JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


2000


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Modern Fortran Programming with DVF" (2 messages)
(SC22WG5.1693) Some discussion points/wishes (1 message)
-noimplicit option (was Re: module) (1 message)
-scent? (1 message)
.mod & .M (3 messages)
<No subject> (8 messages)
@macros (was: symbols in FORTRAN) (1 message)
about EOF (5 messages)
About function abstractions and procedure abstractions (3 messages)
About GOTO (5 messages)
about mails (1 message)
Access to user code from library routines (1 message)
ACM Fortran Forum (August) (1 message)
ACM Fortran Forum (December) (1 message)
acting on real and imaginary part (23 messages)
Allocatable arrays - passing procedure (2 messages)
Allocation status of pointers (10 messages)
Alternate returns (2 messages)
Ambiguous procedure interface (6 messages)
Announcing Compaq Visual Fortran 6.5 (1 message)
another test (4 messages)
any OO Fortran90 resource? (2 messages)
Are I/O specifiers considered to be optional arguments? (4 messages)
Argument Keywords for Module Procedures? (6 messages)
array & pointer (5 messages)
Array addition! (3 messages)
Array construction (4 messages)
array dimension in interfaces (1 message)
array handling in derived data types (4 messages)
array size (2 messages)
Association of zero-sized objects (3 messages)
Association of zero-sized objects. (13 messages)
automatic array (3 messages)
Automatic code documentation (3 messages)
Automatic generation of interface files (1 message)
avoiding redundant Fortran 90 coding (5 messages)
AXPY for general vector updates (2 messages)
AXPY for general vector updates - CORRECTION (1 message)
BAD MESSAGE (2 messages)
Bartels' minimization procedure (2 messages)
beowolf clustering (1 message)
binary to ASCII (4 messages)
bit functions & negative numbers (2 messages)
BNF Diagrams (3 messages)
books for F90 (2 messages)
Bug ? (2 messages)
Bug or feature (11 messages)
Bug or feature - revisited (7 messages)
C Interoperability implementations (5 messages)
C to Fortran transaltion (1 message)
C++ (fwd), some laughs ... (1 message)
C++ and Fortran 90 (3 messages)
Cache optimization -- again (1 message)
Cache optimization --- again (1 message)
Cache optimization in stencil operations--again (1 message)
Cache optimization in stencil-like operations (4 messages)
Calling C Library Function with String array argument (3 messages)
calling fortran 77 from fortran 90 (5 messages)
calling fortran from C++ (11 messages)
Chapter 12, Section 4 (3 messages)
character kinds (19 messages)
character manipulation (4 messages)
Character type inflexibility (7 messages)
Checking array argument SIZE's (2 messages)
Co-array Fortran for Beowulf? (9 messages)
Commenting Fortran 90 code (1 message)
Comments on F (6 messages)
Commercial: New N.A. Software Fortran95 Release <fwd> (1 message)
Commercial: Use Linux and Windows ? <fwd> (1 message)
Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux (13 messages)
Compiler for dual processors Linux (5 messages)
Conformance question (3 messages)
Confusion in my letter about coroutines (4 messages)
constant kinds (36 messages)
constant kinds => function evaluation (1 message)
Construct name vs. variable name (1 message)
Contruct name vs. variable name (13 messages)
convert (2 messages)
copies to sender (2 messages)
CORRECTED: OpenMP on Alpha linux (1 message)
Count Direct Access File Records (7 messages)
Dangling Pointer (1 message)
data rewrite (3 messages)
data statments, modules, and derived types (3 messages)
DATE_AND_TIME interpretation (5 messages)
dbx, modules (4 messages)
Deallocating a pointer (3 messages)
deallocating linked lists (help) (4 messages)
debugging-tool for malloc ??? (4 messages)
Default kind (1 message)
[log in to unmask] (1 message)
Differences between Compilers - OSF1 and IRIX (5 messages)
DIMENSION(0), PARAMETER vs. Compaq (2 messages)
div/mod (was constant kinds => function evaluation) (1 message)
DLL in Fortran Power Station (2 messages)
DLL in Fortran Power Station <fwd> (1 message)
double precision and kinds (1 message)
Double Precision in eg77 on Linux Intel x86 (6 messages)
Double Precision with g77 (3 messages)
Double precision, etc (3 messages)
Doubly linked list and other data structures (9 messages)
draw a curve (2 messages)
DTED data (1 message)
dual processor experience (3 messages)
Duff's device (3 messages)
echos (10 messages)
Efficiency (3 messages)
Efficient temporary storage (6 messages)
Equivalence (1 message)
Eunge-Kutta (again) (5 messages)
Explicit interfaces and archaic Fortran features (1 message)
Explicit-shape versus assumed-size arrays (1 message)
external/system calls (8 messages)
Extracting INTERFACE information from f90 files (2 messages)
F 90/95 + Python (1 message)
F question : How to pass C and linker options to F ? (2 messages)
F under Linux and glibc2 (2 messages)
F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler (11 messages)
f90 free compiler (2 messages)
f90 text preprocessor (7 messages)
f90+MPI on dual linux boxes (3 messages)
Feature vs. Feature cost trade-off (3 messages)
FFT (4 messages)
FFT in F90 (1 message)
FFT in true f90 (2 messages)
FFT routines (2 messages)
File merging tool (5 messages)
FINDINGS: automatic code documentation (3 messages)
FIRSTLOC and LASTLOC intrinsic functions (1 message)
Followup: fuji compiler problem (3 messages)
FORALL versus DO problem... (1 message)
fortan 90 & C (1 message)
Fortran & Sockets (1 message)
fortran 90 for linux (2 messages)
Fortran 90 Numerical Recipes (6 messages)
FORTRAN 90 optimization strategies (8 messages)
Fortran 90 shortcut IF ? (7 messages)
Fortran 90 Syntax (1 message)
Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (March) (1 message)
Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (sep) (1 message)
Fortran 90/95/HPF Information File (January) (1 message)
Fortran 90/95/HPF Information File (July) (1 message)
Fortran 90/95/HPF Information File (Nov) (1 message)
Fortran 90/95/HPF Informaton (May) (1 message)
Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers (1 message)
Fortran compiler (2 messages)
Fortran compiler -Reply (1 message)
Fortran Forum (April 2000) (1 message)
Fortran Journal (3 messages)
fortran man page on Unix (5 messages)
Fortran plus 2 from NASoftware (1 message)
fortran source for parsing text-files ? (1 message)
Fortran to Ada DLL Interface Question (2 messages)
Fortran User Survey Results (1 message)
Fortran XML parsers (1 message)
FORTRAN90 & MPICH (2 messages)
Fortran90 and XML (1 message)
Fuji compiler problem (1 message)
Function reference as only thing in RHS of assignment statement (4 messages)
Functions in f90 (9 messages)
Fw: Rejected [non-member submission] Re: Re: Porting mainframe Fortran codes to a PC ? (1 message)
Fw: symbols in FORTRAN (1 message)
Fw: Use of Modules in large Fortran applications (1 message)
Fwd: Out of Office AutoReply: list move (2 messages)
Fwd: Re: DATE_AND_TIME interpretation (1 message)
GNU Fortran 95 project started. (1 message)
GNU Fortran 95 Web Page Moved. (1 message)
Gnumake for the PC? (8 messages)
GO TO (19 messages)
GO TO absurdities (1 message)
Graphics (1 message)
hadowing user defined type names with `=>' (DIGITAL Fortran) (1 message)
HDF5 F90 APIs on linux (1 message)
help please (9 messages)
HELP PLEASE! (3 messages)
Help with a large Fortran 90 code (4 messages)
Help with Unformated I/O (1 message)
Helping the compiler with INDEPENDENT and ALLOCATABLEs (1 message)
Hexapod kinematics (1 message)
High-rank views of rank-1 arrays (1 message)
High-rank views of rank-1 objects (again) (1 message)
history of fortran (3 messages)
Homework (was: Operations froma an input file?) (1 message)
How can I generate array [0 0], [0 0 0] ...? (1 message)
How can I use gdb debugger with fortran (4 messages)
How to find out about accessability of service routines? (2 messages)
How to pass a subroutine to another subroutine by a string (1 message)
How to pass a subroutine to another subroutine by a string variable ? (4 messages)
How to set-up a large PARAMETER array (7 messages)
How to unsubscribe comp-fortran-90 ? (1 message)
HTML formatting (4 messages)
I/O Format error (3 messages)
IBM SP xlf bug was: Re: Suspected bugs... (1 message)
IF as IF construct name (1 message)
Ignore previous message (1 message)
implicit character declaration (5 messages)
Implicit none problem (5 messages)
imsl (1 message)
indefinite integral (2 messages)
Inlined functions in HP Fortran (3 messages)
Inlined functions in HPF (1 message)
INQUIRE about (un)formatted files (2 messages)
Intel linux compiler beta application (1 message)
Intent for derived types with pointer components (3 messages)
Interface block contains assumed-length string argument (4 messages)
Interfacing g77 with F (5 messages)
internal procedures as actual arguments (7 messages)
Is Fortran widely used ? (2 messages)
Is there a sparse matrix module/class around anywhere? (2 messages)
Is there a UCASE function in F9x ? (1 message)
ISO TR 15580 IEEE Arithmetic (4 messages)
It works!!!! (1 message)
job advert (1 message)
Job Opportunity (1 message)
John Bray's comments on my J3 paper 00-197 (4 messages)
Lahey lf95 Express and gcc on Linux x86 [LONG] (2 messages)
Lahey/Fujitsu f95 Express v5.5 on Linux (4 messages)
Language Challenge 2000 (1 message)
Language Challenge 2000 - Update (1 message)
Language Challenge 2000 -- FAQ (1 message)
Lanzcos eigenvalues in F90 (2 messages)
Large Programs (7 messages)
Large Programs and stack overflow (27 messages)
Large scale optimization (1 message)
LBOUND (3 messages)
Learning Fortran. (2 messages)
legal code? (4 messages)
lf95 overflow trapping (1 message)
Lf95: How to call API file mapping routines?? (1 message)
Linear Algebra Software in F90 (2 messages)
Linked list (2 messages)
linking fortran & excel (1 message)
linking MPI libraries with Fujitsu/Lahey F95 (5 messages)
