Print

Print


For those of you working between Christmas and New Year please find enclosed a (not completely serious) audit of ACB mailbase usage over the last year.

Introduction

The ACB mailbase is seen by most subscribers as a valuable resource of chemical pathology information exchange. To others, it is a means of boasting they receive numerous e-mails. 

This audit has assessed several aspects of the contributions made to the mailbase in the last year.

Methods

Text from the ACB mailbase archives  from 1/1/99 to 20/12/99 was pasted into an Excel spreadsheet where the 'subtotals' facility was used to determine:

1.    The most fequent mailbase participants.
2.    The monthly variation of contributions.
3.    The daily variation of contributions.
4.    The hourly variation of contributions.

Results

Table 1 shows the 20 most diligent mailbase participants during the year:

Table 1

Name                                    No. of Entries
      g.challand 
     80
     
      Jonathan Kay 
     58
     
      R.W. Wulkan 
     41
     
      John O'Connor 
     37
     
      Mike Addison 
     31
     
      Robert Forrest 
     31
     
      Dr D G Williams 
     24
     
      Craig Webster 
     23
     
      Tim Reynolds 
     23
     
      Robin Marks 
     22
     
      Graham Jones 
     21
     
      Dr J. Falconer Smith 
     19
     
      Roger Ekins 
     17
     
      Dr. M. Steiner 
     16
     
      Rick Jones 
     16
     
      S Halloran 
     16
     
      paul collinson 
     15
     
      Samuel Vasikaran 
     15
     
      Eric Kilpatrick 
     14
     
      Michael Freemantle 
     14
     


Figure 1 shows the seasonal variation of mailbase contributions:

Figure 1


Figure 2 shows the daily variation:

Figure 2


Figure 3 shows the hourly variation (GMT and BST treated as the same):

Figure 3


Discussion

No surprises that Gordon Challand is the top contributor. Some participants (e.g. GMA) tried to reduce the number of apparant contributions by using more that one e-mail address. A limitation of Table 1 is that it does not take into account the length of contribution, otherwise Robert Forrest and Roger Ekins would probably be placed higher.

The monthly variation is largely explained by Easter/Summer holidays.

The daily variation shows a weekend tail off but the reason for Wednesday being the busiest day is not immediately obvious.

The hourly variation shows some (?overseas) nightowls and 2 peak periods at the start of the working day and mid afternoon.

Re-audit

Probably best left to someone else.