Print

Print


hi,
some interviewed pwds (japanese with disabilities) commented me that "you know,
wearing glasses also means they have disability because they can't see things without
them" implying that the baseline of wearing glasses and, for instance, using a
wheelchair is the same.  and they have a point here: disability is context-dependent;
that is, for example, most graduate students would not function at all and be
handicapped at schools if they are not allowed to use the glasses or contact lenses
(therefore, they would become the disabled, they said) whereas not being able to run
like karl lewis is not so salient in the classroom context. they seemed to use this
kind of parable to suggest that "no one is perfect" and a distinction between the
non-disabled and pwds is not concrete and distinctive as the general perceive, which
both are convincing to me.            .

Carolyn Tyjewski wrote:

> I think the problem you're struggling with is the assumption that because everyone
> supposedly has a disability that everyone identifies as Disabled or having a
> disability and the misconception that culture means conformity and solidarity.  In
> other words, these ideas are only mutually exclusive and contradictory if one
> believes that identity conforms with reality and/or that culture means conformity
> and solidarity and both just aren't true.
>

well, certainty, having disability does not mean you automatically belong to the
disability culture, just as not all deaf people belong to the Deaf culture. you need
to "identify" with a particular group of people. ok, i think you made a point here.

> As for conformity and solidarity within a culture, name a culture that has
> conformity and or solidarity amongst its people.

i'm not referring to a specific culture because, as you mentioned, no existing culture
of people is independent from other cultures' influences. i don't deny that. what i'm
talking about is a definition of culture which is a behavioral or psychological
similarity of people. ok, since some people seem to have a trouble with the terms i
used, conformity or solidarity, i'd use (a tendency of ) similarity or carolyn's term,
"feeling of kinship" because it implies one's consciousness involvement, which i agree
with.



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%