I am getting lots of these messages all of a sudden I
can't believe that members of the list for a long time s
suddenly start looping?
Any ideas.
Thanks
Sally
.................. a copy follows / do you want more?
.........................
From: MX%"[log in to unmask]" 20-MAY-1999 10:59:54.57
To: MX%"[log in to unmask]"
CC:
Subj: LOOPING message Re: News: Most UK businesses in dark over DPA 98
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from CSDAlpha2.sbu.ac.uk (136.148.1.111) by ice.sbu.ac.uk (MX V5.0)
with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 1999 10:59:52 +0100
Received: from mailout1.mailbase.ac.uk (mailout1.mailbase.ac.uk
[128.240.226.11]) by CSDAlpha2.sbu.ac.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id
LAA02026 for <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 20 May 1999 11:09:13
+0100 (BST)
From: [log in to unmask]
Received: from naga.mailbase.ac.uk (naga.mailbase.ac.uk [128.240.226.3]) by
mailout1.mailbase.ac.uk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA06706 for
<[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 20 May 1999 10:59:44 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by naga.mailbase.ac.uk (8.8.x/Mailbase) id
KAA16552; Thu, 20 May 1999 10:59:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mail.gn.apc.org (mail.gn.apc.org [194.202.158.47]) by
naga.mailbase.ac.uk (8.8.x/Mailbase) with ESMTP id KAA16546; Thu, 20
May 1999 10:59:39 +0100 (BST)
Received: from Justice.org.uk (useran98.uk.uudial.com [62.188.135.115]) by
mail.gn.apc.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA06722 for
<[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 20 May 1999 10:59:06 +0100
(BST)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.gn.apc.org: Host useran98.uk.uudial.com
[62.188.135.115] claimed to be Justice.org.uk
Received: from MDaemon Pop Client [194.202.158.47] by Justice.org.uk
[127.0.0.1] with POP (MDaemon.v2.7.SP4.R) for
<[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 20 May 1999 11:00:30 +0100
Received: from mailout1.mailbase.ac.uk (mailout1.mailbase.ac.uk
[128.240.226.11]) by mail.gn.apc.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id
KAA04920 for <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 20 May 1999 10:31:19
+0100 (BST)
Received: from naga.mailbase.ac.uk (naga.mailbase.ac.uk [128.240.226.3]) by
mailout1.mailbase.ac.uk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA02220; Thu,
20 May 1999 10:30:14 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by naga.mailbase.ac.uk (8.8.x/Mailbase) id
KAA09748; Thu, 20 May 1999 10:21:28 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk ([log in to unmask] [158.125.1.206]) by
naga.mailbase.ac.uk (8.8.x/Mailbase) with ESMTP id JAA07274; Thu, 20
May 1999 09:55:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [158.125.1.205] (helo=pophost1.lboro.ac.uk) by mailer2.lut.ac.uk
with smtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 10kObW-0004Fl-00 for
[log in to unmask]; Thu, 20 May 1999 09:55:02 +0100
Received: from ([158.125.93.4]) [158.125.93.4] by pophost1.lboro.ac.uk with
esmtp (Exim 1.82 #1) id 10kObW-0001su-00; Thu, 20 May 1999 09:55:02
+0100
X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Message-ID: <l03130312b3697cdaf389@[158.125.93.4]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 08:53:19 +0000
X-Unsub: To leave, send text 'leave data-protection' to [log in to unmask]
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
Original-Sender: [log in to unmask]
X-UIDL: f9c723251171f459ba935b6a9dc5b561
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: LOOPING message Re: News: Most UK businesses in dark over DPA 98
To: [log in to unmask]
X-List: [log in to unmask]
Sender: [log in to unmask]
This is an automatically generated message
Mail for your mailing list data-protection. This appears to be part of
a mail loop. You can almost certainly delete this copy -
- it is being forwarded to you for information only.
Duplicate copies of the message have NOT been sent to the list.
