Print

Print


> James Giles writes:
>  > Well, actually -1 might very well be a valid unit number.  Nothing in
>  > the standard requires unit numbers to be positive.
> 
> 3rd para (not counting the constraint as a para) after R903 in section
> 9.3 of f95.
> 
> Actually, it says zero or positive.

Must have been written by a C programmer.  :-)



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%