I don't pretend to be a bibliographer, but it makes me squirm to think of VOL:ISSUE:NUMBER:PAGE stuff as part of dc:Title. It occured to me recently that capturing such information in a structured way might be done by using SICIs (Serial Item and Contribution Identifier), and then using this SICI as the (or one of several) dc:Identifier values. comments? stu > -----Original Message----- > From: Jul,Erik [SMTP:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Monday, August 03, 1998 3:24 PM > To: 'Leif Andresen'; [log in to unmask] > Subject: RE: Version of actual doc. - Title or relation? > > Leif: > > We have encountered similar difficulties: How to encode what is > essentially additional title information.? > > In library cataloging, volume and number information are treated as > part > of the title. > > If we adopt this basic premise, then an unqualified dc.title for a > particular serial issue might look like this: > > <dc.title>D-Lib Magazine: The magazine of digital library research > July/August 1998</> > > Alternatively, it seems reasonable to desire more structure in the > title > element such as might be achieved through additional elements: > > <title>The title > <vol>1</vol> > <no>2</no> > </title> > > "Vol" and "no" would have to be defined in an XML namespace. > > I would encourage you to think along these lines rather than using the > Relation element. > > --Erik > > Erik Jul > [log in to unmask] > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Leif Andresen [SMTP:[log in to unmask]] > > Sent: Monday, August 03, 1998 12:04 PM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Version of actual doc. - Title or relation? > > > > To the meta2-list > > > > Belongs version of actual document DC.Title or DC.Relation? > > > > In Denmark we are working with a "Recommended use af Dublin Core" as > a > > national sollution of metadata. The project is part of > implementation > > of legal deposit of electronic static publications. The project > > include publication of a specification of editors for making > > html-documents. We will use the specification in this a campaign > with > > publishers and web-designers as target group. > > > > We only use subelements in DC.Relation (until now): > > > > IsVersionOf Parallel printed edition > > HasPart File-list > > Requires Needed software for using this document > > > > We have a problem. We need some space in the format for > > Version/Release of a publication. First we don*t like to use > > DC.Relation because it is for relation to others documents. As we > see > > it, it could be a part of the title. Our idea was a subelement in > > DC.Title: > > DC.Title.Version or DC.Title.Release. E.g.: > > META NAME="DC.Title" CONTENT="Textbook of metadata* > > META NAME="DC.Title.Release" CONTENT="Version 2.3" > > > > But may be DC.Relation is the right place. A proposal: > > > > In the report of Relations Working Group you have six pairs of > > relations. IsPartOf make a pointer UP from a part of a document to > the > > whole document and HasPart make a pointer DOWN to the parts. > > IsFormatOf/HasFormat, References/IsReferenvedBy, > IsBasedOn/IsBasisFor > > and Requires/IsRequiredBy works in the same way. IsVersionOf is a > > pointer to an earlier version. But is HasVersion a pointer to a > > following version - or a number for the version of the actual > > document? Most logic is a pointer to another document. > > > > So: I think that my proposel may be IsVersion for relation to the > > document itselfs, e.g.: > > META NAME="DC.Relation.IsVersion" CONTENT="2.3" > > and e.g.: > > META NAME="DC.Relation.IsVersion" CONTENT="Second Edition" > > > > I have exchanges emails about this question with some different > people > > - with different views. > > > > We have to decide in a few weeks - so comments on the list are very > > welcome. > > > > > > regards > > Leif > > > > > > ******************************************************** > > Leif Andresen * Email: [log in to unmask] > > Library Advisory Officer > > Danish National Library Authority > > Nyhavn 31 E, DK-1051 Copenhagen K > > Phone direct: +45 3373 3354 > > Phone: +45 3373 3373 * Telefax: +45 3373 3372 > > ******************************************************** > > > > > > > > > > > > > >