Linking with FORTRAN90 and C++ libraries under Windows NT (3 messages)
Linux f90/5 compilers (5 messages)
Linux or Tru64 on Alphas? (2 messages)
Linux support for Fortran 95 (1 message)
list configuration (1 message)
list move (77 messages)
list move [--<sp>] (1 message)
list problems (1 message)
list server move (1 message)
list server test (1 message)
List-directed output (2 messages)
Loren's example of a useful role for GO TO (8 messages)
lost file (1 message)
Makefiles for f90 projects (14 messages)
Makefiles for interface'd f90 systems (1 message)
Matlab's find command (1 message)
ME TOO GO TO (1 message)
member status (1 message)
Memory allocated on reading process (2 messages)
Memory leak (4 messages)
Message attachments (1 message)
Message from Internet (1 message)
Metcalf convert from f77 to f90 (2 messages)
Minor point, Re: J3/00-197 (1 message)
minval, maxval (3 messages)
mixing f77 with f90 on SUN (7 messages)
Modern Fortran Programming with Digital Visual Fortran (1 message)
Modes and block constructs -- was Parentheses (2 messages)
module (24 messages)
Module for special functions--Erf(x) (1 message)
More about Co-array Fortran (1 message)
More on INTENT and pointer components (1 message)
More questions on assumed shape vs. assumed size (2 messages)
MS Fortran Powerstation v 4.0 (1 message)
Multiline comment statement for F2K ? (6 messages)
multithreading on Wintel (1 message)
My quadrature code (was Runge-Kutta (again) ) (1 message)
NAG dbx90 and ddd (1 message)
Nag Libraries for Workshop 5, and beyond (1 message)
Negative subscripts (1 message)
Nested contains (3 messages)
New address for SMLib (1 message)
New coco features (1 message)
New intrinsics (11 messages)
New Journal (1 message)
New versions of portability project (1 message)
Not present optional args same as nullified pointer? (3 messages)
Now: Coroutines and reverse calling mechanisms (1 message)
Numerical Recipes question (again): error function? (1 message)
Numerical Recipes question - clarification (1 message)
Numerical Recipes question - clarification (fwd) (5 messages)
object-oriented concepts in CFD (3 messages)
odd bit of code (7 messages)
ODE library (4 messages)
off topic (well, it is a language issue...) (1 message)
Old Fortran text on the web?? (1 message)
OO (C++) emulation in F95 ... (18 messages)
Open Directory Project: Fortran (1 message)
Opening a non-existing file is not an error? (7 messages)
opening files from a dll (1 message)
OpenMP bug in Cray's Fortran 90 compiler (1 message)
OpenMP on Alpha linux (2 messages)
Operations from an input file? (1 message)
Operations froma an input file? (3 messages)
Out of topic - FEM for dummyes. (1 message)
over-view of Polyhedron benchmark collection (1 message)
PACK intrinsic with 2D arrays (2 messages)
PARAMETERs as TARGETs (7 messages)
Parentheses (2 messages)
parentheses in Fortran (25 messages)
Partial sorting & ordering (1 message)
Passing Arrays (1 message)
Pentium BLAS crashes (1 message)
Permitted optimizations (19 messages)
Permitted optimizations (was: parentheses in Fortran) (13 messages)
Platforms that have LOGICAL(KIND=1) (9 messages)
Pointer problem with Nag f95 (5 messages)
Pointer problem with Nag f95 (Sir Humphrey award) (2 messages)
pointers and allocatables (12 messages)
Portability Project Update (1 message)
Porting mainframe Fortran codes to a PC ? (9 messages)
Preprocessing in f90 (3 messages)
Preprocessing in f90 revisited (1 message)
Printing to the printer (1 message)
problem with logical at runtime (2 messages)
Problem with random numbers (LF95) (3 messages)
Problems compiling with vf90 (2 messages)
Problems linking __cmpdi2 kernlib function under Linux (2 messages)
procedure pointers; was: module (1 message)
PUBLIC and PRIVATE attributes for user defined operators (3 messages)
PURE procedures (2 messages)
Pure procedures and exceptions (3 messages)
Queries on Fortran90 (2 messages)
Query on bivariate normal integral (1 message)
Question about "make" (3 messages)
Question about matmul and transpose (4 messages)
Question about optimizers (1 message)
Question about PUBLIC/Private and nested MODULEs (5 messages)
Question on character valued functions (22 messages)
Question re real & complex (4 messages)
Question regarding Transfer (2 messages)
Questions about assumed shape (4 messages)
Qustion on the WHERE statement (3 messages)
random numbers. (4 messages)
RE Are I/O specifiers considered to be optional arguments? (4 messages)
Re Kinds (5 messages)
Re: Bug or Feature? (2 messages)
Re: FORTRAN 90 optimization strategies (1 message)
Re: shallow question (1 message)
Re: Standards question (1 message)
read error (4 messages)
Real Fortran guru test (19 messages)
Reasons to convert existing Fortran 77 code to Fortran 90 (3 messages)
Regarding Your Question about Lanczos Eigenvalue Routines? (1 message)
Request (3 messages)
Results for Friedrich Hertweck's little timing test (3 messages)
routine wanted (2 messages)
royalties (1 message)
Runge-Kutta (13 messages)
Runge-Kutta (again) (10 messages)
SAVE on global data (6 messages)
SCO-Fortran (1 message)
Scope of variables in a module USEd inside a module (5 messages)
scoping for `=>' (4 messages)
Seasoned Greetings (1 message)
selected_real_kind (7 messages)
sequence (2 messages)
Serious f90 problems on Fuji VPP system (3 messages)
shadowing user defined type names with `=>' (DIGITAL Fortran) (2 messages)
shallow question (3 messages)
Shared Libraries under Linux and Pentium BLAS crashes (1 message)
sheepskin (2 messages)
signed vs. unsigned ints in Ftn90 (6 messages)
Simitz (1 message)
simple question (3 messages)
Single/double precision in summation (17 messages)
SORRY typed x = y assignment (1 message)
Sorting and Random Number generation (2 messages)
Sparse matrices! (1 message)
Sparse matrices. (2 messages)
Speed comparision of NR f77 and f90 routines (5 messages)
speeding up access to array slices (3 messages)
Standards question (7 messages)
static and allocatable arrays (4 messages)
Stong opinions (6 messages)
strange allocation behavior (4 messages)
strange allocation behavior -- absoft pro f90 6.0 under linux (fwd) (1 message)
String concatenation and continuation (11 messages)
Style standardizer (3 messages)
Subroutine call diagram (3 messages)
summary: FFT in F90 (3 messages)
Sun compiler bug (1 message)
sun f90 query (3 messages)
Sun f95 compiler (1 message)
Sun Workshop 4.2 versus 5.0 results (4 messages)
Suspected bugs... (22 messages)
Suspected bugs... (fwd) (16 messages)
SV: Out of topic - FEM for dummyes. (1 message)
SV: symbols in FORTRAN (1 message)
symbols in FORTRAN (40 messages)
System_Clock subroutine (2 messages)
Teaching Fortran 90 to physics majors (1 message)
template instruction (16 messages)
template instruction + CoArray Fortran (1 message)
test (12 messages)
test message (11 messages)
test message from Phillip Helbig to [log in to unmask] (6 messages)
test msg (1 message)
test of list move (3 messages)
The big mistery (Sub: HELP, PLEASE!)... (1 message)
the essence of -escence (1 message)
The new version of F for Linux (1 message)
THE NR (?) APPRECIATI0N AWARDS (1 message)
time travel, mime garbage,... (1 message)
timing (2 messages)
Timing a simple routine (9 messages)
Timing subroutines (8 messages)
tools to analyze the structure of Fortran codes (3 messages)
TRANSFER structure with pointer (4 messages)
Travis D Nesmith/RS-MA/FRBOG/US is out of the office. (1 message)
two non-linear equations (3 messages)
Two of everything? (4 messages)
typed x = y assignment (3 messages)
Unformatted I/O of derived type variables (3 messages)
units (1 message)
Universal trivia (1 message)
unsubscribe (6 messages)
Update : Allocatable array - passing procedure (1 message)
Use of Modules in large Fortran applications (3 messages)
Use of SUN Workshop FORTRAN90 (5.0) (2 messages)
Uses of HPF in Economics (2 messages)
Using a Pointer Array Function as a Procedure Argument (5 messages)
Value of Inheritance (was OO (C++) emulation in F95) (2 messages)
Van Snyder's paper (1 message)
Van's signature quote: solved! (1 message)
variable initialization (2 messages)
virus documentation (1 message)
Walt wrote... (3 messages)
wanted: cray el series (1 message)
What are your favorite linear algebra benchmark programs? (4 messages)
What do compilers do about assumed-shape dummy arguments? (20 messages)
What is the difference between pointers in C and f90? (3 messages)
Where are SCRATCH files?? (3 messages)
where can I download free fortran90 compiler for unix? (3 messages)
Which compilers require this search rule? (7 messages)
Why the digital array viewer cannot display for quickwin typ e project? (1 message)
Why the digital array viewer cannot display for quickwin type project? (1 message)
Working of LAPACK90 (1 message)
Would this introduce an incompatibility? (5 messages)
Writing arithmetic expressions with mixed type (1 message)
Writing arithmetic expressions with mixed types (11 messages)
Your make_pm stuff; was, Re: New coco features (7 messages)
[Announce] LF95 5.6 released - Perfect score on Polyhedron diagnostic tests! (1 message)
[Announce] Salford FTN95 Version 2 (1 message)
[Commercial] FortranPlus Educational Prices <fwd> (1 message)
[Commercial] New Fortran Encyclopaedia from N.A. Software <fwd> (2 messages)
[constant] kinds (3 messages)
[Efficiency] (1 message)
[Fwd: INQUIRE about (un)formatted files] (1 message)
[Fwd: Permitted optimizations] (1 message)
[Fwd: Re: What is the difference between pointers in C and f90?] (1 message)
[How to unsubscribe comp-fortran-90 ?] (3 messages)
[LF] Pentium BLAS crashes (2 messages)
[LF] Problem with random numbers (LF95) (1 message)
[LF] SIZE function for assumed size array (2 messages)
[LF] Sorting and Random Number generation (7 messages)
[opening files from a dll] (3 messages)
[random numbers.] (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Modern Fortran Programming with DVF"

