 |
 |
Good tell me what you think (actually, a lot of it is familiar to you, because it is standard disability studies stuff, but of course its audience is not you, but all the philosophers, bioethicists and public policy types who never heard of disability studies) I would write it quite diffeerently today Nevertheless, I think it reprresnts a useful contribution to the field of disability studies because it contains four genuinely different approaches to the question of justice. And, sob, it's only 60 degrees here. On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, David Pfeiffer wrote: > I just received my copy yesterday from the publisher. I shall read it and > I know that I will not be bored as I wasn't bored in Boston at the panel. > David > > On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Anita Silvers wrote: > > > Gee David read DISABILITY, DIFFERENCE, DISCRIMNATION: Perspectives on > > Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy (new from Rowman > > & Littlefield) by Silvers, Wasserman, Mahowald and Becker, and also persue > > the philosophical work on disability listed in the very extensive > > bibliography. Some of it may engage you, some of it may make your blood > > pressure rise but I don't think you will be bored. > > > > On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, David Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > > I always thought (since being an undergraduate philosophy major with a > > > graduate degree in theology - but a Ph.D. in political science) that > > > philosophy in the US was rather boring. I continue to do what I often > > > consider as philosophy with no formal connection to philosoph....David > > > Pfeiffer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%