Print

Print


At the begining of this year the European Parliament appointed a comission for the study of capabilities of the American HAARP system including its potential to global control of human psyche.
 
     "Neuroscience is being increasingly recognized    as posing potential threat to human rights"(from the article on the annual public meeting of the French National Bioethics Committee in magazine Nature, volume 391, January 22, 1998)
 
                                                     PSYCHOELECTRONIC THREAT TO DEMOCRACY

                                                                      THE SECRET  ARMS  RACE

  THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE USA BUILT RADAR SYSTEMS THAT   COULD ENABLE THEM TO CONTROL THE MINDS OF WHOLE POPULATIONS
 
         SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION, MILITARY DOCUMENTS,
        WARNINGS BY CIVILIAN AND MILITARY RESEARCHERS
 
                           CONTENTS
 
 1. The History - the scandal  in the USA and electrical stimulation of the brain.
 2. Mind stimulators can change the state of our mind
 3. Scientific experiments and patents - effects of electromagnetism on animal and human organisms and brains
 4. American military documents on the development of radiofrequency weapons -the nervous system  function is not much different from the radio receiver
 5. The  Secret arms race and hushed up scandal in the USSR
 6. Thought control and the invention of Igor Smirnov
 7. American radar system  HAARP could be used for the global control of human minds
 8. A secret conference organized by the American National Laboratory in Los Alamos
 9. Have the radiofrequency weapons been  put to use yet?
10. The Revolution in military affairs may result in the destruction of democracy
11. Warnings by civil and military scientists
(missing parts and chapters including references
 you find at http://www.mk.net/~mcf/babdoc.htm)
 
HISTORY  -  THE SCANDAL IN THE USA IN THE SEVENTIES AND THE ELECTRICAL BRAIN STIMULATION
 
The signals  in the nerves, in  the brain and the  whole body are  carried  by  weak  electrical  impulses.  The scientists who experimented since  1930 with the  electrical stimulation of  the brain inserted tiny wires (electrodes) into the brains of animals and humans and  stimulated the nerves in different  points of the brain by impulses of weak  electrical current. In  this way they produced reactions normally  aroused by  sensory perceptions  or events  inside of  the organism. 
 
SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS AND PATENTS - EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION ON ANIMAL AND HUMAN ORGANISMS AND BRAINS
 
In 1831 English scientist M. Faraday discovered that flowing electricity induces magnetism and magnetism in motion induces the flow of electric current. The condition for the transformation of electromagnetic energy into electrical energy is that the "receiver" is tuned to the same frequency in which  the electromagnetic energy is emitted.  So radio waves which belong among electromagnetic waves can also produce the flow of electric current in the brain if they are tuned to the frequencies in which the nerve impulses are transferred. There are two objections opposed to this theory. First the extra    low frequencies which are produced by the activity of human brain are way too long to make it feasible to target such a small object like the human being is - a 10 Hz wave is about  20.000 miles long. This problem circumvented the scientists by the use of microwaves pulsed at extra low frequencies.  But there the second objection comes in question - such signals have microwave properties and can not penetrate the human tissue.  For the answer to that question the scientists are searching until present time, but in the meanwhile they experiment with the frequencies of microwaves at which the electromagnetic radiation affects organisms and brains.
 
AMERICAN MILITARY DOCUMENTS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF       RADIOFREQUENCY WEAPONS - THE NERVOUS SYSTEM CAN BE          COMPARED TO A RADIO RECEIVER
 
In  the 1986 the American Air Force issued a book "Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology" (19)." The chapter on the "Electromagnetic Spectrum  in Low Intensity Conflict" wrote Capt. Paul Tyler. At the beginning he quotes "Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000" issued by American Air Force in 1982: "Currently available data allow the projection that specially generated radiofrequency radiation (RFR) fields may pose a powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel military threats... the increasing understanding of the brain as an electrically mediated organ suggested the serious probability that impressed electromagnetic fields can be disruptive to purposeful behavior and may be capable of directing and or interrogating such behavior. Further, the passage of approximately 100 miliamperes through the myocardium can lead to cardiac standstill and death... A rapidly scanning RFR system  could provide an effective stun or kill capability over a large area. System effectiveness will be a function of wave form, field intensity, pulse width, repetition frequency, and carrier frequency."
The last line defines the technical principle of the control of cerebral functions. A phenomenon generally accepted in the modern neurological literature is a synchronization of frequencies of emitted nerve impulses in different parts of the brain in reaction to the stimuli which catch the attention of the brain (34). Per E. Roland from the Laboratory for Brain Research and Positron Emission Tomography at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, engaged  in the research  of brain activation in reaction to different stimuli. He studied the influx of blood, bringing the nutrition to the activated areas of the  brain. In this way he was finding the different areas or columns of neurons which got activated in reaction to different stimuli. He writes that looking at the distribution of those activated areas in the brain, he can tell what is the subject a person is thinking about. Then he asks a question whether those so called "metabolical columns" have common electrophysiological properties, e.g. whether their electrical activity is identical. The reply to this question he finds in the work of German scientists Schopman and Stryker from 1981 who "showed that in the visual cortex of the cat, the metabolic columns corresponded with electrophysiologically defined columns in which the neurons had orientation specificity for the stimulus used." This means that different stimuli produce in the brain different electrical events. In the opposite direction Whitsel and Juliano (1989) found that "metabolic columns only occurred at cortical locations where the neurons possessed electrophysiologically defined functional properties related to the stimulus."  Skarda and Freeman (1987) and Singer (1990) "advanced the concept that neurons in different active columns synchronize their electrical oscillatory activity in response to optimal inputs" (35).
Wolf  Singer (36) describes an experiment where two different stimuli produced at the same time are observed in the brain. They were "represented by two independently oscillating assemblies of cells".  According to Wolf Singer the differences in brain activity in reaction to different stimuli  are represented by different groups of neurons oscillating in different frequencies. And what happens when an external electromagnetic frequency is applied to the brain? H. Frolich from the Department of Physics at the University of Liverpool, England, writes: oscillations produced by coherent excitation of a single polar mode "yield long range, frequency selective, interactions between systems with equal excitation frequencies" (38).  In other words it is basically the frequency of nerve impulses e.g.  frequency of electrical currents e.g. - from military point of view - frequency of electromagnetic waves that defines the activity of the brain in reaction to stimuli which catch its attention, and we can always bypass the physical perception by electromagnetic signals which will produce, in the brain, the same electrophysiological events as would be produced by the perception. It means the events in the brain can be produced "synthetically" from the outside. In this way even the thoughts can be transmitted (for details see http://mk.net/~mcf/babdoc.htm).
 
OUR MAJOR OBJECTIVE IS TO GET ACROSS TO GENERAL PUBLIC THE THREAT WHICH RADIOFREQUENCY WEAPONS REPRESENT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY AND TO WORK TOWARD THE BAN OF THOSE WEAPONS. IF YOU SUPPORT THE BAN OF RADIOFREQUENCY WEAPONS JUST E-MAIL YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS (ON OUR WEBSITE WILL BE PLACED ONLY YOUR NAME, CITY AND STATE WHERE YOU RESIDE) TO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING E-MAIL ADDRESSES:
[log in to unmask][log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask],[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
                       International Movement
                          For the Ban of
                    Radiofrequency Weapons