"Modern Fortran Programming with DVF"

Richard Hales <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 11:48:52 +0000 (GMT)

35 lines

Re: "Modern Fortran Programming with DVF"

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 03 Feb 2000 09:23:18 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

(SC22WG5.1693) Some discussion points/wishes

Re: (SC22WG5.1693) Some discussion points/wishes

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 06 Jan 2000 11:33:24 -0800

65 lines

New Thread

-noimplicit option (was Re: module)

-noimplicit option (was Re: module)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:24:42 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

-scent?

-scent?

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:45:01 -0700

61 lines

New Thread

.mod & .M

.mod & .M

Y.K. ZHOU <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Nov 2000 20:12:18 -0800 (PST)

82 lines

Re: .mod & .M

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 09 Nov 2000 11:54:20 +0100

95 lines

Re: .mod & .M

Brian Hanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Nov 2000 09:53:44 -0500 (EST)

107 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Matt Challacombe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:29:24 -0700

30 lines

<No subject>

Abdel Bassal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2000 15:29:38 +1030 (CST)

22 lines

<No subject>

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 27 Jan 2000 08:29:14 -0700

36 lines

<No subject>

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2000 16:14:59 +0100

119 lines

<No subject>

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 19:00:26 GMT

41 lines

<No subject>

Nguyen Le Anh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 17:22:26 ICT

15 lines

<No subject>

mbai <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:17:22 +0900

10390 lines

<No subject>

othman alothman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Jul 2000 02:46:20 GMT

25 lines

New Thread

@macros (was: symbols in FORTRAN)

@macros (was: symbols in FORTRAN)

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Aug 2000 12:53:42 -0600

49 lines

New Thread

about EOF

about EOF

Darima Lamazhapova <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2000 16:59:15 +0400 (MSD)

19 lines

Re: about EOF

Darima Lamazhapova <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:23:21 +0400 (MSD)

46 lines

Re: about EOF

Orville E. Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:42:49 -0500

77 lines

Re: about EOF

Marcel Swart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2000 16:47:33 +0200

29 lines

about EOF

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2000 07:50:05 -0700 (PDT)

61 lines

New Thread

About function abstractions and procedure abstractions

About function abstractions and procedure abstractions

MiC . <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2000 06:04:29 GMT

26 lines

About function abstractions and procedure abstractions

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2000 03:30:36 -0400

53 lines

Re: About function abstractions and procedure abstractions

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:21:22 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

About GOTO

About GOTO

Darima Lamazhapova <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jul 2000 19:22:45 +0400

23 lines

Re: About GOTO

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jul 2000 17:45:53 +0200

51 lines

About GOTO

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Jul 2000 09:48:18 -0700 (PDT)

73 lines

Re: About GOTO

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:37:22 +0000

34 lines

Re: About GOTO

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jul 2000 21:51:47 -0400 (EDT)

39 lines

New Thread

about mails

about mails

Victor Petrovsky <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2000 04:03:24 +0400

16 lines

New Thread

Access to user code from library routines

Access to user code from library routines

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 01 Sep 2000 11:01:57 -0700

80 lines

New Thread

ACM Fortran Forum (August)

ACM Fortran Forum (August)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Jul 2000 14:42:33 -0400

64 lines

New Thread

ACM Fortran Forum (December)

ACM Fortran Forum (December)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Nov 2000 05:41:31 -0500

76 lines

New Thread

acting on real and imaginary part

acting on real and imaginary part

Jürgen v.Hagen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 10:25:55 +0200

37 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 10:52:16 +0100 (BST)

36 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 00:55:18 +1400

46 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 13:40:28 -0700 (PDT)

44 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:10:43 +0200

60 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:08:43 -1000

28 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:08:43 -1000

34 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 08:52:19 +0200

56 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

Jürgen v.Hagen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:02:08 +0200

45 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:31:48 +0100 (BST)

43 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:53:06 +0100 (BST)

35 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 20:08:39 +0010

64 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:38:19 +0100 (BST)

40 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Aug 2000 07:48:25 -0700 (PDT)

42 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:29:05 -0700

50 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 22:27:40 -1000

27 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Aug 2000 22:27:40 -1000

52 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Aug 2000 18:53:22 -1000

58 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Aug 2000 18:53:22 -1000

57 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 26 Aug 2000 19:34:53 +0010

53 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Aug 2000 10:51:49 -1000

46 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Aug 2000 09:35:28 -1000

64 lines

Re: acting on real and imaginary part

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Aug 2000 03:18:38 -0700

58 lines

New Thread

Allocatable arrays - passing procedure

Allocatable arrays - passing procedure

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:28:41 +1000

51 lines

Re: Allocatable arrays - passing procedure

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:21:41 +0010

58 lines

New Thread

Allocation status of pointers

Allocation status of pointers

Paul Bolton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:17:11 +0100

31 lines

Re: Allocation status of pointers

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:31:37 +0100

23 lines

Re: Allocation status of pointers

Paul Stevenson <[log in to unmask]>

10 Oct 2000 10:35:21 +0100

25 lines

Re: Allocation status of pointers

Paul Bolton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:14:27 +0100

84 lines

Re: Allocation status of pointers

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:17:05 +0200

44 lines

Re: Allocation status of pointers

Jürgen v.Hagen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:32:39 +0200

31 lines

Re: Allocation status of pointers

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:20:34 +0200

164 lines

Re: Allocation status of pointers

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 07:35:25 -0700 (PDT)

35 lines

Re: Allocation status of pointers

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:36:52 +0200

118 lines

Re: Allocation status of pointers

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2000 19:00:04 +0100

122 lines

New Thread

Alternate returns

Alternate returns

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 01 Sep 2000 11:32:43 -0700

57 lines

Re: Alternate returns

J. van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 06 Sep 2000 16:36:45 +0200 (MET DST)

67 lines

New Thread

Ambiguous procedure interface

Ambiguous procedure interface

Charles Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:40:48 -0400

52 lines

Re: Ambiguous procedure interface

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:56:31 -0500

59 lines

Re: Ambiguous procedure interface

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:06:31 -0400 (EDT)

94 lines

Re: Ambiguous procedure interface

Brian Hanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:02:25 -0400 (EDT)

106 lines

RE: Ambiguous procedure interface

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:14:25 -0400

18 lines

Re: Ambiguous procedure interface

Charles Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:55:18 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

Announcing Compaq Visual Fortran 6.5

Announcing Compaq Visual Fortran 6.5

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:21:42 -0400

74 lines

New Thread

another test

another test

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Nov 2000 19:08:31 -0800

26 lines

Re: another test

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Nov 2000 11:48:25 -0800

32 lines

Re: another test

Ray Harris, Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:23:02 -0600

31 lines

Re: another test

Ray Harris, Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:23:42 -0600

35 lines

New Thread

any OO Fortran90 resource?

any OO Fortran90 resource?

Gong Chengming <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:46:45 +0800

12 lines

Re: any OO Fortran90 resource?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:23:29 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

Are I/O specifiers considered to be optional arguments?

Are I/O specifiers considered to be optional arguments?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 07 Apr 2000 16:47:55 -0700

33 lines

Re: Are I/O specifiers considered to be optional arguments?

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 08 Apr 2000 12:02:34 -0500

59 lines

Re: Are I/O specifiers considered to be optional arguments?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Apr 2000 07:38:44 -0700 (PDT)

37 lines

Re: Are I/O specifiers considered to be optional arguments?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:05:51 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

Argument Keywords for Module Procedures?

Argument Keywords for Module Procedures?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:18:16 -0400

42 lines

Re: Argument Keywords for Module Procedures?

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jun 2000 14:30:32 -0500

64 lines

Argument Keywords for Module Procedures?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jun 2000 12:41:37 -0700 (PDT)

80 lines

Re: Argument Keywords for Module Procedures?

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jun 2000 14:49:49 -0500

62 lines

Re: Argument Keywords for Module Procedures?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:30:20 -0700 (PDT)

35 lines

Re: Argument Keywords for Module Procedures?

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jun 2000 13:09:58 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

array & pointer

array & pointer

Franck AUBINEAU <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2000 16:16:00 +0100

87 lines

Re: array & pointer

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2000 16:52:36 +0100

71 lines

Re: array & pointer

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:24:56 +0000

33 lines

Re: array & pointer

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:05:06 MET

88 lines

Re: array & pointer

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:45:28 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Array addition!

Array addition!

varadharajan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Aug 2000 22:45:10 +0530 (IST)

28 lines

Re: Array addition!

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 07 Aug 2000 16:33:01 -0500

40 lines

RE: Array addition!

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Aug 2000 16:10:09 +0100

87 lines

New Thread

Array construction

Array construction

Karn Trisophon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:44:42 +0700

37 lines

Re: Array construction

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 14:19:30 +0200

59 lines

Re: Array construction

Robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 23:50:15 +0000

47 lines

Re: Array construction

Karn Trisophon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 04 Apr 2000 18:40:59 +0700

57 lines

New Thread

array dimension in interfaces

array dimension in interfaces

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:32:18 +0200

91 lines

New Thread

array handling in derived data types

array handling in derived data types

Goeran Klose <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:41:48 +0100

43 lines

array handling in derived data types

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:48:22 -0800

72 lines

Re: array handling in derived data types

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Dec 2000 11:53:43 -0600

37 lines

array handling in derived data types

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:25:25 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

array size

array size

Suresh Seetharam <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:14:26 GMT0BST

100 lines

Re: array size

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Jun 2000 15:52:52 -0500

101 lines

New Thread

Association of zero-sized objects

Re: Association of zero-sized objects

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:51:20 -0700

66 lines

association of zero-sized objects

Joerg Stiller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:52:42 +0100

47 lines

Re: association of zero-sized objects

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:59:44 +0000 (GMT)

61 lines

New Thread

Association of zero-sized objects.

Association of zero-sized objects.

Lars Mossberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:19:47 +0100

42 lines

Association of zero-sized objects.

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:53:27 -0500

23 lines

Re: Association of zero-sized objects.

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:11:55 -0500

33 lines

Re: Association of zero-sized objects.

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:39:47 -0800 (PST)

52 lines

Association of zero-sized objects.

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:40:42 -0700

49 lines

Association of zero-sized objects.

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:08:52 -0800 (PST)

50 lines

Re: Association of zero-sized objects.

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:58:15 -0600

69 lines

Re: Association of zero-sized objects.

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:03:33 -0700

56 lines

Re: Association of zero-sized objects.

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:22:36 -0700

35 lines

Re: Association of zero-sized objects.

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:20:35 -0800 (PST)

53 lines

Re: Association of zero-sized objects.

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:33:48 -0700

49 lines

Re: Association of zero-sized objects.

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:58:38 -0700

48 lines

Re: Association of zero-sized objects.

