Print

Print


I have been asked by Antoinette Titchener-Hooker at the CVCP to send out the
following message, which is a correction drafting error in the CVCP note
(I/99/10) sent out to universities on 27 January about hardship loans. It
also reflected a misunderstanding by universities about the spending of the
hardship loan budgets. The DfEE has given the correct position.  A paper
copy of the new note is being sent out today.

Roger Clark
Academic Registrar
University of Reading


8 February 1999

Correction to I/99/10 - Hardship Loan Review: CVCP response

Background

1. Paragraph 13 of CVCP Note I/99/10 dated 27 January (Hardship Loans
Review - CVCP Response) said that:

" However, institutions have been advised that they run the risk of losing
ACCESS FUNDS for 1999/2000 if they have not used two-thirds of their
Hardship Loans by the end of March 1999. This needs to be reviewed".


Correction

2. First, this contained a drafting error and was intended to read: "… run
the risk of losing HARDSHIP LOANS for 1999/2000 …".

3. Second, the DfEE has informed CVCP that it is not the case that an HEI's
hardship loan budget will have to be surrendered if a certain proportion of
that budget is not spent by the end of March 1999. The actual position is as
follows.

4. HEIs have been given budget allocations for the 1998/99 academic year,
and this total is unaffected by the way in which the budget is spent across
the two relevant financial years. When DfEE notified HEIs of their hardship
loan budget allocation in August last year, it recommended that HEIs should
spend about 60% of their allocations in the first two terms and 40% in the
final term. The purpose of this was to ensure that sufficient funds were
available for students who applied for hardship loans later in the academic
year, and no reduction of 1998/99 hardship loan budgets would be incurred by
HEIs whose expenditure pattern differed from this.

5. I should be pleased if you could alert all relevant staff to this
correction and am sorry for the mistake in the original CVCP note.

CVCP/DFEE discussions

6. The CVCP response to the DfEE Review highlighted that the actual pattern
of applications for hardship loans was not as expected by the DfEE, with
take up to date being low. This is one of the issues CVCP will discuss with
the DfEE at a meeting on 12 February to discuss the Review findings.  We
shall also argue strongly for the hardship loans to be put into the Access
Funds as a fairer and more efficient way of targeting support on vulnerable
students in financial need.



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%