If this message has been wrongly identified as part of a loop
then please contact the mailbase administrators at
[log in to unmask]
>From [log in to unmask] Thu May 20 10:59:40 1999
Received: from mail.gn.apc.org (mail.gn.apc.org [194.202.158.47])
by naga.mailbase.ac.uk (8.8.x/Mailbase) with ESMTP id KAA16546;
Thu, 20 May 1999 10:59:39 +0100 (BST)
Received: from Justice.org.uk (useran98.uk.uudial.com [62.188.135.115])
by mail.gn.apc.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA06722
for <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 20 May 1999 10:59:06 +0100 (BST)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.gn.apc.org: Host useran98.uk.uudial.com [62.188.135.115] claimed to be Justice.org.uk
Received: from MDaemon Pop Client [194.202.158.47] by Justice.org.uk [127.0.0.1] with POP (MDaemon.v2.7.SP4.R) for <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 20 May 1999 11:00:30 +0100
Received: from mailout1.mailbase.ac.uk (mailout1.mailbase.ac.uk [128.240.226.11])
by mail.gn.apc.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA04920
for <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 20 May 1999 10:31:19 +0100 (BST)
Received: from naga.mailbase.ac.uk (naga.mailbase.ac.uk [128.240.226.3])
by mailout1.mailbase.ac.uk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA02220;
Thu, 20 May 1999 10:30:14 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by naga.mailbase.ac.uk (8.8.x/Mailbase) id KAA09748;
Thu, 20 May 1999 10:21:28 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk ([log in to unmask] [158.125.1.206])
by naga.mailbase.ac.uk (8.8.x/Mailbase) with ESMTP id JAA07274;
Thu, 20 May 1999 09:55:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [158.125.1.205] (helo=pophost1.lboro.ac.uk)
by mailer2.lut.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 2.10 #1)
id 10kObW-0004Fl-00
for [log in to unmask]; Thu, 20 May 1999 09:55:02 +0100
Received: from ([158.125.93.4]) [158.125.93.4]
by pophost1.lboro.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.82 #1)
id 10kObW-0001su-00; Thu, 20 May 1999 09:55:02 +0100
X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Message-Id: <l03130312b3697cdaf389@[158.125.93.4]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 08:53:19 +0000
Subject: Re: News: Most UK businesses in dark over DPA 98
From: Charles Oppenheim <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
X-List: [log in to unmask]
X-Unsub: To leave, send text 'leave data-protection' to [log in to unmask]
X-List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Errors-To: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
X-UIDL: f9c723251171f459ba935b6a9dc5b561
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [log in to unmask]
Yaman wrote:
> UK bosses also seem oblivious to the implications of a possible
> ban
>on the commercial use of the Electoral Roll. Three quarters of
>companies reckon a ban would have no cost implications at all on their
>business - in reality, the Electoral Roll is worth 55 million overall
>to UK companies per annum.
> Thousands of companies throughout the UK rely on the Electoral
> Roll
>for targeting customers, credit screenings and call centre technology.
>The direct marketing industry believes a ban on usage of the Electoral
>Roll will adversely affect businesses, charities, government agencies
>and consumers who will see an increase in mis-targeted mail.
>
I am not sure where this suggestion comes from. Also not sure where the
figure of 55million comes from. Grateful if anyone could quote a source
for this suggestion or the figure. Such a ban would either require a
change to the 1984 Act, which I can hardly see being introduced, or else an
amendment to the 1998 Act, which is unlikely in the short term. In any
case, I am not aware of any proposal to ban such use. What *is* true is
that the DP Registrar has commmissioned me and a colleague to undertake
research on the scale of, and issues raised by, people (not just commercial
organisations) using publicly available lists (of which the electoral
register is just one).
Professor Charles Oppenheim
Dept of Information Science
Loughborough University
Loughborough
Leics LE11 3TU
Tel 01509-223065
Fax 01509-223053
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