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 15 Jan 2000 19:03:26 EST

45 lines

New Thread

automatic array

automatic array

Alexei Matveev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:38:06 +0200

42 lines

Re: automatic array

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:06:45 -0500

59 lines

Re: automatic array

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:07:14 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Automatic code documentation

Automatic code documentation

Simon J. Rees <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2000 13:49:39 -0600

25 lines

Re: Automatic code documentation

Craig McNeile <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2000 13:23:08 GMT

24 lines

Re: Automatic code documentation

Pincon Bruno <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2000 08:48:44 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Automatic generation of interface files

Automatic generation of interface files

Barry W. Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Nov 2000 11:51:44 -0600 (CST)

62 lines

New Thread

avoiding redundant Fortran 90 coding

avoiding redundant Fortran 90 coding

Goeran Klose <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Aug 2000 18:21:33 +0200 (MEST)

36 lines

RE: avoiding redundant Fortran 90 coding

Ahmad Mr M <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Aug 2000 18:05:46 +0100

56 lines

Re: avoiding redundant Fortran 90 coding

Goeran Klose <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Aug 2000 14:33:17 +0200 (MEST)

61 lines

Re: avoiding redundant Fortran 90 coding

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:17:58 -0400

98 lines

Re: avoiding redundant Fortran 90 coding

Goeran Klose <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Aug 2000 17:42:43 +0200 (MEST)

58 lines

New Thread

AXPY for general vector updates

AXPY for general vector updates

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 06 Aug 2000 13:14:40 -0400

42 lines

Re: AXPY for general vector updates

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 06 Aug 2000 17:20:04 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

AXPY for general vector updates - CORRECTION

Re: AXPY for general vector updates - CORRECTION

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 06 Aug 2000 23:07:16 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

BAD MESSAGE

Re: BAD MESSAGE

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Nov 2000 10:48:16 -1000

37 lines

Re: BAD MESSAGE

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:35:47 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Bartels' minimization procedure

Bartels' minimization procedure

Gerd Bruno Rocha <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Sep 2000 12:16:46 -0300

24 lines

Re: Bartels' minimization procedure

Don Shirer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Sep 2000 09:08:31 -0400 (EDT)

27 lines

New Thread

beowolf clustering

beowolf clustering

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Nov 2000 19:04:38 -0800

29 lines

New Thread

binary to ASCII

binary to ASCII

AGP <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:51:26 -0500

26 lines

Re: binary to ASCII

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 02:59:04 -0400 (EDT)

58 lines

Re: binary to ASCII

Craig T. Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:19:43 -0500

125 lines

Re: binary to ASCII

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:11:04 +0100 (BST)

115 lines

New Thread

bit functions & negative numbers

bit functions & negative numbers

Joerg Stiller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Apr 2000 19:27:00 +0200

36 lines

bit functions & negative numbers

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Apr 2000 10:52:00 -0700 (PDT)

32 lines

New Thread

BNF Diagrams

BNF Diagrams

Orville E. Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jan 2000 15:13:58 -0600

22 lines

Re: BNF Diagrams

Niki Milligan (nee Reid) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2000 16:36:38 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

37 lines

Re: BNF Diagrams

Orville E. Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2000 10:34:27 -0600

21 lines

New Thread

books for F90

books for F90

Gerd Bruno Rocha <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 02 Sep 2000 16:02:59 -0300

23 lines

RE: books for F90

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2000 14:32:27 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

Bug ?

Bug ?

Alexandre Desboeufs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:20:22 +0100

50 lines

Re: Bug ?

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:46:08 +0000 (GMT)

31 lines

New Thread

Bug or feature

Bug or feature

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Jun 2000 18:57:09 -0700

73 lines

Re: Bug or feature

Kurt Kaellblad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:32:01 +0200

101 lines

Re: Bug or feature

Bob Wells Tel: +44/0 1865 272915 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jun 2000 10:38:48 +0100

60 lines

Re: Bug or feature

Kurt W. Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 07 Jun 2000 08:02:10 -0400

42 lines

Re: Bug or feature

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 07 Jun 2000 14:12:02 +0100

14 lines

Re: Bug or feature

Kurt W. Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 07 Jun 2000 08:43:01 -0400

25 lines

RE: Bug or feature

Mandeep Singh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jun 2000 08:44:31 -0500

59 lines

RE: Bug or feature

Kurt W. Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 07 Jun 2000 10:44:12 -0400

78 lines

Re: Bug or feature

Jack N. Hatfield <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 07 Jun 2000 08:42:15 -0700

102 lines

Re: Bug or feature

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 07 Jun 2000 10:15:26 -0700

21 lines

Re: Bug or feature

Dominik Sadnik <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 07 Jun 2000 08:09:01 +0200

90 lines

New Thread

Bug or feature - revisited

Re: Bug or feature - revisited

Friedrich Hertweck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jun 2000 10:32:04 +0200

279 lines

Re: Bug or feature - revisited

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:44:09 -0400

78 lines

Re: Bug or feature - revisited

Friedrich Hertweck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jun 2000 14:07:55 +0200

167 lines

Re: Bug or feature - revisited

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:33:24 +0100 (BST)

114 lines

Re: Bug or feature - revisited

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:59:20 -0400

65 lines

Re: Bug or feature - revisited

Friedrich Hertweck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:46:37 +0200

204 lines

Re: Bug or feature - revisited

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:34:01 +0100 (BST)

251 lines

New Thread

C Interoperability implementations

C Interoperability implementations

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 06 Jan 2000 10:49:13 -0500

23 lines

C Interoperability implementations

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2000 08:33:06 -0800 (PST)

37 lines

Re: C Interoperability implementations

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 6 Jan 2000 11:38:09 -0500

61 lines

Re: C Interoperability implementations

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 06 Jan 2000 14:48:54 -0500

52 lines

Re: C Interoperability implementations

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2000 12:00:19 -0800 (PST)

30 lines

New Thread

C to Fortran transaltion

C to Fortran transaltion

Ismael Núñez Riboni <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:06:41 -0300

36 lines

New Thread

C++ (fwd), some laughs ...

C++ (fwd), some laughs ...

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 16:14:14 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

C++ and Fortran 90

C++ and Fortran 90

Dennis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 17:30:26 -0400

49 lines

Re: C++ and Fortran 90

LE HIR Nathalie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 02 May 2000 09:43:34 +0200

68 lines

Re: C++ and Fortran 90

Dennis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:34:19 -0400

82 lines

New Thread

Cache optimization -- again

Re: Cache optimization -- again

Alexei Matveev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 19:20:51 +0200

49 lines

New Thread

Cache optimization --- again

Re: Cache optimization --- again

Alexei Matveev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 19:29:57 +0200

47 lines

New Thread

Cache optimization in stencil operations--again

Cache optimization in stencil operations--again

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 02:17:33 +0300

66 lines

New Thread

Cache optimization in stencil-like operations

Cache optimization in stencil-like operations

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 05:43:49 +0300

97 lines

Cache optimization in stencil-like operations

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 05:46:28 +0300

95 lines

Re: Cache optimization in stencil-like operations

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 14:51:46 +0100

140 lines

Re: Cache optimization in stencil-like operations

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 14:52:03 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Calling C Library Function with String array argument

Calling C Library Function with String array argument

Kipp Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 16:33:05 +1000

38 lines

Re: Calling C Library Function with String array argument

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 08:40:52 +0100 (BST)

40 lines

Re: Calling C Library Function with String array argument

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 13:32:06 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

calling fortran 77 from fortran 90

calling fortran 77 from fortran 90

Jaehoon Seol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 09:52:06 -0600 (CST)

95 lines

Re: calling fortran 77 from fortran 90

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 16:07:12 +0000 (GMT)

65 lines

RE: calling fortran 77 from fortran 90

Srivastava, Niraj <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 11:12:16 -0500

116 lines

Re: calling fortran 77 from fortran 90

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 02 Feb 2000 10:14:45 -0600

126 lines

Re: calling fortran 77 from fortran 90

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 11:33:12 EST

26 lines

New Thread

calling fortran from C++

calling fortran from C++

Jaehoon Seol <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Jan 2000 17:16:11 -0600 (CST)

54 lines

Re: calling fortran from C++

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 30 Jan 2000 18:40:35 EST

26 lines

Re: calling fortran from C++

Adriaan Joubert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2000 05:25:16 +0000

29 lines

Re: calling fortran from C++

Laurence Viry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jan 2000 09:39:31 +0100

73 lines

calling fortran from C++

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 31 Jan 2000 17:07:10 -0700

66 lines

RE: calling fortran from C++

David Singleton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 12:12:18 +1100 (EST)

33 lines

Re: calling fortran from C++

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:16:59 EST

31 lines

RE: calling fortran from C++

Kurt W. Hirchert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 01 Feb 2000 07:55:52 -0500

42 lines

Re: calling fortran from C++

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 14:48:06 -0700

40 lines

Re: calling fortran from C++

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 13:57:51 +0000

56 lines

Re: calling fortran from C++

Jaehoon Seol <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 10:06:47 -0600 (CST)

35 lines

New Thread

Chapter 12, Section 4

Chapter 12, Section 4

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:08:20 +0200 (CEST)

28 lines

Chapter 12, Section 4

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:07:59 -0700 (PDT)

106 lines

Chapter 12, Section 4

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:45:51 +0200 (CEST)

57 lines

New Thread

character kinds

character kinds

Robert Kernell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:27:53 -0400 (EDT)

33 lines

RE: character kinds

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:29:27 -0400

26 lines

RE: character kinds

simon harding <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:36:13 +0100

47 lines

character kinds

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:41:13 -0700 (PDT)

39 lines

Re: character kinds

Robert Kernell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:00:56 -0400 (EDT)

52 lines

Re: character kinds

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:55:19 -0400

41 lines

Re: character kinds

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:08:14 -0600

49 lines

RE: character kinds

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:41:51 -0700

45 lines

Re: character kinds

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 28 Oct 2000 19:31:13 +0010

49 lines

character kinds

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Nov 2000 04:26:44 -0500

44 lines

character kinds

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Nov 2000 04:26:44 -0500

44 lines

Re: character kinds

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Nov 2000 10:37:00 +0000

40 lines

Re: character kinds

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:34:39 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

65 lines

Re: character kinds

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 02 Nov 2000 09:51:59 -0500

36 lines

Re: character kinds

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 02 Nov 2000 10:33:15 -0700

28 lines

Re: character kinds

Len Makin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 03 Nov 2000 13:37:24 +1100

67 lines

Re: character kinds

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 03 Nov 2000 10:46:52 -0700

37 lines

Re: character kinds

David Singleton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Nov 2000 07:06:53 +1100 (EST)

33 lines

Re: character kinds

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Nov 2000 14:06:36 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

52 lines

New Thread

character manipulation

character manipulation

Jaehoon Seol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Apr 2000 17:56:03 -0500 (CDT)

16 lines

Re: character manipulation

Jaehoon Seol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Apr 2000 23:31:40 -0500 (CDT)

32 lines

Re: character manipulation

Craig T. Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Apr 2000 21:36:07 -0500

107 lines

Re: character manipulation

Fred Marton <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Apr 2000 23:48:21 +0800

132 lines

New Thread

Character type inflexibility

Character type inflexibility

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:19:04 +0100

63 lines

Re: Character type inflexibility

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 10:11:38 +0100 (BST)

138 lines

Re: Character type inflexibility

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 12:11:14 +0100

24 lines

Re: Character type inflexibility

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:27:44 +0100

47 lines

Re: Character type inflexibility

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Aug 2000 20:05:40 +0200

33 lines

Re: Character type inflexibility

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:57:12 +0100 (BST)

91 lines

Re: Character type inflexibility

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:46:53 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

Checking array argument SIZE's

Checking array argument SIZE's

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Apr 2000 12:27:21 -0400

44 lines

Checking array argument SIZE's

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Apr 2000 08:08:51 -0700 (PDT)

47 lines

New Thread

Co-array Fortran for Beowulf?

Co-array Fortran for Beowulf?

