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 08:08:04 -0700

402 lines

New Thread

Philosophy for/of design

Philosophy for/of design

John Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 15:14:06 +0000

67 lines

New Thread

Practice based Research

Practice based Research

Prof Brian Allison <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:13:14 +0700

101 lines

New Thread

Prelude to summary

Prelude to summary

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 13:23:40 +0200

68 lines

New Thread

Prelude to summary+clarifications+12 principles

Re: Prelude to summary+clarifications+12 principles

Lubomir S. Popov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 17:38:51 -0400

106 lines

New Thread

RE Response to point twelve of Ken Friedman ...

RE: RE Response to point twelve of Ken Friedman ...

Alec Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 18:42:51 +0100

195 lines

New Thread

REPLY: Re: On the evidence of good practice-based PhDs

REPLY: Re: On the evidence of good practice-based PhDs

David Durling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 13:55:04 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

REPLY: Response to points from Alec

REPLY: Response to points from Alec

David Durling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 09 May 2000 20:38:12 +0100

105 lines

New Thread

Research into Practice conference registration

Research into Practice conference registration

Michael Biggs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:35:49 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

Response to Rob Curedale

Re: Response to Rob Curedale

Dr. Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 9:20:00

50 lines

New Thread

Response to Rob Curedale's Response.

Response to Rob Curedale's Response.

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 19:31:37 +0200

202 lines

New Thread

Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman

Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman

Alec Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 19:22:32 +0100

210 lines

New Thread

Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...

RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...

Tim Smithers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 10:01:41 +0200

144 lines

RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...

Alec Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 10:46:51 +0100

189 lines

RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...

Tim Smithers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:00:32 +0200

125 lines

RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...

Tim Smithers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 00:22:16 +0200

118 lines

RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...

Tim Smithers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 00:22:16 +0200

118 lines

RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...

Alec Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:03:41 +0100

201 lines

Re: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman ...

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 23 May 2000 22:42:52 EDT

104 lines

New Thread

Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman/

RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman/

Dr. Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 19:25:00

123 lines

New Thread

Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman/Terrence Love

RE: Response to twelve points from Ken Friedman/Terrence Love

Lubomir S. Popov <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:05:51 -0400

123 lines

New Thread

Sketches

Sketches

Paul M. Gutherson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:17:16 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Social Science Research and Industrial Design

Social Science Research and Industrial Design

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 May 2000 00:07:51 EDT

108 lines

New Thread

Summary of The Milano conference "Design Plus Research"

Summary of The Milano conference "Design Plus Research"

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 13:32:42 +0200

127 lines

New Thread

Sympathy for us devils

Sympathy for us devils

aguas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 10:28:21 -0700

297 lines

New Thread

Thanks for three good posts

Thanks for three good posts

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 21:39:56 +0200

267 lines

Re: Thanks for three good posts

Lubomir S. Popov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 12:16:02 -0400

286 lines

New Thread

The Beryl Graham Challenge

The Beryl Graham Challenge

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:02:59 +0200

54 lines

New Thread

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. [Beryl's Challenge]

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. [Beryl's Challenge]

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 20:45:19 +0200

295 lines

New Thread

The sanctity of philosophy and other issues ... [Response to John Wood]

The sanctity of philosophy and other issues ... [Response to John Wood]

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 19:17:35 +0200

167 lines

New Thread

Thesis 19: The nature of the philosophical doctorate

Re: Thesis 19: The nature of the philosophical doctorate

Dr. Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 9:00:00

222 lines

New Thread

Vacancy for a Fulltime Professor of Design Methodology

Vacancy for a Fulltime Professor of Design Methodology

Lloyd.P <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 15:33:09 +0200

163 lines

New Thread

Would welcome Klaus Krippendorff's paper ...

Would welcome Klaus Krippendorff's paper ...

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 00:15:50 +0200

26 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

July 2018
May 2018
November 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
June 2015
May 2015
March 2015
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
February 2014
December 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
November 2012
October 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
September 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager