 |
 |
Alexa wrote in response to the article in the London Metro: > This is typical. Sounds like Peter Singer has been successful. as if Peter Singer was some kind of malign force of evil-rather than being a rather mainstream utilitarian philosopher. I hear that at a recent Harvard anti-Singer rally, there was an unusual alliance of Right to Lifers and Disability Activists carrying placards saying things like "Dr Singer - the New Mengele". For a while now, I've been thinking that the reason Peter Singer is being demonised,( and I believe, correct me if I'm wrong, that the impetus for all this started in Germany) is that a new generation of guilty germans is desperate to be able to point the finger at someone else. "See! The Jews are just as bad as we were. Maybe even worse". It's blatantly obvious, though no one will say it, that this is the reason why Peter Singer is being singled out above all else, and is a lightning rod for projections of Nazi guilt. As it happens just today I came across an article in Salon Magazine, at http://www.salonmagazine.com/books/it/1999/07/02/philosopher/index.html which confirms me in my hypothesis, though the author stops short of naming the anti-semitic undercurrents: But consider this quote: ." The general message [of the demonstrators] : Singer is an arrogant, elitist intellectual who has come to America to poison the minds of our Ivy League youth. The protesters called him a killer, a Nazi, a hater and, perhaps most telling of all, a snob. " Now where have I heard this stereotypic profile before, I wonder? Except with a new enhancement - it seems that there is nothing so delightful for people who can't deal with their own guilt as to pass the mantle of Nazism to as many Jews as possible. Talk about projection!! And finally, if you're going to villify Peter Singer, at least read his damn book! Judy Singer %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%