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jul 2000 19:06:55 -0700

32 lines

Re: Co-array Fortran for Beowulf?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:51:15 -0400 (EDT)

23 lines

Re: Co-array Fortran for Beowulf?

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:14:19 +0100

29 lines

Re: Co-array Fortran for Beowulf?

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jul 2000 05:24:40 -0400

19 lines

Re: Co-array Fortran for Beowulf?

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jul 2000 10:37:45 +0100 (BST)

41 lines

Re: Co-array Fortran for Beowulf?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:28:32 -0400 (EDT)

28 lines

Re: Co-array Fortran for Beowulf?

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:17:41 -0400

59 lines

Re: Co-array Fortran for Beowulf?

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:31:55 -0400

40 lines

Re: Co-array Fortran for Beowulf?

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:11:00 -0400

128 lines

New Thread

Commenting Fortran 90 code

Commenting Fortran 90 code

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Apr 2000 16:11:42 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Comments on F

Comments on F

José Luis Gómez Dans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Nov 2000 10:22:09 +0000

33 lines

Re: Comments on F

Wei-Yin Loh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Nov 2000 08:53:19 -0600 (CST)

53 lines

Re: Comments on F

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Nov 2000 09:23:08 -0700

32 lines

Re: Comments on F

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Nov 2000 09:39:46 -0700

44 lines

Re: Comments on F

Wei-Yin Loh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Nov 2000 15:10:17 -0600 (CST)

49 lines

Re: Comments on F

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Nov 2000 14:50:14 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

Commercial: New N.A. Software Fortran95 Release <fwd>

Commercial: New N.A. Software Fortran95 Release <fwd>

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 14:15:52 +0000

82 lines

New Thread

Commercial: Use Linux and Windows ? <fwd>

Commercial: Use Linux and Windows ? <fwd>

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 14:59:14 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

Peter Mittermayer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Apr 2000 15:20:18 +0200

27 lines

RE: Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Apr 2000 09:40:26 -0400

34 lines

Re: Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Apr 2000 15:26:46 +0100

95 lines

RE: Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:06:25 +1000

45 lines

RE: Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

Juan Casero <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Apr 2000 19:29:29 -0400

60 lines

RE: Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 Apr 2000 17:47:38 -0600

79 lines

RE: Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

Juan Casero <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Apr 2000 20:30:33 -0400

93 lines

Re: Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

Jose Marin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Apr 2000 15:54:02 +0100 (BST)

61 lines

Re: Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

John A. Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:28:34 -0400 (EDT)

62 lines

Re: Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:56:00 +0200

104 lines

RE: Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:03:11 -0400

39 lines

Re: Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Apr 2000 14:46:37 +0200

43 lines

Re: Compaq Fortran Tru64/Alpha Linux

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Apr 2000 16:16:01 +0200

41 lines

New Thread

Compiler for dual processors Linux

Compiler for dual processors Linux

Donald Wu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 04 Apr 2000 11:39:05 +0100

36 lines

Re: Compiler for dual processors Linux

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 04 Apr 2000 12:02:36 GMT

60 lines

Re: Compiler for dual processors Linux

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 04 Apr 2000 12:22:50 -0400

39 lines

Re: Compiler for dual processors Linux

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 5 Apr 2000 21:12:29 EDT

33 lines

Re: Compiler for dual processors Linux

Wilhelm Gehrke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Apr 2000 07:30:19 +0200 (MET DST)

40 lines

New Thread

Conformance question

Conformance question

Neil Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:27:30 -0600

68 lines

RE: Conformance question

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:01:53 -0400

33 lines

RE: Conformance question

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:25:36 +0100 (BST)

32 lines

New Thread

Confusion in my letter about coroutines

Confusion in my letter about coroutines

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:32:30 -0700

39 lines

Re: Confusion in my letter about coroutines

John Venier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2000 12:04:02 -0500 (CDT)

62 lines

Re: Confusion in my letter about coroutines

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

01 Sep 2000 10:21:36 -0700

85 lines

Re: Confusion in my letter about coroutines

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Sep 2000 11:51:00 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

constant kinds

constant kinds

Robert Kernell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 11:10:36 -0500 (EST)

23 lines

Re: constant kinds

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:01:14 -0500

43 lines

Re: constant kinds

Pascal Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:00:12 +0100

53 lines

Re: constant kinds

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 10:05:28 -0700

49 lines

Re: constant kinds

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:15:14 +0100

20 lines

constant kinds

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:12:59 -0800 (PST)

112 lines

Re: constant kinds

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:22:02 +0100

21 lines

Re: constant kinds

Pascal Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:17:32 +0100

30 lines

Re: constant kinds

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:27:57 +0100

25 lines

Re: constant kinds

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:26:50 -0800 (PST)

48 lines

Re: constant kinds

Ian Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:39:47 +0000

32 lines

Re: constant kinds

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:39:28 +0100

52 lines

Re: constant kinds

Pascal Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:40:43 +0100

65 lines

Re: constant kinds

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 10:00:13 -0800 (PST)

100 lines

Re: constant kinds

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:46:16 -0500

40 lines

Re: constant kinds

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:52:49 -0500

43 lines

Re: constant kinds

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:38:11 -1000

35 lines

Re: constant kinds

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:38:11 -1000

34 lines

Re: constant kinds

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:38:11 -1000

35 lines

Re: constant kinds

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:38:11 -1000

31 lines

Re: constant kinds

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:38:11 -1000

35 lines

Re: constant kinds

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:38:11 -1000

38 lines

Re: constant kinds

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:38:11 -1000

36 lines

Re: constant kinds

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:38:11 -1000

32 lines

Re: constant kinds

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 09:00:35 +0100

50 lines

Re: constant kinds

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 19:53:45 +0010

55 lines

Re: constant kinds

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 19:59:38 +0010

37 lines

re: constant kinds

Robert Kernell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 08:51:49 -0500 (EST)

20 lines

Re: constant kinds

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:36:13 -1000

42 lines

Re: constant kinds

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:36:14 -1000

37 lines

Re: constant kinds

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:36:14 -1000

56 lines

Re: constant kinds

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:13:22 +0010

51 lines

Re: constant kinds

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:23:25 +0010

44 lines

Re: constant kinds

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Nov 2000 11:23:19 -1000

52 lines

Re: constant kinds

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:22:18 +0100

29 lines

Re: constant kinds

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:41:23 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

constant kinds => function evaluation

Re: constant kinds => function evaluation

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:52:46 +0100

85 lines

New Thread

Construct name vs. variable name

Re: Construct name vs. variable name

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:38:26 +0200

139 lines

New Thread

Contruct name vs. variable name

Contruct name vs. variable name

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 09 Aug 2000 16:38:40 +0200

123 lines

Contruct name vs. variable name

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 09:25:25 -0700 (PDT)

37 lines

Re: Contruct name vs. variable name

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 17:48:41 +0100 (BST)

57 lines

Re: Contruct name vs. variable name

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 19:31:17 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)

66 lines

Re: Contruct name vs. variable name

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 09 Aug 2000 14:48:27 -0500

60 lines

Re: Contruct name vs. variable name

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 15:20:12 -0700 (PDT)

28 lines

Re: Contruct name vs. variable name

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 09 Aug 2000 17:35:26 -0500

33 lines

Re: Contruct name vs. variable name

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 09:02:33 +0100

54 lines

Re: Contruct name vs. variable name

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 09:43:14 +0100 (BST)

58 lines

Re: Contruct name vs. variable name

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 16:35:49 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)

40 lines

Re: Contruct name vs. variable name

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:27:54 +0200

59 lines

Re: Contruct name vs. variable name

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:38:38 -0600

70 lines

Re: Contruct name vs. variable name

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:08:37 +1000

59 lines

New Thread

convert

convert

AGP <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:48:49 -0500

20 lines

Re: convert

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:18:40 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

copies to sender

copies to sender

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:23:40 -0800

31 lines

Re: copies to sender

Ray Harris, Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:27:44 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

CORRECTED: OpenMP on Alpha linux

CORRECTED: OpenMP on Alpha linux

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:23:22 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Count Direct Access File Records

Count Direct Access File Records

Orville E. Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:00:41 -0500

23 lines

Re: Count Direct Access File Records

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 07 Apr 2000 22:58:49 +0200

27 lines

Count Direct Access File Records

Mandeep Singh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Apr 2000 17:07:32 -0500

36 lines

Re: Count Direct Access File Records

Alvaro Agustin Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 07 Apr 2000 17:49:23 -0500

30 lines

Count Direct Access File Records

Mandeep Singh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Apr 2000 17:57:43 -0500

44 lines

Count Direct Access File Records

Mandeep Singh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Apr 2000 18:02:55 -0500

57 lines

Re: Count Direct Access File Records

Clive Page <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:09:53 +0100 (BST)

82 lines

New Thread

Dangling Pointer

Re: Dangling Pointer

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 16:09:45 +0200

187 lines

New Thread

data rewrite

data rewrite

Mingwu Bai <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Oct 2000 23:00:37 JST

58 lines

Re:data rewrite

Xiong Jun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Oct 2000 23:9:33 +0800

20 lines

Re: data rewrite

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Oct 2000 19:02:12 +0300

79 lines

New Thread

data statments, modules, and derived types

data statments, modules, and derived types

Kevin Maguire <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:20:00 +0000 (GMT)

46 lines

data statments, modules, and derived types

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:07:58 -0800 (PST)

89 lines

Re: data statments, modules, and derived types

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:15:19 EST

20 lines

New Thread

DATE_AND_TIME interpretation

DATE_AND_TIME interpretation

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 13 Oct 2000 20:52:18 -0400

15 lines

DATE_AND_TIME interpretation

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:22:38 -0700

34 lines

Re: DATE_AND_TIME interpretation

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Oct 2000 18:50:03 +0300

60 lines

Re: DATE_AND_TIME interpretation

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Oct 2000 23:10:54 -0700

85 lines

Re: DATE_AND_TIME interpretation

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Dec 2000 22:22:39 -0800

73 lines

New Thread

dbx, modules

dbx, modules

Rowena Lohman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jun 2000 12:54:10 -0700

53 lines

RE: dbx, modules

Mandeep Singh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:00:34 -0500

73 lines

Re: dbx, modules

John Venier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:28:54 -0500 (CDT)

54 lines

Re: dbx, modules

Chuck Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:06:44 -0700 (PDT)

71 lines

New Thread

Deallocating a pointer

Deallocating a pointer

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 10:32:14 +0100 (BST)

84 lines

Re: Deallocating a pointer

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2000 10:48:56 +0000

168 lines

Re: Deallocating a pointer

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2000 15:13:57 +0000

108 lines

New Thread

deallocating linked lists (help)

deallocating linked lists (help)

Catherine Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Aug 2000 14:29:35 -0700 (PDT)

93 lines

Re: deallocating linked lists (help)

varadharajan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:35:11 +0530 (IST)

26 lines

Re: deallocating linked lists (help)

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:06:47 +0200

141 lines

Re: deallocating linked lists (help)

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Aug 2000 19:04:09 +0000

112 lines

New Thread

debugging-tool for malloc ???

debugging-tool for malloc ???

Dominik Sadnik <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:59:19 +0200

33 lines

Re: debugging-tool for malloc ???

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:28:15 +0100

30 lines

Re: debugging-tool for malloc ???

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:50:50 -0400

14 lines

Re: debugging-tool for malloc ???

John Venier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:04:49 -0500 (CDT)

48 lines

New Thread

Default kind

Re: Default kind

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:38:11 -1000

21 lines

New Thread

[log in to unmask]

[log in to unmask]

sylvia hart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:43:05 PST

97 lines

New Thread

Differences between Compilers - OSF1 and IRIX

Differences between Compilers - OSF1 and IRIX

Marco Kampp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jun 2000 17:23:33 +0100 (GMT)

26 lines

Re: Differences between Compilers - OSF1 and IRIX

Marcel Swart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jun 2000 18:34:36 +0200

51 lines

RE: Differences between Compilers - OSF1 and IRIX

Bob Wells Tel: +44/0 1865 272915 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jun 2000 17:42:43 +0100

27 lines

Re: Differences between Compilers - OSF1 and IRIX

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:21:22 -0400 (EDT)

55 lines

Re: Differences between Compilers - OSF1 and IRIX

Marcel Swart <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:00:51 +0200

47 lines

New Thread

DIMENSION(0), PARAMETER vs. Compaq

DIMENSION(0), PARAMETER vs. Compaq

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Nov 2000 15:38:47 +0100

69 lines

RE: DIMENSION(0), PARAMETER vs. Compaq

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:45:34 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

div/mod (was constant kinds => function evaluation)

Re: div/mod (was constant kinds => function evaluation)

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Nov 2000 06:18:06 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

DLL in Fortran Power Station

DLL in Fortran Power Station

Alexandre Suman de Araujo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:55:49 -0300

23 lines

Re: DLL in Fortran Power Station

Sebastian Henkel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:59:43 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

DLL in Fortran Power Station <fwd>

Re: DLL in Fortran Power Station <fwd>

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 19:01:47 +0000

83 lines

New Thread

double precision and kinds

double precision and kinds

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:05:21 +0000

58 lines

New Thread

Double Precision in eg77 on Linux Intel x86

Double Precision in eg77 on Linux Intel x86

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2000 21:43:44 -0400

36 lines

Re: Double Precision in eg77 on Linux Intel x86

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2000 22:48:46 -0400

57 lines

Re: Double Precision in eg77 on Linux Intel x86

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Sep 2000 23:50:17 -0400 (EDT)

68 lines

Re: Double Precision in eg77 on Linux Intel x86

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2000 11:41:52 -1000

28 lines

Re: Double Precision in eg77 on Linux Intel x86

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2000 10:40:09 -1000

38 lines

Re: Double Precision in eg77 on Linux Intel x86

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2000 23:24:15 -0700 (PDT)

28 lines

New Thread

Double Precision with g77

Double Precision with g77

Sean Oughton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:53:21 +0100

28 lines

Re: Double Precision with g77

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Apr 2000 14:50:52 +0200

38 lines

Re: Double Precision with g77

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Apr 2000 12:56:39 -0700

62 lines

New Thread

Double precision, etc

Re: Double precision, etc

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2000 12:39:27 -1000

35 lines

Re: Double precision, etc

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2000 09:57:13 +0200

45 lines

Re: Double precision, etc

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2000 17:26:52 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

Doubly linked list and other data structures

Doubly linked list and other data structures

GianLuigi Piacentini <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 04 Jan 2000 14:27:50 +0100

36 lines

Doubly linked list and other data structures

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Jan 2000 15:36:43 -0800 (PST)

77 lines

Re:Doubly linked list and other data structures

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:02:44 -0800

77 lines

Re:Doubly linked list and other data structures

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 05 Jan 2000 01:34:32 +0100

29 lines

Re: Doubly linked list and other data structures

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:44:18 -0800

59 lines

Re: Doubly linked list and other data structures

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 4 Jan 2000 19:56:01 -0500 (EST)

45 lines

RE: Doubly linked list and other data structures

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 05 Jan 2000 15:57:17 MET

67 lines

RE: Doubly linked list and other data structures

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2000 08:02:31 -0800 (PST)

55 lines

Doubly linked list and other data structures

GianLuigi Piacentini <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 08 Jan 2000 22:24:37 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

draw a curve

draw a curve

Mingwu Bai <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:45:04 JST

26 lines

Re: draw a curve

Jeff Ryman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2000 01:06:14 -0400

51 lines

New Thread

DTED data

DTED data

EXT-Hanly, John M <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Nov 2000 07:36:52 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

dual processor experience

dual processor experience

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:03:00 +0100

26 lines

Re: dual processor experience

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:24:37 GMT

80 lines

RE: dual processor experience

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:43:24 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Duff's device

Duff's device

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

03 May 2000 11:43:31 -0700

35 lines

Re: Duff's device

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 03 May 2000 21:18:44 +0100

54 lines

Re: Duff's device

Keith Bierman (SunLabs) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 03 May 2000 14:17:38 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

echos

echos

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:37:55 -0700

20 lines

Re: echos

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Nov 2000 19:44:18 +0000

25 lines

Re: echos

Mandeep Singh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:03:32 -0600

33 lines

Re: echos

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:08:02 -0700

26 lines

Re: echos

Mohit Agarwal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2000 03:27:08 +0530

30 lines

Re: echos

Ray Harris, Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:23:30 -0600

24 lines

Re: echos

Ray Harris, Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:23:35 -0600

31 lines

Re: echos

Ray Harris, Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:24:10 -0600

38 lines

Re: echos

Ray Harris, Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:24:16 -0600

30 lines

Re: echos

Ray Harris, Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:24:42 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

Efficiency

Efficiency

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 14:58:32 +0100 (MET)

43 lines

Re: Efficiency

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 15:15:52 +0100

30 lines

RE: Efficiency

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:29:34 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Efficient temporary storage

Efficient temporary storage

Michael Kirkpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Jan 2000 13:00:38 +1100

77 lines

Re: Efficient temporary storage

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 14 Jan 2000 21:28:15 EST

30 lines

Re: Efficient temporary storage

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:14:38 -0600

104 lines

Re: Efficient temporary storage

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:35:35 +0000

31 lines

Re: Efficient temporary storage

Norm <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:30:16 -0500

54 lines

Re: Efficient temporary storage

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:30:58 +0000

92 lines

New Thread

Equivalence

Equivalence

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2000 10:20:58 +0000 ("GMT)

46 lines

New Thread

Eunge-Kutta (again)

Re: Eunge-Kutta (again)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 02 Oct 2000 10:58:28 -0700

71 lines

Re: Eunge-Kutta (again)

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 03 Oct 2000 09:38:53 +0200

94 lines

Re: Eunge-Kutta (again)

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont LycraR <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:17:30 +0200

49 lines

Re: Eunge-Kutta (again)

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 03 Oct 2000 11:51:09 +0200

47 lines

Re: Eunge-Kutta (again)

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 04 Oct 2000 10:27:43 +0200

49 lines

New Thread

Explicit interfaces and archaic Fortran features

Explicit interfaces and archaic Fortran features

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:44:57 -0400

62 lines

New Thread

Explicit-shape versus assumed-size arrays

Explicit-shape versus assumed-size arrays

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:36:28 -0400

66 lines

New Thread

external/system calls

external/system calls

Manfred Mudelsee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Jun 2000 13:13:34 +0200

56 lines

Re: external/system calls

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Jun 2000 06:30:26 -0700

50 lines

Re: external/system calls

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2000 15:55:32 +0200

30 lines

Re: external/system calls

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2000 09:21:23 -0700 (PDT)

31 lines

Re: external/system calls

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2000 12:03:32 -0600

43 lines

Re: external/system calls

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Jun 2000 20:15:04 +0100

47 lines

Re: external/system calls

Craig T. Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Jun 2000 08:51:14 -0500

139 lines

Re: external/system calls

Craig T. Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Jun 2000 12:27:51 -0500

130 lines

New Thread

Extracting INTERFACE information from f90 files

Extracting INTERFACE information from f90 files

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:43:52 +0000

32 lines

Re: Extracting INTERFACE information from f90 files

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Nov 2000 12:49:41 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

F 90/95 + Python

F 90/95 + Python

Ravi C Venkatesan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Sep 2000 10:02:31 +0530 (IST)

24 lines

New Thread

F question : How to pass C and linker options to F ?

F question : How to pass C and linker options to F ?

Jaiyong Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:32:11 -0500

32 lines

Re: F question : How to pass C and linker options to F ?

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Aug 2000 03:51:42 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

F under Linux and glibc2

F under Linux and glibc2

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 05 Sep 2000 22:10:35 -0400

34 lines

Re: F under Linux and glibc2

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 06 Sep 2000 08:04:27 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler

F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler

M. Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:31:13 +0100

85 lines

Re: F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:54:46 +0100 (BST)

49 lines

Re: F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler

Alois Steindl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:59:11 +0200 (METDST)

15 lines

Re: F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:59:35 +0100 (BST)

38 lines

Re: F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:22:13 +0100

24 lines

Re: F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:49:56 +0200

49 lines

Re: F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:06:10 +0200

54 lines

F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler

M. Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:56:00 +0100

70 lines

F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 07:40:37 -0700 (PDT)

31 lines

Re: F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler

M. Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:57:53 +0100

97 lines

Re: F77 Code Compiled by NAG F90 Compiler

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:42:31 +0010

67 lines

New Thread

f90 free compiler

f90 free compiler

M.T Shakeri <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:03:46 GMT

27 lines

Re: f90 free compiler

Paul Stevenson <[log in to unmask]>

11 Oct 2000 10:25:40 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

f90 text preprocessor

f90 text preprocessor

Alexei Matveev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:25:39 +0200

27 lines

Re: f90 text preprocessor

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:31:45 GMT

58 lines

Re: f90 text preprocessor

Ted Stern <[log in to unmask]>

29 Mar 2000 09:01:41 -0800

50 lines

Re: f90 text preprocessor

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:33:36 -0600

37 lines

Re: f90 text preprocessor

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:44:04 -0500

31 lines

Re: f90 text preprocessor

Keith Bierman ADT/QED <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:36:17 -0800

28 lines

Re: f90 text preprocessor

John Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:05:08 +0100 (BST)

24 lines

New Thread

f90+MPI on dual linux boxes

f90+MPI on dual linux boxes

Alexei Matveev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:49:09 +0100

26 lines

Re: f90+MPI on dual linux boxes

Feyzi Inanc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:13:17 -0600

57 lines

Re: f90+MPI on dual linux boxes

Wilhelm Gehrke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 08:35:27 +0100 (MET)

34 lines

New Thread

Feature vs. Feature cost trade-off

Feature vs. Feature cost trade-off

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:21:31 -0700

35 lines

Feature vs. Feature cost trade-off

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:40:16 -0700 (PDT)

56 lines

Feature vs. Feature cost trade-off

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:16:18 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

FFT

FFT

Joerg Stiller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 09 May 2000 19:32:23 +0200

27 lines

FFT

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 01:29:42 -0400

20 lines

Re: FFT

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:03:58 +1000 (EST)

35 lines

Re: FFT

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:26:49 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

FFT in F90

FFT in F90

Tao Pang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:29:36 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

FFT in true f90

FFT in true f90

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 09 May 2000 10:27:45 +0300

31 lines

FFT in true f90

Gallo, Bob L <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:41:54 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

FFT routines

FFT routines

Srivastava, Niraj <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 23:16:26 -0400

17 lines

Re: FFT routines

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 01 Aug 2000 23:34:45 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

File merging tool

File merging tool

Schwarz, Michael, MDVT9056 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2000 17:46:12 +0100

56 lines

Re: File merging tool

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2000 17:04:27 +0000

42 lines

Re: File merging tool

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:00:46 +0100

66 lines

Re: File merging tool

Anthony Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Jan 2000 17:54:20 +0000 ("GMT)

40 lines

Re: File merging tool

David J. Lamich <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 08 Jan 2000 03:54:43 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

FINDINGS: automatic code documentation

FINDINGS: automatic code documentation

Simon J. Rees <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:50:00 -0600

68 lines

Re: FINDINGS: automatic code documentation

W. J. Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 16:28:42 +0100 (MET)

93 lines

Re: FINDINGS: automatic code documentation

Craig McNeile <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 16:16:11 GMT

50 lines

New Thread

FIRSTLOC and LASTLOC intrinsic functions

FIRSTLOC and LASTLOC intrinsic functions

Jean Vezina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:14:17 -0500

81 lines

New Thread

Followup: fuji compiler problem

Followup: fuji compiler problem

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 04 Nov 2000 14:31:00 +0000

168 lines

Re: Followup: fuji compiler problem

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Nov 2000 18:03:50 +0100 (MET)

65 lines

RE: Followup: fuji compiler problem

Kipp Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:44:57 +1100

75 lines

New Thread

FORALL versus DO problem...

RE: FORALL versus DO problem...

José Rui Faustino de Sousa <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jun 2000 18:31:51 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

fortan 90 & C

fortan 90 & C

Franck AUBINEAU <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2000 13:57:53 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Fortran & Sockets

Fortran & Sockets

Charles W Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jun 2000 15:19:45 -0700

19 lines

New Thread

fortran 90 for linux

fortran 90 for linux

Ahmed Kaiss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:42:15 +0100

14 lines

Re: fortran 90 for linux

Comer Duncan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:06:22 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Fortran 90 Numerical Recipes

Fortran 90 Numerical Recipes

Lefteris Kaskavelis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 01 Nov 2000 11:15:32 +0000

36 lines

Re: Fortran 90 Numerical Recipes

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 01 Nov 2000 13:42:03 +0100

22 lines

Re: Fortran 90 Numerical Recipes

Pierre Hugonnet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 02 Nov 2000 09:06:58 +0100

45 lines

Re: Fortran 90 Numerical Recipes

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 02 Nov 2000 19:52:28 +0010

47 lines

Re: Fortran 90 Numerical Recipes

José Luis Gómez Dans <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Nov 2000 10:53:44 +0000

38 lines

Re: Fortran 90 Numerical Recipes

Alan Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 02 Nov 2000 23:50:18 +1100

54 lines

New Thread

FORTRAN 90 optimization strategies

FORTRAN 90 optimization strategies

Goeran Klose <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 06 Nov 2000 11:51:40 +0100 (MET)

23 lines

Re: FORTRAN 90 optimization strategies

Jacques Duilio Brancher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 06 Nov 2000 09:13:48 -0200

34 lines

Re: FORTRAN 90 optimization strategies

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:25:37 -0800

41 lines

Re: FORTRAN 90 optimization strategies

Richard Friedman (rchrd) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 06 Nov 2000 08:25:15 -0800

53 lines

Re: FORTRAN 90 optimization strategies

Jürgen v.Hagen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 06 Nov 2000 18:50:44 +0100

28 lines

Re: FORTRAN 90 optimization strategies

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 07 Nov 2000 20:28:13 -0500

44 lines

Re: FORTRAN 90 optimization strategies

Craig McNeile <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:48:19 GMT

40 lines

Re: FORTRAN 90 optimization strategies

Nils Smeds <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 08 Nov 2000 12:20:55 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

Fortran 90 shortcut IF ?

Re: Fortran 90 shortcut IF ?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 14 Jan 2000 19:54:14 +0010

56 lines

Re: Fortran 90 shortcut IF ?

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:06:00 +0100

50 lines

Re: Fortran 90 shortcut IF ?

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:52:45 -0500

26 lines

Re: Fortran 90 shortcut IF ?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:57:34 EST

32 lines

Re: Fortran 90 shortcut IF ?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2000 07:48:01 -0800 (PST)

48 lines

Re: Fortran 90 shortcut IF ?

William F Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:13:27 -0500

31 lines

Re: Fortran 90 shortcut IF ?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:37:20 -0800 (PST)

53 lines

New Thread

Fortran 90 Syntax

Fortran 90 Syntax

Orville E. Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:17:57 -0600

39 lines

New Thread

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (March)

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (March)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2000 04:18:47 -0500

658 lines

New Thread

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (sep)

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information (sep)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Sep 2000 03:58:02 -0400

664 lines

New Thread

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information File (January)

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information File (January)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:35:23 -0500

630 lines

New Thread

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information File (July)

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information File (July)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Jul 2000 05:27:15 -0400

656 lines

New Thread

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information File (Nov)

Fortran 90/95/HPF Information File (Nov)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Nov 2000 03:32:10 -0500

671 lines

New Thread

Fortran 90/95/HPF Informaton (May)

Fortran 90/95/HPF Informaton (May)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 04:40:24 -0400

664 lines

New Thread

Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers

Fortran 95 for Fortran 77 Programmers

Shaun Forth AMORG <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 06 Nov 2000 11:59:23 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

Fortran compiler

Re: Fortran compiler

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:04:22 -0500

44 lines

Re: Fortran compiler

Shyan Lam <[log in to unmask]>

23 Mar 00 14:26:36 CST

59 lines

New Thread

Fortran compiler -Reply

Re: Fortran compiler -Reply

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 23 Mar 2000 08:45:22 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Fortran Forum (April 2000)

Fortran Forum (April 2000)

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Apr 2000 04:54:41 -0400

69 lines

New Thread

Fortran Journal

Re: Fortran Journal

Orville E. Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:49:47 -0600

18 lines

Re: Fortran Journal

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:55:19 -0700

26 lines

Re: Fortran Journal

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:50:07 -0500

107 lines

New Thread

fortran man page on Unix

fortran man page on Unix

Robert Kernell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:56:55 -0400 (EDT)

25 lines

Re: fortran man page on Unix

Richard Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:51:43 -0700 (PDT)

67 lines

Re: fortran man page on Unix

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:58:27 -0400

51 lines

RE: fortran man page on Unix

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:06:00 -0700

48 lines

Re: fortran man page on Unix

Arne Kure <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Oct 2000 12:25:09 +0200 (USAST)

70 lines

New Thread

Fortran plus 2 from NASoftware

Re: Fortran plus 2 from NASoftware

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jan 2000 14:31:41 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

70 lines

New Thread

fortran source for parsing text-files ?

fortran source for parsing text-files ?

Dominik Sadnik <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Apr 2000 08:39:47 +0200

18 lines

New Thread

Fortran to Ada DLL Interface Question

Fortran to Ada DLL Interface Question

Neill Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Jul 2000 13:59:17 -0400

148 lines

RE: Fortran to Ada DLL Interface Question

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:52:00 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

Fortran User Survey Results

Fortran User Survey Results

Niki Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 16:08:20 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

22 lines

New Thread

Fortran XML parsers

Fortran XML parsers

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 14 Mar 2000 13:06:48 CST

23 lines

New Thread

FORTRAN90 & MPICH

FORTRAN90 & MPICH

Feyzi Inanc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 09:40:06 -0600

48 lines

FORTRAN90 & MPICH

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 08:06:58 -0800 (PST)

62 lines

New Thread

Fortran90 and XML

Fortran90 and XML

Simon J. Rees <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:17:17 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Fuji compiler problem

Re: Fuji compiler problem

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:36:53 -1000

36 lines

New Thread

Function reference as only thing in RHS of assignment statement

Function reference as only thing in RHS of assignment statement

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 04 Aug 2000 16:25:11 -0700

57 lines

Function reference as only thing in RHS of assignment statement

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 5 Aug 2000 00:44:04 -0600

30 lines

Re: Function reference as only thing in RHS of assignment statement

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 07 Aug 2000 09:36:59 +0100

28 lines

Re: Function reference as only thing in RHS of assignment statement

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 07 Aug 2000 20:01:20 +0010

56 lines

New Thread

Functions in f90

Functions in f90

Glenn Carver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Apr 2000 13:21:06 +0100

48 lines

RE: Functions in f90

Lionel, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:46:38 -0400

28 lines

Re: Functions in f90

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Apr 2000 13:53:52 +0100 (BST)

39 lines

Re: Functions in f90

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Apr 2000 13:59:51 +0100

63 lines

Re: Functions in f90

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 03 Apr 2000 15:05:42 +0200

64 lines

Functions in f90

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 03 Apr 2000 15:16:51 +0100

33 lines

Re: Functions in f90

Robert Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Apr 2000 14:53:37 +0100 (BST)

32 lines

Re: Functions in f90

Orville E. Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:46:02 -0500

37 lines

Functions in f90

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 03 Apr 2000 15:55:05 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

Fw: Rejected [non-member submission] Re: Re: Porting mainframe Fortran codes to a PC ?

Fw: Rejected [non-member submission] Re: Re: Porting mainframe Fortran codes to a PC ?

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Jul 2000 14:37:24 -0700

53 lines

New Thread

Fw: symbols in FORTRAN

Fw: symbols in FORTRAN

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Aug 2000 20:00:24 -0600

85 lines

New Thread

Fw: Use of Modules in large Fortran applications

Fw: Use of Modules in large Fortran applications

Norm <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:02:12 -0500

262 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Out of Office AutoReply: list move

Fwd: Out of Office AutoReply: list move

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:21:28 -0100

36 lines

Re: Fwd: Out of Office AutoReply: list move

Ray Harris, Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:28:04 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: DATE_AND_TIME interpretation

Fwd: Re: DATE_AND_TIME interpretation

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Oct 2000 23:02:53 +0300

80 lines

New Thread

GNU Fortran 95 project started.

GNU Fortran 95 project started.

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2000 22:49:42 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

GNU Fortran 95 Web Page Moved.

GNU Fortran 95 Web Page Moved.

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:55:25 +0200

47 lines

New Thread

Gnumake for the PC?

Gnumake for the PC?

Alvaro Agustin Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 08 May 2000 09:46:19 -0500

32 lines

Re: Gnumake for the PC?

John A. Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:58:48 -0400 (EDT)

37 lines

Re: Gnumake for the PC?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:06:25 -0400 (EDT)

61 lines

Re: Gnumake for the PC?

John Bray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 08 May 2000 16:23:03 +0100

22 lines

Re: Gnumake for the PC?

John A. Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:24:09 -0400 (EDT)

46 lines

Re: Gnumake for the PC?

John A. Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:36:09 -0400 (EDT)

26 lines

Re: Gnumake for the PC?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:56:39 -0400 (EDT)

48 lines

RE: Gnumake for the PC?

Billinghurst, David (CRTS) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 23:47:34 -0000

45 lines

New Thread

GO TO

GO TO

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:38:26 -0700

38 lines

Re: GO TO

Stu Anderson 425-865-3595 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:35:14 -0700 (PDT)

30 lines

Re: GO TO

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:47:58 -0700

54 lines

Re: GO TO

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:49:12 -0700 (PDT)

83 lines

Re: GO TO

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:00:27 +1000

55 lines

Re: GO TO

James Giles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 18:50:37 -0600

40 lines

Re: GO TO

John Venier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 20:10:37 -0500 (CDT)

98 lines

RE: GO TO

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 14:43:26 +1000

87 lines

Re: GO TO

Harvey Richardson - Sun UK Principal Systems Engineer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 13:40:20 +0100 (BST)

30 lines

Re: GO TO

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 14:50:33 +0100

31 lines

Re: GO TO

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 14:01:30 +0100

39 lines

RE: GO TO

Loren P Meissner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 08:48:27 -0700

93 lines

Re: GO TO

Walt Brainerd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:04:29 -0700

52 lines

Re: GO TO

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:14:27 -0700 (PDT)

46 lines

Re: GO TO

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:21:52 +0100

28 lines

Re: GO TO

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 19:33:01 +0100

48 lines

Re: GO TO

Alberto Fasso' <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:56:46 -0700 (PDT)

42 lines

Re: GO TO

Toon Moene <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:32:07 +0200

40 lines

Re: GO TO

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 12:34:17 -0700 (PDT)

40 lines

New Thread

GO TO absurdities

Re: GO TO absurdities

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Aug 2000 11:27:41 +0200

91 lines

New Thread

Graphics

Re: Graphics

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Jul 2000 20:40:22 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

hadowing user defined type names with `=>' (DIGITAL Fortran)

Re: hadowing user defined type names with `=>' (DIGITAL Fortran)

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:16:35 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

HDF5 F90 APIs on linux

HDF5 F90 APIs on linux

Matt Challacombe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jun 2000 09:06:56 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

help please

help please

David Wong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:16:39 -0500

157 lines

Re: help please

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 06 Jan 2000 21:21:29 +0100

15 lines

help please

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Jan 2000 12:35:32 -0800 (PST)

51 lines

Re: help please

Alvaro Fernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:02:36 -0600

47 lines

Re: help please

robin <[log in to unmask]>

(No, or invalid, date.)

38 lines

Re: help please

robin <[log in to unmask]>

(No, or invalid, date.)

31 lines

Re: help please

robin <[log in to unmask]>

(No, or invalid, date.)

31 lines

Re: help please

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2000 16:00:32 -0800 (PST)

28 lines

Re: help please

Lawrie Schonfelder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:44:37 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

51 lines

New Thread

HELP PLEASE!

HELP PLEASE!

Ismael Núñez Riboni <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 21:45:12 -0300

72 lines

Re: HELP PLEASE!

Alois Steindl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 09:45:18 +0100 (MET)

24 lines

Re: HELP PLEASE!

robin <[log in to unmask]>

(No, or invalid, date.)

34 lines

New Thread

Help with a large Fortran 90 code

Help with a large Fortran 90 code

Hassan, Khaled <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 09:58:56 -0700

32 lines

Re: Help with a large Fortran 90 code

Klaus Ramstöck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 17:49:31 +0000

45 lines

Help with a large Fortran 90 code

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 10:35:06 -0700 (PDT)

32 lines

Re: Help with a large Fortran 90 code

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 10:31:56 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

Help with Unformated I/O

Help with Unformated I/O

Abdel Bassal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Jan 2000 03:34:33 +1030 (CST)

18 lines

New Thread

Helping the compiler with INDEPENDENT and ALLOCATABLEs

Helping the compiler with INDEPENDENT and ALLOCATABLEs

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:40:43 -0400

133 lines

New Thread

Hexapod kinematics

Hexapod kinematics

GianLuigi Piacentini <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jun 2000 23:40:52 +0200

20 lines

New Thread

High-rank views of rank-1 arrays

High-rank views of rank-1 arrays

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2000 18:31:47 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

High-rank views of rank-1 objects (again)

High-rank views of rank-1 objects (again)

Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:24:19 -0700

67 lines

New Thread

history of fortran

history of fortran

Ian Chivers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2000 15:42:02 +0100

29 lines

history of fortran

Michael Metcalf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jun 2000 11:57:51 -0400

30 lines

Re: history of fortran

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 06 Jun 2000 09:08:58 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

Homework (was: Operations froma an input file?)

Homework (was: Operations froma an input file?)

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 16 Oct 2000 19:49:32 +0010

57 lines

New Thread

How can I generate array [0 0], [0 0 0] ...?

How can I generate array [0 0], [0 0 0] ...?

Raffaele Borrelli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 16:50:42 +0200 (CEST)

37 lines

New Thread

How can I use gdb debugger with fortran

How can I use gdb debugger with fortran

Raffaele Borrelli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 01 May 2000 00:55:20 +0200

18 lines

Re: How can I use gdb debugger with fortran

Tim Prince <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Apr 2000 17:00:06 -0700

34 lines

Re: How can I use gdb debugger with fortran

Petros Dafniotis, DuPont Central R & D <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:01:13 +0200

27 lines

How can I use gdb debugger with fortran

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 07:46:21 -0700 (PDT)

30 lines

New Thread

How to find out about accessability of service routines?

How to find out about accessability of service routines?

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 17:14:05 +0200 (MET DST)

31 lines

Re: How to find out about accessability of service routines?

Peter Shenkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:40:16 -0400 (EDT)

45 lines

New Thread

How to pass a subroutine to another subroutine by a string

Re: How to pass a subroutine to another subroutine by a string

robin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:51:27 -1000

31 lines

New Thread

How to pass a subroutine to another subroutine by a string variable ?

How to pass a subroutine to another subroutine by a string variable ?

Jaiyong Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Aug 2000 17:27:38 -0500

30 lines

Re: How to pass a subroutine to another subroutine by a string variable ?

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:33:14 +0100

51 lines

Re: How to pass a subroutine to another subroutine by a string variable ?

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:52:14 -0700 (PDT)

38 lines

Re: How to pass a subroutine to another subroutine by a string variable ?

John C. Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Aug 2000 20:36:50 -0500 (CDT)

62 lines

New Thread

How to set-up a large PARAMETER array

How to set-up a large PARAMETER array

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 10:05:41 +0100 (MET)

30 lines

Re: How to set-up a large PARAMETER array

Dan Nagle <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 09 Mar 2000 07:37:20 -0500

60 lines

How to set-up a large PARAMETER array

Thorsten Ohl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2000 14:32:45 +0100 (CET)

54 lines

Re: How to set-up a large PARAMETER array

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:40:58 +0100 (MET)

41 lines

Re: How to set-up a large PARAMETER array

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:44:59 +0000 (GMT)

78 lines

Re: How to set-up a large PARAMETER array

Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2000 08:46:02 -0600

63 lines

Re: How to set-up a large PARAMETER array

Roland Schilling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2000 18:51:45 +0100 (MET)

22 lines

New Thread

How to unsubscribe comp-fortran-90 ?

How to unsubscribe comp-fortran-90 ?

Woo Chat Ming <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:07:44 +0800 (HKT)

20 lines

New Thread

HTML formatting

HTML formatting

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2000 16:39:20 -0500

29 lines

Re: HTML formatting

N. Shamsundar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:43:36 -0600

40 lines

Re: HTML formatting

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:22:39 +0000

23 lines

Re: HTML formatting

Paul J. Nikolai <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:10:28 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

I/O Format error

I/O Format error

JEAN-JACQUES WASBAUER <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 13:53:27 +0200

121 lines

Re: I/O Format error

Greynolds, Al <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 06:01:38 -0700

199 lines

Re: I/O Format error

Malcolm Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 14:04:54 +0100 (BST)

36 lines

New Thread

IBM SP xlf bug was: Re: Suspected bugs...

IBM SP xlf bug was: Re: Suspected bugs...

William V. Nicholson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Dec 2000 10:05:25 -0800

60 lines

New Thread

IF as IF construct name

IF as IF construct name

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 09 Aug 2000 17:19:42 +0200

79 lines

New Thread

Ignore previous message

Ignore previous message

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:47:24 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

implicit character declaration

implicit character declaration

Vanwormer, Laura A. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:54:32 -0400

28 lines

Re: implicit character declaration

Matthijs van Waveren <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 17:26:14 +0100

123 lines

Re: implicit character declaration

Matthijs van Waveren <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 17:34:53 +0100

101 lines

Re: implicit character declaration

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 10:43:51 -0700 (PDT)

38 lines

Re: implicit character declaration

Ralph and Wendy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:46:03 -0700

55 lines

New Thread

Implicit none problem

Implicit none problem

Bertrand Meltz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 16:18:00 +0200 (MET DST)

36 lines

Re: Implicit none problem

Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 16:36:31 +0100

22 lines

Implicit none problem

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 07:49:56 -0700 (PDT)

49 lines

Re: Implicit none problem

Jan van Oosterwijk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 16:53:41 +0200

54 lines

Re: Implicit none problem

Richard Maine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 08:24:10 -0700 (PDT)

38 lines

New Thread

imsl

imsl

BaRiS ERGuL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Nov 2000 10:36:49 +0200

37 lines

New Thread

indefinite integral

indefinite integral

mbai <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:09:56 +0900

51 lines

Re: indefinite integral

Robert Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 14:58:15 +0100 (BST)

47 lines

New Thread

Inlined functions in HP Fortran

Inlined functions in HP Fortran

Aleksandar Donev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:21:11 -0400

47 lines

Re: Inlined functions in HP Fortran

Herbert Fruchtl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Aug 2000 18:00:30 +0100

72 lines

Re: Inlined functions in HP Fortran

Matthijs van Waveren <[log in to unmask]>